it said that this film is or was banned in the us since it was released. since there is no information on imdb i must rely on my other sources and believe it. if this is really true and the movie is even more hurtful and frightening and is it is anyway. the movie is a so called mockumentary and although i think the topic is too serious call it like that. it creates a scenario where america is like a military state and all revolutionary objects are arrested immediately without proof. after an obligatory tribunal they have to decide if they go to prison for some years or choose the punishment park. in that and they have to walk through the desert for three days to reach an american flag and posted 50 miles ahead and while theyre are followed by police and army troops. the movie itself pretends to be a documentary about these incidents and follows both the tribunals and the hunting through the desert and filmed by european film crews. all the facts are explained and the interviewers ask questions and film everything. people stare directly into the camera and shouting at it. it seems very and very real. talking about realism here is nonsense. this movie is not about how to make a realistic film and it is about how such a film would look like and if it was real. and it certainly would look like this. if it would be filmed anyway. in an utopian state like this and there surely do not be a european film crew allowed to film those things. there are many things that frighten us. the defendants are people from all social classes. political leaders and musicians and authors and philosophists and unemployed and etc. they seem to be hopeless and rebellious or scared. they are no heroes. they talk a lot in the tribunal and knowing it doesn not lead to anything and saying nevertheless all they said in speeches and books and songs before. one says he not afraid to die. is this true. well and he doesn not have to run through the desert hunted by cops. the defendants have no chance and or at least and their only chance and the decision between prison and punishment park and is no chance really. the way they decide in the end and the way film ends and makes it clear that this kind of heroism is suicide. these tribunals remind us a lot of tribunals in the third reich. the officials use the same kind of idealistic speeching and ignoring all the arguments from the defendants and starting to scream at them and then telling them they should be quiet. they warn the defendants of watching their language and insult them much more. they ask them questions and the defendants can not answer and but it never intendend they should. these scenes are a statement about what we call justice. the scenes in the desert are on a different level. when we see the prisoners for the first time and we realize that they realize and they haven not got a chance. seeing the desert and the mountains and feeling the sun and the thirst and they do not have a clue how they should stand this free days. the film crew follows them and talks to them while they try to escape this madness. they argue and should they play the game and or escape and or revolt. it all leads to the same and no one is surprised. some will question if such parks would exist in reality in such a state. why not. it empties the prisons and allows the government to punish the revolutionaries as they want to. it is not a gas chamber and but the nazis killed jews before concentration camps were built. the comparison is fair and since they is no real difference. the movie is scary and depressing. the problems that are talked about sound to familiar to ignore. these is not science fiction. talking about poverty and unemployment and crime is not utopic. the film shows us that government and democracy as it is presented to us and is not only useless and but dangerous. it also shows us that revolution is not definitely the solution. the defendants seem to be confused because they do not really know how to fight this. they do things and but for nothing. even is this delivers no solution to us and it still is a statement. to me and the most frightening thing is the fact of the banning of this movie. here we have a film that accuses the loss of freedom and moral and peace. it accuses the government and a fictional goverment nevertheless and to be dangerous and inhuman. and such a film is banned. think about it when you see the american flag the next time. 
it said that this film is or was banned in the us since it was released. since there is no information on imdb i must rely on my other sources and believe it. if this is really true and the movie is even more hurtful and frightening and is it is anyway. the movie is a so called mockumentary and although i think the topic is too serious call it like that. it creates a scenario where america is like a military state and all revolutionary objects are arrested immediately without proof. after an obligatory tribunal they have to decide if they go to prison for some years or choose the punishment park. in that and they have to walk through the desert for three days to reach an american flag and posted 50 miles ahead and while theyre are followed by police and army troops. the movie itself pretends to be a documentary about these incidents and follows both the tribunals and the hunting through the desert and filmed by european film crews. all the facts are explained and the interviewers ask questions and film everything. people stare directly into the camera and shouting at it. it seems very and very real. talking about realism here is nonsense. this movie is not about how to make a realistic film and it is about how such a film would look like and if it was real. and it certainly would look like this. if it would be filmed anyway. in an utopian state like this and there surely do not be a european film crew allowed to film those things. there are many things that frighten us. the defendants are people from all social classes. political leaders and musicians and authors and philosophists and unemployed and etc. they seem to be hopeless and rebellious or scared. they are no heroes. they talk a lot in the tribunal and knowing it doesn not lead to anything and saying nevertheless all they said in speeches and books and songs before. one says he not afraid to die. is this true. well and he doesn not have to run through the desert hunted by cops. the defendants have no chance and or at least and their only chance and the decision between prison and punishment park and is no chance really. the way they decide in the end and the way film ends and makes it clear that this kind of heroism is suicide. these tribunals remind us a lot of tribunals in the third reich. the officials use the same kind of idealistic speeching and ignoring all the arguments from the defendants and starting to scream at them and then telling them they should be quiet. they warn the defendants of watching their language and insult them much more. they ask them questions and the defendants can not answer and but it never intendend they should. these scenes are a statement about what we call justice. the scenes in the desert are on a different level. when we see the prisoners for the first time and we realize that they realize and they haven not got a chance. seeing the desert and the mountains and feeling the sun and the thirst and they do not have a clue how they should stand this free days. the film crew follows them and talks to them while they try to escape this madness. they argue and should they play the game and or escape and or revolt. it all leads to the same and no one is surprised. some will question if such parks would exist in reality in such a state. why not. it empties the prisons and allows the government to punish the revolutionaries as they want to. it is not a gas chamber and but the nazis killed jews before concentration camps were built. the comparison is fair and since they is no real difference. the movie is scary and depressing. the problems that are talked about sound to familiar to ignore. these is not science fiction. talking about poverty and unemployment and crime is not utopic. the film shows us that government and democracy as it is presented to us and is not only useless and but dangerous. it also shows us that revolution is not definitely the solution. the defendants seem to be confused because they do not really know how to fight this. they do things and but for nothing. even is this delivers no solution to us and it still is a statement. to me and the most frightening thing is the fact of the banning of this movie. here we have a film that accuses the loss of freedom and moral and peace. it accuses the government and a fictional goverment nevertheless and to be dangerous and inhuman. and such a film is banned. think about it when you see the american flag the next time. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
