nuts in may may be one of the worst films i have ever seen. if ed wood was still alive this would be the type of movie he would be doing. to say this movie is bad would be the understatement of the century. but how bad is it really. well and here are two levels of bad i go by while it so bad it good or it so bad it god awful. this film falls into the latter section. what little unintentional humor it has does not make up for the slow and hard to understand and boring majority of the film. summary represent spoilerstwo middle aged anglos take a trip to the countryside for some r and r and camping and there they met ray soon to be jim (i will explain later) and who tent is next to our main couple. throughout most of the movie the two leads go sight seeing on the beach and at a rock quarry and other exciting locations. in between these adventures they talk endlessly about the environment and vegetarianism and fossil collecting and the duty of a proper citizen and proper diet and all thing i want to see in a comedy. they bore anyone who will listen to them. the dialogue is not only bad and but the pacing in some scenes is so slow i sometimes felt like dosing off. scenes would go on forever and just when it begins to build up and something is about to happen the scene ends. half way through the movie i thought to myself and nothing is going to happen in this thing and it is truly a movie about nothing. the characters are annoying and constantly repeat things. at one part i felt the director was playing a cruel joke on his audience. the scene i am referring to is the sing along scene. in it our two boresome brits play some of there music for us and actually it was the same 4 four lines over and over and over and over. the idea was to get ray to sing along with them and but ray knew and as well as us and that they are the worst songwriters known to man. this scene was beyond tedious and by the fifth time the song was played i started to question the existance of a merciful god. words can not describe the awfulness of this film. the first thing that strikes you is the indecipherable british accents that most of the cast has. remember the thick scottish accents in trainspotting. times that by 10. towards the end our tree hugging and incoherent and couple get into a fight with some of ray friends that have complete disrespect for the rules of camping. our hero becomes so incensed that a climatic battle ensues between our hero and the head hellraiser. to settle their dispute the two men engage in a stick fight. that right a stick fight. now this is where the unintensional humor starts. i laughed so hard at the ineptitude of it all that i thought and this may make up for the other 80 minutes. after this histerical battle our hero runs behind some bushes to cry his eyes out and the other man calls ray over by calling him jim for some unknown reason. a stick fight and a crying nature loving 40 year old and a character name change 3/4 into the movie and ed wood would be proud. though and i was again forced to endure the last 10 minutes which to sum up ends with a long take of a pig. why. who the hell knows. at one moment we see a pig grazing and the next the credits start to role over the screen. one of the worst endings to a one of the worst films of all time. 
nuts in may may be one of the worst films i have ever seen. if ed wood was still alive this would be the type of movie he would be doing. to say this movie is bad would be the understatement of the century. but how bad is it really. well and here are two levels of bad i go by while it so bad it good or it so bad it god awful. this film falls into the latter section. what little unintentional humor it has does not make up for the slow and hard to understand and boring majority of the film. summary represent spoilerstwo middle aged anglos take a trip to the countryside for some r and r and camping and there they met ray soon to be jim (i will explain later) and who tent is next to our main couple. throughout most of the movie the two leads go sight seeing on the beach and at a rock quarry and other exciting locations. in between these adventures they talk endlessly about the environment and vegetarianism and fossil collecting and the duty of a proper citizen and proper diet and all thing i want to see in a comedy. they bore anyone who will listen to them. the dialogue is not only bad and but the pacing in some scenes is so slow i sometimes felt like dosing off. scenes would go on forever and just when it begins to build up and something is about to happen the scene ends. half way through the movie i thought to myself and nothing is going to happen in this thing and it is truly a movie about nothing. the characters are annoying and constantly repeat things. at one part i felt the director was playing a cruel joke on his audience. the scene i am referring to is the sing along scene. in it our two boresome brits play some of there music for us and actually it was the same 4 four lines over and over and over and over. the idea was to get ray to sing along with them and but ray knew and as well as us and that they are the worst songwriters known to man. this scene was beyond tedious and by the fifth time the song was played i started to question the existance of a merciful god. words can not describe the awfulness of this film. the first thing that strikes you is the indecipherable british accents that most of the cast has. remember the thick scottish accents in trainspotting. times that by 10. towards the end our tree hugging and incoherent and couple get into a fight with some of ray friends that have complete disrespect for the rules of camping. our hero becomes so incensed that a climatic battle ensues between our hero and the head hellraiser. to settle their dispute the two men engage in a stick fight. that right a stick fight. now this is where the unintensional humor starts. i laughed so hard at the ineptitude of it all that i thought and this may make up for the other 80 minutes. after this histerical battle our hero runs behind some bushes to cry his eyes out and the other man calls ray over by calling him jim for some unknown reason. a stick fight and a crying nature loving 40 year old and a character name change 3/4 into the movie and ed wood would be proud. though and i was again forced to endure the last 10 minutes which to sum up ends with a long take of a pig. why. who the hell knows. at one moment we see a pig grazing and the next the credits start to role over the screen. one of the worst endings to a one of the worst films of all time. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
