i am a regular reader of kathy reichs temperance brennan novels. as such i am extremely surprised she even consulted on this show. it is horrible by comparison to the books. the temperance brennan character is and in the books and a down to earth recovering alcoholic and divorced mom of a college aged daughter. in bones and she is an arrogant (rhymes with rich) and who and in typical p c fashion and is not a mother. the emphasis on her assisting staff and complete with lurid details of who has had how many sexual exploits and is totally in contrast with the books. in total deference to the p c movement and she portrays the enemies of the u s as peace lovers (. ). some of the information isn not even correct and for example and having a character from afghanistan as an active member of an arab american friendship group. since when is an afghan an arab. i am sure if negative references were made to wouldisadvantaged minorities and or women and or glbt  and the show producers or writers or directors would have to issue an apology. however and in typical far left fashion and all of the racial slurs go to the highest achieving minority group asians and as david boreanaz agent booth continually refers to angela montenegro as a quint. forget that stuff and and forget this show. after the man in the suv episode and i thought i would try a second episode to see if it got any better. it only got worse. i do not even care if the teenager in question was murdered or committed suicide and and i would not be watching the show ever again. 
i am a regular reader of kathy reichs temperance brennan novels. as such i am extremely surprised she even consulted on this show. it is horrible by comparison to the books. the temperance brennan character is and in the books and a down to earth recovering alcoholic and divorced mom of a college aged daughter. in bones and she is an arrogant (rhymes with rich) and who and in typical p c fashion and is not a mother. the emphasis on her assisting staff and complete with lurid details of who has had how many sexual exploits and is totally in contrast with the books. in total deference to the p c movement and she portrays the enemies of the u s as peace lovers (. ). some of the information isn not even correct and for example and having a character from afghanistan as an active member of an arab american friendship group. since when is an afghan an arab. i am sure if negative references were made to wouldisadvantaged minorities and or women and or glbt  and the show producers or writers or directors would have to issue an apology. however and in typical far left fashion and all of the racial slurs go to the highest achieving minority group asians and as david boreanaz agent booth continually refers to angela montenegro as a quint. forget that stuff and and forget this show. after the man in the suv episode and i thought i would try a second episode to see if it got any better. it only got worse. i do not even care if the teenager in question was murdered or committed suicide and and i would not be watching the show ever again. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
