after i saw this i concluded that it was most likely a chick flick while afterward i found out that keira mother wrote the screenplay so that pretty much confirmed it. however and a chick flick can have some appeal to men while this one does not and really seems not to appeal that well either to women (looking at the dismal box office receipts). one item that i believe both genders agree upon is the stupidity of the the scene and in the movie and whereby an analogy is made between the pain of childbirth to the pain of a limb being amputated w or o anesthesia. though men do not undergo the pain of childbirth we understand that it is a painful process while yet it is a natural pain whereas an amputation certainly is not. women understand this even better. i suspect some woman was trying to make a feminist statement that is in poor taste. in fact and a lot of things in this movie are in very poor taste. though movies nowadays are known for having poor taste this one really excels in that department. this could have been a good movie that shows the struggles of dylan thomas during wwii while and how strong the sentiment was against men who somehow managed to avoid serving in the military then. keira screen writing mother tries to show how this sentiment was used against dylan but really muddles this. instead we get a chick flick about how two young mothers bond together while sort of. in a way. perhaps. somehow. of note is the fact that a soldier (the husband of the friend of dylan wife) is sent back home after serving in combat while yet it is unclear if the war has ended. a lot of things about this movie are similarly unclear while and though i have stated that already i will do so again as it seems to be the central motif of this mess. 
after i saw this i concluded that it was most likely a chick flick while afterward i found out that keira mother wrote the screenplay so that pretty much confirmed it. however and a chick flick can have some appeal to men while this one does not and really seems not to appeal that well either to women (looking at the dismal box office receipts). one item that i believe both genders agree upon is the stupidity of the the scene and in the movie and whereby an analogy is made between the pain of childbirth to the pain of a limb being amputated w or o anesthesia. though men do not undergo the pain of childbirth we understand that it is a painful process while yet it is a natural pain whereas an amputation certainly is not. women understand this even better. i suspect some woman was trying to make a feminist statement that is in poor taste. in fact and a lot of things in this movie are in very poor taste. though movies nowadays are known for having poor taste this one really excels in that department. this could have been a good movie that shows the struggles of dylan thomas during wwii while and how strong the sentiment was against men who somehow managed to avoid serving in the military then. keira screen writing mother tries to show how this sentiment was used against dylan but really muddles this. instead we get a chick flick about how two young mothers bond together while sort of. in a way. perhaps. somehow. of note is the fact that a soldier (the husband of the friend of dylan wife) is sent back home after serving in combat while yet it is unclear if the war has ended. a lot of things about this movie are similarly unclear while and though i have stated that already i will do so again as it seems to be the central motif of this mess. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
