rabbit fever is one of those film oddities. it an enjoyable 90 minutes and demands little of the viewer and and delivers as much and and on any terrestrial television channel even in a prime time slot i think that rabbit fever would be rather well received. which makes me wonder why it has been pushed into cinemas. the movie is filmed in the style of a television documentary and and introduces us to 6 women who have am addictive relationship with the rabbit vibrator. the film is primarily focused on investigating a supposed addictive quality to the famous sex aid product. the narrative is 100% tongue in cheek throughout. the storyline is strong and an introduction to some well rounded and likable characters and some enjoyable back story and peripheral characters and situations develops into an engaging story and and pleasing conclusions. sadly there nothing that feels clever or new. rabbit fever has some sharp moments and a few switches that hint at what the writers are capable of and and all credit to them it not just 90 minutes of knob gags and innuendo and i could probably watch it with my mother. but there a laziness about some of the scenes that holds it back and those moments went you are up for it and when you want it to be outrageous and and all you get is a dollop of sit com. i chuckled and i left the theatre feeling empathy for the characters and but i also left with the bitter thought that someone had taken a 90 minute reel of made for tv and light entertainment and tried to put it into national cinema. i think rabbit fever achieves some of what it set out to do and it a quirky subject and a rounded storyline and a well presented cast and a good diversion for 90 minutes. but there nothing in this that can justify the extravagance of a movie theatre environment. quite the opposite  a few commercial breaks would have given the viewer chance to grab a breath of life that rabbit fever seems to lack. 
rabbit fever is one of those film oddities. it an enjoyable 90 minutes and demands little of the viewer and and delivers as much and and on any terrestrial television channel even in a prime time slot i think that rabbit fever would be rather well received. which makes me wonder why it has been pushed into cinemas. the movie is filmed in the style of a television documentary and and introduces us to 6 women who have am addictive relationship with the rabbit vibrator. the film is primarily focused on investigating a supposed addictive quality to the famous sex aid product. the narrative is 100% tongue in cheek throughout. the storyline is strong and an introduction to some well rounded and likable characters and some enjoyable back story and peripheral characters and situations develops into an engaging story and and pleasing conclusions. sadly there nothing that feels clever or new. rabbit fever has some sharp moments and a few switches that hint at what the writers are capable of and and all credit to them it not just 90 minutes of knob gags and innuendo and i could probably watch it with my mother. but there a laziness about some of the scenes that holds it back and those moments went you are up for it and when you want it to be outrageous and and all you get is a dollop of sit com. i chuckled and i left the theatre feeling empathy for the characters and but i also left with the bitter thought that someone had taken a 90 minute reel of made for tv and light entertainment and tried to put it into national cinema. i think rabbit fever achieves some of what it set out to do and it a quirky subject and a rounded storyline and a well presented cast and a good diversion for 90 minutes. but there nothing in this that can justify the extravagance of a movie theatre environment. quite the opposite  a few commercial breaks would have given the viewer chance to grab a breath of life that rabbit fever seems to lack. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
