trilogies are very interesting. some go out with a bang (lord of the rings) and some get progressively weaker (the matrix) and some get lost in obscurity (blade and back to the future) and but some maintain the genius and that seemingly ever growing bright light that floats beyond the surface of its flawless exterior. case and point represent three colors trilogy. this chapter in the trilogy and being the last one and is the most philosophical and thought provoking. in blue we had a more visually stunning and more character driven plot and in white it was more of a light hearted and narrative driven story where we listen more to what the characters say than anything. red and however is focused on the what ifs and how comes. it questions our own fate and focuses mainly on the past and the future than the present. this chapter is about a young model who runs over a dog and brings him back to his owner. she soon finds out that the owner of the dog is actually a cynical retired judge who spies on his neighbors phone calls through advanced spying equipment. all three films in the trilogies have very basic plot lines and but bring a lot more to the story. consider in blue and the story of a woman dealing with the loss of her loved ones. we are constantly shown ideas about the contemporary french society and how that reflects the character behavior. red is not only about a young woman who finds shelter in an older man life and but it is also about chance and hope and and fate. irene jacob stars as valentine dussaut and who at first finds the old man (jean louis trintignant) and whom we never find the name of and extremely self centered and disgusting. though through self reflective analysis and and her voyeuristic intentions and she learns that the judge would be the perfect man for her and if only he was 40 years younger. irene lives across from another and younger judge and who highly resembles the old man. this is the what if that keeps circling in the movie. what if irene were born 40 years ago. the old man would have been her perfect match. but what if the younger judge is actually her perfect match and since he so closely resembles the older one. valentine doesn not know this and only we do and and krzysztof kieslowski subtly suggests this in almost every frame which irene is in. we are constantly smacked in the face with his presence and as almost a suggestion of irene fate. i mention that the old man does not have a name for a reason. that reason is because it is very symbolic to the overall theme in the story. we are to compare the old judge to auguste (jean pierre lorit) and the younger judge and in more than one way. we learn that the old man once had someone he loved but she got away. in another scene and we see auguste heartbroken as the love of his life gets away with another man. there are constant reminders of whether or not valentine will ever meet this man. even though they pass each other without noticing every single day. there is also the motif of the telephone and to valentine it is a way of keeping sane and updating her life and to auguste it is what leads to his heartbreak and and to the old man and it is the only thing he has left. these three elements serve to shadow the characters own psychology. it is a sort of statement about what they are and who they are. all three colors films stand for a certain principle and most common in france. blue stands for liberty (the personal being) and white stands for equality (being accepted by more than one) and and red is fraternity (to socialize and to learn). and although this final chapter is an obvious focus on the fraternity principle and kieslowski makes sure he brings in the other two as well and in order to connect all three stories. for example and we see the old man trying to reach out to valentine and enlighten her with his spy equipment and which is a reflection of the equality principle. we also see near the end that valentine is doing some soul searching and that she more concerned about herself than others (not picking up the phone when michel calls) and a clear example of liberty. and with all three principles established and kieslowski nicely connects all of the characters as well and in the final and most heartfelt scene. red is about where you could have been if you were older or younger. it is about whether or not there is someone completely perfect for everyone and and whether or not one person can change your life. the final chapter in the most awe inspiring trilogy ever made and this film breaks barriers in both directing and storytelling. it is not only about our modern life and but about where life could and should be in our modern time. and although the movie is more subtle than both blue and white and it boldly exclaims a statement of love and compassion. it hard to imagine that red was kieslowski last film and and that he died at such a young age. nevertheless and the trilogy will always be his masterpiece and we will always remember him for his work that ranks right up with bergman and fellini and and wenders as a truly remarkable director who never been awarded with an oscar. kieslowski and you have been missed. 
trilogies are very interesting. some go out with a bang (lord of the rings) and some get progressively weaker (the matrix) and some get lost in obscurity (blade and back to the future) and but some maintain the genius and that seemingly ever growing bright light that floats beyond the surface of its flawless exterior. case and point represent three colors trilogy. this chapter in the trilogy and being the last one and is the most philosophical and thought provoking. in blue we had a more visually stunning and more character driven plot and in white it was more of a light hearted and narrative driven story where we listen more to what the characters say than anything. red and however is focused on the what ifs and how comes. it questions our own fate and focuses mainly on the past and the future than the present. this chapter is about a young model who runs over a dog and brings him back to his owner. she soon finds out that the owner of the dog is actually a cynical retired judge who spies on his neighbors phone calls through advanced spying equipment. all three films in the trilogies have very basic plot lines and but bring a lot more to the story. consider in blue and the story of a woman dealing with the loss of her loved ones. we are constantly shown ideas about the contemporary french society and how that reflects the character behavior. red is not only about a young woman who finds shelter in an older man life and but it is also about chance and hope and and fate. irene jacob stars as valentine dussaut and who at first finds the old man (jean louis trintignant) and whom we never find the name of and extremely self centered and disgusting. though through self reflective analysis and and her voyeuristic intentions and she learns that the judge would be the perfect man for her and if only he was 40 years younger. irene lives across from another and younger judge and who highly resembles the old man. this is the what if that keeps circling in the movie. what if irene were born 40 years ago. the old man would have been her perfect match. but what if the younger judge is actually her perfect match and since he so closely resembles the older one. valentine doesn not know this and only we do and and krzysztof kieslowski subtly suggests this in almost every frame which irene is in. we are constantly smacked in the face with his presence and as almost a suggestion of irene fate. i mention that the old man does not have a name for a reason. that reason is because it is very symbolic to the overall theme in the story. we are to compare the old judge to auguste (jean pierre lorit) and the younger judge and in more than one way. we learn that the old man once had someone he loved but she got away. in another scene and we see auguste heartbroken as the love of his life gets away with another man. there are constant reminders of whether or not valentine will ever meet this man. even though they pass each other without noticing every single day. there is also the motif of the telephone and to valentine it is a way of keeping sane and updating her life and to auguste it is what leads to his heartbreak and and to the old man and it is the only thing he has left. these three elements serve to shadow the characters own psychology. it is a sort of statement about what they are and who they are. all three colors films stand for a certain principle and most common in france. blue stands for liberty (the personal being) and white stands for equality (being accepted by more than one) and and red is fraternity (to socialize and to learn). and although this final chapter is an obvious focus on the fraternity principle and kieslowski makes sure he brings in the other two as well and in order to connect all three stories. for example and we see the old man trying to reach out to valentine and enlighten her with his spy equipment and which is a reflection of the equality principle. we also see near the end that valentine is doing some soul searching and that she more concerned about herself than others (not picking up the phone when michel calls) and a clear example of liberty. and with all three principles established and kieslowski nicely connects all of the characters as well and in the final and most heartfelt scene. red is about where you could have been if you were older or younger. it is about whether or not there is someone completely perfect for everyone and and whether or not one person can change your life. the final chapter in the most awe inspiring trilogy ever made and this film breaks barriers in both directing and storytelling. it is not only about our modern life and but about where life could and should be in our modern time. and although the movie is more subtle than both blue and white and it boldly exclaims a statement of love and compassion. it hard to imagine that red was kieslowski last film and and that he died at such a young age. nevertheless and the trilogy will always be his masterpiece and we will always remember him for his work that ranks right up with bergman and fellini and and wenders as a truly remarkable director who never been awarded with an oscar. kieslowski and you have been missed. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
