when i first saw this on tape and about 10 years after it had been released and i thought it was one of the better james bond movies. however and after seeing it again around the turn of the century and i was disappointed. i think it a bit overrated only because critics were so happy to see sean connery end his 12 year hiatus from playing bond that they do not dare criticize the film. i guess what disappointed me was the ending. after investing two hours into the film and you expect a less hokey and more satisfying ending. and and it may be nitpicking and but i was disappointed in not seeing the regular actors in the supporting roles such as miss moneypenny and q and felix leiter and etc. on the positive side and there was plenty of unique action scenes and particularly early on and and the two villains were interesting. i thought klaus maria brandauer was the more intriguing of the two because he was so low key and looked the nice guy next door. he wasn not your normal bond villain. this had plenty of skin and for a pg movie and especially with kim basinger starring and never being an actress known for hiding her figure. the language was very tame and but most bond movies are pretty good in that department. all in all and it a fair bond and nothing else. just because connery is in it and it doesn not mean it automatically good. roger moore and pierce brosnan have proved they could play the role well and too. 
when i first saw this on tape and about 10 years after it had been released and i thought it was one of the better james bond movies. however and after seeing it again around the turn of the century and i was disappointed. i think it a bit overrated only because critics were so happy to see sean connery end his 12 year hiatus from playing bond that they do not dare criticize the film. i guess what disappointed me was the ending. after investing two hours into the film and you expect a less hokey and more satisfying ending. and and it may be nitpicking and but i was disappointed in not seeing the regular actors in the supporting roles such as miss moneypenny and q and felix leiter and etc. on the positive side and there was plenty of unique action scenes and particularly early on and and the two villains were interesting. i thought klaus maria brandauer was the more intriguing of the two because he was so low key and looked the nice guy next door. he wasn not your normal bond villain. this had plenty of skin and for a pg movie and especially with kim basinger starring and never being an actress known for hiding her figure. the language was very tame and but most bond movies are pretty good in that department. all in all and it a fair bond and nothing else. just because connery is in it and it doesn not mean it automatically good. roger moore and pierce brosnan have proved they could play the role well and too. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
