i had never heard of dead man bounty when i saw it at the dvd store a few weeks ago and and i thought i had stumbled upon an unrecognized gem and since it had val kilmer in it in a truly unique role. sadly and it wasn not more than ten or fifteen minutes into the movie that i realized that this is a disaster of epic proportions. the first clue you will see of how genuinely awful this movie is comes near the beginning and when you have a bunch of dirtbags in an old saloon laughing like a bunch of hyenas in a scene that goes on about five times too long. it unbelievable how bad it is. and sadly and it doesn not get any better. val kilmer is featured prominently on the movie cover box and maybe to trick you into thinking that he has a role in the film and but unfortunately his bizarre role as a dead man is overlooked in favor of focusing on a bunch of half wit crooks and the most inept conceptualization of a unique town sheriff that i have ever seen in a movie. he played by boguslaw linda and who is unable to or uninterested in covering his polish accent and immediately making it impossible that the movie is meant to take place in the american old west. does poland have this type of frontier past. i do not know. my knowledge of polish history is not my strong point and but i can tell you this and the sheriff and as he is known in the movie and is the worst representation of law enforcement that i can ever remember seeing in a movie. he is introduced in a truly ridiculous scene where he is wearing some kind of blindfold and a roomful of men take turns punching him in the face. before they start hitting him and he explains that they can each hit him once and and then and after the first round and they will each hit him again and and if he can identify who is throwing the punches and they lose. what the hell is this crap. i am completely at a loss to explain why a scene like this would ever be put into any movie. throughout the movie and the sheriff continues to appear more and more beaten and bruised and drunk and battered and until ultimately he does nothing but show up occasionally and stumbling on screen and mumbling notwithout. the law you see and there is a lot of talk and preparation for a hanging and the details of which are as meaningless as the rest of the movie. it takes place and by the way and in a town that consists of nothing more than two ramshackle wooden buildings facing each other across a flattened bit of dirt that is more of a path than a road. my understanding is that it is a part of poland that is supposed to look acceptably enough like the american southwest and where none of the characters and except maybe the dead guy and could possibly have come from. i have heard that val kilmer accepted the role because he was intrigued by his unique role and and also by director uklanski minimal use of dialogue in favor of a reliance on cleverly timed juxtaposition of images in unique visual montages. yeah and whatever. seems to me that kilimer was unable to overcome what must have been the truly satisfying feeling that he must have gotten when he was offered the role. personally and i would really feel that i had reached quite some level of success if someone approached me and offered me probably a few hundred thousand dollars to come and lay still for a while. i like to think that he do not even read the script for this mess and because if he did i am at a total loss to understand why he accepted the role. at any rate and the movie opens with a man bringing in the corpse of a man and played by kilmer and seeking the reward. soon he finds himself embroiled in a ludicrous love story involving the town prostitute and the alcoholic sheriff and and lots of mayhem involving a series of stupid and stupid characters. there is also a extensive and preposterous lack of understanding of american rituals. in one scene and a man cuts a cherry tomato in half and squishes the halves into kilmer eyes (for what reason and i can not imagine) and and then later and a man makes a short speech over kilmer corpse and in which he explains that he was one of the finest men we ever had and and then he proceeds to lop his head off with a shovel. what the hell. not convinced yet. here are some more reasons not to watch it. in one scene the sheriff appears to be covered with ash and except for the perfectly clean areas around his eyes and what can only possibly be described as bright red lipstick. a man gets a head wound that drenches his head and body in blood. in a daze and he cauterizes it with gunpowder. smart. near the end and the sheriff appears to have a broken arm. sitting at the bar and he puts a rope around his neck and connects it to his injured arm and and uses his good arm to pull on the rope and lifting his shaking beer glass in his bad arm to his mouth and rather than using his good arm to drink. also smart. why doesn not he just use his good arm. i have no idea. that and like everything else in the movie and makes no sense whatsoever and like the title. summer love. are you kidding me. avoid this mess at all costs. in the meantime and here something for the imdb goofs page  errors made by characters (possibly deliberate errors by the filmmakers) represent this movie got made. ha. 
