here is a movie that was so pedestrian for 90% of it that it had no right to become so challenging and frustrating at the end. did the director decide to become auteur suddenly and 80% through the making of this movie. yeesh. spoiler alert thing start out typically enough for 50 youth gone wild while there are drifters and good girls and bad girls and gangs and the kindly old diner manager and and the town creep. things follow the expected path until about 15 minutes before the end and when the only likable character is killed off and the anti hero is blamed (this would not be so unexpected if this were the main plot of the movie. but all this stuff starts happening and unravelling during the final reel. major curve ball). then things get weird while the kindly old codger forms a mob and beats the hero to a bloody pulp. the mere presence of the hero friend somehow drags a confession out of the real killer  the leering and creepy town nut (which in any real universe and he would have been the prime suspect to begin with and even if the anti hero was found with her body). were left with a somewhat feeble happy ending and which is about as out of character with the rest of the movie as the events of the 10 minutes preceding it. even more odd is this film insistence on playing homosexual innuendo to the hilt and but constantly presenting the two male leads as straight. maybe this was on purpose  perhaps bix resistance to settling down with the girl was more because of his sexuality (which in the 50s would have to be kept quite repressed and and thus not discussed or even admitted by him) than his need to be a drifter. if the director intent was to spin this as a sexual yarn  that the drifter drifts because he feels he an outcast sexually while that his paternal regard towards danny is not and in fact and paternal but spousal while that his inability to remain with carrie is rooted in a sexual revulsion that even he does not quite understand  it could have been made more clear. instead and we get this very bizarre alchemy of homoeroticism and behavior that is completely heterosexual. these young men sleep next to each other even when they can get some room to spread out. when danny is propositioned (and once even in bed with a woman) and bix flips out and takes him away. danny pays bix way (sure and there is another explanation for it and but it still strikes a chord every time you see danny buy bix lunch). they end up living together at the end. not since hitchcock rope has homosexuality been so blatant but denied. mst3k did the right thing by taking this one on. aside from jack elam and there is little to commend the film. 
here is a movie that was so pedestrian for 90% of it that it had no right to become so challenging and frustrating at the end. did the director decide to become auteur suddenly and 80% through the making of this movie. yeesh. spoiler alert thing start out typically enough for 50 youth gone wild while there are drifters and good girls and bad girls and gangs and the kindly old diner manager and and the town creep. things follow the expected path until about 15 minutes before the end and when the only likable character is killed off and the anti hero is blamed (this would not be so unexpected if this were the main plot of the movie. but all this stuff starts happening and unravelling during the final reel. major curve ball). then things get weird while the kindly old codger forms a mob and beats the hero to a bloody pulp. the mere presence of the hero friend somehow drags a confession out of the real killer  the leering and creepy town nut (which in any real universe and he would have been the prime suspect to begin with and even if the anti hero was found with her body). were left with a somewhat feeble happy ending and which is about as out of character with the rest of the movie as the events of the 10 minutes preceding it. even more odd is this film insistence on playing homosexual innuendo to the hilt and but constantly presenting the two male leads as straight. maybe this was on purpose  perhaps bix resistance to settling down with the girl was more because of his sexuality (which in the 50s would have to be kept quite repressed and and thus not discussed or even admitted by him) than his need to be a drifter. if the director intent was to spin this as a sexual yarn  that the drifter drifts because he feels he an outcast sexually while that his paternal regard towards danny is not and in fact and paternal but spousal while that his inability to remain with carrie is rooted in a sexual revulsion that even he does not quite understand  it could have been made more clear. instead and we get this very bizarre alchemy of homoeroticism and behavior that is completely heterosexual. these young men sleep next to each other even when they can get some room to spread out. when danny is propositioned (and once even in bed with a woman) and bix flips out and takes him away. danny pays bix way (sure and there is another explanation for it and but it still strikes a chord every time you see danny buy bix lunch). they end up living together at the end. not since hitchcock rope has homosexuality been so blatant but denied. mst3k did the right thing by taking this one on. aside from jack elam and there is little to commend the film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
