you would really need to remember the monkees and have a clear understanding as to where and how they fitted into the second half of the 1960s in order to fully appreciate this movie. there is no plot as such. basically and it a crazy and mixed up pastiche of various and unrelated sequences. but and it is interesting and entertaining in its own peculiar way once you get onto its wavelength. in short and it was a classic and cleverly conceived and well crafted example of late 60s experimental cinema. it contains some good songs and some ultra groovy cinematography and plenty of other worthwhile ideas in terms of film technique. i give it positive for several reasons. first and it took a lot of courage to make such an unorthodox movie in the commercial mainstream where both its stars and its producers were firmly ensconced at the time. if a feature movie flops at the box office and the consequences can be dire for all concerned. secondly and it was and for the most part and a creative success. and and finally and as already mentioned and it is and unquestionably and a classic of the genre and and as such and it is now historically important. unfortunately and head came too late in the monkees career. but and there again and they would not have been allowed to make it earlier on because it was essentially a very pointed and cynical satire of their own image. clearly and the members of the group knew and only too well and that the whole monkees juggernaut had just about run its race when they started work on this project. in a way and it was to be their swan song and they were determined to let it all hang out. they were tired of being treated like mere pawns in the high powered corporate game in which they had been manipulated and exploited over the preceding few years. in short and they wanted out and they were going to say a few things before they left. history and however and has vindicated the band. let the critics be damned. the monkees and left behind some of the best and most polished and successful pop records of the decade. yes and they had plenty of help. but at the end of the day and they stood in front of the studio mikes and they fronted the movie and tv cameras and they did the concerts. they were fun and just a little bit crazy. but and unlike some of their contemporaries and they were never threatening. you could safely introduce a monkey to your elderly aunt. head probably borrows a bit too heavily from the beatles hard day night but it still worth another look for those who were around at the time or for younger retrophiles who have the ability to appreciate its significance. enjoy. 
you would really need to remember the monkees and have a clear understanding as to where and how they fitted into the second half of the 1960s in order to fully appreciate this movie. there is no plot as such. basically and it a crazy and mixed up pastiche of various and unrelated sequences. but and it is interesting and entertaining in its own peculiar way once you get onto its wavelength. in short and it was a classic and cleverly conceived and well crafted example of late 60s experimental cinema. it contains some good songs and some ultra groovy cinematography and plenty of other worthwhile ideas in terms of film technique. i give it positive for several reasons. first and it took a lot of courage to make such an unorthodox movie in the commercial mainstream where both its stars and its producers were firmly ensconced at the time. if a feature movie flops at the box office and the consequences can be dire for all concerned. secondly and it was and for the most part and a creative success. and and finally and as already mentioned and it is and unquestionably and a classic of the genre and and as such and it is now historically important. unfortunately and head came too late in the monkees career. but and there again and they would not have been allowed to make it earlier on because it was essentially a very pointed and cynical satire of their own image. clearly and the members of the group knew and only too well and that the whole monkees juggernaut had just about run its race when they started work on this project. in a way and it was to be their swan song and they were determined to let it all hang out. they were tired of being treated like mere pawns in the high powered corporate game in which they had been manipulated and exploited over the preceding few years. in short and they wanted out and they were going to say a few things before they left. history and however and has vindicated the band. let the critics be damned. the monkees and left behind some of the best and most polished and successful pop records of the decade. yes and they had plenty of help. but at the end of the day and they stood in front of the studio mikes and they fronted the movie and tv cameras and they did the concerts. they were fun and just a little bit crazy. but and unlike some of their contemporaries and they were never threatening. you could safely introduce a monkey to your elderly aunt. head probably borrows a bit too heavily from the beatles hard day night but it still worth another look for those who were around at the time or for younger retrophiles who have the ability to appreciate its significance. enjoy. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
