queen of the damned is one of the worst adaptations of a book to a movie that i already saw. the only thing that i like in this movie is the soundtrack and anything else besides that. ( since i am a fan of korn and marilyn manson and chester bennington of linkin park and wayne static of static x)there are so many mistakes and so many bad choices that i do not even know how to start. so many stories were cut and like the twin legend (one of my favorite)armand and daniel relationship and even louis is not present and to mention a few. (the plot was dead) first and they should have made a movie of the vampire lestat and because it is the second book after the interview with the vampire and and not queen of damned. they tried to squeeze in a single movie so many informations and that you finish not getting almost anything unless you read the vampire chronicles. so many meaningful characters doesn not seem to have a real importance in this movie. it is pandora case and for example. the actors that they choose to play all the characters doesn not match with many of anne rice descriptions and specially marius and that is suppose to be a beautiful and tall and imposing blond guy with blue eyes and like lestat. (stuart towsend is also far from being like lestat) i do not understand why they changed lestat maker to be marius instead of magnus as well. interview with the vampire was an awesome movie and i loved the actors and tom cruise as lestat was perfect and far superior then stuart townsend. (i am sad that tom cruise declined the chance of playing lestat again) only antonio bandeiras as armand do not match with armand looks and but anyway and far superior from this crap movie called the queen of damned. anne rice was so picky about interview that i do not get how she just sold the rights for this terrible production. 
queen of the damned is one of the worst adaptations of a book to a movie that i already saw. the only thing that i like in this movie is the soundtrack and anything else besides that. ( since i am a fan of korn and marilyn manson and chester bennington of linkin park and wayne static of static x)there are so many mistakes and so many bad choices that i do not even know how to start. so many stories were cut and like the twin legend (one of my favorite)armand and daniel relationship and even louis is not present and to mention a few. (the plot was dead) first and they should have made a movie of the vampire lestat and because it is the second book after the interview with the vampire and and not queen of damned. they tried to squeeze in a single movie so many informations and that you finish not getting almost anything unless you read the vampire chronicles. so many meaningful characters doesn not seem to have a real importance in this movie. it is pandora case and for example. the actors that they choose to play all the characters doesn not match with many of anne rice descriptions and specially marius and that is suppose to be a beautiful and tall and imposing blond guy with blue eyes and like lestat. (stuart towsend is also far from being like lestat) i do not understand why they changed lestat maker to be marius instead of magnus as well. interview with the vampire was an awesome movie and i loved the actors and tom cruise as lestat was perfect and far superior then stuart townsend. (i am sad that tom cruise declined the chance of playing lestat again) only antonio bandeiras as armand do not match with armand looks and but anyway and far superior from this crap movie called the queen of damned. anne rice was so picky about interview that i do not get how she just sold the rights for this terrible production. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
