yes and let get this out of the way before we begin represent this is the one that sean connery returned to in 1983 after the stint we had of roger moore. it connery last film. and yes it a (kind of) remake of thunderball and but more of a film inspired by it. if all you bond purists out there think i am gonna get controversial and youre right. bond is one of the greatest movie series ever and but that doesn not mean that a series should go on forever. this and i think and is one of two films where they could have done themselves a huge favour and ended the bond saga. not offended yet. then i will continue. hey and if youre thinking i am indifferent about bond flicks and youre wrong. i grew up with my mum being obsessed with them. any spare moment and bond and his antics would be on the tv. bond rules and and never say never again (directed by irvin empire strikes back kershner) is one of the best. it may not be goldfinger or from russia. and may not have been done by the same production house as all the others (which i hear is why they refuse to accept it was ever made. ) and but still stands head and shoulders above the recent brosnan outings. (if you haven not spat at the screen and read on). characterization. something so many blockbuster films forget about these days and but something which is essential to telling a good story. never played a superb hand by treating 007 like he had been ageing since dr. no. he getting on a bit and so has to do things like go to a health farm  a direct order from m (. ). yeah and if you haven not seen this film and i would not give too much away with the plot because a) loads happens and b) obviously and i want you to see it for yourselves. don not be put off by my old bond revelation and connery still get plenty of superb set pieces to charge and swim and punch and speed and smash and and snog his way through. the man is a legend and and this film is one of his most enjoyable outings as bond. high tech gadgets galore and some great villains and and an excellent supporting cast (including a fantastic cameo by rowan atkinson) lift this movie high above audience expectation. this could have been the last bond film ever and and it would have been a party to remember. playing the secret agent as someone nearing retirement was refreshing stroke of genius  the last scene wraps things up perfectly for the series. . but still we had more and and then more and and more still and and one more moore. still and if you fancy finding out what fatima blush is all about and get this film. then you can at least pretend 007 spent his last moments as a wisecracking secret agent and in the arms of kim basinger and and smirking at mr. bean. (p. s. that other film that i think could have finished it all off. the gritty license to kill. 
yes and let get this out of the way before we begin represent this is the one that sean connery returned to in 1983 after the stint we had of roger moore. it connery last film. and yes it a (kind of) remake of thunderball and but more of a film inspired by it. if all you bond purists out there think i am gonna get controversial and youre right. bond is one of the greatest movie series ever and but that doesn not mean that a series should go on forever. this and i think and is one of two films where they could have done themselves a huge favour and ended the bond saga. not offended yet. then i will continue. hey and if youre thinking i am indifferent about bond flicks and youre wrong. i grew up with my mum being obsessed with them. any spare moment and bond and his antics would be on the tv. bond rules and and never say never again (directed by irvin empire strikes back kershner) is one of the best. it may not be goldfinger or from russia. and may not have been done by the same production house as all the others (which i hear is why they refuse to accept it was ever made. ) and but still stands head and shoulders above the recent brosnan outings. (if you haven not spat at the screen and read on). characterization. something so many blockbuster films forget about these days and but something which is essential to telling a good story. never played a superb hand by treating 007 like he had been ageing since dr. no. he getting on a bit and so has to do things like go to a health farm  a direct order from m (. ). yeah and if you haven not seen this film and i would not give too much away with the plot because a) loads happens and b) obviously and i want you to see it for yourselves. don not be put off by my old bond revelation and connery still get plenty of superb set pieces to charge and swim and punch and speed and smash and and snog his way through. the man is a legend and and this film is one of his most enjoyable outings as bond. high tech gadgets galore and some great villains and and an excellent supporting cast (including a fantastic cameo by rowan atkinson) lift this movie high above audience expectation. this could have been the last bond film ever and and it would have been a party to remember. playing the secret agent as someone nearing retirement was refreshing stroke of genius  the last scene wraps things up perfectly for the series. . but still we had more and and then more and and more still and and one more moore. still and if you fancy finding out what fatima blush is all about and get this film. then you can at least pretend 007 spent his last moments as a wisecracking secret agent and in the arms of kim basinger and and smirking at mr. bean. (p. s. that other film that i think could have finished it all off. the gritty license to kill. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
