spoiler alert i have never seen comments on a movie and that i disagree with more then the comments people made on this. one could learn from critical viewings of this movie. as an educational film and i rate it highly because it teaches how to succeed. we do not watch movies to learn while we generally watch for entertainment. as entertainment and i rate it low represent the ending is downbeat and cerebral or intellectual. this conflict results in my eight star rating. the movie follows jane craig (holly hunter) and a television news producer. the network executive introduces tom grunnick (william hurt) and to study for the on air news anchor position. tom immediately charms people with humbleness. another potential news anchor has been waiting for years for his on air opportunity and aaron altman (albert brooks). altman knows all news stories and inside and out. the network executive wants grunnick on the air and jane argues and saying grunnick is not ready and he doesn not know the news. they do not listen to her. forced to place grunnick on the air and jane contacts altman to get information on the news story and relays altman comments through an earpiece to grunnick while grunnick speaks. we watch the sharp contrast between altman or jane craig words and grunnick  and as grunnick skillfully rewords everything altman and jane craig say in his ear and in order to make it understandable and likable and entertaining the audience. altman gets a chance on air and the network execs require him to seek coaching from grunnick and the new guy. this new (news ingnorant) guy coaching him. this is something altman does not see justified and but agrees reluctantly. grunnick coaches altman and gets excited noting hundreds of altman shortcomings in appearance and audio and vocabulary. altman never considered these things before and when he became an expert on the news itself. the complexity of understanding what grunnick taught him and causes altman to have a panicked sweating attack (flop sweat) when he is on the air. grunnick eventually becomes the top network anchor and altman resigns prior to being fired. but grunnick fails in his attempt for a romance with jane craig and because she finds out from altman and that grunnick sometimes fakes circumstances in order to make people like him. this turns her off of him. this sends the message that in relationships and we want people who are genuine and not trying to make us like them. this movie sends the message that getting people to like you is the most important skill in a job and but it is especially true in broadcast news. there are many people commenting on how this is the dumbing down of tv news and how grunnick represents a good looking and but dumb guy or all style and but no substance. the opposite is true and grunnick possessed skills and very complex intellect and to get people to like him and including the presence of mind to know exactly how he appears and sounds and when he is on camera (he coaches altman to punch a word in every sentence). grunnick flaw that costs him the relationship with jane craig and is that he is too driven to be likable and will fake a situation. many people are calling altman very intelligent or brilliant. altman played by brookes is not as intelligent as grunnick and the flop sweat scene shows that his mind could not handle the complexity that grunnick handles when on the air. altman is angered by this fact that he knew the news and grunnick suceeded more by getting people to like him. there are also people commenting that these things are exclusive to the tv news industry. the concept that winning friends is the most important skill in a job and is obviously and not popular and but my experience indicates it is true in most jobs. as an education on how to succeed and this movie is fantastic and albeit unpopular. educational and yes and but it does not have an uplifting ending. 
spoiler alert i have never seen comments on a movie and that i disagree with more then the comments people made on this. one could learn from critical viewings of this movie. as an educational film and i rate it highly because it teaches how to succeed. we do not watch movies to learn while we generally watch for entertainment. as entertainment and i rate it low represent the ending is downbeat and cerebral or intellectual. this conflict results in my eight star rating. the movie follows jane craig (holly hunter) and a television news producer. the network executive introduces tom grunnick (william hurt) and to study for the on air news anchor position. tom immediately charms people with humbleness. another potential news anchor has been waiting for years for his on air opportunity and aaron altman (albert brooks). altman knows all news stories and inside and out. the network executive wants grunnick on the air and jane argues and saying grunnick is not ready and he doesn not know the news. they do not listen to her. forced to place grunnick on the air and jane contacts altman to get information on the news story and relays altman comments through an earpiece to grunnick while grunnick speaks. we watch the sharp contrast between altman or jane craig words and grunnick  and as grunnick skillfully rewords everything altman and jane craig say in his ear and in order to make it understandable and likable and entertaining the audience. altman gets a chance on air and the network execs require him to seek coaching from grunnick and the new guy. this new (news ingnorant) guy coaching him. this is something altman does not see justified and but agrees reluctantly. grunnick coaches altman and gets excited noting hundreds of altman shortcomings in appearance and audio and vocabulary. altman never considered these things before and when he became an expert on the news itself. the complexity of understanding what grunnick taught him and causes altman to have a panicked sweating attack (flop sweat) when he is on the air. grunnick eventually becomes the top network anchor and altman resigns prior to being fired. but grunnick fails in his attempt for a romance with jane craig and because she finds out from altman and that grunnick sometimes fakes circumstances in order to make people like him. this turns her off of him. this sends the message that in relationships and we want people who are genuine and not trying to make us like them. this movie sends the message that getting people to like you is the most important skill in a job and but it is especially true in broadcast news. there are many people commenting on how this is the dumbing down of tv news and how grunnick represents a good looking and but dumb guy or all style and but no substance. the opposite is true and grunnick possessed skills and very complex intellect and to get people to like him and including the presence of mind to know exactly how he appears and sounds and when he is on camera (he coaches altman to punch a word in every sentence). grunnick flaw that costs him the relationship with jane craig and is that he is too driven to be likable and will fake a situation. many people are calling altman very intelligent or brilliant. altman played by brookes is not as intelligent as grunnick and the flop sweat scene shows that his mind could not handle the complexity that grunnick handles when on the air. altman is angered by this fact that he knew the news and grunnick suceeded more by getting people to like him. there are also people commenting that these things are exclusive to the tv news industry. the concept that winning friends is the most important skill in a job and is obviously and not popular and but my experience indicates it is true in most jobs. as an education on how to succeed and this movie is fantastic and albeit unpopular. educational and yes and but it does not have an uplifting ending. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
