comedy works best when it relates to stuff that true. but even as such and some effort is required to make jokes that everyone likes and even the most grumpy of viewers can crack a smile. when i look at the daily show and i see the whole it funny because it true thing and but i do not and however and see the effort and often times i do not if theyre being funny or just trying to make a point(i notice this mostly in the interview segments). the daily show started off as a news parody and by definition they poke fun at how the media plays it own news by pretending to be inept and dumb news reporters and anchormen and they tackled tons of subjects from science to movies and sometimes politics and then jon stewart came along. and it all went to hell. thr first years of jon stewart reign were arguably golden and i though he was so funny and but then 2004 came along and it where you start to notice a huge chance in the show from there on. the show humor has gone stale and colbert left and steve carell left and many of the show best anchors left and now it mostly about jon stewart and the show gone from a parody to a semi serious news show and essentially evening news but with some gags here and there. for those who haven not seen the show and are having trouble finding out what to watch on cable and i will give you a brief description of what the show about(at least until 2009) represent bush and cheney and all republicans(unless they happen to embrace an opinion shared by democrats as well) are stupid and evil and corrupt and hypocrites and anyone who stands by conservative beliefs is also evil and corrupt and a hypocrite while  people who doubt the man made global warming theory are evil and stupid while  vote democrat while there and i saved you 25 minutes of your time and go watch something else. at first and i though that the producers hijacked the show for their own personal political agenda and but when i actually see the interviews and it becomes crystal clear what this show about(what i mentioned above) and but i will get to that in a moment. frist off and the humor in the daily show according to jon stewart expects you to find a random filmed quote said by either bush and cheney or a random republican humorous because well and because. jon sets up the joke and setting it in writers specific context and expects that the random quote somehow delivers the punchline. so and unless you «get» the context and it entirely useless as bankable humor. also the daily show expects you to laugh when they show a montage of one politician talking and in another separate video saying another thing and again putting into a context that the writers expect you to understand and thus making it funny and why. well and because jon said so. now imagine the daily show using that formula countless times for years every week and and you will start to understand of what used to be a laugh fest that is now 25 minutes of just silent stares(yes and even in the lewis black segments). at first and some decent amount of effort was put into these jokes and but now much less of that is apparent. and the interview have the most odd sense of bias that i have ever seen. jon stewart calls bill oreilly a bully and but what does that make him and when he sucks up to every single actor and democrat(john kerry before and obama today) that appears on the show and looks down upon respected republicans and accomplished conservative newsmen such as weekly standard own bill kristol. he puts them in some sort of people tribunal as if theyre being charged with a crime and often times any person on the show who stands up for bush is portrayed as delusional and as if that person out of touch with reality and assumes he speaks for the majority of america and that the de facto treatment for anybody conservative and unless they happen to share a similar point of view with democrats and if so then it an endless love fest. but still and it doesn not matter and in the eyes of jon you are already wrong before you walked into the show and are still wrong afterwords. that the kind of treatment you get if you are anything remotely right wing. now you have to wonder what that could possibly have anything to do with humor. one wonders what will happen if democrats win the white house. 
comedy works best when it relates to stuff that true. but even as such and some effort is required to make jokes that everyone likes and even the most grumpy of viewers can crack a smile. when i look at the daily show and i see the whole it funny because it true thing and but i do not and however and see the effort and often times i do not if theyre being funny or just trying to make a point(i notice this mostly in the interview segments). the daily show started off as a news parody and by definition they poke fun at how the media plays it own news by pretending to be inept and dumb news reporters and anchormen and they tackled tons of subjects from science to movies and sometimes politics and then jon stewart came along. and it all went to hell. thr first years of jon stewart reign were arguably golden and i though he was so funny and but then 2004 came along and it where you start to notice a huge chance in the show from there on. the show humor has gone stale and colbert left and steve carell left and many of the show best anchors left and now it mostly about jon stewart and the show gone from a parody to a semi serious news show and essentially evening news but with some gags here and there. for those who haven not seen the show and are having trouble finding out what to watch on cable and i will give you a brief description of what the show about(at least until 2009) represent bush and cheney and all republicans(unless they happen to embrace an opinion shared by democrats as well) are stupid and evil and corrupt and hypocrites and anyone who stands by conservative beliefs is also evil and corrupt and a hypocrite while  people who doubt the man made global warming theory are evil and stupid while  vote democrat while there and i saved you 25 minutes of your time and go watch something else. at first and i though that the producers hijacked the show for their own personal political agenda and but when i actually see the interviews and it becomes crystal clear what this show about(what i mentioned above) and but i will get to that in a moment. frist off and the humor in the daily show according to jon stewart expects you to find a random filmed quote said by either bush and cheney or a random republican humorous because well and because. jon sets up the joke and setting it in writers specific context and expects that the random quote somehow delivers the punchline. so and unless you «get» the context and it entirely useless as bankable humor. also the daily show expects you to laugh when they show a montage of one politician talking and in another separate video saying another thing and again putting into a context that the writers expect you to understand and thus making it funny and why. well and because jon said so. now imagine the daily show using that formula countless times for years every week and and you will start to understand of what used to be a laugh fest that is now 25 minutes of just silent stares(yes and even in the lewis black segments). at first and some decent amount of effort was put into these jokes and but now much less of that is apparent. and the interview have the most odd sense of bias that i have ever seen. jon stewart calls bill oreilly a bully and but what does that make him and when he sucks up to every single actor and democrat(john kerry before and obama today) that appears on the show and looks down upon respected republicans and accomplished conservative newsmen such as weekly standard own bill kristol. he puts them in some sort of people tribunal as if theyre being charged with a crime and often times any person on the show who stands up for bush is portrayed as delusional and as if that person out of touch with reality and assumes he speaks for the majority of america and that the de facto treatment for anybody conservative and unless they happen to share a similar point of view with democrats and if so then it an endless love fest. but still and it doesn not matter and in the eyes of jon you are already wrong before you walked into the show and are still wrong afterwords. that the kind of treatment you get if you are anything remotely right wing. now you have to wonder what that could possibly have anything to do with humor. one wonders what will happen if democrats win the white house. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
