a tough sell represent british playwright ronald harwood adapts his autobiographical stage drama into loud and bellowing film about wwii shakespearean theatrical troupe saddled with an aged and blustery and brilliant but unreliable star at the end of his tether. the actor effete assistant works diligently to get his master coiffed and costumed for a production of king lear (during an air raid. ) and yet both men are losing their grip on their unraveling situation. based on the waning years of actor donald wolfit and whose dresser was ronald harwood and this acclaimed production would seem to be a welcome haven for scenery chewing thespians. unfortunately and albert finney (at this point in his career and not at all elderly) seems too robust and quick thinking to play the actor while finney (and oscar nominated director peter yates) cannot modulate sir moods and bouts of coherency in a way that makes sense to us and so that in one scene he stopping a train with the commanding echo of his voice and and in the next he curiously falling apart. with such a wreck of a human being in the midst of failing health and aptitude and one would assume a dedicated assistant would go to great lengths to protect his boss (and his future) and yet servant tom courtenay prods and badgers and goads finney to carry on rather than rest. courtenay and who played this part on stage (and was nominated for an oscar alongside finney for best actor) and is far more attuned to his role and and eventually his bleating commands and confusion achieve the only real feeling in the film. these two and thankfully and do not peck at each other heads and and scenarist harwood is careful not to fall into a love hate pattern (which could possibly be perceived in the film first act) while but and without a juxtaposition of servant vs. celebrity and there nothing much to behold in this portrait except for the deterioration of narcissism and the hint at what once was. half from . 
a tough sell represent british playwright ronald harwood adapts his autobiographical stage drama into loud and bellowing film about wwii shakespearean theatrical troupe saddled with an aged and blustery and brilliant but unreliable star at the end of his tether. the actor effete assistant works diligently to get his master coiffed and costumed for a production of king lear (during an air raid. ) and yet both men are losing their grip on their unraveling situation. based on the waning years of actor donald wolfit and whose dresser was ronald harwood and this acclaimed production would seem to be a welcome haven for scenery chewing thespians. unfortunately and albert finney (at this point in his career and not at all elderly) seems too robust and quick thinking to play the actor while finney (and oscar nominated director peter yates) cannot modulate sir moods and bouts of coherency in a way that makes sense to us and so that in one scene he stopping a train with the commanding echo of his voice and and in the next he curiously falling apart. with such a wreck of a human being in the midst of failing health and aptitude and one would assume a dedicated assistant would go to great lengths to protect his boss (and his future) and yet servant tom courtenay prods and badgers and goads finney to carry on rather than rest. courtenay and who played this part on stage (and was nominated for an oscar alongside finney for best actor) and is far more attuned to his role and and eventually his bleating commands and confusion achieve the only real feeling in the film. these two and thankfully and do not peck at each other heads and and scenarist harwood is careful not to fall into a love hate pattern (which could possibly be perceived in the film first act) while but and without a juxtaposition of servant vs. celebrity and there nothing much to behold in this portrait except for the deterioration of narcissism and the hint at what once was. half from . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
