i do not read the book scarlett and when i watched this mini series i enjoyed it very much and thought it do not need to be compared to gwtw. the story may differ from the book and but who cares its a movie. even in the credits its based on the book and its not the book. the film is clearly under appreciated with the reviews that other people write but can not even spell the main characters names right. the acting in scarlett i thought was superb. joanne whalley and timothy dalton were excellent. they took the characters and gave them there touch. now as far as other people go by and they compare them to the great vivian leigh and clark gable. they obviously did fantastic and but the leads in this film are completely different people who have there own acting methods and shouldn not be pressured of what people have to say. if you wanted certain actors to do well then you should have directed the film and i am sure that other actors would not do as well as these with the chemistry and cleverness they brought to these roles. the supporting cast stood out with there grandness and and jean smart steals the scenes that shes in with her comedy genius. the locations in the film were very beautiful and it was just grand to see scarlett go to all those places in the film as she causes trouble and other things. also the scene in which scarlett talks to her dad grave it was very dramatic and i thought from then on that there were two great actresses who brought scarlett ohara to life. not just vivian leigh but also joanne whalley. the film and the book may differ and but you must not take to heart that this is a sequel to one of the best films ever made otherwise you will think that this has to be like gone with the wind and you will not like this film. but this is an under rated classic that is unlike gwtw and its its own movie. also keep in mind that tomorrow is another day. 
i do not read the book scarlett and when i watched this mini series i enjoyed it very much and thought it do not need to be compared to gwtw. the story may differ from the book and but who cares its a movie. even in the credits its based on the book and its not the book. the film is clearly under appreciated with the reviews that other people write but can not even spell the main characters names right. the acting in scarlett i thought was superb. joanne whalley and timothy dalton were excellent. they took the characters and gave them there touch. now as far as other people go by and they compare them to the great vivian leigh and clark gable. they obviously did fantastic and but the leads in this film are completely different people who have there own acting methods and shouldn not be pressured of what people have to say. if you wanted certain actors to do well then you should have directed the film and i am sure that other actors would not do as well as these with the chemistry and cleverness they brought to these roles. the supporting cast stood out with there grandness and and jean smart steals the scenes that shes in with her comedy genius. the locations in the film were very beautiful and it was just grand to see scarlett go to all those places in the film as she causes trouble and other things. also the scene in which scarlett talks to her dad grave it was very dramatic and i thought from then on that there were two great actresses who brought scarlett ohara to life. not just vivian leigh but also joanne whalley. the film and the book may differ and but you must not take to heart that this is a sequel to one of the best films ever made otherwise you will think that this has to be like gone with the wind and you will not like this film. but this is an under rated classic that is unlike gwtw and its its own movie. also keep in mind that tomorrow is another day. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
