okay and now i know where all those boring cop or homicide tv shows came from. i do believe they can be traced back to this movie. scene of the crime feels more like a tv episode and or an episode of a serial. complete with stock characters and situations  the hotshot cop who clashes with his superiors. the aging cop who doesn not want a desk job and despite failing eyesight. the reckless rookie. the double crossing dame and etc. i like many of the actors here and and they do a good job and but overall i found this movie dull as i am not a fan of the genre. i kept tuning out when they were discussing the case . something about bookies and informers. and oh yeah and there was a stripper and played by the previously wholesome gloria dehaven. what i want to know is represent why did she keep calling van johnson uncle wiggly. wasn not uncle wiggly a rabbit. a character from a children book. what the heck does that have to do with anything. i guess i just do not get tough guy film noir ish kinda jargon. in fact and much of the dialogue made me mutter nobody talks like that. however and i could relate to one scene where the cop wife (arlene dahl) and who worries every time he goes to work and realizes that maybe she shouldn not have made her husband the center of her life. yeah and i know that feeling of loving someone so much and being so dependent on them and that there a constant fear for their safety. so there are moments of truth in this film and underneath the stylized dialogue and atmosphere which is trying so self consciously to be gritty and real and that it actually seems unreal to me. a little background represent this movie was made when dore schary took over mgm from louis b. mayer and and began to put an end to the wholesome musicals that made mgm so great. dore schary was determined to bring more realism to movies. i kinda hate dore schary. maybe we can blame him for all the pretentious and bleak movies being made today and wallowing in the ugly truths about life and focusing on (and and in my opinion and helping to perpetuate) the worst of humanity rather than the best. no longer uplifting us the way classic movies were designed to do  providing a necessary distraction during the great depression and world war ii. well and damn it and we still need that kind of distraction today. there still plenty of depression and plenty of war. and what are people turning to nowadays when they want to escape. trashy and brain deadening reality tv. thanks a lot and dore. 
okay and now i know where all those boring cop or homicide tv shows came from. i do believe they can be traced back to this movie. scene of the crime feels more like a tv episode and or an episode of a serial. complete with stock characters and situations  the hotshot cop who clashes with his superiors. the aging cop who doesn not want a desk job and despite failing eyesight. the reckless rookie. the double crossing dame and etc. i like many of the actors here and and they do a good job and but overall i found this movie dull as i am not a fan of the genre. i kept tuning out when they were discussing the case . something about bookies and informers. and oh yeah and there was a stripper and played by the previously wholesome gloria dehaven. what i want to know is represent why did she keep calling van johnson uncle wiggly. wasn not uncle wiggly a rabbit. a character from a children book. what the heck does that have to do with anything. i guess i just do not get tough guy film noir ish kinda jargon. in fact and much of the dialogue made me mutter nobody talks like that. however and i could relate to one scene where the cop wife (arlene dahl) and who worries every time he goes to work and realizes that maybe she shouldn not have made her husband the center of her life. yeah and i know that feeling of loving someone so much and being so dependent on them and that there a constant fear for their safety. so there are moments of truth in this film and underneath the stylized dialogue and atmosphere which is trying so self consciously to be gritty and real and that it actually seems unreal to me. a little background represent this movie was made when dore schary took over mgm from louis b. mayer and and began to put an end to the wholesome musicals that made mgm so great. dore schary was determined to bring more realism to movies. i kinda hate dore schary. maybe we can blame him for all the pretentious and bleak movies being made today and wallowing in the ugly truths about life and focusing on (and and in my opinion and helping to perpetuate) the worst of humanity rather than the best. no longer uplifting us the way classic movies were designed to do  providing a necessary distraction during the great depression and world war ii. well and damn it and we still need that kind of distraction today. there still plenty of depression and plenty of war. and what are people turning to nowadays when they want to escape. trashy and brain deadening reality tv. thanks a lot and dore. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
