this was one of christie later stories. throughout her long career and she was interested in the shifting narrative and the notion of conflicting agents. both are essentially the same thing and boil down to questions of who it is that controls or creates the situation. in detective fiction and the game is a matter of conflicting realities. the murderer intends to change reality to fool the detective and the writer intends to do the same to the reader. both the reader and the detective are in similar battles to create what they see. that why her stories often include a writer. in her works and she explores every combination of tricks she can think of that deal with this. along the way and we often have bodies that are not who they seem and and times and and intended victims and such. but the real magic of the books is this notion of control. in bertram it was literally a building. here and it is a dead man. well and sometimes that happens and but not like this. it is as if the writer were the famous mr. rafiel. this is particularly sweet to marple readers who remember this same character from the carribean mystery and which in a way was also framed by her nephew. in that story and rafiel was the conveyor of the story to the authorities. the producers of this series have an almost wacky commitment to using a different creative team on each one. sometimes it produces bland work. the bertram episode was rather brilliantly staged. this one is the most lavish of the lot and and has an active camera. but unlike the bertram work and it has nothing to do with the story. the camera moves and captures merely because it can. the citizen kane quote at the beginning was a little too literal and blunt. this story is good and but the adapter took out some pretty critical stuff and and that irrelevant camera annoys. ted evaluation  2 of 3 represent has some interesting elements. 
this was one of christie later stories. throughout her long career and she was interested in the shifting narrative and the notion of conflicting agents. both are essentially the same thing and boil down to questions of who it is that controls or creates the situation. in detective fiction and the game is a matter of conflicting realities. the murderer intends to change reality to fool the detective and the writer intends to do the same to the reader. both the reader and the detective are in similar battles to create what they see. that why her stories often include a writer. in her works and she explores every combination of tricks she can think of that deal with this. along the way and we often have bodies that are not who they seem and and times and and intended victims and such. but the real magic of the books is this notion of control. in bertram it was literally a building. here and it is a dead man. well and sometimes that happens and but not like this. it is as if the writer were the famous mr. rafiel. this is particularly sweet to marple readers who remember this same character from the carribean mystery and which in a way was also framed by her nephew. in that story and rafiel was the conveyor of the story to the authorities. the producers of this series have an almost wacky commitment to using a different creative team on each one. sometimes it produces bland work. the bertram episode was rather brilliantly staged. this one is the most lavish of the lot and and has an active camera. but unlike the bertram work and it has nothing to do with the story. the camera moves and captures merely because it can. the citizen kane quote at the beginning was a little too literal and blunt. this story is good and but the adapter took out some pretty critical stuff and and that irrelevant camera annoys. ted evaluation  2 of 3 represent has some interesting elements. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
