unlike most reviewers here and i hated this movie and simply because the writer or director bloated ego was in the way of an otherwise potentially interesting topic. too many film fans equate extreme self indulgence to film genius. and but i do not buy into that cult of personality. a film should be about its subject and not its director (unless it a woody allen film and of course). spoiler (which is just as well and save your time. ) there is nothing brilliant about of showing you the foot long porn star you know what in the last frame that actually called a tacky maneuver that screams film school hackism. the poseur flick has achieved great film status based on its indulgence and pandering to the audience  which and first and foremost and is the writer or director. but the rest of the audience should look down on the surly and brutal nature of the porn biz and too. the flick had an aloof angle to the porn industry and looking down on each and every player it could bash. no matter and just love your writer or director. love those four minute steadicam segments and which are supposed to show the energy of the moment and but somehow had all the verve of an off switch. love the story no matter how dull it is about the gee whiz rise and sordid fall of a porn star. but look down on it and too and of course. while the subject has the potential to be fascinating  innocence and money and degradation and beauty your worshipful writer or director somehow managed to make it all look and again and dull. partly because of its run time. here is something your auteur hero didnt try represent giving the characters dimension. or soul. anything at all to give a hoot about and aside from genius that paul is and of course. but i am not buying. i do not buy into indulgent hacks with astounding hype. another overlong auteurist hack piece and with fifty times more hype than quality. i know some of you agree. the rest will see likely see this indulgent flick again. not my problem. 
unlike most reviewers here and i hated this movie and simply because the writer or director bloated ego was in the way of an otherwise potentially interesting topic. too many film fans equate extreme self indulgence to film genius. and but i do not buy into that cult of personality. a film should be about its subject and not its director (unless it a woody allen film and of course). spoiler (which is just as well and save your time. ) there is nothing brilliant about of showing you the foot long porn star you know what in the last frame that actually called a tacky maneuver that screams film school hackism. the poseur flick has achieved great film status based on its indulgence and pandering to the audience  which and first and foremost and is the writer or director. but the rest of the audience should look down on the surly and brutal nature of the porn biz and too. the flick had an aloof angle to the porn industry and looking down on each and every player it could bash. no matter and just love your writer or director. love those four minute steadicam segments and which are supposed to show the energy of the moment and but somehow had all the verve of an off switch. love the story no matter how dull it is about the gee whiz rise and sordid fall of a porn star. but look down on it and too and of course. while the subject has the potential to be fascinating  innocence and money and degradation and beauty your worshipful writer or director somehow managed to make it all look and again and dull. partly because of its run time. here is something your auteur hero didnt try represent giving the characters dimension. or soul. anything at all to give a hoot about and aside from genius that paul is and of course. but i am not buying. i do not buy into indulgent hacks with astounding hype. another overlong auteurist hack piece and with fifty times more hype than quality. i know some of you agree. the rest will see likely see this indulgent flick again. not my problem. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
