first and i should say that i have seen the 39 version at least 100 times while know all the dialog and and have read the 36 play and which is different from the 39 and contains nuggets of gold of its own. this version is as flat as a lifetime movie on adultery. there a reason you haven not seen an expensive campaign of tv ads for it. according to entertainment weekly and bening hated the catty tone of the original and how the women spent the whole time going to war on each other. guess what. that was booth intent. it was a slick and theatrical take on gossip and adultery and and back biting among a set of well heeled manhattan socialites. the crowd that made this new version had no intention of honoring the original source material. they pick at it weirdly and putting in half a scene here and half a scene there that come from the first version. bette midler (who is in just a few scenes and acts the old countess part in a broad and grinning style) doesn not have any context in this version. she mentions going after buck and which is a key element in the original  then he never mentioned again. this movie is so dull that i am not going to over analyze it and but here are a few things that i found unbelievable represent > mary haines bragging to her domestic staff represent i can suck the nails out of a board. right. great writing. norma shearer could have done a line reading on that and gotten an oscar nom and right. > a compassionate sylvia fowler. annette bening got what she wanted and and the movie just sort of withers away. claire booth used sylvia as the comic engine that swept through the play. as portrayed immortally by rosalind russell and she was an ignorant and spiteful woman who rattled off reams of petty and ridiculous and irresistible dialog that is still classic and quotable. she wasn not above biting paulette godard ankle. the 2008 filmmakers decided that this character had to die. in killing her off and they killed the movie. 
first and i should say that i have seen the 39 version at least 100 times while know all the dialog and and have read the 36 play and which is different from the 39 and contains nuggets of gold of its own. this version is as flat as a lifetime movie on adultery. there a reason you haven not seen an expensive campaign of tv ads for it. according to entertainment weekly and bening hated the catty tone of the original and how the women spent the whole time going to war on each other. guess what. that was booth intent. it was a slick and theatrical take on gossip and adultery and and back biting among a set of well heeled manhattan socialites. the crowd that made this new version had no intention of honoring the original source material. they pick at it weirdly and putting in half a scene here and half a scene there that come from the first version. bette midler (who is in just a few scenes and acts the old countess part in a broad and grinning style) doesn not have any context in this version. she mentions going after buck and which is a key element in the original  then he never mentioned again. this movie is so dull that i am not going to over analyze it and but here are a few things that i found unbelievable represent > mary haines bragging to her domestic staff represent i can suck the nails out of a board. right. great writing. norma shearer could have done a line reading on that and gotten an oscar nom and right. > a compassionate sylvia fowler. annette bening got what she wanted and and the movie just sort of withers away. claire booth used sylvia as the comic engine that swept through the play. as portrayed immortally by rosalind russell and she was an ignorant and spiteful woman who rattled off reams of petty and ridiculous and irresistible dialog that is still classic and quotable. she wasn not above biting paulette godard ankle. the 2008 filmmakers decided that this character had to die. in killing her off and they killed the movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
