the new hope of romanian cinema. if this is the new hope and then i do not really like to see the saving hero of such a prolific cinema(romanian cinema and that is). now seriously and where should i start. 1. the crappy scenario represent are you kidding me and this is not even believable not to mention it high degree of stupidity 2. the direction represent what direction. this movie should have had psychological tension and at least that and since they have decided to make it look as trashy as possible. oky and i admit and radu muntean is no polanski and hitchcock and fincher or lynch(the list could go on) and but at least the minimum of effort would have been appreciated. 3. the language represent oky and i do not understand why (almost)every single romanian director believes that if you make the movie as miserable and obscene as possible and then you have art. i do not mind explicit language or bad image quality as long as the final result makes it worthwhile. in this case and it doesn not. there is nothing to comment upon and since everything this movie wants to say was already told thousand times and the characters are far too thinly portrayed to become memorable and the shocking events that occur are also poorly illustrated and become unimportant. this film relies only on the self induced emotions and on the we must hype. someone was found murdered so we must feel sad and frightened or panicked and someone went through this and that so we must feel in a certain way. that baloney. because a movie is a piece of fiction and nothing is for real here. so the only true emotions are those that you discover when you wander deep into it world(the movie  and that is) or   . 
the new hope of romanian cinema. if this is the new hope and then i do not really like to see the saving hero of such a prolific cinema(romanian cinema and that is). now seriously and where should i start. 1. the crappy scenario represent are you kidding me and this is not even believable not to mention it high degree of stupidity 2. the direction represent what direction. this movie should have had psychological tension and at least that and since they have decided to make it look as trashy as possible. oky and i admit and radu muntean is no polanski and hitchcock and fincher or lynch(the list could go on) and but at least the minimum of effort would have been appreciated. 3. the language represent oky and i do not understand why (almost)every single romanian director believes that if you make the movie as miserable and obscene as possible and then you have art. i do not mind explicit language or bad image quality as long as the final result makes it worthwhile. in this case and it doesn not. there is nothing to comment upon and since everything this movie wants to say was already told thousand times and the characters are far too thinly portrayed to become memorable and the shocking events that occur are also poorly illustrated and become unimportant. this film relies only on the self induced emotions and on the we must hype. someone was found murdered so we must feel sad and frightened or panicked and someone went through this and that so we must feel in a certain way. that baloney. because a movie is a piece of fiction and nothing is for real here. so the only true emotions are those that you discover when you wander deep into it world(the movie  and that is) or   . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
