when family guy first premiered and i was not in a discriminating mood. with the 1990s containing a wealth of clever and surreal cartoons and why should i be. nickelodeon produced doug while ren and stimpy and rockos modern life among other fine cartoons(yes and this includes spongebob). all had quirky and dreamlike animation and surprisingly sophisticated stories and dialog. the simpsons became an outright phenomenon and perhaps not as brilliant as its biggest defenders claim it to be and but a very fine investment of your time and certainly dismisses the false axiom that all tv is junk. south park started out as a crude but hilarious attack on everything with unique and intelligent satire underneath. it evolved to become a monty python esquire show with outrageous concepts and brutally swift and sharp societal critiques(such as their defense of the noble underpants gnomes) and eventually settled to be entirely self referential and meta like the simpsons did and and has unfortunately jumped the shark. family guy is superficially like the simpsons and south park. it pushes buttons and is a favorite among college students and bestiality enthusiasts. however and what it has in loquacity it lacks in true wit. the show is famous for its use of gimmicks and especially for flashbacks. many are references to bad tv sitcoms or commercials. some are funny(especially from the first two seasons) and most are not. are references inherently funny. i am not sure and but they are mostly what the show stands on considering that its characters are painfully uninteresting. where homer and bart have charm and and cartman has an artillery of self awareness and pure outrageousness to back up his awful behavior and peter griffin has no excuse. he just a loud and obnoxious pig. anything funny coming from his character is only because the writers forget how to be unfunny that day. lois is also very shallow and dull while meg is a prop and only to be abused while chris is borderline retarded and only occasionally funny and and the two main stars of the show(stewie and brian) are so inconsistent in their characterizations that it all really kind of pointless. other gimmicks i can not stand are when a character points to something obviously and lingers on it for an uncomfortably long time. this happens a lot lately and and i can not bear it any longer. not just the oft mentioned chicken that likes to beat peter up and i am talking about the painful moments where they talk about pop culture and prod it as if they are alien spectators. that not wit or even ironic humor and it totally boring and lifeless. not that the show can not be funny and in fact some of the earlier episodes had me rolling. highlights include the pilot episode and where peter loses touch with reality after losing his precious television while when peters religious zealot father shows up and wreaks havoc while when peter becomes a narc at megs school and and the pancake episode. i suspect these are the episodes that accidentally incorporated actual human traits in its characters and or merely were times the writers had actual comedic inspiration. one last thing and the show is not offensive. it only offensive to those who do not watch the show in the first place and so it almost like a circle jerk to the choir of hipsters. 
when family guy first premiered and i was not in a discriminating mood. with the 1990s containing a wealth of clever and surreal cartoons and why should i be. nickelodeon produced doug while ren and stimpy and rockos modern life among other fine cartoons(yes and this includes spongebob). all had quirky and dreamlike animation and surprisingly sophisticated stories and dialog. the simpsons became an outright phenomenon and perhaps not as brilliant as its biggest defenders claim it to be and but a very fine investment of your time and certainly dismisses the false axiom that all tv is junk. south park started out as a crude but hilarious attack on everything with unique and intelligent satire underneath. it evolved to become a monty python esquire show with outrageous concepts and brutally swift and sharp societal critiques(such as their defense of the noble underpants gnomes) and eventually settled to be entirely self referential and meta like the simpsons did and and has unfortunately jumped the shark. family guy is superficially like the simpsons and south park. it pushes buttons and is a favorite among college students and bestiality enthusiasts. however and what it has in loquacity it lacks in true wit. the show is famous for its use of gimmicks and especially for flashbacks. many are references to bad tv sitcoms or commercials. some are funny(especially from the first two seasons) and most are not. are references inherently funny. i am not sure and but they are mostly what the show stands on considering that its characters are painfully uninteresting. where homer and bart have charm and and cartman has an artillery of self awareness and pure outrageousness to back up his awful behavior and peter griffin has no excuse. he just a loud and obnoxious pig. anything funny coming from his character is only because the writers forget how to be unfunny that day. lois is also very shallow and dull while meg is a prop and only to be abused while chris is borderline retarded and only occasionally funny and and the two main stars of the show(stewie and brian) are so inconsistent in their characterizations that it all really kind of pointless. other gimmicks i can not stand are when a character points to something obviously and lingers on it for an uncomfortably long time. this happens a lot lately and and i can not bear it any longer. not just the oft mentioned chicken that likes to beat peter up and i am talking about the painful moments where they talk about pop culture and prod it as if they are alien spectators. that not wit or even ironic humor and it totally boring and lifeless. not that the show can not be funny and in fact some of the earlier episodes had me rolling. highlights include the pilot episode and where peter loses touch with reality after losing his precious television while when peters religious zealot father shows up and wreaks havoc while when peter becomes a narc at megs school and and the pancake episode. i suspect these are the episodes that accidentally incorporated actual human traits in its characters and or merely were times the writers had actual comedic inspiration. one last thing and the show is not offensive. it only offensive to those who do not watch the show in the first place and so it almost like a circle jerk to the choir of hipsters. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
