this could have been a great movie with plenty of educational potential for teachers around the world about evolution and biology and the creative work in science and research and darwin life and but it is not. the screenplay is mostly historically inaccurate and transforms a true story into a mexican soup opera melodrama. while it is true that darwin gradually lost his religious beliefs and this was in great part due to his findings during the voyage of the beagle and not solely due to the loss of his daughter. he was certainly disturbed by his loss and but that did not made him literally insane and delusional and detached from his friends and family. the such portrayal of darwin is an invention of the script writer. thus it cannot be used in any way as place to learn a bit about darwin life and psyche. according to most historians and darwin had the theory ready by the end of the beagle voyage and and kept it from going public because he wanted to develop further the consequences of it and check against more data. in the movie and it is an imaginary conflict of darwin with his religious beliefs and the mental illness that he developed after his daughter death that kept him from going public. the movie brings a modern situation and the creationists vs scientists debate and into the life and times of darwin and thus it is anachronistic. it depicts thomas huxley not as a man trying to develop further understanding of biology but as someone eager to kill god and in his own words from the movie and and destroy the church and who would accept the theory of evolution for such purposes and not because it was a synthesis of plenty of disconnected data. huxley is presented as a very arrogant and insensible person and a combination that i interpret was an attempt to ridicule active atheists who speak up against religion. in real life and huxley accepted darwin ideas after publication only gradually and and before the work of darwin he thought that there was not enough evidence to support evolution. his first support of evolution was published one month after the origin of species became public. he was agnostic but did not think it was necessary to kill god and only thought that there was not enough evidence to believe in the supernatural. the debate creationists vs scientists appears throughout the movie and and creationists catch phrases such as it is only a theory are part of the discussion. of course and no such dispute or catch phrases existed at that time. in fact and the anglican church published a positive review of the origin saying that they saw god work in evolution and in some sense and quite in fact in contradiction to the way that the clergy is portrayed in the screenplay. another awful aspect of this movie is that it gives the wrong impression to the general public that scientific research is done by a solitary crazy man who just writes a lot. nothing could be further from the truth. the conception of the theory of evolution was the result of thorough observations of living forms by darwin during five years in the hms beagle and and was developed gradually as it can be seen from darwin notes of the voyage. even though the beagle voyage was the sole most important part of darwin life to the conception of origin of species and the voyage is briefly mentioned only once at the beginning and and no attempt is made to show that the book came as an elaborate analysis of observations. to make it worse and darwin is shown performing a single experiment (pigeon breeding) to test his theory and and in the end and quits it. and i am not really sure whether such experiment did actually occur. great disappointment. it is not in any way a homage to darwin and science. 
this could have been a great movie with plenty of educational potential for teachers around the world about evolution and biology and the creative work in science and research and darwin life and but it is not. the screenplay is mostly historically inaccurate and transforms a true story into a mexican soup opera melodrama. while it is true that darwin gradually lost his religious beliefs and this was in great part due to his findings during the voyage of the beagle and not solely due to the loss of his daughter. he was certainly disturbed by his loss and but that did not made him literally insane and delusional and detached from his friends and family. the such portrayal of darwin is an invention of the script writer. thus it cannot be used in any way as place to learn a bit about darwin life and psyche. according to most historians and darwin had the theory ready by the end of the beagle voyage and and kept it from going public because he wanted to develop further the consequences of it and check against more data. in the movie and it is an imaginary conflict of darwin with his religious beliefs and the mental illness that he developed after his daughter death that kept him from going public. the movie brings a modern situation and the creationists vs scientists debate and into the life and times of darwin and thus it is anachronistic. it depicts thomas huxley not as a man trying to develop further understanding of biology but as someone eager to kill god and in his own words from the movie and and destroy the church and who would accept the theory of evolution for such purposes and not because it was a synthesis of plenty of disconnected data. huxley is presented as a very arrogant and insensible person and a combination that i interpret was an attempt to ridicule active atheists who speak up against religion. in real life and huxley accepted darwin ideas after publication only gradually and and before the work of darwin he thought that there was not enough evidence to support evolution. his first support of evolution was published one month after the origin of species became public. he was agnostic but did not think it was necessary to kill god and only thought that there was not enough evidence to believe in the supernatural. the debate creationists vs scientists appears throughout the movie and and creationists catch phrases such as it is only a theory are part of the discussion. of course and no such dispute or catch phrases existed at that time. in fact and the anglican church published a positive review of the origin saying that they saw god work in evolution and in some sense and quite in fact in contradiction to the way that the clergy is portrayed in the screenplay. another awful aspect of this movie is that it gives the wrong impression to the general public that scientific research is done by a solitary crazy man who just writes a lot. nothing could be further from the truth. the conception of the theory of evolution was the result of thorough observations of living forms by darwin during five years in the hms beagle and and was developed gradually as it can be seen from darwin notes of the voyage. even though the beagle voyage was the sole most important part of darwin life to the conception of origin of species and the voyage is briefly mentioned only once at the beginning and and no attempt is made to show that the book came as an elaborate analysis of observations. to make it worse and darwin is shown performing a single experiment (pigeon breeding) to test his theory and and in the end and quits it. and i am not really sure whether such experiment did actually occur. great disappointment. it is not in any way a homage to darwin and science. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
