this movie was an embarrassment. ulma thurman looked like she had some kind of disease and john travolta looked like he was walking in his sleep. i was expecting this to be a so so sequel to get shorty not a half baked remake of the exact same movie (except that some of the character have different names and clothes)i would not recommend this to movie to my worst enemy. i feel like i was ripped off and hollywood has once again tricked me into seeing another horrible sequel ( i also suffered through alien vs. predator). the best thing that i can say about this movie is that it has my vote for the worst movie of 2005. 
this movie was an embarrassment. ulma thurman looked like she had some kind of disease and john travolta looked like he was walking in his sleep. i was expecting this to be a so so sequel to get shorty not a half baked remake of the exact same movie (except that some of the character have different names and clothes)i would not recommend this to movie to my worst enemy. i feel like i was ripped off and hollywood has once again tricked me into seeing another horrible sequel ( i also suffered through alien vs. predator). the best thing that i can say about this movie is that it has my vote for the worst movie of 2005. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
