maybe it just that it was made in 1997 and or maybe whoever managed to get this up to a 7 has a soft spot for kids with aids. but really people and the maniacal laughter and mayhem during the withdrawal scene. did you not see that coming. i am surprised there was no baby crawling across the ceiling and sickboy addressing the camera. the acting was fine and sure. but to me this is just one example of a movie from a time when situations and subject matter could pass for cinematic language. things happen and but that it. there no glue or motive that can be detected on screen and allowing the subject matter to use pre existing emotional connections to furthur the plot and without the script doing it like it supposed to. 
maybe it just that it was made in 1997 and or maybe whoever managed to get this up to a 7 has a soft spot for kids with aids. but really people and the maniacal laughter and mayhem during the withdrawal scene. did you not see that coming. i am surprised there was no baby crawling across the ceiling and sickboy addressing the camera. the acting was fine and sure. but to me this is just one example of a movie from a time when situations and subject matter could pass for cinematic language. things happen and but that it. there no glue or motive that can be detected on screen and allowing the subject matter to use pre existing emotional connections to furthur the plot and without the script doing it like it supposed to. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
