it was probably watching this tv movie that got me interested in the debate as to whether anna was really tsar nicholas daughter anastasia. since seeing it i have made a point of watching various documentaries and also bought a book. despite the evidence that has been discovered since the film was released and i sometimes still think she was. such is the power of amy irving acting in this 2 parter which is somewhat liberal with the historical facts and but packed to the brim with tear jerking drama and irving totally convincing performance. i was not consciously aware of irving before this and though i must have seen her without realizing it in carrie (another favourite film). in anasasia and i never felt for one moment that it only a film. for me this woman was anastasia and and when part one ended with her in the railway carriage meeting members of the royal family and i knew that come hell or high water i had to see the second part. i just wanted to see how she would prove that she was who she claimed to be and and as the story progressed i felt an intense hatred of rex harrison character and though i greatly admire him as an actor. when i saw the movie listed again in the tv guide and i convinced my mother that we should watch it and and afterward she thanked me for doing so and being almost as keen as i had been to watch part 2. then i bought the video and can totally recommend it. anastasia is one of those rare tv movies that you simply must watch for the sheer enjoyment of watching the finest acting i have ever seen on tv and and it doesn not really matter whether you believe the legend or not. 
it was probably watching this tv movie that got me interested in the debate as to whether anna was really tsar nicholas daughter anastasia. since seeing it i have made a point of watching various documentaries and also bought a book. despite the evidence that has been discovered since the film was released and i sometimes still think she was. such is the power of amy irving acting in this 2 parter which is somewhat liberal with the historical facts and but packed to the brim with tear jerking drama and irving totally convincing performance. i was not consciously aware of irving before this and though i must have seen her without realizing it in carrie (another favourite film). in anasasia and i never felt for one moment that it only a film. for me this woman was anastasia and and when part one ended with her in the railway carriage meeting members of the royal family and i knew that come hell or high water i had to see the second part. i just wanted to see how she would prove that she was who she claimed to be and and as the story progressed i felt an intense hatred of rex harrison character and though i greatly admire him as an actor. when i saw the movie listed again in the tv guide and i convinced my mother that we should watch it and and afterward she thanked me for doing so and being almost as keen as i had been to watch part 2. then i bought the video and can totally recommend it. anastasia is one of those rare tv movies that you simply must watch for the sheer enjoyment of watching the finest acting i have ever seen on tv and and it doesn not really matter whether you believe the legend or not. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
