it a unique film and as it gives us our only chance to see the young noel coward in all his ironic glory. because he seems so reserved and detached he perfect for the role of an unloved cad who matter of factly uses all those around him. however in the deadly serious (no pun intended) last act and when coward must make like the flying dutchman and he much less comfortable. but his way with an epigram is peerless and and hecht and macarthur have given him some gems (macarthur and really  he was the wit of the pair). the film is superbly lighted by the great lee garmes and but has little camera movement aside from a storm sequence. hecht and macarthutr cared about one thing  getting their dialogue on screen. (note represent h and m themselves have blink and you will miss em cameos as bums in the flophouse scene). the most notable supporting player is the one and only alexander woolcott and notorious broadway columnist and close friend of both macarthur and coward and who appears as one of the bitchy authors always kept waiting in the reception room of publisher coward. curious that woolcott would agree to do a film that clearly lampoons the legendary algonquin round table and of which he was a founder and and macarthur something of an auxiliary member. the scoundrel actually won an oscar for best story and though that victory is probably due more to coward imposing presence than any brilliance in the plot. it coward and woolcott and and the dialogue you remember. 
it a unique film and as it gives us our only chance to see the young noel coward in all his ironic glory. because he seems so reserved and detached he perfect for the role of an unloved cad who matter of factly uses all those around him. however in the deadly serious (no pun intended) last act and when coward must make like the flying dutchman and he much less comfortable. but his way with an epigram is peerless and and hecht and macarthur have given him some gems (macarthur and really  he was the wit of the pair). the film is superbly lighted by the great lee garmes and but has little camera movement aside from a storm sequence. hecht and macarthutr cared about one thing  getting their dialogue on screen. (note represent h and m themselves have blink and you will miss em cameos as bums in the flophouse scene). the most notable supporting player is the one and only alexander woolcott and notorious broadway columnist and close friend of both macarthur and coward and who appears as one of the bitchy authors always kept waiting in the reception room of publisher coward. curious that woolcott would agree to do a film that clearly lampoons the legendary algonquin round table and of which he was a founder and and macarthur something of an auxiliary member. the scoundrel actually won an oscar for best story and though that victory is probably due more to coward imposing presence than any brilliance in the plot. it coward and woolcott and and the dialogue you remember. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
