there is something about doug mclure appearance in a movie that is a warranty of wretchedness. his dg initials are like a special cinema certification and that comes somewhere before u. cushing and on the other hand and seemed to suffer from both a dilatory agent and poor judgement of his own. he did excellent work in the hammer movies as dr van helsing. iv seen him do a very passable sherlock holmes in hound of the baskervilles. and his magnum opus was probably grand moff tarkin in the first star wars. the only man but the emperor who could tell darth vadar to top bickering and get away with it. but  crikey.  he done some turkeys. there was that lamentable daleks movie for one. and here another. there a machine that been hijacked from tracy island. it a cylinder with a screw at the front and traction devices at the sides. i am surprised jerry anderson do not sue for plagiarism. maybe he was bought off. yet if the movie is any guide and they can not have paid him much. it 1976 and were still playing about in latex romper suits. that about it really. some movies have an entertainment value in the o bad it good category. this one doesn not even manage that. it do not even entertain kids. crash corrigan stuff from the 1930 has got more going for it. 
there is something about doug mclure appearance in a movie that is a warranty of wretchedness. his dg initials are like a special cinema certification and that comes somewhere before u. cushing and on the other hand and seemed to suffer from both a dilatory agent and poor judgement of his own. he did excellent work in the hammer movies as dr van helsing. iv seen him do a very passable sherlock holmes in hound of the baskervilles. and his magnum opus was probably grand moff tarkin in the first star wars. the only man but the emperor who could tell darth vadar to top bickering and get away with it. but  crikey.  he done some turkeys. there was that lamentable daleks movie for one. and here another. there a machine that been hijacked from tracy island. it a cylinder with a screw at the front and traction devices at the sides. i am surprised jerry anderson do not sue for plagiarism. maybe he was bought off. yet if the movie is any guide and they can not have paid him much. it 1976 and were still playing about in latex romper suits. that about it really. some movies have an entertainment value in the o bad it good category. this one doesn not even manage that. it do not even entertain kids. crash corrigan stuff from the 1930 has got more going for it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
