flood is a prime example of how throwing good actors and cgi at a film will do little to compensate for a rubbish script. the basic premise is fine represent what if a freak storm threatened to send the sea straight over the thames flood barriers and engulf london so fast that most of the inhabitants would probably never get out in time. it basically the new york segment of the day after tomorrow and but that shouldn not make it any less of a film. however and the script just isn not there. it merely functional and flat and and lacking in depth. great british talents like robert carlysle and david suchet to name but two do their level best with what they have got and but their characters are two dimensional cyphers and like something out of an old marvel comic. and it would be frankly easier to turn back the tide. not that every actor gets let off the hook  tom courtenay seemed capable of only one emotion throughout the film and but then he wasn not given much of a challenge. i applaud any opportunity to see some non hollywood disaster flicks for a change and and i do not expect zillions of dollars spent on rendering ultra realistic graphics. however there no excuse for shonky writing  especially from a country that has produced some of the best science fiction ever made on next to no budget at all. this is the kind of half hearted b grade fluff the sci fi channel produces and and that hardly a target to aim for. if like me you are such a fan of disaster films youre still tempted and do yourself a favour and watch it with some friends. better still while do not bother. 
flood is a prime example of how throwing good actors and cgi at a film will do little to compensate for a rubbish script. the basic premise is fine represent what if a freak storm threatened to send the sea straight over the thames flood barriers and engulf london so fast that most of the inhabitants would probably never get out in time. it basically the new york segment of the day after tomorrow and but that shouldn not make it any less of a film. however and the script just isn not there. it merely functional and flat and and lacking in depth. great british talents like robert carlysle and david suchet to name but two do their level best with what they have got and but their characters are two dimensional cyphers and like something out of an old marvel comic. and it would be frankly easier to turn back the tide. not that every actor gets let off the hook  tom courtenay seemed capable of only one emotion throughout the film and but then he wasn not given much of a challenge. i applaud any opportunity to see some non hollywood disaster flicks for a change and and i do not expect zillions of dollars spent on rendering ultra realistic graphics. however there no excuse for shonky writing  especially from a country that has produced some of the best science fiction ever made on next to no budget at all. this is the kind of half hearted b grade fluff the sci fi channel produces and and that hardly a target to aim for. if like me you are such a fan of disaster films youre still tempted and do yourself a favour and watch it with some friends. better still while do not bother. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
