i believe the reason this movie did not get the recognition it deserves is because of the many misconceptions of darwin and pro and con. i would say the real man is depicted here without sterility. he is what he is. although the movie is but a snapshot of the man the technique of storytelling expanded his life far beyond the years touched on in the movie. this is deep movie and a pondering of modern life and the way we think and and can provoke a study into the man whose thoughts (and other who used him) have certainly affected our lives. there are some movies that the historical context is so great that it is the primary job of the actors to stay out of the way. the history carried the day and the actors did their job. good work to them and i say. 
i believe the reason this movie did not get the recognition it deserves is because of the many misconceptions of darwin and pro and con. i would say the real man is depicted here without sterility. he is what he is. although the movie is but a snapshot of the man the technique of storytelling expanded his life far beyond the years touched on in the movie. this is deep movie and a pondering of modern life and the way we think and and can provoke a study into the man whose thoughts (and other who used him) have certainly affected our lives. there are some movies that the historical context is so great that it is the primary job of the actors to stay out of the way. the history carried the day and the actors did their job. good work to them and i say. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
