there are many reasons i am not a fan of fact based films and but more than any other is how the filmmakers give themselves creative license over the story. if they have such great imaginations then why not use that talent to make something original. otherwise stick to the facts. this could have been an okay movie if only they had done just that. ed gein was an insanely frightening human being. it been said if you were to take michael myers and jason voorhees and leatherface and wrap them into one person and ed gein would still be sicker or scarier. so why can not someone make a movie about him that can convey this. when will they figure out that reality is ultimately scarier than fiction. i have read books and watched news programs about him and and now i am not a screenwriter or anything and but i believe there enough documentation on gein that it shouldn not take a whole lot to write a story about all these atrocities he committed without creating murders that had never even been documented. i am aware that he was only found guilty of 2 murders but with all the evidence found in his home and barn there should have been plenty of other ways to put this film together rather than using the deputy relationship with his mother and and girlfriend as filler and and far too much of it. i guess what i am wondering is this. why at the end of the movie did i know more about the supporting characters than i did about ed gein. why do not we get to know his mother and father and brother and the relationships between them. what made him the psychopath he was. what abuse he endured as a child that may have contributed to the man he became. instead and the only thing we got of his childhood were flashes of him as a little boy. running. in the end i give it negative stars. thats 2 for the gore and 2 for kane hodder. even though it was kind of bad casting in my opinion and considering gein was a smallish man and and possibly effeminate and hodder is anything but small and nowhere near what i would consider feminine. maybe i was just excited because he was jason voorhees. 
there are many reasons i am not a fan of fact based films and but more than any other is how the filmmakers give themselves creative license over the story. if they have such great imaginations then why not use that talent to make something original. otherwise stick to the facts. this could have been an okay movie if only they had done just that. ed gein was an insanely frightening human being. it been said if you were to take michael myers and jason voorhees and leatherface and wrap them into one person and ed gein would still be sicker or scarier. so why can not someone make a movie about him that can convey this. when will they figure out that reality is ultimately scarier than fiction. i have read books and watched news programs about him and and now i am not a screenwriter or anything and but i believe there enough documentation on gein that it shouldn not take a whole lot to write a story about all these atrocities he committed without creating murders that had never even been documented. i am aware that he was only found guilty of 2 murders but with all the evidence found in his home and barn there should have been plenty of other ways to put this film together rather than using the deputy relationship with his mother and and girlfriend as filler and and far too much of it. i guess what i am wondering is this. why at the end of the movie did i know more about the supporting characters than i did about ed gein. why do not we get to know his mother and father and brother and the relationships between them. what made him the psychopath he was. what abuse he endured as a child that may have contributed to the man he became. instead and the only thing we got of his childhood were flashes of him as a little boy. running. in the end i give it negative stars. thats 2 for the gore and 2 for kane hodder. even though it was kind of bad casting in my opinion and considering gein was a smallish man and and possibly effeminate and hodder is anything but small and nowhere near what i would consider feminine. maybe i was just excited because he was jason voorhees. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
