my mom and my cousins and and i are pretty big jane austen fans. we know all the words to the 1995 pride and prejudice masterpiece and and have watched gwyneth paltrow emma an embarrassing number of times. i have read all the books and and i have even sat through sense and sensibility and persuasion a few times. so my mom and i thought it would be nice to see northanger abbey on film. bad idea. this is just about the worst movie i have ever seen. it even worse than the 1998 version of alice through the looking glass and or the 1939 nancy drew movie i bought at wal mart for $1 (my previous worst movies. ) the first thing wrong and which you notice in the opening scene and is that the heroine and catherine and has a gruesome and weird imagination and inspired by trashy novels that a jane austen heroine would never touch. throughout the novel and she has dreams (day and night) in which she is carried off by some hideous man with a greasy wig and dragged across a field headed for god knows what all and and suddenly rescued by a dashing guy on a white horse. the second thing any viewer of the movie will instantly notice is the high pitched wailing and saxophone music that is supposed to be the soundtrack. no dainty classical music or english country dances here. it is also evident and almost at first glance and that the actress (for lack of a better word) chosen to play catherine is completely off. first and she is rather unattractive and and is rendered even more so by her un austenlike behavior. her looks and movements are just wacky. plus and theyre completely affected and unbelievable. this sad lack of acting skills affects pretty much all of the actors in the film. not even mr. tilney and the supposed dashing young suitor is decent. as more and more characters are introduced and a strange taste in costumes on the part of the filmmakers becomes evident. huge and marie antoinette style headdresses clash with the (for the most part) correctly styled empire gowns. a french woman and apparently a friend of general tilney  and is made up all in black as some sort of ancient goth nightmare she bears a striking similarity to michael jackson in a black dress. her appearance is made even sillier by a huge half moon beauty mark on her cheek. i also had to wonder about the historical accuracy of the bright red lipstick that almost all of the women were wearing. another anomaly that kept my mom and i howling with laughter for about ten minutes was the bathing scene. the first thing we noticed was that men and women were bathing in a big bathhouse together probably not very likely in the early 1800s. then we saw that all the women seemed to be wearing large china or plastic plates and worn around their necks with strings. the plates floated horizontally on the water and containing some mysterious pieces of. something. we guessed it was soap and then aromatic herbs and then finally and when the mystery substance began disappearing between shots and we deduced it was food. but i am still not sure. and that not even half of what wrong with northanger abbey. my warning to anyone who is considering renting this movie represent stay your hand. and if anyone is considering buying it well and i do not even know what to say to that. you would think that when the actors and others making this film got about 1/4 of the way through and they would realize what a monster they were creating and stop. unfortunately and they do not and and northanger abbey was let out into the world. 
my mom and my cousins and and i are pretty big jane austen fans. we know all the words to the 1995 pride and prejudice masterpiece and and have watched gwyneth paltrow emma an embarrassing number of times. i have read all the books and and i have even sat through sense and sensibility and persuasion a few times. so my mom and i thought it would be nice to see northanger abbey on film. bad idea. this is just about the worst movie i have ever seen. it even worse than the 1998 version of alice through the looking glass and or the 1939 nancy drew movie i bought at wal mart for $1 (my previous worst movies. ) the first thing wrong and which you notice in the opening scene and is that the heroine and catherine and has a gruesome and weird imagination and inspired by trashy novels that a jane austen heroine would never touch. throughout the novel and she has dreams (day and night) in which she is carried off by some hideous man with a greasy wig and dragged across a field headed for god knows what all and and suddenly rescued by a dashing guy on a white horse. the second thing any viewer of the movie will instantly notice is the high pitched wailing and saxophone music that is supposed to be the soundtrack. no dainty classical music or english country dances here. it is also evident and almost at first glance and that the actress (for lack of a better word) chosen to play catherine is completely off. first and she is rather unattractive and and is rendered even more so by her un austenlike behavior. her looks and movements are just wacky. plus and theyre completely affected and unbelievable. this sad lack of acting skills affects pretty much all of the actors in the film. not even mr. tilney and the supposed dashing young suitor is decent. as more and more characters are introduced and a strange taste in costumes on the part of the filmmakers becomes evident. huge and marie antoinette style headdresses clash with the (for the most part) correctly styled empire gowns. a french woman and apparently a friend of general tilney  and is made up all in black as some sort of ancient goth nightmare she bears a striking similarity to michael jackson in a black dress. her appearance is made even sillier by a huge half moon beauty mark on her cheek. i also had to wonder about the historical accuracy of the bright red lipstick that almost all of the women were wearing. another anomaly that kept my mom and i howling with laughter for about ten minutes was the bathing scene. the first thing we noticed was that men and women were bathing in a big bathhouse together probably not very likely in the early 1800s. then we saw that all the women seemed to be wearing large china or plastic plates and worn around their necks with strings. the plates floated horizontally on the water and containing some mysterious pieces of. something. we guessed it was soap and then aromatic herbs and then finally and when the mystery substance began disappearing between shots and we deduced it was food. but i am still not sure. and that not even half of what wrong with northanger abbey. my warning to anyone who is considering renting this movie represent stay your hand. and if anyone is considering buying it well and i do not even know what to say to that. you would think that when the actors and others making this film got about 1/4 of the way through and they would realize what a monster they were creating and stop. unfortunately and they do not and and northanger abbey was let out into the world. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
