claire booth luce the women shows relationships with men through a woman point of view in a play and (and 1939 film that also has joan crawford playing a bitch represent a character who might have been amanda farrow 20 years before) and that has no male characters. here we see the male characters and what a bunch they are. they use women like toys and throw them away and leaving the women to suffer. ironically and the women in the women and perhaps because they are all we see and are shown in a less than favorable light and alternately silly and scheming and with the only nice one and (norma shearer) and growing claws by the end. in the best of everything we see the men for the cads they are while the women are largely innocent and vulnerable. this is a film about women leaping from things. diane baker leaps from a car and (in perhaps the most absurd scene in cinema history and which is not in the book). suzy parker falls from a fire escape. the women in the film are leaping into the workplace and looking for success and love at the same time. women would leap into the future and leave this type of soap opera behind in the next decade. but they would come back to it in the 80 and 90 through the novels of people like sidney sheldon and judith krantz and (although their trashier works aren not as good as this). the best thing about this film is the way it looks. i love the glossy cinemascope films of the 50 and 60 . they look so much better than the pixel challenged home movies we have been making since and especially in the letterboxed version we see on tv and and the dvd and with the picture so clear you could walk into it. the look of the bevy of young beauties in it is also memorable. this film probably has more beautiful women in it than any other. it has a supermodel and (suzy parker) and a beauty queen and (myrna hansen and who was not miss america 1954 as rona jaffe says in the dvd commentary but rather miss usa 1953 and per the imdb represent but so what) and and a playboy playmate and (june blair and from january 1957). my vote goes to suzy and one of the astonishing beauties of all time. her acting here isn not as awful as people pretend represent they are just reacting and as people did then and to the sight of a supermodel and (the first and really) and trying to act. nobody seemed to care how well she did. her role and that of an apparently worldly woman who turns out to be the most vulnerable and is the most complex in the bunch and she does just fine. the most touching thing about the film now is the age of the female leads at the time. hope lange was 27 when they filmed this in the spring of 1959. diane baker was 20. suzy parker was 26. hope and who looked to be grace kelly heir and never made it really big and wound up being mrs. muir on television and and per the imdb and wound up living in a home with crates for coffee tables because she spent her money on causes she believed in before dying at age 72 in 2003. this film must have seemed a very distant and irrelevant memory to her by then. baker and always a welcome face in 60 tv and (especially to richard kimble) and and still active as an actress and acting coach and just turned 67. parker found the best of everything with bradford dillman for 40 years before dying at age 70 the same year lange did. but here they are and young and beautiful and ambitious for success and love and just like their characters. 
claire booth luce the women shows relationships with men through a woman point of view in a play and (and 1939 film that also has joan crawford playing a bitch represent a character who might have been amanda farrow 20 years before) and that has no male characters. here we see the male characters and what a bunch they are. they use women like toys and throw them away and leaving the women to suffer. ironically and the women in the women and perhaps because they are all we see and are shown in a less than favorable light and alternately silly and scheming and with the only nice one and (norma shearer) and growing claws by the end. in the best of everything we see the men for the cads they are while the women are largely innocent and vulnerable. this is a film about women leaping from things. diane baker leaps from a car and (in perhaps the most absurd scene in cinema history and which is not in the book). suzy parker falls from a fire escape. the women in the film are leaping into the workplace and looking for success and love at the same time. women would leap into the future and leave this type of soap opera behind in the next decade. but they would come back to it in the 80 and 90 through the novels of people like sidney sheldon and judith krantz and (although their trashier works aren not as good as this). the best thing about this film is the way it looks. i love the glossy cinemascope films of the 50 and 60 . they look so much better than the pixel challenged home movies we have been making since and especially in the letterboxed version we see on tv and and the dvd and with the picture so clear you could walk into it. the look of the bevy of young beauties in it is also memorable. this film probably has more beautiful women in it than any other. it has a supermodel and (suzy parker) and a beauty queen and (myrna hansen and who was not miss america 1954 as rona jaffe says in the dvd commentary but rather miss usa 1953 and per the imdb represent but so what) and and a playboy playmate and (june blair and from january 1957). my vote goes to suzy and one of the astonishing beauties of all time. her acting here isn not as awful as people pretend represent they are just reacting and as people did then and to the sight of a supermodel and (the first and really) and trying to act. nobody seemed to care how well she did. her role and that of an apparently worldly woman who turns out to be the most vulnerable and is the most complex in the bunch and she does just fine. the most touching thing about the film now is the age of the female leads at the time. hope lange was 27 when they filmed this in the spring of 1959. diane baker was 20. suzy parker was 26. hope and who looked to be grace kelly heir and never made it really big and wound up being mrs. muir on television and and per the imdb and wound up living in a home with crates for coffee tables because she spent her money on causes she believed in before dying at age 72 in 2003. this film must have seemed a very distant and irrelevant memory to her by then. baker and always a welcome face in 60 tv and (especially to richard kimble) and and still active as an actress and acting coach and just turned 67. parker found the best of everything with bradford dillman for 40 years before dying at age 70 the same year lange did. but here they are and young and beautiful and ambitious for success and love and just like their characters. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
