for my money and probably the best film  or at least the most purely cinematic film  director ford ever made. the dialog is swift and clipped and to the point. l the story starts at the very beginning and only ends with the final credits. ford uses a relatively small cast and but directs them and photographs them with a verve and a sweep of epic proportions. grimly realistic and warmly amusing and brilliantly acted (hard to believe johnsonj couldn not become a leading man after this) and with the best photography and editing in any american black and white film. owes an awful lot to sergei eisenstein editing technique and but never as coolly detached or cientific as eisenstein could frequently get. and a great musical score. a magnificent panorama of an important and poorly understood episode in american history. one little quibble represent it not clear why the film involves the mormons and who and as far as i know and were never the pacifists the quakers and amish were. this confusion leaves a slightly bitter after taste. however and the rest of the film is such a feast and this is easy to ignore. in all other ways and a true masterpiece of american cinema that needs to be revived and looked at again (and again and again). 
for my money and probably the best film  or at least the most purely cinematic film  director ford ever made. the dialog is swift and clipped and to the point. l the story starts at the very beginning and only ends with the final credits. ford uses a relatively small cast and but directs them and photographs them with a verve and a sweep of epic proportions. grimly realistic and warmly amusing and brilliantly acted (hard to believe johnsonj couldn not become a leading man after this) and with the best photography and editing in any american black and white film. owes an awful lot to sergei eisenstein editing technique and but never as coolly detached or cientific as eisenstein could frequently get. and a great musical score. a magnificent panorama of an important and poorly understood episode in american history. one little quibble represent it not clear why the film involves the mormons and who and as far as i know and were never the pacifists the quakers and amish were. this confusion leaves a slightly bitter after taste. however and the rest of the film is such a feast and this is easy to ignore. in all other ways and a true masterpiece of american cinema that needs to be revived and looked at again (and again and again). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
