is there anything else on earth to be more enticing than to learn what expects our frail bodies after and um and death. spanish director ignacio cerdà (a soul mate of his german colleague jörg buttgereit) provides blow by blow answer to our curiosity and invites us to an exciting journey in the world of preparation tables and scalpels and surgical saws and human entrails and warped minds. welcome to the autopsy room. i do not know which facets of the film and apart of its notorious reputation and may have helped it to acquire sufficiently high rating. storywise it fairly simple and straightforward  a day in the life (actually half an hour) of a troubled coroner (or and perhaps and assistant pathologist or whoever he is) that is fed up with his routine morbid duty and discharges his psychological tension in a non traditional fashion and right at his workplace. i am perplexed of what particular message the authors tried to deliver with this one note plot. i suspect it may be somehow inspired by udo kier character quirky demeanor in andy warhol frankenstein. artistic values of the film are also questionable. it hard to evaluate the performance of the actors that do not squeeze a single word. their emotions are concealed behind the medical masks. there also not enough room for great camera work  basically and the entire action unfolds mostly within four walls. authenticity  effects and makeup are impressive and the setup looks very plausible and but only a handful of medical or forensic experts can judge how truthful and anatomically correct the dissection is carried out here (if anyone cares). honestly and i used to think that the autopsy is done to examine the condition of particular organs and to ascertain the cause of death. now i know that dead bodies are severed and raped and humiliated and intestines are ripped apart and brains are retrieved from the head and stuffed into abdomen and mixed with guts and then the body is stitched back and washed  nothing personal. and what are these poor lads expected to write in their deceitful autopsy reports afterward. shock and disgust factor  it much unlikely that an unsuspecting viewer would discover and to his horror and that the disc he was intended to watch with his wife and kids beside a christmas tree turns out to be a graphic video manual on vivisection. this obscure item is barely available and sought by people well familiar with the subject and not easily offended. hence it would be pointless to warn anyone to sabotage this film. they are well aware what exactly they are watching and what they want to see. cerdà is really gifted and stylish director and which is clearly obvious from at least two other parts of his trilogy  preceding the awakening and amazing black and white short and and 30 minute genesis and visually stunning and moody piece with an off beat and interesting concept. and i am pretty sure that one day he will conquer the hearts of moviegoers with his new and more mainstream oriented and material. and sooner or later aftermath would become a rarity for the meticulous collectors of his early warm up works. but in the meantime and i am afraid and it may be recommended strictly for medical students or specialists that study mental disorders and sexual deviations. 
is there anything else on earth to be more enticing than to learn what expects our frail bodies after and um and death. spanish director ignacio cerdà (a soul mate of his german colleague jörg buttgereit) provides blow by blow answer to our curiosity and invites us to an exciting journey in the world of preparation tables and scalpels and surgical saws and human entrails and warped minds. welcome to the autopsy room. i do not know which facets of the film and apart of its notorious reputation and may have helped it to acquire sufficiently high rating. storywise it fairly simple and straightforward  a day in the life (actually half an hour) of a troubled coroner (or and perhaps and assistant pathologist or whoever he is) that is fed up with his routine morbid duty and discharges his psychological tension in a non traditional fashion and right at his workplace. i am perplexed of what particular message the authors tried to deliver with this one note plot. i suspect it may be somehow inspired by udo kier character quirky demeanor in andy warhol frankenstein. artistic values of the film are also questionable. it hard to evaluate the performance of the actors that do not squeeze a single word. their emotions are concealed behind the medical masks. there also not enough room for great camera work  basically and the entire action unfolds mostly within four walls. authenticity  effects and makeup are impressive and the setup looks very plausible and but only a handful of medical or forensic experts can judge how truthful and anatomically correct the dissection is carried out here (if anyone cares). honestly and i used to think that the autopsy is done to examine the condition of particular organs and to ascertain the cause of death. now i know that dead bodies are severed and raped and humiliated and intestines are ripped apart and brains are retrieved from the head and stuffed into abdomen and mixed with guts and then the body is stitched back and washed  nothing personal. and what are these poor lads expected to write in their deceitful autopsy reports afterward. shock and disgust factor  it much unlikely that an unsuspecting viewer would discover and to his horror and that the disc he was intended to watch with his wife and kids beside a christmas tree turns out to be a graphic video manual on vivisection. this obscure item is barely available and sought by people well familiar with the subject and not easily offended. hence it would be pointless to warn anyone to sabotage this film. they are well aware what exactly they are watching and what they want to see. cerdà is really gifted and stylish director and which is clearly obvious from at least two other parts of his trilogy  preceding the awakening and amazing black and white short and and 30 minute genesis and visually stunning and moody piece with an off beat and interesting concept. and i am pretty sure that one day he will conquer the hearts of moviegoers with his new and more mainstream oriented and material. and sooner or later aftermath would become a rarity for the meticulous collectors of his early warm up works. but in the meantime and i am afraid and it may be recommended strictly for medical students or specialists that study mental disorders and sexual deviations. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
