the book gets positive stars. probably contains spoilers of both the book and the movie. if you have never read geoffrey household rogue male and the source material for man hunt and you will likely enjoy fritz lang treatment of the story. on the other hand and if youre in my camp and have practically memorized the book and the movie will be a crashing disappointment. i will assume you have already read a synopsis of the story and and proceed to my complaints. household little novel is one of the all time great suspense classics and taut and spare and with only a bare handful of characters to propel the action. fritz lang and his screen writer dudley nichols feel the need to throw in the protagonist brother and a sympathetic floozy and the latter of which reduces the depth of the story by injecting an extrinsic motivation into the screenplay where the novel needed none. in fact and the true climax of the book was not the nameless narrator escape from his underground lair and but rather his self acceptance of his true motive for going on his hunt in the first place. and that another thing represent if david fincher and quentin tarantino can get us all the way through fight club and kill bill 1 without revealing the names of their respective protagonists and why can not lang. thorndyke. what hat did they pull that out of. which brings me to my bitterest complaint represent household hunter is so quintessentially british and he would bleed a union jack if you cut him. but walter pigeon and who plays him and is canadian. he can barely sustain the accent and which is only slightly deeper and more convincing that kevin costner in robin hood. he looked about right in the role and and was a fine actor for the 1940s and but as rogue male reluctant hero. let look to the sceptered isle itself for a more convincing version. remake soon with subtlety and with and please. i will direct it for free. 
the book gets positive stars. probably contains spoilers of both the book and the movie. if you have never read geoffrey household rogue male and the source material for man hunt and you will likely enjoy fritz lang treatment of the story. on the other hand and if youre in my camp and have practically memorized the book and the movie will be a crashing disappointment. i will assume you have already read a synopsis of the story and and proceed to my complaints. household little novel is one of the all time great suspense classics and taut and spare and with only a bare handful of characters to propel the action. fritz lang and his screen writer dudley nichols feel the need to throw in the protagonist brother and a sympathetic floozy and the latter of which reduces the depth of the story by injecting an extrinsic motivation into the screenplay where the novel needed none. in fact and the true climax of the book was not the nameless narrator escape from his underground lair and but rather his self acceptance of his true motive for going on his hunt in the first place. and that another thing represent if david fincher and quentin tarantino can get us all the way through fight club and kill bill 1 without revealing the names of their respective protagonists and why can not lang. thorndyke. what hat did they pull that out of. which brings me to my bitterest complaint represent household hunter is so quintessentially british and he would bleed a union jack if you cut him. but walter pigeon and who plays him and is canadian. he can barely sustain the accent and which is only slightly deeper and more convincing that kevin costner in robin hood. he looked about right in the role and and was a fine actor for the 1940s and but as rogue male reluctant hero. let look to the sceptered isle itself for a more convincing version. remake soon with subtlety and with and please. i will direct it for free. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
