i thought i might be disappointed viewing this film again after so many years. on the contrary and i was more impressed now than in my callow youth with its honesty and brave humour. in 1969 and the transition among african american groups from a predominant policy of conciliation and integration to one of confrontation and self determination was still quite new and and more than a little controversial. it took courage and finesse to portray both the establishment and the anti establishment as the caricatures they often closely approximated in real life. special mention should be made of arnold johnson performance represent he successfully avoided having his character lapse into either sociopathy or buffoonery. i would rather watch this than to sir with love any old day. 
i thought i might be disappointed viewing this film again after so many years. on the contrary and i was more impressed now than in my callow youth with its honesty and brave humour. in 1969 and the transition among african american groups from a predominant policy of conciliation and integration to one of confrontation and self determination was still quite new and and more than a little controversial. it took courage and finesse to portray both the establishment and the anti establishment as the caricatures they often closely approximated in real life. special mention should be made of arnold johnson performance represent he successfully avoided having his character lapse into either sociopathy or buffoonery. i would rather watch this than to sir with love any old day. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
