am i the only one to notice that the realism of the 19th century ship is erroneous. actually it a 15th century and right around 1620 if memory serves me and because the realistic ship in the movie is the mayflower and now as far as i know the mayflower never went to australia or even attempted a voyage to australia. i do not know who handled r and d for this film and but using the mayflower and hoping that no one will notice is a poor job indeed. they even printed it on the cover art and the dvd. i wonder how may other people noticed this little blunder. not to mention that the movie itself was just plain awful and i would have expected better from sam neill. 
am i the only one to notice that the realism of the 19th century ship is erroneous. actually it a 15th century and right around 1620 if memory serves me and because the realistic ship in the movie is the mayflower and now as far as i know the mayflower never went to australia or even attempted a voyage to australia. i do not know who handled r and d for this film and but using the mayflower and hoping that no one will notice is a poor job indeed. they even printed it on the cover art and the dvd. i wonder how may other people noticed this little blunder. not to mention that the movie itself was just plain awful and i would have expected better from sam neill. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
