sitting in a big wing chair with a huge book in his lap and the one and only bela lugosi looks into the camera and and in a dreadful vocal delivery that sounds as if he were mocking a reading of shakespeare and intones sloooow ly represent man constant groping of things unknown and drawing from the endless reaches of time and brings to light many startling things while (snicker) while startling. and because they seem new (lugosi eyes now bulging and with raised eyebrows and and mouth sneering and he continues) but most are not new and the signs of the ages (cue a visual of lightening and accompanied by the sound of thunder which then continues to rumble for an astonishing 86 seconds). and so begins what is arguably the worst film ever made. this movie almost defies description. told in semi docudrama style with an unseen narrator explaining the plot . such as it is . the story revolves around the vicissitudes of a man named glen (ed wood and jr. ) who cross dresses while hence the reference to glenda. the film has no real structure. instead and it consists mostly of a random assortment of vignettes that may . or may not . relate to glen or to the cross dressing motif. one long sequence consists of some unknown woman wriggling on a sofa and followed by a man whipping a woman in what we would today refer to as s and m. then and at odd moments bela reappears and for no apparent reason and and babbles more inane dialogue and like represent when he wrong because he does right and and when he right because he does wrong while pull the string and dance to that. huh. about twenty percent of the film visuals consist of stock footage and accompanied by a vo that relates to the story motif but not the visuals. hence and we see stock footage of represent bustling city streets and freeway traffic and a thunderous herd of buffalo and and a playground full of kids. but it gets worse. in a film about cross dressing and we have 58 consecutive seconds of stock footage of a foundry furnace making hot steel and and 84 consecutive seconds of battle scenes from wwii. even the simplest items are botched. in one scene we see a newspaper headline that reads man nabbed dressed as girl. underneath the headline and which has clearly been glued or pasted on and the article is about . taxes. in one of my favorite scenes and an off screen woman spouts out represent airplanes and why it against the creator will and in a voice that sounds like she just inhaled helium. except for the performance of lyle talbot and the acting is uniformly horrendous. production design is cheap looking and drab while (but you gotta love that tacky wallpaper). the editing is sloppy. most of the background music is suitable only for 1950 style elevators. the b and w cinematography has way too much contrast. and the costumes look like something that came from a thrift store. this film is so bad it makes plan 9 from outer space look like citizen kane and by comparison. i just do not know how one could make a film any worse than ed wood glen or glenda. but thankfully and it got bela lugosi in it. every time he opened his mouth and and gazed into the camera with those big and bulging eyes and i about fell on the floor laughing. 
sitting in a big wing chair with a huge book in his lap and the one and only bela lugosi looks into the camera and and in a dreadful vocal delivery that sounds as if he were mocking a reading of shakespeare and intones sloooow ly represent man constant groping of things unknown and drawing from the endless reaches of time and brings to light many startling things while (snicker) while startling. and because they seem new (lugosi eyes now bulging and with raised eyebrows and and mouth sneering and he continues) but most are not new and the signs of the ages (cue a visual of lightening and accompanied by the sound of thunder which then continues to rumble for an astonishing 86 seconds). and so begins what is arguably the worst film ever made. this movie almost defies description. told in semi docudrama style with an unseen narrator explaining the plot . such as it is . the story revolves around the vicissitudes of a man named glen (ed wood and jr. ) who cross dresses while hence the reference to glenda. the film has no real structure. instead and it consists mostly of a random assortment of vignettes that may . or may not . relate to glen or to the cross dressing motif. one long sequence consists of some unknown woman wriggling on a sofa and followed by a man whipping a woman in what we would today refer to as s and m. then and at odd moments bela reappears and for no apparent reason and and babbles more inane dialogue and like represent when he wrong because he does right and and when he right because he does wrong while pull the string and dance to that. huh. about twenty percent of the film visuals consist of stock footage and accompanied by a vo that relates to the story motif but not the visuals. hence and we see stock footage of represent bustling city streets and freeway traffic and a thunderous herd of buffalo and and a playground full of kids. but it gets worse. in a film about cross dressing and we have 58 consecutive seconds of stock footage of a foundry furnace making hot steel and and 84 consecutive seconds of battle scenes from wwii. even the simplest items are botched. in one scene we see a newspaper headline that reads man nabbed dressed as girl. underneath the headline and which has clearly been glued or pasted on and the article is about . taxes. in one of my favorite scenes and an off screen woman spouts out represent airplanes and why it against the creator will and in a voice that sounds like she just inhaled helium. except for the performance of lyle talbot and the acting is uniformly horrendous. production design is cheap looking and drab while (but you gotta love that tacky wallpaper). the editing is sloppy. most of the background music is suitable only for 1950 style elevators. the b and w cinematography has way too much contrast. and the costumes look like something that came from a thrift store. this film is so bad it makes plan 9 from outer space look like citizen kane and by comparison. i just do not know how one could make a film any worse than ed wood glen or glenda. but thankfully and it got bela lugosi in it. every time he opened his mouth and and gazed into the camera with those big and bulging eyes and i about fell on the floor laughing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
