i was having a horrid day but this movie grabbed me and and i couldn not put it down until the end. and i had forgotten about my horrid day. and the ending. by the way. where is the sequel. the budget is obviously extremely low. but . look what they did with it. it reminds me of a play. they are basically working with a tent and a escape pod and a few guns and uniforms and camping gear and and a canner thing. that is it for props. maybe this is even a good thing and forcing the acting and writing to have to step up and take their rightful place in film and as the centers of the work and instead of as afterthoughts used to have an excuse to make cgi fights (starwars). the cgi is fine. it is not exactly eamless. but imho it still works. why. because there isn not too much of it and and what there is and is not taking over with an army of effects house people trying to cram everything they can into the shot. it prompts the imagination. it some relatively simple stuff and with decent composition (especially the heavy freighter shot. there is one long shot that must be at least ten seconds. that tracks the entire length of the ship. it must be a record for sci fi battle sequence film making in the past 10 years and to have an action sequence that lasts longer than 0. 75 seconds) and and some relation to the story. it might look old or not tate of the art and but it doesn not look stupid and it doesn not take away from the story. the acting is good and except the characters die too fast to get to know them. the captain was great and but a few of his scenes could have used another take. i also got confused with his character losing his cool and stomping on a corpse and i like to think captains are calm cool and in control. what was going on in that scene. did the other crew worry about him losing it at that moment. did he feel himself losing control. now and as for the plot. mostly it is good. why. because it doesn not try to explain itself. it just happens. it called the planet and its a mystery and get it. nobody knows why there is a statue and and they do not find out either. the mysterious cult. the weird scientist with the tattoo. what do you expect to find out in less than 90 minutes. this isn not war and peace. and and thank god and it not star wars or trek either. no midichlorians and no 5 minutes of expository boring dialog that has no purpose in the story. the characters are stranded and and are only able to figure out a few basic things. it is not a star trek episode where they find out it leonardo davinci or a child like space wanderer. it is mysterious and and i liked that. i do not know why and maybe i can identify with these guys more  and since they do not know whats happening and and i do not either. they do not talk a lot of space gibberish or have magic boxes telling them what is happening. in fact and i would argue that one of the weakest moments is when the traitor turns on the crew and and tries to explain the reason for the planet and the cult and etc. this coincidentally has some of the weakest dialog and imho and in the whole movie and and it interrupts the flow and some of the characters look unnatural in that scene. ok and sometimes i felt it was a little too mysterious and though. like and why did the guy get fried through his eyes with lightning. that was odd. just weird. the hamlet ending. again i would have liked to have known some of these characters better. and would it have been so hard to have a 30 second rescue scene at the end. this is not a serial show and it was a film and and we like closure in films and even if they can have a sequel. imagine hamlet with no flights of angels sing thee to thy restanyways. what can i say. this was well worth the dollar i payed at the red box machine at the supermarket. it was also and imho and a better piece of storytelling than starwars parts 1 2 or 3. like i said and it sucked me in and wanting to know what was happening and and i couldn not stop watching until the end. 
i was having a horrid day but this movie grabbed me and and i couldn not put it down until the end. and i had forgotten about my horrid day. and the ending. by the way. where is the sequel. the budget is obviously extremely low. but . look what they did with it. it reminds me of a play. they are basically working with a tent and a escape pod and a few guns and uniforms and camping gear and and a canner thing. that is it for props. maybe this is even a good thing and forcing the acting and writing to have to step up and take their rightful place in film and as the centers of the work and instead of as afterthoughts used to have an excuse to make cgi fights (starwars). the cgi is fine. it is not exactly eamless. but imho it still works. why. because there isn not too much of it and and what there is and is not taking over with an army of effects house people trying to cram everything they can into the shot. it prompts the imagination. it some relatively simple stuff and with decent composition (especially the heavy freighter shot. there is one long shot that must be at least ten seconds. that tracks the entire length of the ship. it must be a record for sci fi battle sequence film making in the past 10 years and to have an action sequence that lasts longer than 0. 75 seconds) and and some relation to the story. it might look old or not tate of the art and but it doesn not look stupid and it doesn not take away from the story. the acting is good and except the characters die too fast to get to know them. the captain was great and but a few of his scenes could have used another take. i also got confused with his character losing his cool and stomping on a corpse and i like to think captains are calm cool and in control. what was going on in that scene. did the other crew worry about him losing it at that moment. did he feel himself losing control. now and as for the plot. mostly it is good. why. because it doesn not try to explain itself. it just happens. it called the planet and its a mystery and get it. nobody knows why there is a statue and and they do not find out either. the mysterious cult. the weird scientist with the tattoo. what do you expect to find out in less than 90 minutes. this isn not war and peace. and and thank god and it not star wars or trek either. no midichlorians and no 5 minutes of expository boring dialog that has no purpose in the story. the characters are stranded and and are only able to figure out a few basic things. it is not a star trek episode where they find out it leonardo davinci or a child like space wanderer. it is mysterious and and i liked that. i do not know why and maybe i can identify with these guys more  and since they do not know whats happening and and i do not either. they do not talk a lot of space gibberish or have magic boxes telling them what is happening. in fact and i would argue that one of the weakest moments is when the traitor turns on the crew and and tries to explain the reason for the planet and the cult and etc. this coincidentally has some of the weakest dialog and imho and in the whole movie and and it interrupts the flow and some of the characters look unnatural in that scene. ok and sometimes i felt it was a little too mysterious and though. like and why did the guy get fried through his eyes with lightning. that was odd. just weird. the hamlet ending. again i would have liked to have known some of these characters better. and would it have been so hard to have a 30 second rescue scene at the end. this is not a serial show and it was a film and and we like closure in films and even if they can have a sequel. imagine hamlet with no flights of angels sing thee to thy restanyways. what can i say. this was well worth the dollar i payed at the red box machine at the supermarket. it was also and imho and a better piece of storytelling than starwars parts 1 2 or 3. like i said and it sucked me in and wanting to know what was happening and and i couldn not stop watching until the end. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
