i was expecting a lot from this movie and and i can say i haven not been disappointed. first of all and this movie and as a world tour of wine making and let the spectator enjoy beautiful places. the people interviewed are really interesting and funny too and in particular hubert de montille. the shooting may be confusing and the camera always being unsteady and often focusing on secondary elements in the backgrounds. you may not like it and but i do not consider it as a defect. the themes raised in the movie may be kind of confusing as well and since globalization isn not the only issue discussed. but nossiter managed to give his movie a consistency all along. a great achievement of this movie is revealing all the characters involved in the wine industry as they really are and avoiding a cliché good against evil. this could be the main difference between mondovino and michael moore documentaries while nossiter point of view appears in a subtle way and through opinions expressed by his favorite characters. the richness of this documentary relies mainly upon the characters and the history of long time wine making families and such as the de montilles and the mondavis and the antinori and the frescobaldi. nossiter lets the spectator discover that wine is somehow related to families and rather than just being a business and an industry. this movie doesn not make you want to drink wine and but certainly make you want to discover vineyards and wine makers. i watched this movie as a student in enology and and let just there are many ways to learn. i give this documentary positive  and despite his technical particularities. 
i was expecting a lot from this movie and and i can say i haven not been disappointed. first of all and this movie and as a world tour of wine making and let the spectator enjoy beautiful places. the people interviewed are really interesting and funny too and in particular hubert de montille. the shooting may be confusing and the camera always being unsteady and often focusing on secondary elements in the backgrounds. you may not like it and but i do not consider it as a defect. the themes raised in the movie may be kind of confusing as well and since globalization isn not the only issue discussed. but nossiter managed to give his movie a consistency all along. a great achievement of this movie is revealing all the characters involved in the wine industry as they really are and avoiding a cliché good against evil. this could be the main difference between mondovino and michael moore documentaries while nossiter point of view appears in a subtle way and through opinions expressed by his favorite characters. the richness of this documentary relies mainly upon the characters and the history of long time wine making families and such as the de montilles and the mondavis and the antinori and the frescobaldi. nossiter lets the spectator discover that wine is somehow related to families and rather than just being a business and an industry. this movie doesn not make you want to drink wine and but certainly make you want to discover vineyards and wine makers. i watched this movie as a student in enology and and let just there are many ways to learn. i give this documentary positive  and despite his technical particularities. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
