prompt
stringlengths 275
19.1k
| reward_model
stringlengths 898
44.3k
| data_source
stringclasses 36
values | ability
stringclasses 1
value | extra_info
stringlengths 24
49
| answer
stringlengths 1
2.76k
| meta
stringlengths 280
22.1k
| task_type
stringclasses 7
values | task_name
stringclasses 36
values |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Elephantopus is a genus of perennial plants in the daisy family.
Elephantopus is widespread over much of Africa, southern Asia, Australia, and the Americas.
Several species of Elephantopus are native to the southeastern United States.
Elephantopus scaber is a traditional medicine.
conclusion: No Elephantopus is native to the southeastern United States.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nElephantopus is a genus of perennial plants in the daisy family.\\nElephantopus is widespread over much of Africa, southern Asia, Australia, and the Americas.\\nSeveral species of Elephantopus are native to the southeastern United States.\\nElephantopus scaber is a traditional medicine.\\n\\nconclusion: No Elephantopus is native to the southeastern United States.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"a5e85064ef95c7088e114785e34b215f\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nElephantopus is a genus of perennial plants in the daisy family.\\\\nElephantopus is widespread over much of Africa, southern Asia, Australia, and the Americas.\\\\nSeveral species of Elephantopus are native to the southeastern United States.\\\\nElephantopus scaber is a traditional medicine.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: No Elephantopus is native to the southeastern United States.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "a5e85064ef95c7088e114785e34b215f"}
|
False
|
{"id": "a5e85064ef95c7088e114785e34b215f", "question": "\npremises: \nElephantopus is a genus of perennial plants in the daisy family.\nElephantopus is widespread over much of Africa, southern Asia, Australia, and the Americas.\nSeveral species of Elephantopus are native to the southeastern United States.\nElephantopus scaber is a traditional medicine.\n\nconclusion: No Elephantopus is native to the southeastern United States.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If entertainment is interesting, it will be popular.
All popular things are well-known.
conclusion: If entertainment is interesting, it will be well-known.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf entertainment is interesting, it will be popular.\\nAll popular things are well-known.\\n\\nconclusion: If entertainment is interesting, it will be well-known.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"30e3bda6c08641c57579350d2a8bc685\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf entertainment is interesting, it will be popular.\\\\nAll popular things are well-known.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If entertainment is interesting, it will be well-known.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "30e3bda6c08641c57579350d2a8bc685"}
|
True
|
{"id": "30e3bda6c08641c57579350d2a8bc685", "question": "\npremises: \nIf entertainment is interesting, it will be popular.\nAll popular things are well-known.\n\nconclusion: If entertainment is interesting, it will be well-known.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All growth companies’ stocks are volatile.
If the stock price is volatile, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.
Some companies’ stocks are growth companies’ stocks.
All mature companies’ stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.
KO is a mature company’s stock.
conclusion: KO is a company stock and a growth company’s stock.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll growth companies\\u2019 stocks are volatile.\\nIf the stock price is volatile, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.\\nSome companies\\u2019 stocks are growth companies\\u2019 stocks.\\nAll mature companies\\u2019 stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.\\nKO is a mature company\\u2019s stock.\\n\\nconclusion: KO is a company stock and a growth company\\u2019s stock.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"313655eaa381fcb74fb203b82099563c\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll growth companies\\\\u2019 stocks are volatile.\\\\nIf the stock price is volatile, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.\\\\nSome companies\\\\u2019 stocks are growth companies\\\\u2019 stocks.\\\\nAll mature companies\\\\u2019 stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.\\\\nKO is a mature company\\\\u2019s stock.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: KO is a company stock and a growth company\\\\u2019s stock.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "313655eaa381fcb74fb203b82099563c"}
|
False
|
{"id": "313655eaa381fcb74fb203b82099563c", "question": "\npremises: \nAll growth companies\u2019 stocks are volatile.\nIf the stock price is volatile, then it is not suitable for a retirement fund.\nSome companies\u2019 stocks are growth companies\u2019 stocks.\nAll mature companies\u2019 stocks are suitable for a retirement fund.\nKO is a mature company\u2019s stock.\n\nconclusion: KO is a company stock and a growth company\u2019s stock.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Dagfinn is a given name.
Notable people with the given name include Dagfinn Aarskog, Dagfinn Bakke and Dagfinn Dahl.
Dagfinn Aarskog is a Norwegian physician.
Dagfinn Dahl is a Norwegian barrister.
conclusion: Dagfinn Aarskog is a notable person.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nDagfinn is a given name.\\nNotable people with the given name include Dagfinn Aarskog, Dagfinn Bakke and Dagfinn Dahl. \\nDagfinn Aarskog is a Norwegian physician.\\nDagfinn Dahl is a Norwegian barrister.\\n\\nconclusion: Dagfinn Aarskog is a notable person.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"b3d82f3d766ae8e7dfa8e5840401296b\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nDagfinn is a given name.\\\\nNotable people with the given name include Dagfinn Aarskog, Dagfinn Bakke and Dagfinn Dahl. \\\\nDagfinn Aarskog is a Norwegian physician.\\\\nDagfinn Dahl is a Norwegian barrister.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Dagfinn Aarskog is a notable person.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "b3d82f3d766ae8e7dfa8e5840401296b"}
|
True
|
{"id": "b3d82f3d766ae8e7dfa8e5840401296b", "question": "\npremises: \nDagfinn is a given name.\nNotable people with the given name include Dagfinn Aarskog, Dagfinn Bakke and Dagfinn Dahl. \nDagfinn Aarskog is a Norwegian physician.\nDagfinn Dahl is a Norwegian barrister.\n\nconclusion: Dagfinn Aarskog is a notable person.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Bulbophyllum attenuatum is in the genus bulbophyllum.
All bulbophyllum are orchids.
conclusion: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is not an orchid.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nBulbophyllum attenuatum is in the genus bulbophyllum.\\nAll bulbophyllum are orchids.\\n\\nconclusion: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is not an orchid.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"362eb1c4784d11b4aa6971609bb19248\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nBulbophyllum attenuatum is in the genus bulbophyllum.\\\\nAll bulbophyllum are orchids.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is not an orchid.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "362eb1c4784d11b4aa6971609bb19248"}
|
False
|
{"id": "362eb1c4784d11b4aa6971609bb19248", "question": "\npremises: \nBulbophyllum attenuatum is in the genus bulbophyllum.\nAll bulbophyllum are orchids.\n\nconclusion: Bulbophyllum attenuatum is not an orchid.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All iPhones are electronic.
Some phones are iPhones.
conclusion: No phones are electronic.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll iPhones are electronic.\\nSome phones are iPhones.\\n\\nconclusion: No phones are electronic.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"674dd9e91bf3b76fca993ea145df57b4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll iPhones are electronic.\\\\nSome phones are iPhones.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: No phones are electronic.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "674dd9e91bf3b76fca993ea145df57b4"}
|
False
|
{"id": "674dd9e91bf3b76fca993ea145df57b4", "question": "\npremises: \nAll iPhones are electronic.\nSome phones are iPhones.\n\nconclusion: No phones are electronic.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Some basketball players are not American.
All basketball players are tall.
If someone is tall, they wear large shoes.
If someone wears large shoes, they wear large-sized clothes.
Yuri does not wear large-size clothes.
conclusion: If Yuri does not wear large shoes, then Yuri is an American basketball player.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nSome basketball players are not American.\\nAll basketball players are tall.\\nIf someone is tall, they wear large shoes.\\nIf someone wears large shoes, they wear large-sized clothes.\\nYuri does not wear large-size clothes.\\n\\nconclusion: If Yuri does not wear large shoes, then Yuri is an American basketball player.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"de47f5bcc885843bce36f7c40f0d035f\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nSome basketball players are not American.\\\\nAll basketball players are tall.\\\\nIf someone is tall, they wear large shoes.\\\\nIf someone wears large shoes, they wear large-sized clothes.\\\\nYuri does not wear large-size clothes.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If Yuri does not wear large shoes, then Yuri is an American basketball player.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "de47f5bcc885843bce36f7c40f0d035f"}
|
False
|
{"id": "de47f5bcc885843bce36f7c40f0d035f", "question": "\npremises: \nSome basketball players are not American.\nAll basketball players are tall.\nIf someone is tall, they wear large shoes.\nIf someone wears large shoes, they wear large-sized clothes.\nYuri does not wear large-size clothes.\n\nconclusion: If Yuri does not wear large shoes, then Yuri is an American basketball player.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Miroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.
Miroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.
Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.
Fiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.
conclusion: Miroslav Fiedler was a French mathematician.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\n\\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler was a French mathematician.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"12c1c864bf3bab88e773d4c712c4c9e8\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\\\\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\\\\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\\\\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler was a French mathematician.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "12c1c864bf3bab88e773d4c712c4c9e8"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "12c1c864bf3bab88e773d4c712c4c9e8", "question": "\npremises: \nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\n\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler was a French mathematician.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
James Cocks was a British lawyer.
James Cocks was a Whig politician who sat in the House of Commons.
A British is a European.
Any lawyer is familiar with laws.
Some Whigs speak French.
conclusion: James Cocks speaks French.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nJames Cocks was a British lawyer.\\nJames Cocks was a Whig politician who sat in the House of Commons.\\nA British is a European.\\nAny lawyer is familiar with laws.\\nSome Whigs speak French.\\n\\nconclusion: James Cocks speaks French.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"422a81a56d12a9d84ca0a6feced8af4c\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nJames Cocks was a British lawyer.\\\\nJames Cocks was a Whig politician who sat in the House of Commons.\\\\nA British is a European.\\\\nAny lawyer is familiar with laws.\\\\nSome Whigs speak French.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: James Cocks speaks French.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "422a81a56d12a9d84ca0a6feced8af4c"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "422a81a56d12a9d84ca0a6feced8af4c", "question": "\npremises: \nJames Cocks was a British lawyer.\nJames Cocks was a Whig politician who sat in the House of Commons.\nA British is a European.\nAny lawyer is familiar with laws.\nSome Whigs speak French.\n\nconclusion: James Cocks speaks French.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
A roundel is a rounded artillery fortification.
A roundel is not higher than adjacent walls.
Cannons can be deployed on artillery fortifications.
Roundels are the oldest artillery fortifications.
Battery towers are an artillery fortification.
conclusion: Battery towers are higher than adjacent walls.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nA roundel is a rounded artillery fortification.\\nA roundel is not higher than adjacent walls. \\nCannons can be deployed on artillery fortifications. \\nRoundels are the oldest artillery fortifications.\\nBattery towers are an artillery fortification.\\n\\nconclusion: Battery towers are higher than adjacent walls.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"f7324084e588acaa0ca6f5cbd0e2cdc8\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nA roundel is a rounded artillery fortification.\\\\nA roundel is not higher than adjacent walls. \\\\nCannons can be deployed on artillery fortifications. \\\\nRoundels are the oldest artillery fortifications.\\\\nBattery towers are an artillery fortification.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Battery towers are higher than adjacent walls.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "f7324084e588acaa0ca6f5cbd0e2cdc8"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "f7324084e588acaa0ca6f5cbd0e2cdc8", "question": "\npremises: \nA roundel is a rounded artillery fortification.\nA roundel is not higher than adjacent walls. \nCannons can be deployed on artillery fortifications. \nRoundels are the oldest artillery fortifications.\nBattery towers are an artillery fortification.\n\nconclusion: Battery towers are higher than adjacent walls.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Cancer biology is finding genetic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells.
Cancer researchers have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value.
P values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect.
conclusion: Cancer effect size is a metric that is preferred by the majority of cancer researchers.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nCancer biology is finding genetic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells. \\nCancer researchers have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value.\\nP values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect. \\n\\nconclusion: Cancer effect size is a metric that is preferred by the majority of cancer researchers.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"0714d75cbe578987e918d3a089482564\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nCancer biology is finding genetic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells. \\\\nCancer researchers have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value.\\\\nP values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Cancer effect size is a metric that is preferred by the majority of cancer researchers.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "0714d75cbe578987e918d3a089482564"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "0714d75cbe578987e918d3a089482564", "question": "\npremises: \nCancer biology is finding genetic alterations that confer selective advantage to cancer cells. \nCancer researchers have frequently ranked the importance of substitutions to cancer growth by P value.\nP values are thresholds for belief, not metrics of effect. \n\nconclusion: Cancer effect size is a metric that is preferred by the majority of cancer researchers.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
The installment sales method is the approach to recognize revenue under the US GAAP.
In accrual accounting, revenues are recognized when they are realized.
In cash accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received.
The US GAAP is the accounting standard developed and used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
Sally works for the US Securities and Exchange Commission.
conclusion: The company Sally works for performs accrual accounting.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThe installment sales method is the approach to recognize revenue under the US GAAP.\\nIn accrual accounting, revenues are recognized when they are realized.\\nIn cash accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received.\\nThe US GAAP is the accounting standard developed and used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\\nSally works for the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\\n\\nconclusion: The company Sally works for performs accrual accounting.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"6c28099676b09c16751afbb5680b4b69\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThe installment sales method is the approach to recognize revenue under the US GAAP.\\\\nIn accrual accounting, revenues are recognized when they are realized.\\\\nIn cash accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received.\\\\nThe US GAAP is the accounting standard developed and used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\\\\nSally works for the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: The company Sally works for performs accrual accounting.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "6c28099676b09c16751afbb5680b4b69"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "6c28099676b09c16751afbb5680b4b69", "question": "\npremises: \nThe installment sales method is the approach to recognize revenue under the US GAAP.\nIn accrual accounting, revenues are recognized when they are realized.\nIn cash accounting, revenues are recognized when cash is received.\nThe US GAAP is the accounting standard developed and used by the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\nSally works for the US Securities and Exchange Commission.\n\nconclusion: The company Sally works for performs accrual accounting.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
WeTab is a MeeGo-based tablet computer.
There is a WeTab product.
WeTab was announced by Neofonie.
Neofonie is a German producer.
Germans speak English or German.
conclusion: There is a tablet computer that was announced by a German.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nWeTab is a MeeGo-based tablet computer.\\nThere is a WeTab product.\\nWeTab was announced by Neofonie.\\nNeofonie is a German producer.\\nGermans speak English or German.\\n\\nconclusion: There is a tablet computer that was announced by a German.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"7526933801f3e34f462e200185270f0e\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nWeTab is a MeeGo-based tablet computer.\\\\nThere is a WeTab product.\\\\nWeTab was announced by Neofonie.\\\\nNeofonie is a German producer.\\\\nGermans speak English or German.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: There is a tablet computer that was announced by a German.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "7526933801f3e34f462e200185270f0e"}
|
True
|
{"id": "7526933801f3e34f462e200185270f0e", "question": "\npremises: \nWeTab is a MeeGo-based tablet computer.\nThere is a WeTab product.\nWeTab was announced by Neofonie.\nNeofonie is a German producer.\nGermans speak English or German.\n\nconclusion: There is a tablet computer that was announced by a German.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
An Olympian is a person who trains for an Olympic sport and goes to the Olympics.
Carlos Reyes trains for an Olympic sport.
Carlos Reyes went to the Olympics.
Carlos Reyes is a welterweight.
Heavy weights are not welterweights.
conclusion: Carlos Reyes won an Olympic medal.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAn Olympian is a person who trains for an Olympic sport and goes to the Olympics.\\nCarlos Reyes trains for an Olympic sport.\\nCarlos Reyes went to the Olympics.\\nCarlos Reyes is a welterweight.\\nHeavy weights are not welterweights.\\n\\nconclusion: Carlos Reyes won an Olympic medal.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"d4e56ad42a764b8cafba3cf349047ad9\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAn Olympian is a person who trains for an Olympic sport and goes to the Olympics.\\\\nCarlos Reyes trains for an Olympic sport.\\\\nCarlos Reyes went to the Olympics.\\\\nCarlos Reyes is a welterweight.\\\\nHeavy weights are not welterweights.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Carlos Reyes won an Olympic medal.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "d4e56ad42a764b8cafba3cf349047ad9"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "d4e56ad42a764b8cafba3cf349047ad9", "question": "\npremises: \nAn Olympian is a person who trains for an Olympic sport and goes to the Olympics.\nCarlos Reyes trains for an Olympic sport.\nCarlos Reyes went to the Olympics.\nCarlos Reyes is a welterweight.\nHeavy weights are not welterweights.\n\nconclusion: Carlos Reyes won an Olympic medal.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All fruits sold in Boston are shipped from Columbia.
Some fruits sold in New Haven are shipped from Mexico.
No fruits shipped from Columbia are fruits sold in New York.
Avocadoe are a kind of fruit sold in New York or New York.
Avocadoe are either shipped from Columbia and sold in New Haven, or neither shipped from Columbia nor sold in New Haven.
conclusion: Avocados are either sold in New Haven or sold in Boston
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll fruits sold in Boston are shipped from Columbia. \\nSome fruits sold in New Haven are shipped from Mexico.\\nNo fruits shipped from Columbia are fruits sold in New York. \\nAvocadoe are a kind of fruit sold in New York or New York. \\nAvocadoe are either shipped from Columbia and sold in New Haven, or neither shipped from Columbia nor sold in New Haven. \\n\\nconclusion: Avocados are either sold in New Haven or sold in Boston\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"55edf0cca6984a66431540f7bfa0e7f4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll fruits sold in Boston are shipped from Columbia. \\\\nSome fruits sold in New Haven are shipped from Mexico.\\\\nNo fruits shipped from Columbia are fruits sold in New York. \\\\nAvocadoe are a kind of fruit sold in New York or New York. \\\\nAvocadoe are either shipped from Columbia and sold in New Haven, or neither shipped from Columbia nor sold in New Haven. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Avocados are either sold in New Haven or sold in Boston\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "55edf0cca6984a66431540f7bfa0e7f4"}
|
False
|
{"id": "55edf0cca6984a66431540f7bfa0e7f4", "question": "\npremises: \nAll fruits sold in Boston are shipped from Columbia. \nSome fruits sold in New Haven are shipped from Mexico.\nNo fruits shipped from Columbia are fruits sold in New York. \nAvocadoe are a kind of fruit sold in New York or New York. \nAvocadoe are either shipped from Columbia and sold in New Haven, or neither shipped from Columbia nor sold in New Haven. \n\nconclusion: Avocados are either sold in New Haven or sold in Boston\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
[BG] There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.
All students who want to have a long vacation love summer the most.
Emma's favorite season is summer.
Mia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's.
James wants to have a long vacation.
conclusion: James's favorite season is summer.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\n[BG] There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.\\nAll students who want to have a long vacation love summer the most.\\nEmma's favorite season is summer.\\nMia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's. \\nJames wants to have a long vacation.\\n\\nconclusion: James's favorite season is summer.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"d56457f207f5560e893cf5860650813d\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\n[BG] There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.\\\\nAll students who want to have a long vacation love summer the most.\\\\nEmma's favorite season is summer.\\\\nMia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's. \\\\nJames wants to have a long vacation.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: James's favorite season is summer.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "d56457f207f5560e893cf5860650813d"}
|
True
|
{"id": "d56457f207f5560e893cf5860650813d", "question": "\npremises: \n[BG] There are four seasons in a year: Spring, Summer, Fall, and Winter.\nAll students who want to have a long vacation love summer the most.\nEmma's favorite season is summer.\nMia's favorite season is not the same as Emma's. \nJames wants to have a long vacation.\n\nconclusion: James's favorite season is summer.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
DI Ray is a police procedural television series.
