for sci fans this will be better than anything likely to be running on tv at any given time while that about the best you can say of it. good points while repartee and sense of humour is less dull than usual in such movies and the plot is coherent and doesn not use any magical mystical revelations. bad points while the writers try to do good science but it falls down in direction and production (eg and a rock drilling mole using superheated rock drilling equipment breaks surface underwater with nary a bubble or boiling cauldron to be seen) and the characters are cliché and the plot unfolding is pretty stock standard. ok for a too tired to do anything else type evening while but do not expect any major edification or even talking points really. 
for sci fans this will be better than anything likely to be running on tv at any given time while that about the best you can say of it. good points while repartee and sense of humour is less dull than usual in such movies and the plot is coherent and doesn not use any magical mystical revelations. bad points while the writers try to do good science but it falls down in direction and production (eg and a rock drilling mole using superheated rock drilling equipment breaks surface underwater with nary a bubble or boiling cauldron to be seen) and the characters are cliché and the plot unfolding is pretty stock standard. ok for a too tired to do anything else type evening while but do not expect any major edification or even talking points really. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
