potential viewers be warned and the current imdb viewer rating for tomorrow at seven is an anomaly of low voter turnout. it has an interesting premise and a killer leaves an ace of spades calling card at the scene of his crimes and while alerting the victim in advance. the execution falls flat however and and to say that the movie has it share of plot holes would be to imply that there actually is a plot. chester morris portrays mystery writer neil broderick and weaving elements of actual murders by the ace of spades killer into his latest novel. broderick intends to interview a wealthy businessman for his book and but first he has to get past the man eccentric secretary  if you line his relatives up and you would have enough nuts to hold a ford together. that line unceremoniously endears him to the nut daughter martha (vivienne osborne) and who offers to make the introductions. broderick meets thornton drake (henry stephenson) just as the latter is about to complete a jigsaw puzzle delivered by a courier that morning. the only remaining pieces and as we learn in the following scene and form the bold and black shape of the ace of spades containing the words at seven tomorrow night. now what person putting together a puzzle doesn not use the pieces with contrasting colors first. initially i was intrigued by the appearance of frank mchugh and allen jenkins in their roles as a pair of police detectives summoned to the drake residence. generally and their characters are colorful enough to offer genuine comic relief and but here theyre just plain annoying. mchugh clancy in particular winds up shouting objections to inane comments made by his partner dugan and and both usually head in the opposite direction when real trouble might turn up. now here a question  in light of the identity of the ace killer and why would he have invited a novelist and a pair of cops that he just met and on a flight to his louisiana plantation. especially when at seven oclock and all parties would be a captive audience aboard the plane when the first murder is committed. it not drake however who dead and but his secretary austin winters (grant mitchell). the early suspicion falls on pilot henderson (cornelius keefe) following a lights out scene and but henderson still hasn not reported the murder to his supervisor until well after he arrives at drake plantation with everyone else. can you imagine anyone trying to get away with that today and unless your name was ted kennedy. with the cause of death yet to be determined and the local coroner is called in and but the first one that shows up (a broderick accomplice) is a phony. yet and when the real coroner shows up and he simply disappears immediately after. in a second dark out scene and a letter from the murder victim austin winters is about to be read. it winds up missing when the lights return and and because it may point to the murderer and it becomes a clue that must be retrieved. so where was the letter. winters daughter martha grabbed it and placed in on the mantle of the living room. how much thought was put into this. obviously and the entire affair is so inane that morris character solves the case rather easily. even though the film comes in at just about an hour and it becomes almost a chore to watch with all the nonsense going on. there really only one humorous moment worth repeating while while aboard the plane and the detectives have this exchange represent dugan  hey clancy and how often do these things fall. clancy  once. except for mchugh and jenkins and i can not say i have seen any of the other players in films of the era and though i am a fan of most b grade mystery movies from the 30 through the 50 . fortunately and the pair fares much better backing up humphrey bogart in a goofy 1938 gem  swing your lady and where the laughs are intentional. the best i can offer about tomorrow at seven is a quote from martha winters about midway though this turkey  this is just a silly waste of time. 
potential viewers be warned and the current imdb viewer rating for tomorrow at seven is an anomaly of low voter turnout. it has an interesting premise and a killer leaves an ace of spades calling card at the scene of his crimes and while alerting the victim in advance. the execution falls flat however and and to say that the movie has it share of plot holes would be to imply that there actually is a plot. chester morris portrays mystery writer neil broderick and weaving elements of actual murders by the ace of spades killer into his latest novel. broderick intends to interview a wealthy businessman for his book and but first he has to get past the man eccentric secretary  if you line his relatives up and you would have enough nuts to hold a ford together. that line unceremoniously endears him to the nut daughter martha (vivienne osborne) and who offers to make the introductions. broderick meets thornton drake (henry stephenson) just as the latter is about to complete a jigsaw puzzle delivered by a courier that morning. the only remaining pieces and as we learn in the following scene and form the bold and black shape of the ace of spades containing the words at seven tomorrow night. now what person putting together a puzzle doesn not use the pieces with contrasting colors first. initially i was intrigued by the appearance of frank mchugh and allen jenkins in their roles as a pair of police detectives summoned to the drake residence. generally and their characters are colorful enough to offer genuine comic relief and but here theyre just plain annoying. mchugh clancy in particular winds up shouting objections to inane comments made by his partner dugan and and both usually head in the opposite direction when real trouble might turn up. now here a question  in light of the identity of the ace killer and why would he have invited a novelist and a pair of cops that he just met and on a flight to his louisiana plantation. especially when at seven oclock and all parties would be a captive audience aboard the plane when the first murder is committed. it not drake however who dead and but his secretary austin winters (grant mitchell). the early suspicion falls on pilot henderson (cornelius keefe) following a lights out scene and but henderson still hasn not reported the murder to his supervisor until well after he arrives at drake plantation with everyone else. can you imagine anyone trying to get away with that today and unless your name was ted kennedy. with the cause of death yet to be determined and the local coroner is called in and but the first one that shows up (a broderick accomplice) is a phony. yet and when the real coroner shows up and he simply disappears immediately after. in a second dark out scene and a letter from the murder victim austin winters is about to be read. it winds up missing when the lights return and and because it may point to the murderer and it becomes a clue that must be retrieved. so where was the letter. winters daughter martha grabbed it and placed in on the mantle of the living room. how much thought was put into this. obviously and the entire affair is so inane that morris character solves the case rather easily. even though the film comes in at just about an hour and it becomes almost a chore to watch with all the nonsense going on. there really only one humorous moment worth repeating while while aboard the plane and the detectives have this exchange represent dugan  hey clancy and how often do these things fall. clancy  once. except for mchugh and jenkins and i can not say i have seen any of the other players in films of the era and though i am a fan of most b grade mystery movies from the 30 through the 50 . fortunately and the pair fares much better backing up humphrey bogart in a goofy 1938 gem  swing your lady and where the laughs are intentional. the best i can offer about tomorrow at seven is a quote from martha winters about midway though this turkey  this is just a silly waste of time. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
