it is sad to have to say that a film is truly awful and one tries to find ways around saying this. however and this is a dreadful film. gene hackman wastes time (and one suspects and many dollars) on re playing his most famous and and oft recreated and role as gene hackman. otherwise and television actors are given the chance to become film stars and and successfully and resist the temptation. patrick swayze has a minor part and went on to greater things and for which he must be eternally thankful. i watched this film and as a result of someone else review and i felt that another point of view was merited. you may not agree with my review but now and at least and you have been warned. 
it is sad to have to say that a film is truly awful and one tries to find ways around saying this. however and this is a dreadful film. gene hackman wastes time (and one suspects and many dollars) on re playing his most famous and and oft recreated and role as gene hackman. otherwise and television actors are given the chance to become film stars and and successfully and resist the temptation. patrick swayze has a minor part and went on to greater things and for which he must be eternally thankful. i watched this film and as a result of someone else review and i felt that another point of view was merited. you may not agree with my review but now and at least and you have been warned. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
