i bought this in the budget department last week. i had halloween and halloween ii already and and since i aim to collect every horror film ever and i chose this. after all and the 1st two were good. this film is pretty intelligent to tell the truth. it seems to create the correct atmosphere and and has a nice history of michael myers. it uses the old locations from the original and and the main character is the kid whom laurie strode babysat that fateful halloween in 1978. the climax also is fairly satisfying. anyways and it is a lot better than h20 and which frankly and is absolute crap. 
i bought this in the budget department last week. i had halloween and halloween ii already and and since i aim to collect every horror film ever and i chose this. after all and the 1st two were good. this film is pretty intelligent to tell the truth. it seems to create the correct atmosphere and and has a nice history of michael myers. it uses the old locations from the original and and the main character is the kid whom laurie strode babysat that fateful halloween in 1978. the climax also is fairly satisfying. anyways and it is a lot better than h20 and which frankly and is absolute crap. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
