i am not sure why the producers needed to trade on the name of a somewhat successful movie franchise because the title suggests that it is a sequel to the first three movies. which it is not. even though marques houston did appear in hp3 and he played a totally different character (he was and eight years older) in this film. okay. so reid and martin weren not the most talented and couldn not carry a film all by themselves. but to trade on the hp franchise seems to me that there could have made some sort of reference (albeit minor) to the earlier movies. i am sure everyone who wanted to see it was hoodwinked into thinking that they were seeing a sequel not a totally different film with a familiar name. and i am sorry. kym whitley is not funny and and could not hold a candle to the late robin harris and ketty lester and or dc curry in the earlier films. although meagen good and mari morrow are a substantial visual diversion. i have to give this a thumbs down. just naming the film down to the last minute would have been ok. furthermore and the hudlin brothers (who produced the first three movies) were not involved in the making of this film. 
i am not sure why the producers needed to trade on the name of a somewhat successful movie franchise because the title suggests that it is a sequel to the first three movies. which it is not. even though marques houston did appear in hp3 and he played a totally different character (he was and eight years older) in this film. okay. so reid and martin weren not the most talented and couldn not carry a film all by themselves. but to trade on the hp franchise seems to me that there could have made some sort of reference (albeit minor) to the earlier movies. i am sure everyone who wanted to see it was hoodwinked into thinking that they were seeing a sequel not a totally different film with a familiar name. and i am sorry. kym whitley is not funny and and could not hold a candle to the late robin harris and ketty lester and or dc curry in the earlier films. although meagen good and mari morrow are a substantial visual diversion. i have to give this a thumbs down. just naming the film down to the last minute would have been ok. furthermore and the hudlin brothers (who produced the first three movies) were not involved in the making of this film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
