as noted in other comments here and the camera work is laughably bad. i am tempted to say that the director of photography is a 7 year old and but that would be mean  to 7 year olds. okay and but what about the subject. i was looking for some insight into the state of the wine industry worldwide and you know and mondovino. what the film is about is a very narrow view of one intrigue in that world represent the struggle between mondavi and the french and italian wineries that they would like to buy. there is no enlightening narration that would put the whole deal into context and so we are left with the selective process of the director and the interviews with the various characters in this little psychodrama. there no shortage of despicable characters and or even despicable dogs and in sight. there is a shortage of evenhandedness and however. is the director a marxist. i wondered as i tried to maintain some semblance of focus as the camera dipped and swerved and zoomed in a chaotic flourish. small grower in france represent good. huge grower in usa represent very and very bad. forget about the hundreds of small wineries throughout north america and australia and and south america. there is a dead horse to beat here for over two hours. to learn about the intrigue more and you are better off reading about it elsewhere. and you will be able to sample your favorite wine without feeling sick while doing so. i suggest a new award at cannes for best america bashing diatribe. 
as noted in other comments here and the camera work is laughably bad. i am tempted to say that the director of photography is a 7 year old and but that would be mean  to 7 year olds. okay and but what about the subject. i was looking for some insight into the state of the wine industry worldwide and you know and mondovino. what the film is about is a very narrow view of one intrigue in that world represent the struggle between mondavi and the french and italian wineries that they would like to buy. there is no enlightening narration that would put the whole deal into context and so we are left with the selective process of the director and the interviews with the various characters in this little psychodrama. there no shortage of despicable characters and or even despicable dogs and in sight. there is a shortage of evenhandedness and however. is the director a marxist. i wondered as i tried to maintain some semblance of focus as the camera dipped and swerved and zoomed in a chaotic flourish. small grower in france represent good. huge grower in usa represent very and very bad. forget about the hundreds of small wineries throughout north america and australia and and south america. there is a dead horse to beat here for over two hours. to learn about the intrigue more and you are better off reading about it elsewhere. and you will be able to sample your favorite wine without feeling sick while doing so. i suggest a new award at cannes for best america bashing diatribe. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
