sure and the film is full of black militant stereotypes and much of the jargon of the time. in that sense and the movie has indeed dated. but as a satirical look at america number one parasitical industry and advertising and it still on target. but just as important is the counter message and namely the effect of big bucks on those who would make the industry more socially responsibleno promoting war toys and alcohol and etc. thus and the movie also about the allures of capitalism. note and for example and how putney garb suddenly changes to resemble third world revolutionary fidel  and just before he pulls out of the firm. for a moment and it looks like swope mini revolution has succeeded among his staff and and he moving on and maybe to spread the movement. but then and the former militants succumb to the allure of big bucks and he departs shaking his head and perhaps to hijack a plane to cuba. downey final word and however and is an ironical one as the arab (i believe) burns down the money tower leaving the metaphorical structure of (advertising and capitalism) a smoking ruin. to me and this looks like change can only succeed as a cleansing act of destruction and not as a process of reforma message consistent with the radical spirit of the time. whatever the subtext and there are some genuinely funny moments and especially with the commercials that play as well now as they did then. those who compare the anarchic style to that of the marx bros. make a good point. the throw away lines fly thick and fast along with the outrageous set ups. forty years later and it still a hard movie to get a consistent handle on. despite the crudities and however and the film remains a work of daring originality with some genuinely telling moments. 
sure and the film is full of black militant stereotypes and much of the jargon of the time. in that sense and the movie has indeed dated. but as a satirical look at america number one parasitical industry and advertising and it still on target. but just as important is the counter message and namely the effect of big bucks on those who would make the industry more socially responsibleno promoting war toys and alcohol and etc. thus and the movie also about the allures of capitalism. note and for example and how putney garb suddenly changes to resemble third world revolutionary fidel  and just before he pulls out of the firm. for a moment and it looks like swope mini revolution has succeeded among his staff and and he moving on and maybe to spread the movement. but then and the former militants succumb to the allure of big bucks and he departs shaking his head and perhaps to hijack a plane to cuba. downey final word and however and is an ironical one as the arab (i believe) burns down the money tower leaving the metaphorical structure of (advertising and capitalism) a smoking ruin. to me and this looks like change can only succeed as a cleansing act of destruction and not as a process of reforma message consistent with the radical spirit of the time. whatever the subtext and there are some genuinely funny moments and especially with the commercials that play as well now as they did then. those who compare the anarchic style to that of the marx bros. make a good point. the throw away lines fly thick and fast along with the outrageous set ups. forty years later and it still a hard movie to get a consistent handle on. despite the crudities and however and the film remains a work of daring originality with some genuinely telling moments. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
