my goodness. and here i thought that there were no directors worse than uwe boll. imagine the number of decisions necessary to produce a motion picture. conceptual approval. scriptwriting. dialogue editing. casting. set and prop design. location selection. acting. timing. cinematography. lighting. music. sound and video editing. direction. now imagine that every single one of those decisions was made wrong. result represent dracula 3000. for a film supposedly set in the 2900s and this movie looks surprisingly like a cheap gangsta flick of the 1970 . the set is ridiculous for the period. the dialogue is atrocious. the timing of each scene is ludicrous. the acting is beyond abysmal. everything stinks. let just take props and for example. if you have a movie set on a space freighter built in 2900 and how likely is it that it will have the exposed piping and hydraulic doors of a 1960 era oil tanker. what and technology hasn not changed in 900 years. the professor uses a standard tandy keyboard and radio shack flipswitches to reprogram the computer. what and they haven not figured out voice control yet. of course and the prof is tethered to a wheelchair. with wheels. even though and you know and they have got intergalactic hyperdrive. but apparently not even a motorized wheelchair and much less a floating one and or bionic legs or something. and apparently this freighter was carrying an intergalactic consignment of rosewood caskets. how convenient. then there are the weapons  the crew carry standard late 20th century firearms. in a ship. in the vacuum of space and where one bullethole would kill them all. nice planning there and prop department. oh and why go on. 
my goodness. and here i thought that there were no directors worse than uwe boll. imagine the number of decisions necessary to produce a motion picture. conceptual approval. scriptwriting. dialogue editing. casting. set and prop design. location selection. acting. timing. cinematography. lighting. music. sound and video editing. direction. now imagine that every single one of those decisions was made wrong. result represent dracula 3000. for a film supposedly set in the 2900s and this movie looks surprisingly like a cheap gangsta flick of the 1970 . the set is ridiculous for the period. the dialogue is atrocious. the timing of each scene is ludicrous. the acting is beyond abysmal. everything stinks. let just take props and for example. if you have a movie set on a space freighter built in 2900 and how likely is it that it will have the exposed piping and hydraulic doors of a 1960 era oil tanker. what and technology hasn not changed in 900 years. the professor uses a standard tandy keyboard and radio shack flipswitches to reprogram the computer. what and they haven not figured out voice control yet. of course and the prof is tethered to a wheelchair. with wheels. even though and you know and they have got intergalactic hyperdrive. but apparently not even a motorized wheelchair and much less a floating one and or bionic legs or something. and apparently this freighter was carrying an intergalactic consignment of rosewood caskets. how convenient. then there are the weapons  the crew carry standard late 20th century firearms. in a ship. in the vacuum of space and where one bullethole would kill them all. nice planning there and prop department. oh and why go on. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
