the vampire craze has and in my opinion and actually proved its worthiness of such infamous categorization. there were many sub genre films last year from a multitude of countries. i have reviewed many and have a few more to discuss. forgive my indulgence and but since i have recognized the trend as a phenomenon (which it is and and coincidentally and features my favorite horror staple). i am going to now move outside of north america for a bit and introduce you to hopefully meaning films that you do not see as of now. of the many effects of twilight is the creation of guy and girl vampire movies. i hate this sexist categorization and which has the effect of polarizing an entire generation of fans into sides. i think men are prone to hate stephenie meyer work (and its offspring) to some degree because they feel some sense of betrayal that an archetype which was always theirs is now liberated. women may be unlikely to enjoy future neutral pics since they grew up with ironclad expectations that were enforced four times. we need more directors to create vampire films which either gender is capable of enjoying (unequally) if vampires are going to survive the craze and remain relevant. cue represent thirst this korean film was directed by park chan wook of oldboy fame. there are two ways to dissect it. either it straddles between gender expectations and is universally marginally enjoyable and or it is a floundering mess that doesn not decide which target audience it prefers and should therefore be viewed by no one. don not let me convince you that the film has no inclinations. its director is a man whose fame is story driven action films. its protagonist is male and has a passive aggressive interest in his lover (more on this later). still and his desire for a woman he has known both before and after mortal life is not contrived and and his attention is returned. there is a male slant to this picture and yet it is not so one sided that women could not enjoy it. the same cannot be said of daybreakers or new moon. the plot follows an emile zola novel called thérèse raquin and which i have not read. according to wikipedia and the novel is about an affair that develops between a married woman and a single man. he kills her husband during a fishing trip and begins dating her. the two of them are incapable of having sex because they picture the dead man body between them. they are thus driven to insanity and but care for the woman ailing mother. at the novel conclusion and they try to kill each other and discover each other plans and and commit suicide. now and transcribe this nearly 150 year old french novel into modern south korea and you have got thirst. chan wook doesn not embellish the story enough to elevate this to must see. he often ignores many of his own ideas in favor of following his inspiration. i think the most memorable parts are when his scruples are unhinged by narrative. his use of the mother in law as the foil for their bad romance is just perfect. see it. the protagonist is originally a devout christian who becomes a vampire after a faulty blood transfusion following his volunteering for a new medicine. he thus becomes the god he once was smitten with. people flock to him and view him as a grand healer. ok. that really cool and could have provided a great basis for his relationship. yet this idea is given little idea screen time as he changes into a realistic christ figure who tries to maintain his virtue even though his lifestyle demands that he relinquish it. instead of confronting the delusional people and he instead sips blood out of comatose hospital patients. let continue with the christian allusion. the woman tricks the vampire man into killing her husband. her overprotective mother in law suffers a stroke and eventually warns friends of the family of her daughter in law treachery (finger waggles). the man kills her but resurrects her. the two of them invite former friends over and the woman begins mercilessly harassing the humans. the man says enough is enough and decides to drive to a beach and forces her into waiting for sunrise with him. they both die and but he atones for her crimes (and his own but the film portrays her evil more prominently). the woman character is a caricature and and her profession offers an explanation for her behavior. she is a housewife with no education and while the man is a priest whose mortal life was restrictive. vampirism magnifies their characteristics. she becomes a monster like one would expect of someone without knowledge. he becomes a demigod with a spirit. his life is how atheists view themselves and her life is how religious people view those without divine intervention. 
the vampire craze has and in my opinion and actually proved its worthiness of such infamous categorization. there were many sub genre films last year from a multitude of countries. i have reviewed many and have a few more to discuss. forgive my indulgence and but since i have recognized the trend as a phenomenon (which it is and and coincidentally and features my favorite horror staple). i am going to now move outside of north america for a bit and introduce you to hopefully meaning films that you do not see as of now. of the many effects of twilight is the creation of guy and girl vampire movies. i hate this sexist categorization and which has the effect of polarizing an entire generation of fans into sides. i think men are prone to hate stephenie meyer work (and its offspring) to some degree because they feel some sense of betrayal that an archetype which was always theirs is now liberated. women may be unlikely to enjoy future neutral pics since they grew up with ironclad expectations that were enforced four times. we need more directors to create vampire films which either gender is capable of enjoying (unequally) if vampires are going to survive the craze and remain relevant. cue represent thirst this korean film was directed by park chan wook of oldboy fame. there are two ways to dissect it. either it straddles between gender expectations and is universally marginally enjoyable and or it is a floundering mess that doesn not decide which target audience it prefers and should therefore be viewed by no one. don not let me convince you that the film has no inclinations. its director is a man whose fame is story driven action films. its protagonist is male and has a passive aggressive interest in his lover (more on this later). still and his desire for a woman he has known both before and after mortal life is not contrived and and his attention is returned. there is a male slant to this picture and yet it is not so one sided that women could not enjoy it. the same cannot be said of daybreakers or new moon. the plot follows an emile zola novel called thérèse raquin and which i have not read. according to wikipedia and the novel is about an affair that develops between a married woman and a single man. he kills her husband during a fishing trip and begins dating her. the two of them are incapable of having sex because they picture the dead man body between them. they are thus driven to insanity and but care for the woman ailing mother. at the novel conclusion and they try to kill each other and discover each other plans and and commit suicide. now and transcribe this nearly 150 year old french novel into modern south korea and you have got thirst. chan wook doesn not embellish the story enough to elevate this to must see. he often ignores many of his own ideas in favor of following his inspiration. i think the most memorable parts are when his scruples are unhinged by narrative. his use of the mother in law as the foil for their bad romance is just perfect. see it. the protagonist is originally a devout christian who becomes a vampire after a faulty blood transfusion following his volunteering for a new medicine. he thus becomes the god he once was smitten with. people flock to him and view him as a grand healer. ok. that really cool and could have provided a great basis for his relationship. yet this idea is given little idea screen time as he changes into a realistic christ figure who tries to maintain his virtue even though his lifestyle demands that he relinquish it. instead of confronting the delusional people and he instead sips blood out of comatose hospital patients. let continue with the christian allusion. the woman tricks the vampire man into killing her husband. her overprotective mother in law suffers a stroke and eventually warns friends of the family of her daughter in law treachery (finger waggles). the man kills her but resurrects her. the two of them invite former friends over and the woman begins mercilessly harassing the humans. the man says enough is enough and decides to drive to a beach and forces her into waiting for sunrise with him. they both die and but he atones for her crimes (and his own but the film portrays her evil more prominently). the woman character is a caricature and and her profession offers an explanation for her behavior. she is a housewife with no education and while the man is a priest whose mortal life was restrictive. vampirism magnifies their characteristics. she becomes a monster like one would expect of someone without knowledge. he becomes a demigod with a spirit. his life is how atheists view themselves and her life is how religious people view those without divine intervention. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
