bone eater is set in a small desert town in alabama where property developer dick krantz (jim storm) is financing the building of a huge resort. late one night three of his workers riley (timothy starks) and hansen (adrian alvarado) and miller (paul rae) are digging foundations in the desert when they unearth what looks like a tomahawk axe and unfortunately for them an ancient native american demon called the bone eater comes along and kills them. local sheriff steve evans (bruce boxleitner) soon has krantz breathing down his neck as the construction of his resort grinds to a halt and sheriff evans also has to deal with the bone eater demon as it kills anyone it comes across. you know i consider myself a fairly big fan of the horror and sci fi genre and i certainly do not think my opinion is worth more than anyone else (unlike many here on the imdb. ) but please believe me when i say that bone eater is the worst sci fi channel creature feature i have ever seen and it up against some damned strong competition. as a horror and sci fi fan there are two names that when involved with a film send shudders down my spine in anticipation of how bad it will turn out and those names are jesus i have no talent franco who had nothing to do with bone eater and jim wynorski who directed the absolute disaster that is bone eater. in fact bone eater is so bad wynorski hid under the pseudonym bob robertson and when a director as bad as wynorski hides under a pseudonym you know the film must be bad. where do i even start. bone eater is quite simply the worst film i have seen this year and is so bad it untrue and the story is awful and the script is sloppy (at one point sheriff evans tells kia to meet him at the hospital but when they meet there later he acts surprised and says what are you doing here. and at one point sheriff evans triumphantly claims that we are in the twentieth century and that ancient native american demons are nonsense although actually we are in the twenty first century now and there a part when a woman tells in flashback the story where three men awaken the bone eater and it kills them but since it killed all three of them how did anyone else know about it for it to be passed down in legend. ) and at times it gets more than a little bit embarrassing. the character are horrible clichés and the small town sheriff who saves the day and his daughter becomes involved which adds some personal motivation and as for the native americans there an old wise man and a young hot head who hates white man and a young woman who is the voice of reason between the two who have names like storm cloud and black hawk. the film is as boring as hell and nothing happens and the story is awful and it full of plot holes and lapses in any sort of logic and the set pieces are terrible and there no horror or gore or suspense or mystery and bone eater is just the sort of film that makes you lose the will to live. bone eater has some of the worst cgi computer effects i have seen in a while and from the daft looking stiff moving bone eater creature itself which is just a selection of bones magically held together to a motorbike jumping a large gap to an awful cgi truck crashing over the edge of a cliff to a van being tossed to one side by the bone eater. whenever the bone eater needs to get some speed up he causes a large horse to form from the sand and dust and rides it. in principal this is actually quite a neat idea but it looks awful and the scenes even have cheesy cowboy music on the soundtrack. there is one pointless scene at the end when sheriff evans cuts his own arm (why. ) and it bleeds but apart from that there isn not a single drop of blood in the thing and whenever the bone eater kills someone they usually just disappear in a cloud of dust and boring. the hilariously goofy climatic showdown between sheriff evans and the bone eater has to be seen to be believed and sheriff evans goes native on horseback complete with tribal war paint on his face while the bone eater also rides his dust horse and they have a sort of jousting contest which is just to bad to describe properly. with a supposed budget of about $700 and 000 bone eater is filmed in a very bland and forgettable and flat way and there no sense of style here at all. the majority of the film takes place in bright sunlight and if you watch it on a decent telly then the desert scenery is quite nice on occasion. there are several veteran known actors really slumming it here and boxleitner plays exactly the same role as in the similarly themed but much better creature feature snakehead terror (2004) and william katt will obviously put his name to any crap as long as he gets paid while ex star trek man walter koenig must be really desperate to agree to appear in this. bone eater is a truly atrocious creature feature and there really not much more you can say about it other than to steer well clear of it. the worst film ever to appear on the sci fi channel and that saying something and isn not it. 
bone eater is set in a small desert town in alabama where property developer dick krantz (jim storm) is financing the building of a huge resort. late one night three of his workers riley (timothy starks) and hansen (adrian alvarado) and miller (paul rae) are digging foundations in the desert when they unearth what looks like a tomahawk axe and unfortunately for them an ancient native american demon called the bone eater comes along and kills them. local sheriff steve evans (bruce boxleitner) soon has krantz breathing down his neck as the construction of his resort grinds to a halt and sheriff evans also has to deal with the bone eater demon as it kills anyone it comes across. you know i consider myself a fairly big fan of the horror and sci fi genre and i certainly do not think my opinion is worth more than anyone else (unlike many here on the imdb. ) but please believe me when i say that bone eater is the worst sci fi channel creature feature i have ever seen and it up against some damned strong competition. as a horror and sci fi fan there are two names that when involved with a film send shudders down my spine in anticipation of how bad it will turn out and those names are jesus i have no talent franco who had nothing to do with bone eater and jim wynorski who directed the absolute disaster that is bone eater. in fact bone eater is so bad wynorski hid under the pseudonym bob robertson and when a director as bad as wynorski hides under a pseudonym you know the film must be bad. where do i even start. bone eater is quite simply the worst film i have seen this year and is so bad it untrue and the story is awful and the script is sloppy (at one point sheriff evans tells kia to meet him at the hospital but when they meet there later he acts surprised and says what are you doing here. and at one point sheriff evans triumphantly claims that we are in the twentieth century and that ancient native american demons are nonsense although actually we are in the twenty first century now and there a part when a woman tells in flashback the story where three men awaken the bone eater and it kills them but since it killed all three of them how did anyone else know about it for it to be passed down in legend. ) and at times it gets more than a little bit embarrassing. the character are horrible clichés and the small town sheriff who saves the day and his daughter becomes involved which adds some personal motivation and as for the native americans there an old wise man and a young hot head who hates white man and a young woman who is the voice of reason between the two who have names like storm cloud and black hawk. the film is as boring as hell and nothing happens and the story is awful and it full of plot holes and lapses in any sort of logic and the set pieces are terrible and there no horror or gore or suspense or mystery and bone eater is just the sort of film that makes you lose the will to live. bone eater has some of the worst cgi computer effects i have seen in a while and from the daft looking stiff moving bone eater creature itself which is just a selection of bones magically held together to a motorbike jumping a large gap to an awful cgi truck crashing over the edge of a cliff to a van being tossed to one side by the bone eater. whenever the bone eater needs to get some speed up he causes a large horse to form from the sand and dust and rides it. in principal this is actually quite a neat idea but it looks awful and the scenes even have cheesy cowboy music on the soundtrack. there is one pointless scene at the end when sheriff evans cuts his own arm (why. ) and it bleeds but apart from that there isn not a single drop of blood in the thing and whenever the bone eater kills someone they usually just disappear in a cloud of dust and boring. the hilariously goofy climatic showdown between sheriff evans and the bone eater has to be seen to be believed and sheriff evans goes native on horseback complete with tribal war paint on his face while the bone eater also rides his dust horse and they have a sort of jousting contest which is just to bad to describe properly. with a supposed budget of about $700 and 000 bone eater is filmed in a very bland and forgettable and flat way and there no sense of style here at all. the majority of the film takes place in bright sunlight and if you watch it on a decent telly then the desert scenery is quite nice on occasion. there are several veteran known actors really slumming it here and boxleitner plays exactly the same role as in the similarly themed but much better creature feature snakehead terror (2004) and william katt will obviously put his name to any crap as long as he gets paid while ex star trek man walter koenig must be really desperate to agree to appear in this. bone eater is a truly atrocious creature feature and there really not much more you can say about it other than to steer well clear of it. the worst film ever to appear on the sci fi channel and that saying something and isn not it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
