films about the mundane are often the most interesting of all films to me and in the hands of an insightful artist who examines all the twisted little details of the mundane. the french cinema seems to often be very good at this sort of thing and and i love the french cinema. this film was about the mundane. it do not have a much of a plot. it was just characters who lived in a town and very normal people and and stuff just happened. but it wasn not very interesting stuff and and it wasn not examined very insightfully. the film did capture a bit of a mood and but it wasn not a particularly captivating mood. and while i can not think of much that the film did specifically wrong and it failed on just about every level to do anything right. there were a lot of characters in this film. a lot of them kind of looked alike and so it was hard to figure out who was who and and what were their relations to one another. i do not mind putting some effort into understanding a film and or even watching an especially complex film more than one time to iron out the details and but this one was a puzzle not worth the solving for me. the only good thing i can really say about this film is that the cinematography was pleasant functional and not brilliant and but pleasant. the camera often captured some nice postcard type shots. but it rarely found the really interesting little details. i have seen a handful of not so good films so far at the seattle international film festival and but this was the only one that failed to get any applause when the credits rolled. i sensed a big collective sigh of relief when the film was finally over. but i suppose there are probably some people out there who would like it. negative . 
films about the mundane are often the most interesting of all films to me and in the hands of an insightful artist who examines all the twisted little details of the mundane. the french cinema seems to often be very good at this sort of thing and and i love the french cinema. this film was about the mundane. it do not have a much of a plot. it was just characters who lived in a town and very normal people and and stuff just happened. but it wasn not very interesting stuff and and it wasn not examined very insightfully. the film did capture a bit of a mood and but it wasn not a particularly captivating mood. and while i can not think of much that the film did specifically wrong and it failed on just about every level to do anything right. there were a lot of characters in this film. a lot of them kind of looked alike and so it was hard to figure out who was who and and what were their relations to one another. i do not mind putting some effort into understanding a film and or even watching an especially complex film more than one time to iron out the details and but this one was a puzzle not worth the solving for me. the only good thing i can really say about this film is that the cinematography was pleasant functional and not brilliant and but pleasant. the camera often captured some nice postcard type shots. but it rarely found the really interesting little details. i have seen a handful of not so good films so far at the seattle international film festival and but this was the only one that failed to get any applause when the credits rolled. i sensed a big collective sigh of relief when the film was finally over. but i suppose there are probably some people out there who would like it. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
