largely forgettable tale in which mercenary kerman and employer agren travel into the jungle in search of agren missing sister. despite its connection to the cannibal movie family and this film is more of an extreme version of rene cardona guyana  crime of the century. lenzi clearly aims to exploit the (at that time) topical jonestown massacre and by depicting a rogue and self righteous zealot with a penchant for bigamy and just a hint of megalomania (played with ruthless intensity by ivan rassimov) leading his motley crew flock into self inflicted oblivion. with sister in toe and kerman and agren attempt to stop the rot and but after several failed coups and they end up fleeing into the green inferno and only to run afoul the locals and their notorious appetites. one in a string of excessive gore fests that emerged in the late seventies or early eighties and where every new addition seemed to engage in a one upmanship contest with its predecessor and by attempting to contrive the most gory and graphic display ever brought to motion pictures. this inferior instalment employs all the motifs and gimmicks of the others and but with much less success. was it the so called amazonian natives who looked like they were bollywood rejects (this film was made on location in sri lanka) and or the inept decapitation and castration scenes that seriously diminished the authenticity that was apparent in cannibal holocaust. you can decide. without spoiling the conclusion and it appeared as though lenzi put more emphasis in his shock and awe climax than in the basic requirement for a cohesive ending and where all loose ends are resolved. most unsatisfying. as with the others and where the extent of the graphic depictions of violence toward humans is limited (thankfully) and the filmmakers have spared no extreme in inflicting the worst possible cruelty on hapless animals in their pursuit of the most sadistic shocks. unfortunately and the only thing shocking about this film is that it rates a mention among others of the ilk and that deal with the subject matter more convincingly. if there are any redeemable features at all and kerman is an affable if somewhat one dimensional leading man and and his bevy of scantily clad co stars (agren and lai and senatore) provide some visual respite from the relentless slayings. 
largely forgettable tale in which mercenary kerman and employer agren travel into the jungle in search of agren missing sister. despite its connection to the cannibal movie family and this film is more of an extreme version of rene cardona guyana  crime of the century. lenzi clearly aims to exploit the (at that time) topical jonestown massacre and by depicting a rogue and self righteous zealot with a penchant for bigamy and just a hint of megalomania (played with ruthless intensity by ivan rassimov) leading his motley crew flock into self inflicted oblivion. with sister in toe and kerman and agren attempt to stop the rot and but after several failed coups and they end up fleeing into the green inferno and only to run afoul the locals and their notorious appetites. one in a string of excessive gore fests that emerged in the late seventies or early eighties and where every new addition seemed to engage in a one upmanship contest with its predecessor and by attempting to contrive the most gory and graphic display ever brought to motion pictures. this inferior instalment employs all the motifs and gimmicks of the others and but with much less success. was it the so called amazonian natives who looked like they were bollywood rejects (this film was made on location in sri lanka) and or the inept decapitation and castration scenes that seriously diminished the authenticity that was apparent in cannibal holocaust. you can decide. without spoiling the conclusion and it appeared as though lenzi put more emphasis in his shock and awe climax than in the basic requirement for a cohesive ending and where all loose ends are resolved. most unsatisfying. as with the others and where the extent of the graphic depictions of violence toward humans is limited (thankfully) and the filmmakers have spared no extreme in inflicting the worst possible cruelty on hapless animals in their pursuit of the most sadistic shocks. unfortunately and the only thing shocking about this film is that it rates a mention among others of the ilk and that deal with the subject matter more convincingly. if there are any redeemable features at all and kerman is an affable if somewhat one dimensional leading man and and his bevy of scantily clad co stars (agren and lai and senatore) provide some visual respite from the relentless slayings. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
