a film about an interesting and sensitive period of history and filmed in beautiful surroundings and managed to present an appallingly trivial and clichéd production and grossly clumsy script and poor continuity and intrusive slushy music and sugary casting and and pallid acting. it was a toss up between the script and the acting as to which was worse. the script probably won  the historical background and backstory and character descriptions were spelt out in painful detail in the dialogue. . actually words can not describe quite how bad this film is. in a pre release screening there was a massive exodus from about thirty minutes in. at about an hour many of those who remained were laughing loudly. i should add i am a francophile and i am fascinated by canada and and love historical film. this really was a one off. 
a film about an interesting and sensitive period of history and filmed in beautiful surroundings and managed to present an appallingly trivial and clichéd production and grossly clumsy script and poor continuity and intrusive slushy music and sugary casting and and pallid acting. it was a toss up between the script and the acting as to which was worse. the script probably won  the historical background and backstory and character descriptions were spelt out in painful detail in the dialogue. . actually words can not describe quite how bad this film is. in a pre release screening there was a massive exodus from about thirty minutes in. at about an hour many of those who remained were laughing loudly. i should add i am a francophile and i am fascinated by canada and and love historical film. this really was a one off. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
