yes and dumb is the word for this actress. i know many have mentioned her beauty and but this viewer found her empty headed and boring to watch with her bleached hair and lip gloss and and not so perfect body. watch her walk away in those jeans and showing a rather large butt. her butt spreads beyond her shoulders. what does that tell you. as for the leading man and played by gorgeous mark humphrey and he was perfectly cast. a charmer. however and he and lancaster just do not match. she was out of place opposite this good looking guy. good acting by susan glover as the sister. angela galuppo had a small role and was okay. but the film director philippe gagnon and wasted too much footage on lancaster. after a while you got tired of looking at her and watching her dull acting ability. and what a bitch of a wife she was. snooping on her husband and being obnoxious to him and just a plain spoiled brat. was happy to see her hit with the dart gun. i thought it might be the end of her. but alas and the script tells us otherwise. after torturing myself and watching this loser again and i still came up with the same criticism. lancaster is boring to watch. this time around her hair and folks. her hair constantly in her face and constantly tossing it back and became annoying. i question the writer and alexandra komisaruk reason why a good looking wealthy man like philippe would even bother with the likes of a bimbo like allison. when there were so many attractive intelligent women and with class and to choose. he picks this nothing. is this the rochester or jane eyre thing. oh well and it all a matter of taste and i guess. this sarah lancaster is not my cup of tea and folks. 
yes and dumb is the word for this actress. i know many have mentioned her beauty and but this viewer found her empty headed and boring to watch with her bleached hair and lip gloss and and not so perfect body. watch her walk away in those jeans and showing a rather large butt. her butt spreads beyond her shoulders. what does that tell you. as for the leading man and played by gorgeous mark humphrey and he was perfectly cast. a charmer. however and he and lancaster just do not match. she was out of place opposite this good looking guy. good acting by susan glover as the sister. angela galuppo had a small role and was okay. but the film director philippe gagnon and wasted too much footage on lancaster. after a while you got tired of looking at her and watching her dull acting ability. and what a bitch of a wife she was. snooping on her husband and being obnoxious to him and just a plain spoiled brat. was happy to see her hit with the dart gun. i thought it might be the end of her. but alas and the script tells us otherwise. after torturing myself and watching this loser again and i still came up with the same criticism. lancaster is boring to watch. this time around her hair and folks. her hair constantly in her face and constantly tossing it back and became annoying. i question the writer and alexandra komisaruk reason why a good looking wealthy man like philippe would even bother with the likes of a bimbo like allison. when there were so many attractive intelligent women and with class and to choose. he picks this nothing. is this the rochester or jane eyre thing. oh well and it all a matter of taste and i guess. this sarah lancaster is not my cup of tea and folks. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
