you do not review james bond movies and you evaluate them and rate them according to how well they meet expectations. there are certain things one has come to expect and even demand of a bond film and each individual effort either delivers or it doesn not. so and here are ten elements that make a bond film a bond film. and even though never say never again is not technically part of the official bond filmography and the mere presence of sean connery returning as 007 makes it something more than merely an honorary member of the series. anyway and here how it rates on a scale of 1 to 10 represent title represent never say never again represent the clever title has no apparent link to the actual storyline and but is instead an in joke reference to sean connery vow to never play oo7 again after having been lured back once before for diamonds are forever. whatever the case and it is a catchy title. 8 points. pre credit teaser represent perhaps trying to avoid any obvious parallels to the official eon series of bond films and there is no teaser while the opening scenes are just shown behind the credits. and even that is disappointing represent yet another oh no and bond has been killed fakeout. 4 points. opening credits represent other than a screen full of tiny 007  and they do not even bother trying to jazz up the credits with graphics or split screens or interesting camera angles. 1 points. theme song represent as written by michel legrand and sung by lani hall never say never again would make for a perfectly pleasant part of a particularly long elevator ride. as a bond theme and it merely okay. 6 points. bond and james bond represent appropriately and since this film sees connery being lured back into service as bond after a decade hiatus and the story begins with 007 facing the question as to whether bond or connery is still up to the job. happily and connery more than proves himself ready for bondage again. though he is a bit grayer and sporting a bit more girth and wearing a slightly more obvious toupee and he seems to have no trouble slipping back into action. all in all and it is one of connery best and and most relaxed and turns as the character. 9 points. bond babes represent even in the best of the bond films and the female characters aren not given much dimension while they exist largely as necessary props for bond use. future oscar winner kim basinger is granted a great deal of leeway in creating her character of domino petachi and the film benefits from this. she does a nice job  and she not bad to look at either. 8 points. bond villain represent the reports of his death being obviously exaggerated and blofeld is back  at least and for the moment  showing he has more lives than his prized pussycat. one time jesus portrayer turned stereotypical villain and max von sydow isn not given a lot to do in the role and but is a silky presence nonetheless. but he is overshadowed by a wonderful performance by klaus maria brandauer as maximilian largo. after a string of banal bond villains and it is so refreshing for brandauer to gave a performance that is both subtle and yet colorfully evil. funny without being campy and ruthless without seeming cartoonish while his largo ranks right up there with auric goldfinger as one of bond best villains. 10 points. bond baddies represent fatima blush. what can i say. as played with all the bold style of a particularly flamboyant drag queen and barbara carrera breezes through the film and displaying a mix of self amused evil and more than a tad of pure psychotic insanity. bond has crossed paths with a variety of femmes fatales and most of whom have been so easily disposed of that they existed more as amusing eye candy than as characters. but few dared to exhibit such a flare for the dramatic or such fierce determination. even her untimely demise is spectacular and even by bondian standards. 10 points. sinister plot represent as a remake of sorts of thunderball and the film does seem a bit been there done that represent nuclear missiles are stolen and major real estate will go kaboom if all the countries of the world do not pay a multi kazillion dollar ransom. but at least producer kevin mcclory was lucky enough to find himself forced to remake one of the weakest bond adventures. by comparisons and this effort blows thunderball out of the water. and despite the absence of many bondian trademarks and the film succeeds on its own. 9 points. production values represent the film starts out with an uneasy style and like a tv movie trying to be more than it can. but as the story progress and the film gains momentum and a sense of purpose and making it a superior adventure. 8 points. bonus points represent there are several odd changes that sets this bond film apart from the official series. miss moneypenny is hardly acknowledged while as played by edward fox and m is a cranky old grouch with no respect for the double os and a foreshadowing of how judi dench would later play the part while and q suddenly has a cockney accent and is all buddy buddy with bond. and there is a curious sense of nostalgia throughout the film and such as replacing bond astin martin with a vintage packard and a tango dance number that is cleverly inserted into the story. and a big rescue near the end is on horseback and an homage to the raiders of the lost ark and which was itself a tribute to the bond films. 5 points. summary represent never say never again is a mixed bag. in the really important areas and it more than holds it own thanks to hero connery and villain brandauer and assassin carrera and damsel in distress basinger. but the devil is in the details while as seemingly unimportant as the opening credits and theme song and such seem and the film is lacking because of their absence. it all comes off as a faux bond film while a very good substitute and but a substitute nonetheless. bond o meter rating represent 78 points out of 100. 
