there a certain irony in a parody of the gothic genre being turned into a mess of clichés by filmmakers who either had no idea what the story purpose was and or just do not care. all of the hallmarks of your average family film are present rambunctious younger siblings and a grumpy teenager who doesn not want to move and unsympathetic parents who are unable to see the apparition and and of course a romantic subplot. the movie has very little in common with wilde original story and which was largely written to poke fun at the melodramatic gothic novellas that were all the rage at the time. if wilde saw this version and he would probably laugh and then of course and write a parody. one can only hope that the children who watched this bland and mass produced pap eventually discovered the wit and sparkle of the original version. 
there a certain irony in a parody of the gothic genre being turned into a mess of clichés by filmmakers who either had no idea what the story purpose was and or just do not care. all of the hallmarks of your average family film are present rambunctious younger siblings and a grumpy teenager who doesn not want to move and unsympathetic parents who are unable to see the apparition and and of course a romantic subplot. the movie has very little in common with wilde original story and which was largely written to poke fun at the melodramatic gothic novellas that were all the rage at the time. if wilde saw this version and he would probably laugh and then of course and write a parody. one can only hope that the children who watched this bland and mass produced pap eventually discovered the wit and sparkle of the original version. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
