one of the more prominent or popular episodes and but clearly one of the worst. a red shirt female falls for khan (instead of dropping dead  for a change) and then proceeds to betray kirk and the enterprise as if loyalty were a non existent character trait on the ship. makes one wonder what kind of psychology tests this supposedly brilliant starfleet uses to test people when hiring. we have the same kind of absurd lack of loyalty in wink of an eye and when a red shirt male takes the enemy side just because he falls in love. same as in ss. (however and in that episode the betrayal plays a tiny role in the overall plot. ) this is very silly because it once again makes kirk crew seem like a bunch of soft headed and easy to impress morons and who  once they fall in love with the enemy  are capable of doing just about anything. the fact that mcgivers switches back to kirk side doesn not ameliorate the illogic in any way. lord mcgiveth and the lord mctaketh. why is khan kept behind a regular door when they know he has superior strength. that one of several st plot devices that undermine kirk intelligence. why does khan hold a knife against mccoy throat. if khan is of such superior intelligence then one would expect him to be more wily with the way he carries himself. and what with a sikh being played with a latino accent. montalban should have been provided with a vocal coach. i was half expecting to hear the plaaain. the plaaaain. in the background at any moment. why the hell would kirk (or any ship captain) provide limitless use of the ship library concerning the innermost technical details of the enterprise to anyone. is the starfleet an institution solely consisting of idiots. ss is a very cartoonish and silly episode and so no wonder trekkies love it. it doesn not have too many sci fi elements in it and which is what trekkies hate the most. it also figures that the st franchise chose to revive this dull character for the second movie and that way pleasing rabid trekkies and who were so very disappointed with the first movie which  you guessed it  had far too much sci fi for the average tiny trekkie brain. 
one of the more prominent or popular episodes and but clearly one of the worst. a red shirt female falls for khan (instead of dropping dead  for a change) and then proceeds to betray kirk and the enterprise as if loyalty were a non existent character trait on the ship. makes one wonder what kind of psychology tests this supposedly brilliant starfleet uses to test people when hiring. we have the same kind of absurd lack of loyalty in wink of an eye and when a red shirt male takes the enemy side just because he falls in love. same as in ss. (however and in that episode the betrayal plays a tiny role in the overall plot. ) this is very silly because it once again makes kirk crew seem like a bunch of soft headed and easy to impress morons and who  once they fall in love with the enemy  are capable of doing just about anything. the fact that mcgivers switches back to kirk side doesn not ameliorate the illogic in any way. lord mcgiveth and the lord mctaketh. why is khan kept behind a regular door when they know he has superior strength. that one of several st plot devices that undermine kirk intelligence. why does khan hold a knife against mccoy throat. if khan is of such superior intelligence then one would expect him to be more wily with the way he carries himself. and what with a sikh being played with a latino accent. montalban should have been provided with a vocal coach. i was half expecting to hear the plaaain. the plaaaain. in the background at any moment. why the hell would kirk (or any ship captain) provide limitless use of the ship library concerning the innermost technical details of the enterprise to anyone. is the starfleet an institution solely consisting of idiots. ss is a very cartoonish and silly episode and so no wonder trekkies love it. it doesn not have too many sci fi elements in it and which is what trekkies hate the most. it also figures that the st franchise chose to revive this dull character for the second movie and that way pleasing rabid trekkies and who were so very disappointed with the first movie which  you guessed it  had far too much sci fi for the average tiny trekkie brain. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
