this is a very strange product from hollywood. apparently it do not test well because actors who have footage in the credits have been edited completely out of the movie and which means a hasty cut job was done on it. it feels like it was wrestled out of the usually competent demme hands and and just thrown away. on the other and it is so totally lacking in substance that maybe nothing could save it. it has no real center and either narratively or time wise. although it says the running time is 92 minutes and i seem to recall it ending abruptly and around the 80 minute mark. it over before it even gets going. it pretty much laugh free. the merits of the matthew modine picture were as elusive then as the luke wilson picture is now. 
this is a very strange product from hollywood. apparently it do not test well because actors who have footage in the credits have been edited completely out of the movie and which means a hasty cut job was done on it. it feels like it was wrestled out of the usually competent demme hands and and just thrown away. on the other and it is so totally lacking in substance that maybe nothing could save it. it has no real center and either narratively or time wise. although it says the running time is 92 minutes and i seem to recall it ending abruptly and around the 80 minute mark. it over before it even gets going. it pretty much laugh free. the merits of the matthew modine picture were as elusive then as the luke wilson picture is now. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
