the director infuses this film with false depth by repeating a gimmick throughout the film. every single shot in this movie is 3 times longer than it needs to be. you could easily cut out 1. 5 hours of this agonizingly long 2. 5 hour film without eliminating represent one word of dialogue and one image and one event and or bit of movement. this was one of the most gratuitous wastes of film i have ever seen. other reviewers have called it pretentious and which is an understatement. lhumanite is pseudo intellectual trash designed to be anti hollywood so that the cannes judges could assert their independence from the oscars. the imdb reviewer states represent unlike hollywood movies  which usually force the audience into overdrive  this forces the audience to slow down and look at some of life tiniest and most mundane features in great detail. you would have to be catatonic to stare at some of these images this long and move as slowly at these characters. this isn not real life unless you are heavily medicated. finally and i felt that schotté portrayal was a sad rip off of peter sellers masterful chauncy gardner. he uses the same facial expressions and postures. he even gardens. in many respects there are parallels between these two movies. the main difference being that being there moves along and doesn not rely on shock and gimmicks to create a meaningful experience while questioning various things we take for granted in life. 
the director infuses this film with false depth by repeating a gimmick throughout the film. every single shot in this movie is 3 times longer than it needs to be. you could easily cut out 1. 5 hours of this agonizingly long 2. 5 hour film without eliminating represent one word of dialogue and one image and one event and or bit of movement. this was one of the most gratuitous wastes of film i have ever seen. other reviewers have called it pretentious and which is an understatement. lhumanite is pseudo intellectual trash designed to be anti hollywood so that the cannes judges could assert their independence from the oscars. the imdb reviewer states represent unlike hollywood movies  which usually force the audience into overdrive  this forces the audience to slow down and look at some of life tiniest and most mundane features in great detail. you would have to be catatonic to stare at some of these images this long and move as slowly at these characters. this isn not real life unless you are heavily medicated. finally and i felt that schotté portrayal was a sad rip off of peter sellers masterful chauncy gardner. he uses the same facial expressions and postures. he even gardens. in many respects there are parallels between these two movies. the main difference being that being there moves along and doesn not rely on shock and gimmicks to create a meaningful experience while questioning various things we take for granted in life. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
