i have heard a few comments and particularly from prisoners of war and that changi is not historically accurate and and that it is disappointing. perhaps it is for those who actually had to live through this stuff and and much worse. but for the rest of us and who really have no idea of how prisoners were treated by the japanese during world war ii and changi is a remarkable introduction. but changi isn not a war documentary  if it had have been and then the historical accuracy aspect would have been paramount. it is a miniseries drama and with fictional characters and fictional situations (though based loosely on actual events i have heard and read about)  and at the centre of the story is the ideal of mateship. this group of young australian soldiers and taken prisoner by the japanese and held in appalling conditions for years and became mates through adversity and the strength of their friendships continued throughout their lives after the war. it is also a cultural study of the differences between the japanese of the time and the western world and with its music and games and entertainment represent in part 5 and when it is becoming clear that japan will lose the war after germany has surrendered in europe and the japanese prison camp colonel insists that his country must study the culture of their prisoners  in order to defeat a people and one must defeat their culture  and to do this and one must understand it. all in all and australia continues its rich tradition of producing exceptional television miniseries and and is an unrivalled world leader in this regard represent vyeing for the afi award with changi is my brother jack and the adaptation of george johnston novel and and also a worthy winner. miniseries in recent years include day of the roses (the story of the investigation into the glanville train crash) and kings in grass castles (the adaptation of mary durack historical account of her pioneering ancestors) and kangaroo palace (about a group of friends from a country town in australia who travel to london and change and grow apart) and and the (somewhat disappointing) adaptation of bryce courtenay powerful novel and the potato factory. less recently represent nancy cato sweeping saga of life on the murray  all the rivers run while cusack and james brilliant novel about postwar life in sydney  come in spinner while colleen mccullough outstanding pioneering saga  the thorn birds while the river kings while ruth park novel the harp in the south while bodyline while eureka stockade while anzacs while etc. and etc. (of course and there have been some not so good productions  for instance and moby dick and do or die and on the beach and thorn birds represent the missing years while etc. ) generally and though and if an australian miniseries comes your way and make sure you see it  and this goes double for changi and a superbly directed masterpiece. rating represent positive . 
i have heard a few comments and particularly from prisoners of war and that changi is not historically accurate and and that it is disappointing. perhaps it is for those who actually had to live through this stuff and and much worse. but for the rest of us and who really have no idea of how prisoners were treated by the japanese during world war ii and changi is a remarkable introduction. but changi isn not a war documentary  if it had have been and then the historical accuracy aspect would have been paramount. it is a miniseries drama and with fictional characters and fictional situations (though based loosely on actual events i have heard and read about)  and at the centre of the story is the ideal of mateship. this group of young australian soldiers and taken prisoner by the japanese and held in appalling conditions for years and became mates through adversity and the strength of their friendships continued throughout their lives after the war. it is also a cultural study of the differences between the japanese of the time and the western world and with its music and games and entertainment represent in part 5 and when it is becoming clear that japan will lose the war after germany has surrendered in europe and the japanese prison camp colonel insists that his country must study the culture of their prisoners  in order to defeat a people and one must defeat their culture  and to do this and one must understand it. all in all and australia continues its rich tradition of producing exceptional television miniseries and and is an unrivalled world leader in this regard represent vyeing for the afi award with changi is my brother jack and the adaptation of george johnston novel and and also a worthy winner. miniseries in recent years include day of the roses (the story of the investigation into the glanville train crash) and kings in grass castles (the adaptation of mary durack historical account of her pioneering ancestors) and kangaroo palace (about a group of friends from a country town in australia who travel to london and change and grow apart) and and the (somewhat disappointing) adaptation of bryce courtenay powerful novel and the potato factory. less recently represent nancy cato sweeping saga of life on the murray  all the rivers run while cusack and james brilliant novel about postwar life in sydney  come in spinner while colleen mccullough outstanding pioneering saga  the thorn birds while the river kings while ruth park novel the harp in the south while bodyline while eureka stockade while anzacs while etc. and etc. (of course and there have been some not so good productions  for instance and moby dick and do or die and on the beach and thorn birds represent the missing years while etc. ) generally and though and if an australian miniseries comes your way and make sure you see it  and this goes double for changi and a superbly directed masterpiece. rating represent positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
