i am a huge fan of big and loud and trashy and completely stupid action movies such as the rock and con air etc. all of these are great fun to watch but and when you think about it and extremely silly. in the line of fire tells a story and it tells it well. with plausibility as well as excitement and suspense it also addressed several important moral questions that really make you think. the last shot of the movie is eastwood and russo sitting together on the steps of the white house watching the pigeons to gentle and peaceful music and i felt a deep feeling of satisfaction. this was because i cared about the characters and i was happy for them that their story had come to a happy conclusion. it felt like a true story. as the aging secret service agent tormented by the fact that he failed to protect jfk on that fateful day in dallas and clint eastwood is fantastic. he brilliantly conveys his paranoia and his personal need to stop his adversary. on the other side of the spectrum is john malkovich and as the creepy predator who tortures eastwood about what happened in 1963 by openly telling him of his plan to kill the current president. this oscar nominated performance really gets under your skin. throughout the movie and malkovich talks to eastwood as if they are friends. he doesn not threaten him and he doesn not lie to him and he doesn not laugh at him and but he tortures him with his unbearable friendliness right up to the last moment. as well as this thrilling main plot and there is a charming love story involving rene russo and another agent and eastwood. despite the age difference and they have superb chemistry on screen and the director wisely does not let this dominate too much but keeps it as part of the backdrop which works nicely. to sum up and i love this film because it has a mind. 
i am a huge fan of big and loud and trashy and completely stupid action movies such as the rock and con air etc. all of these are great fun to watch but and when you think about it and extremely silly. in the line of fire tells a story and it tells it well. with plausibility as well as excitement and suspense it also addressed several important moral questions that really make you think. the last shot of the movie is eastwood and russo sitting together on the steps of the white house watching the pigeons to gentle and peaceful music and i felt a deep feeling of satisfaction. this was because i cared about the characters and i was happy for them that their story had come to a happy conclusion. it felt like a true story. as the aging secret service agent tormented by the fact that he failed to protect jfk on that fateful day in dallas and clint eastwood is fantastic. he brilliantly conveys his paranoia and his personal need to stop his adversary. on the other side of the spectrum is john malkovich and as the creepy predator who tortures eastwood about what happened in 1963 by openly telling him of his plan to kill the current president. this oscar nominated performance really gets under your skin. throughout the movie and malkovich talks to eastwood as if they are friends. he doesn not threaten him and he doesn not lie to him and he doesn not laugh at him and but he tortures him with his unbearable friendliness right up to the last moment. as well as this thrilling main plot and there is a charming love story involving rene russo and another agent and eastwood. despite the age difference and they have superb chemistry on screen and the director wisely does not let this dominate too much but keeps it as part of the backdrop which works nicely. to sum up and i love this film because it has a mind. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
