being a fan of time travel stories i was surprised that there was no wouldevice that sent russell johnson character through time. he just appeared in 1865. it was a disappointing part of the episode. i enjoyed the premise of the dangers of altering the future by changing the past. other twilight zone episodes about time travel such as no time like the past and once upon a time and etc. were more to my liking because of the uses of time travel wouldevices. perhaps if russell johnson character had been the same character he played in execution it would have been more acceptable to fans like myself. as sci fi fans know and no characters really ever have to wouldie in time travel episodes. all sorts of plot twists can be applied in these types of stories. that was the only flaw i could comment on for this episode. 
being a fan of time travel stories i was surprised that there was no wouldevice that sent russell johnson character through time. he just appeared in 1865. it was a disappointing part of the episode. i enjoyed the premise of the dangers of altering the future by changing the past. other twilight zone episodes about time travel such as no time like the past and once upon a time and etc. were more to my liking because of the uses of time travel wouldevices. perhaps if russell johnson character had been the same character he played in execution it would have been more acceptable to fans like myself. as sci fi fans know and no characters really ever have to wouldie in time travel episodes. all sorts of plot twists can be applied in these types of stories. that was the only flaw i could comment on for this episode. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