DI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.
DI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.
Maya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.
conclusion: DI Ray was created by a Brit.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\\n\\nconclusion: DI Ray was created by a Brit.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"6dd1fb5c866c4585ffa294f9518d3ffd\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\\\\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\\\\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\\\\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: DI Ray was created by a Brit.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "6dd1fb5c866c4585ffa294f9518d3ffd"}
|
True
|
{"id": "6dd1fb5c866c4585ffa294f9518d3ffd", "question": "\npremises: \nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\n\nconclusion: DI Ray was created by a Brit.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All defenders are soccer players.
No soccer players are professional basketball players.
All centerbacks are defenders.
All NBA players are professional basketball players.
If Stephen Curry is not an NBA player, then Stephen Curry is not an NBA player or a soccer player.
conclusion: Stephen Curry is not a centerback.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\nIf Stephen Curry is not an NBA player, then Stephen Curry is not an NBA player or a soccer player.\\n\\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is not a centerback.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"9388461f30094ef1f7182060c14cdf75\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\\\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\\\\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\\\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\\\nIf Stephen Curry is not an NBA player, then Stephen Curry is not an NBA player or a soccer player.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is not a centerback.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "9388461f30094ef1f7182060c14cdf75"}
|
True
|
{"id": "9388461f30094ef1f7182060c14cdf75", "question": "\npremises: \nAll defenders are soccer players.\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\nIf Stephen Curry is not an NBA player, then Stephen Curry is not an NBA player or a soccer player.\n\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is not a centerback.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Daniel is a software engineer and he works at Palantir Technologies.
Daniel studied bioengineering during his undergraduate at Rice University.
Daniel’s older sister works at Meta as a technical sourcer.
Daniel’s dad and older sister both graduated from Stanford University.
Daniel’s dad is a doctor practicing internal medicine at a veteran’s hospital in Minneapolis
conclusion: Daniel and his sister grew up in Minneapolis, Minnesota.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nDaniel is a software engineer and he works at Palantir Technologies.\\nDaniel studied bioengineering during his undergraduate at Rice University.\\nDaniel\\u2019s older sister works at Meta as a technical sourcer. \\nDaniel\\u2019s dad and older sister both graduated from Stanford University.\\nDaniel\\u2019s dad is a doctor practicing internal medicine at a veteran\\u2019s hospital in Minneapolis\\n\\nconclusion: Daniel and his sister grew up in Minneapolis, Minnesota.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"093af6e04d64d16bd76b65f710c40697\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nDaniel is a software engineer and he works at Palantir Technologies.\\\\nDaniel studied bioengineering during his undergraduate at Rice University.\\\\nDaniel\\\\u2019s older sister works at Meta as a technical sourcer. \\\\nDaniel\\\\u2019s dad and older sister both graduated from Stanford University.\\\\nDaniel\\\\u2019s dad is a doctor practicing internal medicine at a veteran\\\\u2019s hospital in Minneapolis\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Daniel and his sister grew up in Minneapolis, Minnesota.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "093af6e04d64d16bd76b65f710c40697"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "093af6e04d64d16bd76b65f710c40697", "question": "\npremises: \nDaniel is a software engineer and he works at Palantir Technologies.\nDaniel studied bioengineering during his undergraduate at Rice University.\nDaniel\u2019s older sister works at Meta as a technical sourcer. \nDaniel\u2019s dad and older sister both graduated from Stanford University.\nDaniel\u2019s dad is a doctor practicing internal medicine at a veteran\u2019s hospital in Minneapolis\n\nconclusion: Daniel and his sister grew up in Minneapolis, Minnesota.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No low-scoring players are top players in the league.
Basketball players are either top players in the league or successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers.
All players who successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers are solid at shooting 2-pointers.
No players who are solid at shooting 2-pointers are bad at mid-range shots.
Candace is either a low-scoring player or successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers.
conclusion: Candace is either a player who successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers or is bad at mid-range shots.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo low-scoring players are top players in the league.\\nBasketball players are either top players in the league or successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers.\\nAll players who successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers are solid at shooting 2-pointers.\\nNo players who are solid at shooting 2-pointers are bad at mid-range shots.\\nCandace is either a low-scoring player or successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers.\\n\\nconclusion: Candace is either a player who successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers or is bad at mid-range shots.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"a7546659a7bb579c69a7da17023f44e1\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo low-scoring players are top players in the league.\\\\nBasketball players are either top players in the league or successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers.\\\\nAll players who successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers are solid at shooting 2-pointers.\\\\nNo players who are solid at shooting 2-pointers are bad at mid-range shots.\\\\nCandace is either a low-scoring player or successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Candace is either a player who successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers or is bad at mid-range shots.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "a7546659a7bb579c69a7da17023f44e1"}
|
True
|
{"id": "a7546659a7bb579c69a7da17023f44e1", "question": "\npremises: \nNo low-scoring players are top players in the league.\nBasketball players are either top players in the league or successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers.\nAll players who successfully shoot a high percentage of 3-pointers are solid at shooting 2-pointers.\nNo players who are solid at shooting 2-pointers are bad at mid-range shots.\nCandace is either a low-scoring player or successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers.\n\nconclusion: Candace is either a player who successfully shoots a high percentage of 3-pointers or is bad at mid-range shots.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All imaginative processes are produced in human brains.
All science-fiction is from an imaginative process.
Either science-fiction or fact.
No facts are proven to be false.
Dune is a science-fiction or proven to be false.
conclusion: Dune is a fact.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll imaginative processes are produced in human brains.\\nAll science-fiction is from an imaginative process.\\nEither science-fiction or fact. \\nNo facts are proven to be false.\\nDune is a science-fiction or proven to be false.\\n\\nconclusion: Dune is a fact.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"ec78ac8f7998d832001b965d95b4039e\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll imaginative processes are produced in human brains.\\\\nAll science-fiction is from an imaginative process.\\\\nEither science-fiction or fact. \\\\nNo facts are proven to be false.\\\\nDune is a science-fiction or proven to be false.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Dune is a fact.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "ec78ac8f7998d832001b965d95b4039e"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "ec78ac8f7998d832001b965d95b4039e", "question": "\npremises: \nAll imaginative processes are produced in human brains.\nAll science-fiction is from an imaginative process.\nEither science-fiction or fact. \nNo facts are proven to be false.\nDune is a science-fiction or proven to be false.\n\nconclusion: Dune is a fact.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No homework is fun.
Some reading is homework.
conclusion: Some reading is fun.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo homework is fun.\\nSome reading is homework.\\n\\nconclusion: Some reading is fun.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"142fa7b0f8e7d38e80ca43ccaaff6368\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo homework is fun.\\\\nSome reading is homework.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Some reading is fun.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "142fa7b0f8e7d38e80ca43ccaaff6368"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "142fa7b0f8e7d38e80ca43ccaaff6368", "question": "\npremises: \nNo homework is fun.\nSome reading is homework.\n\nconclusion: Some reading is fun.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
TS Leda was a good passenger and cargo vessel.
TS Leda was the first Norweigian vessel that was built with stabilizers.
Stabilizers are mechanical devices that are only on ships that have powerful steam turbine engines.
To be a good passenger and cargo vessel, ships must be quiet and good at sea.
Some ships that are quiet and good at sea have powerful steam turbine engines.
conclusion: TS Leda was quiet and good at sea.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nTS Leda was a good passenger and cargo vessel.\\nTS Leda was the first Norweigian vessel that was built with stabilizers.\\nStabilizers are mechanical devices that are only on ships that have powerful steam turbine engines.\\n To be a good passenger and cargo vessel, ships must be quiet and good at sea.\\nSome ships that are quiet and good at sea have powerful steam turbine engines.\\n\\nconclusion: TS Leda was quiet and good at sea.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"61b6b958389aa89bfd3c9257b730403d\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nTS Leda was a good passenger and cargo vessel.\\\\nTS Leda was the first Norweigian vessel that was built with stabilizers.\\\\nStabilizers are mechanical devices that are only on ships that have powerful steam turbine engines.\\\\n To be a good passenger and cargo vessel, ships must be quiet and good at sea.\\\\nSome ships that are quiet and good at sea have powerful steam turbine engines.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: TS Leda was quiet and good at sea.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "61b6b958389aa89bfd3c9257b730403d"}
|
True
|
{"id": "61b6b958389aa89bfd3c9257b730403d", "question": "\npremises: \nTS Leda was a good passenger and cargo vessel.\nTS Leda was the first Norweigian vessel that was built with stabilizers.\nStabilizers are mechanical devices that are only on ships that have powerful steam turbine engines.\n To be a good passenger and cargo vessel, ships must be quiet and good at sea.\nSome ships that are quiet and good at sea have powerful steam turbine engines.\n\nconclusion: TS Leda was quiet and good at sea.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
The National Lobster Hatchery is a hatchery located in Padstow England.
The National Lobster Hatchery is open to visitors.
A hatchery is either for profit, or for conservation.
If a hatchery is for conservation, it might release animals into the wild.
The National Lobster Hatchery is not for profit.
conclusion: All hatcheries are open to visitors.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is a hatchery located in Padstow England.\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is open to visitors.\\nA hatchery is either for profit, or for conservation.\\nIf a hatchery is for conservation, it might release animals into the wild.\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is not for profit.\\n\\nconclusion: All hatcheries are open to visitors.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"aa8dbb52b49b9fc3e5bb94df04e5e998\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is a hatchery located in Padstow England.\\\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is open to visitors.\\\\nA hatchery is either for profit, or for conservation.\\\\nIf a hatchery is for conservation, it might release animals into the wild.\\\\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is not for profit.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: All hatcheries are open to visitors.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "aa8dbb52b49b9fc3e5bb94df04e5e998"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "aa8dbb52b49b9fc3e5bb94df04e5e998", "question": "\npremises: \nThe National Lobster Hatchery is a hatchery located in Padstow England.\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is open to visitors.\nA hatchery is either for profit, or for conservation.\nIf a hatchery is for conservation, it might release animals into the wild.\nThe National Lobster Hatchery is not for profit.\n\nconclusion: All hatcheries are open to visitors.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No touring musicians are permanent members of an orchestra.
Musicians are either permanent members of an orchestra or have a unique musical voice or style.
All musicians who have a unique musical voice or style are interesting as individual performers.
All musicians who are interesting as individual performers are capable of attracting large audiences.
If Ryan is interesting as an individual performer and has a unique musical voice or style, then Ryan is either a touring soloist musician and capable of attracting large audiences, or neither a touring soloist musician nor capable of attracting large audiences.
conclusion: Ryan is either a permanent member of an orchestra or a touring soloist musician.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo touring musicians are permanent members of an orchestra.\\nMusicians are either permanent members of an orchestra or have a unique musical voice or style.\\nAll musicians who have a unique musical voice or style are interesting as individual performers.\\nAll musicians who are interesting as individual performers are capable of attracting large audiences.\\nIf Ryan is interesting as an individual performer and has a unique musical voice or style, then Ryan is either a touring soloist musician and capable of attracting large audiences, or neither a touring soloist musician nor capable of attracting large audiences.\\n\\nconclusion: Ryan is either a permanent member of an orchestra or a touring soloist musician.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"4b8fde7333798a55252f411729b8c017\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo touring musicians are permanent members of an orchestra.\\\\nMusicians are either permanent members of an orchestra or have a unique musical voice or style.\\\\nAll musicians who have a unique musical voice or style are interesting as individual performers.\\\\nAll musicians who are interesting as individual performers are capable of attracting large audiences.\\\\nIf Ryan is interesting as an individual performer and has a unique musical voice or style, then Ryan is either a touring soloist musician and capable of attracting large audiences, or neither a touring soloist musician nor capable of attracting large audiences.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Ryan is either a permanent member of an orchestra or a touring soloist musician.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "4b8fde7333798a55252f411729b8c017"}
|
True
|
{"id": "4b8fde7333798a55252f411729b8c017", "question": "\npremises: \nNo touring musicians are permanent members of an orchestra.\nMusicians are either permanent members of an orchestra or have a unique musical voice or style.\nAll musicians who have a unique musical voice or style are interesting as individual performers.\nAll musicians who are interesting as individual performers are capable of attracting large audiences.\nIf Ryan is interesting as an individual performer and has a unique musical voice or style, then Ryan is either a touring soloist musician and capable of attracting large audiences, or neither a touring soloist musician nor capable of attracting large audiences.\n\nconclusion: Ryan is either a permanent member of an orchestra or a touring soloist musician.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No soccer players are professional basketball players.
All NBA players are professional basketball players.
All defenders are soccer players.
All centerback players are defenders.
If Stephen Curry is an NBA player or a soccer player, then he is a professional basketball player.
conclusion: Stephen Curry is an NBA player.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\nAll centerback players are defenders.\\nIf Stephen Curry is an NBA player or a soccer player, then he is a professional basketball player.\\n\\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is an NBA player.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"80bfd57d9f758f6b47e091f745cc2362\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\\\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\\\nAll centerback players are defenders.\\\\nIf Stephen Curry is an NBA player or a soccer player, then he is a professional basketball player.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is an NBA player.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "80bfd57d9f758f6b47e091f745cc2362"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "80bfd57d9f758f6b47e091f745cc2362", "question": "\npremises: \nNo soccer players are professional basketball players.\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\nAll defenders are soccer players.\nAll centerback players are defenders.\nIf Stephen Curry is an NBA player or a soccer player, then he is a professional basketball player.\n\nconclusion: Stephen Curry is an NBA player.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Common utilities include water, electricity, gas, heating, sewer, trash, and recycling.
Many apartment rents cover the cost of water and electricity.
Susan lives in an apartment where the rent covers all utilities.
The rent of the apartment where Ava lives does not cover any utility expenses.
Noah lives in an apartment where the rent does not cover heating.
conclusion: Susan does not need to pay the water bill.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nCommon utilities include water, electricity, gas, heating, sewer, trash, and recycling.\\nMany apartment rents cover the cost of water and electricity.\\nSusan lives in an apartment where the rent covers all utilities.\\nThe rent of the apartment where Ava lives does not cover any utility expenses.\\nNoah lives in an apartment where the rent does not cover heating.\\n\\nconclusion: Susan does not need to pay the water bill.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"c50b5f64c22ddf40aa4a8cd93152459b\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nCommon utilities include water, electricity, gas, heating, sewer, trash, and recycling.\\\\nMany apartment rents cover the cost of water and electricity.\\\\nSusan lives in an apartment where the rent covers all utilities.\\\\nThe rent of the apartment where Ava lives does not cover any utility expenses.\\\\nNoah lives in an apartment where the rent does not cover heating.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Susan does not need to pay the water bill.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "c50b5f64c22ddf40aa4a8cd93152459b"}
|
True
|
{"id": "c50b5f64c22ddf40aa4a8cd93152459b", "question": "\npremises: \nCommon utilities include water, electricity, gas, heating, sewer, trash, and recycling.\nMany apartment rents cover the cost of water and electricity.\nSusan lives in an apartment where the rent covers all utilities.\nThe rent of the apartment where Ava lives does not cover any utility expenses.\nNoah lives in an apartment where the rent does not cover heating.\n\nconclusion: Susan does not need to pay the water bill.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Miroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.
Miroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.
Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.
Fiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.
conclusion: Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\n\\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"e1e339c92fb9a406d167480bacdcd5f7\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\\\\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\\\\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\\\\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "e1e339c92fb9a406d167480bacdcd5f7"}
|
True
|
{"id": "e1e339c92fb9a406d167480bacdcd5f7", "question": "\npremises: \nMiroslav Fiedler was a Czech mathematician.\nMiroslav Fiedler is known for his contributions to linear algebra and graph theory.\nMiroslav Fiedler is honored by the Fiedler eigenvalue.\nFiedler eigenvalue is the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\n\nconclusion: Miroslav Fiedler is honored by the second smallest eigenvalue of the graph Laplacian.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No watch that is battery-powered is automatic.
All digital watches are battery-powered.
Some mechanical watches are automatic.
All smart watches are digital.
Moonwatch is not a digital watch or an automatic.
conclusion: Moonwatch is a smartwatch and a mechanical watch.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo watch that is battery-powered is automatic.\\nAll digital watches are battery-powered.\\nSome mechanical watches are automatic.\\nAll smart watches are digital.\\nMoonwatch is not a digital watch or an automatic.\\n\\nconclusion: Moonwatch is a smartwatch and a mechanical watch.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"9bf48d3e11fec4a4df99907e48bd8852\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo watch that is battery-powered is automatic.\\\\nAll digital watches are battery-powered.\\\\nSome mechanical watches are automatic.\\\\nAll smart watches are digital.\\\\nMoonwatch is not a digital watch or an automatic.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Moonwatch is a smartwatch and a mechanical watch.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "9bf48d3e11fec4a4df99907e48bd8852"}
|
False
|
{"id": "9bf48d3e11fec4a4df99907e48bd8852", "question": "\npremises: \nNo watch that is battery-powered is automatic.\nAll digital watches are battery-powered.\nSome mechanical watches are automatic.\nAll smart watches are digital.\nMoonwatch is not a digital watch or an automatic.\n\nconclusion: Moonwatch is a smartwatch and a mechanical watch.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.
If two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.
Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.
Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.
conclusion: Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid needed to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\\n\\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid needed to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"a3907fbfcbd030ff4c61848540f3a983\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\\\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\\\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\\\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid needed to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "a3907fbfcbd030ff4c61848540f3a983"}
|
True
|
{"id": "a3907fbfcbd030ff4c61848540f3a983", "question": "\npremises: \nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\nReal Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\nReal Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\n\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid needed to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If the game has sold more than 1 million copies, then it is on the Best Seller list.
All Games developed by Paradox Development Studio sold more than 1 million copies.
Some games published before 2010 support the Linux OS system.
All games on the Best Seller list are popular among young people.
FIFA22 neither supports the Linux OS system nor is it popular among young people.
conclusion: FIFA21 is published before 2010
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf the game has sold more than 1 million copies, then it is on the Best Seller list. \\nAll Games developed by Paradox Development Studio sold more than 1 million copies. \\nSome games published before 2010 support the Linux OS system. \\nAll games on the Best Seller list are popular among young people. \\nFIFA22 neither supports the Linux OS system nor is it popular among young people.\\n\\nconclusion: FIFA21 is published before 2010\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"72fad8dd65cc82b9ceefb010620dc155\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf the game has sold more than 1 million copies, then it is on the Best Seller list. \\\\nAll Games developed by Paradox Development Studio sold more than 1 million copies. \\\\nSome games published before 2010 support the Linux OS system. \\\\nAll games on the Best Seller list are popular among young people. \\\\nFIFA22 neither supports the Linux OS system nor is it popular among young people.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: FIFA21 is published before 2010\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "72fad8dd65cc82b9ceefb010620dc155"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "72fad8dd65cc82b9ceefb010620dc155", "question": "\npremises: \nIf the game has sold more than 1 million copies, then it is on the Best Seller list. \nAll Games developed by Paradox Development Studio sold more than 1 million copies. \nSome games published before 2010 support the Linux OS system. \nAll games on the Best Seller list are popular among young people. \nFIFA22 neither supports the Linux OS system nor is it popular among young people.\n\nconclusion: FIFA21 is published before 2010\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
People are either interested in puzzles or bad at chess.
