i am a big fan of larkin works and i believe that he was amid the greatest 20th century poets. the film itself does a great justice to the bard of hull. wonderfully portrayed by all the players in their roles. bonneville does do a service to the sexually repressed larkin and he avoids an impression and strays from becoming a caricature. the use of his poetry was the highlight of the piece itself. rather than acting out the massive intensity with which larkin felt and the use of his words themselves give a better insight into plot and add a much more sombre but altogether more fascinating atmosphere. most enjoyable. 
i am a big fan of larkin works and i believe that he was amid the greatest 20th century poets. the film itself does a great justice to the bard of hull. wonderfully portrayed by all the players in their roles. bonneville does do a service to the sexually repressed larkin and he avoids an impression and strays from becoming a caricature. the use of his poetry was the highlight of the piece itself. rather than acting out the massive intensity with which larkin felt and the use of his words themselves give a better insight into plot and add a much more sombre but altogether more fascinating atmosphere. most enjoyable. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
