the film had it moments and but was disappointing in my eyes anyway. it was a reworking of trespass (walter hill) and so the treasure of the sierra madre and with less tension and bite and human emotion. there was some nice acting but the story was limp and lacked any real depth. i watched the movie for mr reno and mr fishburn and neither were inspired and both had little to say or act out of their skin for. this movie has been done to death in the past and did not have to be made and eats up money which could be used on better movies. for an action movie it was sparse of action and as a thriller did not thrill. better than watching snow fall and but not for me. 
the film had it moments and but was disappointing in my eyes anyway. it was a reworking of trespass (walter hill) and so the treasure of the sierra madre and with less tension and bite and human emotion. there was some nice acting but the story was limp and lacked any real depth. i watched the movie for mr reno and mr fishburn and neither were inspired and both had little to say or act out of their skin for. this movie has been done to death in the past and did not have to be made and eats up money which could be used on better movies. for an action movie it was sparse of action and as a thriller did not thrill. better than watching snow fall and but not for me. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
