so you have the spoiler warning  but i would argue that you cannot spoil what is already rotten. i assume they changed the name to the cavern just in case withins reputation had preceded it. after paying the cable rental for this movie and i considered saving my household garbage for a month and mailing it to the writer or director. he had his garbage delivered to my home and so i thought it only fair that i return the favor. the movie opens with a suggestion that the scene is in the desert of kazakhstan. i am not sure why they picked kazakhstan while maybe the writer is a fan of the ali g show. but they should have just started inside the cave and because the outside was obviously not kazakhstan. it was the first clue that i was going to hate the movie. the movie has no redeeming qualities and save one represent it consistent. everything is terrible. the writing and the directing and the acting and the cinematography  every aspect of this film is just bad. and i like bad films and goofy films and b horror films . . . but this was just plain bad. and stupid. and hackneyed. and predictable. and boring. to get a feel for the film and go into your laundry room with 5 of your friends and and turn off the lights. put a flashlight (turned on) into your dryer and start it tumbling. now all of you start screaming and yelling at the top of your lungs. that it. for a complete re enactment and have 5 of the 6 people in the laundry room play dead on the floor. toss karo syrup on them. turn the lights back on (stop the dryer). now have a guy in a gorilla costume enter the room and rape the last person standing. finaddendum represent reading through the other comments and many find it remarkable this movie was made on a low budget. that not remarkable. making a crap movie on a huge budget is remarkable (waterworld). making a good movie on a low budget is remarkable (like blair witch and which i thoroughly enjoyed). making a crap movie on a low budget isn not a bit surprising and and you can expect more of the same if these people are still making movies and because i can not imagine anybody would hand them a pile of cash after watching this. is the low budget an excuse for a terrible film. no and and it certainly no reason to watch it. would you eat a dog dung sandwich just because it was cheap to make. the imdb rating for this film over time will be interesting to watch. it should trend farther downward and but only if the number of unsuspecting innocent viewers can outpace the movie makers ability to beg their personal friends to give it 10 stars. 
so you have the spoiler warning  but i would argue that you cannot spoil what is already rotten. i assume they changed the name to the cavern just in case withins reputation had preceded it. after paying the cable rental for this movie and i considered saving my household garbage for a month and mailing it to the writer or director. he had his garbage delivered to my home and so i thought it only fair that i return the favor. the movie opens with a suggestion that the scene is in the desert of kazakhstan. i am not sure why they picked kazakhstan while maybe the writer is a fan of the ali g show. but they should have just started inside the cave and because the outside was obviously not kazakhstan. it was the first clue that i was going to hate the movie. the movie has no redeeming qualities and save one represent it consistent. everything is terrible. the writing and the directing and the acting and the cinematography  every aspect of this film is just bad. and i like bad films and goofy films and b horror films . . . but this was just plain bad. and stupid. and hackneyed. and predictable. and boring. to get a feel for the film and go into your laundry room with 5 of your friends and and turn off the lights. put a flashlight (turned on) into your dryer and start it tumbling. now all of you start screaming and yelling at the top of your lungs. that it. for a complete re enactment and have 5 of the 6 people in the laundry room play dead on the floor. toss karo syrup on them. turn the lights back on (stop the dryer). now have a guy in a gorilla costume enter the room and rape the last person standing. finaddendum represent reading through the other comments and many find it remarkable this movie was made on a low budget. that not remarkable. making a crap movie on a huge budget is remarkable (waterworld). making a good movie on a low budget is remarkable (like blair witch and which i thoroughly enjoyed). making a crap movie on a low budget isn not a bit surprising and and you can expect more of the same if these people are still making movies and because i can not imagine anybody would hand them a pile of cash after watching this. is the low budget an excuse for a terrible film. no and and it certainly no reason to watch it. would you eat a dog dung sandwich just because it was cheap to make. the imdb rating for this film over time will be interesting to watch. it should trend farther downward and but only if the number of unsuspecting innocent viewers can outpace the movie makers ability to beg their personal friends to give it 10 stars. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
