this is good movie that is flawed in many ways with low production. martha coolidge herself said she only had 350 and 000 dollars to work with. this is a movie that i loved growing up in the midwest. i remember friends and i having the nostalgia trip on this movie 10 years ago. great things about this movie. great cast with hungry actors and a hungry director. bad points of this movie. to small of a budget calling for way too much improvisation. if martha coolidge had been given more money and time on this movie then the results would of been even better. they should have taken the story from an early 20 prospective and not from a 15 17 year old high school stand point. most of the actors or actresses were in their early to mid 20 trying to play 15 17 year olds. (come on) the music is extremely memorable and the two soundtracks get played all the time in my car. the best scenes in this film take place in seedy hollywood clubs by nicolas cage character. i gave this film a high rating of positive for five reasons. nicholas cage improvisational on the spot acting while the camera work and angles are excellent given the budget they had and only being able to have one take of each scene while the sytles and music and lingo are captured perfectly and forever while again the music is incredible and carries the story along from scene to scene while and finally. martha coolidge could turn a weak script and unknown actors and a very very low budget and 20 days of shooting the entire movie into such a good and memorable movie is astounding. 
this is good movie that is flawed in many ways with low production. martha coolidge herself said she only had 350 and 000 dollars to work with. this is a movie that i loved growing up in the midwest. i remember friends and i having the nostalgia trip on this movie 10 years ago. great things about this movie. great cast with hungry actors and a hungry director. bad points of this movie. to small of a budget calling for way too much improvisation. if martha coolidge had been given more money and time on this movie then the results would of been even better. they should have taken the story from an early 20 prospective and not from a 15 17 year old high school stand point. most of the actors or actresses were in their early to mid 20 trying to play 15 17 year olds. (come on) the music is extremely memorable and the two soundtracks get played all the time in my car. the best scenes in this film take place in seedy hollywood clubs by nicolas cage character. i gave this film a high rating of positive for five reasons. nicholas cage improvisational on the spot acting while the camera work and angles are excellent given the budget they had and only being able to have one take of each scene while the sytles and music and lingo are captured perfectly and forever while again the music is incredible and carries the story along from scene to scene while and finally. martha coolidge could turn a weak script and unknown actors and a very very low budget and 20 days of shooting the entire movie into such a good and memorable movie is astounding. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
