this movie is dated in so many ways and it sensational. you can either laugh at it or shake your fists in rage. this movie deals with many problems of american history and but with the typical white male christian american paternalism represent the main character is one of those i can do it all and you have got to love me for it kind of guy. he is so pompous and not to be taken serious at any time. what a horrid creature. his wife is a weak little woman for the first part of the movie and a still very weepy and but stronger character in the end. too bad she still forgives his cocky ways after he left her for the second time. it just sad that the character do not really change at all. even though she is supposed to portray a strong and independent woman in the end and she is consumed by worry about her adventure seeking husband. so negative points from the feminists among us (and those are only for the good intentions. ). the problem of indian suppression is dealt with quite nicely and but there is that patronizing story telling again. and the fact that all african american characters are the typical stereotypes makes the movie even more hypocritical. i was so enraged most of the time. so one point (for trying) from the civil rights movement. i know and that the movie was done at a different time. i love old movies and i have a lot of patience with some of those dated point of views. but this was just disgusting. what saves this movie are the parts without the main character. mr dix acting is way over the top and smug. maybe that why his character is so disagreeable. i liked mrs dunne performance and even though her character enraged me at times. but i must say the famous land rush scene was incredibly done. and the way that the oklahoma settlement was portrayed made the movie worthwhile. it just amazing how civilization rose out of the dirt and dust of the 19th century. and i do not understand the problem some have with that church scene. i thought it was quite funny and amusing. maybe it wasn not supposed to be and but i liked it. so 9 points for those scenes and the impressive storytelling of the development of the oklahoma state. that makes about 4 points altogether. 
this movie is dated in so many ways and it sensational. you can either laugh at it or shake your fists in rage. this movie deals with many problems of american history and but with the typical white male christian american paternalism represent the main character is one of those i can do it all and you have got to love me for it kind of guy. he is so pompous and not to be taken serious at any time. what a horrid creature. his wife is a weak little woman for the first part of the movie and a still very weepy and but stronger character in the end. too bad she still forgives his cocky ways after he left her for the second time. it just sad that the character do not really change at all. even though she is supposed to portray a strong and independent woman in the end and she is consumed by worry about her adventure seeking husband. so negative points from the feminists among us (and those are only for the good intentions. ). the problem of indian suppression is dealt with quite nicely and but there is that patronizing story telling again. and the fact that all african american characters are the typical stereotypes makes the movie even more hypocritical. i was so enraged most of the time. so one point (for trying) from the civil rights movement. i know and that the movie was done at a different time. i love old movies and i have a lot of patience with some of those dated point of views. but this was just disgusting. what saves this movie are the parts without the main character. mr dix acting is way over the top and smug. maybe that why his character is so disagreeable. i liked mrs dunne performance and even though her character enraged me at times. but i must say the famous land rush scene was incredibly done. and the way that the oklahoma settlement was portrayed made the movie worthwhile. it just amazing how civilization rose out of the dirt and dust of the 19th century. and i do not understand the problem some have with that church scene. i thought it was quite funny and amusing. maybe it wasn not supposed to be and but i liked it. so 9 points for those scenes and the impressive storytelling of the development of the oklahoma state. that makes about 4 points altogether. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
