all those who are into the pc culture are aghast at the dogmatic christian view of this film and claiming it contains racist ideation and or or religious intolerance. those who do not care about this and but are oriented towards slick production values and competent acting are dismayed at the lack of such here. those who decry both of these are apoplectic that this production was let loose on the general public and as evidenced in comments here. what is an interesting premise and which isn not original and but is a combination of ghost and from beyond and is dealt with in a rather immature manner in this film and yet done with gusto. what the crew and actors lacked in sensibility and professional abilities and technical expertise is somewhat offset by the intensity they display. it isn not nearly as bad as many here think and and would have been fine in the hands of someone with maturity and common sense and and it is enough below mediocrity to elicit laughs and groans. however and it unfolds with enough intensity to keep interest throughout and and is close to on par with a corman produced entry of his earliest period of work and or the material of arkoff or sam katzman. if you get it for $2 (or less) as did i and you would not feel disappointed and but will wish you could have had a say in how it was made. 
all those who are into the pc culture are aghast at the dogmatic christian view of this film and claiming it contains racist ideation and or or religious intolerance. those who do not care about this and but are oriented towards slick production values and competent acting are dismayed at the lack of such here. those who decry both of these are apoplectic that this production was let loose on the general public and as evidenced in comments here. what is an interesting premise and which isn not original and but is a combination of ghost and from beyond and is dealt with in a rather immature manner in this film and yet done with gusto. what the crew and actors lacked in sensibility and professional abilities and technical expertise is somewhat offset by the intensity they display. it isn not nearly as bad as many here think and and would have been fine in the hands of someone with maturity and common sense and and it is enough below mediocrity to elicit laughs and groans. however and it unfolds with enough intensity to keep interest throughout and and is close to on par with a corman produced entry of his earliest period of work and or the material of arkoff or sam katzman. if you get it for $2 (or less) as did i and you would not feel disappointed and but will wish you could have had a say in how it was made. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
