there is nothing original and humane or insightful in this film. the acting is average and images are amateurish and the writing lacks subtlety and the scenes are very basic. something close to a soap. in 2 represent37 and a suicide is used to turn the film into a suspense drama. we watch and partly and because we want to know who dies. the various characters each have a problem and and the film shows how bad each problem is for them and but only as a way to get them each to a place where you think they might kill themselves. despite the different points of view offered by the camera on the key events and there is never another way of seeing the events themselves. so in 2 represent37 and the arseholes are arseholes and the angels are angels. this is simple stuff. without this complexity and the film emerges as a voyeuristic tale of youth sex and violence. you hardly get to know the kids as much as the breasts and bodies and limps that the filmmaker passes off as characterisation. in the end and if you know anything about film in the last 5 years and 2 represent37 is just an immature rip off of elephant  not a meditation and not a progression. yet while the filmmaker and distributor use the alleged suicide of a friend at every chance to give the film some legitimacy and they never talk about gus van sant or elephant. the positive posts on imdb curiously avoid any mention of this and or simply do not value originality. if you do want something with heart and voice  avoid this piece of youth exploitation. i was surprised by the filmmakers age when i found out after seeing this film  i had assumed a 13 year old had made it. the twenty somethings i have always known are too busy trying to express something real in them to lift the work of an old man. 
there is nothing original and humane or insightful in this film. the acting is average and images are amateurish and the writing lacks subtlety and the scenes are very basic. something close to a soap. in 2 represent37 and a suicide is used to turn the film into a suspense drama. we watch and partly and because we want to know who dies. the various characters each have a problem and and the film shows how bad each problem is for them and but only as a way to get them each to a place where you think they might kill themselves. despite the different points of view offered by the camera on the key events and there is never another way of seeing the events themselves. so in 2 represent37 and the arseholes are arseholes and the angels are angels. this is simple stuff. without this complexity and the film emerges as a voyeuristic tale of youth sex and violence. you hardly get to know the kids as much as the breasts and bodies and limps that the filmmaker passes off as characterisation. in the end and if you know anything about film in the last 5 years and 2 represent37 is just an immature rip off of elephant  not a meditation and not a progression. yet while the filmmaker and distributor use the alleged suicide of a friend at every chance to give the film some legitimacy and they never talk about gus van sant or elephant. the positive posts on imdb curiously avoid any mention of this and or simply do not value originality. if you do want something with heart and voice  avoid this piece of youth exploitation. i was surprised by the filmmakers age when i found out after seeing this film  i had assumed a 13 year old had made it. the twenty somethings i have always known are too busy trying to express something real in them to lift the work of an old man. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
