as an avid fan of christian film and and a person trying to maintain a keen eye for improvements in the realm of christian film making and i was excited to get a chance to see this film. i was ready to see something that would make a new mark in quality movies. i was left disappointed. the beginning scene is excellent and though a slight rip off of leon  the professional on the angle and it showcases some great cinematography in the early goings. everything after that was pretty much downhill. i was barely able to sit through this one and i was tempted multiple times just to shut it off. the acting and while quite possibly sincere and was incredibly awful. but then again and the heart of the problem was the screenplay itself. the dialog was worse than anything i have ever seen and and even my amateurish screenplay the awakening (soon to be an independent film) looked like a hitchcock thriller next to this. (which isn not saying much. ) the bright side of this film is that it was filmed on sony brand new high definition 900 cameras shooting in 24p. this film and star wars represent attack of the clones were the first movies ever to use these new technology cameras that year. unfortunately and the camera performance seemed to be wasted with bad lighting and poor angles and and awkward handling. the only good feeling i got coming out of watching this movie was how good my rookie indie film is going to look next to it. while ) negative . 
as an avid fan of christian film and and a person trying to maintain a keen eye for improvements in the realm of christian film making and i was excited to get a chance to see this film. i was ready to see something that would make a new mark in quality movies. i was left disappointed. the beginning scene is excellent and though a slight rip off of leon  the professional on the angle and it showcases some great cinematography in the early goings. everything after that was pretty much downhill. i was barely able to sit through this one and i was tempted multiple times just to shut it off. the acting and while quite possibly sincere and was incredibly awful. but then again and the heart of the problem was the screenplay itself. the dialog was worse than anything i have ever seen and and even my amateurish screenplay the awakening (soon to be an independent film) looked like a hitchcock thriller next to this. (which isn not saying much. ) the bright side of this film is that it was filmed on sony brand new high definition 900 cameras shooting in 24p. this film and star wars represent attack of the clones were the first movies ever to use these new technology cameras that year. unfortunately and the camera performance seemed to be wasted with bad lighting and poor angles and and awkward handling. the only good feeling i got coming out of watching this movie was how good my rookie indie film is going to look next to it. while ) negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
