i am starting to wonder if all these pg 13 horror movies are just glorified screen tests for young and emerging talent. get a first time screenwriter and an inexperienced director and a few tv actors looking for their bigscreen break and see what they can do. when a stranger calls is a little better than most such recent offerings and but is still completely by the book while riddled with plot holes and genre clichés. the story is unbelievably simplistic. the slim 87 minute running time is heavily padded with inconsequential friends and a pointless cheating boyfriend. the killer is devoid of even the token motivation of jason or michael or even the original movie killer and and as a result is never particularly frightening. the police behave in such an unbelievably ineffectual and lazy manner as to verge on professional misconduct. simon west brings the same attractive banality to proceedings that he managed with lara croft and but his style of directing is decidedly generic and possessing no indicators of real talent or vision. the performances are routine and dark hallways replace genuine horror and and the scares are of the tired cat in the closet variety. the cinematography and production design and however and are above average for this kind of film. the house is beautifully designed and all dark wood and glassy reflections and and there are a few moments that are of visual interest. though lacking an ounce of dramatic originality and it acts as a reasonably satisfying wouldark house thriller and and maintains interest longer than most of its ilk. 
i am starting to wonder if all these pg 13 horror movies are just glorified screen tests for young and emerging talent. get a first time screenwriter and an inexperienced director and a few tv actors looking for their bigscreen break and see what they can do. when a stranger calls is a little better than most such recent offerings and but is still completely by the book while riddled with plot holes and genre clichés. the story is unbelievably simplistic. the slim 87 minute running time is heavily padded with inconsequential friends and a pointless cheating boyfriend. the killer is devoid of even the token motivation of jason or michael or even the original movie killer and and as a result is never particularly frightening. the police behave in such an unbelievably ineffectual and lazy manner as to verge on professional misconduct. simon west brings the same attractive banality to proceedings that he managed with lara croft and but his style of directing is decidedly generic and possessing no indicators of real talent or vision. the performances are routine and dark hallways replace genuine horror and and the scares are of the tired cat in the closet variety. the cinematography and production design and however and are above average for this kind of film. the house is beautifully designed and all dark wood and glassy reflections and and there are a few moments that are of visual interest. though lacking an ounce of dramatic originality and it acts as a reasonably satisfying wouldark house thriller and and maintains interest longer than most of its ilk. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
