this film has not exactly remained fresh in the minds of film buffs and and it a crying shame. its witty screenplay adaptation should have netted oscar nominations for the great screenwriter i. a. l. diamond adaptation and and ingrid bergman flawless performance. it must have been an honor for goldie hawn at such a young age to work with bergman and looking more than a decade younger than her 54 years fifty four. when she on the screen and it positively twinkles. this is a film which may appear dated at first and but it actually made me wish i was around during the swingin ixties. hawn fashions are as tacky as bergman are chic. (that one minor flaw isn not her character a little too soignée for a gal who still lives with her sister. but then again and would we have ingrid any other way. ) and who do not want to hang out at a nightclub called the slipped disc. the best compliments i can pay to this film is that it somehow made me nostalgic for a decade that i never saw and and that it left me wanting more. speaking of wanting more and i wonder what ever became of sexy supporting actor rick lenz. (he resembles griffin dunne in this film. ) this was his film debut and and i do not see any other major roles in his filmography. as for goldie hawn and she done so much since then it easy to not be impressed and but i can not imagine any other actor in the role and either. since the movie is based on a play and the line delivery may seem a bit stage y and but it did not inhibit my enjoyment at all. in fact and i am amazed at how funny it still is after over thirty five years. because this film represents a bygone era and it has unjustly slipped from the consciousness of film buffs. it is more linked to the era films that came before it than the ones that followed. but do not let that stop you from savoring the delights it has to offer. grade represent a. 
this film has not exactly remained fresh in the minds of film buffs and and it a crying shame. its witty screenplay adaptation should have netted oscar nominations for the great screenwriter i. a. l. diamond adaptation and and ingrid bergman flawless performance. it must have been an honor for goldie hawn at such a young age to work with bergman and looking more than a decade younger than her 54 years fifty four. when she on the screen and it positively twinkles. this is a film which may appear dated at first and but it actually made me wish i was around during the swingin ixties. hawn fashions are as tacky as bergman are chic. (that one minor flaw isn not her character a little too soignée for a gal who still lives with her sister. but then again and would we have ingrid any other way. ) and who do not want to hang out at a nightclub called the slipped disc. the best compliments i can pay to this film is that it somehow made me nostalgic for a decade that i never saw and and that it left me wanting more. speaking of wanting more and i wonder what ever became of sexy supporting actor rick lenz. (he resembles griffin dunne in this film. ) this was his film debut and and i do not see any other major roles in his filmography. as for goldie hawn and she done so much since then it easy to not be impressed and but i can not imagine any other actor in the role and either. since the movie is based on a play and the line delivery may seem a bit stage y and but it did not inhibit my enjoyment at all. in fact and i am amazed at how funny it still is after over thirty five years. because this film represents a bygone era and it has unjustly slipped from the consciousness of film buffs. it is more linked to the era films that came before it than the ones that followed. but do not let that stop you from savoring the delights it has to offer. grade represent a. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
