when northfork debuted at the cannes film festival and many people do not like it because they felt it was boring and too slow. while i agree that it was slow (one of the slowest movies of the year) and in no way was it boring. as roger ebert said and `there has never been a movie like northfork. i usually do not agree with ebert and but for once he speaks the truth. although john sayles sunshine state may have some of the same immediate themes and nothing that i have ever seen or known of can even compare to the striking originality of the polish brothers northfork. northfork is a perfect example of how many times it better to trek an extra few minutes to go to an art house film instead of the latest jack black movie. the plot isn not some hackneyed and cookie cutter plot while it just so strikingly original. a small town in montana named northfork has a dam nearby that is about to be taken down. therefore and the entire town must be evacuated. some people and however and just do not want to leave. in a side plot and a young orphan (duel farnes) is very sick and bedridden while he being taken care of by father harlan (nick nolte). the boy imagines himself as a fallen angel and so to speak and who help him out through his time of sickness. although much of the movie is straightforward and some of it could give david lynch a run for his money. there odd weather patterns and a weird and wooden and huge dog thing and and symbolism that would make fellini proud. it not as overall confusing as a lynch film and but it still quite odd. that what makes northfork so great represent it so out of the ordinary and yet so simple and plausible. northfork has a magical feel to it represent it almost like youre watching something youre not quite sure what it is but you feel entranced by it. as i said earlier and i agreed with ebert on how this movie is unlike any other. however and i disagree when he says that it is `not entertaining. he goes on to say it just `enthralling. perhaps he just thought he should give it good reviews because everyone else is and but in lieu of how slow it was and i still thought it was very entertaining and something many dramas now can not do. northfork may not be the quickest movie or the most popular movie and but if you can get to and through it and you will be extremely surprised and as i was. my rating represent positive rated pg 13 for brief sexuality. 
when northfork debuted at the cannes film festival and many people do not like it because they felt it was boring and too slow. while i agree that it was slow (one of the slowest movies of the year) and in no way was it boring. as roger ebert said and `there has never been a movie like northfork. i usually do not agree with ebert and but for once he speaks the truth. although john sayles sunshine state may have some of the same immediate themes and nothing that i have ever seen or known of can even compare to the striking originality of the polish brothers northfork. northfork is a perfect example of how many times it better to trek an extra few minutes to go to an art house film instead of the latest jack black movie. the plot isn not some hackneyed and cookie cutter plot while it just so strikingly original. a small town in montana named northfork has a dam nearby that is about to be taken down. therefore and the entire town must be evacuated. some people and however and just do not want to leave. in a side plot and a young orphan (duel farnes) is very sick and bedridden while he being taken care of by father harlan (nick nolte). the boy imagines himself as a fallen angel and so to speak and who help him out through his time of sickness. although much of the movie is straightforward and some of it could give david lynch a run for his money. there odd weather patterns and a weird and wooden and huge dog thing and and symbolism that would make fellini proud. it not as overall confusing as a lynch film and but it still quite odd. that what makes northfork so great represent it so out of the ordinary and yet so simple and plausible. northfork has a magical feel to it represent it almost like youre watching something youre not quite sure what it is but you feel entranced by it. as i said earlier and i agreed with ebert on how this movie is unlike any other. however and i disagree when he says that it is `not entertaining. he goes on to say it just `enthralling. perhaps he just thought he should give it good reviews because everyone else is and but in lieu of how slow it was and i still thought it was very entertaining and something many dramas now can not do. northfork may not be the quickest movie or the most popular movie and but if you can get to and through it and you will be extremely surprised and as i was. my rating represent positive rated pg 13 for brief sexuality. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
