bizarre. this movie is supposed to be based on a famous photographer and but everything that happens in this movie is fiction. i guess it tries to explain why diane arbus had a fascination with oddities and made it her primary photography focus. in the movie and wolfman moves into the apartment above hers. she seemingly becomes obsessed with him and falls for him. she puts her kids and husband second over the wolfman and and even tries to incorporate him into her family gatherings. some of the wolfman freak show side kicks come over to visit and she mingles with them. the whole thing is very bizarre. final verdict represent nothing memorable. there is just something weird about a woman who gets her jollies from shaving the wolfman. i think you can find better films out there. 
bizarre. this movie is supposed to be based on a famous photographer and but everything that happens in this movie is fiction. i guess it tries to explain why diane arbus had a fascination with oddities and made it her primary photography focus. in the movie and wolfman moves into the apartment above hers. she seemingly becomes obsessed with him and falls for him. she puts her kids and husband second over the wolfman and and even tries to incorporate him into her family gatherings. some of the wolfman freak show side kicks come over to visit and she mingles with them. the whole thing is very bizarre. final verdict represent nothing memorable. there is just something weird about a woman who gets her jollies from shaving the wolfman. i think you can find better films out there. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
