from the weeks and weeks of promotion for this and abc the one was supposed to be the real world meets american idol. we were to watch these singers perform and compete and see how they lived together in a house as well. the drama. the tension. where does one begin with this atrocity. let start with the judges who were known as music experts on this program. experts implies they have expertise. andre harrell at least had a pedigree. he was in charge of motown records for a time. the other two. eh. kate hudson uncle and who could have been labeled mr. weird beard. he dyed his facial hair three distinctly different florescent colors. i wonder how scary he would have been with a black light. and the paula abdul wannabe and who did something i do not think could happen represent she was even more gushing and cloying than paula. she then over corrected and became harshly critical after the first episode. the farce of critiques that these three offered was a true joke and an insult and not only to the process of finding the best singer and but to the audience that is now quite savvy and already having done this numerous times on fox. there was the host. george stroumboulopoulos was no ryan seacrest. in fact and he was as lackluster as can be. he actually sucked what little energy there was in the program and dry. how he got that job was the second biggest mystery of the show. the first was how did they pick the 11 competitors for this program. this was literally a talent free talent show. ok. perhaps that an exaggeration. and granted and the performers all have to be relatively close in ability and because if they were not and there do not be a contest. if only one person was good and there would be no suspense. so and i get that they all needed to be comparable. but they all should have had some chops. additionally and the judges were running a singing academy and so the program was part fame and as well. clearly these performers desperately needed those lessons. but you need some extremely talented people to teach those with little talent to be talented. and that definitely wasn not what was happening here. it seemed in casting the show and the priority was on the homelife elements and as all of the players were very attractive to look at and in equal parts to how badly they vocalized. but the filmed segments in their house were so chopped and sliced and you couldn not get into the stories that were starting to happen and so the show do not capture the events there and either. as badly devised as all of that was and the one had an incredible and unbelievable and fatal design flaw built into the results that made it completely laughable. the audience phoned in their votes for who they liked the best and just like on ai. but then and after the audience vote was revealed and the bottom three contestants were forced to sing a final song. the music experts and based on that performance and chose one person from the three to save for the following week. and then and the contestants who were safe got to vote for who they wanted to keep from the remaining two and sending the remaining contestant home. the design flaw was that the contestants had the final say. i mean and if you were in a music competition and you wanted to get as far along the path as you could and would you vote to keep the better singer and or would you try to get rid of your toughest rival. any first season viewer of cbs survivor could answer that one. and that exactly what happened on the program. the person who had the better potential was lost and and the contestants voted back the one who had no talent at all. on top of that and the contestant who was just saved from the bottom by the experts was also allowed to vote against the remaining two. it was a complete farce. maybe if they let the contestants vote first and at least the experts would save the better of two evils to finish. but this just confirms how not ready this show was for broadcast and how unsatisfying the whole process was to view and how misguided the producers were in attempting it. 
from the weeks and weeks of promotion for this and abc the one was supposed to be the real world meets american idol. we were to watch these singers perform and compete and see how they lived together in a house as well. the drama. the tension. where does one begin with this atrocity. let start with the judges who were known as music experts on this program. experts implies they have expertise. andre harrell at least had a pedigree. he was in charge of motown records for a time. the other two. eh. kate hudson uncle and who could have been labeled mr. weird beard. he dyed his facial hair three distinctly different florescent colors. i wonder how scary he would have been with a black light. and the paula abdul wannabe and who did something i do not think could happen represent she was even more gushing and cloying than paula. she then over corrected and became harshly critical after the first episode. the farce of critiques that these three offered was a true joke and an insult and not only to the process of finding the best singer and but to the audience that is now quite savvy and already having done this numerous times on fox. there was the host. george stroumboulopoulos was no ryan seacrest. in fact and he was as lackluster as can be. he actually sucked what little energy there was in the program and dry. how he got that job was the second biggest mystery of the show. the first was how did they pick the 11 competitors for this program. this was literally a talent free talent show. ok. perhaps that an exaggeration. and granted and the performers all have to be relatively close in ability and because if they were not and there do not be a contest. if only one person was good and there would be no suspense. so and i get that they all needed to be comparable. but they all should have had some chops. additionally and the judges were running a singing academy and so the program was part fame and as well. clearly these performers desperately needed those lessons. but you need some extremely talented people to teach those with little talent to be talented. and that definitely wasn not what was happening here. it seemed in casting the show and the priority was on the homelife elements and as all of the players were very attractive to look at and in equal parts to how badly they vocalized. but the filmed segments in their house were so chopped and sliced and you couldn not get into the stories that were starting to happen and so the show do not capture the events there and either. as badly devised as all of that was and the one had an incredible and unbelievable and fatal design flaw built into the results that made it completely laughable. the audience phoned in their votes for who they liked the best and just like on ai. but then and after the audience vote was revealed and the bottom three contestants were forced to sing a final song. the music experts and based on that performance and chose one person from the three to save for the following week. and then and the contestants who were safe got to vote for who they wanted to keep from the remaining two and sending the remaining contestant home. the design flaw was that the contestants had the final say. i mean and if you were in a music competition and you wanted to get as far along the path as you could and would you vote to keep the better singer and or would you try to get rid of your toughest rival. any first season viewer of cbs survivor could answer that one. and that exactly what happened on the program. the person who had the better potential was lost and and the contestants voted back the one who had no talent at all. on top of that and the contestant who was just saved from the bottom by the experts was also allowed to vote against the remaining two. it was a complete farce. maybe if they let the contestants vote first and at least the experts would save the better of two evils to finish. but this just confirms how not ready this show was for broadcast and how unsatisfying the whole process was to view and how misguided the producers were in attempting it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
