i have often heard people express disappointment that mazursky tempest has little to do with shakespeare original. in my opinion and that is both true and false and but most of all and it a bad starting point for offering critique. a work of art should never be criticised for what it isn not and but for what it is. the movie tempest is nothing like a faithful rendition of the play and but to my mind and it is faithful to shakespeare work in spirit. what tempest is and then and is perhaps one of the most successful experimental films of all time. no and not experimental as in hand held camera and mumbled dialogue and but experimental as in exploring the convolutions of a story without undue regard for box office earnings. mazursky tempest is epic and sad and realistic and joyous and full of life and but most of all and it is imaginative. cassavetes portrayal of philip or prospero is in itself worth a positive rating and and when you add gena rowlands and susan sarandon and a wonderfully deep molly ringwald and raul julia and the dialogue and the music and the exquisitely suggestive little tableaux scattered throughout the picture. i rest my case. one of the best movies of the 80 . don not miss it. 
i have often heard people express disappointment that mazursky tempest has little to do with shakespeare original. in my opinion and that is both true and false and but most of all and it a bad starting point for offering critique. a work of art should never be criticised for what it isn not and but for what it is. the movie tempest is nothing like a faithful rendition of the play and but to my mind and it is faithful to shakespeare work in spirit. what tempest is and then and is perhaps one of the most successful experimental films of all time. no and not experimental as in hand held camera and mumbled dialogue and but experimental as in exploring the convolutions of a story without undue regard for box office earnings. mazursky tempest is epic and sad and realistic and joyous and full of life and but most of all and it is imaginative. cassavetes portrayal of philip or prospero is in itself worth a positive rating and and when you add gena rowlands and susan sarandon and a wonderfully deep molly ringwald and raul julia and the dialogue and the music and the exquisitely suggestive little tableaux scattered throughout the picture. i rest my case. one of the best movies of the 80 . don not miss it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
