so forgive the really lame game play scene and cardboard background and studio like stadium. for this part i should have give the movie 5 instead of 7 and but read on. from the premise to plot there is a lot similarities with the replacements. some say this movie rip off the replacements and while some say this script wrote before it. both movies require some sort of suspension of disbelief on the basic premise and and this is especially difficult for second string since it has nfl license team and all the history behind it. food poison excuse may sound too lame for some people and and not to mention in second string bills has to overcome big scores again and again and with the limit budget in shooting the game play scene and this make it look even bad. in replacements and the premise and the league is fictional yet you know it happen in real life. i believe it is easier to accept fictional story and setting with real event (oh yeah and this happen before. and rather than real setting or background with fictional scenario (there is no way bill can win a superbowl. while some of the scene were actually shoot in pre season game of raven games and real stadium and real audience and some nfl match alike shooting angle. but let say both movies came out on the same day and and we erase the budget factor (thus forgive the game play action scene) represent overall and i like second string over replacements and not by much and but i like this more. it has relatively better character development. in replacements and keanu character is too out sync with the world and and all he care is maybe and get a girl. in second string you see the struggle of the qb from getting the job back and and deal with his past with coach. or the fumble guy problem. this hold the ball all day long solution of course is not new and but we see progression in fixing it. how about those trick play. i think it is relatively realistic than replacements. the dan marino like fake knee pass and flea flicker and wild cat full back rush and all real and except sometimes this look a bit too easy. but for me it is better than replacement center catch and rushing for 50 yards call and or how a 60 yards field goal look too easy. oh btw and i am glad they do not force the te kicker made his shot. of course  if you objectively review this movie over other football movies all there and this could easily be a 5 out of 10 movie. but some say this is the worse football movie. try the comebacks. 
so forgive the really lame game play scene and cardboard background and studio like stadium. for this part i should have give the movie 5 instead of 7 and but read on. from the premise to plot there is a lot similarities with the replacements. some say this movie rip off the replacements and while some say this script wrote before it. both movies require some sort of suspension of disbelief on the basic premise and and this is especially difficult for second string since it has nfl license team and all the history behind it. food poison excuse may sound too lame for some people and and not to mention in second string bills has to overcome big scores again and again and with the limit budget in shooting the game play scene and this make it look even bad. in replacements and the premise and the league is fictional yet you know it happen in real life. i believe it is easier to accept fictional story and setting with real event (oh yeah and this happen before. and rather than real setting or background with fictional scenario (there is no way bill can win a superbowl. while some of the scene were actually shoot in pre season game of raven games and real stadium and real audience and some nfl match alike shooting angle. but let say both movies came out on the same day and and we erase the budget factor (thus forgive the game play action scene) represent overall and i like second string over replacements and not by much and but i like this more. it has relatively better character development. in replacements and keanu character is too out sync with the world and and all he care is maybe and get a girl. in second string you see the struggle of the qb from getting the job back and and deal with his past with coach. or the fumble guy problem. this hold the ball all day long solution of course is not new and but we see progression in fixing it. how about those trick play. i think it is relatively realistic than replacements. the dan marino like fake knee pass and flea flicker and wild cat full back rush and all real and except sometimes this look a bit too easy. but for me it is better than replacement center catch and rushing for 50 yards call and or how a 60 yards field goal look too easy. oh btw and i am glad they do not force the te kicker made his shot. of course  if you objectively review this movie over other football movies all there and this could easily be a 5 out of 10 movie. but some say this is the worse football movie. try the comebacks. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
