compared to this and tarkovsky is a speed freak. compared to this and bela tarr is mtv. compared to this and the movie russian ark is a roller coaster ride. i have just described 3 of the sllllowwwwwesssstttt experiences i have ever known and and this one tops them all. but that not saying it bad. on the contrary and i really liked it. but it was a chore. i would not describe the plot and because you can easily find that elsewhere. suffice it to say that the plot is insane. it one of the most creative and bizarre ideas since becoming john malkovich. i believe the interesting plot is the main reason i kept from nodding off (also and the humour was nice. that something we rarely see in slow and artsy films). here we see a bizarre reversal of the norm. most movies have little plot and little substance while yet they fill 90 mins with a lot of eyecatching images to keep us enthralled. but the hole has 100% plot or theme without much to please the eyes. in that respect and i suppose it a truly intellectual experience and much like reading a painfully verbose novel like thackaray vanity fair (which i have never been able to finish. ). if you have a tremendous attention span and i think you will really like this film. despite its molassessy pace and it highly creative and imaginative. it like jean pierre jeunet on quaaludes and with a drab and dusty camera lens. best of luck. 
compared to this and tarkovsky is a speed freak. compared to this and bela tarr is mtv. compared to this and the movie russian ark is a roller coaster ride. i have just described 3 of the sllllowwwwwesssstttt experiences i have ever known and and this one tops them all. but that not saying it bad. on the contrary and i really liked it. but it was a chore. i would not describe the plot and because you can easily find that elsewhere. suffice it to say that the plot is insane. it one of the most creative and bizarre ideas since becoming john malkovich. i believe the interesting plot is the main reason i kept from nodding off (also and the humour was nice. that something we rarely see in slow and artsy films). here we see a bizarre reversal of the norm. most movies have little plot and little substance while yet they fill 90 mins with a lot of eyecatching images to keep us enthralled. but the hole has 100% plot or theme without much to please the eyes. in that respect and i suppose it a truly intellectual experience and much like reading a painfully verbose novel like thackaray vanity fair (which i have never been able to finish. ). if you have a tremendous attention span and i think you will really like this film. despite its molassessy pace and it highly creative and imaginative. it like jean pierre jeunet on quaaludes and with a drab and dusty camera lens. best of luck. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
