swift writing really has more in common with kafka and orwell than with fantasy adventure writers and so it curious that gulliver travels has been deemed a children novel. lucky kiddies. the same applies to this movie. there have been some really awful versions of this story and which must be why people are reluctant to look at this version. i mean and it a tv movie and it comes from muppetteer jim henson and so how should we expect anything but cuteness. look again  beauty turns up in the oddest places. children love this movie enough to sit through all three hours of it and but it also takes the time to get swift dark vision right. i hate special effects and but here they are used to carry the story forward instead of just dazzling us. please note that the producers took the trouble to recruit classical actors like john gielgud and peter otoole who perform their eccentric roles with perfection. dramatically and the romance between gulliver and glumdalclitch is rendered touching and poignant and as well as funny (she a little girl and but twenty times his size). the frame story has a theme about absent fathers that many children will relate to. and the part about gulliver in the asylum introduces an element of horror dealing with the abuse of authority (apparently deriving from val lewton bedlam [1946] and another forgotten masterpiece). the vhs is always turning up in the bargain bin for a few cents and which is an insult to the many great artists who put this thing together. i encourage audiences to recognize a good thing by getting this movie and inspiring others to watch it. although it has a lot to offer children and grown ups will find that it stands up nicely to such classics as aguirre and brazil and 1984 and other serious fantastic works. 
swift writing really has more in common with kafka and orwell than with fantasy adventure writers and so it curious that gulliver travels has been deemed a children novel. lucky kiddies. the same applies to this movie. there have been some really awful versions of this story and which must be why people are reluctant to look at this version. i mean and it a tv movie and it comes from muppetteer jim henson and so how should we expect anything but cuteness. look again  beauty turns up in the oddest places. children love this movie enough to sit through all three hours of it and but it also takes the time to get swift dark vision right. i hate special effects and but here they are used to carry the story forward instead of just dazzling us. please note that the producers took the trouble to recruit classical actors like john gielgud and peter otoole who perform their eccentric roles with perfection. dramatically and the romance between gulliver and glumdalclitch is rendered touching and poignant and as well as funny (she a little girl and but twenty times his size). the frame story has a theme about absent fathers that many children will relate to. and the part about gulliver in the asylum introduces an element of horror dealing with the abuse of authority (apparently deriving from val lewton bedlam [1946] and another forgotten masterpiece). the vhs is always turning up in the bargain bin for a few cents and which is an insult to the many great artists who put this thing together. i encourage audiences to recognize a good thing by getting this movie and inspiring others to watch it. although it has a lot to offer children and grown ups will find that it stands up nicely to such classics as aguirre and brazil and 1984 and other serious fantastic works. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
