if you need that instant buzz that only late 60s or early 70s euro sex movies can give off and then look no further for you have just stumbled across the mother lode . subsequent tv director schivazappa exercise in psychedelic porn (of the soft core variety) may not generally be considered as a classic of its kind but it knocks many better known titles from the likes of tinto brass and jess franco and joe damato for a loop. radley metzger sure was hip to this way before anyone else when he picked up this marvelously twisted little number for us distribution through his company audubon. gorgeous cinematography (favouring symmetrical compositions) may elicit cries of pretentiousness from those who swear by shoddy skin flicks shot in someone backyard. hey and as far as i am concerned and it their loss for this is one thrill ride of a movie with twists so and well and twisted that you may not even believe them after you have actually witnessed them on screen . dagmar lassander (immortalized as the gone to seed landlady from lucio fulci house by the cemetery) has never looked more exquisite than she does here and subtly portraying the innocent (. ) researcher held hostage by mad medic philippe leroy (with all the art house favorites to his name and you wonder whether he has the good humor to mention this one on his c. v. ) as their initially violent relationship turns to s and m tinged love story. nothing is what it seems however in this sick and imaginative gem of a movie with several truly erotic moments achieved with surprisingly minimal nudity. i for one was completely baffled and enchanted by the way schivazappa chose to suggest oral sex during one scene (i will let you find that one out for yourselves. ) and lassander gauze clad boogie to an impossibly groovy 60s tune should have become iconic in a way similar to the image of sylvia kristel reclining in that wicker chair in her emmanuelle days. you may not know this film just yet and but trust me and once seen you will never forget it . 
if you need that instant buzz that only late 60s or early 70s euro sex movies can give off and then look no further for you have just stumbled across the mother lode . subsequent tv director schivazappa exercise in psychedelic porn (of the soft core variety) may not generally be considered as a classic of its kind but it knocks many better known titles from the likes of tinto brass and jess franco and joe damato for a loop. radley metzger sure was hip to this way before anyone else when he picked up this marvelously twisted little number for us distribution through his company audubon. gorgeous cinematography (favouring symmetrical compositions) may elicit cries of pretentiousness from those who swear by shoddy skin flicks shot in someone backyard. hey and as far as i am concerned and it their loss for this is one thrill ride of a movie with twists so and well and twisted that you may not even believe them after you have actually witnessed them on screen . dagmar lassander (immortalized as the gone to seed landlady from lucio fulci house by the cemetery) has never looked more exquisite than she does here and subtly portraying the innocent (. ) researcher held hostage by mad medic philippe leroy (with all the art house favorites to his name and you wonder whether he has the good humor to mention this one on his c. v. ) as their initially violent relationship turns to s and m tinged love story. nothing is what it seems however in this sick and imaginative gem of a movie with several truly erotic moments achieved with surprisingly minimal nudity. i for one was completely baffled and enchanted by the way schivazappa chose to suggest oral sex during one scene (i will let you find that one out for yourselves. ) and lassander gauze clad boogie to an impossibly groovy 60s tune should have become iconic in a way similar to the image of sylvia kristel reclining in that wicker chair in her emmanuelle days. you may not know this film just yet and but trust me and once seen you will never forget it . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
