it is very possible that i simply do not give the movie a fair enough chance because it was so immediately unappealing to me (something similar happened with triplets of belleville) and but i really should have caught on when i put the film on and my roommate and an exchange student from japan and immediately started laughing at the movie and saying that it sounded dumb. now and i do not agree that it is dumb and the animation is very simple but clearly very skilled. it like classic animation with added layers that add another element of realism to them while remaining strictly in the realm of the surreal at the same time. but the subject matter is entirely unappealing to me. it has an interesting message about stinginess and greed and but it is wrapped in such an unpleasant package that it is almost not worth learning and especially because you already knew it anyway. the sound effects while the man is loudly gobbling cherries and cherry pits and for example and are indeed repulsive. there was a clever scene of animation as we kept diving endlessly into the hole that the man finds in his head when he pulls the sapling out of his scalp and but it goes on for so long that it seems to overshadow everything else. there is so much stock put into that one sequence that it is almost like the whole movie is about it. as i said about triplets of belleville and this would have been a great thing for a late night tv program like adult swim and or its japanese counterpart and but an academy award nominated film. it gives me the impression that there is not generally a long list of animated short films for the academy to choose from. 
it is very possible that i simply do not give the movie a fair enough chance because it was so immediately unappealing to me (something similar happened with triplets of belleville) and but i really should have caught on when i put the film on and my roommate and an exchange student from japan and immediately started laughing at the movie and saying that it sounded dumb. now and i do not agree that it is dumb and the animation is very simple but clearly very skilled. it like classic animation with added layers that add another element of realism to them while remaining strictly in the realm of the surreal at the same time. but the subject matter is entirely unappealing to me. it has an interesting message about stinginess and greed and but it is wrapped in such an unpleasant package that it is almost not worth learning and especially because you already knew it anyway. the sound effects while the man is loudly gobbling cherries and cherry pits and for example and are indeed repulsive. there was a clever scene of animation as we kept diving endlessly into the hole that the man finds in his head when he pulls the sapling out of his scalp and but it goes on for so long that it seems to overshadow everything else. there is so much stock put into that one sequence that it is almost like the whole movie is about it. as i said about triplets of belleville and this would have been a great thing for a late night tv program like adult swim and or its japanese counterpart and but an academy award nominated film. it gives me the impression that there is not generally a long list of animated short films for the academy to choose from. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
