this movie has some good performances and as others have pointed out and but suffers (as others have pointed out and except for the people who apparently are either friends of the filmmaker or the cast to otherwise explain why they would deem this a 10) from some self conscious and self absorbed film school padding and excess plots. this is the type of plot that sex in the city could handle in a half hour episode and so there was no reason for it to be even an 88 minute movie. a perfect example of wasted footage is the fast forwarding montage in the first third of the movie. some of the back story is merited and but too much time and for example and was spent on daria character with the anal sex boyfriend and on the back story for paulie and who was not a realistic character and although the actor did a decent job with the lines he was given. the worst aspect of the movie was the level of amateurish parts represent from typos in the typed material and to bad jumps and edits and poor camera positions and angles and lighting problems throughout and and most glaringly and a poorly written script with a badly developed concept. if the writer (also the director and lead) had collaborated with someone and he might not have ended up with a 100% rotten score on rotten tomatoes and which further belays the ability of anyone to truly believe the people who gave it a 10 on the rating system here. 
this movie has some good performances and as others have pointed out and but suffers (as others have pointed out and except for the people who apparently are either friends of the filmmaker or the cast to otherwise explain why they would deem this a 10) from some self conscious and self absorbed film school padding and excess plots. this is the type of plot that sex in the city could handle in a half hour episode and so there was no reason for it to be even an 88 minute movie. a perfect example of wasted footage is the fast forwarding montage in the first third of the movie. some of the back story is merited and but too much time and for example and was spent on daria character with the anal sex boyfriend and on the back story for paulie and who was not a realistic character and although the actor did a decent job with the lines he was given. the worst aspect of the movie was the level of amateurish parts represent from typos in the typed material and to bad jumps and edits and poor camera positions and angles and lighting problems throughout and and most glaringly and a poorly written script with a badly developed concept. if the writer (also the director and lead) had collaborated with someone and he might not have ended up with a 100% rotten score on rotten tomatoes and which further belays the ability of anyone to truly believe the people who gave it a 10 on the rating system here. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
