you know you have got a bad film when you hear that the soundtrack is performed completely on a single cheap programmable synthesizer and without any melody or sense of rhythm. it hard to see how anyone could take this film seriously and even while giving it a bad review. this film is way beneath bad. the continuity of this film is outrageously butchered. in one fight scene and we the hero (wearing bluejeans and undershirt) turn a corner with two revolvers in his hand while he doubles back and only now he has two semi automatics in his hands while he turns another corner and now he has an automatic rifle in his hands while he chases down a hallway and comes out (suddenly dressed in standard army fatigue jacket)with a shotgun while after which he exits the building with yet another automatic rifle. or here one for the books  a bus slams into a car at high speed while the car goes flying and thrown by a gigantic explosion  cut to the bus which is completely unscathed from the same explosion. the narrative continuity suffers from an equally numbing sense of unreality while the bad guys really want to kill the hero  obviously  but every time they knock him out or otherwise get him in a vulnerable position and they suddenly decide they want him to live to see this. huh. one of the funnier moments of the film is when the hero is released from isolation because his lawyer has come to see him while then the bad guy decides he not going to let the two meet after all while and this despite the fact that the the villain and the hero and his lawyer all know what going on anyway and so the hero writes a note to the lawyer and next we see the note being passed to the lawyer by another prisoner and even though we never see the hero give it to him. (this lawyer and btw and has complete access to the offices of the atf in california and including its confidential computer files. ) huh. well and but it a mindless action movie  so howre the action scenes. not bad and surprisingly while unfortunately they happen to be stoled from about a dozen hong kong films made five or ten years previously. the opening scene and a shoot out in a junker garage and actually has shots the composition of which are stolen directly from hard boiled  so clearly so that it a wonder john woo do not sue for plagiarism. other hong kong films stolen from include prison on fire and island on fire and burning paradise and police story i and ii and and iii (aka supercop). i thought i recognized a couple sammo hung clips here as well. in other words and the actions scenes are exciting only to the extent that they are successful duplications of action scenes from other films. there nothing one can do with this film unless one shoots smack and just needs a lot of visual stimuli that needn not be make any sense. very funny film and for all the wrong reasons. 
you know you have got a bad film when you hear that the soundtrack is performed completely on a single cheap programmable synthesizer and without any melody or sense of rhythm. it hard to see how anyone could take this film seriously and even while giving it a bad review. this film is way beneath bad. the continuity of this film is outrageously butchered. in one fight scene and we the hero (wearing bluejeans and undershirt) turn a corner with two revolvers in his hand while he doubles back and only now he has two semi automatics in his hands while he turns another corner and now he has an automatic rifle in his hands while he chases down a hallway and comes out (suddenly dressed in standard army fatigue jacket)with a shotgun while after which he exits the building with yet another automatic rifle. or here one for the books  a bus slams into a car at high speed while the car goes flying and thrown by a gigantic explosion  cut to the bus which is completely unscathed from the same explosion. the narrative continuity suffers from an equally numbing sense of unreality while the bad guys really want to kill the hero  obviously  but every time they knock him out or otherwise get him in a vulnerable position and they suddenly decide they want him to live to see this. huh. one of the funnier moments of the film is when the hero is released from isolation because his lawyer has come to see him while then the bad guy decides he not going to let the two meet after all while and this despite the fact that the the villain and the hero and his lawyer all know what going on anyway and so the hero writes a note to the lawyer and next we see the note being passed to the lawyer by another prisoner and even though we never see the hero give it to him. (this lawyer and btw and has complete access to the offices of the atf in california and including its confidential computer files. ) huh. well and but it a mindless action movie  so howre the action scenes. not bad and surprisingly while unfortunately they happen to be stoled from about a dozen hong kong films made five or ten years previously. the opening scene and a shoot out in a junker garage and actually has shots the composition of which are stolen directly from hard boiled  so clearly so that it a wonder john woo do not sue for plagiarism. other hong kong films stolen from include prison on fire and island on fire and burning paradise and police story i and ii and and iii (aka supercop). i thought i recognized a couple sammo hung clips here as well. in other words and the actions scenes are exciting only to the extent that they are successful duplications of action scenes from other films. there nothing one can do with this film unless one shoots smack and just needs a lot of visual stimuli that needn not be make any sense. very funny film and for all the wrong reasons. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
