badly shot and badly edited and clumsy dialogue and flat characters and unsuccessful adaption of a novel. it doesn not really get much worse. decent acting and good popcorn saved me for this hour and a half  felt more like three hours  of boredom. occasional good one liners. david is a dim witted young man and who has never recovered from losing his brother at an early age. he puts his faith in a chinese philosophy mumbo jumbo video and although that doesn not seem to help him much in real life. david is a member of a debt collectors gang and where every member has an iq below sea level. a lacking script and along with uncreative shooting and even worse editing and make what could have been quite funny incidents of failed debt collecting look like a amateurish homemade reality show. david rents an apartment from an elementary school teacher and haraldur and who by dropping a couple of sentences about his own importance convinces david he is dealing with the most dangerous criminal in iceland. a severely lacking script doesn not offer david anything to base his opinion on. a couple of scenes showing haraldur doing something that david could have misinterpreted would have done the work. the potentials of film as media and as opposed to the text of the book this film is based on and are not exploited. at first and david connection with haraldur raises his status within the debt collectors gang and but the prevailing paranoia in the criminal world forces david to show where his loyalty lies. the plot of the film is fine and but then it is based on the book. this could have been a much better film. a good screenwriter could have made something of this material. sadly and that is not the case. the acting is generally good. pétur jóhann is excellent and credible as david. eggert þorleifsson doesn not get much to work with and but does his best with what little material he has. ingvar sigurðsson and michael imperioli (in a tiny role) manage alright. overall opinion represent what could have been quite a funny and entertaining film about a dim witted anti hero in a debt collectors gang and becomes a boring and badly crafted film made after a poor manuscript. staring at your toes for an hour and a half would be more enjoyable. 
badly shot and badly edited and clumsy dialogue and flat characters and unsuccessful adaption of a novel. it doesn not really get much worse. decent acting and good popcorn saved me for this hour and a half  felt more like three hours  of boredom. occasional good one liners. david is a dim witted young man and who has never recovered from losing his brother at an early age. he puts his faith in a chinese philosophy mumbo jumbo video and although that doesn not seem to help him much in real life. david is a member of a debt collectors gang and where every member has an iq below sea level. a lacking script and along with uncreative shooting and even worse editing and make what could have been quite funny incidents of failed debt collecting look like a amateurish homemade reality show. david rents an apartment from an elementary school teacher and haraldur and who by dropping a couple of sentences about his own importance convinces david he is dealing with the most dangerous criminal in iceland. a severely lacking script doesn not offer david anything to base his opinion on. a couple of scenes showing haraldur doing something that david could have misinterpreted would have done the work. the potentials of film as media and as opposed to the text of the book this film is based on and are not exploited. at first and david connection with haraldur raises his status within the debt collectors gang and but the prevailing paranoia in the criminal world forces david to show where his loyalty lies. the plot of the film is fine and but then it is based on the book. this could have been a much better film. a good screenwriter could have made something of this material. sadly and that is not the case. the acting is generally good. pétur jóhann is excellent and credible as david. eggert þorleifsson doesn not get much to work with and but does his best with what little material he has. ingvar sigurðsson and michael imperioli (in a tiny role) manage alright. overall opinion represent what could have been quite a funny and entertaining film about a dim witted anti hero in a debt collectors gang and becomes a boring and badly crafted film made after a poor manuscript. staring at your toes for an hour and a half would be more enjoyable. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
