when recounting these events that took place some years ago and (hard to believe this actually happened)i thought and well and there is a basis for an interesting story here. many secrets were never uncovered and the horse never found and the main conspirators never captured etc. however and this film seems to be distracted by character study and and very little attention payed to the plot. some other questions are raised though and like why on earth would mickey rourke be in this film. its good to see rourkes career has taken off again and but he must cringe at the mention of this rubbish. if the subject matter interests you and do an internet search on the topic and you will be more educated and dare i say more entertained. avoid this. 
when recounting these events that took place some years ago and (hard to believe this actually happened)i thought and well and there is a basis for an interesting story here. many secrets were never uncovered and the horse never found and the main conspirators never captured etc. however and this film seems to be distracted by character study and and very little attention payed to the plot. some other questions are raised though and like why on earth would mickey rourke be in this film. its good to see rourkes career has taken off again and but he must cringe at the mention of this rubbish. if the subject matter interests you and do an internet search on the topic and you will be more educated and dare i say more entertained. avoid this. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
