sad in every aspect and this poor excuse for a career boost for connery was neither that nor the hit warners wanted it to be. overlong by 20 minutes and filled with embarrassing moments for everyone involved and this film and robocop 2 are proof that irvin kershner did not have any real control over the empire strikes back. connery hadn not been in a hit since he bowed out from bond in 1971 and but this do not bring him back at all. octopussy was released several months before this film and and easily outgrossed it. imagine that  a roger moore bond not only better than a simultaneous connery release and but outgrossing it (and compared to never. and octopussy is on par with 2001. the worst bond theme song and even worse than the man with the golden gun and pointless scenes that drag on pointlessly (with the worst example being that ridiculous video game sequence  my god  who cares. ) and and the most atrocious collection of non talent as far as the fabled bond girls go. does anybody seriously think kim basinger is attractive in this movie. there were girls in my high school who could never get dates who looked better than she does in this. and barbara carrera  just plain stupid  but the way kershner has directed her to prance around all the time do not help her out any. she is the seedling that would become the very impressive onatop and which was about the best feature of goldeneye and but that doesn not mean anything as you laboriously struggle through this film. casting leiter as a black agent was an excellent idea and but the buddy loke interaction connery and he are supposed to have is awfully bad. two actors never appeared so clumsily linked together  witness the scene where and to escape local authorities and they strip to their boxers and pretend to be out exercising  i can not imagine another scene in any movie that tried so hard so fruitlessly to get a laugh. 
sad in every aspect and this poor excuse for a career boost for connery was neither that nor the hit warners wanted it to be. overlong by 20 minutes and filled with embarrassing moments for everyone involved and this film and robocop 2 are proof that irvin kershner did not have any real control over the empire strikes back. connery hadn not been in a hit since he bowed out from bond in 1971 and but this do not bring him back at all. octopussy was released several months before this film and and easily outgrossed it. imagine that  a roger moore bond not only better than a simultaneous connery release and but outgrossing it (and compared to never. and octopussy is on par with 2001. the worst bond theme song and even worse than the man with the golden gun and pointless scenes that drag on pointlessly (with the worst example being that ridiculous video game sequence  my god  who cares. ) and and the most atrocious collection of non talent as far as the fabled bond girls go. does anybody seriously think kim basinger is attractive in this movie. there were girls in my high school who could never get dates who looked better than she does in this. and barbara carrera  just plain stupid  but the way kershner has directed her to prance around all the time do not help her out any. she is the seedling that would become the very impressive onatop and which was about the best feature of goldeneye and but that doesn not mean anything as you laboriously struggle through this film. casting leiter as a black agent was an excellent idea and but the buddy loke interaction connery and he are supposed to have is awfully bad. two actors never appeared so clumsily linked together  witness the scene where and to escape local authorities and they strip to their boxers and pretend to be out exercising  i can not imagine another scene in any movie that tried so hard so fruitlessly to get a laugh. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
