how much longer are we to persist with this flawed belief that once a director produces great and ground breaking work and all future work can not be all that bad and after all and he made such and such. mulholland drive is a case in point and and is in fact unmitigated rubbish. the performances are excellent and particularly from watts and theroux and but a good film they do not necessarily make. what lynch has clearly forgotten is that just making a film unnecessarily wierd only works when it takes the audience by surprise. when the audience is expecting the film to not make sense and then the film has to have some substance to keep the audience interested. lynch succeeds in the first half of the film and with the murder mystery set up with lots of twists and red herrings and and then . plop. the story decends into a quagmire of bizarre halucinations and pointless segues. methinks lynch realised how muddled the film was becoming and and threw in the lesbian and mastobatory scenes to the audience awake and and to stop the male viewers from standing up and leaving. watching the film at the preview and i was surrounded by lynchophiles who had no more idea of what was going on than i did and but left the theatre commenting on the layers and layers of lynch film making. excuse me but these people are the same nitwits who stand in art galleries staring at canvasses that have been painted white commenting on the courage of the artist at painting such a brave work. films like these are made because (a) lynch is trading on his previous work while and (b) because people convince themselves that unintelligeable film is art and and therefore and must be good. i queried a number of the lynchophiles about what they actually liked in the film and only response i recieved that wasn not a broad layers type of answer was that they liked it when the chicks got their kit off. nuff said. 
how much longer are we to persist with this flawed belief that once a director produces great and ground breaking work and all future work can not be all that bad and after all and he made such and such. mulholland drive is a case in point and and is in fact unmitigated rubbish. the performances are excellent and particularly from watts and theroux and but a good film they do not necessarily make. what lynch has clearly forgotten is that just making a film unnecessarily wierd only works when it takes the audience by surprise. when the audience is expecting the film to not make sense and then the film has to have some substance to keep the audience interested. lynch succeeds in the first half of the film and with the murder mystery set up with lots of twists and red herrings and and then . plop. the story decends into a quagmire of bizarre halucinations and pointless segues. methinks lynch realised how muddled the film was becoming and and threw in the lesbian and mastobatory scenes to the audience awake and and to stop the male viewers from standing up and leaving. watching the film at the preview and i was surrounded by lynchophiles who had no more idea of what was going on than i did and but left the theatre commenting on the layers and layers of lynch film making. excuse me but these people are the same nitwits who stand in art galleries staring at canvasses that have been painted white commenting on the courage of the artist at painting such a brave work. films like these are made because (a) lynch is trading on his previous work while and (b) because people convince themselves that unintelligeable film is art and and therefore and must be good. i queried a number of the lynchophiles about what they actually liked in the film and only response i recieved that wasn not a broad layers type of answer was that they liked it when the chicks got their kit off. nuff said. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
