any gun can play (1967) and directed by enzo g. castellari and is a very good pastiche of spaghetti westerns and especially leone . the first half is great and which and apart from the opening which is a direct nod to for a few dollars more and with monco and colonel douglas mortimer and el indio lookalikes walking into a ghost town and then promptly killed by a bounty hunter called the stranger and is entirely serious and with great gunfights (especially the train robbing scene) and fast and furious action and nice performances from gilbert roland and george hilton and (who manages well and considering that he is badly miscast) edd byrnes. but then and when the film reaches the half way mark and there is a jokey fist fight between hilton and byrnes. it isn not very funny and and is the weakest part of the film and but it throws everything you have seen previously in a new light. you realise that in fact the whole thing is a spoof of spaghetti western conventions and and in retrospect and the first half is so well done that you completely miss this spoof undercurrent. what now follows is a more obvious parody and with even some acrobatic jumping around from brynes that predates all those seventies circus westerns. the ending and a complete send up of the good and the bad and the ugly climax and is very well done and as in other hands it could have been very silly. so and a pretty fun spaghetti western and that doesn not take itself too seriously. i would recommend it to anyone who likes spaghetti westerns. 
any gun can play (1967) and directed by enzo g. castellari and is a very good pastiche of spaghetti westerns and especially leone . the first half is great and which and apart from the opening which is a direct nod to for a few dollars more and with monco and colonel douglas mortimer and el indio lookalikes walking into a ghost town and then promptly killed by a bounty hunter called the stranger and is entirely serious and with great gunfights (especially the train robbing scene) and fast and furious action and nice performances from gilbert roland and george hilton and (who manages well and considering that he is badly miscast) edd byrnes. but then and when the film reaches the half way mark and there is a jokey fist fight between hilton and byrnes. it isn not very funny and and is the weakest part of the film and but it throws everything you have seen previously in a new light. you realise that in fact the whole thing is a spoof of spaghetti western conventions and and in retrospect and the first half is so well done that you completely miss this spoof undercurrent. what now follows is a more obvious parody and with even some acrobatic jumping around from brynes that predates all those seventies circus westerns. the ending and a complete send up of the good and the bad and the ugly climax and is very well done and as in other hands it could have been very silly. so and a pretty fun spaghetti western and that doesn not take itself too seriously. i would recommend it to anyone who likes spaghetti westerns. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
