this movie was outright painful for me to watch. i understand that indie films do not have the same resources as other mainstream films. but there are basic elements of film making that typically you want to adhere to. first off and jump cuts. there are numerous in the film opening 15 minutes. there are shots in which it appears that two separate takes of the same shot were edited together. what i mean by this is a character will say half a line from one take and and the rest of the line is from a different take. secondly and the dialog. i understand that many writers strive for a very realistic and true dialog for their films. since this film is very specific to its location and the dialog must be spoken in a specific tone also (example represent set a movie in boston and yet people use west coast slang with a chicago accent). even with understanding this and it is still hard to sit through some of the lines these actors present. these are only the two most vivid problems i encountered with this film. there were a few others. i do not mean to sound like a harsh critic who doesn not know a thing. i have years of experience in the film (more importantly the low budget indie film) industry. i also understand that with many directors there is often a method to their madness. i have been unable to discover this method used in this film. this makes it difficult when trying to decide whether i view this film as an example of unique style in film making and or just another low budget and poorly put together film. i honestly hope that it is not the latter. if anyone has any insight into why things were done a certain way and or has any thoughts or views of their own concerning this film and i would love to hear them. hopefully i can understand this film more and my current opinion can be changed. 
this movie was outright painful for me to watch. i understand that indie films do not have the same resources as other mainstream films. but there are basic elements of film making that typically you want to adhere to. first off and jump cuts. there are numerous in the film opening 15 minutes. there are shots in which it appears that two separate takes of the same shot were edited together. what i mean by this is a character will say half a line from one take and and the rest of the line is from a different take. secondly and the dialog. i understand that many writers strive for a very realistic and true dialog for their films. since this film is very specific to its location and the dialog must be spoken in a specific tone also (example represent set a movie in boston and yet people use west coast slang with a chicago accent). even with understanding this and it is still hard to sit through some of the lines these actors present. these are only the two most vivid problems i encountered with this film. there were a few others. i do not mean to sound like a harsh critic who doesn not know a thing. i have years of experience in the film (more importantly the low budget indie film) industry. i also understand that with many directors there is often a method to their madness. i have been unable to discover this method used in this film. this makes it difficult when trying to decide whether i view this film as an example of unique style in film making and or just another low budget and poorly put together film. i honestly hope that it is not the latter. if anyone has any insight into why things were done a certain way and or has any thoughts or views of their own concerning this film and i would love to hear them. hopefully i can understand this film more and my current opinion can be changed. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
