an awful film while badly written and badly acted and cliched and hackneyed and dross. the premise is such a good one and a chance to educate about black cowboys but the film is truly dire. it is a curious mix of a bad 1950 randolph scott b movie and a bad 1970 spaghetti western. the villains are cardboard and the flashbacks laughable and the dialogue excruciating. the deliberate anachronisms (such as victorian rap singers and modern swear words like motherfer) and are irritating to the extreme. a frankenstein monster that died on the lab table. 
an awful film while badly written and badly acted and cliched and hackneyed and dross. the premise is such a good one and a chance to educate about black cowboys but the film is truly dire. it is a curious mix of a bad 1950 randolph scott b movie and a bad 1970 spaghetti western. the villains are cardboard and the flashbacks laughable and the dialogue excruciating. the deliberate anachronisms (such as victorian rap singers and modern swear words like motherfer) and are irritating to the extreme. a frankenstein monster that died on the lab table. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
