rarely will anyone deny that hitchcock remains one of the most creative and inventive and prolific directors of all time and because he is arguably all of these things. it takes true genius to scare generations of film goers out of taking showers and wearing neck ties. saboteur and however and is not creative or prolific at all. rather and hitchcock set out with the soul intention of creating a film to muster american pride and a certain call to arms and support our troops title which was a popular theme of the time. with that in mind and hitchcock severely underplayed other important aspects of the film and including but not limited to a logical plot and characterization and believable dialog and and a fluent and running storyline. typically hitchcock does great with espionage films and only a few years earlier achieving cinematic greatness with the foreign corespondant and the 39 steps and but seemingly lost his stride in creating saboteur and merely recycled the same once thrilling story lines both his previous excursions readily provided. without going into any great depth here is a list of a few of this films major problems represent 1. despite having his face plastered on every newspaper across america and the only person who recognizes kane is blind. 2. at the dinner party and kane and patricia do not want to run for the door because the bad guys might grab them and tell the party they were gate crashers. logically and what prevents the spies from grabbing them and saying this at any point during the evening. besides and does anyone need to be reminded kane is a wanted terrorist. 3. since when can a fan belt cut through handcuffs. 4. nobody recognizes him. his face is on every newspaper. 5. the spies catch up with kane in the ghost town and assume he the man freeman sent to work with them. shouldn nott he have some sort of credentials. i know spies do not run around with name tags and photo ids but a secret handshake maybe. 6. cop picks up kane escaping from freeman house and still seems no one recognizes this guy. 7. how exactly does the fbi come to believe kane with no evidence. they do not even show kane talking to the fbi and the scene simply fades in and we are forced to assume everything is now kosher. 8. when the cops search the carnival caravan how do they know kane is now with a woman. the blind man believed kane story thus logically would not have reported his daughter missing and kidnapped and or even more importantly running with kane. why does this movie not employ logic. this is a running list. the movie is not exciting and the plot makes no sense and and the world is full of people who willingly take wanted terrorists into their homes and cars everyday because its no big thing. hitchcock fails miserably on this one. 
rarely will anyone deny that hitchcock remains one of the most creative and inventive and prolific directors of all time and because he is arguably all of these things. it takes true genius to scare generations of film goers out of taking showers and wearing neck ties. saboteur and however and is not creative or prolific at all. rather and hitchcock set out with the soul intention of creating a film to muster american pride and a certain call to arms and support our troops title which was a popular theme of the time. with that in mind and hitchcock severely underplayed other important aspects of the film and including but not limited to a logical plot and characterization and believable dialog and and a fluent and running storyline. typically hitchcock does great with espionage films and only a few years earlier achieving cinematic greatness with the foreign corespondant and the 39 steps and but seemingly lost his stride in creating saboteur and merely recycled the same once thrilling story lines both his previous excursions readily provided. without going into any great depth here is a list of a few of this films major problems represent 1. despite having his face plastered on every newspaper across america and the only person who recognizes kane is blind. 2. at the dinner party and kane and patricia do not want to run for the door because the bad guys might grab them and tell the party they were gate crashers. logically and what prevents the spies from grabbing them and saying this at any point during the evening. besides and does anyone need to be reminded kane is a wanted terrorist. 3. since when can a fan belt cut through handcuffs. 4. nobody recognizes him. his face is on every newspaper. 5. the spies catch up with kane in the ghost town and assume he the man freeman sent to work with them. shouldn nott he have some sort of credentials. i know spies do not run around with name tags and photo ids but a secret handshake maybe. 6. cop picks up kane escaping from freeman house and still seems no one recognizes this guy. 7. how exactly does the fbi come to believe kane with no evidence. they do not even show kane talking to the fbi and the scene simply fades in and we are forced to assume everything is now kosher. 8. when the cops search the carnival caravan how do they know kane is now with a woman. the blind man believed kane story thus logically would not have reported his daughter missing and kidnapped and or even more importantly running with kane. why does this movie not employ logic. this is a running list. the movie is not exciting and the plot makes no sense and and the world is full of people who willingly take wanted terrorists into their homes and cars everyday because its no big thing. hitchcock fails miserably on this one. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
