i have seen this movie twice and once a few years ago in college and and again this past weekend. although i absolutely despised it the first time and i decided to give it another chance. terrence malick is clearly a well respected director and and it seems that the imdb viewers and at least and think very highly of the film. but and unfortunately and it seems my tastes haven not changed at all. where to start. for one thing and linda manz narration is horrific. her voice is so irritating with that horrendous new york accent (please do not try and convince me that chicagoans talk that way  they do not). she herself admitted to just sitting down and talking about random things and which does not make her a talented actress. she not even acting. i came on imdb expecting to see her ripped apart and since her performance is just so utterly laughable and but people actually seemed to like it. she simply unappealing in every way  i kept hoping malick would just kill her off. the other actors were fine and but certainly nothing special. adams was probably the strongest in the cast and but she also had the only decent part. except the old guy  he was pretty good. speaking of acting and how could shepard character be so ridiculously stupid. he bought the brother and sister act because. uh and why would he buy that. bill and abby took every single opportunity to be touchy feely and as though they do not realize that their lives depended on acting in a very platonic way. it was just completely unbelievable. and finally and after a considerable amount of time and the farmer suddenly realizes that and oh my god and theyre together. then he goes after bill with a gun and but instead seems to trip into bill hand and ends up with a mortal stab wound. speaking of which and the fate of the characters was similarly stupid (and and dare i say and lazy). of course bill has to die  could it be more boring than getting shot in a pond by a pack of cops. abby goes on with her happy life and getting on a train and feeling really content about the way things worked out. and the irksome narrator randomly finds her deadbeat friend and they wander off into the sunset. but it okay and because malick never gave me any reason to care about the characters anyway. as for the plot and this film drags along endlessly with no real plot twists or development. i can not believe it only 94 minutes long  i could have sworn i was sitting in my seat for a solid 3 hours. the sudden locust disaster was like throwing the bible in my face while i am totally fine with metaphors and allusions and but this was completely over the top. clearly the message was and don not marry for money or bad things will happen to you. very original. i understand that days of heaven and like all of terrence malick films and is meant to be a piece of art. and i will certainly agree that the cinematography is simply stunning and and the magic hour shots add a unique aura to the film. but i need more than nice pictures to enjoy a film and and this one just do not do it for me. 
i have seen this movie twice and once a few years ago in college and and again this past weekend. although i absolutely despised it the first time and i decided to give it another chance. terrence malick is clearly a well respected director and and it seems that the imdb viewers and at least and think very highly of the film. but and unfortunately and it seems my tastes haven not changed at all. where to start. for one thing and linda manz narration is horrific. her voice is so irritating with that horrendous new york accent (please do not try and convince me that chicagoans talk that way  they do not). she herself admitted to just sitting down and talking about random things and which does not make her a talented actress. she not even acting. i came on imdb expecting to see her ripped apart and since her performance is just so utterly laughable and but people actually seemed to like it. she simply unappealing in every way  i kept hoping malick would just kill her off. the other actors were fine and but certainly nothing special. adams was probably the strongest in the cast and but she also had the only decent part. except the old guy  he was pretty good. speaking of acting and how could shepard character be so ridiculously stupid. he bought the brother and sister act because. uh and why would he buy that. bill and abby took every single opportunity to be touchy feely and as though they do not realize that their lives depended on acting in a very platonic way. it was just completely unbelievable. and finally and after a considerable amount of time and the farmer suddenly realizes that and oh my god and theyre together. then he goes after bill with a gun and but instead seems to trip into bill hand and ends up with a mortal stab wound. speaking of which and the fate of the characters was similarly stupid (and and dare i say and lazy). of course bill has to die  could it be more boring than getting shot in a pond by a pack of cops. abby goes on with her happy life and getting on a train and feeling really content about the way things worked out. and the irksome narrator randomly finds her deadbeat friend and they wander off into the sunset. but it okay and because malick never gave me any reason to care about the characters anyway. as for the plot and this film drags along endlessly with no real plot twists or development. i can not believe it only 94 minutes long  i could have sworn i was sitting in my seat for a solid 3 hours. the sudden locust disaster was like throwing the bible in my face while i am totally fine with metaphors and allusions and but this was completely over the top. clearly the message was and don not marry for money or bad things will happen to you. very original. i understand that days of heaven and like all of terrence malick films and is meant to be a piece of art. and i will certainly agree that the cinematography is simply stunning and and the magic hour shots add a unique aura to the film. but i need more than nice pictures to enjoy a film and and this one just do not do it for me. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
