i do not much mind the factors that others here have objected to  acting and lighting and so forth. for the most part and these things were executed well enough to carry the film and put its points across. it just a horror film and after all. what bugged me were the points themselves. because this is a deeply moralistic film and and its morality is deeply tacky. in fact it actually fundamentalist christian morality and and this is a fundamentalist christian film. look at the ins represent sutherland character picked on a kid at school when he was a pre teen and leading to his accidental death. baldwin character used masculine wiles and persuasion and good looks to shag quite a few women and some of whom he videotaped. ooh and the swine. how unlucky for him that women are such passive and gormless creatures that they had no complicity in the matter. roberts character dad came back from vietnam a junkie and so ashamed to be caught shooting up that he kills himself. yes and what a terrible sin. why couldn not he have just become an alcoholic like all the others. and bacon character picked on another schoolkid. how awful. the fact that he was a child himself apparently counts for nought. children and it seems and are divinely judged by adult criteria. well and maybe lots of people support this level of moral absolutism. it certainly seems to have gone unremarked in this movie comments. does everyone just buy this stuff. at least human laws treat children differently from adults and recognising that their ethical sense is partially formed. this film has no such qualms and and i find that pretty objectionable. ditto the notion that women are helpless and fluffy creatures before young men evil lusts. or that a vietnam vet driven to drug addiction is so shameful that suicide is a valid option. pathetic. 
i do not much mind the factors that others here have objected to  acting and lighting and so forth. for the most part and these things were executed well enough to carry the film and put its points across. it just a horror film and after all. what bugged me were the points themselves. because this is a deeply moralistic film and and its morality is deeply tacky. in fact it actually fundamentalist christian morality and and this is a fundamentalist christian film. look at the ins represent sutherland character picked on a kid at school when he was a pre teen and leading to his accidental death. baldwin character used masculine wiles and persuasion and good looks to shag quite a few women and some of whom he videotaped. ooh and the swine. how unlucky for him that women are such passive and gormless creatures that they had no complicity in the matter. roberts character dad came back from vietnam a junkie and so ashamed to be caught shooting up that he kills himself. yes and what a terrible sin. why couldn not he have just become an alcoholic like all the others. and bacon character picked on another schoolkid. how awful. the fact that he was a child himself apparently counts for nought. children and it seems and are divinely judged by adult criteria. well and maybe lots of people support this level of moral absolutism. it certainly seems to have gone unremarked in this movie comments. does everyone just buy this stuff. at least human laws treat children differently from adults and recognising that their ethical sense is partially formed. this film has no such qualms and and i find that pretty objectionable. ditto the notion that women are helpless and fluffy creatures before young men evil lusts. or that a vietnam vet driven to drug addiction is so shameful that suicide is a valid option. pathetic. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
