i finally got hold of a dvd copy of this production and was agog with curiosity and since i had read so many people praising it to the skies and particularly angela lansbury portrayal of mrs. lovett. i saw the tim burton movie a few months ago and thought it over the top and overly bloody while thankfully this version is not so horrifying gory but it suffers dramatically in too many other ways for it to be in the least satisfying to me. to begin with and the casting. george hearn is adequate and at least shows some expression (as opposed to johnny depp unending wooden face in the movie). angela lansbury is and quite simply and annoying. at least she has enough power in her voice to get the point across as opposed to helena bonham carter piping and expressionless little girl voice and but subtlety seems to be only a word in the dictionary to ms. lansbury. one cannot be drawn into the story when one of the main characters spends her entire time mugging and winking in a look and ma and i am acting. fashion and being far too aware of the audience. this is not something that is typical of stage productions and heaven knows i have been a regular attendee of many productions at the stratford festial for many years and stage actors do not behave in that fashion as a rule (at least those who want to continue to find regular employment do not. ). betsy joslyn. oh dear and oh dear and oh dear. did anybody besides me notice that she can not sing this role even vaguely appropriately. and her playing george hearn daughter is just creepy and considering that she was married to him at the time. isn not she supposed to be a sweet little sixteen year old. yes and i realize that this is what acting is all about and but not once did she convince me that she was any younger than about thirty five and and the phrase mutton dressed as lamb seems to have been coined just for her. her butchering of green finch and linnet bird had me gnashing my teeth and ready to turn off the dvd player at once. that song was done so well in tim burton movie and and this was a sad shock. the song requires the vocal range of julie andrews in the 1960 and a purity of voice that is only comparable to that of a boy soprano. any vibrato at all kills it dead and and ms. joslyn spent the entire time warbling so hard that i thought she was about to fall off of her ladder because she was trembling so much from the effort at sustaining coloratura notes with a voice that is a mezzo at best. let us pass over the spectacle of her vibrating at least a quarter tone flat on at least three of the higher notes. this is quite simply not a coloratura role and perhaps a discerning director should have told her that but the fact that she was married to the star might possibly have tied the director hands. cris groenendaal was adequate and but again obviously far too old for the role and there is zero chemistry between him and ms. joslyn and which makes the whole subplot fall completely flat. i am reminded a little of past stage productions of wagner ring cycle where and due to the vocal power required for the singers to bellow over the sound of a full wagnerian orchestra they would have to cast based upon ability to penetrate vocally as opposed to any appearance or acting ability or even a good voice and which is why you have the caricature of the massive mountainous viking horned brunehilde with a triple chin and a beard and when the libretto calls for an ethereal beauty who is eternally young and bewitching. the casting of the juvenile leads is exactly like that if you close your eyes you can almost believe in mr. groenendaal anthony and but as soon as you look at the screen the illusion is shattered. (and at no time can you ever believe in ms. joslyn johanna. ) for me and the rest of the production was completely lost because of three out of the four major characters were so obviously miscast. i cannot give a proper review of anything else because they were so distracting that they spoiled the rest of the production. i really can not understand why people rave about this badly shot and self conscious filming of a stage play. surely there more to camera work in the theatre than just plunking a camera down in the front row. if i want that and i will go to a decent play and preferably at the stratford festival and where at least they work together for the production and aren not constantly mugging for the camera. i give it three stars only because the quality of the production apart from the antics of lansbury and joslyn seems adequate if not spectacular. probably the best thing one can do is buy the soundtrack of the film and a cast recording of this play and and then combine the two to make a bearable whole. that what i am going to do and and try to forget that i ever bothered to rent this wholly unremarkable production. 
i finally got hold of a dvd copy of this production and was agog with curiosity and since i had read so many people praising it to the skies and particularly angela lansbury portrayal of mrs. lovett. i saw the tim burton movie a few months ago and thought it over the top and overly bloody while thankfully this version is not so horrifying gory but it suffers dramatically in too many other ways for it to be in the least satisfying to me. to begin with and the casting. george hearn is adequate and at least shows some expression (as opposed to johnny depp unending wooden face in the movie). angela lansbury is and quite simply and annoying. at least she has enough power in her voice to get the point across as opposed to helena bonham carter piping and expressionless little girl voice and but subtlety seems to be only a word in the dictionary to ms. lansbury. one cannot be drawn into the story when one of the main characters spends her entire time mugging and winking in a look and ma and i am acting. fashion and being far too aware of the audience. this is not something that is typical of stage productions and heaven knows i have been a regular attendee of many productions at the stratford festial for many years and stage actors do not behave in that fashion as a rule (at least those who want to continue to find regular employment do not. ). betsy joslyn. oh dear and oh dear and oh dear. did anybody besides me notice that she can not sing this role even vaguely appropriately. and her playing george hearn daughter is just creepy and considering that she was married to him at the time. isn not she supposed to be a sweet little sixteen year old. yes and i realize that this is what acting is all about and but not once did she convince me that she was any younger than about thirty five and and the phrase mutton dressed as lamb seems to have been coined just for her. her butchering of green finch and linnet bird had me gnashing my teeth and ready to turn off the dvd player at once. that song was done so well in tim burton movie and and this was a sad shock. the song requires the vocal range of julie andrews in the 1960 and a purity of voice that is only comparable to that of a boy soprano. any vibrato at all kills it dead and and ms. joslyn spent the entire time warbling so hard that i thought she was about to fall off of her ladder because she was trembling so much from the effort at sustaining coloratura notes with a voice that is a mezzo at best. let us pass over the spectacle of her vibrating at least a quarter tone flat on at least three of the higher notes. this is quite simply not a coloratura role and perhaps a discerning director should have told her that but the fact that she was married to the star might possibly have tied the director hands. cris groenendaal was adequate and but again obviously far too old for the role and there is zero chemistry between him and ms. joslyn and which makes the whole subplot fall completely flat. i am reminded a little of past stage productions of wagner ring cycle where and due to the vocal power required for the singers to bellow over the sound of a full wagnerian orchestra they would have to cast based upon ability to penetrate vocally as opposed to any appearance or acting ability or even a good voice and which is why you have the caricature of the massive mountainous viking horned brunehilde with a triple chin and a beard and when the libretto calls for an ethereal beauty who is eternally young and bewitching. the casting of the juvenile leads is exactly like that if you close your eyes you can almost believe in mr. groenendaal anthony and but as soon as you look at the screen the illusion is shattered. (and at no time can you ever believe in ms. joslyn johanna. ) for me and the rest of the production was completely lost because of three out of the four major characters were so obviously miscast. i cannot give a proper review of anything else because they were so distracting that they spoiled the rest of the production. i really can not understand why people rave about this badly shot and self conscious filming of a stage play. surely there more to camera work in the theatre than just plunking a camera down in the front row. if i want that and i will go to a decent play and preferably at the stratford festival and where at least they work together for the production and aren not constantly mugging for the camera. i give it three stars only because the quality of the production apart from the antics of lansbury and joslyn seems adequate if not spectacular. probably the best thing one can do is buy the soundtrack of the film and a cast recording of this play and and then combine the two to make a bearable whole. that what i am going to do and and try to forget that i ever bothered to rent this wholly unremarkable production. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
