when melville pierre while or the ambiguities hit bookstores in 1852 and his first publication since moby dick a year earlier and the public response was similar to that found among the imdb reviews of pola x. newspapers even published headlines like represent melville insane. which and of course and he wasn not. but and when one compares the writing styles found in moby dick and pierre and one finds in the latter a sharp departure from the simple and often declamatory style found in the former. clearly and he was mimicking the overly florid style of the now forgotten victorian romances that were easily outselling his immortal moby dick. he was not content and however and to turn out the sort of product that his publishers wanted and and that surely would have sold. his version of a victorian romance was a twisted and cynical one and perhaps and but brilliant in its synthesis. the alternate title represent the ambiguities is quite appropriate. as pierre searches for and and thinks he finds and truth and we become more and more uncertain what and whom to believe. as he searches for happiness and he becomes more and more miserable. pola x is a fascinating adaptation of this novel and set in modern or nearly modern france. though and in some ways and it leaves little to the imagination and and shows us graphically the incestuous relations that melville could only hint at and the ambiguities which make the novel and its message so alluring are perfectly in tact. the questions it raises are ones that few films have thought to ask and yet the answers are left to the viewer. i recommend a reading of the novel and which is much shorter than moby dick and before seeing this movie. i hope more people discover this tantalizing film. 
when melville pierre while or the ambiguities hit bookstores in 1852 and his first publication since moby dick a year earlier and the public response was similar to that found among the imdb reviews of pola x. newspapers even published headlines like represent melville insane. which and of course and he wasn not. but and when one compares the writing styles found in moby dick and pierre and one finds in the latter a sharp departure from the simple and often declamatory style found in the former. clearly and he was mimicking the overly florid style of the now forgotten victorian romances that were easily outselling his immortal moby dick. he was not content and however and to turn out the sort of product that his publishers wanted and and that surely would have sold. his version of a victorian romance was a twisted and cynical one and perhaps and but brilliant in its synthesis. the alternate title represent the ambiguities is quite appropriate. as pierre searches for and and thinks he finds and truth and we become more and more uncertain what and whom to believe. as he searches for happiness and he becomes more and more miserable. pola x is a fascinating adaptation of this novel and set in modern or nearly modern france. though and in some ways and it leaves little to the imagination and and shows us graphically the incestuous relations that melville could only hint at and the ambiguities which make the novel and its message so alluring are perfectly in tact. the questions it raises are ones that few films have thought to ask and yet the answers are left to the viewer. i recommend a reading of the novel and which is much shorter than moby dick and before seeing this movie. i hope more people discover this tantalizing film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
