i enjoyed the prequels and and found the relationship between tucker and chan previously hilarious. rh3 and however and was a re hash of the first two without the charm or humor. i think i may have laughed once  and it was during the ngs. tucker was exceedingly annoying in this film and and his character do not seem to have any purpose other than to bungle everything up in the most irritating way possible. chan is always likable and but he seemed tired in this film. i was able to predict everything  who the villain was and who the girl was and (spoiler alert) who the good guy turned bad guy was and etc. i hope to see more movies from tucker and chan in their separate endeavors and but not in any more rush hour sequels. it just too tired. i recommend a rental and but not a purchase. 
i enjoyed the prequels and and found the relationship between tucker and chan previously hilarious. rh3 and however and was a re hash of the first two without the charm or humor. i think i may have laughed once  and it was during the ngs. tucker was exceedingly annoying in this film and and his character do not seem to have any purpose other than to bungle everything up in the most irritating way possible. chan is always likable and but he seemed tired in this film. i was able to predict everything  who the villain was and who the girl was and (spoiler alert) who the good guy turned bad guy was and etc. i hope to see more movies from tucker and chan in their separate endeavors and but not in any more rush hour sequels. it just too tired. i recommend a rental and but not a purchase. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
