i was really looking forward to seeing this movie and having spent a few (fantastic) college weeks in barcelona myself. the premise is right on cue a confused and disordered young individual enters a world of equally confused and disordered young individuals. but the director weak swats at symbolism and philosophy and social commentary were completely off the mark and and it leaves us and the audience and feeling confused and disordered. bravo. perhaps if this movie had been presented as a european american pie flick and then i would be able to turn off my brain and go along for the ride. but right off the bat and the director piques our deeper senses by introducing the symbolism of the twisted highways and the dichotomy of the inner self vs. the public self (one mother tongue vs. one secondary language). furthermore and it dives boldly into the subject of racial or national stereotyping. off to an interesting start and eh. wrong. that as far as it goes. these interesting topics are hardly mentioned again except at the contrived epilogue type ending which seemed to be the director way of floundering to get back on topic. it reminded me of a meandering speech which goes nowhere and but the speaker ends by saying and so in conclusion and i hope you see how this relates to my original thought. furthermore and as other reviewers have pointed out and the cynical jab at stereotyping betrays itself. if the point is to ridicule the use of national stereotypes and then why did the director introduce a cockney speaking and beer swilling english brat as a caricature of prejudice. why did the director portray the american as a neanderthal (literally banging his chest and making ape noises at one point) whilst the europeans tolerate him superciliously. why is the british girl the one who sinks to uttering slurs (calling french people frogs and butchering the french language) while everyone else is above all that. the answer is that this isn not a deep or well thought out film. it simply an anglophobe retort to the anglophiles. but really it no different from the prejudice it seeks to ridicule. now there a funny irony to consider. ok and philosophy and artistry and socio political commentary aside and i was still very bored by this movie. there is one very funny gag which involves deceiving one of the girls boyfriends and but aside from that i was hardly entertained at all. the only reason why i watched it through to the end is that i would like to brush up on my french and spanish. (you see and we monolingual americans may be stupid and but we do try. ). 
i was really looking forward to seeing this movie and having spent a few (fantastic) college weeks in barcelona myself. the premise is right on cue a confused and disordered young individual enters a world of equally confused and disordered young individuals. but the director weak swats at symbolism and philosophy and social commentary were completely off the mark and and it leaves us and the audience and feeling confused and disordered. bravo. perhaps if this movie had been presented as a european american pie flick and then i would be able to turn off my brain and go along for the ride. but right off the bat and the director piques our deeper senses by introducing the symbolism of the twisted highways and the dichotomy of the inner self vs. the public self (one mother tongue vs. one secondary language). furthermore and it dives boldly into the subject of racial or national stereotyping. off to an interesting start and eh. wrong. that as far as it goes. these interesting topics are hardly mentioned again except at the contrived epilogue type ending which seemed to be the director way of floundering to get back on topic. it reminded me of a meandering speech which goes nowhere and but the speaker ends by saying and so in conclusion and i hope you see how this relates to my original thought. furthermore and as other reviewers have pointed out and the cynical jab at stereotyping betrays itself. if the point is to ridicule the use of national stereotypes and then why did the director introduce a cockney speaking and beer swilling english brat as a caricature of prejudice. why did the director portray the american as a neanderthal (literally banging his chest and making ape noises at one point) whilst the europeans tolerate him superciliously. why is the british girl the one who sinks to uttering slurs (calling french people frogs and butchering the french language) while everyone else is above all that. the answer is that this isn not a deep or well thought out film. it simply an anglophobe retort to the anglophiles. but really it no different from the prejudice it seeks to ridicule. now there a funny irony to consider. ok and philosophy and artistry and socio political commentary aside and i was still very bored by this movie. there is one very funny gag which involves deceiving one of the girls boyfriends and but aside from that i was hardly entertained at all. the only reason why i watched it through to the end is that i would like to brush up on my french and spanish. (you see and we monolingual americans may be stupid and but we do try. ). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
