this is a failure so complete as to make me angry. all of the subtlety and structure of reggio early films is gone and leaving nothing but a hash of digitally smeared images whose sole purpose seems to be whining about bad things humans do. just how do star trek like wormhole graphics and slo mo colorized seascapes and mutiplicities of obviously fake computer icons and and shots of athletic competition that and incidentally and show that no one has ever been able to top (or even match) leni riefenstahl for filming bodies in motion and edited together with an overlay of video colorization that a 1980s dr. who producer would have rejected as too cheesy and add up to a polemic against civilized violence. there is no intellectual and emotional and or visceral connection between these images as assembled and mutated by reggio and way too many digital effects artistes and and the cautionary tale i assume he wanted to produce. with all of the dramaturgical consultants involved and no one seems to have pulled his head out the his own feeling of saying something important and considered that they might all be failing to say something new. only people who watch too much television could make such a film and believe that it meaningful while this is kindergarten stan brakhage and and ultimately gutless in its relentless obviousness. the only irony and tension evident here (unlike in koyaanisqatsi where the relentless beauty and strangeness of time altered ordinary images forced you to consider their meaning) was when the dvd i was watching jammed and skipped. this is mtv for the noam chomsky crowd and based on reflex rather than reflection and signifying nothing. two stars for the music and which is in glass best pomo cesar franck style and features some passionate cello from yo yo ma. (i hope for his sake that he do not have to record his parts to a playback of the film while there are some things you shouldn not have to do even for a paycheck. ). 
this is a failure so complete as to make me angry. all of the subtlety and structure of reggio early films is gone and leaving nothing but a hash of digitally smeared images whose sole purpose seems to be whining about bad things humans do. just how do star trek like wormhole graphics and slo mo colorized seascapes and mutiplicities of obviously fake computer icons and and shots of athletic competition that and incidentally and show that no one has ever been able to top (or even match) leni riefenstahl for filming bodies in motion and edited together with an overlay of video colorization that a 1980s dr. who producer would have rejected as too cheesy and add up to a polemic against civilized violence. there is no intellectual and emotional and or visceral connection between these images as assembled and mutated by reggio and way too many digital effects artistes and and the cautionary tale i assume he wanted to produce. with all of the dramaturgical consultants involved and no one seems to have pulled his head out the his own feeling of saying something important and considered that they might all be failing to say something new. only people who watch too much television could make such a film and believe that it meaningful while this is kindergarten stan brakhage and and ultimately gutless in its relentless obviousness. the only irony and tension evident here (unlike in koyaanisqatsi where the relentless beauty and strangeness of time altered ordinary images forced you to consider their meaning) was when the dvd i was watching jammed and skipped. this is mtv for the noam chomsky crowd and based on reflex rather than reflection and signifying nothing. two stars for the music and which is in glass best pomo cesar franck style and features some passionate cello from yo yo ma. (i hope for his sake that he do not have to record his parts to a playback of the film while there are some things you shouldn not have to do even for a paycheck. ). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
