i have always found the dilettante man ray and his artistic efforts to be deeply pretentious and and i have never understood why his work attracts so much attention. apart from his rayographs (which he invented by accident and and which are merely direct contact photo prints) and his one real contribution to culture seems to be that he was the first photographer to depict female nudity in a manner that was accepted as art rather than as porn. but surely this had to happen eventually and and there no real reason why ray deserves the credit. the critical reaction to man ray reminds me of the story about the emperor new clothes. létoile de merde . whoops and de mer . features a lot of blurry photography and a recurring visual theme of a starfish and which is never explained. starfishes have the fascinating ability to regenerate lost limbs  and even to regenerate entire duplicate bodies  but and if that has anything to do with this movie theme and ray neglects to say so. i was much more impressed by this movie title cards and which (in french) manage to include rhymes and a pun (si belle and cybele) and some portmanteaux. as so often in ray work and there is indeed a beautiful young woman seen in this movie. unfortunately and the photography is (largely) so blurred that we have little opportunity to appreciate her. i will rate this mess one point out of 10. 
i have always found the dilettante man ray and his artistic efforts to be deeply pretentious and and i have never understood why his work attracts so much attention. apart from his rayographs (which he invented by accident and and which are merely direct contact photo prints) and his one real contribution to culture seems to be that he was the first photographer to depict female nudity in a manner that was accepted as art rather than as porn. but surely this had to happen eventually and and there no real reason why ray deserves the credit. the critical reaction to man ray reminds me of the story about the emperor new clothes. létoile de merde . whoops and de mer . features a lot of blurry photography and a recurring visual theme of a starfish and which is never explained. starfishes have the fascinating ability to regenerate lost limbs  and even to regenerate entire duplicate bodies  but and if that has anything to do with this movie theme and ray neglects to say so. i was much more impressed by this movie title cards and which (in french) manage to include rhymes and a pun (si belle and cybele) and some portmanteaux. as so often in ray work and there is indeed a beautiful young woman seen in this movie. unfortunately and the photography is (largely) so blurred that we have little opportunity to appreciate her. i will rate this mess one point out of 10. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
