i am a massive fan of the log. i thought the first two series provided some of the best comedy this country has ever seen and the third series and though different and was wonderfully dark and imaginative. the thought of seeing tubbs and edward and briss on the big screen made july 3 something to wait for. yet and somewhere and it all went horribly wrong. the writers had no story and no real ideas. the part set in old england showed the glimmers of genius that we know the league are capable of but these scenes did not fit well with the film. geoff provided the best of too few and largely poor jokes and lipp and briss performances were big let downs. if you love the league and save yourself the time and money and watch episodes from the tv series again. and again. a massive disappointment. 
i am a massive fan of the log. i thought the first two series provided some of the best comedy this country has ever seen and the third series and though different and was wonderfully dark and imaginative. the thought of seeing tubbs and edward and briss on the big screen made july 3 something to wait for. yet and somewhere and it all went horribly wrong. the writers had no story and no real ideas. the part set in old england showed the glimmers of genius that we know the league are capable of but these scenes did not fit well with the film. geoff provided the best of too few and largely poor jokes and lipp and briss performances were big let downs. if you love the league and save yourself the time and money and watch episodes from the tv series again. and again. a massive disappointment. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
