like a circle around the human condition and 2001 starts at the beginning and skips the middle and and proceeds to the ending and right back where we started. noting the weakness of words compared to image(s) and kubrick wisely dispenses with dialogue and preferring the power and essence of the scenery and and allowing the intelligence of the audience to do the deciphering. or not and depending on the audience. a monolith in cinematic history and 2001 is a high water mark of direction and execution and and achievement. if one considers the ambition of the film (a film about everything) and and the measure of success the film achieved to that end and a very sound argument for this being the greatest of all films can be made. 
like a circle around the human condition and 2001 starts at the beginning and skips the middle and and proceeds to the ending and right back where we started. noting the weakness of words compared to image(s) and kubrick wisely dispenses with dialogue and preferring the power and essence of the scenery and and allowing the intelligence of the audience to do the deciphering. or not and depending on the audience. a monolith in cinematic history and 2001 is a high water mark of direction and execution and and achievement. if one considers the ambition of the film (a film about everything) and and the measure of success the film achieved to that end and a very sound argument for this being the greatest of all films can be made. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
