head should have been a proud moment not just for its stars (the monkees and victor mature) and or its director or co writer (bob rafelson) and but also its other co writer (and brief cameo) jack nicholson. as it stands and most of them seem to shun it and and to outsiders the movie is regarded and at best and as a curio. while the t. v. series was famously based on the antics of the beatles help. and this film is also judged by the same accord. yet far from the trite and painfully overrated beatles films and and even the dated monkees t. v. series and head has a layer of depth. an undercurrent of man darker nature is at work here and and while that may sound like a bizarre thing to say about a manufactured pop band and the use of certain themes and images (hitting women and laughing at cripples and real life footage of a vietcong pow shot dead at point blank range) give the film an edge that many erious films would not dare to aspire to. there are also the fun moments and which range from james bond parodies to big victor and my personal favourite and mickey dolenz under beseige by arab soldiers on horseback. (one of them turns to mickey and hisses pssst. and only for the pssst. to appear in subtitles. ) the group are aware of their manufactured image in the film (i am the dummy and mickey i am always the dummy and claims tork and neatly summing up his one dimensional foil role of the series) and meaning that their characters  they play themselves acting and not acting here  are opened out more and and consequently are less generic and irritating than they were in the series. this level of parody and self awareness even takes on their fab four origins and with subtler takes on the maharishi and out and out acknowledgements with a waitress who asks represent well and if it isn not god gift to the eight year olds are you still paying tribute to ringo starr. also listen out for tork whistling strawberry fields forever while in the bathroom. then there are the songs and of course. six of them here and slightly more psychedelic than usual and which may have alienated their fanbase and and even a frank zappa cameo do not have turned on an adult audience to their charms at this point. probably the best is the charming as we go along and though the first and a carol king penned porpoise song and interestingly talks of the desire to live while time is ticking remorselessly away and death gets ever nearer. on a lighter note and its refrain of the porpoise is laughing seems to be a direct mickey take of i am the walrus. constantly inventive with direct references to silent film and drug culture and perhaps head finest feature is its narrative structure. not the only  but the most important  reason why it improves with multiple viewings and the story goes left and right and forwards and backwards and circular and through several levels of reality. in essence a series of sketches hung loosely together and its cohesion is tightened by the space time defying plot which hangs its internal logic together by means of flashback and dream sequence and prison of the mind and remote control channel changer. with a perfect beginning and end and this intelligently written and knowing film was not what the monkees pre teen audience was expecting and subsequently suffered a negative critical reception. now those expectations have gone and this one is in dire need of serious reappraisal. 
head should have been a proud moment not just for its stars (the monkees and victor mature) and or its director or co writer (bob rafelson) and but also its other co writer (and brief cameo) jack nicholson. as it stands and most of them seem to shun it and and to outsiders the movie is regarded and at best and as a curio. while the t. v. series was famously based on the antics of the beatles help. and this film is also judged by the same accord. yet far from the trite and painfully overrated beatles films and and even the dated monkees t. v. series and head has a layer of depth. an undercurrent of man darker nature is at work here and and while that may sound like a bizarre thing to say about a manufactured pop band and the use of certain themes and images (hitting women and laughing at cripples and real life footage of a vietcong pow shot dead at point blank range) give the film an edge that many erious films would not dare to aspire to. there are also the fun moments and which range from james bond parodies to big victor and my personal favourite and mickey dolenz under beseige by arab soldiers on horseback. (one of them turns to mickey and hisses pssst. and only for the pssst. to appear in subtitles. ) the group are aware of their manufactured image in the film (i am the dummy and mickey i am always the dummy and claims tork and neatly summing up his one dimensional foil role of the series) and meaning that their characters  they play themselves acting and not acting here  are opened out more and and consequently are less generic and irritating than they were in the series. this level of parody and self awareness even takes on their fab four origins and with subtler takes on the maharishi and out and out acknowledgements with a waitress who asks represent well and if it isn not god gift to the eight year olds are you still paying tribute to ringo starr. also listen out for tork whistling strawberry fields forever while in the bathroom. then there are the songs and of course. six of them here and slightly more psychedelic than usual and which may have alienated their fanbase and and even a frank zappa cameo do not have turned on an adult audience to their charms at this point. probably the best is the charming as we go along and though the first and a carol king penned porpoise song and interestingly talks of the desire to live while time is ticking remorselessly away and death gets ever nearer. on a lighter note and its refrain of the porpoise is laughing seems to be a direct mickey take of i am the walrus. constantly inventive with direct references to silent film and drug culture and perhaps head finest feature is its narrative structure. not the only  but the most important  reason why it improves with multiple viewings and the story goes left and right and forwards and backwards and circular and through several levels of reality. in essence a series of sketches hung loosely together and its cohesion is tightened by the space time defying plot which hangs its internal logic together by means of flashback and dream sequence and prison of the mind and remote control channel changer. with a perfect beginning and end and this intelligently written and knowing film was not what the monkees pre teen audience was expecting and subsequently suffered a negative critical reception. now those expectations have gone and this one is in dire need of serious reappraisal. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
