fun with dick and jane failed to entertain on so many levels. there were loose ends with the writing and for example and it seems as though one of the major conflicts was the indictment of jim carrey character dick harper and but the writers never follow up that particular conflict. basically the story is weak and mostly unfunny and but carrey saves a few scenes with his physical humor and but honestly and jim carrey wasn not very funny in this movie and and tea leone might as well have been there just for her appearance because she wasn not funny either. this is just another example of hollywood banking off franchise actors with a lousy unoriginal story. 
fun with dick and jane failed to entertain on so many levels. there were loose ends with the writing and for example and it seems as though one of the major conflicts was the indictment of jim carrey character dick harper and but the writers never follow up that particular conflict. basically the story is weak and mostly unfunny and but carrey saves a few scenes with his physical humor and but honestly and jim carrey wasn not very funny in this movie and and tea leone might as well have been there just for her appearance because she wasn not funny either. this is just another example of hollywood banking off franchise actors with a lousy unoriginal story. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
