i have mixed emotions about this film and especially as it compares to its forerunner and an american werewolf in london. that film had it funny moments and it was still more of horror tale than anything else. this updated version and now set in paris and does not have that edge at all and simply isn not in the same class. but it does have some good things going for it that the first film did not have and overall it still fun to watch. so and werewolf purists aside and most of whom think this film is pure garbage compared to the london version and i will still give it decent marks since i do not care what others think. i liked it even though i agree london is better and i prefer that version and too. the first 30 40 minutes of this movie is strictly played for laughs including a hysterical scene with a balloon in a restaurant. it also introduces the lead female character and played by julie delpy. i do not see enough of this actress. she doesn not seem to make that many films and or least ones i hear about over here in america. this french actress has a face that is classic beauty and so the film got points for having her in it and and she looks great. when the horror starts and it can get scary and the special effects are good. i also liked the lack of profanity in this film and unlike the first one represent no f words and no lord name in vain  amazing. however and there are plenty of sexual remarks and there is one scene with a guy running out of bar tied to a cross which was blasphemous to me. the soundtrack is heavy metal which isn not appealing to a middle aged guy like me and either. this film is geared a lot more toward 20 somethings and if that helps anyone. it entertaining. just do not expect it to live up to the first film. 
i have mixed emotions about this film and especially as it compares to its forerunner and an american werewolf in london. that film had it funny moments and it was still more of horror tale than anything else. this updated version and now set in paris and does not have that edge at all and simply isn not in the same class. but it does have some good things going for it that the first film did not have and overall it still fun to watch. so and werewolf purists aside and most of whom think this film is pure garbage compared to the london version and i will still give it decent marks since i do not care what others think. i liked it even though i agree london is better and i prefer that version and too. the first 30 40 minutes of this movie is strictly played for laughs including a hysterical scene with a balloon in a restaurant. it also introduces the lead female character and played by julie delpy. i do not see enough of this actress. she doesn not seem to make that many films and or least ones i hear about over here in america. this french actress has a face that is classic beauty and so the film got points for having her in it and and she looks great. when the horror starts and it can get scary and the special effects are good. i also liked the lack of profanity in this film and unlike the first one represent no f words and no lord name in vain  amazing. however and there are plenty of sexual remarks and there is one scene with a guy running out of bar tied to a cross which was blasphemous to me. the soundtrack is heavy metal which isn not appealing to a middle aged guy like me and either. this film is geared a lot more toward 20 somethings and if that helps anyone. it entertaining. just do not expect it to live up to the first film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
