there considerable amount of money behind this production and so the look of it is very good. it includes some interesting appearances by gilbert roland and eddie burns and and a brief cameo at the beginning by christopher lee. there are a few exciting gunfights and and a humorous bit or two  the satire on django and the man with no name and and sabata is amusing and especially when they are given the names of failed presidents of the mexico revolution. the trouble is and there isn not any purpose in satirizing the spaghetti western as is attempted here. the key element in the spaghettis is irony and which easily blends into comedy while in fact the source of all spaghetti is kurosawa yojimbo and which is universally recognized as one of the great black comedies of all time and and most spaghettis easily slipped over the edge into real comedy of a very sophisticated variety. perhaps the best evidence of this is found in the trinity films and which are both openly spaghettis and openly slap stick comedy. so why bother satirizing a genre that  by its very nature  satirizes itself. consequently and i found the whole enterprise essentially unconvincing. none of these characters were people i would ever care about and the story was generically cliché and and the production values only reflected the money involved and not the passion of the director. over all and a banal and futile effort to cash in on the phenomenon it mocks. 
there considerable amount of money behind this production and so the look of it is very good. it includes some interesting appearances by gilbert roland and eddie burns and and a brief cameo at the beginning by christopher lee. there are a few exciting gunfights and and a humorous bit or two  the satire on django and the man with no name and and sabata is amusing and especially when they are given the names of failed presidents of the mexico revolution. the trouble is and there isn not any purpose in satirizing the spaghetti western as is attempted here. the key element in the spaghettis is irony and which easily blends into comedy while in fact the source of all spaghetti is kurosawa yojimbo and which is universally recognized as one of the great black comedies of all time and and most spaghettis easily slipped over the edge into real comedy of a very sophisticated variety. perhaps the best evidence of this is found in the trinity films and which are both openly spaghettis and openly slap stick comedy. so why bother satirizing a genre that  by its very nature  satirizes itself. consequently and i found the whole enterprise essentially unconvincing. none of these characters were people i would ever care about and the story was generically cliché and and the production values only reflected the money involved and not the passion of the director. over all and a banal and futile effort to cash in on the phenomenon it mocks. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
