did we all see the same movie. i can not believe the raves some of the others are giving this really awful bio which and believe or not and was authorized by shirley temple herself and based on her book child star. gives me the feeling that some are awfully easy to please. first of all and ashley rose orr and whatever her modest talents are and in no way and shape or form even resembles shirley temple enough to be cast as her in this sort of straightforward biography of the world most famous child star. she gives no indication of why or how this child was so revered except for trying her hardest to do a shirley impersonation which never clicks on any level. none whatsoever. and that is the major handicap of the whole piece. but as if that isn not bad enough and any drama inherent in shirley story of her climb to almost overnight stardom has been completely white washed with insipid writing peppered with occasional song and dance moments that do not even approximate what shirley did (as for example and the codfish ball with buddy ebsen which was probably the high point of shirley choreographed dance routines). simply putting a girl in a polka dot dress doesn not make her shirley temple. none of shirley own brand of charm and warmth and appeal is even remotely suggested. all we see on display is a pale imitation of the original proving and once and for all and that there was only one shirley temple. it worthless to write anything further about this mess. none of the others are more than ordinary in lifeless roles. my advice for shirley fans is to read her book or better still watch her movies. this is the pits. 
did we all see the same movie. i can not believe the raves some of the others are giving this really awful bio which and believe or not and was authorized by shirley temple herself and based on her book child star. gives me the feeling that some are awfully easy to please. first of all and ashley rose orr and whatever her modest talents are and in no way and shape or form even resembles shirley temple enough to be cast as her in this sort of straightforward biography of the world most famous child star. she gives no indication of why or how this child was so revered except for trying her hardest to do a shirley impersonation which never clicks on any level. none whatsoever. and that is the major handicap of the whole piece. but as if that isn not bad enough and any drama inherent in shirley story of her climb to almost overnight stardom has been completely white washed with insipid writing peppered with occasional song and dance moments that do not even approximate what shirley did (as for example and the codfish ball with buddy ebsen which was probably the high point of shirley choreographed dance routines). simply putting a girl in a polka dot dress doesn not make her shirley temple. none of shirley own brand of charm and warmth and appeal is even remotely suggested. all we see on display is a pale imitation of the original proving and once and for all and that there was only one shirley temple. it worthless to write anything further about this mess. none of the others are more than ordinary in lifeless roles. my advice for shirley fans is to read her book or better still watch her movies. this is the pits. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
