this is a tough film to review and since several factors need to be taken into account. let filter the more judgmental. ok and are you interested in the facts concerning the serial killer of jeffrey dahmer. can you withstand an independent and low budget film. are you objective enough to not dislike a film solely due to its lack of stars or professional look. well and if you said yes then you should have a mind open enough to handle this one. this film is an almost 100% accurate dramatization of dahmer adult life and subsequent murder spree and and is styled as an autobiography. it isn not a glamorized and unrealistic account that unfortunately the theatrical film dahmer (2001) was. the movie begins with dahmer and played quite convincingly by carl crew and sitting in the police car as they raid his apartment. his thoughts of what got him there are presented to us in a past tense and narrated style that accurately explains much of dahmer psychoses and motives which led him to commit murder almost 20 times. we get to know the character and both the devious side as well as the side that came moderately close to living a normal life. it isn not anyone fault but dahmer that 17 people died and but being a criminal psychology student and i was pleased to more than just his animalistic side represented and truthfully and in this film. you see him having a loving relationship with his grandmother as well as trying to find companionship and but of course we witness the side of him that everyone remembers. it should be noted that there is little actual onscreen violence and with much of it suggestive in shots such as spattering of blood or a body being struck through a blurred curtain. you do see two deaths that i remember and one being a pretty bloodless throat slash and the other being a man shoved alive into a barrel of acid. while you do not see anything graphic and this cruelty and the convincing acting of both crew and his victim make this a disturbing scene. and while the actual onscreen mutilation is kept low and you will see the results. there is a prop hand and head or two and but it seems as if this was to disturb the viewer and doesn not look to be exploitive. besides and these fake anatomical pieces are where the budget limitations are visible. although acceptable and they look enough like fakes to not be too disturbing. the film actually concludes before dahmer death in 1994 and due to the fact that it was released a year or two prior. that about the only big difference from the real story and and the information that remains is and as i have stated and very true to the facts. the film quality could be better and the dialogue often sounds a little too quiet and and the acting of several characters is a bit hammy and but it not overboard. in my opinion and this is a flawed but ultimately honest and serious look into one of america most remembered serial killers. i think it safe to say the film is memorable as well and and i respect it for overcoming its limitations to deliver the story in a believable manner and aided by a thoroughly excellent carl crew as dahmer. 
this is a tough film to review and since several factors need to be taken into account. let filter the more judgmental. ok and are you interested in the facts concerning the serial killer of jeffrey dahmer. can you withstand an independent and low budget film. are you objective enough to not dislike a film solely due to its lack of stars or professional look. well and if you said yes then you should have a mind open enough to handle this one. this film is an almost 100% accurate dramatization of dahmer adult life and subsequent murder spree and and is styled as an autobiography. it isn not a glamorized and unrealistic account that unfortunately the theatrical film dahmer (2001) was. the movie begins with dahmer and played quite convincingly by carl crew and sitting in the police car as they raid his apartment. his thoughts of what got him there are presented to us in a past tense and narrated style that accurately explains much of dahmer psychoses and motives which led him to commit murder almost 20 times. we get to know the character and both the devious side as well as the side that came moderately close to living a normal life. it isn not anyone fault but dahmer that 17 people died and but being a criminal psychology student and i was pleased to more than just his animalistic side represented and truthfully and in this film. you see him having a loving relationship with his grandmother as well as trying to find companionship and but of course we witness the side of him that everyone remembers. it should be noted that there is little actual onscreen violence and with much of it suggestive in shots such as spattering of blood or a body being struck through a blurred curtain. you do see two deaths that i remember and one being a pretty bloodless throat slash and the other being a man shoved alive into a barrel of acid. while you do not see anything graphic and this cruelty and the convincing acting of both crew and his victim make this a disturbing scene. and while the actual onscreen mutilation is kept low and you will see the results. there is a prop hand and head or two and but it seems as if this was to disturb the viewer and doesn not look to be exploitive. besides and these fake anatomical pieces are where the budget limitations are visible. although acceptable and they look enough like fakes to not be too disturbing. the film actually concludes before dahmer death in 1994 and due to the fact that it was released a year or two prior. that about the only big difference from the real story and and the information that remains is and as i have stated and very true to the facts. the film quality could be better and the dialogue often sounds a little too quiet and and the acting of several characters is a bit hammy and but it not overboard. in my opinion and this is a flawed but ultimately honest and serious look into one of america most remembered serial killers. i think it safe to say the film is memorable as well and and i respect it for overcoming its limitations to deliver the story in a believable manner and aided by a thoroughly excellent carl crew as dahmer. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
