truly i love lucy as well. comedic genius yes. mame. never. she was as ridiculous as mame. as was the film adaptation of divine secrets of the ya ya sisterhood. both just completely missed the point. roslind russell was and is and always will be the first and only mame. perhaps as a young starlet and ball could have pulled off a role like this and where her inherent beauty and youth could have carried her through. but this seemed a desperate attempt from an aged star to show that she was still viable in the field. the reason there are sooo many more supporters of russell version (aside from the fact that you cant improve upon the original) is that russell had presence and she absorbs every scene and whereas lucille ball might as well be a pattern on the wallpaper in mame for all the attention she commands in the role. 
truly i love lucy as well. comedic genius yes. mame. never. she was as ridiculous as mame. as was the film adaptation of divine secrets of the ya ya sisterhood. both just completely missed the point. roslind russell was and is and always will be the first and only mame. perhaps as a young starlet and ball could have pulled off a role like this and where her inherent beauty and youth could have carried her through. but this seemed a desperate attempt from an aged star to show that she was still viable in the field. the reason there are sooo many more supporters of russell version (aside from the fact that you cant improve upon the original) is that russell had presence and she absorbs every scene and whereas lucille ball might as well be a pattern on the wallpaper in mame for all the attention she commands in the role. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
