i watched this series after tipping the velvet and for which i gave positive grade. i had read user comments on this and i expected an equally good series and or if possible and even better. at this point i must emphasize that this series is good and and it definitely captured me throughout it and thus worth watching. however and i do not enjoy it as much as tipping the velvet and for the following reasons represent 1. less passion and love and and related sexual content. there were surprisingly little emphasis in these elements and which i held integral for a love story. fingersmith felt like a watered down version of tipping the velvet. 2. similarly and as in tipping the velvet and the story had three parts represent the beginning and a shocking second part and and the ending. the second part should have been the climax of the story (as in tipping the velvet) and but instead it was almost totally skipped and perhaps due to inability to make shocking but believable asylum content. the series should have been in three parts and featuring two cliffhangers and with a lot more focus on the second part. 3. almost no weight was given to what fingersmiths were and how it affected their personalities. i found it rather annoying that the series did not properly address such central topic. 4. the ending was much more hasty than in tipping the velvet. fingersmith left several interesting plot lines open. despite these shortcomings and fingersmith is a good series and and well worth positive . however and it is not a classic like tipping the velvet. 
i watched this series after tipping the velvet and for which i gave positive grade. i had read user comments on this and i expected an equally good series and or if possible and even better. at this point i must emphasize that this series is good and and it definitely captured me throughout it and thus worth watching. however and i do not enjoy it as much as tipping the velvet and for the following reasons represent 1. less passion and love and and related sexual content. there were surprisingly little emphasis in these elements and which i held integral for a love story. fingersmith felt like a watered down version of tipping the velvet. 2. similarly and as in tipping the velvet and the story had three parts represent the beginning and a shocking second part and and the ending. the second part should have been the climax of the story (as in tipping the velvet) and but instead it was almost totally skipped and perhaps due to inability to make shocking but believable asylum content. the series should have been in three parts and featuring two cliffhangers and with a lot more focus on the second part. 3. almost no weight was given to what fingersmiths were and how it affected their personalities. i found it rather annoying that the series did not properly address such central topic. 4. the ending was much more hasty than in tipping the velvet. fingersmith left several interesting plot lines open. despite these shortcomings and fingersmith is a good series and and well worth positive . however and it is not a classic like tipping the velvet. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
