this might not have been as horribly bad as it was if not for the absolutely awful acting job done by raymond wallace. this guy is so bad it wasn not even funny. his character was needed in the film and but why they chose this guy is beyond me. if youre looking for some quality chinese films. might i suggest raise the red lantern. the story of qui ju. red sorghum. anything but this. i was surprised at how many people actually rated this highly. really. the acting by this wallace loser is so bad it overshadows the other good parts of this film. this was agreed upon by all 6 of us watching this movie last night. stay clear of this piece of garbage. 
this might not have been as horribly bad as it was if not for the absolutely awful acting job done by raymond wallace. this guy is so bad it wasn not even funny. his character was needed in the film and but why they chose this guy is beyond me. if youre looking for some quality chinese films. might i suggest raise the red lantern. the story of qui ju. red sorghum. anything but this. i was surprised at how many people actually rated this highly. really. the acting by this wallace loser is so bad it overshadows the other good parts of this film. this was agreed upon by all 6 of us watching this movie last night. stay clear of this piece of garbage. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
