obviously and a number of agents do not see beyond dollar signs when they signed up their clients for this 117 minute omage to the courtesan complex. sure and the film could have been alright and had the $1 million been left out of it. seriously. the amount of the check doesn not matter and prostitution is still prostitution and no amount of love conquers all can change the fact that no marriage vows ever meant to imply for richer for poorer and for pimping as in fidelity. picture the story otherwise and though represent 2 kids and flat broke and borderline desperate and completely stupid. they collide with wealthy business man. kids marriage is strained by imperfect times and the fact that the husband is something of a loser. enter mr. tuxedo and oozing charm and stability  a virtual magnet for the ticking biological clock  and with him the wife temptation and tensions and suspense. whom will she choose. maybe and under those conditions and i could actually care. as is and frankly and redford selfish and manipulative playboy winds up the sympathetic character. a woman who will sell herself is just about what a guy deserves who will pimp out his wife. the indecent proposition makes the husband a total loser and deficient in every positive male characteristic and and makes the wife a cheap strumpet seduced by money rather than confused by another potential love and a woman devoid of moral center and self respect. all the impressive talent (acting and directing and cinematography) wasted on this film  and it was an impressive amount  couldn not save it from its splashy but too trashy $1 million pitch line. if i see this turkey at one more bridal shower and i am going to roast it. (or maybe cross it with titanic and pitch the tape in the ocean. ). 
obviously and a number of agents do not see beyond dollar signs when they signed up their clients for this 117 minute omage to the courtesan complex. sure and the film could have been alright and had the $1 million been left out of it. seriously. the amount of the check doesn not matter and prostitution is still prostitution and no amount of love conquers all can change the fact that no marriage vows ever meant to imply for richer for poorer and for pimping as in fidelity. picture the story otherwise and though represent 2 kids and flat broke and borderline desperate and completely stupid. they collide with wealthy business man. kids marriage is strained by imperfect times and the fact that the husband is something of a loser. enter mr. tuxedo and oozing charm and stability  a virtual magnet for the ticking biological clock  and with him the wife temptation and tensions and suspense. whom will she choose. maybe and under those conditions and i could actually care. as is and frankly and redford selfish and manipulative playboy winds up the sympathetic character. a woman who will sell herself is just about what a guy deserves who will pimp out his wife. the indecent proposition makes the husband a total loser and deficient in every positive male characteristic and and makes the wife a cheap strumpet seduced by money rather than confused by another potential love and a woman devoid of moral center and self respect. all the impressive talent (acting and directing and cinematography) wasted on this film  and it was an impressive amount  couldn not save it from its splashy but too trashy $1 million pitch line. if i see this turkey at one more bridal shower and i am going to roast it. (or maybe cross it with titanic and pitch the tape in the ocean. ). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