If a person is bad at chess, then they don't play a lot of chess.
A person is either a planner or a creative person.
Erica is someone who plays a lot of chess.
If Erica is neither bad at chess nor creative, then Erica is either someone who plans and is creative, or someone who neither plans nor is creative.
conclusion: If Erica either plays a lot of chess matches or is creative, then Erica is neither interested in puzzles nor a person who plays a lot of chess matches.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nPeople are either interested in puzzles or bad at chess.\\nIf a person is bad at chess, then they don't play a lot of chess.\\nA person is either a planner or a creative person.\\nErica is someone who plays a lot of chess.\\nIf Erica is neither bad at chess nor creative, then Erica is either someone who plans and is creative, or someone who neither plans nor is creative.\\n\\nconclusion: If Erica either plays a lot of chess matches or is creative, then Erica is neither interested in puzzles nor a person who plays a lot of chess matches.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"e7fb98699fcfec7a3534aab6fa835104\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nPeople are either interested in puzzles or bad at chess.\\\\nIf a person is bad at chess, then they don't play a lot of chess.\\\\nA person is either a planner or a creative person.\\\\nErica is someone who plays a lot of chess.\\\\nIf Erica is neither bad at chess nor creative, then Erica is either someone who plans and is creative, or someone who neither plans nor is creative.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If Erica either plays a lot of chess matches or is creative, then Erica is neither interested in puzzles nor a person who plays a lot of chess matches.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "e7fb98699fcfec7a3534aab6fa835104"}
|
True
|
{"id": "e7fb98699fcfec7a3534aab6fa835104", "question": "\npremises: \nPeople are either interested in puzzles or bad at chess.\nIf a person is bad at chess, then they don't play a lot of chess.\nA person is either a planner or a creative person.\nErica is someone who plays a lot of chess.\nIf Erica is neither bad at chess nor creative, then Erica is either someone who plans and is creative, or someone who neither plans nor is creative.\n\nconclusion: If Erica either plays a lot of chess matches or is creative, then Erica is neither interested in puzzles nor a person who plays a lot of chess matches.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No professional basketball players are soccer players.
All NBA players are professional basketball players.
All defenders are soccer players.
All centerbacks are defenders.
Roger Federer is not an NBA player or a defender.
conclusion: Roger Federer is not a centerback.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo professional basketball players are soccer players.\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\\nRoger Federer is not an NBA player or a defender.\\n\\nconclusion: Roger Federer is not a centerback.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"b70b0b84f2fc85ee9ec7545fbb035fbd\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo professional basketball players are soccer players.\\\\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\\\\nAll defenders are soccer players.\\\\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\\\\nRoger Federer is not an NBA player or a defender.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Roger Federer is not a centerback.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "b70b0b84f2fc85ee9ec7545fbb035fbd"}
|
True
|
{"id": "b70b0b84f2fc85ee9ec7545fbb035fbd", "question": "\npremises: \nNo professional basketball players are soccer players.\nAll NBA players are professional basketball players.\nAll defenders are soccer players.\nAll centerbacks are defenders.\nRoger Federer is not an NBA player or a defender.\n\nconclusion: Roger Federer is not a centerback.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Badults is a British Sitcom series, starring members of Pappy's.
Badults piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.
The Working title "The Secret Dude Society" was used for Badults.
Andrew Collins was the script editor for Badults
conclusion: No members of Pappy's have starred for a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nBadults is a British Sitcom series, starring members of Pappy's.\\nBadults piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.\\nThe Working title \\\"The Secret Dude Society\\\" was used for Badults.\\nAndrew Collins was the script editor for Badults\\n\\nconclusion: No members of Pappy's have starred for a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"fe809170948820cd8d7b8b374a6e60e6\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nBadults is a British Sitcom series, starring members of Pappy's.\\\\nBadults piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.\\\\nThe Working title \\\\\\\"The Secret Dude Society\\\\\\\" was used for Badults.\\\\nAndrew Collins was the script editor for Badults\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: No members of Pappy's have starred for a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "fe809170948820cd8d7b8b374a6e60e6"}
|
False
|
{"id": "fe809170948820cd8d7b8b374a6e60e6", "question": "\npremises: \nBadults is a British Sitcom series, starring members of Pappy's.\nBadults piloted in July 2013 on BBC Three.\nThe Working title \"The Secret Dude Society\" was used for Badults.\nAndrew Collins was the script editor for Badults\n\nconclusion: No members of Pappy's have starred for a show piloting on BBC Two or BBC Three.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
The Lumina APV is produced by Chevrolet.
The Astro is a van produced by Chevrolet.
Cars produced by Chevrolet are either cars or vans.
conclusion: The Astro is a van.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThe Lumina APV is produced by Chevrolet. \\nThe Astro is a van produced by Chevrolet. \\nCars produced by Chevrolet are either cars or vans.\\n\\nconclusion: The Astro is a van.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"91132917dc2a20a42c1bdd1478f3dd48\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThe Lumina APV is produced by Chevrolet. \\\\nThe Astro is a van produced by Chevrolet. \\\\nCars produced by Chevrolet are either cars or vans.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: The Astro is a van.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "91132917dc2a20a42c1bdd1478f3dd48"}
|
True
|
{"id": "91132917dc2a20a42c1bdd1478f3dd48", "question": "\npremises: \nThe Lumina APV is produced by Chevrolet. \nThe Astro is a van produced by Chevrolet. \nCars produced by Chevrolet are either cars or vans.\n\nconclusion: The Astro is a van.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All Republicans are anti-abortion.
Either Republicans or Democrats.
No Democrats are conservative.
Either conservative or liberal.
A U.S government official is either conservative or a Republican.
conclusion: If a U.S government official is not anti-abortion and a Republican, then a U.S government official is neither anti-abortion nor a liberal.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll Republicans are anti-abortion.\\nEither Republicans or Democrats. \\nNo Democrats are conservative.\\nEither conservative or liberal. \\nA U.S government official is either conservative or a Republican.\\n\\nconclusion: If a U.S government official is not anti-abortion and a Republican, then a U.S government official is neither anti-abortion nor a liberal.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"da1470c708272591a5d50455b40798b4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll Republicans are anti-abortion.\\\\nEither Republicans or Democrats. \\\\nNo Democrats are conservative.\\\\nEither conservative or liberal. \\\\nA U.S government official is either conservative or a Republican.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If a U.S government official is not anti-abortion and a Republican, then a U.S government official is neither anti-abortion nor a liberal.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "da1470c708272591a5d50455b40798b4"}
|
True
|
{"id": "da1470c708272591a5d50455b40798b4", "question": "\npremises: \nAll Republicans are anti-abortion.\nEither Republicans or Democrats. \nNo Democrats are conservative.\nEither conservative or liberal. \nA U.S government official is either conservative or a Republican.\n\nconclusion: If a U.S government official is not anti-abortion and a Republican, then a U.S government official is neither anti-abortion nor a liberal.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
One American screenwriter and producer is Maggie Friedman.
Maggie Friedman was the showrunner and executive producer of the lifetime television series Witches of East End.
Witches of East End is a fantasy-drama series.
Maggie Friedman produced and developed Eastwick.
Eastwick is a series by ABC.
conclusion: There isn't a series by ABC that was developed by the showrunner of Witches of East End.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nOne American screenwriter and producer is Maggie Friedman.\\nMaggie Friedman was the showrunner and executive producer of the lifetime television series Witches of East End.\\nWitches of East End is a fantasy-drama series.\\nMaggie Friedman produced and developed Eastwick.\\nEastwick is a series by ABC.\\n\\nconclusion: There isn't a series by ABC that was developed by the showrunner of Witches of East End.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"55c8650ef8484015291f67d85099c756\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nOne American screenwriter and producer is Maggie Friedman.\\\\nMaggie Friedman was the showrunner and executive producer of the lifetime television series Witches of East End.\\\\nWitches of East End is a fantasy-drama series.\\\\nMaggie Friedman produced and developed Eastwick.\\\\nEastwick is a series by ABC.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: There isn't a series by ABC that was developed by the showrunner of Witches of East End.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "55c8650ef8484015291f67d85099c756"}
|
False
|
{"id": "55c8650ef8484015291f67d85099c756", "question": "\npremises: \nOne American screenwriter and producer is Maggie Friedman.\nMaggie Friedman was the showrunner and executive producer of the lifetime television series Witches of East End.\nWitches of East End is a fantasy-drama series.\nMaggie Friedman produced and developed Eastwick.\nEastwick is a series by ABC.\n\nconclusion: There isn't a series by ABC that was developed by the showrunner of Witches of East End.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Donald Ervin Knuth is an American computer scientist, mathematician, and Professor Emeritus at Stanford University.
Knuth has been called the "father of the analysis of algorithms".
conclusion: A mathematician has been called the "father of the analysis of algorithms".
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nDonald Ervin Knuth is an American computer scientist, mathematician, and Professor Emeritus at Stanford University.\\nKnuth has been called the \\\"father of the analysis of algorithms\\\".\\n\\nconclusion: A mathematician has been called the \\\"father of the analysis of algorithms\\\".\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"429d086731df18f5b63765875dc81399\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nDonald Ervin Knuth is an American computer scientist, mathematician, and Professor Emeritus at Stanford University.\\\\nKnuth has been called the \\\\\\\"father of the analysis of algorithms\\\\\\\".\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: A mathematician has been called the \\\\\\\"father of the analysis of algorithms\\\\\\\".\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "429d086731df18f5b63765875dc81399"}
|
True
|
{"id": "429d086731df18f5b63765875dc81399", "question": "\npremises: \nDonald Ervin Knuth is an American computer scientist, mathematician, and Professor Emeritus at Stanford University.\nKnuth has been called the \"father of the analysis of algorithms\".\n\nconclusion: A mathematician has been called the \"father of the analysis of algorithms\".\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.
If two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.
Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.
Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.
conclusion: Real Madrid and Atlético Madrid did not need to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\\n\\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\\u00e9tico Madrid did not need to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"5473883fad78c671edb8165388b5a26f\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\\\\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\\\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\\\\nReal Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\\\\u00e9tico Madrid did not need to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "5473883fad78c671edb8165388b5a26f"}
|
False
|
{"id": "5473883fad78c671edb8165388b5a26f", "question": "\npremises: \nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during the regular time, they need to play for the extra time.\nIf two soccer teams score the same number of goals in one UCL final during both the regular time and extra time, they need to play the penalty shoot-out.\nReal Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid both scored one goal in 2016 UCL final during the regular time.\nReal Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid both scored zero goals in 2016 UCL final during the extra time.\n\nconclusion: Real Madrid and Atl\u00e9tico Madrid did not need to play a penalty shoot-out in 2016 UCL final.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No students are doctors.
All people taking classes are students.
All graduate students are people taking classes.
All PhD students are graduate students.
If Joe is a graduate student or a doctor (but not both), then Joe is not a graduate student and a student.
conclusion: Joe is a person taking classes.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo students are doctors.\\nAll people taking classes are students. \\nAll graduate students are people taking classes. \\nAll PhD students are graduate students. \\nIf Joe is a graduate student or a doctor (but not both), then Joe is not a graduate student and a student.\\n\\nconclusion: Joe is a person taking classes.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"cf38f2e6d744d38b466fb85b924795a4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo students are doctors.\\\\nAll people taking classes are students. \\\\nAll graduate students are people taking classes. \\\\nAll PhD students are graduate students. \\\\nIf Joe is a graduate student or a doctor (but not both), then Joe is not a graduate student and a student.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Joe is a person taking classes.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "cf38f2e6d744d38b466fb85b924795a4"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "cf38f2e6d744d38b466fb85b924795a4", "question": "\npremises: \nNo students are doctors.\nAll people taking classes are students. \nAll graduate students are people taking classes. \nAll PhD students are graduate students. \nIf Joe is a graduate student or a doctor (but not both), then Joe is not a graduate student and a student.\n\nconclusion: Joe is a person taking classes.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
There are no mansion houses in an urban area.
All skyscrapers reside in urban areas.
Every creepy haunted house is in a mansion house.
Every terrifying Halloween scare comes from a creepy haunted house.
The Scream is a creepy haunted house or a terrifying Halloween scare.
conclusion: If The Scream is either a skyscraper or a creepy haunted house, then it is not a mansion house.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThere are no mansion houses in an urban area.\\nAll skyscrapers reside in urban areas.\\nEvery creepy haunted house is in a mansion house.\\nEvery terrifying Halloween scare comes from a creepy haunted house.\\nThe Scream is a creepy haunted house or a terrifying Halloween scare.\\n\\nconclusion: If The Scream is either a skyscraper or a creepy haunted house, then it is not a mansion house.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"af03aa25a42c8a9f3055bb384946a858\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThere are no mansion houses in an urban area.\\\\nAll skyscrapers reside in urban areas.\\\\nEvery creepy haunted house is in a mansion house.\\\\nEvery terrifying Halloween scare comes from a creepy haunted house.\\\\nThe Scream is a creepy haunted house or a terrifying Halloween scare.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If The Scream is either a skyscraper or a creepy haunted house, then it is not a mansion house.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "af03aa25a42c8a9f3055bb384946a858"}
|
False
|
{"id": "af03aa25a42c8a9f3055bb384946a858", "question": "\npremises: \nThere are no mansion houses in an urban area.\nAll skyscrapers reside in urban areas.\nEvery creepy haunted house is in a mansion house.\nEvery terrifying Halloween scare comes from a creepy haunted house.\nThe Scream is a creepy haunted house or a terrifying Halloween scare.\n\nconclusion: If The Scream is either a skyscraper or a creepy haunted house, then it is not a mansion house.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Miroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.
Any choral conductor is a musician.
Some musicians love music.
Miroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.
conclusion: A Czech person wrote a book in 1946.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nMiroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.\\nAny choral conductor is a musician.\\nSome musicians love music.\\nMiroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.\\n\\nconclusion: A Czech person wrote a book in 1946.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"652fed337ecad4320200b0f398406659\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nMiroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.\\\\nAny choral conductor is a musician.\\\\nSome musicians love music.\\\\nMiroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: A Czech person wrote a book in 1946.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "652fed337ecad4320200b0f398406659"}
|
True
|
{"id": "652fed337ecad4320200b0f398406659", "question": "\npremises: \nMiroslav Venhoda was a Czech choral conductor who specialized in the performance of Renaissance and Baroque music.\nAny choral conductor is a musician.\nSome musicians love music.\nMiroslav Venhoda published a book in 1946 called Method of Studying Gregorian Chant.\n\nconclusion: A Czech person wrote a book in 1946.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
A person either likes eating cheese or is a francophile.
No francophiles are people who like Spain as their favorite country.
A person likes Spain as their favorite country or likes eating cheese.
Benji is not a person who likes eating cheese and a person who studies Spanish.
If Benji is neither a person who studies Spanish nor a person that studies French, then Benji is a person who studies Spanish or a person that studies French.
conclusion: Benji is a person who likes eating cheese.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nA person either likes eating cheese or is a francophile.\\nNo francophiles are people who like Spain as their favorite country.\\nA person likes Spain as their favorite country or likes eating cheese.\\nBenji is not a person who likes eating cheese and a person who studies Spanish.\\nIf Benji is neither a person who studies Spanish nor a person that studies French, then Benji is a person who studies Spanish or a person that studies French.\\n\\nconclusion: Benji is a person who likes eating cheese.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"0d9e77c60f8f5492286f6535805f2bb8\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nA person either likes eating cheese or is a francophile.\\\\nNo francophiles are people who like Spain as their favorite country.\\\\nA person likes Spain as their favorite country or likes eating cheese.\\\\nBenji is not a person who likes eating cheese and a person who studies Spanish.\\\\nIf Benji is neither a person who studies Spanish nor a person that studies French, then Benji is a person who studies Spanish or a person that studies French.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Benji is a person who likes eating cheese.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "0d9e77c60f8f5492286f6535805f2bb8"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "0d9e77c60f8f5492286f6535805f2bb8", "question": "\npremises: \nA person either likes eating cheese or is a francophile.\nNo francophiles are people who like Spain as their favorite country.\nA person likes Spain as their favorite country or likes eating cheese.\nBenji is not a person who likes eating cheese and a person who studies Spanish.\nIf Benji is neither a person who studies Spanish nor a person that studies French, then Benji is a person who studies Spanish or a person that studies French.\n\nconclusion: Benji is a person who likes eating cheese.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
DI Ray is a police procedural television series.
DI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.
DI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.
Maya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.
conclusion: Some Brit produced a television series.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\\n\\nconclusion: Some Brit produced a television series.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"8800fe545bc76b6c87aaca89e42ed6ca\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\\\\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\\\\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\\\\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Some Brit produced a television series.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "8800fe545bc76b6c87aaca89e42ed6ca"}
|
True
|
{"id": "8800fe545bc76b6c87aaca89e42ed6ca", "question": "\npremises: \nDI Ray is a police procedural television series.\nDI Ray was created and written by Maya Sondhi.\nDI Ray was produced by Jed Mercurio.\nMaya Sondhi and Jed Mercurio are both British.\n\nconclusion: Some Brit produced a television series.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
There is no dog on the roof.
If there is a dog on the roof something went wrong.
conclusion: Something went wrong.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThere is no dog on the roof.\\nIf there is a dog on the roof something went wrong.\\n\\nconclusion: Something went wrong.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"64cf16960c55cd3080a8d56090748d6f\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThere is no dog on the roof.\\\\nIf there is a dog on the roof something went wrong.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Something went wrong.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "64cf16960c55cd3080a8d56090748d6f"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "64cf16960c55cd3080a8d56090748d6f", "question": "\npremises: \nThere is no dog on the roof.\nIf there is a dog on the roof something went wrong.\n\nconclusion: Something went wrong.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Mr. and Mrs. Smith make a travel plan, they want to go to a city in California or Florida, and where neither of them has ever been.
Cities in California that they are interested in are San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.
Cities in Florida that they are interested in are Orlando and Miami.
Mr. Smith has been to two cities in California.
Mrs. Smith has been to one city in Florida.
conclusion: They have at least two candidate cities in California to visit.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nMr. and Mrs. Smith make a travel plan, they want to go to a city in California or Florida, and where neither of them has ever been.\\nCities in California that they are interested in are San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.\\nCities in Florida that they are interested in are Orlando and Miami.\\nMr. Smith has been to two cities in California.\\nMrs. Smith has been to one city in Florida.\\n\\nconclusion: They have at least two candidate cities in California to visit.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"d06728e8080d9ef032e7349f1257aaa7\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nMr. and Mrs. Smith make a travel plan, they want to go to a city in California or Florida, and where neither of them has ever been.\\\\nCities in California that they are interested in are San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.\\\\nCities in Florida that they are interested in are Orlando and Miami.\\\\nMr. Smith has been to two cities in California.\\\\nMrs. Smith has been to one city in Florida.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: They have at least two candidate cities in California to visit.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "d06728e8080d9ef032e7349f1257aaa7"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "d06728e8080d9ef032e7349f1257aaa7", "question": "\npremises: \nMr. and Mrs. Smith make a travel plan, they want to go to a city in California or Florida, and where neither of them has ever been.\nCities in California that they are interested in are San Francisco, Los Angeles, and San Diego.\nCities in Florida that they are interested in are Orlando and Miami.\nMr. Smith has been to two cities in California.\nMrs. Smith has been to one city in Florida.\n\nconclusion: They have at least two candidate cities in California to visit.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If George likes music, he wants to compose.
