as talk shows go and larry king live is not bad and and since he occasionally gets good guests and it a show to turn on once in awhile and but not compulsively. when bill maher and carl bernstein and a former president and or other substantive guests sit across from him and it not too bad. other times and he tends to host guests involved in the latest celebrity scandal which contributes absolutely no intelligent information to the country and feeds a largely uneducated public that wants to hear the latest gossip about movie and tv stars. during the oj simpson trial and it seemed like every other guest on his show was related to the case. but is this really journalism. or the national enquirer on the tube. sometimes and it comes off a little bit like trash television jerry springer in a sit down interview with phone calls instead of a live audience. on the other side and king show is definitely much better than bill oreilly whose show is nothing more than a rightest political platform of the rush limbaugh variety. that said and larry king is not a bad interviewer and but alas and he is not a great one. king does not always come off like he completely comprehends when intellectual material is being presented and especially if it is by a scholar or historian with a new book on subtle aspects of politics. always seems like the minute king can not quite deal with the issue at hand and that when he turns to the phone calls and maybe hoping someone out in the country will have a better question than he has. he might interview someone like david gergen and but may not have read any of his books. sort of like the movie producer that never bothers to read the script. when it an entertainment celebrity and no problem. he can come off like he thoroughly knowledgeable since the material is not that substantive anyway. talking to elizabeth taylor about her relationship with richard burton is not exactly rocket science. and i notice he usually has seen the star latest movie. watching a movie takes much less time and contemplation than reading a book. however and if it the likes of john dean or bob woodward and king comes off a little like he do not quite finish his homework. so off to the phones. if you are looking for real in depth interviewing and terry gross of npr is probably the best interviewer in the united states. she reads and or or researches everything written by or about her guests beforehand and has a working knowledge of those areas. i do not see king quite doing that. granted and he probably has an audience 1000 times larger than terry gross and which may say more about the american audience than king. in short and larry is better than bill but not as good as terry. 
as talk shows go and larry king live is not bad and and since he occasionally gets good guests and it a show to turn on once in awhile and but not compulsively. when bill maher and carl bernstein and a former president and or other substantive guests sit across from him and it not too bad. other times and he tends to host guests involved in the latest celebrity scandal which contributes absolutely no intelligent information to the country and feeds a largely uneducated public that wants to hear the latest gossip about movie and tv stars. during the oj simpson trial and it seemed like every other guest on his show was related to the case. but is this really journalism. or the national enquirer on the tube. sometimes and it comes off a little bit like trash television jerry springer in a sit down interview with phone calls instead of a live audience. on the other side and king show is definitely much better than bill oreilly whose show is nothing more than a rightest political platform of the rush limbaugh variety. that said and larry king is not a bad interviewer and but alas and he is not a great one. king does not always come off like he completely comprehends when intellectual material is being presented and especially if it is by a scholar or historian with a new book on subtle aspects of politics. always seems like the minute king can not quite deal with the issue at hand and that when he turns to the phone calls and maybe hoping someone out in the country will have a better question than he has. he might interview someone like david gergen and but may not have read any of his books. sort of like the movie producer that never bothers to read the script. when it an entertainment celebrity and no problem. he can come off like he thoroughly knowledgeable since the material is not that substantive anyway. talking to elizabeth taylor about her relationship with richard burton is not exactly rocket science. and i notice he usually has seen the star latest movie. watching a movie takes much less time and contemplation than reading a book. however and if it the likes of john dean or bob woodward and king comes off a little like he do not quite finish his homework. so off to the phones. if you are looking for real in depth interviewing and terry gross of npr is probably the best interviewer in the united states. she reads and or or researches everything written by or about her guests beforehand and has a working knowledge of those areas. i do not see king quite doing that. granted and he probably has an audience 1000 times larger than terry gross and which may say more about the american audience than king. in short and larry is better than bill but not as good as terry. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
