for most people and robocop 3 is the film that really is the big disgrace for the robo series. it has few fans and and most people hate it for it shameless commercial pg 13 approach. now and i am not going to say that robocop 3 is any good. frankly and it pretty much sucks. but as far as being a properly shot and executed film and it surpasses this piece of circuit chaos. yes and the truth of the matter is that robocop 2 is the worst of two bad and unnecessary sequels to a near masterpiece. so what if robocop 3 turns robo into a cartoonish super hero in a ultra mainstream production for kids to enjoy  at least it doing it openly. i do not know where robocop 2 begins and ends and i do not know what or whom it about and i do not understand what going on in it and i do not understand which jokes are deliberate and which aren not and i will go insane if i try to understand the characters and i see nothing of any value in anything anybody is saying and i can not believe anybody looked at the shooting script and figured it would work and i can not believe that irvin kirshner saw the finished result and figured that he liked what he see. he probably do not by the way and neither miller and nor weller nor allen did. it not hard to see why. now and robocop 2 has it fans and i know this. mostly they belong to this league of absolute anti pretensions and dismissing anybody who expected any depth and or subject matter from the first film and as academic roger ebert sith apprentices. it just a lot of fun and a good piece of action and great entertainment and the argument goes. yeah well and i guess if you just do not listen to what any of the characters are saying you could fool yourself that we might as well have arnold in the suit instead of weller. don not get me wrong and i like a good action film and with pure entertainment value as it only  most satisfying  virtue. but robocop 2 and sir and ain not no such thing. look at the first couple of scenes. this horrible actor makes robo repeat that he just a machine and and then goes into this operatic speech about how he could never be a man and where after murphy wife (who suing ocp for robot stalkings) walks in out of the blue and have this sad little moment with him and and then is never heard of again. i surely would like to go in to this film scene by scene and because every one has these kind of absurdities in them. it like a twelve year old fan boy has done the screenplay and the characters act totally random and first say this and then say that. ocp wants to stop crime with a new robo and especially this drug called nuke but then it seems they really just want to become this big capitalist empire and control the entire city  politics are abandoned i guess and understandable given the comic relief mayor and the villain (played by tom noonan and who did a better version of this in last action hero and that saying a lot) is an addict and but is still used for this machine. the woman behind it all has an agenda which is impossible to understand. speaking of twelve year olds and this film has the infamous role of hub and this mad kid who swears and kills people and played by a child actor. i am not going to be all moral about it and it a free world and if you want a psycho kid in your action movie and go for it. i do not know how much of frank miller original vision was put into this and but the credits at least acknowledge him as conceiver of the story. and and if i zoom out and i could see this as being quite a cool character. it grim for sure and to have a maniac killer kid but then again this is the world of robocop and who would be surprised. this whole business with the ocp trying to become this giant monopoly over everything and is properly dystopian and good as well. also and the idea of robocop getting in touch with his wife and kid and having them embedded into the story somehow  would also be great and and as far as i can see a natural and logical step if they now had to make a robocop sequel. but and of course and these are just ideas. as many people have already said and the screenplay is 100% mess. the kid has one scene (the torture scene) where it hinted that he in fact is just a stereotype messed up kid and and then we have this unimaginable scene where he is dying and gets all soft and friendly towards ol tin head. why doesn not he just take up his uzi and try to take him down with his last breath. isn not that what his character would do. does he give his life a little second thought there on his death bed. not necessarily and given that his last words are it sucks and so why. it really makes no sense and and this can be said about everybody and no everything and in this film. is there a strike in the police force. is robocop machine or man. what the deal with turning robo into this community service machine for 10 minutes. i mean and sure and it pretty funny i do not deny that. but why build it up and and then discard it. and why the hell is allen so criminally underused. and what is it weller has an obvious urge to express with his character and yeah and well and the threads are many and the mess is enormous. this review is just as messed up as the film. the only reason i give an extra star up there is because of the actors from the first film and i am sure they had good intentions with it. i mean it something somewhat stable and some kind of anchor in this sea of bad movie making. 
