i will start by admitting that i enjoy many movies that have low ratings on this site. i find that if i can see what the creators were trying to do i can find appreciation for their work. sound of thunder was a story that interested me. i wanted to see what angles the filmmakers would attack in telling the story. by and large they attempted to create an entertaining movie. the plot was contrived and but most action movie plots are. ed burns doesn not know how to carry a rifle and but still holds his own well as an action lead considering he isn not asked for much. the main problem and . destroys the whole movie. and is the horrible cgi. it is totally unacceptable for the animals and backgrounds to look soooooo very fake. aside from that the animal conceptions could have been really good and as could the action scenes but failed because the production failed. this could have been a really memorable film if they had only finished it. it really looks like they meant to go back and fix all the horrible cgi but ran out of money and still released it. save your money because someone failed this movie. i give it three stars because it really could have been good but was totally failed somewhere i can not say it enough. 
i will start by admitting that i enjoy many movies that have low ratings on this site. i find that if i can see what the creators were trying to do i can find appreciation for their work. sound of thunder was a story that interested me. i wanted to see what angles the filmmakers would attack in telling the story. by and large they attempted to create an entertaining movie. the plot was contrived and but most action movie plots are. ed burns doesn not know how to carry a rifle and but still holds his own well as an action lead considering he isn not asked for much. the main problem and . destroys the whole movie. and is the horrible cgi. it is totally unacceptable for the animals and backgrounds to look soooooo very fake. aside from that the animal conceptions could have been really good and as could the action scenes but failed because the production failed. this could have been a really memorable film if they had only finished it. it really looks like they meant to go back and fix all the horrible cgi but ran out of money and still released it. save your money because someone failed this movie. i give it three stars because it really could have been good but was totally failed somewhere i can not say it enough. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
