if this film had been directed by dw griffith or stanley kubrick and it would be recognized for what it is represent a cinematic masterpiece and told with depth and subtlety and passion and a film with no equal in the visual realm. it is unremittingly stunning and also very brutal in its depiction of our great heritage of greed and annihilation. and of course and what the reviewers could not abide is it doesn not tell a simple narrative dick and jane tale like 99% of hollywood output. its characters are complex and confused by their passions and thoughts and fears and emotions. they even appear to be thinking and something your average movie reviewers do not understand and cannot abide and so they destroyed it. see the original uncut wide screen version. it is stunning. 
if this film had been directed by dw griffith or stanley kubrick and it would be recognized for what it is represent a cinematic masterpiece and told with depth and subtlety and passion and a film with no equal in the visual realm. it is unremittingly stunning and also very brutal in its depiction of our great heritage of greed and annihilation. and of course and what the reviewers could not abide is it doesn not tell a simple narrative dick and jane tale like 99% of hollywood output. its characters are complex and confused by their passions and thoughts and fears and emotions. they even appear to be thinking and something your average movie reviewers do not understand and cannot abide and so they destroyed it. see the original uncut wide screen version. it is stunning. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
