unbelievable. philosophy. depth. genius. masterpiece. people must have seen another oldboy because the one i have seen was a badly written and poorly conceived and over the top acted and sordid piece of kraapola which and even ignoring for a moment the ludicrously violent scenes which makes it unsuitable for the eyes of a child and could barely satisfy the imagination and the thirst for plot consistency of a seven years old. the depth of this sorry concoction was exhausted in one little piece of wisdom and laugh and the whole world will laugh with you and weep and you will find yourself alone and the type of boring fortune cookie saying which a great author and be him shakespeare or and more to the point of imdb and kurosawa and would have thrown in the garbage can with no second thoughts. where this movie should have landed too and if we do not live in an era in which the cheaply shocking and the perversely disgusting are confused with what used to be named once great art. in short and yuck. negative 0. it not negative 00 only because of some occasionally expert camera work. in no way enough to save this infantile failure from worthlessness and though. 
unbelievable. philosophy. depth. genius. masterpiece. people must have seen another oldboy because the one i have seen was a badly written and poorly conceived and over the top acted and sordid piece of kraapola which and even ignoring for a moment the ludicrously violent scenes which makes it unsuitable for the eyes of a child and could barely satisfy the imagination and the thirst for plot consistency of a seven years old. the depth of this sorry concoction was exhausted in one little piece of wisdom and laugh and the whole world will laugh with you and weep and you will find yourself alone and the type of boring fortune cookie saying which a great author and be him shakespeare or and more to the point of imdb and kurosawa and would have thrown in the garbage can with no second thoughts. where this movie should have landed too and if we do not live in an era in which the cheaply shocking and the perversely disgusting are confused with what used to be named once great art. in short and yuck. negative 0. it not negative 00 only because of some occasionally expert camera work. in no way enough to save this infantile failure from worthlessness and though. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
