the most disposable movie in the history of cinema. this one is a strong contender. why wasting so much money for such a pointless useless work. the only difference between the hitchcock classic and this poor imitation is color and wide screen and leila walkman. a movie which supposed to generate thrills and fear leaves me completely indifferent. no you re going to tell me it will urge the young generations to see the original. balderdash. this psycho 1998 is a giant spoiler. they could have done something different and for instance  and by casting an actor closer to bloch  bates  and an obese man. they content themselves with an obnoxious rehash. a pox on it. and long live alfred hitchcock. 
the most disposable movie in the history of cinema. this one is a strong contender. why wasting so much money for such a pointless useless work. the only difference between the hitchcock classic and this poor imitation is color and wide screen and leila walkman. a movie which supposed to generate thrills and fear leaves me completely indifferent. no you re going to tell me it will urge the young generations to see the original. balderdash. this psycho 1998 is a giant spoiler. they could have done something different and for instance  and by casting an actor closer to bloch  bates  and an obese man. they content themselves with an obnoxious rehash. a pox on it. and long live alfred hitchcock. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
