a 1957 roger corman non epic in which a sundry bunch of characters end up in a lead lined valley (sic) just as stock footage thermo nuclear heck is unleashed. it the end of the world. four men with guns and two women and (one an unmarried virgin the other a las vegas show gird who drinks and smokes  guess which one makes it to the end of the movie. ) time passes and tensions develop (or are supposed to). something is in the woods eating radioactive rabbits. a mutant monster. seven weeks of radioactive dust has performed a million years of evolution (on an already living human) the result is a laughably bad and zip up the back and rubber monster who is strangely scared of their only source of fresh water. it rains. the monster dissolves. the remaining two characters and the hunk and the virgin. set out to repopulate the world as the caption the beginning fills the screen after it transpires that the brief shower of rain had washed all the radioactivity away and dissolved all the monsters running around out there. the only thing of real note about this is the incredible amount of curtain acting that goes on in it. one of the staple elements of bad and lo budget movie making of the period was the superabundant use of curtains in the set design. it was cheap. finished with one set up. pull a curtain across and drop a different piece of furniture in front of it and you have a different location in minutes without having to move the camera or change the lighting. curtain acting is a skill in which the actor will get to comment on what going on outside any building he happens to be in (it looks like rain and or here they come now and and it looks like they have got the sheriff with them. and that sort of stuff). he will do this by standing to one side of the window  reaching across his body and lifting the curtain away from the window but along the axis of the shot  ie towards the camera  thus enabling him to pretend to look out and tell us what happening off screen and without letting the audience see he staring at the studio wall three inches away from his nose behind some cheap velvet curtains. there was a lot of that in this movie. 
a 1957 roger corman non epic in which a sundry bunch of characters end up in a lead lined valley (sic) just as stock footage thermo nuclear heck is unleashed. it the end of the world. four men with guns and two women and (one an unmarried virgin the other a las vegas show gird who drinks and smokes  guess which one makes it to the end of the movie. ) time passes and tensions develop (or are supposed to). something is in the woods eating radioactive rabbits. a mutant monster. seven weeks of radioactive dust has performed a million years of evolution (on an already living human) the result is a laughably bad and zip up the back and rubber monster who is strangely scared of their only source of fresh water. it rains. the monster dissolves. the remaining two characters and the hunk and the virgin. set out to repopulate the world as the caption the beginning fills the screen after it transpires that the brief shower of rain had washed all the radioactivity away and dissolved all the monsters running around out there. the only thing of real note about this is the incredible amount of curtain acting that goes on in it. one of the staple elements of bad and lo budget movie making of the period was the superabundant use of curtains in the set design. it was cheap. finished with one set up. pull a curtain across and drop a different piece of furniture in front of it and you have a different location in minutes without having to move the camera or change the lighting. curtain acting is a skill in which the actor will get to comment on what going on outside any building he happens to be in (it looks like rain and or here they come now and and it looks like they have got the sheriff with them. and that sort of stuff). he will do this by standing to one side of the window  reaching across his body and lifting the curtain away from the window but along the axis of the shot  ie towards the camera  thus enabling him to pretend to look out and tell us what happening off screen and without letting the audience see he staring at the studio wall three inches away from his nose behind some cheap velvet curtains. there was a lot of that in this movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
