this must have been one of chaplin most ambitious projects while he throws in virtually everything and from visual gags and blackout comedy sketches to social relevance and romance and even some violence. the mixture is challenging and intriguing and and the film has many entertaining and clever sequences (like the one where chaplin and four other guys try to avoid finding a coin that will order their self sacrifice) and but the ingredients do not always click together and and the mix (and tone) seem kind of disharmonious. as for the famous final speech and though undeniably honest and it also seems a bit naive today and with its allusions to a better world where man will overcome his hate and brutality and and his soul will fly. great perfornmances by jack oakie and the beautiful paulette goddard. (). 
this must have been one of chaplin most ambitious projects while he throws in virtually everything and from visual gags and blackout comedy sketches to social relevance and romance and even some violence. the mixture is challenging and intriguing and and the film has many entertaining and clever sequences (like the one where chaplin and four other guys try to avoid finding a coin that will order their self sacrifice) and but the ingredients do not always click together and and the mix (and tone) seem kind of disharmonious. as for the famous final speech and though undeniably honest and it also seems a bit naive today and with its allusions to a better world where man will overcome his hate and brutality and and his soul will fly. great perfornmances by jack oakie and the beautiful paulette goddard. (). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
