have wanted to see this for a while represent i never thought i would be watching it in a damp trafalgar square and london with 15 and 000 other people and all to a new score by the pet shop boys. quickly and that experience specifically. a new departure from psb and it seemed to suffer from the same problem the miniaturist hugo wolf had when he wrote his opera der corregidor represent the long structure was a chain of short ones and i. e. songs. psb produced a more fluid and integrated score although it was quite static on its own terms. neither could they resist song represent a setting of the subtitled text worked in this respect a free standing meditation on the action of the odessa steps massacre during the action of that sequence itself was and i would go so far to say and counterproductive. overall it was very exciting though and which is surely what eisenstein was trying to achieve. it is a very exciting film with choppier editing taking the place of acceleration of tension or action. in fact the film and though beautifully shot and passionately acted (it has a silent film melodrama and but not in the excess of the hollywood comic style) breathes through its careful editing pacing specific shots with a sense of the rate at which the audience will take them in. and there a huge range of perspective too while either he had a lot of cameras or the sequences on the harbor and steps took a great deal of time. super film and which can be assessed irrespective of sound and as that how the finished product would have been conceived. positive . 
have wanted to see this for a while represent i never thought i would be watching it in a damp trafalgar square and london with 15 and 000 other people and all to a new score by the pet shop boys. quickly and that experience specifically. a new departure from psb and it seemed to suffer from the same problem the miniaturist hugo wolf had when he wrote his opera der corregidor represent the long structure was a chain of short ones and i. e. songs. psb produced a more fluid and integrated score although it was quite static on its own terms. neither could they resist song represent a setting of the subtitled text worked in this respect a free standing meditation on the action of the odessa steps massacre during the action of that sequence itself was and i would go so far to say and counterproductive. overall it was very exciting though and which is surely what eisenstein was trying to achieve. it is a very exciting film with choppier editing taking the place of acceleration of tension or action. in fact the film and though beautifully shot and passionately acted (it has a silent film melodrama and but not in the excess of the hollywood comic style) breathes through its careful editing pacing specific shots with a sense of the rate at which the audience will take them in. and there a huge range of perspective too while either he had a lot of cameras or the sequences on the harbor and steps took a great deal of time. super film and which can be assessed irrespective of sound and as that how the finished product would have been conceived. positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
