having seen carlo lizzani documentary on luchino visconti and i was bound to higher expectations before watching this film made three years later by adam low. but the viewer like me did get dissatisfied. i faced a need for critical opinion and which i generally do not like giving due to the fact there are no documentaries that will satisfy every viewer. there are also no documentaries that will examine a theme totally. but when i read the reviews already written on this title and i also felt a bit confused. people sometimes do not know what to criticize. therefore and to be clear and i will divide this film into two major parts that differ considerably represent the former one about visconti before his director career and latter one about visconti the director. the aristocratic background and all the hobbies and the wealth that young luchino experienced and enjoyed are clearly presented. his effort in horse racing is mentioned as well as his relation with his mother so much disturbed after his parents divorce. we also get a very accurate idea of where luchino was brought up as a real count of milano represent in riches galore and with nannies and cooks with access to everything and in true aristocracy. for instance and his father splendid villa at grazzano and other marvelous villas prove that. there is also an emphasis on visconti crucial visit in paris in the 1930s where he met eminent people (left wingers) who later had impact on his style and message in art. that clearly explains the idea of a communist with the aristocratic upbringing (a contrast at first sight). however and the part about his director career and which started with ossessione during wwii and ended with innocente just before the director death in 1976 and is poorly executed. his movies are not discussed well. why. because there are very few people who really have something to say. franco zeffirelli and the director and remembers the works on la terra trema and that is all right. there are also some interviews with franco rosi. but later and such movies like il gattopardo and la caduta dei rei and la morte a venezia or ludwig are mostly discussed by helmut berger. although i liked the actor in the role of ludwig and i did not like the interviews of his. moreover and some thoughts he reveals are not accurate to entail in such a documentary. there is no mention of significant works of visconti like conversation piece and there are no interviews with eminent cast burt lancaster. a mention about silvana mangano and romy schneider should also be made. there is one footage interview with maria callas that appears to be interesting but that is only a short bit. franco zeffirelli and though i appreciate him as a director and makes fun of it all rather than says something really precious. for instance and he mentions the event how visconti separated from him after years of service. therefore and i say represent simplified and unsatisfactory. what i find a strong point here are footage interviews with visconti himself. as a result and we may get his own opinion about his works. for instance and i very much appreciate the words he says about death regarding it as a normal chapter of life and as natural as birth itself. he also discusses his health problems after the stroke while filming ludwig. i believe it is better to see luchino visconti (1999) by carlo lizzani than this doc. although it is shorter and condensed as a whole and you will get a better idea of the director. visconti would be furious about that and the fury of his usually turned people emotions and viewpoints into stone. negative . 
having seen carlo lizzani documentary on luchino visconti and i was bound to higher expectations before watching this film made three years later by adam low. but the viewer like me did get dissatisfied. i faced a need for critical opinion and which i generally do not like giving due to the fact there are no documentaries that will satisfy every viewer. there are also no documentaries that will examine a theme totally. but when i read the reviews already written on this title and i also felt a bit confused. people sometimes do not know what to criticize. therefore and to be clear and i will divide this film into two major parts that differ considerably represent the former one about visconti before his director career and latter one about visconti the director. the aristocratic background and all the hobbies and the wealth that young luchino experienced and enjoyed are clearly presented. his effort in horse racing is mentioned as well as his relation with his mother so much disturbed after his parents divorce. we also get a very accurate idea of where luchino was brought up as a real count of milano represent in riches galore and with nannies and cooks with access to everything and in true aristocracy. for instance and his father splendid villa at grazzano and other marvelous villas prove that. there is also an emphasis on visconti crucial visit in paris in the 1930s where he met eminent people (left wingers) who later had impact on his style and message in art. that clearly explains the idea of a communist with the aristocratic upbringing (a contrast at first sight). however and the part about his director career and which started with ossessione during wwii and ended with innocente just before the director death in 1976 and is poorly executed. his movies are not discussed well. why. because there are very few people who really have something to say. franco zeffirelli and the director and remembers the works on la terra trema and that is all right. there are also some interviews with franco rosi. but later and such movies like il gattopardo and la caduta dei rei and la morte a venezia or ludwig are mostly discussed by helmut berger. although i liked the actor in the role of ludwig and i did not like the interviews of his. moreover and some thoughts he reveals are not accurate to entail in such a documentary. there is no mention of significant works of visconti like conversation piece and there are no interviews with eminent cast burt lancaster. a mention about silvana mangano and romy schneider should also be made. there is one footage interview with maria callas that appears to be interesting but that is only a short bit. franco zeffirelli and though i appreciate him as a director and makes fun of it all rather than says something really precious. for instance and he mentions the event how visconti separated from him after years of service. therefore and i say represent simplified and unsatisfactory. what i find a strong point here are footage interviews with visconti himself. as a result and we may get his own opinion about his works. for instance and i very much appreciate the words he says about death regarding it as a normal chapter of life and as natural as birth itself. he also discusses his health problems after the stroke while filming ludwig. i believe it is better to see luchino visconti (1999) by carlo lizzani than this doc. although it is shorter and condensed as a whole and you will get a better idea of the director. visconti would be furious about that and the fury of his usually turned people emotions and viewpoints into stone. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
