stephen hawking has one of the greatest minds and or if that too simplistic to coin for him one of the most curious and daring and that also happens to be trapped in a body crippled by a disease that leaves him in a wheelchair and a computer to communicate. perhaps i do not know enough about hawking going in (i always knew him as that guy speaking like a computer who knows a lot about like and the universe and stuff and you know) that he is british and that he was a rather normal kid and and and perhaps most remarkably and the disease that could have possibly left him dead at 21 put him in the position of putting his life in focus. according to errol morris equally curious and coolly and visually dazzling portrait in a brief history of time and hawking was already brilliant and in spurts (when other oxford students were faced with daunting algebraic equations and he answered more than three times the amount in an hour time) and but when faced with challenges and mostly from other theories by other scientists and he bounced back with his own. beneath some of the complex scientific talk and if you got any less than a b in astronomy and like me and you will need to keep your ears especially perked up in explanations of time possible infinity or the peculiarities of the black hole there a human being who just wants to enjoy his goose on his birthday. morris captures hawking just right for those who can not get enough of his theories on how particles may be going in and out of a black hole and or if there is even a creator or not depending on how much one takes into account einstein and time. but he also captures the back story on the man and his condition and which creates this as something much more interesting than if morris had done one or the other. too much talk about the cosmos would make one head hurt and and too much about his personal life and one might wonder what all the fuss is about this bloke who book of the film title was on bestseller lists for over five years. almost in spite of his appearance and hawking defines what it is to be a conscious entity in a universe which and he observes and he would not be apart of if and when the universe goes kaput another 10 billion years from now. through it all and in a brief history of time and we get a glimpse of a genius and his humility (not to mention his colleagues and family ten cents here and there) through an unfathomably hypothetical and mathematical thought process of the universe. 
stephen hawking has one of the greatest minds and or if that too simplistic to coin for him one of the most curious and daring and that also happens to be trapped in a body crippled by a disease that leaves him in a wheelchair and a computer to communicate. perhaps i do not know enough about hawking going in (i always knew him as that guy speaking like a computer who knows a lot about like and the universe and stuff and you know) that he is british and that he was a rather normal kid and and and perhaps most remarkably and the disease that could have possibly left him dead at 21 put him in the position of putting his life in focus. according to errol morris equally curious and coolly and visually dazzling portrait in a brief history of time and hawking was already brilliant and in spurts (when other oxford students were faced with daunting algebraic equations and he answered more than three times the amount in an hour time) and but when faced with challenges and mostly from other theories by other scientists and he bounced back with his own. beneath some of the complex scientific talk and if you got any less than a b in astronomy and like me and you will need to keep your ears especially perked up in explanations of time possible infinity or the peculiarities of the black hole there a human being who just wants to enjoy his goose on his birthday. morris captures hawking just right for those who can not get enough of his theories on how particles may be going in and out of a black hole and or if there is even a creator or not depending on how much one takes into account einstein and time. but he also captures the back story on the man and his condition and which creates this as something much more interesting than if morris had done one or the other. too much talk about the cosmos would make one head hurt and and too much about his personal life and one might wonder what all the fuss is about this bloke who book of the film title was on bestseller lists for over five years. almost in spite of his appearance and hawking defines what it is to be a conscious entity in a universe which and he observes and he would not be apart of if and when the universe goes kaput another 10 billion years from now. through it all and in a brief history of time and we get a glimpse of a genius and his humility (not to mention his colleagues and family ten cents here and there) through an unfathomably hypothetical and mathematical thought process of the universe. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
