i am not a fan of the original book but was expecting to see a better adaptation than the natalie portman movie and which i found awful. this version is even worse. first and there is very little of ms. gregory book in this script. the whole subplot of george boleyn sexuality is completely eliminated and in this version george is merely a flunky shuttling between his duty to the boleyn family and his duty to the king. i thought the title of the book referred to mary as the lesser known of the boleyn sisters and but here it is used to refer to anne. second and the script has the characters periodically address the audience as if in confession. apparently this is intended to give a bit of back story and explain their motives and but it is amateurish in execution. on top of the bad script and the direction is stunningly bad. there are too many shots done with a circling camera which is none too steady at best and downright shaky at worst. several of the speeches are delivered tentatively and as if in a first rehearsal. the production values for henry flamboyant court are minimal. the costumes vary represent some are copies of historical portraits and others are from some costume designer fevered imagination. and the king and the source of all power and favors and is often shown alone. no fawning courtiers and no servants in the background  where are all the people. i am accustomed to hollywood turning history into fantasy and but i expected better from a bbc production. even based on a flawed book this production is bad. 
i am not a fan of the original book but was expecting to see a better adaptation than the natalie portman movie and which i found awful. this version is even worse. first and there is very little of ms. gregory book in this script. the whole subplot of george boleyn sexuality is completely eliminated and in this version george is merely a flunky shuttling between his duty to the boleyn family and his duty to the king. i thought the title of the book referred to mary as the lesser known of the boleyn sisters and but here it is used to refer to anne. second and the script has the characters periodically address the audience as if in confession. apparently this is intended to give a bit of back story and explain their motives and but it is amateurish in execution. on top of the bad script and the direction is stunningly bad. there are too many shots done with a circling camera which is none too steady at best and downright shaky at worst. several of the speeches are delivered tentatively and as if in a first rehearsal. the production values for henry flamboyant court are minimal. the costumes vary represent some are copies of historical portraits and others are from some costume designer fevered imagination. and the king and the source of all power and favors and is often shown alone. no fawning courtiers and no servants in the background  where are all the people. i am accustomed to hollywood turning history into fantasy and but i expected better from a bbc production. even based on a flawed book this production is bad. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
