i really liked the first part of this film in africa for about an hour or so until the animal cruelty by civilized humans in scotland got to me in the second half and made me so sad i couldn not watch some of it. however and this was done by the filmmaker to make a point that early natural scientists ruined everything alive they do not understand by studying it literally to death without considering the rights and comfort of the animals studied and which we know now shouldn not be studied anywhere but in the natural world they inhabit and and as unobtrusively as possible. i do recommend this film as it was a mostly serious and honest story of tarzan and made a point of showing the gross animal cruelty that was rampant in the 19th century scientific world as well as the pure and simple and beautifully primitive life tarzan lived as a young man who was found as a baby and raised by chimps after the violent death of his parents in the african jungle. christopher lambert was wonderful and very soulful in his life of tarzan role and as was ralph richardson in his last film role as tarzan ultra rich and nobility reeking gramps in scotland. andy macdowell was pretty and pretty good as tarzan gussied up and civilized jane in her first movie role. from his charismatic work in this film and his very haunting eyes and i cannot understand why lambert did not later become a big star and but his really bad movie choices later may have done him in. the terrific ian holm and as a wounded frenchman in africa helped by tarzan and who then escorted tarzan back to his previously unknown and ancestral home in scotland and was great as always. i am so glad tarzan got sick of and do not stay in the animal cruel civilized world at that time and went home to africa in the end to live out his life with his gentle and loving ape relatives who raised him instead of staying in scotland and living like royalty and which would have ruined him if it do not kill him first. 
i really liked the first part of this film in africa for about an hour or so until the animal cruelty by civilized humans in scotland got to me in the second half and made me so sad i couldn not watch some of it. however and this was done by the filmmaker to make a point that early natural scientists ruined everything alive they do not understand by studying it literally to death without considering the rights and comfort of the animals studied and which we know now shouldn not be studied anywhere but in the natural world they inhabit and and as unobtrusively as possible. i do recommend this film as it was a mostly serious and honest story of tarzan and made a point of showing the gross animal cruelty that was rampant in the 19th century scientific world as well as the pure and simple and beautifully primitive life tarzan lived as a young man who was found as a baby and raised by chimps after the violent death of his parents in the african jungle. christopher lambert was wonderful and very soulful in his life of tarzan role and as was ralph richardson in his last film role as tarzan ultra rich and nobility reeking gramps in scotland. andy macdowell was pretty and pretty good as tarzan gussied up and civilized jane in her first movie role. from his charismatic work in this film and his very haunting eyes and i cannot understand why lambert did not later become a big star and but his really bad movie choices later may have done him in. the terrific ian holm and as a wounded frenchman in africa helped by tarzan and who then escorted tarzan back to his previously unknown and ancestral home in scotland and was great as always. i am so glad tarzan got sick of and do not stay in the animal cruel civilized world at that time and went home to africa in the end to live out his life with his gentle and loving ape relatives who raised him instead of staying in scotland and living like royalty and which would have ruined him if it do not kill him first. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
