bears about as much resemblance to dean koontz novel as jessica simpson does to a rocket scientist. if you have read the book and i suggest you put it as far out of your mind as possible before watching the movie. watchers is your typical boy meets dog and dog turns out to be super intelligent government lab experiment and dog and boy are pursued by super intelligent and emotionally disturbed monster created by same lab and and and oh yeah and did i mention the shady government agents pursuing the monster pursuing the dog. movie. corey haim is the boy and barbara williams is his mother and michael ironside is one of the evil government guys and and sandy the dog is and well and the dog (named furface here while einstein in the book). the monster effects are ridiculously cheesy and much of the dialogue is laughable and the script rarely makes sense or is believable  a good example is haim character unquestioning acceptance of the dog intelligence and as if every fido off the street can type messages on a computer keyboard or bark once for yes and twice for no. hmm and it gotta be the puppy chow and right. haim performance is enthusiastic but shaky and as he carries off the stupid dialogue with the least amount of skill. ironside has been the highlight of many a bad movie and and this is no exception. he easily gives the best performance of the movie and although i am compelled to add that the dog (who a pretty darn good actor himself. ) comes in a close second. all in all and an atrociously dumb movie and and yet . . . and yet i watched it three times within a week. and yet i can not help liking it. hey and what can i say and i have a taste for junk  and michael ironside (not that i have ever actually tasted michael ironside i am sure there are laws against that). but any movie that can make me laugh that hard (yes and even unintentionally) can not be all bad. chalk it up to a guilty pleasure and a yes i know it insultingly stupid but i like it anyway movie. it tough for me to rate this. on a normal scale i am forced to give it a d  and but on my own personal cheese scale and it gets bumped up to an a . yeah and i know. i am weird like that. 
bears about as much resemblance to dean koontz novel as jessica simpson does to a rocket scientist. if you have read the book and i suggest you put it as far out of your mind as possible before watching the movie. watchers is your typical boy meets dog and dog turns out to be super intelligent government lab experiment and dog and boy are pursued by super intelligent and emotionally disturbed monster created by same lab and and and oh yeah and did i mention the shady government agents pursuing the monster pursuing the dog. movie. corey haim is the boy and barbara williams is his mother and michael ironside is one of the evil government guys and and sandy the dog is and well and the dog (named furface here while einstein in the book). the monster effects are ridiculously cheesy and much of the dialogue is laughable and the script rarely makes sense or is believable  a good example is haim character unquestioning acceptance of the dog intelligence and as if every fido off the street can type messages on a computer keyboard or bark once for yes and twice for no. hmm and it gotta be the puppy chow and right. haim performance is enthusiastic but shaky and as he carries off the stupid dialogue with the least amount of skill. ironside has been the highlight of many a bad movie and and this is no exception. he easily gives the best performance of the movie and although i am compelled to add that the dog (who a pretty darn good actor himself. ) comes in a close second. all in all and an atrociously dumb movie and and yet . . . and yet i watched it three times within a week. and yet i can not help liking it. hey and what can i say and i have a taste for junk  and michael ironside (not that i have ever actually tasted michael ironside i am sure there are laws against that). but any movie that can make me laugh that hard (yes and even unintentionally) can not be all bad. chalk it up to a guilty pleasure and a yes i know it insultingly stupid but i like it anyway movie. it tough for me to rate this. on a normal scale i am forced to give it a d  and but on my own personal cheese scale and it gets bumped up to an a . yeah and i know. i am weird like that. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
