this usually all sounds a lot better in my head (so forgive me for rambling) i am hardly tarantino biggest fan (and will try not to stoop to calling him a hack. which is quite hard) i do not like to mock or critique a movie before seeing it. so with cautious hesitation and i walked to the cinema today to watch inglorious basterdsnow and to call it a rip off of a rip off would be unfair here. tarantino is happy enough to take the title from enzo castellari (less than spectacular) dirty dozen clone and but not it plot points (that and he takes from all other genre of movies) inglorious opens with a nazi officer and his lengthy interrogation against a farmer who is hiding jews in his basement. this is such an anti climax and in that and it dialogue is stale and and outcome signposted a mile off. of course and one of the hidden jews makes her escape (but more of her later) we (the obviously and easily pleased) audience are treated to the introduction of lt. aldo raine (ha ha and that name almost sounds like b movie king aldo ray. ha ha quentin. keep those tributes coming) and this character is played by none other than brad (dallas) pitt (sorry and dallas was about the only good thing he ever starred in) and with jaw jutting and mr jolie treats us to a hound dogged and southern drawled and smirking nazi killer. meanwhile mr tarantino forgets that actual grown ups may be in attendance and so assumes that the teenyboppers would not have heard of the dirty dozen. raines platoon consists of (john cassavettes looking) blood thirsty jewish soldiers and all looking to get the big payback on adolf hitler. tarantino in all his superior knowledge and pays special attention to two of these men and by casting his long time best buddy (and fellow homage sycophant) eli roth (as the baseball bat wielding bear jew) the other man is called hugo stiglitz (and i will wager more than half the qt fan boys had never heard this name before this movie) keep up the good work tarantino and you have managed about 6 or 7 hommages so far (in the first 15 minutes) keep adding them and and it may detract from the plot (or lack of. )anyhow and cutting a long (and extremely boring and protracted) story short and both raine and his men (the inglorious basterds) and the sole survivor from chapter one and both have separate plots to kill hitler at the showing of a nazi propaganda movie and in a french cinema (owned by the fore mentioned survivor and now grown up)more boring (and pointless) conversations follow two and fro and as pitt mugs away at an audience past caring. and any genuine suspense and leading to the assassination of the most deadly tyrant of all time and is thrown away by the directors insistence of placing a 1980 david bowie song in a wwii movie. my problems (and there are many) with this movie and is the re occurring problem i have with most tarantino product. he rarely knows when to either start or stop. i do not need homage after homage to get the joke (whatever it may be) i knew of inglorious bastards and enzo castellari and aldo ray and hugo stiglitz (and the ultimate crime of the entire movie) ennio morricone haunting score from revolver. i go to the cinema to see the stars. if the best you can do is the dire barad pitt and i will assume you (mr tarantino) are the main draw here. i do not want the audience directing the movie. i pay to see your vision and your ideas and your creativity. not how you can patchwork (time and time again) endless scenes from endless movies. it high time the fan boys (on imdb) employed some tough love on your idol (god knows and if you do not. the studios should. )the tired old argument with tarantino worshippers is well and if you can do better. do so let me tell you and if i was a 46 year old director and with the (unfortunate) pull qt has. i would want to offer you a lot more than a warmed up muddled re hash of better wwii movies than this tripe. the directors he attempts to emulate and made movies so bad by accident and or due to budgetary constraints. it a cop out and time and time again and to hear his fans campaign his lack of imagination as art. i am sure he capable of better (but after giving him the benefit of the doubt and once more. and not to mention 2 and a half hours of my life. ) maybe he isn not. 
this usually all sounds a lot better in my head (so forgive me for rambling) i am hardly tarantino biggest fan (and will try not to stoop to calling him a hack. which is quite hard) i do not like to mock or critique a movie before seeing it. so with cautious hesitation and i walked to the cinema today to watch inglorious basterdsnow and to call it a rip off of a rip off would be unfair here. tarantino is happy enough to take the title from enzo castellari (less than spectacular) dirty dozen clone and but not it plot points (that and he takes from all other genre of movies) inglorious opens with a nazi officer and his lengthy interrogation against a farmer who is hiding jews in his basement. this is such an anti climax and in that and it dialogue is stale and and outcome signposted a mile off. of course and one of the hidden jews makes her escape (but more of her later) we (the obviously and easily pleased) audience are treated to the introduction of lt. aldo raine (ha ha and that name almost sounds like b movie king aldo ray. ha ha quentin. keep those tributes coming) and this character is played by none other than brad (dallas) pitt (sorry and dallas was about the only good thing he ever starred in) and with jaw jutting and mr jolie treats us to a hound dogged and southern drawled and smirking nazi killer. meanwhile mr tarantino forgets that actual grown ups may be in attendance and so assumes that the teenyboppers would not have heard of the dirty dozen. raines platoon consists of (john cassavettes looking) blood thirsty jewish soldiers and all looking to get the big payback on adolf hitler. tarantino in all his superior knowledge and pays special attention to two of these men and by casting his long time best buddy (and fellow homage sycophant) eli roth (as the baseball bat wielding bear jew) the other man is called hugo stiglitz (and i will wager more than half the qt fan boys had never heard this name before this movie) keep up the good work tarantino and you have managed about 6 or 7 hommages so far (in the first 15 minutes) keep adding them and and it may detract from the plot (or lack of. )anyhow and cutting a long (and extremely boring and protracted) story short and both raine and his men (the inglorious basterds) and the sole survivor from chapter one and both have separate plots to kill hitler at the showing of a nazi propaganda movie and in a french cinema (owned by the fore mentioned survivor and now grown up)more boring (and pointless) conversations follow two and fro and as pitt mugs away at an audience past caring. and any genuine suspense and leading to the assassination of the most deadly tyrant of all time and is thrown away by the directors insistence of placing a 1980 david bowie song in a wwii movie. my problems (and there are many) with this movie and is the re occurring problem i have with most tarantino product. he rarely knows when to either start or stop. i do not need homage after homage to get the joke (whatever it may be) i knew of inglorious bastards and enzo castellari and aldo ray and hugo stiglitz (and the ultimate crime of the entire movie) ennio morricone haunting score from revolver. i go to the cinema to see the stars. if the best you can do is the dire barad pitt and i will assume you (mr tarantino) are the main draw here. i do not want the audience directing the movie. i pay to see your vision and your ideas and your creativity. not how you can patchwork (time and time again) endless scenes from endless movies. it high time the fan boys (on imdb) employed some tough love on your idol (god knows and if you do not. the studios should. )the tired old argument with tarantino worshippers is well and if you can do better. do so let me tell you and if i was a 46 year old director and with the (unfortunate) pull qt has. i would want to offer you a lot more than a warmed up muddled re hash of better wwii movies than this tripe. the directors he attempts to emulate and made movies so bad by accident and or due to budgetary constraints. it a cop out and time and time again and to hear his fans campaign his lack of imagination as art. i am sure he capable of better (but after giving him the benefit of the doubt and once more. and not to mention 2 and a half hours of my life. ) maybe he isn not. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
