when watching this movie and with it deterministic cause and effect and wall to wall clichés and hackneyed sentiment and can anyone be so naive as to think that this is actually how barrie life played out. you watch it in a posture of disagreement. hollywood biopics aren not based on the individual lives anymore and theyre just rewrites of previously successful biopics. if hollywood made a movie about your life it would be filled with such perfect synchronization that you would barely recognize your own story. any personal complexity would be obliterated by some all explaining and simplistic backstory. your story would resemble rocky because it the only life arc hollywood knows how to produce anymore. we couldn not leave the audience pondering anything left open ended as they exit. this movie doesn not trust an audience to figure things out without being led to them. i perceived the captain hook or mother reference eons before the movie literalized it for me. i could see the 25 kids twist coming for days. this is a completely average movie. not horrible but not great. hence it likely to be showered with a few oscars next year. there nothing the academy likes better than congratulating itself for finally noticing patterns put in place over the previous thirty years. from the new yorker article lost boys by anthony lane represent arthur llewelyn davies and also adored his boys and and it may be unfair of finding neverland to omit him and for streamlining purposes and from the scene while by the time that johnny depp meets kate winslet and she is already a widow and whereas arthur was very much alive when barrie first entered the consciousnessand and little by little and the homeof the llewellyn davies family. finding neverland is a weepie. from the moment that barrie met george and jack and and started to ponder the means by which they might be rendered immortal and the story is sad and but the reality is even more dismal represent 1907arthur llewellyn davies dies from cancer of the jaw. 1910sylvia dies of lung cancer. the five boys are orphaned while barrie is made their guardian. 1915george is killed in the first world war and fighting with his regiment in flanders. 1921michael and an undergraduate at oxford and is drowned while swimming with a friend. the two bodies and when recovered and are found clinging together. on april 5 and 1960 and peter llewellyn davies and by then an esteemed publisher and threw himself under a subway train in london. we should not presume to read a mind in torment and but we may note in passing that and if he had lived another month and he would have reached the centenary of barrie birth and thus and one imagines and a fresh flurry of interest in peter panthat terrible masterpiece and in the words of peter llewellyn davies. 
when watching this movie and with it deterministic cause and effect and wall to wall clichés and hackneyed sentiment and can anyone be so naive as to think that this is actually how barrie life played out. you watch it in a posture of disagreement. hollywood biopics aren not based on the individual lives anymore and theyre just rewrites of previously successful biopics. if hollywood made a movie about your life it would be filled with such perfect synchronization that you would barely recognize your own story. any personal complexity would be obliterated by some all explaining and simplistic backstory. your story would resemble rocky because it the only life arc hollywood knows how to produce anymore. we couldn not leave the audience pondering anything left open ended as they exit. this movie doesn not trust an audience to figure things out without being led to them. i perceived the captain hook or mother reference eons before the movie literalized it for me. i could see the 25 kids twist coming for days. this is a completely average movie. not horrible but not great. hence it likely to be showered with a few oscars next year. there nothing the academy likes better than congratulating itself for finally noticing patterns put in place over the previous thirty years. from the new yorker article lost boys by anthony lane represent arthur llewelyn davies and also adored his boys and and it may be unfair of finding neverland to omit him and for streamlining purposes and from the scene while by the time that johnny depp meets kate winslet and she is already a widow and whereas arthur was very much alive when barrie first entered the consciousnessand and little by little and the homeof the llewellyn davies family. finding neverland is a weepie. from the moment that barrie met george and jack and and started to ponder the means by which they might be rendered immortal and the story is sad and but the reality is even more dismal represent 1907arthur llewellyn davies dies from cancer of the jaw. 1910sylvia dies of lung cancer. the five boys are orphaned while barrie is made their guardian. 1915george is killed in the first world war and fighting with his regiment in flanders. 1921michael and an undergraduate at oxford and is drowned while swimming with a friend. the two bodies and when recovered and are found clinging together. on april 5 and 1960 and peter llewellyn davies and by then an esteemed publisher and threw himself under a subway train in london. we should not presume to read a mind in torment and but we may note in passing that and if he had lived another month and he would have reached the centenary of barrie birth and thus and one imagines and a fresh flurry of interest in peter panthat terrible masterpiece and in the words of peter llewellyn davies. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
