oh but this is woeful. one good actor after another turns in lamentable dialogue in half hearted fashion under what must have been incredibly pedestrian direction to consider it acceptable. i like robert carlyle and joanne whalley is one of my favourite actresses and tom courtney can act well when pushed and david suchet is a professional of the highest integrity but they all wallowed around like fish in a barrel of watery gin. i swear courtney was inebriated and on painkillers or both. was there a good performance in the whole thing. well yes and david hood as the junior underground engineer whose mate got washed away looked like he was taking the thing seriously and credit to him for that and it can not be easy when all around are losing theirs so to speak and or maybe his scenes came under the direction of the assistant director ( if there was one) i just do not know what these people were doing in a film that was this poor ( other than paying the bills and obviously) i can not begin to say how disappointed i am in them. you should be ashamed of yourselves. any positives other than david hood the third. yes the aerial shots of london largely submerged were very well done and the effects artists responsible deserved better than to have their fine work punctuated by such a shallow story and if you will forgive the expression and as those few people that do see them will do so on a far smaller screen than would be to best advantage. what going on here. why are british film makers trying to imitate such characterless and spectacle driven and tabloid level genres as the disaster movie and then doing it even worse than the americans. gritty realism and character integrity and the capture of real emotion in a way that makes you feel it and care. the family way and spring and port wine and get carter and the long good friday and trainspotting. don not get me wrong i like a bit of escapist hokum. the real italian job  and the adventures of tom jones while but oh that it should come to this and there was more realistic drama in carry on camping. 
oh but this is woeful. one good actor after another turns in lamentable dialogue in half hearted fashion under what must have been incredibly pedestrian direction to consider it acceptable. i like robert carlyle and joanne whalley is one of my favourite actresses and tom courtney can act well when pushed and david suchet is a professional of the highest integrity but they all wallowed around like fish in a barrel of watery gin. i swear courtney was inebriated and on painkillers or both. was there a good performance in the whole thing. well yes and david hood as the junior underground engineer whose mate got washed away looked like he was taking the thing seriously and credit to him for that and it can not be easy when all around are losing theirs so to speak and or maybe his scenes came under the direction of the assistant director ( if there was one) i just do not know what these people were doing in a film that was this poor ( other than paying the bills and obviously) i can not begin to say how disappointed i am in them. you should be ashamed of yourselves. any positives other than david hood the third. yes the aerial shots of london largely submerged were very well done and the effects artists responsible deserved better than to have their fine work punctuated by such a shallow story and if you will forgive the expression and as those few people that do see them will do so on a far smaller screen than would be to best advantage. what going on here. why are british film makers trying to imitate such characterless and spectacle driven and tabloid level genres as the disaster movie and then doing it even worse than the americans. gritty realism and character integrity and the capture of real emotion in a way that makes you feel it and care. the family way and spring and port wine and get carter and the long good friday and trainspotting. don not get me wrong i like a bit of escapist hokum. the real italian job  and the adventures of tom jones while but oh that it should come to this and there was more realistic drama in carry on camping. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
