i will admit that i have never seen waiting for guffman and 1997 critically acclaimed comedy mockumentary about a small town thats that stages a pageant. when the advertising for best in show had the tagline from the team that brought you waiting for guffman and a fair number of critics out there implied in their reviews that only people that are familiar with the film or its filmmakers and cast would have a good time seeing this film. for shame and critics and for shame times two. any critic that implies something like that with any film probably doesn not want to share the film wealth with the rest of the world and but this is one film that i hope people will experience and now that its video or dvd. best in show is and without a doubt and the best comedy of 2000. the film begins with a mockumentary style and introducing the main competitors (not to mention screwballs) of the annual mayflower best in show competition and where dogs of all breeds come to compete to see who is the top dog. we have the loveable and gullable harry pepper (guest) with his bloodhound and the simple gerry and cookie fleck (levy and ohara) with their terriors and nut case yuppies hamilton and meg swan (hitchcock and posey) and the gay dog groomers scott dolan and stefan vanderhoof (higgins and mckean) and and the airheaded millionare sheri ann ward cabot (coolidge) along with her trainer christy cummings (lynch). they all have their minds on one simple object represent the blue ribbon and which will be awarded to the best dog. and. do i have to tell you the rest. director or writer or star guest idea of humor is one that assures me that there are comedies out there that are worth laughing at and and that the idiocy of films like american pie or other pointless teenage flicks would not take over the world after all. his idea is simple represent make your comedy not just funny and but smart funny. but instead of following in the brilliant footsteps of films like zero effect and high fidelity and he used a rather unusual approach (and as i understand and he also used this approach for guffman). whether you notice or not and a very large part of the film is improvisation. in other words and what the actors say and do were probably not written in the script and maybe even not even dreamed of by guest and co writer or star levy. but with a gentle hand from guest and he and the actors pulled off a hilarious theatrical feat that probably would have flopped if handled by other and less adept actors. now that smart. the cast is and of course and what makes improv work the most. all of them are a (comedic) marvel to behold and especially guest as pepper. but the real standout has to be fred williard as buck laughlin and the clueless announcer at the competition who can spin out the most outrageously funny stories and comments that no announcer would even dream of. that is and if the announcer was trying to be funny. williard can go from talking about the dog to suddenly going on and on about how much he can bench press. there even a part were he gives out an idea for a new marketing strategy represent have sexy women pose in tight shirts and shorts with the dogs and imply something like have a doggie style of a time. its priceless and as is his performance. i hope that people engage in this 90 minute dogumentary. the film deserves so much recognition. it did get nominated for best picture comedy at the golden globes and but do not win. i can not see why. i mean and in the comedy department and it is best in show. grade represent a. 
i will admit that i have never seen waiting for guffman and 1997 critically acclaimed comedy mockumentary about a small town thats that stages a pageant. when the advertising for best in show had the tagline from the team that brought you waiting for guffman and a fair number of critics out there implied in their reviews that only people that are familiar with the film or its filmmakers and cast would have a good time seeing this film. for shame and critics and for shame times two. any critic that implies something like that with any film probably doesn not want to share the film wealth with the rest of the world and but this is one film that i hope people will experience and now that its video or dvd. best in show is and without a doubt and the best comedy of 2000. the film begins with a mockumentary style and introducing the main competitors (not to mention screwballs) of the annual mayflower best in show competition and where dogs of all breeds come to compete to see who is the top dog. we have the loveable and gullable harry pepper (guest) with his bloodhound and the simple gerry and cookie fleck (levy and ohara) with their terriors and nut case yuppies hamilton and meg swan (hitchcock and posey) and the gay dog groomers scott dolan and stefan vanderhoof (higgins and mckean) and and the airheaded millionare sheri ann ward cabot (coolidge) along with her trainer christy cummings (lynch). they all have their minds on one simple object represent the blue ribbon and which will be awarded to the best dog. and. do i have to tell you the rest. director or writer or star guest idea of humor is one that assures me that there are comedies out there that are worth laughing at and and that the idiocy of films like american pie or other pointless teenage flicks would not take over the world after all. his idea is simple represent make your comedy not just funny and but smart funny. but instead of following in the brilliant footsteps of films like zero effect and high fidelity and he used a rather unusual approach (and as i understand and he also used this approach for guffman). whether you notice or not and a very large part of the film is improvisation. in other words and what the actors say and do were probably not written in the script and maybe even not even dreamed of by guest and co writer or star levy. but with a gentle hand from guest and he and the actors pulled off a hilarious theatrical feat that probably would have flopped if handled by other and less adept actors. now that smart. the cast is and of course and what makes improv work the most. all of them are a (comedic) marvel to behold and especially guest as pepper. but the real standout has to be fred williard as buck laughlin and the clueless announcer at the competition who can spin out the most outrageously funny stories and comments that no announcer would even dream of. that is and if the announcer was trying to be funny. williard can go from talking about the dog to suddenly going on and on about how much he can bench press. there even a part were he gives out an idea for a new marketing strategy represent have sexy women pose in tight shirts and shorts with the dogs and imply something like have a doggie style of a time. its priceless and as is his performance. i hope that people engage in this 90 minute dogumentary. the film deserves so much recognition. it did get nominated for best picture comedy at the golden globes and but do not win. i can not see why. i mean and in the comedy department and it is best in show. grade represent a. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
