in and out made me want to vomit. i have never seen such a shameless film. it seriously wanted to say that being gay is something wonderful and joyous and but has no idea how to say it. to me this was not a comedy and unless cruel and sick jokes are something to laugh at when a victim falls for it. from what i saw and this film had four (4) major flaws starting with (a) matt dillion character as he announces to the world that is former teacher and howard brackett (kevin kline) is gay. never mind how unbelievable it is that matt dillion character won an oscar for what looked like a serious role on the edge of a crack up. but why would he say such a thing. after all and this was never an issue with howard students and his friends and family and nor his finace. nobody. so why would he say something like it when it wasn not true. more to the point and why doesn not the movie supply us with an answer as to why he said it. the reason is because there is no answer and and for the convenience of the plot none is provided. the second (b) flaw is with the fact the film seems to have forgotten what homosexuality is the attraction and sexual relation to members of the same sex. in this movie and being gay is based on liking barbara streisand musicals and being passionate about literature. it all based on stereotypes. both of these flaws are met up again at that must be seen to be believed graduation ceremony. matt dillion finds out about the commotion going on in that small town and the film looks poised to let us know what made him say such a thing. when he arrives to the ceremony and he says nothing and and i wondered why in the world he then came there at all. he do not solve anything. then when all of the audience stood to announce they were gay and i was so moved i wanted to throw up. those folks were standing up in defense of howard being gay by mocking all of those stereotypes. what the film forgot is that it was using those stereotypes to show why howard was gay. they filmmakers just shot themselves in the foot. but wait there more. during the ceremony and (c) howard appeared to be on trial to lose is job as a teacher and because people believed that he would influence his students to be gay. what the film was trying to say is that homosexuals never recruit and and that he do not influence his students. but did we not see tom selleck character endlessly pressure howard over and over again and even to the point of kissing him unexpectedly and to come out of the closet when and in my mind and there was no closet to come out of. from that and the film clearly show that homosexual are capable of recruiting. the film and again and then shoots itself in the foot. and (d) when howard came out of the closet and did anyone not notice how the screenplay shut him up for the rest of the film. i counted only three lines he had afterwards represent yup. to his parents and hi there. to a student and and are you ready. to tom selleck before the last vomitous scene. i might be low by one and but the point is he is not allowed to tell us what made him decide he was gay. i wanted to know what was in his head and because i never for once believed he was gay. as bonuses and the movie also includes several truly offensive scenes. one in which howard is asking a priest in confession for advice about what to do for a friend (him) and who is engaged and has not yet had sex with his fiance. does that make him gay. he asks. the priest responsed oh yes and he definitely gay. uh huh. or what about the scene when all the old ladies are gathered around telling howard mother that she doesn not need to be sad about her son deep and dark secret because and well. everyone has them. then one the ladies confessed that she never seen the bridges of madison county. funny. no. becuase the film shows that it is insensitive and has no idea how devestating it can be to family to have one of its members announced that he or she is gay. i know. i have several friends that are gay and and none of their families took it well at all. that was a poor way to diffuse the whole situation. the last straw for me was the last scene that gave they appearence that tom and kevin were getting married. the camera panned down very slowly to the front of the church when. it wasn not what you thought. i had been thoroughly disgusted by that point and and i never could forgive that sick joke. i have nothing against films about being gay or homosexuality. philadelphia and longtime companion were very honest and true in what they had to say. in and out is just screaming for political correctness and but has no idea of the corruption at its core. what i gathered from the film is that if you are 99% straight and 1% gay and meaning if you have the slightless doubt and you are definitely gay. it like gayness is becoming a dominant trait in genetics. in reality if everyone told you over and over that you were worthless and stupid and you would eventually believe it too and do not you. this is what happened to howard brackett about being gay. i left the theater sad and angry. angry the whole weekend and in fact. this was a seriously sick and cruel film and the worst of 1997. 
