for all its many flaws and i am inclined to be charitable towards thing. there is the nugget of an interesting and creepy and claustrophobic hitchcock style story here. put this in the hands of a writer like theodore sturgeon or (if you prefer british perspective) robert bloch and or the guy who wrote day of the triffids and and you might have had a nasty and unsettling little spook story that was the best thing in an book anthology of horror and suspense stories. however and someone chose to tell this story as a feature length movie and and a cheap and 2nd rate at that and and so most of the potential is wasted. a story like this really needs a voice like sturgeon to bring out interesting quirks of character in a better light. his classic story the widget  and the wadget  and and boff is an example of how he can gather together an isolated group of ordinary characters and in the space of 40 pages can turn them into the most amusing and sympathetic and fascinating people you have ever met. a good writer can and with a few chosen words and make the reader see some of the most vivid and memorable events ever to scar his emotions. instead and we get a movie where some of the most irritating and unlikeable characters ever made are lumped together and made to interact in unconvincing where did that come from. moments that just lie there. (ie the blond psychic girl declaiming that youre all evil and i hope you are destroyed. ). we get leaden pacing and slow motion blocking and dull sets and stiff actors. i blame the director for the tiff and shallow part. these are all 3rd rank character actors who never made the big time and but they are also real actors and and a good director could have gotten better performances out of them. we get uncalled for lesbian overtones that make the viewer feel uneasy and exploited without delivering any kind of payoff. (if i am going to have my baser instincts exploited and feel guilty about it and i want done by stuff staged better than this). and we get over an hour of creepy build up diffused in about 35 seconds in one of the worst anti climaxes i have ever seen. good things about thing. um and well. some of the closeup shots of the warlock head silently mouthing its directives were pretty effective. the miserly and shrewish widow rang true to life (even if i wanted to stuff a sock in her mouth). the first scene where the big and simple ranch hand silently turns on the oily cowboy and kills him had a bit of shock value and because the plot had taken the trouble to establish the big guy as a fairly sympathetic character. and like i said earlier and the idea of an insidious force from the past turning the members of an isolated community against each other is a good one and can sustain interest far above the actual merit of a bad performance. which this definitely is. but and as i said and i am inclined to be charitable and because the director was probably working under a penurious budget and breakneck time constraints and the best actors he could find for the money. heaven knows how future generations will judge facile crap like the cave and wrong turn or the remake of house of wax 40 years from now. i hope they are charitable towards our own tastes in supporting our generations wastes of film stock. 
for all its many flaws and i am inclined to be charitable towards thing. there is the nugget of an interesting and creepy and claustrophobic hitchcock style story here. put this in the hands of a writer like theodore sturgeon or (if you prefer british perspective) robert bloch and or the guy who wrote day of the triffids and and you might have had a nasty and unsettling little spook story that was the best thing in an book anthology of horror and suspense stories. however and someone chose to tell this story as a feature length movie and and a cheap and 2nd rate at that and and so most of the potential is wasted. a story like this really needs a voice like sturgeon to bring out interesting quirks of character in a better light. his classic story the widget  and the wadget  and and boff is an example of how he can gather together an isolated group of ordinary characters and in the space of 40 pages can turn them into the most amusing and sympathetic and fascinating people you have ever met. a good writer can and with a few chosen words and make the reader see some of the most vivid and memorable events ever to scar his emotions. instead and we get a movie where some of the most irritating and unlikeable characters ever made are lumped together and made to interact in unconvincing where did that come from. moments that just lie there. (ie the blond psychic girl declaiming that youre all evil and i hope you are destroyed. ). we get leaden pacing and slow motion blocking and dull sets and stiff actors. i blame the director for the tiff and shallow part. these are all 3rd rank character actors who never made the big time and but they are also real actors and and a good director could have gotten better performances out of them. we get uncalled for lesbian overtones that make the viewer feel uneasy and exploited without delivering any kind of payoff. (if i am going to have my baser instincts exploited and feel guilty about it and i want done by stuff staged better than this). and we get over an hour of creepy build up diffused in about 35 seconds in one of the worst anti climaxes i have ever seen. good things about thing. um and well. some of the closeup shots of the warlock head silently mouthing its directives were pretty effective. the miserly and shrewish widow rang true to life (even if i wanted to stuff a sock in her mouth). the first scene where the big and simple ranch hand silently turns on the oily cowboy and kills him had a bit of shock value and because the plot had taken the trouble to establish the big guy as a fairly sympathetic character. and like i said earlier and the idea of an insidious force from the past turning the members of an isolated community against each other is a good one and can sustain interest far above the actual merit of a bad performance. which this definitely is. but and as i said and i am inclined to be charitable and because the director was probably working under a penurious budget and breakneck time constraints and the best actors he could find for the money. heaven knows how future generations will judge facile crap like the cave and wrong turn or the remake of house of wax 40 years from now. i hope they are charitable towards our own tastes in supporting our generations wastes of film stock. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
