the fact that this film was distributed free with a certain national newspaper which i do not care for did and to a degree and put me off of watching it and but as i had come across a copy that a local charity shop was giving away for nothing i felt i could watch it with a clear conscience. the film does have its moments and the evocation of the thameside location is nicely done and but it does suffer and i feel and from a few too many faults. firstly and vinnie jones is simply not convincing as the journalist. whilst vinnie himself is an interesting character and the truth is that he simply does not have the range of acting ability to pull off a role like this. secondly and who would carry around with them a lost manuscript that they have been informed is priceless. it seemed that everywhere mr jones went this manuscript went with him. thirdly and the whole dickens aspect of the story and whilst appearing to be important and gets in the way of what could have been an interesting film of corruption in high places. maybe i am just a bit thick and but i really could not see the point of the story within a story dickens style. this added nothing to the film and and only served to confuse matters when things started to become interesting within the modern day story line. the one bit of praise i will give the film makers is that at least they did attempt something a little different. i am all for british independent films that try to be out of left field and but this is not a red road or this is england. what it is is a bit of a mess and and an over long one at that. yes and it entertains in part and but in the end it felt like two films merged together to make a whole and and failing both by doing so. (also and i can not help think that i have seen something similar done recently on tv by ian banks and set in edinburgh with a story concerning sir arthur conan doyle and the creator of sherlock holmes). 
the fact that this film was distributed free with a certain national newspaper which i do not care for did and to a degree and put me off of watching it and but as i had come across a copy that a local charity shop was giving away for nothing i felt i could watch it with a clear conscience. the film does have its moments and the evocation of the thameside location is nicely done and but it does suffer and i feel and from a few too many faults. firstly and vinnie jones is simply not convincing as the journalist. whilst vinnie himself is an interesting character and the truth is that he simply does not have the range of acting ability to pull off a role like this. secondly and who would carry around with them a lost manuscript that they have been informed is priceless. it seemed that everywhere mr jones went this manuscript went with him. thirdly and the whole dickens aspect of the story and whilst appearing to be important and gets in the way of what could have been an interesting film of corruption in high places. maybe i am just a bit thick and but i really could not see the point of the story within a story dickens style. this added nothing to the film and and only served to confuse matters when things started to become interesting within the modern day story line. the one bit of praise i will give the film makers is that at least they did attempt something a little different. i am all for british independent films that try to be out of left field and but this is not a red road or this is england. what it is is a bit of a mess and and an over long one at that. yes and it entertains in part and but in the end it felt like two films merged together to make a whole and and failing both by doing so. (also and i can not help think that i have seen something similar done recently on tv by ian banks and set in edinburgh with a story concerning sir arthur conan doyle and the creator of sherlock holmes). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