If George has access to a program, he can compose.
If George can compose and wants to compose, he will compose.
conclusion: If George will not compose, George can not compose.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf George likes music, he wants to compose.\\nIf George has access to a program, he can compose.\\nIf George can compose and wants to compose, he will compose.\\n\\nconclusion: If George will not compose, George can not compose.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"ae200e47d8754edcba25e2df9403d002\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf George likes music, he wants to compose.\\\\nIf George has access to a program, he can compose.\\\\nIf George can compose and wants to compose, he will compose.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If George will not compose, George can not compose.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "ae200e47d8754edcba25e2df9403d002"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "ae200e47d8754edcba25e2df9403d002", "question": "\npremises: \nIf George likes music, he wants to compose.\nIf George has access to a program, he can compose.\nIf George can compose and wants to compose, he will compose.\n\nconclusion: If George will not compose, George can not compose.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All advocates of high tariff rates are Republicans.
Some Republicans are not conservatives.
conclusion: Some conservatives are advocates of high tariff rates.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll advocates of high tariff rates are Republicans.\\nSome Republicans are not conservatives.\\n\\nconclusion: Some conservatives are advocates of high tariff rates.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"035474512fbac9e6f15f7eef8f3571e1\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll advocates of high tariff rates are Republicans.\\\\nSome Republicans are not conservatives.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Some conservatives are advocates of high tariff rates.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "035474512fbac9e6f15f7eef8f3571e1"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "035474512fbac9e6f15f7eef8f3571e1", "question": "\npremises: \nAll advocates of high tariff rates are Republicans.\nSome Republicans are not conservatives.\n\nconclusion: Some conservatives are advocates of high tariff rates.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Machine Learning algorithms can be categorized as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning.
Unsupervised learning doesn't require labelled data.
The state-of-the-art text summarization model is trained with machine learning algorithms.
Reinforcement learning is not used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.
The Machine Learning algorithm for training text summarization model requires labelled data.
conclusion: Supervised learning is used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nMachine Learning algorithms can be categorized as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning.\\nUnsupervised learning doesn't require labelled data.\\nThe state-of-the-art text summarization model is trained with machine learning algorithms.\\nReinforcement learning is not used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.\\nThe Machine Learning algorithm for training text summarization model requires labelled data.\\n\\nconclusion: Supervised learning is used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"48fe95b64a68406244ccd51f8f933f7e\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nMachine Learning algorithms can be categorized as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning.\\\\nUnsupervised learning doesn't require labelled data.\\\\nThe state-of-the-art text summarization model is trained with machine learning algorithms.\\\\nReinforcement learning is not used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.\\\\nThe Machine Learning algorithm for training text summarization model requires labelled data.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Supervised learning is used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "48fe95b64a68406244ccd51f8f933f7e"}
|
True
|
{"id": "48fe95b64a68406244ccd51f8f933f7e", "question": "\npremises: \nMachine Learning algorithms can be categorized as supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning.\nUnsupervised learning doesn't require labelled data.\nThe state-of-the-art text summarization model is trained with machine learning algorithms.\nReinforcement learning is not used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.\nThe Machine Learning algorithm for training text summarization model requires labelled data.\n\nconclusion: Supervised learning is used to train the state-of-the-art text summarization model.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All cancers are malignant tumors.
No malignant tumor can be treated at home.
All colorectal cancer is cancer.
Having a cold can be treated at home.
Breast cancer is neither having a cold nor a malignant tumor (exclusive).
conclusion: Breast cancer is not colorectal cancer.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll cancers are malignant tumors.\\nNo malignant tumor can be treated at home.\\nAll colorectal cancer is cancer.\\nHaving a cold can be treated at home.\\nBreast cancer is neither having a cold nor a malignant tumor (exclusive).\\n\\nconclusion: Breast cancer is not colorectal cancer.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"a9ba7d169d3be00086c07a1de72f1bd6\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll cancers are malignant tumors.\\\\nNo malignant tumor can be treated at home.\\\\nAll colorectal cancer is cancer.\\\\nHaving a cold can be treated at home.\\\\nBreast cancer is neither having a cold nor a malignant tumor (exclusive).\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Breast cancer is not colorectal cancer.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"easy\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "a9ba7d169d3be00086c07a1de72f1bd6"}
|
True
|
{"id": "a9ba7d169d3be00086c07a1de72f1bd6", "question": "\npremises: \nAll cancers are malignant tumors.\nNo malignant tumor can be treated at home.\nAll colorectal cancer is cancer.\nHaving a cold can be treated at home.\nBreast cancer is neither having a cold nor a malignant tumor (exclusive).\n\nconclusion: Breast cancer is not colorectal cancer.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "easy", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All mammals are animals.
All monkeys are mammals.
An animal is either a monkey or a bird.
All birds fly.
All animals breathe.
If something can fly, then it has wings.
If Rock is neither a fly nor a bird, then Rock neither flies nor breathes.
conclusion: Rock has wings.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll mammals are animals.\\nAll monkeys are mammals. \\nAn animal is either a monkey or a bird.\\nAll birds fly.\\nAll animals breathe.\\nIf something can fly, then it has wings.\\nIf Rock is neither a fly nor a bird, then Rock neither flies nor breathes.\\n\\nconclusion: Rock has wings.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"04718aed1ca3c7ccbb3c193916f941a7\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll mammals are animals.\\\\nAll monkeys are mammals. \\\\nAn animal is either a monkey or a bird.\\\\nAll birds fly.\\\\nAll animals breathe.\\\\nIf something can fly, then it has wings.\\\\nIf Rock is neither a fly nor a bird, then Rock neither flies nor breathes.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Rock has wings.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "04718aed1ca3c7ccbb3c193916f941a7"}
|
True
|
{"id": "04718aed1ca3c7ccbb3c193916f941a7", "question": "\npremises: \nAll mammals are animals.\nAll monkeys are mammals. \nAn animal is either a monkey or a bird.\nAll birds fly.\nAll animals breathe.\nIf something can fly, then it has wings.\nIf Rock is neither a fly nor a bird, then Rock neither flies nor breathes.\n\nconclusion: Rock has wings.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Peter Parker is a either a superhero or a civilian.
The Hulk is a destroyer.
The Hulk wakes up when he is angry.
If the Hulk wakes up, then he will break a bridge.
Thor is a god.
Thor will break a bridge when he is happy.
A god is not a destroyer and a destroyer is not a god.
Peter Parker wears a uniform when he is a superhero.
Peter Parker is not a civilian if and only if a destroyer is breaking a bridge.
If Thor is happy, the Hulk is angry.
conclusion: If Thor is not happy, then no bridge will be broken.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nPeter Parker is a either a superhero or a civilian.\\nThe Hulk is a destroyer.\\nThe Hulk wakes up when he is angry.\\nIf the Hulk wakes up, then he will break a bridge.\\nThor is a god.\\nThor will break a bridge when he is happy.\\nA god is not a destroyer and a destroyer is not a god.\\nPeter Parker wears a uniform when he is a superhero.\\nPeter Parker is not a civilian if and only if a destroyer is breaking a bridge.\\nIf Thor is happy, the Hulk is angry.\\n\\nconclusion: If Thor is not happy, then no bridge will be broken.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"9501a6ec5d8cff66fbaef7832113620c\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nPeter Parker is a either a superhero or a civilian.\\\\nThe Hulk is a destroyer.\\\\nThe Hulk wakes up when he is angry.\\\\nIf the Hulk wakes up, then he will break a bridge.\\\\nThor is a god.\\\\nThor will break a bridge when he is happy.\\\\nA god is not a destroyer and a destroyer is not a god.\\\\nPeter Parker wears a uniform when he is a superhero.\\\\nPeter Parker is not a civilian if and only if a destroyer is breaking a bridge.\\\\nIf Thor is happy, the Hulk is angry.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If Thor is not happy, then no bridge will be broken.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "9501a6ec5d8cff66fbaef7832113620c"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "9501a6ec5d8cff66fbaef7832113620c", "question": "\npremises: \nPeter Parker is a either a superhero or a civilian.\nThe Hulk is a destroyer.\nThe Hulk wakes up when he is angry.\nIf the Hulk wakes up, then he will break a bridge.\nThor is a god.\nThor will break a bridge when he is happy.\nA god is not a destroyer and a destroyer is not a god.\nPeter Parker wears a uniform when he is a superhero.\nPeter Parker is not a civilian if and only if a destroyer is breaking a bridge.\nIf Thor is happy, the Hulk is angry.\n\nconclusion: If Thor is not happy, then no bridge will be broken.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Everything is either big or small.
All big things are heavy.
All small things are light.
All heavy things are still.
All light things are unstable.
All unstable things are changing.
All unstable things are kinetic.
A bird is not both heavy and still.
conclusion: A bird is kinetic and changing.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nEverything is either big or small.\\nAll big things are heavy. \\nAll small things are light. \\nAll heavy things are still.\\nAll light things are unstable.\\nAll unstable things are changing.\\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \\nA bird is not both heavy and still.\\n\\nconclusion: A bird is kinetic and changing.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"c30766a4967b8732e3e47b464e431faa\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nEverything is either big or small.\\\\nAll big things are heavy. \\\\nAll small things are light. \\\\nAll heavy things are still.\\\\nAll light things are unstable.\\\\nAll unstable things are changing.\\\\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \\\\nA bird is not both heavy and still.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: A bird is kinetic and changing.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "c30766a4967b8732e3e47b464e431faa"}
|
True
|
{"id": "c30766a4967b8732e3e47b464e431faa", "question": "\npremises: \nEverything is either big or small.\nAll big things are heavy. \nAll small things are light. \nAll heavy things are still.\nAll light things are unstable.\nAll unstable things are changing.\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \nA bird is not both heavy and still.\n\nconclusion: A bird is kinetic and changing.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Products are either produced in China or the US.
All produced in China are labeled.
All produced in the US are sold in the US.
If labeled, then the product is cheaper.
All sold in the US are sold in Walmart.
All displayed on the homepage are sold in Walmart.
No products returned by customers are sold in Walmart.
G-910 is either displayed on the homepage or cheaper.
conclusion: G-910 is a product returned by customers or sold in Walmart.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nProducts are either produced in China or the US. \\nAll produced in China are labeled. \\nAll produced in the US are sold in the US. \\nIf labeled, then the product is cheaper. \\nAll sold in the US are sold in Walmart. \\nAll displayed on the homepage are sold in Walmart. \\nNo products returned by customers are sold in Walmart. \\nG-910 is either displayed on the homepage or cheaper.\\n\\nconclusion: G-910 is a product returned by customers or sold in Walmart.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"ddc591a186c5a58b9e0e1147edc43f37\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nProducts are either produced in China or the US. \\\\nAll produced in China are labeled. \\\\nAll produced in the US are sold in the US. \\\\nIf labeled, then the product is cheaper. \\\\nAll sold in the US are sold in Walmart. \\\\nAll displayed on the homepage are sold in Walmart. \\\\nNo products returned by customers are sold in Walmart. \\\\nG-910 is either displayed on the homepage or cheaper.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: G-910 is a product returned by customers or sold in Walmart.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "ddc591a186c5a58b9e0e1147edc43f37"}
|
True
|
{"id": "ddc591a186c5a58b9e0e1147edc43f37", "question": "\npremises: \nProducts are either produced in China or the US. \nAll produced in China are labeled. \nAll produced in the US are sold in the US. \nIf labeled, then the product is cheaper. \nAll sold in the US are sold in Walmart. \nAll displayed on the homepage are sold in Walmart. \nNo products returned by customers are sold in Walmart. \nG-910 is either displayed on the homepage or cheaper.\n\nconclusion: G-910 is a product returned by customers or sold in Walmart.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If a person coach a football club, the person is a football coach.
If a person has a position in a club for a position in a year, and the club is in NFL in the same year, the person plays in NFL.
Minnesota Vikings is a football club.
Dennis Green coached Minnesota Vikings.
Cris Carter had 13 touchdown receptions.
Minnesota Vikings was in the National Football League in 1997.
John Randle was Minnesota Vikings defensive tackle in 1997.
conclusion: Cris Carter played for Minnesota Vikings.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf a person coach a football club, the person is a football coach.\\nIf a person has a position in a club for a position in a year, and the club is in NFL in the same year, the person plays in NFL.\\nMinnesota Vikings is a football club.\\nDennis Green coached Minnesota Vikings.\\nCris Carter had 13 touchdown receptions.\\nMinnesota Vikings was in the National Football League in 1997.\\nJohn Randle was Minnesota Vikings defensive tackle in 1997.\\n\\nconclusion: Cris Carter played for Minnesota Vikings.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"3dc51a1e6e2cbb56f0b3be92c4ff1860\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf a person coach a football club, the person is a football coach.\\\\nIf a person has a position in a club for a position in a year, and the club is in NFL in the same year, the person plays in NFL.\\\\nMinnesota Vikings is a football club.\\\\nDennis Green coached Minnesota Vikings.\\\\nCris Carter had 13 touchdown receptions.\\\\nMinnesota Vikings was in the National Football League in 1997.\\\\nJohn Randle was Minnesota Vikings defensive tackle in 1997.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Cris Carter played for Minnesota Vikings.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "3dc51a1e6e2cbb56f0b3be92c4ff1860"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "3dc51a1e6e2cbb56f0b3be92c4ff1860", "question": "\npremises: \nIf a person coach a football club, the person is a football coach.\nIf a person has a position in a club for a position in a year, and the club is in NFL in the same year, the person plays in NFL.\nMinnesota Vikings is a football club.\nDennis Green coached Minnesota Vikings.\nCris Carter had 13 touchdown receptions.\nMinnesota Vikings was in the National Football League in 1997.\nJohn Randle was Minnesota Vikings defensive tackle in 1997.\n\nconclusion: Cris Carter played for Minnesota Vikings.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All devices belonging to the company are connected to Google Home.
All devices with the company logo belong to the company.
A device is either with the company logo or belongs to employees.
All devices belonging to employees are available to connect to the company's wifi.
All devices connected to Google Home are controlled by managers.
All devices that connect to the company's wifi are easy to operate.
All devices that are easy to operate are produced after 2020.
IPod1 is produced before 2020.
conclusion: IPod1 is not with the company logo, and managers do not control it.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll devices belonging to the company are connected to Google Home. \\nAll devices with the company logo belong to the company. \\nA device is either with the company logo or belongs to employees. \\nAll devices belonging to employees are available to connect to the company's wifi. \\nAll devices connected to Google Home are controlled by managers. \\nAll devices that connect to the company's wifi are easy to operate. \\nAll devices that are easy to operate are produced after 2020. \\nIPod1 is produced before 2020. \\n\\nconclusion: IPod1 is not with the company logo, and managers do not control it.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"8808c9fe2a7ae24491fe05e248df67d2\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll devices belonging to the company are connected to Google Home. \\\\nAll devices with the company logo belong to the company. \\\\nA device is either with the company logo or belongs to employees. \\\\nAll devices belonging to employees are available to connect to the company's wifi. \\\\nAll devices connected to Google Home are controlled by managers. \\\\nAll devices that connect to the company's wifi are easy to operate. \\\\nAll devices that are easy to operate are produced after 2020. \\\\nIPod1 is produced before 2020. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: IPod1 is not with the company logo, and managers do not control it.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "8808c9fe2a7ae24491fe05e248df67d2"}
|
False
|
{"id": "8808c9fe2a7ae24491fe05e248df67d2", "question": "\npremises: \nAll devices belonging to the company are connected to Google Home. \nAll devices with the company logo belong to the company. \nA device is either with the company logo or belongs to employees. \nAll devices belonging to employees are available to connect to the company's wifi. \nAll devices connected to Google Home are controlled by managers. \nAll devices that connect to the company's wifi are easy to operate. \nAll devices that are easy to operate are produced after 2020. \nIPod1 is produced before 2020. \n\nconclusion: IPod1 is not with the company logo, and managers do not control it.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All buildings in New Haven are low.
All buildings managed by the Yale Housing are located in New Haven.
All buildings in Manhattans are high.
All buildings owned by Bloomberg are located in Manhattans.
All buildings with the Bloomberg logo are owned by Bloomberg.
Tower A is managed by the Yale Housing.
Tower B is with the Bloomberg logo.
conclusion: Tower B is not located in Manhattans.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll buildings in New Haven are low. \\nAll buildings managed by the Yale Housing are located in New Haven. \\nAll buildings in Manhattans are high. \\nAll buildings owned by Bloomberg are located in Manhattans. \\nAll buildings with the Bloomberg logo are owned by Bloomberg. \\nTower A is managed by the Yale Housing.\\nTower B is with the Bloomberg logo.\\n\\nconclusion: Tower B is not located in Manhattans.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"7a00a2dac5d902f97319763f2c66d55f\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll buildings in New Haven are low. \\\\nAll buildings managed by the Yale Housing are located in New Haven. \\\\nAll buildings in Manhattans are high. \\\\nAll buildings owned by Bloomberg are located in Manhattans. \\\\nAll buildings with the Bloomberg logo are owned by Bloomberg. \\\\nTower A is managed by the Yale Housing.\\\\nTower B is with the Bloomberg logo.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Tower B is not located in Manhattans.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "7a00a2dac5d902f97319763f2c66d55f"}
|
False
|
{"id": "7a00a2dac5d902f97319763f2c66d55f", "question": "\npremises: \nAll buildings in New Haven are low. \nAll buildings managed by the Yale Housing are located in New Haven. \nAll buildings in Manhattans are high. \nAll buildings owned by Bloomberg are located in Manhattans. \nAll buildings with the Bloomberg logo are owned by Bloomberg. \nTower A is managed by the Yale Housing.\nTower B is with the Bloomberg logo.\n\nconclusion: Tower B is not located in Manhattans.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All phones are things.
All cellphones are phones.
All iPhones are cellphones.
All engineers are workers.
All workers are human.
Jack is either an engineer or a worker.
Jack is is either a human or a phone.
conclusion: Jack is not a thing.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll phones are things.\\nAll cellphones are phones. \\nAll iPhones are cellphones. \\nAll engineers are workers.\\nAll workers are human. \\nJack is either an engineer or a worker.\\nJack is is either a human or a phone.\\n\\nconclusion: Jack is not a thing.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"19f8db0b644092a1bdfb1c8241ed8925\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll phones are things.\\\\nAll cellphones are phones. \\\\nAll iPhones are cellphones. \\\\nAll engineers are workers.\\\\nAll workers are human. \\\\nJack is either an engineer or a worker.\\\\nJack is is either a human or a phone.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Jack is not a thing.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "19f8db0b644092a1bdfb1c8241ed8925"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "19f8db0b644092a1bdfb1c8241ed8925", "question": "\npremises: \nAll phones are things.\nAll cellphones are phones. \nAll iPhones are cellphones. \nAll engineers are workers.\nAll workers are human. \nJack is either an engineer or a worker.\nJack is is either a human or a phone.\n\nconclusion: Jack is not a thing.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Thick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.
Thick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.
If a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.
The fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.
The Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.
Attolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.
