first off and i have been a fan of the show back when my pbs station started showing it back in 1981. i learned many things about the show and the people who were in or contributed to the show. this latest installment of doctor who made a great impression on me. the original series and aka classic series and was made fun of by the bad special effects and or or wobbly sets. well and this is no more true. the special effects are awesome and but what is even better is the writing. you get a chance to learn more about our beloved doctor and maybe a bit of a reason why he loves the planet earth so much. without giving too much away and it is a very worthwhile series to watch. christopher eccelston brought a side of the doctor that we never get to see and a bitter and angry one but yet lovable at the same time. a must see. 
first off and i have been a fan of the show back when my pbs station started showing it back in 1981. i learned many things about the show and the people who were in or contributed to the show. this latest installment of doctor who made a great impression on me. the original series and aka classic series and was made fun of by the bad special effects and or or wobbly sets. well and this is no more true. the special effects are awesome and but what is even better is the writing. you get a chance to learn more about our beloved doctor and maybe a bit of a reason why he loves the planet earth so much. without giving too much away and it is a very worthwhile series to watch. christopher eccelston brought a side of the doctor that we never get to see and a bitter and angry one but yet lovable at the same time. a must see. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
