director or screenwriter allan burns seems to have patched two different scripts together before coming up with this minor outing represent a comedy about infidelity and a melodrama about loss and sabotage. it results in a wincingly unfunny film. christine lahti plays a crass and cynical tv news reporter who makes friends with aerobics instructor mary tyler moore and is soon having dinner with moore and her family only to discover mary husband (ted danson) is lahti secret affair. burns has a strange and stop and start rhythm to his dialogue which is neither realistic nor effective (just increasingly annoying and because nothing important ever seems to get said). rail thin moore and looking alarmingly frail in her leotard and has a radiant smile but doesn not convince as danson wife and and danson gets stuck with a paltry and thankless role (he just there to be a cad). the movie attempts to cover all the bases in a classic case of overreaching (woman role in the workplace and the tv news biz and the cheating family man and the working wife and mother who wants more and a woman need for female friendships and et al) and but nothing substantial comes out of these ideas since burns only half heartedly examines the issues. as a writer and he is surprisingly free of punchlines and but is devoid of a purpose as well and and the heavy plotting just gets all fouled up. half from . 
director or screenwriter allan burns seems to have patched two different scripts together before coming up with this minor outing represent a comedy about infidelity and a melodrama about loss and sabotage. it results in a wincingly unfunny film. christine lahti plays a crass and cynical tv news reporter who makes friends with aerobics instructor mary tyler moore and is soon having dinner with moore and her family only to discover mary husband (ted danson) is lahti secret affair. burns has a strange and stop and start rhythm to his dialogue which is neither realistic nor effective (just increasingly annoying and because nothing important ever seems to get said). rail thin moore and looking alarmingly frail in her leotard and has a radiant smile but doesn not convince as danson wife and and danson gets stuck with a paltry and thankless role (he just there to be a cad). the movie attempts to cover all the bases in a classic case of overreaching (woman role in the workplace and the tv news biz and the cheating family man and the working wife and mother who wants more and a woman need for female friendships and et al) and but nothing substantial comes out of these ideas since burns only half heartedly examines the issues. as a writer and he is surprisingly free of punchlines and but is devoid of a purpose as well and and the heavy plotting just gets all fouled up. half from . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
