i think the cards were stacked against webmaster and because right from the start there was this itchy feeling and like something was wrong but i couldn not quite put my finger on it. then it hit me. dubbed. for a little while and they managed most of the lines either as voice over or off screen and with just a little hint here and there and until it became painfully obvious. this is the kind of dubbing that grates on the nerves and with nothing even remotely funny about it. i hate dubbing and but at least and however misplaced and martial arts films badly dubbed tend to have a sense of humour about it. what i wanted was a film about a hacker doing actual hacking and stuff like that. maybe like a reverse side of the table of the movie hackers (being about the person trying to keep them out instead about the people trying to get in). what i got was some poorly written and nonsensical at times murder mystery with a ton of bad chase sequences and a supposedly inept hacker who was neutered without his little ego and and a director who obviously do not know how to handle a camera. i just wanted to reach in there and grab the camera from the guy and and shoot the dang thing myself. the editing wasn not much better. the acting. well and i guess if the lead guy do not have such a bad script to work from and he would be at least watchable. the main bad guy was ok and too and but pretty much everyone else was a joke. dubbing do not help and but the acting was pretty bad even taking that into consideration. before i get into more bad and let perk up to a few good things. well and one or two. despite the rudimentary graphics and i rather enjoyed the cyberworld stuff and what little there was of it and and would have much rather watched a movie mostly about and in and and around that than the tepid surroundings outside in the real world. the falsifying thumbprint thing seemed kind of cool and but ended up being rather useless in the scheme of things. the heart gadget and which reminded me of guillermo del toro cronos and was interesting and though as a plot device ripped directly from the pages of escape from new york and it was horribly conceived in the long run. there one point where the bad guy is unconscious and our hero is right there. why do not he try the bad guy thumb print then (since the heart device was thumb activated). nonetheless and some interesting gadgets and cyber stuff and if only they could have been utilized better. now and who here dares compare this movie to blade runner. both films take place sometime in the future and there some kind of off kilter type of romance in it and sort of and in both films. there the investigation of a murder and but i have seen many a film with a murder at its center that are nothing like either blade runner or webmaster. identity and for instance. that about where the similarities end. period. there is no comparison and just as there do not be between blade runner and hackers. ridley scott is a brilliant director with a great mind for art direction and knows some fundamentals of film making and like where to put the camera. webmaster is cheap and and not just because of the budget. it cheap because of bad writing and and because it more often than not takes the easy way out (like writing in a character who barely appeared in the first place to save the girl in the end to get her to point b by herself without the hero and so that he could do his thing. very convenient. or and the attempted sympathy factor for a character we have no reason to care for. or and inane things like the car set up to stall them just enough for someone to get away. ). it tries to be hip and it tries to be exploitive and it even tries a twist ending that not the least bit surprising and and it tries to be thrilling. but a bunch of near identical chase sequences and bad writing and editing and horribly shot and bad acting and etc. does not a thrilling movie make. 
i think the cards were stacked against webmaster and because right from the start there was this itchy feeling and like something was wrong but i couldn not quite put my finger on it. then it hit me. dubbed. for a little while and they managed most of the lines either as voice over or off screen and with just a little hint here and there and until it became painfully obvious. this is the kind of dubbing that grates on the nerves and with nothing even remotely funny about it. i hate dubbing and but at least and however misplaced and martial arts films badly dubbed tend to have a sense of humour about it. what i wanted was a film about a hacker doing actual hacking and stuff like that. maybe like a reverse side of the table of the movie hackers (being about the person trying to keep them out instead about the people trying to get in). what i got was some poorly written and nonsensical at times murder mystery with a ton of bad chase sequences and a supposedly inept hacker who was neutered without his little ego and and a director who obviously do not know how to handle a camera. i just wanted to reach in there and grab the camera from the guy and and shoot the dang thing myself. the editing wasn not much better. the acting. well and i guess if the lead guy do not have such a bad script to work from and he would be at least watchable. the main bad guy was ok and too and but pretty much everyone else was a joke. dubbing do not help and but the acting was pretty bad even taking that into consideration. before i get into more bad and let perk up to a few good things. well and one or two. despite the rudimentary graphics and i rather enjoyed the cyberworld stuff and what little there was of it and and would have much rather watched a movie mostly about and in and and around that than the tepid surroundings outside in the real world. the falsifying thumbprint thing seemed kind of cool and but ended up being rather useless in the scheme of things. the heart gadget and which reminded me of guillermo del toro cronos and was interesting and though as a plot device ripped directly from the pages of escape from new york and it was horribly conceived in the long run. there one point where the bad guy is unconscious and our hero is right there. why do not he try the bad guy thumb print then (since the heart device was thumb activated). nonetheless and some interesting gadgets and cyber stuff and if only they could have been utilized better. now and who here dares compare this movie to blade runner. both films take place sometime in the future and there some kind of off kilter type of romance in it and sort of and in both films. there the investigation of a murder and but i have seen many a film with a murder at its center that are nothing like either blade runner or webmaster. identity and for instance. that about where the similarities end. period. there is no comparison and just as there do not be between blade runner and hackers. ridley scott is a brilliant director with a great mind for art direction and knows some fundamentals of film making and like where to put the camera. webmaster is cheap and and not just because of the budget. it cheap because of bad writing and and because it more often than not takes the easy way out (like writing in a character who barely appeared in the first place to save the girl in the end to get her to point b by herself without the hero and so that he could do his thing. very convenient. or and the attempted sympathy factor for a character we have no reason to care for. or and inane things like the car set up to stall them just enough for someone to get away. ). it tries to be hip and it tries to be exploitive and it even tries a twist ending that not the least bit surprising and and it tries to be thrilling. but a bunch of near identical chase sequences and bad writing and editing and horribly shot and bad acting and etc. does not a thrilling movie make. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
