to be fair and i do not see a lot of this show. probably because it wasn not as good as the original mash and but i seem to recall them moving it around on the weekly schedule. some shows just aren not worth the trouble of following around every week. but i really did try at first and so it wasn not all bad. maybe i just kept expecting it to improve and but i can not give this show a 1. in all honesty and i can not give it any more than a 2 either. it wasn not mash (i am not going to type those stupid  every time). and it was trying to be mash without putting forth any effort and like it would just magically happen. well guess what. no magic. the best i can do here is to compare it to other shows. trapper john and m. d. was a much better show by far. however and they should have called it b. j. hunnicut and m. d. because pernell roberts looked exactly like an older bj and but nothing at all like trapper john. keep everything else the same and just change his name and the name of the show. presto. after mash wasn not the only sequel to completely bomb and dishonor the original. archie bunker place was a lame follow up to all in the family. it had no heart and no conflict and no depth  all of the things that made all in the family so memorable. likewise and mash was funny because the doctors were reacting to the impossible absurdity of war. remove the war and you remove the drive for 99% of the humor. potter can not yell at klinger for wearing a dress and because klinger isn not wearing a dress and because he not trying to get kicked out of the army and because he already out of the army and because the war is over. (breathe) all of the jokes became forced because there was no motivation for anything. the least motivated was the viewer and to stay around and watch the show. and from what i remember and the whole show seemed to be potter and klinger and and mulcahy just standing there unnaturally and facing the audience like a trio of vaudeville performers. it was reminiscent of good times and where they spent 90% of the show standing behind that couch and talking to the audience and trying to make it look like they were having natural conversation. they weren not. and it felt even less natural on after mash. another random tidbit i recall is that the people who made mash never got any royalties from the spin off. the studio used the absurd excuse that after mash was really a spin off of the movie mash (which they owned) and not the tv series. nice try and but mulcahy was the only one of the three in the movie and and he was never deaf. i guess studio execs will do anything for a buck. anything other than make a worthwhile sequel and that is. 
to be fair and i do not see a lot of this show. probably because it wasn not as good as the original mash and but i seem to recall them moving it around on the weekly schedule. some shows just aren not worth the trouble of following around every week. but i really did try at first and so it wasn not all bad. maybe i just kept expecting it to improve and but i can not give this show a 1. in all honesty and i can not give it any more than a 2 either. it wasn not mash (i am not going to type those stupid  every time). and it was trying to be mash without putting forth any effort and like it would just magically happen. well guess what. no magic. the best i can do here is to compare it to other shows. trapper john and m. d. was a much better show by far. however and they should have called it b. j. hunnicut and m. d. because pernell roberts looked exactly like an older bj and but nothing at all like trapper john. keep everything else the same and just change his name and the name of the show. presto. after mash wasn not the only sequel to completely bomb and dishonor the original. archie bunker place was a lame follow up to all in the family. it had no heart and no conflict and no depth  all of the things that made all in the family so memorable. likewise and mash was funny because the doctors were reacting to the impossible absurdity of war. remove the war and you remove the drive for 99% of the humor. potter can not yell at klinger for wearing a dress and because klinger isn not wearing a dress and because he not trying to get kicked out of the army and because he already out of the army and because the war is over. (breathe) all of the jokes became forced because there was no motivation for anything. the least motivated was the viewer and to stay around and watch the show. and from what i remember and the whole show seemed to be potter and klinger and and mulcahy just standing there unnaturally and facing the audience like a trio of vaudeville performers. it was reminiscent of good times and where they spent 90% of the show standing behind that couch and talking to the audience and trying to make it look like they were having natural conversation. they weren not. and it felt even less natural on after mash. another random tidbit i recall is that the people who made mash never got any royalties from the spin off. the studio used the absurd excuse that after mash was really a spin off of the movie mash (which they owned) and not the tv series. nice try and but mulcahy was the only one of the three in the movie and and he was never deaf. i guess studio execs will do anything for a buck. anything other than make a worthwhile sequel and that is. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
