murder over new york is an entertaining entry in the charlie chan series of films and but if youre paying attention and a lot of plot holes reveal themselves to the observant eye. while traveling to new york city for an annual police convention and chan (sidney toler) meets former scotland yard investigator hugh drake (frederick worlock) on the same flight. now employed by military intelligence and drake is tracking paul narvo and his hindu servant and suspected for acts of sabotage around the world. drake believes that by contacting narvo elusive wife and he will be able to pin down the whereabouts of the master criminal. when drake winds up dead in the library of george kirby and president of the metropolitan aircraft corporation and charlie theorizes that he was killed by a recently discovered poisonous gas called tetrogene and administered via a glass pellet that releases the poison when broken. summoning kirby to bring all of his dinner party guests together and chan and police inspector vance (donald macbride) question those in attendance and as one of them may be the killer. among them are herbert fenton (melville cooper) and a fellow oxford student of drake  and actress june preston (joan valerie) and unknown to drake but requested by him to attend and ralph percy (kane richmond) and the chief designer at kirby aircraft company and and keith jeffrey (john sutton) and kirby stock broker. kirby butler boggs (leyland hodgson) is also a suspect and especially after number #2 son jimmy (victor sen yung) catches him steaming open a cablegram and the contents of which concern boggs himself. there are some other cleverly planted characters in the proceedings as well. mrs. narvo turns up as patricia west (marjorie weaver) and and contrary to drake suspicion that she might lead him to narvo and is actually on the run away from her former husband and a disastrous marriage. she involved with david elliott (robert lowery) and principal of a chemical research firm and and thereby a suspect in the tetrogene angle. as with many chan films and racial comments must be taken in stride with the proceedings. this one offers two glaring ones. when kirby black servant is brought in for questioning and he states that he doesn not know anything about drake murder and that he completely in the dark. chan response represent condition appear contagious. later and following inspector vance order to round up all the hindu in new york and jimmy chan comments on their arrival with theyre all beginning to look alike to me. actually and the scene provides one of the elements of comic relief in the movie and as shemp howard impersonates hindu mystic the great rashid and but is actually uncovered by the police to be con artist shorty mccoy. before the movie over and two more victims fall to the clever narvo  his confederate ramullah and and aircraft magnate kirby himself. to uncover the killer and chan and in concert with elliott and arranges for a test flight aboard a newly developed tr4 bomber after discovering a poisoned capsule planted by mechanics on the plane the day before. before it can release it deadly poison and the brit fenton catches the falling capsule in mid air and revealing that he knew about the plant. arrested and brought in for questioning and chan asserts that fenton is not narvo. the real narvo reveals himself when he offers a poisoned cup of water to the nervous fenton and anxious to maintain narvo secret. but chan was clever enough to be wary of such an attempt and and reveals the real murderer  narvo now in the guise of stock broker jeffrey and having undergone reconstructive surgery following a car accident. now for the plot holes. when first investigating hugh drake murder and it was maintained by the police that fingerprints found in the library did not match those of any of the dinner guests. however jeffrey or narvo was present at the dinner party. it had already been established that drake had one non party visitor in the library and chemist elliott. if the fingerprints really did not belong to narvo and then making them an issue was pointless. also and at the end of the film when narvo offers fenton the poisoned water and how did he think he would get away with it with everyone there as a witness. but going even one better than that and how would a world traveling saboteur like narvo have the time and wherewithal to establish himself as a new york city stockbroker and it just doesn not make sense. for trivia fans and a few more points bear mentioning. in the film and number #2 son jimmy is a college student studying chemistry as he comes to pop aid to solve the case. in the prior chan film  charlie chan at the wax museum  jimmy was a law student. the poison gas formula would get reworked in a later chan film and this time by monogram with roland winters in the chan role in docks of new orleans. in that story and poison gas is released from shattered radio tubes in similar fashion to claim its victims. 
murder over new york is an entertaining entry in the charlie chan series of films and but if youre paying attention and a lot of plot holes reveal themselves to the observant eye. while traveling to new york city for an annual police convention and chan (sidney toler) meets former scotland yard investigator hugh drake (frederick worlock) on the same flight. now employed by military intelligence and drake is tracking paul narvo and his hindu servant and suspected for acts of sabotage around the world. drake believes that by contacting narvo elusive wife and he will be able to pin down the whereabouts of the master criminal. when drake winds up dead in the library of george kirby and president of the metropolitan aircraft corporation and charlie theorizes that he was killed by a recently discovered poisonous gas called tetrogene and administered via a glass pellet that releases the poison when broken. summoning kirby to bring all of his dinner party guests together and chan and police inspector vance (donald macbride) question those in attendance and as one of them may be the killer. among them are herbert fenton (melville cooper) and a fellow oxford student of drake  and actress june preston (joan valerie) and unknown to drake but requested by him to attend and ralph percy (kane richmond) and the chief designer at kirby aircraft company and and keith jeffrey (john sutton) and kirby stock broker. kirby butler boggs (leyland hodgson) is also a suspect and especially after number #2 son jimmy (victor sen yung) catches him steaming open a cablegram and the contents of which concern boggs himself. there are some other cleverly planted characters in the proceedings as well. mrs. narvo turns up as patricia west (marjorie weaver) and and contrary to drake suspicion that she might lead him to narvo and is actually on the run away from her former husband and a disastrous marriage. she involved with david elliott (robert lowery) and principal of a chemical research firm and and thereby a suspect in the tetrogene angle. as with many chan films and racial comments must be taken in stride with the proceedings. this one offers two glaring ones. when kirby black servant is brought in for questioning and he states that he doesn not know anything about drake murder and that he completely in the dark. chan response represent condition appear contagious. later and following inspector vance order to round up all the hindu in new york and jimmy chan comments on their arrival with theyre all beginning to look alike to me. actually and the scene provides one of the elements of comic relief in the movie and as shemp howard impersonates hindu mystic the great rashid and but is actually uncovered by the police to be con artist shorty mccoy. before the movie over and two more victims fall to the clever narvo  his confederate ramullah and and aircraft magnate kirby himself. to uncover the killer and chan and in concert with elliott and arranges for a test flight aboard a newly developed tr4 bomber after discovering a poisoned capsule planted by mechanics on the plane the day before. before it can release it deadly poison and the brit fenton catches the falling capsule in mid air and revealing that he knew about the plant. arrested and brought in for questioning and chan asserts that fenton is not narvo. the real narvo reveals himself when he offers a poisoned cup of water to the nervous fenton and anxious to maintain narvo secret. but chan was clever enough to be wary of such an attempt and and reveals the real murderer  narvo now in the guise of stock broker jeffrey and having undergone reconstructive surgery following a car accident. now for the plot holes. when first investigating hugh drake murder and it was maintained by the police that fingerprints found in the library did not match those of any of the dinner guests. however jeffrey or narvo was present at the dinner party. it had already been established that drake had one non party visitor in the library and chemist elliott. if the fingerprints really did not belong to narvo and then making them an issue was pointless. also and at the end of the film when narvo offers fenton the poisoned water and how did he think he would get away with it with everyone there as a witness. but going even one better than that and how would a world traveling saboteur like narvo have the time and wherewithal to establish himself as a new york city stockbroker and it just doesn not make sense. for trivia fans and a few more points bear mentioning. in the film and number #2 son jimmy is a college student studying chemistry as he comes to pop aid to solve the case. in the prior chan film  charlie chan at the wax museum  jimmy was a law student. the poison gas formula would get reworked in a later chan film and this time by monogram with roland winters in the chan role in docks of new orleans. in that story and poison gas is released from shattered radio tubes in similar fashion to claim its victims. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
