the movie was pretty bad. it not so much a script problem. it just that the movie is really boring in terms of pacing. the movie just seems to plod along at a slow and agonizing rate. the story in san franpsycho is that there a serial killer on the loose who is killing morally corrupt individuals (maybe i read too much into it and but hey and it my nature apparently) after the san franpsycho kills a pair of people under the golden gate bridge were introduced to one of the main characters of the film represent joe estevez (brother of martin sheen) as a curmudgeony cop named bill culp. bill is currently trying to hunt down the killer (seriously he doesn not have a name and he just the killer) and and he is trying to coerce a local news reporter named rita to help him with his investigation and bill is the stereotypical hard edged cop and he threatens rita to throw her in jail for obstruction of justice. anyway a few scenes pass by and suddenly rita finds a letter left by the psychopath (he a cold blooded psychopath. ) and she has a change of heart and tells bill and his partner joe about it and help them with the investigation. the movie tries to be a taut murder thriller and but sort of just fails at that. it much like the movie the black dahlia it tries to be tense but it just is unbelievable in terms of that. the movie tries to be serious throughout and but it has scenes like where the killer masturbates (obviously a fan of gore porn what with lines like represent ooh blood on her or something to that effect) and joe estevez hitting the table going represent he a cold blooded murderer. i admit to chuckling more than once at the movie and even though i am sure it was intended to be a deadly serious movie. one of the only positive points the movie has going for it is the fact that i do not pay money to see it (huzzah netflix). and it sad because i could see some good in their movies after watching the damned. sure the movie had its fair share of flaws and but it was enjoyable. sadly though san franpsycho has nothing going for it. granted it has an okay script it nothing too grand and but it could have been interesting. instead what you get is a murder thriller that fails to thrill or have even vaguely enjoyable deaths. also the other reviews claim that the movie has a great twist ending that shocking apparently i was watching a different movie because by about the one hour mark i sort of figured out what was going to happen. the ending do not shock me in the least bit. i would go on insulting this wreck of a movie but i do not think i will. long story short this movie is a boring uninspired thriller (i use that term loosely) that fails to have the hitchcockian thrills that another reviewer claims to have a predictable ending and bland deaths and acting with all of the emotion of a plank of wood and and a decent soundtrack. i am sure others will try to defend this with the usual represent it was a low budget movie and they did the best they could with such a low budget and and all that other nonsense. but when you get right down to it there was very little that they could have really spent that budget on and there was very little special effects work and the soundtrack sounds like it might have been recycled from hood of the living dead or the damned and and it the same damn crew from those two films. this movie really reminds me a lot of another low budget flick that was no good and and it was called mr. jingles and the two are about the same quality and they fail to deliver anything close to enjoyment and should fade quickly into obscurity. 
the movie was pretty bad. it not so much a script problem. it just that the movie is really boring in terms of pacing. the movie just seems to plod along at a slow and agonizing rate. the story in san franpsycho is that there a serial killer on the loose who is killing morally corrupt individuals (maybe i read too much into it and but hey and it my nature apparently) after the san franpsycho kills a pair of people under the golden gate bridge were introduced to one of the main characters of the film represent joe estevez (brother of martin sheen) as a curmudgeony cop named bill culp. bill is currently trying to hunt down the killer (seriously he doesn not have a name and he just the killer) and and he is trying to coerce a local news reporter named rita to help him with his investigation and bill is the stereotypical hard edged cop and he threatens rita to throw her in jail for obstruction of justice. anyway a few scenes pass by and suddenly rita finds a letter left by the psychopath (he a cold blooded psychopath. ) and she has a change of heart and tells bill and his partner joe about it and help them with the investigation. the movie tries to be a taut murder thriller and but sort of just fails at that. it much like the movie the black dahlia it tries to be tense but it just is unbelievable in terms of that. the movie tries to be serious throughout and but it has scenes like where the killer masturbates (obviously a fan of gore porn what with lines like represent ooh blood on her or something to that effect) and joe estevez hitting the table going represent he a cold blooded murderer. i admit to chuckling more than once at the movie and even though i am sure it was intended to be a deadly serious movie. one of the only positive points the movie has going for it is the fact that i do not pay money to see it (huzzah netflix). and it sad because i could see some good in their movies after watching the damned. sure the movie had its fair share of flaws and but it was enjoyable. sadly though san franpsycho has nothing going for it. granted it has an okay script it nothing too grand and but it could have been interesting. instead what you get is a murder thriller that fails to thrill or have even vaguely enjoyable deaths. also the other reviews claim that the movie has a great twist ending that shocking apparently i was watching a different movie because by about the one hour mark i sort of figured out what was going to happen. the ending do not shock me in the least bit. i would go on insulting this wreck of a movie but i do not think i will. long story short this movie is a boring uninspired thriller (i use that term loosely) that fails to have the hitchcockian thrills that another reviewer claims to have a predictable ending and bland deaths and acting with all of the emotion of a plank of wood and and a decent soundtrack. i am sure others will try to defend this with the usual represent it was a low budget movie and they did the best they could with such a low budget and and all that other nonsense. but when you get right down to it there was very little that they could have really spent that budget on and there was very little special effects work and the soundtrack sounds like it might have been recycled from hood of the living dead or the damned and and it the same damn crew from those two films. this movie really reminds me a lot of another low budget flick that was no good and and it was called mr. jingles and the two are about the same quality and they fail to deliver anything close to enjoyment and should fade quickly into obscurity. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
