i do not know why imdb lists all the ghoulies films as theatrical releases. they were all straight to video films. same with the puppet master series. why hasn not anyone noticed this yet. right and somehow you have stumbled across ghoulies iv and probably raiding through an old abandoned video rental store from 1993. you looked in the discount section and found this. look at the back and front covers. what do you expect and the shawshank redemption. there is no need to review this film so critically. it is the fourth ghoulies film. i bought it on dvd for 6. 50 because. it was 6. 50. i knew it wasn not kubrick material. and i was right. an unremastered dvd with no extras and not even a trailer and boasts an uncared for film. it actually contains the star of the first ghoulies film and peter liapis. who really do not get many big roles apart from those two films. and i do not see why. he not too bad an actor and is pretty fun. but i guess if youre gonna take a lead role in the ghoulies films and scorsese and tarantino will lose interest. also present is his idiot sidekick bobby di cocco and who despite having a very small resemblance to al pacino (very small) and retains none of his acting ability. a complete idiot who just awkward to watch. then there stacie randall  obviously a porn star and i do not need to look that up. she does look quite sexy and though her costume and her character and everything she does drags down the films credibility and which is no easy task for such a film. then there is the ghoulies themselves. who also manage to let us down. ghoulies iii made them start talking and mistake no. 1 and but ghoulies iv takes it a step further. instead of being puppets and this time the ghoulies are in fact kids in costumes. the filmmakers decided to run that extra mile to insult the films viewers. also and there only two of them and and theyre not the main highlight of the film and as they do not appear in a lot of it. however and at times they are mildly amusing. and theyre not evil this time either. this really is hilariously bad stuff and it amazing that i was actually able to enjoy it. i dunno why. some of the black humour is actually funny and though the script is mostly effortless. imagine satan only threat to you being that he will kill you and slowly. painfully. but at least full moon had no involvement this time. did they. yeah and a very bad and cheaply made film with 0 production value and but not so bad as to be in the ranks of puppet master half  and lawnmower man 2 and surviving christmas or even ghoulies iii. 
i do not know why imdb lists all the ghoulies films as theatrical releases. they were all straight to video films. same with the puppet master series. why hasn not anyone noticed this yet. right and somehow you have stumbled across ghoulies iv and probably raiding through an old abandoned video rental store from 1993. you looked in the discount section and found this. look at the back and front covers. what do you expect and the shawshank redemption. there is no need to review this film so critically. it is the fourth ghoulies film. i bought it on dvd for 6. 50 because. it was 6. 50. i knew it wasn not kubrick material. and i was right. an unremastered dvd with no extras and not even a trailer and boasts an uncared for film. it actually contains the star of the first ghoulies film and peter liapis. who really do not get many big roles apart from those two films. and i do not see why. he not too bad an actor and is pretty fun. but i guess if youre gonna take a lead role in the ghoulies films and scorsese and tarantino will lose interest. also present is his idiot sidekick bobby di cocco and who despite having a very small resemblance to al pacino (very small) and retains none of his acting ability. a complete idiot who just awkward to watch. then there stacie randall  obviously a porn star and i do not need to look that up. she does look quite sexy and though her costume and her character and everything she does drags down the films credibility and which is no easy task for such a film. then there is the ghoulies themselves. who also manage to let us down. ghoulies iii made them start talking and mistake no. 1 and but ghoulies iv takes it a step further. instead of being puppets and this time the ghoulies are in fact kids in costumes. the filmmakers decided to run that extra mile to insult the films viewers. also and there only two of them and and theyre not the main highlight of the film and as they do not appear in a lot of it. however and at times they are mildly amusing. and theyre not evil this time either. this really is hilariously bad stuff and it amazing that i was actually able to enjoy it. i dunno why. some of the black humour is actually funny and though the script is mostly effortless. imagine satan only threat to you being that he will kill you and slowly. painfully. but at least full moon had no involvement this time. did they. yeah and a very bad and cheaply made film with 0 production value and but not so bad as to be in the ranks of puppet master half  and lawnmower man 2 and surviving christmas or even ghoulies iii. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
