the basic plot of this film has already been detailed in several other comments so i would not bother. i would like to first commend the producer and cast and directors and crew for creating a wonderfully engaging film on a meager and $1m budget and a small fraction of standard hollywood fare that doesn not look cheap. these people have a drive to make something new and entertaining while not spending a fortune doing it. this is essentially art for art sake. i know and i know and some of you will decide that this is not art but something less and that fine. i for one am glad that people like these will continue to put forth the time and effort for our benefit without expecting huge multimillion dollar payoffs. now to the criticism. i feel that the scenario presented is credible to a point. it wonderful when everything works out and the hero or heroine saves the day and all well that ends well. what gets me is the blatant manipulation of events so that blind luck is responsible more than courage and strength. when lee was attacked but not severely injured and somehow she washed up on a mud bank right next to the dead guide. then and miraculously and his loaded revolver is still in his holster and it actually works (after some cleaning and fiddling). finally and when lee is attacked on the mud bank and jumps in the water and once again the croc fails to kill her. she ends up with her hand in his (her. ) mouth and manages to repeatedly pull the trigger and ultimately to blow the croc brains out (literally). i came to the conclusion that having lee go hand to mouth with the croc was just a way to end the film with the human in triumph. based upon what i have seen and the croc attack and continue to hold on until the prey stops struggling. croc will spin around and around to dismember and drown the prey. that happened to the first 3 victims but not to lee. she had teeth marks but they were not deep. i think that the ending would have been better had the croc won and frankly and thereby proving his dominance of the mangrove and his territory for millions of years. but then and how many of us would have been upset or disappointed that the pretty girl do not get out alive. 
the basic plot of this film has already been detailed in several other comments so i would not bother. i would like to first commend the producer and cast and directors and crew for creating a wonderfully engaging film on a meager and $1m budget and a small fraction of standard hollywood fare that doesn not look cheap. these people have a drive to make something new and entertaining while not spending a fortune doing it. this is essentially art for art sake. i know and i know and some of you will decide that this is not art but something less and that fine. i for one am glad that people like these will continue to put forth the time and effort for our benefit without expecting huge multimillion dollar payoffs. now to the criticism. i feel that the scenario presented is credible to a point. it wonderful when everything works out and the hero or heroine saves the day and all well that ends well. what gets me is the blatant manipulation of events so that blind luck is responsible more than courage and strength. when lee was attacked but not severely injured and somehow she washed up on a mud bank right next to the dead guide. then and miraculously and his loaded revolver is still in his holster and it actually works (after some cleaning and fiddling). finally and when lee is attacked on the mud bank and jumps in the water and once again the croc fails to kill her. she ends up with her hand in his (her. ) mouth and manages to repeatedly pull the trigger and ultimately to blow the croc brains out (literally). i came to the conclusion that having lee go hand to mouth with the croc was just a way to end the film with the human in triumph. based upon what i have seen and the croc attack and continue to hold on until the prey stops struggling. croc will spin around and around to dismember and drown the prey. that happened to the first 3 victims but not to lee. she had teeth marks but they were not deep. i think that the ending would have been better had the croc won and frankly and thereby proving his dominance of the mangrove and his territory for millions of years. but then and how many of us would have been upset or disappointed that the pretty girl do not get out alive. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
