this adaption contains two parts represent 1. the now time and when gulliver is at home in england and soon is put into a mental asylum by the evil dr. bates 2. the described time and in which gulliver describes his travels. the times are interspersed with a very choppy tempo and which makes willing suspense of disbelief far more difficult than it would have been if the movie simply would have discarded that part and and followed the book as written. in the book and there is no dr. bates and no asylum and and mrs gulliver gets very little mention. the travels  in plural  are depicted as one in the movie. there are several movies covering the topic of sane people dumped into asylum by some nasty person out there and look at them if you want that stuff. the now time part adds absolutely nothing to the story value and is a complete invention by the movie adapters and and takes valuable time from the real story. all the time when this was going on i was longing for the next bit of real travel to be shown. so much for the drawbacks. the parts which actually are part of the real story are well done and and the cgi is really well done for its time. many small (and a few medium sized) parts of the real travels are simply cut out and but that does not make the story halt. this is afaik the only version which depicts all four travels and and for that the movie should get special mention. the two interspersed parts get approximately equal time. i rate the first part negative  and and the actual travel coverage as positive . averaging out and i give it a negative . if only they would have cut the rubbish and focused 99% on the actual travels and since that cut would have freed up a lot of time much better spent on filling in the details cut from the travels. why some adapter think that he is gifted enough to improve upon swift work and i do not know. my best guess is that cgi was so costly back in 1996 so that the movie company felt a need to incorporate a lot of filler which did not need elaborate sets and gci and etc. in order to keep total costs under some limit and while at the same time producing a mini series which clocked in at some set number of minutes. 
this adaption contains two parts represent 1. the now time and when gulliver is at home in england and soon is put into a mental asylum by the evil dr. bates 2. the described time and in which gulliver describes his travels. the times are interspersed with a very choppy tempo and which makes willing suspense of disbelief far more difficult than it would have been if the movie simply would have discarded that part and and followed the book as written. in the book and there is no dr. bates and no asylum and and mrs gulliver gets very little mention. the travels  in plural  are depicted as one in the movie. there are several movies covering the topic of sane people dumped into asylum by some nasty person out there and look at them if you want that stuff. the now time part adds absolutely nothing to the story value and is a complete invention by the movie adapters and and takes valuable time from the real story. all the time when this was going on i was longing for the next bit of real travel to be shown. so much for the drawbacks. the parts which actually are part of the real story are well done and and the cgi is really well done for its time. many small (and a few medium sized) parts of the real travels are simply cut out and but that does not make the story halt. this is afaik the only version which depicts all four travels and and for that the movie should get special mention. the two interspersed parts get approximately equal time. i rate the first part negative  and and the actual travel coverage as positive . averaging out and i give it a negative . if only they would have cut the rubbish and focused 99% on the actual travels and since that cut would have freed up a lot of time much better spent on filling in the details cut from the travels. why some adapter think that he is gifted enough to improve upon swift work and i do not know. my best guess is that cgi was so costly back in 1996 so that the movie company felt a need to incorporate a lot of filler which did not need elaborate sets and gci and etc. in order to keep total costs under some limit and while at the same time producing a mini series which clocked in at some set number of minutes. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
