i am not a big fan of the spielberg or cruise version of this film. and so i must throw in with the more humble latt or howel version. c thomas howel had more heart and more sympathy that cruise in the lead role (at least in my opinion). now this is hard to imagine until you strip away everything thing in the spielberg version that cost more than a thousand dollars. there would be nothing left and no special effects and no sets and no cruise. because i doubt that anything cost more than a cool grand in the david michael latt version. so and comparing apples to turnips i guess i have to go with the turnips. at least it gives independent movies a shot at the epic science fiction disaster market. 
i am not a big fan of the spielberg or cruise version of this film. and so i must throw in with the more humble latt or howel version. c thomas howel had more heart and more sympathy that cruise in the lead role (at least in my opinion). now this is hard to imagine until you strip away everything thing in the spielberg version that cost more than a thousand dollars. there would be nothing left and no special effects and no sets and no cruise. because i doubt that anything cost more than a cool grand in the david michael latt version. so and comparing apples to turnips i guess i have to go with the turnips. at least it gives independent movies a shot at the epic science fiction disaster market. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
