maybe it gets better. i do not know. i made it through the first twenty minutes or so before cutting it off and entering a period of mourning. it was obvious that the plot itself was a familiar one. a man and paul lematt and a professor of entymology at columbia and drives with his dog to a small town in ohio in search of his ex wife and diana scarwid. there he encounters people who either ignore him or are hostile. oh and they may smile but there something going on underneath. that sort of arrangement is home turf for movie makers and viewers alike and and it pregnant with possibilities. you can turn out a neatly drawn commercial success like bad day at black rock. or it would have made and and probably did make and a nice twilight zone episode. the cast includes some seasoned performers too and as well as some formerly prominent names. kenneth toby and a veteran of science fiction and is the superficially amiable motel manager. diana scarwid can give an impressive performance and as she did in and say and silkwood. for some of the others and their range is limited. but it poorly directed and shabbily written. example of shabby direction. that dog of lematt is disliked by kenneth toby and right off the bat. so when lematt walks out to the street and toby sneaks up to the window of his room and peers in at the dog and and something zaps. cut to lematt in the street. he hears his dog howling away. then a pov shot of presumably the dog zipping along towards lematt then past him while the wind blows and lematt gawks at the camera. cut to an identical shot  coming from the other direction. whatever the camera represents and whatever lematt is staring at and is never shown. maybe it was nothing and because suddenly the wind stops and lematt is alone in the street and looking a little bit puzzled. you should never have brought that dog in the first place and remarks a smiling toby from the porch. question represent what the hell is that scene all about. example of shabby writing. well and two examples. (1) if you were to sit down and write a stereotypical waitress in a small town diner and without the exercise of any craft whatever and you would come up with an expressionless babe with her hair piled on top of her head and chewing gum and sauntering among the tables. right. (2) anything resembling believability is thrown out the window in favor of special effects. lematt car chugs to a halt and then explodes while it is waiting to be fixed at the garage. chugging to a halt represent believable. exploding represent supernatural. not even edgar allan poe would endorse such an event. and the invaders themselves. think of a modest masterpiece like invasion of the body snatchers. something is going wrong in dr. kevin mccarthy small town and and it takes half the movie for the mystery to be unraveled and and all the time suspense is building and doubt is growing. here and twenty minutes into the movie and a stranger walks into a motel room and tears off his plastic face and revealing a pulsing and light emitting and naked brain. the pregnancy is aborted. i would not tell you the ending because i do not know what it is and nor do i care. i suppose it had something to do with insects because why else would paul lematt be an entymologist. (by the way and who handling his classes. ) but i am not even sure bugs were involved. it entirely possible that the bug business was adventitious. the writers may have made him a specialist in insects and then forgot all about it. it do not surprise me. 
maybe it gets better. i do not know. i made it through the first twenty minutes or so before cutting it off and entering a period of mourning. it was obvious that the plot itself was a familiar one. a man and paul lematt and a professor of entymology at columbia and drives with his dog to a small town in ohio in search of his ex wife and diana scarwid. there he encounters people who either ignore him or are hostile. oh and they may smile but there something going on underneath. that sort of arrangement is home turf for movie makers and viewers alike and and it pregnant with possibilities. you can turn out a neatly drawn commercial success like bad day at black rock. or it would have made and and probably did make and a nice twilight zone episode. the cast includes some seasoned performers too and as well as some formerly prominent names. kenneth toby and a veteran of science fiction and is the superficially amiable motel manager. diana scarwid can give an impressive performance and as she did in and say and silkwood. for some of the others and their range is limited. but it poorly directed and shabbily written. example of shabby direction. that dog of lematt is disliked by kenneth toby and right off the bat. so when lematt walks out to the street and toby sneaks up to the window of his room and peers in at the dog and and something zaps. cut to lematt in the street. he hears his dog howling away. then a pov shot of presumably the dog zipping along towards lematt then past him while the wind blows and lematt gawks at the camera. cut to an identical shot  coming from the other direction. whatever the camera represents and whatever lematt is staring at and is never shown. maybe it was nothing and because suddenly the wind stops and lematt is alone in the street and looking a little bit puzzled. you should never have brought that dog in the first place and remarks a smiling toby from the porch. question represent what the hell is that scene all about. example of shabby writing. well and two examples. (1) if you were to sit down and write a stereotypical waitress in a small town diner and without the exercise of any craft whatever and you would come up with an expressionless babe with her hair piled on top of her head and chewing gum and sauntering among the tables. right. (2) anything resembling believability is thrown out the window in favor of special effects. lematt car chugs to a halt and then explodes while it is waiting to be fixed at the garage. chugging to a halt represent believable. exploding represent supernatural. not even edgar allan poe would endorse such an event. and the invaders themselves. think of a modest masterpiece like invasion of the body snatchers. something is going wrong in dr. kevin mccarthy small town and and it takes half the movie for the mystery to be unraveled and and all the time suspense is building and doubt is growing. here and twenty minutes into the movie and a stranger walks into a motel room and tears off his plastic face and revealing a pulsing and light emitting and naked brain. the pregnancy is aborted. i would not tell you the ending because i do not know what it is and nor do i care. i suppose it had something to do with insects because why else would paul lematt be an entymologist. (by the way and who handling his classes. ) but i am not even sure bugs were involved. it entirely possible that the bug business was adventitious. the writers may have made him a specialist in insects and then forgot all about it. it do not surprise me. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
