and now for another point of view represent i do not like it. i do not finish it in fact. i know that unforgiven is ranked by some as one of the greatest westerns ever made. i know that it stars and was directed by clint eastwood and one of the icons of american cinema. i know that it won a bunch of oscars. still and i do not like it. i do not like westerns and and that clearly a matter of taste and but i also do not admire eastwood acting. he is not and never has been a leading man. he is no burt lancaster and no paul newman and no john wayne. in this film alone he is dwarfed by richard harris and gene hackman while they are both actors. no and eastwood is a tall guy with a reedy voice who usually plays tough guys. here he plays a retired tough guy. when i see him on screen and i see a man laboring at his acting. then there the anti western western plot. it is too obviously intended to inject contemporary values  a respect for the role of women and blacks and native americans and and single parents while a disrespect for violence and drinking while the wholesomeness that comes with marriage and including interracial marriage and and small adorable children  into a century in which those values weren not necessarily accepted and at least in these ways. by promoting those values and the movie comes across as mannered and if not preachy. then there are the hoary movie stereotypes  prostitutes with hearts of gold and the kid who can not shoot straight and the city slicker new to the wild west and the sage brush shimmering on a summer afternoon with a musical accompaniment in major chords. finally there is the pacing of eastwood direction. i gave up after an hour. eastwood was still riding north and chatting with morgan freeman and the kid who couldn not shoot straight and sixty minutes after the plot driven by the slashing of a prostitute was set in motion. it was way too slow. somebody had to find these elements uncompelling. i am afraid it was me. 
and now for another point of view represent i do not like it. i do not finish it in fact. i know that unforgiven is ranked by some as one of the greatest westerns ever made. i know that it stars and was directed by clint eastwood and one of the icons of american cinema. i know that it won a bunch of oscars. still and i do not like it. i do not like westerns and and that clearly a matter of taste and but i also do not admire eastwood acting. he is not and never has been a leading man. he is no burt lancaster and no paul newman and no john wayne. in this film alone he is dwarfed by richard harris and gene hackman while they are both actors. no and eastwood is a tall guy with a reedy voice who usually plays tough guys. here he plays a retired tough guy. when i see him on screen and i see a man laboring at his acting. then there the anti western western plot. it is too obviously intended to inject contemporary values  a respect for the role of women and blacks and native americans and and single parents while a disrespect for violence and drinking while the wholesomeness that comes with marriage and including interracial marriage and and small adorable children  into a century in which those values weren not necessarily accepted and at least in these ways. by promoting those values and the movie comes across as mannered and if not preachy. then there are the hoary movie stereotypes  prostitutes with hearts of gold and the kid who can not shoot straight and the city slicker new to the wild west and the sage brush shimmering on a summer afternoon with a musical accompaniment in major chords. finally there is the pacing of eastwood direction. i gave up after an hour. eastwood was still riding north and chatting with morgan freeman and the kid who couldn not shoot straight and sixty minutes after the plot driven by the slashing of a prostitute was set in motion. it was way too slow. somebody had to find these elements uncompelling. i am afraid it was me. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
