the willies starts late one night as brother josh (joshua miller) and kyle (jason horst) are camping outside with their cousin michael (sean astin) and they decide to pass the time by telling scary stories. first up is michael with a story entitled bad apples in which a young boy named danny hollister (ian fried) is bullied at school and however the sinister new janitor mr. jenkins (james karen) decides to help him out. next up is kyle as he tells a strange story called flyboy in which an overweight bully with a worrying fascination with dead flies gets what he deserves in a horrible twisted way. written and directed by brian peck the willies do not do much for me and i doubt it will do much for you either. the script is strange as far as episodic anthologies go and instead of the usual three or four stories it only has two main tales and a few bizarre urban myth type mini scenes at the start and these consist of the person who orders food from a fast food restaurant only to find a dead rat in her chicken and a man who dies of a heart attack on a ride and someone who tries to dry her poodle off in the microwave only for it to explode. i have no idea what the purpose of these scenes are but they add nothing to the film and as for the two main stories they are both weak. for a start they are too long which is a huge mistake in these types of films and usually the stories in anthologies are short and sharp and quick with a nice twist at the end usually involving people getting what they deserved. however in the willies the stories last for the best part of 40 minutes each which is longer than the average tv episode and i must admit i found both stories very boring and they have very little going for them and seem to be aimed at children. the first story is the better to watch as a whole but it has no twist ending as far as i could see while the second one has a nice just deserts ending but the build up to it is weak and drawn out for no good reason. i really like horror anthology films so the willies comes as a disappointment and frankly it lets the genre down. director peck was obviously working on a low budget and as a whole the willies is pretty tough to sit through and there plenty of continuity errors and it poorly made. there no atmosphere and there no scares and there no gore and the special effects are poor and it features unnecessary shots of a dirty toilet several times. overall it a pretty unappealing film to sit through. technically the willies is rough around the edges to say the least and the effects are far from special and it has an extremely drab and grainy look to the picture. the acting is poor and no ones going to win any awards thats for sure. the willies is a poor film and it not scary and it not fun and it not entertaining and it only features two overlong stories. definitely not recommended. 
the willies starts late one night as brother josh (joshua miller) and kyle (jason horst) are camping outside with their cousin michael (sean astin) and they decide to pass the time by telling scary stories. first up is michael with a story entitled bad apples in which a young boy named danny hollister (ian fried) is bullied at school and however the sinister new janitor mr. jenkins (james karen) decides to help him out. next up is kyle as he tells a strange story called flyboy in which an overweight bully with a worrying fascination with dead flies gets what he deserves in a horrible twisted way. written and directed by brian peck the willies do not do much for me and i doubt it will do much for you either. the script is strange as far as episodic anthologies go and instead of the usual three or four stories it only has two main tales and a few bizarre urban myth type mini scenes at the start and these consist of the person who orders food from a fast food restaurant only to find a dead rat in her chicken and a man who dies of a heart attack on a ride and someone who tries to dry her poodle off in the microwave only for it to explode. i have no idea what the purpose of these scenes are but they add nothing to the film and as for the two main stories they are both weak. for a start they are too long which is a huge mistake in these types of films and usually the stories in anthologies are short and sharp and quick with a nice twist at the end usually involving people getting what they deserved. however in the willies the stories last for the best part of 40 minutes each which is longer than the average tv episode and i must admit i found both stories very boring and they have very little going for them and seem to be aimed at children. the first story is the better to watch as a whole but it has no twist ending as far as i could see while the second one has a nice just deserts ending but the build up to it is weak and drawn out for no good reason. i really like horror anthology films so the willies comes as a disappointment and frankly it lets the genre down. director peck was obviously working on a low budget and as a whole the willies is pretty tough to sit through and there plenty of continuity errors and it poorly made. there no atmosphere and there no scares and there no gore and the special effects are poor and it features unnecessary shots of a dirty toilet several times. overall it a pretty unappealing film to sit through. technically the willies is rough around the edges to say the least and the effects are far from special and it has an extremely drab and grainy look to the picture. the acting is poor and no ones going to win any awards thats for sure. the willies is a poor film and it not scary and it not fun and it not entertaining and it only features two overlong stories. definitely not recommended. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
