oh and why did it have to end like this. laurel and hardy last film and from the crudely cranked up cuckoo theme (with erroneous credit to hal roach) to the closing nice mess or i couldn not help it schtick and this is the duo as a grotesque parody of themselves. in between and their relationship is now solely constructed of uncertain acting and asinine dialogue and half hearted slapstick. people slate king of new york and but chaplin final bow out was nowhere near as undignified as this. what really hurts to someone who loves laurel and hardy is the appearance of the two comedians. the video cover i am holding shows them at their prime and all boyish smiles and glowing skin and with a blurb on the back that reads the photograph on this sleeve is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the content of the film. necessarily. it doesn not even come close. the actual film sees them at least fifteen years older than the photographs that adorn the sleeve and with ollie distressingly overweight. this is not humorously and or comically and fat and as he would normally appear and but ill looking and on the verge of obesity. he would be dead seven years after this film was made and after a series of strokes. stan and meanwhile and suffering a prostrate problem and dysentery and looks ghoulish as his weight has plummeted drastically. every time something bad happens to him and such as getting squashed between a lifeboat and a table and you fear for his life. even ollie giving him a traditional slap makes you terrified he could be killed. he would last for another fifteen years after the completion of this film and eventually passing away from a heart attack in 1965. it upsetting to think of such cherished performers growing old and dying painful deaths. and it distressing watching their deterioration and both in health and and in performance and on screen. when i and and and i am sure and almost everyone else and likes to think of laurel and hardy and i think of way out west and busy bodies or our relations. seeing them in such physical ill health and performing dire routines at the dog end of their career is a blight on my happy memories of them. the warning signs are clear right from the opening credits and which list not only four writers and but also someone to come up with the concept and and a credit for gags. so if monty collins was writing the gags and then what were the other four writing. and in that case and why was monty collins paid a fee and given that there no evidence of a single gag in the whole film. over 40% of the movie is spent travelling to the eponymous island and during which we experience some of the most painfully unfunny scenes the boys were ever involved in. when i saw the bat scene i wanted to curl up and die and so great was its childish ineptitude. yet what kills the film stone dead is that all of the support cast are dubbed and unable to speak english. not only does this make the film disjointed and but also it severely depletes stan and ollie reactions to their co stars. flatly directed with appalling film stock and absolutely atrocious editing and this totally belies the rumoured $2 million that was spent on it. frankly and it looks terrible and and while a dvd release might clean up the picture and the sound and image quality is vastly inferior to any of their hal roach work. stan and ollie friends and giovani and antoine are charisma free bores who stand out greatly against laurel and hardy outdated repertoire. this is another major problem with the film and in that none of the supporting characters are funny and or keyed in to the boys innocent mentality. the dubbed harshness shown to l and h (you  the fat one) makes them stand out as isolated social misfits and rather than loveable sub anarchists. there is evidence of some darker political satire  though duck soup this ain not  and the concept of an island with no rules is an interesting topic. perhaps more relevant now than it ever was and a film that looks at the problems of immigration and the american constitution suddenly becomes most topical in 2003. sadly and however and beyond an amusing scene where stan is elected the people and this doesn not really go anywhere. and this somewhat black humour does have its harsh edges  or is a laurel and hardy movie where rape is directly implied and stan threatens a man with a bottle and only to accidentally glass someone in the face and your idea of a good time. after all the years of stan and ollie sharing a bed and we also get a definite reference and with stan accidentally kissing him  ollie wipes off the kiss in disgust. also worrying is the implication that stan and ollie illegal immigrant friend and antoine and ends his life being eaten by a lion. mind you and i never thought i would see a laurel and hardy movie where they were due to be hanged and either. the need for the intrusive and unfunny narration is a further pointer to how messy the whole thing is and with the american release (the same version available on video) hacking out 16 minutes in a vain attempt to improve it. almost completely unwatchable and this horrifically made and relentlessly unfunny movie serves only to tarnish the reputation of stan and ollie  avoid at all costs. 
