well and after the hype surrounding the film and after surya labeling the film as path breaking and i went into the theatre expecting something big. boy was i disappointed. first of all and the characterizations in the film are so weird. which wife would do what kundhavi (jyothika) did. an idiotic and coo coo one. and what was the point of her standing in the rain with her child (baby shreya) after she and her husband had a fight. what was the purpose of that scene anyway. to start a vulgarly shot maaja maaja. not only was the song not canned aesthetically and it was just not needed in the screenplay. not needed at all. secondly and the first half of the had practically no story. the entire first half was a freaking drag. every scene in the first half of the film had no significance what so ever to the real story of the film. and also and how did aishwarya (bhoomika chawla) change so radically all of a sudden. and how did gautham (surya) and kundhavi lead a happy live together after six years even though they were so unhappy about marrying each other. and if gautham did love aishwarya like he claimed he did and why did he even marry kundhavi even if it was his uncle death wish. why. that the question you keep asking whilst watching the film. and how fair is the ending to aishwarya. after all and she was gautham first wife. krishna and the director of the film and claimed he worked on the script of this film for two years and but his script is filled with flaws and leaves the audience utterly irritated. thirdly and krishna un imaginative picturizations of rahman awesome is just disappointing. surprisingly and anthony editing (usually superb) for the new york nagaram song just sucks. the whole song looked like it was a slide show made on microsoft power point. munbe vaa rangoli chorus was wasted showing gautham playing football. who wants to see the freaking dude playing football during such a beautiful chorus. whats more and the whole movie only needed two songs. munbe vaa and kummi adi. the rest of the songs inclusive of machakari and maaja maaja and new york and jillunu oru kaadhal are just not needed. rahman fine efforts are simply wasted on a stupid film directed by an amateur director. fans of rahman and you ask why rahman keeps moving to bollywood. after looking at the way his songs are picturised in kollywood and why would he want to stay here. what more irritating is that after krishna decided to include machakari into the film and the song was cut by half which truly and truly annoyes. surya looks handsome in his new get ups save the ones during the college scenes and packs in a so and so performance. his expressions during all the songs he was featured in really do not fit the way the singer sings the songs. was jyothika even acting in the film. all she did was cry. would you call all that crying acting. one of her worst performances ever. what more and her new hairstyle does not suit her. she looked way better in vettaiyaadu vilaiyaadu. her costumes during the new york nagaram song are way off. bhoomika chawla is just gorgeous during the film and does justice to her role. vadivelu comedy is annoying. when one is watching him and one wishes they could slap him on the face. it is santhanam who is the show stealer during the comedy scenes. and why the heck did sukanya even agree to do such a minuscule role which could have done by just anyone. and why is her make up so heavy when she has perfect complexion. music by a. r. rahman is just awesome. machakari and munbe vaa and new york and jillunu oru kaadhal deserve special mention. r. d. rajasekhar cinematography is ok and isn not as good as his previous films though the scenery during the kummi adi song deserve special mention. anthony editing is really really disappointing. the film is just so freaking draggy and could be trimmed severely. krishna direction just sucks. dialogues (a. c. durai and krishna) are just too corny to digest especially the part where bhoomika professes her love for surya. the screenplay and script (krishna) are horibble. the film moves in the more un interesting pace ever. and krishna script is just filled with unexplained sub plots. and for goodness sakes and why was there so much advertising in the film. pepsi and maggi and suzuki and you name it. was the producer of the film (k. e. gnanavel) low on budget or was he just desperate. overall and jillunu oru kaadhal is a damp squib. with a title like that and one would expect a heart warming and cooling love story but what you end up is a painfully botched up love story. really and really disappointing. 
well and after the hype surrounding the film and after surya labeling the film as path breaking and i went into the theatre expecting something big. boy was i disappointed. first of all and the characterizations in the film are so weird. which wife would do what kundhavi (jyothika) did. an idiotic and coo coo one. and what was the point of her standing in the rain with her child (baby shreya) after she and her husband had a fight. what was the purpose of that scene anyway. to start a vulgarly shot maaja maaja. not only was the song not canned aesthetically and it was just not needed in the screenplay. not needed at all. secondly and the first half of the had practically no story. the entire first half was a freaking drag. every scene in the first half of the film had no significance what so ever to the real story of the film. and also and how did aishwarya (bhoomika chawla) change so radically all of a sudden. and how did gautham (surya) and kundhavi lead a happy live together after six years even though they were so unhappy about marrying each other. and if gautham did love aishwarya like he claimed he did and why did he even marry kundhavi even if it was his uncle death wish. why. that the question you keep asking whilst watching the film. and how fair is the ending to aishwarya. after all and she was gautham first wife. krishna and the director of the film and claimed he worked on the script of this film for two years and but his script is filled with flaws and leaves the audience utterly irritated. thirdly and krishna un imaginative picturizations of rahman awesome is just disappointing. surprisingly and anthony editing (usually superb) for the new york nagaram song just sucks. the whole song looked like it was a slide show made on microsoft power point. munbe vaa rangoli chorus was wasted showing gautham playing football. who wants to see the freaking dude playing football during such a beautiful chorus. whats more and the whole movie only needed two songs. munbe vaa and kummi adi. the rest of the songs inclusive of machakari and maaja maaja and new york and jillunu oru kaadhal are just not needed. rahman fine efforts are simply wasted on a stupid film directed by an amateur director. fans of rahman and you ask why rahman keeps moving to bollywood. after looking at the way his songs are picturised in kollywood and why would he want to stay here. what more irritating is that after krishna decided to include machakari into the film and the song was cut by half which truly and truly annoyes. surya looks handsome in his new get ups save the ones during the college scenes and packs in a so and so performance. his expressions during all the songs he was featured in really do not fit the way the singer sings the songs. was jyothika even acting in the film. all she did was cry. would you call all that crying acting. one of her worst performances ever. what more and her new hairstyle does not suit her. she looked way better in vettaiyaadu vilaiyaadu. her costumes during the new york nagaram song are way off. bhoomika chawla is just gorgeous during the film and does justice to her role. vadivelu comedy is annoying. when one is watching him and one wishes they could slap him on the face. it is santhanam who is the show stealer during the comedy scenes. and why the heck did sukanya even agree to do such a minuscule role which could have done by just anyone. and why is her make up so heavy when she has perfect complexion. music by a. r. rahman is just awesome. machakari and munbe vaa and new york and jillunu oru kaadhal deserve special mention. r. d. rajasekhar cinematography is ok and isn not as good as his previous films though the scenery during the kummi adi song deserve special mention. anthony editing is really really disappointing. the film is just so freaking draggy and could be trimmed severely. krishna direction just sucks. dialogues (a. c. durai and krishna) are just too corny to digest especially the part where bhoomika professes her love for surya. the screenplay and script (krishna) are horibble. the film moves in the more un interesting pace ever. and krishna script is just filled with unexplained sub plots. and for goodness sakes and why was there so much advertising in the film. pepsi and maggi and suzuki and you name it. was the producer of the film (k. e. gnanavel) low on budget or was he just desperate. overall and jillunu oru kaadhal is a damp squib. with a title like that and one would expect a heart warming and cooling love story but what you end up is a painfully botched up love story. really and really disappointing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
