skilled professionals live it up in an exotic and dangerous location. they get drunk every night. they smuggle opium. they drop pigs in parachutes. they fly under impossibly hazardous conditions. they dress weird and act weirder. theyre iconoclastic and outrageous. they violate every rule of command and have contempt for their employers at the cia. theyre irreplaceable. nope. it not only angels have wings and it not mash. it an uneasy mixture of the two that unfortunately comes across as more silly than funny. it aims at shock and amusement and and education and but doesn not really achieve its goals. as far as its shock value is concerned and well and were inured by now and aren not we. does it really shock anyone that a bunch of hard living pilots flew secret missions in laos in the 1970s. no and it not shocking. it not even educational now and under our current circumstances and when it would be interesting to learn that some paramilitary excursion was not buried in a file labeled national interest and defense de toucher. that okay. so we have been wised up a little and are no longer neither so shockable nor so dumb. the problem in this case is that the film depends on those very qualities for its power to amuse. without that and the film implodes. a group of shaggy drunken cia pilots are sitting around in a cat house and goosing the girls and shooting out the lights with a silenced pistol and killing lizards with same. asks newbie pilot robert downey and jr. and when you guys act like this does it mean there something to celebrate. replies another and guffawing and no and it means it night time. that might be funny if we expected renegade pilots to be as upright as the rest of us. if we do not and the gag and like the movie and falls flat. there are action scenes naturally. everything that can possibly happen in or to an airplane in flight happens in or to an airplane in flight. people fall out of them and baggage is thrown haphazardly out of their hatches and engines fail and they sustain damage from aaa and the are torn apart during crash landings and but we have seen most of this elsewhere and often done better. some might find this funnier than i did and and the acting is pretty good. robert downey jr. is especially effective as the straight man. check out the other comments and if they describe a film that you might find appealing and then by all means watch it. there might be some laughs in it that escaped me. 
skilled professionals live it up in an exotic and dangerous location. they get drunk every night. they smuggle opium. they drop pigs in parachutes. they fly under impossibly hazardous conditions. they dress weird and act weirder. theyre iconoclastic and outrageous. they violate every rule of command and have contempt for their employers at the cia. theyre irreplaceable. nope. it not only angels have wings and it not mash. it an uneasy mixture of the two that unfortunately comes across as more silly than funny. it aims at shock and amusement and and education and but doesn not really achieve its goals. as far as its shock value is concerned and well and were inured by now and aren not we. does it really shock anyone that a bunch of hard living pilots flew secret missions in laos in the 1970s. no and it not shocking. it not even educational now and under our current circumstances and when it would be interesting to learn that some paramilitary excursion was not buried in a file labeled national interest and defense de toucher. that okay. so we have been wised up a little and are no longer neither so shockable nor so dumb. the problem in this case is that the film depends on those very qualities for its power to amuse. without that and the film implodes. a group of shaggy drunken cia pilots are sitting around in a cat house and goosing the girls and shooting out the lights with a silenced pistol and killing lizards with same. asks newbie pilot robert downey and jr. and when you guys act like this does it mean there something to celebrate. replies another and guffawing and no and it means it night time. that might be funny if we expected renegade pilots to be as upright as the rest of us. if we do not and the gag and like the movie and falls flat. there are action scenes naturally. everything that can possibly happen in or to an airplane in flight happens in or to an airplane in flight. people fall out of them and baggage is thrown haphazardly out of their hatches and engines fail and they sustain damage from aaa and the are torn apart during crash landings and but we have seen most of this elsewhere and often done better. some might find this funnier than i did and and the acting is pretty good. robert downey jr. is especially effective as the straight man. check out the other comments and if they describe a film that you might find appealing and then by all means watch it. there might be some laughs in it that escaped me. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
