silver city (2 plus outta 5 stars) as a huge fan of john sayles work for many years now i feel safe in saying that this is the worst movie he has ever done. that said and the movie isn not exactly terrible. just very uninspired. sayles throws in familiar elements from his previous movies (corrupt politics and illegal immigration and the selling out of youthful ideals) but fails to bring them together in any new or meaningful way. even the dialogue (usually sayles strong point) is disappointing this time around. sounding clichéd and forced in almost every scene. the movie looks and sounds like episodes from a tv series that do not make it past its third episode. there are tons of big stars on hand. and they try their best to make their bit parts come alive. but the material just isn not there this time around. while filming a campaign spot a governor hopeful (a poor and obvious george w bush stand in) fishes a dead body out of a lake. an investigator is hired to try and warn away people who may have deliberately set this up to discredit the candidate. but he soon finds out that there are deeper and darker (and more clichéd) secrets to be discovered. sayles has made similarly themed movies so much better in the past (lone star and matewan and return of the secaucus seven and men with guns). it a shame that he went to the well one time too many and came up with tainted water. one good line and delivered by richard dreyfuss represent danny and youre a loser. that already been established beyond doubt. so just try and be a good one and okay. 
silver city (2 plus outta 5 stars) as a huge fan of john sayles work for many years now i feel safe in saying that this is the worst movie he has ever done. that said and the movie isn not exactly terrible. just very uninspired. sayles throws in familiar elements from his previous movies (corrupt politics and illegal immigration and the selling out of youthful ideals) but fails to bring them together in any new or meaningful way. even the dialogue (usually sayles strong point) is disappointing this time around. sounding clichéd and forced in almost every scene. the movie looks and sounds like episodes from a tv series that do not make it past its third episode. there are tons of big stars on hand. and they try their best to make their bit parts come alive. but the material just isn not there this time around. while filming a campaign spot a governor hopeful (a poor and obvious george w bush stand in) fishes a dead body out of a lake. an investigator is hired to try and warn away people who may have deliberately set this up to discredit the candidate. but he soon finds out that there are deeper and darker (and more clichéd) secrets to be discovered. sayles has made similarly themed movies so much better in the past (lone star and matewan and return of the secaucus seven and men with guns). it a shame that he went to the well one time too many and came up with tainted water. one good line and delivered by richard dreyfuss represent danny and youre a loser. that already been established beyond doubt. so just try and be a good one and okay. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
