it must be said that the director of the cell and tarsem singh and has quite handily established himself with his first feature and which happens to rank as one of the most visually astounding films in contemporary cinema. the cell is more of a visceral experience than a film. as a thriller and it rises above most of its peers and with competent editing and a chilling score effectively providing an exceptionally suspenseful atmosphere. however and it is ultimately tarsem skill for elaborate and disturbing set design and imagery that carries the film jolting sense of terror. as with several recent films and i have been shocked by the alarming hypocrisy among those who have commented negatively about the cell while in defence of the film and i will address a few of these issues. the plot appears to be the main concern and and while it is not revolutionary and borrows heavily from the silence of the lambs and it was never intended to be the most important aspect of the film while the plot itself is a vehicle through which tarsem vision simultaneously horrifying and wondrous is presented to the audience and much in the same way that the plot of the silence of the lambs is secondary to the fascinating study of its two lead characters and lecter and starling. while the silence of the lambs is clearly the superior film and it is irrational for one to condemn the plot of the cell and and in the same breath and praise that of the silence of the lambs. my final concern is the mention of mtv style directing. it pains me to see the condemnation of directors who use innovative camera and cinematography techniques. a camera has the potential to be much more than simply a tool with which to record events while angles and pans and colour adjustment and and so forth and are all used to their full extent in the cell with the purpose of creating the sense of a dream like state that could not have been otherwise achieved. this is essential to the film and as the entire premise behind it is the visualization of a serial killer subconscious. if you simply want a series of static shots and stick to stage plays and give up cinema altogether. that being said and the cell is thoroughly entertaining and terrifying and and breathtaking in both its pacing and design. anyone who is able to look past the perhaps uninspired and yet never dull screenplay will find one of the best films of the year 2000. 
it must be said that the director of the cell and tarsem singh and has quite handily established himself with his first feature and which happens to rank as one of the most visually astounding films in contemporary cinema. the cell is more of a visceral experience than a film. as a thriller and it rises above most of its peers and with competent editing and a chilling score effectively providing an exceptionally suspenseful atmosphere. however and it is ultimately tarsem skill for elaborate and disturbing set design and imagery that carries the film jolting sense of terror. as with several recent films and i have been shocked by the alarming hypocrisy among those who have commented negatively about the cell while in defence of the film and i will address a few of these issues. the plot appears to be the main concern and and while it is not revolutionary and borrows heavily from the silence of the lambs and it was never intended to be the most important aspect of the film while the plot itself is a vehicle through which tarsem vision simultaneously horrifying and wondrous is presented to the audience and much in the same way that the plot of the silence of the lambs is secondary to the fascinating study of its two lead characters and lecter and starling. while the silence of the lambs is clearly the superior film and it is irrational for one to condemn the plot of the cell and and in the same breath and praise that of the silence of the lambs. my final concern is the mention of mtv style directing. it pains me to see the condemnation of directors who use innovative camera and cinematography techniques. a camera has the potential to be much more than simply a tool with which to record events while angles and pans and colour adjustment and and so forth and are all used to their full extent in the cell with the purpose of creating the sense of a dream like state that could not have been otherwise achieved. this is essential to the film and as the entire premise behind it is the visualization of a serial killer subconscious. if you simply want a series of static shots and stick to stage plays and give up cinema altogether. that being said and the cell is thoroughly entertaining and terrifying and and breathtaking in both its pacing and design. anyone who is able to look past the perhaps uninspired and yet never dull screenplay will find one of the best films of the year 2000. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
