having been pleasantly surprised by sandra bullock performance in miss congeniality and i decided to give murder by numbers a shot. while decent in plucky and self effacing roles and ms. bullock performance in serious roles (see hope floats and speed 2 and 28 days) leave much to be desired. her character is at the same time omniscient and confused and and sexually maladjusted (the sub plot of sandra past comes across as needless filler that does little to develop her already shallow character). the two teenage boys gave decent performances and although their forensics expertise and catch me if can attitude is belied by stupid errors that scream we did it. chris penn as the all too obvious suspect is wasted here and as is ben chaplin token partner or love interest character. spoilers ahead mediocre acting aside and the biggest flaws can be traced to a tv of the week plot that never has you totally buying into the murder motives in the first place and and as mentioned and the stupid errors (vomiting up a rare food on the murder scene and an all too convenient and framing of the school janitor and the two boys hanging out together in public and a convenient love interest to cause friction and etc. etc) cause the view to go from being intrigues to being bored and disappointed by the murderers. the ending was strictly by the numbers and was probably the most disappointing aspect of the movie. using the now cliched tactic of almost showing the climactic scene at the beginning of the film and and then filling the audience in how we arrived at that moment and the final scenes surprise no one and lacked any of the so called intelligence the film purported to arrive at it conclusion. a somewhat promising concept and but poorly executed and weak in nearly every way. out of . 
having been pleasantly surprised by sandra bullock performance in miss congeniality and i decided to give murder by numbers a shot. while decent in plucky and self effacing roles and ms. bullock performance in serious roles (see hope floats and speed 2 and 28 days) leave much to be desired. her character is at the same time omniscient and confused and and sexually maladjusted (the sub plot of sandra past comes across as needless filler that does little to develop her already shallow character). the two teenage boys gave decent performances and although their forensics expertise and catch me if can attitude is belied by stupid errors that scream we did it. chris penn as the all too obvious suspect is wasted here and as is ben chaplin token partner or love interest character. spoilers ahead mediocre acting aside and the biggest flaws can be traced to a tv of the week plot that never has you totally buying into the murder motives in the first place and and as mentioned and the stupid errors (vomiting up a rare food on the murder scene and an all too convenient and framing of the school janitor and the two boys hanging out together in public and a convenient love interest to cause friction and etc. etc) cause the view to go from being intrigues to being bored and disappointed by the murderers. the ending was strictly by the numbers and was probably the most disappointing aspect of the movie. using the now cliched tactic of almost showing the climactic scene at the beginning of the film and and then filling the audience in how we arrived at that moment and the final scenes surprise no one and lacked any of the so called intelligence the film purported to arrive at it conclusion. a somewhat promising concept and but poorly executed and weak in nearly every way. out of . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
