this movie really shows its age. the print i saw was terrible due to age and but it is possible that there are better prints out there. however and this was not the major problem with the movie. the problem was that although the film was made in 1933 and it was essentially a silent film with only the barest of dialog scattered (only a few sentences) in the film in the most amateur fashion. sometimes the characters backs were turned or they were talking with their hands over their faces all in a pathetic attempt to obscure their lips and cleaverly (. ) hide the fact that the film was dubbed. well and its true that this czech film would need to be dubbed into many languages but to do it this way was really stupid and obvious. it just looked cheap. overall and the film looked low budget and silly. it really a shame though and because there was a grain of a good story a young woman who marries an older man who is either gay and or or has no interest in women. but in the 21st century and few people would really be willing to sit through this archaic mess. even with a few glimpses of the naked (and somewhat chunky) hedy lamarr and it isn not worth all the fuss that accompanied the film when it debuted. even by 1933 standards and this film was a poorly made dud. about the only interesting thing about the film is to see how different lamarr looked in 1933 compared with the glamorous image hollywood created when she came to america she looks like 2 completely different people. it such an incomplete looking and technically inferior film and i do not see how it has gotten such rave reviews. for technical problems alone and the movie can not rate a 10 or anything near it. 
this movie really shows its age. the print i saw was terrible due to age and but it is possible that there are better prints out there. however and this was not the major problem with the movie. the problem was that although the film was made in 1933 and it was essentially a silent film with only the barest of dialog scattered (only a few sentences) in the film in the most amateur fashion. sometimes the characters backs were turned or they were talking with their hands over their faces all in a pathetic attempt to obscure their lips and cleaverly (. ) hide the fact that the film was dubbed. well and its true that this czech film would need to be dubbed into many languages but to do it this way was really stupid and obvious. it just looked cheap. overall and the film looked low budget and silly. it really a shame though and because there was a grain of a good story a young woman who marries an older man who is either gay and or or has no interest in women. but in the 21st century and few people would really be willing to sit through this archaic mess. even with a few glimpses of the naked (and somewhat chunky) hedy lamarr and it isn not worth all the fuss that accompanied the film when it debuted. even by 1933 standards and this film was a poorly made dud. about the only interesting thing about the film is to see how different lamarr looked in 1933 compared with the glamorous image hollywood created when she came to america she looks like 2 completely different people. it such an incomplete looking and technically inferior film and i do not see how it has gotten such rave reviews. for technical problems alone and the movie can not rate a 10 or anything near it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
