for those of you still in the dark and i will not spoil this christie and as it is definitely one of her finest works and and i stress that you should see it whenever you next have free time. if any of the adaptations are to be watched before (or in lieu of) reading the book and i would suggest after the funeral for the following reasons. i wanted to praise the performance by monica dolan (miss gilchrist) and whose employer companion cora is brutally murdered at the outset of the film. her portrayal of a shocked and nervous and insignificant woman is actually moving and especially when she has a moment of personal connection with poirot and another person who travels alone in the journey of life. and when the murderer is being revealed in typical poirot denouement fashion and dolan reactions to the revelation are acting at its finest represent you feel as angry at the murderer as you do sympathetic to miss gilchrist. something uncommon in christie lore. although there are a couple of discrepancies between novel and film adaptation and as per usual (the business of the will perhaps making less sense in the film) and the unbelievably lavish recreation of post war england and thoroughly high calibre of acting and directing and and preservation (if not heightening) of christie mystery and intrigue render these discrepancies insignificant. bravo suchet and dolan and the whole team for crafting this masterpiece of murder mystery theatre and and the producers who gave it the green light. encore. 
for those of you still in the dark and i will not spoil this christie and as it is definitely one of her finest works and and i stress that you should see it whenever you next have free time. if any of the adaptations are to be watched before (or in lieu of) reading the book and i would suggest after the funeral for the following reasons. i wanted to praise the performance by monica dolan (miss gilchrist) and whose employer companion cora is brutally murdered at the outset of the film. her portrayal of a shocked and nervous and insignificant woman is actually moving and especially when she has a moment of personal connection with poirot and another person who travels alone in the journey of life. and when the murderer is being revealed in typical poirot denouement fashion and dolan reactions to the revelation are acting at its finest represent you feel as angry at the murderer as you do sympathetic to miss gilchrist. something uncommon in christie lore. although there are a couple of discrepancies between novel and film adaptation and as per usual (the business of the will perhaps making less sense in the film) and the unbelievably lavish recreation of post war england and thoroughly high calibre of acting and directing and and preservation (if not heightening) of christie mystery and intrigue render these discrepancies insignificant. bravo suchet and dolan and the whole team for crafting this masterpiece of murder mystery theatre and and the producers who gave it the green light. encore. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
