as a total movie geek with the fortunate job of video store manager and i tend to watch all sorts of movies and from good to very very bad. this was a movie with so many corn ball lines and cheesy cgi effects and predictable plot points that i ended up laughing extensively before switching it off after 30 40 minutes. the creature feature genre of movies has been putting out some pretty awful stuff in recent years (godzilla 2000 anyone. ) and but this movie makes me think the creators weren not even trying. it might be worth checking out just for the make fun of me potential (count the gunshots. ) and but i couldn not in good conscience recommend this movie to anyone. 
as a total movie geek with the fortunate job of video store manager and i tend to watch all sorts of movies and from good to very very bad. this was a movie with so many corn ball lines and cheesy cgi effects and predictable plot points that i ended up laughing extensively before switching it off after 30 40 minutes. the creature feature genre of movies has been putting out some pretty awful stuff in recent years (godzilla 2000 anyone. ) and but this movie makes me think the creators weren not even trying. it might be worth checking out just for the make fun of me potential (count the gunshots. ) and but i couldn not in good conscience recommend this movie to anyone. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
