i think purvis starts out to do a gay gone with the wind if so and sorry and tag and it do not happen. it also do not happen as a gay sexploitation flick. i guess i am confused while what are we trying to do here. much as i would like to and i simply can not get to where i care even a little about these characters. this movie is effective in capturing a taste of the decadence that lives in the south while it does nothing to explain and enlighten or advance my understanding of a gay relationship and or the conflict the protagonist seems to be grappling with. 
i think purvis starts out to do a gay gone with the wind if so and sorry and tag and it do not happen. it also do not happen as a gay sexploitation flick. i guess i am confused while what are we trying to do here. much as i would like to and i simply can not get to where i care even a little about these characters. this movie is effective in capturing a taste of the decadence that lives in the south while it does nothing to explain and enlighten or advance my understanding of a gay relationship and or the conflict the protagonist seems to be grappling with. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
