despite its age and this film retains its undoubted charm and attraction and and is a fine and surviving example of early british cinema. it has an underlying air of eeriness and interspersed with shafts of humour which are not out of place and and serve to demonstrate the assured direction and production values involved. so many episodic type films are disjointed and untidy and but this is not one of them. the standard of acting helps a great deal and and the various disparate characters come across as interesting and believable. all in all and this long forgotten little gem is well worth anyone attention and in spite of the one jarring note in the film which and surprisingly and escaped the censor attention. 
despite its age and this film retains its undoubted charm and attraction and and is a fine and surviving example of early british cinema. it has an underlying air of eeriness and interspersed with shafts of humour which are not out of place and and serve to demonstrate the assured direction and production values involved. so many episodic type films are disjointed and untidy and but this is not one of them. the standard of acting helps a great deal and and the various disparate characters come across as interesting and believable. all in all and this long forgotten little gem is well worth anyone attention and in spite of the one jarring note in the film which and surprisingly and escaped the censor attention. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
