it literally the three stooges all over again and without the charm. this show nothing more than the worst slapstick. i am surprised they actually have writers. the so called jokes are completely haphazard and and controversial for no other point than trying very (very) hard to be controversial. and people think this is edgy. get a clue represent this show takes absolutely no thought and time and effort and money and or creativity or originality to produce. any references present are geared toward anyone between the ages of 6 and 16 who would occasionally browse people magazine. but i suppose this is only what all the kiddies want and like and need today. 
it literally the three stooges all over again and without the charm. this show nothing more than the worst slapstick. i am surprised they actually have writers. the so called jokes are completely haphazard and and controversial for no other point than trying very (very) hard to be controversial. and people think this is edgy. get a clue represent this show takes absolutely no thought and time and effort and money and or creativity or originality to produce. any references present are geared toward anyone between the ages of 6 and 16 who would occasionally browse people magazine. but i suppose this is only what all the kiddies want and like and need today. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
