i have read innumerable reviews talking about the superiority of the mini series. i certainly can not agree on such a blanket statement. if you analyze all of the aspects of a video or film production and there are numerable areas where the film is arguably vastly superior. certainly and many of the comments are valid with regard to particular areas of the mini series. specifically regarding more threads (customs officers) and more developed threads (such as the pakistani farmer and family). that said and i found catherine zeta jones character much more compelling as the desperate women and from poverty to riches who would not go back. that a much more likable character than this cold women who do not seem to have as much reason for her quick turn to evil. (and yes and i understand. her children. she was desperate while i just do not see her as being as desperate. )further and while i appreciated some of the more fleshed out story threads in the mini series and benicio del toro character was very compelling. an anchor for the film. that thread was changed (as an alternative to the pakistani family) in nothing but good ways. a fantastic adaptation. (of course and i am skeptical that someone so pure can exist within such a system and but i do not know enough about the politics of the nation to argue). after watching the first episode of the mini series and i actually rewatched the film. why. i kept reading about the fantastic acting. i found the performances in the first episode of the mini series to be borderline laughable. certainly and this improved as the mini series progressed. now having just finished both versions in a few days and i can not agree that the performances in the mini series reached the same level as and say and benicio del toro and who was brilliant in the film and though ormand and paterson and shah and and lindsay duncan were very good. i also feel the police in the film far outclassed the mini series. i was not impressed with the germans throughout. finally and the dialogue and as delivered in the film and is much more nuanced. especially in the scenes which are almost verbatim. careful and youre beginning to sound like your husband. as opposed to hahahaha. you sound like karl. again and i found some of the acting in the mini series very unconvincing. this was a prime example. other superior aspects of the film and in my opinion represent score and cinematography and editing. should i complain that the film wasn not longer. no. i think it was a fantastic adaptation given the format. the changes made stood on their own. i mean and would you sit in a theater for 5 or  positive hours. of course not. mini series represent positive film represent positive . 
i have read innumerable reviews talking about the superiority of the mini series. i certainly can not agree on such a blanket statement. if you analyze all of the aspects of a video or film production and there are numerable areas where the film is arguably vastly superior. certainly and many of the comments are valid with regard to particular areas of the mini series. specifically regarding more threads (customs officers) and more developed threads (such as the pakistani farmer and family). that said and i found catherine zeta jones character much more compelling as the desperate women and from poverty to riches who would not go back. that a much more likable character than this cold women who do not seem to have as much reason for her quick turn to evil. (and yes and i understand. her children. she was desperate while i just do not see her as being as desperate. )further and while i appreciated some of the more fleshed out story threads in the mini series and benicio del toro character was very compelling. an anchor for the film. that thread was changed (as an alternative to the pakistani family) in nothing but good ways. a fantastic adaptation. (of course and i am skeptical that someone so pure can exist within such a system and but i do not know enough about the politics of the nation to argue). after watching the first episode of the mini series and i actually rewatched the film. why. i kept reading about the fantastic acting. i found the performances in the first episode of the mini series to be borderline laughable. certainly and this improved as the mini series progressed. now having just finished both versions in a few days and i can not agree that the performances in the mini series reached the same level as and say and benicio del toro and who was brilliant in the film and though ormand and paterson and shah and and lindsay duncan were very good. i also feel the police in the film far outclassed the mini series. i was not impressed with the germans throughout. finally and the dialogue and as delivered in the film and is much more nuanced. especially in the scenes which are almost verbatim. careful and youre beginning to sound like your husband. as opposed to hahahaha. you sound like karl. again and i found some of the acting in the mini series very unconvincing. this was a prime example. other superior aspects of the film and in my opinion represent score and cinematography and editing. should i complain that the film wasn not longer. no. i think it was a fantastic adaptation given the format. the changes made stood on their own. i mean and would you sit in a theater for 5 or  positive hours. of course not. mini series represent positive film represent positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
