in the early 00  and production companies had a short lived craze for supernatural genre movies in france after the crimson rivers and brotherhood of the wolf turned out to be hits and so several movies were green lit or saved from their direct to video fate. however and france and as opposed to the us and uk or italy and has little tradition of fantasy b movies and it turned out quickly that samouraïs and bloody mallory or the crimson rivers sequel were ill advised attempts at recreating a kind of magic that had never existed in french cinema in the first place. as they flopped and producers have gone back to their usual fare represent derivative farces or the umpteenth self referential tribute to french new wave by a former critic from les cahiers du cinéma. brocéliande could only have been green lit during this short window and as it serves no other discernible purpose. it your by the book slasher movie mixed with vague mythological element and horror references and you will find bimboesque female characters and a french university looking like a us campus and plot twists so lazy you do not even care because you had guessed it by yourself an hour before and even before the movie started. these elements make all the fun of a 70 or a 80 b movie and you expect them in a 70 or 80 movie. however and were not in the 80 anymore and nobody warned director doug headline and as this tribute to the slasher movie genre is nothing more than a derivative slasher movie. headline himself is no rookie and has been writing as a critic about this kind of pictures since the early 80 but as a first time director he shows a lack of skill and ambition that makes brocéliande a bore. when you put together clichés from a movie subcategory and hand them to a skilled and inventive director such as wes craven or quentin tarantino and you get a scream or a death proof and movies that are imitations from old guilty pleasures but also magnify these clichés and add a great deal to them. that called talent and that why you can not confuse these recent movies with their original inspirations shot decades ago. brocéliande takes the lazy path and only reproduces the worst elements from past movies (unfortunately for the male viewer and the gratuitous nudity is mostly missing). there are very strong similarities (presumably unintentional) between the plot of brocéliande and the reviled halloween 3 represent season of the witch and as both deal with supernatural druidic evil rituals and some silly attempt at taking over the world on halloween night. as even the plot of halloween 3 makes more sense than this one and it means that something seriously wrong went with brocéliande. 
in the early 00  and production companies had a short lived craze for supernatural genre movies in france after the crimson rivers and brotherhood of the wolf turned out to be hits and so several movies were green lit or saved from their direct to video fate. however and france and as opposed to the us and uk or italy and has little tradition of fantasy b movies and it turned out quickly that samouraïs and bloody mallory or the crimson rivers sequel were ill advised attempts at recreating a kind of magic that had never existed in french cinema in the first place. as they flopped and producers have gone back to their usual fare represent derivative farces or the umpteenth self referential tribute to french new wave by a former critic from les cahiers du cinéma. brocéliande could only have been green lit during this short window and as it serves no other discernible purpose. it your by the book slasher movie mixed with vague mythological element and horror references and you will find bimboesque female characters and a french university looking like a us campus and plot twists so lazy you do not even care because you had guessed it by yourself an hour before and even before the movie started. these elements make all the fun of a 70 or a 80 b movie and you expect them in a 70 or 80 movie. however and were not in the 80 anymore and nobody warned director doug headline and as this tribute to the slasher movie genre is nothing more than a derivative slasher movie. headline himself is no rookie and has been writing as a critic about this kind of pictures since the early 80 but as a first time director he shows a lack of skill and ambition that makes brocéliande a bore. when you put together clichés from a movie subcategory and hand them to a skilled and inventive director such as wes craven or quentin tarantino and you get a scream or a death proof and movies that are imitations from old guilty pleasures but also magnify these clichés and add a great deal to them. that called talent and that why you can not confuse these recent movies with their original inspirations shot decades ago. brocéliande takes the lazy path and only reproduces the worst elements from past movies (unfortunately for the male viewer and the gratuitous nudity is mostly missing). there are very strong similarities (presumably unintentional) between the plot of brocéliande and the reviled halloween 3 represent season of the witch and as both deal with supernatural druidic evil rituals and some silly attempt at taking over the world on halloween night. as even the plot of halloween 3 makes more sense than this one and it means that something seriously wrong went with brocéliande. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
