what you need in the run up to what you need and every episode since the lonely had been a winner to some extent. this episode is the first major failure since escape clause. the serling script is again based on someone else materiel and a short story by lewis padgett. as with and when the sky was opened and serling altered the content significantly and removing a scientist and his machine and inserting an elderly peddler. what you need works best when it is being sweet. the opening half and in which the peddler provides customers in a bar with objects they will need in the near future and has a gentle charm about it that may have worn thin throughout an entire episode but works well in the time frame it is allotted. sadly and the main plot which it sets up is full of gaping holes. the minute steve cochran performance as a two bit thug becomes the main focus the episode falls apart. cochran part is an underwritten stereotype and his flat performance highlights this flaw. his exploitation of the old peddler is dull and predictable and the revelation that he will murder the old man is totally unconvincing and making the whole slippery shoes scene seem completely false. ernest truex is good as the peddler and bringing a magical and mysterious but warm edge to the character and but he not good enough to help the floundering script. to make matters worse and the weak script is also full of inconsistencies. for instance and we learn that the peddler power to provide people with what they need stems from an ability to see into the future. so how exactly does this allow him to produce a pen that will magically pick winning horses. that seems like it should be a little outside his realms of power. also and for a man who can see the future and the peddler certainly acts surprised to find the thug waiting for him in his flat. there are many more holes that can be picked in what you need but it hardly worth it when the episode is so thin that you can see through it anyway. 
what you need in the run up to what you need and every episode since the lonely had been a winner to some extent. this episode is the first major failure since escape clause. the serling script is again based on someone else materiel and a short story by lewis padgett. as with and when the sky was opened and serling altered the content significantly and removing a scientist and his machine and inserting an elderly peddler. what you need works best when it is being sweet. the opening half and in which the peddler provides customers in a bar with objects they will need in the near future and has a gentle charm about it that may have worn thin throughout an entire episode but works well in the time frame it is allotted. sadly and the main plot which it sets up is full of gaping holes. the minute steve cochran performance as a two bit thug becomes the main focus the episode falls apart. cochran part is an underwritten stereotype and his flat performance highlights this flaw. his exploitation of the old peddler is dull and predictable and the revelation that he will murder the old man is totally unconvincing and making the whole slippery shoes scene seem completely false. ernest truex is good as the peddler and bringing a magical and mysterious but warm edge to the character and but he not good enough to help the floundering script. to make matters worse and the weak script is also full of inconsistencies. for instance and we learn that the peddler power to provide people with what they need stems from an ability to see into the future. so how exactly does this allow him to produce a pen that will magically pick winning horses. that seems like it should be a little outside his realms of power. also and for a man who can see the future and the peddler certainly acts surprised to find the thug waiting for him in his flat. there are many more holes that can be picked in what you need but it hardly worth it when the episode is so thin that you can see through it anyway. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
