if i could rate it a zero i would  and coming from someone who likes shock or exploitation films of the time and waters overall i must say this is useless. it does nothing  and serves nothing  and an idiot with a camera and a urge to prove his cleverness by rebeling against social standards is all this comes off as. its entirely amateur  and both in principle and execution  and it doesn not have a point  and its digusting for the sake of disgusting  and obscene with the wit of a neanderthal  and its useless. someone said waters was probably chuckling over all the bad press and disgust others gave with this film  and but why. if i made a short film depicting a man in a bathroom taking a sht for ten minutes straight surely it would receive the same accomidations but why would i be proud or chuckle at that. would it be because i am so unintelligent that i have to resort to this so i can say ha. take that censors and mainstream. im so rebellious ill do whatever i want and film it. no. waters shouldn not be proud of this mess  and fans of waters shouldn not watch it  and its useless  and that is  and without any use. its doesn not even fit under the criteria of art for arts sake. to like or defend this movie is to defend something that was designed purposely as being anti culture to be pushed for the mainstream audience  and in modern terms this film is the hot topic of films. useless and obsolete. a poser film that demands it be acknowledged as rebellion . 
if i could rate it a zero i would  and coming from someone who likes shock or exploitation films of the time and waters overall i must say this is useless. it does nothing  and serves nothing  and an idiot with a camera and a urge to prove his cleverness by rebeling against social standards is all this comes off as. its entirely amateur  and both in principle and execution  and it doesn not have a point  and its digusting for the sake of disgusting  and obscene with the wit of a neanderthal  and its useless. someone said waters was probably chuckling over all the bad press and disgust others gave with this film  and but why. if i made a short film depicting a man in a bathroom taking a sht for ten minutes straight surely it would receive the same accomidations but why would i be proud or chuckle at that. would it be because i am so unintelligent that i have to resort to this so i can say ha. take that censors and mainstream. im so rebellious ill do whatever i want and film it. no. waters shouldn not be proud of this mess  and fans of waters shouldn not watch it  and its useless  and that is  and without any use. its doesn not even fit under the criteria of art for arts sake. to like or defend this movie is to defend something that was designed purposely as being anti culture to be pushed for the mainstream audience  and in modern terms this film is the hot topic of films. useless and obsolete. a poser film that demands it be acknowledged as rebellion . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
