first and the obviousas a cop drama crossed with a funny melodrama and quay  is disconcerting  and straightly independent and a menace to banality. jouvet aplomb is put to good use in a tough cop performance immediately noticeable by its vigor and exuberant force while his antoine is not so much a man of intellect and but a man of vast life experience and earthly instinct. quay  is not subversive in the sense that today (and already yesterday ) philistines enjoy using the word. it is clouzot most playful hour. he tended to adapt steeman books in a satiric note. (it said that clouzot was a big reader of detective novels. ) as a director and clouzot firm hand is successful. it is not a mystery or a thriller and but a satirical look at a parisian couple and at the police proceedings. those accustomed with clouzot masterpiece les diaboliques might find slightly disconcerting the multiplicity of things and styles and elements in quay . here clouzot speaks about many things and about a couple and and a hidden love story (simone renant for blier) and about the entertainment world and about old spinsters and about police techniques and an old bitter cop with a boy to raise and etc. there is a note of exuberancenot only in jouvet performance and but also in the film conception. quay is a realistic crime drama made as a satire. it offers an outstanding performance by jouvet as a tough police inspector. antoine is an old cop with an adventurous past (he fought in africa  and but did not climb the ranks stair because of his independent behaviors) while he lives with his son and a schoolboy while at work and antoine is tough and merciless and an able inspector and bitter and intelligent and harsh. it is a role of great gusto and very picturesque. jouvet composed his character of several defining traitshis clothes and his expression and his funny accent and his brutality and and that mocking air . antoine is not made to look more clever than plausible while when he interrogates blier and antoine makes mistakes  and and his talent is presented like the talent we meet in real lifemixed with errors and lacunae and defects. antoine talent is one that comes also from experience and from daily observationit not the almost supernatural _divinatory genius of almost all the famous detectives. quay  is multifacetedit is a realistic crime drama and and also a satire and a melodrama. one can consider it among the first _filmic forays into the legendary toughness of the french police. long ago eastwood and wayne harsh cops and there was antoine. the title is interesting and suggesting that this is a movie about the police and not about a case or a mystery. as craftsmanship and clouzot was perhaps the best and sharpest in france (in the way that welles was). quay  is very true to clouzot naturea sardonic comic and sharp observations and much psychology and sharp and unsparing irony. the man was firstclass when he filmed somethinghe knew what to shoot and what to choosesee the introductory scenes of this film and with jenny lamour great stage success. each scene is memorably and _exemplarily shot. clouzot technical and stylistic aptitudes were amazing. his style is inventive and satirical and sharp and extremely limpid and ingenious. jouvet style was exuberant and powerful and vehement. (some disliked it precisely for these features. as he had been a great stage actor and his movie style was deemed as too theatrical and etc. ) his antoine is a fine example of what was meant by composing a role and by a composition. jouvet had a very peculiar physiognomymuch like a menacing bird of preysomewhat like van cleefyet much subtler and nobler and more intelligent and distinguished. jouvet had this predatory and ferocious air and and it is useful here and as he performs an old tough cop. one of quay  sides is that it is a jouvet recital. he is immediately recognizable and identifiable by the quality of his play (i see that many and watching this flick and do not know it is a jouvet moviewhich is an astounding quality in itself). fresnay and jouvet are the two french actors that i admire the most while the first one was revealed to me by a renoir drama (the famous one) and while jouvet by a carné comedy. i was charmed to see that clouzot gave leading roles to both of them. to end and a word about steeman while he wrote the novel used by clouzot (who had previously adapted another steeman novel and as a fresnay comedy). steeman was an old school mystery writer and in the wallace vein. he became quickly outdated with the new hardboiled fashions. when i was 11 i have read one of his thrillers and and liked it much. 
first and the obviousas a cop drama crossed with a funny melodrama and quay  is disconcerting  and straightly independent and a menace to banality. jouvet aplomb is put to good use in a tough cop performance immediately noticeable by its vigor and exuberant force while his antoine is not so much a man of intellect and but a man of vast life experience and earthly instinct. quay  is not subversive in the sense that today (and already yesterday ) philistines enjoy using the word. it is clouzot most playful hour. he tended to adapt steeman books in a satiric note. (it said that clouzot was a big reader of detective novels. ) as a director and clouzot firm hand is successful. it is not a mystery or a thriller and but a satirical look at a parisian couple and at the police proceedings. those accustomed with clouzot masterpiece les diaboliques might find slightly disconcerting the multiplicity of things and styles and elements in quay . here clouzot speaks about many things and about a couple and and a hidden love story (simone renant for blier) and about the entertainment world and about old spinsters and about police techniques and an old bitter cop with a boy to raise and etc. there is a note of exuberancenot only in jouvet performance and but also in the film conception. quay is a realistic crime drama made as a satire. it offers an outstanding performance by jouvet as a tough police inspector. antoine is an old cop with an adventurous past (he fought in africa  and but did not climb the ranks stair because of his independent behaviors) while he lives with his son and a schoolboy while at work and antoine is tough and merciless and an able inspector and bitter and intelligent and harsh. it is a role of great gusto and very picturesque. jouvet composed his character of several defining traitshis clothes and his expression and his funny accent and his brutality and and that mocking air . antoine is not made to look more clever than plausible while when he interrogates blier and antoine makes mistakes  and and his talent is presented like the talent we meet in real lifemixed with errors and lacunae and defects. antoine talent is one that comes also from experience and from daily observationit not the almost supernatural _divinatory genius of almost all the famous detectives. quay  is multifacetedit is a realistic crime drama and and also a satire and a melodrama. one can consider it among the first _filmic forays into the legendary toughness of the french police. long ago eastwood and wayne harsh cops and there was antoine. the title is interesting and suggesting that this is a movie about the police and not about a case or a mystery. as craftsmanship and clouzot was perhaps the best and sharpest in france (in the way that welles was). quay  is very true to clouzot naturea sardonic comic and sharp observations and much psychology and sharp and unsparing irony. the man was firstclass when he filmed somethinghe knew what to shoot and what to choosesee the introductory scenes of this film and with jenny lamour great stage success. each scene is memorably and _exemplarily shot. clouzot technical and stylistic aptitudes were amazing. his style is inventive and satirical and sharp and extremely limpid and ingenious. jouvet style was exuberant and powerful and vehement. (some disliked it precisely for these features. as he had been a great stage actor and his movie style was deemed as too theatrical and etc. ) his antoine is a fine example of what was meant by composing a role and by a composition. jouvet had a very peculiar physiognomymuch like a menacing bird of preysomewhat like van cleefyet much subtler and nobler and more intelligent and distinguished. jouvet had this predatory and ferocious air and and it is useful here and as he performs an old tough cop. one of quay  sides is that it is a jouvet recital. he is immediately recognizable and identifiable by the quality of his play (i see that many and watching this flick and do not know it is a jouvet moviewhich is an astounding quality in itself). fresnay and jouvet are the two french actors that i admire the most while the first one was revealed to me by a renoir drama (the famous one) and while jouvet by a carné comedy. i was charmed to see that clouzot gave leading roles to both of them. to end and a word about steeman while he wrote the novel used by clouzot (who had previously adapted another steeman novel and as a fresnay comedy). steeman was an old school mystery writer and in the wallace vein. he became quickly outdated with the new hardboiled fashions. when i was 11 i have read one of his thrillers and and liked it much. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
