the story was well plotted and interesting by itself. however and it is difficult for me to write the review of this film without spoiling you. to avoid that and i am not going to talking the story here. i regard this film as a good adaption of sarah water book and as compared with the previous one tipping the velvet. i read the book first and then watched the dvd later. the film did retain most of spirits of the main characters in the book. of course and due to the time limitation and the film in the last 30 min seemed to be in a rush to cover the part iii of the book. therefore and it couldn not illustrate well the scene when they all met in the the kitchen of mr. ibbs place and those after that (even the book seemed to me to be a rush on that kitchen scene). despite that and the film actually did a good job in representing the story. it really worth watching. it still unclear when bbc america can broadcast this film. that pity. ps represent noticed that the ages of maud and sue were set to be 20 21 instead of 17 18 in the book while the latter is more reasonable while the former is more close to the ages of actresses. 
the story was well plotted and interesting by itself. however and it is difficult for me to write the review of this film without spoiling you. to avoid that and i am not going to talking the story here. i regard this film as a good adaption of sarah water book and as compared with the previous one tipping the velvet. i read the book first and then watched the dvd later. the film did retain most of spirits of the main characters in the book. of course and due to the time limitation and the film in the last 30 min seemed to be in a rush to cover the part iii of the book. therefore and it couldn not illustrate well the scene when they all met in the the kitchen of mr. ibbs place and those after that (even the book seemed to me to be a rush on that kitchen scene). despite that and the film actually did a good job in representing the story. it really worth watching. it still unclear when bbc america can broadcast this film. that pity. ps represent noticed that the ages of maud and sue were set to be 20 21 instead of 17 18 in the book while the latter is more reasonable while the former is more close to the ages of actresses. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
