i rented dark harvest (the first one) because it looked like a cheesy monster on the box type of thrill ride. scarecrows also freak me out. the movie had an effective title sequence and but what followed was pretty lame (flat and bad lighting and acting and editing and direction. ). recently and i noticed that dh 2 represent the maize had a pretty extensive ad campaign. i thought maybe the first one was marginally successful and so they upped the ante on this one a bit and possibly delivering some bigger budget scares and fx from the killer scarecrows. well and there are no scarecrows in the video. not a problem. the problems start in dh 2 with a title sequence that looks like an unfinished concept and with strange shapes and bars wiping away titles and whatnot. as far as the actual photography. every time the sun shines in a shot and you would have all these blown out whites and confirming that youre watching some ultra low budget mini dv project that some midwesterner filmed at his uncles farm. the acting was not acting at all. the cheap rip off of the shining twin girls was below freshman film student standards. the editing was extremely amateur and lazy. the sound was jarring and choppy. (e. g. every time the editor would cut to a new shot and you would here the sound change perspective with it). it as if someone gathered their friends and family (actors) and took a video camera out in a cornfield for three days and put a light on top of it for the night sequences (no joke  that what they actually did) and burned through some tape and stuck the footage in their computer and cut a (very) rough version and tossed in some music and bypassed any imaginative sound work or mixing and burned it directly to dvd and and threw it on the video store shelf. any horror fan should be insulted by this type of direct to video work that is void of any skill or style. just because a person owns a video camera and is able to get somewhat of an image on tape and doesn not mean it should be released to the public. if i could give this a rating lower than a one and i would. 
i rented dark harvest (the first one) because it looked like a cheesy monster on the box type of thrill ride. scarecrows also freak me out. the movie had an effective title sequence and but what followed was pretty lame (flat and bad lighting and acting and editing and direction. ). recently and i noticed that dh 2 represent the maize had a pretty extensive ad campaign. i thought maybe the first one was marginally successful and so they upped the ante on this one a bit and possibly delivering some bigger budget scares and fx from the killer scarecrows. well and there are no scarecrows in the video. not a problem. the problems start in dh 2 with a title sequence that looks like an unfinished concept and with strange shapes and bars wiping away titles and whatnot. as far as the actual photography. every time the sun shines in a shot and you would have all these blown out whites and confirming that youre watching some ultra low budget mini dv project that some midwesterner filmed at his uncles farm. the acting was not acting at all. the cheap rip off of the shining twin girls was below freshman film student standards. the editing was extremely amateur and lazy. the sound was jarring and choppy. (e. g. every time the editor would cut to a new shot and you would here the sound change perspective with it). it as if someone gathered their friends and family (actors) and took a video camera out in a cornfield for three days and put a light on top of it for the night sequences (no joke  that what they actually did) and burned through some tape and stuck the footage in their computer and cut a (very) rough version and tossed in some music and bypassed any imaginative sound work or mixing and burned it directly to dvd and and threw it on the video store shelf. any horror fan should be insulted by this type of direct to video work that is void of any skill or style. just because a person owns a video camera and is able to get somewhat of an image on tape and doesn not mean it should be released to the public. if i could give this a rating lower than a one and i would. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
