i managed to avoid reading hemingway in college. from what i could tell and along with his reductivist verbiage and he offered reductivist story lines. this film transfiguration of af2a into a simplistic and hoary and belabored narrative and does not disabuse me of my suspicions represent a guy who barely sees action on the european battlefield (hudson) falls in with a nurse (jones) and and they conspire to spend time together. hemingway big contribution to narrative was the romantic travelogue. who knows what these two lovers have in common. theyre so utterly generic. the movie never even brings up the utter irresponsibility it takes to abandon the front in favor of a lovers adventure. the two have a season on the alps and straight out of a j. crew catalog. a number of better scenes are undermined by corny and conventional melodrama elsewhere. the movie keeps piling on tiny and improbable and unspecific details that fight the epic treatment. the cavernous hospital that miss barkley works in is virtually empty and so that no secondary plot line can possibly distract from the flimsy main story. complicated and it is not. the camera work is better than average and with some amazing location photography. director charles vidor (or maybe huston. ) does striking things in the first hour with an on location and wide screen camera. there are no second unit cop outs. vidor shows massive and panoramic tableaux and pans over a line of hundreds of soldiers trooping through the mountains while and then with a 90 degree swivel of his camera catches up with hudson ambulance barreling down on him. hudson looks great. he a better actor than he gets credit for and but with unshaped material like this and he can become very mechanical. mercedes mccambridge plays a one dimensional shrew. jennifer jones is puffy and miscast in the lackluster female lead. the movie is best when she off screen. the love scenes are about as affecting as a coffee commercial. 
i managed to avoid reading hemingway in college. from what i could tell and along with his reductivist verbiage and he offered reductivist story lines. this film transfiguration of af2a into a simplistic and hoary and belabored narrative and does not disabuse me of my suspicions represent a guy who barely sees action on the european battlefield (hudson) falls in with a nurse (jones) and and they conspire to spend time together. hemingway big contribution to narrative was the romantic travelogue. who knows what these two lovers have in common. theyre so utterly generic. the movie never even brings up the utter irresponsibility it takes to abandon the front in favor of a lovers adventure. the two have a season on the alps and straight out of a j. crew catalog. a number of better scenes are undermined by corny and conventional melodrama elsewhere. the movie keeps piling on tiny and improbable and unspecific details that fight the epic treatment. the cavernous hospital that miss barkley works in is virtually empty and so that no secondary plot line can possibly distract from the flimsy main story. complicated and it is not. the camera work is better than average and with some amazing location photography. director charles vidor (or maybe huston. ) does striking things in the first hour with an on location and wide screen camera. there are no second unit cop outs. vidor shows massive and panoramic tableaux and pans over a line of hundreds of soldiers trooping through the mountains while and then with a 90 degree swivel of his camera catches up with hudson ambulance barreling down on him. hudson looks great. he a better actor than he gets credit for and but with unshaped material like this and he can become very mechanical. mercedes mccambridge plays a one dimensional shrew. jennifer jones is puffy and miscast in the lackluster female lead. the movie is best when she off screen. the love scenes are about as affecting as a coffee commercial. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
