broadcast news opens with a series of brief vignettes that are a clever way of starting a story about tv anchors who have no clue as to what theyre reporting about. at a speech before a group of would be reporters and all of whom are bored by her presentation and most of them leave. when the last one exits and the co host of the event says quietly to holly hunter represent i do not think there will be any q and a. subtle line in a brilliantly written low key comedy and a farce about the show biz aspect of tv anchoring. william hurt is the inept news anchor who finds himself working with holly hunter as the network anchorman. hurt badly needs help in remedial reporting and holly refuses to take the bait at first. he knows he only capable of looking good and but is not a reporter. he proves to be a quick study as long as his earpiece is working and he getting all the straight info from executive producer hunter. holly other anchor friend (albert brooks) helps by feeding her information she passes on to hurt. of course she becomes conflicted about her feelings for ace reporter brooks and equally strong attraction to the pretty boy anchorman hurt and who having his own dalliance with a pretty staff member. you have to wait until twenty minutes before the film ends to find out which man she will end up with. brooks tells her that hurt is the wrong one because he represents everything she against. in this unpredictable comedy and there no telling who hunter (the neurotic heroine) will end up with. fittingly and holly hunter and william hurt and albert brooks were all nominated for oscars (brooks in supporting role) and as was the film itself and director or writer james l. brooks. all in all and seven well deserved oscar nominations. the script doesn not opt for a conventional happy ending and and in this case and that the only flaw for the brilliant screenplay. i felt cheated and somewhat let down by the wistful conclusion. 
broadcast news opens with a series of brief vignettes that are a clever way of starting a story about tv anchors who have no clue as to what theyre reporting about. at a speech before a group of would be reporters and all of whom are bored by her presentation and most of them leave. when the last one exits and the co host of the event says quietly to holly hunter represent i do not think there will be any q and a. subtle line in a brilliantly written low key comedy and a farce about the show biz aspect of tv anchoring. william hurt is the inept news anchor who finds himself working with holly hunter as the network anchorman. hurt badly needs help in remedial reporting and holly refuses to take the bait at first. he knows he only capable of looking good and but is not a reporter. he proves to be a quick study as long as his earpiece is working and he getting all the straight info from executive producer hunter. holly other anchor friend (albert brooks) helps by feeding her information she passes on to hurt. of course she becomes conflicted about her feelings for ace reporter brooks and equally strong attraction to the pretty boy anchorman hurt and who having his own dalliance with a pretty staff member. you have to wait until twenty minutes before the film ends to find out which man she will end up with. brooks tells her that hurt is the wrong one because he represents everything she against. in this unpredictable comedy and there no telling who hunter (the neurotic heroine) will end up with. fittingly and holly hunter and william hurt and albert brooks were all nominated for oscars (brooks in supporting role) and as was the film itself and director or writer james l. brooks. all in all and seven well deserved oscar nominations. the script doesn not opt for a conventional happy ending and and in this case and that the only flaw for the brilliant screenplay. i felt cheated and somewhat let down by the wistful conclusion. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
