this movie starts at a and never quite reaches b. its title promises far more than the film delivers. it superficial and filled with the usual cliches of a story in which a guy questions his sexuality. the people are agreeable and even the obligatory flamboyant type. the lead (kevin mckidd) overacts insofar as there a reason for him to act at all. simon callow and playing a horny straight and is always worth watching and and he by far the only reason to stay with the movie. however and the rubbish about his men group meditations or whatever they are grows extremely tiresome in short order. they seem to have been thrown into the movie mild mix in a misguided effort to vary the setting and non stop inaction. the same comment applies to a really odd and unconvincing camping trip. don not worry about pausing the tape so you can get a snack. let the thing run while you would not miss anything. hugo weaving character is superfluous. he appears in a sequence with one of the lesser leads and doesn not even meet the rest at all. the outcome of that sequence isn not explained and and hugo real estate dealings have nothing to do with the story. the movie is a total disappointment at the end and because there is no resolution. the thing simply fades out and were sent to the closing credits. this is an interlude with no structure. 
this movie starts at a and never quite reaches b. its title promises far more than the film delivers. it superficial and filled with the usual cliches of a story in which a guy questions his sexuality. the people are agreeable and even the obligatory flamboyant type. the lead (kevin mckidd) overacts insofar as there a reason for him to act at all. simon callow and playing a horny straight and is always worth watching and and he by far the only reason to stay with the movie. however and the rubbish about his men group meditations or whatever they are grows extremely tiresome in short order. they seem to have been thrown into the movie mild mix in a misguided effort to vary the setting and non stop inaction. the same comment applies to a really odd and unconvincing camping trip. don not worry about pausing the tape so you can get a snack. let the thing run while you would not miss anything. hugo weaving character is superfluous. he appears in a sequence with one of the lesser leads and doesn not even meet the rest at all. the outcome of that sequence isn not explained and and hugo real estate dealings have nothing to do with the story. the movie is a total disappointment at the end and because there is no resolution. the thing simply fades out and were sent to the closing credits. this is an interlude with no structure. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
