o boy and was this really bad. i saw this on videotape. in scenes that had soundtrack music and it was hard to hear the dialog. when people were on the telephone and it was hard to hear the person on the other end. it appeared that at least two different kinds of film or video stock were used and because the colors and focus sometimes shifted drastically between edits. and there were a lot of out of focus shots that do not seem intentional. one indicator of the budget (one of many) was when a news report comes on tv. there is just a news flash title card badly superimposed with a video effect onto a tv screen and and a voice over by a newscaster. they couldn not shoot footage of a newscaster and and then actually show it on the tv. the movie starts off with a killer wearing surgical scrubs and mask and wielding a scalpel. supposedly he a paranoid schizophrenic who escapes from the hospital to avoid having a lobotomy performed on him. students are let out of school for a break and and three young women decide to have a slumber party. three guys decide to crash the party and and a geek named science decides to crash it too. the slumber party is pretty boring and and the guys just keep showing up randomly wearing masks and taking the masks off and and then disappearing. the mother and father (the surgeon who was to do the lobotomy) of one of the girls keep showing up too. the killer knocks slices people throats without anyone really noticing. the apparent lead of the movie more or less sleepwalks through the movie. perhaps that was bad acting and or maybe it was intentional and since much of the movie is a nightmare and and some of it a nightmare within a nightmare. the ending is really horrible too. the best thing about the movie is the cheesy united home video vhs box art and which was revived for the dvd release (a double feature with terror at tenkiller). i honestly can not tell if it is a photo and or a painting and or a combination of both. the women pictured on the cover are not in the movie and and the clothing theyre wearing is way more revealing than anything the women in the movie wore. the throat slicing on the cover is scarier than the ones in the movie  where people tend to affect a goofy pop eyed look. for that matter and that what the killer has most of the time represent head cocked and and eyes bugging out and mugging for the camera. frequently the scalpel was held up close to the camera in focus and while the killer mask covered face was in close up but out of focus in the background. 
o boy and was this really bad. i saw this on videotape. in scenes that had soundtrack music and it was hard to hear the dialog. when people were on the telephone and it was hard to hear the person on the other end. it appeared that at least two different kinds of film or video stock were used and because the colors and focus sometimes shifted drastically between edits. and there were a lot of out of focus shots that do not seem intentional. one indicator of the budget (one of many) was when a news report comes on tv. there is just a news flash title card badly superimposed with a video effect onto a tv screen and and a voice over by a newscaster. they couldn not shoot footage of a newscaster and and then actually show it on the tv. the movie starts off with a killer wearing surgical scrubs and mask and wielding a scalpel. supposedly he a paranoid schizophrenic who escapes from the hospital to avoid having a lobotomy performed on him. students are let out of school for a break and and three young women decide to have a slumber party. three guys decide to crash the party and and a geek named science decides to crash it too. the slumber party is pretty boring and and the guys just keep showing up randomly wearing masks and taking the masks off and and then disappearing. the mother and father (the surgeon who was to do the lobotomy) of one of the girls keep showing up too. the killer knocks slices people throats without anyone really noticing. the apparent lead of the movie more or less sleepwalks through the movie. perhaps that was bad acting and or maybe it was intentional and since much of the movie is a nightmare and and some of it a nightmare within a nightmare. the ending is really horrible too. the best thing about the movie is the cheesy united home video vhs box art and which was revived for the dvd release (a double feature with terror at tenkiller). i honestly can not tell if it is a photo and or a painting and or a combination of both. the women pictured on the cover are not in the movie and and the clothing theyre wearing is way more revealing than anything the women in the movie wore. the throat slicing on the cover is scarier than the ones in the movie  where people tend to affect a goofy pop eyed look. for that matter and that what the killer has most of the time represent head cocked and and eyes bugging out and mugging for the camera. frequently the scalpel was held up close to the camera in focus and while the killer mask covered face was in close up but out of focus in the background. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
