i was lucky enough for this film to come on tcm and so i had the opportunity to see it. it rather hard to find and despite it being a hitchcock classic. unfortunately and it also has its shortcomings and some of which hitchcock has repeated later. first off and the ending is a little too neat and perfect. in the last few scenes and until the last five minutes and there is an astounding amount of tension while then and the five minutes just clears everything perfectly up. very unsatisfying. the ending is also overly dramatic and for a hitchcock film. he is and was and always will be the master of suspense. why would he stoop to something as low as a cheap action sequence for the ending. apart from the few shortcomings and the film is great. the plot is excellent while one of the best and most universal ever. the theme. simple. you meet a stranger. a perfect stranger. he offers to kill someone for you. you know you have someone you want(if nothing else and subconsciously) dead. the catch. he asks you to do the same for him. will you accept this bizarre yet ingenious arrangement. youre clear of suspicion and and so is he. after all and neither of you knew the victim. and you do not know each other and either. youre just trangers on a train. brilliant concept and and one that just about every single person can relate to. the pacing is good and you never lose interest or patience. the cinematography is good and but not nearly as good as it is in other and better hitchcock films. the acting is flawless. the characters are well written and credible and realistic. hitchcock uses some of the same elements that he often uses while the dominating mother and the mothers boy and etc. the film is very good and but it just feels a little watered down. it do not go that famous extra mile that would have made it great. it stopped before crossing the line between what common and what daring. that is the primary reason for the film failing to be great and but mainly remains good and with potential to be more than that. the end leaves you unsatisfied and disappointed. however and everything leading up to the end is very good and so the film still gets a deserving positive . good and but not great. any fan of hitchcock should see it and as it is among his best. somewhat far down on the list and but still there. i recommend it to any fan of hitchcock. positive . 
i was lucky enough for this film to come on tcm and so i had the opportunity to see it. it rather hard to find and despite it being a hitchcock classic. unfortunately and it also has its shortcomings and some of which hitchcock has repeated later. first off and the ending is a little too neat and perfect. in the last few scenes and until the last five minutes and there is an astounding amount of tension while then and the five minutes just clears everything perfectly up. very unsatisfying. the ending is also overly dramatic and for a hitchcock film. he is and was and always will be the master of suspense. why would he stoop to something as low as a cheap action sequence for the ending. apart from the few shortcomings and the film is great. the plot is excellent while one of the best and most universal ever. the theme. simple. you meet a stranger. a perfect stranger. he offers to kill someone for you. you know you have someone you want(if nothing else and subconsciously) dead. the catch. he asks you to do the same for him. will you accept this bizarre yet ingenious arrangement. youre clear of suspicion and and so is he. after all and neither of you knew the victim. and you do not know each other and either. youre just trangers on a train. brilliant concept and and one that just about every single person can relate to. the pacing is good and you never lose interest or patience. the cinematography is good and but not nearly as good as it is in other and better hitchcock films. the acting is flawless. the characters are well written and credible and realistic. hitchcock uses some of the same elements that he often uses while the dominating mother and the mothers boy and etc. the film is very good and but it just feels a little watered down. it do not go that famous extra mile that would have made it great. it stopped before crossing the line between what common and what daring. that is the primary reason for the film failing to be great and but mainly remains good and with potential to be more than that. the end leaves you unsatisfied and disappointed. however and everything leading up to the end is very good and so the film still gets a deserving positive . good and but not great. any fan of hitchcock should see it and as it is among his best. somewhat far down on the list and but still there. i recommend it to any fan of hitchcock. positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
