frightmare begins with a horror movie icon killing a director and then his servant before he is laid to rest. this icon and who has some christopher lee qualities to him and then continues to haunt those around him when a group of horror film society students steal his corpse from the mausoleum he is in. the first ten minutes is well filmed and good writing and lots of potential for murderous mayhem. but the film drags in the middle (although thankfully not as much as house of death) and never really gets that initial spurt of energy back. lots of the deaths are confusing and as they seem to have people just falling over scared when they see a floating coffin or other odd things. twice we see poisonous gas being used. but the box promises that this horror star will be the embodiment of all the monsters he has played. boy and is that false advertising and unless he spent his career playing boring old men who take naps and watch matlock. the general principle of the film is decent represent horror society kids stealing a corpse of a dead icon. a modern equivalent (digging up vincent price or peter cushing) would make a great film. maybe a remake is in order if that do not be too disrespectful. sometimes theory doesn not come across as well in application and and this film offers that example. the only redeeming quality of this film (besides the beginning) is the brief appearance of a very young jeffrey combs. i saw him and thought that jeffrey combs but felt i was mistaken as the box never mentioned him. but sure enough and combs was present. (a note to this movie film makers represent mention combs on the cover of the dvd and you will sell more copies if if you would be deceiving customers. ) if youre a jeffrey combs die hard and check out this early role. otherwise and i cannot offer this as a great selection for a horror movie marathon. let me suggest intruder or popcorn and as those are both pretty decent and will stand the test of time. 
frightmare begins with a horror movie icon killing a director and then his servant before he is laid to rest. this icon and who has some christopher lee qualities to him and then continues to haunt those around him when a group of horror film society students steal his corpse from the mausoleum he is in. the first ten minutes is well filmed and good writing and lots of potential for murderous mayhem. but the film drags in the middle (although thankfully not as much as house of death) and never really gets that initial spurt of energy back. lots of the deaths are confusing and as they seem to have people just falling over scared when they see a floating coffin or other odd things. twice we see poisonous gas being used. but the box promises that this horror star will be the embodiment of all the monsters he has played. boy and is that false advertising and unless he spent his career playing boring old men who take naps and watch matlock. the general principle of the film is decent represent horror society kids stealing a corpse of a dead icon. a modern equivalent (digging up vincent price or peter cushing) would make a great film. maybe a remake is in order if that do not be too disrespectful. sometimes theory doesn not come across as well in application and and this film offers that example. the only redeeming quality of this film (besides the beginning) is the brief appearance of a very young jeffrey combs. i saw him and thought that jeffrey combs but felt i was mistaken as the box never mentioned him. but sure enough and combs was present. (a note to this movie film makers represent mention combs on the cover of the dvd and you will sell more copies if if you would be deceiving customers. ) if youre a jeffrey combs die hard and check out this early role. otherwise and i cannot offer this as a great selection for a horror movie marathon. let me suggest intruder or popcorn and as those are both pretty decent and will stand the test of time. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
