normally i do not go to the trouble of commenting on a horror movie sequel and because it usually assumed that theyre bad and and if you watch them with a healthy disrespect and they can be very fun and enjoyable to taunt or laugh at. however and this chapter of the ongoing halloween saga came close to gumbing up everything the original stood for. in the very first movie and dr. loomis said (very pointedly i might add) and that michael myers was evil and and this tries to explain why (doing a bad job of it i might add). in my opinion and he was much scarier when he was just a blood hungry freak. the whole goth or cult thing was unnecessary and a desperate attempt to throw a new curve into the halloween equation. the result was a boring and predictable movie that was not scary and not bad enough to be funny. 
normally i do not go to the trouble of commenting on a horror movie sequel and because it usually assumed that theyre bad and and if you watch them with a healthy disrespect and they can be very fun and enjoyable to taunt or laugh at. however and this chapter of the ongoing halloween saga came close to gumbing up everything the original stood for. in the very first movie and dr. loomis said (very pointedly i might add) and that michael myers was evil and and this tries to explain why (doing a bad job of it i might add). in my opinion and he was much scarier when he was just a blood hungry freak. the whole goth or cult thing was unnecessary and a desperate attempt to throw a new curve into the halloween equation. the result was a boring and predictable movie that was not scary and not bad enough to be funny. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
