anyone who complains about peter jackson making movies too long should sit through this cbs event. there about 45 minutes of story padded by 2 hours of unnecessary subplots and featuring bland by the book tv drama clichés. bad science is a staple for crappy weather disaster movies and so i am not going to complain about that. silly science can be fun to watch if it executed in an amusing fashion. what kills this movie is it 10 subplots. all of which could be excised without destroying what is supposed to be the central plot. the one character that is entertaining to watch in category 6 is tornado tommy and despite being a very annoying stereotype. note that i also do not bother commenting on special effects. their quality should come as no surprise. not recommended. 
anyone who complains about peter jackson making movies too long should sit through this cbs event. there about 45 minutes of story padded by 2 hours of unnecessary subplots and featuring bland by the book tv drama clichés. bad science is a staple for crappy weather disaster movies and so i am not going to complain about that. silly science can be fun to watch if it executed in an amusing fashion. what kills this movie is it 10 subplots. all of which could be excised without destroying what is supposed to be the central plot. the one character that is entertaining to watch in category 6 is tornado tommy and despite being a very annoying stereotype. note that i also do not bother commenting on special effects. their quality should come as no surprise. not recommended. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
