it has to be admitted that the best work of harold lloyd ended with his last great silent comedy speedy in 1928. after that he enters sound films (like chaplin and keaton and laurel and hardy and w. c. fields) and does do better than keaton and but not as well as the other three. chaplin was rich enough to make his own films as producer (but he paced his films so there were five years between productions). laurel and hardy were under the protection of hal roach and so production standards for their shorts and sound films were pretty good. fields first worked with mack sennett and than with paramount and and then free lanced. lloyd tried the route that chaplin took and but with less success. he produced his own films and but unlike chaplin he did not own his own studio. also his first two choices were not good (especially feet first). but he did begin to choose more wisely and movie crazy and the cat paw and and the milky way were all good choices. these three (and possibly the sin of harold diddlebock) were his best sound ventures. they are all entertaining and but none are up to safety last and the freshman and the kid brother and or speedy. of the top four sound films the cat paw is the most controversial. ezekiel cobb solution to ridding the city that elects him mayor is very extreme for the tastes of 2005. or is it. when a movie is made dictates what it politics are represent the cat paw is from 1934. that second year of the roosevelt new deal (itself rather controversial for heavier government involvement) movie audiences saw films like gabriel over the white house and the phantom president and where our leaders did extra constitutional actions to rid the nation of internal enemies (and to force disarmament around the globe). even cecil b. de mille got into this act with this day and age and where a bunch of teenagers use rats to force a gangster to confess his crimes. to us and the use of violence to force anyone (even a bunch of goons and boodlers like alan dinehart gang) to confess is repellent. after all and the supreme court has protected us from confession under duress. what we forget is that the reforms we are thinking of did not occur until the warren court and the burger court made them. for example and although mr. justice sutherland opinion in the powell (scottsboro boys) case of 1932 guaranteed every criminal defendant had a right to counsel and gideon v. wainwright did not extend this to ordering court paid counsel to defendants until 1962. the miranda case and with it now well known anti self incrimination warning is from 1963. nothing like this were considered necessary in 1934. if you study other movies of the period up to 1954 (and even to 1960) tricks are used to get confessions  kirk douglas confesses his crimes in front of witnesses in i walk alone while burt lancaster holds a gun to him. when lancaster leaves and douglas sneers about confessing under duress and only to see the gun is unloaded. suddenly he realizes that (legally  in 1948) he has confessed without duress. hate to say it and to any civil libertarians reading this note and but what cobb or lloyd does to dinehart and his pals in the conclusion of the cat paw was not only legal and but would have led to their jail sentences in 1934. we may call it heavy handed and fascistic and or horrid and but it would have worked legally when it was thought up. 
it has to be admitted that the best work of harold lloyd ended with his last great silent comedy speedy in 1928. after that he enters sound films (like chaplin and keaton and laurel and hardy and w. c. fields) and does do better than keaton and but not as well as the other three. chaplin was rich enough to make his own films as producer (but he paced his films so there were five years between productions). laurel and hardy were under the protection of hal roach and so production standards for their shorts and sound films were pretty good. fields first worked with mack sennett and than with paramount and and then free lanced. lloyd tried the route that chaplin took and but with less success. he produced his own films and but unlike chaplin he did not own his own studio. also his first two choices were not good (especially feet first). but he did begin to choose more wisely and movie crazy and the cat paw and and the milky way were all good choices. these three (and possibly the sin of harold diddlebock) were his best sound ventures. they are all entertaining and but none are up to safety last and the freshman and the kid brother and or speedy. of the top four sound films the cat paw is the most controversial. ezekiel cobb solution to ridding the city that elects him mayor is very extreme for the tastes of 2005. or is it. when a movie is made dictates what it politics are represent the cat paw is from 1934. that second year of the roosevelt new deal (itself rather controversial for heavier government involvement) movie audiences saw films like gabriel over the white house and the phantom president and where our leaders did extra constitutional actions to rid the nation of internal enemies (and to force disarmament around the globe). even cecil b. de mille got into this act with this day and age and where a bunch of teenagers use rats to force a gangster to confess his crimes. to us and the use of violence to force anyone (even a bunch of goons and boodlers like alan dinehart gang) to confess is repellent. after all and the supreme court has protected us from confession under duress. what we forget is that the reforms we are thinking of did not occur until the warren court and the burger court made them. for example and although mr. justice sutherland opinion in the powell (scottsboro boys) case of 1932 guaranteed every criminal defendant had a right to counsel and gideon v. wainwright did not extend this to ordering court paid counsel to defendants until 1962. the miranda case and with it now well known anti self incrimination warning is from 1963. nothing like this were considered necessary in 1934. if you study other movies of the period up to 1954 (and even to 1960) tricks are used to get confessions  kirk douglas confesses his crimes in front of witnesses in i walk alone while burt lancaster holds a gun to him. when lancaster leaves and douglas sneers about confessing under duress and only to see the gun is unloaded. suddenly he realizes that (legally  in 1948) he has confessed without duress. hate to say it and to any civil libertarians reading this note and but what cobb or lloyd does to dinehart and his pals in the conclusion of the cat paw was not only legal and but would have led to their jail sentences in 1934. we may call it heavy handed and fascistic and or horrid and but it would have worked legally when it was thought up. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
