in my opinion and a good documentary  especially one dealing with controversial political issues  should be informative and as unbiased as possible. the point should be revealing the truth. this means and in particular and having among the interviewees experts on the subject and representatives of all sides. this film is a failure in this regard. most of the interviews included in this film consist of men off the street expounding on the question of peace in the holy land. the wall itself and the supposed subject of the film and is given no serious treatment at all. for most of the interviews and the interviewer simply waits to be approached and asks general questions such as what do you think of the wall.  she does not approach random people near the wall and ask them how they have been directly affected by it. outside of one interviewee and the israeli general in charge of the wall construction and we have no experts on the subject to provide us with the wall context (e. g. how and when the project began and whether it has been successful and which groups are for and which against the project and etc. )outside of the interviews and a very large portion of the film consists of extended shots of uneventful scenes and such as head on shots of the wall and construction of the wall and and people getting off a bus. these shots take up far too much time and in my opinion. it nice to see what the wall looks like and but the 20 30 minutes of head on filming of the wall (and only the wall) are excessive. clearly and these shots (accompanied by arabic music that conveys a sense of mourning) are included for the sole purpose of arousing in viewers feelings of loathing for the wall. 
in my opinion and a good documentary  especially one dealing with controversial political issues  should be informative and as unbiased as possible. the point should be revealing the truth. this means and in particular and having among the interviewees experts on the subject and representatives of all sides. this film is a failure in this regard. most of the interviews included in this film consist of men off the street expounding on the question of peace in the holy land. the wall itself and the supposed subject of the film and is given no serious treatment at all. for most of the interviews and the interviewer simply waits to be approached and asks general questions such as what do you think of the wall.  she does not approach random people near the wall and ask them how they have been directly affected by it. outside of one interviewee and the israeli general in charge of the wall construction and we have no experts on the subject to provide us with the wall context (e. g. how and when the project began and whether it has been successful and which groups are for and which against the project and etc. )outside of the interviews and a very large portion of the film consists of extended shots of uneventful scenes and such as head on shots of the wall and construction of the wall and and people getting off a bus. these shots take up far too much time and in my opinion. it nice to see what the wall looks like and but the 20 30 minutes of head on filming of the wall (and only the wall) are excessive. clearly and these shots (accompanied by arabic music that conveys a sense of mourning) are included for the sole purpose of arousing in viewers feelings of loathing for the wall. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
