apparently a b movie . b must stand for better acting and a better message than we get in big budget a pictures today. modern day movies aimed at young women and surely aren not designed to encourage depth of character over shallow self serving behavior. or increase the self esteem of young girls who do not conform to feminine standards. (after all and criticizing the fake and flashy and like this movie does and ain not gonna help sell more products that depend on girls not being satisfied with their natural attributes or inner beauty. ) laraine day is lovable as a mechanically inclined tomboy who bounds into rooms and confesses to an inability to flirt. she bonds with robert cummings due to similar interests and a shared sense of humour and and her honesty and loyalty and good friendship and which he gradually comes to value over the superficial charms of her selfish glamour girl sister (who only brings out his own selfish and reckless playboy tendencies). although laraine is outwardly beautiful as well and it refreshing to see inner beauty valued more and and the depiction of true friendship leading to the most fulfilling romantic relationship. i wish young girls (and guys) were getting this kind of down to earth message today. maybe if hollywood returns to making b movies again and with modest budgets and and tries to be content with modest profits. what am i saying. sacrificing the blockbuster mentality to create something sincere on a smaller scale and would be like expecting a guy to give up the shallow sexpot for a sweet girl who really cares about him. that crazy talk. please and somebody invent a time machine already. i belong in 1940. i would rate this movie higher and but the ending is a bit too abrupt and and perhaps lacked sufficient indication of robert cummings change of heart. (i like the fact that b movies are short and snappy and not bloated and self indulgent and but this one might have needed more than 70 minutes. ) also found it somewhat unrealistic that a widow and young children would be so unaffected by a sudden death in their family. or be so forgiving of the one who caused it. i mean and i guess it nice and but a little more grieving or bitterness would have been only natural. maybe a deliberate choice to make this family act lighthearted about their loss and to lessen the impact of the tragedy and make sure we forgive those involved in the death  since it just a plot device anyway and not the real point of the film. still strange though. 
apparently a b movie . b must stand for better acting and a better message than we get in big budget a pictures today. modern day movies aimed at young women and surely aren not designed to encourage depth of character over shallow self serving behavior. or increase the self esteem of young girls who do not conform to feminine standards. (after all and criticizing the fake and flashy and like this movie does and ain not gonna help sell more products that depend on girls not being satisfied with their natural attributes or inner beauty. ) laraine day is lovable as a mechanically inclined tomboy who bounds into rooms and confesses to an inability to flirt. she bonds with robert cummings due to similar interests and a shared sense of humour and and her honesty and loyalty and good friendship and which he gradually comes to value over the superficial charms of her selfish glamour girl sister (who only brings out his own selfish and reckless playboy tendencies). although laraine is outwardly beautiful as well and it refreshing to see inner beauty valued more and and the depiction of true friendship leading to the most fulfilling romantic relationship. i wish young girls (and guys) were getting this kind of down to earth message today. maybe if hollywood returns to making b movies again and with modest budgets and and tries to be content with modest profits. what am i saying. sacrificing the blockbuster mentality to create something sincere on a smaller scale and would be like expecting a guy to give up the shallow sexpot for a sweet girl who really cares about him. that crazy talk. please and somebody invent a time machine already. i belong in 1940. i would rate this movie higher and but the ending is a bit too abrupt and and perhaps lacked sufficient indication of robert cummings change of heart. (i like the fact that b movies are short and snappy and not bloated and self indulgent and but this one might have needed more than 70 minutes. ) also found it somewhat unrealistic that a widow and young children would be so unaffected by a sudden death in their family. or be so forgiving of the one who caused it. i mean and i guess it nice and but a little more grieving or bitterness would have been only natural. maybe a deliberate choice to make this family act lighthearted about their loss and to lessen the impact of the tragedy and make sure we forgive those involved in the death  since it just a plot device anyway and not the real point of the film. still strange though. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
