i watched two very different holmes adventures this morning and but you would be amazed at the similarities. the was presumably the first collaboration between basil rathbone (if i were king and romeo and juliet) and nigel bruce and and director roy william neill. it was not their first sherlock holmes adventure and as they did one a couple of years before this. the made an excellent team and but i prefer the hammer version and which i will talk about later. holmes relies on a lot of disguises to do his work and and i am constantly amused by the mannerisms displayed when they figure something out. they always seem to dash on when they find a new clue. the story itself about keeping a bomb site from the germans in wwii was interesting and kept you focused on the mystery. 
i watched two very different holmes adventures this morning and but you would be amazed at the similarities. the was presumably the first collaboration between basil rathbone (if i were king and romeo and juliet) and nigel bruce and and director roy william neill. it was not their first sherlock holmes adventure and as they did one a couple of years before this. the made an excellent team and but i prefer the hammer version and which i will talk about later. holmes relies on a lot of disguises to do his work and and i am constantly amused by the mannerisms displayed when they figure something out. they always seem to dash on when they find a new clue. the story itself about keeping a bomb site from the germans in wwii was interesting and kept you focused on the mystery. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
