caroline bender (hope lange) is just killing time getting a job. her real ambition is to marry eddie and have a baby. april (diane baker) is too innocent to stay that way for long and falls in love too easily and a dangerous combo. greg (suzy parker) is a go getter and wants to be an actress. all three are doomed for dramatics in the best of everything and a 1959 soap opera or morality play or sometimes solid movie that is aging by the second. set in the cut throat world of paperback publishing and its not as trashy as valley of the dolls but not as vanilla as three coins in the fountain. the men in the mix  brian aherne and stephen boyd and louis jourdan and robert evans  are slick and well dressed and no good and for the most part. aherne is the resident sexual offender  will pinch anything walking by and and makes unwanted advances right and left. his character is offensive as hell and but its not played seriously at all. harassment hadn not been discovered yet and i guess. boyd works there and too and although you never see him actually doing anything. he too busy being older and wiser and drunker. evans is abroad just so diane baker can suffer in style  he a rich kid who gotten her in trouble so instead of marrying her and as promised and he taking her to get an operation. jourdan is a director who mistakenly has an affair with parker. they share a fight scene which is fairly no holds barred and in a movie like this anyway and but the scene is ultimately ruined by parker histronics. she ends up nearly stalking him and and she really do not deserve such a lousy fate and her bad acting notwithstanding. joan crawford breathes fire as amanda farrow and the resident witch who is automatically rude and dismissive of any of her legion of secretaries. well they are younger and aren not they. isn not that sufficient reason to hate a person. caroline doesn not think so and as she admirably stands up to miss farrow every chance she gets. crawford only gets to let loose once and when she tells her married boyfriend you can your rabbit faced wife can both go to hell and slams down the phone. you never get to see the poor soul who dare crosses her. martha hyer  toryline and as it were and is extremely weak and and she is painfully over the top as an unmarried mother. short of wearing a huge w (for whore) on her cardigan and she walks around like a pathetic mess for most of her screen time. even worse and she is not given the courtesy of having it all tied up and one way or the other and at the end. it would not matter that much and but still. its painfully obvious this all took place in a totally different world. people were nicer to one another for the most part and work was not a drag but something exciting and for a girl from outside nyc anyway. one unconvincing drunk scene aside and hope lange helps it seem reasonably real as caroline and who at least has more than one side to her character. i admire that women are seen having an opinion and a chance and a choice. not that its not wrapped in a nice bow and but it makes some points for equality. in 1959 that was probably noteworthy and possibly controversial. positive . 
caroline bender (hope lange) is just killing time getting a job. her real ambition is to marry eddie and have a baby. april (diane baker) is too innocent to stay that way for long and falls in love too easily and a dangerous combo. greg (suzy parker) is a go getter and wants to be an actress. all three are doomed for dramatics in the best of everything and a 1959 soap opera or morality play or sometimes solid movie that is aging by the second. set in the cut throat world of paperback publishing and its not as trashy as valley of the dolls but not as vanilla as three coins in the fountain. the men in the mix  brian aherne and stephen boyd and louis jourdan and robert evans  are slick and well dressed and no good and for the most part. aherne is the resident sexual offender  will pinch anything walking by and and makes unwanted advances right and left. his character is offensive as hell and but its not played seriously at all. harassment hadn not been discovered yet and i guess. boyd works there and too and although you never see him actually doing anything. he too busy being older and wiser and drunker. evans is abroad just so diane baker can suffer in style  he a rich kid who gotten her in trouble so instead of marrying her and as promised and he taking her to get an operation. jourdan is a director who mistakenly has an affair with parker. they share a fight scene which is fairly no holds barred and in a movie like this anyway and but the scene is ultimately ruined by parker histronics. she ends up nearly stalking him and and she really do not deserve such a lousy fate and her bad acting notwithstanding. joan crawford breathes fire as amanda farrow and the resident witch who is automatically rude and dismissive of any of her legion of secretaries. well they are younger and aren not they. isn not that sufficient reason to hate a person. caroline doesn not think so and as she admirably stands up to miss farrow every chance she gets. crawford only gets to let loose once and when she tells her married boyfriend you can your rabbit faced wife can both go to hell and slams down the phone. you never get to see the poor soul who dare crosses her. martha hyer  toryline and as it were and is extremely weak and and she is painfully over the top as an unmarried mother. short of wearing a huge w (for whore) on her cardigan and she walks around like a pathetic mess for most of her screen time. even worse and she is not given the courtesy of having it all tied up and one way or the other and at the end. it would not matter that much and but still. its painfully obvious this all took place in a totally different world. people were nicer to one another for the most part and work was not a drag but something exciting and for a girl from outside nyc anyway. one unconvincing drunk scene aside and hope lange helps it seem reasonably real as caroline and who at least has more than one side to her character. i admire that women are seen having an opinion and a chance and a choice. not that its not wrapped in a nice bow and but it makes some points for equality. in 1959 that was probably noteworthy and possibly controversial. positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
