every time the supposed explorers and we  and the audience and is primed to set its first sights one of the wonderous new worlds and for some ungodly reason and the filmmakers decided to distract with an emergency or some false alarm or some bit of artificial dramatic suspense. so instead of calmly enjoying the surface of io and or standing over the rings of saturn or concentrating on the magic of flying by a comet or an asteroid and we are distracted into worrying about the wellbeing and survival of the characters. big let down . the filmmakers seem to be unsure what they want. a documentary of the natural wonders in our solar system and or a suspense thriller in which the viewer cares more about the characters than the subject matter. come on. hello. if i wanted suspense and tension i would watch a real narrative sci fi movie. sure it a docu drama. but the characters and their survival here (the risks of such a mission  should be secondary to the subject matter ). wait. yes the risks of such a mission are an important part of the subject matter  since essentially this is a film about a space mission  and not just about the solar system. but it was overplayed and distracted strongly from the discovery of new worlds we were supposed to be enjoying. otherwise and the film was remarkable in giving a very realistic feel for the human elements of a space mission  and the squabbles and the tensions and the weight of responsibility and the near fatal mistakes and the sacrifices  and etc. also it would fit very well in the hard sci fi subgenre  in fact it would be one of the best  and because here the science was almost closely adhered to. but the distractions were awful. otherwise and i missed showing the effects of being in space for several years on the astronauts after landing on earth. also not. 
every time the supposed explorers and we  and the audience and is primed to set its first sights one of the wonderous new worlds and for some ungodly reason and the filmmakers decided to distract with an emergency or some false alarm or some bit of artificial dramatic suspense. so instead of calmly enjoying the surface of io and or standing over the rings of saturn or concentrating on the magic of flying by a comet or an asteroid and we are distracted into worrying about the wellbeing and survival of the characters. big let down . the filmmakers seem to be unsure what they want. a documentary of the natural wonders in our solar system and or a suspense thriller in which the viewer cares more about the characters than the subject matter. come on. hello. if i wanted suspense and tension i would watch a real narrative sci fi movie. sure it a docu drama. but the characters and their survival here (the risks of such a mission  should be secondary to the subject matter ). wait. yes the risks of such a mission are an important part of the subject matter  since essentially this is a film about a space mission  and not just about the solar system. but it was overplayed and distracted strongly from the discovery of new worlds we were supposed to be enjoying. otherwise and the film was remarkable in giving a very realistic feel for the human elements of a space mission  and the squabbles and the tensions and the weight of responsibility and the near fatal mistakes and the sacrifices  and etc. also it would fit very well in the hard sci fi subgenre  in fact it would be one of the best  and because here the science was almost closely adhered to. but the distractions were awful. otherwise and i missed showing the effects of being in space for several years on the astronauts after landing on earth. also not. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
