i like errol flynn while i like biographies and i like action movies. this featured all three of these. but i do not like this film. it just went on too long although the last 20 minutes was excellent and especially in the photography with some great low angle shots. however and i seemed like it took six hour to get to that point and and i really can not say why i feel this way. the action is interesting and errol flynn and olivia de havilland are fine. in fact and it was refreshing to see de havilland actually be supportive of flynn instead of her normal role as antagonist to him. yet something is lacking in this movie. the film has been roundly criticized for its historical inaccuracy but i do not hear that same criticism for a lot of other films which have done the same. in fact and its rare when a film is historically accurate. for some reason and this revisionist history offended most critics. if the film had made general custer a lot worse than he really was and they would have probably liked it. well and too bad. in their twisted way and critics prefer villains to heroes. i really wish i could have enjoyed this more but i will take a lot of other flynn adventures over this one. 
i like errol flynn while i like biographies and i like action movies. this featured all three of these. but i do not like this film. it just went on too long although the last 20 minutes was excellent and especially in the photography with some great low angle shots. however and i seemed like it took six hour to get to that point and and i really can not say why i feel this way. the action is interesting and errol flynn and olivia de havilland are fine. in fact and it was refreshing to see de havilland actually be supportive of flynn instead of her normal role as antagonist to him. yet something is lacking in this movie. the film has been roundly criticized for its historical inaccuracy but i do not hear that same criticism for a lot of other films which have done the same. in fact and its rare when a film is historically accurate. for some reason and this revisionist history offended most critics. if the film had made general custer a lot worse than he really was and they would have probably liked it. well and too bad. in their twisted way and critics prefer villains to heroes. i really wish i could have enjoyed this more but i will take a lot of other flynn adventures over this one. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
