this is a by the numbers horror film starring richard crenna and joanna pettet as a psychologist duo who purchase and old mansion and invite a small crew of friends and patients to help clean the place up. unbeknownst to them and the mansion harbors a cellar door  the gateway to hell. if you are in the mood for a clichéd horror film and then look no further and but if you want something inventive and then this little film would not appeal to you. violence represent $$$ (rather subdued and albeit the scene where a guy cuts his hand with a saw  rather gruesome mind you. fans of inventive deaths scenes will not like this as every character seems to be electrocuted in some fashion). nudity represent $ (nothing to speak of. mary louise weller adds the good looks but her character was underdeveloped). story represent $$ (cliched and but view worthy nonetheless. this offers nothing new to the genre but the casting of victor buono  who is about as menacing as a department store santa  seems to have attracted a few viewers). acting represent $$ (the best performances are by crenna and pettet with the other actors simply phoning in their roles. the screenwriter fails to develop any characters outside pettet character and seemed to have forgotten about mary louise weller (animal house) who disappears for about twenty minutes and only resurfaces to be electrocuted like everyone else in boring fashion). 
this is a by the numbers horror film starring richard crenna and joanna pettet as a psychologist duo who purchase and old mansion and invite a small crew of friends and patients to help clean the place up. unbeknownst to them and the mansion harbors a cellar door  the gateway to hell. if you are in the mood for a clichéd horror film and then look no further and but if you want something inventive and then this little film would not appeal to you. violence represent $$$ (rather subdued and albeit the scene where a guy cuts his hand with a saw  rather gruesome mind you. fans of inventive deaths scenes will not like this as every character seems to be electrocuted in some fashion). nudity represent $ (nothing to speak of. mary louise weller adds the good looks but her character was underdeveloped). story represent $$ (cliched and but view worthy nonetheless. this offers nothing new to the genre but the casting of victor buono  who is about as menacing as a department store santa  seems to have attracted a few viewers). acting represent $$ (the best performances are by crenna and pettet with the other actors simply phoning in their roles. the screenwriter fails to develop any characters outside pettet character and seemed to have forgotten about mary louise weller (animal house) who disappears for about twenty minutes and only resurfaces to be electrocuted like everyone else in boring fashion). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
