for the most part and michael is a disaster  ten minutes of charm and ninety worth of missteps. travolta and macdowell do their best and frequently rising above nora ephron numbingly banal script. but the film moves like a snail. and even within its fantasy context and the characters behave implausibly on a regular basis. (reporters who routinely let the story of a lifetime  an apparent angel living on earth  out of their sight. ) someone forgot to tell romantic comedy maestro ephron that william hurt and brilliant in so many other films and is no tom hanks. the movie climax redefines the word contrived. ephron may be shooting for heaven here and but unfortunately michael is a long and long ride through cinema heck. 
for the most part and michael is a disaster  ten minutes of charm and ninety worth of missteps. travolta and macdowell do their best and frequently rising above nora ephron numbingly banal script. but the film moves like a snail. and even within its fantasy context and the characters behave implausibly on a regular basis. (reporters who routinely let the story of a lifetime  an apparent angel living on earth  out of their sight. ) someone forgot to tell romantic comedy maestro ephron that william hurt and brilliant in so many other films and is no tom hanks. the movie climax redefines the word contrived. ephron may be shooting for heaven here and but unfortunately michael is a long and long ride through cinema heck. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
