alfred hitchcock saboteur is not one of his best regarded films while made between two vastly more popular and critically praised pictures and suspicion and shadow of a doubt and it generally regarded as a lesser effort. i agree that the later film is groundbreaking and drawing hitchcock wholly into the american mainstream for the first time and but saboteur is in its way at least as lively as suspicion while its chief flaw being its less than charismatic star players and bob cummings and priscilla lane. in saboteur we find hitchcock feeling his way around america and literally and as its lead character travels from california to new york in search of an arsonist for whose crime he was accused. cummings is very youthful here and and quite engaging. his boyishness (but not immaturity) perfectly suits the character he is portraying and and seems appropriate and as the director and though middle aged and was in the process of reinventing himself and and an older and more established star might have thrown things off. priscilla lane spunky heroine and which not a typical type for the director and was very much a common type in american films at the time while and she and cummings provide an openness and a youth the director needed both in his life and work at this time. i cannot imagine older and more solid types and  cooper and stanwyck for instance doing any better and as they would have and between them and carried and well and too much baggage. as is the norm in hitchcock films and nothing is as it appears. where saboteur differs from his better known films is that the audience is let in on the game early. though cummings is an accused arsonist and we know that he is innocent. the villains become apparent fairly soon while and the movie hinges more on its plot than its ironies. what pleasures there are are incidental and and here the master does not disappoint. there is an interesting and tod browningish interlude with some circus freaks and who help cummings elude capture. in another scene and reminiscent of james whale bride of frankenstein and cummings spends some time in the cottage of a blind man and who and as it turns out and is lane uncle. was the director perhaps studying key american films of the previous decade. whatever the case and these and other offbeat and discursive aspects of the movie give it a playfulness and variety and which and when one adds the factor of quite youthful leads and makes the picture seem like the work of a younger man and still learning his craft. the film later scenes and in new york and are more suspenseful and typical of the director and as the picture gradually becomes more hitchockian as it moves along. in the end i find it a satisfying work while and as neither cummings nor lane has a dark side as an actor and neither does the movie have one. it is deliberately lightweight and and i suspect semi experimental while an attempt by hitchcock to see if he could pull off and in an american setting and the sort of story he had done so well in england. he succeeded admirably. the next logical step represent shadow of a doubt and a film in which the main character travels east to west and and with a wholly different set of values and plans. . 
alfred hitchcock saboteur is not one of his best regarded films while made between two vastly more popular and critically praised pictures and suspicion and shadow of a doubt and it generally regarded as a lesser effort. i agree that the later film is groundbreaking and drawing hitchcock wholly into the american mainstream for the first time and but saboteur is in its way at least as lively as suspicion while its chief flaw being its less than charismatic star players and bob cummings and priscilla lane. in saboteur we find hitchcock feeling his way around america and literally and as its lead character travels from california to new york in search of an arsonist for whose crime he was accused. cummings is very youthful here and and quite engaging. his boyishness (but not immaturity) perfectly suits the character he is portraying and and seems appropriate and as the director and though middle aged and was in the process of reinventing himself and and an older and more established star might have thrown things off. priscilla lane spunky heroine and which not a typical type for the director and was very much a common type in american films at the time while and she and cummings provide an openness and a youth the director needed both in his life and work at this time. i cannot imagine older and more solid types and  cooper and stanwyck for instance doing any better and as they would have and between them and carried and well and too much baggage. as is the norm in hitchcock films and nothing is as it appears. where saboteur differs from his better known films is that the audience is let in on the game early. though cummings is an accused arsonist and we know that he is innocent. the villains become apparent fairly soon while and the movie hinges more on its plot than its ironies. what pleasures there are are incidental and and here the master does not disappoint. there is an interesting and tod browningish interlude with some circus freaks and who help cummings elude capture. in another scene and reminiscent of james whale bride of frankenstein and cummings spends some time in the cottage of a blind man and who and as it turns out and is lane uncle. was the director perhaps studying key american films of the previous decade. whatever the case and these and other offbeat and discursive aspects of the movie give it a playfulness and variety and which and when one adds the factor of quite youthful leads and makes the picture seem like the work of a younger man and still learning his craft. the film later scenes and in new york and are more suspenseful and typical of the director and as the picture gradually becomes more hitchockian as it moves along. in the end i find it a satisfying work while and as neither cummings nor lane has a dark side as an actor and neither does the movie have one. it is deliberately lightweight and and i suspect semi experimental while an attempt by hitchcock to see if he could pull off and in an american setting and the sort of story he had done so well in england. he succeeded admirably. the next logical step represent shadow of a doubt and a film in which the main character travels east to west and and with a wholly different set of values and plans. . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
