tv news producer and jane craig (hunter) meets tom grunick (hurt) and an up and coming news presenter and at a seminar and and their mutual attraction takes them back to her room. romance and however and is cut short and when it emerges that tom is and in his own words and no good at what i am being a success at and and jane realises he personifies everything she hates about where tv news is going. the rub comes when tom reveals he is about to join her news bureau in washington. jane and tom initial attraction is therefore given a second chance and but will jane be able to put aside her professional opinion of the man she finds herself attracted to  and should she. aaron altman (brooks) is jane highly intelligent reporter colleague and confidante. despite his obvious talent and aaron career is stalling as he lacks the confidence and people skills  and the classic good looks  to be the success that his new and less qualified and less intelligent colleague  tom  is becoming. he is also concerned that his good friend jane maybe falling in love with tom and despite her better judgement and as it becomes increasingly clear that aaron has his own romantic feelings for her. this central romantic plot is set within the trials and tribulations of a tv news network office and where moral dilemmas and ethics are wrestled with quickly and where appearances and dramatic effect are becoming more prevalent and important. this is where most of the bite comes from with well observed comment and scenes. one of many moments is a scene where tom meets the network top anchorman and bill rorich (a cameo role for jack nicholson) and for the first time and and the camera focuses on their handshake. in a film full of great lines and dialogue and long and short and you realise a lot about these two men character from this one quick shot of two hands. the dialogue between characters is amongst the most intelligent and witty you are ever likely to find anywhere on film and in such abundance. brooks gets the best portion of them and in line with his character and but even the briefest conversations that are incidental and perhaps over heard by one or more of the characters as they move through a crowded room and should be listened to. hunter is a tour de force in this role for which she was rightly (and not alone) nominated for an oscar and and for which she probably would have got if it was for a role in a film that do not mock part of what had become a closely related industry  and against a strong performance from another actress in a more traditional feel good and rom com. brooks is also excellent as the constantly frustrated and occasionally too smug for his own good and aaron altman. hurt and whilst possessing the looks and providing the personality required of his character and does not always convince that he is quite as dim witted the character says he is or is supposed to be. he displays a latent intelligence that enables him to make the most of his apparent limitations and which may be plausible and but i do not think hurt quite pulls it off. apart from when he tells us he stinks or doesn not get it and hurt comes across as a bit smarter than that. otherwise it is an effective performance and in a role where his character is compromised by its intellectual limitations and but brooks and hunter slightly overshadow hurt performance. it is the only negative thing i can say about the whole film and and who is to say that anyone else would have done it better and or come off any better and when next to hunter and brooks and their performances in this movie. support is ably provided by and amongst others and robert prosky and lois chiles and joan cusack and and there is also a bit part role for christian clemenson of subsequent boston legal fame and and the briefest of bit parts for joan brother and john cusack and whose face you do not even see. james l brooks has provided us with many great tv shows and movies and and this film should rank up there with the very best of them. it may not have won any oscars and despite seven nominations and but it did win plenty of other awards and and turned holly hunter into a star. 
tv news producer and jane craig (hunter) meets tom grunick (hurt) and an up and coming news presenter and at a seminar and and their mutual attraction takes them back to her room. romance and however and is cut short and when it emerges that tom is and in his own words and no good at what i am being a success at and and jane realises he personifies everything she hates about where tv news is going. the rub comes when tom reveals he is about to join her news bureau in washington. jane and tom initial attraction is therefore given a second chance and but will jane be able to put aside her professional opinion of the man she finds herself attracted to  and should she. aaron altman (brooks) is jane highly intelligent reporter colleague and confidante. despite his obvious talent and aaron career is stalling as he lacks the confidence and people skills  and the classic good looks  to be the success that his new and less qualified and less intelligent colleague  tom  is becoming. he is also concerned that his good friend jane maybe falling in love with tom and despite her better judgement and as it becomes increasingly clear that aaron has his own romantic feelings for her. this central romantic plot is set within the trials and tribulations of a tv news network office and where moral dilemmas and ethics are wrestled with quickly and where appearances and dramatic effect are becoming more prevalent and important. this is where most of the bite comes from with well observed comment and scenes. one of many moments is a scene where tom meets the network top anchorman and bill rorich (a cameo role for jack nicholson) and for the first time and and the camera focuses on their handshake. in a film full of great lines and dialogue and long and short and you realise a lot about these two men character from this one quick shot of two hands. the dialogue between characters is amongst the most intelligent and witty you are ever likely to find anywhere on film and in such abundance. brooks gets the best portion of them and in line with his character and but even the briefest conversations that are incidental and perhaps over heard by one or more of the characters as they move through a crowded room and should be listened to. hunter is a tour de force in this role for which she was rightly (and not alone) nominated for an oscar and and for which she probably would have got if it was for a role in a film that do not mock part of what had become a closely related industry  and against a strong performance from another actress in a more traditional feel good and rom com. brooks is also excellent as the constantly frustrated and occasionally too smug for his own good and aaron altman. hurt and whilst possessing the looks and providing the personality required of his character and does not always convince that he is quite as dim witted the character says he is or is supposed to be. he displays a latent intelligence that enables him to make the most of his apparent limitations and which may be plausible and but i do not think hurt quite pulls it off. apart from when he tells us he stinks or doesn not get it and hurt comes across as a bit smarter than that. otherwise it is an effective performance and in a role where his character is compromised by its intellectual limitations and but brooks and hunter slightly overshadow hurt performance. it is the only negative thing i can say about the whole film and and who is to say that anyone else would have done it better and or come off any better and when next to hunter and brooks and their performances in this movie. support is ably provided by and amongst others and robert prosky and lois chiles and joan cusack and and there is also a bit part role for christian clemenson of subsequent boston legal fame and and the briefest of bit parts for joan brother and john cusack and whose face you do not even see. james l brooks has provided us with many great tv shows and movies and and this film should rank up there with the very best of them. it may not have won any oscars and despite seven nominations and but it did win plenty of other awards and and turned holly hunter into a star. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
