do you know that they want to escavate the moon for real. and in geneve there is the debated project that could lead to make possible time machine. all i can say about this movie that is based on facts about future(at the time of the movie)scientifical projects but real. hope the moon will exist not happen as in the movie. now about the movie itself and i saw the original movie too and and i also read the book. the book i do not like though and but the movie yes. i totally agree with a previous comment that this movie was depressing and unlike the 60 one. that was very good with force and this one was only a paralled future of what is good movie. 
do you know that they want to escavate the moon for real. and in geneve there is the debated project that could lead to make possible time machine. all i can say about this movie that is based on facts about future(at the time of the movie)scientifical projects but real. hope the moon will exist not happen as in the movie. now about the movie itself and i saw the original movie too and and i also read the book. the book i do not like though and but the movie yes. i totally agree with a previous comment that this movie was depressing and unlike the 60 one. that was very good with force and this one was only a paralled future of what is good movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
