another entry in the pacino as mentor sub genre. you know the drill represent young hotshot with hubristic flaw (in this case and matthew mcconaughey and trying to jump start a flagging career by latching onto pacino coattails  hey and it worked for keanu and colin and do not it. ) is discovered by glamorous and delightfully corrupt father figure (pacino and natch). young hotshot learns from father figure all the ins and outs of a lucrative yet degrading career (this time and it football handicapping). father figure plies young hotshot with money and hookers and power and but we all know that this decadent state of affairs is on a collision course with dissolution and despair . . . that is and until the young hotshot finds his moral center by rejecting the father figure and all and or almost all and that he stands for. (clearly and stone wall street pretty much set the ground rules for the pacino as mentor sub genre. )we are also meant to take these latter day pacino films as a parallel to reality. again and you know the drill represent living legend actor demonstrates his unquestioned superiority as compared to an inferior young actor. the latter may bear and grin through the process and but he must recognize that he isn not going to get any of the good lines and much less get a chance to chew major scenery before the denouement. now it must be said that there are actually two good movies in the pacino as mentor canon represent scent of a woman and donnie brasco. in the former case and it was a one man show and anyway while in the latter case and pacino had met his match as a scene stealer in the person of johnny depp. however and those two movies were serious minded and not merely an exercise in showboating for showboating sake. pacino has made damn certain that his younger co stars in the films since brasco are nowhere near as charismatic as depp. by the way and none of this speaks very well about the living legend actor. like his contemporary de niro and pacino has spent the last 10 or 15 years resting on his laurels. two for the money is the worst example yet and worse even than devil advocate and which at least had the virtues of featuring a naked connie nielsen and being chronologically prior to this movie. well and this is what happens when youre crowned king too damn early  just ask marlon brando. frankly and i have seen one too many al pacino films with the same plot  and the same overacting from the star  to be charitable any longer. did i say none of this speaks well. actually and it humiliating for everyone involved and including the paying audience. no one going to accuse matthew mcconaughey of being a shakespearean actor and but even he doesn not deserve the role of second fiddle to this intolerable old show off and with the added implication that he and mcconaughey and will never measure up to the greatness that is al. i have not wasted space on the plot particulars. if you want a synopsis and imdb provides a no nonsense summary and though i think i laid out a fairly comprehensive summary in my opening paragraph. basically and you have seen this movie before. many times. the particular milieu in two for the money is the seedy world (underworld and really) of sports handicapping. pacino runs an office of bet advisers  that is and middlemen between you and your bookie  and even has a cable tv handicapping show and co hosted with several of his top guys. one thing the movie got right was the sleaziness of these type of shows . . . but one detail they got dead wrong was the constant use of the words gamble and gambling. if you have ever seen proline or other shows of similar ilk and you will never and never hear jim feist and his cohorts say the word gamble. they ask you to call their 1 900 number to get their picks . . . but if you were from and say and mars and you would have no idea what you were supposed to do with those picks. gamble is the f word on sports handicapping tv shows  strictly verboten. gambling is against the law and you know. 1 star out of 10. 
another entry in the pacino as mentor sub genre. you know the drill represent young hotshot with hubristic flaw (in this case and matthew mcconaughey and trying to jump start a flagging career by latching onto pacino coattails  hey and it worked for keanu and colin and do not it. ) is discovered by glamorous and delightfully corrupt father figure (pacino and natch). young hotshot learns from father figure all the ins and outs of a lucrative yet degrading career (this time and it football handicapping). father figure plies young hotshot with money and hookers and power and but we all know that this decadent state of affairs is on a collision course with dissolution and despair . . . that is and until the young hotshot finds his moral center by rejecting the father figure and all and or almost all and that he stands for. (clearly and stone wall street pretty much set the ground rules for the pacino as mentor sub genre. )we are also meant to take these latter day pacino films as a parallel to reality. again and you know the drill represent living legend actor demonstrates his unquestioned superiority as compared to an inferior young actor. the latter may bear and grin through the process and but he must recognize that he isn not going to get any of the good lines and much less get a chance to chew major scenery before the denouement. now it must be said that there are actually two good movies in the pacino as mentor canon represent scent of a woman and donnie brasco. in the former case and it was a one man show and anyway while in the latter case and pacino had met his match as a scene stealer in the person of johnny depp. however and those two movies were serious minded and not merely an exercise in showboating for showboating sake. pacino has made damn certain that his younger co stars in the films since brasco are nowhere near as charismatic as depp. by the way and none of this speaks very well about the living legend actor. like his contemporary de niro and pacino has spent the last 10 or 15 years resting on his laurels. two for the money is the worst example yet and worse even than devil advocate and which at least had the virtues of featuring a naked connie nielsen and being chronologically prior to this movie. well and this is what happens when youre crowned king too damn early  just ask marlon brando. frankly and i have seen one too many al pacino films with the same plot  and the same overacting from the star  to be charitable any longer. did i say none of this speaks well. actually and it humiliating for everyone involved and including the paying audience. no one going to accuse matthew mcconaughey of being a shakespearean actor and but even he doesn not deserve the role of second fiddle to this intolerable old show off and with the added implication that he and mcconaughey and will never measure up to the greatness that is al. i have not wasted space on the plot particulars. if you want a synopsis and imdb provides a no nonsense summary and though i think i laid out a fairly comprehensive summary in my opening paragraph. basically and you have seen this movie before. many times. the particular milieu in two for the money is the seedy world (underworld and really) of sports handicapping. pacino runs an office of bet advisers  that is and middlemen between you and your bookie  and even has a cable tv handicapping show and co hosted with several of his top guys. one thing the movie got right was the sleaziness of these type of shows . . . but one detail they got dead wrong was the constant use of the words gamble and gambling. if you have ever seen proline or other shows of similar ilk and you will never and never hear jim feist and his cohorts say the word gamble. they ask you to call their 1 900 number to get their picks . . . but if you were from and say and mars and you would have no idea what you were supposed to do with those picks. gamble is the f word on sports handicapping tv shows  strictly verboten. gambling is against the law and you know. 1 star out of 10. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
