flesh feast starts at miami airport and ace reporter dan carter (harry kerwin and he is also credited as production designer) phones his mate ed casey (phil philbin) to let him know that he has just returned from south america where he has been investigating carl schuman (doug foster) and that he was onto a big story but while still talking on the phone he is stabbed in the back and killed. schuman meets dr. elaine frederick (veronica lake and she also executive produced) who has recently been released from a mental institution and together they discuss their grisly plans. the news of cater death has reached casey and he decides to take the story up himself and do some investigating and well actually he gets his secretary viginia day (marth mischon) to do most of the investigating and just report back to him and lazy bugger. virginia informs casey that they have someone on the inside named kristine (heather hughes) since dr. frederick rents her spare rooms out to nurses and kristine reports back to casey about schuman and dr. frederick grotesque youth restoration experiments involving human flesh and specially cultivated maggots. co written and co produced and directed by brad f. grinter flesh feast is a pretty poor film on all accounts. first lets start with the script by grinter and thomas casey who was also responsible for the cinematography (you get the feeling that most of the cast and crew had more than one job) and basically it terrible. the character are one dimensional idiots and have no personality and i do not like anyone in this film. for what it worth i quite like some of the ideas here and the flesh eating maggots and the basement laboratory and stealing bodies from a hospital and that unforgettable twist ending that almost worth sitting through the rest of the film for on it own. unfortunately the dialogue is so badly written and stiff and unnatural sounding it untrue and i mean there is one scene in which a nurse says that they would not let us out of the house which is fine except for the fact that she is speaking outside in the garden to someone. no thought has been put into the story as no explanation is ever given for why flesh eating maggots are able to restore youth and in fact at one point near the end when questioned about this very thing dr. frederick claims there is no time to explain at that point which to me sounds like the people who wrote this do not have a clue either. even at an extremely short 68 minutes long flesh feast is very slow and dull and the poor editing doesn not help with scenes and shots lasting for far too long and for example there is a scene in which an ambulance pulls up outside a hospital and drives up to the doors and the guy gets out and he walks to the back doors and opens them etc. etc. did we really need to see every single detail. there is also another sequence in which dr. frederick enters room and puts some gloves on and then she takes them off walks into the opposite room and puts another pair on. i personally think that grinter probably do not shoot enough material so he stretches every scene out as much as he can to make the run time up. i do like that bizarre ending though and i really do. technically flesh feast is complete crap and i am not sure what the budget was on this but it must have been small and very small. just about the entire film takes place in one house and dr. frederick laboratory consists of a table and some plastic beakers and test tubes and some ancient looking electronic medical equipment and a strange screen with funny colours on it (do not ask). the cinematography is poor and the music sucks and the entire film looks dubbed and badly dubbed too. the exploitation elements are also disappointing and there are a few maggot shots but they do not actually do anything other than wriggle a bit and there is a brief scene where a dead body has it leg sawn off and a ok looking dismembered corpse and limbs hanging on hooks. the acting is awful from everyone concerned and  and i mean really bad which makes the rubbishy dialogue even worse. do yourself a favour and avoid flesh feast and yes there are one or two unintentionally funny moments and that ending is and well unique to say the least but for the most part this is real amateur film making that quickly becomes painful to watch. i doubt most people will make it through this is one sitting and i can tolerate just about anything but even i considered switching it off. definitely one to avoid and you will be pleased you did and if you really have to see it do not say you weren not warned. 
flesh feast starts at miami airport and ace reporter dan carter (harry kerwin and he is also credited as production designer) phones his mate ed casey (phil philbin) to let him know that he has just returned from south america where he has been investigating carl schuman (doug foster) and that he was onto a big story but while still talking on the phone he is stabbed in the back and killed. schuman meets dr. elaine frederick (veronica lake and she also executive produced) who has recently been released from a mental institution and together they discuss their grisly plans. the news of cater death has reached casey and he decides to take the story up himself and do some investigating and well actually he gets his secretary viginia day (marth mischon) to do most of the investigating and just report back to him and lazy bugger. virginia informs casey that they have someone on the inside named kristine (heather hughes) since dr. frederick rents her spare rooms out to nurses and kristine reports back to casey about schuman and dr. frederick grotesque youth restoration experiments involving human flesh and specially cultivated maggots. co written and co produced and directed by brad f. grinter flesh feast is a pretty poor film on all accounts. first lets start with the script by grinter and thomas casey who was also responsible for the cinematography (you get the feeling that most of the cast and crew had more than one job) and basically it terrible. the character are one dimensional idiots and have no personality and i do not like anyone in this film. for what it worth i quite like some of the ideas here and the flesh eating maggots and the basement laboratory and stealing bodies from a hospital and that unforgettable twist ending that almost worth sitting through the rest of the film for on it own. unfortunately the dialogue is so badly written and stiff and unnatural sounding it untrue and i mean there is one scene in which a nurse says that they would not let us out of the house which is fine except for the fact that she is speaking outside in the garden to someone. no thought has been put into the story as no explanation is ever given for why flesh eating maggots are able to restore youth and in fact at one point near the end when questioned about this very thing dr. frederick claims there is no time to explain at that point which to me sounds like the people who wrote this do not have a clue either. even at an extremely short 68 minutes long flesh feast is very slow and dull and the poor editing doesn not help with scenes and shots lasting for far too long and for example there is a scene in which an ambulance pulls up outside a hospital and drives up to the doors and the guy gets out and he walks to the back doors and opens them etc. etc. did we really need to see every single detail. there is also another sequence in which dr. frederick enters room and puts some gloves on and then she takes them off walks into the opposite room and puts another pair on. i personally think that grinter probably do not shoot enough material so he stretches every scene out as much as he can to make the run time up. i do like that bizarre ending though and i really do. technically flesh feast is complete crap and i am not sure what the budget was on this but it must have been small and very small. just about the entire film takes place in one house and dr. frederick laboratory consists of a table and some plastic beakers and test tubes and some ancient looking electronic medical equipment and a strange screen with funny colours on it (do not ask). the cinematography is poor and the music sucks and the entire film looks dubbed and badly dubbed too. the exploitation elements are also disappointing and there are a few maggot shots but they do not actually do anything other than wriggle a bit and there is a brief scene where a dead body has it leg sawn off and a ok looking dismembered corpse and limbs hanging on hooks. the acting is awful from everyone concerned and  and i mean really bad which makes the rubbishy dialogue even worse. do yourself a favour and avoid flesh feast and yes there are one or two unintentionally funny moments and that ending is and well unique to say the least but for the most part this is real amateur film making that quickly becomes painful to watch. i doubt most people will make it through this is one sitting and i can tolerate just about anything but even i considered switching it off. definitely one to avoid and you will be pleased you did and if you really have to see it do not say you weren not warned. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
