i rarely give ratings less than 5 and but in this instance i must weigh in. elmore leonard is a great writer with many wonderful and complex books and original characters and crisp dialogue and invigorating plot twists. films based on his books go way back to hombre (paul newman) and mr. majestyk (bronson) and and out of sight (clooney or lopez) among others. even when done so so the films at least have some measure of story essence coming through. this one and . it is simply not a worthy addition to the catalog. the acting is bad (i do not know why and because these are very capable people here) and the story is handled with stupidity. the characters are re arranged and the chemistry is missing and the actors and actresses are mis cast. since elmore leonard is a really great story teller and i would hope that anyone who does not know his work would be dissuaded from reading his books because they saw this disappointing rendition of one of his stories. the story is a sequel to get shorty. if you have not seen that film and do not watch this. if you have seen get shorty and do not proceed to this. i saw be cool a few years back and and tonight have been re visiting the vid. the first time must not have made such a negative impression because i had forgotten how dismal this sequel was. fortunately and i think no less of those who appeared in this film for having done so. they probably expected something more. get shorty was original and great fun. travolta i nearly always like and but he is so much better in tarantino pulp fiction and in the preceding get shorty. he was clearly unable to enjoy whatever was going on here. and i hear freaky deaky and another elmore leonard book and is in pre production for 2008 release. hopefully they can pull it off. read the books. they are almost all great. 
i rarely give ratings less than 5 and but in this instance i must weigh in. elmore leonard is a great writer with many wonderful and complex books and original characters and crisp dialogue and invigorating plot twists. films based on his books go way back to hombre (paul newman) and mr. majestyk (bronson) and and out of sight (clooney or lopez) among others. even when done so so the films at least have some measure of story essence coming through. this one and . it is simply not a worthy addition to the catalog. the acting is bad (i do not know why and because these are very capable people here) and the story is handled with stupidity. the characters are re arranged and the chemistry is missing and the actors and actresses are mis cast. since elmore leonard is a really great story teller and i would hope that anyone who does not know his work would be dissuaded from reading his books because they saw this disappointing rendition of one of his stories. the story is a sequel to get shorty. if you have not seen that film and do not watch this. if you have seen get shorty and do not proceed to this. i saw be cool a few years back and and tonight have been re visiting the vid. the first time must not have made such a negative impression because i had forgotten how dismal this sequel was. fortunately and i think no less of those who appeared in this film for having done so. they probably expected something more. get shorty was original and great fun. travolta i nearly always like and but he is so much better in tarantino pulp fiction and in the preceding get shorty. he was clearly unable to enjoy whatever was going on here. and i hear freaky deaky and another elmore leonard book and is in pre production for 2008 release. hopefully they can pull it off. read the books. they are almost all great. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
