as i write this and no user reviews are in yet and but there are 17 votes with a 4. 8 average and so apparently some people thought this movie had its moments. i do not notice any and and even if i had i do not think i could have stopped rolling my eyes for long enough to appreciate them. a common debate among movie buffs is whether major mistakes in science and police tactics and and the like so common in b movies should detract significantly from one enjoyment. i tend to fall into the yes and that a reasonable reaction camp  especially when the mistakes are central to the plot. with this movie and i look forward to reading how anyone can defend this mess. they completely botch pretty much every aspect of military tactics and strategy and police tactics and weapons and science and folklore and common sense and and human behavior (outside of b movies and that is. ) in short and i can not think of any non trivial thing they got right. any movie would have its work cut out for it when its central premise is a supernatural spirit and impervious to all small arms and able to disappear into another dimension at will and and yet apparently vulnerable to simply a bigger explosion. (they do not make ghosts like they used to. ) combine this premise with every detail being wrong and you have a memorably bad movie. 
as i write this and no user reviews are in yet and but there are 17 votes with a 4. 8 average and so apparently some people thought this movie had its moments. i do not notice any and and even if i had i do not think i could have stopped rolling my eyes for long enough to appreciate them. a common debate among movie buffs is whether major mistakes in science and police tactics and and the like so common in b movies should detract significantly from one enjoyment. i tend to fall into the yes and that a reasonable reaction camp  especially when the mistakes are central to the plot. with this movie and i look forward to reading how anyone can defend this mess. they completely botch pretty much every aspect of military tactics and strategy and police tactics and weapons and science and folklore and common sense and and human behavior (outside of b movies and that is. ) in short and i can not think of any non trivial thing they got right. any movie would have its work cut out for it when its central premise is a supernatural spirit and impervious to all small arms and able to disappear into another dimension at will and and yet apparently vulnerable to simply a bigger explosion. (they do not make ghosts like they used to. ) combine this premise with every detail being wrong and you have a memorably bad movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