Thick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.
conclusion: Megan Whalen Turner worked with Greenwillow Books.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\\n\\nconclusion: Megan Whalen Turner worked with Greenwillow Books.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"af10ff47e7361e099c6069a95ebe1fb1\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\\\\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\\\\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\\\\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\\\\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\\\\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\\\\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Megan Whalen Turner worked with Greenwillow Books.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "af10ff47e7361e099c6069a95ebe1fb1"}
|
True
|
{"id": "af10ff47e7361e099c6069a95ebe1fb1", "question": "\npremises: \nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\n\nconclusion: Megan Whalen Turner worked with Greenwillow Books.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All devices belonging to the company are connected to Google Home.
All devices with the company logo belong to the company.
A device is either with the company logo or belongs to employees.
All devices belonging to employees are available to connect to the company's wifi.
All devices connected to Google Home are controlled by managers.
All devices that connect to the company's wifi are easy to operate.
All devices that are easy to operate are produced after 2020.
IPod1 is produced before 2020.
conclusion: IPod1 is controlled by managers.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll devices belonging to the company are connected to Google Home. \\nAll devices with the company logo belong to the company. \\nA device is either with the company logo or belongs to employees. \\nAll devices belonging to employees are available to connect to the company's wifi. \\nAll devices connected to Google Home are controlled by managers. \\nAll devices that connect to the company's wifi are easy to operate. \\nAll devices that are easy to operate are produced after 2020. \\nIPod1 is produced before 2020. \\n\\nconclusion: IPod1 is controlled by managers.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"dd1902b34a4f590d442cfad1ae16b968\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll devices belonging to the company are connected to Google Home. \\\\nAll devices with the company logo belong to the company. \\\\nA device is either with the company logo or belongs to employees. \\\\nAll devices belonging to employees are available to connect to the company's wifi. \\\\nAll devices connected to Google Home are controlled by managers. \\\\nAll devices that connect to the company's wifi are easy to operate. \\\\nAll devices that are easy to operate are produced after 2020. \\\\nIPod1 is produced before 2020. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: IPod1 is controlled by managers.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "dd1902b34a4f590d442cfad1ae16b968"}
|
True
|
{"id": "dd1902b34a4f590d442cfad1ae16b968", "question": "\npremises: \nAll devices belonging to the company are connected to Google Home. \nAll devices with the company logo belong to the company. \nA device is either with the company logo or belongs to employees. \nAll devices belonging to employees are available to connect to the company's wifi. \nAll devices connected to Google Home are controlled by managers. \nAll devices that connect to the company's wifi are easy to operate. \nAll devices that are easy to operate are produced after 2020. \nIPod1 is produced before 2020. \n\nconclusion: IPod1 is controlled by managers.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No easy Leetcode problems have an AC rate lower than 20 percent.
All Leetcode problems recommended to novices are easy.
Leetcode problems either have an AC rate lower than 20 percent or are starred by more than 1 thousand users.
All hard Leetcode problems are starred by more than 1 thousand users.
No Leetcode problems published after 2022 are starred by more than 1 thousand users.
2Sum is not recommended to novices and hard.
4Sum is either starred by more than 1 thousand users and published after 2022, or neither starred by more than 1 thousand users nor published after 2022.
conclusion: 4Sum is a Leetcode problem recommended to the novice or is hard.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo easy Leetcode problems have an AC rate lower than 20 percent. \\nAll Leetcode problems recommended to novices are easy. \\nLeetcode problems either have an AC rate lower than 20 percent or are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\nAll hard Leetcode problems are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\nNo Leetcode problems published after 2022 are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\n2Sum is not recommended to novices and hard. \\n4Sum is either starred by more than 1 thousand users and published after 2022, or neither starred by more than 1 thousand users nor published after 2022. \\n\\nconclusion: 4Sum is a Leetcode problem recommended to the novice or is hard.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"9e83eaa4315e0edf4de7b408ae43d55c\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo easy Leetcode problems have an AC rate lower than 20 percent. \\\\nAll Leetcode problems recommended to novices are easy. \\\\nLeetcode problems either have an AC rate lower than 20 percent or are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\\\nAll hard Leetcode problems are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\\\nNo Leetcode problems published after 2022 are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\\\n2Sum is not recommended to novices and hard. \\\\n4Sum is either starred by more than 1 thousand users and published after 2022, or neither starred by more than 1 thousand users nor published after 2022. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: 4Sum is a Leetcode problem recommended to the novice or is hard.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "9e83eaa4315e0edf4de7b408ae43d55c"}
|
False
|
{"id": "9e83eaa4315e0edf4de7b408ae43d55c", "question": "\npremises: \nNo easy Leetcode problems have an AC rate lower than 20 percent. \nAll Leetcode problems recommended to novices are easy. \nLeetcode problems either have an AC rate lower than 20 percent or are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \nAll hard Leetcode problems are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \nNo Leetcode problems published after 2022 are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \n2Sum is not recommended to novices and hard. \n4Sum is either starred by more than 1 thousand users and published after 2022, or neither starred by more than 1 thousand users nor published after 2022. \n\nconclusion: 4Sum is a Leetcode problem recommended to the novice or is hard.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Symphony No. 9 is a music piece.
Composers write music pieces.
Beethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society is an orchestra.
Beethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.
Orchestras are led by conductors.
conclusion: Beethoven is a composer.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nSymphony No. 9 is a music piece.\\nComposers write music pieces.\\nBeethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.\\nVienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.\\nVienna Music Society is an orchestra.\\nBeethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.\\nOrchestras are led by conductors.\\n\\nconclusion: Beethoven is a composer.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"c1440620f4617d228bb691730d60b7b6\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nSymphony No. 9 is a music piece.\\\\nComposers write music pieces.\\\\nBeethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.\\\\nVienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.\\\\nVienna Music Society is an orchestra.\\\\nBeethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.\\\\nOrchestras are led by conductors.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Beethoven is a composer.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "c1440620f4617d228bb691730d60b7b6"}
|
True
|
{"id": "c1440620f4617d228bb691730d60b7b6", "question": "\npremises: \nSymphony No. 9 is a music piece.\nComposers write music pieces.\nBeethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.\nVienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.\nVienna Music Society is an orchestra.\nBeethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.\nOrchestras are led by conductors.\n\nconclusion: Beethoven is a composer.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Olivia doesn't prefer warm temperature during the day.
When Olivia sleeps, she prefers cool temperature.
Olivia sleeps during the night.
Olivia works during the day.
Olivia either works or sleeps.
The time is either the day or the night.
Olivia either prefers warm temperature or prefers cool temperature.
conclusion: At all times, Olivia prefers cool temperature.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nOlivia doesn't prefer warm temperature during the day.\\nWhen Olivia sleeps, she prefers cool temperature.\\nOlivia sleeps during the night.\\nOlivia works during the day.\\nOlivia either works or sleeps.\\nThe time is either the day or the night.\\nOlivia either prefers warm temperature or prefers cool temperature.\\n\\nconclusion: At all times, Olivia prefers cool temperature.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"af004c5a021eb0690edc7189e5cd42a4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nOlivia doesn't prefer warm temperature during the day.\\\\nWhen Olivia sleeps, she prefers cool temperature.\\\\nOlivia sleeps during the night.\\\\nOlivia works during the day.\\\\nOlivia either works or sleeps.\\\\nThe time is either the day or the night.\\\\nOlivia either prefers warm temperature or prefers cool temperature.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: At all times, Olivia prefers cool temperature.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "af004c5a021eb0690edc7189e5cd42a4"}
|
True
|
{"id": "af004c5a021eb0690edc7189e5cd42a4", "question": "\npremises: \nOlivia doesn't prefer warm temperature during the day.\nWhen Olivia sleeps, she prefers cool temperature.\nOlivia sleeps during the night.\nOlivia works during the day.\nOlivia either works or sleeps.\nThe time is either the day or the night.\nOlivia either prefers warm temperature or prefers cool temperature.\n\nconclusion: At all times, Olivia prefers cool temperature.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All people who are respected by others are people who contribute to the country.
If a person is respected by others, then he/she contributes to the country.
All people available to have a visit without any fees are those respected by others.
All Customers who once served in the army are available to have a visit without any fees.
All people who once were sentenced for thief stayed in prison for some time.
All people who once stayed in prison for some time have a bad record in the local state.
James was either once sentenced for thief or stayed in prison for some time.
James is either with a bad record in the local state or respected by others.
conclusion: James did not contribute to the country and did not serve in the army.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll people who are respected by others are people who contribute to the country. \\nIf a person is respected by others, then he/she contributes to the country. \\nAll people available to have a visit without any fees are those respected by others. \\nAll Customers who once served in the army are available to have a visit without any fees. \\nAll people who once were sentenced for thief stayed in prison for some time. \\nAll people who once stayed in prison for some time have a bad record in the local state. \\nJames was either once sentenced for thief or stayed in prison for some time. \\nJames is either with a bad record in the local state or respected by others. \\n\\nconclusion: James did not contribute to the country and did not serve in the army.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"b7d8a72b53f53d0b6bb3bb4bbc73dcb3\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll people who are respected by others are people who contribute to the country. \\\\nIf a person is respected by others, then he/she contributes to the country. \\\\nAll people available to have a visit without any fees are those respected by others. \\\\nAll Customers who once served in the army are available to have a visit without any fees. \\\\nAll people who once were sentenced for thief stayed in prison for some time. \\\\nAll people who once stayed in prison for some time have a bad record in the local state. \\\\nJames was either once sentenced for thief or stayed in prison for some time. \\\\nJames is either with a bad record in the local state or respected by others. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: James did not contribute to the country and did not serve in the army.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "b7d8a72b53f53d0b6bb3bb4bbc73dcb3"}
|
True
|
{"id": "b7d8a72b53f53d0b6bb3bb4bbc73dcb3", "question": "\npremises: \nAll people who are respected by others are people who contribute to the country. \nIf a person is respected by others, then he/she contributes to the country. \nAll people available to have a visit without any fees are those respected by others. \nAll Customers who once served in the army are available to have a visit without any fees. \nAll people who once were sentenced for thief stayed in prison for some time. \nAll people who once stayed in prison for some time have a bad record in the local state. \nJames was either once sentenced for thief or stayed in prison for some time. \nJames is either with a bad record in the local state or respected by others. \n\nconclusion: James did not contribute to the country and did not serve in the army.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Everyone that uses a football can throw a football.
If someone plays football, then they use a football.
Either someone is a football player or a basketball player.
Every basketball player is tall.
Everyone that can throw a football can throw a football with a spiral.
If someone is tall, then they are in shape.
If Jack is neither tall nor a basketball player, then Jack is neither tall nor can throw a football.
conclusion: Jack is in shape.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nEveryone that uses a football can throw a football.\\nIf someone plays football, then they use a football.\\nEither someone is a football player or a basketball player.\\nEvery basketball player is tall.\\nEveryone that can throw a football can throw a football with a spiral.\\nIf someone is tall, then they are in shape.\\nIf Jack is neither tall nor a basketball player, then Jack is neither tall nor can throw a football.\\n\\nconclusion: Jack is in shape.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"bf67a4c07b12ab769770dce07a059251\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nEveryone that uses a football can throw a football.\\\\nIf someone plays football, then they use a football.\\\\nEither someone is a football player or a basketball player.\\\\nEvery basketball player is tall.\\\\nEveryone that can throw a football can throw a football with a spiral.\\\\nIf someone is tall, then they are in shape.\\\\nIf Jack is neither tall nor a basketball player, then Jack is neither tall nor can throw a football.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Jack is in shape.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "bf67a4c07b12ab769770dce07a059251"}
|
True
|
{"id": "bf67a4c07b12ab769770dce07a059251", "question": "\npremises: \nEveryone that uses a football can throw a football.\nIf someone plays football, then they use a football.\nEither someone is a football player or a basketball player.\nEvery basketball player is tall.\nEveryone that can throw a football can throw a football with a spiral.\nIf someone is tall, then they are in shape.\nIf Jack is neither tall nor a basketball player, then Jack is neither tall nor can throw a football.\n\nconclusion: Jack is in shape.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All phones are things.
All cellphones are phones.
All iPhones are cellphones.
All engineers are workers.
All workers are human.
Jack is either an engineer or a worker.
Jack is is either a human or a phone.
conclusion: Jack is a thing and an iPhone.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll phones are things.\\nAll cellphones are phones. \\nAll iPhones are cellphones. \\nAll engineers are workers.\\nAll workers are human. \\nJack is either an engineer or a worker.\\nJack is is either a human or a phone.\\n\\nconclusion: Jack is a thing and an iPhone.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"2010301d594de8aa719104d80d2e111e\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll phones are things.\\\\nAll cellphones are phones. \\\\nAll iPhones are cellphones. \\\\nAll engineers are workers.\\\\nAll workers are human. \\\\nJack is either an engineer or a worker.\\\\nJack is is either a human or a phone.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Jack is a thing and an iPhone.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "2010301d594de8aa719104d80d2e111e"}
|
False
|
{"id": "2010301d594de8aa719104d80d2e111e", "question": "\npremises: \nAll phones are things.\nAll cellphones are phones. \nAll iPhones are cellphones. \nAll engineers are workers.\nAll workers are human. \nJack is either an engineer or a worker.\nJack is is either a human or a phone.\n\nconclusion: Jack is a thing and an iPhone.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Either present their work at the conference or provide a tutorial session at the conference.
All who present their work at the conference will attend in person.
All those providing a tutorial session at the conference are invited to join the club.
All who attend the conference in person are provided with souvenirs.
All invited to join the club are provided with delicious meals.
All provided with delicious meals are happy to communicate with each other during the dinner.
All provided with delicious meals are invited to take a photo with the audience.
James does not attend the conference in person and is not provided with souvenirs.
conclusion: James is not provided with souvenirs.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nEither present their work at the conference or provide a tutorial session at the conference. \\nAll who present their work at the conference will attend in person. \\nAll those providing a tutorial session at the conference are invited to join the club. \\nAll who attend the conference in person are provided with souvenirs. \\nAll invited to join the club are provided with delicious meals. \\nAll provided with delicious meals are happy to communicate with each other during the dinner. \\nAll provided with delicious meals are invited to take a photo with the audience. \\nJames does not attend the conference in person and is not provided with souvenirs.\\n\\nconclusion: James is not provided with souvenirs.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"2bbcb03f296f7e3ce1b67501807c4076\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nEither present their work at the conference or provide a tutorial session at the conference. \\\\nAll who present their work at the conference will attend in person. \\\\nAll those providing a tutorial session at the conference are invited to join the club. \\\\nAll who attend the conference in person are provided with souvenirs. \\\\nAll invited to join the club are provided with delicious meals. \\\\nAll provided with delicious meals are happy to communicate with each other during the dinner. \\\\nAll provided with delicious meals are invited to take a photo with the audience. \\\\nJames does not attend the conference in person and is not provided with souvenirs.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: James is not provided with souvenirs.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "2bbcb03f296f7e3ce1b67501807c4076"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "2bbcb03f296f7e3ce1b67501807c4076", "question": "\npremises: \nEither present their work at the conference or provide a tutorial session at the conference. \nAll who present their work at the conference will attend in person. \nAll those providing a tutorial session at the conference are invited to join the club. \nAll who attend the conference in person are provided with souvenirs. \nAll invited to join the club are provided with delicious meals. \nAll provided with delicious meals are happy to communicate with each other during the dinner. \nAll provided with delicious meals are invited to take a photo with the audience. \nJames does not attend the conference in person and is not provided with souvenirs.\n\nconclusion: James is not provided with souvenirs.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All mammals are animals.
All monkeys are mammals.
An animal is either a monkey or a bird.
All birds fly.
All animals breathe.
If something can fly, then it has wings.
If Rock is neither a fly nor a bird, then Rock neither flies nor breathes.
conclusion: Rock is a monkey.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll mammals are animals.\\nAll monkeys are mammals. \\nAn animal is either a monkey or a bird.\\nAll birds fly.\\nAll animals breathe.\\nIf something can fly, then it has wings.\\nIf Rock is neither a fly nor a bird, then Rock neither flies nor breathes.\\n\\nconclusion: Rock is a monkey.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"70b85180b383d3b9a7ca94a881be9bb8\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll mammals are animals.\\\\nAll monkeys are mammals. \\\\nAn animal is either a monkey or a bird.\\\\nAll birds fly.\\\\nAll animals breathe.\\\\nIf something can fly, then it has wings.\\\\nIf Rock is neither a fly nor a bird, then Rock neither flies nor breathes.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Rock is a monkey.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "70b85180b383d3b9a7ca94a881be9bb8"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "70b85180b383d3b9a7ca94a881be9bb8", "question": "\npremises: \nAll mammals are animals.\nAll monkeys are mammals. \nAn animal is either a monkey or a bird.\nAll birds fly.\nAll animals breathe.\nIf something can fly, then it has wings.\nIf Rock is neither a fly nor a bird, then Rock neither flies nor breathes.\n\nconclusion: Rock is a monkey.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No grass is food.
All meadows are grass.
All edible things are food.
All fruits are edible.
All lemons are fruit.
Grapes are not edible and lemons.
Bananas are grass or fruit.
conclusion: Bananas are a lemon and meadow.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo grass is food. \\nAll meadows are grass.\\nAll edible things are food. \\nAll fruits are edible.\\nAll lemons are fruit.\\nGrapes are not edible and lemons.\\nBananas are grass or fruit.\\n\\nconclusion: Bananas are a lemon and meadow.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"f9cca72e5a34c0b72ebc11d7e3be7f69\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo grass is food. \\\\nAll meadows are grass.\\\\nAll edible things are food. \\\\nAll fruits are edible.\\\\nAll lemons are fruit.\\\\nGrapes are not edible and lemons.\\\\nBananas are grass or fruit.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Bananas are a lemon and meadow.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "f9cca72e5a34c0b72ebc11d7e3be7f69"}
|
False
|
{"id": "f9cca72e5a34c0b72ebc11d7e3be7f69", "question": "\npremises: \nNo grass is food. \nAll meadows are grass.\nAll edible things are food. \nAll fruits are edible.\nAll lemons are fruit.\nGrapes are not edible and lemons.\nBananas are grass or fruit.\n\nconclusion: Bananas are a lemon and meadow.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
The Great Lakes are Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario.
Some major settlements of Lake Erie are in NY, PA, OH, and MI.
NY, PA, OH, MI are states in the US.
ON is a state of Canada.
There is a major settlement of Lake Huron in ON.
All states are in their country.
The US is in North America.
