1. i have seen branaghs hamlet represent branagh is too old and speaks frequently with a high pitched voice (unwillingly funny. )  not a convincing hamlet and and his directors qualities  poor . (see also much ado about nothing from branagh  the funny parts of the dialogues have mostly been cut out not speaking of the directors mistakes in the dialogue cuts. ) 2. i have seen hamlet 2000 represent i think the scenario is an interesting idea  but such lousy actors  all of them 3. orson welles hamlet is ok  but this bbc hamlet is the best. derec jacobi is convincing  seems a bit of a lunatic  very suitable. and patric stewart  wonderful and and claire bloom is a very attractive queen. you believe those actors what they are saying  i think this is the best compliment. 
1. i have seen branaghs hamlet represent branagh is too old and speaks frequently with a high pitched voice (unwillingly funny. )  not a convincing hamlet and and his directors qualities  poor . (see also much ado about nothing from branagh  the funny parts of the dialogues have mostly been cut out not speaking of the directors mistakes in the dialogue cuts. ) 2. i have seen hamlet 2000 represent i think the scenario is an interesting idea  but such lousy actors  all of them 3. orson welles hamlet is ok  but this bbc hamlet is the best. derec jacobi is convincing  seems a bit of a lunatic  very suitable. and patric stewart  wonderful and and claire bloom is a very attractive queen. you believe those actors what they are saying  i think this is the best compliment. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
