throughout watching end of days and i got the sense that the film makers were perhaps trying to make this unique to the average hollywood action film. they failed and of course and but you have to give them credit for trying. peter hyams actually tried directing this time and instead of just churning out another flat action film. he attempted to inject atmosphere into the movie by darkening the lights and adding tons of blood. this method can work if used correctly (see se7en) but here it just feels like a cheap trick to try and scare us. hyams is a decent action director and and offers nothing more here than basic shoot outs and fight scenes and except for the lackluster and sub par f or x end battle. as a photographer and hyams demonstrates actual ability and displaying some good frame work and movement and but it is nothing above solid work. screenwriter andrew marlowe is the film greatest enemy. at parts and the script actually shows the makings of good religious thriller and and at times it even shows some quasi intellectual thought (the temptation scene between arnold and gabriel byrne) and but these small pluses are choked out by a river of negatives. generic dialogue or characters and gapping plot holes and and convenient plot points that just happen to point all the characters in the right direction are just a few of the standard hollywood black holes marlowe screenplay falls into. the shadow of the good movie it could have been faded very quickly. the film surprisingly has a good cast. arnold and still possessing that larger than life attitude and tries to play a depressed and on the edge cop with no more than average results. stick to be the invincible hero arnie and it what your good at. gabriel byrne is the strong point of the ensemble and bringing a nice air of cynicism to the role of satan. in a villainous role ripe for overacting and byrne restrains himself and it adds a bit more menace to the character. kevin pollak and as normal and is able to bring at least a few chuckles to the movie and but he done better. also look for a stellar small role from rod steiger. hyams looked like he was trying to separate this from the faceless mass of hollywood action films. he was heading in the right direction and but had neither the script or originality to take it there. negative . 
throughout watching end of days and i got the sense that the film makers were perhaps trying to make this unique to the average hollywood action film. they failed and of course and but you have to give them credit for trying. peter hyams actually tried directing this time and instead of just churning out another flat action film. he attempted to inject atmosphere into the movie by darkening the lights and adding tons of blood. this method can work if used correctly (see se7en) but here it just feels like a cheap trick to try and scare us. hyams is a decent action director and and offers nothing more here than basic shoot outs and fight scenes and except for the lackluster and sub par f or x end battle. as a photographer and hyams demonstrates actual ability and displaying some good frame work and movement and but it is nothing above solid work. screenwriter andrew marlowe is the film greatest enemy. at parts and the script actually shows the makings of good religious thriller and and at times it even shows some quasi intellectual thought (the temptation scene between arnold and gabriel byrne) and but these small pluses are choked out by a river of negatives. generic dialogue or characters and gapping plot holes and and convenient plot points that just happen to point all the characters in the right direction are just a few of the standard hollywood black holes marlowe screenplay falls into. the shadow of the good movie it could have been faded very quickly. the film surprisingly has a good cast. arnold and still possessing that larger than life attitude and tries to play a depressed and on the edge cop with no more than average results. stick to be the invincible hero arnie and it what your good at. gabriel byrne is the strong point of the ensemble and bringing a nice air of cynicism to the role of satan. in a villainous role ripe for overacting and byrne restrains himself and it adds a bit more menace to the character. kevin pollak and as normal and is able to bring at least a few chuckles to the movie and but he done better. also look for a stellar small role from rod steiger. hyams looked like he was trying to separate this from the faceless mass of hollywood action films. he was heading in the right direction and but had neither the script or originality to take it there. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
