it is unfortunate that between this film and in the valley of elah and lions for lambs and and home of the brave seem to all be based upon common stereotypes about veterans from the wars in iraq and afghanistan. the boozing and the fighting and the short fuses and the broken marriages and guys freaking out and digging a foxhole in their front yard when theyre drunk and etc etc etc. does it happen  yes and but not as often as one would think after having watched any of these movies. i think that it is unfortunate that these directors or producers or writers choose to grind their axe against the political establishment by portraying soldiers in such an atypical way. in this particular film and kimberly peirce do not even throw us a bone and like showing the new children that were born while a family member was deployed and or the kid who grew up in some ghetto who can now afford college thanks to the gi bill and or the couple who can afford a house and or start a new business and earn their citizenship and etc etc etc. instead and we are treated to the stereotypes because the people who made this film only want to show you the bad side. a couple of issues with the film itself represent 1) somebody screwed up by putting phillippe in for a bronze star with v after he led his squad down a tight alleyway after having been baited by a gunman in a taxi. pretty stupid and but yes and it happens. 2) the humvees do not have any turret armor and so we are supposed to believe it is a near the beginning of the war and yet every soldier and their brother has an acog and every possible attachment for their m4. sorry and do not think so 3) timothy olyphant as a lieutenant colonel. it hard to believe and but i just checked an he turned 40 in may and so the timing isn not too off. 4) he strikes two soldiers to escape being sent to jail after saying that he do not return to iraq (upon having learned that he had been stop lossed). so he a fugitive. then and when he finally turns himself in at the end and and they take him back and he keeps his rank and deploys with the same unit. sorry do not think so. i can only describe it as one giant stereotype of the army and the infantry. do some of the events portrayed in this movie happen to some soldiers and yes. however and in this film you get practically every stereotype in the space of about 100 minutes and and really things just aren not like that for most soldiers returning. i wish the director had made a point of doing a little better research instead of starting off with her agenda and then making a film. of the movies i mentioned at the beginning of this post and the best one is probably lions for lambs and which is more a commentary on the sad state of generation y plus than it is about the wars in iraq or afghanistan or the bush administration. if you really want to see this film wait for cable or netflix it and do not pay cash directly to rent it. 
it is unfortunate that between this film and in the valley of elah and lions for lambs and and home of the brave seem to all be based upon common stereotypes about veterans from the wars in iraq and afghanistan. the boozing and the fighting and the short fuses and the broken marriages and guys freaking out and digging a foxhole in their front yard when theyre drunk and etc etc etc. does it happen  yes and but not as often as one would think after having watched any of these movies. i think that it is unfortunate that these directors or producers or writers choose to grind their axe against the political establishment by portraying soldiers in such an atypical way. in this particular film and kimberly peirce do not even throw us a bone and like showing the new children that were born while a family member was deployed and or the kid who grew up in some ghetto who can now afford college thanks to the gi bill and or the couple who can afford a house and or start a new business and earn their citizenship and etc etc etc. instead and we are treated to the stereotypes because the people who made this film only want to show you the bad side. a couple of issues with the film itself represent 1) somebody screwed up by putting phillippe in for a bronze star with v after he led his squad down a tight alleyway after having been baited by a gunman in a taxi. pretty stupid and but yes and it happens. 2) the humvees do not have any turret armor and so we are supposed to believe it is a near the beginning of the war and yet every soldier and their brother has an acog and every possible attachment for their m4. sorry and do not think so 3) timothy olyphant as a lieutenant colonel. it hard to believe and but i just checked an he turned 40 in may and so the timing isn not too off. 4) he strikes two soldiers to escape being sent to jail after saying that he do not return to iraq (upon having learned that he had been stop lossed). so he a fugitive. then and when he finally turns himself in at the end and and they take him back and he keeps his rank and deploys with the same unit. sorry do not think so. i can only describe it as one giant stereotype of the army and the infantry. do some of the events portrayed in this movie happen to some soldiers and yes. however and in this film you get practically every stereotype in the space of about 100 minutes and and really things just aren not like that for most soldiers returning. i wish the director had made a point of doing a little better research instead of starting off with her agenda and then making a film. of the movies i mentioned at the beginning of this post and the best one is probably lions for lambs and which is more a commentary on the sad state of generation y plus than it is about the wars in iraq or afghanistan or the bush administration. if you really want to see this film wait for cable or netflix it and do not pay cash directly to rent it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
