didn not the writer for this movie see the other three. i loved the original and i thought 2 was the best and i tolerated 3 (it was ok and nothing special). but i hated this one. who dare they kill off ug. this was certainly not the ug who had been almost like a brother to charlie in number 2. remember his speech. charlie said and you do not just leave me on earth and would you. ug replied and charlie and bounty hunter and saying that he was now one of them now. how dare the writers ignore this special bond between them and turn him into a baddie who get killed by charlie (in a particularly awkward scene) just because they realized the movie was getting boring. in fact for the first 20 minutes and we get a new cast and have to wait this long until we again find out what happened to charlie and who was the hero we have been waiting to see. i kept waiting saying and come on and when charlie going to appear. angela basset must be doing her best to deny she was ever in this turkey. moving it to the future eliminates the possibility of ever seeing a sequel with the original cast or in our time. i think the writers decided and that their movie was going to be the last and they could do whatever they wanted. this movie is totally out of line with the first two. and it do not even seem like it was written by the same people who made 3. 3 at least had humor and could easily be seen by younger children. 4 is just ugly and mean spirited (eric dare) is particularly cruel and unnecessary. i hated this movie. hated and hated and hated it. i hated the fact that anyone could like it and i hated the fact that it ruined what was one of my favorite camp classics. i give this a one start simply because imdb. com would not let me give it a zero. 
didn not the writer for this movie see the other three. i loved the original and i thought 2 was the best and i tolerated 3 (it was ok and nothing special). but i hated this one. who dare they kill off ug. this was certainly not the ug who had been almost like a brother to charlie in number 2. remember his speech. charlie said and you do not just leave me on earth and would you. ug replied and charlie and bounty hunter and saying that he was now one of them now. how dare the writers ignore this special bond between them and turn him into a baddie who get killed by charlie (in a particularly awkward scene) just because they realized the movie was getting boring. in fact for the first 20 minutes and we get a new cast and have to wait this long until we again find out what happened to charlie and who was the hero we have been waiting to see. i kept waiting saying and come on and when charlie going to appear. angela basset must be doing her best to deny she was ever in this turkey. moving it to the future eliminates the possibility of ever seeing a sequel with the original cast or in our time. i think the writers decided and that their movie was going to be the last and they could do whatever they wanted. this movie is totally out of line with the first two. and it do not even seem like it was written by the same people who made 3. 3 at least had humor and could easily be seen by younger children. 4 is just ugly and mean spirited (eric dare) is particularly cruel and unnecessary. i hated this movie. hated and hated and hated it. i hated the fact that anyone could like it and i hated the fact that it ruined what was one of my favorite camp classics. i give this a one start simply because imdb. com would not let me give it a zero. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
