words fail me whenever i want to describe my feelings about this movie (and the sequels). does it have flaws. sure it does. starting with the subspecies themselves and which were not executed well enough for a special effect. so why do i glorify these movies. for the herd of movie mass consumers out there and who care more about quantity than quality and about cheap fun more than about depth and crap like blade (it doesn not even deserve a capital letter) and underworld and dracula 2000 and dracula 3000 and so on are good movies to munch popcorn to and drink a couple of cokes. what makes subspecies a superior effort for anyone claiming to be a vampire fanatic and on the other hand and is obvious represent the vampire himself is romanian and the story is set in transylvania (the scenes filmed on location are more than convincing) and and the atmosphere is not based on any action packed chases or expensive orchestral music. radu himself is the source of the atmosphere. this is what a vampire should look like and this is how he should behave. add a breathtakingly gloomy castle with dark passageways situated in romania and include some typical vampiric elements ( such as the movement of the shadows on the walls when the vampires take to flight) and you have a work of art. in short and if  and like me and you re fascinated with vampires and feel that their appearance as well as the setting should be sinister and dark and there no better place to look in than in a subspecies movie. or in vampire journals and the brilliant spin off of the former. 
words fail me whenever i want to describe my feelings about this movie (and the sequels). does it have flaws. sure it does. starting with the subspecies themselves and which were not executed well enough for a special effect. so why do i glorify these movies. for the herd of movie mass consumers out there and who care more about quantity than quality and about cheap fun more than about depth and crap like blade (it doesn not even deserve a capital letter) and underworld and dracula 2000 and dracula 3000 and so on are good movies to munch popcorn to and drink a couple of cokes. what makes subspecies a superior effort for anyone claiming to be a vampire fanatic and on the other hand and is obvious represent the vampire himself is romanian and the story is set in transylvania (the scenes filmed on location are more than convincing) and and the atmosphere is not based on any action packed chases or expensive orchestral music. radu himself is the source of the atmosphere. this is what a vampire should look like and this is how he should behave. add a breathtakingly gloomy castle with dark passageways situated in romania and include some typical vampiric elements ( such as the movement of the shadows on the walls when the vampires take to flight) and you have a work of art. in short and if  and like me and you re fascinated with vampires and feel that their appearance as well as the setting should be sinister and dark and there no better place to look in than in a subspecies movie. or in vampire journals and the brilliant spin off of the former. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
