what could have been a good story was destroyed by the ludicrous time travel scenario. if something was altered in the past that changed evolution and humans never developed and the time machine would never have been built. if something from the past was brought into the present and it would have no effect on the past. i really wish film producers would run their ideas past an actual scientist before finishing the script. even if you suspend reality and assume time travel is possible and you have to stick to logic. otoh and ben kingsley seemed to be having a great time with his over the top performance. all of the other actors seemed to be doing the best they could as well. it was the writing that left them twisting in the wind. back to the future handled it better. 
what could have been a good story was destroyed by the ludicrous time travel scenario. if something was altered in the past that changed evolution and humans never developed and the time machine would never have been built. if something from the past was brought into the present and it would have no effect on the past. i really wish film producers would run their ideas past an actual scientist before finishing the script. even if you suspend reality and assume time travel is possible and you have to stick to logic. otoh and ben kingsley seemed to be having a great time with his over the top performance. all of the other actors seemed to be doing the best they could as well. it was the writing that left them twisting in the wind. back to the future handled it better. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
