just what is the point of this film. it starts off as one film and then changes track and cheating us of a resolution to that film and ends as another movie which is nothing but a pale and pale imitation of so many other schlock horror flicks you have ever seen. the overall impression is confusion in every respect and a great deal of hubris. screenplay by tarantino and direction by rodriguez and two guys who have previously shown talent and but who now seem to believe their own hype and assume that whatever they do must be good merely because they did it. but it doesn not quite work that way. youre only good while you continue doing good things. there are so many questions to ask represent just what are george clooney and harvey keitel doing getting involved in such pointless dreck. clooney initially makes an intriguing bad guy  utterly ruthless and efficient  and it would have been interesting to see where that was going. but and of course and we never do. and the clooney of the vampire film changes into a completely different character. that not clever or witty and that just bad and bad work. keitel looks thoroughly ill at ease throughout and and no wonder. did no one in the studio take a look at the script before this project was given the go ahead. tarantino is utterly unpleasant as a murderous sexual deviant (and why did he and as writer and assume we would find the rape and gruesome murder and butchering of an inoffensive hostage funny). on every level  except the technical  this film stinks. avoid. 
just what is the point of this film. it starts off as one film and then changes track and cheating us of a resolution to that film and ends as another movie which is nothing but a pale and pale imitation of so many other schlock horror flicks you have ever seen. the overall impression is confusion in every respect and a great deal of hubris. screenplay by tarantino and direction by rodriguez and two guys who have previously shown talent and but who now seem to believe their own hype and assume that whatever they do must be good merely because they did it. but it doesn not quite work that way. youre only good while you continue doing good things. there are so many questions to ask represent just what are george clooney and harvey keitel doing getting involved in such pointless dreck. clooney initially makes an intriguing bad guy  utterly ruthless and efficient  and it would have been interesting to see where that was going. but and of course and we never do. and the clooney of the vampire film changes into a completely different character. that not clever or witty and that just bad and bad work. keitel looks thoroughly ill at ease throughout and and no wonder. did no one in the studio take a look at the script before this project was given the go ahead. tarantino is utterly unpleasant as a murderous sexual deviant (and why did he and as writer and assume we would find the rape and gruesome murder and butchering of an inoffensive hostage funny). on every level  except the technical  this film stinks. avoid. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
