john parrish is an ex union officer who plans to sell his ranch and land to the wilkison over at anchor. the trouble is that the price being offered is way to low and when they start to bully parrish and his workers and he has a change of heart and particularly when things take a brutal turn for the worse. originally after watching this one i had a sense of frustration and chiefly because of the cast that was involved. when you got edward g. robinson and glenn ford and barbara stanwyck in the same movie and you hope that they get a story and script from which to excel. sadly they do not get chance to produce a western classic worthy of multiple revisits and or is that my over expectation is doing it a disservice. well i slept on it and decided to ponder further about the picture. i think yes it fair to say that the actors in question deserved a better story from which to work from and it is and when all is said and done and a plot that has been milked for all it worth and and then some. but the violent men is still a very rewarding film regardless of the missed opportunities evident with the production. glenn ford as parrish is as cool as an eskimo nose throughout and and it always great to see babs stanwyck playing a bitch because she good at it. while eddie g and when one gets used to him being in a western and is fine in what is an under written part. robinson and who stepped in at the last minute when first choice as lee wilkison and broderick crawford got injured and is the one who is short changed the most by the makers and even supporting characters such as the devilish wade matlock {a grinning delight from the reliable richard jaeckel} and judith wilkison {a radiant dianne foster} get something to leave an impression with. but for what it is and robinson crutch toting bad guy is at the least memorable for all the right reasons. not shy on action and gun play and it with the twists and almost shakespearean tragedies that rudolph maté film rises above the mundane and with all of it gorgeously framed by burnett guffey stunning cinematography. lone pine in alabama has been used on many a western picture {see seven men from now for another glorious use of it} and but here guffey really excels and manages to dazzle the eyes at every turn. the violent men isn not a great western picture and and perhaps a better director than maté could have really given donald hamilton {the big country} novel an adaptation to be proud of. but for every niggle and irk i personally had with it and i found two more reasons to actually really like it and so that it be and it recommended and for sure. positive . 
john parrish is an ex union officer who plans to sell his ranch and land to the wilkison over at anchor. the trouble is that the price being offered is way to low and when they start to bully parrish and his workers and he has a change of heart and particularly when things take a brutal turn for the worse. originally after watching this one i had a sense of frustration and chiefly because of the cast that was involved. when you got edward g. robinson and glenn ford and barbara stanwyck in the same movie and you hope that they get a story and script from which to excel. sadly they do not get chance to produce a western classic worthy of multiple revisits and or is that my over expectation is doing it a disservice. well i slept on it and decided to ponder further about the picture. i think yes it fair to say that the actors in question deserved a better story from which to work from and it is and when all is said and done and a plot that has been milked for all it worth and and then some. but the violent men is still a very rewarding film regardless of the missed opportunities evident with the production. glenn ford as parrish is as cool as an eskimo nose throughout and and it always great to see babs stanwyck playing a bitch because she good at it. while eddie g and when one gets used to him being in a western and is fine in what is an under written part. robinson and who stepped in at the last minute when first choice as lee wilkison and broderick crawford got injured and is the one who is short changed the most by the makers and even supporting characters such as the devilish wade matlock {a grinning delight from the reliable richard jaeckel} and judith wilkison {a radiant dianne foster} get something to leave an impression with. but for what it is and robinson crutch toting bad guy is at the least memorable for all the right reasons. not shy on action and gun play and it with the twists and almost shakespearean tragedies that rudolph maté film rises above the mundane and with all of it gorgeously framed by burnett guffey stunning cinematography. lone pine in alabama has been used on many a western picture {see seven men from now for another glorious use of it} and but here guffey really excels and manages to dazzle the eyes at every turn. the violent men isn not a great western picture and and perhaps a better director than maté could have really given donald hamilton {the big country} novel an adaptation to be proud of. but for every niggle and irk i personally had with it and i found two more reasons to actually really like it and so that it be and it recommended and for sure. positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
