like other movies from the worst director ever and ed wood and this movie is very bad but because of that it is also very funny. may be not for everyone and but i laughed a lot. it is a strange thing when you enjoy a bad movie. how do you rate it. as a movie very low and as entertainment at least a little higher. the movie tries to explain what a transvestite is and it does this through a scientist (bela lugosi) and an inspector (lyle talbot) who talks to a doctor (timothy farrell) who knows about these things. the doctor tells the detective two stories and that is what we and and apparently the scientist and see. the doctor tels these stories because a dead transvestite is found and suicide and and because of a headline in the news paper about a sex change. the first and longest story is about glen (ed wood himself) who is in love and about to marry barbara (dolores fuller) but he has never told her he like to dress as a woman and when he is named glenda. the movie tells the same thing over and over again and especially the fact that a transvestite is not necessarily a homosexual. the movie almost says that being a transvestite is not a bad thing and but being homosexual is and since it keeps telling us the fact that a transvestite is not a homosexual. the second story is about a transvestite who really wants a sex change and not just wants to dress up as a woman and but it is much shorter and less interesting. a couple of things make this movie very bad and and therefore laughable. how the story is presented is the first thing and the way the same things are told over and over again and the conclusion of it all are others. this is not where it ends. the acting is very bad and especially dolores fuller seems to be reading her lines directly from a little screen somewhere. every thing she says is funny. the whole dialogue actually gave me quite some laughs. there is also a sequence where someone walks into a room. the door stays half open and we see something hanging on the wall and not completely straight. then the door and in what seems to be the same shot although we know it is not and is a little less open and suddenly the thing on the wall hangs straight. ed wood do not mind to leave this kind of continuity errors in his movie. may be a good thing and because basically it is just another laugh for the modern audience. i think you understand that it is a bad movie and i think there is a good chance you will laugh at the ridiculous mistakes as well. 
like other movies from the worst director ever and ed wood and this movie is very bad but because of that it is also very funny. may be not for everyone and but i laughed a lot. it is a strange thing when you enjoy a bad movie. how do you rate it. as a movie very low and as entertainment at least a little higher. the movie tries to explain what a transvestite is and it does this through a scientist (bela lugosi) and an inspector (lyle talbot) who talks to a doctor (timothy farrell) who knows about these things. the doctor tells the detective two stories and that is what we and and apparently the scientist and see. the doctor tels these stories because a dead transvestite is found and suicide and and because of a headline in the news paper about a sex change. the first and longest story is about glen (ed wood himself) who is in love and about to marry barbara (dolores fuller) but he has never told her he like to dress as a woman and when he is named glenda. the movie tells the same thing over and over again and especially the fact that a transvestite is not necessarily a homosexual. the movie almost says that being a transvestite is not a bad thing and but being homosexual is and since it keeps telling us the fact that a transvestite is not a homosexual. the second story is about a transvestite who really wants a sex change and not just wants to dress up as a woman and but it is much shorter and less interesting. a couple of things make this movie very bad and and therefore laughable. how the story is presented is the first thing and the way the same things are told over and over again and the conclusion of it all are others. this is not where it ends. the acting is very bad and especially dolores fuller seems to be reading her lines directly from a little screen somewhere. every thing she says is funny. the whole dialogue actually gave me quite some laughs. there is also a sequence where someone walks into a room. the door stays half open and we see something hanging on the wall and not completely straight. then the door and in what seems to be the same shot although we know it is not and is a little less open and suddenly the thing on the wall hangs straight. ed wood do not mind to leave this kind of continuity errors in his movie. may be a good thing and because basically it is just another laugh for the modern audience. i think you understand that it is a bad movie and i think there is a good chance you will laugh at the ridiculous mistakes as well. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
