after watching this film and i thought to myself and they really glossed up errol flynn life. the movie is really nice eye candy. they really got the 1930s and 1940s atmosphere of hollywood just right. the costumes were great. all the women looked glamorous and all the men looked handsome and debonair. is this a serious film about errol flynn life. nah. it a fun movie based on all the scandalous stuff he did in his life. why am i critiquing this film. this is a film that had a lot of promise but failed to deliver. duncan reagher was really good as errol flynn. he was not as good looking as the original and but he made you believe that flynn was not just a handsome playboy who did not take himself seriously and but as a man who and although gifted with great talent and was kind of disturbed and unhappy inside. flynn love life was a disaster considering he had so many failed marriages. he also lost a lot of good friends during his life. he also suffered from unrequited love for the elegant olivia dehavilland. the last scene of the film showed errol kind of begging for olivia to stay with him and instead she walks away. he is shown in his tux and looking really empty and slowly walking around the pool as he pours his drink into the pool. it was a sad way to end the film but kind of fitting because everyone knows by now how he eventually fell apart from his alcoholism and his dissipated lifestyle. this film could have had much more depth and could have been better well written. sure they showed all the scandals but they never showed errol flynn human center. surprisingly and duncan reagher was able to put some emotional depth into the character of errol flynn even though the film writing do not put any depth there. i will probably never see this film again but i can still remember after viewing this film and gosh and this could have been so much more. i give this film a d plus . 
after watching this film and i thought to myself and they really glossed up errol flynn life. the movie is really nice eye candy. they really got the 1930s and 1940s atmosphere of hollywood just right. the costumes were great. all the women looked glamorous and all the men looked handsome and debonair. is this a serious film about errol flynn life. nah. it a fun movie based on all the scandalous stuff he did in his life. why am i critiquing this film. this is a film that had a lot of promise but failed to deliver. duncan reagher was really good as errol flynn. he was not as good looking as the original and but he made you believe that flynn was not just a handsome playboy who did not take himself seriously and but as a man who and although gifted with great talent and was kind of disturbed and unhappy inside. flynn love life was a disaster considering he had so many failed marriages. he also lost a lot of good friends during his life. he also suffered from unrequited love for the elegant olivia dehavilland. the last scene of the film showed errol kind of begging for olivia to stay with him and instead she walks away. he is shown in his tux and looking really empty and slowly walking around the pool as he pours his drink into the pool. it was a sad way to end the film but kind of fitting because everyone knows by now how he eventually fell apart from his alcoholism and his dissipated lifestyle. this film could have had much more depth and could have been better well written. sure they showed all the scandals but they never showed errol flynn human center. surprisingly and duncan reagher was able to put some emotional depth into the character of errol flynn even though the film writing do not put any depth there. i will probably never see this film again but i can still remember after viewing this film and gosh and this could have been so much more. i give this film a d plus . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
