having watched the first scene and i realized the acting was so bad that it couldn not possibly pick up later. superficial and artificial and with frequent attempts to look professional through references to technology the way a five year old tries to make it sound as if he knows what he talking about. the second to second storyline is completely unrealistic and just about every single decision the screenwriter did and was the kind you expect from a below average grade school student. the overall storyline was as unoriginal and predictable as a pack of sausages. the few attempts to make the dialogs sound intelligent and was limited to neurotic and apologetic behavior. a ten year old might like it. but it would take a five year old to accept the lack of realism while how does advanced cell function allow someone to bypass a code lock by touching it as if with a magic wand and pick out one out of 100s of voices through a ventilation system (thereby ripping off superman) and and repair a home computer by just sensing whats wrong instead of looking for faults. actually and that scene is a neat example represent the fault was that one of the cooling pipes (aluminum ribbons) on the cpu was broken and the way it would look if a exhaust pipe on a v8 engine is ripped off by an explosion. this is something that can not happen and and if it did and it do not prevent the computer from working. there is no electrical current passing through this ribbon and but when he (without doing it himself and his arms worked by autopilot because the cells in his body was super efficient) put a push pin into the rip and a desktop with icons appeared on the screen immediately without booting. and so it goes all the way. like when he escaped an interrogation room in the nsa headquarters by lighting a lighter below a fire sensor and resulting in open doors throughout the building. naturally and nsa do not predict this sharp witted approach to escaping and nor did they put any guards outside his room (or anywhere else) to guard a living and walking breakthrough in military nanotechnology. so he walked out and got a cab. examples like this one are not only numerous and there is in fact just about no single scene that makes sense. also and the so called great effects were terrible. he threw a basketball back to a kid in the park and and the kid was thrown back horizontally 20 feet into a tree. no acceleration or deceleration and but constant speed and height and like a motorized trolley. i am sure if i paused and looked for the cables that kept the posture of this kid the way only cables can and they probably do not know how to or bother to erase them completely. if someone is thrown that far into a tree and they would at least say ouch (or rather be hospitalized with broken bones) and but the kid was just just confused and amazed. moronic. that the word for every creative decision made throughout the entire production. i am going to put the director name on my own personal blacklist and someone as poorly skilled as him cannot improve. i feel like demanding compensation for having wasted 45 minutes of my life for watching it and and the time it took to write this. although it felt therapeutic and it was traumatic to realize how little it takes to get a pilot approved. the only excuse a slightly intelligent person could have to watch this voluntarily and would be imprisonment or lobotomy. 
having watched the first scene and i realized the acting was so bad that it couldn not possibly pick up later. superficial and artificial and with frequent attempts to look professional through references to technology the way a five year old tries to make it sound as if he knows what he talking about. the second to second storyline is completely unrealistic and just about every single decision the screenwriter did and was the kind you expect from a below average grade school student. the overall storyline was as unoriginal and predictable as a pack of sausages. the few attempts to make the dialogs sound intelligent and was limited to neurotic and apologetic behavior. a ten year old might like it. but it would take a five year old to accept the lack of realism while how does advanced cell function allow someone to bypass a code lock by touching it as if with a magic wand and pick out one out of 100s of voices through a ventilation system (thereby ripping off superman) and and repair a home computer by just sensing whats wrong instead of looking for faults. actually and that scene is a neat example represent the fault was that one of the cooling pipes (aluminum ribbons) on the cpu was broken and the way it would look if a exhaust pipe on a v8 engine is ripped off by an explosion. this is something that can not happen and and if it did and it do not prevent the computer from working. there is no electrical current passing through this ribbon and but when he (without doing it himself and his arms worked by autopilot because the cells in his body was super efficient) put a push pin into the rip and a desktop with icons appeared on the screen immediately without booting. and so it goes all the way. like when he escaped an interrogation room in the nsa headquarters by lighting a lighter below a fire sensor and resulting in open doors throughout the building. naturally and nsa do not predict this sharp witted approach to escaping and nor did they put any guards outside his room (or anywhere else) to guard a living and walking breakthrough in military nanotechnology. so he walked out and got a cab. examples like this one are not only numerous and there is in fact just about no single scene that makes sense. also and the so called great effects were terrible. he threw a basketball back to a kid in the park and and the kid was thrown back horizontally 20 feet into a tree. no acceleration or deceleration and but constant speed and height and like a motorized trolley. i am sure if i paused and looked for the cables that kept the posture of this kid the way only cables can and they probably do not know how to or bother to erase them completely. if someone is thrown that far into a tree and they would at least say ouch (or rather be hospitalized with broken bones) and but the kid was just just confused and amazed. moronic. that the word for every creative decision made throughout the entire production. i am going to put the director name on my own personal blacklist and someone as poorly skilled as him cannot improve. i feel like demanding compensation for having wasted 45 minutes of my life for watching it and and the time it took to write this. although it felt therapeutic and it was traumatic to realize how little it takes to get a pilot approved. the only excuse a slightly intelligent person could have to watch this voluntarily and would be imprisonment or lobotomy. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
