larry clark is not renowned for his talents as a writer or a director and but he has made some undeniably important films. kids and bully and and to a lesser extent ken park all achieve their intended purpose represent shock and revulsion and and even disgust. these films are uncompromising in their content and use their controversial nature to expose very serious problems in modern youth. kids exposed us to the proliferation of a. i. d. s. and sexual promiscuity among the young. bully touched upon similar issues. ken park dealt somewhat ham handedly with sexual abuse and suburban ennui. irrefutably and all of these films exposed something horrifying and left a bad taste in your mouth. wassup rockers is about a group of poor hispanic skateboarders from south central las angeles who go to arbitrarily go to beverly hills to skate. that it. wassup rockers is nothing. it has no substance. it has an essentially nonexistent narrative. and and like kids and it features a cast of first time actors who were drawn out of the films setting. however and unlike kids and none of them have any semblance of talent. there is better acting in porn. this film features and without a doubt and the most terrible performances i have ever seen in a feature film. one can respect larry clark to exposing these young men to the film making process and but these kids are absolutely cringe worthy and folks. might i add that apparently these gents also produced the soundtrack and which features some of the most dismally inept garage punk you will ever hear my advice is to pop a couple of migraine pills before you enter the theater and or you will regret it afterward. but then again and it not like they had much of a script to work with. every line that is uttered is a contrived and pathetically delivered and and irritating beyond all measure. the story itself is ludicrous. it starts out reasonably enough and but soon slips quite unexpectedly into sheer absurdity. this begins of course with a capricious sexcapade with a pair of rich white girls and followed by a series of clichéd national lampoonish encounters and characters being killed off for no reason and and finally resulting in a ridiculous anti climax. shots go on much longer than they need to. be prepared to watch people fall of skateboards for about fifteen minutes straight and overlong and lingering shots of characters doing nothing or skateboarding down streets. but then again and with the script at a scant 32 pages they need as much useless filler as possible. perhaps wassup rockers would have worked better as a short film. anyways and i could go on like this. this is the worst film larry clark has made yet. for those of you who are interested in seeing a clark movie if only for his shocking pederast antics and look elsewhere. this is by far the tamest film he made yet and and it also the worst. it flat out horrible. like and uwe boll horrible. definitely the worst one i saw at the festival. negative . 
larry clark is not renowned for his talents as a writer or a director and but he has made some undeniably important films. kids and bully and and to a lesser extent ken park all achieve their intended purpose represent shock and revulsion and and even disgust. these films are uncompromising in their content and use their controversial nature to expose very serious problems in modern youth. kids exposed us to the proliferation of a. i. d. s. and sexual promiscuity among the young. bully touched upon similar issues. ken park dealt somewhat ham handedly with sexual abuse and suburban ennui. irrefutably and all of these films exposed something horrifying and left a bad taste in your mouth. wassup rockers is about a group of poor hispanic skateboarders from south central las angeles who go to arbitrarily go to beverly hills to skate. that it. wassup rockers is nothing. it has no substance. it has an essentially nonexistent narrative. and and like kids and it features a cast of first time actors who were drawn out of the films setting. however and unlike kids and none of them have any semblance of talent. there is better acting in porn. this film features and without a doubt and the most terrible performances i have ever seen in a feature film. one can respect larry clark to exposing these young men to the film making process and but these kids are absolutely cringe worthy and folks. might i add that apparently these gents also produced the soundtrack and which features some of the most dismally inept garage punk you will ever hear my advice is to pop a couple of migraine pills before you enter the theater and or you will regret it afterward. but then again and it not like they had much of a script to work with. every line that is uttered is a contrived and pathetically delivered and and irritating beyond all measure. the story itself is ludicrous. it starts out reasonably enough and but soon slips quite unexpectedly into sheer absurdity. this begins of course with a capricious sexcapade with a pair of rich white girls and followed by a series of clichéd national lampoonish encounters and characters being killed off for no reason and and finally resulting in a ridiculous anti climax. shots go on much longer than they need to. be prepared to watch people fall of skateboards for about fifteen minutes straight and overlong and lingering shots of characters doing nothing or skateboarding down streets. but then again and with the script at a scant 32 pages they need as much useless filler as possible. perhaps wassup rockers would have worked better as a short film. anyways and i could go on like this. this is the worst film larry clark has made yet. for those of you who are interested in seeing a clark movie if only for his shocking pederast antics and look elsewhere. this is by far the tamest film he made yet and and it also the worst. it flat out horrible. like and uwe boll horrible. definitely the worst one i saw at the festival. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
