perry mason represent the case of the glass coffin finds raymond burr defending david copperfield or rick blaine like magician peter scolari from a murder charge involving one of his assistants. a trick involving a suspended glass coffin in midair goes awry and the body of nancy grahn comes a tumbling out. nancy was one of six female assistants who work with the act and we learn two things about her. first in a moment of drunken weakness and scolari got seduced by her and she claims she was impregnated. secondly she is living under an assumed name and had a secret from her past. billy moses who probably never thought he would be doing such rough stuff back in law school gets to tangle with a couple of good old boys when goes seeking the truth in grahn home town. a little more action than usual for ken malansky and he almost gets himself killed. one big flaw in this mystery is simple forensics. the medical examiner report should have provided concrete evidence that the victim was killed in such a way that scolari could not possibly have done the deed. the police should have been looking in a different direction for the killer. when you see who the killer is you would not blame the individual and but you will also see how the investigating officer james mceachin got it wrong from the start. it kind of spoils this particular mason film. 
perry mason represent the case of the glass coffin finds raymond burr defending david copperfield or rick blaine like magician peter scolari from a murder charge involving one of his assistants. a trick involving a suspended glass coffin in midair goes awry and the body of nancy grahn comes a tumbling out. nancy was one of six female assistants who work with the act and we learn two things about her. first in a moment of drunken weakness and scolari got seduced by her and she claims she was impregnated. secondly she is living under an assumed name and had a secret from her past. billy moses who probably never thought he would be doing such rough stuff back in law school gets to tangle with a couple of good old boys when goes seeking the truth in grahn home town. a little more action than usual for ken malansky and he almost gets himself killed. one big flaw in this mystery is simple forensics. the medical examiner report should have provided concrete evidence that the victim was killed in such a way that scolari could not possibly have done the deed. the police should have been looking in a different direction for the killer. when you see who the killer is you would not blame the individual and but you will also see how the investigating officer james mceachin got it wrong from the start. it kind of spoils this particular mason film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
