i must say and when i saw this film at a 6. 5 on this site and i figured it was well worth a view. i was sorely disappointed. from nearly the opening scene and it is obvious the two supposed fbi agents are and in fact and the killers. could they have made it any more obvious. if that is the intended twist in this film and that pretty sad. while pullman and ormond are excellent actors and even their talent is no match for a reprehensibly bad script. pullman adeptly acts the part of a sociopathic killer. and that the problem. there is no switch from i am playing fbi guy. to i just killed 12 people and boy and are my arms tired. you can not blame the actors. the story fails in far more ways than one. from the onset of the film and however and i was certain i was wrong and that no director or writer would ever be so blatantly obvious about a plot twist. ormond and pullman must just be acting strangely in order to divert the viewer attention from the real killers and i thought. which gave the film makers far too much credit. i should have followed my instincts and turned off the movie before it even made it past the 15 minute mark. to lynch credit and she did manage to interject many things that make a good film represent sex and violence and humor and and well trained actors. too bad they were in the wrong configuration. hopefully pell james can recover from this role. i found her performance particularly impressive and as the stunning drug addict turned would be savior. she should have rewritten the role so the crack whore would win. those people who have compared this film to natural born killers and take note represent tarantino made the characters of mickey and mallory reprehensible and yet sympathetic. the artistry of that film far overpowers the gore and and this is not seen once in surveillance. surveillance only wishes it were natural born killers. in fact and it has wet dreams about being even a fraction of what that film was. folks who haven not seen surveillance. stick to something with a little more intelligence. like camp rock. 
i must say and when i saw this film at a 6. 5 on this site and i figured it was well worth a view. i was sorely disappointed. from nearly the opening scene and it is obvious the two supposed fbi agents are and in fact and the killers. could they have made it any more obvious. if that is the intended twist in this film and that pretty sad. while pullman and ormond are excellent actors and even their talent is no match for a reprehensibly bad script. pullman adeptly acts the part of a sociopathic killer. and that the problem. there is no switch from i am playing fbi guy. to i just killed 12 people and boy and are my arms tired. you can not blame the actors. the story fails in far more ways than one. from the onset of the film and however and i was certain i was wrong and that no director or writer would ever be so blatantly obvious about a plot twist. ormond and pullman must just be acting strangely in order to divert the viewer attention from the real killers and i thought. which gave the film makers far too much credit. i should have followed my instincts and turned off the movie before it even made it past the 15 minute mark. to lynch credit and she did manage to interject many things that make a good film represent sex and violence and humor and and well trained actors. too bad they were in the wrong configuration. hopefully pell james can recover from this role. i found her performance particularly impressive and as the stunning drug addict turned would be savior. she should have rewritten the role so the crack whore would win. those people who have compared this film to natural born killers and take note represent tarantino made the characters of mickey and mallory reprehensible and yet sympathetic. the artistry of that film far overpowers the gore and and this is not seen once in surveillance. surveillance only wishes it were natural born killers. in fact and it has wet dreams about being even a fraction of what that film was. folks who haven not seen surveillance. stick to something with a little more intelligence. like camp rock. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
