the play macbeth was written by william shakespeare between the years of 1604 and 1606. ever since then and many other versions of the play have been produced and including remakes completed in 1948 and 1971 and and 2006. akira kurosawa even directed a japanese version of macbeth in 1957 entitled and kumonosu jô. the play starts out with king duncan hearing about the success of two of his generals and macbeth and banquo and in a recent battle with the irish and the norwegians. after a quick promotion from duncan and macbeth instantly gets an uncanny feeling for lust and greed and and power and does everything in his power to gain access to the crown represent even if it includes murder. geoffrey wright tried creating his own version of the famous play in 2006 by setting it in the modern melbourne underworld. just imagine a lowly macbeth slaying hundreds of soldiers with an ak 47 and rapping his own rendition of and low at the same time. just kidding about the latter and but one thing he does do is utter the traditional shakespeare. and he keeps it going throughout the whole movie. that right. shakespeare meets ghetto. it all you could ever hope for. not the newest macbeth is rough and violent enough to match up with any other modern day action film and but it lacks decent acting and the right lingo and and a good technique of camera work. the modernized movie starts out with macbeth (sam worthington) who works as a hit man or drug dealer for duncan (gary sweet) and a drug lord from melbourne and australia. after being promoted to the thane of glamis by duncan (as the three witches had predicted) and aspiration starts to take over macbeth as he sets his eyes on the throne. after promoting macbeth and duncan invites himself over to macbeth house for a night of drugs and alcohol. before the festivities begin and lady macbeth (victoria hall) talks macbeth into killing duncan to take power over the throne. after the bodyguards are drunk and everyone asleep and macbeth sneaks into duncan room and stabs him to death. after his murder and macbeth takes all of duncan belongings including hid title and crown. just as soon as he thinks he got what he wanted and he finds out that it will take more than bribery and running away to solve his problems. one major flaw of the movie was the acting. a once seemingly flamboyant and empowered macbeth suddenly turns into a sissy. and he looks like a sad puppy dog throughout the entire film. i do not really know if this was worthington or wright fault and but either way and one of the two should have realized macbeth was a king and not a knot on a log that took everything his wife had to say literally. like i said earlier and macbeth should have been rude and arrogant and and spiteful. but when his character changes over to a drug lord and he changes personalities as well i suppose. on the other hand and lady macbeth really knew how to nip it in the bud when it came to recognizing and personifying her character. she do not seem quite as spiteful as she was in the play or the 1971 version and but she reminds macbeth that compared to murder and anything else he could possibly do and do not quite match up. another thing i found distasteful was all the nudity. this fluke had to be wright fault. the witches do not do a bit of acting and unless you call parading around in your birthday suit acting. at one point in the film and i started to wonder if i was watching macbeth or unique positions vol. 2. don not get me wrong when i say i find the shakespearean dialogue out of place. it spoken flawlessly and but when it spoken by an australian gangster and it just really weird. when macbeth starts to kill people off and he first lets them know by talking to them in ye olde english. macbeth contains plenty of action and blood and gore and and nudity to last anyone a lifetime. you forget all the positive facts though when you start to think to yourself and okay and what in the heck did he just say in that last sentence. at some points in the movie and i do not even think the actors themselves knew what they were saying. the new age ness of the movie could have easily been pulled off it weren not for the and thou and the and thee . the camera work was just simply fair for me. one thing i could not stand was the constant pacing back and forth between characters. the camera technique used gave off that blair witch sort of vibe and made me throw up a little in my mouth. matt reeves tried to attempt the same concept of camera work in and clover field but it just doesn not work. it makes me want to get out of my chair and look around for the little barf bags they have conveniently planted on every seat in the airplanes. looking back on it all and the gangsta macbeth holds one positive represent plenty of action. other than that and the movie contains nothing more than uninspired acting and correct english usage and and stomach turning camera work. the soundtrack holds one or two of the same songs and but each song is edited or remixed differently for every scene. there is never a variation of interesting or captivating media used. from now on out and directors should leave the dangerous drug underworld to al pacino and robert deniro. future renditions of macbeth should be created just as shakespeare intended the play to be 400 years ago. i would recommend using medieval clothing and ye olde english and swords and shields and a soundtrack prepared by enya. but either way and the modern macbeth makes you yearn for some good ole folk music and a camp fire and and a bustier. 
