first of all and i have to say that i am not generally a big fan of werewolf movies in general. it not that i do not like them and just that i do not like them a lot. there are some that i have enjoyed. werewolf of london (1935 and stuart walker) and an american werewolf in london (1981 and john landis). and some that i have thought were okay but nothing special. the wolf man (1941 and george waggner) and the howling (1981 and joe dante) and dog soldiers (2002 and neil marshall) are some examples. but overall and the werewolf sub genre is not my favorite. but i had this one on one of those 50 movie sets so i thought i would give it a watch and see how it was. spoilers follow. the mad monster is a werewolf tale and but the werewolf is primarily used as a vehicle for revenge by a mad scientist and dr. lorenzo cameron (george zucco). dr. cameron has discovered a way to transform human beings into beasts and specifically wolves and but was ridiculed and ostracized by the greater scientific community. forced out of a prestigious position and he goes mad and plots revenge on those who mocked him in an old country mansion and where he lives with his daughter lenora (the lovely anne nagel) and his assistant petro (glenn strange) of limited mental abilities. using his serum and dr. cameron transforms petro into a werewolf and sends him off to kill his old rivals. eventually and though and the werewolf petro gets out of control and both the mad doctor and his creation are killed. the movie also plays out somewhat as a murder or crime drama and with lenora journalist suitor (johnny downs) investigating the doctor strange behavior and the rash of murders. the story seems to borrow many elements from other big pictures that came before it. there are reminders of frankenstein (1931 and james whale) in the creation of a monster which runs amok and and the creature killing an innocent child. visions of dr. jekyll and mr. hyde (1931 and rouben mamoulian or the 1941 and victor fleming version) and the wolf man (1941 and george waggner) also come to mind. and that is one of the problems with this movie in my view it comes across as a mediocre melding of some great films. it doesn not add much to the genre. true and there are some redeeming qualities. george zucco performance was convincing and and the scene showing dr. lorenzo talking to his visions or hallucinations of his tormentors works well for me in showing his insanity. there is some reasonable character build up and at least in the case of his character. but glenn strange character is not at all convincing and and seems to have this comedic quality whether intentional or not and i am not sure that just doesn not fit into the movie as a whole. i seemed to like it more than most imdb users based on my rating of negative  and but it was still a below average film. perhaps worth a view if you are a fan of early werewolf movies or a big fan of the 1930 and 1940 horror films and but unlikely to appeal to you if you are not. 
first of all and i have to say that i am not generally a big fan of werewolf movies in general. it not that i do not like them and just that i do not like them a lot. there are some that i have enjoyed. werewolf of london (1935 and stuart walker) and an american werewolf in london (1981 and john landis). and some that i have thought were okay but nothing special. the wolf man (1941 and george waggner) and the howling (1981 and joe dante) and dog soldiers (2002 and neil marshall) are some examples. but overall and the werewolf sub genre is not my favorite. but i had this one on one of those 50 movie sets so i thought i would give it a watch and see how it was. spoilers follow. the mad monster is a werewolf tale and but the werewolf is primarily used as a vehicle for revenge by a mad scientist and dr. lorenzo cameron (george zucco). dr. cameron has discovered a way to transform human beings into beasts and specifically wolves and but was ridiculed and ostracized by the greater scientific community. forced out of a prestigious position and he goes mad and plots revenge on those who mocked him in an old country mansion and where he lives with his daughter lenora (the lovely anne nagel) and his assistant petro (glenn strange) of limited mental abilities. using his serum and dr. cameron transforms petro into a werewolf and sends him off to kill his old rivals. eventually and though and the werewolf petro gets out of control and both the mad doctor and his creation are killed. the movie also plays out somewhat as a murder or crime drama and with lenora journalist suitor (johnny downs) investigating the doctor strange behavior and the rash of murders. the story seems to borrow many elements from other big pictures that came before it. there are reminders of frankenstein (1931 and james whale) in the creation of a monster which runs amok and and the creature killing an innocent child. visions of dr. jekyll and mr. hyde (1931 and rouben mamoulian or the 1941 and victor fleming version) and the wolf man (1941 and george waggner) also come to mind. and that is one of the problems with this movie in my view it comes across as a mediocre melding of some great films. it doesn not add much to the genre. true and there are some redeeming qualities. george zucco performance was convincing and and the scene showing dr. lorenzo talking to his visions or hallucinations of his tormentors works well for me in showing his insanity. there is some reasonable character build up and at least in the case of his character. but glenn strange character is not at all convincing and and seems to have this comedic quality whether intentional or not and i am not sure that just doesn not fit into the movie as a whole. i seemed to like it more than most imdb users based on my rating of negative  and but it was still a below average film. perhaps worth a view if you are a fan of early werewolf movies or a big fan of the 1930 and 1940 horror films and but unlikely to appeal to you if you are not. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
