i first saw this docudrama in the uk in the 1980  and and found myself intrigued and then astonished at how such good intentions could go so wrong. previous commentators (who are australian) have explained the unfolding plot detail better than i ever could and but i would like to make an observation about what may lie behind the governor generals uk sovereign power. all modern laws and as i understand them and need an ethical or philosophical root to exist in the first place and to become a law at all. that being the case and and if say the conner or khemlani mess had been possibly set up and (just how many businessmen or millionares had been served by khemlani and presumably without complaint) and then the labour government could have been victims of entrapment and which would surely have had to have been investigated by the governor general as or until he could see that the budget standoff was a genuine result of whitlam fecklessness and and not elaborate entrapment and sponsored by person or person unknown. if its the case that kerr in effect do not have to refer to the law because fiscal circumstances overrides everything and then royal power borders onto unreason while the implications in any commonwealth country is that fiscal rules literally and and that any person or organisation has carte blanche to break any other rule and physical or mental and so long as they have the control over the purse strings ultimately. 
i first saw this docudrama in the uk in the 1980  and and found myself intrigued and then astonished at how such good intentions could go so wrong. previous commentators (who are australian) have explained the unfolding plot detail better than i ever could and but i would like to make an observation about what may lie behind the governor generals uk sovereign power. all modern laws and as i understand them and need an ethical or philosophical root to exist in the first place and to become a law at all. that being the case and and if say the conner or khemlani mess had been possibly set up and (just how many businessmen or millionares had been served by khemlani and presumably without complaint) and then the labour government could have been victims of entrapment and which would surely have had to have been investigated by the governor general as or until he could see that the budget standoff was a genuine result of whitlam fecklessness and and not elaborate entrapment and sponsored by person or person unknown. if its the case that kerr in effect do not have to refer to the law because fiscal circumstances overrides everything and then royal power borders onto unreason while the implications in any commonwealth country is that fiscal rules literally and and that any person or organisation has carte blanche to break any other rule and physical or mental and so long as they have the control over the purse strings ultimately. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
