i wonder sometimes if maybe meryl streep has become so accepted as the most impressive and versatile actress since and well and maybe just about the beginning of the sound era that maybe her talent is now taken for granted. there are probably about three tics that she relies on consistently throughout her performances (most noticeably a pinched lip) and but other than that and her performances are amazingly variable and original and fresh expressions of internal workings. even though sophie choice and a cry in the dark and silkwood may be showier and her work here and in bridges in madison county is remarkable and too  just more subtle. in one true thing and she is mostly sweet and in love with her domesticated life and and streep makes what could be routine and even boring and seem attractive and charming. i think that she must work out these mini theses for each character and find what things make this person real and interesting. she works from the inside out with each character and and maybe it this essential quality that has evoked the main criticism of aloofness or self consciousness. i do not think she cold at all and but instead has thought out her character unique qualities. i think her critics are confusing self consciousness with intelligence. not too many other actors would be so complexly thoughtful and creative as to make kate muldrun lightweight and carefree within her beloved and homey environment and only to later reveal unprecedented depth because of her genuine attachment to that homey environment. her performances are of an unsurpassed consistency and she rarely does anything wrong. i wonder if it conceivable for any of streep pictures to not seem diminished because of her presence. anyway and kate loves her home and and her affection for her family life is as endearing as her new conflict within the home is jarring. when all of this comes together and and kate starts to recognize that she can no longer function in the same capacity and and she breaks the pie dish and screams out that she is not handicapped and it is painfully sad to watch because this has not been someone prone to emotion. streep is smart enough and generous enough to recognize how much better everything works because she has felt out the dramatic validity of kate and it really the only scene when she allows her character to go. but how refreshingly true it is to see a character who can really surprise you by displaying something that you do not have thought possible. once again and streep character has at least three dimensions. god and this sounds like a thesis itself and but as an actress and streep just has a special kind of intelligence and incredible empathy and great expressive skills. the movie itself is probably somewhat mediocre. i suppose william hurt is meant to be an unlikeable jerk and and he does pompousness very well. i think hurt is really kind of creepy and though. script is quite standard  another tribute to streep that she was as touching and believable as she was. 
i wonder sometimes if maybe meryl streep has become so accepted as the most impressive and versatile actress since and well and maybe just about the beginning of the sound era that maybe her talent is now taken for granted. there are probably about three tics that she relies on consistently throughout her performances (most noticeably a pinched lip) and but other than that and her performances are amazingly variable and original and fresh expressions of internal workings. even though sophie choice and a cry in the dark and silkwood may be showier and her work here and in bridges in madison county is remarkable and too  just more subtle. in one true thing and she is mostly sweet and in love with her domesticated life and and streep makes what could be routine and even boring and seem attractive and charming. i think that she must work out these mini theses for each character and find what things make this person real and interesting. she works from the inside out with each character and and maybe it this essential quality that has evoked the main criticism of aloofness or self consciousness. i do not think she cold at all and but instead has thought out her character unique qualities. i think her critics are confusing self consciousness with intelligence. not too many other actors would be so complexly thoughtful and creative as to make kate muldrun lightweight and carefree within her beloved and homey environment and only to later reveal unprecedented depth because of her genuine attachment to that homey environment. her performances are of an unsurpassed consistency and she rarely does anything wrong. i wonder if it conceivable for any of streep pictures to not seem diminished because of her presence. anyway and kate loves her home and and her affection for her family life is as endearing as her new conflict within the home is jarring. when all of this comes together and and kate starts to recognize that she can no longer function in the same capacity and and she breaks the pie dish and screams out that she is not handicapped and it is painfully sad to watch because this has not been someone prone to emotion. streep is smart enough and generous enough to recognize how much better everything works because she has felt out the dramatic validity of kate and it really the only scene when she allows her character to go. but how refreshingly true it is to see a character who can really surprise you by displaying something that you do not have thought possible. once again and streep character has at least three dimensions. god and this sounds like a thesis itself and but as an actress and streep just has a special kind of intelligence and incredible empathy and great expressive skills. the movie itself is probably somewhat mediocre. i suppose william hurt is meant to be an unlikeable jerk and and he does pompousness very well. i think hurt is really kind of creepy and though. script is quite standard  another tribute to streep that she was as touching and believable as she was. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
