a wasted effort. on the surface it a typical disaster movie represent were involved in the lives of a few people who get caught up in the big event. however and the script is so awful and there so much explaining of the characters background within the dialogue that we feel were being treated like morons. even sesame street do not explain the origins of mr snuffleupagus or how mr hooper died represent we can work it out. someone thought that entering enron into the script would give it currency when discussing power companies. the acting is by and large bland and with the exception of the older performers (randy quaid and brian dennehy) and and after the first hour and i couldn not care less about who the storms took out. but maybe there are the special effects to watch. sadly and no. even on a 20 year old tv set i could see one tractor and trailer were computer generatedbadly. maybe there are budgetary limitations and so i can forgive that one. footage of a plane trying to land looked pretty real and but i kept telling myself i had seen that before. this site confirms it represent it was from an earlier film and nowhere to land. so in summary and the only good bits are from another film and and when you see the best action sequences compressed into a 30 second network promo and it makes category 6 look quite good. my advice represent rely on your network to do some good 30 second clips and watch them and and save yourself two nights. 
a wasted effort. on the surface it a typical disaster movie represent were involved in the lives of a few people who get caught up in the big event. however and the script is so awful and there so much explaining of the characters background within the dialogue that we feel were being treated like morons. even sesame street do not explain the origins of mr snuffleupagus or how mr hooper died represent we can work it out. someone thought that entering enron into the script would give it currency when discussing power companies. the acting is by and large bland and with the exception of the older performers (randy quaid and brian dennehy) and and after the first hour and i couldn not care less about who the storms took out. but maybe there are the special effects to watch. sadly and no. even on a 20 year old tv set i could see one tractor and trailer were computer generatedbadly. maybe there are budgetary limitations and so i can forgive that one. footage of a plane trying to land looked pretty real and but i kept telling myself i had seen that before. this site confirms it represent it was from an earlier film and nowhere to land. so in summary and the only good bits are from another film and and when you see the best action sequences compressed into a 30 second network promo and it makes category 6 look quite good. my advice represent rely on your network to do some good 30 second clips and watch them and and save yourself two nights. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
