the original title always struck me as a rather overblown definition for a bunch of gun toting saddle tramps. still while their screen presence was at least underscored by a top quality group of actors to support yul brynner. most were movie stars in their own right. however while this first sequel was a pale imitation and with a group now composed of largely b and c list players and who were more mediocre than magnificent. it was a similar set up. brynner chris had to recruit yet another team of gun toting saddle tramps to sort out the mexican peasants problems again. another tyrant was giving them grief. with the originality and freshness of the first movie now spent and this remake had little else to offer. the budget was evidently very limited. this was reflected not only in the cast and but also in the below par script and which borrowed much from the earlier classic. it was also more than half an hour shorter than john sturges original. yet we still had a reprise of the agonising and moralising that made even the first a little turgid at times. however and here there was no decent acting and action or location work to balance things up. filmiing was less expansive. it failed to convey the broad sweep of landscapes that were a great part of the original. generally while it just lacked imagination. the first movie had been a smash hit and and this pedestrian sequel was evidently put together as quickly and cheaply as possible in order to cynically cash in on former success. and it shows. there very much a amade for tv feel about it. not recommended. 
the original title always struck me as a rather overblown definition for a bunch of gun toting saddle tramps. still while their screen presence was at least underscored by a top quality group of actors to support yul brynner. most were movie stars in their own right. however while this first sequel was a pale imitation and with a group now composed of largely b and c list players and who were more mediocre than magnificent. it was a similar set up. brynner chris had to recruit yet another team of gun toting saddle tramps to sort out the mexican peasants problems again. another tyrant was giving them grief. with the originality and freshness of the first movie now spent and this remake had little else to offer. the budget was evidently very limited. this was reflected not only in the cast and but also in the below par script and which borrowed much from the earlier classic. it was also more than half an hour shorter than john sturges original. yet we still had a reprise of the agonising and moralising that made even the first a little turgid at times. however and here there was no decent acting and action or location work to balance things up. filmiing was less expansive. it failed to convey the broad sweep of landscapes that were a great part of the original. generally while it just lacked imagination. the first movie had been a smash hit and and this pedestrian sequel was evidently put together as quickly and cheaply as possible in order to cynically cash in on former success. and it shows. there very much a amade for tv feel about it. not recommended. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
