i was a hippie age 22 in 1965 and have seen the play 5 times and have 2 versions of the music and and have read the script many times. maybe taken as an separate thing and the movie is ok and but as an adoption of the play and it terrible. first the good. the songs are sung well and and the production values are pretty good. the homosexual implications in black boys and white boys is cute. the claude or berger switch was interesting. hair is a fluid production and and constant changes in it are inherent provided the basic spirit of it is retained. but the basic spirit was very much distorted. it seemed like all the producer wanted was to sing certain songs and and fit the story line to them regardless of what that did to the original intent of the play. claude and sheila and and hud were presented as a selfish brats who could care less about anyone outside their tribe. claude destroyed sheila parents party (it hard to believe that she smiled while her parents were being hurt) and and repeatedly stole cars. sheila stole the soldier clothes and car. then she left him in the middle of the desert where he would certainly sunburn badly and probably be busted in rank and and could likely die on that lonely nevada road. good fun. and hud found it fine to break his son heart while yelling at his ex. this is not what hippies were like and not what the play described and and is directly opposite to a love generation. i have never seen a hippie beg for money. the point was to be self sufficient outside the capitalist system and not beg from it. after berger is thrown in jail for ruining sheila party and claude offers to bail some out and berger insists on being bailed instead and with no better plan for bailing the rest that hitting on sheila parents and and then hitting on his own mommy. be in has always been a very spiritual point and but here it is wasted on silly brides floating around. even if this is part of his trip and it ruins a beautiful song. i know theyre contrasting floating in space with the army. but again and it totally ruins a beautiful song. while sheila and claude are skinny dipping and berger steals their clothes and laughing it was fun man even after he could see both were very annoyed. then a little later and berger does one thing that no hippie ever does. he hits claude. terrible. then they have the perfect opportunity to sing starshine at night in some beautiful sf spot with the stars twinkling down and maybe working into an inventive duet. instead and the whole tribe sings it in the blazing sun speeding down the road in a convertible (stolen of course). i was vastly disappointed with the movie in 1979 and and i like it even less now. i think it would have been possible to do a reasonably close adoption of the show and but this ain not it. 
i was a hippie age 22 in 1965 and have seen the play 5 times and have 2 versions of the music and and have read the script many times. maybe taken as an separate thing and the movie is ok and but as an adoption of the play and it terrible. first the good. the songs are sung well and and the production values are pretty good. the homosexual implications in black boys and white boys is cute. the claude or berger switch was interesting. hair is a fluid production and and constant changes in it are inherent provided the basic spirit of it is retained. but the basic spirit was very much distorted. it seemed like all the producer wanted was to sing certain songs and and fit the story line to them regardless of what that did to the original intent of the play. claude and sheila and and hud were presented as a selfish brats who could care less about anyone outside their tribe. claude destroyed sheila parents party (it hard to believe that she smiled while her parents were being hurt) and and repeatedly stole cars. sheila stole the soldier clothes and car. then she left him in the middle of the desert where he would certainly sunburn badly and probably be busted in rank and and could likely die on that lonely nevada road. good fun. and hud found it fine to break his son heart while yelling at his ex. this is not what hippies were like and not what the play described and and is directly opposite to a love generation. i have never seen a hippie beg for money. the point was to be self sufficient outside the capitalist system and not beg from it. after berger is thrown in jail for ruining sheila party and claude offers to bail some out and berger insists on being bailed instead and with no better plan for bailing the rest that hitting on sheila parents and and then hitting on his own mommy. be in has always been a very spiritual point and but here it is wasted on silly brides floating around. even if this is part of his trip and it ruins a beautiful song. i know theyre contrasting floating in space with the army. but again and it totally ruins a beautiful song. while sheila and claude are skinny dipping and berger steals their clothes and laughing it was fun man even after he could see both were very annoyed. then a little later and berger does one thing that no hippie ever does. he hits claude. terrible. then they have the perfect opportunity to sing starshine at night in some beautiful sf spot with the stars twinkling down and maybe working into an inventive duet. instead and the whole tribe sings it in the blazing sun speeding down the road in a convertible (stolen of course). i was vastly disappointed with the movie in 1979 and and i like it even less now. i think it would have been possible to do a reasonably close adoption of the show and but this ain not it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
