spoiler it gives away the very irrelevant endingat the beginning of this movie and there was a brief intro to the world of gore by the master of gore movies and h. g. lewis. he talked about how this movie was lost and and then found years after the director death. he also talked about how gore movies were measured by the amount of stage blood used in it. blood feast was a 2 galloner and 10 and 000 maniacs was a 5 galloner. but and then he goes and claims that dr. gore was a 15 galloner. i want to know where half of the 15 gallons went. watching the movie and i saw very little near 15 gallons. agreed and there was a fairly large amount of blood and but no where near 15 gallons. some of the dismemberment scenes were definitely pretty gory and realistic and strings of flesh and all and but i do not say 15 gallons. end. ennnnnnnnndddddd. does that sound familiar. that what you should have been saying near the last half of this movie. after the igor character was tossed into the acid bath and the movie slowed to a painful crawl. there was no coherent end and as it do not fit into anything the 90 minutes before it provided. she drove off in a van with a total stranger and big deal. that what happens when you keep an individual (i would not say person and because she doesn not qualify as a person) very innocent about the world around her. the doctor teaches the girl that a man is to be loved and so every man she meets and she loves. even though h. g. lewis told us at the beginning of the movie that we may not like the acting and the directing and or even the gore. i will go with choices a and b. both were terrible. it was enough to give me bad dreams of cut editing and people with shifty eyes as they talk to one person. but and i made it through the movie and and came out stronger. too bad i couldn not say the same after finishing robo c. h. i. c. this was a bad movie. i can usually take my doses of vinegar in good stride and but every once in a while and you get a movie that bites back. i think this movie took off an arm or a leg (haha. sigh) admitted and i did enjoy the stare down scenes and where the good doctor stared at his future victims and opened his eyes really wide and just stared. it was very similar to fuad ramseys in blood feast when he stared at that lady in his catering shop and and did not use his power after that. i guess this movie picks up where fuad powers left off. final judgement the movie should have stayed lost. good day scott . 
spoiler it gives away the very irrelevant endingat the beginning of this movie and there was a brief intro to the world of gore by the master of gore movies and h. g. lewis. he talked about how this movie was lost and and then found years after the director death. he also talked about how gore movies were measured by the amount of stage blood used in it. blood feast was a 2 galloner and 10 and 000 maniacs was a 5 galloner. but and then he goes and claims that dr. gore was a 15 galloner. i want to know where half of the 15 gallons went. watching the movie and i saw very little near 15 gallons. agreed and there was a fairly large amount of blood and but no where near 15 gallons. some of the dismemberment scenes were definitely pretty gory and realistic and strings of flesh and all and but i do not say 15 gallons. end. ennnnnnnnndddddd. does that sound familiar. that what you should have been saying near the last half of this movie. after the igor character was tossed into the acid bath and the movie slowed to a painful crawl. there was no coherent end and as it do not fit into anything the 90 minutes before it provided. she drove off in a van with a total stranger and big deal. that what happens when you keep an individual (i would not say person and because she doesn not qualify as a person) very innocent about the world around her. the doctor teaches the girl that a man is to be loved and so every man she meets and she loves. even though h. g. lewis told us at the beginning of the movie that we may not like the acting and the directing and or even the gore. i will go with choices a and b. both were terrible. it was enough to give me bad dreams of cut editing and people with shifty eyes as they talk to one person. but and i made it through the movie and and came out stronger. too bad i couldn not say the same after finishing robo c. h. i. c. this was a bad movie. i can usually take my doses of vinegar in good stride and but every once in a while and you get a movie that bites back. i think this movie took off an arm or a leg (haha. sigh) admitted and i did enjoy the stare down scenes and where the good doctor stared at his future victims and opened his eyes really wide and just stared. it was very similar to fuad ramseys in blood feast when he stared at that lady in his catering shop and and did not use his power after that. i guess this movie picks up where fuad powers left off. final judgement the movie should have stayed lost. good day scott . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
