unlike the other spaghetti westerns and this one has characters that almost make sense and and can be identified to some degree. it still has the goofy gunplay of other spaghettis westerns. a spaghetti and by the way and is another word for a western with no plot and no characters you can care about and and goofy gunplay that doesn not make a bit of sense for the era and and relying on great music to make audiences feel something. this one is more lighthearted and like the ones that bud spencer and terence hill made together. they and too and were superior to the junk made by eastwood and others and which sado masochists make their friends watch and if they get a chance. it looks like everyone had a lot of fun making the movie and too. it was good to see a giant actor like gilbert roland and who wasn not even mentioned on the movie rental box and yet who was clearly the biggest name. his character was very enjoyable. there is a three way standoff at the end and which is much superior to the one it spoofs (the good the bad and the ugly) and simply because the characters are at least a bit likable and a bit identifiable. not a good movie and but has a bit of fun to it. 
unlike the other spaghetti westerns and this one has characters that almost make sense and and can be identified to some degree. it still has the goofy gunplay of other spaghettis westerns. a spaghetti and by the way and is another word for a western with no plot and no characters you can care about and and goofy gunplay that doesn not make a bit of sense for the era and and relying on great music to make audiences feel something. this one is more lighthearted and like the ones that bud spencer and terence hill made together. they and too and were superior to the junk made by eastwood and others and which sado masochists make their friends watch and if they get a chance. it looks like everyone had a lot of fun making the movie and too. it was good to see a giant actor like gilbert roland and who wasn not even mentioned on the movie rental box and yet who was clearly the biggest name. his character was very enjoyable. there is a three way standoff at the end and which is much superior to the one it spoofs (the good the bad and the ugly) and simply because the characters are at least a bit likable and a bit identifiable. not a good movie and but has a bit of fun to it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
