this is the second hitchcock film to appear on the list and the second hitchcock film i have seen in full and the first was rope and which i really enjoyed. with saboteur hitchcock was more room to roam free and whereas rope took place all in one room. i do not enjoy this one as much as rope but that not saying this is a bad film and it just seems like an average flick that could have been something more. it seems like a film hitchcock would make as a break in between his more serious ones. as a thriller and i feel it fails to really get my on the edge of my seat or engaged with the lead character who is running around the states. the climax of the film feels like a miss opportunity to really amp up the tension. the sound design is almost non existent. you can hear their dialogue and a bit of the environment around them and but the important things are missing and the stitches ripping apart from the sleeve and the need of music to amp of the tension and all missing. intentional no doubt and yet it lacks the emotional punch one would want from such a scene. then it ends abruptly leaving you empty inside. the film doesn not feel like it should either and they are almost globe trotting from place to place and yet it feels more confined. the script itself is very average and seems to go about the more obtuse ways to get the plot moving. the performances are there and but nothing amazing. everyone plays their parts to scripted words on the page. the relationship between the two leads is weak and needed more work. the one stand out is otto kruger and who has that rich and ego and evil persona down pat. in the end and i wanted more from this one. i understand it one of hitchcock least exciting films and but i did have a good time watching it. i can recommend it and just not enthusiastically. 
this is the second hitchcock film to appear on the list and the second hitchcock film i have seen in full and the first was rope and which i really enjoyed. with saboteur hitchcock was more room to roam free and whereas rope took place all in one room. i do not enjoy this one as much as rope but that not saying this is a bad film and it just seems like an average flick that could have been something more. it seems like a film hitchcock would make as a break in between his more serious ones. as a thriller and i feel it fails to really get my on the edge of my seat or engaged with the lead character who is running around the states. the climax of the film feels like a miss opportunity to really amp up the tension. the sound design is almost non existent. you can hear their dialogue and a bit of the environment around them and but the important things are missing and the stitches ripping apart from the sleeve and the need of music to amp of the tension and all missing. intentional no doubt and yet it lacks the emotional punch one would want from such a scene. then it ends abruptly leaving you empty inside. the film doesn not feel like it should either and they are almost globe trotting from place to place and yet it feels more confined. the script itself is very average and seems to go about the more obtuse ways to get the plot moving. the performances are there and but nothing amazing. everyone plays their parts to scripted words on the page. the relationship between the two leads is weak and needed more work. the one stand out is otto kruger and who has that rich and ego and evil persona down pat. in the end and i wanted more from this one. i understand it one of hitchcock least exciting films and but i did have a good time watching it. i can recommend it and just not enthusiastically. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
