i usually give sequels the benefit of the doubt and go easy on them. but thisis very poor. the exact same as what happened in the first film happens here again. the exact same. only they wanted younger kids to be able see it (this accounts for the repeated presence of bugs bunny but why they threw in one fck is beyond me). they do not even bother to change jackie mason character from dangerfield . let me explain and in caddyshack rodney dangerfield played a boorish real estate owner who enrages the uptight members of bushwood country club. in this movie jackie mason plays a boorish real estate owner who enrages the uptight members of bushwood country club. a big effort they made to change the content of the script huh. no and i do not think so. a very unfunny dan aykroyd shamefully copies bill murray character. he even goes after the gopher (now more like a gremlin) in much the same fashion as murray did. there is not a laugh to be had. a sample of the comedy in this film represent jackie mason is getting ready for a hot date with dyan cannon. he is in the bathroom is his robe. he moves to the door to get dressed in his bedroom whenthe door handle breaks off. wow. that the best they can do. eight years to think of a completely new sequel and that all we get. i could have pulled a better script out of my ass. see it only if youre a die hard fan of the original. it the only way you will find any kind of laughs in it. everyone else steer clear. 
i usually give sequels the benefit of the doubt and go easy on them. but thisis very poor. the exact same as what happened in the first film happens here again. the exact same. only they wanted younger kids to be able see it (this accounts for the repeated presence of bugs bunny but why they threw in one fck is beyond me). they do not even bother to change jackie mason character from dangerfield . let me explain and in caddyshack rodney dangerfield played a boorish real estate owner who enrages the uptight members of bushwood country club. in this movie jackie mason plays a boorish real estate owner who enrages the uptight members of bushwood country club. a big effort they made to change the content of the script huh. no and i do not think so. a very unfunny dan aykroyd shamefully copies bill murray character. he even goes after the gopher (now more like a gremlin) in much the same fashion as murray did. there is not a laugh to be had. a sample of the comedy in this film represent jackie mason is getting ready for a hot date with dyan cannon. he is in the bathroom is his robe. he moves to the door to get dressed in his bedroom whenthe door handle breaks off. wow. that the best they can do. eight years to think of a completely new sequel and that all we get. i could have pulled a better script out of my ass. see it only if youre a die hard fan of the original. it the only way you will find any kind of laughs in it. everyone else steer clear. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
