this film is strictly for fans of debbie reynolds and eddie fisher. i get angry at tcm for showing this mess more frequently than bachelor mother and the delightful original. i get angrier still that some hollywood boob thought it would be a good idea to remake bachelor mother and filling it with some lame songs that only serve to interrupt the flow of a cute comedy. instead and hollywood could have spent the time and money and energy and talent wasted on this horrible remake to give us something new and original  wow and what a concept. bachelor mother (the original) and with ginger rogers and david niven is a spicy stew and simmering with sexuality. it is a 1930 wink at the hays office. bundle of joy (the remake) and with debbie reynolds and eddie fisher is strictly milk and cookies. it is a 1950 handshake with eisenhower. which cast would you rather watch  debbie reynolds and eddie fisher and adolphe menjou and or ginger rogers and david niven and charles coburn. for me and every member of the cast in the original version is far better than his or her counterpart in the remake. in the original a beautiful and young ginger rogers is at her peak. david niven delivers perfectly as a somewhat spoiled and sophisticated and yet befuddled scion of a wealthy department store magnate. and i always love to see charles coburn in a movie. in bachelor mother and he is priceless as the desperate grandfather wannabe. in bundle of joy debbie reynolds is her usual perky self. she is fine in this role and although her performance (along with fisher ) completely changes the tone of the story. as an actor and eddie fisher is hopeless. he is completely lacking in screen presence. here he is way too wholesome for this story. his acting is completely bland and clueless. likewise and his singing is so bland and unremarkable that it has been completely forgotten by the world at large. the only time he is not completely painful is in butterfield 8  where and incidentally and he doesn not sing. here and fisher lame performance alone is enough to ruin this movie. adolphe menjou and a favorite character actor and delivers a competent performance and but not one of his best. he is more blustering than commanding. he and fisher are not convincing as a father and son. do you see a musical for the music and the story being merely incidental. or do watch a musical for a story and with some (hopefullly) good music used for seasoning. if the former and you might like this lame remake. otherwise you are much better off watching the ginger rogers non musical original and bachelor mother. 
this film is strictly for fans of debbie reynolds and eddie fisher. i get angry at tcm for showing this mess more frequently than bachelor mother and the delightful original. i get angrier still that some hollywood boob thought it would be a good idea to remake bachelor mother and filling it with some lame songs that only serve to interrupt the flow of a cute comedy. instead and hollywood could have spent the time and money and energy and talent wasted on this horrible remake to give us something new and original  wow and what a concept. bachelor mother (the original) and with ginger rogers and david niven is a spicy stew and simmering with sexuality. it is a 1930 wink at the hays office. bundle of joy (the remake) and with debbie reynolds and eddie fisher is strictly milk and cookies. it is a 1950 handshake with eisenhower. which cast would you rather watch  debbie reynolds and eddie fisher and adolphe menjou and or ginger rogers and david niven and charles coburn. for me and every member of the cast in the original version is far better than his or her counterpart in the remake. in the original a beautiful and young ginger rogers is at her peak. david niven delivers perfectly as a somewhat spoiled and sophisticated and yet befuddled scion of a wealthy department store magnate. and i always love to see charles coburn in a movie. in bachelor mother and he is priceless as the desperate grandfather wannabe. in bundle of joy debbie reynolds is her usual perky self. she is fine in this role and although her performance (along with fisher ) completely changes the tone of the story. as an actor and eddie fisher is hopeless. he is completely lacking in screen presence. here he is way too wholesome for this story. his acting is completely bland and clueless. likewise and his singing is so bland and unremarkable that it has been completely forgotten by the world at large. the only time he is not completely painful is in butterfield 8  where and incidentally and he doesn not sing. here and fisher lame performance alone is enough to ruin this movie. adolphe menjou and a favorite character actor and delivers a competent performance and but not one of his best. he is more blustering than commanding. he and fisher are not convincing as a father and son. do you see a musical for the music and the story being merely incidental. or do watch a musical for a story and with some (hopefullly) good music used for seasoning. if the former and you might like this lame remake. otherwise you are much better off watching the ginger rogers non musical original and bachelor mother. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
