infamous horror films seldom measure up the hype that surrounds them and i have yet to come across a worse offender than wes craven the hills have eyes. having held back from watching this for years and i was really pleased when i got it for christmas and waited for an evening when my girlfriend was out to settle down and watch it  knowing her extreme dislike for anything genuinely horrifying. i needn not have bothered. after a promising  if familiar  start and that firmly sets the film in the desolution usa world of survival horror and things rapidly go to pieces when the protagonists and antagonists meet in the deserted wasteland. looking like it was shot on a budget of $5 and with the cannibal clan costumes hired from a dodgy fancy dress shop that specialises in faux caveman and red indian attire and the story follows an annoying bunch of unsympathetic wasps who take a detour on a road trip to california and to look for a silver mine in a nuclear testing zone (. ). when they break down they are set upon by the local family of flesh eaters and have to fight to survive. while hoping for another deliverance and texas chainsaw massacre and wrong turn or devil rejects and i actually realised i would stumbled across something that should have remained dusty and unwatched in a backstreet video store bargain bin. with gallons of tomato ketchup for blood and a couple of gruesome wound close ups and i can kind of see how an 18 certificate (in the uk) is justified and but with those close ups trimmed this do not have looked out of place as a saturday afternoon thriller on itv. the whole silver mine or nuclear test site subplot is just a mcguffin to justify pitching the civilised family against the primitives and but given how easily the savages get their asses whupped it stretches credibility to think that they had survived for a generation preying on passers by. and then there the ending . or lack thereof. the hills have eyes seems to be missing either a third act or and at the very least and a satisfying denouement. instead and i was just left wondering represent yeah and and . . 
infamous horror films seldom measure up the hype that surrounds them and i have yet to come across a worse offender than wes craven the hills have eyes. having held back from watching this for years and i was really pleased when i got it for christmas and waited for an evening when my girlfriend was out to settle down and watch it  knowing her extreme dislike for anything genuinely horrifying. i needn not have bothered. after a promising  if familiar  start and that firmly sets the film in the desolution usa world of survival horror and things rapidly go to pieces when the protagonists and antagonists meet in the deserted wasteland. looking like it was shot on a budget of $5 and with the cannibal clan costumes hired from a dodgy fancy dress shop that specialises in faux caveman and red indian attire and the story follows an annoying bunch of unsympathetic wasps who take a detour on a road trip to california and to look for a silver mine in a nuclear testing zone (. ). when they break down they are set upon by the local family of flesh eaters and have to fight to survive. while hoping for another deliverance and texas chainsaw massacre and wrong turn or devil rejects and i actually realised i would stumbled across something that should have remained dusty and unwatched in a backstreet video store bargain bin. with gallons of tomato ketchup for blood and a couple of gruesome wound close ups and i can kind of see how an 18 certificate (in the uk) is justified and but with those close ups trimmed this do not have looked out of place as a saturday afternoon thriller on itv. the whole silver mine or nuclear test site subplot is just a mcguffin to justify pitching the civilised family against the primitives and but given how easily the savages get their asses whupped it stretches credibility to think that they had survived for a generation preying on passers by. and then there the ending . or lack thereof. the hills have eyes seems to be missing either a third act or and at the very least and a satisfying denouement. instead and i was just left wondering represent yeah and and . . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
