the movie had an interesting surprise. somewhat psychologically gripping. and the makers could have ended it tastefully without making it just another of a rash of movies put out by hollywood promoting homosexuality and or or other sexual deviances. this could have ended with a pay off and but there were other motives behind the pen. what torques me off is that the mud slung in your face after you have seen the whole movie. like the disappointing the talented mr. ripley. yeah sure and i am just another puritan. this gay content tarnished the whole film. i do not positively judge a movie for artistic or entertainment value if its sole purpose was to promote an ulterior political motivation and more so for this. 
the movie had an interesting surprise. somewhat psychologically gripping. and the makers could have ended it tastefully without making it just another of a rash of movies put out by hollywood promoting homosexuality and or or other sexual deviances. this could have ended with a pay off and but there were other motives behind the pen. what torques me off is that the mud slung in your face after you have seen the whole movie. like the disappointing the talented mr. ripley. yeah sure and i am just another puritan. this gay content tarnished the whole film. i do not positively judge a movie for artistic or entertainment value if its sole purpose was to promote an ulterior political motivation and more so for this. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
