a made for television version of the heart of darkness seemed like a good way to add more insight to the book and well and that was the wrong assumption. the movie made it even worse. i was highly disappointed about almost everything in the movie. i hoped that the movie would possibly help put the pieces of the book together that i do not comprehend and but it did no such thing. it still left me confused and hanging. it is one of those movies that makes one feel like it would be more fun to watch the grass grow instead of watching the movie. not exactly anyone cup of tea. it was an overall dreadful and boring and and slow movie. to begin with and nicolas roeg must have been pretty desperate when he decided that he wanted to undertake the task of making the already boring book into a movie. it a guaranteed loss. it like going into a knife fight and but forgetting the knife on the kitchen counter. the knifeless person is going to lose while and in the case and the knifeless person was roeg. all i have heard about the movie are bad things and and the movie deserves those bad things to be said about it. from watching the movie and i got the impression that the people who made the movie and just skimmed over the book to get the key points. furthermore and although the movie did follow the main story line of the book and it left out quite a few details and and it also changed the ending. i am not a fan of that. roeg left out when marlow and his crew came across the russian sailor camp and and at that camp they found the book. also it do not show when at the camp they came across the sign that says and wood for you. hurry up. approach cautiously (conrad 110). also and at the end of the book kurtz dies on the boat and not at the inner station. on the contrary and nicolas roeg did one good thing while he was making his movie while he managed to hire some pretty decent actors to play in the movie. for instance and he acquired tim roth and john malkovich and both of whom would later go on to have successful careers. in doing so and he added a little something to the horrible movie. also and though i am ripping his book to shreds and i do have some respect for him and because it takes a lot of courage to try to take on the heart of darkness. it isn not exactly the easiest novel to portray into a film. twus a valiant effort and though. in conclusion and if for whatever reason someone actually wants to watch this movie and i suggest the reading of heart of darkness first. this way and you will get all of the scenes that were left out of the movie and you would not be completely lost when you watch it. but i really suggest you do not read the book and that you really do not watch the movie while both will be a complete waste of your time. trust me. i was forced to do both by my english teacher and and now i wish that the book and the movie do not exist. if either the book or the movie are pursued and good luck. 
a made for television version of the heart of darkness seemed like a good way to add more insight to the book and well and that was the wrong assumption. the movie made it even worse. i was highly disappointed about almost everything in the movie. i hoped that the movie would possibly help put the pieces of the book together that i do not comprehend and but it did no such thing. it still left me confused and hanging. it is one of those movies that makes one feel like it would be more fun to watch the grass grow instead of watching the movie. not exactly anyone cup of tea. it was an overall dreadful and boring and and slow movie. to begin with and nicolas roeg must have been pretty desperate when he decided that he wanted to undertake the task of making the already boring book into a movie. it a guaranteed loss. it like going into a knife fight and but forgetting the knife on the kitchen counter. the knifeless person is going to lose while and in the case and the knifeless person was roeg. all i have heard about the movie are bad things and and the movie deserves those bad things to be said about it. from watching the movie and i got the impression that the people who made the movie and just skimmed over the book to get the key points. furthermore and although the movie did follow the main story line of the book and it left out quite a few details and and it also changed the ending. i am not a fan of that. roeg left out when marlow and his crew came across the russian sailor camp and and at that camp they found the book. also it do not show when at the camp they came across the sign that says and wood for you. hurry up. approach cautiously (conrad 110). also and at the end of the book kurtz dies on the boat and not at the inner station. on the contrary and nicolas roeg did one good thing while he was making his movie while he managed to hire some pretty decent actors to play in the movie. for instance and he acquired tim roth and john malkovich and both of whom would later go on to have successful careers. in doing so and he added a little something to the horrible movie. also and though i am ripping his book to shreds and i do have some respect for him and because it takes a lot of courage to try to take on the heart of darkness. it isn not exactly the easiest novel to portray into a film. twus a valiant effort and though. in conclusion and if for whatever reason someone actually wants to watch this movie and i suggest the reading of heart of darkness first. this way and you will get all of the scenes that were left out of the movie and you would not be completely lost when you watch it. but i really suggest you do not read the book and that you really do not watch the movie while both will be a complete waste of your time. trust me. i was forced to do both by my english teacher and and now i wish that the book and the movie do not exist. if either the book or the movie are pursued and good luck. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
