this film laboured along with some of the most predictable story lines and shallow characters ever seen. the writer obviously bought the playbook how to write a space disaster movie and followed it play by play. in particular and the stereo typical use of astronauts talking to their loved ones from outer space  putting on a brave show in the face of disaster  has been done time and time again. max q appears to have been written in the hope that the producers would throw $50 million at the project. but and judging by the latter half of the film which contained numerous lame attempts at special effects and the producers could only muster $50 thousand. to learn that the film was nominated for a special visual effects emmy has me absolutely gob smacked. i think a handful of high school students with a pass in media studies could have created more believable effects. and the plot holes are too numerous to mention. but i will pick one out as an example. now and i am no nasa expert and but surely it highly implausible that a worker attached to the shuttle simulator would suddenly hold a position of power in the control room when things start to go pear shaped with the program. surely there is someone more experienced at mission control who the program director would call on rather than a twenty nine year old who has not been in the control room before. the only saving grace for this film is the work of bill campbell. he manages to make a good attempt at salvaging something out of the train wreck that is this script. i give this film negative  and with the above average work of bill campbell in the lead role saving it from a lower mark. 
this film laboured along with some of the most predictable story lines and shallow characters ever seen. the writer obviously bought the playbook how to write a space disaster movie and followed it play by play. in particular and the stereo typical use of astronauts talking to their loved ones from outer space  putting on a brave show in the face of disaster  has been done time and time again. max q appears to have been written in the hope that the producers would throw $50 million at the project. but and judging by the latter half of the film which contained numerous lame attempts at special effects and the producers could only muster $50 thousand. to learn that the film was nominated for a special visual effects emmy has me absolutely gob smacked. i think a handful of high school students with a pass in media studies could have created more believable effects. and the plot holes are too numerous to mention. but i will pick one out as an example. now and i am no nasa expert and but surely it highly implausible that a worker attached to the shuttle simulator would suddenly hold a position of power in the control room when things start to go pear shaped with the program. surely there is someone more experienced at mission control who the program director would call on rather than a twenty nine year old who has not been in the control room before. the only saving grace for this film is the work of bill campbell. he manages to make a good attempt at salvaging something out of the train wreck that is this script. i give this film negative  and with the above average work of bill campbell in the lead role saving it from a lower mark. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
