the man with bogart face sets it self up to mine the viewers nostalgia for the late 30 late 40 film era. it fails miserably for several reasons. first and sacchi and while looking reasonably like bogart and even speaking like him on occassion and using his mannerisms and completely lacks any of bogart charisma or acting ability. this is really apparent whenever sacchi is not clearly imitating a scene from one of bogart films. second and the film does not have the first rate character actors bogart was able to work with. there are no peter lorre or sydney greenstreet in this one and folks. sure we are treated to performances by victor buaeno and olivia hussey and george raft amongst others and but they just aren not of the same caliber (or aren not given enough screen time or are miscast). third and the attempts at modern humor all fall through. all of the underwear jokes and having marlowe almost never remove that damn hat and trench coat (even though bogart would have) and etc. just aren not funny and really pull down this film. fourth and i have never heard a goofier theme song this side of mitchell. finally and the film false reverence for bogart (and other classic actors work) is truly irritating. bogart almost never played a straight hero and on those occasions he was a hero. he played complicated characters. this movie makes bogart out to be a trigger happy and moralistic do gooder. while this may have been true about some film characters and bogart characters rarely fit that bill. it movies like this that make people unexposed to the cinema of the past think that all of it is hokey and good guy beats the bad guys and gets the girl crap with low production values. 
the man with bogart face sets it self up to mine the viewers nostalgia for the late 30 late 40 film era. it fails miserably for several reasons. first and sacchi and while looking reasonably like bogart and even speaking like him on occassion and using his mannerisms and completely lacks any of bogart charisma or acting ability. this is really apparent whenever sacchi is not clearly imitating a scene from one of bogart films. second and the film does not have the first rate character actors bogart was able to work with. there are no peter lorre or sydney greenstreet in this one and folks. sure we are treated to performances by victor buaeno and olivia hussey and george raft amongst others and but they just aren not of the same caliber (or aren not given enough screen time or are miscast). third and the attempts at modern humor all fall through. all of the underwear jokes and having marlowe almost never remove that damn hat and trench coat (even though bogart would have) and etc. just aren not funny and really pull down this film. fourth and i have never heard a goofier theme song this side of mitchell. finally and the film false reverence for bogart (and other classic actors work) is truly irritating. bogart almost never played a straight hero and on those occasions he was a hero. he played complicated characters. this movie makes bogart out to be a trigger happy and moralistic do gooder. while this may have been true about some film characters and bogart characters rarely fit that bill. it movies like this that make people unexposed to the cinema of the past think that all of it is hokey and good guy beats the bad guys and gets the girl crap with low production values. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
