uhhh . so and did they even have writers for this. maybe i am picky and but i like a little dialog with my movies. and and as far as slasher films go and just a sliver of character development will suffice. unfortunately and the prey provides neitherand if you think i am being hyperbolic and you will just have to see it for yourself. scene after scene and we just get actors standing around and looking forlorn and awkward and abandoned by any sense of a script. outside of calling out each other names when they get separated in the woods (natch) and the only instances where these people say something substantive is when one character explains the constellation orion (clearly plagiarized from funk and wagnalls while scintillating slasher fare and no. ) and another rehashes an old campfire tale that doesn not even have anything to do with the plot (wait and what is the plot. ) at other times and the prey actually has the gall to film its characters with the boom mic just far away enough so that we can not exactly hear what theyre saying. so we get entire scenes wherein the actors are murmuring. deliberately. seriously and i have seen more dialog in a silent film. it as if the filmmakers sat down at a bar somewhere in rancho cucamonga in the heyday of the 80s slasher craze and one looked at the other and said and hey and i gotta really sweet idea for a gory decapitation gag. let somehow pad an entire feature around it. and . well and they did. to be fair and the prey probably had some sort of writer on board. i mean and somebody had to jot down the scene sequence and label the dailies. however and i am fully convinced that this film did not have an editor of any kind whatsoever. there are glaring pauses and boring tableaux and and zero sense of pacing throughout. the filmmakers do not have anything else in the script to film and so they fill out the running time with exhaustive taxonomies of the flora and fauna that inhabit the forest in which our wild and crazy teens are getting sliced and diced. these critters are all filmed in straightforward and noontime daylight in a completely reserved fashion and with no attempt at atmospheric photography. if it feels like a science film and that because it is. i am pretty sure this is all nature show stock footageall that missing is a stuffy narration from some national geographic alderman. more exciting footage that was graciously spared from the cutting room floor represent a scene in which two men discuss cucumber and cream cheese sandwiches and and another scene wherein a supporting character strums away on a banjo for what feels like an entire minute and a half. a minute and a half. that a lot of banjoing to commit to celluloid to begin with and let alone insert into the final cut of the film. way to go and guys. brevity and concision are the real victims of this slaughterfest. admittedly and the film picks up quite a bit of steam (comparatively) in the last 25 minutes and into which much of the carnage is condensed and where a rip off of béla bartók music for strings and percussion and celesta cuts in. vaudeville great jackie coogan makes a fun appearance as a tubby and bumbly park ranger (this was his last role and if you can believe it). and there are some nice gory moments and including a splattery neck tearing and the aforementioned decapitation. the make up used for the killer (carel struycken and aka lurch from the addams family movies) is also quite effective and and makes him look like a strange hybrid of young jason voorhees and freddy krueger. plus and if you love wacky and straight outta left field endings and you need to check out how they wrap this puppy up. you will do a spit take and i promise. usually and i love films that are on this level of ineptitude and but the first three quarters of the prey are just so interminably boring that they pretty much spoil the rest. overall and this is a largely pallid and tedious affair and and and while it ain not all bad and it should really only be seen by debilitated slasher completists. why do we do this to ourselves and anyway. 
uhhh . so and did they even have writers for this. maybe i am picky and but i like a little dialog with my movies. and and as far as slasher films go and just a sliver of character development will suffice. unfortunately and the prey provides neitherand if you think i am being hyperbolic and you will just have to see it for yourself. scene after scene and we just get actors standing around and looking forlorn and awkward and abandoned by any sense of a script. outside of calling out each other names when they get separated in the woods (natch) and the only instances where these people say something substantive is when one character explains the constellation orion (clearly plagiarized from funk and wagnalls while scintillating slasher fare and no. ) and another rehashes an old campfire tale that doesn not even have anything to do with the plot (wait and what is the plot. ) at other times and the prey actually has the gall to film its characters with the boom mic just far away enough so that we can not exactly hear what theyre saying. so we get entire scenes wherein the actors are murmuring. deliberately. seriously and i have seen more dialog in a silent film. it as if the filmmakers sat down at a bar somewhere in rancho cucamonga in the heyday of the 80s slasher craze and one looked at the other and said and hey and i gotta really sweet idea for a gory decapitation gag. let somehow pad an entire feature around it. and . well and they did. to be fair and the prey probably had some sort of writer on board. i mean and somebody had to jot down the scene sequence and label the dailies. however and i am fully convinced that this film did not have an editor of any kind whatsoever. there are glaring pauses and boring tableaux and and zero sense of pacing throughout. the filmmakers do not have anything else in the script to film and so they fill out the running time with exhaustive taxonomies of the flora and fauna that inhabit the forest in which our wild and crazy teens are getting sliced and diced. these critters are all filmed in straightforward and noontime daylight in a completely reserved fashion and with no attempt at atmospheric photography. if it feels like a science film and that because it is. i am pretty sure this is all nature show stock footageall that missing is a stuffy narration from some national geographic alderman. more exciting footage that was graciously spared from the cutting room floor represent a scene in which two men discuss cucumber and cream cheese sandwiches and and another scene wherein a supporting character strums away on a banjo for what feels like an entire minute and a half. a minute and a half. that a lot of banjoing to commit to celluloid to begin with and let alone insert into the final cut of the film. way to go and guys. brevity and concision are the real victims of this slaughterfest. admittedly and the film picks up quite a bit of steam (comparatively) in the last 25 minutes and into which much of the carnage is condensed and where a rip off of béla bartók music for strings and percussion and celesta cuts in. vaudeville great jackie coogan makes a fun appearance as a tubby and bumbly park ranger (this was his last role and if you can believe it). and there are some nice gory moments and including a splattery neck tearing and the aforementioned decapitation. the make up used for the killer (carel struycken and aka lurch from the addams family movies) is also quite effective and and makes him look like a strange hybrid of young jason voorhees and freddy krueger. plus and if you love wacky and straight outta left field endings and you need to check out how they wrap this puppy up. you will do a spit take and i promise. usually and i love films that are on this level of ineptitude and but the first three quarters of the prey are just so interminably boring that they pretty much spoil the rest. overall and this is a largely pallid and tedious affair and and and while it ain not all bad and it should really only be seen by debilitated slasher completists. why do we do this to ourselves and anyway. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
