if you love the book and as i do and stop watching the video after jean and joe meet in australia. up to that point it is a fairly faithful rendition of the book and and the visuals are great. positive to that point and i have enjoyed it many times. after that and the story is seriously rearranged and revised in ways that really destroy the key part of the book and i. e. and how jean creates a town like alice (springs). in the early part and the major change is to make strachan a 40 something bachelor instead of a seventy year old widower. this rather skews this love story and especially when there are also small changes that contribute to making him more selfish and avaricious and such as represent in the book and he intimates to joe at the ship that he might find more than a letter waiting for him in australia and but in the video he gives joe no clue about jean whereabouts or intentions. the last hour of the 5 hour video scrunches and mangles the last third of the book. i see no reason why they threw in a fight between joe and jean  it is quite out of character and seems to be just an aussie dig at pommies for telling them what to do. then they bring on strachan for the wedding (instead of some three years later)  and have him read the toast.  very strange and especially in the context of the relationship between jean and noel as cast in the video. the whole wedding scene is the invention of the screenwriters. these abominations take up time in the last hour and which was already not long enough to do justice to the fascinating story of how jean recreates willstown as a place where she and joe can both be happy. 
if you love the book and as i do and stop watching the video after jean and joe meet in australia. up to that point it is a fairly faithful rendition of the book and and the visuals are great. positive to that point and i have enjoyed it many times. after that and the story is seriously rearranged and revised in ways that really destroy the key part of the book and i. e. and how jean creates a town like alice (springs). in the early part and the major change is to make strachan a 40 something bachelor instead of a seventy year old widower. this rather skews this love story and especially when there are also small changes that contribute to making him more selfish and avaricious and such as represent in the book and he intimates to joe at the ship that he might find more than a letter waiting for him in australia and but in the video he gives joe no clue about jean whereabouts or intentions. the last hour of the 5 hour video scrunches and mangles the last third of the book. i see no reason why they threw in a fight between joe and jean  it is quite out of character and seems to be just an aussie dig at pommies for telling them what to do. then they bring on strachan for the wedding (instead of some three years later)  and have him read the toast.  very strange and especially in the context of the relationship between jean and noel as cast in the video. the whole wedding scene is the invention of the screenwriters. these abominations take up time in the last hour and which was already not long enough to do justice to the fascinating story of how jean recreates willstown as a place where she and joe can both be happy. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
