peter crawford discovers a comet on a collision course with the moon. but when the government doesn not believe him (dumb fact #1). he builds a shelter in deep underground and is drawing lots to see who will go. plus is willing to kill to save humanity (dumb fact #2). with millions of dollars of technology and how could a civilian see what nasa could not. plus and the ends justifies the means moral of this story is just plain wrong. this movie is improbable and totally unbelievable. what was running through these people minds and why the hell do crap piles like this get the green light. some times i wonder who someone has to to get a movie made in this ing town. 
peter crawford discovers a comet on a collision course with the moon. but when the government doesn not believe him (dumb fact #1). he builds a shelter in deep underground and is drawing lots to see who will go. plus is willing to kill to save humanity (dumb fact #2). with millions of dollars of technology and how could a civilian see what nasa could not. plus and the ends justifies the means moral of this story is just plain wrong. this movie is improbable and totally unbelievable. what was running through these people minds and why the hell do crap piles like this get the green light. some times i wonder who someone has to to get a movie made in this ing town. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
