i agree with most of mr. rivera comments and and i just want to ad a couple of caveats. this film and the mascot is criminally neglected in its current form. for that matter and so is vampyr. the mascot isn not a bonus feature  it tacked on as a chapter in vampyr. even though it made very clear that this is a separate movie and it should have been treated as such by the manufacturers. and while im at it and vampyr needs some of that same respect and cleaning up as well. i got the feeling the decision to put the mascot on there went something like this. dude a represent we just transferred vampyr to dvd and but it comes up about 20 minutes short. we need to put something on there that would not cost much money. can you believe film critics want to be paid to talk about films. dude b represent not to worry. i have this little animation thingy that been sitting in my drawer. just go ahead and throw it on as an additional chapter. dude a represent youre awesome and dude b. the animation of the mascot is great and and there no need for me to repeat what mr. rivera done so well. however and this thing needs some major cleaning and restoring and especially the audio. the plot comes through in the dialogue. and in my copy there were so many hisses and pops and places where the sound just dropped right off (i would have had no idea what the dog was going after without having read the box). no amount of volume was going to make the words more understandable and it just brought up the tinniness and made the hisses and pops louder. bottom line is represent starewicz films need to be put into a respectful collection and cleaned up and spiffed up and liner notes and the whole nine yards. in other words and they need to be criterionized positive for the movie and not the product which would get only a 5. 
i agree with most of mr. rivera comments and and i just want to ad a couple of caveats. this film and the mascot is criminally neglected in its current form. for that matter and so is vampyr. the mascot isn not a bonus feature  it tacked on as a chapter in vampyr. even though it made very clear that this is a separate movie and it should have been treated as such by the manufacturers. and while im at it and vampyr needs some of that same respect and cleaning up as well. i got the feeling the decision to put the mascot on there went something like this. dude a represent we just transferred vampyr to dvd and but it comes up about 20 minutes short. we need to put something on there that would not cost much money. can you believe film critics want to be paid to talk about films. dude b represent not to worry. i have this little animation thingy that been sitting in my drawer. just go ahead and throw it on as an additional chapter. dude a represent youre awesome and dude b. the animation of the mascot is great and and there no need for me to repeat what mr. rivera done so well. however and this thing needs some major cleaning and restoring and especially the audio. the plot comes through in the dialogue. and in my copy there were so many hisses and pops and places where the sound just dropped right off (i would have had no idea what the dog was going after without having read the box). no amount of volume was going to make the words more understandable and it just brought up the tinniness and made the hisses and pops louder. bottom line is represent starewicz films need to be put into a respectful collection and cleaned up and spiffed up and liner notes and the whole nine yards. in other words and they need to be criterionized positive for the movie and not the product which would get only a 5. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
