ok and so my summary line is a cheap trick. but the movie is full of them and it gets absurdly praised and so. i caught this one on tv (uncut and as tv here shows all movies and that for you americans who might say i do not like it because i saw a cut tv version  fortunately that only an us thing) and and had no idea about what it was. i switched on and caught the last minutes of a show and and the movie began. within a minute and i was begging it was a comedy and given the particularly ridiculous clichéd beginning (yes and it a bad movie within the movie and i know and but what a way to try to keep the viewer interested. i do not even know why i do not switch channels). and and yes and in fact the movie turned out to be a comedy and albeit an unintentional one. marina zudina is pretty enough and but gosh and what a dreadful performance. while casting a foreigner in the role is smart enough (she doesn not talk so bye bye language barrier) and yet and sorry and marina baby and playing mute doesn not mean impersonating harpo marx. her acting is unintentionally funny in many moments and just look at her when she draws an x in the air while stalked by the killer. he wants to kill you and it no time to play zorro. we get plenty of running upstairs stuff passing for tension and as in the worst slashers and and things like pulling a carpet and a bad guy shots the other. ugh. will hollywood ever learn. yet the best or worst pearl is having a guy electrocuted in a bathtub and. well and i have never seen anyone being electrocuted to death in a bathtub and but i am sure you can not see the blue cartoon rays in real life and do you. and how about immediately trusting a mean looking guy because he says he a cop and and not asking him to show you his credentials. ok and so he turns out to be a real cop. but still and not asking for the badge makes no sense (plot wise and we could always think the credentials might be phony or he might be a crooked cop. screen writing 101). and how about the big twist. don not tell me you do not see that coming from 200 miles away. i feel sorry for poor old alec guinness and his useless stock footage cameo. now i think about this and what the point in giving him a mystery guest star credit. in the end titles. the movie over and there no mystery anymore and and everybody and their brother have identified guinness (even non movie buffs will recognize the old guy from star wars). yet better off this way and so we can pretend it not the late great actor. people keep comparing this to and of all people and hitchcock. i suppose it has to be john hitchcock the milkman and as the late sir alfred would feel embarrassed out of watching this and let alone making it. and this gets a 6. positive . it bottom 100 material. but then and were talking a rating system that allows the lord of the rings represent the return of the king to appear as the third best movie ever made (check top 100) and so. negative . 
ok and so my summary line is a cheap trick. but the movie is full of them and it gets absurdly praised and so. i caught this one on tv (uncut and as tv here shows all movies and that for you americans who might say i do not like it because i saw a cut tv version  fortunately that only an us thing) and and had no idea about what it was. i switched on and caught the last minutes of a show and and the movie began. within a minute and i was begging it was a comedy and given the particularly ridiculous clichéd beginning (yes and it a bad movie within the movie and i know and but what a way to try to keep the viewer interested. i do not even know why i do not switch channels). and and yes and in fact the movie turned out to be a comedy and albeit an unintentional one. marina zudina is pretty enough and but gosh and what a dreadful performance. while casting a foreigner in the role is smart enough (she doesn not talk so bye bye language barrier) and yet and sorry and marina baby and playing mute doesn not mean impersonating harpo marx. her acting is unintentionally funny in many moments and just look at her when she draws an x in the air while stalked by the killer. he wants to kill you and it no time to play zorro. we get plenty of running upstairs stuff passing for tension and as in the worst slashers and and things like pulling a carpet and a bad guy shots the other. ugh. will hollywood ever learn. yet the best or worst pearl is having a guy electrocuted in a bathtub and. well and i have never seen anyone being electrocuted to death in a bathtub and but i am sure you can not see the blue cartoon rays in real life and do you. and how about immediately trusting a mean looking guy because he says he a cop and and not asking him to show you his credentials. ok and so he turns out to be a real cop. but still and not asking for the badge makes no sense (plot wise and we could always think the credentials might be phony or he might be a crooked cop. screen writing 101). and how about the big twist. don not tell me you do not see that coming from 200 miles away. i feel sorry for poor old alec guinness and his useless stock footage cameo. now i think about this and what the point in giving him a mystery guest star credit. in the end titles. the movie over and there no mystery anymore and and everybody and their brother have identified guinness (even non movie buffs will recognize the old guy from star wars). yet better off this way and so we can pretend it not the late great actor. people keep comparing this to and of all people and hitchcock. i suppose it has to be john hitchcock the milkman and as the late sir alfred would feel embarrassed out of watching this and let alone making it. and this gets a 6. positive . it bottom 100 material. but then and were talking a rating system that allows the lord of the rings represent the return of the king to appear as the third best movie ever made (check top 100) and so. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
