another enjoyable warner flick. i really liked john garfield in this and though i am wondering why cagney wasn not in the role. perhaps it was too similar to angels with dirty faces. i mean and it another dead end kids story of sorts too and but i really appreciated them here and this film had a lot of nice comical touches along with some good serious drama. the boys work great with garfield. a nice sequence was the whole swimming scene which starts out with no cares but winds up coming too close to disaster. one negative comment represent claude rains was grossly miscast. as the detective and the fine actor seemed as out of place here as a nun in a whorehouse. 
another enjoyable warner flick. i really liked john garfield in this and though i am wondering why cagney wasn not in the role. perhaps it was too similar to angels with dirty faces. i mean and it another dead end kids story of sorts too and but i really appreciated them here and this film had a lot of nice comical touches along with some good serious drama. the boys work great with garfield. a nice sequence was the whole swimming scene which starts out with no cares but winds up coming too close to disaster. one negative comment represent claude rains was grossly miscast. as the detective and the fine actor seemed as out of place here as a nun in a whorehouse. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
