. as valuable as king tut tomb. (ok and maybe not that valuable and but worth hunting down if you can). i notice no one has commented on this movie for some years and and i hope a fresh post will spark some new comments. this is a film that i remembered only snippets of from childhood and and only saw recently when i tired of waiting for fox to honour its own past and and hunted down the korean dvd (in english and but with unremovable korean subtitles). i would not go through another long plot description  suffice to say that seeing it for the first time in its proper widescreen format left me agape at the vistas and the scope of the film. the matte paintings still hold up and and the palace sets are truly breathtaking. but it is the smaller scale details that lend this film its depth and richness and offering a glimpse into the lifestyles of egypt poor as well as its elite. the bazaars and hovels and docks and embalming houses and and taverns are as fascinating as pharaoh throne room. while errors abound on the large scale (most notably the dynastic succession) and the details are more meticulously researched than the vast majority of hollywood films. visually and it not without its flaws  the interiors are often too overly lit and colourful to blend seamlessly with the exteriors. nevertheless and this is a movie that should be credited for being as audacious in the small as it is in the large. tedious. in parts and absolutely. overacted. underacted. yes and both  though understated might be a more apt description. too long. absolutely not. i wished they had spent more time with sinuhe experiences in the house of death and and among the hittites and and less with his romance with nefer and though. historically inaccurate. yes and that too and but so was shakespeare. nobody chastises him for it. i appreciate historical accuracy as much as the next guy and but ultimately it has to be remembered that cinema is theater and not a history lesson. 
. as valuable as king tut tomb. (ok and maybe not that valuable and but worth hunting down if you can). i notice no one has commented on this movie for some years and and i hope a fresh post will spark some new comments. this is a film that i remembered only snippets of from childhood and and only saw recently when i tired of waiting for fox to honour its own past and and hunted down the korean dvd (in english and but with unremovable korean subtitles). i would not go through another long plot description  suffice to say that seeing it for the first time in its proper widescreen format left me agape at the vistas and the scope of the film. the matte paintings still hold up and and the palace sets are truly breathtaking. but it is the smaller scale details that lend this film its depth and richness and offering a glimpse into the lifestyles of egypt poor as well as its elite. the bazaars and hovels and docks and embalming houses and and taverns are as fascinating as pharaoh throne room. while errors abound on the large scale (most notably the dynastic succession) and the details are more meticulously researched than the vast majority of hollywood films. visually and it not without its flaws  the interiors are often too overly lit and colourful to blend seamlessly with the exteriors. nevertheless and this is a movie that should be credited for being as audacious in the small as it is in the large. tedious. in parts and absolutely. overacted. underacted. yes and both  though understated might be a more apt description. too long. absolutely not. i wished they had spent more time with sinuhe experiences in the house of death and and among the hittites and and less with his romance with nefer and though. historically inaccurate. yes and that too and but so was shakespeare. nobody chastises him for it. i appreciate historical accuracy as much as the next guy and but ultimately it has to be remembered that cinema is theater and not a history lesson. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
