it is a shame that a movie with such a good cinematography as this one had no plot to be supported by the work of sarah cawley (cinematography) and adam lichtenstein (film editing) and and above all and no sense of what goes on in mexico city. the movie tries to be a very realistic depiction of life in city and but it is unable to do it. it is a shame and a lot of film wasted. an american woman tries to find her brother who has been kidnaped. the first account of the story is powerful and interesting and very realistic and but it seems that there was no effort to come with a better narrative of the ordeal and especially when it comes to the issue of the attitudes of the us embassy personnel in mexico city and when dealing with an issue like this one. compare and as an example and with frantic(1988) and which deals with a similar issue. something similar can be said of the role of local authorities. compare and as an example and with todo el poder (1999). the movie is worth watching if you want to get a sense of the looks of the city itself and paying little or no attention to the rather weak plot and the many twists that require a rather extensive suspension of disbelief. who is going to believe that a mexican patrol from mexico city is going to go all the way to catch the main characters to the mexico us border. and that this policeman is going to be able to use its radio from the border to mexico city. only the producers of this movie. it is worth mentioning that unlike frida and other movies about mexico at least in these one mexicans talk spanish. 
it is a shame that a movie with such a good cinematography as this one had no plot to be supported by the work of sarah cawley (cinematography) and adam lichtenstein (film editing) and and above all and no sense of what goes on in mexico city. the movie tries to be a very realistic depiction of life in city and but it is unable to do it. it is a shame and a lot of film wasted. an american woman tries to find her brother who has been kidnaped. the first account of the story is powerful and interesting and very realistic and but it seems that there was no effort to come with a better narrative of the ordeal and especially when it comes to the issue of the attitudes of the us embassy personnel in mexico city and when dealing with an issue like this one. compare and as an example and with frantic(1988) and which deals with a similar issue. something similar can be said of the role of local authorities. compare and as an example and with todo el poder (1999). the movie is worth watching if you want to get a sense of the looks of the city itself and paying little or no attention to the rather weak plot and the many twists that require a rather extensive suspension of disbelief. who is going to believe that a mexican patrol from mexico city is going to go all the way to catch the main characters to the mexico us border. and that this policeman is going to be able to use its radio from the border to mexico city. only the producers of this movie. it is worth mentioning that unlike frida and other movies about mexico at least in these one mexicans talk spanish. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
