it is always difficult to bring a 450 pages book down to a three hours film. i read the book before and and i found the bbc production dealing with this difficulty in the best way possible. the qualities of the book haven not been lost represent the dense and lively depiction of a fingersmith patchwork family in london in the 1860s and the cold and obscene cruelty in which maud is brought up and the characterization of different social groups by different ways of speaking and the unexpected and surprising twists of the story and the way the film makes the spectators look different at the same scenes when they are told first from sue point of view then from maud one. the main actors do very good and and especially the growing love between the two women is convincingly developed and with a first culmination in a very tender love scene between the two and finally forgiving all the evil they were ready to do and did to each other and because they still love each other. for each of her books the author and sarah waters and has thoroughly investigated what life was like in british 19th century. while in tipping the velvet it was the world of the vaudeville theaters and the beginning of social movements and in affinity the dreadful reality of women penitentiaries and the fashionable evocation of spirits and in fingersmith she depicts the public ceremony of hanging people in london and the inhuman treatment of persons supposed or declared disturbed in asylums based on the reading of sources and scientific research. this is very well transferred to the film so that the corresponding scenes show a high grade of historic truth. i highly recommend this film production because it offers three hours of colorful victorian atmosphere and vivid emotions and and suspense. 
it is always difficult to bring a 450 pages book down to a three hours film. i read the book before and and i found the bbc production dealing with this difficulty in the best way possible. the qualities of the book haven not been lost represent the dense and lively depiction of a fingersmith patchwork family in london in the 1860s and the cold and obscene cruelty in which maud is brought up and the characterization of different social groups by different ways of speaking and the unexpected and surprising twists of the story and the way the film makes the spectators look different at the same scenes when they are told first from sue point of view then from maud one. the main actors do very good and and especially the growing love between the two women is convincingly developed and with a first culmination in a very tender love scene between the two and finally forgiving all the evil they were ready to do and did to each other and because they still love each other. for each of her books the author and sarah waters and has thoroughly investigated what life was like in british 19th century. while in tipping the velvet it was the world of the vaudeville theaters and the beginning of social movements and in affinity the dreadful reality of women penitentiaries and the fashionable evocation of spirits and in fingersmith she depicts the public ceremony of hanging people in london and the inhuman treatment of persons supposed or declared disturbed in asylums based on the reading of sources and scientific research. this is very well transferred to the film so that the corresponding scenes show a high grade of historic truth. i highly recommend this film production because it offers three hours of colorful victorian atmosphere and vivid emotions and and suspense. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