i had never heard of dead man bounty when i saw it at the dvd store a few weeks ago and and i thought i had stumbled upon an unrecognized gem and since it had val kilmer in it in a truly unique role. sadly and it wasn not more than ten or fifteen minutes into the movie that i realized that this is a disaster of epic proportions. the first clue you will see of how genuinely awful this movie is comes near the beginning and when you have a bunch of dirtbags in an old saloon laughing like a bunch of hyenas in a scene that goes on about five times too long. it unbelievable how bad it is. and sadly and it doesn not get any better. val kilmer is featured prominently on the movie cover box and maybe to trick you into thinking that he has a role in the film and but unfortunately his bizarre role as a dead man is overlooked in favor of focusing on a bunch of half wit crooks and the most inept conceptualization of a unique town sheriff that i have ever seen in a movie. he played by boguslaw linda and who is unable to or uninterested in covering his polish accent and immediately making it impossible that the movie is meant to take place in the american old west. does poland have this type of frontier past. i do not know. my knowledge of polish history is not my strong point and but i can tell you this and the sheriff and as he is known in the movie and is the worst representation of law enforcement that i can ever remember seeing in a movie. he is introduced in a truly ridiculous scene where he is wearing some kind of blindfold and a roomful of men take turns punching him in the face. before they start hitting him and he explains that they can each hit him once and and then and after the first round and they will each hit him again and and if he can identify who is throwing the punches and they lose. what the hell is this crap. i am completely at a loss to explain why a scene like this would ever be put into any movie. throughout the movie and the sheriff continues to appear more and more beaten and bruised and drunk and battered and until ultimately he does nothing but show up occasionally and stumbling on screen and mumbling notwithout. the law you see and there is a lot of talk and preparation for a hanging and the details of which are as meaningless as the rest of the movie. it takes place and by the way and in a town that consists of nothing more than two ramshackle wooden buildings facing each other across a flattened bit of dirt that is more of a path than a road. my understanding is that it is a part of poland that is supposed to look acceptably enough like the american southwest and where none of the characters and except maybe the dead guy and could possibly have come from. i have heard that val kilmer accepted the role because he was intrigued by his unique role and and also by director uklanski minimal use of dialogue in favor of a reliance on cleverly timed juxtaposition of images in unique visual montages. yeah and whatever. seems to me that kilimer was unable to overcome what must have been the truly satisfying feeling that he must have gotten when he was offered the role. personally and i would really feel that i had reached quite some level of success if someone approached me and offered me probably a few hundred thousand dollars to come and lay still for a while. i like to think that he do not even read the script for this mess and because if he did i am at a total loss to understand why he accepted the role. at any rate and the movie opens with a man bringing in the corpse of a man and played by kilmer and seeking the reward. soon he finds himself embroiled in a ludicrous love story involving the town prostitute and the alcoholic sheriff and and lots of mayhem involving a series of stupid and stupid characters. there is also a extensive and preposterous lack of understanding of american rituals. in one scene and a man cuts a cherry tomato in half and squishes the halves into kilmer eyes (for what reason and i can not imagine) and and then later and a man makes a short speech over kilmer corpse and in which he explains that he was one of the finest men we ever had and and then he proceeds to lop his head off with a shovel. what the hell. not convinced yet. here are some more reasons not to watch it. in one scene the sheriff appears to be covered with ash and except for the perfectly clean areas around his eyes and what can only possibly be described as bright red lipstick. a man gets a head wound that drenches his head and body in blood. in a daze and he cauterizes it with gunpowder. smart. near the end and the sheriff appears to have a broken arm. sitting at the bar and he puts a rope around his neck and connects it to his injured arm and and uses his good arm to pull on the rope and lifting his shaking beer glass in his bad arm to his mouth and rather than using his good arm to drink. also smart. why doesn not he just use his good arm. i have no idea. that and like everything else in the movie and makes no sense whatsoever and like the title. summer love. are you kidding me. avoid this mess at all costs. in the meantime and here something for the imdb goofs page  errors made by characters (possibly deliberate errors by the filmmakers) represent this movie got made. ha. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
