if i had never seen the first road house and then i guess this movie might get one more star and but even then that makes it a 3 star movie. for that matter i was really surprised as to the relatively high rating it currently has. in reality and i was not able to finish this movie and as it was painful. where it went wrong (at least the most obvious way) is that it pretty much parallels the original exactly even though the original plot is still referenced. this doesn not really make sense and doesn not work. also and the acting is weak. i never felt like i was into the movie yet i felt like i was watching people act. even good actors like busey do not work out and probably due to the screenplay or maybe the awkward editing. the strangest thing is that the movie feels like a mid 90 b movie and yet is made in 06. i am not sure as to why and but then again and this often seems to happen with sequels for some reason. the music and the look and and the whole overall feel reminds me of movies you saw 10 years ago on cinemax late at night. the strangest thing of all is that i am also expecting ja rule to come in at some point. often it reminds me of more current movies with rappers as actors. the most irritating thing is love interest girl who character seems like a total rip off of the lois lane character on smallville which is also quite annoying. and lets not forget the fakest sounding southern accents i have heard since walk the line. i realize this is common place in movies and but no accent at all would work better than attempting to sound like you are from that universal hick place on tv where anyone from any southern state (or ky and wv) sound exactly the same. sure and people in desert towns in az sound just like people in southeastern states 2000 plus miles away. that was wearing thin 10 years ago in the b movies where technique came from. why do writers or directors make such decisions. bottom line represent i would truly not recommend this if you are a fan of road house or if you like good movies. also and if you have not seen it yet and do not spoil it by seeing this version first. the original road house was one of those accidental classics that people love and watch over and over. it was an unexpected success like american graffiti and dazed and confused and and more recently office space and fast and furious (only the first one. ) and and napolean dynamite. why did they spoil it. they should have never made a sequel to road house other than a high budget version with the right actors or director. sure and you can never top the original (ex represent bad news bears and the longest yard and etc. ) and but at least if you can do it right it will be presentable as is the case with the examples i mentioned. but to make a low budget and off network and self production of road house is criminal. 
if i had never seen the first road house and then i guess this movie might get one more star and but even then that makes it a 3 star movie. for that matter i was really surprised as to the relatively high rating it currently has. in reality and i was not able to finish this movie and as it was painful. where it went wrong (at least the most obvious way) is that it pretty much parallels the original exactly even though the original plot is still referenced. this doesn not really make sense and doesn not work. also and the acting is weak. i never felt like i was into the movie yet i felt like i was watching people act. even good actors like busey do not work out and probably due to the screenplay or maybe the awkward editing. the strangest thing is that the movie feels like a mid 90 b movie and yet is made in 06. i am not sure as to why and but then again and this often seems to happen with sequels for some reason. the music and the look and and the whole overall feel reminds me of movies you saw 10 years ago on cinemax late at night. the strangest thing of all is that i am also expecting ja rule to come in at some point. often it reminds me of more current movies with rappers as actors. the most irritating thing is love interest girl who character seems like a total rip off of the lois lane character on smallville which is also quite annoying. and lets not forget the fakest sounding southern accents i have heard since walk the line. i realize this is common place in movies and but no accent at all would work better than attempting to sound like you are from that universal hick place on tv where anyone from any southern state (or ky and wv) sound exactly the same. sure and people in desert towns in az sound just like people in southeastern states 2000 plus miles away. that was wearing thin 10 years ago in the b movies where technique came from. why do writers or directors make such decisions. bottom line represent i would truly not recommend this if you are a fan of road house or if you like good movies. also and if you have not seen it yet and do not spoil it by seeing this version first. the original road house was one of those accidental classics that people love and watch over and over. it was an unexpected success like american graffiti and dazed and confused and and more recently office space and fast and furious (only the first one. ) and and napolean dynamite. why did they spoil it. they should have never made a sequel to road house other than a high budget version with the right actors or director. sure and you can never top the original (ex represent bad news bears and the longest yard and etc. ) and but at least if you can do it right it will be presentable as is the case with the examples i mentioned. but to make a low budget and off network and self production of road house is criminal. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
