thank god for this movie. it a document of talent that and three decades later and seems even more unique and rare in retrospect. the music is just extraordinary and packed with so much talent in writing and performance and arrangement and production that it absolutely infectious. the lyrics and vocal arrangements are incredible. the performances by under appreciated talents like nell carter and ren woods uplift my spirit every time i hear them. while the film may be different from the stage version and i prefer the soundtrack to the cast album and which i find truly grating and under developed. here the arrangements are filled out and expanded into dynamic pieces that couldn not have been produced in a stage setting. but the music isn not the only thing extraordinary about this movie. the juxtaposition of almost hyper realist dialog scenes (reminds me of altman films) intercut with exuberant musical and dance numbers and really works. all the talent in this movie directing and writing and photography and editing and music and choreography and casting and acting and costuming and art direction merge perfectly into one of the best musical films i have seen. i think it amazing how much we know about the characters in hair and based on very little information or plot. theyre not drawn as caricatures and but as realistic and very human people. we see little glimpses of where they come from and but the portrait is completed by vignettes that draw the characters to the surface through accomplished acting and directing and editing. there an undercurrent theme of the misogyny of berger and hud which colors their characters by exposing their reckless macho hippie ideology. the scene of berger home life reveals important details about his psychology and and the brief glimpse of claude home tells us volumes about his background through the simple and realistic and genuine interaction between claude and (presumably) his father. i love the fashion in this movie. it defiantly mixes sixties ideas with very seventies looks (one does have to overlook treat williams hair extensions. ). it a document of how chic much of the late seventies was and contrary to the conventional wisdom that the era was all about bad taste. claude beige knitted tie was a hot trend of 1979 and and the hair and clothing of the singers and dancers (particularly those in white during the central park scene) mixes up the decades in a way that suggests the timelessness of the musical themes. these elements merge with twyla tharpe extraordinary state of the art choreography in a way that enhances the artistry of both. hairisn not a film that rewards cynicism. if you come to it with expectations and then youre most likely going to be held captive by artists who aren not bound by your rules. for me and it opened my eyes and ears and spirit to an insightful and passionate musical dialog about war and friendship and family that transcends its time and is still meaningful and relevant to me to this day. 
thank god for this movie. it a document of talent that and three decades later and seems even more unique and rare in retrospect. the music is just extraordinary and packed with so much talent in writing and performance and arrangement and production that it absolutely infectious. the lyrics and vocal arrangements are incredible. the performances by under appreciated talents like nell carter and ren woods uplift my spirit every time i hear them. while the film may be different from the stage version and i prefer the soundtrack to the cast album and which i find truly grating and under developed. here the arrangements are filled out and expanded into dynamic pieces that couldn not have been produced in a stage setting. but the music isn not the only thing extraordinary about this movie. the juxtaposition of almost hyper realist dialog scenes (reminds me of altman films) intercut with exuberant musical and dance numbers and really works. all the talent in this movie directing and writing and photography and editing and music and choreography and casting and acting and costuming and art direction merge perfectly into one of the best musical films i have seen. i think it amazing how much we know about the characters in hair and based on very little information or plot. theyre not drawn as caricatures and but as realistic and very human people. we see little glimpses of where they come from and but the portrait is completed by vignettes that draw the characters to the surface through accomplished acting and directing and editing. there an undercurrent theme of the misogyny of berger and hud which colors their characters by exposing their reckless macho hippie ideology. the scene of berger home life reveals important details about his psychology and and the brief glimpse of claude home tells us volumes about his background through the simple and realistic and genuine interaction between claude and (presumably) his father. i love the fashion in this movie. it defiantly mixes sixties ideas with very seventies looks (one does have to overlook treat williams hair extensions. ). it a document of how chic much of the late seventies was and contrary to the conventional wisdom that the era was all about bad taste. claude beige knitted tie was a hot trend of 1979 and and the hair and clothing of the singers and dancers (particularly those in white during the central park scene) mixes up the decades in a way that suggests the timelessness of the musical themes. these elements merge with twyla tharpe extraordinary state of the art choreography in a way that enhances the artistry of both. hairisn not a film that rewards cynicism. if you come to it with expectations and then youre most likely going to be held captive by artists who aren not bound by your rules. for me and it opened my eyes and ears and spirit to an insightful and passionate musical dialog about war and friendship and family that transcends its time and is still meaningful and relevant to me to this day. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
