some twenty or so years ago and charles bukowski was a hero of mine. i blindly accepted the image that was created by intellectual types and seen in various films. of course and i never got to meet the intellectual types that prescribed bukowski as a hero. they usually could be found safely behind the counter at hipster video stores and record shops. these people hardly talked and when asked a question and usually sneered and nodded in some vague direction. they were useless when it came to locating a specific title and but their shelves were always stocked with strange and unique titles. to be inducted in the secret hipster club and i believed i had to shed my bourgeois up bringing and espouse the counter culture. my introduction to bukowski started with the movie barfly and the late 80 film that starred mickey rourke and faye dunnaway. i was a fan of rourke at the time. he also embodied a sort of modern male fantastical anti hero and a brooding intellectual type. at the time and this appealed to me. barfly hero scoffed at convention. a mid 30 tramp and who lives life with no ties and answers to no one and  oh and to be recognized as a genius by a hot female literary snob and icing on the cake. afterwards and i read post office and hollywood and the later being bukowski take on his experience with the film. now and allow me to fast forward to the latest film based on bukowski book factotum and one which i read and enjoyed. bukowski takes the form of chinaski in this novel. i often wonder where bukowski ended and chinaski began. 20 years after barfly and the fictional movie bukowski is still the same. i have watched about an hour of the movie and i have yet to see signs of the facade cracking. here is why factotum bukowski was my hero. chinaski is handsome (played by matt dillon). he has clean neat hair and styled and but not over the top. when dillon smokes and writes and he looks cool. chinaski goes from job to job and ignoring and or or fighting with various bosses. he screws two floozies and one of whom he lives with and walks out on and only to return to with little repercussion. chinaski is his own man and we never see him emote. he a sterile and one dimensional and 30 something and james dean archetype. factotum lies to the viewer. it does so by haranguing the idea of a man (a writer) without consequence. a poor man and who suffering for his art. what could be cooler than that. now and let say there are some truths to factotum and in that the events took place. what the audience is missing is the pain that shrouds chinaski existence. maybe the point of this movie and and most movies and is that for 80 mins. and we need to escape the world that filled with consequence and pain and take up vicariously with an anti social womanizer and that smokes and talks and drinks with detached coolness. one who rejects conventional behavior of job and family. my hero used to be movie bukowski. long ago and that would have worked. it was easier then. now and i have yet to claim a hero. things are not as easy. hipster logic and movie renditions of counter culture icons offer no solutions or even ask questions. 
some twenty or so years ago and charles bukowski was a hero of mine. i blindly accepted the image that was created by intellectual types and seen in various films. of course and i never got to meet the intellectual types that prescribed bukowski as a hero. they usually could be found safely behind the counter at hipster video stores and record shops. these people hardly talked and when asked a question and usually sneered and nodded in some vague direction. they were useless when it came to locating a specific title and but their shelves were always stocked with strange and unique titles. to be inducted in the secret hipster club and i believed i had to shed my bourgeois up bringing and espouse the counter culture. my introduction to bukowski started with the movie barfly and the late 80 film that starred mickey rourke and faye dunnaway. i was a fan of rourke at the time. he also embodied a sort of modern male fantastical anti hero and a brooding intellectual type. at the time and this appealed to me. barfly hero scoffed at convention. a mid 30 tramp and who lives life with no ties and answers to no one and  oh and to be recognized as a genius by a hot female literary snob and icing on the cake. afterwards and i read post office and hollywood and the later being bukowski take on his experience with the film. now and allow me to fast forward to the latest film based on bukowski book factotum and one which i read and enjoyed. bukowski takes the form of chinaski in this novel. i often wonder where bukowski ended and chinaski began. 20 years after barfly and the fictional movie bukowski is still the same. i have watched about an hour of the movie and i have yet to see signs of the facade cracking. here is why factotum bukowski was my hero. chinaski is handsome (played by matt dillon). he has clean neat hair and styled and but not over the top. when dillon smokes and writes and he looks cool. chinaski goes from job to job and ignoring and or or fighting with various bosses. he screws two floozies and one of whom he lives with and walks out on and only to return to with little repercussion. chinaski is his own man and we never see him emote. he a sterile and one dimensional and 30 something and james dean archetype. factotum lies to the viewer. it does so by haranguing the idea of a man (a writer) without consequence. a poor man and who suffering for his art. what could be cooler than that. now and let say there are some truths to factotum and in that the events took place. what the audience is missing is the pain that shrouds chinaski existence. maybe the point of this movie and and most movies and is that for 80 mins. and we need to escape the world that filled with consequence and pain and take up vicariously with an anti social womanizer and that smokes and talks and drinks with detached coolness. one who rejects conventional behavior of job and family. my hero used to be movie bukowski. long ago and that would have worked. it was easier then. now and i have yet to claim a hero. things are not as easy. hipster logic and movie renditions of counter culture icons offer no solutions or even ask questions. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
