topical. certainly. entertainment. probably  but only on removal of any shred of the viewer common sense. reality. only in so much that it was made on this planet. how thousands of people were supposed to have died as a result of a 5 metre wall of water in a city liberally littered with buildings in excess of 25 metres high is quite beyond me. carlyle line to the effect of how could anyone survive that. when the shot shows forests of buildings with several floors above the water is completely laughable. further and if someone commits themselves to an area (under water) where one cylinder of air is not enough (i. e. they are going to die) and why not use the simple expedient of taking more than one cylinder. clearly and the writer thinks that people in stressful situations cannot count beyond one (one cylinder and one floor). rather than watching this tripe and you would be more informed and entertained by throwing the dvd away and reading the pricing information on the cellophane outer wrapper. pitiful and truly pitiful and and a terrible waste of the on screen talent. as for the sexist propaganda suggesting that only women can see through the problems to illuminate the solutions to be effected by the expendable men represent yet more pc tosh. small wonder that first blood and delta force and navy seals and other such movies of little or no merit will always have a following while this blatantly politically motivated bilge is peddled. 
topical. certainly. entertainment. probably  but only on removal of any shred of the viewer common sense. reality. only in so much that it was made on this planet. how thousands of people were supposed to have died as a result of a 5 metre wall of water in a city liberally littered with buildings in excess of 25 metres high is quite beyond me. carlyle line to the effect of how could anyone survive that. when the shot shows forests of buildings with several floors above the water is completely laughable. further and if someone commits themselves to an area (under water) where one cylinder of air is not enough (i. e. they are going to die) and why not use the simple expedient of taking more than one cylinder. clearly and the writer thinks that people in stressful situations cannot count beyond one (one cylinder and one floor). rather than watching this tripe and you would be more informed and entertained by throwing the dvd away and reading the pricing information on the cellophane outer wrapper. pitiful and truly pitiful and and a terrible waste of the on screen talent. as for the sexist propaganda suggesting that only women can see through the problems to illuminate the solutions to be effected by the expendable men represent yet more pc tosh. small wonder that first blood and delta force and navy seals and other such movies of little or no merit will always have a following while this blatantly politically motivated bilge is peddled. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
