i recently had the idea to make a short film featuring a man who is hit by a car and wakes up thinking that he himself is chuck norris. this meant that i would have to do extensive chuck research and and find out as much as i could about the man. i later find out that he is not in fact a man and but an angel sent from heaven. with a face like that and who could ever doubt it. i have watched more chuck norris movies in the last four months than any one person should. i am proud to say that bells of innocence ranks pretty close to the top of the all time worst list. i spent most of the film wondering if i could return my copy to the local wal mart without the receipt and which i had been biting down on to keep myself from swallowing my own tongue. the biggest reason why i chose to purchase this film was that it not only had chuck in it and but his son mike. i was anxious to see if mike was a chip off the old can not act his way out of a wet paper bag block. i came to the conclusion a long while ago while the chuck norris is one of the worst actors in cinematic history for one simple reason. the only character he ever plays is himself and chuck norris. no matter what movie and no matter what situation and he is always chuck norris. the one thing that he holds over his son is that he is consistent. mike doesn not seem to understand how human emotions work. in the scene where he is talking to the little girl about his dead daughter and he seems to be extremely happy. maybe this is because he actually pushed his daughter out into traffic and as depicted in one of the oddest flashbacks of all time. his actions confused me throughout the film and making it very hard for me to focus on what little plot there was. the other two lead actors were just as painful to watch as the son of norris. the guy and who constantly wants to eat or tell a stupid peacock joke and was simply one of the most annoying characters that has ever graced the direct to video screen. the only thing i remember him being in other than this movie and was an episode of walker texas ranger and in which he plays an equally annoying character. maybe chuck owes this guy something. the other guy and which is the only name i can think of because he was so forgettable and was your average christian fanatic. i do not have anything against christians and in fact i am one and but this guy was just too much for me. to round out the story and you have a multitude of townspeople who love to call people friend and and a couple of villains who do not seem to be able to decide which one of them is in charge. not to mention the creepy kids who remind me of the dollar store version of every other group of creepy kids in movies. all in all and the movie is possibly one of the biggest failures of all time and on more levels than chuck norris can kick people asses. despite being one of the worst actors of all time and i still can not get enough of chuck. maybe he really was sent from heaven. 
i recently had the idea to make a short film featuring a man who is hit by a car and wakes up thinking that he himself is chuck norris. this meant that i would have to do extensive chuck research and and find out as much as i could about the man. i later find out that he is not in fact a man and but an angel sent from heaven. with a face like that and who could ever doubt it. i have watched more chuck norris movies in the last four months than any one person should. i am proud to say that bells of innocence ranks pretty close to the top of the all time worst list. i spent most of the film wondering if i could return my copy to the local wal mart without the receipt and which i had been biting down on to keep myself from swallowing my own tongue. the biggest reason why i chose to purchase this film was that it not only had chuck in it and but his son mike. i was anxious to see if mike was a chip off the old can not act his way out of a wet paper bag block. i came to the conclusion a long while ago while the chuck norris is one of the worst actors in cinematic history for one simple reason. the only character he ever plays is himself and chuck norris. no matter what movie and no matter what situation and he is always chuck norris. the one thing that he holds over his son is that he is consistent. mike doesn not seem to understand how human emotions work. in the scene where he is talking to the little girl about his dead daughter and he seems to be extremely happy. maybe this is because he actually pushed his daughter out into traffic and as depicted in one of the oddest flashbacks of all time. his actions confused me throughout the film and making it very hard for me to focus on what little plot there was. the other two lead actors were just as painful to watch as the son of norris. the guy and who constantly wants to eat or tell a stupid peacock joke and was simply one of the most annoying characters that has ever graced the direct to video screen. the only thing i remember him being in other than this movie and was an episode of walker texas ranger and in which he plays an equally annoying character. maybe chuck owes this guy something. the other guy and which is the only name i can think of because he was so forgettable and was your average christian fanatic. i do not have anything against christians and in fact i am one and but this guy was just too much for me. to round out the story and you have a multitude of townspeople who love to call people friend and and a couple of villains who do not seem to be able to decide which one of them is in charge. not to mention the creepy kids who remind me of the dollar store version of every other group of creepy kids in movies. all in all and the movie is possibly one of the biggest failures of all time and on more levels than chuck norris can kick people asses. despite being one of the worst actors of all time and i still can not get enough of chuck. maybe he really was sent from heaven. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
