i was looking forward to seeing two bright young actors appearing in dear john and but it was very slow moving while and i felt that both the screenplay and the direction hampered the flexibility of the principle performers. i usually do enjoy film adaptations of these novels. ironically and i did think the movie did an excellent job of depicting realistic military action. the cinematography was very good at segueing through love letters and focusing just enough on a key word or phrase in each letter. i felt that channing tatum became bogged down in what became a very hang dog series of expressions in response to loss. 
i was looking forward to seeing two bright young actors appearing in dear john and but it was very slow moving while and i felt that both the screenplay and the direction hampered the flexibility of the principle performers. i usually do enjoy film adaptations of these novels. ironically and i did think the movie did an excellent job of depicting realistic military action. the cinematography was very good at segueing through love letters and focusing just enough on a key word or phrase in each letter. i felt that channing tatum became bogged down in what became a very hang dog series of expressions in response to loss. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
