the movie starts off promisingly enough and the use of imagery and simple short clips convey the bigger story and which would normally need a considerably higher budget than the one here. however it did start to worry me as it continued and combined with another overly husky max payne type voice over the movie was starting to look not so good. i hoped it was just the introduction to the story. the story is what really caught me and took me to this movie. the idea that a research scientist has created a virus that actually protects the cells it infects from other infection was an interesting scientific idea. then that subjects who had the most bizarre disorders sought out the scientist and offered to be his human experiments made me think this could be one very good small movie. yet the introduction hadn not gone well. there did seem to be a change of pace as the movie turned to recorded interviews with the four main characters in the movie and the test subjects. although the acting wasn not superb and there seemed to be a lot of scope for character development throughout the movie and and the recordings were done quite well with a varied mix of characters. however these faded through the movie. they weren not used again after a few brief clips and i did feel that there was a missed opportunity to provide some great character development by reflecting back to them and however it wasn not to be. the imagery becomes increasingly disconnected from the story and often repeating to represent something that is still happening. this disconnection and repetition is reflected in the annoying and distracting commentary. it began reciting words one after the other. short and meaningless sentences and reciting none too relevant or interesting scientific ramblings. if there was something to be described and four or five words would be used and it was too long and repetitive and circular and looping and . youre getting the idea. now this could have been to reflect the confusion and of the character and slowly becoming caught up in his own thoughts and rambling due to lack of food and water. what it actually did was to cause me to totally switch off to the voice and by the closing stages of the movie i found that i hadn not been listening to some of the ramblings. a number of times that an event occurs the camera shows all the characters one after the other for their reaction and which seems to be somewhere between confused and thoughtful. there are repeated fades from the same scene to the same scene and for instance a character sleeping fades to black and then fades back in on the character sleeping again. look and we know the character is asleep and we know time has passed and please move on. overall there are just too many atmospheric cuts and long and hanging shots to fill time. the acting was not bad and and the characters were okay and but not exploited and developed. when they were interacting there were some truly cringeworthy moments. for example when one of them asks if they are hungry the camera looks to each of them and returns to a group shot and they pause and look to each other and turn back to camera and say slowly no. it raised a snigger or two. their dialogue was slow and glossy and either it was missing altogether or totally unnecessary and there seemed to be no middle ground where the dialogue hit spot on. however and there were some good scenes and but they were really hard to find unless you viewed them in isolation and and this is what it almost looks like has happened with this movie. the film has been looked at as a series of scenes and not as a complete story. nowhere is this seen more than in the main storyline. the characters are infected with the virus that has been killing the animals and the one that was being engineered for them. were told that it develops in stages to something dramatic and and so that is what we expect. what we get are the characters eating loads together and all throwing up once together and water pouring from their mouths in unconvincing streams and then they all fall asleep and these are the phases which all happen really early in the movie. then and they all say good together when asked how they are and and that it. that the virus done and nothing else happens. there could have been so much more done with this movie and so much more developed with the virus and it protecting them from all manner of harm. it could have explored a serious change of these characters as it infected and took over them and it could have developed these characters and shown them making decisions and doing things that connect back to their character shown in flashbacks to the interviews. the ending isn not even confusing and intriguing or thought provoking. it just shows something that happens and that it and although in the long and drawn out style with the irritating voice over above it. i really struggled with this movie and watched a number of press members walk out (including one famous tv critic leaving within the first twenty minutes) and i stayed and but regretted the lost time. 
the movie starts off promisingly enough and the use of imagery and simple short clips convey the bigger story and which would normally need a considerably higher budget than the one here. however it did start to worry me as it continued and combined with another overly husky max payne type voice over the movie was starting to look not so good. i hoped it was just the introduction to the story. the story is what really caught me and took me to this movie. the idea that a research scientist has created a virus that actually protects the cells it infects from other infection was an interesting scientific idea. then that subjects who had the most bizarre disorders sought out the scientist and offered to be his human experiments made me think this could be one very good small movie. yet the introduction hadn not gone well. there did seem to be a change of pace as the movie turned to recorded interviews with the four main characters in the movie and the test subjects. although the acting wasn not superb and there seemed to be a lot of scope for character development throughout the movie and and the recordings were done quite well with a varied mix of characters. however these faded through the movie. they weren not used again after a few brief clips and i did feel that there was a missed opportunity to provide some great character development by reflecting back to them and however it wasn not to be. the imagery becomes increasingly disconnected from the story and often repeating to represent something that is still happening. this disconnection and repetition is reflected in the annoying and distracting commentary. it began reciting words one after the other. short and meaningless sentences and reciting none too relevant or interesting scientific ramblings. if there was something to be described and four or five words would be used and it was too long and repetitive and circular and looping and . youre getting the idea. now this could have been to reflect the confusion and of the character and slowly becoming caught up in his own thoughts and rambling due to lack of food and water. what it actually did was to cause me to totally switch off to the voice and by the closing stages of the movie i found that i hadn not been listening to some of the ramblings. a number of times that an event occurs the camera shows all the characters one after the other for their reaction and which seems to be somewhere between confused and thoughtful. there are repeated fades from the same scene to the same scene and for instance a character sleeping fades to black and then fades back in on the character sleeping again. look and we know the character is asleep and we know time has passed and please move on. overall there are just too many atmospheric cuts and long and hanging shots to fill time. the acting was not bad and and the characters were okay and but not exploited and developed. when they were interacting there were some truly cringeworthy moments. for example when one of them asks if they are hungry the camera looks to each of them and returns to a group shot and they pause and look to each other and turn back to camera and say slowly no. it raised a snigger or two. their dialogue was slow and glossy and either it was missing altogether or totally unnecessary and there seemed to be no middle ground where the dialogue hit spot on. however and there were some good scenes and but they were really hard to find unless you viewed them in isolation and and this is what it almost looks like has happened with this movie. the film has been looked at as a series of scenes and not as a complete story. nowhere is this seen more than in the main storyline. the characters are infected with the virus that has been killing the animals and the one that was being engineered for them. were told that it develops in stages to something dramatic and and so that is what we expect. what we get are the characters eating loads together and all throwing up once together and water pouring from their mouths in unconvincing streams and then they all fall asleep and these are the phases which all happen really early in the movie. then and they all say good together when asked how they are and and that it. that the virus done and nothing else happens. there could have been so much more done with this movie and so much more developed with the virus and it protecting them from all manner of harm. it could have explored a serious change of these characters as it infected and took over them and it could have developed these characters and shown them making decisions and doing things that connect back to their character shown in flashbacks to the interviews. the ending isn not even confusing and intriguing or thought provoking. it just shows something that happens and that it and although in the long and drawn out style with the irritating voice over above it. i really struggled with this movie and watched a number of press members walk out (including one famous tv critic leaving within the first twenty minutes) and i stayed and but regretted the lost time. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
