joe (wes) and jim (adam) re acquaint us with the beauty and isolation (psychological as well as physical) and utter terror of murder most fowl in the navaho southwest. characterizations and settings and plot continually build . . even if at times the personal asides leave us wanting more . . with some interesting alternative choices as to who done it. flashbacks (e. g. peter fonda . . good to see him) provide clues but they do not go where you might think. comic asides (e. g. the preacher) are mild and appropriate. where skinwalkers and coyote waits start to drag . . thief engages the clutch and four wheels you around the next corner and never quite sure what there. disagree with joe leaphorn manic comment to jim chee to slow down for the potholes. wrong . there are no potholes in the plot and just tracks to follow. on to the next episode. great photography (as always) and appealing characters and more to explore. 
joe (wes) and jim (adam) re acquaint us with the beauty and isolation (psychological as well as physical) and utter terror of murder most fowl in the navaho southwest. characterizations and settings and plot continually build . . even if at times the personal asides leave us wanting more . . with some interesting alternative choices as to who done it. flashbacks (e. g. peter fonda . . good to see him) provide clues but they do not go where you might think. comic asides (e. g. the preacher) are mild and appropriate. where skinwalkers and coyote waits start to drag . . thief engages the clutch and four wheels you around the next corner and never quite sure what there. disagree with joe leaphorn manic comment to jim chee to slow down for the potholes. wrong . there are no potholes in the plot and just tracks to follow. on to the next episode. great photography (as always) and appealing characters and more to explore. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
