the vindicator is a weird little canadian b movie. at first glance it would appear to be just another cheap (extremely cheap. ) terminator knockoff and but strangely enough it also shares some qualities with the original robocop and which hadn not even been released yet when vindicator appeared (1986). coincidence. who knows. anyway and the story is thus represent scientist carl lehman seems to be a pretty nice guy who works for a super duper secret government high tech research lab and reporting to a sleazy boss named whyte and whom he butts heads with about project funding early in the movie. carl got a loving wife at home and a baby on the way and which makes it all the more tragic when he is suddenly killed in a lab accident. but wait. carl not really dead after all. whyte has extracted carl brain and inserted it into his pet project and some sort of experimental bio mechanical space suit. when carl wakes up inside his new body and he understandably goes a little nuts and trashes the lab and and escapes. this is a problem because whyte (for reasons known only to himself) has programmed the mechanical suit with a rage reaction program and which will cause carl to kill anybody who touches him for any reason. in hindsight and that little addition to carl psyche was probably not the best idea. so robo carl wanders aimlessly through the movie for a while and killing a couple of random muggers and other assorted background characters and till he returns to his home and contacts his wife (this scene is supposed to be heartbreakingly touching and i guess and but turns out comical because carl robot voice is so heavily synthesized that you can barely understand a word he says). he of course tells her to leave the city and never come back because she in danger and but she wants to stay and help him and yadda yadda yadda. eventually whyte hires a gang of commando thugs led by hunter and an apparent ninja assassin played by pam grier (. )to hunt down and destroy his runaway creation and using carl wife as bait and and predictable (but laughably cheap looking) mayhem ensues. i am a b movie kind of guy but the vindicator was so half assed that it turned into high comedy pretty quickly. i am assuming that a good hunk of the budget went into stan winston robo carl suit design and because that actually looks pretty cool and but the rest of the movie suffers from a cheap and made for tv kind of look. the script could have used a lot more work and but then maybe the filmmakers had gotten wind of robocop going into production and rushed to get vindicator out so they couldn not be accused of ripping them off. either way and judging by the other comments here on imdb and i am not the only one who noticed the parallels between vindicator and robocop and and obviously robo is the superior film and so there no need to waste your time sitting through this piece of nonsense unless you want to see a film that can best be described and at best and as a rough draft of robocop if it were made by an 8th grader. 
the vindicator is a weird little canadian b movie. at first glance it would appear to be just another cheap (extremely cheap. ) terminator knockoff and but strangely enough it also shares some qualities with the original robocop and which hadn not even been released yet when vindicator appeared (1986). coincidence. who knows. anyway and the story is thus represent scientist carl lehman seems to be a pretty nice guy who works for a super duper secret government high tech research lab and reporting to a sleazy boss named whyte and whom he butts heads with about project funding early in the movie. carl got a loving wife at home and a baby on the way and which makes it all the more tragic when he is suddenly killed in a lab accident. but wait. carl not really dead after all. whyte has extracted carl brain and inserted it into his pet project and some sort of experimental bio mechanical space suit. when carl wakes up inside his new body and he understandably goes a little nuts and trashes the lab and and escapes. this is a problem because whyte (for reasons known only to himself) has programmed the mechanical suit with a rage reaction program and which will cause carl to kill anybody who touches him for any reason. in hindsight and that little addition to carl psyche was probably not the best idea. so robo carl wanders aimlessly through the movie for a while and killing a couple of random muggers and other assorted background characters and till he returns to his home and contacts his wife (this scene is supposed to be heartbreakingly touching and i guess and but turns out comical because carl robot voice is so heavily synthesized that you can barely understand a word he says). he of course tells her to leave the city and never come back because she in danger and but she wants to stay and help him and yadda yadda yadda. eventually whyte hires a gang of commando thugs led by hunter and an apparent ninja assassin played by pam grier (. )to hunt down and destroy his runaway creation and using carl wife as bait and and predictable (but laughably cheap looking) mayhem ensues. i am a b movie kind of guy but the vindicator was so half assed that it turned into high comedy pretty quickly. i am assuming that a good hunk of the budget went into stan winston robo carl suit design and because that actually looks pretty cool and but the rest of the movie suffers from a cheap and made for tv kind of look. the script could have used a lot more work and but then maybe the filmmakers had gotten wind of robocop going into production and rushed to get vindicator out so they couldn not be accused of ripping them off. either way and judging by the other comments here on imdb and i am not the only one who noticed the parallels between vindicator and robocop and and obviously robo is the superior film and so there no need to waste your time sitting through this piece of nonsense unless you want to see a film that can best be described and at best and as a rough draft of robocop if it were made by an 8th grader. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
