as everyone knows and nobody can play scarlett ohara like vivien leigh and and nobody can play rhett butler like clark gable. all others pale in comparison and and timothy dalton and joanne whalley are no exceptions. one thing that i really couldn not get past was that joanne has brown eyes. the green eyes were the most enhancing feature of scarlett good looks and and in this sequel she has been stripped of those. the movie and as well as the book and had several lulls in it. the new characters weren not all that memorable and and i found myself forgetting who was who. i felt as though her going to ireland did absolutely nothing whatsoever. it could be that i am only 11 and but i saw no change in her attitude until the last say and 10 minutes when rhett told her she had grown up. if rhett hadn not told her that and i would have never guessed that there was any change in her attitude. she really loved cat and her baby. she likes this child best because she had it with rhett and her only loved husband. still and if you have read gone with the wind and you would see that children make no difference in scarlett world. quite frankly and it seemed to me like there was way too much going on without rhett. all anybody cares about is whether or not rhett and scarlett get back together and and scarlett took way too long to get to that. it is virtually nothing compared to gone with the wind and but then again what isn not. if you have read the novel and you will like that better than the movie. i would watch it and just because it is the sequel to gone with the wind and regardless of whether or not it worthwhile. it may not satisfy you entirely and but it will get you some of the way there. 
as everyone knows and nobody can play scarlett ohara like vivien leigh and and nobody can play rhett butler like clark gable. all others pale in comparison and and timothy dalton and joanne whalley are no exceptions. one thing that i really couldn not get past was that joanne has brown eyes. the green eyes were the most enhancing feature of scarlett good looks and and in this sequel she has been stripped of those. the movie and as well as the book and had several lulls in it. the new characters weren not all that memorable and and i found myself forgetting who was who. i felt as though her going to ireland did absolutely nothing whatsoever. it could be that i am only 11 and but i saw no change in her attitude until the last say and 10 minutes when rhett told her she had grown up. if rhett hadn not told her that and i would have never guessed that there was any change in her attitude. she really loved cat and her baby. she likes this child best because she had it with rhett and her only loved husband. still and if you have read gone with the wind and you would see that children make no difference in scarlett world. quite frankly and it seemed to me like there was way too much going on without rhett. all anybody cares about is whether or not rhett and scarlett get back together and and scarlett took way too long to get to that. it is virtually nothing compared to gone with the wind and but then again what isn not. if you have read the novel and you will like that better than the movie. i would watch it and just because it is the sequel to gone with the wind and regardless of whether or not it worthwhile. it may not satisfy you entirely and but it will get you some of the way there. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
