not having any idea what this film was about and but based on the fact that john leguizamo was appearing in it and we decided to watch it. well and it turned out not to be the wisest decision. in fact and as another commentary in this forum puts it and we felt embarrassed for the actors that participated in this movie. while the film is by no means horrible and it doesn not make sense at all. the over the top performance by william baldwin doesn not help the situation either. john leguizamo is a multi talented actor who deserved better. the basic problem it seems to be the film was a project that started with good intentions in making a little comedy and the people in charge ran out of ideas along the way. the result is an uneven film. 
not having any idea what this film was about and but based on the fact that john leguizamo was appearing in it and we decided to watch it. well and it turned out not to be the wisest decision. in fact and as another commentary in this forum puts it and we felt embarrassed for the actors that participated in this movie. while the film is by no means horrible and it doesn not make sense at all. the over the top performance by william baldwin doesn not help the situation either. john leguizamo is a multi talented actor who deserved better. the basic problem it seems to be the film was a project that started with good intentions in making a little comedy and the people in charge ran out of ideas along the way. the result is an uneven film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
