i saw this film much like skywalker02 did and but when i could manage to see it again and with formal film training and psychology and and life has had the time to really take me by the hand and start beating me about and . i really click with the film. i remember the pay for service cable channels played this thing almost to death and much like poltergeist when it first came out and and many other popular films. i felt back then it wasn not worth the fuss and constant airtime (i know cable isn not really on air) given it and but i was very young and adult situation drama do not have and shouldn not have worked. however and recent viewing of the film has enlightened me on the film. i think that susan surandon and molly ringwald were likely studying the script together and and i would be a bit surprised if surandon had coached ringwald during this project. ringwald other projects and while good and do not have her exhibiting the potential depth as this role. surandon nailed hers and as raul julia did also. cassavettes and wife delivered acceptable performances and but i will admit at times first class acting turns to mediocre. a steady ebb and flow to the acting does take place during many scenes and but overall i can see why the story might call for the dynamic to become more subtle. all in all and i do not find this film to be the take me out and drown me kind of boredom fest as skywalker02 would have you believe. i think that perhaps with the right psychological training and a bit more hardship in one domestic life strategically placed and coupled with some film courses perhaps this film would appear different. i would say if you are feeling a bit melancholy and yearn for a simpler life and and you have had your share of marital discord amongst dysfunctional family units and then perhaps this film might provide more insight and entertainment than you might think. i do feel it is a classic and find it much more entertaining than mainstream films that are supposed to share many of the same elements and such as terms of endearment which as far as i am concerned could be stripped of a few extraordinary performances by jack nicholson and then ceremoniously burned until nothing is left. (how could a film like that get more attention than this one. talk about boredom. )best thing and do not take my word or anyone else  and see the film and support our industry. 
i saw this film much like skywalker02 did and but when i could manage to see it again and with formal film training and psychology and and life has had the time to really take me by the hand and start beating me about and . i really click with the film. i remember the pay for service cable channels played this thing almost to death and much like poltergeist when it first came out and and many other popular films. i felt back then it wasn not worth the fuss and constant airtime (i know cable isn not really on air) given it and but i was very young and adult situation drama do not have and shouldn not have worked. however and recent viewing of the film has enlightened me on the film. i think that susan surandon and molly ringwald were likely studying the script together and and i would be a bit surprised if surandon had coached ringwald during this project. ringwald other projects and while good and do not have her exhibiting the potential depth as this role. surandon nailed hers and as raul julia did also. cassavettes and wife delivered acceptable performances and but i will admit at times first class acting turns to mediocre. a steady ebb and flow to the acting does take place during many scenes and but overall i can see why the story might call for the dynamic to become more subtle. all in all and i do not find this film to be the take me out and drown me kind of boredom fest as skywalker02 would have you believe. i think that perhaps with the right psychological training and a bit more hardship in one domestic life strategically placed and coupled with some film courses perhaps this film would appear different. i would say if you are feeling a bit melancholy and yearn for a simpler life and and you have had your share of marital discord amongst dysfunctional family units and then perhaps this film might provide more insight and entertainment than you might think. i do feel it is a classic and find it much more entertaining than mainstream films that are supposed to share many of the same elements and such as terms of endearment which as far as i am concerned could be stripped of a few extraordinary performances by jack nicholson and then ceremoniously burned until nothing is left. (how could a film like that get more attention than this one. talk about boredom. )best thing and do not take my word or anyone else  and see the film and support our industry. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
