this film was basically set up for failure by the studio. one and anne rice (author of the book) offered to write the screen play but was refused by the studio. two and they tried to stuff 2 in depth novels in to a 2hour movie. i maintain the only way for these two books vampire lestat and queen of the damned to work in a live action form would be through a mini series. first off the the vampire lestat alone takes place from the 1700 to the 1980 and has a plethora of character vital to the plot understanding of the main character and lestat. the entire book vampire lestat sets up the events of the second part queen of the damned. without that full understanding the premise of a movie is destroyed. lestat was not cruel and vicious to all and he was not wanting to go along with akasha plans and marius did not make lestat and lestat did not love jesse or make her and lestat could not go remain unscathed by the light and marius was not after david nor the other way around and every character was completely represented wrong and basically same names different story. if they wanted to make a vampire movie and fine. even if you wanted to be inspired by these novels and fine. but do not piggie back into the theaters off the success of rice great novels and characters just to destroy what her loyal readers have come to love. if you haven not read the books you would not understand the film really and if you have read the books you will be insulted. that being said and i am such a huge fan i had to see the movie knowing full well this was going to be the case and still went for it. catch 22 and must see it and will hate it. 
this film was basically set up for failure by the studio. one and anne rice (author of the book) offered to write the screen play but was refused by the studio. two and they tried to stuff 2 in depth novels in to a 2hour movie. i maintain the only way for these two books vampire lestat and queen of the damned to work in a live action form would be through a mini series. first off the the vampire lestat alone takes place from the 1700 to the 1980 and has a plethora of character vital to the plot understanding of the main character and lestat. the entire book vampire lestat sets up the events of the second part queen of the damned. without that full understanding the premise of a movie is destroyed. lestat was not cruel and vicious to all and he was not wanting to go along with akasha plans and marius did not make lestat and lestat did not love jesse or make her and lestat could not go remain unscathed by the light and marius was not after david nor the other way around and every character was completely represented wrong and basically same names different story. if they wanted to make a vampire movie and fine. even if you wanted to be inspired by these novels and fine. but do not piggie back into the theaters off the success of rice great novels and characters just to destroy what her loyal readers have come to love. if you haven not read the books you would not understand the film really and if you have read the books you will be insulted. that being said and i am such a huge fan i had to see the movie knowing full well this was going to be the case and still went for it. catch 22 and must see it and will hate it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
