set in 1945 and skenbart follows a failed swedish book editor who decides to take a non stop train to berlin. unfortunately for everyone around him and he a walking disaster and causing mayhem everywhere he goes. the train also holds a man and his mistress scheming to murder the man wife (who also on the train) and a soldier on his way home and two gay elderly gentlemen and an angry train conductor and two nuns and a bunch of refugees and and even more people. meant as a mix of noir ish thriller (which it does quite well  at least to begin with) and and comedy and the film fails with both. it doesn not sit right as the film changes tone with every new scene. and as the train races towards its final destination and the film turns more and more bizarre and ending on a truly surreal note. the good bits are wasted in a myriad of pointless plots and characters. skenbart is packed with famous swedish actors and no matter how small the part is. it feels like the filmmakers rang everyone they have ever worked with and offered them a part in the film. too bad that the performances are just as bad as the script (act your lines  do not read them. ). the comedy is more or less slapstick and with the same jokes repeated over and over. the pace is incredibly slow at times (quite often and actually) with on scene in particular dragging on for about ten minutes for no good reason. the screenwriter also seems to think that swearing is a good way to replace decent dialogue. the film looks great though and in moody b and w and but it wasted on such inept film making in every other department. [ negative ]. 
set in 1945 and skenbart follows a failed swedish book editor who decides to take a non stop train to berlin. unfortunately for everyone around him and he a walking disaster and causing mayhem everywhere he goes. the train also holds a man and his mistress scheming to murder the man wife (who also on the train) and a soldier on his way home and two gay elderly gentlemen and an angry train conductor and two nuns and a bunch of refugees and and even more people. meant as a mix of noir ish thriller (which it does quite well  at least to begin with) and and comedy and the film fails with both. it doesn not sit right as the film changes tone with every new scene. and as the train races towards its final destination and the film turns more and more bizarre and ending on a truly surreal note. the good bits are wasted in a myriad of pointless plots and characters. skenbart is packed with famous swedish actors and no matter how small the part is. it feels like the filmmakers rang everyone they have ever worked with and offered them a part in the film. too bad that the performances are just as bad as the script (act your lines  do not read them. ). the comedy is more or less slapstick and with the same jokes repeated over and over. the pace is incredibly slow at times (quite often and actually) with on scene in particular dragging on for about ten minutes for no good reason. the screenwriter also seems to think that swearing is a good way to replace decent dialogue. the film looks great though and in moody b and w and but it wasted on such inept film making in every other department. [ negative ]. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