The Great Lakes began to form at the end of the Last Glacial Period.
conclusion: Lake Erie has a major settlement.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThe Great Lakes are Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario.\\nSome major settlements of Lake Erie are in NY, PA, OH, and MI.\\nNY, PA, OH, MI are states in the US.\\nON is a state of Canada.\\nThere is a major settlement of Lake Huron in ON. \\nAll states are in their country.\\nThe US is in North America.\\nThe Great Lakes began to form at the end of the Last Glacial Period.\\n\\nconclusion: Lake Erie has a major settlement.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"ef26e5ade5b9a88ddc4f88538fa5bd52\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThe Great Lakes are Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario.\\\\nSome major settlements of Lake Erie are in NY, PA, OH, and MI.\\\\nNY, PA, OH, MI are states in the US.\\\\nON is a state of Canada.\\\\nThere is a major settlement of Lake Huron in ON. \\\\nAll states are in their country.\\\\nThe US is in North America.\\\\nThe Great Lakes began to form at the end of the Last Glacial Period.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Lake Erie has a major settlement.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "ef26e5ade5b9a88ddc4f88538fa5bd52"}
|
True
|
{"id": "ef26e5ade5b9a88ddc4f88538fa5bd52", "question": "\npremises: \nThe Great Lakes are Lake Superior, Lake Michigan, Lake Huron, Lake Erie, and Lake Ontario.\nSome major settlements of Lake Erie are in NY, PA, OH, and MI.\nNY, PA, OH, MI are states in the US.\nON is a state of Canada.\nThere is a major settlement of Lake Huron in ON. \nAll states are in their country.\nThe US is in North America.\nThe Great Lakes began to form at the end of the Last Glacial Period.\n\nconclusion: Lake Erie has a major settlement.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No easy Leetcode problems have an AC rate lower than 20 percent.
All Leetcode problems recommended to novices are easy.
Leetcode problems either have an AC rate lower than 20 percent or are starred by more than 1 thousand users.
All hard Leetcode problems are starred by more than 1 thousand users.
No Leetcode problems published after 2022 are starred by more than 1 thousand users.
2Sum is not recommended to novices and hard.
4Sum is either starred by more than 1 thousand users and published after 2022, or neither starred by more than 1 thousand users nor published after 2022.
conclusion: 2Sum is an easy Leetcode problem.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo easy Leetcode problems have an AC rate lower than 20 percent. \\nAll Leetcode problems recommended to novices are easy. \\nLeetcode problems either have an AC rate lower than 20 percent or are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\nAll hard Leetcode problems are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\nNo Leetcode problems published after 2022 are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\n2Sum is not recommended to novices and hard. \\n4Sum is either starred by more than 1 thousand users and published after 2022, or neither starred by more than 1 thousand users nor published after 2022. \\n\\nconclusion: 2Sum is an easy Leetcode problem.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"aba6e966ff04ffcfa7cd45611849050e\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo easy Leetcode problems have an AC rate lower than 20 percent. \\\\nAll Leetcode problems recommended to novices are easy. \\\\nLeetcode problems either have an AC rate lower than 20 percent or are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\\\nAll hard Leetcode problems are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\\\nNo Leetcode problems published after 2022 are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \\\\n2Sum is not recommended to novices and hard. \\\\n4Sum is either starred by more than 1 thousand users and published after 2022, or neither starred by more than 1 thousand users nor published after 2022. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: 2Sum is an easy Leetcode problem.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "aba6e966ff04ffcfa7cd45611849050e"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "aba6e966ff04ffcfa7cd45611849050e", "question": "\npremises: \nNo easy Leetcode problems have an AC rate lower than 20 percent. \nAll Leetcode problems recommended to novices are easy. \nLeetcode problems either have an AC rate lower than 20 percent or are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \nAll hard Leetcode problems are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \nNo Leetcode problems published after 2022 are starred by more than 1 thousand users. \n2Sum is not recommended to novices and hard. \n4Sum is either starred by more than 1 thousand users and published after 2022, or neither starred by more than 1 thousand users nor published after 2022. \n\nconclusion: 2Sum is an easy Leetcode problem.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All students learning piano can strike the right notes.
All students who can strike the right note can get the rhythms right.
If a student can get the rhythms right, he will start working on coordination between the left and the right hands.
Some students who start working on coordination between the left and the right hands become good at it. The other students find it challenging.
If John can strike the right notes, get the rhythms right and is good at coordination between right and left hands, then he puts emotions into his playing.
John is a student learning piano.
John does not find coordination between the left and the right hands challenging.
conclusion: John can get the rhythms right.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll students learning piano can strike the right notes. \\nAll students who can strike the right note can get the rhythms right. \\nIf a student can get the rhythms right, he will start working on coordination between the left and the right hands. \\nSome students who start working on coordination between the left and the right hands become good at it. The other students find it challenging. \\nIf John can strike the right notes, get the rhythms right and is good at coordination between right and left hands, then he puts emotions into his playing. \\nJohn is a student learning piano. \\nJohn does not find coordination between the left and the right hands challenging. \\n\\nconclusion: John can get the rhythms right.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"306481760a968a6ee4664d17209c6fc3\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll students learning piano can strike the right notes. \\\\nAll students who can strike the right note can get the rhythms right. \\\\nIf a student can get the rhythms right, he will start working on coordination between the left and the right hands. \\\\nSome students who start working on coordination between the left and the right hands become good at it. The other students find it challenging. \\\\nIf John can strike the right notes, get the rhythms right and is good at coordination between right and left hands, then he puts emotions into his playing. \\\\nJohn is a student learning piano. \\\\nJohn does not find coordination between the left and the right hands challenging. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: John can get the rhythms right.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "306481760a968a6ee4664d17209c6fc3"}
|
True
|
{"id": "306481760a968a6ee4664d17209c6fc3", "question": "\npremises: \nAll students learning piano can strike the right notes. \nAll students who can strike the right note can get the rhythms right. \nIf a student can get the rhythms right, he will start working on coordination between the left and the right hands. \nSome students who start working on coordination between the left and the right hands become good at it. The other students find it challenging. \nIf John can strike the right notes, get the rhythms right and is good at coordination between right and left hands, then he puts emotions into his playing. \nJohn is a student learning piano. \nJohn does not find coordination between the left and the right hands challenging. \n\nconclusion: John can get the rhythms right.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All OS are software.
All Mac are OS.
An OS is either Mac or Windows.
All Windows are convenient.
All software has code.
If something is convenient, then it is popular.
Burger is a piece of code and a Mac.
PyTorch is either Windows and software, or neither Windows nor software.
conclusion: PyTorch is popular and has code.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll OS are software.\\nAll Mac are OS.\\nAn OS is either Mac or Windows.\\nAll Windows are convenient.\\nAll software has code.\\nIf something is convenient, then it is popular.\\nBurger is a piece of code and a Mac.\\nPyTorch is either Windows and software, or neither Windows nor software.\\n\\nconclusion: PyTorch is popular and has code.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"21fce6449648ade289c29d7e4732f780\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll OS are software.\\\\nAll Mac are OS.\\\\nAn OS is either Mac or Windows.\\\\nAll Windows are convenient.\\\\nAll software has code.\\\\nIf something is convenient, then it is popular.\\\\nBurger is a piece of code and a Mac.\\\\nPyTorch is either Windows and software, or neither Windows nor software.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: PyTorch is popular and has code.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "21fce6449648ade289c29d7e4732f780"}
|
True
|
{"id": "21fce6449648ade289c29d7e4732f780", "question": "\npremises: \nAll OS are software.\nAll Mac are OS.\nAn OS is either Mac or Windows.\nAll Windows are convenient.\nAll software has code.\nIf something is convenient, then it is popular.\nBurger is a piece of code and a Mac.\nPyTorch is either Windows and software, or neither Windows nor software.\n\nconclusion: PyTorch is popular and has code.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All people who are respected by others are people who contribute to the country.
If a person is respected by others, then he/she contributes to the country.
All people available to have a visit without any fees are those respected by others.
All Customers who once served in the army are available to have a visit without any fees.
All people who once were sentenced for thief stayed in prison for some time.
All people who once stayed in prison for some time have a bad record in the local state.
James was either once sentenced for thief or stayed in prison for some time.
James is either with a bad record in the local state or respected by others.
conclusion: James contributes to the country, and he once served in the army.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll people who are respected by others are people who contribute to the country. \\nIf a person is respected by others, then he/she contributes to the country. \\nAll people available to have a visit without any fees are those respected by others. \\nAll Customers who once served in the army are available to have a visit without any fees. \\nAll people who once were sentenced for thief stayed in prison for some time. \\nAll people who once stayed in prison for some time have a bad record in the local state. \\nJames was either once sentenced for thief or stayed in prison for some time. \\nJames is either with a bad record in the local state or respected by others. \\n\\nconclusion: James contributes to the country, and he once served in the army.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"dbaf8512d3a34bf7eecc2c16b5dae2db\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll people who are respected by others are people who contribute to the country. \\\\nIf a person is respected by others, then he/she contributes to the country. \\\\nAll people available to have a visit without any fees are those respected by others. \\\\nAll Customers who once served in the army are available to have a visit without any fees. \\\\nAll people who once were sentenced for thief stayed in prison for some time. \\\\nAll people who once stayed in prison for some time have a bad record in the local state. \\\\nJames was either once sentenced for thief or stayed in prison for some time. \\\\nJames is either with a bad record in the local state or respected by others. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: James contributes to the country, and he once served in the army.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "dbaf8512d3a34bf7eecc2c16b5dae2db"}
|
False
|
{"id": "dbaf8512d3a34bf7eecc2c16b5dae2db", "question": "\npremises: \nAll people who are respected by others are people who contribute to the country. \nIf a person is respected by others, then he/she contributes to the country. \nAll people available to have a visit without any fees are those respected by others. \nAll Customers who once served in the army are available to have a visit without any fees. \nAll people who once were sentenced for thief stayed in prison for some time. \nAll people who once stayed in prison for some time have a bad record in the local state. \nJames was either once sentenced for thief or stayed in prison for some time. \nJames is either with a bad record in the local state or respected by others. \n\nconclusion: James contributes to the country, and he once served in the army.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Either present their work at the conference or provide a tutorial session at the conference.
All who present their work at the conference will attend in person.
All those providing a tutorial session at the conference are invited to join the club.
All who attend the conference in person are provided with souvenirs.
All invited to join the club are provided with delicious meals.
All provided with delicious meals are happy to communicate with each other during the dinner.
All provided with delicious meals are invited to take a photo with the audience.
James does not attend the conference in person and is not provided with souvenirs.
conclusion: James is provided with souvenirs.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nEither present their work at the conference or provide a tutorial session at the conference. \\nAll who present their work at the conference will attend in person. \\nAll those providing a tutorial session at the conference are invited to join the club. \\nAll who attend the conference in person are provided with souvenirs. \\nAll invited to join the club are provided with delicious meals. \\nAll provided with delicious meals are happy to communicate with each other during the dinner. \\nAll provided with delicious meals are invited to take a photo with the audience. \\nJames does not attend the conference in person and is not provided with souvenirs.\\n\\nconclusion: James is provided with souvenirs.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"266237e8a72e622a5144f86bed3d53a5\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nEither present their work at the conference or provide a tutorial session at the conference. \\\\nAll who present their work at the conference will attend in person. \\\\nAll those providing a tutorial session at the conference are invited to join the club. \\\\nAll who attend the conference in person are provided with souvenirs. \\\\nAll invited to join the club are provided with delicious meals. \\\\nAll provided with delicious meals are happy to communicate with each other during the dinner. \\\\nAll provided with delicious meals are invited to take a photo with the audience. \\\\nJames does not attend the conference in person and is not provided with souvenirs.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: James is provided with souvenirs.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "266237e8a72e622a5144f86bed3d53a5"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "266237e8a72e622a5144f86bed3d53a5", "question": "\npremises: \nEither present their work at the conference or provide a tutorial session at the conference. \nAll who present their work at the conference will attend in person. \nAll those providing a tutorial session at the conference are invited to join the club. \nAll who attend the conference in person are provided with souvenirs. \nAll invited to join the club are provided with delicious meals. \nAll provided with delicious meals are happy to communicate with each other during the dinner. \nAll provided with delicious meals are invited to take a photo with the audience. \nJames does not attend the conference in person and is not provided with souvenirs.\n\nconclusion: James is provided with souvenirs.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Everything is either big or small.
All big things are heavy.
All small things are light.
All heavy things are still.
All light things are unstable.
All unstable things are changing.
All unstable things are kinetic.
A bird is not both heavy and still.
conclusion: A bird is kinetic or changing.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nEverything is either big or small.\\nAll big things are heavy. \\nAll small things are light. \\nAll heavy things are still.\\nAll light things are unstable.\\nAll unstable things are changing.\\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \\nA bird is not both heavy and still.\\n\\nconclusion: A bird is kinetic or changing.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"4182ea5197aa4730e1466e1bc5ed6c50\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nEverything is either big or small.\\\\nAll big things are heavy. \\\\nAll small things are light. \\\\nAll heavy things are still.\\\\nAll light things are unstable.\\\\nAll unstable things are changing.\\\\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \\\\nA bird is not both heavy and still.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: A bird is kinetic or changing.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "4182ea5197aa4730e1466e1bc5ed6c50"}
|
True
|
{"id": "4182ea5197aa4730e1466e1bc5ed6c50", "question": "\npremises: \nEverything is either big or small.\nAll big things are heavy. \nAll small things are light. \nAll heavy things are still.\nAll light things are unstable.\nAll unstable things are changing.\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \nA bird is not both heavy and still.\n\nconclusion: A bird is kinetic or changing.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Pets are allowed in some managed buildings.
[BG] A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.
The security deposit can be either equal to one month's rent or more.
Fluffy is Tom's cat.
Cats are pets.
The Olive Garden is a managed building.
The monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.
Tom will rent an apartment in a managed building if and only if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.
2000$ is more than $1500.
conclusion: Tom is allowed to move in an apartment in The Olive Garden with Fluffy.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nPets are allowed in some managed buildings.\\n[BG] A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.\\nThe security deposit can be either equal to one month's rent or more.\\nFluffy is Tom's cat.\\nCats are pets.\\nThe Olive Garden is a managed building.\\nThe monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.\\nTom will rent an apartment in a managed building if and only if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.\\n2000$ is more than $1500.\\n\\nconclusion: Tom is allowed to move in an apartment in The Olive Garden with Fluffy.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"4a240397c4277f69e59fab8a72e2e0bc\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nPets are allowed in some managed buildings.\\\\n[BG] A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.\\\\nThe security deposit can be either equal to one month's rent or more.\\\\nFluffy is Tom's cat.\\\\nCats are pets.\\\\nThe Olive Garden is a managed building.\\\\nThe monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.\\\\nTom will rent an apartment in a managed building if and only if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.\\\\n2000$ is more than $1500.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Tom is allowed to move in an apartment in The Olive Garden with Fluffy.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "4a240397c4277f69e59fab8a72e2e0bc"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "4a240397c4277f69e59fab8a72e2e0bc", "question": "\npremises: \nPets are allowed in some managed buildings.\n[BG] A deposit is required to rent an apartment in a managed building.\nThe security deposit can be either equal to one month's rent or more.\nFluffy is Tom's cat.\nCats are pets.\nThe Olive Garden is a managed building.\nThe monthly rent at the Olive Garden is $2000.\nTom will rent an apartment in a managed building if and only if he is allowed to move in with Fluffy, and the security deposit is no more than $1500.\n2000$ is more than $1500.\n\nconclusion: Tom is allowed to move in an apartment in The Olive Garden with Fluffy.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Thick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.
Thick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.
If a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.
The fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.
The Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.
Attolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.
Thick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.
conclusion: Thick as Thieves is not set in the mede empire.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\\n\\nconclusion: Thick as Thieves is not set in the mede empire.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"e6f4381b97d04c7a88c65c2a6f0ac252\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\\\\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\\\\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\\\\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\\\\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\\\\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\\\\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Thick as Thieves is not set in the mede empire.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "e6f4381b97d04c7a88c65c2a6f0ac252"}
|
False
|
{"id": "e6f4381b97d04c7a88c65c2a6f0ac252", "question": "\npremises: \nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\n\nconclusion: Thick as Thieves is not set in the mede empire.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Everything is either big or small.
All big things are heavy.
All small things are light.
All heavy things are still.
All light things are unstable.
All unstable things are changing.
All unstable things are kinetic.
A bird is not both heavy and still.
conclusion: A bird is still.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nEverything is either big or small.\\nAll big things are heavy. \\nAll small things are light. \\nAll heavy things are still.\\nAll light things are unstable.\\nAll unstable things are changing.\\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \\nA bird is not both heavy and still.\\n\\nconclusion: A bird is still.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"868726e953fb19038084c4de5dd7fc75\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nEverything is either big or small.\\\\nAll big things are heavy. \\\\nAll small things are light. \\\\nAll heavy things are still.\\\\nAll light things are unstable.\\\\nAll unstable things are changing.\\\\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \\\\nA bird is not both heavy and still.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: A bird is still.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "868726e953fb19038084c4de5dd7fc75"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "868726e953fb19038084c4de5dd7fc75", "question": "\npremises: \nEverything is either big or small.\nAll big things are heavy. \nAll small things are light. \nAll heavy things are still.\nAll light things are unstable.\nAll unstable things are changing.\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \nA bird is not both heavy and still.\n\nconclusion: A bird is still.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All rental cars cost the renter money.
Whenever Sarah goes to Vermont, Sarah drives there.
For someone who does not own a car to drive somewhere, they must either borrow a car or rent a car.
Sarah doesn’t own a car.
Sarah never borrows a car to go camping.
Sarah is going to go camping in Vermont this weekend.
To go camping somewhere, you must go to that place.
conclusion: Sarah will spend money this weekend.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll rental cars cost the renter money.\\nWhenever Sarah goes to Vermont, Sarah drives there.\\nFor someone who does not own a car to drive somewhere, they must either borrow a car or rent a car.\\nSarah doesn\\u2019t own a car.\\nSarah never borrows a car to go camping.\\nSarah is going to go camping in Vermont this weekend.\\nTo go camping somewhere, you must go to that place.\\n\\nconclusion: Sarah will spend money this weekend.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"85a3aafeb37a9c6e36936ed32ad7b87a\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll rental cars cost the renter money.\\\\nWhenever Sarah goes to Vermont, Sarah drives there.\\\\nFor someone who does not own a car to drive somewhere, they must either borrow a car or rent a car.\\\\nSarah doesn\\\\u2019t own a car.\\\\nSarah never borrows a car to go camping.\\\\nSarah is going to go camping in Vermont this weekend.\\\\nTo go camping somewhere, you must go to that place.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Sarah will spend money this weekend.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "85a3aafeb37a9c6e36936ed32ad7b87a"}
|
True
|
{"id": "85a3aafeb37a9c6e36936ed32ad7b87a", "question": "\npremises: \nAll rental cars cost the renter money.\nWhenever Sarah goes to Vermont, Sarah drives there.\nFor someone who does not own a car to drive somewhere, they must either borrow a car or rent a car.\nSarah doesn\u2019t own a car.\nSarah never borrows a car to go camping.\nSarah is going to go camping in Vermont this weekend.\nTo go camping somewhere, you must go to that place.\n\nconclusion: Sarah will spend money this weekend.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
The only types of mammals that lay eggs are platypuses and echidnas.
Platypuses are not hyrax.
Echidnas are not hyrax.
No mammals are invertebrates.
All animals are either vertebrates or invertebrates.
Mammals are animals.
Hyraxes are mammals.
Grebes lay eggs.
