having endured this film last night and i turned off the dvd player with a sense of deserving a medal for having the stamina to see it through to the end. throughout the film i felt that i was watching the storyline fillers that you get in a high budget porn movie. the acting was stiff and taut and camera work appalling and and the locations and sets were so poor it felt like they had borrowed them from the local high school amateur dramatic society. the only saving grace for this movie was that it had amy adams and harriet sansom harris in its credits and other than that it was pure dribble. 
having endured this film last night and i turned off the dvd player with a sense of deserving a medal for having the stamina to see it through to the end. throughout the film i felt that i was watching the storyline fillers that you get in a high budget porn movie. the acting was stiff and taut and camera work appalling and and the locations and sets were so poor it felt like they had borrowed them from the local high school amateur dramatic society. the only saving grace for this movie was that it had amy adams and harriet sansom harris in its credits and other than that it was pure dribble. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
