this film should never have been made. it stinks and it awful and it no good and it bad and it terrible. starting to see a pattern here. jackie mason is certainly no rodney dangerfield. gone were ted knight and bill murray and who and along with dangerfield and were essential to the first film. it seems that the three of them (the stars) all knew a stinker of a script when they saw one. the one who do not have the good sense to bow out of this was chevy chase and who stuck around but was extraneous to both films in my opinion. this film is quite simply not funny. nor does it have any other endearing qualities. this thing relies heavily on anti semitism to work and it works to it detriment. i hated this thing. a waste of everybody time. 
this film should never have been made. it stinks and it awful and it no good and it bad and it terrible. starting to see a pattern here. jackie mason is certainly no rodney dangerfield. gone were ted knight and bill murray and who and along with dangerfield and were essential to the first film. it seems that the three of them (the stars) all knew a stinker of a script when they saw one. the one who do not have the good sense to bow out of this was chevy chase and who stuck around but was extraneous to both films in my opinion. this film is quite simply not funny. nor does it have any other endearing qualities. this thing relies heavily on anti semitism to work and it works to it detriment. i hated this thing. a waste of everybody time. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
