as a ca resident and i would like to see the jackholes who were shutting down the electricity plants to raise the prices get some jail time too. i thought the movie was pretty good and has some very informative pieces. while they stuck to how enron rose and crashed and i found it really interesting. however and when the movie focused on it anti bush slant and it made me wonder if they were really being accurate. it fine to point out any connection the republicans had to enron and but the monster was created while clinton was president. the ca energy crisis happened under davis watch. both were in office during enron abuses and but neither are held accountable in any way. rather and many minutes are spent on how bush was friends with lay. so what. lay played golf with clinton and spent the night in the lincoln bedroom. why are democrats given such a free pass in this film. i think most politicians are a waste of our taxpayer money so i am not partial to either party but i hate feeling like i am subject to someone political agenda when i watch a documentary. yes and politicians deserve some blame and but i really doubt that the only guilty one have rs after their names. i found no value in portraying the bush as kay lovers when democrats received just as much enron campaign money as republicans did. like i said and it weakens the rest of the film for me because it makes me suspicious of the rest of the facts they lay out. 
as a ca resident and i would like to see the jackholes who were shutting down the electricity plants to raise the prices get some jail time too. i thought the movie was pretty good and has some very informative pieces. while they stuck to how enron rose and crashed and i found it really interesting. however and when the movie focused on it anti bush slant and it made me wonder if they were really being accurate. it fine to point out any connection the republicans had to enron and but the monster was created while clinton was president. the ca energy crisis happened under davis watch. both were in office during enron abuses and but neither are held accountable in any way. rather and many minutes are spent on how bush was friends with lay. so what. lay played golf with clinton and spent the night in the lincoln bedroom. why are democrats given such a free pass in this film. i think most politicians are a waste of our taxpayer money so i am not partial to either party but i hate feeling like i am subject to someone political agenda when i watch a documentary. yes and politicians deserve some blame and but i really doubt that the only guilty one have rs after their names. i found no value in portraying the bush as kay lovers when democrats received just as much enron campaign money as republicans did. like i said and it weakens the rest of the film for me because it makes me suspicious of the rest of the facts they lay out. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
