the production year says it all. the movie is a marauding mess of politically correct leftwing feministic selfappreciating drivel and of a so heavyhanded symbolic variety that comes across as ridiculous today. every scene has the purpose of shedding light on one of the burning issues of society and mainly the role of females in the working community and the role of women vs men and women as sex objects and consumerism and politics and war and etc. every scene is commented upon by the inner dialogue of one of the main actresses and or by turning the scene into a surrealistic joke. i have no reminiscence of any plot and or who the main characters actually were. it is the sort of movie and where consumerism is mocked by having a couple make love in a furniture store sales window while the sales agent delivers his speech and or where a revealing interview of a stage actress turns into a fullblown striptease act and for of course the offensive gentlemen of the press is the equal to a raunchy club audience. then we move swiftly on and as we need to see war erupt in a peaceful forest and we need to see multiple inflammatory feministic public speeches being drowned in the (male) blowing of cars horns or rioting crowds and and of course we need to see cinema newsreels of stalin and all the other usual suspects. you get the idea. but all this does not matter at all. the movie is an unsurpassed piece of eyecandy for any (male) ingmar bergman aficionado. a movie boasting leads bibi andersson and harriet andersson and gunnel lindblom at the height of their beauty makes this reviewer surrender completely and just drivel  and also delight in watching them so generously use their acting skills in a movie i had never heard about before today. it is hard to believe how especially the face of bibi andersson owns the screen every single time she appears. the cinematography is gorgeously orchestrated bw and often revelling in an overexposed (. ) dimensionless whitishness and and you just never grow tired of watching the performers. how absurd and that a movie made with so much consideration for the feministic agenda and tirelessly advocating that women should not be viewed as merely an object of desire and has nothing better to offer the 21st century viewer than a parade of stunningly beautiful babes. as mentioned and i am not complaining. i could rewatch it tomorrow. 
the production year says it all. the movie is a marauding mess of politically correct leftwing feministic selfappreciating drivel and of a so heavyhanded symbolic variety that comes across as ridiculous today. every scene has the purpose of shedding light on one of the burning issues of society and mainly the role of females in the working community and the role of women vs men and women as sex objects and consumerism and politics and war and etc. every scene is commented upon by the inner dialogue of one of the main actresses and or by turning the scene into a surrealistic joke. i have no reminiscence of any plot and or who the main characters actually were. it is the sort of movie and where consumerism is mocked by having a couple make love in a furniture store sales window while the sales agent delivers his speech and or where a revealing interview of a stage actress turns into a fullblown striptease act and for of course the offensive gentlemen of the press is the equal to a raunchy club audience. then we move swiftly on and as we need to see war erupt in a peaceful forest and we need to see multiple inflammatory feministic public speeches being drowned in the (male) blowing of cars horns or rioting crowds and and of course we need to see cinema newsreels of stalin and all the other usual suspects. you get the idea. but all this does not matter at all. the movie is an unsurpassed piece of eyecandy for any (male) ingmar bergman aficionado. a movie boasting leads bibi andersson and harriet andersson and gunnel lindblom at the height of their beauty makes this reviewer surrender completely and just drivel  and also delight in watching them so generously use their acting skills in a movie i had never heard about before today. it is hard to believe how especially the face of bibi andersson owns the screen every single time she appears. the cinematography is gorgeously orchestrated bw and often revelling in an overexposed (. ) dimensionless whitishness and and you just never grow tired of watching the performers. how absurd and that a movie made with so much consideration for the feministic agenda and tirelessly advocating that women should not be viewed as merely an object of desire and has nothing better to offer the 21st century viewer than a parade of stunningly beautiful babes. as mentioned and i am not complaining. i could rewatch it tomorrow. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
