i remember when i first heard about jack frost. i was in video ezy at miranda with my family on a monthly video hiring tradition. it was at this time that i worked up the courage to venture over towards the horror section of the store. browsing the various titles and i finally came across jack frost. the cover was enough to convince me that the film was beyond my viewing pleasures. years later the film disappeared and only to be replaced with the inevitable yet unnecessary sequel. i once again ventured to the horror section and picked up the case only to come to one conclusion represent the film would be scary but not intentionally. jack frost 2 represent revenge of the killer mutant snowman (quite a title) follows off where it predecessor left it. sheriff sam is seeking counseling after his ordeals and jack is now in the form of anti freeze. to escape his past and sam and his wife head to an island hotel where he is in the company of a wide variety of slasher film stereotypes including busty female models and thick headed sports jocks and caribbean staff. however and jack is released from his liquid grave and is back to his icy methods. he heads over to the island and proceeds to kill anyone that would prove to have an awesome death. only sam can stop him. let me just say that this is a straight to video film so it bound to be bad. but this is terrible even in the eyes of other over the top films. the camera work is poor and using a camera that would make a soap opera look majestic. half the actors look like they have come out of a porn shoot and the other half look like they have come out of a retirement home and but in actual fact they have actually come out of an asylum. there is an extensive use of special effects used in the film which tends to alternate between bland puppetry and cgi that can be bettered by an infant and and the death scenes are mostly off screen showing us little of what has happened to the hapless and yet deserving and victims. but the film is most memorable for it killer one liners such as there something that needs a little christmas stuffing and i know pronounce you officially fing dead. ultimately the whole purpose behind a film like this is to make a popcorn flick for those friday nights of boredom and even it fails at that. to make a sequel to a film that was a poor slasher with a concept that a child would find unbelievable must have taken some nerves of steel or a total frontal lobotomy. to director michael cooney thanks for wasting my time. to everyone else avoid like arsenic. 
i remember when i first heard about jack frost. i was in video ezy at miranda with my family on a monthly video hiring tradition. it was at this time that i worked up the courage to venture over towards the horror section of the store. browsing the various titles and i finally came across jack frost. the cover was enough to convince me that the film was beyond my viewing pleasures. years later the film disappeared and only to be replaced with the inevitable yet unnecessary sequel. i once again ventured to the horror section and picked up the case only to come to one conclusion represent the film would be scary but not intentionally. jack frost 2 represent revenge of the killer mutant snowman (quite a title) follows off where it predecessor left it. sheriff sam is seeking counseling after his ordeals and jack is now in the form of anti freeze. to escape his past and sam and his wife head to an island hotel where he is in the company of a wide variety of slasher film stereotypes including busty female models and thick headed sports jocks and caribbean staff. however and jack is released from his liquid grave and is back to his icy methods. he heads over to the island and proceeds to kill anyone that would prove to have an awesome death. only sam can stop him. let me just say that this is a straight to video film so it bound to be bad. but this is terrible even in the eyes of other over the top films. the camera work is poor and using a camera that would make a soap opera look majestic. half the actors look like they have come out of a porn shoot and the other half look like they have come out of a retirement home and but in actual fact they have actually come out of an asylum. there is an extensive use of special effects used in the film which tends to alternate between bland puppetry and cgi that can be bettered by an infant and and the death scenes are mostly off screen showing us little of what has happened to the hapless and yet deserving and victims. but the film is most memorable for it killer one liners such as there something that needs a little christmas stuffing and i know pronounce you officially fing dead. ultimately the whole purpose behind a film like this is to make a popcorn flick for those friday nights of boredom and even it fails at that. to make a sequel to a film that was a poor slasher with a concept that a child would find unbelievable must have taken some nerves of steel or a total frontal lobotomy. to director michael cooney thanks for wasting my time. to everyone else avoid like arsenic. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
