i am a huge fan of both emily watson (breaking the waves) and tom wilkinson (normal) and was amused to see them upstaged by rupert everett (dellamorte dellamore) in this shockingly rather minor movie that had all the ingredients to be so much more. the too brief scenes in which he portrays a languid and infinitely entitled and worthless son of a rich lord are spot on and entertaining. but for a love triangle there was remarkably little chemistry to speak of between anyone. the music was annoyingly movie of the week quality and and the voice over jarring and totally unnecessary. clearly the work of a first time director with a small budget who either lacked or do not sufficiently heed good advice. too bad. i can appreciate how the people you kind of hate at the beginning are the ones you kind of like at the end and and vice versa and so there is some sort of character arc and at least in terms of perception. for example and watson character and while refreshingly honest to her husband about her feelings for another man and began to grate on me near the end and particularly when she announced to her husband that she simply had absolutely no control over her actions and and later when she simply declared that she would be moving back into their marital flat and with no asking of permission and no apologies offered. and i went from disliking wilkinson control freak or moral relativist character to sort of understanding him and not really wanting him to change (unlike his wife). this movie awkwardly morphed from a whodunit to a love story or steel magnolias illness drama without sufficiently informing me of the fact and so i was left distractedly guessing what the next plot twist might be long after they had all been revealed (was it the lord driving the car. the lord dog. ). the scene where the lord visits wilkinson and relates how brave watson is and the bestest nurse any dying boyfriend could ever ask for and florence nightingale incarnate and etc. was ok until he started over the top sobbing like a baby. good god. if you ask me she just another flitty rich person with way too much time on her hands and and so she drives her hard working and well providing spouse crazy with unnecessary drama. her screwing around was just another way to occupy her empty life while the dying guy thing was an added bonus for her as it somehow made her previous actions completely above reproach. look and everyone would have been better off if wilkinson had just left her for his secretary and who seemed to appreciate him for who he was. instead he acted like an abused dog and his open craving for his wife affection increasing with every kick she gives him. i am not anti pc or anything and it just do not ring true and even after taking into account all of the harsh realities of middle age we all tend to face. the ending for me was (and not the director intention i am certain) depressing. the movie spent the last 80 minutes convincing me that these two people just do not belong together and so i found no joy in the promise of their relationship continuing. i am not above wanting my emotions manipulated by a story and it just has to be somewhat plausible and not hackneyed. is that asking too much. my score represent negative . 
i am a huge fan of both emily watson (breaking the waves) and tom wilkinson (normal) and was amused to see them upstaged by rupert everett (dellamorte dellamore) in this shockingly rather minor movie that had all the ingredients to be so much more. the too brief scenes in which he portrays a languid and infinitely entitled and worthless son of a rich lord are spot on and entertaining. but for a love triangle there was remarkably little chemistry to speak of between anyone. the music was annoyingly movie of the week quality and and the voice over jarring and totally unnecessary. clearly the work of a first time director with a small budget who either lacked or do not sufficiently heed good advice. too bad. i can appreciate how the people you kind of hate at the beginning are the ones you kind of like at the end and and vice versa and so there is some sort of character arc and at least in terms of perception. for example and watson character and while refreshingly honest to her husband about her feelings for another man and began to grate on me near the end and particularly when she announced to her husband that she simply had absolutely no control over her actions and and later when she simply declared that she would be moving back into their marital flat and with no asking of permission and no apologies offered. and i went from disliking wilkinson control freak or moral relativist character to sort of understanding him and not really wanting him to change (unlike his wife). this movie awkwardly morphed from a whodunit to a love story or steel magnolias illness drama without sufficiently informing me of the fact and so i was left distractedly guessing what the next plot twist might be long after they had all been revealed (was it the lord driving the car. the lord dog. ). the scene where the lord visits wilkinson and relates how brave watson is and the bestest nurse any dying boyfriend could ever ask for and florence nightingale incarnate and etc. was ok until he started over the top sobbing like a baby. good god. if you ask me she just another flitty rich person with way too much time on her hands and and so she drives her hard working and well providing spouse crazy with unnecessary drama. her screwing around was just another way to occupy her empty life while the dying guy thing was an added bonus for her as it somehow made her previous actions completely above reproach. look and everyone would have been better off if wilkinson had just left her for his secretary and who seemed to appreciate him for who he was. instead he acted like an abused dog and his open craving for his wife affection increasing with every kick she gives him. i am not anti pc or anything and it just do not ring true and even after taking into account all of the harsh realities of middle age we all tend to face. the ending for me was (and not the director intention i am certain) depressing. the movie spent the last 80 minutes convincing me that these two people just do not belong together and so i found no joy in the promise of their relationship continuing. i am not above wanting my emotions manipulated by a story and it just has to be somewhat plausible and not hackneyed. is that asking too much. my score represent negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
