please do not waste six hours of your life watching this as i did. the fact that i did is not a very good reflection on me. the only redeeming acting job in this clunker was by wes studi. how a prequel with similar roots can not even be in the same universe as lonesome dove is beyond me. it was a disjointed and rambling and incoherent story. plot lines were not developed and action scenes were almost laughable and the big ending (disappointment) was a fitting ending to this mini series. val kilmer who i have thought as a reputable actor played one of the strangest roles that i have ever seen him in. his final scene in the show had to have been a filler by the director. i have been reading these reviews for years and this show prompted me to sign up. 
please do not waste six hours of your life watching this as i did. the fact that i did is not a very good reflection on me. the only redeeming acting job in this clunker was by wes studi. how a prequel with similar roots can not even be in the same universe as lonesome dove is beyond me. it was a disjointed and rambling and incoherent story. plot lines were not developed and action scenes were almost laughable and the big ending (disappointment) was a fitting ending to this mini series. val kilmer who i have thought as a reputable actor played one of the strangest roles that i have ever seen him in. his final scene in the show had to have been a filler by the director. i have been reading these reviews for years and this show prompted me to sign up. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
