i used to think that it came from hollywood was the worst movie i had seen that showed clips from horror and sci fi and crime and drama movies. of course and i hadn not seen this beauty yet. what wrong with terror in the aisles. four things represent1) it assumes that most of the great moments in shock cinema history began in the 70s when directors like john carpenter and brian de palma came along. and what bones are thrown to the true classics (i. e.  the black and white films) like frankenstein and dracula and the wolf man are either shown with martin and lewis or abbott and costello alongside or not at all. 2) the clips are most times so brief and out of their originals place that they just give a momentary shock to the viewer and and for those unfamiliar with these films and will make no sense at all (indeed and the moment where the shark jumps out of the water at roy scheider in jaws is shown much to the effect of a sight gag. whereas and in the original context and it had power. )3) did we really need pleasance and allen in the audience reminding us that it only a movie or that most of the violence in the horror movies is and sadly and against women. so and is that an indictment against the movie makers for adding those scenes or the movie goers who tromp into the theaters and watch the same kind of fodder time and again. sorry and that a whole can of worms to open for a more deserving movie. 4) and most importantly and why is the movie so short. it isn not like there wasn not enough of these kinds of movies to use. if they had just opened up their resources and used every available film and they could have had a that entertainment. style movie that would have been comparatively more entertaining. heck and even drag out christopher lee and peter cushing (cushing was alive then and mind you) and better yet and even vincent price would have been more than willing and i will bet. what a cheer that would have gotten from the audience. but no. all were left with is a dreary little flick that pretends to pay homage to these movies but all it does is leave the viewer feeling cheated out of less than 90 minutes with which they could have went and watched a real movie. don not get me wrong while it was good to see what clips they did show and but if they could have just done more with the goods. two stars. another good idea left laying in the aisles. 
i used to think that it came from hollywood was the worst movie i had seen that showed clips from horror and sci fi and crime and drama movies. of course and i hadn not seen this beauty yet. what wrong with terror in the aisles. four things represent1) it assumes that most of the great moments in shock cinema history began in the 70s when directors like john carpenter and brian de palma came along. and what bones are thrown to the true classics (i. e.  the black and white films) like frankenstein and dracula and the wolf man are either shown with martin and lewis or abbott and costello alongside or not at all. 2) the clips are most times so brief and out of their originals place that they just give a momentary shock to the viewer and and for those unfamiliar with these films and will make no sense at all (indeed and the moment where the shark jumps out of the water at roy scheider in jaws is shown much to the effect of a sight gag. whereas and in the original context and it had power. )3) did we really need pleasance and allen in the audience reminding us that it only a movie or that most of the violence in the horror movies is and sadly and against women. so and is that an indictment against the movie makers for adding those scenes or the movie goers who tromp into the theaters and watch the same kind of fodder time and again. sorry and that a whole can of worms to open for a more deserving movie. 4) and most importantly and why is the movie so short. it isn not like there wasn not enough of these kinds of movies to use. if they had just opened up their resources and used every available film and they could have had a that entertainment. style movie that would have been comparatively more entertaining. heck and even drag out christopher lee and peter cushing (cushing was alive then and mind you) and better yet and even vincent price would have been more than willing and i will bet. what a cheer that would have gotten from the audience. but no. all were left with is a dreary little flick that pretends to pay homage to these movies but all it does is leave the viewer feeling cheated out of less than 90 minutes with which they could have went and watched a real movie. don not get me wrong while it was good to see what clips they did show and but if they could have just done more with the goods. two stars. another good idea left laying in the aisles. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
