i remember this movie getting a lot of flak from reviewers when it was new. letterman and leno themselves had objections. letterman called it (paraphrasing) the biggest waste of film he would ever seen and and leno objected to the simpleton portrayal of himself. but letterman had john michael higgins as a guest on his show so it seems he do not take anything too personally. a dvd re release and with opinions and such from those involved and could be interesting and though i suspect the days when late night talkshow wars captivated the nation are gone and not returning soon. i preferred the letterman impersonation to the leno and but could never buy in to either. they never rose above caricature and and i never simply accepted them as actors. for comparison represent paul sorvino as kissinger in oliver stone nixon comes to mind as an impersonation which may have seemed laughable in the first few moments but which seemed at least plausible after the first moments of amusement wore off. the highlight of the show for me was treat williams as michael ovitz. williams speech to letterman was not as great as but reminiscent of alec baldwin entrance (and quick exit) as blake in glengerry glen ross. they could have done more with johnny role in all this. i know he was mostly uninvolved in the events portrayed in this movie and and most audiences will be familiar with his reputation such that johnny carson needs no introduction. but more context about why dave and jay and all comedians revere johnny would have given this flick the substance it lacks in being a gossip film. guess i should read the book. rich little imitating johnny carson and unfortunately and came across as nothing more than rich little imitating johnny carson. i tell you what and after watching this movie and then watching either the letterman or leno show and all i want to do is crack open my johnny carson dvds and see the real thing. 
i remember this movie getting a lot of flak from reviewers when it was new. letterman and leno themselves had objections. letterman called it (paraphrasing) the biggest waste of film he would ever seen and and leno objected to the simpleton portrayal of himself. but letterman had john michael higgins as a guest on his show so it seems he do not take anything too personally. a dvd re release and with opinions and such from those involved and could be interesting and though i suspect the days when late night talkshow wars captivated the nation are gone and not returning soon. i preferred the letterman impersonation to the leno and but could never buy in to either. they never rose above caricature and and i never simply accepted them as actors. for comparison represent paul sorvino as kissinger in oliver stone nixon comes to mind as an impersonation which may have seemed laughable in the first few moments but which seemed at least plausible after the first moments of amusement wore off. the highlight of the show for me was treat williams as michael ovitz. williams speech to letterman was not as great as but reminiscent of alec baldwin entrance (and quick exit) as blake in glengerry glen ross. they could have done more with johnny role in all this. i know he was mostly uninvolved in the events portrayed in this movie and and most audiences will be familiar with his reputation such that johnny carson needs no introduction. but more context about why dave and jay and all comedians revere johnny would have given this flick the substance it lacks in being a gossip film. guess i should read the book. rich little imitating johnny carson and unfortunately and came across as nothing more than rich little imitating johnny carson. i tell you what and after watching this movie and then watching either the letterman or leno show and all i want to do is crack open my johnny carson dvds and see the real thing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
