how can anyone even begin to like this film is really beyond me. the idea. it has none. a guy fell apart. that the idea. wow. an environment was slowly killing him. now that original and worth watching. this is the first fasbinder film i have seen. i have heard that he a genius of mise en scene and but i have seen student films with more attention and inspiration and idea and and craft than this. this. this nothing. it has nothing. each and every shot is too long. there so much emptiness in them. the acting horrible. you can see the actors had no preparation at all and no understanding of their roles and not even an attempt at showing emotions. it so. superficial. the lines are so explicative that you could removed 90% of them and still have the same crappy film. tempo. who cares about it. atmosphere and dynamics and that for pussies. one shot per scene and 80% of the time people staring unrealistically and having no idea how to represent emotions and importance of the moment besides hollow staring at the camera or one another. editing. all rules of editing have been disregarded with no pa pay off of any kind. photography. half of the shots have reflection in them and and crappy lighting with no stylization of any kind. shadows and play of shadows. who needs that. we need a guy pissing and drinking and hitting his wife like he . like he acting. we need a bunch of close ups of a not so beautiful woman. we need an amateurish climax of his capture by an unconvincing arabian torturer. this film has so much wrongs that it isn not worth the no budget it had. frankly and i haven not seen a film this bad since american pie 5. yup. that bad. i have just started watching his veronica foss movie and which seems much better and based on the first 15 minutes (since it does have a hint of directing and artistic idea and unlike this crap) and so i would not argue that fasbinder clueless. but this. this film sucks. 
how can anyone even begin to like this film is really beyond me. the idea. it has none. a guy fell apart. that the idea. wow. an environment was slowly killing him. now that original and worth watching. this is the first fasbinder film i have seen. i have heard that he a genius of mise en scene and but i have seen student films with more attention and inspiration and idea and and craft than this. this. this nothing. it has nothing. each and every shot is too long. there so much emptiness in them. the acting horrible. you can see the actors had no preparation at all and no understanding of their roles and not even an attempt at showing emotions. it so. superficial. the lines are so explicative that you could removed 90% of them and still have the same crappy film. tempo. who cares about it. atmosphere and dynamics and that for pussies. one shot per scene and 80% of the time people staring unrealistically and having no idea how to represent emotions and importance of the moment besides hollow staring at the camera or one another. editing. all rules of editing have been disregarded with no pa pay off of any kind. photography. half of the shots have reflection in them and and crappy lighting with no stylization of any kind. shadows and play of shadows. who needs that. we need a guy pissing and drinking and hitting his wife like he . like he acting. we need a bunch of close ups of a not so beautiful woman. we need an amateurish climax of his capture by an unconvincing arabian torturer. this film has so much wrongs that it isn not worth the no budget it had. frankly and i haven not seen a film this bad since american pie 5. yup. that bad. i have just started watching his veronica foss movie and which seems much better and based on the first 15 minutes (since it does have a hint of directing and artistic idea and unlike this crap) and so i would not argue that fasbinder clueless. but this. this film sucks. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
