i am a fan of get shorty. this is the sequel for the movie that needed no sequel. chili is back but rene russo is gone without a peep. unfortunately chili game was played out in the first movie and rather than find an interesting personal arc for him and they just have him stand around repeating lines from the first movie. it pretty tepid. travolta looks old here. it like they move people around him because his bones are getting creaky. his pink lip gloss and the blue eye contacts are very weird. the 2nd bad role is edie (played by uma thurman). she a music producer and a role that requires her only to be the female reuben kincaid. (hey these kids have a great new sound. ) in any scene she strikes the wrong pitch motivationally or emotionally or both. it painful to watch. despite it plentiful problems and be cool gets better after a very unpromising start. i certainly got my laughs out of it (vince vaughan running around on fire and cedric the entertainer and ludicrous and the rock and a t shirt that says widow on it) and but it offers no great memories after it over. it a helium light love fest from the first frame. there no one as pricelessly idiotic as gene hackman in the first movie. it just about doing good in the world and for a couple of kids who deserve a chance (beyonce and the rock). ho hum. the first one wasn not preachy. working in (repeatedly) gags and lines from the first movie is annoying as is the dumb concession to the rock wrestling fans (he raises his eyebrow twice) as are the droll inside jokes represent steven tyler saying i am not the kind of singer that make appearances in movies ar ar. the all star spectacular line up is part of the problem. the first movie wasn not burdened by stars. for a buck rental let call it even. 
i am a fan of get shorty. this is the sequel for the movie that needed no sequel. chili is back but rene russo is gone without a peep. unfortunately chili game was played out in the first movie and rather than find an interesting personal arc for him and they just have him stand around repeating lines from the first movie. it pretty tepid. travolta looks old here. it like they move people around him because his bones are getting creaky. his pink lip gloss and the blue eye contacts are very weird. the 2nd bad role is edie (played by uma thurman). she a music producer and a role that requires her only to be the female reuben kincaid. (hey these kids have a great new sound. ) in any scene she strikes the wrong pitch motivationally or emotionally or both. it painful to watch. despite it plentiful problems and be cool gets better after a very unpromising start. i certainly got my laughs out of it (vince vaughan running around on fire and cedric the entertainer and ludicrous and the rock and a t shirt that says widow on it) and but it offers no great memories after it over. it a helium light love fest from the first frame. there no one as pricelessly idiotic as gene hackman in the first movie. it just about doing good in the world and for a couple of kids who deserve a chance (beyonce and the rock). ho hum. the first one wasn not preachy. working in (repeatedly) gags and lines from the first movie is annoying as is the dumb concession to the rock wrestling fans (he raises his eyebrow twice) as are the droll inside jokes represent steven tyler saying i am not the kind of singer that make appearances in movies ar ar. the all star spectacular line up is part of the problem. the first movie wasn not burdened by stars. for a buck rental let call it even. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
