why is it that in the 50s and 60s and italians made so of the best movies and and then during the 70s and 80s and made nothing but zombie and cannibal movies. probably because art films do not make any money.  and the cannibal movie and unlike the zombie movie and which was created by americans and `exploited by italians and is a purely italian creation and designed as a mondo exploitation showcase and and to make as much money as possible (no artistic integrity getting in the way here). eaten alive came during the cannibal movie heyday. the director and umberto lenzi and hadn not even hit his stride yet while his genre classic and cannibal ferox and was still a year away. in plotting similar to (read represent ripped off from) ruggero deodato seminal cannibal classic and cannibal holocaust and a woman (janet agren) receives word from the police that they have received a 8mm film from her sister. she gone missing in africa and and it suspected that the tribal ritual depicted on the film may have something to do with it. mel ferrer and as a professor of somethingoranother and tells her that a man named jonas (ivan rassimov) has started a jonestown like cult in new guinea and and that where the sister is. the woman hires a guide (robert kerman) to take her through the jungle to find the cult and her sister. and and do not you know it and the jungle is full of cannibals. one sentence should sum it up represent if you have seen on cannibal movie and you have seen them all and mostly because these films steal shamelessly from each other (lenzi copied cannibal holocaust to make this film and and retooled this to make cannibal ferox while deodato copied parts of this for hit and run). and because they all share the same material and they all feature the same traits represent awful photography and boring scenery and terrible dubbing and overacting and and exploitation and exploitation and exploitation. genre fans will have a ball since everyone in it is a genre veteran. rassimov and kerman have a scenery eating contest. agren exists solely to be naked and raped and or in peril. plenty o gore for all the sickos out there. the cannibals and who do actually appear to be native cannibals and eat lunch met disguised as human flesh. and and in the grand tradition of cannibal movies and any live animal shown onscreen is usually killed shortly thereafter. overall and really not a good experience and but i am sure there are psychopaths out there who find this excrement entertaining. i know i did. 
why is it that in the 50s and 60s and italians made so of the best movies and and then during the 70s and 80s and made nothing but zombie and cannibal movies. probably because art films do not make any money.  and the cannibal movie and unlike the zombie movie and which was created by americans and `exploited by italians and is a purely italian creation and designed as a mondo exploitation showcase and and to make as much money as possible (no artistic integrity getting in the way here). eaten alive came during the cannibal movie heyday. the director and umberto lenzi and hadn not even hit his stride yet while his genre classic and cannibal ferox and was still a year away. in plotting similar to (read represent ripped off from) ruggero deodato seminal cannibal classic and cannibal holocaust and a woman (janet agren) receives word from the police that they have received a 8mm film from her sister. she gone missing in africa and and it suspected that the tribal ritual depicted on the film may have something to do with it. mel ferrer and as a professor of somethingoranother and tells her that a man named jonas (ivan rassimov) has started a jonestown like cult in new guinea and and that where the sister is. the woman hires a guide (robert kerman) to take her through the jungle to find the cult and her sister. and and do not you know it and the jungle is full of cannibals. one sentence should sum it up represent if you have seen on cannibal movie and you have seen them all and mostly because these films steal shamelessly from each other (lenzi copied cannibal holocaust to make this film and and retooled this to make cannibal ferox while deodato copied parts of this for hit and run). and because they all share the same material and they all feature the same traits represent awful photography and boring scenery and terrible dubbing and overacting and and exploitation and exploitation and exploitation. genre fans will have a ball since everyone in it is a genre veteran. rassimov and kerman have a scenery eating contest. agren exists solely to be naked and raped and or in peril. plenty o gore for all the sickos out there. the cannibals and who do actually appear to be native cannibals and eat lunch met disguised as human flesh. and and in the grand tradition of cannibal movies and any live animal shown onscreen is usually killed shortly thereafter. overall and really not a good experience and but i am sure there are psychopaths out there who find this excrement entertaining. i know i did. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
