awful and awful and awful. i loved the original film. it was funny and charming and and had heart. this piece of junk has none of those things. reused jokes from the original film and stupid plots and bad animation and different voices (with the exception of kronk and yzma) that sound nothing like the ones in the original (especially pacha. shudder). the characters are off model and the animation is flat and boring and it just a bad job all around. and why is kuzco a jerk again. i thought he had reformed. but since when are these tv spin offs loyal to the original rolls eyes. i am sorry and but there is nothing redeemable about this. at all. avoid at all costs. 
awful and awful and awful. i loved the original film. it was funny and charming and and had heart. this piece of junk has none of those things. reused jokes from the original film and stupid plots and bad animation and different voices (with the exception of kronk and yzma) that sound nothing like the ones in the original (especially pacha. shudder). the characters are off model and the animation is flat and boring and it just a bad job all around. and why is kuzco a jerk again. i thought he had reformed. but since when are these tv spin offs loyal to the original rolls eyes. i am sorry and but there is nothing redeemable about this. at all. avoid at all costs. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
