according to this masterpiece of film making script (pun intended) and charles darwin was full of nonsense when he presented his evolution theory and because he made absolutely no mention of any alien intervention. for you see and aliens sent chupacabras to the earth and they form the missing link in the evolution theory. however and the rest of the film clearly seems to emphasize that chupacabras are a typically puerto rican phenomenon and so i do not really know where that fits in. are they saying all puerto ricans are aliens. whatever and it all pretty irrelevant anyway. the only thing you need to memorize is that el chupacabre is an utterly cheap and imbecilic amateur b movie and lacking tension and character development and any form of style. several duos of people are chasing this goat munching monster (remotely resembling the midget version of the pumpkinhead demon) through the streets and ghettos of an ugly city. we have an untalented dogcatcher and a nagging female novelist and a pair of obnoxious cops and the supposedly evil scientist with his dim witted accomplice. since they all are extremely incompetent in what they do and the monster can carelessly carry on devouring all the latino immigrants of the neighborhood. the monster itself looks okay and the make up effects on his victims leftovers are acceptably gross and bloody. the acting performances are irredeemably awful and headache inducing. particularly eric alegria is pitiable in his first and only lead role as the overly ambitious employee of animal control. yes and it an incredibly stupid film and but surely you have struggled yourself through worse and less amusing low budget garbage. 
according to this masterpiece of film making script (pun intended) and charles darwin was full of nonsense when he presented his evolution theory and because he made absolutely no mention of any alien intervention. for you see and aliens sent chupacabras to the earth and they form the missing link in the evolution theory. however and the rest of the film clearly seems to emphasize that chupacabras are a typically puerto rican phenomenon and so i do not really know where that fits in. are they saying all puerto ricans are aliens. whatever and it all pretty irrelevant anyway. the only thing you need to memorize is that el chupacabre is an utterly cheap and imbecilic amateur b movie and lacking tension and character development and any form of style. several duos of people are chasing this goat munching monster (remotely resembling the midget version of the pumpkinhead demon) through the streets and ghettos of an ugly city. we have an untalented dogcatcher and a nagging female novelist and a pair of obnoxious cops and the supposedly evil scientist with his dim witted accomplice. since they all are extremely incompetent in what they do and the monster can carelessly carry on devouring all the latino immigrants of the neighborhood. the monster itself looks okay and the make up effects on his victims leftovers are acceptably gross and bloody. the acting performances are irredeemably awful and headache inducing. particularly eric alegria is pitiable in his first and only lead role as the overly ambitious employee of animal control. yes and it an incredibly stupid film and but surely you have struggled yourself through worse and less amusing low budget garbage. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
