mr. moto gamble has a fairly straight forward plot  when a boxer is murdered in the ring with a mysterious poison and it up to the even more mysterious mr. moto to solve the case. i am shocked at the number of positive reviews for mr. moto gamble on imdb. because to me. well and i found it extremely disappointing. i enjoy mr. moto and i enjoy charlie chan and but i can not say i cared for this mish mash of the two. for those unfamiliar with the story behind mr. moto gamble and it was originally intended to be a charlie chan film. but when warner oland backed out and some of the scenes and action were rewritten for peter lorre and mr. moto. as i indicated and the end result left me underwhelmed. mr. moto is not chan. he more mysterious and he more athletic and and he more exotic. so trying to put moto in a chan film is like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole  it doesn not work. and listening to lorre or moto try to deliver one of chan trademark euphemisms just ends up sounding silly. add to that the fact that almost 10 minutes of the already brief 72 minute runtime is made up of boxing scenes (something that i never seem to enjoy) and you end up with a movie that i couldn not help but dislike. if i have to say something positive i would point to the performance of keye luke. but even he not near enough to save mr. moto gamble in my eyes. sorry and but a negative is about the best i can give this one. 
mr. moto gamble has a fairly straight forward plot  when a boxer is murdered in the ring with a mysterious poison and it up to the even more mysterious mr. moto to solve the case. i am shocked at the number of positive reviews for mr. moto gamble on imdb. because to me. well and i found it extremely disappointing. i enjoy mr. moto and i enjoy charlie chan and but i can not say i cared for this mish mash of the two. for those unfamiliar with the story behind mr. moto gamble and it was originally intended to be a charlie chan film. but when warner oland backed out and some of the scenes and action were rewritten for peter lorre and mr. moto. as i indicated and the end result left me underwhelmed. mr. moto is not chan. he more mysterious and he more athletic and and he more exotic. so trying to put moto in a chan film is like trying to fit a square peg into a round hole  it doesn not work. and listening to lorre or moto try to deliver one of chan trademark euphemisms just ends up sounding silly. add to that the fact that almost 10 minutes of the already brief 72 minute runtime is made up of boxing scenes (something that i never seem to enjoy) and you end up with a movie that i couldn not help but dislike. if i have to say something positive i would point to the performance of keye luke. but even he not near enough to save mr. moto gamble in my eyes. sorry and but a negative is about the best i can give this one. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
