first off and i am not a firefighter and but i am in some kind of para firefighting unit (the guys who get called if an earthquake hits and the real firefighters need more people for sar) and so i had some training and simulation but i have no real life experience. but still and there are some points one notices as totally unbelievable. i can understand that they removed the mouth or nose pieces of the masks and that there is not enough smoke and because the public would otherwise see nothing. but some things defy logic represent  no second mask attached to the oxygen. how the hell do you want to rescue people trough the smoke without one.  rappelling people. no and it not done like that. i would be screaming too if somebody hitched a rope around me in that fashion and hung me from a building. if i could scream and that is and and not pass out from want of air because the rope squeezes my lungs. the second time when theyre abseiling jack it better but still weird. aim high. no and you bloody do not. you always fight fire from as low as possible. you do not fight want to sprinkle flames and you will want to extinguish the fire and and that below the flames. no discipline. theyre running around like chicken. and they shout all the time and instead of using radio and and keeping discipline. no tactics. why do not they work in teams of at least two. you still can get separated and but it takes much more than if everyone just scurries around alone in search for victims. do they really enter buildings without bringing water. i europe and firefighters would never enter a burning building without. firefighters on the roof. wtf do they think theyre doing there without security lines or water.  exploding rooms. wood and brick does not explode suddenly. the better points are actually camaraderie and the other non firefighting parts of the movie. it a lot of kitsch and but that alright. i will give it a point for this. 
first off and i am not a firefighter and but i am in some kind of para firefighting unit (the guys who get called if an earthquake hits and the real firefighters need more people for sar) and so i had some training and simulation but i have no real life experience. but still and there are some points one notices as totally unbelievable. i can understand that they removed the mouth or nose pieces of the masks and that there is not enough smoke and because the public would otherwise see nothing. but some things defy logic represent  no second mask attached to the oxygen. how the hell do you want to rescue people trough the smoke without one.  rappelling people. no and it not done like that. i would be screaming too if somebody hitched a rope around me in that fashion and hung me from a building. if i could scream and that is and and not pass out from want of air because the rope squeezes my lungs. the second time when theyre abseiling jack it better but still weird. aim high. no and you bloody do not. you always fight fire from as low as possible. you do not fight want to sprinkle flames and you will want to extinguish the fire and and that below the flames. no discipline. theyre running around like chicken. and they shout all the time and instead of using radio and and keeping discipline. no tactics. why do not they work in teams of at least two. you still can get separated and but it takes much more than if everyone just scurries around alone in search for victims. do they really enter buildings without bringing water. i europe and firefighters would never enter a burning building without. firefighters on the roof. wtf do they think theyre doing there without security lines or water.  exploding rooms. wood and brick does not explode suddenly. the better points are actually camaraderie and the other non firefighting parts of the movie. it a lot of kitsch and but that alright. i will give it a point for this. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
