does anyone care about any of the characters in this film.  or for that matter what happens to them.  i doubt it. that is the key problem  for a tragedy to work we have to care about at least one of the characters and none of them inspire any sympathy or appear to have any redeeming qualities at all. what may have worked in the 16th century and certainly does not work in one can only assume post apocalyptic liverpool if that was indeed what it was meant to be. the problem is the characters in post apocalyptic liverpool and whilst still driving around in cars and using mobile phones and watching television and have reverted to speaking in shakespearian language  with a liverpudlian dialect. oh dear. bad enough you might think  but this often lapsed into pure scouse  with comments such as eh lah are you a cockney. and was that a merseyrail announcement during one of the scenes filmed in the underground. well the good news is that in post apocalyptic liverpool  the trains are still running. the characters without exception are badly drawn and wooden and more like charicatures on the lines of the joker or penguin in batman and robin except there is no real storyline to speak of  or if there is  it is one that doesn not work in a modern setting where half the sets are gloomy and blade runnerish and the other half are fluorescent garish or just 21st century normal. costumes are also mixed up with half wearing their everyday clothes (parkers are big in post apocalyptic liverpool  apparently) and the other half wearing costumes from the leftovers of a fancy dress party. the film explores the ideas of lust and incest and revenge in the most inane fashion imaginable  the tragedy is that this film was made at all. 
does anyone care about any of the characters in this film.  or for that matter what happens to them.  i doubt it. that is the key problem  for a tragedy to work we have to care about at least one of the characters and none of them inspire any sympathy or appear to have any redeeming qualities at all. what may have worked in the 16th century and certainly does not work in one can only assume post apocalyptic liverpool if that was indeed what it was meant to be. the problem is the characters in post apocalyptic liverpool and whilst still driving around in cars and using mobile phones and watching television and have reverted to speaking in shakespearian language  with a liverpudlian dialect. oh dear. bad enough you might think  but this often lapsed into pure scouse  with comments such as eh lah are you a cockney. and was that a merseyrail announcement during one of the scenes filmed in the underground. well the good news is that in post apocalyptic liverpool  the trains are still running. the characters without exception are badly drawn and wooden and more like charicatures on the lines of the joker or penguin in batman and robin except there is no real storyline to speak of  or if there is  it is one that doesn not work in a modern setting where half the sets are gloomy and blade runnerish and the other half are fluorescent garish or just 21st century normal. costumes are also mixed up with half wearing their everyday clothes (parkers are big in post apocalyptic liverpool  apparently) and the other half wearing costumes from the leftovers of a fancy dress party. the film explores the ideas of lust and incest and revenge in the most inane fashion imaginable  the tragedy is that this film was made at all. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
