a typical old b and w film. the dialogues are sometimes good and but too often  especially in the second half  they get naive and sometimes awfully naive and occasionally close to the point where they are unintentionally comical. the first third and with its background information on ladd gatsby shown with a series of interesting flashbacks and is the best part of the movie. but once gatsby moves into his new villa and makes his moves on betty field and the film gets overly melodramatic. the ending is yet another cop out ending while i do not know whether the novel itself contains this dumb and clichéd ending or whether the movie producer made some changes to it and but i have always considered car accidents to be a poor way to add drama to the conclusion of a story. i have seen this plot device a million times (or if it not a car and then it a fall from a horse) while the writer doesn not know how to end the story but he knows that he wants it to be dramatic and so he adds in a car accident. lame. and to make things worse and the accident is outrageously coincidental and preposterous and both plot wise and time wise while plot wise because field husband mistress (winters) gets killed by field and and the fact that winters sort of rushes out from the gas station into the street as though she would never noticed in the years that she had lived in it that there was a dangerous road right across her house  and and of course and at the very moment that she comes out she sees ladd car and mistakes it for field husband car and then shouts over here. i am here. run me over and make the ending tragic that way. while time wise because ladd and field get involved in an accident at the very day when they are preparing to tell field husband about their affair. basically and there is just too much forced and artificial irony in this accident. it also doesn not exactly help this movie how winters husband and da silva and goes on a revenge mission to kill the guy who ran over his wife while he basically does this by walking around like a zombie and going from car to car looking for scratches and and acting very badly indeed. both da silva acting and his character behaviour throughout the film are awful and confusing and respectively. scott fitzgerald was upset on a couple of occasions how his novels were adapted for the screen by hollywood screenwriters and and  although he was dead long before this movie was done  he might have been right to complain and judging by this film naive script. or and maybe his novels are even sillier and more naive than this film and and were actually improved upon by the screen adaptations. or and the films are pretty much like the novels. i could and of course and read this particular novel to find out and but i just can not be bothered. fitzgerald name doesn not exactly inspire me to read any of his books (and i do not mean the way his name sounds. ) he was certainly no heller and clavell and or twain. more like hemingway  a lot of noise about nothing. 
a typical old b and w film. the dialogues are sometimes good and but too often  especially in the second half  they get naive and sometimes awfully naive and occasionally close to the point where they are unintentionally comical. the first third and with its background information on ladd gatsby shown with a series of interesting flashbacks and is the best part of the movie. but once gatsby moves into his new villa and makes his moves on betty field and the film gets overly melodramatic. the ending is yet another cop out ending while i do not know whether the novel itself contains this dumb and clichéd ending or whether the movie producer made some changes to it and but i have always considered car accidents to be a poor way to add drama to the conclusion of a story. i have seen this plot device a million times (or if it not a car and then it a fall from a horse) while the writer doesn not know how to end the story but he knows that he wants it to be dramatic and so he adds in a car accident. lame. and to make things worse and the accident is outrageously coincidental and preposterous and both plot wise and time wise while plot wise because field husband mistress (winters) gets killed by field and and the fact that winters sort of rushes out from the gas station into the street as though she would never noticed in the years that she had lived in it that there was a dangerous road right across her house  and and of course and at the very moment that she comes out she sees ladd car and mistakes it for field husband car and then shouts over here. i am here. run me over and make the ending tragic that way. while time wise because ladd and field get involved in an accident at the very day when they are preparing to tell field husband about their affair. basically and there is just too much forced and artificial irony in this accident. it also doesn not exactly help this movie how winters husband and da silva and goes on a revenge mission to kill the guy who ran over his wife while he basically does this by walking around like a zombie and going from car to car looking for scratches and and acting very badly indeed. both da silva acting and his character behaviour throughout the film are awful and confusing and respectively. scott fitzgerald was upset on a couple of occasions how his novels were adapted for the screen by hollywood screenwriters and and  although he was dead long before this movie was done  he might have been right to complain and judging by this film naive script. or and maybe his novels are even sillier and more naive than this film and and were actually improved upon by the screen adaptations. or and the films are pretty much like the novels. i could and of course and read this particular novel to find out and but i just can not be bothered. fitzgerald name doesn not exactly inspire me to read any of his books (and i do not mean the way his name sounds. ) he was certainly no heller and clavell and or twain. more like hemingway  a lot of noise about nothing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
