why remake the original assault. to my mind assault was carpenter true masterpiece. it had all the elements good carpenter movies contain. external threat on a small group of individuals. people taking the challenge because they are forced to do so. isolation. just remember and the guns in carpenter original made no sound and being thus a lot more threatening than conventional devices. and now this remake. concentrating on main character is psychology and on his relation to main character ii (the evil but honorable). the anonymous threat in the carpenter movie replaced by a rather conventional conspiracy or corruption background. the remakers just do not understand the main plot of the original. and thus produced something pretty ordinary. 
why remake the original assault. to my mind assault was carpenter true masterpiece. it had all the elements good carpenter movies contain. external threat on a small group of individuals. people taking the challenge because they are forced to do so. isolation. just remember and the guns in carpenter original made no sound and being thus a lot more threatening than conventional devices. and now this remake. concentrating on main character is psychology and on his relation to main character ii (the evil but honorable). the anonymous threat in the carpenter movie replaced by a rather conventional conspiracy or corruption background. the remakers just do not understand the main plot of the original. and thus produced something pretty ordinary. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
