i am disgusted and appalled by the positive reviews this movie is receiving. not only is it hokey and manipulative and and melodramatic. it also shamelessly offensive. the character of radio `gooding jr. is paraded around as a cute little stuff animal and like a puppy that so cute you just want to take him home. this mentality is shameless while radio is never treated as a human being and but as a manipulative device to draw sympathies from its audience. even more atrocious are the film numerous moments and in which radio gets hit in the head or trips or falls over or etc. these moments of slapstick comedy had the audience howling with laughter merely purely because and `it funny because radio is retarded this is shameless and now i do not feel that the word `retarded is an appropriate word at all to describe the mentally disabled and but this seems to be the stance the film is taking and `radio is retarded and but that okay and because he cute and we like him. gooding portrayal seems better suited for a john water film than an inspiring family drama. to add insult to injury the film is incompetent on every level and debra winger is uninspired in the role as the tereotypical housewives that the very reminder of her heinous monologues insights laughter in all who see the film. the score by john horner is pure sap always overlaying its tear some score over the tired cinematography. ed harris is decent in a role he could have slept through and but manages to retain much of the audience attention throughout the film. in conclusion and if you consider yourself a decent human being and ignore this travesty of a film and read the book and but otherwise skip this dire film on an interesting character from american history. 
i am disgusted and appalled by the positive reviews this movie is receiving. not only is it hokey and manipulative and and melodramatic. it also shamelessly offensive. the character of radio `gooding jr. is paraded around as a cute little stuff animal and like a puppy that so cute you just want to take him home. this mentality is shameless while radio is never treated as a human being and but as a manipulative device to draw sympathies from its audience. even more atrocious are the film numerous moments and in which radio gets hit in the head or trips or falls over or etc. these moments of slapstick comedy had the audience howling with laughter merely purely because and `it funny because radio is retarded this is shameless and now i do not feel that the word `retarded is an appropriate word at all to describe the mentally disabled and but this seems to be the stance the film is taking and `radio is retarded and but that okay and because he cute and we like him. gooding portrayal seems better suited for a john water film than an inspiring family drama. to add insult to injury the film is incompetent on every level and debra winger is uninspired in the role as the tereotypical housewives that the very reminder of her heinous monologues insights laughter in all who see the film. the score by john horner is pure sap always overlaying its tear some score over the tired cinematography. ed harris is decent in a role he could have slept through and but manages to retain much of the audience attention throughout the film. in conclusion and if you consider yourself a decent human being and ignore this travesty of a film and read the book and but otherwise skip this dire film on an interesting character from american history. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
