how on earth can people give this movie a low rating. unbelievable. the performances of wilkinson and watson are so full of merit that i can only imagine that these detractors were weaned on blockbusters and porn. (if this sounds bad tempered and it because i just wiped my original 400 worder just now) i was so impressed by tom wilkinson. all hail the guy. this is a performance of considerable subtlety and massive skill. his development as an actor from the full monty to this masterpiece of a performance is amazing while one of the best things to happen in film making in the last ten years. emily watson is somewhat less commanding and due to that glint in her eye that says ee me. this cheeky woman and here. you can not guess what i am going to do next because i do not know either. it seems to be something she can not help showing us in every role and but still and she an actor of terrific ability and presence. she is very sexy here and as she needs to be and and fair play to her for this represent this is a screen quality that normally and for me and she doesn not have in previous films. as you might expect and rupert everett and required to play an upper class late 30 something who could give tutorials at phd level in how not to give a toss about heading to hell on account of total selfishness and delivers. he is so thin here and throughout the movie and however and i am worried for him. linda bassett housekeeper is also excellent represent a smallish role but with a major plot twist to deliver and she makes you ponder how much talent we have in britain in terms of character acting. i want to see more of her. the narrative arc is fine while it an interesting enough plot and given that no one in film making seems to be trying to convince joe public that there nothing new under the sun and though it does stray towards 40s melodrama in the last reel. but never mind that  this is a terrific 80 minutes worth of anyone who has half a brain money. congrats to julian fellowes on his first directorial effort represent o how we need more films of substance like this. he shows a lot of skill in terms of adapting the original novel and telling a story with much effectiveness and subtlety. and congrats too on conjuring an immense display of the film actor art from mr tom wilkinson. what a geezer. t. 
how on earth can people give this movie a low rating. unbelievable. the performances of wilkinson and watson are so full of merit that i can only imagine that these detractors were weaned on blockbusters and porn. (if this sounds bad tempered and it because i just wiped my original 400 worder just now) i was so impressed by tom wilkinson. all hail the guy. this is a performance of considerable subtlety and massive skill. his development as an actor from the full monty to this masterpiece of a performance is amazing while one of the best things to happen in film making in the last ten years. emily watson is somewhat less commanding and due to that glint in her eye that says ee me. this cheeky woman and here. you can not guess what i am going to do next because i do not know either. it seems to be something she can not help showing us in every role and but still and she an actor of terrific ability and presence. she is very sexy here and as she needs to be and and fair play to her for this represent this is a screen quality that normally and for me and she doesn not have in previous films. as you might expect and rupert everett and required to play an upper class late 30 something who could give tutorials at phd level in how not to give a toss about heading to hell on account of total selfishness and delivers. he is so thin here and throughout the movie and however and i am worried for him. linda bassett housekeeper is also excellent represent a smallish role but with a major plot twist to deliver and she makes you ponder how much talent we have in britain in terms of character acting. i want to see more of her. the narrative arc is fine while it an interesting enough plot and given that no one in film making seems to be trying to convince joe public that there nothing new under the sun and though it does stray towards 40s melodrama in the last reel. but never mind that  this is a terrific 80 minutes worth of anyone who has half a brain money. congrats to julian fellowes on his first directorial effort represent o how we need more films of substance like this. he shows a lot of skill in terms of adapting the original novel and telling a story with much effectiveness and subtlety. and congrats too on conjuring an immense display of the film actor art from mr tom wilkinson. what a geezer. t. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
