what can be said about such a pathetic movie .  very bad acting . the main actress seems to know only one facial expression represent fear mixed with weakness. like a poor beaten dog. the other actress (the one who plays the evil) looks like the female double of ozzy osbourne and with an awful red wig. the other actors are so pitiful that they do not even worth being described.  there absolutely no plot. the story begins with possibilities but goes nowhere represent we do not know anything about the meaning of 11 represent11 and nor who rayden really is and excepted the simple she evil or she a child of apocalypse. which is not an explanation. we do not know why the parents have been killed and what kind of danger is growing and why sara was chosen. as the film goes on and we just watch pseudo scary scenes and with a bad music. moreover and the end doesn not tell anything represent we just see two possibilities as if one of them was a bonus scene or the director cut. there no plot and so no possible interpretation.  11 represent11 is just full of clichés . it is so obvious that i couldn not help laughing. for example represent the deserted library or the bathroom scenes and ghost silhouettes walking with a blast of wind and . there even the fashionable little scary girl as in dark water or the ring. of course and the main character is bullied at school and looks like a stereotyped gothic girl (dark hair and red lips and skinny and black clothes). is it an obligation to make her credible . i do not think so. the psychology of sara is so few developed and so typical that it doesn not make her credible and nor endearing. terrible direction represent as i said and nothing original and everything has already been seen a thousand times and is used here without any real purpose.  there are some funny incoherences. for example and i do not know if ghost science and paranormal course or whatever is taught in american universities. in europe it is really not the case represent teachers talking about negative energies or using unmaterial creatures sensors. ridiculous. also represent how can you watch a movie shot in the sixties with a super 8 camera on a computer screen without spending hours of your time for a digitalization (in the movie they watch it immediately on the computer screen) and how can you and on this old film and isolate a tiny detail then zoom in and see a perfectly identifiable face . i wonder if the director has ever tried to digitize an old analogical film. eventually and 11 represent11 just worths being watched if you like to laugh at silly movies and or maybe if you want to fall asleep on your couch. but it an expensive way to fall asleep . 
what can be said about such a pathetic movie .  very bad acting . the main actress seems to know only one facial expression represent fear mixed with weakness. like a poor beaten dog. the other actress (the one who plays the evil) looks like the female double of ozzy osbourne and with an awful red wig. the other actors are so pitiful that they do not even worth being described.  there absolutely no plot. the story begins with possibilities but goes nowhere represent we do not know anything about the meaning of 11 represent11 and nor who rayden really is and excepted the simple she evil or she a child of apocalypse. which is not an explanation. we do not know why the parents have been killed and what kind of danger is growing and why sara was chosen. as the film goes on and we just watch pseudo scary scenes and with a bad music. moreover and the end doesn not tell anything represent we just see two possibilities as if one of them was a bonus scene or the director cut. there no plot and so no possible interpretation.  11 represent11 is just full of clichés . it is so obvious that i couldn not help laughing. for example represent the deserted library or the bathroom scenes and ghost silhouettes walking with a blast of wind and . there even the fashionable little scary girl as in dark water or the ring. of course and the main character is bullied at school and looks like a stereotyped gothic girl (dark hair and red lips and skinny and black clothes). is it an obligation to make her credible . i do not think so. the psychology of sara is so few developed and so typical that it doesn not make her credible and nor endearing. terrible direction represent as i said and nothing original and everything has already been seen a thousand times and is used here without any real purpose.  there are some funny incoherences. for example and i do not know if ghost science and paranormal course or whatever is taught in american universities. in europe it is really not the case represent teachers talking about negative energies or using unmaterial creatures sensors. ridiculous. also represent how can you watch a movie shot in the sixties with a super 8 camera on a computer screen without spending hours of your time for a digitalization (in the movie they watch it immediately on the computer screen) and how can you and on this old film and isolate a tiny detail then zoom in and see a perfectly identifiable face . i wonder if the director has ever tried to digitize an old analogical film. eventually and 11 represent11 just worths being watched if you like to laugh at silly movies and or maybe if you want to fall asleep on your couch. but it an expensive way to fall asleep . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