Grebes are not platypuses and also not echidnas.
conclusion: Platypuses are vertebrates.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThe only types of mammals that lay eggs are platypuses and echidnas.\\nPlatypuses are not hyrax.\\nEchidnas are not hyrax.\\nNo mammals are invertebrates.\\nAll animals are either vertebrates or invertebrates.\\nMammals are animals.\\nHyraxes are mammals.\\nGrebes lay eggs.\\nGrebes are not platypuses and also not echidnas.\\n\\nconclusion: Platypuses are vertebrates.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"b6ca92568fbe921c59c697f57b353738\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThe only types of mammals that lay eggs are platypuses and echidnas.\\\\nPlatypuses are not hyrax.\\\\nEchidnas are not hyrax.\\\\nNo mammals are invertebrates.\\\\nAll animals are either vertebrates or invertebrates.\\\\nMammals are animals.\\\\nHyraxes are mammals.\\\\nGrebes lay eggs.\\\\nGrebes are not platypuses and also not echidnas.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Platypuses are vertebrates.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "b6ca92568fbe921c59c697f57b353738"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "b6ca92568fbe921c59c697f57b353738", "question": "\npremises: \nThe only types of mammals that lay eggs are platypuses and echidnas.\nPlatypuses are not hyrax.\nEchidnas are not hyrax.\nNo mammals are invertebrates.\nAll animals are either vertebrates or invertebrates.\nMammals are animals.\nHyraxes are mammals.\nGrebes lay eggs.\nGrebes are not platypuses and also not echidnas.\n\nconclusion: Platypuses are vertebrates.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If something can go underwater, then it enjoys water.
All animals that can swim can go underwater.
Either an animal can swim or it can walk.
Animals that can walk travel on land.
Animals that enjoy water splash water around.
Every animal that travels on land enjoys basking in the sun.
George splashes water around and can swim.
Liam is either an animal that can walk and enjoys water, or is neither an animal that can walk nor enjoys water.
conclusion: George enjoys basking in the sun.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf something can go underwater, then it enjoys water.\\nAll animals that can swim can go underwater.\\nEither an animal can swim or it can walk.\\nAnimals that can walk travel on land.\\nAnimals that enjoy water splash water around.\\nEvery animal that travels on land enjoys basking in the sun.\\nGeorge splashes water around and can swim.\\nLiam is either an animal that can walk and enjoys water, or is neither an animal that can walk nor enjoys water.\\n\\nconclusion: George enjoys basking in the sun.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"fe0f2ead321d632fdc775058ede07d60\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf something can go underwater, then it enjoys water.\\\\nAll animals that can swim can go underwater.\\\\nEither an animal can swim or it can walk.\\\\nAnimals that can walk travel on land.\\\\nAnimals that enjoy water splash water around.\\\\nEvery animal that travels on land enjoys basking in the sun.\\\\nGeorge splashes water around and can swim.\\\\nLiam is either an animal that can walk and enjoys water, or is neither an animal that can walk nor enjoys water.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: George enjoys basking in the sun.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "fe0f2ead321d632fdc775058ede07d60"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "fe0f2ead321d632fdc775058ede07d60", "question": "\npremises: \nIf something can go underwater, then it enjoys water.\nAll animals that can swim can go underwater.\nEither an animal can swim or it can walk.\nAnimals that can walk travel on land.\nAnimals that enjoy water splash water around.\nEvery animal that travels on land enjoys basking in the sun.\nGeorge splashes water around and can swim.\nLiam is either an animal that can walk and enjoys water, or is neither an animal that can walk nor enjoys water.\n\nconclusion: George enjoys basking in the sun.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Everyone that uses a football can throw a football.
If someone plays football, then they use a football.
Either someone is a football player or a basketball player.
Every basketball player is tall.
Everyone that can throw a football can throw a football with a spiral.
If someone is tall, then they are in shape.
If Jack is neither tall nor a basketball player, then Jack is neither tall nor can throw a football.
conclusion: Jack plays football.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nEveryone that uses a football can throw a football.\\nIf someone plays football, then they use a football.\\nEither someone is a football player or a basketball player.\\nEvery basketball player is tall.\\nEveryone that can throw a football can throw a football with a spiral.\\nIf someone is tall, then they are in shape.\\nIf Jack is neither tall nor a basketball player, then Jack is neither tall nor can throw a football.\\n\\nconclusion: Jack plays football.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"e8fd24e9ab5bdd4d1a114b0b6b6b744a\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nEveryone that uses a football can throw a football.\\\\nIf someone plays football, then they use a football.\\\\nEither someone is a football player or a basketball player.\\\\nEvery basketball player is tall.\\\\nEveryone that can throw a football can throw a football with a spiral.\\\\nIf someone is tall, then they are in shape.\\\\nIf Jack is neither tall nor a basketball player, then Jack is neither tall nor can throw a football.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Jack plays football.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "e8fd24e9ab5bdd4d1a114b0b6b6b744a"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "e8fd24e9ab5bdd4d1a114b0b6b6b744a", "question": "\npremises: \nEveryone that uses a football can throw a football.\nIf someone plays football, then they use a football.\nEither someone is a football player or a basketball player.\nEvery basketball player is tall.\nEveryone that can throw a football can throw a football with a spiral.\nIf someone is tall, then they are in shape.\nIf Jack is neither tall nor a basketball player, then Jack is neither tall nor can throw a football.\n\nconclusion: Jack plays football.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Thick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.
Thick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.
If a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.
The fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.
The Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.
Attolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.
Thick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.
conclusion: Megan Whalen Turner did not work with Greenwillow Books.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\\n\\nconclusion: Megan Whalen Turner did not work with Greenwillow Books.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"6ae80485017350a8c45d1fe13975cf76\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\\\\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\\\\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\\\\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\\\\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\\\\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\\\\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Megan Whalen Turner did not work with Greenwillow Books.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "6ae80485017350a8c45d1fe13975cf76"}
|
False
|
{"id": "6ae80485017350a8c45d1fe13975cf76", "question": "\npremises: \nThick as Thieves is a young adult fantasy novel, written by Megan Whalen Turner.\nThick as Thieves was published by Greenwillow Books.\nIf a book was published by a company, than the author of that book worked with the company that published the book.\nThe fictional Mede Empire is where Thick as Thieves is set.\nThe Mede Empire plots to swallow up some nearby countries.\nAttolia and Sounis are countries near the Mede Empire.\nThick as Thieves was sold both as a hardcover and an e-book.\n\nconclusion: Megan Whalen Turner did not work with Greenwillow Books.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All video applications are software.
All YouTube-related applications are video applications.
An APP is either related to YouTube or Instagram.
All Instagram is entertainment.
All software is programmed.
All entertainments are interesting.
If something is interesting, then it is good.
TikTok is not good.
conclusion: Tiktok is a program.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll video applications are software.\\nAll YouTube-related applications are video applications. \\nAn APP is either related to YouTube or Instagram.\\nAll Instagram is entertainment. \\nAll software is programmed. \\nAll entertainments are interesting.\\nIf something is interesting, then it is good.\\nTikTok is not good.\\n\\nconclusion: Tiktok is a program.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"d016630fa4643c467ff716ca7ca9b91d\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll video applications are software.\\\\nAll YouTube-related applications are video applications. \\\\nAn APP is either related to YouTube or Instagram.\\\\nAll Instagram is entertainment. \\\\nAll software is programmed. \\\\nAll entertainments are interesting.\\\\nIf something is interesting, then it is good.\\\\nTikTok is not good.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Tiktok is a program.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "d016630fa4643c467ff716ca7ca9b91d"}
|
True
|
{"id": "d016630fa4643c467ff716ca7ca9b91d", "question": "\npremises: \nAll video applications are software.\nAll YouTube-related applications are video applications. \nAn APP is either related to YouTube or Instagram.\nAll Instagram is entertainment. \nAll software is programmed. \nAll entertainments are interesting.\nIf something is interesting, then it is good.\nTikTok is not good.\n\nconclusion: Tiktok is a program.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If someone yells, then they are not cool.
If someone is angry, then they yell.
If someone flies, then they are cool.
Every person that knows magic can fly.
All wizards know magic.
Harry either yells and flies, or neither yells nor flies.
Potter is a wizard and flies.
conclusion: Harry is neither a wizard nor angry.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf someone yells, then they are not cool.\\nIf someone is angry, then they yell.\\nIf someone flies, then they are cool.\\nEvery person that knows magic can fly.\\nAll wizards know magic.\\nHarry either yells and flies, or neither yells nor flies.\\nPotter is a wizard and flies.\\n\\nconclusion: Harry is neither a wizard nor angry.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"0775f4da65f177fb5c8a363812a3935f\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf someone yells, then they are not cool.\\\\nIf someone is angry, then they yell.\\\\nIf someone flies, then they are cool.\\\\nEvery person that knows magic can fly.\\\\nAll wizards know magic.\\\\nHarry either yells and flies, or neither yells nor flies.\\\\nPotter is a wizard and flies.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Harry is neither a wizard nor angry.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "0775f4da65f177fb5c8a363812a3935f"}
|
True
|
{"id": "0775f4da65f177fb5c8a363812a3935f", "question": "\npremises: \nIf someone yells, then they are not cool.\nIf someone is angry, then they yell.\nIf someone flies, then they are cool.\nEvery person that knows magic can fly.\nAll wizards know magic.\nHarry either yells and flies, or neither yells nor flies.\nPotter is a wizard and flies.\n\nconclusion: Harry is neither a wizard nor angry.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All young adults go on a diet.
All college students are young adults.
All Yale students are college students.
Someone is either a Yale student or a Harvard student.
All Harvard students are diligent.
If Susan is a Harvard student, then she is a young adult.
If Susan is a Yale student, then she does not go on a diet.
conclusion: Susan does not go on a diet and is diligent.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll young adults go on a diet.\\nAll college students are young adults.\\nAll Yale students are college students.\\nSomeone is either a Yale student or a Harvard student.\\nAll Harvard students are diligent.\\nIf Susan is a Harvard student, then she is a young adult.\\nIf Susan is a Yale student, then she does not go on a diet.\\n\\nconclusion: Susan does not go on a diet and is diligent.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"d83db569f47f102d2a8a30a1195a732d\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll young adults go on a diet.\\\\nAll college students are young adults.\\\\nAll Yale students are college students.\\\\nSomeone is either a Yale student or a Harvard student.\\\\nAll Harvard students are diligent.\\\\nIf Susan is a Harvard student, then she is a young adult.\\\\nIf Susan is a Yale student, then she does not go on a diet.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Susan does not go on a diet and is diligent.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "d83db569f47f102d2a8a30a1195a732d"}
|
False
|
{"id": "d83db569f47f102d2a8a30a1195a732d", "question": "\npremises: \nAll young adults go on a diet.\nAll college students are young adults.\nAll Yale students are college students.\nSomeone is either a Yale student or a Harvard student.\nAll Harvard students are diligent.\nIf Susan is a Harvard student, then she is a young adult.\nIf Susan is a Yale student, then she does not go on a diet.\n\nconclusion: Susan does not go on a diet and is diligent.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No buildings in New Haven are higher than 400 meters.
All buildings managed by Yale Housing are in New Haven.
All buildings in Manhattan are higher than 400 meters.
All buildings owned by Bloomberg are in Manhattan.
All buildings with the Bloomberg logo are buildings owned by Bloomberg.
Tower A is neither in New Haven nor in Manhattan.
Tower B is a building with the Bloomberg logo and in Manhattan.
conclusion: Tower A is not higher than 400 meters.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo buildings in New Haven are higher than 400 meters. \\nAll buildings managed by Yale Housing are in New Haven. \\nAll buildings in Manhattan are higher than 400 meters. \\nAll buildings owned by Bloomberg are in Manhattan. \\nAll buildings with the Bloomberg logo are buildings owned by Bloomberg. \\nTower A is neither in New Haven nor in Manhattan.\\nTower B is a building with the Bloomberg logo and in Manhattan. \\n\\nconclusion: Tower A is not higher than 400 meters.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"c823bd888bc9e9b7d78417ebdeb8f61a\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo buildings in New Haven are higher than 400 meters. \\\\nAll buildings managed by Yale Housing are in New Haven. \\\\nAll buildings in Manhattan are higher than 400 meters. \\\\nAll buildings owned by Bloomberg are in Manhattan. \\\\nAll buildings with the Bloomberg logo are buildings owned by Bloomberg. \\\\nTower A is neither in New Haven nor in Manhattan.\\\\nTower B is a building with the Bloomberg logo and in Manhattan. \\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Tower A is not higher than 400 meters.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "c823bd888bc9e9b7d78417ebdeb8f61a"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "c823bd888bc9e9b7d78417ebdeb8f61a", "question": "\npremises: \nNo buildings in New Haven are higher than 400 meters. \nAll buildings managed by Yale Housing are in New Haven. \nAll buildings in Manhattan are higher than 400 meters. \nAll buildings owned by Bloomberg are in Manhattan. \nAll buildings with the Bloomberg logo are buildings owned by Bloomberg. \nTower A is neither in New Haven nor in Manhattan.\nTower B is a building with the Bloomberg logo and in Manhattan. \n\nconclusion: Tower A is not higher than 400 meters.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
No songs are visual.
All folk songs are songs.
All videos are visual.
All movies are videos.
All sci-fi movies are movies.
Inception is a sci-fi movie.
Mac is neither a folk song nor a sci-fi movie.
conclusion: Inception is either a video or a folk song.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nNo songs are visual. \\nAll folk songs are songs. \\nAll videos are visual. \\nAll movies are videos.\\nAll sci-fi movies are movies.\\nInception is a sci-fi movie.\\nMac is neither a folk song nor a sci-fi movie.\\n\\nconclusion: Inception is either a video or a folk song.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"e983f551cb0ed1dde25ae9fcd41b11c4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nNo songs are visual. \\\\nAll folk songs are songs. \\\\nAll videos are visual. \\\\nAll movies are videos.\\\\nAll sci-fi movies are movies.\\\\nInception is a sci-fi movie.\\\\nMac is neither a folk song nor a sci-fi movie.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Inception is either a video or a folk song.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "e983f551cb0ed1dde25ae9fcd41b11c4"}
|
True
|
{"id": "e983f551cb0ed1dde25ae9fcd41b11c4", "question": "\npremises: \nNo songs are visual. \nAll folk songs are songs. \nAll videos are visual. \nAll movies are videos.\nAll sci-fi movies are movies.\nInception is a sci-fi movie.\nMac is neither a folk song nor a sci-fi movie.\n\nconclusion: Inception is either a video or a folk song.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All video applications are software.
All YouTube-related applications are video applications.
An APP is either related to YouTube or Instagram.
All Instagram is entertainment.
All software is programmed.
All entertainments are interesting.
If something is interesting, then it is good.
TikTok is not good.
conclusion: Tiktok is not both related to youtube and a program.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll video applications are software.\\nAll YouTube-related applications are video applications. \\nAn APP is either related to YouTube or Instagram.\\nAll Instagram is entertainment. \\nAll software is programmed. \\nAll entertainments are interesting.\\nIf something is interesting, then it is good.\\nTikTok is not good.\\n\\nconclusion: Tiktok is not both related to youtube and a program.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"6ef5f5bb5c091909844384c845c55898\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll video applications are software.\\\\nAll YouTube-related applications are video applications. \\\\nAn APP is either related to YouTube or Instagram.\\\\nAll Instagram is entertainment. \\\\nAll software is programmed. \\\\nAll entertainments are interesting.\\\\nIf something is interesting, then it is good.\\\\nTikTok is not good.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Tiktok is not both related to youtube and a program.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "6ef5f5bb5c091909844384c845c55898"}
|
False
|
{"id": "6ef5f5bb5c091909844384c845c55898", "question": "\npremises: \nAll video applications are software.\nAll YouTube-related applications are video applications. \nAn APP is either related to YouTube or Instagram.\nAll Instagram is entertainment. \nAll software is programmed. \nAll entertainments are interesting.\nIf something is interesting, then it is good.\nTikTok is not good.\n\nconclusion: Tiktok is not both related to youtube and a program.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
A student who loves shrieking will be punished.
If a person swears, then he is a student.
If someone is a teacher, then Bob will talk to him.
All gentlemen are in a suit.
All teachers are men.
There is a teacher.
If someone is not a gentlemen, then he is not nice.
Willy is nice.
Bob loves shrieking and swearing.
conclusion: There is a man that Bob will talk to.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nA student who loves shrieking will be punished.\\nIf a person swears, then he is a student.\\nIf someone is a teacher, then Bob will talk to him.\\nAll gentlemen are in a suit.\\nAll teachers are men.\\nThere is a teacher.\\nIf someone is not a gentlemen, then he is not nice.\\nWilly is nice.\\nBob loves shrieking and swearing.\\n\\nconclusion: There is a man that Bob will talk to.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"5210c764d928db961a01fd4b52485ffc\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nA student who loves shrieking will be punished.\\\\nIf a person swears, then he is a student.\\\\nIf someone is a teacher, then Bob will talk to him.\\\\nAll gentlemen are in a suit.\\\\nAll teachers are men.\\\\nThere is a teacher.\\\\nIf someone is not a gentlemen, then he is not nice.\\\\nWilly is nice.\\\\nBob loves shrieking and swearing.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: There is a man that Bob will talk to.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "5210c764d928db961a01fd4b52485ffc"}
|
True
|
{"id": "5210c764d928db961a01fd4b52485ffc", "question": "\npremises: \nA student who loves shrieking will be punished.\nIf a person swears, then he is a student.\nIf someone is a teacher, then Bob will talk to him.\nAll gentlemen are in a suit.\nAll teachers are men.\nThere is a teacher.\nIf someone is not a gentlemen, then he is not nice.\nWilly is nice.\nBob loves shrieking and swearing.\n\nconclusion: There is a man that Bob will talk to.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Peter Parker is a either a superhero or a civilian.
The Hulk is a destroyer.
The Hulk wakes up when he is angry.
If the Hulk wakes up, then he will break a bridge.
Thor is a god.
Thor will break a bridge when he is happy.
A god is not a destroyer and a destroyer is not a god.
Peter Parker wears a uniform when he is a superhero.
Peter Parker is not a civilian if and only if a destroyer is breaking a bridge.
If Thor is happy, the Hulk is angry.
conclusion: If the Hulk does not wake up, then Thor is not happy.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nPeter Parker is a either a superhero or a civilian.\\nThe Hulk is a destroyer.\\nThe Hulk wakes up when he is angry.\\nIf the Hulk wakes up, then he will break a bridge.\\nThor is a god.\\nThor will break a bridge when he is happy.\\nA god is not a destroyer and a destroyer is not a god.\\nPeter Parker wears a uniform when he is a superhero.\\nPeter Parker is not a civilian if and only if a destroyer is breaking a bridge.\\nIf Thor is happy, the Hulk is angry.\\n\\nconclusion: If the Hulk does not wake up, then Thor is not happy.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"829df8f147de36623b075a6e4535d8b3\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nPeter Parker is a either a superhero or a civilian.\\\\nThe Hulk is a destroyer.\\\\nThe Hulk wakes up when he is angry.\\\\nIf the Hulk wakes up, then he will break a bridge.\\\\nThor is a god.\\\\nThor will break a bridge when he is happy.\\\\nA god is not a destroyer and a destroyer is not a god.\\\\nPeter Parker wears a uniform when he is a superhero.\\\\nPeter Parker is not a civilian if and only if a destroyer is breaking a bridge.\\\\nIf Thor is happy, the Hulk is angry.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If the Hulk does not wake up, then Thor is not happy.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "829df8f147de36623b075a6e4535d8b3"}
|
True
|
{"id": "829df8f147de36623b075a6e4535d8b3", "question": "\npremises: \nPeter Parker is a either a superhero or a civilian.\nThe Hulk is a destroyer.\nThe Hulk wakes up when he is angry.\nIf the Hulk wakes up, then he will break a bridge.\nThor is a god.\nThor will break a bridge when he is happy.\nA god is not a destroyer and a destroyer is not a god.\nPeter Parker wears a uniform when he is a superhero.\nPeter Parker is not a civilian if and only if a destroyer is breaking a bridge.\nIf Thor is happy, the Hulk is angry.\n\nconclusion: If the Hulk does not wake up, then Thor is not happy.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Barbara Ann Marshall is a former swimmer and former world record-holder.
