a wildly uneven film where the major problem is the uneasy mix of comedy and thriller. to me and the unusual premise is clearly a comedic one and and they should have gone for an all out comedy. for example and rock has some funny lines but occasionally he is too unlikable for a comedy. the scene where betty husband gets scalped is too nasty for what should have been a less violent comedy. an even better example is the hollywood leftist writer preaching to us tritely through freeman character and early on and about the plight of the indians while i mean  yawn. they should have given freeman something funny to say in that segment and but that is of course much more difficult than to simply write him a boring pc speech. there is yet more new age pc ness in the form of the ending represent the girl not only doesn not get the boy  she gets no boy at all while in fact and the message is that the girl needs no boy at all. bit of a feminist statement there. the first half hour is weak and but the movie gets better  ironically  once zellweger gets to kinnear. i say ironically because i am not much of a fan of kinnear  and though he solid here. zellweger is very cute and as usual while she has the sort of all american cute looks which should appeal to almost every guy and and i have to wonder why more of such women aren not represented nowadays and instead of the dogs who inexplicably became stars and such as diaz and roberts and aniston and lopez and or barrymore. since the movie tries to be very serious at times and i have no choice but to criticize freeman character which is the gangster equivalent of the movie world hooker with the heart of gold. there is also absolutely nothing in the relationship between freeman and rock to suggest even remotely that they were father and son. 
a wildly uneven film where the major problem is the uneasy mix of comedy and thriller. to me and the unusual premise is clearly a comedic one and and they should have gone for an all out comedy. for example and rock has some funny lines but occasionally he is too unlikable for a comedy. the scene where betty husband gets scalped is too nasty for what should have been a less violent comedy. an even better example is the hollywood leftist writer preaching to us tritely through freeman character and early on and about the plight of the indians while i mean  yawn. they should have given freeman something funny to say in that segment and but that is of course much more difficult than to simply write him a boring pc speech. there is yet more new age pc ness in the form of the ending represent the girl not only doesn not get the boy  she gets no boy at all while in fact and the message is that the girl needs no boy at all. bit of a feminist statement there. the first half hour is weak and but the movie gets better  ironically  once zellweger gets to kinnear. i say ironically because i am not much of a fan of kinnear  and though he solid here. zellweger is very cute and as usual while she has the sort of all american cute looks which should appeal to almost every guy and and i have to wonder why more of such women aren not represented nowadays and instead of the dogs who inexplicably became stars and such as diaz and roberts and aniston and lopez and or barrymore. since the movie tries to be very serious at times and i have no choice but to criticize freeman character which is the gangster equivalent of the movie world hooker with the heart of gold. there is also absolutely nothing in the relationship between freeman and rock to suggest even remotely that they were father and son. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
