john sayles and what have you done. silver city had moments in which i could see the glimmering hope of a good story and well drawn characters and thought provoking dialog. and then those moments would quickly be covered over by layers of poor writing and clumsy direction and and abysmal acting. i truly love almost all of john sayles work and but silver city is ghastly. i got the feeling that sayles may have been working on the beginnings of a good story involving the illegal labor and industrial corruption plot lines and but then he got rushed and stuck the secondary plot line satirizing the bush administration onto it. the two stories do not really connect with each other and and the weaker elements of the political theme dominate the first 3/4 of the movie and causing me to lose patience with the whole affair. the other major flaw is danny huston acting. his dialog in every scene is delivered with a gawping grin and regardless of its appropriateness to the mood. i hated this guy by the end of the film and having been reminded of every bad actor in every high school play i have ever seen. not having seen huston in anything else and i do not know whether to blame him or to blame sayles direction of him more. regardless and he the unfortunate focal point of a very unfortunate movie. right down to the last sledgehammer subtle final scene i was disappointed by silver city. sayles at his best and or heck and even sayles at mediocre and can be so very much better than this film. see any of his other works instead. this isn not even worth a rental. 
john sayles and what have you done. silver city had moments in which i could see the glimmering hope of a good story and well drawn characters and thought provoking dialog. and then those moments would quickly be covered over by layers of poor writing and clumsy direction and and abysmal acting. i truly love almost all of john sayles work and but silver city is ghastly. i got the feeling that sayles may have been working on the beginnings of a good story involving the illegal labor and industrial corruption plot lines and but then he got rushed and stuck the secondary plot line satirizing the bush administration onto it. the two stories do not really connect with each other and and the weaker elements of the political theme dominate the first 3/4 of the movie and causing me to lose patience with the whole affair. the other major flaw is danny huston acting. his dialog in every scene is delivered with a gawping grin and regardless of its appropriateness to the mood. i hated this guy by the end of the film and having been reminded of every bad actor in every high school play i have ever seen. not having seen huston in anything else and i do not know whether to blame him or to blame sayles direction of him more. regardless and he the unfortunate focal point of a very unfortunate movie. right down to the last sledgehammer subtle final scene i was disappointed by silver city. sayles at his best and or heck and even sayles at mediocre and can be so very much better than this film. see any of his other works instead. this isn not even worth a rental. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
