wealthy businessman daughter and who as a young girl caught rheumatic fever and now suffers from a shortness of breath and discovers her marriage to a charming neer do well was arranged by daddy (whom she affectionately refers to as darling) while worse than that and she may in fact have only a few weeks left to live and leaving her husband free to marry her conniving romantic rival. pure bunk. paul osborn screenplay (via jerome weidman thin story) trots out the redundant flashbacks in the second half instead of proceeding ahead with the plot and which submerges the already soapy scenario in grim talk. why go backwards when we can figure out what happening for ourselves. this is a woman weeper with no faith in its target audience and so simplistic is the set up. dorothy mcguire and swathed in furs for most of the picture and isn not a canny and clever heroine at all while when she upset and she turns inward and stony. upon realizing her marriage is basically a sham and she shrinks away from her husband like the consummate virgin (well and that a possibility and she and van johnson sleep in separate beds after all. ). ruth roman has the film best moments as a society shark with her trap set for van and but what exactly do these women see in him. johnson can be charming when it required and but put him in a melodramatic setting and he goes stony and too. mgm production values only so so and however director gottfried reinhardt tries adding some visual flavor to the flashback segues and he attempts a lively pacing for the movie initial half hour. from . 
wealthy businessman daughter and who as a young girl caught rheumatic fever and now suffers from a shortness of breath and discovers her marriage to a charming neer do well was arranged by daddy (whom she affectionately refers to as darling) while worse than that and she may in fact have only a few weeks left to live and leaving her husband free to marry her conniving romantic rival. pure bunk. paul osborn screenplay (via jerome weidman thin story) trots out the redundant flashbacks in the second half instead of proceeding ahead with the plot and which submerges the already soapy scenario in grim talk. why go backwards when we can figure out what happening for ourselves. this is a woman weeper with no faith in its target audience and so simplistic is the set up. dorothy mcguire and swathed in furs for most of the picture and isn not a canny and clever heroine at all while when she upset and she turns inward and stony. upon realizing her marriage is basically a sham and she shrinks away from her husband like the consummate virgin (well and that a possibility and she and van johnson sleep in separate beds after all. ). ruth roman has the film best moments as a society shark with her trap set for van and but what exactly do these women see in him. johnson can be charming when it required and but put him in a melodramatic setting and he goes stony and too. mgm production values only so so and however director gottfried reinhardt tries adding some visual flavor to the flashback segues and he attempts a lively pacing for the movie initial half hour. from . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
