i was very disappointed by this movie. ms english who says that she is a fan of the original movie seemed to have taken a great piece of artistic work and and transformed it into a flat lined ho hum you have come a long way baby production. i tried to like meg ryan mary haines and but she was just boring. she do not seem to feel anything about her husband affair. there was no emotional struggle and no deep hurt. in the original 1939 movie norma shearer mary haines felt betrayed and shocked and vulnerable and confused and angry. the 2008 production was more about some fake sisterhood theme and (actually my wife words)and do not make you shed a tear or even chuckle. the only performances that were note worthy were of debra messing and and bette midler. (i wanted more of bette. ) there was really no protagonist in this movie. the sylvia fowler character had too many sub themes to it. and crystal allen had no fire. the remake of the department store encounter with annette benning and and miss mendez was luke warm. also the pacing was slow as well. obviously the 1939 version needed to be updated and but this one wasn not it. the reason that the original version worked so well was that the characters were dealing with man problems. a subject by the way which isn not out dated. the magic of the original movie was that the movie was about both sexes and while you never saw the men. 
i was very disappointed by this movie. ms english who says that she is a fan of the original movie seemed to have taken a great piece of artistic work and and transformed it into a flat lined ho hum you have come a long way baby production. i tried to like meg ryan mary haines and but she was just boring. she do not seem to feel anything about her husband affair. there was no emotional struggle and no deep hurt. in the original 1939 movie norma shearer mary haines felt betrayed and shocked and vulnerable and confused and angry. the 2008 production was more about some fake sisterhood theme and (actually my wife words)and do not make you shed a tear or even chuckle. the only performances that were note worthy were of debra messing and and bette midler. (i wanted more of bette. ) there was really no protagonist in this movie. the sylvia fowler character had too many sub themes to it. and crystal allen had no fire. the remake of the department store encounter with annette benning and and miss mendez was luke warm. also the pacing was slow as well. obviously the 1939 version needed to be updated and but this one wasn not it. the reason that the original version worked so well was that the characters were dealing with man problems. a subject by the way which isn not out dated. the magic of the original movie was that the movie was about both sexes and while you never saw the men. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
