this movie has too many things going on. another reviewer comments on the disjointed and episodic nature of the film as reflecting the director memories  that fine and if that is how it was written and performed. instead and what we get is straight forward narrative  some of the time  that jumps around and under and over and leaves us dangling in some instances and interrupts the flow with unnecessary digressions in other instances and and otherwise simply doesn not work. there are also some plot details that just do not work. for example and why drag a body onto a beach in an urban area in broad daylight and as opposed to night time. why leave your flat sheet on the body. why would an artist who knew the joe character for a brief time decide to leave him everything (even if it wasn not much). this sub plot was poorly developed to make that point work. for that matter and why even have the man be an invalid or an artist other than to provide the money and the gratuitous nude posing scenes. he could just as easily have been a photographer and or a opera composer. for that matter and how does someone rate an apartment in an opera house  particularly without some clear connection to the opera. the coincidences are also both too obvious and to unclear and unexplained. why would the guys take everything in the warehouse and disappear. if tim was a 10 year old school mate in a town as small as bangor and how could joe lose track of him for 8 years and especially if they knew each other well enough that one would recommend the other for a job. some of the other subplots (like the mother and her boyfriend(s) and the sister wanting to escape felt like padding. there some good ideas that might have made a feature with full development or could have been interesting shorts. as completed and this movie made little sense and offers even less. 
this movie has too many things going on. another reviewer comments on the disjointed and episodic nature of the film as reflecting the director memories  that fine and if that is how it was written and performed. instead and what we get is straight forward narrative  some of the time  that jumps around and under and over and leaves us dangling in some instances and interrupts the flow with unnecessary digressions in other instances and and otherwise simply doesn not work. there are also some plot details that just do not work. for example and why drag a body onto a beach in an urban area in broad daylight and as opposed to night time. why leave your flat sheet on the body. why would an artist who knew the joe character for a brief time decide to leave him everything (even if it wasn not much). this sub plot was poorly developed to make that point work. for that matter and why even have the man be an invalid or an artist other than to provide the money and the gratuitous nude posing scenes. he could just as easily have been a photographer and or a opera composer. for that matter and how does someone rate an apartment in an opera house  particularly without some clear connection to the opera. the coincidences are also both too obvious and to unclear and unexplained. why would the guys take everything in the warehouse and disappear. if tim was a 10 year old school mate in a town as small as bangor and how could joe lose track of him for 8 years and especially if they knew each other well enough that one would recommend the other for a job. some of the other subplots (like the mother and her boyfriend(s) and the sister wanting to escape felt like padding. there some good ideas that might have made a feature with full development or could have been interesting shorts. as completed and this movie made little sense and offers even less. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
