this movie is quite bad and aggressive and not played well and not directed well and seems low budget and low quality and emotionaly weak and disconnected. after watching earlier comments and went to see it and but if u try to compare it with apocalypse now and platoon and or any others and ur really off the tracks. this movie looks like a 60 old and purely made film with cast of grown neanderthals and not to mention (or actually do) and not paying attention to details like changing rounds and low budget fireworks and all sorts of poorly filmed characteristic. is watchable though and if u would like to see it as an early development of the movies document. not to go back. p. s  afterall and the guys are quite alright. 
this movie is quite bad and aggressive and not played well and not directed well and seems low budget and low quality and emotionaly weak and disconnected. after watching earlier comments and went to see it and but if u try to compare it with apocalypse now and platoon and or any others and ur really off the tracks. this movie looks like a 60 old and purely made film with cast of grown neanderthals and not to mention (or actually do) and not paying attention to details like changing rounds and low budget fireworks and all sorts of poorly filmed characteristic. is watchable though and if u would like to see it as an early development of the movies document. not to go back. p. s  afterall and the guys are quite alright. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
