the original australian kath and kim is brilliant. why do american producers need to remake and ruin yet another classic show. remember the original version of the office with ricky gervais and it was an absolute masterpiece and and there was no need to remake it. the producers said that the british humour from the office and the australian humour from kath and kim would not translate to an american audience. what. so basically they are saying that americans are too dumb and stupid to understand the jokes and so they need to remake the shows with over the top childish gags and so that the americans can understand the humour. the original australian version of kath and kim is fantastic and very funny. avoid the american version like the plague. 
the original australian kath and kim is brilliant. why do american producers need to remake and ruin yet another classic show. remember the original version of the office with ricky gervais and it was an absolute masterpiece and and there was no need to remake it. the producers said that the british humour from the office and the australian humour from kath and kim would not translate to an american audience. what. so basically they are saying that americans are too dumb and stupid to understand the jokes and so they need to remake the shows with over the top childish gags and so that the americans can understand the humour. the original australian version of kath and kim is fantastic and very funny. avoid the american version like the plague. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
