i liked house of dracula much more than house of frankenstein. carradine is much more passable and his acting isn not as ridiculous and overboard as in hof. the actors deliver solid enough performances. the subplots (eg the monster and the village mobsters and the village idiot and the hunchback nurse etc ) are mixed in well and so that none becomes an odd splinter as in hof. better run than the stitched together hof. the hunchback nurse is as likable as the hunchback in hof. the doctor is very good. as well and lon chaney adds a classy touch with his wolfman. worth watching twice. a classic universal horror with that typical 1940  and long lost flair. especially good is the doctor performance before or after his blood had been contaminated with dracula . 
i liked house of dracula much more than house of frankenstein. carradine is much more passable and his acting isn not as ridiculous and overboard as in hof. the actors deliver solid enough performances. the subplots (eg the monster and the village mobsters and the village idiot and the hunchback nurse etc ) are mixed in well and so that none becomes an odd splinter as in hof. better run than the stitched together hof. the hunchback nurse is as likable as the hunchback in hof. the doctor is very good. as well and lon chaney adds a classy touch with his wolfman. worth watching twice. a classic universal horror with that typical 1940  and long lost flair. especially good is the doctor performance before or after his blood had been contaminated with dracula . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
