the third entry in the stepford franchise and but apparently the three made for tv obscure sequels are incredibly obscure and hard to trace down and whereas the 70 original as well as the blockbuster remake with nicole kidman are commonly known and very popular. i haven not seen either the early 80 revenge of the stepford wives or the mid 90 the stepford husbands and but this the stepford children is a quite charming and highly entertaining little film. it basically the exact same film as the original while obviously less mysterious yet much cheesier and incredibly 80 to the nth degree. the main difference here and like the title implies and is that not just the liberated wives but also the rebellious and punk teenage offspring in town undergoes the typical and highly effective stepford treatment and licensed by the local men association. for some reason the scenario attempts to uphold the stepford mystery until late in the film and even though nobody is likely to watch this sequel before having checked out the original and presumably everybody also knows about the denouement. the harding family is all packed and ready to move from the grisly city of new york to the small and peaceful community of stepford. particularly father steven is excited about their new life because he already lived in stepford and always wanted to go back ever since his first wife and whom his new wife laura and adolescent children mary and david know very little about and died under mysterious circumstances. the town is almost too perfect and with picturesque neighbors and model students and and especially the modern teenagers face huge difficulties to adjust. their efforts to modernize the place and take the local youth of stanford in tow cause confrontations with the eminent townsfolk and particularly the members of the men association and and put the familial relationships under a lot of stress. david meets and falls in love with the last normal girl in school lois and but when even she transforms into a domestic dummy overnight and david can convince his skeptical mother to investigate the sinister stanford secret. the first hour of the stanford children is slow paced and rather tame and but the finale is trashy and cheesy like the vhs cover promises and like a late 80 thriller ought to be and in fact. the modus operandi behind the stanford secrets is illustrated in greater detail and and i think horror fans and lovers of the original film will appreciate that. at least and i did. the overall plot still doesn not make a lot of sense and the script is chock full of irrational aspects and but it nonetheless an engaging formula and undoubtedly one that evokes an atmosphere of suspense and fear. the acting performances are far above average. especially the arrogant and obnoxious members of the men association depict plausible characters and even teenage players tammy lauren and randall batinkoff give away impressive performances. recommended without hesitation. 
the third entry in the stepford franchise and but apparently the three made for tv obscure sequels are incredibly obscure and hard to trace down and whereas the 70 original as well as the blockbuster remake with nicole kidman are commonly known and very popular. i haven not seen either the early 80 revenge of the stepford wives or the mid 90 the stepford husbands and but this the stepford children is a quite charming and highly entertaining little film. it basically the exact same film as the original while obviously less mysterious yet much cheesier and incredibly 80 to the nth degree. the main difference here and like the title implies and is that not just the liberated wives but also the rebellious and punk teenage offspring in town undergoes the typical and highly effective stepford treatment and licensed by the local men association. for some reason the scenario attempts to uphold the stepford mystery until late in the film and even though nobody is likely to watch this sequel before having checked out the original and presumably everybody also knows about the denouement. the harding family is all packed and ready to move from the grisly city of new york to the small and peaceful community of stepford. particularly father steven is excited about their new life because he already lived in stepford and always wanted to go back ever since his first wife and whom his new wife laura and adolescent children mary and david know very little about and died under mysterious circumstances. the town is almost too perfect and with picturesque neighbors and model students and and especially the modern teenagers face huge difficulties to adjust. their efforts to modernize the place and take the local youth of stanford in tow cause confrontations with the eminent townsfolk and particularly the members of the men association and and put the familial relationships under a lot of stress. david meets and falls in love with the last normal girl in school lois and but when even she transforms into a domestic dummy overnight and david can convince his skeptical mother to investigate the sinister stanford secret. the first hour of the stanford children is slow paced and rather tame and but the finale is trashy and cheesy like the vhs cover promises and like a late 80 thriller ought to be and in fact. the modus operandi behind the stanford secrets is illustrated in greater detail and and i think horror fans and lovers of the original film will appreciate that. at least and i did. the overall plot still doesn not make a lot of sense and the script is chock full of irrational aspects and but it nonetheless an engaging formula and undoubtedly one that evokes an atmosphere of suspense and fear. the acting performances are far above average. especially the arrogant and obnoxious members of the men association depict plausible characters and even teenage players tammy lauren and randall batinkoff give away impressive performances. recommended without hesitation. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
