although there is very little plot and whatever exists is just all improvisational and still it was a good start from a new director with no previous financial back up and also a smart move from andy warhol to make his cimematic productions more marketable and viewer friendly. in any case this story of a street hustler relies too much on showing joe buck naked (almost all the time. ). and the creative use of a flashy editing really wears off after the hundredth time and the cutting off the dialog thing gets really annoying half way. this would have been a much more entertaining or even dramatic if they made a documentary of the daily of an actual male prostitute or hustler and instead of letting the actors make up some nonesensical plot and dialog of their own. 
although there is very little plot and whatever exists is just all improvisational and still it was a good start from a new director with no previous financial back up and also a smart move from andy warhol to make his cimematic productions more marketable and viewer friendly. in any case this story of a street hustler relies too much on showing joe buck naked (almost all the time. ). and the creative use of a flashy editing really wears off after the hundredth time and the cutting off the dialog thing gets really annoying half way. this would have been a much more entertaining or even dramatic if they made a documentary of the daily of an actual male prostitute or hustler and instead of letting the actors make up some nonesensical plot and dialog of their own. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
