documentaries about fans are always mishmashes and and never worth seeing through and but i found this one and made by some of the fans themselves and more than usually unenlightening. as a veteran of the original tolkien craze and forty years ago and i would hoped for more than the obvious which doesn not always equate to the true. if there anyone living who doesn not already know the nature of a fandom and any fandom and from having been or known a fan and he would not discover it here. between irrelevancies and platitudes (to which the actors from the films are particularly prone) and and acting out (by fans making the most if not the best of their one shot at fame) and i could glean little of the special appeal of lotr and the special emotional responses it evokes and and the range of the special creative forms those responses can take. in addition and the film is rather lazy represent it slights some facts that could have been got across with little effort and e. g. what the exact legal loophole was (the wording of a copyright notice) that permitted the books unauthorized publication in the u. s. (speaking of which represent i take strong exception to the film dismissal of the covers on that edition as irrelevant and psychedelic and which they were not. they were the work of jack gaughan and a very able sf illustrator of the period and and some fans and including me and found them more apt and and more attractive and than the covers on the rival set. ). 
documentaries about fans are always mishmashes and and never worth seeing through and but i found this one and made by some of the fans themselves and more than usually unenlightening. as a veteran of the original tolkien craze and forty years ago and i would hoped for more than the obvious which doesn not always equate to the true. if there anyone living who doesn not already know the nature of a fandom and any fandom and from having been or known a fan and he would not discover it here. between irrelevancies and platitudes (to which the actors from the films are particularly prone) and and acting out (by fans making the most if not the best of their one shot at fame) and i could glean little of the special appeal of lotr and the special emotional responses it evokes and and the range of the special creative forms those responses can take. in addition and the film is rather lazy represent it slights some facts that could have been got across with little effort and e. g. what the exact legal loophole was (the wording of a copyright notice) that permitted the books unauthorized publication in the u. s. (speaking of which represent i take strong exception to the film dismissal of the covers on that edition as irrelevant and psychedelic and which they were not. they were the work of jack gaughan and a very able sf illustrator of the period and and some fans and including me and found them more apt and and more attractive and than the covers on the rival set. ). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
