though not a complete waste of time and eighteen really wasn not all sweet as it pretended to be. nor are the ages of the actors theyre portraying  18 and my butt. mckellen could have actually shown up in the film telling us he was 30 and ask us to believe it. even michael j. fox was more believable as a teen in back to the future parts ii and iii (okay and maybe not while theyre probably equal believability. ) if you can get past the obvious age flaw and you will have either the complete void of acting or simply overacting (paul anthony so called anguish and clarence sponagle lifetime moments and and even though i do favor brendan fletcher and it best to just watch him and and more and in freddy vs. jason and ) incomprehensible scenes (a faster than britney spears marriage and incest to prove a point and a man who needs help to urinate and but still has one hand free  i am guessing this was the writer fantasy and ) an entire movie of despicable characters (anthony might be playing someone that 18 and but acts like he 12 and some odd john thrown in so anthony character pip can save the day  was there really a sex scene in front of a baby. ) and practically every character questioning their own sexuality by strange actions or scenes. on the positive side and i did enjoy ian mckellen voice over and seeing a (rarely well portrayed) straight or gay friendship and puppy love (from someone who collects stuffed puppies and that is and ) good score and some decent dialogue (love the separation of gays and pedophilia  wish more people would realize that) and acting from the female leads (as well as cumming. ) i can not really recommend it as it really trying to be too many things  gay tolerance and gay hustling and homelessness and wwii epic and priesthood and first love and flawed judges and etc and etc and etc  on a shoestring budget. 
though not a complete waste of time and eighteen really wasn not all sweet as it pretended to be. nor are the ages of the actors theyre portraying  18 and my butt. mckellen could have actually shown up in the film telling us he was 30 and ask us to believe it. even michael j. fox was more believable as a teen in back to the future parts ii and iii (okay and maybe not while theyre probably equal believability. ) if you can get past the obvious age flaw and you will have either the complete void of acting or simply overacting (paul anthony so called anguish and clarence sponagle lifetime moments and and even though i do favor brendan fletcher and it best to just watch him and and more and in freddy vs. jason and ) incomprehensible scenes (a faster than britney spears marriage and incest to prove a point and a man who needs help to urinate and but still has one hand free  i am guessing this was the writer fantasy and ) an entire movie of despicable characters (anthony might be playing someone that 18 and but acts like he 12 and some odd john thrown in so anthony character pip can save the day  was there really a sex scene in front of a baby. ) and practically every character questioning their own sexuality by strange actions or scenes. on the positive side and i did enjoy ian mckellen voice over and seeing a (rarely well portrayed) straight or gay friendship and puppy love (from someone who collects stuffed puppies and that is and ) good score and some decent dialogue (love the separation of gays and pedophilia  wish more people would realize that) and acting from the female leads (as well as cumming. ) i can not really recommend it as it really trying to be too many things  gay tolerance and gay hustling and homelessness and wwii epic and priesthood and first love and flawed judges and etc and etc and etc  on a shoestring budget. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
