i went to see this film over matchstick men and in fact buying the tickets to matchstick men and going to the other and because it looked like a fun movie with action and romance and thrills and jungles and and exotic locations. they had all that but so do a lot of movies with a conception of story. all i can say is why why why why did they not just make it a straight narrative instead of some sappy flashback story. here is all the movies from what i have seen the film was derived from represent of course and indiana jones and romancing the stone and but also true lies and proof of life and that old 80s tom selleck movie and bananas (woody allen) and and hero (from the use of digital extras). ps the only scene in the movie that was cool is when the central character finds her room blown up. 
i went to see this film over matchstick men and in fact buying the tickets to matchstick men and going to the other and because it looked like a fun movie with action and romance and thrills and jungles and and exotic locations. they had all that but so do a lot of movies with a conception of story. all i can say is why why why why did they not just make it a straight narrative instead of some sappy flashback story. here is all the movies from what i have seen the film was derived from represent of course and indiana jones and romancing the stone and but also true lies and proof of life and that old 80s tom selleck movie and bananas (woody allen) and and hero (from the use of digital extras). ps the only scene in the movie that was cool is when the central character finds her room blown up. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
