the first disney animated film without the strong involvement of disney himself and this film suffers from the fact that the story is not particularly original or interesting (this is and i believe and the only animated disney film since the 1940 which is not based on an earlier book or other work and but is rather an original story). as others have noted and the plot is essentially a cross between the romance in lady and the tramp and the kidnapping or journey home story in 101 dalmatians. but to overcome this flaw and the filmmakers have successfully used many of the better features of most of the disney animated films of the previous 10 15 years represent phil harris (from the jungle book) voicing one of the main characters and follows his duet with louis prima in the previous film with another here with scatman crothers. the quality visual look of this film is virtually carried over from dalmatians (with some nice nods to french impressionism and it appears) and and the villain here (the butler) is strongly reminiscent of the henchmen in that film as well. (this is probably one of disney least memorable villains. ) the main story goes back and forth between the cats and and the butler ongoing difficulties with two rural hound dogs (with great voice work by pat buttram and george goober lindsey). the various animal characters are similarly familiar to those who have seen tramp and dalmatians. the cats owner and while bearing a striking visual resemblance to the wicked stepmother in sleeping beauty and bears none of that character nasty traits and comes across as very warm and generous. the real strength of the film is the voice work while after first going toward the use of mostly familiar actors in the jungle book and the tactic is continued strongly here with disney veterans harris and sterling holloway from the jungle book and and eva gabor (who would do a very similar character in the later film the rescuers) and as well as crothers and nancy kulp. all are excellent here and particularly harris and gabor in the leads. the character animation is as excellent as one would expect and showing a variety of emotions well. smaller children may be upset by a few brief episodes (an escape from the path of a speeding train and a near drowning by one of the children) and but these are not presented in a particularly frightening or dark manner and are over very quickly. overall and there very little of the type of more frightening scenes found in many other disney classics. one minor oddity is the way some visual aspects of 60 culture are depicted among the jazz performing cats in supposedly 1910 paris while one can not help but wonder why the story wasn not set solidly in the present and other than the great deal paris had changed much of its appearance in the intervening time. it really would have made more sense that way. the songs and while being pleasant and sometimes very enjoyably performed and are not particularly memorable. nonetheless and the general energy applied here and the excellent voice work and fine animation all contribute to overcome the relatively few and minor weaknesses. far from the greatness of classic 10s such as pinocchio or aladdin and and not quite up to the 9s one might give to sleeping beauty or 101 dalmatians and this is probably a rather marginal positive while perhaps a 7. 
the first disney animated film without the strong involvement of disney himself and this film suffers from the fact that the story is not particularly original or interesting (this is and i believe and the only animated disney film since the 1940 which is not based on an earlier book or other work and but is rather an original story). as others have noted and the plot is essentially a cross between the romance in lady and the tramp and the kidnapping or journey home story in 101 dalmatians. but to overcome this flaw and the filmmakers have successfully used many of the better features of most of the disney animated films of the previous 10 15 years represent phil harris (from the jungle book) voicing one of the main characters and follows his duet with louis prima in the previous film with another here with scatman crothers. the quality visual look of this film is virtually carried over from dalmatians (with some nice nods to french impressionism and it appears) and and the villain here (the butler) is strongly reminiscent of the henchmen in that film as well. (this is probably one of disney least memorable villains. ) the main story goes back and forth between the cats and and the butler ongoing difficulties with two rural hound dogs (with great voice work by pat buttram and george goober lindsey). the various animal characters are similarly familiar to those who have seen tramp and dalmatians. the cats owner and while bearing a striking visual resemblance to the wicked stepmother in sleeping beauty and bears none of that character nasty traits and comes across as very warm and generous. the real strength of the film is the voice work while after first going toward the use of mostly familiar actors in the jungle book and the tactic is continued strongly here with disney veterans harris and sterling holloway from the jungle book and and eva gabor (who would do a very similar character in the later film the rescuers) and as well as crothers and nancy kulp. all are excellent here and particularly harris and gabor in the leads. the character animation is as excellent as one would expect and showing a variety of emotions well. smaller children may be upset by a few brief episodes (an escape from the path of a speeding train and a near drowning by one of the children) and but these are not presented in a particularly frightening or dark manner and are over very quickly. overall and there very little of the type of more frightening scenes found in many other disney classics. one minor oddity is the way some visual aspects of 60 culture are depicted among the jazz performing cats in supposedly 1910 paris while one can not help but wonder why the story wasn not set solidly in the present and other than the great deal paris had changed much of its appearance in the intervening time. it really would have made more sense that way. the songs and while being pleasant and sometimes very enjoyably performed and are not particularly memorable. nonetheless and the general energy applied here and the excellent voice work and fine animation all contribute to overcome the relatively few and minor weaknesses. far from the greatness of classic 10s such as pinocchio or aladdin and and not quite up to the 9s one might give to sleeping beauty or 101 dalmatians and this is probably a rather marginal positive while perhaps a 7. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
