well and i fear that my review of this special would not heed much different observation than the others before me and but i literally just watched it during a pbs membership drive and frankly i am too excited not to say anything. to really appreciate the enigma that is barbra streisand and you have to look back before the movies. before the broadway phenomenon of the mid 60 . when television was still a young medium and there was a form of entertainment very prominent on the air that is but a memory today represent musical variety. some musical shows were weekly series and but others were single and one time specials and usually showcasing the special talent of the individual performer. this is where we get the raw and uninhibited first looks at streisand. she had already been a guest performer on other variety shows including garry moore and ed sullivan and and scored a major coup in a one time only tandem appearance with the woman who would pass her the baton of belter extraordinary represent judy garland. in 1966 and color me barbra introduced barbra streisand in color (hence the title) and but copied the format of her first special a year earlier almost to the letter. in 3 distinct acts and we get an abstract streisand (in an after hours art museum looking at and sometimes becoming the works of art) and a comic streisand working an already adoring audience in a studio circus (populated with many fuzzy and furry animals) and and best of all and a singing streisand in mini concert format just  well and frankly and just doing it. it amazes me that she still had the film debut of funny girl yet to come and as well as turns as songwriter and director and and political activist. here and she is barely 24 years old and doing extraordinary things because and as she puts it in her own on camera introduction and we do not know we couldn not and so we did. the art museum sequence is shot in philadelphia over one weekend immediately after the museum closed to the public on saturday evening and and apparently done with only one color camera. yet there are cuts and dissolves and and tracking shots galore and resulting in one rather spectacular peak moment  the modern and slightly beatnik flavored and gotta move. after getting lost amongst the modern abstracts and jazz club bongos begin and with streisand emerging in a psychedelic gown and glittering eye makeup and doing the catchy staccato tune with almost androgynous sex appeal. it is not until act 3 and believe it or not and that the moment is matched or bettered by another feat represent in the concert sequence and in a white gown and pearl earrings and streisand recites the torchy any place i hang my hat is home and tearing into the final notes and revealing one of those climactic belts that makes you scream like a little girl even if youre 44 years old. and a guy. just plain old great television. check it out. 
well and i fear that my review of this special would not heed much different observation than the others before me and but i literally just watched it during a pbs membership drive and frankly i am too excited not to say anything. to really appreciate the enigma that is barbra streisand and you have to look back before the movies. before the broadway phenomenon of the mid 60 . when television was still a young medium and there was a form of entertainment very prominent on the air that is but a memory today represent musical variety. some musical shows were weekly series and but others were single and one time specials and usually showcasing the special talent of the individual performer. this is where we get the raw and uninhibited first looks at streisand. she had already been a guest performer on other variety shows including garry moore and ed sullivan and and scored a major coup in a one time only tandem appearance with the woman who would pass her the baton of belter extraordinary represent judy garland. in 1966 and color me barbra introduced barbra streisand in color (hence the title) and but copied the format of her first special a year earlier almost to the letter. in 3 distinct acts and we get an abstract streisand (in an after hours art museum looking at and sometimes becoming the works of art) and a comic streisand working an already adoring audience in a studio circus (populated with many fuzzy and furry animals) and and best of all and a singing streisand in mini concert format just  well and frankly and just doing it. it amazes me that she still had the film debut of funny girl yet to come and as well as turns as songwriter and director and and political activist. here and she is barely 24 years old and doing extraordinary things because and as she puts it in her own on camera introduction and we do not know we couldn not and so we did. the art museum sequence is shot in philadelphia over one weekend immediately after the museum closed to the public on saturday evening and and apparently done with only one color camera. yet there are cuts and dissolves and and tracking shots galore and resulting in one rather spectacular peak moment  the modern and slightly beatnik flavored and gotta move. after getting lost amongst the modern abstracts and jazz club bongos begin and with streisand emerging in a psychedelic gown and glittering eye makeup and doing the catchy staccato tune with almost androgynous sex appeal. it is not until act 3 and believe it or not and that the moment is matched or bettered by another feat represent in the concert sequence and in a white gown and pearl earrings and streisand recites the torchy any place i hang my hat is home and tearing into the final notes and revealing one of those climactic belts that makes you scream like a little girl even if youre 44 years old. and a guy. just plain old great television. check it out. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
