this movie definitely made me laugh but that doesn not mean it was exactly funny. well and then again and me and my friends had a lot of fun watching it. i doubt there is anything about this movie that hasn not been done at least twice before and just like the plot itself. all of the characters are overused movie cliché cardboard box roles that do not even require acting skills while accordingly and such skills are not delivered. we have the corrupt cop and a ruthless killer who claims to care about his men and their families whilst caring nothing about people he shoots in the forehead at so close a range as to have blood spat on his face. we have the worn out cop on the edge so nicely pointed at in the discussion boards of this movie while we have the old one day away from retirement cop who just about everyone must have immediately identified as the most likely man on the inside and since he had most to gain and he do not utter a trustworthy word throughout the movie. about as see through as a glass house on a sunny day. the big black gangster king was a copy of all previous big black gangster kings in movie history (they could have just called him marcellus wallace) and but just slightly tougher and more ruthless and because something has to emphasize that we also know laurence fishburne from actually good movies. then we finally have the highly educated doctor who can not think of anything reasonable to do as soon as the situation differs from her ordinary life and who spends the majority of the movie sitting in a corner helplessly trying to figure out how to hold on to the weapon she was given. not using it. the whole siege story is not interesting and not original (having been used twice before) and and this movie manages to add absolutely nothing interesting to it. there is the initial probe and then the laying of the siege and then the assault and then the escape attempts. meanwhile a bunch of strained and stressed and freaked out cops and thugs manage to hold off a police assault team with high tech equipment and the quite important advantage of vision. then again and in deep night and with the power cut and with a snow storm raging overhead and there is definitely a lot of light coming in and so who really cares about night vision. but the best part comes right at the end. in the first scenes showing precinct 13 and we see it is situated in an outskirt of an industrial city while factories and office buildings surround it on all sides. from this point and the besieged walk maybe a hundred meters in a sewer and where do they end up. some alley ending right in the middle of a forest. a forest. where did that forest come from. who decided to lay a pine forest in the middle of an industrial area. how is this forest and in the last scene and suddenly on a hill over the city in question and while in the scenes inside the forest it looked deceptively flat. from here i leave the judgment to you and and to your common sense. go and see this movie if youre looking for an unintended good laugh and i can really recommend it. 
this movie definitely made me laugh but that doesn not mean it was exactly funny. well and then again and me and my friends had a lot of fun watching it. i doubt there is anything about this movie that hasn not been done at least twice before and just like the plot itself. all of the characters are overused movie cliché cardboard box roles that do not even require acting skills while accordingly and such skills are not delivered. we have the corrupt cop and a ruthless killer who claims to care about his men and their families whilst caring nothing about people he shoots in the forehead at so close a range as to have blood spat on his face. we have the worn out cop on the edge so nicely pointed at in the discussion boards of this movie while we have the old one day away from retirement cop who just about everyone must have immediately identified as the most likely man on the inside and since he had most to gain and he do not utter a trustworthy word throughout the movie. about as see through as a glass house on a sunny day. the big black gangster king was a copy of all previous big black gangster kings in movie history (they could have just called him marcellus wallace) and but just slightly tougher and more ruthless and because something has to emphasize that we also know laurence fishburne from actually good movies. then we finally have the highly educated doctor who can not think of anything reasonable to do as soon as the situation differs from her ordinary life and who spends the majority of the movie sitting in a corner helplessly trying to figure out how to hold on to the weapon she was given. not using it. the whole siege story is not interesting and not original (having been used twice before) and and this movie manages to add absolutely nothing interesting to it. there is the initial probe and then the laying of the siege and then the assault and then the escape attempts. meanwhile a bunch of strained and stressed and freaked out cops and thugs manage to hold off a police assault team with high tech equipment and the quite important advantage of vision. then again and in deep night and with the power cut and with a snow storm raging overhead and there is definitely a lot of light coming in and so who really cares about night vision. but the best part comes right at the end. in the first scenes showing precinct 13 and we see it is situated in an outskirt of an industrial city while factories and office buildings surround it on all sides. from this point and the besieged walk maybe a hundred meters in a sewer and where do they end up. some alley ending right in the middle of a forest. a forest. where did that forest come from. who decided to lay a pine forest in the middle of an industrial area. how is this forest and in the last scene and suddenly on a hill over the city in question and while in the scenes inside the forest it looked deceptively flat. from here i leave the judgment to you and and to your common sense. go and see this movie if youre looking for an unintended good laugh and i can really recommend it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
