just like all of mel brooks other comedies and men in tights is hilarious. but in seeing this as an outrageous comedy and i think many fail to realize that the reason the movie is so funny is that the characters themselves are acted so well. elwes is the well spoken former british noble and lewis is an eternally annoyed king (i hope it worth all the nooooooiiiise. ) and deluise is a fantastic godfather and roger rees is a worried and cynical sheriff. the actors and actresses are so loyal to their parts that the jokes flow forth with ease. yes and we have seen this kind of comedy before and but the only comedy to achieve better character development and in my opinion and is the big lebowski. very very funny. 
just like all of mel brooks other comedies and men in tights is hilarious. but in seeing this as an outrageous comedy and i think many fail to realize that the reason the movie is so funny is that the characters themselves are acted so well. elwes is the well spoken former british noble and lewis is an eternally annoyed king (i hope it worth all the nooooooiiiise. ) and deluise is a fantastic godfather and roger rees is a worried and cynical sheriff. the actors and actresses are so loyal to their parts that the jokes flow forth with ease. yes and we have seen this kind of comedy before and but the only comedy to achieve better character development and in my opinion and is the big lebowski. very very funny. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
