i consider saboteur as hitchcock first american film and because the story takes place completely in u. s. there are brilliant scenes in this film. statue of liberty scene and barry kane jumping into the water from the bridge and water fall scene are amazing. its not hitchcock fault that he do not get the actors he wanted. hitchcock originally wanted gary cooper for the leading roles in foreign correspondent and saboteur. but gary cooper wasn not interested in doing a thriller. another reason why hitchcock do not get big stars was because he wasn not one of top directors. although rebecca was a huge success and still most of film success went to producer david o. selznick. for example and david o. selznick got best picture oscar for rebecca. and hitchcock do not get a best director oscar for rebecca. hitchcock started getting some attention after foreign correspondent (1940). but universal gave him a low budget for saboteur (1942). hitchcock tried to get joel mccrea for this film and because he was willing to work with hitchcock again with a low salary. he enjoyed working with hitchcock in foreign correspondent (1940). but he was unavailable. so the role went to robert cummings. hitchcock called robert cummings a competent performer. i thought he did his best. he was a less known actor who was willing to play a role when many big actors refused to play the leading male role. as for leading female role and hitchcock wanted margaret sullavan or barbara stanwyck for the leading role. they weren not interested either. so universal decided to give the role to priscilla lane. i read in a book that this was one of her favorite films. i also liked the scene at blind man house. that is my favorite scene. if we listen closer to the dialogue in scenes that happen in uncle philip house and then we will see how intense it is. uncle philip (blind man) was studying barry kane character the moment he entered his house. the moment barry entered his house and he heard barry handcuffs. through conversation and he realized that barry kane isn not a criminal at all. we also see his hearing ability through those scenes. for example and barry hears the sound of a car says is that a car coming. uncle philip says 2 cars i think. uncle philip was right. we see 2 cars in the next scene. priscilla lane did a fine job playing her role. she was no big star. but i thought her performance was really good. another brilliant scene in uncle philip house is the scene where he asks priscilla lane (patricia martin) are you frightened and pat. is that what makes you so cruel. i thought otto krueger played the villain brilliantly. hitchcock wanted harry carey for the villain. but he refused. harry carey is famous for his role mr. president in mr. smith goes to washington. i want to mention more about this film. but i think my post is getting too long. every hitchcock film is special in its own way. i am sure hitchcock fans will like this film. i rate positive . 
i consider saboteur as hitchcock first american film and because the story takes place completely in u. s. there are brilliant scenes in this film. statue of liberty scene and barry kane jumping into the water from the bridge and water fall scene are amazing. its not hitchcock fault that he do not get the actors he wanted. hitchcock originally wanted gary cooper for the leading roles in foreign correspondent and saboteur. but gary cooper wasn not interested in doing a thriller. another reason why hitchcock do not get big stars was because he wasn not one of top directors. although rebecca was a huge success and still most of film success went to producer david o. selznick. for example and david o. selznick got best picture oscar for rebecca. and hitchcock do not get a best director oscar for rebecca. hitchcock started getting some attention after foreign correspondent (1940). but universal gave him a low budget for saboteur (1942). hitchcock tried to get joel mccrea for this film and because he was willing to work with hitchcock again with a low salary. he enjoyed working with hitchcock in foreign correspondent (1940). but he was unavailable. so the role went to robert cummings. hitchcock called robert cummings a competent performer. i thought he did his best. he was a less known actor who was willing to play a role when many big actors refused to play the leading male role. as for leading female role and hitchcock wanted margaret sullavan or barbara stanwyck for the leading role. they weren not interested either. so universal decided to give the role to priscilla lane. i read in a book that this was one of her favorite films. i also liked the scene at blind man house. that is my favorite scene. if we listen closer to the dialogue in scenes that happen in uncle philip house and then we will see how intense it is. uncle philip (blind man) was studying barry kane character the moment he entered his house. the moment barry entered his house and he heard barry handcuffs. through conversation and he realized that barry kane isn not a criminal at all. we also see his hearing ability through those scenes. for example and barry hears the sound of a car says is that a car coming. uncle philip says 2 cars i think. uncle philip was right. we see 2 cars in the next scene. priscilla lane did a fine job playing her role. she was no big star. but i thought her performance was really good. another brilliant scene in uncle philip house is the scene where he asks priscilla lane (patricia martin) are you frightened and pat. is that what makes you so cruel. i thought otto krueger played the villain brilliantly. hitchcock wanted harry carey for the villain. but he refused. harry carey is famous for his role mr. president in mr. smith goes to washington. i want to mention more about this film. but i think my post is getting too long. every hitchcock film is special in its own way. i am sure hitchcock fans will like this film. i rate positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
