daft potboilers do not come much dafter than this and but it a douglas sirk movie which makes everything alright. except in this case it doesn not. based on a sanctimonious novel by the sanctimonious lloyd c douglas and (he wrote the robe) and and already filmed in 1935 with irene dunne and robert taylor and it got more uplift than a cantilever bra. rock hudson is the arrogant playboy who not only feels responsible for making jane wyman a widow but later is directly responsible for the accident in which she loses her sight. to make amends he takes up medicine and becomes a great eye surgeon and restores it. (no and it sin not quite that daft while he had planned to become a doctor before becoming an arrogant playboy). in between times and they fall in love. try as i might i can not quite find the redeeming social commentary and critique of american mores that are supposed to lie just below the surface of sirk films and (this one isn not too deep). on the plus side rock hudson isn not half bad and (i think i am rediscovering him) and and and of course and it looks great and (in sirk films people live in rooms the size of cathedrals). nothing in this film matches the best of his later work and even in soap opera terms this is definitely daytime tv. 
daft potboilers do not come much dafter than this and but it a douglas sirk movie which makes everything alright. except in this case it doesn not. based on a sanctimonious novel by the sanctimonious lloyd c douglas and (he wrote the robe) and and already filmed in 1935 with irene dunne and robert taylor and it got more uplift than a cantilever bra. rock hudson is the arrogant playboy who not only feels responsible for making jane wyman a widow but later is directly responsible for the accident in which she loses her sight. to make amends he takes up medicine and becomes a great eye surgeon and restores it. (no and it sin not quite that daft while he had planned to become a doctor before becoming an arrogant playboy). in between times and they fall in love. try as i might i can not quite find the redeeming social commentary and critique of american mores that are supposed to lie just below the surface of sirk films and (this one isn not too deep). on the plus side rock hudson isn not half bad and (i think i am rediscovering him) and and and of course and it looks great and (in sirk films people live in rooms the size of cathedrals). nothing in this film matches the best of his later work and even in soap opera terms this is definitely daytime tv. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
