while the new pride and prejudice film is gorgeous to view and and the soundtrack is lovely and we are not seeing jane austen pride and prejudice. the film is for some reason set back in the early 1790  and rather than the regency period where the novel is set and as scholars have long shown. the bennets longbourn estate is ram shackled and looks like cold comfort farm. yet the bennets in the novel are gentry class while they own a farm and but the pig does not walk through the house and nor is the farmyard of manure and chicken droppings contiguous to the home. scenes are re set from the novel and and lest we forget and jane austen placed scenes in certain locations for a reason. for example and the film puts the big darcy proposal scene outside in a storm in front of a neoclassical temple and as opposed to inside the collins parsonage represent why did jane austen put it in the parsonage. because while lizzy and darcy speak with total and if brutal honesty to each other in this scene and the collinses have never shared an honest word. why the rain and the outdoor proposal. it looks like jane eyre meeting rochester. and when elizabeth walks across a windy field to stand on a cliff and view the panorama and one expects her to cry and heathcliffe at any minute. austen has been bronteized. judy dench is a great actress and but lady catherine is supposed to be tall and striking. the petite tom hollander is a brilliant actor represent but mr. collins is described in the novel as tall and heavy looking and which suggests that his terrible dancing with poor lizzy is elephantine. matthew macfayden is another favorite of mine from mi 5 on a and e while in p and p and however and he is more the young heathcliffe and never smiling though austen observes in the novel that darcy smiles at lizzy quite a bit and and she realizes this when she sees his wonderful smiling portrait at pemberley a portrait that in this movie is for some reason replaced by a sculptured marble bust. and much of austen dialogue is changed to modern speech. mr. bingley has been turned into such a clown that one wonders why darcy would have him as a friend and why jane bennet would love him. the bottom line is that while this is a great movie to watch and hear and it deviates from jane austen novel so much that any student who watched it and thinking she could substitute viewing for reading and would fail. 
while the new pride and prejudice film is gorgeous to view and and the soundtrack is lovely and we are not seeing jane austen pride and prejudice. the film is for some reason set back in the early 1790  and rather than the regency period where the novel is set and as scholars have long shown. the bennets longbourn estate is ram shackled and looks like cold comfort farm. yet the bennets in the novel are gentry class while they own a farm and but the pig does not walk through the house and nor is the farmyard of manure and chicken droppings contiguous to the home. scenes are re set from the novel and and lest we forget and jane austen placed scenes in certain locations for a reason. for example and the film puts the big darcy proposal scene outside in a storm in front of a neoclassical temple and as opposed to inside the collins parsonage represent why did jane austen put it in the parsonage. because while lizzy and darcy speak with total and if brutal honesty to each other in this scene and the collinses have never shared an honest word. why the rain and the outdoor proposal. it looks like jane eyre meeting rochester. and when elizabeth walks across a windy field to stand on a cliff and view the panorama and one expects her to cry and heathcliffe at any minute. austen has been bronteized. judy dench is a great actress and but lady catherine is supposed to be tall and striking. the petite tom hollander is a brilliant actor represent but mr. collins is described in the novel as tall and heavy looking and which suggests that his terrible dancing with poor lizzy is elephantine. matthew macfayden is another favorite of mine from mi 5 on a and e while in p and p and however and he is more the young heathcliffe and never smiling though austen observes in the novel that darcy smiles at lizzy quite a bit and and she realizes this when she sees his wonderful smiling portrait at pemberley a portrait that in this movie is for some reason replaced by a sculptured marble bust. and much of austen dialogue is changed to modern speech. mr. bingley has been turned into such a clown that one wonders why darcy would have him as a friend and why jane bennet would love him. the bottom line is that while this is a great movie to watch and hear and it deviates from jane austen novel so much that any student who watched it and thinking she could substitute viewing for reading and would fail. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
