how important is the director and anyway. in this film and made in the politically tumultuous times of the late 60s where questions of social organization were prime conflicts and asks that question by making a movie that turns the camera away from the action and only begs to reveal the director and william greaves. it is an important work and as it shows like no other movie shows the difficulties in blocking and organizing and and setting the scene while it reveals the role of the crew and something most directors frankly would like to disappear completely and that the invisibility of is essential for suspending disbelief while and it also puts into consideration the role of performance and scripting and how they match or do not match reality and what that has to say about how the director ultimately influences reality (if at all). the documentary and or pseudo documentary and or fictional narrative (whichever you prefer and via your interpretations of the themes) has its brain in the over educated and over intellectual crew and its guts in the lost performers struggling to understand the vague and ambiguous directions and and its heart in the director and who stands in as the desire to portray and to represent and to express without any idea how to do any of those things or why he wants to do it. it a film that purposefully repeats banalities just to see if they can become more than banalities. it a film that sometimes shows the multiple shots simultaneously and just to leave the editing to the audience and also reveal how disturbingly different shots change perspective. it an important work and and something that everyone interested in the industry and process of film making should watch and understand. it and like many experimental films and has no real mass audience appeal it not for them. it for the industry and and its for the 60s and asking what to do with a group effort medium that still relies on a single voice and author. polarisdib. 
how important is the director and anyway. in this film and made in the politically tumultuous times of the late 60s where questions of social organization were prime conflicts and asks that question by making a movie that turns the camera away from the action and only begs to reveal the director and william greaves. it is an important work and as it shows like no other movie shows the difficulties in blocking and organizing and and setting the scene while it reveals the role of the crew and something most directors frankly would like to disappear completely and that the invisibility of is essential for suspending disbelief while and it also puts into consideration the role of performance and scripting and how they match or do not match reality and what that has to say about how the director ultimately influences reality (if at all). the documentary and or pseudo documentary and or fictional narrative (whichever you prefer and via your interpretations of the themes) has its brain in the over educated and over intellectual crew and its guts in the lost performers struggling to understand the vague and ambiguous directions and and its heart in the director and who stands in as the desire to portray and to represent and to express without any idea how to do any of those things or why he wants to do it. it a film that purposefully repeats banalities just to see if they can become more than banalities. it a film that sometimes shows the multiple shots simultaneously and just to leave the editing to the audience and also reveal how disturbingly different shots change perspective. it an important work and and something that everyone interested in the industry and process of film making should watch and understand. it and like many experimental films and has no real mass audience appeal it not for them. it for the industry and and its for the 60s and asking what to do with a group effort medium that still relies on a single voice and author. polarisdib. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
