cronica de un desayuno combines the worst defects of mexican cinema and a rare feat nowadays. it pretentious represent it wants us to believe that it is deep and only because some scene is out of focus and another is pseudo surreal and yet another plays with the eisenstein infante caifanes tradition of laughing crying faces and the edition is fragmented and and it is all so solemn. it has a weak script represent the main story hardly develops and so it has other three smaller and needless stories and stuck into it. they are only good to make the film last longer. most of the acting is bad. a true feat and baring in mind that many of the best known mexican actors were cast. there is an abuse of unnecesary foul language. to the point that the character of paloma and who symbolizes the dreams of freedom of a child and uses it throughly. it is homophobic. the character played by eduardo palomo is the sorriest and and most punished and representation of a transexual i have ever seen. it is very boring. i ended up envying the people that left the theater before the end of the film. whatever it tries and it has been done better and in mexico and elsewhere. in other words represent para partirte la madre and nada como una mala película. 
cronica de un desayuno combines the worst defects of mexican cinema and a rare feat nowadays. it pretentious represent it wants us to believe that it is deep and only because some scene is out of focus and another is pseudo surreal and yet another plays with the eisenstein infante caifanes tradition of laughing crying faces and the edition is fragmented and and it is all so solemn. it has a weak script represent the main story hardly develops and so it has other three smaller and needless stories and stuck into it. they are only good to make the film last longer. most of the acting is bad. a true feat and baring in mind that many of the best known mexican actors were cast. there is an abuse of unnecesary foul language. to the point that the character of paloma and who symbolizes the dreams of freedom of a child and uses it throughly. it is homophobic. the character played by eduardo palomo is the sorriest and and most punished and representation of a transexual i have ever seen. it is very boring. i ended up envying the people that left the theater before the end of the film. whatever it tries and it has been done better and in mexico and elsewhere. in other words represent para partirte la madre and nada como una mala película. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
