yesterday was one of those days we decided to go to the movies. we picked ik ook van jou more or less at random and but we were interested to see the state of current dutch filmmaking. the film is based on a book by ronald giphart and and i must confess straight away that he is not exactly one of my favorites. the film features actors that are best known in the netherlands for their appearances in soap operas and or or afternoon talk shows. at least one of them (kamerling) has done some fairly decent stuff after leaving the soap world. so we decided to give this movie the benefit of the doubt. and what a mistake that was. this movie fails on all fronts. bad acting (the best performance is actually by a guinea pig and which very convincingly pretends to be dead). flat and uninteresting story with unexplained and uninteresting sidelines (why france. why tell the story to a girl from uganda. ) mistakes (black people dont have to use sunscreen and as far as i know and and heating systems in the netherlands do not produce clouds of steam like in new york and even if this looks great on film and people do not wear t shirts outside on new years eve in northern europe). there one funny moment which involves two little dogs and and that it. so that what i think and but more importantly and it seemed that none of the people leaving the movie theater afterwards had enjoyed it. i overheard one of them saying that he was extremely disappointed and because he liked the book so much. i did not read the book and but my advice would have to be represent read the book and do not see the film. 
yesterday was one of those days we decided to go to the movies. we picked ik ook van jou more or less at random and but we were interested to see the state of current dutch filmmaking. the film is based on a book by ronald giphart and and i must confess straight away that he is not exactly one of my favorites. the film features actors that are best known in the netherlands for their appearances in soap operas and or or afternoon talk shows. at least one of them (kamerling) has done some fairly decent stuff after leaving the soap world. so we decided to give this movie the benefit of the doubt. and what a mistake that was. this movie fails on all fronts. bad acting (the best performance is actually by a guinea pig and which very convincingly pretends to be dead). flat and uninteresting story with unexplained and uninteresting sidelines (why france. why tell the story to a girl from uganda. ) mistakes (black people dont have to use sunscreen and as far as i know and and heating systems in the netherlands do not produce clouds of steam like in new york and even if this looks great on film and people do not wear t shirts outside on new years eve in northern europe). there one funny moment which involves two little dogs and and that it. so that what i think and but more importantly and it seemed that none of the people leaving the movie theater afterwards had enjoyed it. i overheard one of them saying that he was extremely disappointed and because he liked the book so much. i did not read the book and but my advice would have to be represent read the book and do not see the film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
