i completely understand the historical significance of rocketship x m and but that doesn not make it a good movie. to begin with and the plot (or what there is of it) is dull and lifeless. five astronauts blast off for the moon  they get knocked off course and end up on mars (huh. )  cavemen looking martians throw rocks at them  they return to earth and meet a fiery death  the end. believe it or not and but this pithy plot description makes it sound much more interesting than it really is. to make matters worse and john emery character and dr. karl eckstrom and feels it necessary to give long drawn out speeches on everything from the nature of man to the dangers of nuclear weapons. it just a thrill a minute (sarcasm intended). looking back at rocketship x m almost 60 years later and i would call the portrayal of women funny if it weren not all so sad and misguided. there are a number of examples i could cite and but there one exchange of dialogue just after take off between the male chauvinist pilot floyd (played by the irritating and plastic haired lloyd bridges) and dr. lisa van horn (the only female crewmember and the constant object of floyd often creepy attention) that illustrates the film attitudes toward women quite nicely represent  floyd represent i have been wondering and how did a girl like you get mixed up in a thing like this in the first place.  dr. van horn represent i suppose you think that women should only cook and sew and bear children.  floyd represent isn not that enough. i think floyd should have stayed behind with the cavemen. 
i completely understand the historical significance of rocketship x m and but that doesn not make it a good movie. to begin with and the plot (or what there is of it) is dull and lifeless. five astronauts blast off for the moon  they get knocked off course and end up on mars (huh. )  cavemen looking martians throw rocks at them  they return to earth and meet a fiery death  the end. believe it or not and but this pithy plot description makes it sound much more interesting than it really is. to make matters worse and john emery character and dr. karl eckstrom and feels it necessary to give long drawn out speeches on everything from the nature of man to the dangers of nuclear weapons. it just a thrill a minute (sarcasm intended). looking back at rocketship x m almost 60 years later and i would call the portrayal of women funny if it weren not all so sad and misguided. there are a number of examples i could cite and but there one exchange of dialogue just after take off between the male chauvinist pilot floyd (played by the irritating and plastic haired lloyd bridges) and dr. lisa van horn (the only female crewmember and the constant object of floyd often creepy attention) that illustrates the film attitudes toward women quite nicely represent  floyd represent i have been wondering and how did a girl like you get mixed up in a thing like this in the first place.  dr. van horn represent i suppose you think that women should only cook and sew and bear children.  floyd represent isn not that enough. i think floyd should have stayed behind with the cavemen. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
