i will commend it in only one respect. it was innovative. innovative doesn not mean it a good film and it means that it can give you an idea of what you can take and implement in your own films. the simple plot is. well. simple. i got to the point where i do not care if they destroy the building or not. if i had to hear that girl annoying giggle one more time and i swear i would hurl the dvd out the window. and there also the protagonist. they try to make him lovable and but he a freakin pervert. sniffing the girls bra and sneaking peeks at her when she naked and putting her bra over his eyes when he sleeps and putting her bra on a blow up sex doll (which she takes her panties off while hes asleep and slips them on his doll. umm)what irritates me even moreso is that crappy tinting. in the photo gallery on the dvd and you can see what the film looked liek before they greyscaled it and put in a color tint (digitally too). the film looked a lot better without the effect. so they sacrificed it being a good film just to be artsy. bah. i could understand using gimmicks like that if the film quality was crap. i think most people who liked this film just liked it because the chick was naked for a good 5  10 minutes. this doesn not compare to delicatessen ( like so many are tryign to do). delicatessen has characters you can get into and like. these people here just grunt and giggle. lastly and i would also liek to point out that this was also tryign to be like a german impressionistic film liek the old silents. one of the problems with most foreign and especially artsy and films is that thety focus on making an artsy composition and forget about the pace of the scene. it results in the audience not really understanding what while s going on because they do not get a sense of the space of the surroundings. anyway and it rubbish. the short film on the dvd and surprise and was a heckuva lot better. 
i will commend it in only one respect. it was innovative. innovative doesn not mean it a good film and it means that it can give you an idea of what you can take and implement in your own films. the simple plot is. well. simple. i got to the point where i do not care if they destroy the building or not. if i had to hear that girl annoying giggle one more time and i swear i would hurl the dvd out the window. and there also the protagonist. they try to make him lovable and but he a freakin pervert. sniffing the girls bra and sneaking peeks at her when she naked and putting her bra over his eyes when he sleeps and putting her bra on a blow up sex doll (which she takes her panties off while hes asleep and slips them on his doll. umm)what irritates me even moreso is that crappy tinting. in the photo gallery on the dvd and you can see what the film looked liek before they greyscaled it and put in a color tint (digitally too). the film looked a lot better without the effect. so they sacrificed it being a good film just to be artsy. bah. i could understand using gimmicks like that if the film quality was crap. i think most people who liked this film just liked it because the chick was naked for a good 5  10 minutes. this doesn not compare to delicatessen ( like so many are tryign to do). delicatessen has characters you can get into and like. these people here just grunt and giggle. lastly and i would also liek to point out that this was also tryign to be like a german impressionistic film liek the old silents. one of the problems with most foreign and especially artsy and films is that thety focus on making an artsy composition and forget about the pace of the scene. it results in the audience not really understanding what while s going on because they do not get a sense of the space of the surroundings. anyway and it rubbish. the short film on the dvd and surprise and was a heckuva lot better. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
