this film is enjoyable if you like poverty row and public domain films from the first half of the 20th century and or are a fan of amateur film making. the film splices together public domain thrillers together along with newly shot scenes in which the actors (with the sole exception of redfield doing a near dead on lugosi rip and all of the performers are simply dreadful. ) attempt to interact with the stock footage. the new footage is covered with digitally added film scratches and as is some of the already substandard old footage (. ). as near as i can figure out the plot has something to do with a bunch of strangers being brought together on an island for a will reading(. ) this film and while boasting a creative premise ala dead men don not wear plaid and is a technical and creative wreck. in one dreadfully over long sequence and injured sailor on a ship describes an abortive trip to fog island and whatever that is. the flashback then incoherently weaves together old footage from totally different eras and and of totally disparate film quality. unrelated scenes from the lost world (1925) and the most dangerous game (1932) and white zombie (1932) and bela lugosi meets a brooklyn gorilla (1952) and some other poverty row productions. this is done over an incredibly bad voice over which seems to have too much room echo as if the audio was recorded on a cheap home video camera. the filmmakers seem to think that they are paying homage to the great actors of yesteryear by giving characters the surnames of famous actors (carradine and zucco and ouspenskaya and etc. etc. ). this tactic was done cleverly and as well as subtly in final destination here it just obnoxious. bizarre and and painfully unfunny and jokes about spiderman and dracula and and superman abound. even the old as dirt dewey and cheetam and howe lawyer reference is used here this was old and tired when the three stooges used it in the 1930s. the film stock and audio and do not match scene to scene and and dozens of different sources are used for lugosi. the finale effect is that he seems to be getting and older and younger and older and thinner and heavier and younger and older again minute by minute. oddly the film do not use this as a comedy subplot and squanders a good chance for comedy. truth be told though and it was great fun to watch this late at night in bed. maybe thats what they wanted to happen. 
this film is enjoyable if you like poverty row and public domain films from the first half of the 20th century and or are a fan of amateur film making. the film splices together public domain thrillers together along with newly shot scenes in which the actors (with the sole exception of redfield doing a near dead on lugosi rip and all of the performers are simply dreadful. ) attempt to interact with the stock footage. the new footage is covered with digitally added film scratches and as is some of the already substandard old footage (. ). as near as i can figure out the plot has something to do with a bunch of strangers being brought together on an island for a will reading(. ) this film and while boasting a creative premise ala dead men don not wear plaid and is a technical and creative wreck. in one dreadfully over long sequence and injured sailor on a ship describes an abortive trip to fog island and whatever that is. the flashback then incoherently weaves together old footage from totally different eras and and of totally disparate film quality. unrelated scenes from the lost world (1925) and the most dangerous game (1932) and white zombie (1932) and bela lugosi meets a brooklyn gorilla (1952) and some other poverty row productions. this is done over an incredibly bad voice over which seems to have too much room echo as if the audio was recorded on a cheap home video camera. the filmmakers seem to think that they are paying homage to the great actors of yesteryear by giving characters the surnames of famous actors (carradine and zucco and ouspenskaya and etc. etc. ). this tactic was done cleverly and as well as subtly in final destination here it just obnoxious. bizarre and and painfully unfunny and jokes about spiderman and dracula and and superman abound. even the old as dirt dewey and cheetam and howe lawyer reference is used here this was old and tired when the three stooges used it in the 1930s. the film stock and audio and do not match scene to scene and and dozens of different sources are used for lugosi. the finale effect is that he seems to be getting and older and younger and older and thinner and heavier and younger and older again minute by minute. oddly the film do not use this as a comedy subplot and squanders a good chance for comedy. truth be told though and it was great fun to watch this late at night in bed. maybe thats what they wanted to happen. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
