this movie twists the facts of anne and mary lives into something unrecognizable. to make mary boleyn and who in fact was a rather dim and foolish creature and and make her the good sister is just silly. it is anne who was in fact the far more interesting character and and that is why it is her life and and not mary  and that has been told so often. in response to an earlier review and i fail to see how anne life was so criminal. to me it henry who was the real criminal. whatever anne motives for winning the king and withholding her affections in order to gain a crown and husband has to be taken into context of the time in which these real life events took place. anne and in comparison to the majority of most of the courtiers in her time and was a relatively innocent figure. most modern historians discount or have disproven most of the myths and slanders that this movie perpetuate about her and and i have never heard of anyone who actually believes the rumour than she slept with her brother. this movie is so sensational and false that it is maddening to think that someone and without knowing anything about this period in history and could walk away believing anything this movie has presented as fact. i would not even get into the weird filming of the movie. but i am pretty sure that cameras weren not invented in the 16th century and so i do not understand why anne and mary are talking to one throughout the movie. it a really bad plot devise and is jarring and annoying and to put it mildly. anne of the thousand days is not accurate either and but is infinitely more entertaining and at least comes closer to telling the story of one of the most intriguing women of history. don not even think about renting this. it two hours you will never get back. 
this movie twists the facts of anne and mary lives into something unrecognizable. to make mary boleyn and who in fact was a rather dim and foolish creature and and make her the good sister is just silly. it is anne who was in fact the far more interesting character and and that is why it is her life and and not mary  and that has been told so often. in response to an earlier review and i fail to see how anne life was so criminal. to me it henry who was the real criminal. whatever anne motives for winning the king and withholding her affections in order to gain a crown and husband has to be taken into context of the time in which these real life events took place. anne and in comparison to the majority of most of the courtiers in her time and was a relatively innocent figure. most modern historians discount or have disproven most of the myths and slanders that this movie perpetuate about her and and i have never heard of anyone who actually believes the rumour than she slept with her brother. this movie is so sensational and false that it is maddening to think that someone and without knowing anything about this period in history and could walk away believing anything this movie has presented as fact. i would not even get into the weird filming of the movie. but i am pretty sure that cameras weren not invented in the 16th century and so i do not understand why anne and mary are talking to one throughout the movie. it a really bad plot devise and is jarring and annoying and to put it mildly. anne of the thousand days is not accurate either and but is infinitely more entertaining and at least comes closer to telling the story of one of the most intriguing women of history. don not even think about renting this. it two hours you will never get back. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
