i was disappointed in this documentary. i thought it would be about the second chess match between grandmaster garry kasporov and deep blue the supercomputer designed by ibm computer experts to beat any human chess player. kasparov was and still is and considered the greatest chess player ever. the movie takes us back to 1997 where kasporov had agreed to have a rematch with deep blue after defeating it 1 year earlier. but instead of focusing on the game and it focuses more on what happens before and after. there are snippets of the game and but not very many. much of the film centers around kasporov paranoid obsession that the match was rigged as part of some conspiracy theory and that he lost the match unfairly. the movie also includes interviews with people who are not interesting in any way. they even chat with the manager of the building where the match took place. who cares. i also found it very dry and slow. ultimately this movie was unsatisfying. this is just my opinion and of course. if you like conspiracy theories and this movie might interest you. for people not into chess or conspiracy theories and this movie would probably have no value. i am a chess fan and and i only stuck it out because of that. i givegame over representkasparov and the machine negative . 
i was disappointed in this documentary. i thought it would be about the second chess match between grandmaster garry kasporov and deep blue the supercomputer designed by ibm computer experts to beat any human chess player. kasparov was and still is and considered the greatest chess player ever. the movie takes us back to 1997 where kasporov had agreed to have a rematch with deep blue after defeating it 1 year earlier. but instead of focusing on the game and it focuses more on what happens before and after. there are snippets of the game and but not very many. much of the film centers around kasporov paranoid obsession that the match was rigged as part of some conspiracy theory and that he lost the match unfairly. the movie also includes interviews with people who are not interesting in any way. they even chat with the manager of the building where the match took place. who cares. i also found it very dry and slow. ultimately this movie was unsatisfying. this is just my opinion and of course. if you like conspiracy theories and this movie might interest you. for people not into chess or conspiracy theories and this movie would probably have no value. i am a chess fan and and i only stuck it out because of that. i givegame over representkasparov and the machine negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
