2/3 of this movie is recycled footage of the previous movies and a fact that sadly obvious even to someone like myself who hasn not seen the original movies. and somehow it feels like a rip off even though i haven not seen the stuff before. it like that episode of every tv show where the characters sit around a photo album or something and you just see recycled footage of other episodes. i have seen some producers do extended montages of recycled footage and but never anything beyond 5 minutes or so. this movie is mostly stuff that had already been seen by audiences and so you could mount a case that it one of the biggest rip offs ever foisted on the motion picture public. i got to see it in the theater and in a 16mm print and which is good enough i suppose considering how rare this kind of material must be on film these days. i give the movie some credit for semi convincing gothic atmosphere and for unintentional humor and but that about it. the aztec mummy monster looks good and even has some mobility in his face which is better than most movie monsters of the period. but the robot is pitiful and although it interesting that they made the human face totally visible. it a robot human or something of the sort as they somewhat explain in the movie. i think that considered an android. so technically in hard sci fi terms this movie should be called android vs. the aztec mummy and but i doubt anyone was too worried about technicalities here anymore than they were worried about quality. in fact the movie is so sloppily put together that it makes television look good. even the dubbing from mexican into english is lazy and weak  for example at one point the hero says i might as well begin at the beginning. what the heck kind of translation is that. couldn not they at least have him say start at the beginning so that it doesn not sound repetitive. a high school newspaper editor could have fixed the screenplay of this movie. it the epitome of utilitarian film making and just absolutely nothing is in this movie that doesn not need to be there for the basic commercial purpose of the film. they put no more effort into making it than they had to and and considering the extensive recycled footage i would doubt that they actually spent more than a week making this movie. i will now cease posting about it on the principle that i do not want to expend more energy in the process of commenting than the creators of the movie actually expended while making it. 
2/3 of this movie is recycled footage of the previous movies and a fact that sadly obvious even to someone like myself who hasn not seen the original movies. and somehow it feels like a rip off even though i haven not seen the stuff before. it like that episode of every tv show where the characters sit around a photo album or something and you just see recycled footage of other episodes. i have seen some producers do extended montages of recycled footage and but never anything beyond 5 minutes or so. this movie is mostly stuff that had already been seen by audiences and so you could mount a case that it one of the biggest rip offs ever foisted on the motion picture public. i got to see it in the theater and in a 16mm print and which is good enough i suppose considering how rare this kind of material must be on film these days. i give the movie some credit for semi convincing gothic atmosphere and for unintentional humor and but that about it. the aztec mummy monster looks good and even has some mobility in his face which is better than most movie monsters of the period. but the robot is pitiful and although it interesting that they made the human face totally visible. it a robot human or something of the sort as they somewhat explain in the movie. i think that considered an android. so technically in hard sci fi terms this movie should be called android vs. the aztec mummy and but i doubt anyone was too worried about technicalities here anymore than they were worried about quality. in fact the movie is so sloppily put together that it makes television look good. even the dubbing from mexican into english is lazy and weak  for example at one point the hero says i might as well begin at the beginning. what the heck kind of translation is that. couldn not they at least have him say start at the beginning so that it doesn not sound repetitive. a high school newspaper editor could have fixed the screenplay of this movie. it the epitome of utilitarian film making and just absolutely nothing is in this movie that doesn not need to be there for the basic commercial purpose of the film. they put no more effort into making it than they had to and and considering the extensive recycled footage i would doubt that they actually spent more than a week making this movie. i will now cease posting about it on the principle that i do not want to expend more energy in the process of commenting than the creators of the movie actually expended while making it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
