ok and i read the director comment about this movie (featured as the frontmost comment) and and i have to admit that i can identify with his position. micheal and i hope your career recovered from this particular setback and you went on to other and better things. i have seen this movie in the mst3k form. even with all the chopped continuity and snotty remarks being tossed out by the robots and i saw a potentially decent movie with an ambitious set of ideas trying to struggle out from under the limited budget and limited actors available to it. and this is one of those films (mitchell is another) where the mst3k crew took a lot of cheap shots at the lead character even when she actually deserved better. you know they had some unfair fun at the actress expense because it made for a livelier episode. imo and the fact that the movie actually tried to be about something and and had a few decent and effective moments here and there and should keep it out of the bottom 100 (tangents or time chasers is another movie with a plot and a heart that doesn not deserve to be there either). but it is still not a very good movie. i do not blame the writer or lead actress for being who she is. it just that her acting and writing skills needed a few more years to mature before she could pull off a vanity project such as this or carry a feature film. the writing and characterization is amateurish and slapdash and and the dialog is often barely up to abc afterschool special standards. the cast sincerely gives it their best effort and and the acting in general is definitely head and shoulders above abortions like future war or space mutiny and but there aren not any really professional level performances here and with the exception of big joe estevez and who is hammy but suitably intense. i never saw the full original cut and but mst sampling of soultaker was representative enough to make these facts plain. oh and and the film has robert zdar in it. that is and imo and a real kiss of death for any movie that hopes to be taken seriously. yes and he big and scary looking in his role and but i just hate the guy as an actor. (in real life and i wish him well and hope he is financially comfortable). there were little things i liked about the film. for instance and the camaraderie between the male lead and his dead buddy added some warmth and humor to the movie and made it a lot more watchable. the idea of an elevator in the hospital that opened its doors to the afterlife was an inspired way to invoke some spooky vibes without springing for special effects and and i respected whoever worked that into the script in attempt to keep the budget manageable. it do not really work and but it might have with just a little more tweaking. so anyway and mr. rissi and better luck with your other projects  your involvement with this misfire do not keep me from watching something else you did if the buzz was good. and ms. miller has nothing to be ashamed of  she was young and ambitious and and the movie wasn not that bad. 
ok and i read the director comment about this movie (featured as the frontmost comment) and and i have to admit that i can identify with his position. micheal and i hope your career recovered from this particular setback and you went on to other and better things. i have seen this movie in the mst3k form. even with all the chopped continuity and snotty remarks being tossed out by the robots and i saw a potentially decent movie with an ambitious set of ideas trying to struggle out from under the limited budget and limited actors available to it. and this is one of those films (mitchell is another) where the mst3k crew took a lot of cheap shots at the lead character even when she actually deserved better. you know they had some unfair fun at the actress expense because it made for a livelier episode. imo and the fact that the movie actually tried to be about something and and had a few decent and effective moments here and there and should keep it out of the bottom 100 (tangents or time chasers is another movie with a plot and a heart that doesn not deserve to be there either). but it is still not a very good movie. i do not blame the writer or lead actress for being who she is. it just that her acting and writing skills needed a few more years to mature before she could pull off a vanity project such as this or carry a feature film. the writing and characterization is amateurish and slapdash and and the dialog is often barely up to abc afterschool special standards. the cast sincerely gives it their best effort and and the acting in general is definitely head and shoulders above abortions like future war or space mutiny and but there aren not any really professional level performances here and with the exception of big joe estevez and who is hammy but suitably intense. i never saw the full original cut and but mst sampling of soultaker was representative enough to make these facts plain. oh and and the film has robert zdar in it. that is and imo and a real kiss of death for any movie that hopes to be taken seriously. yes and he big and scary looking in his role and but i just hate the guy as an actor. (in real life and i wish him well and hope he is financially comfortable). there were little things i liked about the film. for instance and the camaraderie between the male lead and his dead buddy added some warmth and humor to the movie and made it a lot more watchable. the idea of an elevator in the hospital that opened its doors to the afterlife was an inspired way to invoke some spooky vibes without springing for special effects and and i respected whoever worked that into the script in attempt to keep the budget manageable. it do not really work and but it might have with just a little more tweaking. so anyway and mr. rissi and better luck with your other projects  your involvement with this misfire do not keep me from watching something else you did if the buzz was good. and ms. miller has nothing to be ashamed of  she was young and ambitious and and the movie wasn not that bad. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
