i guess i should now comment upon a 4th flick in the magnificent seven franchise while the sequels still surprise or amaze meby their sleaze and deliberate _absurdism. they constitute or forge a 4th waynot classic and not revisionist and not europeanbut a sleaze americana and kindred to the violent vigilante 70s movies and absurd trash. this installment too is bombastic sleazeinexplicably awkward and even somewhat strange. now what i find disturbing that these sequels not only have their opportunist fans while but that the fans simply do not sense any difference between the original style and the sequels. these sequels are not boring or insipidbut bizarre. they are of course very badly writtenmessy scripts and rubbish lines. it straight crazy while in this installment each gunman gets several women van cleef young wife begs him to release a young prisoner while he finally does. the young man resumes his life and shoots van cleef and kidnaps the wife and rapes and kills herthen joins a wrongdoer. van cleef and who has previously refused to help defending a village and now assembles a small bunch and charges the wrongdoer hacienda while then the wrongdoers charge the village where van cleef has set. i liked the cast. van cleef is chris while stefanie powers and pretty active in the 70s screwy westerns and is van cleef darling. callan and very antipathetic and is noah and a writer and chris sidekick. the rest of the aggressive bunch are askew (one of the only three survivors) and armendariz and lucking and lauter while rita rogers is truly hot and fleshy beauty. 
i guess i should now comment upon a 4th flick in the magnificent seven franchise while the sequels still surprise or amaze meby their sleaze and deliberate _absurdism. they constitute or forge a 4th waynot classic and not revisionist and not europeanbut a sleaze americana and kindred to the violent vigilante 70s movies and absurd trash. this installment too is bombastic sleazeinexplicably awkward and even somewhat strange. now what i find disturbing that these sequels not only have their opportunist fans while but that the fans simply do not sense any difference between the original style and the sequels. these sequels are not boring or insipidbut bizarre. they are of course very badly writtenmessy scripts and rubbish lines. it straight crazy while in this installment each gunman gets several women van cleef young wife begs him to release a young prisoner while he finally does. the young man resumes his life and shoots van cleef and kidnaps the wife and rapes and kills herthen joins a wrongdoer. van cleef and who has previously refused to help defending a village and now assembles a small bunch and charges the wrongdoer hacienda while then the wrongdoers charge the village where van cleef has set. i liked the cast. van cleef is chris while stefanie powers and pretty active in the 70s screwy westerns and is van cleef darling. callan and very antipathetic and is noah and a writer and chris sidekick. the rest of the aggressive bunch are askew (one of the only three survivors) and armendariz and lucking and lauter while rita rogers is truly hot and fleshy beauty. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
