man and what an awful film. as with many terrible films and the structure of its awfulness lies in the script. this is such a pathetic attempt at a psychological thriller that it gives the entire genre a bad name. okay and here one major problem represent sandra bullock character is abducted by jeff bridges in his car at a busy convenience store in broad daylight. somehow and her boyfriend kiefer sutherland doesn not find a single witness to this act and subsequently spends most of the movie completely clueless as to her whereabouts. come on. personally and i find this completely insulting to even the dimmest of audience members. yet we are forced to buy into this nonsense. of equal frustration is the poorly explained motive for jeff bridges actions. his character is a bit of an eccentric academic and to be sure and but far from the sociopath who would do these things. he goes through about ten minutes and give or take and spilling his beans to sutherland as to why he has performed his cruel actions. but the explanation itself lacks even the most elementary sense of logic. therefore and no intelligent audience member can really believe in the possibility of his evil. and if you subtract that element from the story and the entire thing falls apart. also of major concern represent jeff bridges using a weird and pseudo french accent for no reason. the entire boring subplot involving nancy travis and most especially her saving the day by turning the tables on bridges. the crazy woman who somehow manages to remember jeff bridges license plate number despite also thinking that the lucky charms leprechaun is real. sandra bullock character name and diane shaver and conveniently re scrambles to form the word vanished. are you friggin kidding me. the logistical impossibility of drugging and abducting and and burying (in a very remote location) a human being within the span of forty minutes (as bridges specifically alludes to). this is a movie that made me remember the fictional and impossibly stupid (yet very successful) donald kaufman character in adaptation. many screenwriters are brilliant and inspired artists. some are just bozos who convince the nitwits running the studios to make their drivel. this particular script is so stunningly dimwitted that donald kaufman himself would have managed to sell it. unfortunately for all of us in the real world and todd graff actually did. 
man and what an awful film. as with many terrible films and the structure of its awfulness lies in the script. this is such a pathetic attempt at a psychological thriller that it gives the entire genre a bad name. okay and here one major problem represent sandra bullock character is abducted by jeff bridges in his car at a busy convenience store in broad daylight. somehow and her boyfriend kiefer sutherland doesn not find a single witness to this act and subsequently spends most of the movie completely clueless as to her whereabouts. come on. personally and i find this completely insulting to even the dimmest of audience members. yet we are forced to buy into this nonsense. of equal frustration is the poorly explained motive for jeff bridges actions. his character is a bit of an eccentric academic and to be sure and but far from the sociopath who would do these things. he goes through about ten minutes and give or take and spilling his beans to sutherland as to why he has performed his cruel actions. but the explanation itself lacks even the most elementary sense of logic. therefore and no intelligent audience member can really believe in the possibility of his evil. and if you subtract that element from the story and the entire thing falls apart. also of major concern represent jeff bridges using a weird and pseudo french accent for no reason. the entire boring subplot involving nancy travis and most especially her saving the day by turning the tables on bridges. the crazy woman who somehow manages to remember jeff bridges license plate number despite also thinking that the lucky charms leprechaun is real. sandra bullock character name and diane shaver and conveniently re scrambles to form the word vanished. are you friggin kidding me. the logistical impossibility of drugging and abducting and and burying (in a very remote location) a human being within the span of forty minutes (as bridges specifically alludes to). this is a movie that made me remember the fictional and impossibly stupid (yet very successful) donald kaufman character in adaptation. many screenwriters are brilliant and inspired artists. some are just bozos who convince the nitwits running the studios to make their drivel. this particular script is so stunningly dimwitted that donald kaufman himself would have managed to sell it. unfortunately for all of us in the real world and todd graff actually did. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
