specks of white and various shapes and a beautiful nude and random images. that is what this little experimental short film is. it kind of interesting to think how in the early days of film such images could be transferred onto film and but despite my love of a lot of surreal images and films and and a fascination with the bizarre and this film just do not do it for me. i am not sorry i watched it and but if there is any underlying meaning in it and i do not get it. visually and it is not that outstanding and in my humble opinion. as an example of dadaism and i suppose it would fit in quite well and since it seems to reject any semblance of logic or reason and though i would have preferred that it do it in a more visually interesting way. but to each his own. 
specks of white and various shapes and a beautiful nude and random images. that is what this little experimental short film is. it kind of interesting to think how in the early days of film such images could be transferred onto film and but despite my love of a lot of surreal images and films and and a fascination with the bizarre and this film just do not do it for me. i am not sorry i watched it and but if there is any underlying meaning in it and i do not get it. visually and it is not that outstanding and in my humble opinion. as an example of dadaism and i suppose it would fit in quite well and since it seems to reject any semblance of logic or reason and though i would have preferred that it do it in a more visually interesting way. but to each his own. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
