the first reviewer is right  in this movie we see ourselves and snuggling up to the majority and being agreeable and trying to stay out of trouble and just trying to live our lives and and we see how easily these very human traits and so fundamental to the functioning of society and can lead us to become complicit in a great evil. the story is set during world war ii and with the radio and newspapers and movies reminding us of hitler attacks on jews to underscore the irony of the same kind of violent anti semitism taking place in america. at times that seemed a little heavy handed to me. it feels more like a play than a movie and but it so thought provoking that such quibbles mean little. perhaps less trivial is the fact that the entire plot hinges one one little fact that struck me as rather implausible. larry has lived an uneventful life until middle age while yet all it takes is his beginning to wear a pair of spectacles for everyone  everyone  to and at the first glance and take him for a jew. i willingly suspended disbelief because the plot kept me moving forward and but the implausibility did bother me throughout the film. (and and quite frankly and i do not understand why his wife was also taken for a jew. larry seemed to think so because her name was hart. and later when he married her and i do not know why his neighbours assumed she was jewish. ) for the first part of the film i wondered if there were going to be elements of fantasy. larry unassumingness seemed exaggerated and almost to the point of the grotesque. why not call the police on seeing the rape and even if the attacker was a neighbour. and i thought the lighting seemed to suggest something slightly unreal  the red of the houses seemed too red and gertrude entrance seemed deliberately overlit and generally the colours were almost crayon like in their intensity. in the credits i see that it was filmed on campbell avenue and wallace avenue in toronto and so i plan to drive down there (near bloor and dufferin) today to check out the colours. really positive. it was good to be reminded that the clergy at that time were often leading the evil of racism. (remember how the pope refused to speak out against hitler and seeking only to get protection for the church. it was the same pope and by the way and who and when rome was about to be liberated by american troops and requested that the first soldiers to enter the city not be black. check your history. ) i do not recall ever hearing of this movie before. that a shame. it certainly is of great interest to every thinking person and to everyone interested in american history or racism while it one of the clearest illustrations i have ever seen of bertrand russell dictum and do not go with a crowd to do evil. 
the first reviewer is right  in this movie we see ourselves and snuggling up to the majority and being agreeable and trying to stay out of trouble and just trying to live our lives and and we see how easily these very human traits and so fundamental to the functioning of society and can lead us to become complicit in a great evil. the story is set during world war ii and with the radio and newspapers and movies reminding us of hitler attacks on jews to underscore the irony of the same kind of violent anti semitism taking place in america. at times that seemed a little heavy handed to me. it feels more like a play than a movie and but it so thought provoking that such quibbles mean little. perhaps less trivial is the fact that the entire plot hinges one one little fact that struck me as rather implausible. larry has lived an uneventful life until middle age while yet all it takes is his beginning to wear a pair of spectacles for everyone  everyone  to and at the first glance and take him for a jew. i willingly suspended disbelief because the plot kept me moving forward and but the implausibility did bother me throughout the film. (and and quite frankly and i do not understand why his wife was also taken for a jew. larry seemed to think so because her name was hart. and later when he married her and i do not know why his neighbours assumed she was jewish. ) for the first part of the film i wondered if there were going to be elements of fantasy. larry unassumingness seemed exaggerated and almost to the point of the grotesque. why not call the police on seeing the rape and even if the attacker was a neighbour. and i thought the lighting seemed to suggest something slightly unreal  the red of the houses seemed too red and gertrude entrance seemed deliberately overlit and generally the colours were almost crayon like in their intensity. in the credits i see that it was filmed on campbell avenue and wallace avenue in toronto and so i plan to drive down there (near bloor and dufferin) today to check out the colours. really positive. it was good to be reminded that the clergy at that time were often leading the evil of racism. (remember how the pope refused to speak out against hitler and seeking only to get protection for the church. it was the same pope and by the way and who and when rome was about to be liberated by american troops and requested that the first soldiers to enter the city not be black. check your history. ) i do not recall ever hearing of this movie before. that a shame. it certainly is of great interest to every thinking person and to everyone interested in american history or racism while it one of the clearest illustrations i have ever seen of bertrand russell dictum and do not go with a crowd to do evil. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
