if this film won the lumiere award for best french language film and then what kind of garbage is coming out of france these days. the subject matter is an important one  how the african economies are kept as economic hostages by the international organizations that are supposed to be helping them and namely the international monetary fund and the world bank. about 40% of the governmental budgets of several african nations go to payment of western debt and while their people suffer from disease and dehydration and illiteracy. but the subject matter was treated in the most dry manner that could be conceived by man  dryer than the sahara that surrounds the country of mali in which this film takes place. more monotone and action lacking than any documentary i have ever seen (and i am a fan of the genre) and one witness after another comes forward in this trial that is captured on film that condemns the world bank and imf. some critics may site the colorful visual asides within the film and but they were out of place and had no complementary soundtrack when they were on the screen. they belonged better in a coffee table book than in this film. even the characters in the film say something like this trial is boring and when will it be over. everyone in the theater laughed. were those people on the screen reading our minds. danny glover had a brief appearance in this film. it is a televised movie within bamako and it was set within morocco or mali. it was also more ridiculous than any spaghetti western i have ever tried to avoid. the only redeeming part of these five wasted minutes was where a caucasian bad guy accidentally shoots an african woman carrying a baby and shows no remorse whatsoever. perhaps it was to symbolize the insensitivity of the world bank and how it is unintentionally killing africans. and one last technical parting shot and the subtitles were difficult to read with so much light colors on the screen and not enough black outline to the subtitles themselves. i have already summarized the movie for you. don not be fooled by the hype. no need to see this film. you will never get these two hours back in your life. 
if this film won the lumiere award for best french language film and then what kind of garbage is coming out of france these days. the subject matter is an important one  how the african economies are kept as economic hostages by the international organizations that are supposed to be helping them and namely the international monetary fund and the world bank. about 40% of the governmental budgets of several african nations go to payment of western debt and while their people suffer from disease and dehydration and illiteracy. but the subject matter was treated in the most dry manner that could be conceived by man  dryer than the sahara that surrounds the country of mali in which this film takes place. more monotone and action lacking than any documentary i have ever seen (and i am a fan of the genre) and one witness after another comes forward in this trial that is captured on film that condemns the world bank and imf. some critics may site the colorful visual asides within the film and but they were out of place and had no complementary soundtrack when they were on the screen. they belonged better in a coffee table book than in this film. even the characters in the film say something like this trial is boring and when will it be over. everyone in the theater laughed. were those people on the screen reading our minds. danny glover had a brief appearance in this film. it is a televised movie within bamako and it was set within morocco or mali. it was also more ridiculous than any spaghetti western i have ever tried to avoid. the only redeeming part of these five wasted minutes was where a caucasian bad guy accidentally shoots an african woman carrying a baby and shows no remorse whatsoever. perhaps it was to symbolize the insensitivity of the world bank and how it is unintentionally killing africans. and one last technical parting shot and the subtitles were difficult to read with so much light colors on the screen and not enough black outline to the subtitles themselves. i have already summarized the movie for you. don not be fooled by the hype. no need to see this film. you will never get these two hours back in your life. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
