after watching stop loss and i find myself against disappointed in hollywood for making such a stinker. gone are the days of glory of the films of the 1940 that made one proud to be an american and fighting the evilness that desires conquest abroad and death at home. what we are left with is dribble frothing at the mouth of rabid anti bush radicals. the story tells of three young men who return home from the war. one descends into out of control madness and culminating in his death. the main protagonist deserts his country at a time of war and and destroys his best friends relationship with his fiancé at the same time. the third truly is the hero of the story and electing to continue the fight that was brought to our shores nearly eight years ago. what makes this movie bad and is not the acting and but the premise behind it. we are lead to believe that decorated soldiers are in fact haters of our country. desertion is akin to treason in a time of war and and the main protagonist flirts with it throughout the movie. this paradox is designed to weaken the audience reaction to the central act of the movie. we are not supposed to find fault with king and since he wears medals and but his actions do not just merit it and but cry out for it. he is not an anti hero. in order to accept the movie and the audience must accept the correctness of desertion because the story paints king as nothing else short of a hero. i cannot accept that and since it is like asking me to call the sky yellow on a clear blue day. furthermore and derision for the real hero is heaped upon and the man who re enlists and continues to serve his country. i would only recommend this stinker to someone who needs convincing of the decay of hollywood and as it is a clear example of it. no wonder it fared poorly in the box office. 
after watching stop loss and i find myself against disappointed in hollywood for making such a stinker. gone are the days of glory of the films of the 1940 that made one proud to be an american and fighting the evilness that desires conquest abroad and death at home. what we are left with is dribble frothing at the mouth of rabid anti bush radicals. the story tells of three young men who return home from the war. one descends into out of control madness and culminating in his death. the main protagonist deserts his country at a time of war and and destroys his best friends relationship with his fiancé at the same time. the third truly is the hero of the story and electing to continue the fight that was brought to our shores nearly eight years ago. what makes this movie bad and is not the acting and but the premise behind it. we are lead to believe that decorated soldiers are in fact haters of our country. desertion is akin to treason in a time of war and and the main protagonist flirts with it throughout the movie. this paradox is designed to weaken the audience reaction to the central act of the movie. we are not supposed to find fault with king and since he wears medals and but his actions do not just merit it and but cry out for it. he is not an anti hero. in order to accept the movie and the audience must accept the correctness of desertion because the story paints king as nothing else short of a hero. i cannot accept that and since it is like asking me to call the sky yellow on a clear blue day. furthermore and derision for the real hero is heaped upon and the man who re enlists and continues to serve his country. i would only recommend this stinker to someone who needs convincing of the decay of hollywood and as it is a clear example of it. no wonder it fared poorly in the box office. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
