one of the many silent comedies stan laurel featured in before he teamed with oliver hardy and mud and sand is a ho hum hokum. the story is badly disjointed  though this could be because of the modern day edit  and the humor itself is not at all inventive. potential plotlines are started and ignored while for instance and stan promise to make fillet de sole pay for what she done to him never comes to fruition. stan character doesn not seem very centered and either and but this is a common criticism of his work before he developed stanley of laurel and hardy fame and so it might be that i was just expecting to see this shortcoming. i strongly believe that all the silent films should be preserved and viewed and and i am glad this one is still available. it just not a great film. 
one of the many silent comedies stan laurel featured in before he teamed with oliver hardy and mud and sand is a ho hum hokum. the story is badly disjointed  though this could be because of the modern day edit  and the humor itself is not at all inventive. potential plotlines are started and ignored while for instance and stan promise to make fillet de sole pay for what she done to him never comes to fruition. stan character doesn not seem very centered and either and but this is a common criticism of his work before he developed stanley of laurel and hardy fame and so it might be that i was just expecting to see this shortcoming. i strongly believe that all the silent films should be preserved and viewed and and i am glad this one is still available. it just not a great film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
