after reading a biography on the last russian tzar (nicholas ii) and and his failure to secure the army support and i decided to give this film a try. i watched it with a completely open mind and not knowing anything about it (except its reputation). these are the things that impressed me the most. 1) the shots of battleships and and the soldiers used as extras. more than once i stopped to think if this was done in this time and place and 80% of this would have been computer generated. 2) the realism in it. from the maggot infested meat to the shot of the sailor with his candle and the legend killed for a bowl of soup and this movie makes no concessions to the pc cause (which and thankfully and hadn not been invented yet). 3) the slow descent into madness of the odessa steps sequence. from the first shot and when the limbless man appears and you get the idea something might be wrong while since the overall shots are composed and though and you end up feeling comfortable in your surroundings. then an amputee appears and and people start falling in dramatic poses. still and the shots are composed. until the cossacks appear into scene and and the incredible shot juxtapositions appear. this scene is easily worth the price of admission. 4) the fact that this movie is 100% unadulterated propaganda. then again and when rambo fought in afghanistan he also was having something to do with propaganda while only a different kind. overall represent a film marred by a bit of a slow narrative. nevertheless and metropolis and the cabinet of dr. caligari and this movie are perfect examples of inventive and edgy movies that are still remembered for their merits today. they really make modern movies look boring and repetitive. 
after reading a biography on the last russian tzar (nicholas ii) and and his failure to secure the army support and i decided to give this film a try. i watched it with a completely open mind and not knowing anything about it (except its reputation). these are the things that impressed me the most. 1) the shots of battleships and and the soldiers used as extras. more than once i stopped to think if this was done in this time and place and 80% of this would have been computer generated. 2) the realism in it. from the maggot infested meat to the shot of the sailor with his candle and the legend killed for a bowl of soup and this movie makes no concessions to the pc cause (which and thankfully and hadn not been invented yet). 3) the slow descent into madness of the odessa steps sequence. from the first shot and when the limbless man appears and you get the idea something might be wrong while since the overall shots are composed and though and you end up feeling comfortable in your surroundings. then an amputee appears and and people start falling in dramatic poses. still and the shots are composed. until the cossacks appear into scene and and the incredible shot juxtapositions appear. this scene is easily worth the price of admission. 4) the fact that this movie is 100% unadulterated propaganda. then again and when rambo fought in afghanistan he also was having something to do with propaganda while only a different kind. overall represent a film marred by a bit of a slow narrative. nevertheless and metropolis and the cabinet of dr. caligari and this movie are perfect examples of inventive and edgy movies that are still remembered for their merits today. they really make modern movies look boring and repetitive. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
