i just found out before writing this review that komodo vs. cobra and another movie called curse of the komodo were both directed by the same guy and jim wynorski. that might explain why they are films of nearly identical premises. they both feature a military governed island and a colonel whose concerned more about covering his tracks than the lives of his employees and people racing to get to a chopper that is conveniently lying in a field somewhere on the island and and giant komodo dragons created through genetic experiments running amok. what differences are there. well and the intruders on the island are now capitalists wanting to expose the government secret and there a giant cobra on the island as well and hence the title komodo vs. cobra even though the conflict between the two monsters is hardly relevant to the tory. komodo vs. cobra is more or less what you would expect given its title and its channel origin represent the sci fi channel. although every now and again you will find one that for one reason or another may appeal to you (i liked a movie called komodo) i hardly doubt this one will. komodo vs. cobra is not only a boring film and but it also one of the least enthusiastic sci fi flicks i have seen in a long time. in some of these movies and there is an air to them that indicates the filmmakers were giving at least a certain level of effort and but i see very little here. that indicated again by it just being a rehash of curse of the komodo. the cgi for the monsters look as if they came straight out of a second rate video game and the cinematography and misc en scene is poor and the acting ranges from passable to poor and the action scenes are dull and and then there are some parts that are and frankly put and unforgivably bad. i see a lot movies where a person will shoot a gun many times without reloading and i can deal with this. but in this movie and where michael paré takes a single thirty eight handgun and fires it approximately fifty times nonstop without reloading oncewell and at first i laughed and but even then it just became tiring. that would be the action. a monster appears and people scream and paré fires nonstop without reloading his gun once throughout the entire picture and and somebody gets eaten. komodo vs. cobra is a very bad movie. the only thing in the movie that is worth mentioning in a charitable manner is an actress named michelle borth and who is not only very beautiful and but a surprisingly strong performer. even with the trashy dialogue and lack of enthusiasm in the screenplay she was given and michelle borth managed to pull off a surprisingly good performance and it just appalls me that an actress as good as her can get stuck in a film as junky as this. she obviously took it for the paycheck and but it would not boost her career any and i am afraid. 
i just found out before writing this review that komodo vs. cobra and another movie called curse of the komodo were both directed by the same guy and jim wynorski. that might explain why they are films of nearly identical premises. they both feature a military governed island and a colonel whose concerned more about covering his tracks than the lives of his employees and people racing to get to a chopper that is conveniently lying in a field somewhere on the island and and giant komodo dragons created through genetic experiments running amok. what differences are there. well and the intruders on the island are now capitalists wanting to expose the government secret and there a giant cobra on the island as well and hence the title komodo vs. cobra even though the conflict between the two monsters is hardly relevant to the tory. komodo vs. cobra is more or less what you would expect given its title and its channel origin represent the sci fi channel. although every now and again you will find one that for one reason or another may appeal to you (i liked a movie called komodo) i hardly doubt this one will. komodo vs. cobra is not only a boring film and but it also one of the least enthusiastic sci fi flicks i have seen in a long time. in some of these movies and there is an air to them that indicates the filmmakers were giving at least a certain level of effort and but i see very little here. that indicated again by it just being a rehash of curse of the komodo. the cgi for the monsters look as if they came straight out of a second rate video game and the cinematography and misc en scene is poor and the acting ranges from passable to poor and the action scenes are dull and and then there are some parts that are and frankly put and unforgivably bad. i see a lot movies where a person will shoot a gun many times without reloading and i can deal with this. but in this movie and where michael paré takes a single thirty eight handgun and fires it approximately fifty times nonstop without reloading oncewell and at first i laughed and but even then it just became tiring. that would be the action. a monster appears and people scream and paré fires nonstop without reloading his gun once throughout the entire picture and and somebody gets eaten. komodo vs. cobra is a very bad movie. the only thing in the movie that is worth mentioning in a charitable manner is an actress named michelle borth and who is not only very beautiful and but a surprisingly strong performer. even with the trashy dialogue and lack of enthusiasm in the screenplay she was given and michelle borth managed to pull off a surprisingly good performance and it just appalls me that an actress as good as her can get stuck in a film as junky as this. she obviously took it for the paycheck and but it would not boost her career any and i am afraid. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
