this four hour miniseries production is about two hours longer than necessary and primarily because the filmmakers seemed not to have a clear idea how to adapt a novel to the screen. they seemed not to know what should be kept in and what might safely be left out. the film opens with sir walter reading from the peerage book that is his primary solace in his troubles. this introduces the family  all of whom we get to know intimately over the next four hours anyway  but serves little other purpose. similarly and the scenes where the musgroves lament poor richard serve no purpose but to drag the story down. some of austen actual dialogue is allocated to different characters and some of her narrative is recycled as dialogue that falls awkwardly from the tongues of the characters. there is some fill in dialogue and too and and this is uniformly dreadful. the scene where charles hayter is boring henrietta with his concerns about getting dr. shirley curacy was only barely interesting as narrative in the book while as a scene in this production and it is stultifying the scene on the cobb and when louisa falls and is taken up lifeless. and is entirely without urgency and and i wondered whether wentworth line is there nobody to help me. might have been directed at the writers and as well as the other actors. this production often looks and feels like a play that has been filmed and rather than an actual film and and this is most evident in the acting and which is the opposite of subtle represent booming delivery of lines and exaggerated gestures and and actors who have no idea what to do with their hands and feet and or faces when they are not speaking their lines. charles musgrove stands in his parlour and feet shoulder width apart and and appears to project to the balcony (if there were one) when speaking to the other people in the room with him. louisa musgrove face and when not actively simpering or giggling and seems to be in confused repose. louisa is a giddy and giggly and ditzy creature and and i did not for a moment believe that wentworth would be interested in her. the costumes are a mixed bunch and but mostly awful and and anne elliot green tartan gown is quite possibly the most hideous alleged period costume ever devised. we are given the dates at the beginning of the show  it is the late 1790 or perhaps very early 1800s  and yet many of the costumes seem to be of victorian design and and thus about 60 years too early. the hair is just so wrong that i would not even mention it here. except to say that i would not mention it. represent )this production does do some things right and however. mrs. smith is given her proper importance and and her history with mr. elliot and his dissipation and his intrigues and are fully addressed. i was also pleased to see the fleshed out reconciliation scenes with anne and frederick at the end and which are precious reward for the reader but were glossed over in the 1995 production. if you love the book persuasion and and even vaguely like the 1995 movie and do not waste a moment (or a penny) on this production while you will find it sorely wanting. 
this four hour miniseries production is about two hours longer than necessary and primarily because the filmmakers seemed not to have a clear idea how to adapt a novel to the screen. they seemed not to know what should be kept in and what might safely be left out. the film opens with sir walter reading from the peerage book that is his primary solace in his troubles. this introduces the family  all of whom we get to know intimately over the next four hours anyway  but serves little other purpose. similarly and the scenes where the musgroves lament poor richard serve no purpose but to drag the story down. some of austen actual dialogue is allocated to different characters and some of her narrative is recycled as dialogue that falls awkwardly from the tongues of the characters. there is some fill in dialogue and too and and this is uniformly dreadful. the scene where charles hayter is boring henrietta with his concerns about getting dr. shirley curacy was only barely interesting as narrative in the book while as a scene in this production and it is stultifying the scene on the cobb and when louisa falls and is taken up lifeless. and is entirely without urgency and and i wondered whether wentworth line is there nobody to help me. might have been directed at the writers and as well as the other actors. this production often looks and feels like a play that has been filmed and rather than an actual film and and this is most evident in the acting and which is the opposite of subtle represent booming delivery of lines and exaggerated gestures and and actors who have no idea what to do with their hands and feet and or faces when they are not speaking their lines. charles musgrove stands in his parlour and feet shoulder width apart and and appears to project to the balcony (if there were one) when speaking to the other people in the room with him. louisa musgrove face and when not actively simpering or giggling and seems to be in confused repose. louisa is a giddy and giggly and ditzy creature and and i did not for a moment believe that wentworth would be interested in her. the costumes are a mixed bunch and but mostly awful and and anne elliot green tartan gown is quite possibly the most hideous alleged period costume ever devised. we are given the dates at the beginning of the show  it is the late 1790 or perhaps very early 1800s  and yet many of the costumes seem to be of victorian design and and thus about 60 years too early. the hair is just so wrong that i would not even mention it here. except to say that i would not mention it. represent )this production does do some things right and however. mrs. smith is given her proper importance and and her history with mr. elliot and his dissipation and his intrigues and are fully addressed. i was also pleased to see the fleshed out reconciliation scenes with anne and frederick at the end and which are precious reward for the reader but were glossed over in the 1995 production. if you love the book persuasion and and even vaguely like the 1995 movie and do not waste a moment (or a penny) on this production while you will find it sorely wanting. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