for most people and robocop 3 is the film that really is the big disgrace for the robo series. it has few fans and and most people hate it for it shameless commercial pg 13 approach. now and i am not going to say that robocop 3 is any good. frankly and it pretty much sucks. but as far as being a properly shot and executed film and it surpasses this piece of circuit chaos. yes and the truth of the matter is that robocop 2 is the worst of two bad and unnecessary sequels to a near masterpiece. so what if robocop 3 turns robo into a cartoonish super hero in a ultra mainstream production for kids to enjoy  at least it doing it openly. i do not know where robocop 2 begins and ends and i do not know what or whom it about and i do not understand what going on in it and i do not understand which jokes are deliberate and which aren not and i will go insane if i try to understand the characters and i see nothing of any value in anything anybody is saying and i can not believe anybody looked at the shooting script and figured it would work and i can not believe that irvin kirshner saw the finished result and figured that he liked what he see. he probably do not by the way and neither miller and nor weller nor allen did. it not hard to see why. now and robocop 2 has it fans and i know this. mostly they belong to this league of absolute anti pretensions and dismissing anybody who expected any depth and or subject matter from the first film and as academic roger ebert sith apprentices. it just a lot of fun and a good piece of action and great entertainment and the argument goes. yeah well and i guess if you just do not listen to what any of the characters are saying you could fool yourself that we might as well have arnold in the suit instead of weller. don not get me wrong and i like a good action film and with pure entertainment value as it only  most satisfying  virtue. but robocop 2 and sir and ain not no such thing. look at the first couple of scenes. this horrible actor makes robo repeat that he just a machine and and then goes into this operatic speech about how he could never be a man and where after murphy wife (who suing ocp for robot stalkings) walks in out of the blue and have this sad little moment with him and and then is never heard of again. i surely would like to go in to this film scene by scene and because every one has these kind of absurdities in them. it like a twelve year old fan boy has done the screenplay and the characters act totally random and first say this and then say that. ocp wants to stop crime with a new robo and especially this drug called nuke but then it seems they really just want to become this big capitalist empire and control the entire city  politics are abandoned i guess and understandable given the comic relief mayor and the villain (played by tom noonan and who did a better version of this in last action hero and that saying a lot) is an addict and but is still used for this machine. the woman behind it all has an agenda which is impossible to understand. speaking of twelve year olds and this film has the infamous role of hub and this mad kid who swears and kills people and played by a child actor. i am not going to be all moral about it and it a free world and if you want a psycho kid in your action movie and go for it. i do not know how much of frank miller original vision was put into this and but the credits at least acknowledge him as conceiver of the story. and and if i zoom out and i could see this as being quite a cool character. it grim for sure and to have a maniac killer kid but then again this is the world of robocop and who would be surprised. this whole business with the ocp trying to become this giant monopoly over everything and is properly dystopian and good as well. also and the idea of robocop getting in touch with his wife and kid and having them embedded into the story somehow  would also be great and and as far as i can see a natural and logical step if they now had to make a robocop sequel. but and of course and these are just ideas. as many people have already said and the screenplay is 100% mess. the kid has one scene (the torture scene) where it hinted that he in fact is just a stereotype messed up kid and and then we have this unimaginable scene where he is dying and gets all soft and friendly towards ol tin head. why doesn not he just take up his uzi and try to take him down with his last breath. isn not that what his character would do. does he give his life a little second thought there on his death bed. not necessarily and given that his last words are it sucks and so why. it really makes no sense and and this can be said about everybody and no everything and in this film. is there a strike in the police force. is robocop machine or man. what the deal with turning robo into this community service machine for 10 minutes. i mean and sure and it pretty funny i do not deny that. but why build it up and and then discard it. and why the hell is allen so criminally underused. and what is it weller has an obvious urge to express with his character and yeah and well and the threads are many and the mess is enormous. this review is just as messed up as the film. the only reason i give an extra star up there is because of the actors from the first film and i am sure they had good intentions with it. i mean it something somewhat stable and some kind of anchor in this sea of bad movie making. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
