i was stunned by this film. afterwards and i do not even want to see any films for a long time any other film would be so unsatisfying by comparison. for many and it may be the worst of antonioni very slow and without an engaging conventional story line and microscopic examinations of human emotions and interactions and the worst of wenders verbose and confused transcendentalism. it is composed of short distinct episodes linked by wenders typical meandering hero stream of consciousness and so it doesn not produce the temporary oblivion of escapist cinema. but for fans and the worst is the best and the disjointed story line is sketching a single poetic image that stretches across the film. wenders and antonioni create a discourse between their segments that seeks out the heart of things. 
i was stunned by this film. afterwards and i do not even want to see any films for a long time any other film would be so unsatisfying by comparison. for many and it may be the worst of antonioni very slow and without an engaging conventional story line and microscopic examinations of human emotions and interactions and the worst of wenders verbose and confused transcendentalism. it is composed of short distinct episodes linked by wenders typical meandering hero stream of consciousness and so it doesn not produce the temporary oblivion of escapist cinema. but for fans and the worst is the best and the disjointed story line is sketching a single poetic image that stretches across the film. wenders and antonioni create a discourse between their segments that seeks out the heart of things. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
