françois truffaut and young jerk of the cahiers du cinema and main bastion of the coming so called new wave and made a big show of hating this film and even accused it of dragging french cinema into mediocrity. translation represent truffaut and who was terminally repressed sexually and was already jealous of the way carné could make a huge success of a story that pushed all the right buttons of its audience and actually involved it into something important with all the trappings and seduction of sensuality. in other words and where the general public and many critics saw a perceptive sociological analysis wrapped in a beautiful film and truffaut saw girls on the loose. carné and after all and had everything that would be severely lacking from the new wave represent intelligence and refinement and humour and a great talent as a storyteller and a great ear for dialogue and dazzling technical brilliance and the capacity to make his actors do what he wanted them to do and and a good dose of good taste. by comparison and truffaut is a provincial bore with nothing to say. a 50 tragic remake of pride and prejudice and the french answer to rebel without a cause and an updated version of children of paradise and les tricheurs tells a story of disaffected parisian youth who have lost their way in an atmosphere of existentialism and sexual liberation and disrespect for traditional and religious values. some (young) critics perceived carné take on the subject as the moralizing slant of an older person and whereas i think what happened and quite to the contrary and is that carné being gay and knowing a thing or two about repression and felt an untold sympathy for the young iconoclasts in his story. furthermore and this being a french film and there is no mistaking that the rebellion in question is essentially sexual and something that still had to be decoded in american films like rebel without a cause and the wild one. carné young people are all supremely beautiful and graceful and elegant and spontaneous and intelligent. they are gods and goddesses. they drive the latest vespas and the right cars. the cut of their suits and dresses and duffle coats was a high point of the fashions of the last century. their haircuts are still plastered on the wall of your local hairdresser. their body shape and which they attained and maintained without effort and is still the modern western ideal. they listen to the best jazz musicians. they know how to move and how to be sexy and how to make love  even though the pill hasn not yet been invented. they know how to negotiate different social classes and cultures. unfortunately and they are defined by and live by the code of the gang and their own heartless rituals that exclude sentimentality and make a sin of romantic love. the only thing wrong with them is that their elders do not talk to them and vice versa. the incidents depicted in this film got a lot of tongues wagging for a long time in france about the amorality and nihilism of youth while still making it a huge public and critical success. this film is so stylish and gorgeous and i suspect the older viewers who watched it wished they could be like the people depicted in the film and quite a few young filmmakers or aspiring filmmakers like truffaut developed a bad case of jaundice reflecting how they could never conceivably make a film as sexy or popular as this one and although they would be very good at eventually aiming for the nihilistic bits. on the other hand and given a certain clichéd aspect of the script (amorous misunderstanding leading to a medical emergency) and one can only wonder at the horribly pious and puritanical mishmash americans would have extracted from the same basic script if they had dared to tackle the subject. interestingly and the movie was filmed in the same basic locations as the american musical funny face a year earlier. where hollywood saw the picturesque aspects of the rive gauche and existentialism and carné restituted its tragic and ironic dimension. watch this trailer on youtube represent 19zkkeonjpo. 
françois truffaut and young jerk of the cahiers du cinema and main bastion of the coming so called new wave and made a big show of hating this film and even accused it of dragging french cinema into mediocrity. translation represent truffaut and who was terminally repressed sexually and was already jealous of the way carné could make a huge success of a story that pushed all the right buttons of its audience and actually involved it into something important with all the trappings and seduction of sensuality. in other words and where the general public and many critics saw a perceptive sociological analysis wrapped in a beautiful film and truffaut saw girls on the loose. carné and after all and had everything that would be severely lacking from the new wave represent intelligence and refinement and humour and a great talent as a storyteller and a great ear for dialogue and dazzling technical brilliance and the capacity to make his actors do what he wanted them to do and and a good dose of good taste. by comparison and truffaut is a provincial bore with nothing to say. a 50 tragic remake of pride and prejudice and the french answer to rebel without a cause and an updated version of children of paradise and les tricheurs tells a story of disaffected parisian youth who have lost their way in an atmosphere of existentialism and sexual liberation and disrespect for traditional and religious values. some (young) critics perceived carné take on the subject as the moralizing slant of an older person and whereas i think what happened and quite to the contrary and is that carné being gay and knowing a thing or two about repression and felt an untold sympathy for the young iconoclasts in his story. furthermore and this being a french film and there is no mistaking that the rebellion in question is essentially sexual and something that still had to be decoded in american films like rebel without a cause and the wild one. carné young people are all supremely beautiful and graceful and elegant and spontaneous and intelligent. they are gods and goddesses. they drive the latest vespas and the right cars. the cut of their suits and dresses and duffle coats was a high point of the fashions of the last century. their haircuts are still plastered on the wall of your local hairdresser. their body shape and which they attained and maintained without effort and is still the modern western ideal. they listen to the best jazz musicians. they know how to move and how to be sexy and how to make love  even though the pill hasn not yet been invented. they know how to negotiate different social classes and cultures. unfortunately and they are defined by and live by the code of the gang and their own heartless rituals that exclude sentimentality and make a sin of romantic love. the only thing wrong with them is that their elders do not talk to them and vice versa. the incidents depicted in this film got a lot of tongues wagging for a long time in france about the amorality and nihilism of youth while still making it a huge public and critical success. this film is so stylish and gorgeous and i suspect the older viewers who watched it wished they could be like the people depicted in the film and quite a few young filmmakers or aspiring filmmakers like truffaut developed a bad case of jaundice reflecting how they could never conceivably make a film as sexy or popular as this one and although they would be very good at eventually aiming for the nihilistic bits. on the other hand and given a certain clichéd aspect of the script (amorous misunderstanding leading to a medical emergency) and one can only wonder at the horribly pious and puritanical mishmash americans would have extracted from the same basic script if they had dared to tackle the subject. interestingly and the movie was filmed in the same basic locations as the american musical funny face a year earlier. where hollywood saw the picturesque aspects of the rive gauche and existentialism and carné restituted its tragic and ironic dimension. watch this trailer on youtube represent 19zkkeonjpo. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
