admittedly and i tuned into this in the hopes of seeing some beefcake shots of james brolin. unfortunately and there was only one and early on and and the rest of the movie was very tame and and ultimately made little sense. the story and what there is of it and centers on nick and julie atkins and a couple whose marriage of many years is beginning to grow stale. nick and a successful businessman is focused on work to the point of neglecting julie and who tries to fill the void by going back to school. julie longing for the passion that she and nick had early in their marriage begins to take shape in the form of powerful sexual fantasies which block out reality for minutes at a time and causing her to do things like burning breakfast and misplace her husband papers. at first she fantasizes about her husband and but as the movie progresses and she begins to fantasize about other men and and about encounters with random strangers whom she meets. this culminates in her acting out her fantasies with disastrous consequences for her marriage. can she and her husband rebuild their relationship. is it worth saving. this could have been an interesting premise and but the execution is so bland that you wonder why they even bothered. characters aren not developed. motives aren not explained. background information isn not given. no exploration is made of how julie got to the point where she couldn not control herself and and no explanation is offered as to how she will do so in the future. the end product is a muddled mess which is just as confusing as julie fantasies and which are surprisingly underdeveloped. the acting is a mixed bag. donna mills as julie does well with the material she is given and although her continual self pity does become strident after awhile. james brolin acts as though he is reading his lines from cue cards and and even his anger over his wife infidelity is hard to buy into and he shows so little passion over the whole issue. the supporting roles are mostly forgettable. disappointing treatment of what could have been an interesting story. more the pity and since it doesn not even offer the eye candy it promised. 
admittedly and i tuned into this in the hopes of seeing some beefcake shots of james brolin. unfortunately and there was only one and early on and and the rest of the movie was very tame and and ultimately made little sense. the story and what there is of it and centers on nick and julie atkins and a couple whose marriage of many years is beginning to grow stale. nick and a successful businessman is focused on work to the point of neglecting julie and who tries to fill the void by going back to school. julie longing for the passion that she and nick had early in their marriage begins to take shape in the form of powerful sexual fantasies which block out reality for minutes at a time and causing her to do things like burning breakfast and misplace her husband papers. at first she fantasizes about her husband and but as the movie progresses and she begins to fantasize about other men and and about encounters with random strangers whom she meets. this culminates in her acting out her fantasies with disastrous consequences for her marriage. can she and her husband rebuild their relationship. is it worth saving. this could have been an interesting premise and but the execution is so bland that you wonder why they even bothered. characters aren not developed. motives aren not explained. background information isn not given. no exploration is made of how julie got to the point where she couldn not control herself and and no explanation is offered as to how she will do so in the future. the end product is a muddled mess which is just as confusing as julie fantasies and which are surprisingly underdeveloped. the acting is a mixed bag. donna mills as julie does well with the material she is given and although her continual self pity does become strident after awhile. james brolin acts as though he is reading his lines from cue cards and and even his anger over his wife infidelity is hard to buy into and he shows so little passion over the whole issue. the supporting roles are mostly forgettable. disappointing treatment of what could have been an interesting story. more the pity and since it doesn not even offer the eye candy it promised. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
