two movies represent the fifth element and armageddon. the same subject represent to save the world. the same main actor represent bruce willis. one difference represent armageddon is very inferior to luc besson film. some spectacular special effects do not succeed in hiding a labored and globally conventional screenplay. several parts of the movie are showing it. i think about the president speech and especially willis relationship with his daughter and grace. at the beginning of the movie and he tends to neglect and overprotect her and this makes her weary. then and at the end of the movie and it true love and understanding that shine in him. on another hand and the movie falls in the following trap represent michael bay takes his subject too seriously. of course and the movie tries to be funny but the result doesn not work as the humor introduced in the movie is often crude and pretty low level whereas in the fifth element and the humor was zany and involuntary and enabled to overlook the serious side of the action. the movie suffers from two other handicaps represent it often falls into the ridiculous (the russian astronaut) and almost all the actors are bad used. bruce willis is all the contrary of his fifth element character. he plays the he man and he hams it up and sometimes and he unbearable. the other actors are barely credible in their own roles and particularly and willis sinking crew. it seems that this crew is here just for having fun. one of them is taken for being very qualified but he looks like a fool. and poor liv tyler. she at the nasa just to be decorative. when the movie was released in france in august 1998 and bruce willis expressed is weariness of saving the world. his weariness was probably justified by this spectacular but poor movie. 
two movies represent the fifth element and armageddon. the same subject represent to save the world. the same main actor represent bruce willis. one difference represent armageddon is very inferior to luc besson film. some spectacular special effects do not succeed in hiding a labored and globally conventional screenplay. several parts of the movie are showing it. i think about the president speech and especially willis relationship with his daughter and grace. at the beginning of the movie and he tends to neglect and overprotect her and this makes her weary. then and at the end of the movie and it true love and understanding that shine in him. on another hand and the movie falls in the following trap represent michael bay takes his subject too seriously. of course and the movie tries to be funny but the result doesn not work as the humor introduced in the movie is often crude and pretty low level whereas in the fifth element and the humor was zany and involuntary and enabled to overlook the serious side of the action. the movie suffers from two other handicaps represent it often falls into the ridiculous (the russian astronaut) and almost all the actors are bad used. bruce willis is all the contrary of his fifth element character. he plays the he man and he hams it up and sometimes and he unbearable. the other actors are barely credible in their own roles and particularly and willis sinking crew. it seems that this crew is here just for having fun. one of them is taken for being very qualified but he looks like a fool. and poor liv tyler. she at the nasa just to be decorative. when the movie was released in france in august 1998 and bruce willis expressed is weariness of saving the world. his weariness was probably justified by this spectacular but poor movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
