for those with access to the bbc or the cbc and this has proved to be spectacular. like battlestar gallactica and this is a show rebuilt from the ground up. but in the case of dr who and they saved the best parts. i can not believe i am saying this but. this is by far the best dr who. this has none of the cheap production values and sometimes slow plodding of the old show. the acting is quite good and there is a real sense of continuity and history. the new doctor is easily the equal of the great tom baker and and the writer (former qaf lead) seems to have made even the minor characters come alive. i know. i am gushing. but this should be on everyone sci fi geeks list. i just do not know why it hasn not made its way here. whatever you do. if you ever loved dr who or sci fi. see this. 
for those with access to the bbc or the cbc and this has proved to be spectacular. like battlestar gallactica and this is a show rebuilt from the ground up. but in the case of dr who and they saved the best parts. i can not believe i am saying this but. this is by far the best dr who. this has none of the cheap production values and sometimes slow plodding of the old show. the acting is quite good and there is a real sense of continuity and history. the new doctor is easily the equal of the great tom baker and and the writer (former qaf lead) seems to have made even the minor characters come alive. i know. i am gushing. but this should be on everyone sci fi geeks list. i just do not know why it hasn not made its way here. whatever you do. if you ever loved dr who or sci fi. see this. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
