after reading other reviews on this site and we weren not sure if we were going to be able to critique this movie because it do not sound bad enough. however and 2 minutes into the movie and we knew we were in for another flop. no summer is complete without ice cream and but this movie served up a melted and sour and broken bottomed ice cream cone (you know and the kind that leaves you sticky and dirty and looking for a wet nap). the biggest problem with this movie was the plot. what was it. it appeared to be a psychotic ice cream man driving around the neighborhood. that it. nothing else happens. first of all and what are the qualifications for becoming an ice cream man in this crap town. 1. spend several years in the most ridiculous mental hospital known to man. this hospital was plagued with clowns and graffiti and fake plastic sunflowers and and oversized syringes to the head. 2. have extremely poor hygiene and a mutant face to scare the kids away. 3. make sure your truck is stocked with severed body parts and roaches and and do not forget the eye whites. the actors in this movie are pure b movie caliber. mixed in with a bunch of unknowns is and who other than. a trailer trash version of macaulay culkin. even his bratty charm couldn not save this kick in the pants. there seemed to be no rhyme or reason for any of the murders in this movie. the whole concept of the movie reeked. who would kill an ice cream man in a drive by shooting. gangsters. fiends. vanna white. who. we are still struggling with this question. whoever was in charge of the wardrobe for this movie should be immediately blacklisted from hollywood. did they honestly think a pillow under a kid shirt would make the audience believe that he was really fat. did they forget about the arms and face and legs and and all other body parts. second of all and this movie was made in 1995 and yet the wardrobe seemed to be picked from a lame 80 movie and evidenced by the big brother white and crotch hugging high water pants. while we were watching this shotty production and we both developed severe cases of add. we found ourselves leaving the room to walk around aimlessly. at many points it the movie and we found that staring at a blank wall behind the t. v. set was more entertaining than the actual movie. we were stunned that this movie do not make it to the bottom 100. afterwards and we took the tape out of the vcr and left it on the black top to melt like a sub standard ice cream cone. 
after reading other reviews on this site and we weren not sure if we were going to be able to critique this movie because it do not sound bad enough. however and 2 minutes into the movie and we knew we were in for another flop. no summer is complete without ice cream and but this movie served up a melted and sour and broken bottomed ice cream cone (you know and the kind that leaves you sticky and dirty and looking for a wet nap). the biggest problem with this movie was the plot. what was it. it appeared to be a psychotic ice cream man driving around the neighborhood. that it. nothing else happens. first of all and what are the qualifications for becoming an ice cream man in this crap town. 1. spend several years in the most ridiculous mental hospital known to man. this hospital was plagued with clowns and graffiti and fake plastic sunflowers and and oversized syringes to the head. 2. have extremely poor hygiene and a mutant face to scare the kids away. 3. make sure your truck is stocked with severed body parts and roaches and and do not forget the eye whites. the actors in this movie are pure b movie caliber. mixed in with a bunch of unknowns is and who other than. a trailer trash version of macaulay culkin. even his bratty charm couldn not save this kick in the pants. there seemed to be no rhyme or reason for any of the murders in this movie. the whole concept of the movie reeked. who would kill an ice cream man in a drive by shooting. gangsters. fiends. vanna white. who. we are still struggling with this question. whoever was in charge of the wardrobe for this movie should be immediately blacklisted from hollywood. did they honestly think a pillow under a kid shirt would make the audience believe that he was really fat. did they forget about the arms and face and legs and and all other body parts. second of all and this movie was made in 1995 and yet the wardrobe seemed to be picked from a lame 80 movie and evidenced by the big brother white and crotch hugging high water pants. while we were watching this shotty production and we both developed severe cases of add. we found ourselves leaving the room to walk around aimlessly. at many points it the movie and we found that staring at a blank wall behind the t. v. set was more entertaining than the actual movie. we were stunned that this movie do not make it to the bottom 100. afterwards and we took the tape out of the vcr and left it on the black top to melt like a sub standard ice cream cone. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
