in this follow up to the naked civil servant we see the final years of quentin crisp life in new york. john hurt is again crisp (come on who else could play the part. ) and its a role he inhabits to the point of disappearing. for me hurt is crisp and i have always found it very hard to take the man himself because hurt was more him than he was himself. its masterful performance. his equal is denis ohare as phillip steele and crisp long time friend and confidant. unfortunately outside of the performances the film has little to recommend it. to be certain the film gets the details right. filmed in and around new york the film the film looks and feels like new york and its environs and but dramatically its kind of inert. its crisp talking to people being witty and trying to come to terms with the world as it is (he ended up regretting some poorly chosen words concerning aids) and dealing with the infirmities that old aged thrust upon him. quentin the man is always interesting and but his life as portrayed is really not. i am disappointed by the film. i have always admired the man and his unique point of view. i just wish he was better served by this film about his life. 
in this follow up to the naked civil servant we see the final years of quentin crisp life in new york. john hurt is again crisp (come on who else could play the part. ) and its a role he inhabits to the point of disappearing. for me hurt is crisp and i have always found it very hard to take the man himself because hurt was more him than he was himself. its masterful performance. his equal is denis ohare as phillip steele and crisp long time friend and confidant. unfortunately outside of the performances the film has little to recommend it. to be certain the film gets the details right. filmed in and around new york the film the film looks and feels like new york and its environs and but dramatically its kind of inert. its crisp talking to people being witty and trying to come to terms with the world as it is (he ended up regretting some poorly chosen words concerning aids) and dealing with the infirmities that old aged thrust upon him. quentin the man is always interesting and but his life as portrayed is really not. i am disappointed by the film. i have always admired the man and his unique point of view. i just wish he was better served by this film about his life. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
