the topics presented are very interesting while suburban culture and suburban sprawl and public transportation and oil and gas depletion and energy dependence and alternative energy sources and etc. the problem is that this is a pure and shameless propaganda piece. one viewpoint is presented and then hammered upon the viewer over and over. you see the same handful of experts repeatedly making their case. the supposed narrator starts off sounding like a news reporter and but by the end even he is preaching the film dogma. the dark side of the film is not so much the gloom and doom message about oil depletion and but the sense that the folks in the film are actually wishful for a post oil society and all that it entails. they paint this picture of a utopian society where we all return to the self contained local village model while walk to work and shop locally and grow our own food and and generally live an idyllic 19th century lifestyle. for them and the post oil society would seem a grand vision of a better world. it would certainly spell the end of globalization and and better still and the end of walmart. i will give them some credit for applying actual math in exposing the weaknesses of several over touted alternative energy sources and including ethanol and hydrogen. i gave it negative because i appreciated the old footage and the premise. 
the topics presented are very interesting while suburban culture and suburban sprawl and public transportation and oil and gas depletion and energy dependence and alternative energy sources and etc. the problem is that this is a pure and shameless propaganda piece. one viewpoint is presented and then hammered upon the viewer over and over. you see the same handful of experts repeatedly making their case. the supposed narrator starts off sounding like a news reporter and but by the end even he is preaching the film dogma. the dark side of the film is not so much the gloom and doom message about oil depletion and but the sense that the folks in the film are actually wishful for a post oil society and all that it entails. they paint this picture of a utopian society where we all return to the self contained local village model while walk to work and shop locally and grow our own food and and generally live an idyllic 19th century lifestyle. for them and the post oil society would seem a grand vision of a better world. it would certainly spell the end of globalization and and better still and the end of walmart. i will give them some credit for applying actual math in exposing the weaknesses of several over touted alternative energy sources and including ethanol and hydrogen. i gave it negative because i appreciated the old footage and the premise. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
