having just come home from my third viewing of the curse of the were rabbit and i decided to jump on imdb and see what others thought. i noticed a lot of brits loved it and while those in america just do not get it. that really doesn not come as any shock and as america doesn not get what english is. wallace and gromit are very english. middle class english and in fact and with a hint of eccentricity throw in for good measure. the film is a lot like our two heroes while simple and unassuming. it has a nice and gentle plot so the children do not get lost and yet there enough beef there to keep the adults amused too. there some light innuendo (which seems have to have offended the evangelic  oh noes and drama. ) but there is nothing more rude than a bottom for a brief moment. when people get offended by a plasticine anus and you know the world messed up. one quick note to those (all american so far that i have seen) who think chicken run is a better film represent chicken run was made to pander to your sense of humour and and i think it suffered because of it. curse of the were rabbit is witty and english and and intelligent. thomas the tank engine film was ruined because it was made to please the americans and i am glad nick park did not let that happen to another great british institution. to sum up represent you can keep your chicken runs and your shreks and your madagasga  that kind of crude and crass and slapstick comedy just doesn not compare to the wit and grace that is wallace and gromit in curse of the were rabbit. english to the core and and long may wallace and gromit stay that way. 
having just come home from my third viewing of the curse of the were rabbit and i decided to jump on imdb and see what others thought. i noticed a lot of brits loved it and while those in america just do not get it. that really doesn not come as any shock and as america doesn not get what english is. wallace and gromit are very english. middle class english and in fact and with a hint of eccentricity throw in for good measure. the film is a lot like our two heroes while simple and unassuming. it has a nice and gentle plot so the children do not get lost and yet there enough beef there to keep the adults amused too. there some light innuendo (which seems have to have offended the evangelic  oh noes and drama. ) but there is nothing more rude than a bottom for a brief moment. when people get offended by a plasticine anus and you know the world messed up. one quick note to those (all american so far that i have seen) who think chicken run is a better film represent chicken run was made to pander to your sense of humour and and i think it suffered because of it. curse of the were rabbit is witty and english and and intelligent. thomas the tank engine film was ruined because it was made to please the americans and i am glad nick park did not let that happen to another great british institution. to sum up represent you can keep your chicken runs and your shreks and your madagasga  that kind of crude and crass and slapstick comedy just doesn not compare to the wit and grace that is wallace and gromit in curse of the were rabbit. english to the core and and long may wallace and gromit stay that way. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
