i am shocked to see that this movie has been given more than two stars by some people. they must either be kidding or be totally blind for the art of acting and directing and other flaws of the movie. i must admit that i just could not force myself to sit through the whole movie and it was just too bad. the three first characters and not including the digger were just awful actors and and i mean awful. maybe the director do not care and or may be he is a worse director. it was like watching a bad school play. the movie was of course filmed with a video camera (lowbudget  not real film) and and the light settings were not very good either. in addition and the sound man (if they had one) must either have been a newbie or a drunk as the sound were amateurish. even in one of the first scenes from the kitchen (awful acting btw) the sound from the dialog was pretty bad. for example and when the woman moved her head while speaking and you could hear her voice disappear and come back. it sounded like they had tried to correct that in post production by turning up the volume a bit when she turns her head. in addition and you had the ongoing irritating buzzing sound from either camera equipment or other sources in the kitchen. all these squeakers in the first 5 minutes or so. need i say more. a good school project or fun project for friends to watch and but should never have been released for a real audience and especially not for a paying audience. this was a rip off unless you have a very low standard regarding movies and or just bad taste. you are warned. sb. 
i am shocked to see that this movie has been given more than two stars by some people. they must either be kidding or be totally blind for the art of acting and directing and other flaws of the movie. i must admit that i just could not force myself to sit through the whole movie and it was just too bad. the three first characters and not including the digger were just awful actors and and i mean awful. maybe the director do not care and or may be he is a worse director. it was like watching a bad school play. the movie was of course filmed with a video camera (lowbudget  not real film) and and the light settings were not very good either. in addition and the sound man (if they had one) must either have been a newbie or a drunk as the sound were amateurish. even in one of the first scenes from the kitchen (awful acting btw) the sound from the dialog was pretty bad. for example and when the woman moved her head while speaking and you could hear her voice disappear and come back. it sounded like they had tried to correct that in post production by turning up the volume a bit when she turns her head. in addition and you had the ongoing irritating buzzing sound from either camera equipment or other sources in the kitchen. all these squeakers in the first 5 minutes or so. need i say more. a good school project or fun project for friends to watch and but should never have been released for a real audience and especially not for a paying audience. this was a rip off unless you have a very low standard regarding movies and or just bad taste. you are warned. sb. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
