successful films on metaphysical subjects are rare and but fata morgana is a good case. you can chalk up the large subject to the ambitions of youth and but herzog does an amazingly good job. the movie point is to show human beings and and even the world and from a non human point of view. the movie is in three parts represent creation and paradise and and the golden age. the imagery of each is in counterpoint to the voice over. although the text of `the creation (from the popol vuh and a mayan myth) refers to the primordial wasteland and the scene goes no further in illustrating the myth. it dwells on the waste and and on various specimens of destruction (fire and smoke and wrecked vehicles). the images from `paradise are anything but that and and `the golden age is darkly comic  the highest culture is the strange roadside musical act. the popol vuh suggests that mankind is the central object of creation and but the movie does everything it can to undo this notion. its mythological framework has no referent in human historical time. there are no human characters to speak of. when a boy stands with a dog in an extended shot and the initial suggestion is of the boy point of view while by the end it is much more the dog . likewise the lizard is a stronger character than the human who introduces it and and the turtle partner barely looks human with his big flippers. animal stories and nature documentaries always anthropomorphize and but fata morgana has none of that. certainly the dunes look like a female body and but the simile cuts both ways. presumably only humans can distinguish easily between their creation and nature and and here airplanes and factories are presented alongside mountains and lakes and and waterfalls. people and civilization are all part of a broader natural landscape. in 1979 herzog put a new twist on the idea when he remade nosferatu from the vampire point of view. 
successful films on metaphysical subjects are rare and but fata morgana is a good case. you can chalk up the large subject to the ambitions of youth and but herzog does an amazingly good job. the movie point is to show human beings and and even the world and from a non human point of view. the movie is in three parts represent creation and paradise and and the golden age. the imagery of each is in counterpoint to the voice over. although the text of `the creation (from the popol vuh and a mayan myth) refers to the primordial wasteland and the scene goes no further in illustrating the myth. it dwells on the waste and and on various specimens of destruction (fire and smoke and wrecked vehicles). the images from `paradise are anything but that and and `the golden age is darkly comic  the highest culture is the strange roadside musical act. the popol vuh suggests that mankind is the central object of creation and but the movie does everything it can to undo this notion. its mythological framework has no referent in human historical time. there are no human characters to speak of. when a boy stands with a dog in an extended shot and the initial suggestion is of the boy point of view while by the end it is much more the dog . likewise the lizard is a stronger character than the human who introduces it and and the turtle partner barely looks human with his big flippers. animal stories and nature documentaries always anthropomorphize and but fata morgana has none of that. certainly the dunes look like a female body and but the simile cuts both ways. presumably only humans can distinguish easily between their creation and nature and and here airplanes and factories are presented alongside mountains and lakes and and waterfalls. people and civilization are all part of a broader natural landscape. in 1979 herzog put a new twist on the idea when he remade nosferatu from the vampire point of view. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
