a ham actor without a penny. who better than michael caine to play such a character. he is totally and utterly hilarious but and as in most of caine performances and he goes for it for real. the film seems to be a showcase of dylan moran and he splendiferous in his double act with caine. this and however and is where the script falters. moran impersonations should have been incorporated in a rather more organic way. they are too much of an act on their own and makes the potential plausibility of the plot fly out of the window. never mind. get it if you can find it. there is enough in it to make it a pleasurable journey. 
a ham actor without a penny. who better than michael caine to play such a character. he is totally and utterly hilarious but and as in most of caine performances and he goes for it for real. the film seems to be a showcase of dylan moran and he splendiferous in his double act with caine. this and however and is where the script falters. moran impersonations should have been incorporated in a rather more organic way. they are too much of an act on their own and makes the potential plausibility of the plot fly out of the window. never mind. get it if you can find it. there is enough in it to make it a pleasurable journey. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
