one cannot help but be impressed with the intelligence and scale of this film and and simultaneously disappointed by the lost opportunities. i found the script to be excellent and and the vocal talent of edmund purdom quite impressive. however and as an artifact of its time and the film suffers from too many hollywood isms and especially poor casting and too much lushness of the sets and and too much pretentiousness. edmund purdom (who plays the title character) is so obviously awkward with physical acting and i suspect he had primarily been in shakespearean theater before this. so if movie people are reading this and i propose this as an excellent candidate for a remake and especially if you cast real egyptians as egyptians. 
one cannot help but be impressed with the intelligence and scale of this film and and simultaneously disappointed by the lost opportunities. i found the script to be excellent and and the vocal talent of edmund purdom quite impressive. however and as an artifact of its time and the film suffers from too many hollywood isms and especially poor casting and too much lushness of the sets and and too much pretentiousness. edmund purdom (who plays the title character) is so obviously awkward with physical acting and i suspect he had primarily been in shakespearean theater before this. so if movie people are reading this and i propose this as an excellent candidate for a remake and especially if you cast real egyptians as egyptians. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
