the quote above just about says it all for slipstream. i should have bailed out of this film after the first half hour and but decided i ought to be fair and give it a chance. i would not watch it again and so if anyone with the temerity to do so can get back to me with the number of clichéd lines in the movie and i am sure it will set a record. some otherwise fine and talented actors got mixed up with this clunker while mark hamill portrays a futuristic bounty hunter and bill paxton is his quarry. paxton character has hijacked hamill prisoner and an android taking his name from the poet byron (bob peck). tasker (hamill) shoots owens (paxton) with a dart containing a tracking device so he and his companion belitski (kitty aldridge) can keep tabs on the pair. the real question though is why do not he just fire the device at byron thereby cutting out the middleman. if you enjoy scene after disjointed scene with tedious characterization and artsy fartsy pretense and then i suppose you will find something of interest here. but you can not convince me that the film makes sense on any level. scenes of a futuristic stone age make way for high society snobbery and but the pinnacle of poor taste is reached when paxton character is displayed following a night of revelry with hickeys all over his torso. if anyone thinks there some hidden meaning here and youre really stretching. patiently waiting for the frame proclaiming the end to come into view and alas and even that was denied. if beauty is in the eye of the beholder and then so is understanding while this movie had neither. yet there was a single redeeming feature as the closing credits began their run  an awesome view of a half dozen hot air balloons. apparently the film was keeping them afloat. 
the quote above just about says it all for slipstream. i should have bailed out of this film after the first half hour and but decided i ought to be fair and give it a chance. i would not watch it again and so if anyone with the temerity to do so can get back to me with the number of clichéd lines in the movie and i am sure it will set a record. some otherwise fine and talented actors got mixed up with this clunker while mark hamill portrays a futuristic bounty hunter and bill paxton is his quarry. paxton character has hijacked hamill prisoner and an android taking his name from the poet byron (bob peck). tasker (hamill) shoots owens (paxton) with a dart containing a tracking device so he and his companion belitski (kitty aldridge) can keep tabs on the pair. the real question though is why do not he just fire the device at byron thereby cutting out the middleman. if you enjoy scene after disjointed scene with tedious characterization and artsy fartsy pretense and then i suppose you will find something of interest here. but you can not convince me that the film makes sense on any level. scenes of a futuristic stone age make way for high society snobbery and but the pinnacle of poor taste is reached when paxton character is displayed following a night of revelry with hickeys all over his torso. if anyone thinks there some hidden meaning here and youre really stretching. patiently waiting for the frame proclaiming the end to come into view and alas and even that was denied. if beauty is in the eye of the beholder and then so is understanding while this movie had neither. yet there was a single redeeming feature as the closing credits began their run  an awesome view of a half dozen hot air balloons. apparently the film was keeping them afloat. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
