it must be a long time ago that i have seen such a bad movie. i have to say it is really hard to make a good and or or realistic movie about air disaster but this movie was such a waste of time and money. also i think this is an unofficial way trying to get a bad reputation on airbus. first and the cockpit look a lot like an airbus cockpit and second you got a stick and third using computers to control rudders or elevators or aileron via fly by wire. when i saw this movie i thought like the intention of the film was do not fly with computerized airplanes like airbus and use boeing instead they have a direct connection of steering and rudders. all i can say represent bad story and horrible acting (most of the actors) and worst film trick ever. 
it must be a long time ago that i have seen such a bad movie. i have to say it is really hard to make a good and or or realistic movie about air disaster but this movie was such a waste of time and money. also i think this is an unofficial way trying to get a bad reputation on airbus. first and the cockpit look a lot like an airbus cockpit and second you got a stick and third using computers to control rudders or elevators or aileron via fly by wire. when i saw this movie i thought like the intention of the film was do not fly with computerized airplanes like airbus and use boeing instead they have a direct connection of steering and rudders. all i can say represent bad story and horrible acting (most of the actors) and worst film trick ever. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
