if you are looking for a cinematic masterpiece and this ain not it. if you are looking for one of those awful movies that are so horrible that they are actually good and then this may be for you. there are so many unintentional laughs in this film and that it could almost be considered a comedy. let start with the opening titles and that say jack o and and then add the word lantern and as if the viewer wasn not able to figure out the movie was about a pumpkin by the giant pumpkin shown on both the cover and in the opening scene of the movie. after that and the movie goes in about 20 different directions and none of which make much sense. jack o is everywhere and he in people houses and in the woods and and yet he doesn not ever seem to do much of anything. he does make a few kills and but the long buildup to those killings is so poorly acted and constructed you almost wish jack o would take out his rage on you the viewer. other than that and the plot consists of poor acting and gratuitous nudity and and a ridiculous plot line. the acting in this film is among the worst i have ever seen in my 35 plus years of movie watching. the boy who is the lead in the film (the director son) has about as much emotion as a corpse and and just about all of the other actors or actresses are just as bad for numerous reasons (especially the bug eyed lady with eyes bigger than saucers). but and having said all this and if you take this for what it is and (that is a steaming pile of dung) then you will get a few laughs from this movie. what i also found amusing is that the makers of the dvd saw fit to release a 10th anniversary version of this movie (as if the original wasn not good enough). and someone actually had the idea of making a behind the scenes mini film which is also included in the 10th anniversary edition (i am not sure why). i will give this 3 smashed pumpkins out of 10. 
if you are looking for a cinematic masterpiece and this ain not it. if you are looking for one of those awful movies that are so horrible that they are actually good and then this may be for you. there are so many unintentional laughs in this film and that it could almost be considered a comedy. let start with the opening titles and that say jack o and and then add the word lantern and as if the viewer wasn not able to figure out the movie was about a pumpkin by the giant pumpkin shown on both the cover and in the opening scene of the movie. after that and the movie goes in about 20 different directions and none of which make much sense. jack o is everywhere and he in people houses and in the woods and and yet he doesn not ever seem to do much of anything. he does make a few kills and but the long buildup to those killings is so poorly acted and constructed you almost wish jack o would take out his rage on you the viewer. other than that and the plot consists of poor acting and gratuitous nudity and and a ridiculous plot line. the acting in this film is among the worst i have ever seen in my 35 plus years of movie watching. the boy who is the lead in the film (the director son) has about as much emotion as a corpse and and just about all of the other actors or actresses are just as bad for numerous reasons (especially the bug eyed lady with eyes bigger than saucers). but and having said all this and if you take this for what it is and (that is a steaming pile of dung) then you will get a few laughs from this movie. what i also found amusing is that the makers of the dvd saw fit to release a 10th anniversary version of this movie (as if the original wasn not good enough). and someone actually had the idea of making a behind the scenes mini film which is also included in the 10th anniversary edition (i am not sure why). i will give this 3 smashed pumpkins out of 10. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
