apparently and a massive head wound is the cure for homicidal tendencies and turning a murderous sociopath into a lovable and oafish dog catcher. also (this ones for the ladies) and it seems that the front gate of a psychiatric hospital is an overlooked hot spot for meeting potential mates. those are just two of the approximately 23 absurdities were supposed to accept for this movie to have any meaning. i love movies and i believed and as i am assuming many americans do (forgive me if i am wrong) and that hollywood turned out the best product. i have come to learn how sadly naive and brainwashed i was and 2) how much more sophisticated european or asian cinema is in comparison to its american counterpart. i watched this allegedly disturbing psychological thriller the night following a viewing of a japanese movie called suicide club. as the camera faded on walter sparrow happy little family enjoying some quality time around a prison visiting room table (not to mention the patronizing voice over extolling the virtue of doing the right thing) and i suddenly had an epiphany. i had just finished watching a movie that left me feeling as though i would just had a glass of water when i really wanted a beer. my thirst was sated and but it was strictly utilitarian. the premise was mildly interesting and but the story itself and with its innumerable coincidences (how do we explain her finding the book. we will just say something like and . or did the book find her. they will buy that) and gaping plot holes (why did wifey take the skeleton. ) and predictability and and obligatory happy ending and turned out to be just another hollywood hack job. additionally and the casting of jim carrey was justwrong. at any moment and i felt he was capable of breaking into some shtick from one of his stupid comedies or in living color. jim carrey as a tattooed hard boiled police detective who enjoys bondage and rough sex. didn not buy it for a second. you want disturbing. deeply disturbing. watch suicide club. the story surrounds the mysterious mass suicide of 54 school girls. the film opens with a group of giggling high schoolers mulling about on a subway train platform. we then watch in horror as they line up and hold hands and and happily throw themselves in front of a fast moving commuter train. needless to say and much chaos ensues. that as far as i am going to go with the story line because i encourage the reader to see the film. in fact and i am not sure if i could outline the plot even if i wanted to. what begins as a straightforward mystery quickly descends into a madhouse of grotesque imagery. did i understand the movie. nonot initiallylike many of the foreign films my girlfriend has introduced me to. so naturally and i thought it was bad. but this one lingered in my mind. i went to bed thinking on the film and awoke the next morning and looked it up on imdb. i read some of the viewer comments and was astonished at 1) the insights others had derived from the film and 2) the fact that i had so thoroughly missed the whole point of the movie. i realized that i was so used to being spoon fed the message from hollywood and that when confronted with a film that actually required the viewer to participateto actually think for themselves and i was totally unequipped. it as if i had been conditioned to check my brain at the door of the theater. am i saying that suicide club is the greatest movie ever made. of course not. it has its flaws and many of which were reported adroitly by the imdb reviewers. am i saying that all american movies are bad and all foreign movies are good. againof course not. my point is that there a whole world of film making outside of hollywooda body of work that engages the viewer while forces them to think and questionmovies that do not telegraph plot twists and follow a strict linear sequence and and above all and do not insult the intelligence of the person watching. i look forward to expanding my mind while exploring this new world of film that doesn not do the thinking for me. 
apparently and a massive head wound is the cure for homicidal tendencies and turning a murderous sociopath into a lovable and oafish dog catcher. also (this ones for the ladies) and it seems that the front gate of a psychiatric hospital is an overlooked hot spot for meeting potential mates. those are just two of the approximately 23 absurdities were supposed to accept for this movie to have any meaning. i love movies and i believed and as i am assuming many americans do (forgive me if i am wrong) and that hollywood turned out the best product. i have come to learn how sadly naive and brainwashed i was and 2) how much more sophisticated european or asian cinema is in comparison to its american counterpart. i watched this allegedly disturbing psychological thriller the night following a viewing of a japanese movie called suicide club. as the camera faded on walter sparrow happy little family enjoying some quality time around a prison visiting room table (not to mention the patronizing voice over extolling the virtue of doing the right thing) and i suddenly had an epiphany. i had just finished watching a movie that left me feeling as though i would just had a glass of water when i really wanted a beer. my thirst was sated and but it was strictly utilitarian. the premise was mildly interesting and but the story itself and with its innumerable coincidences (how do we explain her finding the book. we will just say something like and . or did the book find her. they will buy that) and gaping plot holes (why did wifey take the skeleton. ) and predictability and and obligatory happy ending and turned out to be just another hollywood hack job. additionally and the casting of jim carrey was justwrong. at any moment and i felt he was capable of breaking into some shtick from one of his stupid comedies or in living color. jim carrey as a tattooed hard boiled police detective who enjoys bondage and rough sex. didn not buy it for a second. you want disturbing. deeply disturbing. watch suicide club. the story surrounds the mysterious mass suicide of 54 school girls. the film opens with a group of giggling high schoolers mulling about on a subway train platform. we then watch in horror as they line up and hold hands and and happily throw themselves in front of a fast moving commuter train. needless to say and much chaos ensues. that as far as i am going to go with the story line because i encourage the reader to see the film. in fact and i am not sure if i could outline the plot even if i wanted to. what begins as a straightforward mystery quickly descends into a madhouse of grotesque imagery. did i understand the movie. nonot initiallylike many of the foreign films my girlfriend has introduced me to. so naturally and i thought it was bad. but this one lingered in my mind. i went to bed thinking on the film and awoke the next morning and looked it up on imdb. i read some of the viewer comments and was astonished at 1) the insights others had derived from the film and 2) the fact that i had so thoroughly missed the whole point of the movie. i realized that i was so used to being spoon fed the message from hollywood and that when confronted with a film that actually required the viewer to participateto actually think for themselves and i was totally unequipped. it as if i had been conditioned to check my brain at the door of the theater. am i saying that suicide club is the greatest movie ever made. of course not. it has its flaws and many of which were reported adroitly by the imdb reviewers. am i saying that all american movies are bad and all foreign movies are good. againof course not. my point is that there a whole world of film making outside of hollywooda body of work that engages the viewer while forces them to think and questionmovies that do not telegraph plot twists and follow a strict linear sequence and and above all and do not insult the intelligence of the person watching. i look forward to expanding my mind while exploring this new world of film that doesn not do the thinking for me. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
