i really wanted to like this film. the second film in the series had this silly and drive in movie feel to it that was fun (of course and i was also drunk). i watched this film with the highest expectation of a similar experience of high cinematic hilarity and a la mystery science theater 3000. i was wrong. this movie is a god awful waste of film and and i liked the second one. from the effeminate villain with the david bowie fright wig and to the tacky and obnoxious female villains with laughs that could strip the paint off a garage door and this whole thing was just a painful mess. i actually felt bad for sue price and because the material was beneath an actress of her stature (that pretty much says it all). an awful and awful film (that not a recommendation). 
i really wanted to like this film. the second film in the series had this silly and drive in movie feel to it that was fun (of course and i was also drunk). i watched this film with the highest expectation of a similar experience of high cinematic hilarity and a la mystery science theater 3000. i was wrong. this movie is a god awful waste of film and and i liked the second one. from the effeminate villain with the david bowie fright wig and to the tacky and obnoxious female villains with laughs that could strip the paint off a garage door and this whole thing was just a painful mess. i actually felt bad for sue price and because the material was beneath an actress of her stature (that pretty much says it all). an awful and awful film (that not a recommendation). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