in and out made me want to vomit. i have never seen such a shameless film. it seriously wanted to say that being gay is something wonderful and joyous and but has no idea how to say it. to me this was not a comedy and unless cruel and sick jokes are something to laugh at when a victim falls for it. from what i saw and this film had four (4) major flaws starting with (a) matt dillion character as he announces to the world that is former teacher and howard brackett (kevin kline) is gay. never mind how unbelievable it is that matt dillion character won an oscar for what looked like a serious role on the edge of a crack up. but why would he say such a thing. after all and this was never an issue with howard students and his friends and family and nor his finace. nobody. so why would he say something like it when it wasn not true. more to the point and why doesn not the movie supply us with an answer as to why he said it. the reason is because there is no answer and and for the convenience of the plot none is provided. the second (b) flaw is with the fact the film seems to have forgotten what homosexuality is the attraction and sexual relation to members of the same sex. in this movie and being gay is based on liking barbara streisand musicals and being passionate about literature. it all based on stereotypes. both of these flaws are met up again at that must be seen to be believed graduation ceremony. matt dillion finds out about the commotion going on in that small town and the film looks poised to let us know what made him say such a thing. when he arrives to the ceremony and he says nothing and and i wondered why in the world he then came there at all. he do not solve anything. then when all of the audience stood to announce they were gay and i was so moved i wanted to throw up. those folks were standing up in defense of howard being gay by mocking all of those stereotypes. what the film forgot is that it was using those stereotypes to show why howard was gay. they filmmakers just shot themselves in the foot. but wait there more. during the ceremony and (c) howard appeared to be on trial to lose is job as a teacher and because people believed that he would influence his students to be gay. what the film was trying to say is that homosexuals never recruit and and that he do not influence his students. but did we not see tom selleck character endlessly pressure howard over and over again and even to the point of kissing him unexpectedly and to come out of the closet when and in my mind and there was no closet to come out of. from that and the film clearly show that homosexual are capable of recruiting. the film and again and then shoots itself in the foot. and (d) when howard came out of the closet and did anyone not notice how the screenplay shut him up for the rest of the film. i counted only three lines he had afterwards represent yup. to his parents and hi there. to a student and and are you ready. to tom selleck before the last vomitous scene. i might be low by one and but the point is he is not allowed to tell us what made him decide he was gay. i wanted to know what was in his head and because i never for once believed he was gay. as bonuses and the movie also includes several truly offensive scenes. one in which howard is asking a priest in confession for advice about what to do for a friend (him) and who is engaged and has not yet had sex with his fiance. does that make him gay. he asks. the priest responsed oh yes and he definitely gay. uh huh. or what about the scene when all the old ladies are gathered around telling howard mother that she doesn not need to be sad about her son deep and dark secret because and well. everyone has them. then one the ladies confessed that she never seen the bridges of madison county. funny. no. becuase the film shows that it is insensitive and has no idea how devestating it can be to family to have one of its members announced that he or she is gay. i know. i have several friends that are gay and and none of their families took it well at all. that was a poor way to diffuse the whole situation. the last straw for me was the last scene that gave they appearence that tom and kevin were getting married. the camera panned down very slowly to the front of the church when. it wasn not what you thought. i had been thoroughly disgusted by that point and and i never could forgive that sick joke. i have nothing against films about being gay or homosexuality. philadelphia and longtime companion were very honest and true in what they had to say. in and out is just screaming for political correctness and but has no idea of the corruption at its core. what i gathered from the film is that if you are 99% straight and 1% gay and meaning if you have the slightless doubt and you are definitely gay. it like gayness is becoming a dominant trait in genetics. in reality if everyone told you over and over that you were worthless and stupid and you would eventually believe it too and do not you. this is what happened to howard brackett about being gay. i left the theater sad and angry. angry the whole weekend and in fact. this was a seriously sick and cruel film and the worst of 1997. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
