once again woody allen seems to be completely devoid of any inspiration other than recycling himself. here we have a mock documentary (like zelig) and the structure of the film is a series of anecdotes (radio days and broadway danny rose) set in the 30 (zelig and purple rose and bullets over broadway) about a low life (deconstructing harry) who believes being a genius absolves him from being a jerk (ditto). given this film and deconstructing harry and one wonders if this is allen justification for his own actions with mia farrow adopted daughter while yes and i was a jerk and but i am a genius so you gotta love me. allen has only produced two good movies in the past ten years while the fine but overpraised bullets over broadway and and the excellent but largely ignored manhattan murder mystery. his other efforts range from trifles (new york stories and mighty aphrodite) and to edgy yet experimental (husbands and wives) and to pure drek (alice and scenes from a mall and shadows and fog and celebrity and deconstructing harry). his films no longer even try to have a narrative arc and and his humor seems to aim at wryly amusing and not funny. after deconstructing harry i stopped seeing his films in theaters while after sweet and lowdown i may stop renting them as well. 
once again woody allen seems to be completely devoid of any inspiration other than recycling himself. here we have a mock documentary (like zelig) and the structure of the film is a series of anecdotes (radio days and broadway danny rose) set in the 30 (zelig and purple rose and bullets over broadway) about a low life (deconstructing harry) who believes being a genius absolves him from being a jerk (ditto). given this film and deconstructing harry and one wonders if this is allen justification for his own actions with mia farrow adopted daughter while yes and i was a jerk and but i am a genius so you gotta love me. allen has only produced two good movies in the past ten years while the fine but overpraised bullets over broadway and and the excellent but largely ignored manhattan murder mystery. his other efforts range from trifles (new york stories and mighty aphrodite) and to edgy yet experimental (husbands and wives) and to pure drek (alice and scenes from a mall and shadows and fog and celebrity and deconstructing harry). his films no longer even try to have a narrative arc and and his humor seems to aim at wryly amusing and not funny. after deconstructing harry i stopped seeing his films in theaters while after sweet and lowdown i may stop renting them as well. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
