a movie theater with a bad history of past gruesome murders reopens. of course and the bloody killings start anew. written and directed and shot and scored and edited with an appalling lack of flair and finesse by the singularly talentless rick sloane (who later disgraced celluloid some more with the absolutely atrocious hobgoblins) and this horrendously ham fisted attempt at a slasher spoof strikes out something rotten in every conceivable way represent the excruciatingly lethargic pacing and the painfully static and grainy cinematography (there a stinky surplus of drab master shots featured throughout) and an annoyingly droning and redundant humn hiver synthesizer score and the flat (non)direction and a tediously talky and uneventful script and the groan inducing sophomoric sense of lowbrow humor and the bloodless murder set pieces and a pitifully unscary killer (he just some wrinkled up old guy in pasty make up) and the uniformly obnoxious and unappealing characters and a dissatisfyingly abrupt ending and and lifeless performances from a noticeably uninspired cast all ensure that watching this schlocky swill is about as fun and rewarding as eating rancid raw eels drenched with sour vinegar. this crud totally lacks the necessary crude charm and sleazy vigor required to be enjoyable junk. instead it just a bland and plodding and meandering stiff that never catches fire or becomes even remotely amusing in a so shoddy it smoking sort of way. only a smidgen of nudity and the delightful presence of the always dependable mary woronov as a snarky and sardonic secretary provide a little relief from the overall crumminess of this lousy loser. 
a movie theater with a bad history of past gruesome murders reopens. of course and the bloody killings start anew. written and directed and shot and scored and edited with an appalling lack of flair and finesse by the singularly talentless rick sloane (who later disgraced celluloid some more with the absolutely atrocious hobgoblins) and this horrendously ham fisted attempt at a slasher spoof strikes out something rotten in every conceivable way represent the excruciatingly lethargic pacing and the painfully static and grainy cinematography (there a stinky surplus of drab master shots featured throughout) and an annoyingly droning and redundant humn hiver synthesizer score and the flat (non)direction and a tediously talky and uneventful script and the groan inducing sophomoric sense of lowbrow humor and the bloodless murder set pieces and a pitifully unscary killer (he just some wrinkled up old guy in pasty make up) and the uniformly obnoxious and unappealing characters and a dissatisfyingly abrupt ending and and lifeless performances from a noticeably uninspired cast all ensure that watching this schlocky swill is about as fun and rewarding as eating rancid raw eels drenched with sour vinegar. this crud totally lacks the necessary crude charm and sleazy vigor required to be enjoyable junk. instead it just a bland and plodding and meandering stiff that never catches fire or becomes even remotely amusing in a so shoddy it smoking sort of way. only a smidgen of nudity and the delightful presence of the always dependable mary woronov as a snarky and sardonic secretary provide a little relief from the overall crumminess of this lousy loser. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
