i have done some research on ed gien and and i have found a few interesting things. like the fact that ed gien and was quiet and a loner and not some buff over bearing jerk as in this movie. i will say that i do not finish this movie but i will. i will cringe through the fact that all of us and wisconsinites and talk like we are from kentucy. you know the funny and but oh so sad factor in this movie and is wisconsin isn not as hot as they made it look. this movie is not only an insult to wisconsin people and being a wisconsite myself and but it is a complete insult to a man that was proved to be an insane and lonely man. he killed two people and the movie couldn not even get that right. ed do not get that close and personal and scare people and he shot the two and only people and he killed. so and why do these movies lie and say based on a true story. this is not based on nothing but the lies the director came up with in his foul head. a joke and nothing more. ok and i would like to add on to this. i did finish this oh so sad movie and and i personal would like to laugh at the director. do your homework when making a movie. i would like to inform you that there are no mountains (for those who have never been in wisconsin) and oh there is no desert. what the hell and there was more pine trees and snow in ravenous and that was suppose to be shot in californa. ok and for those who know nothing about ed gein and i would like to give you and your history lesson. ed gein was thought to have killed his family and but it was never proved. he killed a bartender and she was shot at bar close when no one was around. he took the dead bartender back to his house. 10 years later he shot and killed the store clerk and he stoled the cash register and the store truck. he was caught because of this murder and he came in the day before when her son was there and asked about antifreeze. the day he killed her and he was in there buying the antifreeze and and the reciept that only had antif. was the only evidence they had to start a world wide man hunt. he robbed graves and in fact in robbed 56 graves. he hate the people he dug up and he made furinture while lamp shades and couches and chairs and and other things. he had a family that he had dinner with once and awhile and they threw all the meat he ever gave them out when he was caught and considering he was caught at their house. he was arrested and hid in the back of a cop car and in fear of what may happen to him. how do i know all of this. i read the book the judge that tried him wrote. after this movie was over and after watching the whole horrific thing and not only am i offended by the directors horriable view on what wisconsin women look like. i mean it was hard to tell who this guy had on the slab half the time and you know cause wisconsin women are all blondes. please. i am overly offended by the lack of homework this guy did and the poor job he did making this movie. i have no idea who this kane guy is and i think he may be ok in something else and but he did a horrible job playing ed gein. after all of this i am so sad i wasted the 3. 99 on the movie. movie after finished was completely untrue and this movie is like me saying that the world is flat and george washington wasn not our first president. come on people and that is your history and and this is wisconsin history. to end this rant and how would all of you feel if i made a movie and george washington looked like brad pitt (some of you may think that is fine and but it would be not true) and he lived and wasn not the president and whatever. you can not rewrite history. 
i have done some research on ed gien and and i have found a few interesting things. like the fact that ed gien and was quiet and a loner and not some buff over bearing jerk as in this movie. i will say that i do not finish this movie but i will. i will cringe through the fact that all of us and wisconsinites and talk like we are from kentucy. you know the funny and but oh so sad factor in this movie and is wisconsin isn not as hot as they made it look. this movie is not only an insult to wisconsin people and being a wisconsite myself and but it is a complete insult to a man that was proved to be an insane and lonely man. he killed two people and the movie couldn not even get that right. ed do not get that close and personal and scare people and he shot the two and only people and he killed. so and why do these movies lie and say based on a true story. this is not based on nothing but the lies the director came up with in his foul head. a joke and nothing more. ok and i would like to add on to this. i did finish this oh so sad movie and and i personal would like to laugh at the director. do your homework when making a movie. i would like to inform you that there are no mountains (for those who have never been in wisconsin) and oh there is no desert. what the hell and there was more pine trees and snow in ravenous and that was suppose to be shot in californa. ok and for those who know nothing about ed gein and i would like to give you and your history lesson. ed gein was thought to have killed his family and but it was never proved. he killed a bartender and she was shot at bar close when no one was around. he took the dead bartender back to his house. 10 years later he shot and killed the store clerk and he stoled the cash register and the store truck. he was caught because of this murder and he came in the day before when her son was there and asked about antifreeze. the day he killed her and he was in there buying the antifreeze and and the reciept that only had antif. was the only evidence they had to start a world wide man hunt. he robbed graves and in fact in robbed 56 graves. he hate the people he dug up and he made furinture while lamp shades and couches and chairs and and other things. he had a family that he had dinner with once and awhile and they threw all the meat he ever gave them out when he was caught and considering he was caught at their house. he was arrested and hid in the back of a cop car and in fear of what may happen to him. how do i know all of this. i read the book the judge that tried him wrote. after this movie was over and after watching the whole horrific thing and not only am i offended by the directors horriable view on what wisconsin women look like. i mean it was hard to tell who this guy had on the slab half the time and you know cause wisconsin women are all blondes. please. i am overly offended by the lack of homework this guy did and the poor job he did making this movie. i have no idea who this kane guy is and i think he may be ok in something else and but he did a horrible job playing ed gein. after all of this i am so sad i wasted the 3. 99 on the movie. movie after finished was completely untrue and this movie is like me saying that the world is flat and george washington wasn not our first president. come on people and that is your history and and this is wisconsin history. to end this rant and how would all of you feel if i made a movie and george washington looked like brad pitt (some of you may think that is fine and but it would be not true) and he lived and wasn not the president and whatever. you can not rewrite history. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
