i guess the previous house movie was a hit and prompting universal to wring a few more drops from the monster cash cow. the creative team must have been in a recycling mood and starting with the opening theme lifted from son of frankenstein and some of the stock footage dispersed through the film and like one unintentionally funny bit of business where footage of glenn strange as the monster is mixed with clips of karloff from 1935 bride and and compared to how robotic strange moved and karloff seems to move like a cheetah in comparison. previous film continuity is thrown by the wayside and concerning the miraculous death cheating abilities of the wolf man and dracula and but when dr. edelmann and larry talbot discover frankenstein monster with the skeleton representing boris karloff  and edward t. lowe does at least acknowledge some of the past movie history and though talbot curiously never mentions having met karloff dr. niemann. since this was to be the last of universal horror cycle and the supernatural elements of the wolf man and drac get(unconvincingly) morphed into medical ailments. drac is told he suffers from a blood disease and a very rare sickness that allows him to transform into a bat or evaporate if sunlight touches him. > represent ] and larry talbot just has a little pressure on the brain. of course all of this is painstakingly explained with a lot of medical jargon being related in many scenes throughout. this proves to be the biggest hindrance and as somewhere along the way the filmmakers seem to forget about actual horror or entertainment in favor of giving the monsters conditions that seem as treatable as a flu. as a huge fan of the old universal horrors and it rare that i feel so bored while watching one. the whole thing just feels like a movie that was made just because it could be and but if this mess hadn not been slapped together and the monsters might never have met abbott and costello and so i guess some good came of this. 
i guess the previous house movie was a hit and prompting universal to wring a few more drops from the monster cash cow. the creative team must have been in a recycling mood and starting with the opening theme lifted from son of frankenstein and some of the stock footage dispersed through the film and like one unintentionally funny bit of business where footage of glenn strange as the monster is mixed with clips of karloff from 1935 bride and and compared to how robotic strange moved and karloff seems to move like a cheetah in comparison. previous film continuity is thrown by the wayside and concerning the miraculous death cheating abilities of the wolf man and dracula and but when dr. edelmann and larry talbot discover frankenstein monster with the skeleton representing boris karloff  and edward t. lowe does at least acknowledge some of the past movie history and though talbot curiously never mentions having met karloff dr. niemann. since this was to be the last of universal horror cycle and the supernatural elements of the wolf man and drac get(unconvincingly) morphed into medical ailments. drac is told he suffers from a blood disease and a very rare sickness that allows him to transform into a bat or evaporate if sunlight touches him. > represent ] and larry talbot just has a little pressure on the brain. of course all of this is painstakingly explained with a lot of medical jargon being related in many scenes throughout. this proves to be the biggest hindrance and as somewhere along the way the filmmakers seem to forget about actual horror or entertainment in favor of giving the monsters conditions that seem as treatable as a flu. as a huge fan of the old universal horrors and it rare that i feel so bored while watching one. the whole thing just feels like a movie that was made just because it could be and but if this mess hadn not been slapped together and the monsters might never have met abbott and costello and so i guess some good came of this. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
