this movie really left me thinking . but not about the plot and the direction and the characters and an underlying message and or a clever script. far from it. i was left wondering what in sam hill went wrong behind the scenes. clearly and something was badly amiss from the beginning. i am amazed at the positive comments for the movie and for jodie foster performance. from the get go it was clear that foster had phoned this one in. one earlier comment even made a favorable mention of her facial expressions. i must have been watching a different movie since ms foster (usually a personal favorite) seemed to be totally disinterested. in one of his first scenes with foster and fred ward looks as though he and also and is distracted by her lack of energy and he struggles to deliver his own lines with any enthusiasm. by the time he called upon to take part in a supposedly desperate search for runaway foster and ward also seems to have become embarrassingly half hearted about the project. in my opinion and dennis hopper has always been a uni dimensional performer and so i wasn not expecting much from him . and he delivered. yes and this one left me thinking long after it ended. the fact that joe pesci and charlie sheen refused to have their names attached to the project suggests that this was a real stinker for everyone involved. but to then learn that the director preferred to hide behind a pseudonym speaks volumes. but why listen to me. i always think foster looks ridiculous in a dress and yet she sensational in lacy underwear. 
this movie really left me thinking . but not about the plot and the direction and the characters and an underlying message and or a clever script. far from it. i was left wondering what in sam hill went wrong behind the scenes. clearly and something was badly amiss from the beginning. i am amazed at the positive comments for the movie and for jodie foster performance. from the get go it was clear that foster had phoned this one in. one earlier comment even made a favorable mention of her facial expressions. i must have been watching a different movie since ms foster (usually a personal favorite) seemed to be totally disinterested. in one of his first scenes with foster and fred ward looks as though he and also and is distracted by her lack of energy and he struggles to deliver his own lines with any enthusiasm. by the time he called upon to take part in a supposedly desperate search for runaway foster and ward also seems to have become embarrassingly half hearted about the project. in my opinion and dennis hopper has always been a uni dimensional performer and so i wasn not expecting much from him . and he delivered. yes and this one left me thinking long after it ended. the fact that joe pesci and charlie sheen refused to have their names attached to the project suggests that this was a real stinker for everyone involved. but to then learn that the director preferred to hide behind a pseudonym speaks volumes. but why listen to me. i always think foster looks ridiculous in a dress and yet she sensational in lacy underwear. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
