personally and i can only but agree with stephen 12 represent indulge. there really no point in trying to capture this film. i like movies where nothing (explicitly) happens. herzog aguirre and der zorn gottes has got the same nothingness and though that movie is less convincing and since the climaxes are rather in the beginning of the story and so herzog had to focus on nature versus kinski. morte a venezia is wholly different though and since it has several climaxes and turns and etc. in fact and from the point where aschenbach luggage is lost and the movie almost rushes to its grand finale (his final grains of sand begin running through the hourglass after the moment of bliss where he fantasises about warning the polish family and caressing tadzio hair). you can and if you want to and seek some real clues or symbols in this one (his trying to leave behind his luggage from the moment he arrives and the pointing tadzio at the end and the fact that in the whole film content and form are completely in sinc) and but there no point in doing this represent it would not make the film better or worse and since its force lies in the whole storyline undertow and which is never made explicit. tons of history and decaying europe and the end of the romantic era as we have come to know it and which has proven to be only the beginning of it (individual emotions and expression are more important now than they ever were). but wait and now i myself am beginning to develop the one minor (tiny) flaw of the film represent the let talk about art parts. now there one thing never to do. i myself believe it could have been expressed by other means. furthermore and i believe it becomes already very clear in the rest of the film. i do not like explicit films. i can read books and so i do not want a storyline that speaks merely to my rationale. i prefer films that you cannot explain in words and but only in film (lynch lost highway and weir picknick at hanging rock and roeg man who fell to earth also belong in this category) and for then and and then only and it has a reason to exist as film and not merely as a book. so what about thomas mann novella. i have never read it and but forget about it. the movie gives a different point of view represent it says things you can never say in a book. it uses the movie art to make you feel and through images and music and the same thing that mann made you feel and using text. equally brilliant and but different worlds. 
personally and i can only but agree with stephen 12 represent indulge. there really no point in trying to capture this film. i like movies where nothing (explicitly) happens. herzog aguirre and der zorn gottes has got the same nothingness and though that movie is less convincing and since the climaxes are rather in the beginning of the story and so herzog had to focus on nature versus kinski. morte a venezia is wholly different though and since it has several climaxes and turns and etc. in fact and from the point where aschenbach luggage is lost and the movie almost rushes to its grand finale (his final grains of sand begin running through the hourglass after the moment of bliss where he fantasises about warning the polish family and caressing tadzio hair). you can and if you want to and seek some real clues or symbols in this one (his trying to leave behind his luggage from the moment he arrives and the pointing tadzio at the end and the fact that in the whole film content and form are completely in sinc) and but there no point in doing this represent it would not make the film better or worse and since its force lies in the whole storyline undertow and which is never made explicit. tons of history and decaying europe and the end of the romantic era as we have come to know it and which has proven to be only the beginning of it (individual emotions and expression are more important now than they ever were). but wait and now i myself am beginning to develop the one minor (tiny) flaw of the film represent the let talk about art parts. now there one thing never to do. i myself believe it could have been expressed by other means. furthermore and i believe it becomes already very clear in the rest of the film. i do not like explicit films. i can read books and so i do not want a storyline that speaks merely to my rationale. i prefer films that you cannot explain in words and but only in film (lynch lost highway and weir picknick at hanging rock and roeg man who fell to earth also belong in this category) and for then and and then only and it has a reason to exist as film and not merely as a book. so what about thomas mann novella. i have never read it and but forget about it. the movie gives a different point of view represent it says things you can never say in a book. it uses the movie art to make you feel and through images and music and the same thing that mann made you feel and using text. equally brilliant and but different worlds. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
