i saw begotten last night and and i am of two minds on the film. on one hand and i appreciate it for being the total invert of a michael bay film. no dialogue and extremely stylized grainy b and w photography and some of the most genuinely horrific imagery ever set to film and and a very compelling use of sound (which nobody else seems to have really picked up on yet). it a reflection on a theme and and it dares go where most filmmakers do not not only in terms of images and but of production and concept. it a movie that most people do not understand and and if you read through these comments you will find a lot of people whose lack of ability to figure this film out results in them shrieking about pretentiousness with the fervor of a gibbon rattling the bars of its cage at feeding time. it genuinely shocked and disturbed me and and the last time a film managed to do that was a while ago. on the other and this is a thirty minute short that sprawls out to over an hour and a half. i understand that there might be artistic merit in using repetition and monolithic pacing as a bludgeon and but in this case it just doesn not help everything hang together. imagine being approached by a ragged man on the street who grabys you by the shoulders and says something that completely confounds the core of your being. but then and instead of leaving your shattered and gibbering in his wake and he just keeps talking and talking and talking. by the end of the movie and i found myself glancing at my watch now and again. this is not entertainment and people. this is disentertainment. this is how you deprogram people who just watched glitter. if you watch movies to be entertained and this will frustrate and confound and and possibly anger you. you do not approach begotten like a chocolate cake you want to eat because it tastes good. you approach it like something on the menu you have never heard of before and something you see furtive glances of through the kitchen door and something that dark and glistens and twitches on its platter while something you order not because it will taste good and but because you just have to know what it like. 
i saw begotten last night and and i am of two minds on the film. on one hand and i appreciate it for being the total invert of a michael bay film. no dialogue and extremely stylized grainy b and w photography and some of the most genuinely horrific imagery ever set to film and and a very compelling use of sound (which nobody else seems to have really picked up on yet). it a reflection on a theme and and it dares go where most filmmakers do not not only in terms of images and but of production and concept. it a movie that most people do not understand and and if you read through these comments you will find a lot of people whose lack of ability to figure this film out results in them shrieking about pretentiousness with the fervor of a gibbon rattling the bars of its cage at feeding time. it genuinely shocked and disturbed me and and the last time a film managed to do that was a while ago. on the other and this is a thirty minute short that sprawls out to over an hour and a half. i understand that there might be artistic merit in using repetition and monolithic pacing as a bludgeon and but in this case it just doesn not help everything hang together. imagine being approached by a ragged man on the street who grabys you by the shoulders and says something that completely confounds the core of your being. but then and instead of leaving your shattered and gibbering in his wake and he just keeps talking and talking and talking. by the end of the movie and i found myself glancing at my watch now and again. this is not entertainment and people. this is disentertainment. this is how you deprogram people who just watched glitter. if you watch movies to be entertained and this will frustrate and confound and and possibly anger you. you do not approach begotten like a chocolate cake you want to eat because it tastes good. you approach it like something on the menu you have never heard of before and something you see furtive glances of through the kitchen door and something that dark and glistens and twitches on its platter while something you order not because it will taste good and but because you just have to know what it like. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
