snakes on a train starts as mexican couple brujo (a. j. castro) and alma (julia ruiz) cross the boarder into the us and they then illegally board a seventeen hour train to los angeles. however alma family do not approve of her and brujo relationship and placed an ancient black magic curse on her that turns all her insides into snakes and ain not life a btch. as the snakes pour out of alma mouth and slither away to other parts of the train they begin to infect the other passengers with the same unusual ailment. edited and directed by the mallachi brothers (although the imdb claims it just one guy using a pseudonym and peter mervis) one has to say that i thought snakes on a train was crap and it as simple as that really. it seems the entire film was set up and made to cash in on the samuel l. jackson cult flick snakes on a plane (2006) by every horror fans least favourite production company the asylum who specialise in ripping off big budget hollywood flicks and that style of money and film making is no more evident than here with snakes on a train and making a film just because the title rhymes with a more successful film is not a good starting point. the script by eric forsberg is rubbish and for a start snakes on a plane was great fun whereas snakes on a train is a lot more serious and when you actually break it down and look at it this should have been much more light hearted. in fact it probably would have worked better as an scary movie (2000) type spoof. you know something and i am struggling to find one positive thing to say about snakes on a train it that bad. for a start the character are rubbish and it impossible to emote with anyone and the story is downright awful and makes no sense (if people spew all those small snakes up where did the huge ones come from. why did alma turn into the giant snake at the end. why did bujo kill the train driver. how was he going to stop the train once it reached los angeles. where did that typhoon come from at the end. ) and it takes itself far too seriously and the first seventy odd minutes is so boring and uneventful i am surprised i stayed awake and it just a very and very poor film on just about every level. director mervis only has a few train carriage car sets which all look pretty much alike so the film becomes very repetitive and dull to watch. there barely any blood or gore and there are some snakes borrowing under a few peoples skin and someone gets shot and that about it. the special effects are rubbish too and the giant cgi snake at the end is truly awful and the least said about it the better. it not scary and there zero atmosphere and it a bit of a bore from start to finish. the real live snakes are a problem too and they are just so docile and nonthreatening. if you look at any scene featuring a real snake and an actor the snakes never make any move towards them or act aggressively and in fact always appear to want to slither away in the opposite direction. shot in california technically the film is obviously low budget and it show  and basically it looks cheap because it is. the acting isn not great not that the actor are given any sort of material to work with. snakes on a train is rubbish and i am sorry but that how i feel and i do not quite know how else to describe it. i really can not see what anyone would get out of watching snakes on a train and it really is that bad. 
snakes on a train starts as mexican couple brujo (a. j. castro) and alma (julia ruiz) cross the boarder into the us and they then illegally board a seventeen hour train to los angeles. however alma family do not approve of her and brujo relationship and placed an ancient black magic curse on her that turns all her insides into snakes and ain not life a btch. as the snakes pour out of alma mouth and slither away to other parts of the train they begin to infect the other passengers with the same unusual ailment. edited and directed by the mallachi brothers (although the imdb claims it just one guy using a pseudonym and peter mervis) one has to say that i thought snakes on a train was crap and it as simple as that really. it seems the entire film was set up and made to cash in on the samuel l. jackson cult flick snakes on a plane (2006) by every horror fans least favourite production company the asylum who specialise in ripping off big budget hollywood flicks and that style of money and film making is no more evident than here with snakes on a train and making a film just because the title rhymes with a more successful film is not a good starting point. the script by eric forsberg is rubbish and for a start snakes on a plane was great fun whereas snakes on a train is a lot more serious and when you actually break it down and look at it this should have been much more light hearted. in fact it probably would have worked better as an scary movie (2000) type spoof. you know something and i am struggling to find one positive thing to say about snakes on a train it that bad. for a start the character are rubbish and it impossible to emote with anyone and the story is downright awful and makes no sense (if people spew all those small snakes up where did the huge ones come from. why did alma turn into the giant snake at the end. why did bujo kill the train driver. how was he going to stop the train once it reached los angeles. where did that typhoon come from at the end. ) and it takes itself far too seriously and the first seventy odd minutes is so boring and uneventful i am surprised i stayed awake and it just a very and very poor film on just about every level. director mervis only has a few train carriage car sets which all look pretty much alike so the film becomes very repetitive and dull to watch. there barely any blood or gore and there are some snakes borrowing under a few peoples skin and someone gets shot and that about it. the special effects are rubbish too and the giant cgi snake at the end is truly awful and the least said about it the better. it not scary and there zero atmosphere and it a bit of a bore from start to finish. the real live snakes are a problem too and they are just so docile and nonthreatening. if you look at any scene featuring a real snake and an actor the snakes never make any move towards them or act aggressively and in fact always appear to want to slither away in the opposite direction. shot in california technically the film is obviously low budget and it show  and basically it looks cheap because it is. the acting isn not great not that the actor are given any sort of material to work with. snakes on a train is rubbish and i am sorry but that how i feel and i do not quite know how else to describe it. i really can not see what anyone would get out of watching snakes on a train and it really is that bad. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
