a good example of the differences between american and foreign cinema can be seen in a film i recently watched on television represent indecent proposal. indecent proposal two protagonists and david and diane murphy are played woody harrelson and demi moore. i am not sure if it was their total lack of chemistry or that they were not acting well and but why we should care so much whether these two stay together was beyond me. love and affection and playfulness and attraction  none of these materialized on screen in their interactions together. since i knew that eventually robert redford would show up and it was clear from the beginning that the good part and the meat of the movie and would be the scenes between him and demi moore. poor woody harrelson just could not muster any emotion at all for the film. he seemed to be holding back and preoccupied with his receding hairline. ok and so fast forward. what idiots these two (diane and david) are for thinking they can win back the $50 and 000 they owe by gambling. no acting faux pas there and just hideously bad and lazy and unforgivable writing. of course they lose all their money. surprised. i know i wasn not. enter robert redford (john gage in the film)  a romantic and perhaps emotionally frigid man and an updated gatsby. a very good role and though not a great and great actor and next to those two and redford looks like olivier. he immediately falls in love and lust with diane and we the viewers for once feel it. this is how to love a woman. not david way and trading gum mouth to mouth with diane on a slimy pier. (did i see that right. ) as gage and redford wears a suit and tie in every scene. yes it meant to instruct the seemingly brain dead audience that here is a rich man and but he also looks damn good and by this point the brain dead audience appreciates it. other wardrobe symbolism includes david now ironed shirts at the end of the film and signifying resolve and getting it together after a long interlude of forlorn wrinkled shirt wearing. and what is it with california garden parties as depicted in hollywood movies. suddenly everyone appears british and complete with lacy dresses and three piece suits for the men and hats (hats. ) and of course the parasol. yes diane and her transformation to rich man fiancée now complete and is there at the auction daintily twirling a parasol. though she insisted that she couldn not be bought and she succumbed at last to the sexual tension. here is where the film branches off into pure americana. i mean and of course david and diane will end up together and my question is represent why. diane was bored with david and why not let her ride the robert redford wave. and i mean for a good long while. how can she pull herself out of the sexual romantic thrall of this sexy older man so easily just because woody harrelson brings his receding hairline to the garden party and sits himself down and looks demi moore in the eyes. that just not how it goes. he was so weak. but we must have our happy ending. we have to swallow the moral lesson. were not sophisticated enough yet to have it otherwise. director lyn tried to make a fatal attraction for the juvie set and the younguns. in addition to garden parties in which there nary an suv and tee shirt and or baseball cap in sight and such films also feature a reliable public transportation system that connects far flung california cities and municipalities. how else to symbolize the return to middle class or working class life. 
a good example of the differences between american and foreign cinema can be seen in a film i recently watched on television represent indecent proposal. indecent proposal two protagonists and david and diane murphy are played woody harrelson and demi moore. i am not sure if it was their total lack of chemistry or that they were not acting well and but why we should care so much whether these two stay together was beyond me. love and affection and playfulness and attraction  none of these materialized on screen in their interactions together. since i knew that eventually robert redford would show up and it was clear from the beginning that the good part and the meat of the movie and would be the scenes between him and demi moore. poor woody harrelson just could not muster any emotion at all for the film. he seemed to be holding back and preoccupied with his receding hairline. ok and so fast forward. what idiots these two (diane and david) are for thinking they can win back the $50 and 000 they owe by gambling. no acting faux pas there and just hideously bad and lazy and unforgivable writing. of course they lose all their money. surprised. i know i wasn not. enter robert redford (john gage in the film)  a romantic and perhaps emotionally frigid man and an updated gatsby. a very good role and though not a great and great actor and next to those two and redford looks like olivier. he immediately falls in love and lust with diane and we the viewers for once feel it. this is how to love a woman. not david way and trading gum mouth to mouth with diane on a slimy pier. (did i see that right. ) as gage and redford wears a suit and tie in every scene. yes it meant to instruct the seemingly brain dead audience that here is a rich man and but he also looks damn good and by this point the brain dead audience appreciates it. other wardrobe symbolism includes david now ironed shirts at the end of the film and signifying resolve and getting it together after a long interlude of forlorn wrinkled shirt wearing. and what is it with california garden parties as depicted in hollywood movies. suddenly everyone appears british and complete with lacy dresses and three piece suits for the men and hats (hats. ) and of course the parasol. yes diane and her transformation to rich man fiancée now complete and is there at the auction daintily twirling a parasol. though she insisted that she couldn not be bought and she succumbed at last to the sexual tension. here is where the film branches off into pure americana. i mean and of course david and diane will end up together and my question is represent why. diane was bored with david and why not let her ride the robert redford wave. and i mean for a good long while. how can she pull herself out of the sexual romantic thrall of this sexy older man so easily just because woody harrelson brings his receding hairline to the garden party and sits himself down and looks demi moore in the eyes. that just not how it goes. he was so weak. but we must have our happy ending. we have to swallow the moral lesson. were not sophisticated enough yet to have it otherwise. director lyn tried to make a fatal attraction for the juvie set and the younguns. in addition to garden parties in which there nary an suv and tee shirt and or baseball cap in sight and such films also feature a reliable public transportation system that connects far flung california cities and municipalities. how else to symbolize the return to middle class or working class life. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
