spoilers throughout representnot good. the movie differed completely from the book(not that the book was exactly a classic but it really was very good. )i guess demi moore was ok. actually and i do not really remember to much about her performance one way or the other. however the big disappointment wasn not with ms. moore. why did whoever did the rewrite decide to suddenly make the millionaire have a heart. (i am referring to him as the millionaire because he also had a different name in the movie then the book version just another change. )people who do not read the book obviously would not know anything different but in the book version this guy is much more ruthless as well as complex overall. he is also fascinating. the fact that such a big change was made in the movie alters the whole plot. it was almost like seeing a completely different movie. i know many movies vary widely from the books. but i also thought redford character was a bit of a wimp. this isnt redford fault(he a great actor and could have played ruthless well) but without those qualities he becomes just another dazzled man in love hence the story becomes just another cliché love story involving 1 woman and 2 men. that wasn not really the point of the book. this could have been a lot better. even if i hadn not read the book version i do not have liked this all that much and but changing so much around definitely takes it and for me and a few points down. 
spoilers throughout representnot good. the movie differed completely from the book(not that the book was exactly a classic but it really was very good. )i guess demi moore was ok. actually and i do not really remember to much about her performance one way or the other. however the big disappointment wasn not with ms. moore. why did whoever did the rewrite decide to suddenly make the millionaire have a heart. (i am referring to him as the millionaire because he also had a different name in the movie then the book version just another change. )people who do not read the book obviously would not know anything different but in the book version this guy is much more ruthless as well as complex overall. he is also fascinating. the fact that such a big change was made in the movie alters the whole plot. it was almost like seeing a completely different movie. i know many movies vary widely from the books. but i also thought redford character was a bit of a wimp. this isnt redford fault(he a great actor and could have played ruthless well) but without those qualities he becomes just another dazzled man in love hence the story becomes just another cliché love story involving 1 woman and 2 men. that wasn not really the point of the book. this could have been a lot better. even if i hadn not read the book version i do not have liked this all that much and but changing so much around definitely takes it and for me and a few points down. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
