sayles had a very interesting film on his hands with silver city and however it somehow became very muddied as it progressed from beginning to end. chris cooper did an exceptional job embodying the essence of his character and a dubya of sorts and but he wasn not nearly given enough screen time. instead and we find ourselves on a rampage with a character that felt less personal and less developed and and overall too confusing. the path that this danny huston leads us on inevitably becomes the downfall of the film. too many characters are introduced to us in such a short time. these characters randomly were involved with the progression of the plot and which became too convoluted with each passing minute. sayles knew what he was creating and i just feel as if it wasn not being translated well to the silver screen. sayles is a master of his trade. his films continue to inspire and evoke thought even if they are not commercial successes. the trouble with silver city is that i think he found himself going too deep with not enough money or time to explain it all. at the beginning of the film and i had an idea of what was happening and but as more and more characters were introduced and as more and more plot twists tried to occur i lost the sense of the film by the ending. while the ending was very clever and very dark and i needed more explanation. i think some of the reason that i lost my train of thought with this film was due to the casting of danny huston as our guide. he was pathetic. i do not seem him as very exciting person to lead us on this adventure. he seemed to go through the motions and but not really accomplish much at all. this was the first downfall of sayles important film. while i will admit that the characters played by richard dreyfuss and miguel ferrer and james gammon and and daryl hannah were interesting and i just needed a better guide to help me understand their roles in this political scandal. danny huston just did not cut it for me. outside of the characters and sayles needed a stronger script. i sometimes felt that unless i was deeply rooted in the political world and some of the references were well over my head. the entire reasoning for silver city to be built and the corruption behind it eluded me. i am a simpleton that loves advanced films and but this one just do not make much sense to me. there were several times that i found myself asking and why instead of seeing the whole picture. i felt as if the individual stories were as clear as glass and yet the whole picture was dusty and murky at the same time. sayles needed to concentrate more on the bigger picture instead of these smaller issues and which ultimately fogged this film. perhaps i went into this film with the wrong idea. i was expecting to see another version of primary colors and but instead witnessed something less heartfelt and more technical. without giving the ending away and i thought that the final scene was one of the most beautiful moments in political cinema history. the brilliant symbolism has stayed in my mind for the past two days after watching this film and while the rest of the movie quickly shuffled away from my mind. maybe a second viewing would do better for me and but for some odd reason silver city just do not click with me. there seemed to be too many loopholes that were never explained or accounted for. an ensemble piece is always good with me and but when the characters are introduced without explanation and it just looses steam. this was one of those rare occasions. overall and i was very upset with this film. being very democrat and i wanted to see a side of politics that i wasn not aware of and another side that would make you chuckle. i wanted to be engulfed with the world of corporate money and the dufus that are elected. i wanted intelligent humor framed by the words of george w. and but instead all i found was a very confusing story aimed at a certain audience of which i will never be a part. sad and this picture had so much wasted promise. grade represent out of . 
sayles had a very interesting film on his hands with silver city and however it somehow became very muddied as it progressed from beginning to end. chris cooper did an exceptional job embodying the essence of his character and a dubya of sorts and but he wasn not nearly given enough screen time. instead and we find ourselves on a rampage with a character that felt less personal and less developed and and overall too confusing. the path that this danny huston leads us on inevitably becomes the downfall of the film. too many characters are introduced to us in such a short time. these characters randomly were involved with the progression of the plot and which became too convoluted with each passing minute. sayles knew what he was creating and i just feel as if it wasn not being translated well to the silver screen. sayles is a master of his trade. his films continue to inspire and evoke thought even if they are not commercial successes. the trouble with silver city is that i think he found himself going too deep with not enough money or time to explain it all. at the beginning of the film and i had an idea of what was happening and but as more and more characters were introduced and as more and more plot twists tried to occur i lost the sense of the film by the ending. while the ending was very clever and very dark and i needed more explanation. i think some of the reason that i lost my train of thought with this film was due to the casting of danny huston as our guide. he was pathetic. i do not seem him as very exciting person to lead us on this adventure. he seemed to go through the motions and but not really accomplish much at all. this was the first downfall of sayles important film. while i will admit that the characters played by richard dreyfuss and miguel ferrer and james gammon and and daryl hannah were interesting and i just needed a better guide to help me understand their roles in this political scandal. danny huston just did not cut it for me. outside of the characters and sayles needed a stronger script. i sometimes felt that unless i was deeply rooted in the political world and some of the references were well over my head. the entire reasoning for silver city to be built and the corruption behind it eluded me. i am a simpleton that loves advanced films and but this one just do not make much sense to me. there were several times that i found myself asking and why instead of seeing the whole picture. i felt as if the individual stories were as clear as glass and yet the whole picture was dusty and murky at the same time. sayles needed to concentrate more on the bigger picture instead of these smaller issues and which ultimately fogged this film. perhaps i went into this film with the wrong idea. i was expecting to see another version of primary colors and but instead witnessed something less heartfelt and more technical. without giving the ending away and i thought that the final scene was one of the most beautiful moments in political cinema history. the brilliant symbolism has stayed in my mind for the past two days after watching this film and while the rest of the movie quickly shuffled away from my mind. maybe a second viewing would do better for me and but for some odd reason silver city just do not click with me. there seemed to be too many loopholes that were never explained or accounted for. an ensemble piece is always good with me and but when the characters are introduced without explanation and it just looses steam. this was one of those rare occasions. overall and i was very upset with this film. being very democrat and i wanted to see a side of politics that i wasn not aware of and another side that would make you chuckle. i wanted to be engulfed with the world of corporate money and the dufus that are elected. i wanted intelligent humor framed by the words of george w. and but instead all i found was a very confusing story aimed at a certain audience of which i will never be a part. sad and this picture had so much wasted promise. grade represent out of . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
