what a waste of talent  although it appears that crudup in real life is a lot more like the vapid and self absorbed and character less character he portrays in this disappointing movie. in art and sometimes the empty spaces reveal more than the painted or created content. what this movie reveals is the unconsciousness and the contradictory or competing and unresolved impulses or consciousness of the film director or writer. it unintentionally shows the lack of awareness that a truly evolved and deeply aware character should have and be tormented about in order to deserve audience empathy or sympathy or the lack of which is used to serve as a cautionary tale to the audience. but this film fails on either level in that regard. the fact that cal and the main character (very much an antagonist and not a protagonist in the true sense of the word) and has no empathy for anyone and especially those most deserving of it (which does not include him) and that he has such overblown and entitled and self pitying and whiney sympathy only for himself and combined with the hallmark lack of remorse and no sense of guilt or awareness of his impact on others  all converge in this film to make him the epitome of the self involved and developmentally arrested and narcissistic sociopath  somehow this is now the gold standard for males on film and in the world at this point and time. one of his counterpoints (james legros) states with a laser true flash represent i bet you haven not done one good thing in life  and i bet you would not. it captures the absolute essence of the cal character. something the other characters he bulldozes over in the film seem to realize fairly quickly despite the director having stacked the deck to manipulate sympathy for cal. that is a testament to the supporting cast talent and skills. cal eventual return has nothing to do with character development and transformation or evolution of consciousness. it has only to do with the ultimate capitulation that until something better comes along and he may as well be back in his comfy cozy status quo of entitled enablement where the living is easy and no one will demand that he grow up something of which he is willfully incapable and uninterested in doing. the film could have been pointed and intentional about showing the traps and tragedies  the devastating effects of this kind of lack of conscience or consciousness and but it excuses and glorifies it instead  in fact and it wallows in self pity right along with the arrogant and selfish and emotionally stunted main character. (and it sure sent chills up my spine when thinking of the recent revelations about convicted murderer scott peterson). if you want to see crudup at his most nuanced and full of an exciting potential that has never been truly realized in my opinion and see the underrated inventing the abbotts . 
what a waste of talent  although it appears that crudup in real life is a lot more like the vapid and self absorbed and character less character he portrays in this disappointing movie. in art and sometimes the empty spaces reveal more than the painted or created content. what this movie reveals is the unconsciousness and the contradictory or competing and unresolved impulses or consciousness of the film director or writer. it unintentionally shows the lack of awareness that a truly evolved and deeply aware character should have and be tormented about in order to deserve audience empathy or sympathy or the lack of which is used to serve as a cautionary tale to the audience. but this film fails on either level in that regard. the fact that cal and the main character (very much an antagonist and not a protagonist in the true sense of the word) and has no empathy for anyone and especially those most deserving of it (which does not include him) and that he has such overblown and entitled and self pitying and whiney sympathy only for himself and combined with the hallmark lack of remorse and no sense of guilt or awareness of his impact on others  all converge in this film to make him the epitome of the self involved and developmentally arrested and narcissistic sociopath  somehow this is now the gold standard for males on film and in the world at this point and time. one of his counterpoints (james legros) states with a laser true flash represent i bet you haven not done one good thing in life  and i bet you would not. it captures the absolute essence of the cal character. something the other characters he bulldozes over in the film seem to realize fairly quickly despite the director having stacked the deck to manipulate sympathy for cal. that is a testament to the supporting cast talent and skills. cal eventual return has nothing to do with character development and transformation or evolution of consciousness. it has only to do with the ultimate capitulation that until something better comes along and he may as well be back in his comfy cozy status quo of entitled enablement where the living is easy and no one will demand that he grow up something of which he is willfully incapable and uninterested in doing. the film could have been pointed and intentional about showing the traps and tragedies  the devastating effects of this kind of lack of conscience or consciousness and but it excuses and glorifies it instead  in fact and it wallows in self pity right along with the arrogant and selfish and emotionally stunted main character. (and it sure sent chills up my spine when thinking of the recent revelations about convicted murderer scott peterson). if you want to see crudup at his most nuanced and full of an exciting potential that has never been truly realized in my opinion and see the underrated inventing the abbotts . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
