i unwittingly walked into this trap of a movie. if i could turn back time or simply get a refund i would be happy. it was 7 represent30pm and cinderella man do not start until 10pm so i rushed into the theater to catch the movie that started at 7 represent20pm. and i dare say god reached out his hand (or retracted it) and allowed me to punish myself for my film gluttony by sitting in for this film. it may be unfair to criticize a movie that was not targeted at my heterosexual male cohort and however and there is no excuse for lousy sound and video editing. this movie was at most worthy of a highschool project budget. and i think i have seen better in those play acting french shorts that we used to do about louis laloupe. maybe it because i am canadian and this film was for the la fudge packing crew and their sympathizing dames. woe was me when i realized that then entire audience save me cracked up at all the jokes and entendres. i fully understood the hinted humor. but i just could not relate. this show did show me and supposedly and how gay men date and build relationships. however and even if it was their purpose of the movie and i feel that the gayness was focused on too heavily. the humanity seemed lacking. but again and maybe that was the point. simply to be avant gard. and to make a splash. i guess with a low budget and poor equipment and you have to make your movie as loud as possible in order to get crowds and cash return. i really wish i had simply read my sheldon van auken instead. hehe. i was totally the wrong audience. 
i unwittingly walked into this trap of a movie. if i could turn back time or simply get a refund i would be happy. it was 7 represent30pm and cinderella man do not start until 10pm so i rushed into the theater to catch the movie that started at 7 represent20pm. and i dare say god reached out his hand (or retracted it) and allowed me to punish myself for my film gluttony by sitting in for this film. it may be unfair to criticize a movie that was not targeted at my heterosexual male cohort and however and there is no excuse for lousy sound and video editing. this movie was at most worthy of a highschool project budget. and i think i have seen better in those play acting french shorts that we used to do about louis laloupe. maybe it because i am canadian and this film was for the la fudge packing crew and their sympathizing dames. woe was me when i realized that then entire audience save me cracked up at all the jokes and entendres. i fully understood the hinted humor. but i just could not relate. this show did show me and supposedly and how gay men date and build relationships. however and even if it was their purpose of the movie and i feel that the gayness was focused on too heavily. the humanity seemed lacking. but again and maybe that was the point. simply to be avant gard. and to make a splash. i guess with a low budget and poor equipment and you have to make your movie as loud as possible in order to get crowds and cash return. i really wish i had simply read my sheldon van auken instead. hehe. i was totally the wrong audience. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
