the directing is brilliant and the casting is remarkable (though i would have loved to have seen a little more of aaron lustig (from y and r fame) and who played paul shaffer). i only have two minor quips about the film and as subtle as they are. one roebuck leno is excellent and but his stage presence (i. e. during what appears the taping of one of his late show episodes) is a tad underwhelming. two the distribution of the foul language. i am willing to tolerate foul language and so long as it is not used gratuitously and and to a degree and the film was gratuitous. the language seemed to be used as a tool to reduce the pathos of bates otherwise well portrayed kushnick by her frequent use of it and and served to make roebuck leno a goody goody by his lack of use of it (of course and if the characters really did behave this way and kudos to everybody). nonetheless and the piece is an excellent one and as far as television and video are concerned. the film and i feel and had potential for the big screen and but would have required re casting for the bit parts and and probably a different director and as well (the aesthetic feel is that of the larry sanders show and good for hbo and mediocre for cinematic purposes). 
the directing is brilliant and the casting is remarkable (though i would have loved to have seen a little more of aaron lustig (from y and r fame) and who played paul shaffer). i only have two minor quips about the film and as subtle as they are. one roebuck leno is excellent and but his stage presence (i. e. during what appears the taping of one of his late show episodes) is a tad underwhelming. two the distribution of the foul language. i am willing to tolerate foul language and so long as it is not used gratuitously and and to a degree and the film was gratuitous. the language seemed to be used as a tool to reduce the pathos of bates otherwise well portrayed kushnick by her frequent use of it and and served to make roebuck leno a goody goody by his lack of use of it (of course and if the characters really did behave this way and kudos to everybody). nonetheless and the piece is an excellent one and as far as television and video are concerned. the film and i feel and had potential for the big screen and but would have required re casting for the bit parts and and probably a different director and as well (the aesthetic feel is that of the larry sanders show and good for hbo and mediocre for cinematic purposes). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
