well and that was sure a waste of dave mckean talents and wasn not it. don not get me wrong represent when it comes to graphic design and dave mckean may be the best in the world right now. the layered and textured look he can accomplish with just a few pencil lines on rough paper make the efforts of people like peter greenaway and david fincher look like what they are represent hackwork. mckean has been the godfather of a revolution in the look of comics and film and even magazine ads which borrow the distinctive collage effect he has pioneered. but this movie. it junk. complete junk. the story and from neil gaiman and is and unfortunately and exactly what gaiman has been giving us ever since he ripped off clive barker for the first time represent a pseudo mythic and overblown dreamscape and populated by characters which have titles in all capital letters rather than names. everything is allegory and to the point that it is impossible to get any human drama and emotion and or empathy from anyone involved. people make pithy postulations and speaking in riddles which bring to mind what rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead might have sounded like if tom stoppard had suffered a debilitating stroke halfway through its composition. really and gaiman and get over yourself. youre not a prophet. youre a poser. mckean directing doesn not help  his pacing is poor and taking fully half an hour to actually rev himself up for the main picaresque plot and and then simply providing a disconnected sequence of events and none of them given any weight. the monsters do not menace because theyre not foreshadowed and simply thrown at the screen. the plot doesn not engage because we do not really care about the rancid little protagonists. half the dialogue and muttered into into shirt fronts and ubiquitous masks and is unintelligible. some of the visuals are pretty and and i am sure the fanboys will lick it up. pity. think of the amount of really good work mckean could have produced if he hadn not been stuck with this lame project. grade represent d or d . 
well and that was sure a waste of dave mckean talents and wasn not it. don not get me wrong represent when it comes to graphic design and dave mckean may be the best in the world right now. the layered and textured look he can accomplish with just a few pencil lines on rough paper make the efforts of people like peter greenaway and david fincher look like what they are represent hackwork. mckean has been the godfather of a revolution in the look of comics and film and even magazine ads which borrow the distinctive collage effect he has pioneered. but this movie. it junk. complete junk. the story and from neil gaiman and is and unfortunately and exactly what gaiman has been giving us ever since he ripped off clive barker for the first time represent a pseudo mythic and overblown dreamscape and populated by characters which have titles in all capital letters rather than names. everything is allegory and to the point that it is impossible to get any human drama and emotion and or empathy from anyone involved. people make pithy postulations and speaking in riddles which bring to mind what rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead might have sounded like if tom stoppard had suffered a debilitating stroke halfway through its composition. really and gaiman and get over yourself. youre not a prophet. youre a poser. mckean directing doesn not help  his pacing is poor and taking fully half an hour to actually rev himself up for the main picaresque plot and and then simply providing a disconnected sequence of events and none of them given any weight. the monsters do not menace because theyre not foreshadowed and simply thrown at the screen. the plot doesn not engage because we do not really care about the rancid little protagonists. half the dialogue and muttered into into shirt fronts and ubiquitous masks and is unintelligible. some of the visuals are pretty and and i am sure the fanboys will lick it up. pity. think of the amount of really good work mckean could have produced if he hadn not been stuck with this lame project. grade represent d or d . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
