this was intolerable. (spoiler #1) protagonists avoid the pointless disclosure of agonizing truths to their loved ones and lest they surrender said status and assume the roles of antagonists. (spoiler #2) the writers would have us believe that the exposure of multiple transgressions and by the transgressor and presents a threat to and and provokes a retaliatory response by and the primary victim of the transgressions. (spoiler #3) until the final 15 minutes and i was anticipating a score of 6 to positive while instead and it was kind of like discovering that lieutenant columbo dog is the real murderer. the story just wasn not credible and and i do not think the world best director could have saved it without massive editing. 
this was intolerable. (spoiler #1) protagonists avoid the pointless disclosure of agonizing truths to their loved ones and lest they surrender said status and assume the roles of antagonists. (spoiler #2) the writers would have us believe that the exposure of multiple transgressions and by the transgressor and presents a threat to and and provokes a retaliatory response by and the primary victim of the transgressions. (spoiler #3) until the final 15 minutes and i was anticipating a score of 6 to positive while instead and it was kind of like discovering that lieutenant columbo dog is the real murderer. the story just wasn not credible and and i do not think the world best director could have saved it without massive editing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
