riotously cheesy lunacy about lava spewing from the la brea tar pits in los angeles. even if you attempt to suspend disbelief by ignoring this ludicrous premise and you will still be howling with laughter at the inane dialog and nonsensical plot contrivances and and wildly reckless scientific plot holes that parade across the screen. i have a theory represent every successful actor is doomed to appear in at least one bad movie at some point in his or her career. this was tommy lee jones turn. although he makes a decent effort and the script is just so pathetic even he goes down in flames (oops and sorry about that). most of the supporting cast is also choked by the hackneyed writing while a few of the actors simply phone in their roles. anne heche deserves special hall of shame recognition for her awkward portrayal of a scientist. she is about as convincing in this role as pee wee herman and and even he would have at least done a better acting job. since the scientific plot holes are too numerous to list here and i would instead suggest that you screen the film with friends and and have a game of find the scientific absurdities. the loser could be forced to listen to tapes of corny lines from the movie like everybody looks the same over and over. here a sample of the kind of nonsense you can expect represent a scheme to blow up a building is devised and engineered and and the dynamite set and detonated all within a space of about 20 minutes. let us not forget the obligatory disaster movie clichés represent divorced dads and scientists who get ignored by everybody and obnoxious cops and tough street kids and bratty teenagers and greedy investors etc. while all are present and in abundance. the film also bashes you over the head with a relentless barrage of political correctness. for fans of cheese and silliness only. all other viewers represent beware. 
riotously cheesy lunacy about lava spewing from the la brea tar pits in los angeles. even if you attempt to suspend disbelief by ignoring this ludicrous premise and you will still be howling with laughter at the inane dialog and nonsensical plot contrivances and and wildly reckless scientific plot holes that parade across the screen. i have a theory represent every successful actor is doomed to appear in at least one bad movie at some point in his or her career. this was tommy lee jones turn. although he makes a decent effort and the script is just so pathetic even he goes down in flames (oops and sorry about that). most of the supporting cast is also choked by the hackneyed writing while a few of the actors simply phone in their roles. anne heche deserves special hall of shame recognition for her awkward portrayal of a scientist. she is about as convincing in this role as pee wee herman and and even he would have at least done a better acting job. since the scientific plot holes are too numerous to list here and i would instead suggest that you screen the film with friends and and have a game of find the scientific absurdities. the loser could be forced to listen to tapes of corny lines from the movie like everybody looks the same over and over. here a sample of the kind of nonsense you can expect represent a scheme to blow up a building is devised and engineered and and the dynamite set and detonated all within a space of about 20 minutes. let us not forget the obligatory disaster movie clichés represent divorced dads and scientists who get ignored by everybody and obnoxious cops and tough street kids and bratty teenagers and greedy investors etc. while all are present and in abundance. the film also bashes you over the head with a relentless barrage of political correctness. for fans of cheese and silliness only. all other viewers represent beware. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
