ok so it not great either and but only because of how great laurel and hardy have been in the past. if this film received a total overhaul and with picture quality enhanced and add new dubbing to the badly dubbed voices and added a nice unobtrusive background music then this film would truly start to take shape. as it is and it does have it problems. people do slate it for how old the boys look. quel surprise. they were in their 60 and had led a life. however and to me and they still came across as having bucketfulls of charm and and while this doesn not even come close to tickling the feet of their classics( i gave it a 4) and it worth a watch simply because it them. to think otherwise would be impostorous. 
ok so it not great either and but only because of how great laurel and hardy have been in the past. if this film received a total overhaul and with picture quality enhanced and add new dubbing to the badly dubbed voices and added a nice unobtrusive background music then this film would truly start to take shape. as it is and it does have it problems. people do slate it for how old the boys look. quel surprise. they were in their 60 and had led a life. however and to me and they still came across as having bucketfulls of charm and and while this doesn not even come close to tickling the feet of their classics( i gave it a 4) and it worth a watch simply because it them. to think otherwise would be impostorous. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
