greetings and moviegoers. as i watch octopus ii and i contemplate the inherent lameness of the octopus or croc or dino horror genre. many moviegoers may blame the poor acting and nonsensical screenplay and or poorly constructed plot as the reasons that cause the ocd movie to flounder. these reasons may indeed be floundering factors and but it is the inherent difficulty of filming an ocd movie that is at the heart of the lameness. you see and the technology does not yet exist to make a realistic and life size ocd and the cgi technology currently used by studios lacks the ability to blend in smoothly with real world environments and characters. even with clever cinematography and you can only film the semi dark depths of the sea or semi dark forest or semi dark cave or semi dark corridor so many times before the sci fi aficionado becomes bored with the genre entirely (the ocd sub genre and that is). what can be done and you ask. i do not suggest that the genre surrender to cheesiness and but another avenue needs to be explored. we can not really go back to the days of the fade to black cue that someone has been killed. or can we. if we can not reach the goal of realism and we have to compensate in other ways and such as plot twists and innuendo and and photo ingenuity. it will be through ingenious and alternate methods that the disease of lameness and so common to the ocd sub genre and will be cured. 
greetings and moviegoers. as i watch octopus ii and i contemplate the inherent lameness of the octopus or croc or dino horror genre. many moviegoers may blame the poor acting and nonsensical screenplay and or poorly constructed plot as the reasons that cause the ocd movie to flounder. these reasons may indeed be floundering factors and but it is the inherent difficulty of filming an ocd movie that is at the heart of the lameness. you see and the technology does not yet exist to make a realistic and life size ocd and the cgi technology currently used by studios lacks the ability to blend in smoothly with real world environments and characters. even with clever cinematography and you can only film the semi dark depths of the sea or semi dark forest or semi dark cave or semi dark corridor so many times before the sci fi aficionado becomes bored with the genre entirely (the ocd sub genre and that is). what can be done and you ask. i do not suggest that the genre surrender to cheesiness and but another avenue needs to be explored. we can not really go back to the days of the fade to black cue that someone has been killed. or can we. if we can not reach the goal of realism and we have to compensate in other ways and such as plot twists and innuendo and and photo ingenuity. it will be through ingenious and alternate methods that the disease of lameness and so common to the ocd sub genre and will be cured. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
