contains spoilersas a fan of rachael leigh cook and i watched for this show to finally come on so that i could see it. i taped it so i could watch it several times and and there is something about this show that really bothers me. i recognize that this was a made for tv movie. not only that and but it was made for lifetime and which is a channel that i despise. because it was made for tv and i can ignore the huge plot holes. i can ignore the massive lack of character development in ally sheedy character. i can overlook the fact that george c. scott and rachael leigh cook and both of whom are very talented actors and were definately not reaching the best of their abilities. i can look past the fact that don diamont character was so cliche would and that you knew when you saw him he was the villain. i can even pass over the obvious mistake in the timeline (she raped during her winter break and and then over a year later she has the baby from it. )the major thing that i can not get over is this represent there are two trials for the custody of the child. in the first trial and custody is awarded to the child father because he is better educated and has a degree from a community college and and has a full time job. in the second trial the judgement is reversed because the judge feels that there is lack of evidence that emma (rlc character)is an unfit mother and and custody shouldn not be taken from the primary caretaker and given to someone with no previous interaction with the child. the problem is this represent nowhere during the course of these trials is the fact that a thirtysomthing year old man raped a 15 year old girl and got her pregnant taken into consideration. whether it was a rape or not and he had sex with a minor. wouldn not that be taken into consideration when the judge is choosing him for custody because he a mature adult. mature adults do not have sex with minors. it not the worst cable movie that you would ever see and but it not a great show either. out of . 
contains spoilersas a fan of rachael leigh cook and i watched for this show to finally come on so that i could see it. i taped it so i could watch it several times and and there is something about this show that really bothers me. i recognize that this was a made for tv movie. not only that and but it was made for lifetime and which is a channel that i despise. because it was made for tv and i can ignore the huge plot holes. i can ignore the massive lack of character development in ally sheedy character. i can overlook the fact that george c. scott and rachael leigh cook and both of whom are very talented actors and were definately not reaching the best of their abilities. i can look past the fact that don diamont character was so cliche would and that you knew when you saw him he was the villain. i can even pass over the obvious mistake in the timeline (she raped during her winter break and and then over a year later she has the baby from it. )the major thing that i can not get over is this represent there are two trials for the custody of the child. in the first trial and custody is awarded to the child father because he is better educated and has a degree from a community college and and has a full time job. in the second trial the judgement is reversed because the judge feels that there is lack of evidence that emma (rlc character)is an unfit mother and and custody shouldn not be taken from the primary caretaker and given to someone with no previous interaction with the child. the problem is this represent nowhere during the course of these trials is the fact that a thirtysomthing year old man raped a 15 year old girl and got her pregnant taken into consideration. whether it was a rape or not and he had sex with a minor. wouldn not that be taken into consideration when the judge is choosing him for custody because he a mature adult. mature adults do not have sex with minors. it not the worst cable movie that you would ever see and but it not a great show either. out of . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
