some of the early talkies survived to become classics. 1929 the squall is a classic all right and but not in the way it was intended. melodramatic in story and acting and today it seems ludicrous and particularly the casting of myrna loy as nubi and a seductive gypsy. imagine nora charles breaking up a young couple and driving a young man to steal. outrageous. however and as many people know and when loy first came to hollywood and she did quite a few of these exotic seductress roles. based on a play and the squall concerns the aforementioned gypsy who in the film is now in hungary (spain in the play) running away from her cruel master and inviting herself into the home of the lajos family (richard tucker and alice joyce) and basically by appearing at the door. one by one and nubi seduces the men of the family and the farm talking her pidgin english (nubi not bad. nubi do nothing wrong. ) and dropping hints about nice presents. the son in the family and paul (carroll nye) is engaged to the beautiful irma (loretta young) and can not wait to marry her. he loses interest when he meets nubi. with the exception of the lovely alice joyce and zasu pitts as a woman who lives in the household and the stunningly beautiful loretta young and the acting is uniformly awful. loy is stuck with the hallmarks of her character  bad english and whining and hysteria. with her darkened makeup and peasant getup and curly hair and she is not only beautiful but right out of the 1980s  quite modern and though richard tucker putting the back of his hand on his forehead reminds us were just emerging from the silents. robert osborne on tcm commented that this film is one of his secret pleasures. while it is deliciously bad and it not deliciously bad enough to sit through again. it just bad  but a great example of how far we have come and and had someone not picked up on myrna loy sense of humor and how limited her wonderful career might have been. 
some of the early talkies survived to become classics. 1929 the squall is a classic all right and but not in the way it was intended. melodramatic in story and acting and today it seems ludicrous and particularly the casting of myrna loy as nubi and a seductive gypsy. imagine nora charles breaking up a young couple and driving a young man to steal. outrageous. however and as many people know and when loy first came to hollywood and she did quite a few of these exotic seductress roles. based on a play and the squall concerns the aforementioned gypsy who in the film is now in hungary (spain in the play) running away from her cruel master and inviting herself into the home of the lajos family (richard tucker and alice joyce) and basically by appearing at the door. one by one and nubi seduces the men of the family and the farm talking her pidgin english (nubi not bad. nubi do nothing wrong. ) and dropping hints about nice presents. the son in the family and paul (carroll nye) is engaged to the beautiful irma (loretta young) and can not wait to marry her. he loses interest when he meets nubi. with the exception of the lovely alice joyce and zasu pitts as a woman who lives in the household and the stunningly beautiful loretta young and the acting is uniformly awful. loy is stuck with the hallmarks of her character  bad english and whining and hysteria. with her darkened makeup and peasant getup and curly hair and she is not only beautiful but right out of the 1980s  quite modern and though richard tucker putting the back of his hand on his forehead reminds us were just emerging from the silents. robert osborne on tcm commented that this film is one of his secret pleasures. while it is deliciously bad and it not deliciously bad enough to sit through again. it just bad  but a great example of how far we have come and and had someone not picked up on myrna loy sense of humor and how limited her wonderful career might have been. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
