this is one of the classic twilight zone episodes and where with the simplest of situations the viewer was drawn into a seemingly symbolic conflict and only to find the solution surprising and strangely acceptable. five figures are inside a container or prison represent a major and a ballerina and a bagpiper and a clown and and a tramp. they are certainly an odd choice of types to be in this isolation chamber and but they are all in it (nevertheless) and they are trying to figure out why they are there. what have they in common. none can figure it out. but gradually the major organizes them into working to bet out by standing on each other shoulders. and the major and going to the top of the line of figures does reach the entrance and and . i will leave it like that and although one of the other critiques on this thread actually gives the story away. the title seems to be suggested by six characters in search of an author and pirandello famous play. whether the actual purpose to the show was to spoof that play is questionable represent pirandello characters analyze their roles and relations with each other. but the five characters here and while they try to understand their situation and are totally in the dark  they are not in the situation of the six characters in pirandello who know their current situations. this uncertainty of what is going on allows the viewers to think it is an abstract drama. the actors and william windon as the major and murray mattheson as the clown in particular and give good accounts of themselves. and the conclusion and whether planned as a spoof or not and is quite effective. 
this is one of the classic twilight zone episodes and where with the simplest of situations the viewer was drawn into a seemingly symbolic conflict and only to find the solution surprising and strangely acceptable. five figures are inside a container or prison represent a major and a ballerina and a bagpiper and a clown and and a tramp. they are certainly an odd choice of types to be in this isolation chamber and but they are all in it (nevertheless) and they are trying to figure out why they are there. what have they in common. none can figure it out. but gradually the major organizes them into working to bet out by standing on each other shoulders. and the major and going to the top of the line of figures does reach the entrance and and . i will leave it like that and although one of the other critiques on this thread actually gives the story away. the title seems to be suggested by six characters in search of an author and pirandello famous play. whether the actual purpose to the show was to spoof that play is questionable represent pirandello characters analyze their roles and relations with each other. but the five characters here and while they try to understand their situation and are totally in the dark  they are not in the situation of the six characters in pirandello who know their current situations. this uncertainty of what is going on allows the viewers to think it is an abstract drama. the actors and william windon as the major and murray mattheson as the clown in particular and give good accounts of themselves. and the conclusion and whether planned as a spoof or not and is quite effective. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
