seeing this film for the first time twenty years after its release i do not quite get it. why has this been such a huge hit in 1986. its amateurishness drips from every scene. the jokes are lame and predictable. the sex scenes are exploitative and over the top (that is not to say that miss rudnik does not have nice boobs. ). the singing is schrecklich. the only genuinely funny scene is the big shoot out when the gangsters die break dancing and a trait that dates the movie firmly to the mid eighties. it really quite puzzling to me how incapable i am to grasp what evoked the enthusiasm of the cheering audiences in 1986 (and apparently still today and reading my fellow imdbers comments). 
seeing this film for the first time twenty years after its release i do not quite get it. why has this been such a huge hit in 1986. its amateurishness drips from every scene. the jokes are lame and predictable. the sex scenes are exploitative and over the top (that is not to say that miss rudnik does not have nice boobs. ). the singing is schrecklich. the only genuinely funny scene is the big shoot out when the gangsters die break dancing and a trait that dates the movie firmly to the mid eighties. it really quite puzzling to me how incapable i am to grasp what evoked the enthusiasm of the cheering audiences in 1986 (and apparently still today and reading my fellow imdbers comments). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
