i am also a sf buff and among other genres and and i especially like those films from 60 and 70 with their ideas over effects premise that produced so many intelligent and likable stories put on screen. in a nutshell i completely agree with scott 886 review of this movie. i heard of this film and and being what i previously mentioned and a 60 and 70 sf buff and with a penchant for sf stories with touch of the twilight zone and i expected a lot and and my expectations were heightened with reviews ranking the effects of this movie second best to kubrick 2001 space odyssey. what a fraud. journey to the far side of the sun and was ordinary and convoluted and half baked and silly looking film and with laughable amateur special effects (and remember i love films from that era and despise cgi) and and it can be fully compared more to 60 sf disasters such as marooned and which journey very much reminded me of. the idea behind it all is not that bad and but building the plot on a story of a twin planet to earth and on which the same world is inverted and asked for a master like kubrick to direct. needles to say robert parish is nothing like that and so he delivered boring and silly movie and that looked and felt like a matinée tv series of those days. not worth wasting your time on and even if you are an absolute fan of the genre. 
i am also a sf buff and among other genres and and i especially like those films from 60 and 70 with their ideas over effects premise that produced so many intelligent and likable stories put on screen. in a nutshell i completely agree with scott 886 review of this movie. i heard of this film and and being what i previously mentioned and a 60 and 70 sf buff and with a penchant for sf stories with touch of the twilight zone and i expected a lot and and my expectations were heightened with reviews ranking the effects of this movie second best to kubrick 2001 space odyssey. what a fraud. journey to the far side of the sun and was ordinary and convoluted and half baked and silly looking film and with laughable amateur special effects (and remember i love films from that era and despise cgi) and and it can be fully compared more to 60 sf disasters such as marooned and which journey very much reminded me of. the idea behind it all is not that bad and but building the plot on a story of a twin planet to earth and on which the same world is inverted and asked for a master like kubrick to direct. needles to say robert parish is nothing like that and so he delivered boring and silly movie and that looked and felt like a matinée tv series of those days. not worth wasting your time on and even if you are an absolute fan of the genre. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
