at first i do not like they way the director was constantly switching from the past (gulliver travels) to the present (gulliver in the insane asylum). but it really is the best way to film the story even though it took some getting used to. danson is outstanding as the title character and edward fox makes a wonderful villain. worst part is mary steenburgen as gulliver wife. she never has been hollywood gorgeous and in this film they make her look downright dowdy for some reason. i will never understand why directors make a woman ugly when it adds nothing to the story. plus you want to strangle her for being so damn stupid in believing the lies bad guy bates keeps telling her. even her son can see thru the bastard. still a good show and i rate it b plus . 
at first i do not like they way the director was constantly switching from the past (gulliver travels) to the present (gulliver in the insane asylum). but it really is the best way to film the story even though it took some getting used to. danson is outstanding as the title character and edward fox makes a wonderful villain. worst part is mary steenburgen as gulliver wife. she never has been hollywood gorgeous and in this film they make her look downright dowdy for some reason. i will never understand why directors make a woman ugly when it adds nothing to the story. plus you want to strangle her for being so damn stupid in believing the lies bad guy bates keeps telling her. even her son can see thru the bastard. still a good show and i rate it b plus . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
