the brief existence of the sex pistols and the making of this film after the controversial and groundbreaking english punk band break up both happened before i was born. however and i started listening to their only album and never mind the b and %@# and s and here the sex pistols and in 2003 and when i was a teenager and and quickly became a big fan. i do not see the great rock n roll swindle until 2006 and but saw it a couple times that year and and thought it was pretty good (certainly not great and but pretty good) and even if i could only remember bits of it and and do not see how it all connected. seeing it a third time and nearly three years after the second and i do not care much for it at all. i am not even sure what i found so good about most of it in the first place (can not remember now). this film is a mockumentary and in which sex pistols manager malcolm mclaren tells his side of the story of the band and its members while guitarist steve jones and credited here as the crook while drummer paul cook and credited as the tea maker while bassist sid vicious and credited as the gimmick while and john lydon (a. k. a. johnny rotten) credited as the collaborator. mclaren claims that he created the band (and even the genre of punk rock) as a scam to make money. he tells much of the story to helen wellington lloyd (a. k. a. helen of troy) and in various places where they go together. it basically a hodgepodge of mclaren talking and pistols songs and live footage of the band and fictional scenes (often silly and strange ones) and several cartoon sequences and etc. and all put together in one film and to tell the pistols manager side of the story in a bizarre way. it has been well proved that mclaren is a liar and i know many have already pointed this out and including band members themselves. he was not the driving force of the band and he do not create them (nor did he invent punk rock and and the sex pistols weren not even the first punk band and though they were unique). the band members were the ones who made the band what it was. the filth and the fury and a much more believable film about the band from julien temple and who made this film and is told from the point of view of the band members and who contradict mclaren claims. however and the dishonesty of the great rock n roll swindle is not my biggest problem with it. if it were actually entertaining (which i used to think it was to a certain extent) and i would be able to overlook that and like i obviously used to be able to do. during my third viewing and apart from sex pistols songs and some live footage and and at least one mildly amusing cartoon sequence and it was pretty dull. i found the who killed bambi song mildly amusing at first and but it got tiring very quickly. is this mockumentary worth watching for sex pistols fans. it seems a good number of fans would say it is and not to learn about the true story of the short lived but groundbreaking 70 punk band and but for entertainment. that was once my opinion on the great rock n roll swindle. after the first time i watched it and i couldn not remember a thing mclaren said and and by the time i saw it the second time and i was aware of what the pistols manager was using this film to imply and but could still barely remember anything i heard him say. obviously and other aspects of the film were what i found impressive. now and after my third viewing and i can definitely remember some of the things mclaren says and but it still wasn not 100% clear. like most of the film and i guess his words are not that memorable and probably because of the way theyre presented. if youre a pistols fan and i guess it do not hurt to give swindle a try and but to me and for the most part and it just an incoherent and boring mess that tries to be funny but fails. 
the brief existence of the sex pistols and the making of this film after the controversial and groundbreaking english punk band break up both happened before i was born. however and i started listening to their only album and never mind the b and %@# and s and here the sex pistols and in 2003 and when i was a teenager and and quickly became a big fan. i do not see the great rock n roll swindle until 2006 and but saw it a couple times that year and and thought it was pretty good (certainly not great and but pretty good) and even if i could only remember bits of it and and do not see how it all connected. seeing it a third time and nearly three years after the second and i do not care much for it at all. i am not even sure what i found so good about most of it in the first place (can not remember now). this film is a mockumentary and in which sex pistols manager malcolm mclaren tells his side of the story of the band and its members while guitarist steve jones and credited here as the crook while drummer paul cook and credited as the tea maker while bassist sid vicious and credited as the gimmick while and john lydon (a. k. a. johnny rotten) credited as the collaborator. mclaren claims that he created the band (and even the genre of punk rock) as a scam to make money. he tells much of the story to helen wellington lloyd (a. k. a. helen of troy) and in various places where they go together. it basically a hodgepodge of mclaren talking and pistols songs and live footage of the band and fictional scenes (often silly and strange ones) and several cartoon sequences and etc. and all put together in one film and to tell the pistols manager side of the story in a bizarre way. it has been well proved that mclaren is a liar and i know many have already pointed this out and including band members themselves. he was not the driving force of the band and he do not create them (nor did he invent punk rock and and the sex pistols weren not even the first punk band and though they were unique). the band members were the ones who made the band what it was. the filth and the fury and a much more believable film about the band from julien temple and who made this film and is told from the point of view of the band members and who contradict mclaren claims. however and the dishonesty of the great rock n roll swindle is not my biggest problem with it. if it were actually entertaining (which i used to think it was to a certain extent) and i would be able to overlook that and like i obviously used to be able to do. during my third viewing and apart from sex pistols songs and some live footage and and at least one mildly amusing cartoon sequence and it was pretty dull. i found the who killed bambi song mildly amusing at first and but it got tiring very quickly. is this mockumentary worth watching for sex pistols fans. it seems a good number of fans would say it is and not to learn about the true story of the short lived but groundbreaking 70 punk band and but for entertainment. that was once my opinion on the great rock n roll swindle. after the first time i watched it and i couldn not remember a thing mclaren said and and by the time i saw it the second time and i was aware of what the pistols manager was using this film to imply and but could still barely remember anything i heard him say. obviously and other aspects of the film were what i found impressive. now and after my third viewing and i can definitely remember some of the things mclaren says and but it still wasn not 100% clear. like most of the film and i guess his words are not that memorable and probably because of the way theyre presented. if youre a pistols fan and i guess it do not hurt to give swindle a try and but to me and for the most part and it just an incoherent and boring mess that tries to be funny but fails. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
