so it a space movie. but it low budget. you ask and what about the effects. the effects are at times good and and at times really and really bad. i mean bad. and notice i started with the effects. there a story here and but it told in what i think is the wrong order. i do not mean a tarantino style wrong order. i mean and it told in a completely nonsensical arrangement. most of it about a mother (in the future and because you know and it sci fi) as told by her daughter and which is mostly exposition done in narrative from the daughter perspective. only once youre through the first hour and hear paul darrow voice as a computer do you realize how much more tolerable the constant narrative would have been if he would read it. this narrative is so constant and inclusive and that the actors on screen hardly say a word for the first hour. there also a lesson here for you up and coming filmmakers represent if youre not doing 2001 and want to have some action (this one does) and then please hire a good fight choreographer. otherwise and your fights will look like and well and what in battlespace. and notice the title has the word battle in it. ugh. i think this might be the classic scenario of trying to make a movie based on nothing more than a concept. and some effects. my biggest surprise is seeing the imdb listing this film as costing $1. 8 million. when you compare it to something like primer and which did better with a budget of a few thousand and you realize in low budget film making and it all about the story. i wasn not expecting much  but i was still disappointed. two out of ten stars. 
so it a space movie. but it low budget. you ask and what about the effects. the effects are at times good and and at times really and really bad. i mean bad. and notice i started with the effects. there a story here and but it told in what i think is the wrong order. i do not mean a tarantino style wrong order. i mean and it told in a completely nonsensical arrangement. most of it about a mother (in the future and because you know and it sci fi) as told by her daughter and which is mostly exposition done in narrative from the daughter perspective. only once youre through the first hour and hear paul darrow voice as a computer do you realize how much more tolerable the constant narrative would have been if he would read it. this narrative is so constant and inclusive and that the actors on screen hardly say a word for the first hour. there also a lesson here for you up and coming filmmakers represent if youre not doing 2001 and want to have some action (this one does) and then please hire a good fight choreographer. otherwise and your fights will look like and well and what in battlespace. and notice the title has the word battle in it. ugh. i think this might be the classic scenario of trying to make a movie based on nothing more than a concept. and some effects. my biggest surprise is seeing the imdb listing this film as costing $1. 8 million. when you compare it to something like primer and which did better with a budget of a few thousand and you realize in low budget film making and it all about the story. i wasn not expecting much  but i was still disappointed. two out of ten stars. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
