well and first of all and as many reviewers have pointed out  this is a rip off of the martin cahill story  first represented by the bbc and by the john boorman film the general  which is a great film and far and far superior to this one. speaking as a native british person and the supporting cast to kevin spacey was really good in terms of british and irish acting talent and especially peter mullan  but it was totally wasted. the characters were cp. and as for kevin spacey  do not come across as a loveable rogue but as nothing really substantial or significant. not a lot to redeem this film. the best bits are the gags and tricks nicked from the other films it rips off. compare notes on this film and the general  i would be interested to see what others think. 
well and first of all and as many reviewers have pointed out  this is a rip off of the martin cahill story  first represented by the bbc and by the john boorman film the general  which is a great film and far and far superior to this one. speaking as a native british person and the supporting cast to kevin spacey was really good in terms of british and irish acting talent and especially peter mullan  but it was totally wasted. the characters were cp. and as for kevin spacey  do not come across as a loveable rogue but as nothing really substantial or significant. not a lot to redeem this film. the best bits are the gags and tricks nicked from the other films it rips off. compare notes on this film and the general  i would be interested to see what others think. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
