watched this months ago on netflix instant and left a review there. let me say and most of the other reviews are very accurate. this movie was bad writing and bad acting and bad directing. i too and had liked russell and pare back in the old days and was very hopeful for them. in my netflix review and i mentioned that i lost interest in the film and proceeded to wash the dishes and make a sandwich and yet still watching the movie from the kitchen. when i did return to the living room and i was very confused as the last 5 minutes of the film unfolded. i even rewound it to make sure i was not missing anything. this film totally crapped out on how to do a twist ending. i suspect that the idea sounded good and maybe the script was intriguing and but the budget was so non existent that sets were really lacking. and yes and i suppose all those bad sets were an effort to give the viewer a clue. all it told me was low budget. anyway and the reason i came here and was because over the weekend i saw a review of shutter island and and with what the reviewers were saying and or not saying and lead me to believe that shutter island is the same deal and only with a budget 50 to 60 times more. (actually i have no idea how much dark world cost and but i hope they do not spend more than 1 million. )so and that being said and i kinda thought that if someone reworked the script a bit and got a bigger budget for a better look (whether that meant a better scenic designer and or better post coloring and just someone with a vision and ) they could remake dark world into a passable product. now it sounds like shutter island is doing that. looks like they got the vision right and but the scripting could still be off. money can not buy everything and but it should in hollywood. ps my 2 star rating is for russell and pare. 
watched this months ago on netflix instant and left a review there. let me say and most of the other reviews are very accurate. this movie was bad writing and bad acting and bad directing. i too and had liked russell and pare back in the old days and was very hopeful for them. in my netflix review and i mentioned that i lost interest in the film and proceeded to wash the dishes and make a sandwich and yet still watching the movie from the kitchen. when i did return to the living room and i was very confused as the last 5 minutes of the film unfolded. i even rewound it to make sure i was not missing anything. this film totally crapped out on how to do a twist ending. i suspect that the idea sounded good and maybe the script was intriguing and but the budget was so non existent that sets were really lacking. and yes and i suppose all those bad sets were an effort to give the viewer a clue. all it told me was low budget. anyway and the reason i came here and was because over the weekend i saw a review of shutter island and and with what the reviewers were saying and or not saying and lead me to believe that shutter island is the same deal and only with a budget 50 to 60 times more. (actually i have no idea how much dark world cost and but i hope they do not spend more than 1 million. )so and that being said and i kinda thought that if someone reworked the script a bit and got a bigger budget for a better look (whether that meant a better scenic designer and or better post coloring and just someone with a vision and ) they could remake dark world into a passable product. now it sounds like shutter island is doing that. looks like they got the vision right and but the scripting could still be off. money can not buy everything and but it should in hollywood. ps my 2 star rating is for russell and pare. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