the play macbeth was written by william shakespeare between the years of 1604 and 1606. ever since then and many other versions of the play have been produced and including remakes completed in 1948 and 1971 and and 2006. akira kurosawa even directed a japanese version of macbeth in 1957 entitled and kumonosu jô. the play starts out with king duncan hearing about the success of two of his generals and macbeth and banquo and in a recent battle with the irish and the norwegians. after a quick promotion from duncan and macbeth instantly gets an uncanny feeling for lust and greed and and power and does everything in his power to gain access to the crown represent even if it includes murder. geoffrey wright tried creating his own version of the famous play in 2006 by setting it in the modern melbourne underworld. just imagine a lowly macbeth slaying hundreds of soldiers with an ak 47 and rapping his own rendition of and low at the same time. just kidding about the latter and but one thing he does do is utter the traditional shakespeare. and he keeps it going throughout the whole movie. that right. shakespeare meets ghetto. it all you could ever hope for. not the newest macbeth is rough and violent enough to match up with any other modern day action film and but it lacks decent acting and the right lingo and and a good technique of camera work. the modernized movie starts out with macbeth (sam worthington) who works as a hit man or drug dealer for duncan (gary sweet) and a drug lord from melbourne and australia. after being promoted to the thane of glamis by duncan (as the three witches had predicted) and aspiration starts to take over macbeth as he sets his eyes on the throne. after promoting macbeth and duncan invites himself over to macbeth house for a night of drugs and alcohol. before the festivities begin and lady macbeth (victoria hall) talks macbeth into killing duncan to take power over the throne. after the bodyguards are drunk and everyone asleep and macbeth sneaks into duncan room and stabs him to death. after his murder and macbeth takes all of duncan belongings including hid title and crown. just as soon as he thinks he got what he wanted and he finds out that it will take more than bribery and running away to solve his problems. one major flaw of the movie was the acting. a once seemingly flamboyant and empowered macbeth suddenly turns into a sissy. and he looks like a sad puppy dog throughout the entire film. i do not really know if this was worthington or wright fault and but either way and one of the two should have realized macbeth was a king and not a knot on a log that took everything his wife had to say literally. like i said earlier and macbeth should have been rude and arrogant and and spiteful. but when his character changes over to a drug lord and he changes personalities as well i suppose. on the other hand and lady macbeth really knew how to nip it in the bud when it came to recognizing and personifying her character. she do not seem quite as spiteful as she was in the play or the 1971 version and but she reminds macbeth that compared to murder and anything else he could possibly do and do not quite match up. another thing i found distasteful was all the nudity. this fluke had to be wright fault. the witches do not do a bit of acting and unless you call parading around in your birthday suit acting. at one point in the film and i started to wonder if i was watching macbeth or unique positions vol. 2. don not get me wrong when i say i find the shakespearean dialogue out of place. it spoken flawlessly and but when it spoken by an australian gangster and it just really weird. when macbeth starts to kill people off and he first lets them know by talking to them in ye olde english. macbeth contains plenty of action and blood and gore and and nudity to last anyone a lifetime. you forget all the positive facts though when you start to think to yourself and okay and what in the heck did he just say in that last sentence. at some points in the movie and i do not even think the actors themselves knew what they were saying. the new age ness of the movie could have easily been pulled off it weren not for the and thou and the and thee . the camera work was just simply fair for me. one thing i could not stand was the constant pacing back and forth between characters. the camera technique used gave off that blair witch sort of vibe and made me throw up a little in my mouth. matt reeves tried to attempt the same concept of camera work in and clover field but it just doesn not work. it makes me want to get out of my chair and look around for the little barf bags they have conveniently planted on every seat in the airplanes. looking back on it all and the gangsta macbeth holds one positive represent plenty of action. other than that and the movie contains nothing more than uninspired acting and correct english usage and and stomach turning camera work. the soundtrack holds one or two of the same songs and but each song is edited or remixed differently for every scene. there is never a variation of interesting or captivating media used. from now on out and directors should leave the dangerous drug underworld to al pacino and robert deniro. future renditions of macbeth should be created just as shakespeare intended the play to be 400 years ago. i would recommend using medieval clothing and ye olde english and swords and shields and a soundtrack prepared by enya. but either way and the modern macbeth makes you yearn for some good ole folk music and a camp fire and and a bustier. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
