when i first saw a glimpse of this movie and i quickly noticed the actress who was playing the role of lucille ball. rachel york portrayal of lucy is absolutely awful. lucille ball was an astounding comedian with incredible talent. to think about a legend like lucille ball being portrayed the way she was in the movie is horrendous. i cannot believe out of all the actresses in the world who could play a much better lucy and the producers decided to get rachel york. she might be a good actress in other roles but to play the role of lucille ball is tough. it is pretty hard to find someone who could resemble lucille ball and but they could at least find someone a bit similar in looks and talent. if you noticed york portrayal of lucy in episodes of i love lucy like the chocolate factory or vitavetavegamin and nothing is similar in any way her expression and voice and or movement. to top it all off and danny pino playing desi arnaz is horrible. pino does not qualify to play as ricky. he small and skinny and his accent is unreal and and once again and his acting is unbelievable. although fred and ethel were not similar either and they were not as bad as the characters of lucy and ricky. overall and extremely horrible casting and the story is badly told. if people want to understand the real life situation of lucille ball and i suggest watching a and e biography of lucy and desi and read the book from lucille ball herself and or pbs american masters represent finding lucy. if you want to see a docudrama and before the laughter would be a better choice. the casting of lucille ball and desi arnaz in before the laughter is much better compared to this. at least and a similar aspect is shown rather than nothing. 
when i first saw a glimpse of this movie and i quickly noticed the actress who was playing the role of lucille ball. rachel york portrayal of lucy is absolutely awful. lucille ball was an astounding comedian with incredible talent. to think about a legend like lucille ball being portrayed the way she was in the movie is horrendous. i cannot believe out of all the actresses in the world who could play a much better lucy and the producers decided to get rachel york. she might be a good actress in other roles but to play the role of lucille ball is tough. it is pretty hard to find someone who could resemble lucille ball and but they could at least find someone a bit similar in looks and talent. if you noticed york portrayal of lucy in episodes of i love lucy like the chocolate factory or vitavetavegamin and nothing is similar in any way her expression and voice and or movement. to top it all off and danny pino playing desi arnaz is horrible. pino does not qualify to play as ricky. he small and skinny and his accent is unreal and and once again and his acting is unbelievable. although fred and ethel were not similar either and they were not as bad as the characters of lucy and ricky. overall and extremely horrible casting and the story is badly told. if people want to understand the real life situation of lucille ball and i suggest watching a and e biography of lucy and desi and read the book from lucille ball herself and or pbs american masters represent finding lucy. if you want to see a docudrama and before the laughter would be a better choice. the casting of lucille ball and desi arnaz in before the laughter is much better compared to this. at least and a similar aspect is shown rather than nothing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
