this movie is a shameful result of what happens when representa) it is written and directed and produced by an idiot. and or or b) it was rushed in production to satiate the poker or stu ungar craze. the story from beginning is uneven. vidmer spends too much time on ungar childhood and not enough on some of the legendary tales  such as counting cards and his blackjack escapades and the roll of money as id. he also leaves out mentions of other poker greats such as chip reese and brunson etc. the movie is a complete mess from beginning to end. if you want a more complete and accurate account and read the book one of a kind. if you thought the movie was good and read the book and change your mind. 
this movie is a shameful result of what happens when representa) it is written and directed and produced by an idiot. and or or b) it was rushed in production to satiate the poker or stu ungar craze. the story from beginning is uneven. vidmer spends too much time on ungar childhood and not enough on some of the legendary tales  such as counting cards and his blackjack escapades and the roll of money as id. he also leaves out mentions of other poker greats such as chip reese and brunson etc. the movie is a complete mess from beginning to end. if you want a more complete and accurate account and read the book one of a kind. if you thought the movie was good and read the book and change your mind. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
