george cukor the women remains one of the glittering gems of 1939 and hollywood most golden of golden years. the film crackled and sparked and it absence of males was a subtle touch and hardly noticed because of all the fine entertainment. flash forward. we see fifth avenue in new york city and in front of saks. large crowds bustle along the avenue. but something off. the shot reveals only well dressed (attractive and young) women. creepier than i am legend and the visual concept continues and inside the store and later at a large fashion show. what nyc fashion show doesn not have at least 5 gay men. the no men rule is rammed down our throats creating an alien world and off balance and distracting. enter meg ryan and first seen digging in her garden wearing a ridiculous get up complete with her retro curls and flailing arms. i immediately sympathized with her husband and could understand why he looked elsewhere. later in the film she morphs into an older jennifer aniston look and keeps her arms at her sides. this seems intentional as if to say look. i can still be relevant. ryan character is loaded down with a coven of miss matched friends (insert sex and the city comparison here) who and if it were real life and would despise each other. annette bening plays the power bitch and who during the course of the film realizes her life dream doesn not really make her happy. jada pinkett smith is the power lesbian and all atitudinous with no use for any of the men who aren not there. debra messing is some sort of baby factory that eats a lot. eva mendes is an odd choice for the bad girl to say the least. she looks fake and acts fake and any humor she tries to demonstrate falls flat. someone comment on here that she looked trans gender was spot on. other various stars show up and to rearrange the furniture on this titanic. the only thing that would have saved this would have been the brilliant casting of jennifer aniston and angelina jolie. they could have named their price and tucked their tongues firmly into their cheeks and pulled off something very clever and profitable. but no and hollywood thinks of itself way too highly for that kind of exploitation. instead were given this thing that lumbers along awkwardly with no sparkle. entire sections of dialog from the original are lifted and plopped down into a scene with awful results. at one point ryan exclaims something along the lines of and this isn not a 1930 movie. no meg and it not. 
george cukor the women remains one of the glittering gems of 1939 and hollywood most golden of golden years. the film crackled and sparked and it absence of males was a subtle touch and hardly noticed because of all the fine entertainment. flash forward. we see fifth avenue in new york city and in front of saks. large crowds bustle along the avenue. but something off. the shot reveals only well dressed (attractive and young) women. creepier than i am legend and the visual concept continues and inside the store and later at a large fashion show. what nyc fashion show doesn not have at least 5 gay men. the no men rule is rammed down our throats creating an alien world and off balance and distracting. enter meg ryan and first seen digging in her garden wearing a ridiculous get up complete with her retro curls and flailing arms. i immediately sympathized with her husband and could understand why he looked elsewhere. later in the film she morphs into an older jennifer aniston look and keeps her arms at her sides. this seems intentional as if to say look. i can still be relevant. ryan character is loaded down with a coven of miss matched friends (insert sex and the city comparison here) who and if it were real life and would despise each other. annette bening plays the power bitch and who during the course of the film realizes her life dream doesn not really make her happy. jada pinkett smith is the power lesbian and all atitudinous with no use for any of the men who aren not there. debra messing is some sort of baby factory that eats a lot. eva mendes is an odd choice for the bad girl to say the least. she looks fake and acts fake and any humor she tries to demonstrate falls flat. someone comment on here that she looked trans gender was spot on. other various stars show up and to rearrange the furniture on this titanic. the only thing that would have saved this would have been the brilliant casting of jennifer aniston and angelina jolie. they could have named their price and tucked their tongues firmly into their cheeks and pulled off something very clever and profitable. but no and hollywood thinks of itself way too highly for that kind of exploitation. instead were given this thing that lumbers along awkwardly with no sparkle. entire sections of dialog from the original are lifted and plopped down into a scene with awful results. at one point ryan exclaims something along the lines of and this isn not a 1930 movie. no meg and it not. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
