the first robocop had a sense of cynical wit and a sick sense of violence. it was a fine line to walk and but paul verhoeven pulled it off and the film did so well and they made a sequel. how awful. (possible spoilers ahead  though anything that could spoil this is beyond me). irvin kershner is not the director for this type of film. he clearly did not understand the wit of the original and as a result the massive over the top senseless violence looks really bad  and worse is very distasteful. even worse is the musical score. leonard rosenman was an old man from another era and the heroic and light music does not match the images on the screen at all. what was he scoring. the great american hero. worst of all and he completely eliminated robocop theme from the first film and which was so memorable and perfect. can you imagine a superman film without john williams fanfare and or indiana jones and etc. how could he do that. the plot is just a collection of ideas that do not gel. in beginning we see robo stalking his old wife. fine and good idea. but and they completely drop it after that. then and there is this a stupid idea of the company reprogramming robo to be nice. that thrown in for 10 minutes and then is immediately dropped. or and the silly idea that the repulsive 10 year old drug lord reminds robo of his son  once again and a weak motif that is shown briefly twice and dropped. this may work in a comic book and but not on film and frank miller was unfortunately too inexperienced at the time and threw every idea in along with the kitchen sink. it doesn not work as a whole. some people here seem to be praising the corporate bashing in this film and the privatization of the police. that is the best part of the film that is consistent with the first. however and in the original and the old man was a tough business man out for a profit and but ultimately fair in the end. in this film and he is just pure evil in his lust for money and power. you can not just change characters like that for no reason. and nancy allen character is useless in this film and whereas in the first she was essential to robo search for himself. she is as gratuitous as the violence in this film. and the violence and yes the violence. i enjoy many violent and bloody films when they serve purposes and are meant to tell a story. irvin kershner seems to get off on human beings being blown to bits and shot to pieces and children lusting for death and torture and peoples desire for drugs. he doesn not know when to stop. do we really need to see every last innocent bystander (even people trying to help others) get shot up. it is inferred when we see the bad robocop shooting repeatedly. instead mr. kershner proves he has very little taste for this type of work and creates an abominable mess that is a terrible piece of pop art and worse and a disgusting message of violence for any young person watching this film. no and this film isn not meant to be message y and i certainly do not watch robocop movies or alien or predator movies for that reason. however and when you go too far and cross the line and much of what you do must be put into question. and as for this film and in the words of the evil kid drug dealer last words as he dies and it still sucks. 
the first robocop had a sense of cynical wit and a sick sense of violence. it was a fine line to walk and but paul verhoeven pulled it off and the film did so well and they made a sequel. how awful. (possible spoilers ahead  though anything that could spoil this is beyond me). irvin kershner is not the director for this type of film. he clearly did not understand the wit of the original and as a result the massive over the top senseless violence looks really bad  and worse is very distasteful. even worse is the musical score. leonard rosenman was an old man from another era and the heroic and light music does not match the images on the screen at all. what was he scoring. the great american hero. worst of all and he completely eliminated robocop theme from the first film and which was so memorable and perfect. can you imagine a superman film without john williams fanfare and or indiana jones and etc. how could he do that. the plot is just a collection of ideas that do not gel. in beginning we see robo stalking his old wife. fine and good idea. but and they completely drop it after that. then and there is this a stupid idea of the company reprogramming robo to be nice. that thrown in for 10 minutes and then is immediately dropped. or and the silly idea that the repulsive 10 year old drug lord reminds robo of his son  once again and a weak motif that is shown briefly twice and dropped. this may work in a comic book and but not on film and frank miller was unfortunately too inexperienced at the time and threw every idea in along with the kitchen sink. it doesn not work as a whole. some people here seem to be praising the corporate bashing in this film and the privatization of the police. that is the best part of the film that is consistent with the first. however and in the original and the old man was a tough business man out for a profit and but ultimately fair in the end. in this film and he is just pure evil in his lust for money and power. you can not just change characters like that for no reason. and nancy allen character is useless in this film and whereas in the first she was essential to robo search for himself. she is as gratuitous as the violence in this film. and the violence and yes the violence. i enjoy many violent and bloody films when they serve purposes and are meant to tell a story. irvin kershner seems to get off on human beings being blown to bits and shot to pieces and children lusting for death and torture and peoples desire for drugs. he doesn not know when to stop. do we really need to see every last innocent bystander (even people trying to help others) get shot up. it is inferred when we see the bad robocop shooting repeatedly. instead mr. kershner proves he has very little taste for this type of work and creates an abominable mess that is a terrible piece of pop art and worse and a disgusting message of violence for any young person watching this film. no and this film isn not meant to be message y and i certainly do not watch robocop movies or alien or predator movies for that reason. however and when you go too far and cross the line and much of what you do must be put into question. and as for this film and in the words of the evil kid drug dealer last words as he dies and it still sucks. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
