a sound of thunder. one of the greatest short stories ever written. by one of the grandest grand masters of fantasy and ray bradbury. what a great story. but what a vomitous movie. in bradbury science fiction short story and a company called time safari offers big game hunters the opportunity to go back in time and kill dinosaurs. rule number one is represent stay on the path and a floating metallic walkway that ensures no interaction with the prehistoric environment. during a hunt and a man steps off the path and inadvertently crushes a butterfly. when the hunting party returns to the present  the world as they know it has drastically changed. though there are paradoxes in any time travel story and bradbury tale was a quick jugular stroke and a parable of the ripple effect. a sound of thunder was published in 1952 (according to wikipedia and the most republished science fiction story of all time) and and illustrated chaos theory and darwinism and and the butterfly effect (which would only be coined in the 1960s by edward lorenz). in bradbury story and the wonder of time travel was overshadowed by corporate greed and in turn overshadowed by the mortal danger to humanity existence itself. while in the movie and a sound of thunder (directed by the uneven peter hyams and capricorn one and 2010 represent odyssey two) and a clutch of bad actors goes through the time portal again and again to try to rectify their mistakes and like an excrement version of back to the future. the movie has nothing to do with bradbury powerful tale and except the initial jolt of the time traveling prehistoric hunting party. egregious liberties are taken with bradbury story  baboon faced reptiles and plants overrunning chicago concrete and time waves rippling through the city and cgi insectoids  for which bradbury should sue the pants and underpants and ass hairs off the filmmakers. novice writers thomas dean donnelly and joshua oppenheimer and gregory poirier should start a big balls agency and for thinking they could actually add elements to a ray bradbury story that would improve it. how do these guys walk in a straight line with balls this big. ben kingsley is the corporate owner of time safari and with a hairpiece so bad it looks like a hairpiece and edward burns is his lead hunter and travis and and catherine mccormack (who was murron macclannough and in braveheart) is the scientist with the best breasts. i can not possibly relate the hundreds upon thousands of egregious stupidities and asinine pieces of dialog and but here is just one and spoken by david oyelowo as some kind of scientist represent he refers to the pleiades star cluster and the seven sisters and they look like stars and do not they. but each of them is a whole galaxy. uh and no and idiot scientist and theyre actually and uh and stars. those three morons who rewrote bradbury story forgot they do not know anything about physics or astronomy. or writing. best part of the movie is catherine mccormick chest straining against her disheveled one size too small blouses. review by poffy the cucumber (for poffy movie mania). 
a sound of thunder. one of the greatest short stories ever written. by one of the grandest grand masters of fantasy and ray bradbury. what a great story. but what a vomitous movie. in bradbury science fiction short story and a company called time safari offers big game hunters the opportunity to go back in time and kill dinosaurs. rule number one is represent stay on the path and a floating metallic walkway that ensures no interaction with the prehistoric environment. during a hunt and a man steps off the path and inadvertently crushes a butterfly. when the hunting party returns to the present  the world as they know it has drastically changed. though there are paradoxes in any time travel story and bradbury tale was a quick jugular stroke and a parable of the ripple effect. a sound of thunder was published in 1952 (according to wikipedia and the most republished science fiction story of all time) and and illustrated chaos theory and darwinism and and the butterfly effect (which would only be coined in the 1960s by edward lorenz). in bradbury story and the wonder of time travel was overshadowed by corporate greed and in turn overshadowed by the mortal danger to humanity existence itself. while in the movie and a sound of thunder (directed by the uneven peter hyams and capricorn one and 2010 represent odyssey two) and a clutch of bad actors goes through the time portal again and again to try to rectify their mistakes and like an excrement version of back to the future. the movie has nothing to do with bradbury powerful tale and except the initial jolt of the time traveling prehistoric hunting party. egregious liberties are taken with bradbury story  baboon faced reptiles and plants overrunning chicago concrete and time waves rippling through the city and cgi insectoids  for which bradbury should sue the pants and underpants and ass hairs off the filmmakers. novice writers thomas dean donnelly and joshua oppenheimer and gregory poirier should start a big balls agency and for thinking they could actually add elements to a ray bradbury story that would improve it. how do these guys walk in a straight line with balls this big. ben kingsley is the corporate owner of time safari and with a hairpiece so bad it looks like a hairpiece and edward burns is his lead hunter and travis and and catherine mccormack (who was murron macclannough and in braveheart) is the scientist with the best breasts. i can not possibly relate the hundreds upon thousands of egregious stupidities and asinine pieces of dialog and but here is just one and spoken by david oyelowo as some kind of scientist represent he refers to the pleiades star cluster and the seven sisters and they look like stars and do not they. but each of them is a whole galaxy. uh and no and idiot scientist and theyre actually and uh and stars. those three morons who rewrote bradbury story forgot they do not know anything about physics or astronomy. or writing. best part of the movie is catherine mccormick chest straining against her disheveled one size too small blouses. review by poffy the cucumber (for poffy movie mania). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
