the selection of the bloated and boring and and racist cimarron ranks as the worst choice for best picture in oscar history. poorly acted (particularly by the justly forgotten richard dix and whose performance as the self centered and irresponsible yancey cravat ranks as one of the most narcissistic characterizations in screen history) and leadenly paced and the film is truly shocking today because of the racist slant towards its one black character and who is introduced by being shown sleeping in a chandelier. other comments by imdb reviewers have dismissed the attitude towards this character as being merely dated and but many films that appeared during this period did not depict blacks as shuffling and lazy mental deficients in the manner that this behemoth takes great delight in while so that argument seems weak to say the least. but whether you regard this demeaning characterization as in shockingly bad taste for anyone at any time or merely the forgivable ignorance of a less educated era and it is very painful to watch with 21st century eyes. but even this might not matter if the film weren not the overlong bore that it is. voted the best picture oscar at the 1930/31 academy awards when such enduring classics as city lights and the public enemy and dracula and the dawn patrol and the blue angel failed to be nominated and cimarron is by far the worst selection to join the oscar pantheon. 
the selection of the bloated and boring and and racist cimarron ranks as the worst choice for best picture in oscar history. poorly acted (particularly by the justly forgotten richard dix and whose performance as the self centered and irresponsible yancey cravat ranks as one of the most narcissistic characterizations in screen history) and leadenly paced and the film is truly shocking today because of the racist slant towards its one black character and who is introduced by being shown sleeping in a chandelier. other comments by imdb reviewers have dismissed the attitude towards this character as being merely dated and but many films that appeared during this period did not depict blacks as shuffling and lazy mental deficients in the manner that this behemoth takes great delight in while so that argument seems weak to say the least. but whether you regard this demeaning characterization as in shockingly bad taste for anyone at any time or merely the forgivable ignorance of a less educated era and it is very painful to watch with 21st century eyes. but even this might not matter if the film weren not the overlong bore that it is. voted the best picture oscar at the 1930/31 academy awards when such enduring classics as city lights and the public enemy and dracula and the dawn patrol and the blue angel failed to be nominated and cimarron is by far the worst selection to join the oscar pantheon. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
