not even original in the plot. ho hum. there were a couple of angles that could have been quite interesting and but the film follows the path of 90% of hollywood movies. i do not really get samuel jackson acting most of the time in his other films and but he was rather good in this film. he rarely yelled and went much further in his character rather than reverting to an in your face anger. i liked eva mendes  as usual  and even though she is great eye candy and she proves herself to be much more than that as an actress. luis guzman was actually really good also and except that i disliked the change of his character towards samuel jackson at the end of the film. how can one character center around a dislike for a former cop and then turn into lollipop land within a split second. is there no original thought left in hollywood. 
not even original in the plot. ho hum. there were a couple of angles that could have been quite interesting and but the film follows the path of 90% of hollywood movies. i do not really get samuel jackson acting most of the time in his other films and but he was rather good in this film. he rarely yelled and went much further in his character rather than reverting to an in your face anger. i liked eva mendes  as usual  and even though she is great eye candy and she proves herself to be much more than that as an actress. luis guzman was actually really good also and except that i disliked the change of his character towards samuel jackson at the end of the film. how can one character center around a dislike for a former cop and then turn into lollipop land within a split second. is there no original thought left in hollywood. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
