the end of suburbia and as it should appeal to general citizens and mass consumers alike and is likely to become of cultural reform status. the film uses super cynical analysis by authors and policy makers and and social philosophers on the paradox created by suburban style living mainly in the post war era. what we have created in america is a place with none of the amenities of country life and and none of the amenities of urban city life. this is the prescription that is laid out for suburbia and and the film focus on the singular idea of oil. basically and in the most general sense and that the world is nearing or at it peak oil production and and when we realize this in full and major lifestyle changes will be in effect and whether by our best interest or forced violently upon us by a quality of living even the slum dwellers of calcutta couldn not describe to us. if nothing more and the end of suburbia will siphon the viewer flush in their gut and creating a sickening feeling. this is bound to happen. it a bleak outlook on our inherent way of life. the ambivalence lies particularly in each respective viewers critical analysis of the film. i foresee many unprepared viewers slandering the film as smug liberal propaganda like a michale moore film. what they fail to consider is that a reaction like this is all too normal when such a message hits so unbelievably hard to the lifestyle of the vast majority of the masses. this is the truth and and as a student studying city planning and i can tell you that we better get prepared now and because what slim chance we have of maintaining quality of life in this dwindling cesspool of tampered resources is fading faster than a race of people stricken by the black plague. 
the end of suburbia and as it should appeal to general citizens and mass consumers alike and is likely to become of cultural reform status. the film uses super cynical analysis by authors and policy makers and and social philosophers on the paradox created by suburban style living mainly in the post war era. what we have created in america is a place with none of the amenities of country life and and none of the amenities of urban city life. this is the prescription that is laid out for suburbia and and the film focus on the singular idea of oil. basically and in the most general sense and that the world is nearing or at it peak oil production and and when we realize this in full and major lifestyle changes will be in effect and whether by our best interest or forced violently upon us by a quality of living even the slum dwellers of calcutta couldn not describe to us. if nothing more and the end of suburbia will siphon the viewer flush in their gut and creating a sickening feeling. this is bound to happen. it a bleak outlook on our inherent way of life. the ambivalence lies particularly in each respective viewers critical analysis of the film. i foresee many unprepared viewers slandering the film as smug liberal propaganda like a michale moore film. what they fail to consider is that a reaction like this is all too normal when such a message hits so unbelievably hard to the lifestyle of the vast majority of the masses. this is the truth and and as a student studying city planning and i can tell you that we better get prepared now and because what slim chance we have of maintaining quality of life in this dwindling cesspool of tampered resources is fading faster than a race of people stricken by the black plague. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
