started watching this but do not believe in any of the characters. in particular the relationship between the bakery assistant and the waitress just do not work for me at all. the scenes between the bakery owner and the assistant were nice but the rest was just very slow. it was a very superficial movie and it gave me the feeling that i was watching play rather than a film. the characters were very tagey and the storyline was a lot like a stage farce. by the time the pyromaniac waylaid the assistant i was bored and do not care what happened next and so i switched off. glad i do not pay to see it. didn not laugh or even smile once. there seems to be a strange tendency for americans to classify their films as comedy when they are funny peculiar rather than funny ha ha. i have finally learned to avoid what americans term dark comedies which usually turn out to be gruesome weird and unfunny. now it looks like i will have to be a bit more discerning when they call a film romantic comedy as well. maybe comedy means something different when applied to a film rather than a series in america. i do not understand why america can produce amazingly funny comedies like two and a half men and will and grace and king of queens but can not seem to produce really funny films without resorting to toilet humour. this film wasn not gross or anything. but it wasn not anything at all just one big yawn. 
started watching this but do not believe in any of the characters. in particular the relationship between the bakery assistant and the waitress just do not work for me at all. the scenes between the bakery owner and the assistant were nice but the rest was just very slow. it was a very superficial movie and it gave me the feeling that i was watching play rather than a film. the characters were very tagey and the storyline was a lot like a stage farce. by the time the pyromaniac waylaid the assistant i was bored and do not care what happened next and so i switched off. glad i do not pay to see it. didn not laugh or even smile once. there seems to be a strange tendency for americans to classify their films as comedy when they are funny peculiar rather than funny ha ha. i have finally learned to avoid what americans term dark comedies which usually turn out to be gruesome weird and unfunny. now it looks like i will have to be a bit more discerning when they call a film romantic comedy as well. maybe comedy means something different when applied to a film rather than a series in america. i do not understand why america can produce amazingly funny comedies like two and a half men and will and grace and king of queens but can not seem to produce really funny films without resorting to toilet humour. this film wasn not gross or anything. but it wasn not anything at all just one big yawn. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
