nice to see a comedy for grown ups. masterfully structured by aaron sorkin via mike nichols own mastery. mr nichol mastery is to present characters in all their shocking truth and from the sad and riveting richard burton and elizabeth taylor in who afraid of virginia woolf to the sad and riveting julia roberts and clive owen and jude law and natalie portman in closer. in charlie wilson war the shocking truth is outside the characters and the sad and riveting tom hanks and julia roberts and philip seymour hoffman and amy adams are at the service of something else and it personal only to a point. hanks has to bury his brilliance in single malts and julia roberts throws parties and introduces characters with blatant straightforwardness. amy adams witnesses and exist as a character and witnessing. an insurmountable task that miss adams manages to surmount and beautifully. it is philip seymour hoffman gus with a t and however and that monopolized my attention. his character may not be a first but it is a first the way that hoffman presented him to us. someone who survives the disregard with which he treated by the absolute conviction that he smarter than all of them put together. hoffman is superb. the pacing of the tale helps enormously not to fall in a myriad of useless questions. a sharp and short and smart and sad comedy and when was the last time i was able to say that. 
nice to see a comedy for grown ups. masterfully structured by aaron sorkin via mike nichols own mastery. mr nichol mastery is to present characters in all their shocking truth and from the sad and riveting richard burton and elizabeth taylor in who afraid of virginia woolf to the sad and riveting julia roberts and clive owen and jude law and natalie portman in closer. in charlie wilson war the shocking truth is outside the characters and the sad and riveting tom hanks and julia roberts and philip seymour hoffman and amy adams are at the service of something else and it personal only to a point. hanks has to bury his brilliance in single malts and julia roberts throws parties and introduces characters with blatant straightforwardness. amy adams witnesses and exist as a character and witnessing. an insurmountable task that miss adams manages to surmount and beautifully. it is philip seymour hoffman gus with a t and however and that monopolized my attention. his character may not be a first but it is a first the way that hoffman presented him to us. someone who survives the disregard with which he treated by the absolute conviction that he smarter than all of them put together. hoffman is superb. the pacing of the tale helps enormously not to fall in a myriad of useless questions. a sharp and short and smart and sad comedy and when was the last time i was able to say that. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
