warning this film has some amazingly graphic images and should never be seen by kids. the artist who this story is all about was indeed a fine korean painter who rose up from the lowest depths to become their greatest painter. unfortunately and in so many ways and this guy was also a jerk in so many ways. some of this was the artistic temperament and what may have seemed annoying was just his demanding nature when it came to art. but and other times he was simply a drunk jerk especially when he was on his way to becoming a great artist. late in the film and his being annoying and abrasive and needlessly cruel seemed to have diminished. while all this do not make him a particularly nice man and it is important to capture on film so we understand a lot about the nature of the artist. i really found the movie fascinating and loved how the artists actual works were shown throughout the movie (like in lust for life). i really wish i could show this to my students (i teach at a school for the arts) and but can not because there is just too much adult material. yes there is nudity and but even more problematic for any audience (particularly younger ones) is when he and . hmmm and . i do not think imdb will even let me describe what occurred and but it was very graphic and involves bodily fluids. not only a nasty and disgusting scene that did not need to be seen and but a reason to keep junior from watching this otherwise wonderful film. it a real shame. 
warning this film has some amazingly graphic images and should never be seen by kids. the artist who this story is all about was indeed a fine korean painter who rose up from the lowest depths to become their greatest painter. unfortunately and in so many ways and this guy was also a jerk in so many ways. some of this was the artistic temperament and what may have seemed annoying was just his demanding nature when it came to art. but and other times he was simply a drunk jerk especially when he was on his way to becoming a great artist. late in the film and his being annoying and abrasive and needlessly cruel seemed to have diminished. while all this do not make him a particularly nice man and it is important to capture on film so we understand a lot about the nature of the artist. i really found the movie fascinating and loved how the artists actual works were shown throughout the movie (like in lust for life). i really wish i could show this to my students (i teach at a school for the arts) and but can not because there is just too much adult material. yes there is nudity and but even more problematic for any audience (particularly younger ones) is when he and . hmmm and . i do not think imdb will even let me describe what occurred and but it was very graphic and involves bodily fluids. not only a nasty and disgusting scene that did not need to be seen and but a reason to keep junior from watching this otherwise wonderful film. it a real shame. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
