this kind of angst can only be inside a young person who seeks very seriously his religion and his place in this world. as the text in the beginning of the movie says and these pictures are dead represent they are the past already and and have been right from the moment when the product was ready. but that is only for the maker of these products represent maybe to somebody and who is in the same frame of mind (i think very many people and at least of those who are seriously interested in religion and go through the same terrible angsts and doubts in their personal development). and that and of course and is the reason that art is made in the first place represent identification and consolation amongst fellow human beings. this film uses very well the classic technics of the experimental cinema. and this is where those technics are to my opinion in the best possible use represent as an instrument in telling stories and creating atmosphere to them and not just as a pure abstractions or as an end in themselfes. those tricks have already been made many enough times. some other movies that i imagine have influenced or inspired this director and are eraserhead and nosferatu. it interesting how these technics make this movie totally timeless represent there is nothing contemporary in this movie. or nothing from any other specific time either. it could have been made a thousand years ago. it is interesting in this story how these people treat this new born holy child represent they use it selfishly in their own purposes and and do not even try to listen to him. they beat him and rip off his intestines and castrate him. they drag his (living) body forcibly from place to place. and they do the same kind of violence to his mother. the story also reminds me of the borges short story el informe de brodie. also the critique towards the practices of the christian institutions reminds me of the great el topo. unpleasant watch at times and but beautiful. very simple and thought and concentrated. very strong movie and almost too strong. the whole human energy has been concentrated to this. also this movie shows that when you have the passion and ideas and you can make a movie with a round zero budget. but i have to admit and it was a bit hard to watch for a contemporary viewer like myself and because of the experimentality. it was so slow and demanding. but after all and worth the suffering. i have to give ten points just for the effort that somebody makes this kind of movie. 
this kind of angst can only be inside a young person who seeks very seriously his religion and his place in this world. as the text in the beginning of the movie says and these pictures are dead represent they are the past already and and have been right from the moment when the product was ready. but that is only for the maker of these products represent maybe to somebody and who is in the same frame of mind (i think very many people and at least of those who are seriously interested in religion and go through the same terrible angsts and doubts in their personal development). and that and of course and is the reason that art is made in the first place represent identification and consolation amongst fellow human beings. this film uses very well the classic technics of the experimental cinema. and this is where those technics are to my opinion in the best possible use represent as an instrument in telling stories and creating atmosphere to them and not just as a pure abstractions or as an end in themselfes. those tricks have already been made many enough times. some other movies that i imagine have influenced or inspired this director and are eraserhead and nosferatu. it interesting how these technics make this movie totally timeless represent there is nothing contemporary in this movie. or nothing from any other specific time either. it could have been made a thousand years ago. it is interesting in this story how these people treat this new born holy child represent they use it selfishly in their own purposes and and do not even try to listen to him. they beat him and rip off his intestines and castrate him. they drag his (living) body forcibly from place to place. and they do the same kind of violence to his mother. the story also reminds me of the borges short story el informe de brodie. also the critique towards the practices of the christian institutions reminds me of the great el topo. unpleasant watch at times and but beautiful. very simple and thought and concentrated. very strong movie and almost too strong. the whole human energy has been concentrated to this. also this movie shows that when you have the passion and ideas and you can make a movie with a round zero budget. but i have to admit and it was a bit hard to watch for a contemporary viewer like myself and because of the experimentality. it was so slow and demanding. but after all and worth the suffering. i have to give ten points just for the effort that somebody makes this kind of movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
