this is the second adaptation of charlotte armstrong by claude chabrol for the screen representthe first was la rupture (1970)(from novel the balloon man )and it really a pity no one cares about it. it chabrol sleeper and and i urge any of his fans to see it. the chocolate cobweb was not that strong a detective story to begin with. i read it 20 years ago and forgot all about it. the movie promises some good things at first and though and then finally disappoints to a fault. this is a confusing chabrol movie and mixing elements of the heyday (circa 1969) and and a lotta tongue in chick stuff coming from the eighties  and the likes of poulet au vinaigre and not one particularly memorable work. part of the disappointment comes from the cast representthis is a distressingly poor gathering representjacques dutronc plays like a zombie and isabelle huppert reveals herself a somewhat limited actress and finally rather vulgar . it worked in une affaire de femme and it does not here. they are not supported by the young couple representboth are bland and unremarkable. actors from the past and say and stephane audran or michel bouquet(both in la rupture) were brilliant and contributed to chabrol then unique atmosphere. the story itself is undistinguished representbeginning as some kind of serious la vie est un long fleuve tranquille (besides and a character hints at etienne chatilliez very funny movie) and the movie drags on and on as a laughable psychological drama afterwards. we will not congratulate the young female pianist  and who and after all she learned about her wicked hostess and agrees to drive a car along a dangerous road. because he makes too many movies and chabrol frequently releases turkeys. one wonder why people who wants to watch one of his movies should choose this one among all his stuff up for grabs. it seems that chabrol bourgeoise satire has finally given way to leniency. in la rupture the first armstrong adaptation an average detective story which chabrol completely transcended  and you should hear audran say they have so much money. here  and chabrol has lost his bite and his strength. 
this is the second adaptation of charlotte armstrong by claude chabrol for the screen representthe first was la rupture (1970)(from novel the balloon man )and it really a pity no one cares about it. it chabrol sleeper and and i urge any of his fans to see it. the chocolate cobweb was not that strong a detective story to begin with. i read it 20 years ago and forgot all about it. the movie promises some good things at first and though and then finally disappoints to a fault. this is a confusing chabrol movie and mixing elements of the heyday (circa 1969) and and a lotta tongue in chick stuff coming from the eighties  and the likes of poulet au vinaigre and not one particularly memorable work. part of the disappointment comes from the cast representthis is a distressingly poor gathering representjacques dutronc plays like a zombie and isabelle huppert reveals herself a somewhat limited actress and finally rather vulgar . it worked in une affaire de femme and it does not here. they are not supported by the young couple representboth are bland and unremarkable. actors from the past and say and stephane audran or michel bouquet(both in la rupture) were brilliant and contributed to chabrol then unique atmosphere. the story itself is undistinguished representbeginning as some kind of serious la vie est un long fleuve tranquille (besides and a character hints at etienne chatilliez very funny movie) and the movie drags on and on as a laughable psychological drama afterwards. we will not congratulate the young female pianist  and who and after all she learned about her wicked hostess and agrees to drive a car along a dangerous road. because he makes too many movies and chabrol frequently releases turkeys. one wonder why people who wants to watch one of his movies should choose this one among all his stuff up for grabs. it seems that chabrol bourgeoise satire has finally given way to leniency. in la rupture the first armstrong adaptation an average detective story which chabrol completely transcended  and you should hear audran say they have so much money. here  and chabrol has lost his bite and his strength. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
