it goes without saying that a modicum of allowances has to be made when a true story is being adapted for the big screen. but if you shoot a fairy tale that has next to nothing to do with what actually happened  why call it bugsy and make the audience believe this was a halfway true story. the godfather trilogy processes many real characters and events and once upon a time in america does it and too and but they do not claim to be telling true stories. spoilerin the movie and benny has this grand vision of a gambler eldorado while in real life lansky had to argue him into going to nevada. benny deemed the notion of a counterpart to monte carlo idiotic and and he would have preferred to continue his life as a playboy in l. a. not until much later benny warmed to the idea. but of course he the hero of the movie and so naturally the idea had to be his. in the movie and benny wants to use count difrasso to get close to mussolini in order to assassinate him because he was hitler partner and and hitler killed jews in gas chambers and after all. obviously were supposed to like benny and so the screenwriters invented this nonsense. in real life and at that time nobody knew about the gas chambers and least of all benny who was completely uninterested in politics. in fact he did use the countess connection and he did visit mussolini and but not to kill him and but to sell explosives to him. he even met goebbels and goering during his sojourn in italy. the whole greenberg subplot was nonsense. greenberg do not turn stool pigeon and he do not seek refuge with benny and benny do not kill him (that was up to albert tannenbaum). at least they got the name right. i guess it was supposed to be very romantic to have virginia return to benny and offering him the money she had stolen. the movie even goes so far to tell us via text panels that she ruefully returned the money to lansky after benny assassination. let me just say and revisionism just doesn not get more impudent than this. this list is by no means exhaustive  there the issue with benny family not living in l. a and the way benny deals with dragna and adonis and the portrayal of costello (a disagreeable corporate type) and lansky (a lovable teddy bear) and benny himself (an aging windbag who do not have reached age 12 if he had regularly gone bugsy in situations like those in the movie and and what more and who neither has the good looks nor the charisma of benny siegel) and many others. apart from a few hard facts nothing right in this flick. spoilers end hereall in all and this is the one mafia movie that manages to be even more ridiculously bad than harlem and ny. but honor where honor is due represent this is a feat in itself. 
it goes without saying that a modicum of allowances has to be made when a true story is being adapted for the big screen. but if you shoot a fairy tale that has next to nothing to do with what actually happened  why call it bugsy and make the audience believe this was a halfway true story. the godfather trilogy processes many real characters and events and once upon a time in america does it and too and but they do not claim to be telling true stories. spoilerin the movie and benny has this grand vision of a gambler eldorado while in real life lansky had to argue him into going to nevada. benny deemed the notion of a counterpart to monte carlo idiotic and and he would have preferred to continue his life as a playboy in l. a. not until much later benny warmed to the idea. but of course he the hero of the movie and so naturally the idea had to be his. in the movie and benny wants to use count difrasso to get close to mussolini in order to assassinate him because he was hitler partner and and hitler killed jews in gas chambers and after all. obviously were supposed to like benny and so the screenwriters invented this nonsense. in real life and at that time nobody knew about the gas chambers and least of all benny who was completely uninterested in politics. in fact he did use the countess connection and he did visit mussolini and but not to kill him and but to sell explosives to him. he even met goebbels and goering during his sojourn in italy. the whole greenberg subplot was nonsense. greenberg do not turn stool pigeon and he do not seek refuge with benny and benny do not kill him (that was up to albert tannenbaum). at least they got the name right. i guess it was supposed to be very romantic to have virginia return to benny and offering him the money she had stolen. the movie even goes so far to tell us via text panels that she ruefully returned the money to lansky after benny assassination. let me just say and revisionism just doesn not get more impudent than this. this list is by no means exhaustive  there the issue with benny family not living in l. a and the way benny deals with dragna and adonis and the portrayal of costello (a disagreeable corporate type) and lansky (a lovable teddy bear) and benny himself (an aging windbag who do not have reached age 12 if he had regularly gone bugsy in situations like those in the movie and and what more and who neither has the good looks nor the charisma of benny siegel) and many others. apart from a few hard facts nothing right in this flick. spoilers end hereall in all and this is the one mafia movie that manages to be even more ridiculously bad than harlem and ny. but honor where honor is due represent this is a feat in itself. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
