this two and a half hour long film was shown recently at carnegie mellon university (cmu) at a 10 pm show. there was a scheduled 1 am show after that and but wondered if anyone was going to stay awake to see that until 3 represent30 am. the opening scene is of a man walking in a field and and it lasts four minutes of movie time. it is an ominous sign of what to come represent a good 144 minutes more of pretty much the same. there is a scene of a man and a woman against a wall and standing in the sun. it is repeated 15 times and with very sparse dialogue. occasionally and these very long slow sequences are interrupted by shocking stills and such as a close up of female genitalia and shown for one full minute of film time (audience crowd laughing in the last 20 seconds and as to say and what the message. ). the story resembles dostoyevsky novel the karamazov brothers and in which a cretin falls in love with a woman of easy morals. in one of the rare instants in which the crowd was laughing (more in desperation to try to justify having been there already a full two hours to see nothing happening) was when the statement by a british tourist that he couldn not see things clearly since the eurostar train was traveling at 180 miles an hour and was translated by the translator with automatic switch of units of measure from english system to metric system to they couldn not see things clearly since the train was traveling at 300 kilometers per hour. what was amazing about this movie is that the quality of cinematography reveals that alot of money has been spent on it. this was no film kitchen 8 mm experiment. it was carefully planned and structured and acted and montaged. yet and i got so little out of it. some comments indictated on the excruciating detail and such as the minutae of a dandling key chain on a door just opened. okay and it was noted and but what was the purpose. some corageous people in the audience walked away after the first hour. the rest remained out of curiosity represent there must be something happening at the end. there never was. and maybe that what the film is about. all the movies at the theater are action packed. this one wants to be different. there is nothing happening. 
this two and a half hour long film was shown recently at carnegie mellon university (cmu) at a 10 pm show. there was a scheduled 1 am show after that and but wondered if anyone was going to stay awake to see that until 3 represent30 am. the opening scene is of a man walking in a field and and it lasts four minutes of movie time. it is an ominous sign of what to come represent a good 144 minutes more of pretty much the same. there is a scene of a man and a woman against a wall and standing in the sun. it is repeated 15 times and with very sparse dialogue. occasionally and these very long slow sequences are interrupted by shocking stills and such as a close up of female genitalia and shown for one full minute of film time (audience crowd laughing in the last 20 seconds and as to say and what the message. ). the story resembles dostoyevsky novel the karamazov brothers and in which a cretin falls in love with a woman of easy morals. in one of the rare instants in which the crowd was laughing (more in desperation to try to justify having been there already a full two hours to see nothing happening) was when the statement by a british tourist that he couldn not see things clearly since the eurostar train was traveling at 180 miles an hour and was translated by the translator with automatic switch of units of measure from english system to metric system to they couldn not see things clearly since the train was traveling at 300 kilometers per hour. what was amazing about this movie is that the quality of cinematography reveals that alot of money has been spent on it. this was no film kitchen 8 mm experiment. it was carefully planned and structured and acted and montaged. yet and i got so little out of it. some comments indictated on the excruciating detail and such as the minutae of a dandling key chain on a door just opened. okay and it was noted and but what was the purpose. some corageous people in the audience walked away after the first hour. the rest remained out of curiosity represent there must be something happening at the end. there never was. and maybe that what the film is about. all the movies at the theater are action packed. this one wants to be different. there is nothing happening. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
