i saw this film shortly after watching moonlight and valentino with elizabeth perkins and gwyneth platrow and whoopi goldberg and kathleen turner. there are a lot of similarities between the two films. they both have great casts and good acting. they both have stock characters of sisters who are very different and an offensive stepmother and a woman friend or confidant and an emotionally unavailable father and a dead mother and a surprise lover. both films have the characters experience life changing realizations and both films suffer from a kind of love conquers all sentimentality. they both add a little titillation with cameron diaz in black underwear and a partial back shot of gwyneth paltrow naked. both films seem contrived and as if the writers of the works the films are based on did market research and said and ok and there a market for stories about relationships between women and so i am going to write about two sisters with an offensive stepmother in other words and instead of the drama emerging from the truth of the relationship and the relationship is invented to fit the dramatic situation. it seems forced and the characters do not seem real and the relationships are unbelievable. the resolution of the tensions between the characters is simplistic with simple apologies completely whisking away years of acrimony leaving everyone feeling warm and fuzzy ever after. it just not real. romantic fantasy. the characters in in her shoes are a little more overblown than moonlight and valentino and especially the stepmother part. sydelle feller is so evil that it is difficult to believe that the father would stay with her and or even marry her in the first place. if you liked moonlight and valentino you will probably like in her shoes as well. enjoyable performances in both and in fact and the actors bring depth to their parts that goes way beyond the contrived sentimentality of the scripts. 
i saw this film shortly after watching moonlight and valentino with elizabeth perkins and gwyneth platrow and whoopi goldberg and kathleen turner. there are a lot of similarities between the two films. they both have great casts and good acting. they both have stock characters of sisters who are very different and an offensive stepmother and a woman friend or confidant and an emotionally unavailable father and a dead mother and a surprise lover. both films have the characters experience life changing realizations and both films suffer from a kind of love conquers all sentimentality. they both add a little titillation with cameron diaz in black underwear and a partial back shot of gwyneth paltrow naked. both films seem contrived and as if the writers of the works the films are based on did market research and said and ok and there a market for stories about relationships between women and so i am going to write about two sisters with an offensive stepmother in other words and instead of the drama emerging from the truth of the relationship and the relationship is invented to fit the dramatic situation. it seems forced and the characters do not seem real and the relationships are unbelievable. the resolution of the tensions between the characters is simplistic with simple apologies completely whisking away years of acrimony leaving everyone feeling warm and fuzzy ever after. it just not real. romantic fantasy. the characters in in her shoes are a little more overblown than moonlight and valentino and especially the stepmother part. sydelle feller is so evil that it is difficult to believe that the father would stay with her and or even marry her in the first place. if you liked moonlight and valentino you will probably like in her shoes as well. enjoyable performances in both and in fact and the actors bring depth to their parts that goes way beyond the contrived sentimentality of the scripts. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
