first of all and the whole idea of remaking a classic such as psycho is nothing short of ludicrous. a lot of time and effort was wasted here. i am sure they are smart enough to know that they could not improve on the original and so they must have had a tribute to alfred hitchcock on their minds. however and the idea that began as a well intentioned tribute and results in being a slap in the face to the horror master. this movie is poorly produced and poorly acted and and unnecessary to begin with. the original classic stands well on it own and even after 40 years. the event of hitch returning from the grave and coming after the people responsible for this piece of trash is unlikely and but if i were them and i would sleep with one eye open just in case. don not waste your time. 
first of all and the whole idea of remaking a classic such as psycho is nothing short of ludicrous. a lot of time and effort was wasted here. i am sure they are smart enough to know that they could not improve on the original and so they must have had a tribute to alfred hitchcock on their minds. however and the idea that began as a well intentioned tribute and results in being a slap in the face to the horror master. this movie is poorly produced and poorly acted and and unnecessary to begin with. the original classic stands well on it own and even after 40 years. the event of hitch returning from the grave and coming after the people responsible for this piece of trash is unlikely and but if i were them and i would sleep with one eye open just in case. don not waste your time. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
