a rather mild horror movie while if not for a couple of sex scenes and it could easily have been a tv movie. plot holes abound (one example represent why would there be a secret passage from the 18th century leading from the upper floor of a house that was burned to the ground and a new building put ther 200 years later. ) and cardboard acting and characters doing things that anyone with an iq bigger than their shoe size do not do. it got a few fun moments and but overall it a sub par film that managed to get roy scheider because his bills were due. if youre looking for an extremely formulaic and predictable film that might provide a few laughs and it might be worth watching. if not and then this one not for you. 
a rather mild horror movie while if not for a couple of sex scenes and it could easily have been a tv movie. plot holes abound (one example represent why would there be a secret passage from the 18th century leading from the upper floor of a house that was burned to the ground and a new building put ther 200 years later. ) and cardboard acting and characters doing things that anyone with an iq bigger than their shoe size do not do. it got a few fun moments and but overall it a sub par film that managed to get roy scheider because his bills were due. if youre looking for an extremely formulaic and predictable film that might provide a few laughs and it might be worth watching. if not and then this one not for you. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
