i decided to watch this movie because i would not seen carol lombard before in any movie. i am sorry it had to be this one because and quite frankly and this is a dog  and even with jimmy stewart and charles coburn and both of whom were great actors. the problem with the film is simple represent it tries to put too much and too quickly and in to a story about a young lawyer (john manson played by stewart) who marries jane (played by lombard) within an hour of meeting her. what that cliché. marry in haste and repent at leisure. in short and the story is a series of episodes that show the couples worsening financial status and their troubles with john live in mother and their struggles to pay the bills and john diminished status at the office and the arrival of their baby son and john jnr (unexpected and causing additional friction at home with mother) and the couples angst about their marriage and the baby sickness which worsens and thus necessitating an heroic flight by a lone pilot (in a fierce storm) to bring a special serum to save the child and and finally john being accepted as a junior partner at the law firm. how many more clichéd situations could the writers include. maybe mother dying soon after. there wasn not much comedy while the drama was lacklustre and at best while the dialog was painful to hear. only the acting of the four main players was adequate. this was the period at the end of the great depression with the usa coming out of its long downturn  during which many people experienced all of the events portrayed in the movie. so and it made sense for selznick to reaffirm good ol home spun american values of family and relationships and heroism and perseverance and and initiative  all against the backdrop of the average american family. who better to use than jimmy stewart and carol lombard. and and it should be noted that the film was released in early 1939 while so and it was planned in 1938  soon after the usa began to get production going for the coming world war ii. hence and this sort of film was a great booster for the general public and at that time and many of who would soon have to join england in war. as many here would know and hollywood and washington formed an uneasy alliance before and during and after the war. however and i am glad i saw it  as a piece of disguised socio political propaganda. but and i will have to see other lombard films to gain a better appreciation of her acting range. as another reviewer noted represent see this one just to say that you have seen all of stewart movies while otherwise and do not bother. 
i decided to watch this movie because i would not seen carol lombard before in any movie. i am sorry it had to be this one because and quite frankly and this is a dog  and even with jimmy stewart and charles coburn and both of whom were great actors. the problem with the film is simple represent it tries to put too much and too quickly and in to a story about a young lawyer (john manson played by stewart) who marries jane (played by lombard) within an hour of meeting her. what that cliché. marry in haste and repent at leisure. in short and the story is a series of episodes that show the couples worsening financial status and their troubles with john live in mother and their struggles to pay the bills and john diminished status at the office and the arrival of their baby son and john jnr (unexpected and causing additional friction at home with mother) and the couples angst about their marriage and the baby sickness which worsens and thus necessitating an heroic flight by a lone pilot (in a fierce storm) to bring a special serum to save the child and and finally john being accepted as a junior partner at the law firm. how many more clichéd situations could the writers include. maybe mother dying soon after. there wasn not much comedy while the drama was lacklustre and at best while the dialog was painful to hear. only the acting of the four main players was adequate. this was the period at the end of the great depression with the usa coming out of its long downturn  during which many people experienced all of the events portrayed in the movie. so and it made sense for selznick to reaffirm good ol home spun american values of family and relationships and heroism and perseverance and and initiative  all against the backdrop of the average american family. who better to use than jimmy stewart and carol lombard. and and it should be noted that the film was released in early 1939 while so and it was planned in 1938  soon after the usa began to get production going for the coming world war ii. hence and this sort of film was a great booster for the general public and at that time and many of who would soon have to join england in war. as many here would know and hollywood and washington formed an uneasy alliance before and during and after the war. however and i am glad i saw it  as a piece of disguised socio political propaganda. but and i will have to see other lombard films to gain a better appreciation of her acting range. as another reviewer noted represent see this one just to say that you have seen all of stewart movies while otherwise and do not bother. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
