this is certainly a good film and beautifully photographed and evocatively acted. yet one should certainly criticize it and and mizoguchi and for it is not without flaws and weaknesses. mizoguchi really cared for women and and wanted to make statements on man lack of sympathy and total cruelty and yet he sometimes gets ahead of himself in trying to make this statement by adopting the wrong means. this is certainly a case in the crucified lovers and princess yang kwei fei and zankiku monogatari. he sets the scenario in feudal japan and which leaves the viewer at the end with the partially right exclamation represent boy and does feudalism suck and i am glad that it is over. and true and some of the scenarios such weaker films of mizoguchi present would be literary impossible today. also and his women characters sometimes become archetypes of unrealistic self sacrifice and which also simplifies the scenario less appealing. saying that and crucified lovers is a good film and with such few relative weaknesses and though the sometimes chilly and cynical prose by ueda and the screenwriter helps this film allot. i still highly prefer and recommend mizoguchi realistic and contemprary films of 1936 represent osaka elegy and sisters of the gion and as well as his late masterpieces and in which he showed more restraint and subtlety represent ugetsu and sansho dayu and and the life of oharu. 
this is certainly a good film and beautifully photographed and evocatively acted. yet one should certainly criticize it and and mizoguchi and for it is not without flaws and weaknesses. mizoguchi really cared for women and and wanted to make statements on man lack of sympathy and total cruelty and yet he sometimes gets ahead of himself in trying to make this statement by adopting the wrong means. this is certainly a case in the crucified lovers and princess yang kwei fei and zankiku monogatari. he sets the scenario in feudal japan and which leaves the viewer at the end with the partially right exclamation represent boy and does feudalism suck and i am glad that it is over. and true and some of the scenarios such weaker films of mizoguchi present would be literary impossible today. also and his women characters sometimes become archetypes of unrealistic self sacrifice and which also simplifies the scenario less appealing. saying that and crucified lovers is a good film and with such few relative weaknesses and though the sometimes chilly and cynical prose by ueda and the screenwriter helps this film allot. i still highly prefer and recommend mizoguchi realistic and contemprary films of 1936 represent osaka elegy and sisters of the gion and as well as his late masterpieces and in which he showed more restraint and subtlety represent ugetsu and sansho dayu and and the life of oharu. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
