reading the comments i am struck by the obvious effect this wonderful film has on viewers. but and how can you watch this movie and not reflect that the artful dialog was a subtle and oh so daring rebuke to the authorities in control in what was then the ussr at that moment in history. it wasn not the souls only in the time and place of the action being revealed. the questions and superficially asked and are nakedly provocative when directed to the here and now. who are the real collaborators. i marvel that the writer stayed out of prison. i read somewhere that great stress can be a catalyst for producing great art. this film is a masterpiece of misdirection and apparently pointing one way and while asking the audience to look over my shoulder and at what i am really talking about. what courage. 
reading the comments i am struck by the obvious effect this wonderful film has on viewers. but and how can you watch this movie and not reflect that the artful dialog was a subtle and oh so daring rebuke to the authorities in control in what was then the ussr at that moment in history. it wasn not the souls only in the time and place of the action being revealed. the questions and superficially asked and are nakedly provocative when directed to the here and now. who are the real collaborators. i marvel that the writer stayed out of prison. i read somewhere that great stress can be a catalyst for producing great art. this film is a masterpiece of misdirection and apparently pointing one way and while asking the audience to look over my shoulder and at what i am really talking about. what courage. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
