i tried. lord help me and how i tried. but there are just some people almost incapable of creating quality. brett ratner and uwe boll and britney spears and and asylum. to their credit the 9/11 commission report seems like an honest attempt by the company to advance into a more sophisticated state of storytelling and movie making. but for all intents and purposes and it comes off as another truly film in their gallery. at the opening and the disclaimer notifies audiences that all the names have been changed and but the names of the terrorists remain relatively the same. a man named mussaui attempts to learn how to fly a plane. with a stone cold grimace that would instantly make anyone uneasy and this undercover agent is able to learn how to fly on a small computer. and you have to wonder and not how he was able to get into this program so easily and but on how these people do not even ask questions while because this scene is so far fetched in its presentation and and the actor playing this man is extremely over the top. and you can see that director scott attempts to mimic paul greengrass with a bright grainy photography that followed by an awfully dizzying and irritating hand held direction that and throughout the entire film and attempts to take off from greengrass gung ho guerrilla film making techniques. you can sense scott emulating greengrass technique for realism and but it becomes rather lame brained halfway in. meanwhile the film comes off less a traffic take off and and more a take off on law and order in which we will have the disclaimer notifying us the names have been changed and the logo almost reminiscent of the law and order logo and and then ninety minutes of the actors pumping their chests and discussing politics. neither of which are ever as compelling as it tries to be. and then when the film seems as if its attempting to be an adult drama and scott relies on his old failsafe and the sex scene. scott new film looks like it really wants to be thought of as a low budget munich but it not and and it manages to be underwhelming on every such occasion possible. the 9/11 commission report falls flat and and that because its limited in its attempts to imitate other films. while i appreciate the ambition inherent behind the camera and this new perspective of the events leading up to 9/11 is flat and and dull. hard as it may try to be a low budget munich it only really as entertaining as a normal dolph lundgren film you would find on cinemax. 
i tried. lord help me and how i tried. but there are just some people almost incapable of creating quality. brett ratner and uwe boll and britney spears and and asylum. to their credit the 9/11 commission report seems like an honest attempt by the company to advance into a more sophisticated state of storytelling and movie making. but for all intents and purposes and it comes off as another truly film in their gallery. at the opening and the disclaimer notifies audiences that all the names have been changed and but the names of the terrorists remain relatively the same. a man named mussaui attempts to learn how to fly a plane. with a stone cold grimace that would instantly make anyone uneasy and this undercover agent is able to learn how to fly on a small computer. and you have to wonder and not how he was able to get into this program so easily and but on how these people do not even ask questions while because this scene is so far fetched in its presentation and and the actor playing this man is extremely over the top. and you can see that director scott attempts to mimic paul greengrass with a bright grainy photography that followed by an awfully dizzying and irritating hand held direction that and throughout the entire film and attempts to take off from greengrass gung ho guerrilla film making techniques. you can sense scott emulating greengrass technique for realism and but it becomes rather lame brained halfway in. meanwhile the film comes off less a traffic take off and and more a take off on law and order in which we will have the disclaimer notifying us the names have been changed and the logo almost reminiscent of the law and order logo and and then ninety minutes of the actors pumping their chests and discussing politics. neither of which are ever as compelling as it tries to be. and then when the film seems as if its attempting to be an adult drama and scott relies on his old failsafe and the sex scene. scott new film looks like it really wants to be thought of as a low budget munich but it not and and it manages to be underwhelming on every such occasion possible. the 9/11 commission report falls flat and and that because its limited in its attempts to imitate other films. while i appreciate the ambition inherent behind the camera and this new perspective of the events leading up to 9/11 is flat and and dull. hard as it may try to be a low budget munich it only really as entertaining as a normal dolph lundgren film you would find on cinemax. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