you do not review james bond movies and you evaluate them and rate them according to how well they meet expectations. there are certain things one has come to expect and even demand of a bond film and each individual effort either delivers or it doesn not. so and here are ten elements that make a bond film a bond film. and even though never say never again is not technically part of the official bond filmography and the mere presence of sean connery returning as 007 makes it something more than merely an honorary member of the series. anyway and here how it rates on a scale of 1 to 10 represent title represent never say never again represent the clever title has no apparent link to the actual storyline and but is instead an in joke reference to sean connery vow to never play oo7 again after having been lured back once before for diamonds are forever. whatever the case and it is a catchy title. 8 points. pre credit teaser represent perhaps trying to avoid any obvious parallels to the official eon series of bond films and there is no teaser while the opening scenes are just shown behind the credits. and even that is disappointing represent yet another oh no and bond has been killed fakeout. 4 points. opening credits represent other than a screen full of tiny 007  and they do not even bother trying to jazz up the credits with graphics or split screens or interesting camera angles. 1 points. theme song represent as written by michel legrand and sung by lani hall never say never again would make for a perfectly pleasant part of a particularly long elevator ride. as a bond theme and it merely okay. 6 points. bond and james bond represent appropriately and since this film sees connery being lured back into service as bond after a decade hiatus and the story begins with 007 facing the question as to whether bond or connery is still up to the job. happily and connery more than proves himself ready for bondage again. though he is a bit grayer and sporting a bit more girth and wearing a slightly more obvious toupee and he seems to have no trouble slipping back into action. all in all and it is one of connery best and and most relaxed and turns as the character. 9 points. bond babes represent even in the best of the bond films and the female characters aren not given much dimension while they exist largely as necessary props for bond use. future oscar winner kim basinger is granted a great deal of leeway in creating her character of domino petachi and the film benefits from this. she does a nice job  and she not bad to look at either. 8 points. bond villain represent the reports of his death being obviously exaggerated and blofeld is back  at least and for the moment  showing he has more lives than his prized pussycat. one time jesus portrayer turned stereotypical villain and max von sydow isn not given a lot to do in the role and but is a silky presence nonetheless. but he is overshadowed by a wonderful performance by klaus maria brandauer as maximilian largo. after a string of banal bond villains and it is so refreshing for brandauer to gave a performance that is both subtle and yet colorfully evil. funny without being campy and ruthless without seeming cartoonish while his largo ranks right up there with auric goldfinger as one of bond best villains. 10 points. bond baddies represent fatima blush. what can i say. as played with all the bold style of a particularly flamboyant drag queen and barbara carrera breezes through the film and displaying a mix of self amused evil and more than a tad of pure psychotic insanity. bond has crossed paths with a variety of femmes fatales and most of whom have been so easily disposed of that they existed more as amusing eye candy than as characters. but few dared to exhibit such a flare for the dramatic or such fierce determination. even her untimely demise is spectacular and even by bondian standards. 10 points. sinister plot represent as a remake of sorts of thunderball and the film does seem a bit been there done that represent nuclear missiles are stolen and major real estate will go kaboom if all the countries of the world do not pay a multi kazillion dollar ransom. but at least producer kevin mcclory was lucky enough to find himself forced to remake one of the weakest bond adventures. by comparisons and this effort blows thunderball out of the water. and despite the absence of many bondian trademarks and the film succeeds on its own. 9 points. production values represent the film starts out with an uneasy style and like a tv movie trying to be more than it can. but as the story progress and the film gains momentum and a sense of purpose and making it a superior adventure. 8 points. bonus points represent there are several odd changes that sets this bond film apart from the official series. miss moneypenny is hardly acknowledged while as played by edward fox and m is a cranky old grouch with no respect for the double os and a foreshadowing of how judi dench would later play the part while and q suddenly has a cockney accent and is all buddy buddy with bond. and there is a curious sense of nostalgia throughout the film and such as replacing bond astin martin with a vintage packard and a tango dance number that is cleverly inserted into the story. and a big rescue near the end is on horseback and an homage to the raiders of the lost ark and which was itself a tribute to the bond films. 5 points. summary represent never say never again is a mixed bag. in the really important areas and it more than holds it own thanks to hero connery and villain brandauer and assassin carrera and damsel in distress basinger. but the devil is in the details while as seemingly unimportant as the opening credits and theme song and such seem and the film is lacking because of their absence. it all comes off as a faux bond film while a very good substitute and but a substitute nonetheless. bond o meter rating represent 78 points out of 100. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
