for their credit and this is one of their more competent pieces of trash and and that because there considerably good gore and and an interesting take on ripping off snakes on a plane. but and if there any more of example of the inconsistency behind asylum newest rip off it the two characters at the beginning whom are illegal immigrants and can not understand nor speak english to a texas man sneaking them across the border and yet when they get on a train and meet a friend and they begin understanding and speaking perfect english. aside from being a pretty bad depiction of a hollywood formula and snakes on a train is utterly boring. at least and with snakes on a plane we were given the chance to watch actors wax comedic and attempt to be remotely interesting. the mallachi brothers installment features some of the most boring characters i have ever seen and from an electrical engineer (gee and i wonder how he comes in handy later on) and to some stoner surfers and right down to our two main characters attempting to fight off the snake curse that lurks in the husband wife. snakes is never entertaining and and even when it very gory and it still never as good as it has the chance to be and because snakes could have been a funny short film and and instead just takes itself much too seriously and and never camps it up at any moment. instead of taking their small budget and making original films that can set a precedent and they instead force their small budget to work against them in these knock offs. while the mallachi brothers seem to be trying and the train just looks incredibly artificial. it seems almost like a stage play with these inconsistent and awfully bland set pieces that try desperately to look like actual train cars and while every so often it shakes and the background of the windows are blurred and and the sound effects go off every now and then to let us know theyre actually on a train while not to mention that in such a large extended train there only seems to be about ten passengers on it. and beyond the train fight and and a drawn out sex scene and were forced to be subjected to a plot that makes zero sense. and not even the directors can work around the fact that the lethal snakes that go on this train look far from venomous or dangerous. the rest of the film staggers onto only about a minute of snake carnage and a bad subplot of an ex drug agent trying to molest a passenger. all of this dull exposition ends with a really ridiculous climax in which a poorly computer generated snake (i saw better animation on the super nintendo) completely swallows the train whole and and is then dispensed in a method that should have been exercised from the very beginning. asylum scores again. asylum scores yet again with a hackneyed and lazy and horribly directed and and boring rip off of another better film. snakes on a train takes itself way too seriously and and that why it never entertaining or memorable. 
for their credit and this is one of their more competent pieces of trash and and that because there considerably good gore and and an interesting take on ripping off snakes on a plane. but and if there any more of example of the inconsistency behind asylum newest rip off it the two characters at the beginning whom are illegal immigrants and can not understand nor speak english to a texas man sneaking them across the border and yet when they get on a train and meet a friend and they begin understanding and speaking perfect english. aside from being a pretty bad depiction of a hollywood formula and snakes on a train is utterly boring. at least and with snakes on a plane we were given the chance to watch actors wax comedic and attempt to be remotely interesting. the mallachi brothers installment features some of the most boring characters i have ever seen and from an electrical engineer (gee and i wonder how he comes in handy later on) and to some stoner surfers and right down to our two main characters attempting to fight off the snake curse that lurks in the husband wife. snakes is never entertaining and and even when it very gory and it still never as good as it has the chance to be and because snakes could have been a funny short film and and instead just takes itself much too seriously and and never camps it up at any moment. instead of taking their small budget and making original films that can set a precedent and they instead force their small budget to work against them in these knock offs. while the mallachi brothers seem to be trying and the train just looks incredibly artificial. it seems almost like a stage play with these inconsistent and awfully bland set pieces that try desperately to look like actual train cars and while every so often it shakes and the background of the windows are blurred and and the sound effects go off every now and then to let us know theyre actually on a train while not to mention that in such a large extended train there only seems to be about ten passengers on it. and beyond the train fight and and a drawn out sex scene and were forced to be subjected to a plot that makes zero sense. and not even the directors can work around the fact that the lethal snakes that go on this train look far from venomous or dangerous. the rest of the film staggers onto only about a minute of snake carnage and a bad subplot of an ex drug agent trying to molest a passenger. all of this dull exposition ends with a really ridiculous climax in which a poorly computer generated snake (i saw better animation on the super nintendo) completely swallows the train whole and and is then dispensed in a method that should have been exercised from the very beginning. asylum scores again. asylum scores yet again with a hackneyed and lazy and horribly directed and and boring rip off of another better film. snakes on a train takes itself way too seriously and and that why it never entertaining or memorable. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
