after his success with a nightmare on elm street in 1984 and director wes craven for some reason decided that his next project would be this tv movie. i am not a big fan of this director on the whole while early exploitation flick the last house on the left as well as his modern slasher scream sit well with me and but the rest of his work is very hit and miss and i would hesitate to call him the master that others have labelled him as. the main theme here is cryogenic freezing and although it more a springboard for the plot rather than an important part of the movie. the main influence here is obviously the excellent 1974 zombie film deathdream and we focus on miles creighton while a businessman cryogenically frozen for ten years before an accident that means he has to be thawed out immediately. miles is a part of a project for people that are ill while they pay to be frozen in the hope that they will be revived in the future when their illnesses can cured. miles is successfully revived and it seen as a miracle. but the person that wakes up is not the person who was frozen and as miles returns without a soul. this film could actually have been quite decent judging by the idea behind it and but instead were given a plot that doesn not really have a lot to it and it has to be said that craven doesn not make the best out of the potential of the film. the oul is the main focal point and but it would seem that not having a soul and simply having a murderous intent or no compassion are the same thing and which feels a bit unimaginative. the film was made for television so it not particularly nasty and it obvious that not a lot of money was spent on it as the whole production feels very cheap. michael beck never became a very popular actor and that isn not surprising judging by his performance here while while he is passable and he largely lacks charisma and is not formidable in the central role. the plot doesn not flow too badly but there a real lack of suspense and or or tension and things slow down too much too often and which results in the film being rather boring on occasion. it all boils down to a predictable ending also. overall and i have to admit that i was not impressed at all by this film and as far as craven filmography goes and chiller would have to go down with shocker and the scream sequels and the hills have eyes ii as a miss. 
after his success with a nightmare on elm street in 1984 and director wes craven for some reason decided that his next project would be this tv movie. i am not a big fan of this director on the whole while early exploitation flick the last house on the left as well as his modern slasher scream sit well with me and but the rest of his work is very hit and miss and i would hesitate to call him the master that others have labelled him as. the main theme here is cryogenic freezing and although it more a springboard for the plot rather than an important part of the movie. the main influence here is obviously the excellent 1974 zombie film deathdream and we focus on miles creighton while a businessman cryogenically frozen for ten years before an accident that means he has to be thawed out immediately. miles is a part of a project for people that are ill while they pay to be frozen in the hope that they will be revived in the future when their illnesses can cured. miles is successfully revived and it seen as a miracle. but the person that wakes up is not the person who was frozen and as miles returns without a soul. this film could actually have been quite decent judging by the idea behind it and but instead were given a plot that doesn not really have a lot to it and it has to be said that craven doesn not make the best out of the potential of the film. the oul is the main focal point and but it would seem that not having a soul and simply having a murderous intent or no compassion are the same thing and which feels a bit unimaginative. the film was made for television so it not particularly nasty and it obvious that not a lot of money was spent on it as the whole production feels very cheap. michael beck never became a very popular actor and that isn not surprising judging by his performance here while while he is passable and he largely lacks charisma and is not formidable in the central role. the plot doesn not flow too badly but there a real lack of suspense and or or tension and things slow down too much too often and which results in the film being rather boring on occasion. it all boils down to a predictable ending also. overall and i have to admit that i was not impressed at all by this film and as far as craven filmography goes and chiller would have to go down with shocker and the scream sequels and the hills have eyes ii as a miss. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
