has anyone else noticed that this version is basically a scene by scene remake of the 1933 version and with some of the scenes taken out. it makes me think less of a film that does that and showing a definite want of creativity. in all fairness and i tend to be biased in favor of katharine hepburn and but this version of the film seems like cinematic plagiarism. the 1933 version was nice and sweet and though a little awkward in presentation and transition at times and and then this version took the script and the music and and even a fair amount of the scene blocking from the earlier version. i do not understand the point of making the film again when the method of remaking it was to basically redo george cukor film with everything the same except the people working on it. 
has anyone else noticed that this version is basically a scene by scene remake of the 1933 version and with some of the scenes taken out. it makes me think less of a film that does that and showing a definite want of creativity. in all fairness and i tend to be biased in favor of katharine hepburn and but this version of the film seems like cinematic plagiarism. the 1933 version was nice and sweet and though a little awkward in presentation and transition at times and and then this version took the script and the music and and even a fair amount of the scene blocking from the earlier version. i do not understand the point of making the film again when the method of remaking it was to basically redo george cukor film with everything the same except the people working on it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