Barbara Ann Marshall participated in the 1972 Summer Olympics.
Barbara Ann Marshall's home country is the United States.
All people who compete in the 1972 Summer Olympics represent their home country.
Barbara Ann Marshall participated in the preliminary heat in the freestyle relay.
Barbara Ann Marshall did not participate in the event final of the 1972 Summer Olympics freestyle relay.
Only relay swimmers who participated in the event final received medals.
conclusion: Barbara Ann Marshall represented the United States in the 1972 Summer Olympics.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nBarbara Ann Marshall is a former swimmer and former world record-holder.\\nBarbara Ann Marshall participated in the 1972 Summer Olympics.\\nBarbara Ann Marshall's home country is the United States.\\nAll people who compete in the 1972 Summer Olympics represent their home country.\\nBarbara Ann Marshall participated in the preliminary heat in the freestyle relay.\\nBarbara Ann Marshall did not participate in the event final of the 1972 Summer Olympics freestyle relay.\\nOnly relay swimmers who participated in the event final received medals.\\n\\nconclusion: Barbara Ann Marshall represented the United States in the 1972 Summer Olympics.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"174dfb49192d7345eba80ac93b80869a\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nBarbara Ann Marshall is a former swimmer and former world record-holder.\\\\nBarbara Ann Marshall participated in the 1972 Summer Olympics.\\\\nBarbara Ann Marshall's home country is the United States.\\\\nAll people who compete in the 1972 Summer Olympics represent their home country.\\\\nBarbara Ann Marshall participated in the preliminary heat in the freestyle relay.\\\\nBarbara Ann Marshall did not participate in the event final of the 1972 Summer Olympics freestyle relay.\\\\nOnly relay swimmers who participated in the event final received medals.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Barbara Ann Marshall represented the United States in the 1972 Summer Olympics.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "174dfb49192d7345eba80ac93b80869a"}
|
True
|
{"id": "174dfb49192d7345eba80ac93b80869a", "question": "\npremises: \nBarbara Ann Marshall is a former swimmer and former world record-holder.\nBarbara Ann Marshall participated in the 1972 Summer Olympics.\nBarbara Ann Marshall's home country is the United States.\nAll people who compete in the 1972 Summer Olympics represent their home country.\nBarbara Ann Marshall participated in the preliminary heat in the freestyle relay.\nBarbara Ann Marshall did not participate in the event final of the 1972 Summer Olympics freestyle relay.\nOnly relay swimmers who participated in the event final received medals.\n\nconclusion: Barbara Ann Marshall represented the United States in the 1972 Summer Olympics.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Everything is either big or small.
All big things are heavy.
All small things are light.
All heavy things are still.
All light things are unstable.
All unstable things are changing.
All unstable things are kinetic.
A bird is not both heavy and still.
conclusion: If a bird is small or still, then the bird is either kinetic or changing.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nEverything is either big or small.\\nAll big things are heavy. \\nAll small things are light. \\nAll heavy things are still.\\nAll light things are unstable.\\nAll unstable things are changing.\\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \\nA bird is not both heavy and still.\\n\\nconclusion: If a bird is small or still, then the bird is either kinetic or changing.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"1c80c7f95691fef2451b96b32efb88f8\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nEverything is either big or small.\\\\nAll big things are heavy. \\\\nAll small things are light. \\\\nAll heavy things are still.\\\\nAll light things are unstable.\\\\nAll unstable things are changing.\\\\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \\\\nA bird is not both heavy and still.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: If a bird is small or still, then the bird is either kinetic or changing.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "1c80c7f95691fef2451b96b32efb88f8"}
|
False
|
{"id": "1c80c7f95691fef2451b96b32efb88f8", "question": "\npremises: \nEverything is either big or small.\nAll big things are heavy. \nAll small things are light. \nAll heavy things are still.\nAll light things are unstable.\nAll unstable things are changing.\nAll unstable things are kinetic. \nA bird is not both heavy and still.\n\nconclusion: If a bird is small or still, then the bird is either kinetic or changing.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Symphony No. 9 is a music piece.
Composers write music pieces.
Beethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.
Vienna Music Society is an orchestra.
Beethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.
Orchestras are led by conductors.
conclusion: Some orchestras premiered music pieces.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nSymphony No. 9 is a music piece.\\nComposers write music pieces.\\nBeethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.\\nVienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.\\nVienna Music Society is an orchestra.\\nBeethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.\\nOrchestras are led by conductors.\\n\\nconclusion: Some orchestras premiered music pieces.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"435a347c4a13531e9927f9b3cbef7dd8\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nSymphony No. 9 is a music piece.\\\\nComposers write music pieces.\\\\nBeethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.\\\\nVienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.\\\\nVienna Music Society is an orchestra.\\\\nBeethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.\\\\nOrchestras are led by conductors.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Some orchestras premiered music pieces.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "435a347c4a13531e9927f9b3cbef7dd8"}
|
True
|
{"id": "435a347c4a13531e9927f9b3cbef7dd8", "question": "\npremises: \nSymphony No. 9 is a music piece.\nComposers write music pieces.\nBeethoven wrote Symphony No. 9.\nVienna Music Society premiered Symphony No. 9.\nVienna Music Society is an orchestra.\nBeethoven leads the Vienna Music Society.\nOrchestras are led by conductors.\n\nconclusion: Some orchestras premiered music pieces.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Boves is a railway station located in France.
The preceding station of Boves is Longueau.
The preceding station of Dommartin is Boves.
France is a European country.
Dommartin is situated on the Paris–Lille railway.
Any two contiguous stations are on the same railway.
Boves is served by regional TER Hauts-de-France trains.
If A is located in B and B is located in C, then A is located in C.
If A precedes B and B preceds C, than A preceds C.
conclusion: Boves is not in Europe.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nBoves is a railway station located in France. \\nThe preceding station of Boves is Longueau.\\nThe preceding station of Dommartin is Boves.\\nFrance is a European country.\\nDommartin is situated on the Paris\\u2013Lille railway. \\nAny two contiguous stations are on the same railway.\\nBoves is served by regional TER Hauts-de-France trains.\\nIf A is located in B and B is located in C, then A is located in C.\\nIf A precedes B and B preceds C, than A preceds C.\\n\\nconclusion: Boves is not in Europe.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"False\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"5007ed8e03bb32769d09bf004fab8de4\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nBoves is a railway station located in France. \\\\nThe preceding station of Boves is Longueau.\\\\nThe preceding station of Dommartin is Boves.\\\\nFrance is a European country.\\\\nDommartin is situated on the Paris\\\\u2013Lille railway. \\\\nAny two contiguous stations are on the same railway.\\\\nBoves is served by regional TER Hauts-de-France trains.\\\\nIf A is located in B and B is located in C, then A is located in C.\\\\nIf A precedes B and B preceds C, than A preceds C.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Boves is not in Europe.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"False\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "5007ed8e03bb32769d09bf004fab8de4"}
|
False
|
{"id": "5007ed8e03bb32769d09bf004fab8de4", "question": "\npremises: \nBoves is a railway station located in France. \nThe preceding station of Boves is Longueau.\nThe preceding station of Dommartin is Boves.\nFrance is a European country.\nDommartin is situated on the Paris\u2013Lille railway. \nAny two contiguous stations are on the same railway.\nBoves is served by regional TER Hauts-de-France trains.\nIf A is located in B and B is located in C, then A is located in C.\nIf A precedes B and B preceds C, than A preceds C.\n\nconclusion: Boves is not in Europe.\n", "answer": "False", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
If you are on the payroll, then you are being paid by the school.
If someone has a job at a school, then they are on the payroll.
All faculty members have a job at a school.
One can either be a faculty member or a teacher.
Every teacher has students.
If Nancy is a teacher, then they are on the payroll.
If Nancy is not a teacher, then they are not paid by the school.
conclusion: Nancy is paid by the school and has students.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nIf you are on the payroll, then you are being paid by the school.\\nIf someone has a job at a school, then they are on the payroll.\\nAll faculty members have a job at a school.\\nOne can either be a faculty member or a teacher.\\nEvery teacher has students.\\nIf Nancy is a teacher, then they are on the payroll.\\nIf Nancy is not a teacher, then they are not paid by the school.\\n\\nconclusion: Nancy is paid by the school and has students.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"12b66d7f6c107fec0f7b286c94db90d0\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nIf you are on the payroll, then you are being paid by the school.\\\\nIf someone has a job at a school, then they are on the payroll.\\\\nAll faculty members have a job at a school.\\\\nOne can either be a faculty member or a teacher.\\\\nEvery teacher has students.\\\\nIf Nancy is a teacher, then they are on the payroll.\\\\nIf Nancy is not a teacher, then they are not paid by the school.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Nancy is paid by the school and has students.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "12b66d7f6c107fec0f7b286c94db90d0"}
|
True
|
{"id": "12b66d7f6c107fec0f7b286c94db90d0", "question": "\npremises: \nIf you are on the payroll, then you are being paid by the school.\nIf someone has a job at a school, then they are on the payroll.\nAll faculty members have a job at a school.\nOne can either be a faculty member or a teacher.\nEvery teacher has students.\nIf Nancy is a teacher, then they are on the payroll.\nIf Nancy is not a teacher, then they are not paid by the school.\n\nconclusion: Nancy is paid by the school and has students.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
A podcast is not a novel.
[BG] If a person is born in American City, the person is American.
[BG] If a book is novel and it is written by a person, then the person is a novel writer.
Dani Shapiro is an American writer.
Family History is written by Dani Shapiro.
Family History is a novel written in 2003.
Dani Shapiro created a podcast called Family Secrets.
[BG] Boston is an American city.
conclusion: Dani Shapiro is a novel writer.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nA podcast is not a novel.\\n[BG] If a person is born in American City, the person is American.\\n[BG] If a book is novel and it is written by a person, then the person is a novel writer.\\nDani Shapiro is an American writer.\\nFamily History is written by Dani Shapiro.\\nFamily History is a novel written in 2003.\\nDani Shapiro created a podcast called Family Secrets.\\n[BG] Boston is an American city.\\n\\nconclusion: Dani Shapiro is a novel writer.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"True\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"244ee8f3f34114b0803d391d0bda0c32\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nA podcast is not a novel.\\\\n[BG] If a person is born in American City, the person is American.\\\\n[BG] If a book is novel and it is written by a person, then the person is a novel writer.\\\\nDani Shapiro is an American writer.\\\\nFamily History is written by Dani Shapiro.\\\\nFamily History is a novel written in 2003.\\\\nDani Shapiro created a podcast called Family Secrets.\\\\n[BG] Boston is an American city.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Dani Shapiro is a novel writer.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"True\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "244ee8f3f34114b0803d391d0bda0c32"}
|
True
|
{"id": "244ee8f3f34114b0803d391d0bda0c32", "question": "\npremises: \nA podcast is not a novel.\n[BG] If a person is born in American City, the person is American.\n[BG] If a book is novel and it is written by a person, then the person is a novel writer.\nDani Shapiro is an American writer.\nFamily History is written by Dani Shapiro.\nFamily History is a novel written in 2003.\nDani Shapiro created a podcast called Family Secrets.\n[BG] Boston is an American city.\n\nconclusion: Dani Shapiro is a novel writer.\n", "answer": "True", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
Products are either produced in China or the US.
All produced in China are labeled.
All produced in the US are sold in the US.
If labeled, then the product is cheaper.
All sold in the US are sold in Walmart.
All displayed on the homepage are sold in Walmart.
No products returned by customers are sold in Walmart.
G-910 is either displayed on the homepage or cheaper.
conclusion: G-910 is not displayed on the homepage.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nProducts are either produced in China or the US. \\nAll produced in China are labeled. \\nAll produced in the US are sold in the US. \\nIf labeled, then the product is cheaper. \\nAll sold in the US are sold in Walmart. \\nAll displayed on the homepage are sold in Walmart. \\nNo products returned by customers are sold in Walmart. \\nG-910 is either displayed on the homepage or cheaper.\\n\\nconclusion: G-910 is not displayed on the homepage.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"edfb9985e178cdc477425b75cadfadff\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nProducts are either produced in China or the US. \\\\nAll produced in China are labeled. \\\\nAll produced in the US are sold in the US. \\\\nIf labeled, then the product is cheaper. \\\\nAll sold in the US are sold in Walmart. \\\\nAll displayed on the homepage are sold in Walmart. \\\\nNo products returned by customers are sold in Walmart. \\\\nG-910 is either displayed on the homepage or cheaper.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: G-910 is not displayed on the homepage.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "edfb9985e178cdc477425b75cadfadff"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "edfb9985e178cdc477425b75cadfadff", "question": "\npremises: \nProducts are either produced in China or the US. \nAll produced in China are labeled. \nAll produced in the US are sold in the US. \nIf labeled, then the product is cheaper. \nAll sold in the US are sold in Walmart. \nAll displayed on the homepage are sold in Walmart. \nNo products returned by customers are sold in Walmart. \nG-910 is either displayed on the homepage or cheaper.\n\nconclusion: G-910 is not displayed on the homepage.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is "True," "False," or "Unknown" based on the information provided.
### Rules:
1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.
2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.
3. **Evaluation Criteria:**
- **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.
- **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.
- **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.
### Answer Format:
- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:
```
<result>
```
- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: "True", "False", or "Unknown".
Here is the puzzle:
premises:
All people who eat salads regularly are very conscious about their health and eating habits.
All people who grew up in health-conscious childhood homes eat salads regularly.
All people who fulfill their nutritional daily intakes grew up in health-conscious childhood homes.
If people have good relationships with their parents, then they fulfill their nutritional daily intakes.
If people have good relationships with their parents, then they do not eat salads regularly.
If people visit the gym at least once a day, then they always fulfill their daily nutritional intakes.
It is either both true that Taylor grew up in a health-conscious childhood home and she has a good relationship with her parents, or it is true that Taylor neither grew up in a health-conscious childhood home nor has a good relationship with her parents.
conclusion: Taylor eats salads regularly.
**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.
|
{"ground_truth": "{\"prompt\": \"Analyze the given premises and determine the validity of the conclusion. Your task is to assess whether the conclusion is \\\"True,\\\" \\\"False,\\\" or \\\"Unknown\\\" based on the information provided.\\n\\n### Rules:\\n1. **Premises:** You will be provided with a set of statements or premises. These premises are the foundational truths or assumptions for the puzzle.\\n2. **Conclusion:** A statement will be presented as the conclusion. Your task is to evaluate this conclusion in the context of the given premises.\\n3. **Evaluation Criteria:**\\n - **True:** The conclusion logically follows from the premises.\\n - **False:** The conclusion contradicts the premises.\\n - **Unknown:** The conclusion cannot be determined from the premises alone due to insufficient information.\\n\\n### Answer Format:\\n- Please output your answer within a code block (```) as follows:\\n```\\n<result>\\n```\\n- Replace `<result>` with one of the following options: \\\"True\\\", \\\"False\\\", or \\\"Unknown\\\".\\n\\n\\nHere is the puzzle:\\n\\n\\npremises: \\nAll people who eat salads regularly are very conscious about their health and eating habits.\\nAll people who grew up in health-conscious childhood homes eat salads regularly.\\nAll people who fulfill their nutritional daily intakes grew up in health-conscious childhood homes.\\nIf people have good relationships with their parents, then they fulfill their nutritional daily intakes.\\nIf people have good relationships with their parents, then they do not eat salads regularly.\\nIf people visit the gym at least once a day, then they always fulfill their daily nutritional intakes.\\nIt is either both true that Taylor grew up in a health-conscious childhood home and she has a good relationship with her parents, or it is true that Taylor neither grew up in a health-conscious childhood home nor has a good relationship with her parents.\\n\\nconclusion: Taylor eats salads regularly.\\n \\n\\n**Note:** Ensure that your evaluation is based solely on the information provided in the premises without introducing external knowledge or assumptions.\", \"answer\": \"Unknown\", \"task_name\": \"FOLIO\", \"ability\": \"PUZZLE\", \"language\": \"en\", \"meta\": \"{\\\"id\\\": \\\"6df71da85ae1ad3d4bd1904f0cc50280\\\", \\\"question\\\": \\\"\\\\npremises: \\\\nAll people who eat salads regularly are very conscious about their health and eating habits.\\\\nAll people who grew up in health-conscious childhood homes eat salads regularly.\\\\nAll people who fulfill their nutritional daily intakes grew up in health-conscious childhood homes.\\\\nIf people have good relationships with their parents, then they fulfill their nutritional daily intakes.\\\\nIf people have good relationships with their parents, then they do not eat salads regularly.\\\\nIf people visit the gym at least once a day, then they always fulfill their daily nutritional intakes.\\\\nIt is either both true that Taylor grew up in a health-conscious childhood home and she has a good relationship with her parents, or it is true that Taylor neither grew up in a health-conscious childhood home nor has a good relationship with her parents.\\\\n\\\\nconclusion: Taylor eats salads regularly.\\\\n\\\", \\\"answer\\\": \\\"Unknown\\\", \\\"rationale\\\": null, \\\"split\\\": \\\"test\\\", \\\"type\\\": \\\"logic_puzzle\\\", \\\"source_url\\\": \\\"https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO\\\", \\\"dataset_name\\\": \\\"folio\\\", \\\"difficulty_level\\\": \\\"hard\\\", \\\"language\\\": \\\"en\\\"}\"}", "style": "logic"}
|
PUZZLE##FOLIO
|
PUZZLE
|
{"index": "6df71da85ae1ad3d4bd1904f0cc50280"}
|
Unknown
|
{"id": "6df71da85ae1ad3d4bd1904f0cc50280", "question": "\npremises: \nAll people who eat salads regularly are very conscious about their health and eating habits.\nAll people who grew up in health-conscious childhood homes eat salads regularly.\nAll people who fulfill their nutritional daily intakes grew up in health-conscious childhood homes.\nIf people have good relationships with their parents, then they fulfill their nutritional daily intakes.\nIf people have good relationships with their parents, then they do not eat salads regularly.\nIf people visit the gym at least once a day, then they always fulfill their daily nutritional intakes.\nIt is either both true that Taylor grew up in a health-conscious childhood home and she has a good relationship with her parents, or it is true that Taylor neither grew up in a health-conscious childhood home nor has a good relationship with her parents.\n\nconclusion: Taylor eats salads regularly.\n", "answer": "Unknown", "rationale": null, "split": "test", "type": "logic_puzzle", "source_url": "https://github.com/Yale-LILY/FOLIO", "dataset_name": "folio", "difficulty_level": "hard", "language": "en"}
|
logic
|
FOLIO
|
Subsets and Splits
No community queries yet
The top public SQL queries from the community will appear here once available.