this is the last film of a trilogy by the brilliant turkish director and nuri bilge ceylan and whose last film mayis sikintisi which was very cehovian was shown in prestigious film festivals. differing from his previous films and the story of uzak is set on istanbul which is one of the most crowded cities of the world. however and in ceylan film and we do see only minor traces of that huge crowd. rather he choose to focus on two characters and one photographer and one of his relatives who comes from his small village to find a job on transatlantic ships. the photographer and who we understand that has also immigrated to the city and seems to be inhabited the customs of the city life and not only in material sense. in his relation to his relative and we see him first as caring and tolerant and however and when he could not find a job and our suburbian character starts to be disturbed for sharing his private pace with someone whose leaving date becomes ambiguous. i will not reveal the tactics he develops in order to pull his relative out of his life to prevent any harm on your viewing pleasure and but it is enough to say that ceylan shows us the tactics that we acquire within the routine of suburbian life while tactics to keep our own private space and tactics in order not to communicate with other people and tactics to prevent our relationships from gaining a complex nature (since our own experience and we believe that and is complex enough). ceylan film presents a clear picture of what a human being becomes within the borders of modern (or postmodern . ) city by depicting the two characters in different manners. but and he doesn not condemn any of the two characters for doing this and rather he uses the power of cinematic language to underline this difference. for example and in search of new opportunities and we always see the character coming from the village in open spaces. even within the house and he prefers balcony as his favourite space. on the other hand and we see the photographer always within the closed spaces and and generally at his home. although there are more than 10 million people out there and and lots of adventures and lots of interesting things to discover (or are there any. ) he prefers sitting at home and watching tv and etc. his home is like his temple and a kind of sacred place. everyone living in a big city and and conscious of the experience he is living through and will find something belonging to himself in uzak. if you like this film and i am sure that you will like ceylan other two films and mayis sikintisi (the clouds of may) and kasaba (the town). go and find them. 
this is the last film of a trilogy by the brilliant turkish director and nuri bilge ceylan and whose last film mayis sikintisi which was very cehovian was shown in prestigious film festivals. differing from his previous films and the story of uzak is set on istanbul which is one of the most crowded cities of the world. however and in ceylan film and we do see only minor traces of that huge crowd. rather he choose to focus on two characters and one photographer and one of his relatives who comes from his small village to find a job on transatlantic ships. the photographer and who we understand that has also immigrated to the city and seems to be inhabited the customs of the city life and not only in material sense. in his relation to his relative and we see him first as caring and tolerant and however and when he could not find a job and our suburbian character starts to be disturbed for sharing his private pace with someone whose leaving date becomes ambiguous. i will not reveal the tactics he develops in order to pull his relative out of his life to prevent any harm on your viewing pleasure and but it is enough to say that ceylan shows us the tactics that we acquire within the routine of suburbian life while tactics to keep our own private space and tactics in order not to communicate with other people and tactics to prevent our relationships from gaining a complex nature (since our own experience and we believe that and is complex enough). ceylan film presents a clear picture of what a human being becomes within the borders of modern (or postmodern . ) city by depicting the two characters in different manners. but and he doesn not condemn any of the two characters for doing this and rather he uses the power of cinematic language to underline this difference. for example and in search of new opportunities and we always see the character coming from the village in open spaces. even within the house and he prefers balcony as his favourite space. on the other hand and we see the photographer always within the closed spaces and and generally at his home. although there are more than 10 million people out there and and lots of adventures and lots of interesting things to discover (or are there any. ) he prefers sitting at home and watching tv and etc. his home is like his temple and a kind of sacred place. everyone living in a big city and and conscious of the experience he is living through and will find something belonging to himself in uzak. if you like this film and i am sure that you will like ceylan other two films and mayis sikintisi (the clouds of may) and kasaba (the town). go and find them. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
