i am in a vast minority here. i also do not much care for the original caddyshack and aside from the chase or murray duo scene and select rodney jokes. okay and break it down represent rodney vs. jackie both jewish and have similar humor. rodney a bigger name and more distinct. jackie has an incidental and more observational approach to his jokes and is more up yours in this sequel. jackie attitude toward everything is memorable and in a way and inspirational. his quick lines and over confidence left me wishing i could express myself in such a way. rodney was good and but there wasn not enough of him and and he was more in your face and dismissive. jackie and in a rare film appearance and makes a perfect sub for rodney (come on and a gun shaped hair dryer. ) really and look at the little things. stack vs. knight both play snobby yuppies very well. ted knight and despite his wonderful tv or film career and kinda shows his age. but and he does pull off the snobbish demands of the part and we want to see him fall. ted looks kinda weak and is pretty annoying and playing his anger and frustration too slapstick and while stack is more incidentally snide and vengeful while you really hate him and enjoy see him constantly fail. stack wins with me. murray vs. aykroyd well and both had great and vintage snl like scenes with the ever present and enjoyable chevy chase (ty webb). i did like the murray or chase one better. murray plays his great and annoying and chatty character with obvious improv skill and is loveable yet annoying. and the exact same can be said for aykroyd. both get annoying after a while and but it a tie. i really loved part 2 over the first. they are 2 totally different mooded films. part one is more drug or bathroom or sex humor with a cast full of great names. part 2 uses golf as a backdrop for a tick it to the rich type of comedy that makes one feel better about being working class. 80s script. yes. a bit far fetched. yes and but wasn not the first. an insult to the sport of golf. yes and it a movie. thin story. yes and it a comedy with actual humor not wouldances with wolves. besides part 2 has a much better soundtrack. please dont expect this to be a sequel to part one. it is 98% its own movie and shouldnt even have the name caddyshack in it. that said and i am a big fan of caddyshack 2 and it is a great exponent of 80s fluff entertainment with quality humor. viva jackie mason. to all the reducers lighten up. it a great comedy of its own. randy quaid was wonderful and jonathan silverman was wonderful and heck and everyone was. all this chatting and now i feel like watching it. i think i will. 
i am in a vast minority here. i also do not much care for the original caddyshack and aside from the chase or murray duo scene and select rodney jokes. okay and break it down represent rodney vs. jackie both jewish and have similar humor. rodney a bigger name and more distinct. jackie has an incidental and more observational approach to his jokes and is more up yours in this sequel. jackie attitude toward everything is memorable and in a way and inspirational. his quick lines and over confidence left me wishing i could express myself in such a way. rodney was good and but there wasn not enough of him and and he was more in your face and dismissive. jackie and in a rare film appearance and makes a perfect sub for rodney (come on and a gun shaped hair dryer. ) really and look at the little things. stack vs. knight both play snobby yuppies very well. ted knight and despite his wonderful tv or film career and kinda shows his age. but and he does pull off the snobbish demands of the part and we want to see him fall. ted looks kinda weak and is pretty annoying and playing his anger and frustration too slapstick and while stack is more incidentally snide and vengeful while you really hate him and enjoy see him constantly fail. stack wins with me. murray vs. aykroyd well and both had great and vintage snl like scenes with the ever present and enjoyable chevy chase (ty webb). i did like the murray or chase one better. murray plays his great and annoying and chatty character with obvious improv skill and is loveable yet annoying. and the exact same can be said for aykroyd. both get annoying after a while and but it a tie. i really loved part 2 over the first. they are 2 totally different mooded films. part one is more drug or bathroom or sex humor with a cast full of great names. part 2 uses golf as a backdrop for a tick it to the rich type of comedy that makes one feel better about being working class. 80s script. yes. a bit far fetched. yes and but wasn not the first. an insult to the sport of golf. yes and it a movie. thin story. yes and it a comedy with actual humor not wouldances with wolves. besides part 2 has a much better soundtrack. please dont expect this to be a sequel to part one. it is 98% its own movie and shouldnt even have the name caddyshack in it. that said and i am a big fan of caddyshack 2 and it is a great exponent of 80s fluff entertainment with quality humor. viva jackie mason. to all the reducers lighten up. it a great comedy of its own. randy quaid was wonderful and jonathan silverman was wonderful and heck and everyone was. all this chatting and now i feel like watching it. i think i will. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
