mixed group of experts (explorers and divers and scientists) venture a mile underground and go another 2. 4 miles underwater to a spot even more remote and where they find salamanders and giant albino moles (. ) and some big and razor fanged and winged and computer generated creatures lurking about. the cave is sealed off by a rockslide and then the monsters attack and start killing everyone off as they search for an exit. and that all she wrote with this low aiming effort that even fails to combine action and science fiction and horror on the most elementary of levels. imagine if someone gave the folks at the sci fi channel 30 million dollars to make a monster movie. that precisely what the cave is like while almost startling in its ineptitude at times and full of clichés and almost entirely dependent on the special effects to entertain. the only difference is they had more money to build sets and more money to polish up the monsters and more money to hire supposedly professional actors who give awful performances anyway. otherwise and it business as usual. some of these movies are still fun to watch. this one is not and there are loads of reasons why represent 1. ) it takes itself far too seriously and has no sense of humor whatsoever. so you get a completely unoriginal and predictable movie that doesn not even recognize how unoriginal and predictable it is. 2. ) the opening sequence serves no purpose whatsoever other than killing a few minutes and adding to the redundancy. 3. ) unoriginal looking cgi creatures are not impressing anyone in this day and age. 4. ) utilizing shakycam and quick cut editing for your horror scenes is simply lazy and unimaginative film making. and why further obscure the action by making things too dark and adding annoying distractions and such as fire and explosion of bubbles. it makes these scenes not only difficult to see and but also impossible to enjoy even on a no brainer action level. 5. ) even though it wants you take to it seriously and the script is full of clichés and the dialogue is awful and there no attempt whatsoever at characterization. casting 25 year old looking model types in roles as brilliant scientists and gruff veteran explorers might provide some eye candy but it completely kills the credibility of a movie that otherwise plays out completely straight. sorry and you can not have it both ways. 6. ) there were two exceptions to the model rule and as they did decide to cast an old guy and an average looking joe. these were the first two characters killed off. 7. ) for a little diversity and they also squeezed in a black guy and a chinese guy. strangely and neither are given much of a voice in this film and basically stand in the background as whitey discusses what their next move will be. insulting. 8. ) furthermore and how many movies have to be made where a black character sacrifices his life at the very end just to ensure hot white female lead and hot white male lead end up together at the end. ugh. give me a break already. 9. ) much of the acting was horrible. cole hauser performance was completely laughable. the other male lead looked like he just walked off the set of a soap opera and coasted by using the patented dimpled smile makes all the ladies swoon technique and which is the pg 13 gender switch equivalent to my large breasts make all the guys swoon technique often used by ladies in r rated films. either way and his performance was completely phoned in. daniel dae kim (from the tv series lost) and piper perabo also stunk up the room with their stilted and monotone line delivery. 10. ) was the ending a joke. absolutely terrible. please god and we do not need a sequel to this garbage. so basically i do not bother with this one and unless you have never seen a monster movie before or if youre just really desperate and the only other thing on is the simple life. the sets were good and the blue tinted photography is ok and a few of the actors (lena headey and marcel iures. ) tried their best and so i decided to boost the rating up one notch to a 2. 
mixed group of experts (explorers and divers and scientists) venture a mile underground and go another 2. 4 miles underwater to a spot even more remote and where they find salamanders and giant albino moles (. ) and some big and razor fanged and winged and computer generated creatures lurking about. the cave is sealed off by a rockslide and then the monsters attack and start killing everyone off as they search for an exit. and that all she wrote with this low aiming effort that even fails to combine action and science fiction and horror on the most elementary of levels. imagine if someone gave the folks at the sci fi channel 30 million dollars to make a monster movie. that precisely what the cave is like while almost startling in its ineptitude at times and full of clichés and almost entirely dependent on the special effects to entertain. the only difference is they had more money to build sets and more money to polish up the monsters and more money to hire supposedly professional actors who give awful performances anyway. otherwise and it business as usual. some of these movies are still fun to watch. this one is not and there are loads of reasons why represent 1. ) it takes itself far too seriously and has no sense of humor whatsoever. so you get a completely unoriginal and predictable movie that doesn not even recognize how unoriginal and predictable it is. 2. ) the opening sequence serves no purpose whatsoever other than killing a few minutes and adding to the redundancy. 3. ) unoriginal looking cgi creatures are not impressing anyone in this day and age. 4. ) utilizing shakycam and quick cut editing for your horror scenes is simply lazy and unimaginative film making. and why further obscure the action by making things too dark and adding annoying distractions and such as fire and explosion of bubbles. it makes these scenes not only difficult to see and but also impossible to enjoy even on a no brainer action level. 5. ) even though it wants you take to it seriously and the script is full of clichés and the dialogue is awful and there no attempt whatsoever at characterization. casting 25 year old looking model types in roles as brilliant scientists and gruff veteran explorers might provide some eye candy but it completely kills the credibility of a movie that otherwise plays out completely straight. sorry and you can not have it both ways. 6. ) there were two exceptions to the model rule and as they did decide to cast an old guy and an average looking joe. these were the first two characters killed off. 7. ) for a little diversity and they also squeezed in a black guy and a chinese guy. strangely and neither are given much of a voice in this film and basically stand in the background as whitey discusses what their next move will be. insulting. 8. ) furthermore and how many movies have to be made where a black character sacrifices his life at the very end just to ensure hot white female lead and hot white male lead end up together at the end. ugh. give me a break already. 9. ) much of the acting was horrible. cole hauser performance was completely laughable. the other male lead looked like he just walked off the set of a soap opera and coasted by using the patented dimpled smile makes all the ladies swoon technique and which is the pg 13 gender switch equivalent to my large breasts make all the guys swoon technique often used by ladies in r rated films. either way and his performance was completely phoned in. daniel dae kim (from the tv series lost) and piper perabo also stunk up the room with their stilted and monotone line delivery. 10. ) was the ending a joke. absolutely terrible. please god and we do not need a sequel to this garbage. so basically i do not bother with this one and unless you have never seen a monster movie before or if youre just really desperate and the only other thing on is the simple life. the sets were good and the blue tinted photography is ok and a few of the actors (lena headey and marcel iures. ) tried their best and so i decided to boost the rating up one notch to a 2. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
