i had heard that this film was stylish and intriguing and but i just found it annoying. it been a while since i have seen it (and hopefully i would not find out all my memories are wrong and i am unjustly condemning this movie) and but my memory is that the filmmakers tried to portray leopold and loeb as victimized by an anti gay society and and that this somehow caused their horrible crime. i totally disagree with this point of view and and think it unfair both to homosexuals and to bobby franks and the real victim of the story. i can not imagine why anyone would want to claim those two as martyrs. i also thought l and l were portrayed as a bit more sophisticated than they actually were after all and they were teenagers who lived at home. the film places them in a kind of fantasy world that seems like it should be scored by morrissey. i just read an interview with one of the filmmakers that implied the film anachronisms and such as the push button phones that characters used and were meant to add brechtian distance. they certainly do that and but i happened to find it highly irksome. apparently a number of people found this movie interesting and but i would have preferred a less stylish and more realistic examination of the part homosexuality may have played in the leopold and loeb case. 
i had heard that this film was stylish and intriguing and but i just found it annoying. it been a while since i have seen it (and hopefully i would not find out all my memories are wrong and i am unjustly condemning this movie) and but my memory is that the filmmakers tried to portray leopold and loeb as victimized by an anti gay society and and that this somehow caused their horrible crime. i totally disagree with this point of view and and think it unfair both to homosexuals and to bobby franks and the real victim of the story. i can not imagine why anyone would want to claim those two as martyrs. i also thought l and l were portrayed as a bit more sophisticated than they actually were after all and they were teenagers who lived at home. the film places them in a kind of fantasy world that seems like it should be scored by morrissey. i just read an interview with one of the filmmakers that implied the film anachronisms and such as the push button phones that characters used and were meant to add brechtian distance. they certainly do that and but i happened to find it highly irksome. apparently a number of people found this movie interesting and but i would have preferred a less stylish and more realistic examination of the part homosexuality may have played in the leopold and loeb case. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
