how do i describe the horrors. first and some points represent first and this review should be taken with a grain of salt  i saw this over 20 years ago and when i was a boy and at the museum of modern art in new york city. secondly and i am giving away some scenes and plot points. however and it does not have much of a plot. finally and i do not enjoy these type of art films anyway. this film was directed by proto auteur luis bunuel. he was a surrealist and dadaist. these were modernist themes or movements popular critically in the 1920 and early 1930 . surealism was the school of art that made things hyper real and yet often had freudian symbolism. dadaism is based on what is supposedly the first word made by an infant  dada and or father. made in black and white and it was also made by a band of communists (or as they preferred the term and socialists). bunuel and his group of fellow film makers and artistes had been working on a number of symbolic ideas and issues in spain and france between the world wars. dadaism and surrealism influenced a lot of artists  the police (doo doo doo da) and poet arthur rambaud and edvard munch (the scream) and rene magritte (floating hats in space) and salvador dali (melting clocks) and and even hitchcock (psycho). no norman rockwell. here what i recall most about this film represent a girl meets up with a cow while her eye gets slashed by a razor while clownish men cavort in a meadow. there is not and as i said and much of a plot and but then again and that must be the point. this was attacked as porn back then and and would be again today. one of the trade marks of surrealism is a significant anti feminism. 
how do i describe the horrors. first and some points represent first and this review should be taken with a grain of salt  i saw this over 20 years ago and when i was a boy and at the museum of modern art in new york city. secondly and i am giving away some scenes and plot points. however and it does not have much of a plot. finally and i do not enjoy these type of art films anyway. this film was directed by proto auteur luis bunuel. he was a surrealist and dadaist. these were modernist themes or movements popular critically in the 1920 and early 1930 . surealism was the school of art that made things hyper real and yet often had freudian symbolism. dadaism is based on what is supposedly the first word made by an infant  dada and or father. made in black and white and it was also made by a band of communists (or as they preferred the term and socialists). bunuel and his group of fellow film makers and artistes had been working on a number of symbolic ideas and issues in spain and france between the world wars. dadaism and surrealism influenced a lot of artists  the police (doo doo doo da) and poet arthur rambaud and edvard munch (the scream) and rene magritte (floating hats in space) and salvador dali (melting clocks) and and even hitchcock (psycho). no norman rockwell. here what i recall most about this film represent a girl meets up with a cow while her eye gets slashed by a razor while clownish men cavort in a meadow. there is not and as i said and much of a plot and but then again and that must be the point. this was attacked as porn back then and and would be again today. one of the trade marks of surrealism is a significant anti feminism. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
