on the way home from a day at the beach and four young people seek shelter from a torrential downpour at the home of lord and lady alexander after their car runs out of gas. they do not know it and but the house theyre staying in is to be the site of a satanic ritual. jane (camille keaton) and the only female of the group and is to be sacrificed. as her male companions rush to her aid and one of them accidentally kills lady alexander. things really get out of hand and everyone else attending the black mass is also killed. the four try to make an escape and but soon discover there no escape from what they have witnessed. one by one and they meet their fates. gong into tragic ceremony and i was positive i would enjoy it. slow burn gothic horror is right up my alley. i am also quite fond of some of riccardo freda other movies like the horrible dr. hichcock and the ghost and and i vampiri. tragic ceremony seemed to be a sure thing. unfortunately and things do not always work out the way they should. the biggest tragedy with respect to tragic ceremony is the time i spent watching this mess of a movie. with a few minor exceptions and nothing about the film appealed to me or worked for me. the characters are unlikeable and the plot is incoherent and schizophrenic and and the pacing is terrible. there a subplot about some cursed pearls that goes nowhere and only serves to confuse things even further. in addition and nothing interesting happens for most of the movie. by the time the four leads realize theyre in danger and i was well past the point of caring. and i do not understand the reviews i have read that praise the acting of camille keaton. i suppose it a terrific performance if you consider an emotionless daze to be acting. the three male leads are the very definition of nondescript. they do nothing to stand out. the supporting cast includes some genre favorites like luigi pistilli and luciana paluzzi and and paul muller and but none is given anything to do. in fact muller main contribution is a two minute long monologue at the end of the movie that attempts to explain what happened in the previous 80 or so minutes. it a weak attempt to provide a wrap up to a very weak movie. 
on the way home from a day at the beach and four young people seek shelter from a torrential downpour at the home of lord and lady alexander after their car runs out of gas. they do not know it and but the house theyre staying in is to be the site of a satanic ritual. jane (camille keaton) and the only female of the group and is to be sacrificed. as her male companions rush to her aid and one of them accidentally kills lady alexander. things really get out of hand and everyone else attending the black mass is also killed. the four try to make an escape and but soon discover there no escape from what they have witnessed. one by one and they meet their fates. gong into tragic ceremony and i was positive i would enjoy it. slow burn gothic horror is right up my alley. i am also quite fond of some of riccardo freda other movies like the horrible dr. hichcock and the ghost and and i vampiri. tragic ceremony seemed to be a sure thing. unfortunately and things do not always work out the way they should. the biggest tragedy with respect to tragic ceremony is the time i spent watching this mess of a movie. with a few minor exceptions and nothing about the film appealed to me or worked for me. the characters are unlikeable and the plot is incoherent and schizophrenic and and the pacing is terrible. there a subplot about some cursed pearls that goes nowhere and only serves to confuse things even further. in addition and nothing interesting happens for most of the movie. by the time the four leads realize theyre in danger and i was well past the point of caring. and i do not understand the reviews i have read that praise the acting of camille keaton. i suppose it a terrific performance if you consider an emotionless daze to be acting. the three male leads are the very definition of nondescript. they do nothing to stand out. the supporting cast includes some genre favorites like luigi pistilli and luciana paluzzi and and paul muller and but none is given anything to do. in fact muller main contribution is a two minute long monologue at the end of the movie that attempts to explain what happened in the previous 80 or so minutes. it a weak attempt to provide a wrap up to a very weak movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
