return to sender and a. k. a. convicted and is almost imperfect. the one good thing about this particular film was that i was never bored. that being said and the reviews that hail this movie as a low budget success may not have watched the same movie that i saw. rather than write a review and tell you what happens and what works and doesn not work and i will simply comment that nothing works. there are plot holes in this movie that you can drive a semi through. the acting in the film is not very good and although that may be a result of a script so poorly worded that it could have been ghost written by george lucas. there was no need for exceptional sets or costumes for this particular movie and everything seemed appropriate. did i mention that there were some plot holes. by the end of the movie and you are wondering how a blind guy can be such a good shot with a shotgun and why kelly preston trusts aidan quinn and why she would fall asleep the night before her client is supposed to be killed and how aidan quinn can drive 400 miles in such a short time with a car that keeps breaking down during the rest of the movie and why aidan quinn do not by a fifth instead of a bunch of nips and etc. with all that being said and this is certainly a b movie and and a terrible one at that. the unfortunate thing is that it just isn not bad enough to be good. if you value your time and please let this serve as a public service message to stay away from this one. 
return to sender and a. k. a. convicted and is almost imperfect. the one good thing about this particular film was that i was never bored. that being said and the reviews that hail this movie as a low budget success may not have watched the same movie that i saw. rather than write a review and tell you what happens and what works and doesn not work and i will simply comment that nothing works. there are plot holes in this movie that you can drive a semi through. the acting in the film is not very good and although that may be a result of a script so poorly worded that it could have been ghost written by george lucas. there was no need for exceptional sets or costumes for this particular movie and everything seemed appropriate. did i mention that there were some plot holes. by the end of the movie and you are wondering how a blind guy can be such a good shot with a shotgun and why kelly preston trusts aidan quinn and why she would fall asleep the night before her client is supposed to be killed and how aidan quinn can drive 400 miles in such a short time with a car that keeps breaking down during the rest of the movie and why aidan quinn do not by a fifth instead of a bunch of nips and etc. with all that being said and this is certainly a b movie and and a terrible one at that. the unfortunate thing is that it just isn not bad enough to be good. if you value your time and please let this serve as a public service message to stay away from this one. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
