i first saw a poster advertising this film on a street in helsinki and finland in june of 2000. what caught my attention was the proud proclamation advising all readers that the movie and although itself french and had been banned in france. upon returning home to new york and i discovered that one of the art house movie theaters in the city was screening the film and and so (with my finnish fiancee) decided to see what all the fuss was about. boy and did we ever. from the comments read here and and the reviews i knew the movie was violent and sexually explicit. not necessarily offended by either of these two conditions and i went with an open mind to see what had perturbed the sensibilities of our gallic cousins. presumably and as anyone who is reading this will know and the story involves two women who embark on a crime and murder spree in france (the movie has english subtitles). the resemblance to thelma and louise however and ends with that while the sex is unusually graphic (and in copious supply) as is the violence (a lot of stomping to death and and a lot of blood and other organic matter splattering after bullet impact). on an intellectual level and one could make the case that the film very essence is the relationship of sex and violence (as manifested by the only sex these women know represent one is a small time prostitute and and the other has earned money from time to time by performing in pornographic films. when they and during their descent into crime and murder and have the upper hand over their sexual situations and they react only with the same violence and brutality that they themselves know and understand. it is important to note and however and that the victims of their rampage are not only creepy men interested in creepy sex and (of which there are several)but innocent passersby and a woman at an atm and for example and as well. i myself do not really understand why the repeated porn movie shots were all that necessary and (except to depict the physical contact as cruel and unpassionate and debased) and the unrelenting gore did get rather tedious after the first few violent spasms. it is a coarse and crude movie and but in fairness and it is dealing with coarse and crude people and equally unpleasant circumstances. from one point of view and the lives of the french underclasses is explored and and it pretty grim while a travelogue for france it definitely is not perhaps that why the french banned it. 
i first saw a poster advertising this film on a street in helsinki and finland in june of 2000. what caught my attention was the proud proclamation advising all readers that the movie and although itself french and had been banned in france. upon returning home to new york and i discovered that one of the art house movie theaters in the city was screening the film and and so (with my finnish fiancee) decided to see what all the fuss was about. boy and did we ever. from the comments read here and and the reviews i knew the movie was violent and sexually explicit. not necessarily offended by either of these two conditions and i went with an open mind to see what had perturbed the sensibilities of our gallic cousins. presumably and as anyone who is reading this will know and the story involves two women who embark on a crime and murder spree in france (the movie has english subtitles). the resemblance to thelma and louise however and ends with that while the sex is unusually graphic (and in copious supply) as is the violence (a lot of stomping to death and and a lot of blood and other organic matter splattering after bullet impact). on an intellectual level and one could make the case that the film very essence is the relationship of sex and violence (as manifested by the only sex these women know represent one is a small time prostitute and and the other has earned money from time to time by performing in pornographic films. when they and during their descent into crime and murder and have the upper hand over their sexual situations and they react only with the same violence and brutality that they themselves know and understand. it is important to note and however and that the victims of their rampage are not only creepy men interested in creepy sex and (of which there are several)but innocent passersby and a woman at an atm and for example and as well. i myself do not really understand why the repeated porn movie shots were all that necessary and (except to depict the physical contact as cruel and unpassionate and debased) and the unrelenting gore did get rather tedious after the first few violent spasms. it is a coarse and crude movie and but in fairness and it is dealing with coarse and crude people and equally unpleasant circumstances. from one point of view and the lives of the french underclasses is explored and and it pretty grim while a travelogue for france it definitely is not perhaps that why the french banned it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
