from 2002 on dutch cinema finally got better again. this movie is still part and a schoolbook example of the bad period of dutch cinema. the story is needlessly told in flashback style. all of the present sequences set in france are completely redundant and add nothing to the story and emotions or power. for some reason european filmmakers often find it necessary to tell the story not chronological. i never understood why and or what the appeal of it is. the story self also isn not exactly the greatest. it isn not always clear were the movie is trying to go to and what it tries to tell. the story of a young unexperienced boy falling in love with a wild young girl and who later turns out to be quite psychotic might sound good enough on paper and even shows some parallels to paul verhoeven turks fruit and to which this movie often was compared to before and at the time of its release. however the end result is far from comparable. the story fails to capture the right emotions and which is also due to the unimaginative performances from the actors. the way the story is told also makes the movie far from always interesting or compelling. i lost interest for this movie at about 40 minutes through the movie. at the time this movie was made and both antonie kamerling and angela schijf were promising rising stars and with great potential and ambitions but both their careers have pretty much dried up by now. angela schijf seems to give her family more attention than her career (that is not a bad thing of course) and while antonie kamerling tried to start a career in hollywood. he never got any further than playing some small bit parts in 2 renny harlin flops. to be honest i am not surprised. it not that he is a bad actor and he certainly has got the right looks but his english just isn not good enough and to put it mildly. just listen to him speaking english in the beginning of this movie and you will understand what i mean. they are really not bad actors but for some reason it doesn not show in this movie. it probably also due to the poor dialog. i still kind of liked beau van erven dorens. he been criticized a lot but his acting seems very natural. he always keeps the characters close to who he self is. it by no means is one of the worst movies ever made but it not exactly one i would recommend either. bad and uninteresting storytelling makes this a bad movie. negative . 
from 2002 on dutch cinema finally got better again. this movie is still part and a schoolbook example of the bad period of dutch cinema. the story is needlessly told in flashback style. all of the present sequences set in france are completely redundant and add nothing to the story and emotions or power. for some reason european filmmakers often find it necessary to tell the story not chronological. i never understood why and or what the appeal of it is. the story self also isn not exactly the greatest. it isn not always clear were the movie is trying to go to and what it tries to tell. the story of a young unexperienced boy falling in love with a wild young girl and who later turns out to be quite psychotic might sound good enough on paper and even shows some parallels to paul verhoeven turks fruit and to which this movie often was compared to before and at the time of its release. however the end result is far from comparable. the story fails to capture the right emotions and which is also due to the unimaginative performances from the actors. the way the story is told also makes the movie far from always interesting or compelling. i lost interest for this movie at about 40 minutes through the movie. at the time this movie was made and both antonie kamerling and angela schijf were promising rising stars and with great potential and ambitions but both their careers have pretty much dried up by now. angela schijf seems to give her family more attention than her career (that is not a bad thing of course) and while antonie kamerling tried to start a career in hollywood. he never got any further than playing some small bit parts in 2 renny harlin flops. to be honest i am not surprised. it not that he is a bad actor and he certainly has got the right looks but his english just isn not good enough and to put it mildly. just listen to him speaking english in the beginning of this movie and you will understand what i mean. they are really not bad actors but for some reason it doesn not show in this movie. it probably also due to the poor dialog. i still kind of liked beau van erven dorens. he been criticized a lot but his acting seems very natural. he always keeps the characters close to who he self is. it by no means is one of the worst movies ever made but it not exactly one i would recommend either. bad and uninteresting storytelling makes this a bad movie. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
