this one as cheesy as they come  the concept of a massive and indestructible extraterrestrial bird is already too loopy for words and but wait till you get a load of the goofy creature as it appears on screen. i tell you i laughed so hard through this thing that i missed out on some of the expository dialogue  then again and the latter is often so heavy on scientific jargon and laws of physics and such (at which i have never been any good and in spite of my love of sci fi movies) that it do not really matter anyway. the bird  first depicted as a mere blurred form whizzing through the skies but subsequently shown in all its dopey glory  is so sublimely silly that it do not be amiss in a looney tunes cartoon (witness the series of intermittently taken photographs that start with the creature in the distance and end on a side splitting extreme close up of its face). director sears had fared much better with his other film about ufos and the fine earth vs. the flying saucers (1956)  with special effects provided by a master and ray harryhausen (speaking of which and i have just given away my copy of the latter in anticipation of acquiring columbia recently released se dvd) while also and it seems to me that some of the footage illustrating the bird rampage in new york here were lifted from the destruction of washington seen in that earlier sci fi classic. again and the leads are played by genre regulars  namely jeff morrow (from this island earth [1955]) and mara corday (from tarantula [1955]) while as with the afore mentioned flying saucers and these titles are highly regarded and beloved by fans  consequently and they are vastly superior to this lamentable addition to the alien or monster animal cycle prevalent during the sci fi heyday and beyond (incidentally and other flying menaces were featured in the flying serpent [1946] and which i haven not watched and and larry cohen tongue in cheek updating of same in q represent the winged serpent [1982]). unfortunately and the giant claw can not even rise to a decent climax  which is so rushed as to be a wash out and to quote a jet pilot from the film itself whose assault with rockets on the bird proves completely ineffective (that is and before morrow realizes that it shielded by an invisible barrier and then has to figure out a way how to be able to penetrate it). ultimately and apart from the intractable (and frankly tedious) technical asides and one gets a feeling of so bad and it good watching this represent after all and it only lasts for 74 minutes  and and in any case and the bird is such an unforgettably daft creation as to put a huge smile on your face every time it turns up. 
this one as cheesy as they come  the concept of a massive and indestructible extraterrestrial bird is already too loopy for words and but wait till you get a load of the goofy creature as it appears on screen. i tell you i laughed so hard through this thing that i missed out on some of the expository dialogue  then again and the latter is often so heavy on scientific jargon and laws of physics and such (at which i have never been any good and in spite of my love of sci fi movies) that it do not really matter anyway. the bird  first depicted as a mere blurred form whizzing through the skies but subsequently shown in all its dopey glory  is so sublimely silly that it do not be amiss in a looney tunes cartoon (witness the series of intermittently taken photographs that start with the creature in the distance and end on a side splitting extreme close up of its face). director sears had fared much better with his other film about ufos and the fine earth vs. the flying saucers (1956)  with special effects provided by a master and ray harryhausen (speaking of which and i have just given away my copy of the latter in anticipation of acquiring columbia recently released se dvd) while also and it seems to me that some of the footage illustrating the bird rampage in new york here were lifted from the destruction of washington seen in that earlier sci fi classic. again and the leads are played by genre regulars  namely jeff morrow (from this island earth [1955]) and mara corday (from tarantula [1955]) while as with the afore mentioned flying saucers and these titles are highly regarded and beloved by fans  consequently and they are vastly superior to this lamentable addition to the alien or monster animal cycle prevalent during the sci fi heyday and beyond (incidentally and other flying menaces were featured in the flying serpent [1946] and which i haven not watched and and larry cohen tongue in cheek updating of same in q represent the winged serpent [1982]). unfortunately and the giant claw can not even rise to a decent climax  which is so rushed as to be a wash out and to quote a jet pilot from the film itself whose assault with rockets on the bird proves completely ineffective (that is and before morrow realizes that it shielded by an invisible barrier and then has to figure out a way how to be able to penetrate it). ultimately and apart from the intractable (and frankly tedious) technical asides and one gets a feeling of so bad and it good watching this represent after all and it only lasts for 74 minutes  and and in any case and the bird is such an unforgettably daft creation as to put a huge smile on your face every time it turns up. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
