i completely understand why this movie was made. silence of the lambs was an incredible film  a gruesome thriller with a superb story and high jump factor. what i do not understand is why this movie was made. and why anthony hopkins agreed to reprise his role as hannibal the cannibal in this terrible and dissatisfying film. there no possible way to spoil the movie any further than going to see it could and but for those of you who prefer to waste your money and dont read on. the film is absolutely horrible. it so bad that the transition from jodie foster to julianne moore becomes a non issue. the only way to truly enjoy the film is to set your watch and leave the theatre exactly two hours into the film and because up until that point and it quite an interesting thriller. the reparte between moore and hopkins is comparable to hopkins and foster and and the performances by the other characters are pretty good. but literally at the two hour mark and the film degrades into nothing but a cheesy d grade horror flick. it sick and and it stupid and almost like the crew ran out of filming time and and threw together an ending in one day of filming. initial buzz over the thomas harris book unsatisfying and bizarre ending led director ridley scott to order a re write. and and honestly and having seen the film and read the book finale and i do not know which is worse. please  do not waste your money or time on this film and unless youre prepared to leave exactly at the two hour point and because that the only way you will feel satisfied about the saga of clarice starling and hannibal lecter. continuing the mystery that made the first film and and the wait for this one and so great. 
i completely understand why this movie was made. silence of the lambs was an incredible film  a gruesome thriller with a superb story and high jump factor. what i do not understand is why this movie was made. and why anthony hopkins agreed to reprise his role as hannibal the cannibal in this terrible and dissatisfying film. there no possible way to spoil the movie any further than going to see it could and but for those of you who prefer to waste your money and dont read on. the film is absolutely horrible. it so bad that the transition from jodie foster to julianne moore becomes a non issue. the only way to truly enjoy the film is to set your watch and leave the theatre exactly two hours into the film and because up until that point and it quite an interesting thriller. the reparte between moore and hopkins is comparable to hopkins and foster and and the performances by the other characters are pretty good. but literally at the two hour mark and the film degrades into nothing but a cheesy d grade horror flick. it sick and and it stupid and almost like the crew ran out of filming time and and threw together an ending in one day of filming. initial buzz over the thomas harris book unsatisfying and bizarre ending led director ridley scott to order a re write. and and honestly and having seen the film and read the book finale and i do not know which is worse. please  do not waste your money or time on this film and unless youre prepared to leave exactly at the two hour point and because that the only way you will feel satisfied about the saga of clarice starling and hannibal lecter. continuing the mystery that made the first film and and the wait for this one and so great. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
