there something rotten about this film and and basically the way it turns a sinister and twisted character into a hero by exploiting our sympathy with his admittedly horrible situation. sampedro and like many who have lost hope and chooses suicide. the fact that he has been contemplating it for more than 26 years probably makes his condition worse and but the belief that we should do whatever anyone asks and even if it means ending a life is in my opinion profoundly wrong. what a contrast to the uplifting example of the scientist stephen hawkings and who suffered a far worse condition for far longer. yet with the morals upside down and the film revels in hero worship and and the people who disagree with are painted in simplistic idiotic terms. there little room for subtly especially in the encounter with the priest(deliberately manipulating the real life encounter which was with a much younger priest). in that way i suppose the film is on a par with riefenstahls triumph of the will. the insidious idea is that everyone should have to right to take their life and when they feel they cannot live it anymore. it makes no difference whether you are physically or psychologically damaged and there are people evidently who believe you have the right to choose. the same people are likely to make a case for abortion. its all part of the current trend to get the suffering or sufferers out of sight and brush it under the carpet and mammy will say its. ok and and we all feel very happy with ourselves. so we go down the slippery path of believing that some lives and just ain not worth living and and then we will decide that as some people can not really decide for themselves then we will bring in the state to decide for them. enter adolf hitler straight from that other oscar contender der untergang. hitler of course believes that he carrying out exactly what nature does in disposing of the weak. under his regime and there were forced abortions among the weaker strains and the mentally handicapped were quietly put away and the jews were humanely liquidated by using gas. he would have applauded this film and and why not for it is in line with his philosophy. some lives are just not worth living. i differ from ramon sampedro and hitler and all the people involved with making this film. human life is sacred and it is not a right and it is a gift and an obligation. nobody chooses to be born. then who can choose death. its not about religion and its about protecting the weak and helpless and something this film does a lot to undermine. 
there something rotten about this film and and basically the way it turns a sinister and twisted character into a hero by exploiting our sympathy with his admittedly horrible situation. sampedro and like many who have lost hope and chooses suicide. the fact that he has been contemplating it for more than 26 years probably makes his condition worse and but the belief that we should do whatever anyone asks and even if it means ending a life is in my opinion profoundly wrong. what a contrast to the uplifting example of the scientist stephen hawkings and who suffered a far worse condition for far longer. yet with the morals upside down and the film revels in hero worship and and the people who disagree with are painted in simplistic idiotic terms. there little room for subtly especially in the encounter with the priest(deliberately manipulating the real life encounter which was with a much younger priest). in that way i suppose the film is on a par with riefenstahls triumph of the will. the insidious idea is that everyone should have to right to take their life and when they feel they cannot live it anymore. it makes no difference whether you are physically or psychologically damaged and there are people evidently who believe you have the right to choose. the same people are likely to make a case for abortion. its all part of the current trend to get the suffering or sufferers out of sight and brush it under the carpet and mammy will say its. ok and and we all feel very happy with ourselves. so we go down the slippery path of believing that some lives and just ain not worth living and and then we will decide that as some people can not really decide for themselves then we will bring in the state to decide for them. enter adolf hitler straight from that other oscar contender der untergang. hitler of course believes that he carrying out exactly what nature does in disposing of the weak. under his regime and there were forced abortions among the weaker strains and the mentally handicapped were quietly put away and the jews were humanely liquidated by using gas. he would have applauded this film and and why not for it is in line with his philosophy. some lives are just not worth living. i differ from ramon sampedro and hitler and all the people involved with making this film. human life is sacred and it is not a right and it is a gift and an obligation. nobody chooses to be born. then who can choose death. its not about religion and its about protecting the weak and helpless and something this film does a lot to undermine. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
