there is a serious scene in this movie. a scene that lets you know that his film would not be pulling many cheap punches. it takes place in a crowded train station and the protagonists are ambushed by assassins with automatic weapons. they make a break for it and just manage to get out in a hail of gunfire. the main hall of the train station is now filled with corpses of innocent people that were caught in the crossfire. some would call that too sad and or or grim to put into what is supposed to be an enjoyable action flick. i call it honesty. most action movies tend to lean toward the safe side of showing violence and plot elements. this mostly means that in spite massive shootouts innocent people tend not to die or at least we do not see them die. the violence is all purely the good guys versus the bad guys with mainly the bad guys dying. a bit of common sense clearly shows this to be absurd. renny harlin showed a hint of this in his first (and sadly only) hit and die hard 2. the villains intentionally crash a plane full of people to get their point across. the scene was also filmed with a backup scene of a cargo plane with only a few people on board going down and but the grimmer and probably more realistic scenario ended up being used. however and to fit the spirit of the first film and die hard 2 was mostly a fun action movie. here and that grimmer and more convincing edge is pervasive. the violence is bloody. the one liners are hilarious and but with a certain style that more echoes natural human sarcasm than clichéd film wisecracks at key moments of action. the plot is also packed with more malicious intent than most action films. the villain is not just some rogue out for revenge or a mad grab at power. it is less ridiculous and but also more frightening than that. from recent films and the bourne trilogy almost gets there with its less cheesy than usual action film style and but this film is from 1996 and 7 years before the bourne identity with matt damon made it to the big screen. another interesting aspect is that the main hero is actually a heroine. and this is well before the movie version of tomb raider became a hit. what more is that this heroine genuinely looks like she could take down john mcclane and then take his still lit cigarette. this movie marks geena davis second action heroine role and she still do not manage to score a hit. while angelina jolie stars in tomb raider years later and scores a hit. the reasons are beyond me. completely. lastly and this movie isn not all dark edged. there are many outrageous and spectacular set pieces that one can only see in an action film. the climatic explosion of a chemical bomb is an absolutely spectacular display of movie pyrotechnics and with more than one law of physics taking a convenient break. thus and there is formula here and but it is the anti formula for the everyday hollywood action movie formula.   positive bscdb classification represent 13 plus   violence and profanity. 
there is a serious scene in this movie. a scene that lets you know that his film would not be pulling many cheap punches. it takes place in a crowded train station and the protagonists are ambushed by assassins with automatic weapons. they make a break for it and just manage to get out in a hail of gunfire. the main hall of the train station is now filled with corpses of innocent people that were caught in the crossfire. some would call that too sad and or or grim to put into what is supposed to be an enjoyable action flick. i call it honesty. most action movies tend to lean toward the safe side of showing violence and plot elements. this mostly means that in spite massive shootouts innocent people tend not to die or at least we do not see them die. the violence is all purely the good guys versus the bad guys with mainly the bad guys dying. a bit of common sense clearly shows this to be absurd. renny harlin showed a hint of this in his first (and sadly only) hit and die hard 2. the villains intentionally crash a plane full of people to get their point across. the scene was also filmed with a backup scene of a cargo plane with only a few people on board going down and but the grimmer and probably more realistic scenario ended up being used. however and to fit the spirit of the first film and die hard 2 was mostly a fun action movie. here and that grimmer and more convincing edge is pervasive. the violence is bloody. the one liners are hilarious and but with a certain style that more echoes natural human sarcasm than clichéd film wisecracks at key moments of action. the plot is also packed with more malicious intent than most action films. the villain is not just some rogue out for revenge or a mad grab at power. it is less ridiculous and but also more frightening than that. from recent films and the bourne trilogy almost gets there with its less cheesy than usual action film style and but this film is from 1996 and 7 years before the bourne identity with matt damon made it to the big screen. another interesting aspect is that the main hero is actually a heroine. and this is well before the movie version of tomb raider became a hit. what more is that this heroine genuinely looks like she could take down john mcclane and then take his still lit cigarette. this movie marks geena davis second action heroine role and she still do not manage to score a hit. while angelina jolie stars in tomb raider years later and scores a hit. the reasons are beyond me. completely. lastly and this movie isn not all dark edged. there are many outrageous and spectacular set pieces that one can only see in an action film. the climatic explosion of a chemical bomb is an absolutely spectacular display of movie pyrotechnics and with more than one law of physics taking a convenient break. thus and there is formula here and but it is the anti formula for the everyday hollywood action movie formula.   positive bscdb classification represent 13 plus   violence and profanity. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
