i am really disappointed by this piece of work. it is quiet shallow and keeps repeating itself and is mostly not exact and sometimes on the verge of being wrong. i think it made for elementary school and especially because it keeps repeating itself over and over again while leaving large gaps. a young kid might actually enjoy it and learn from it and but a better way to make a kid appreciate theoretical physics are books like a short history of time or the tao of physics. if you are familiar with the topic on a very basic level and you would not gain any new information or views from this series. don not waste your time with it. nice eye candy though. 
i am really disappointed by this piece of work. it is quiet shallow and keeps repeating itself and is mostly not exact and sometimes on the verge of being wrong. i think it made for elementary school and especially because it keeps repeating itself over and over again while leaving large gaps. a young kid might actually enjoy it and learn from it and but a better way to make a kid appreciate theoretical physics are books like a short history of time or the tao of physics. if you are familiar with the topic on a very basic level and you would not gain any new information or views from this series. don not waste your time with it. nice eye candy though. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
