such pain. pain in the shape that it had promise in its central idea and but it never fully recognised it and goes on to blow a lot sand in your face. i do not say this straight to video south african or canadian or uk horror flick is awful and but its just too bland and predictable and there just very little memorable about it. it a guarantee you will forget it and not too long after watching it. i tried watching it last night and but had to finish it during the morning and as i couldn not keep my eyes open. even then i couldn not remember where i got up to and which left me watching it from the beginning again. the only thing that hit a chord was andreas poulsson sharp cinematography of the vast and harsh and eerie desert locations. a nice glossy chic creates a striking visual sense and which can not save the film from that overall empty feeling. everything else is below par and almost comes off grating. like the head scratching revelation of the beast. huh. the computer generated special effects of the ominous monster are tolerable and and there are some grisly flashes of stripped flesh and bones. but there too little and as there no hiding the fact that the clichéd script wants to ponder on the generic character conflict to build tension and uncertainty. that would be fine if the wilted script was more than just basic and shallow fluff and because it never generated any strong and lasting suspense and but makes it uninterestingly labour on. the lead characters are superficial and the token support fall in the dispensable basket. it your stereotypical bunch. scott bairstow and warrick grier performances are colourless and and the beautiful rachel shelley tries but looks rather weary. 
such pain. pain in the shape that it had promise in its central idea and but it never fully recognised it and goes on to blow a lot sand in your face. i do not say this straight to video south african or canadian or uk horror flick is awful and but its just too bland and predictable and there just very little memorable about it. it a guarantee you will forget it and not too long after watching it. i tried watching it last night and but had to finish it during the morning and as i couldn not keep my eyes open. even then i couldn not remember where i got up to and which left me watching it from the beginning again. the only thing that hit a chord was andreas poulsson sharp cinematography of the vast and harsh and eerie desert locations. a nice glossy chic creates a striking visual sense and which can not save the film from that overall empty feeling. everything else is below par and almost comes off grating. like the head scratching revelation of the beast. huh. the computer generated special effects of the ominous monster are tolerable and and there are some grisly flashes of stripped flesh and bones. but there too little and as there no hiding the fact that the clichéd script wants to ponder on the generic character conflict to build tension and uncertainty. that would be fine if the wilted script was more than just basic and shallow fluff and because it never generated any strong and lasting suspense and but makes it uninterestingly labour on. the lead characters are superficial and the token support fall in the dispensable basket. it your stereotypical bunch. scott bairstow and warrick grier performances are colourless and and the beautiful rachel shelley tries but looks rather weary. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
