this movie is essentially a how to on how to be a well connected pedophile. i am amazed that so many people  especially other gay men  have seen this movie and read the book and no one has brought up the fact that if weber was not an influential photographer and he would be in jail and doing time for child abuse. poor peter johnson. weber took this poor and naive (although incredibly handsome) teenager whom he found at a training camp for high school wrestlers in the midwest and brought him to live in his home and and took thousands of homoerotic photos of him and many of them full frontal nudes and all through johnson teenage years. that ain not art. it child abuse. and what worse and weber made lots of money off of it and and poor johnson is going to have serious issues the rest of his life. weber lecherous love of the boy is downright creepy and as are his ramblings about famous (and not so famous) people he known and as he tries to complete johnson education. creepy and and then just plain boring. the only redeeming thing i can say about the movie is that it is a fascinating study of self deception. but i can not help but wonder why no one ever considered the effect this was having on chop suey (weber nickname for johnson) himself. 
this movie is essentially a how to on how to be a well connected pedophile. i am amazed that so many people  especially other gay men  have seen this movie and read the book and no one has brought up the fact that if weber was not an influential photographer and he would be in jail and doing time for child abuse. poor peter johnson. weber took this poor and naive (although incredibly handsome) teenager whom he found at a training camp for high school wrestlers in the midwest and brought him to live in his home and and took thousands of homoerotic photos of him and many of them full frontal nudes and all through johnson teenage years. that ain not art. it child abuse. and what worse and weber made lots of money off of it and and poor johnson is going to have serious issues the rest of his life. weber lecherous love of the boy is downright creepy and as are his ramblings about famous (and not so famous) people he known and as he tries to complete johnson education. creepy and and then just plain boring. the only redeeming thing i can say about the movie is that it is a fascinating study of self deception. but i can not help but wonder why no one ever considered the effect this was having on chop suey (weber nickname for johnson) himself. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
