this movie is a definitive 5. i finally caught it on hbo the other night. i remember when it came out in theatres telling a friend that it would never be a hit because americans do not want movies about history and especially movies that were more about ideas than action. i do not know if that was the reason fmlb do not do well and but now and having finally seen it and i can add a few observations of my own. first and while dwight schultz has been fine in star trek and the a team and as the lead in this movie he is off putting. i kept expecting him to shout out jon lovitz like and i am act ing. he phrasing and tone of voice sounded like he was trying very had to be an act or and on a stage where he had to emphasize strangely various words and phrases. second and i enjoyed the sly positioning of paul newman character as a manipulator who and at every turn and strives to herd these cats (the scientists) along to get to his goal. third and there was some discussion of the moral implications of creating the a bomb and and whether the us should use it. probably not enough of this and or as in depth as warranted. finally and there seemed to be an awful lot of twists thrown in for dramatic effect. i do not know how much of the events in this movie are true to life and but things like having the test bomb slip in its chains or having a lab accident caused by a spilled coffee cup (and a scientist killed as a result) were stretching the bounds of believability. maybe that stuff and or events that were similar and really happened and but it sure felt like various scenes were added solely for dramatic effect and which undermined the whole tone and purpose of the movie. fmlb was ok. i need to read more about the actual events to know if it was over the top or just mostly accurate. 
this movie is a definitive 5. i finally caught it on hbo the other night. i remember when it came out in theatres telling a friend that it would never be a hit because americans do not want movies about history and especially movies that were more about ideas than action. i do not know if that was the reason fmlb do not do well and but now and having finally seen it and i can add a few observations of my own. first and while dwight schultz has been fine in star trek and the a team and as the lead in this movie he is off putting. i kept expecting him to shout out jon lovitz like and i am act ing. he phrasing and tone of voice sounded like he was trying very had to be an act or and on a stage where he had to emphasize strangely various words and phrases. second and i enjoyed the sly positioning of paul newman character as a manipulator who and at every turn and strives to herd these cats (the scientists) along to get to his goal. third and there was some discussion of the moral implications of creating the a bomb and and whether the us should use it. probably not enough of this and or as in depth as warranted. finally and there seemed to be an awful lot of twists thrown in for dramatic effect. i do not know how much of the events in this movie are true to life and but things like having the test bomb slip in its chains or having a lab accident caused by a spilled coffee cup (and a scientist killed as a result) were stretching the bounds of believability. maybe that stuff and or events that were similar and really happened and but it sure felt like various scenes were added solely for dramatic effect and which undermined the whole tone and purpose of the movie. fmlb was ok. i need to read more about the actual events to know if it was over the top or just mostly accurate. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
