the good news for imdb is that this movie was so very bad that it compelled me to register and make a comment. i should add here that i am a film buff who rarely passes harsh judgment. but sometimes a movie is so poorly acted and poorly conceived and poorly edited and with a such a poor story line that it begs criticism. i am surprised by all the claims of how superb and brilliant and dark and and beautifully shot this movie was. i can only conclude that the cast and crew are active posters here. the acting was extremely thin. the pace of the movie was agonizing. i gave it new chances at every turn (mostly because i do not want to feel like i was wasting a saturday morning in ny) and but with every new scene and it dragged longer and delivering characters in which i took no interest and with which i could not connect and for whom i could not empathize. when i see negative reviews on imdb of small independent films like this and i sometimes wonder if the poster has a personal axe to grind (something like. . he used to date the gaffer and she dumped him and and now he going to trash everything she ever works on). but here and nope. i know no one who worked on this film. and i wish it would have been great. but the film wasn not dark (as some have mentioned) or depressing (as others have claimed). . . those suggest that i connected with the film . . . nope and henry may long was just too long and empty and and tedious. that the tomas take on this one. 
the good news for imdb is that this movie was so very bad that it compelled me to register and make a comment. i should add here that i am a film buff who rarely passes harsh judgment. but sometimes a movie is so poorly acted and poorly conceived and poorly edited and with a such a poor story line that it begs criticism. i am surprised by all the claims of how superb and brilliant and dark and and beautifully shot this movie was. i can only conclude that the cast and crew are active posters here. the acting was extremely thin. the pace of the movie was agonizing. i gave it new chances at every turn (mostly because i do not want to feel like i was wasting a saturday morning in ny) and but with every new scene and it dragged longer and delivering characters in which i took no interest and with which i could not connect and for whom i could not empathize. when i see negative reviews on imdb of small independent films like this and i sometimes wonder if the poster has a personal axe to grind (something like. . he used to date the gaffer and she dumped him and and now he going to trash everything she ever works on). but here and nope. i know no one who worked on this film. and i wish it would have been great. but the film wasn not dark (as some have mentioned) or depressing (as others have claimed). . . those suggest that i connected with the film . . . nope and henry may long was just too long and empty and and tedious. that the tomas take on this one. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
