a few thoughts before i get to the heart of the film represent 1) i have never seen so many bare breasts in a film before and displayed in so many non sexual scenes  it was weird while 2) joseph fiennes and where have you been. you charmed us in elizabeth and shakespeare in love and and then you went away for awhile. mainstream american wants more. okay and i am a college english professor and i have read this play many times and and this is probably the best film version i have seen of it. while individual aspects of other productions may have stood out and this is the overall package put together well. pacino is no olivier and but he doesn not need to be and so get over it. the film cinematography is stunning and not just because of the bare breasts. venice is portrayed amazingly and and you do get a feel for really being there. portia residential island is amazingly beautiful and and the lighting is always tinted the proper way for the scenes appropriate moods. the anti semetism in this film or play is hard to watch and especially at the end. pacino dropping to the knees and clutching his religious artifact is perhaps the most powerful moment of his on film since the godfather part iii (when michael daughter is gunned down on the opera steps). is the play anti semetic. sure. is othello racist. sure. take it for what it is represent a commentary on the elizabethan era and not a commentary on today. fiennes is underutilized in the film and but still a pleasure to watch. the women in the film are alright while no one really stood out here and but they do blend in nicely with the scenery. jeremy irons and pacino are excellent in the two juiciest roles and adversaries until the end. i have always felt irons was underrated (i still get chills when i hear his voice from the lion king) and and pacino is pacino. 
a few thoughts before i get to the heart of the film represent 1) i have never seen so many bare breasts in a film before and displayed in so many non sexual scenes  it was weird while 2) joseph fiennes and where have you been. you charmed us in elizabeth and shakespeare in love and and then you went away for awhile. mainstream american wants more. okay and i am a college english professor and i have read this play many times and and this is probably the best film version i have seen of it. while individual aspects of other productions may have stood out and this is the overall package put together well. pacino is no olivier and but he doesn not need to be and so get over it. the film cinematography is stunning and not just because of the bare breasts. venice is portrayed amazingly and and you do get a feel for really being there. portia residential island is amazingly beautiful and and the lighting is always tinted the proper way for the scenes appropriate moods. the anti semetism in this film or play is hard to watch and especially at the end. pacino dropping to the knees and clutching his religious artifact is perhaps the most powerful moment of his on film since the godfather part iii (when michael daughter is gunned down on the opera steps). is the play anti semetic. sure. is othello racist. sure. take it for what it is represent a commentary on the elizabethan era and not a commentary on today. fiennes is underutilized in the film and but still a pleasure to watch. the women in the film are alright while no one really stood out here and but they do blend in nicely with the scenery. jeremy irons and pacino are excellent in the two juiciest roles and adversaries until the end. i have always felt irons was underrated (i still get chills when i hear his voice from the lion king) and and pacino is pacino. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
