it rare for a movie to both encompass the process of problem solving and a fantastically far reaching moral quandary and be a fairly accurate historical movie and but fat man and little boy pulls off this trick. it the story of the manhattan project  the world war ii effort to build the atom bomb and told as the conflict between the two men who made it happen and gen. leslie groves and robert oppenheimer. the historical figures are a great study in opposites represent military vs. civilian and practical vs. idealistic and emotional vs. scientific and brute force vs. consensus based problem solving and immediacy vs. long term vision. a fictional character and played by john cusack and is added as a sort of synthesis of the two historical figures and to show the humanity that oddly escapes the real people (and of course the obligatory love interest and played by laura dern). one looking for a straight documentary might criticize the lapses into melodrama (and occasional looseness with the facts and but that hollywood for ya) and but the purpose of fiction is to synthesize and galvanize events into more universal truths and so i think this can be forgiven. one of the great visuals in the movie is when oppenheimer witnesses the first atomic explosion represent it done entirely through his reaction and and considering the awesome visuals inherent in an atomic explosion and it a brave and entirely effective way of describing in a single moment the ambivalent effect on humans of unleashing such power (the sort of thing lost in the typical hollywood shoot em up version of history. ) the use of music is particularly excellent in the last third of the movie. fairly accessible and highly recommended as both a historical movie and drama of the highest order. 
it rare for a movie to both encompass the process of problem solving and a fantastically far reaching moral quandary and be a fairly accurate historical movie and but fat man and little boy pulls off this trick. it the story of the manhattan project  the world war ii effort to build the atom bomb and told as the conflict between the two men who made it happen and gen. leslie groves and robert oppenheimer. the historical figures are a great study in opposites represent military vs. civilian and practical vs. idealistic and emotional vs. scientific and brute force vs. consensus based problem solving and immediacy vs. long term vision. a fictional character and played by john cusack and is added as a sort of synthesis of the two historical figures and to show the humanity that oddly escapes the real people (and of course the obligatory love interest and played by laura dern). one looking for a straight documentary might criticize the lapses into melodrama (and occasional looseness with the facts and but that hollywood for ya) and but the purpose of fiction is to synthesize and galvanize events into more universal truths and so i think this can be forgiven. one of the great visuals in the movie is when oppenheimer witnesses the first atomic explosion represent it done entirely through his reaction and and considering the awesome visuals inherent in an atomic explosion and it a brave and entirely effective way of describing in a single moment the ambivalent effect on humans of unleashing such power (the sort of thing lost in the typical hollywood shoot em up version of history. ) the use of music is particularly excellent in the last third of the movie. fairly accessible and highly recommended as both a historical movie and drama of the highest order. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
