no one would ever question that director leos carax is a genius and but what we wonder about is represent is he an insane genius. so many people hated this film. i am normally the first person to accuse many french directors of making offensive and boring and disgusting and pretentious films (such as the horrible recent film lenfant and the pointless and offensive feux rouges). but strangely enough and i actually think that pola x is an amazing film and made with great skill and passion by a master of his craft and and containing remarkable performances. the film does carry melodrama to more extreme lengths than i believe i have ever seen on screen before. but then and carax is extreme and that we know. the film also contains what i consider way over the top trotskyite or anarchist fantasies and wet dreams and what with a mysterious group of young men training to fire machine guns at the bourgeoisie in between playing scott walker rather fascinating music in a band which has its recording sessions in an abandoned warehouse filled with squatters and fires burning in old steel barrels. guillaume depardieu plays a rich young man in a château (whose step mother is catherine deneuve and and he wanders into her bathroom while she is naked in the bath and by the way). but he suddenly naps completely when he discovers that his deceased father and a famous diplomat and had fathered an illegitimate daughter who had been effectively disposed of by deneuve as an inconvenience. this is because the sister suddenly turns up as a kind of romanian refugee with wild dishevelled hair and expressionless face and and little ability to speak french coherently. depardieu then transforms himself into a class hero of the far left and wants to kill or destroy his family for their hypocrisy and corruption and and lives in squalor and extreme poverty and while scorning a vast inheritance. he then commences an incestuous sexual relationship with his half sister and which is shown in an explicit sex scene which has offended many people and though i have no objection to it and as i think people are far too hysterical about sex and especially in america and where apparently it never happens. the intensity of the acting and the filming make this unlikely scenario come off as an experience of powerful and if depressing and hyper melodrama. the differences between carax making an extreme film like this and the numerous extreme french films which i think are pretentious and disgusting are (1) that carax is an excellent filmmaker and and (2) he is seriously attempting to explore a meaningful and if harrowing and extreme emotional condition and whereby a human being disintegrates and turns against his background. many would say that the extreme elements in this film were gratuitous and but i do not agree. i believe carax was genuine and and was not making an exploitation picture at all. it is very difficult to defend a man who goes that far and who and for all i know and may be a complete madman and but i believe he deserves defending for this remarkable cinematic achievement. 
no one would ever question that director leos carax is a genius and but what we wonder about is represent is he an insane genius. so many people hated this film. i am normally the first person to accuse many french directors of making offensive and boring and disgusting and pretentious films (such as the horrible recent film lenfant and the pointless and offensive feux rouges). but strangely enough and i actually think that pola x is an amazing film and made with great skill and passion by a master of his craft and and containing remarkable performances. the film does carry melodrama to more extreme lengths than i believe i have ever seen on screen before. but then and carax is extreme and that we know. the film also contains what i consider way over the top trotskyite or anarchist fantasies and wet dreams and what with a mysterious group of young men training to fire machine guns at the bourgeoisie in between playing scott walker rather fascinating music in a band which has its recording sessions in an abandoned warehouse filled with squatters and fires burning in old steel barrels. guillaume depardieu plays a rich young man in a château (whose step mother is catherine deneuve and and he wanders into her bathroom while she is naked in the bath and by the way). but he suddenly naps completely when he discovers that his deceased father and a famous diplomat and had fathered an illegitimate daughter who had been effectively disposed of by deneuve as an inconvenience. this is because the sister suddenly turns up as a kind of romanian refugee with wild dishevelled hair and expressionless face and and little ability to speak french coherently. depardieu then transforms himself into a class hero of the far left and wants to kill or destroy his family for their hypocrisy and corruption and and lives in squalor and extreme poverty and while scorning a vast inheritance. he then commences an incestuous sexual relationship with his half sister and which is shown in an explicit sex scene which has offended many people and though i have no objection to it and as i think people are far too hysterical about sex and especially in america and where apparently it never happens. the intensity of the acting and the filming make this unlikely scenario come off as an experience of powerful and if depressing and hyper melodrama. the differences between carax making an extreme film like this and the numerous extreme french films which i think are pretentious and disgusting are (1) that carax is an excellent filmmaker and and (2) he is seriously attempting to explore a meaningful and if harrowing and extreme emotional condition and whereby a human being disintegrates and turns against his background. many would say that the extreme elements in this film were gratuitous and but i do not agree. i believe carax was genuine and and was not making an exploitation picture at all. it is very difficult to defend a man who goes that far and who and for all i know and may be a complete madman and but i believe he deserves defending for this remarkable cinematic achievement. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
