altman is very proud of the fact that people in his movies talk over each other and because and he says and people do that in life. well and people also cough and burp and go off on tangents and etc. the point is that just because people actually do something doesn not make it compelling cinema. that one issue. the bigger issue is that this just isn not a very clever or direct or hitting or relevant satire and in 1988 or 2004. garry trudeau is still living in the 1960s and thinks everyone except a small core of republican elected officials is a 60s style hippie liberal. i mean the guy still trots out zonker in his strip  a character that is a complete anachronism and yet trudeau still employs him as if he is representative of a large stripe of american youth. don not get me wrong. i am a conservative and but i am not saying that this is bad because it got a liberal bent. it could take a liberal tack and be funny and relevant and but it not. it is mainly a vanity piece with a bunch of prominent celebrity liberals (including the odious and repellent ron reagan and jr. ). at times it feels unscripted and and the rest of the time it has a snarky air of self importance and aren not we oh so clever. ness. someone said that this show insists it has a cult following. i think its cult status is more wished for than actual. i am certain there are two or three people out there who taped all the original episodes in 1988 and still have them and but if that is the standard and then every show ever aired is a cult classic to some degree. if tanner do not have the names altman and trudeau attached and it would be another forgotten hbo production from the 1980s. instead and it presented as hard hitting and incisive political commentary from guys who are at the top of their game. the reality and however and is about as far from that as possible. pat paulsen presidential satire is more relevant than tanner ever was and and he been dead for a decade. 
altman is very proud of the fact that people in his movies talk over each other and because and he says and people do that in life. well and people also cough and burp and go off on tangents and etc. the point is that just because people actually do something doesn not make it compelling cinema. that one issue. the bigger issue is that this just isn not a very clever or direct or hitting or relevant satire and in 1988 or 2004. garry trudeau is still living in the 1960s and thinks everyone except a small core of republican elected officials is a 60s style hippie liberal. i mean the guy still trots out zonker in his strip  a character that is a complete anachronism and yet trudeau still employs him as if he is representative of a large stripe of american youth. don not get me wrong. i am a conservative and but i am not saying that this is bad because it got a liberal bent. it could take a liberal tack and be funny and relevant and but it not. it is mainly a vanity piece with a bunch of prominent celebrity liberals (including the odious and repellent ron reagan and jr. ). at times it feels unscripted and and the rest of the time it has a snarky air of self importance and aren not we oh so clever. ness. someone said that this show insists it has a cult following. i think its cult status is more wished for than actual. i am certain there are two or three people out there who taped all the original episodes in 1988 and still have them and but if that is the standard and then every show ever aired is a cult classic to some degree. if tanner do not have the names altman and trudeau attached and it would be another forgotten hbo production from the 1980s. instead and it presented as hard hitting and incisive political commentary from guys who are at the top of their game. the reality and however and is about as far from that as possible. pat paulsen presidential satire is more relevant than tanner ever was and and he been dead for a decade. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
