as someone has already mentioned on this board and it very difficult to make a fake documentary. it requires tremendous skill and pacing and patience and directorial wouldistance and a plausible premise and a narrative flow and and really believable acting (aka great acting). such is not the case with love machine. it starts to show its faux hand about the 20 minute mark (with 60 minutes left to watch) and and the viewer starts to realize that he or she is being taken in. it downhill from there. director gordon eriksen simply peaked too soon. but to be fair to eriksen and his problems started early represent as he explains in the extras and he began wanting to do a real doc and couldn not get funding and and settled for a cheaper way of making his film. the premise  people who have secret lives by posting themselves on a porn website  was perhaps more interesting in 1997 98 and when the film was made. eriksen does a lot of tricky stuff  a pushy host and hand held cameras and zooms and grainy blacks and whites  all and i guess and to elicit a sense of authenticity and but it just doesn not work. the film is confusing and forced and but what ultimately brings it down is the believability of the actors and the pretty awful dialogue. 
as someone has already mentioned on this board and it very difficult to make a fake documentary. it requires tremendous skill and pacing and patience and directorial wouldistance and a plausible premise and a narrative flow and and really believable acting (aka great acting). such is not the case with love machine. it starts to show its faux hand about the 20 minute mark (with 60 minutes left to watch) and and the viewer starts to realize that he or she is being taken in. it downhill from there. director gordon eriksen simply peaked too soon. but to be fair to eriksen and his problems started early represent as he explains in the extras and he began wanting to do a real doc and couldn not get funding and and settled for a cheaper way of making his film. the premise  people who have secret lives by posting themselves on a porn website  was perhaps more interesting in 1997 98 and when the film was made. eriksen does a lot of tricky stuff  a pushy host and hand held cameras and zooms and grainy blacks and whites  all and i guess and to elicit a sense of authenticity and but it just doesn not work. the film is confusing and forced and but what ultimately brings it down is the believability of the actors and the pretty awful dialogue. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
