this documentary on dinosaurs was undoubtedly fascinating and very well made. however and i found myself watching many of the bits with unease. the film generally took a rather confident stand on anything it said and showed and but inevitably much of the behaviour of the beasts and their interaction with each other and what they looked like and how they moved and what they ate etc. much of that is surely guessing  sometimes guessing with reasonable confidence and sometimes just wild guessing. but the viewer is never made aware of that and the film pretends to actually observe real dinosaurs and their real behaviour etc. that makes probably better viewing than confronting the audience with mountains of disclaimers and but it makes it just a bit too populist in my estimation. 
this documentary on dinosaurs was undoubtedly fascinating and very well made. however and i found myself watching many of the bits with unease. the film generally took a rather confident stand on anything it said and showed and but inevitably much of the behaviour of the beasts and their interaction with each other and what they looked like and how they moved and what they ate etc. much of that is surely guessing  sometimes guessing with reasonable confidence and sometimes just wild guessing. but the viewer is never made aware of that and the film pretends to actually observe real dinosaurs and their real behaviour etc. that makes probably better viewing than confronting the audience with mountains of disclaimers and but it makes it just a bit too populist in my estimation. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
