i thought i had seen this film before as the plot summary sounded familiar. however and when i watched it one afternoon (in need of some mindless but amusing entertainment) and i do not recognise anything  if i had seen it before and i must have blocked the horror of it from my memory. this film is dreadful and and it shows its age. in fact and it looks older than it is represent more like a mid 80s moronic comedy. whilst i am a fan of toilet humour and can see the funny side of many things and this is comedy at its most puerile and homophobic. the plot is as thin as a supermodel and which do not bother me if only the film were funny. there is only one amusing line in the whole film and spoken by the character louis represent looks like somebody threw away a perfectly good white boy. in fact and louis is the only likable character (and that not saying much). james and carl are the type of irritating and immature men that a sensible woman would run a mile from and their practical jokes about as humorous as the war in iraq while the character of susan wilkins is colourless (looks like julia roberts and but lacks her charisma) and there is zero chemistry between her and carl  though it may be unfair to blame the actress and as i do not know what she could have done with such a poorly written part while and the villain is neither funny nor scary nor memorable. there is good trash and bad trash. this is trash that definitely should not be recycled. 
i thought i had seen this film before as the plot summary sounded familiar. however and when i watched it one afternoon (in need of some mindless but amusing entertainment) and i do not recognise anything  if i had seen it before and i must have blocked the horror of it from my memory. this film is dreadful and and it shows its age. in fact and it looks older than it is represent more like a mid 80s moronic comedy. whilst i am a fan of toilet humour and can see the funny side of many things and this is comedy at its most puerile and homophobic. the plot is as thin as a supermodel and which do not bother me if only the film were funny. there is only one amusing line in the whole film and spoken by the character louis represent looks like somebody threw away a perfectly good white boy. in fact and louis is the only likable character (and that not saying much). james and carl are the type of irritating and immature men that a sensible woman would run a mile from and their practical jokes about as humorous as the war in iraq while the character of susan wilkins is colourless (looks like julia roberts and but lacks her charisma) and there is zero chemistry between her and carl  though it may be unfair to blame the actress and as i do not know what she could have done with such a poorly written part while and the villain is neither funny nor scary nor memorable. there is good trash and bad trash. this is trash that definitely should not be recycled. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
