. and my reasons for which are simple there are so many great films presented and discussed here (most of them by their own directors and stars) and so many clips of infamous moments in 70 movie history and and in fact a number of films i have yet to see and that it do not be fair to grade this work. by this logic i shouldn not have given grades to other movie documentaries like martin scorsese personal journey through american movies and my voyage to italy. but while those films were on the basis of one man view of cinema and narrating through most of the way and richard lagravanese and (the late) ted demmes a decade under the influence lets the films and the creators speak entirely for themselves. what makes decade worth at least one watch for film buffs and or just anyone who likes the films of the late 60 70 in america and are the levels that it goes to and that in the uncut version (three hours and not the theatrical version and which i have no comment on) plenty of ground is covered. interviews include the likes of scorsese and robert altman and sidney lumet and julie christie and jon voight and francis ford coppola and paul schrader and pam grier and bruce dern and peter bogdanovich and roger corman and dennis hopper and robert towne and etc and and there a constant flow of insight from start to finish. the way the clips and directors or actors pop up and edited together in a flashy and quick style and is also fascinating. the one down comment i have on the documentary is that most of the information presented has been reported on in various books and like easy riders and raging bulls and and though i haven not seen the movie version of that book yet i am sure it would have covered many of the films and directors and incidents as here (in fact and the book of that is one of the best i have ever read. however and this documentary serves as something special for film buffs and occasional movie goers of the future they can look at this and learn not only about such well known pictures as easy rider and the last picture show and annie hall and coming home and and lessor knowns like scarecrow and panic in needle park and the landlord and joe and they shoot horses don not they. they can also learn about who influenced them (new waves of europe and asia) and who they served as influences for and and how the subject matter that created controversy after controversy still serves as intriguing and chancy material for the contemporary crowd. seek this out. 
. and my reasons for which are simple there are so many great films presented and discussed here (most of them by their own directors and stars) and so many clips of infamous moments in 70 movie history and and in fact a number of films i have yet to see and that it do not be fair to grade this work. by this logic i shouldn not have given grades to other movie documentaries like martin scorsese personal journey through american movies and my voyage to italy. but while those films were on the basis of one man view of cinema and narrating through most of the way and richard lagravanese and (the late) ted demmes a decade under the influence lets the films and the creators speak entirely for themselves. what makes decade worth at least one watch for film buffs and or just anyone who likes the films of the late 60 70 in america and are the levels that it goes to and that in the uncut version (three hours and not the theatrical version and which i have no comment on) plenty of ground is covered. interviews include the likes of scorsese and robert altman and sidney lumet and julie christie and jon voight and francis ford coppola and paul schrader and pam grier and bruce dern and peter bogdanovich and roger corman and dennis hopper and robert towne and etc and and there a constant flow of insight from start to finish. the way the clips and directors or actors pop up and edited together in a flashy and quick style and is also fascinating. the one down comment i have on the documentary is that most of the information presented has been reported on in various books and like easy riders and raging bulls and and though i haven not seen the movie version of that book yet i am sure it would have covered many of the films and directors and incidents as here (in fact and the book of that is one of the best i have ever read. however and this documentary serves as something special for film buffs and occasional movie goers of the future they can look at this and learn not only about such well known pictures as easy rider and the last picture show and annie hall and coming home and and lessor knowns like scarecrow and panic in needle park and the landlord and joe and they shoot horses don not they. they can also learn about who influenced them (new waves of europe and asia) and who they served as influences for and and how the subject matter that created controversy after controversy still serves as intriguing and chancy material for the contemporary crowd. seek this out. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
