sdiner82 had clearly not seen the film in decades and and his memory is appalling. his attempts to paint the mark lester shaving scene as suspect are utterly erroneous and as are his incorrect comments about the bad guy sneaking peeks at the kid body. lester is clothed for the entire time the man is in the room and and the man barely gives him a glance. the scene is a crude attempt to show lester innocent curiosity about the man body. like everything in this film and it badly done and but nothing more. even sdiner82 comments about savalas character who casually sent a german family to their deaths by nudging their trailer off a cliff is nonsense (it was a single woman and she was already dead and and she was in a car). i suggest that sdiner82 review says far and far more about his own and far from liberal mindset and than it does about this valueless film. the only reason i even bothered to look it up and was out of curiosity to see if it was made before or after kojak. the film is a worthless piece of 70 trash and but sdiner82 review of it is the worst kind of slander. he wraps up his review in pseudo intellectual facts and but the only fact is that he is plain wrong on almost every factual matter he discusses. i can only assume that sdiner82 saw exactly what he looked for and which is disturbing. now he can return to burning copies of catcher in the rye. 
sdiner82 had clearly not seen the film in decades and and his memory is appalling. his attempts to paint the mark lester shaving scene as suspect are utterly erroneous and as are his incorrect comments about the bad guy sneaking peeks at the kid body. lester is clothed for the entire time the man is in the room and and the man barely gives him a glance. the scene is a crude attempt to show lester innocent curiosity about the man body. like everything in this film and it badly done and but nothing more. even sdiner82 comments about savalas character who casually sent a german family to their deaths by nudging their trailer off a cliff is nonsense (it was a single woman and she was already dead and and she was in a car). i suggest that sdiner82 review says far and far more about his own and far from liberal mindset and than it does about this valueless film. the only reason i even bothered to look it up and was out of curiosity to see if it was made before or after kojak. the film is a worthless piece of 70 trash and but sdiner82 review of it is the worst kind of slander. he wraps up his review in pseudo intellectual facts and but the only fact is that he is plain wrong on almost every factual matter he discusses. i can only assume that sdiner82 saw exactly what he looked for and which is disturbing. now he can return to burning copies of catcher in the rye. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
