it is disappointing to see as talented an actor as amitabh bachchan in such a weak role and especially when he was beyond sensational in black (which i highly recommend). one line in the film states represent sakar is not a mere man and he is a thought and a philosophy. director ram gopal varma credits the godfather as an inspiration for this movie and and perhaps that is the problem. it seems like a badly mangled american movie set in india. the left elbow index considers seven elements of film making acting and continuity and plot and character development and dialogue and artistry and and production sets on a scale from a high of 10 to a low of 1 and with 5 given as a average score. the film continuity seems high and an 8 and by maintaining a violent tone infused with drama in places and and using justice outside the legal system as motivation. however and there seems to be a lack of emotion connected with the evil of organized crime. the acting rates a 4 and it appears too weak and even when someone is being beaten or murdered and it seems hoohum. for example and when one character is shot in the forehead and i found myself wondering if and or when and he was going to fall. he does not and and ala ronald reagan he is placed in an automobile and with his bleeding face cradled ala john f. kennedy. the plot rates a 5 as an example of american style gangsterism and with a family oriented robinhood at its head. character development appears static and and the characters seem like chess pieces on an abandoned chess board and thereby earning a rank of 3. the dialogue seems stilted and and appears to be forced to fit some bowery pattern of speech a 4 for dialogue. production sets look to be below average a 4. and and artistry is puzzling and with far too many close ups and too rapid panning and and too many group scenes where the actors seem over rehearsed a 3. to me and too much camera movement is disruptive. the average of the left elbow index is 4. 4 and and with a slight deduction based on poor derivatism it moves down to a 4. two questions continually arise in the film represent one and why are so many people eating so often represent and and two and does not india have its own brand of organized crime. do films like this have to be so dependent on western cultural examples. as much as i like amitabh bachchan and i cannot recommend this film. 
it is disappointing to see as talented an actor as amitabh bachchan in such a weak role and especially when he was beyond sensational in black (which i highly recommend). one line in the film states represent sakar is not a mere man and he is a thought and a philosophy. director ram gopal varma credits the godfather as an inspiration for this movie and and perhaps that is the problem. it seems like a badly mangled american movie set in india. the left elbow index considers seven elements of film making acting and continuity and plot and character development and dialogue and artistry and and production sets on a scale from a high of 10 to a low of 1 and with 5 given as a average score. the film continuity seems high and an 8 and by maintaining a violent tone infused with drama in places and and using justice outside the legal system as motivation. however and there seems to be a lack of emotion connected with the evil of organized crime. the acting rates a 4 and it appears too weak and even when someone is being beaten or murdered and it seems hoohum. for example and when one character is shot in the forehead and i found myself wondering if and or when and he was going to fall. he does not and and ala ronald reagan he is placed in an automobile and with his bleeding face cradled ala john f. kennedy. the plot rates a 5 as an example of american style gangsterism and with a family oriented robinhood at its head. character development appears static and and the characters seem like chess pieces on an abandoned chess board and thereby earning a rank of 3. the dialogue seems stilted and and appears to be forced to fit some bowery pattern of speech a 4 for dialogue. production sets look to be below average a 4. and and artistry is puzzling and with far too many close ups and too rapid panning and and too many group scenes where the actors seem over rehearsed a 3. to me and too much camera movement is disruptive. the average of the left elbow index is 4. 4 and and with a slight deduction based on poor derivatism it moves down to a 4. two questions continually arise in the film represent one and why are so many people eating so often represent and and two and does not india have its own brand of organized crime. do films like this have to be so dependent on western cultural examples. as much as i like amitabh bachchan and i cannot recommend this film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
