i am . proud of head and mike nesmith has said. he should be and because this film and which either has been derided by many of us or studied and scrutinized by film professors and works on many levels. yes and it unconventional. to many and frustrating. it almost as if the producers hand you the film and tempt represent you figure it out. you probably already know that the monkees tv show was a runaway marketing success that depended upon business acumen and no small serving of public deception. tv shows are about selling soap and toothpaste first and than to entertain. that the monkees broke out of the box for a short time to make head is a testament to the group popularity and importance in pop culture and despite where your head at. get one thing straight represent head is not the monkees tv show. so what we have here is a psychedelic documentary about western pop culture from a source that has authority on the subject. head is a movie that could only come from those inside the box. by 1968 and the monkees cast and crew were seasoned and weary professionals who had seen their share of promise and disappointment. the movie was a deliberate attempt at market repositioning. so and it did three things represent make a film the way the monkees envisioned. most importantly and reinvent the group to one not subservient to it old bosses  and yas and hipper than before. make a film that exposed american attitudes of information dissemination. head and therefore and really is about media manipulation and its net result represent deception. the mass media is supposed to inform and educate us on the happenings in the world at large and and ultimately asks us to form opinions of these events that can shape thought into positive action. thus we assume the information we absorb to be complete and unbiased  otherwise and how can one establish a valued conclusion on any one idea presented by a book and newspaper or tv show. in one of the street interviews in head and a guy admits and i haven not looked at a newspaper or tv in years. is he lesser or better the man. even the drug parallels are a soft veiling of things are not as they seem. remember the old joke and everything you know is wrong. the screenplay starts with the monkees public admission of it own manufactured image and runs with the football  literally. is the football scene in the movie a visual manifestation of the whole idea behind head. is the film a stream of consciousness exercise. is the film the culmination of pot smoking marathons. there are too many coincidences that occur in the film that suggest otherwise. my guess is that head is the culmination of motivations somewhere between intended and unintended. largely and the insiders responsible for head seem to enjoy themselves in the revelries that take place in the film and but there is anger  anger at the chaos that characterized the late 60s and anger at the way the media and television especially and had changed culture in negative ways. drugs and violence were strong negative forces in the late 60s and still are and but the producers of head want you to know that poor information is a far greater danger. wars have been attributed to hoaxes and lies. what perfect way to spread disinformation than through tv. repeatedly and the mysterious black box is seen as an obstacle to the monkees and seemingly and all of us as well. in one scene and peter is sullenly sitting in a saloon holding a melting ice cream cone and and is asked by a fellow monkey and what wrong. i bought this ice cream cone and i do not want it. the movie suggests that the first purpose of the media is not to inform and but to sell en mass blindly. head goes further represent put any idea into someone head and and merrily goes he. the filmmakers know this and and the danger is real. head is either a movie that creates itself as we go along and or is a deliberate statement. perhaps and perhaps not. maybe it is just pot meets advertising and as critics scathed in 1968. the jokes are on the monkees and us. be careful what you ask for and you may get it. cheers represent a true guilty pleasure. very funny. intelligent. will please the fans. find the substance and it there. unabashedly weird. bizarre collection of characters. good tunage. length is appropriate. lots of great one liners and including my all time prophetic favorite represent the tragedy of your times and my young friends and is that you may get exactly what you want. caveats represent dated. drugs. no plot. no linear delivery of any thought in particular. at least twenty five stories that interweave in stop and go fashion. so and may easily frustrate. may seem pretentious to some. people who can not stand the monkees need not watch and though that in itself is no reason to avoid it. the psychedelic special effects may kill your ailing picture tube or your acid burnt out eyeballs. match and cut. 
i am . proud of head and mike nesmith has said. he should be and because this film and which either has been derided by many of us or studied and scrutinized by film professors and works on many levels. yes and it unconventional. to many and frustrating. it almost as if the producers hand you the film and tempt represent you figure it out. you probably already know that the monkees tv show was a runaway marketing success that depended upon business acumen and no small serving of public deception. tv shows are about selling soap and toothpaste first and than to entertain. that the monkees broke out of the box for a short time to make head is a testament to the group popularity and importance in pop culture and despite where your head at. get one thing straight represent head is not the monkees tv show. so what we have here is a psychedelic documentary about western pop culture from a source that has authority on the subject. head is a movie that could only come from those inside the box. by 1968 and the monkees cast and crew were seasoned and weary professionals who had seen their share of promise and disappointment. the movie was a deliberate attempt at market repositioning. so and it did three things represent make a film the way the monkees envisioned. most importantly and reinvent the group to one not subservient to it old bosses  and yas and hipper than before. make a film that exposed american attitudes of information dissemination. head and therefore and really is about media manipulation and its net result represent deception. the mass media is supposed to inform and educate us on the happenings in the world at large and and ultimately asks us to form opinions of these events that can shape thought into positive action. thus we assume the information we absorb to be complete and unbiased  otherwise and how can one establish a valued conclusion on any one idea presented by a book and newspaper or tv show. in one of the street interviews in head and a guy admits and i haven not looked at a newspaper or tv in years. is he lesser or better the man. even the drug parallels are a soft veiling of things are not as they seem. remember the old joke and everything you know is wrong. the screenplay starts with the monkees public admission of it own manufactured image and runs with the football  literally. is the football scene in the movie a visual manifestation of the whole idea behind head. is the film a stream of consciousness exercise. is the film the culmination of pot smoking marathons. there are too many coincidences that occur in the film that suggest otherwise. my guess is that head is the culmination of motivations somewhere between intended and unintended. largely and the insiders responsible for head seem to enjoy themselves in the revelries that take place in the film and but there is anger  anger at the chaos that characterized the late 60s and anger at the way the media and television especially and had changed culture in negative ways. drugs and violence were strong negative forces in the late 60s and still are and but the producers of head want you to know that poor information is a far greater danger. wars have been attributed to hoaxes and lies. what perfect way to spread disinformation than through tv. repeatedly and the mysterious black box is seen as an obstacle to the monkees and seemingly and all of us as well. in one scene and peter is sullenly sitting in a saloon holding a melting ice cream cone and and is asked by a fellow monkey and what wrong. i bought this ice cream cone and i do not want it. the movie suggests that the first purpose of the media is not to inform and but to sell en mass blindly. head goes further represent put any idea into someone head and and merrily goes he. the filmmakers know this and and the danger is real. head is either a movie that creates itself as we go along and or is a deliberate statement. perhaps and perhaps not. maybe it is just pot meets advertising and as critics scathed in 1968. the jokes are on the monkees and us. be careful what you ask for and you may get it. cheers represent a true guilty pleasure. very funny. intelligent. will please the fans. find the substance and it there. unabashedly weird. bizarre collection of characters. good tunage. length is appropriate. lots of great one liners and including my all time prophetic favorite represent the tragedy of your times and my young friends and is that you may get exactly what you want. caveats represent dated. drugs. no plot. no linear delivery of any thought in particular. at least twenty five stories that interweave in stop and go fashion. so and may easily frustrate. may seem pretentious to some. people who can not stand the monkees need not watch and though that in itself is no reason to avoid it. the psychedelic special effects may kill your ailing picture tube or your acid burnt out eyeballs. match and cut. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
