this was a flick doomed from its conception. the very idea of it was lame  take a minor character from a mediocre pg 13 film and and make a complete non sequel while changing its tone to a pg rated family movie. i wasn not the least bit interested. then came the trailer. not only did it only confirm that the film would be unfunny and generic and but it also managed to give away the entire movie while and i am not exaggerating  every moment and every plot point and every joke is told in the trailer. it like a 3 minute cliff notes version of the flick. so obviously i wasn not gonna pay to see it and but once it hit dvd and i thought sure and i will watch it for free. maybe steve carell can save it. nope. i am still baffled as to why he signed on for this. he must have owed someone a favor. the jokes were all so flat and obvious and and the director obviously asked him to go for very broad comedy style like the original bruce almighty jim carrey. but it just not funny. the studio obviously tried to cash in on the success of 40 year old virgin and complete with several of carell past co stars and a reference to the flick on a theater marquee and and another musical closing credits sequence. but even the talented carrell can not save this. his co stars do not fare much better and with people like morgan freeman and jonah hill and and ed helms just wasted. wanda sykes isn not wasted and she just a waste in anything she does and and her horrible one liners and reactions just make you wish people would stop giving her work. the story itself is just predictable and lazy. it pounds you over the head with obvious foreshadowing and like evan disregard for the environment (drives a gas guzzling humvee and opts to use wood from endangered trees for his house and hates animals and . ) and and by the end it just over the top preachy on both faith and the environment. why the movie was made at all is puzzling enough and but i really do not understand how it reportedly became the most expensive comedy ever. the only real effects work is the presence of all the animals and and the integration of those into the scenes is some of the worst and most obvious blue or green screen work i have ever seen. maybe the rental of the live animals on set cost a fortune. who knows. but whatever it was that cost them so much and it do not translate to quality and that for sure. but hey and it wasn not the worst film of the year by far. there still plenty of worse duds like norbit and death proof. 
this was a flick doomed from its conception. the very idea of it was lame  take a minor character from a mediocre pg 13 film and and make a complete non sequel while changing its tone to a pg rated family movie. i wasn not the least bit interested. then came the trailer. not only did it only confirm that the film would be unfunny and generic and but it also managed to give away the entire movie while and i am not exaggerating  every moment and every plot point and every joke is told in the trailer. it like a 3 minute cliff notes version of the flick. so obviously i wasn not gonna pay to see it and but once it hit dvd and i thought sure and i will watch it for free. maybe steve carell can save it. nope. i am still baffled as to why he signed on for this. he must have owed someone a favor. the jokes were all so flat and obvious and and the director obviously asked him to go for very broad comedy style like the original bruce almighty jim carrey. but it just not funny. the studio obviously tried to cash in on the success of 40 year old virgin and complete with several of carell past co stars and a reference to the flick on a theater marquee and and another musical closing credits sequence. but even the talented carrell can not save this. his co stars do not fare much better and with people like morgan freeman and jonah hill and and ed helms just wasted. wanda sykes isn not wasted and she just a waste in anything she does and and her horrible one liners and reactions just make you wish people would stop giving her work. the story itself is just predictable and lazy. it pounds you over the head with obvious foreshadowing and like evan disregard for the environment (drives a gas guzzling humvee and opts to use wood from endangered trees for his house and hates animals and . ) and and by the end it just over the top preachy on both faith and the environment. why the movie was made at all is puzzling enough and but i really do not understand how it reportedly became the most expensive comedy ever. the only real effects work is the presence of all the animals and and the integration of those into the scenes is some of the worst and most obvious blue or green screen work i have ever seen. maybe the rental of the live animals on set cost a fortune. who knows. but whatever it was that cost them so much and it do not translate to quality and that for sure. but hey and it wasn not the worst film of the year by far. there still plenty of worse duds like norbit and death proof. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
