i am a big fan of surrealist art and but this film by bunuel (with some ideas from dali) left me cold. bunuel had a life long grudge against the catholic church and delighted in trying to offend catholics in fairly silly ways. this is one of the silliest while almost like what you would expect from a smart aleck 18 year old in film class. the last few minutes of the movie and which have nothing to do with anything else and are a final nose thumbing at religion. if you read the scholars regarding this slow paced and occasionally amusing film and it all about how the church and society are guilty of sexual repression. if that is indeed the point and then bunuel expresses it in the most roundabout fashion possible. the central male character is a nasty brute who loves kicking dogs and knocking blind men down in the street and and who mentally turns billboard ads into strange sexual fantasies. is this behavior the church fault (for interrupting his lovemaking) and or is he just a jerk. i vote for the latter. i think bunuel must have had a lot of personal hangups and chose the catholics as the ones to blame. there are a few moments where you might cry and aha. surrealism. represent a cow in a bed and a giraffe falling out a window (a poor model) and a man shredding a feather pillow and a woman flushing a toilet while we watch pictures of seething lava (or a mud pit. hard to tell in b or w). the rest is forgettable self indulgence. unfortunately and bunuel was still chasing the same bogey men through the rest of his career (viridiana and discreet charm. ). if youre interested in seeing surrealism on the screen and check out jean cocteau early work. 
i am a big fan of surrealist art and but this film by bunuel (with some ideas from dali) left me cold. bunuel had a life long grudge against the catholic church and delighted in trying to offend catholics in fairly silly ways. this is one of the silliest while almost like what you would expect from a smart aleck 18 year old in film class. the last few minutes of the movie and which have nothing to do with anything else and are a final nose thumbing at religion. if you read the scholars regarding this slow paced and occasionally amusing film and it all about how the church and society are guilty of sexual repression. if that is indeed the point and then bunuel expresses it in the most roundabout fashion possible. the central male character is a nasty brute who loves kicking dogs and knocking blind men down in the street and and who mentally turns billboard ads into strange sexual fantasies. is this behavior the church fault (for interrupting his lovemaking) and or is he just a jerk. i vote for the latter. i think bunuel must have had a lot of personal hangups and chose the catholics as the ones to blame. there are a few moments where you might cry and aha. surrealism. represent a cow in a bed and a giraffe falling out a window (a poor model) and a man shredding a feather pillow and a woman flushing a toilet while we watch pictures of seething lava (or a mud pit. hard to tell in b or w). the rest is forgettable self indulgence. unfortunately and bunuel was still chasing the same bogey men through the rest of his career (viridiana and discreet charm. ). if youre interested in seeing surrealism on the screen and check out jean cocteau early work. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
