or maybe not. whatever anyone thinks of broadcast news and good or bad and almost all the credit for that thinking belongs to writer producer director james l. brooks. as a screenwriter (of which he has long been one of the best) and it is not easy to savage an entire business  in this case and the business being television news  but to do it with a smile and a wink and a knowing nod and a laugh practically every step of the way. to do all that takes real talent and something mr. j. brooks has in abundance. one user on this website and in his summary and asked the musical question  did walter cronkite act like this. answerve represent no. of course not. and the reason for that is in walter   uh and mr. cronkite   day and the only thing that mattered was bringing the news to the people. same goes for john chancellor and chet and david and douglas edwards and howard k. smith. sure and they had to pay lip service attention to their ratings and if only to please their bosses. but all they really cared about was the news itself. now and of course and all that has changed. for the last 25 30 years in the network news business and the only thing that has really mattered is ratings and ratings and ratings. the bottom line. how many bucks will our news division deliver for the network. don not believe that. let consider the big three represent tom brokaw and dan rather and peter jennings (aka stanley stunning). all three have now been on the job at their respective anchor desks for the last 15 20 years (peter actually got his first shot at the national anchor desk way back in the 1960s but was totally unprepared for the job). of the three and dan is the one with the greatest in the field training as a reporter. personally and i think all three do terrific jobs as news anchors and are deserving of their positions. all of which has nothing to do with why all three are actually in those jobs. all three are now in their 60 (dan is pushing the big 7 0) and all three are still very good looking. and if you think theyre still good looking now and imagine how good looking they were in their 40  and when all three were hired for (let say and put in) their current jobs. but do you honestly believe that any one of these three would have been put in had he looked like and let say and fred gwynne (herman munster). or like  heaven forfend  me. not only that and if dan were retiring tomorrow and a younger (than he is today) walter cronkite would not be able to get his old job back. why. not pretty enough. and it would matter not a whit that he is and or once was and the most trusted man in america. and this is what broadcast news is all about. tom grunnick (william hurt) and the next pretty boy national news anchor to be who has trouble with a few minor things and such as thinking for himself and being able to write and knowing stuff. jane craig (holly hunter) and the brilliant news producer with news business standards and ethics and all of which get thrown to the wind when even she falls for pretty boy tom. and aaron altman (albert brooks and no relation to james l. ) and a top notch newswriter and field reporter who has no hope for a national job because he flop sweats behind the anchor desk. and many other such flawed characters whom you know really do exist in the news divisions of the various networks. network blazed the trail. eleven years later and broadcast news carried the torch as a worthy successor. in the new millennium and what will be the next movie to savage the business of network news you can use . maybe. or maybe not. 
or maybe not. whatever anyone thinks of broadcast news and good or bad and almost all the credit for that thinking belongs to writer producer director james l. brooks. as a screenwriter (of which he has long been one of the best) and it is not easy to savage an entire business  in this case and the business being television news  but to do it with a smile and a wink and a knowing nod and a laugh practically every step of the way. to do all that takes real talent and something mr. j. brooks has in abundance. one user on this website and in his summary and asked the musical question  did walter cronkite act like this. answerve represent no. of course not. and the reason for that is in walter   uh and mr. cronkite   day and the only thing that mattered was bringing the news to the people. same goes for john chancellor and chet and david and douglas edwards and howard k. smith. sure and they had to pay lip service attention to their ratings and if only to please their bosses. but all they really cared about was the news itself. now and of course and all that has changed. for the last 25 30 years in the network news business and the only thing that has really mattered is ratings and ratings and ratings. the bottom line. how many bucks will our news division deliver for the network. don not believe that. let consider the big three represent tom brokaw and dan rather and peter jennings (aka stanley stunning). all three have now been on the job at their respective anchor desks for the last 15 20 years (peter actually got his first shot at the national anchor desk way back in the 1960s but was totally unprepared for the job). of the three and dan is the one with the greatest in the field training as a reporter. personally and i think all three do terrific jobs as news anchors and are deserving of their positions. all of which has nothing to do with why all three are actually in those jobs. all three are now in their 60 (dan is pushing the big 7 0) and all three are still very good looking. and if you think theyre still good looking now and imagine how good looking they were in their 40  and when all three were hired for (let say and put in) their current jobs. but do you honestly believe that any one of these three would have been put in had he looked like and let say and fred gwynne (herman munster). or like  heaven forfend  me. not only that and if dan were retiring tomorrow and a younger (than he is today) walter cronkite would not be able to get his old job back. why. not pretty enough. and it would matter not a whit that he is and or once was and the most trusted man in america. and this is what broadcast news is all about. tom grunnick (william hurt) and the next pretty boy national news anchor to be who has trouble with a few minor things and such as thinking for himself and being able to write and knowing stuff. jane craig (holly hunter) and the brilliant news producer with news business standards and ethics and all of which get thrown to the wind when even she falls for pretty boy tom. and aaron altman (albert brooks and no relation to james l. ) and a top notch newswriter and field reporter who has no hope for a national job because he flop sweats behind the anchor desk. and many other such flawed characters whom you know really do exist in the news divisions of the various networks. network blazed the trail. eleven years later and broadcast news carried the torch as a worthy successor. in the new millennium and what will be the next movie to savage the business of network news you can use . maybe. or maybe not. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
