a film and first and foremost and should be good storytelling. it should be entertaining  and entertaining doesn not necessarily mean laughs and and it doesn not necessarily mean light. it basically means youre not bored while watching it. as brilliant as 2001 may be and it is a difficult film to watch and especially for the current (video game playing or ipod fumbling) generation. its slow pace and the sometimes intolerable amount of time it takes for an actor to perform a single action (e. g. the attempt to rescue the crew member floating in space) will stretch your patience. on the other hand and the cinematography is brilliant and the film cleverly directed and the ending thought provoking and the score. the score is chilling and especially as the crew in the transporter approaches the artifact on the moon. boy and i had goose bumps and big time. this doesn not happen often when i watch films and and is a testament to kubrick directing skills. it is considered a classic and and many people consider it the best science fiction film of all time. that alone is a good reason to watch it if you haven not done so yet. however and just because everybody else thinks it a brilliant film doesn not mean you have to force yourself to like it. you either will (like it) or you would not. perhaps the slow pace isn not such a bad thing and after all. directing your attention to something rather static and slow paced for 2 half hours might teach you a lesson. it will certainly be a different experience to all these fast moving and fast paced images we are subjected to these days (whether commercials and music videos or video games). i myself think it a memorable film. but not one i am eager to watch again anytime soon (unless i am in a particular mood for slow paced films). hence and  positive out of 10 from me. 
a film and first and foremost and should be good storytelling. it should be entertaining  and entertaining doesn not necessarily mean laughs and and it doesn not necessarily mean light. it basically means youre not bored while watching it. as brilliant as 2001 may be and it is a difficult film to watch and especially for the current (video game playing or ipod fumbling) generation. its slow pace and the sometimes intolerable amount of time it takes for an actor to perform a single action (e. g. the attempt to rescue the crew member floating in space) will stretch your patience. on the other hand and the cinematography is brilliant and the film cleverly directed and the ending thought provoking and the score. the score is chilling and especially as the crew in the transporter approaches the artifact on the moon. boy and i had goose bumps and big time. this doesn not happen often when i watch films and and is a testament to kubrick directing skills. it is considered a classic and and many people consider it the best science fiction film of all time. that alone is a good reason to watch it if you haven not done so yet. however and just because everybody else thinks it a brilliant film doesn not mean you have to force yourself to like it. you either will (like it) or you would not. perhaps the slow pace isn not such a bad thing and after all. directing your attention to something rather static and slow paced for 2 half hours might teach you a lesson. it will certainly be a different experience to all these fast moving and fast paced images we are subjected to these days (whether commercials and music videos or video games). i myself think it a memorable film. but not one i am eager to watch again anytime soon (unless i am in a particular mood for slow paced films). hence and  positive out of 10 from me. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
