this was on scifi this past weekend and and i had to check it out. after all. it was science fiction and with vampires and erika eleniak. what could go wrong with this b movie. a lot. to start with represent it can not even be classified as a b movie and because that would put it in the same league as roger corman. and this movie doesn not even meet his expectations. the most money they spent was on the contact lenses for the vampires. secondly represent the casting was horrible. yes and casting udo kier as the captain of the demeter was a smart move. but the director clearly couldn not even get kier to memorize his lines. casting eleniak and in a vampire movie and is also a smart move because it means a bunch of horny guys are going to buy or rent or record this flick to watch her get seduced by a vampire. but and the director and writer and producer screwed that one and too. granted and they got some money out of the poor and unfortuate souls who enjoy watching vampire movies with hot women in them. but no one is going to remember this movie in another two or three years. thirdly represent little things that just emphasize the laziness in this movie. for example and van helsing calls a cross a crucifix and and and when mina is staked in the coffin and the viewer can clearly see the fact that her chest is nothing more than pillows. oh and and one other thing represent why did they go for the george hamiltion type dracula instead of something that would look decently scary. does george hamilton have an overwhelming hold on our future. why do not everyone who saw dracula just laugh at him for his get up. a waste of time. even with a tivo remote in your hand. 
this was on scifi this past weekend and and i had to check it out. after all. it was science fiction and with vampires and erika eleniak. what could go wrong with this b movie. a lot. to start with represent it can not even be classified as a b movie and because that would put it in the same league as roger corman. and this movie doesn not even meet his expectations. the most money they spent was on the contact lenses for the vampires. secondly represent the casting was horrible. yes and casting udo kier as the captain of the demeter was a smart move. but the director clearly couldn not even get kier to memorize his lines. casting eleniak and in a vampire movie and is also a smart move because it means a bunch of horny guys are going to buy or rent or record this flick to watch her get seduced by a vampire. but and the director and writer and producer screwed that one and too. granted and they got some money out of the poor and unfortuate souls who enjoy watching vampire movies with hot women in them. but no one is going to remember this movie in another two or three years. thirdly represent little things that just emphasize the laziness in this movie. for example and van helsing calls a cross a crucifix and and and when mina is staked in the coffin and the viewer can clearly see the fact that her chest is nothing more than pillows. oh and and one other thing represent why did they go for the george hamiltion type dracula instead of something that would look decently scary. does george hamilton have an overwhelming hold on our future. why do not everyone who saw dracula just laugh at him for his get up. a waste of time. even with a tivo remote in your hand. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
