i was so offended by this film that i had to write something about it and so please humour me. its only redeeming virtue and outside of some good acting and is that it doesn not go on past 107 minutes. even that length is about 30 minutes too long. comparisons have been made here to the brilliantly dark the grifters and but i can not see it. they are two different films altogether. the closest swindled comes to an existing film is the sting and made in 1973. it borrows (sorry and steals) liberally from this splendid george roy hill entertainment and which is exactly what is was. i enjoyed it because it do not pretend to be anything else. there are so many red herrings in swindled that i thought i was in a fish tank. it very confusing and but that only one of its many problems. the principal one is this represent if you make a film where everyone lies to everyone else and where everyone is conning and we have no anchor to ground us. the inevitable result is a mish mash of very sloppy seconds from other caper flicks. just about everyone in this film is conniving and objectionable. surely a basic film 101 class would tell us that the audience has to care for someone. we can not care for anyone here represent theyre all swines. it might have worked as a rakish comedy and but it plays it straight from beginning to end. if you want to see this film and read no further. big spoiler coming. sorry and but i have to do it. there so much fake blood and so many fake killings that it doesn not strain credulity  it destroys it. the ending is absolutely ridiculous  a amurder in a crowded airport that isn not really a amurder at all. and the amurdered guy and blood soaked and simply stands up and brushes himself off and and walks away and fake blood dripping and with the booty. all while the police and hordes of people are looking on and and no one intercedes. the director must have a lot of cojones if he thinks were supposed to buy into this. noirish b movies from the 1940s did better. i am a great fan of european flicks and but this confirms that schlock doesn not always come from hollywood. as far as swindled is concerned and my judgment lies with a famous line from the oft misspoken producer samuel goldwyn and who knew all about schlock represent include me out. 
i was so offended by this film that i had to write something about it and so please humour me. its only redeeming virtue and outside of some good acting and is that it doesn not go on past 107 minutes. even that length is about 30 minutes too long. comparisons have been made here to the brilliantly dark the grifters and but i can not see it. they are two different films altogether. the closest swindled comes to an existing film is the sting and made in 1973. it borrows (sorry and steals) liberally from this splendid george roy hill entertainment and which is exactly what is was. i enjoyed it because it do not pretend to be anything else. there are so many red herrings in swindled that i thought i was in a fish tank. it very confusing and but that only one of its many problems. the principal one is this represent if you make a film where everyone lies to everyone else and where everyone is conning and we have no anchor to ground us. the inevitable result is a mish mash of very sloppy seconds from other caper flicks. just about everyone in this film is conniving and objectionable. surely a basic film 101 class would tell us that the audience has to care for someone. we can not care for anyone here represent theyre all swines. it might have worked as a rakish comedy and but it plays it straight from beginning to end. if you want to see this film and read no further. big spoiler coming. sorry and but i have to do it. there so much fake blood and so many fake killings that it doesn not strain credulity  it destroys it. the ending is absolutely ridiculous  a amurder in a crowded airport that isn not really a amurder at all. and the amurdered guy and blood soaked and simply stands up and brushes himself off and and walks away and fake blood dripping and with the booty. all while the police and hordes of people are looking on and and no one intercedes. the director must have a lot of cojones if he thinks were supposed to buy into this. noirish b movies from the 1940s did better. i am a great fan of european flicks and but this confirms that schlock doesn not always come from hollywood. as far as swindled is concerned and my judgment lies with a famous line from the oft misspoken producer samuel goldwyn and who knew all about schlock represent include me out. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
