critters 3 starts on the open road as clifford (john calvin) his teenage daughter annie (aimee brooks) and his young son johnny (the imdb list two actor christian and josephh cousins and identical twins perhaps. ) are heading back home from a vacation. suddenly the tyre on their van blows and they have to stop at a public rest area to fix it. while there annie and johnny meet a kid named josh (leonardo dicaprio and yes that one) who in turn all run into charlie mcfadden (the films co producer don keith opper) from the previous two critter films. charlie tells them the story of the critters and the town of grovers bend but they do not believe him. meanwhile back at the van a critter lays some eggs on it underside and out of sight from everyone. once clifford has fixed the tyre the trio set off for their home and a run down urban tenement block in los angeles somewhere complete with critter eggs along for the ride. upon arrival the eggs hatch and the critters head straight inside the tenement block quickly disposing of frank (geoffrey blake) and the caretaker. as the night draws on the few remaining residents and a fat woman named rosalie (diana bellamy) and a telephone repair woman marsha (katherine cortez) and an elderly couple mr. (bill zuckert) and mrs. menges (frances bay) must come together with clifford and his kids to fight the critters. josh also makes an appearance as his stepfather (william dennis hunt) owns the building. but will the group be able to defeat the critters and prevent themselves from becoming dinner. directed kristine peterson i thought critters 3 was an incredibly undistinguished film and but at least she can say she made a film staring leonardo dicaprio and not many people can say that. the budget for critters 3 probably wasn not exactly a fortune as the whole production looks cheap throughout and there are very few characters and very few critters and i think only 3 ever appear in the same shot at once and it does away with any sort of space angle so there are no expensive spaceship or distant alien planet special effects to pay for. the script by david j. schow is strictly by the numbers and very predictable. a group of humans are stuck in an isolated situation with critters and have no means of contacting the outside world for help and that plot scenario sounds very familiar right. well it same as the previous critters (1986) and critters 2 represent the main course (1988) and many other horror films so it should. critters 3 does nothing with the premise and it never even tries to add anything to an already old and tired and well used storyline. critters 3 is also very tame for a horror film with only two people actually being killed and the comedy elements are seriously lacking as well with the best joke critters 3 can mange being a critter eating some beans and then farting and very funny if your about 5 years old. the characters are mostly standard horror film clichés and quickly became annoying. there is virtually no blood or gore in critters 3 at all and just a few splashes of blood and disappointingly critters 3 in fact seems to go out of it way not to show any violence. the special effects on the critters are ok but they still look like static and simplistic hand puppets that have very little movement. the acting isn not that good and critters 3 happens to be a certain leonardo dicaprio very first feature film and to be fair to the kid he alright and i wonder if any of the other cast or crew had an idea what he go on to become. why on earth does that charlie guy have to keep popping up in these critter films. to give critters 3 some credit it moves along at a good pace and isn not boring and it generally well made with nice enough production values and it a bit of harmless fun if your in the right sort of mood and thankfully it only lasts for about 80 odd minutes. overall critters 3 is an ok time waster but do not expect anything deep or meaningful. there nothing really wrong with it as cheap horror film but i couldn not help feeling that i would seen it all before. an average time waster that isn not as good as either of the previous two critter films. critters 3 ends with a to be continued. as this was filmed back to back with critters 4 (1991) which unsurprisingly went straight to video and probably to save even more money. critters 3 is a decent enough way to waste 80 odd minutes if you can watch it on t. v. for free otherwise do not bother. 
critters 3 starts on the open road as clifford (john calvin) his teenage daughter annie (aimee brooks) and his young son johnny (the imdb list two actor christian and josephh cousins and identical twins perhaps. ) are heading back home from a vacation. suddenly the tyre on their van blows and they have to stop at a public rest area to fix it. while there annie and johnny meet a kid named josh (leonardo dicaprio and yes that one) who in turn all run into charlie mcfadden (the films co producer don keith opper) from the previous two critter films. charlie tells them the story of the critters and the town of grovers bend but they do not believe him. meanwhile back at the van a critter lays some eggs on it underside and out of sight from everyone. once clifford has fixed the tyre the trio set off for their home and a run down urban tenement block in los angeles somewhere complete with critter eggs along for the ride. upon arrival the eggs hatch and the critters head straight inside the tenement block quickly disposing of frank (geoffrey blake) and the caretaker. as the night draws on the few remaining residents and a fat woman named rosalie (diana bellamy) and a telephone repair woman marsha (katherine cortez) and an elderly couple mr. (bill zuckert) and mrs. menges (frances bay) must come together with clifford and his kids to fight the critters. josh also makes an appearance as his stepfather (william dennis hunt) owns the building. but will the group be able to defeat the critters and prevent themselves from becoming dinner. directed kristine peterson i thought critters 3 was an incredibly undistinguished film and but at least she can say she made a film staring leonardo dicaprio and not many people can say that. the budget for critters 3 probably wasn not exactly a fortune as the whole production looks cheap throughout and there are very few characters and very few critters and i think only 3 ever appear in the same shot at once and it does away with any sort of space angle so there are no expensive spaceship or distant alien planet special effects to pay for. the script by david j. schow is strictly by the numbers and very predictable. a group of humans are stuck in an isolated situation with critters and have no means of contacting the outside world for help and that plot scenario sounds very familiar right. well it same as the previous critters (1986) and critters 2 represent the main course (1988) and many other horror films so it should. critters 3 does nothing with the premise and it never even tries to add anything to an already old and tired and well used storyline. critters 3 is also very tame for a horror film with only two people actually being killed and the comedy elements are seriously lacking as well with the best joke critters 3 can mange being a critter eating some beans and then farting and very funny if your about 5 years old. the characters are mostly standard horror film clichés and quickly became annoying. there is virtually no blood or gore in critters 3 at all and just a few splashes of blood and disappointingly critters 3 in fact seems to go out of it way not to show any violence. the special effects on the critters are ok but they still look like static and simplistic hand puppets that have very little movement. the acting isn not that good and critters 3 happens to be a certain leonardo dicaprio very first feature film and to be fair to the kid he alright and i wonder if any of the other cast or crew had an idea what he go on to become. why on earth does that charlie guy have to keep popping up in these critter films. to give critters 3 some credit it moves along at a good pace and isn not boring and it generally well made with nice enough production values and it a bit of harmless fun if your in the right sort of mood and thankfully it only lasts for about 80 odd minutes. overall critters 3 is an ok time waster but do not expect anything deep or meaningful. there nothing really wrong with it as cheap horror film but i couldn not help feeling that i would seen it all before. an average time waster that isn not as good as either of the previous two critter films. critters 3 ends with a to be continued. as this was filmed back to back with critters 4 (1991) which unsurprisingly went straight to video and probably to save even more money. critters 3 is a decent enough way to waste 80 odd minutes if you can watch it on t. v. for free otherwise do not bother. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
