lucio fulci and a director not exactly renowned for his subtlety and ill advisedly tries his hand at black humour in touch of death and a made for tv movie about lester parsons (brett halsey) and a psycho who seduces and murders rich widows in order to pay his gambling debts. starting off with a wonderfully gory scene in which the lethal lothario disposes of his latest victim via chainsaw and mincing machine and hungry hogs and touch of death starts promisingly enough and but fulci soon loses control of proceedings and introducing a weird sub plot involving a mysterious copycat killer and some heavy handed comedic scenes. there are several more graphic murders which and in true fulci fashion and are extremely violent and gruesome and but even the high level of bloodletting doesn not stop this from being one of fulci poorer efforts. as i have found with many of his other movies and a comprehensible storyline is not exactly high on the agenda when lucio is behind the camera. this film has many peculiarities which left me more than little perplexed represent why do not lester dispose all of his victims using the dismemberment method seen at the beginning. why are all of his victims either hairy or disfigured. what the hell is that ending all about. fulci is considered by many to be one of the greats of horror cinema while i do not understand his popularity and finding the majority of the films of his that i have seen so far to be generally lacking both decent narratives and technical proficiency. touch of death certainly does nothing to change my opinion. 
lucio fulci and a director not exactly renowned for his subtlety and ill advisedly tries his hand at black humour in touch of death and a made for tv movie about lester parsons (brett halsey) and a psycho who seduces and murders rich widows in order to pay his gambling debts. starting off with a wonderfully gory scene in which the lethal lothario disposes of his latest victim via chainsaw and mincing machine and hungry hogs and touch of death starts promisingly enough and but fulci soon loses control of proceedings and introducing a weird sub plot involving a mysterious copycat killer and some heavy handed comedic scenes. there are several more graphic murders which and in true fulci fashion and are extremely violent and gruesome and but even the high level of bloodletting doesn not stop this from being one of fulci poorer efforts. as i have found with many of his other movies and a comprehensible storyline is not exactly high on the agenda when lucio is behind the camera. this film has many peculiarities which left me more than little perplexed represent why do not lester dispose all of his victims using the dismemberment method seen at the beginning. why are all of his victims either hairy or disfigured. what the hell is that ending all about. fulci is considered by many to be one of the greats of horror cinema while i do not understand his popularity and finding the majority of the films of his that i have seen so far to be generally lacking both decent narratives and technical proficiency. touch of death certainly does nothing to change my opinion. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
