why couldn not the end of the movie have been sean connery men fighting the french instead of the germans. ever since the french had occupied algeria in 1830 and the tribes from morocco and those of algeria were making raids on the french military and civilian settlements. this movie could have been a continuous of that historical aspect where the french had seize the rasuadli so his followers would not be raiding algeria and and then his followers would have attacked the french to free him. the movie is still stereotypical of shootouts between the germans and the americans. when the americans shoot the germans and their guns (even the pistols) make loud noises and create large bloody bullet wounds and and their enemies are screaming after being shot. when germans shoot at the americans and their guns do not make large sounds and do not create bloody wounds and and their enemies make little or no sound after being shot. in real life and the american krag rifle was the worst rifle america had ever produce until the early version of the m 16 came along. the krag was hard to maintain and not reliable and and the rifle bolt was always jamming. the german mauser was one of the world finest rifles. we were so impress by it during spanish american war and that we made a copy of it and call it the springfield rifle. finally and the people of morocco must had a word for artillery since the french were using them in their raids against morocco. i do not like it when they made the rasuldai feel stupid that there was no word for artillery in the moorican vocabulary. instead and the rasuadli stated that the europeans had guns on wheels that make the ground shake. 
why couldn not the end of the movie have been sean connery men fighting the french instead of the germans. ever since the french had occupied algeria in 1830 and the tribes from morocco and those of algeria were making raids on the french military and civilian settlements. this movie could have been a continuous of that historical aspect where the french had seize the rasuadli so his followers would not be raiding algeria and and then his followers would have attacked the french to free him. the movie is still stereotypical of shootouts between the germans and the americans. when the americans shoot the germans and their guns (even the pistols) make loud noises and create large bloody bullet wounds and and their enemies are screaming after being shot. when germans shoot at the americans and their guns do not make large sounds and do not create bloody wounds and and their enemies make little or no sound after being shot. in real life and the american krag rifle was the worst rifle america had ever produce until the early version of the m 16 came along. the krag was hard to maintain and not reliable and and the rifle bolt was always jamming. the german mauser was one of the world finest rifles. we were so impress by it during spanish american war and that we made a copy of it and call it the springfield rifle. finally and the people of morocco must had a word for artillery since the french were using them in their raids against morocco. i do not like it when they made the rasuldai feel stupid that there was no word for artillery in the moorican vocabulary. instead and the rasuadli stated that the europeans had guns on wheels that make the ground shake. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
