i like tom hanks and and he is one of few actors who will draw me into the theatre regardless of any misgivings i may have concerning the film. i worried about mr. hanks return to light comedy as this is the arena where he made the transition from tv to film remember big. well and charlie wilson war is not light comedy. it is political satire and and extremely well written political satire at that. the script is the star of this film and and the word smithing by aaron sorkin is some of the best on offer this year. mike nicols holds the entire escapade together and delivering a film that zips along in a very quick 90 minutes (timing is everything in comedy and and nothing is ever funny if it drags). nicols choice in sets and lighting are also very reminiscent of 70 and 80 tv and a move used deliberately to root the piece in period. the return to the use of model work and stock photography over digital special effects also enhances the retro look and believability. note to the production designers in your choice of stock footage represent i know the difference between an f 16 and a mig and and a bell and a hind. but that may have been part of the joke and too. i saw this film in philadelphia. it was interesting to watch and listen to the audience not get the historical references to their own history. history tends to repeat because the recidivists have forgotten what happened the first time around. kudos to both mr. hanks and that chameleon phillip seymore hoffman. sorkin script is brought to life by these actors and and the entire production team is on the top of their game. heartily recommended. 
i like tom hanks and and he is one of few actors who will draw me into the theatre regardless of any misgivings i may have concerning the film. i worried about mr. hanks return to light comedy as this is the arena where he made the transition from tv to film remember big. well and charlie wilson war is not light comedy. it is political satire and and extremely well written political satire at that. the script is the star of this film and and the word smithing by aaron sorkin is some of the best on offer this year. mike nicols holds the entire escapade together and delivering a film that zips along in a very quick 90 minutes (timing is everything in comedy and and nothing is ever funny if it drags). nicols choice in sets and lighting are also very reminiscent of 70 and 80 tv and a move used deliberately to root the piece in period. the return to the use of model work and stock photography over digital special effects also enhances the retro look and believability. note to the production designers in your choice of stock footage represent i know the difference between an f 16 and a mig and and a bell and a hind. but that may have been part of the joke and too. i saw this film in philadelphia. it was interesting to watch and listen to the audience not get the historical references to their own history. history tends to repeat because the recidivists have forgotten what happened the first time around. kudos to both mr. hanks and that chameleon phillip seymore hoffman. sorkin script is brought to life by these actors and and the entire production team is on the top of their game. heartily recommended. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
