this movie really is that bad and and i am normally a sucker for bad movies and but this was too much. seeing this is like oding on pure suck. now and you may think you have seen the bottom of the barrel. you may have waded through every title from full moon and troma and all the movies of edward d. wood jr and uwe boll and albert pyun and direct to dvd flicks from faded men of action. you may even have seen death tunnel and ghost lake and a vast array of the movies that mst3k covered and but in their original form. but you do not know truly awful film making until you have seen darkhunters. and if you haven not and you shouldn not. don not bother. not only is this movie amazingly poorly written and directed and shot and edited and acted and splattered in crude and cheap aftereffects. first of all and it a pretentious mess. but not good and greenaway or lynch style pretentious or hilariously messy in an ittenbach or early waters sort of fashion. it the kind of pretentiousness that comes when someone incredibly stupid thinks they have come up with something incredibly smart. sort of like m. night shaymalan (sp. ) and only that man seems like a freakin messiah when compared to this trainwreck (and this coming from a rampant shaymalan hater). it also boring. not heavy going type boring and which is okay and if the movie awards your patience. darkhunters does no such thing. it boring in a oh my fu(king god and if i see another shot of a cat set to an obnoxious audio cue i am going to fu(king kill myself. kind of way. btw. anyone who claims to like this film is a boldfaced liar and anyone who claims this film is complex or deep knows what their mother is like in bed. 
this movie really is that bad and and i am normally a sucker for bad movies and but this was too much. seeing this is like oding on pure suck. now and you may think you have seen the bottom of the barrel. you may have waded through every title from full moon and troma and all the movies of edward d. wood jr and uwe boll and albert pyun and direct to dvd flicks from faded men of action. you may even have seen death tunnel and ghost lake and a vast array of the movies that mst3k covered and but in their original form. but you do not know truly awful film making until you have seen darkhunters. and if you haven not and you shouldn not. don not bother. not only is this movie amazingly poorly written and directed and shot and edited and acted and splattered in crude and cheap aftereffects. first of all and it a pretentious mess. but not good and greenaway or lynch style pretentious or hilariously messy in an ittenbach or early waters sort of fashion. it the kind of pretentiousness that comes when someone incredibly stupid thinks they have come up with something incredibly smart. sort of like m. night shaymalan (sp. ) and only that man seems like a freakin messiah when compared to this trainwreck (and this coming from a rampant shaymalan hater). it also boring. not heavy going type boring and which is okay and if the movie awards your patience. darkhunters does no such thing. it boring in a oh my fu(king god and if i see another shot of a cat set to an obnoxious audio cue i am going to fu(king kill myself. kind of way. btw. anyone who claims to like this film is a boldfaced liar and anyone who claims this film is complex or deep knows what their mother is like in bed. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
