ham handed homage to honest hacking. felt good in a soft core way about equivalent to its mild pornography and until its vapid lack of technical and economic reality and emotional and moral sophistication became apparent. basically a muddled 90s remake of 85 real genius and with fewer and stupider geniuses and and a cynical bad ending. perhaps this movie would appeal to someone delighted by the thesis that becoming a billionaire is so easy it almost accidental. or perhaps to technical types who like seeing themselves depicted as cool and sexy. speculating about the reasons someone might like this movie is certainly more interesting than the movie itself. the movies closing credits song is more interesting than the movie itself. 
ham handed homage to honest hacking. felt good in a soft core way about equivalent to its mild pornography and until its vapid lack of technical and economic reality and emotional and moral sophistication became apparent. basically a muddled 90s remake of 85 real genius and with fewer and stupider geniuses and and a cynical bad ending. perhaps this movie would appeal to someone delighted by the thesis that becoming a billionaire is so easy it almost accidental. or perhaps to technical types who like seeing themselves depicted as cool and sexy. speculating about the reasons someone might like this movie is certainly more interesting than the movie itself. the movies closing credits song is more interesting than the movie itself. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
