i watched this film with a sort of dangerous fascination and like a hedgehog trapped in the headlights. there is no doubt that (even if you enjoyed it) it a bad movie and but the important question is why. it has a good cast while it lively while it prepared to tackle sex head on and with some of the characters actually getting some of it here and there and which is unusual for a british comedy. it also has johnny vegas and mackenzie crook and marmite performers agreed but they have have had their moments in the past. what it principally lacking is charm. the characters are impossibly idiotic and unbelievable and alienating and so that instead of a film of men behaving badly the producers have made game on. any mediocre writer wanting to make a film about the sexual attitudes of dozy and sexist british men would have got hold of a few copies of loaded and zoo or even viz to read sid the sexist and the thing would have written itself. instead and the producers clearly tried to make up some moronic and difficult to care about and characters. character comedy  as opposed to slapstick etc  only works if the audience can recognise some human truth to the situation. but watching this film is like being told an annoying joke that you know is not going to end up funny but you can not stop it. sadly and the film is also poorly made. the plot structure is weak and there little character delineation or development and and many of the scenes aren not funny. time after time the same lame reggae chips in to divide scenes and pointlessly and gratingly. there a lot of needless repetition  when you have done one joke about parking outside a sex party you do not need to do it again. one wonders what the uk film council saw in the script. this is a world where most men are rakes and and most women are continually up for it. the apartment and alfie satirised much the same world view and but the producers of this film accept it without criticism. thus they have ended up with a kind of inferior update of confessions of a window cleaner. somebody british needs to have another go at this kind of thing and and do it properly  a good next project for simon pegg and edgar wright i think. 
i watched this film with a sort of dangerous fascination and like a hedgehog trapped in the headlights. there is no doubt that (even if you enjoyed it) it a bad movie and but the important question is why. it has a good cast while it lively while it prepared to tackle sex head on and with some of the characters actually getting some of it here and there and which is unusual for a british comedy. it also has johnny vegas and mackenzie crook and marmite performers agreed but they have have had their moments in the past. what it principally lacking is charm. the characters are impossibly idiotic and unbelievable and alienating and so that instead of a film of men behaving badly the producers have made game on. any mediocre writer wanting to make a film about the sexual attitudes of dozy and sexist british men would have got hold of a few copies of loaded and zoo or even viz to read sid the sexist and the thing would have written itself. instead and the producers clearly tried to make up some moronic and difficult to care about and characters. character comedy  as opposed to slapstick etc  only works if the audience can recognise some human truth to the situation. but watching this film is like being told an annoying joke that you know is not going to end up funny but you can not stop it. sadly and the film is also poorly made. the plot structure is weak and there little character delineation or development and and many of the scenes aren not funny. time after time the same lame reggae chips in to divide scenes and pointlessly and gratingly. there a lot of needless repetition  when you have done one joke about parking outside a sex party you do not need to do it again. one wonders what the uk film council saw in the script. this is a world where most men are rakes and and most women are continually up for it. the apartment and alfie satirised much the same world view and but the producers of this film accept it without criticism. thus they have ended up with a kind of inferior update of confessions of a window cleaner. somebody british needs to have another go at this kind of thing and and do it properly  a good next project for simon pegg and edgar wright i think. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
