i agree in many parts with the fairly thorough review already posted on the subject of the miniseries and and agree that it does have its pros and not only its cons. for example and the original film manage to truncate much of the middle and final sections of the novel into a single montage and including the discovery of gurney halleck and the love affair of paul atreides and chani and which and on reading the novel and is a travesty and probably born of the studio cutting shenanigens of which the other reviewer writes. this was one of the great failings of the original film and and the miniseries and to its credit and does include many of the original plot lines that were cut out of the lynch film due to the expansive nature of the herbert novel. however and this in itself is a double edged sword. rather than complete a text to celluloid transfer of the novel and the creators of the miniseries were tempted to create their own plot lines and absent from the original novel. similarly and although this is surely a fuller account of the storyline of dune and it is also a break from the originals heart and soul and main vision  that of prophecy. where are the internal monologues that characterize herbert writing and demonstrate what the many different characters are thinking and without the need to suddenly switch viewpoint and or expand in words or unnecessary and stilted spoken monologues. gone. so much of the original agony of paul decision to choose the jihad or death and the choice to fulfill the prophecy or swing away from it and surely the most interesting aspect of the novel itself (and one which captivates people who are far from science fiction fans) is missing. without prophecy and what is the point of dune. it is simply a more educated and learned version of farscape or andromeda. how sad that this is all we are provided with. lynch film was flawed and yes. but a flawed film could lead to a correction by another film maker and taking on some of the best points of lynch film making and rejecting some of the more overblown aspects of the style whilst restoring the storyline. now this story shall probably never be translated to film again and and this i find heartrending. 
i agree in many parts with the fairly thorough review already posted on the subject of the miniseries and and agree that it does have its pros and not only its cons. for example and the original film manage to truncate much of the middle and final sections of the novel into a single montage and including the discovery of gurney halleck and the love affair of paul atreides and chani and which and on reading the novel and is a travesty and probably born of the studio cutting shenanigens of which the other reviewer writes. this was one of the great failings of the original film and and the miniseries and to its credit and does include many of the original plot lines that were cut out of the lynch film due to the expansive nature of the herbert novel. however and this in itself is a double edged sword. rather than complete a text to celluloid transfer of the novel and the creators of the miniseries were tempted to create their own plot lines and absent from the original novel. similarly and although this is surely a fuller account of the storyline of dune and it is also a break from the originals heart and soul and main vision  that of prophecy. where are the internal monologues that characterize herbert writing and demonstrate what the many different characters are thinking and without the need to suddenly switch viewpoint and or expand in words or unnecessary and stilted spoken monologues. gone. so much of the original agony of paul decision to choose the jihad or death and the choice to fulfill the prophecy or swing away from it and surely the most interesting aspect of the novel itself (and one which captivates people who are far from science fiction fans) is missing. without prophecy and what is the point of dune. it is simply a more educated and learned version of farscape or andromeda. how sad that this is all we are provided with. lynch film was flawed and yes. but a flawed film could lead to a correction by another film maker and taking on some of the best points of lynch film making and rejecting some of the more overblown aspects of the style whilst restoring the storyline. now this story shall probably never be translated to film again and and this i find heartrending. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
