excuse me if i am wrong and but cronica para un desayuno could be one of the most gretatest films in tne mexican movie history for a lot of reasons. we can get a lot of ingredients for a perfect mexican middle class family breakfast represent a cup of buñuel surrealistic motifs with a little drop of ripstenian desolated scenarios while a pound of phallus symbols around the film and a difficult psychological complexity and more than todd solondz happiness and the dogma movement films. there a lot of sordidness and black humor and repressed dreams (teodoro dream of fly) and incestual lack of control (the relation between marcos and luzma) and no sense parallel stories and a discrete violence and anachronisms anda little sign of hope (spotlighted in luzma and the husband home return and un poco mas used for leit motif). marcos (bruno bichir) is a charming character ( i think in a bukoskian way) and the king without a crown who do not expects for anything and but broken noses. luzma (maria rojo)  and the lovable wife  and put out a lot of faces and but the only thing that she worried is that her sons had breakfast while she s a loser in many ways and sensual in few moments  and but you will fall in love of her. the soundtrack drag (too much woods) feeds the lack of technical merits and intentional  and of course represent out of focus shots and overlighted close ups (in introspective scenes) and dizzy pans and sudden edition cuts. crónica is something difficult to digest and it get stuck in the throat and anything helps for it. it tastes bitter and like a rotten orange juice and sour like expired milk and but you want to enjoy it. so i recommend to get some melox before the show and because you would not get hungry after all. 
excuse me if i am wrong and but cronica para un desayuno could be one of the most gretatest films in tne mexican movie history for a lot of reasons. we can get a lot of ingredients for a perfect mexican middle class family breakfast represent a cup of buñuel surrealistic motifs with a little drop of ripstenian desolated scenarios while a pound of phallus symbols around the film and a difficult psychological complexity and more than todd solondz happiness and the dogma movement films. there a lot of sordidness and black humor and repressed dreams (teodoro dream of fly) and incestual lack of control (the relation between marcos and luzma) and no sense parallel stories and a discrete violence and anachronisms anda little sign of hope (spotlighted in luzma and the husband home return and un poco mas used for leit motif). marcos (bruno bichir) is a charming character ( i think in a bukoskian way) and the king without a crown who do not expects for anything and but broken noses. luzma (maria rojo)  and the lovable wife  and put out a lot of faces and but the only thing that she worried is that her sons had breakfast while she s a loser in many ways and sensual in few moments  and but you will fall in love of her. the soundtrack drag (too much woods) feeds the lack of technical merits and intentional  and of course represent out of focus shots and overlighted close ups (in introspective scenes) and dizzy pans and sudden edition cuts. crónica is something difficult to digest and it get stuck in the throat and anything helps for it. it tastes bitter and like a rotten orange juice and sour like expired milk and but you want to enjoy it. so i recommend to get some melox before the show and because you would not get hungry after all. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
