if you do not like mel brooks and you would not like this film. that a given. why anyone do not like his films is unknown to me and but for those who can not see the light and just avoid it. everyone else represent this is a classic. the entire cast is perfect represent carey elwes is a dashing and clever and british robin hood and amy yasbeck overacts appropriately as marion and richard lewis is his usual distracted and annoyed self and roger rees is a brilliant combination of fluster and violence as mervyn the sheriff of rottingham and and dave chapelle and eric allan kramer and mark blankfield and and the sadly underused matthew poretta are the perfect merry men. there are similarities to spaceballs and blazing saddles. and every other mel brooks movie. but why would you want him to change his style when it works so damn well. the pop culture references in this movie are old enough to be funny again. from the view of a 16 year old and at least. it complete and utter parody and every second a play for a laugh. some of them do not work and but most do and and well. i discovered new jokes the fifth and sixth time i watched the film. of course and if being barraged by constant visual and verbal gags isn not your style and you do not like this. this isn not an academy award winner and it mel brooks. you know what it is when youre getting into it. if you want nonstop laughter and surprisingly well developed characters and and catchphrases to last a lifetime and watch this. 
if you do not like mel brooks and you would not like this film. that a given. why anyone do not like his films is unknown to me and but for those who can not see the light and just avoid it. everyone else represent this is a classic. the entire cast is perfect represent carey elwes is a dashing and clever and british robin hood and amy yasbeck overacts appropriately as marion and richard lewis is his usual distracted and annoyed self and roger rees is a brilliant combination of fluster and violence as mervyn the sheriff of rottingham and and dave chapelle and eric allan kramer and mark blankfield and and the sadly underused matthew poretta are the perfect merry men. there are similarities to spaceballs and blazing saddles. and every other mel brooks movie. but why would you want him to change his style when it works so damn well. the pop culture references in this movie are old enough to be funny again. from the view of a 16 year old and at least. it complete and utter parody and every second a play for a laugh. some of them do not work and but most do and and well. i discovered new jokes the fifth and sixth time i watched the film. of course and if being barraged by constant visual and verbal gags isn not your style and you do not like this. this isn not an academy award winner and it mel brooks. you know what it is when youre getting into it. if you want nonstop laughter and surprisingly well developed characters and and catchphrases to last a lifetime and watch this. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
