the canterville ghost (1996). the director made this too sappy a production. maybe it the generation and but i really liked the charles laughton version. there is a time and place for emoting and this production does not translate very well. patrick stewart and reciting shakespeare was very good and but still inappropriate. would neither recommend nor watch again. the close ups and padded text and sub plots were lost on me. adding extraneous material and scenes takes away from a truly great work. the screenplay writer should find another profession in which to misplace his talent and maybe afternoon soap operas would be a better venue. check out the really good version and pass on this one. 
the canterville ghost (1996). the director made this too sappy a production. maybe it the generation and but i really liked the charles laughton version. there is a time and place for emoting and this production does not translate very well. patrick stewart and reciting shakespeare was very good and but still inappropriate. would neither recommend nor watch again. the close ups and padded text and sub plots were lost on me. adding extraneous material and scenes takes away from a truly great work. the screenplay writer should find another profession in which to misplace his talent and maybe afternoon soap operas would be a better venue. check out the really good version and pass on this one. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
