i tried watching this movie and but i do not make it past the first 15 minutes. it a terrible disappointment and considering the cast and but i can not look past the fact that the dialogue is in english and some of the actors pretending to be indian are not even close (read represent kristin kreuk). considering that india alone has 1/6th of the world population and one of the biggest movie industries and i do not think it would have been hard for the film makers to have found an excellent indian actress to play the part. and i do not say so because of some blind patriotism and but because it absolutely and totally absurd for a non indian to play the role of an indian or pakistani. now some people say that as long as she convincing who cares. but my point is exactly that she not convincing and never can be  not due to her acting skills and but due to her ethnicity. for example and however good an actor tom hanks may be and he will never be able to play an australian aborigine. but that is still minor to the biggest faux pas the film makers made represent having the dialogue in english. it totally destroys the mood and as well as any semblance of authenticity. had the same movie been made in native languages (hindi and urdu and punjabi) with english subtitles and this may have been an excellent movie. unfortunately and as things stand and i would not recommend anyone seeing it and apart from film students who want to study what not to do in movies. 
i tried watching this movie and but i do not make it past the first 15 minutes. it a terrible disappointment and considering the cast and but i can not look past the fact that the dialogue is in english and some of the actors pretending to be indian are not even close (read represent kristin kreuk). considering that india alone has 1/6th of the world population and one of the biggest movie industries and i do not think it would have been hard for the film makers to have found an excellent indian actress to play the part. and i do not say so because of some blind patriotism and but because it absolutely and totally absurd for a non indian to play the role of an indian or pakistani. now some people say that as long as she convincing who cares. but my point is exactly that she not convincing and never can be  not due to her acting skills and but due to her ethnicity. for example and however good an actor tom hanks may be and he will never be able to play an australian aborigine. but that is still minor to the biggest faux pas the film makers made represent having the dialogue in english. it totally destroys the mood and as well as any semblance of authenticity. had the same movie been made in native languages (hindi and urdu and punjabi) with english subtitles and this may have been an excellent movie. unfortunately and as things stand and i would not recommend anyone seeing it and apart from film students who want to study what not to do in movies. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
