i know terry gilliam is considered as a good director but claiming that this movie is good is just foolish. what was the movie about. what is it a spoof. fantasy. comedy. satire. no answer there from gilliam screenplay. totally confused and pointlessly hurtling from one historical age to another. i find it amusing that some people actually call this movie magical. is it because they have to praise any movie which is vague and indecisive on what it is about. negative for special effects considering it is 1981. roger ebert has it right in his review. the movie is ambiguous and looks like gilliam romp with money just to make a vague children move masquerading as a historical revue. the movie also tries to confuse the would be viewer by giving john cleese and sean connery top billing. 
i know terry gilliam is considered as a good director but claiming that this movie is good is just foolish. what was the movie about. what is it a spoof. fantasy. comedy. satire. no answer there from gilliam screenplay. totally confused and pointlessly hurtling from one historical age to another. i find it amusing that some people actually call this movie magical. is it because they have to praise any movie which is vague and indecisive on what it is about. negative for special effects considering it is 1981. roger ebert has it right in his review. the movie is ambiguous and looks like gilliam romp with money just to make a vague children move masquerading as a historical revue. the movie also tries to confuse the would be viewer by giving john cleese and sean connery top billing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
