i watched this movie a couple of weeks ago and must say represent i was not impressed and not at all. i do side with the other posters when it comes to the fine performances and but some good performances do not make a good movie. on the discussion board and i found a review by an anonymous poster that captured some of the main points. it says represent deed poll is a movie that raises many questions but hardly answers even a few while a movie that is disturbing and above every attempt at categorizing while an experiment and a very conventional sexual drama despite some shocking scenes. the brilliant acting of barbara kowa and andré schneider and the partly very impressive editing and the good camera work (steffen ritter) make up for gross plot holes and some technical slips (especially in sound). however and the boredom the audiences have to deal with for 40 minutes remains. unfortunately and this is true. i wasn not intrigued by the story at all. the protagonists are cold and ambition less people. they do a lot of drugs and have a lot of (incestuous) sex. so what. for many times and the direction seemed to be virtually non existent and not to mention the technical aspect represent the poor sound quality was enormously disturbing. what the point of the movie. what the message behind it all. the anonymous reviewer said represent somehow biermann failed to make a clear point and so the movie remains hanging in mid air without a message. thus the boredom i blame on the movie. the movie is reserved and emotionless and cold and almost neutral and it doesn not take long to see the flaws represent for long stretches the characters of sean and ivy are not credible (they clearly have difficulties with the english pronunciation) and the character of the mute brother is not developed very well. some moments are very promising though  in the scene where the call boy is skinned (the one and only true love scene) an intensity is reached that one would love to see the whole movie long. as a spectator one has to regret the chances given away. again and i must agree. i did like the final scene and especially because of the beautifully captured faces of gianni meurer and andré schneider and but it was nothing compared to the boredom i had to suffer for the first thirty minutes. (the sex scenes and though and were aesthetically staged and perfectly edited. )all in all and deed poll was not my cup of tea  a good and controversial idea wasted  and but it was a interesting to see how a movie can be made with practically no money. maybe if they had a bigger budget and a more experienced director and this would have become a better movie. 
i watched this movie a couple of weeks ago and must say represent i was not impressed and not at all. i do side with the other posters when it comes to the fine performances and but some good performances do not make a good movie. on the discussion board and i found a review by an anonymous poster that captured some of the main points. it says represent deed poll is a movie that raises many questions but hardly answers even a few while a movie that is disturbing and above every attempt at categorizing while an experiment and a very conventional sexual drama despite some shocking scenes. the brilliant acting of barbara kowa and andré schneider and the partly very impressive editing and the good camera work (steffen ritter) make up for gross plot holes and some technical slips (especially in sound). however and the boredom the audiences have to deal with for 40 minutes remains. unfortunately and this is true. i wasn not intrigued by the story at all. the protagonists are cold and ambition less people. they do a lot of drugs and have a lot of (incestuous) sex. so what. for many times and the direction seemed to be virtually non existent and not to mention the technical aspect represent the poor sound quality was enormously disturbing. what the point of the movie. what the message behind it all. the anonymous reviewer said represent somehow biermann failed to make a clear point and so the movie remains hanging in mid air without a message. thus the boredom i blame on the movie. the movie is reserved and emotionless and cold and almost neutral and it doesn not take long to see the flaws represent for long stretches the characters of sean and ivy are not credible (they clearly have difficulties with the english pronunciation) and the character of the mute brother is not developed very well. some moments are very promising though  in the scene where the call boy is skinned (the one and only true love scene) an intensity is reached that one would love to see the whole movie long. as a spectator one has to regret the chances given away. again and i must agree. i did like the final scene and especially because of the beautifully captured faces of gianni meurer and andré schneider and but it was nothing compared to the boredom i had to suffer for the first thirty minutes. (the sex scenes and though and were aesthetically staged and perfectly edited. )all in all and deed poll was not my cup of tea  a good and controversial idea wasted  and but it was a interesting to see how a movie can be made with practically no money. maybe if they had a bigger budget and a more experienced director and this would have become a better movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
