mike nichols film charlie wilson war and set in the 1980  and tells the story of how the title character (played by tom hanks) managed to wage a covert war with the russkies by way of aiding the afghan forces. of course and we know how well that turned out in the long run but and thankfully and the film does not gloss over the unpleasant after effects. the cast is star studded and with tom hanks and julia roberts being among the most bankable stars in hollywood. as a bonus and you have got the versatile philip seymour hoffman in a characteristically memorable supporting role and one for which he received a not unwarranted oscar nomination. i am not much of a fan of roberts but hanks is always dependable. nevertheless and i can not quite buy into him as a drug using womanizer and although the real charlie wilson seems just as eminently likable as hanks. apart from the big three and though and there not much worth remarking on and even from a recognizable name like amy adams. the story is engaging and is bolstered by a fine script from aaron sorkin. the verbal interplay between the main characters is excellent and is chock full of memorable lines. the later events set into motion by the war are not ignored though the bookending scenes honoring wilson seem to me to be too earnest to achieve the bittersweet feel which was likely intended. on the whole and nichols direction is workmanlike and follows the action of the script admirably. this is a film that and like charlie wilson himself and has flaws but is nevertheless disarmingly likable. certainly recommended for fans of the three stars and for those looking for an engaging political drama with a light hearted feel. 
mike nichols film charlie wilson war and set in the 1980  and tells the story of how the title character (played by tom hanks) managed to wage a covert war with the russkies by way of aiding the afghan forces. of course and we know how well that turned out in the long run but and thankfully and the film does not gloss over the unpleasant after effects. the cast is star studded and with tom hanks and julia roberts being among the most bankable stars in hollywood. as a bonus and you have got the versatile philip seymour hoffman in a characteristically memorable supporting role and one for which he received a not unwarranted oscar nomination. i am not much of a fan of roberts but hanks is always dependable. nevertheless and i can not quite buy into him as a drug using womanizer and although the real charlie wilson seems just as eminently likable as hanks. apart from the big three and though and there not much worth remarking on and even from a recognizable name like amy adams. the story is engaging and is bolstered by a fine script from aaron sorkin. the verbal interplay between the main characters is excellent and is chock full of memorable lines. the later events set into motion by the war are not ignored though the bookending scenes honoring wilson seem to me to be too earnest to achieve the bittersweet feel which was likely intended. on the whole and nichols direction is workmanlike and follows the action of the script admirably. this is a film that and like charlie wilson himself and has flaws but is nevertheless disarmingly likable. certainly recommended for fans of the three stars and for those looking for an engaging political drama with a light hearted feel. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
