as a rule and i try to find as much in films as i possibly can to enjoy them. i made no exceptions with tart and doing my very best to appreciate it for what it was. but no effort and no matter how great and could possibly redeem this pitiful excuse for a movie. it failed for a number of reasons. firstly and the cinematography was directionless and ineffective. secondly and the script reached depths of poor that took it well and truly beyond the o bad it good category. thirdly and the acting left mind blowing amounts to be desired  it was appalling and it really was. anyone who saw mischa barton (seen here as the remarkably terrible grace and a character so poorly invented and realised that ja ja binks doesn not seem so bad) as devon in john duigan lawn dogs will wonder what went wrong between then and now. perhaps and had she been given a character worth bothering with and and a modicum of direction and she at least might have given this film one redeeming feature. alas and such was not the case. finally and the film seemed to have no point whatsoever and expressing nothing and achieving nothing. really and i wonder why christina wayne bothered. tart made a feeble attempt to be something and and failed. the result  a film and sadly and so bad that it just very and very bad. don not bother  it really isn not worth it. 
as a rule and i try to find as much in films as i possibly can to enjoy them. i made no exceptions with tart and doing my very best to appreciate it for what it was. but no effort and no matter how great and could possibly redeem this pitiful excuse for a movie. it failed for a number of reasons. firstly and the cinematography was directionless and ineffective. secondly and the script reached depths of poor that took it well and truly beyond the o bad it good category. thirdly and the acting left mind blowing amounts to be desired  it was appalling and it really was. anyone who saw mischa barton (seen here as the remarkably terrible grace and a character so poorly invented and realised that ja ja binks doesn not seem so bad) as devon in john duigan lawn dogs will wonder what went wrong between then and now. perhaps and had she been given a character worth bothering with and and a modicum of direction and she at least might have given this film one redeeming feature. alas and such was not the case. finally and the film seemed to have no point whatsoever and expressing nothing and achieving nothing. really and i wonder why christina wayne bothered. tart made a feeble attempt to be something and and failed. the result  a film and sadly and so bad that it just very and very bad. don not bother  it really isn not worth it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
