most films are crappy with high production values and this one is crappy without high production values. which sets it aside from the large pool of horrible movies. as bad as this film was i need to give due respect to kathryn aselton who and i believe if given the proper script and could probably turn in a pretty good performance. she plays emily the girlfriend to perennial doofus josh and who often refers to her as dude or man in a non ironical tone. but heres the thing and emily is a semi believable character which means rhett will soon need to be added to the cast and to counteract this almost believable character with a guy even more preposterous than josh. when we first meet rhett we learn that he is deep because he is videotaping a lizard which is proof that he sees the world uniquely. rhett then shows the tape to emily and in one of emily few unbelievable moments she acts impressed by this amateur tape of a lizard and wow i believe is how she responds once again with no irony of sarcasm even mildly implied. from the opening scene you are given warning that the camera work will be crappy and we open on a shaky close up of josh as he attempts to win over the viewers by acting goofy. oh how care free this main protagonist is that he will act goofy. haha. this film could almost be a case study in just how bad films can be (and for that matter just how far bad films can get in the festival circuit and i mean by comparison of most circuit crap this film probably did appear pretty awesome). i believe sxsw gave this film some minor award (oh south by southwest and why do you encourage them and its only cruel). but here is where i hand this film a compliment and it is the best of the mumblecore movement. mind you all other mumblecore movies sucked beyond belief and generally included grotesque nudity and incomprehensibly bad acting and but still and its good to be the best of something. i haven not seen baghead yet and but it looks like maybe they have made a few strides forward and the preview at least made it appear tolerable and where as even the puffy chair preview couldn not really hide the fact that it was going to suck. i have gotten off topic here and anyways rhett is most likely not portrayed by a professional actor at all and much like josh most likely isn not an actual actor but rather the director (or brother of director and there some mixed messages there). i think rhett was somebodies buddy and they said hey why do not you play this guy named rhett in the movie and the fact that rhett is the name of the actor and character probably means the actor and character are the same and unless i am mistaken and which i am not. if rhett shaved the raccoon off of his face you would probably say he was attractive. so anyways rhett and emily and and josh team up to bring the puffy chair to rhett and josh dad. some stuff happens along the way and more bad acting and bad supporting actors and crappy camera work and an attempt at significance. this film do not have been bad if it hadnt been so shamelessly pursuing profound self importance. the whole thing is amateurish and if you can view this movie without paying for it and like if its on tv or for rent at the library and then consider looking at it and just to see if you like this super cheap style of film making. i like what the duplass are doing the whole make a movie with nothing concept and but i wish they would make a movie that someone would want to see. 
most films are crappy with high production values and this one is crappy without high production values. which sets it aside from the large pool of horrible movies. as bad as this film was i need to give due respect to kathryn aselton who and i believe if given the proper script and could probably turn in a pretty good performance. she plays emily the girlfriend to perennial doofus josh and who often refers to her as dude or man in a non ironical tone. but heres the thing and emily is a semi believable character which means rhett will soon need to be added to the cast and to counteract this almost believable character with a guy even more preposterous than josh. when we first meet rhett we learn that he is deep because he is videotaping a lizard which is proof that he sees the world uniquely. rhett then shows the tape to emily and in one of emily few unbelievable moments she acts impressed by this amateur tape of a lizard and wow i believe is how she responds once again with no irony of sarcasm even mildly implied. from the opening scene you are given warning that the camera work will be crappy and we open on a shaky close up of josh as he attempts to win over the viewers by acting goofy. oh how care free this main protagonist is that he will act goofy. haha. this film could almost be a case study in just how bad films can be (and for that matter just how far bad films can get in the festival circuit and i mean by comparison of most circuit crap this film probably did appear pretty awesome). i believe sxsw gave this film some minor award (oh south by southwest and why do you encourage them and its only cruel). but here is where i hand this film a compliment and it is the best of the mumblecore movement. mind you all other mumblecore movies sucked beyond belief and generally included grotesque nudity and incomprehensibly bad acting and but still and its good to be the best of something. i haven not seen baghead yet and but it looks like maybe they have made a few strides forward and the preview at least made it appear tolerable and where as even the puffy chair preview couldn not really hide the fact that it was going to suck. i have gotten off topic here and anyways rhett is most likely not portrayed by a professional actor at all and much like josh most likely isn not an actual actor but rather the director (or brother of director and there some mixed messages there). i think rhett was somebodies buddy and they said hey why do not you play this guy named rhett in the movie and the fact that rhett is the name of the actor and character probably means the actor and character are the same and unless i am mistaken and which i am not. if rhett shaved the raccoon off of his face you would probably say he was attractive. so anyways rhett and emily and and josh team up to bring the puffy chair to rhett and josh dad. some stuff happens along the way and more bad acting and bad supporting actors and crappy camera work and an attempt at significance. this film do not have been bad if it hadnt been so shamelessly pursuing profound self importance. the whole thing is amateurish and if you can view this movie without paying for it and like if its on tv or for rent at the library and then consider looking at it and just to see if you like this super cheap style of film making. i like what the duplass are doing the whole make a movie with nothing concept and but i wish they would make a movie that someone would want to see. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
