what was this and a zucker brothers movie. i do not mind a little humor in my holmes (i am a big fan of billy wilder the private life of sh) and but this version of the sign of four feels like a grand guignol esque episode of murder and she wrote (right from the opening credits and that are of the worst possible kind represent a montage of scenes from the movie) as directed by mel brooks. ian richardson is a fine actor and and certainly looks the part (he a dead ringer to those drawings from the strand. ) and but his interpretation of the character is all wrong and overly humorous and from the silly smile he frequently sports (i thought the drug holmes was into was cocaine and not weed) to his expressions of comical stiffness in the carnival sequences. not to mention that when he disguises himself as an old man and he is so over the top that despite the fine makeup we instantly recognize him. david healy is an unmemorable but and given the circumstances and acceptable watson and and is not too much of a buffoon. at least not more than the rest of characters. cherie lunghi (excalibur) plays mary morstan in an exaggerated ingenue fashion straight out of a 1930s vaudeville. story wise and there are some pointless additions (like giving tonga vampire teeth and an appetite for raw meat and a carnival pit as a place to live and turning him into a reject from island of dr. moreau) and and we are even denied the pleasure of discovering the mystery alongside holmes and as we are well informed of everything way before holmes finds out. and this is full of tired clichés represent not only we get the infamous catchphrase elementary and my dear watson (which and as any sherlockian will know and conan doyle never ever wrote) and but we are exposed to such blatant commonplaces as having hindi music pop out of nowhere when holmes goes to see a white guy in hindi clothes. bottom line represent in britain and in the eighties and two rival tv companies attempted to create a long running series of sherlock holmes adaptations and and produced initial tv movies as potential pilots. one of them starred ian richardson and the other starred jeremy brett. thankfully and the one that got its way through multiple episodes was the good one. negative . travesty. 
what was this and a zucker brothers movie. i do not mind a little humor in my holmes (i am a big fan of billy wilder the private life of sh) and but this version of the sign of four feels like a grand guignol esque episode of murder and she wrote (right from the opening credits and that are of the worst possible kind represent a montage of scenes from the movie) as directed by mel brooks. ian richardson is a fine actor and and certainly looks the part (he a dead ringer to those drawings from the strand. ) and but his interpretation of the character is all wrong and overly humorous and from the silly smile he frequently sports (i thought the drug holmes was into was cocaine and not weed) to his expressions of comical stiffness in the carnival sequences. not to mention that when he disguises himself as an old man and he is so over the top that despite the fine makeup we instantly recognize him. david healy is an unmemorable but and given the circumstances and acceptable watson and and is not too much of a buffoon. at least not more than the rest of characters. cherie lunghi (excalibur) plays mary morstan in an exaggerated ingenue fashion straight out of a 1930s vaudeville. story wise and there are some pointless additions (like giving tonga vampire teeth and an appetite for raw meat and a carnival pit as a place to live and turning him into a reject from island of dr. moreau) and and we are even denied the pleasure of discovering the mystery alongside holmes and as we are well informed of everything way before holmes finds out. and this is full of tired clichés represent not only we get the infamous catchphrase elementary and my dear watson (which and as any sherlockian will know and conan doyle never ever wrote) and but we are exposed to such blatant commonplaces as having hindi music pop out of nowhere when holmes goes to see a white guy in hindi clothes. bottom line represent in britain and in the eighties and two rival tv companies attempted to create a long running series of sherlock holmes adaptations and and produced initial tv movies as potential pilots. one of them starred ian richardson and the other starred jeremy brett. thankfully and the one that got its way through multiple episodes was the good one. negative . travesty. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
