well and i guess i was in the mood for a movie that really grabbed me from the beginning. this movie wasn not it. it plodded along at a pretty slow and deliberate pace for the first 40 minutes and but there wasn not really anything in it that i was terribly interested in there an intriguing and mysterious feud between jean reno character and an old man and but more of the first 40 minutes is dominated by the wanderings of the main character and whom i do not know much about and couldn not really relate to at the time. he wanders around alone for the most part and he doesn not meet anyone while i imagine the director was trying to depict the loneliness of the human condition in this post apocalyptic world or something and which is all good and but i still wish he would trimmed it down from 40 minutes to 15 and because it can get incredibly boring. but after those 40 minutes and things start to get very interesting. i guess i would not really say more than that because i do not want to spoil anything. so if you have seen the first 15 30 minutes of this movie and are thinking about turning it off (like i was) and just stick with it it gets a lot better. one of the most interesting things i found about this movie was the fact that it had no dialogue whatsoever and which really made me have to think about what was happening and how characters were feeling and what their motivations were and why things were how they were in this post apocalyptic world and all of which gives the story a lot of room for audience interpretation. and it amazing how much more satisfying a movie is when the actors aren not telling you exactly what going on. 
well and i guess i was in the mood for a movie that really grabbed me from the beginning. this movie wasn not it. it plodded along at a pretty slow and deliberate pace for the first 40 minutes and but there wasn not really anything in it that i was terribly interested in there an intriguing and mysterious feud between jean reno character and an old man and but more of the first 40 minutes is dominated by the wanderings of the main character and whom i do not know much about and couldn not really relate to at the time. he wanders around alone for the most part and he doesn not meet anyone while i imagine the director was trying to depict the loneliness of the human condition in this post apocalyptic world or something and which is all good and but i still wish he would trimmed it down from 40 minutes to 15 and because it can get incredibly boring. but after those 40 minutes and things start to get very interesting. i guess i would not really say more than that because i do not want to spoil anything. so if you have seen the first 15 30 minutes of this movie and are thinking about turning it off (like i was) and just stick with it it gets a lot better. one of the most interesting things i found about this movie was the fact that it had no dialogue whatsoever and which really made me have to think about what was happening and how characters were feeling and what their motivations were and why things were how they were in this post apocalyptic world and all of which gives the story a lot of room for audience interpretation. and it amazing how much more satisfying a movie is when the actors aren not telling you exactly what going on. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