oh and why did it have to end like this. laurel and hardy last film and from the crudely cranked up cuckoo theme (with erroneous credit to hal roach) to the closing nice mess or i couldn not help it schtick and this is the duo as a grotesque parody of themselves. in between and their relationship is now solely constructed of uncertain acting and asinine dialogue and half hearted slapstick. people slate king of new york and but chaplin final bow out was nowhere near as undignified as this. what really hurts to someone who loves laurel and hardy is the appearance of the two comedians. the video cover i am holding shows them at their prime and all boyish smiles and glowing skin and with a blurb on the back that reads the photograph on this sleeve is for illustrative purposes only and does not necessarily reflect the content of the film. necessarily. it doesn not even come close. the actual film sees them at least fifteen years older than the photographs that adorn the sleeve and with ollie distressingly overweight. this is not humorously and or comically and fat and as he would normally appear and but ill looking and on the verge of obesity. he would be dead seven years after this film was made and after a series of strokes. stan and meanwhile and suffering a prostrate problem and dysentery and looks ghoulish as his weight has plummeted drastically. every time something bad happens to him and such as getting squashed between a lifeboat and a table and you fear for his life. even ollie giving him a traditional slap makes you terrified he could be killed. he would last for another fifteen years after the completion of this film and eventually passing away from a heart attack in 1965. it upsetting to think of such cherished performers growing old and dying painful deaths. and it distressing watching their deterioration and both in health and and in performance and on screen. when i and and and i am sure and almost everyone else and likes to think of laurel and hardy and i think of way out west and busy bodies or our relations. seeing them in such physical ill health and performing dire routines at the dog end of their career is a blight on my happy memories of them. the warning signs are clear right from the opening credits and which list not only four writers and but also someone to come up with the concept and and a credit for gags. so if monty collins was writing the gags and then what were the other four writing. and in that case and why was monty collins paid a fee and given that there no evidence of a single gag in the whole film. over 40% of the movie is spent travelling to the eponymous island and during which we experience some of the most painfully unfunny scenes the boys were ever involved in. when i saw the bat scene i wanted to curl up and die and so great was its childish ineptitude. yet what kills the film stone dead is that all of the support cast are dubbed and unable to speak english. not only does this make the film disjointed and but also it severely depletes stan and ollie reactions to their co stars. flatly directed with appalling film stock and absolutely atrocious editing and this totally belies the rumoured $2 million that was spent on it. frankly and it looks terrible and and while a dvd release might clean up the picture and the sound and image quality is vastly inferior to any of their hal roach work. stan and ollie friends and giovani and antoine are charisma free bores who stand out greatly against laurel and hardy outdated repertoire. this is another major problem with the film and in that none of the supporting characters are funny and or keyed in to the boys innocent mentality. the dubbed harshness shown to l and h (you  the fat one) makes them stand out as isolated social misfits and rather than loveable sub anarchists. there is evidence of some darker political satire  though duck soup this ain not  and the concept of an island with no rules is an interesting topic. perhaps more relevant now than it ever was and a film that looks at the problems of immigration and the american constitution suddenly becomes most topical in 2003. sadly and however and beyond an amusing scene where stan is elected the people and this doesn not really go anywhere. and this somewhat black humour does have its harsh edges  or is a laurel and hardy movie where rape is directly implied and stan threatens a man with a bottle and only to accidentally glass someone in the face and your idea of a good time. after all the years of stan and ollie sharing a bed and we also get a definite reference and with stan accidentally kissing him  ollie wipes off the kiss in disgust. also worrying is the implication that stan and ollie illegal immigrant friend and antoine and ends his life being eaten by a lion. mind you and i never thought i would see a laurel and hardy movie where they were due to be hanged and either. the need for the intrusive and unfunny narration is a further pointer to how messy the whole thing is and with the american release (the same version available on video) hacking out 16 minutes in a vain attempt to improve it. almost completely unwatchable and this horrifically made and relentlessly unfunny movie serves only to tarnish the reputation of stan and ollie  avoid at all costs. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
