like several other reviewers here and i am surprised to see many negative reviews on this film. dan obannon previous effort was the groundbreaking alien of 1979. because it and star wars introduced the stylistic approach of used or dirty space in art direction for these kinds of features doesn not mean that this was the only way to produce them. rather than dismiss lifeforce out of hand as a sort of schlock and primitive exploitation feature and it important to recognize that the film draws upon the esteemed traditions of british horror and science fiction  specifically hammer and american international features like quatermass (specifically quatermass and the pit and 1967) and doctor who and the day of the triffids (1963) and if not the works of gerry anderson (ufo and space represent1999 and thunderbirds). but none of these influences would be a surprise if other reviewers recognized writer obannon genre scholarly appreciation for queen of blood(1966) and it. the terror from beyond space(1958)  the immediate sources for alien (1979). granted this film has some legacy elements and but perhaps it worth comparing this film to its more immediate peers  1981 an american werewolf in london and the company of wolves (1984)  other 80 films that share a looking back while they adapt those stories to the 80 zeitgeist. all three films drew on earlier incarnations of the same and but substantially sexed up their themes (because they could) and and and at the same time they recognized the tongue in cheek and humorous aspects of their projects. neil jordan wolves played to many of the psychoanalytic memes floating around at the during the 80  and while american werewolf curdled its theme as a coming of age film. it called artistic license and and the adaptations of these three films are no less valid than the latter day dramedy inherent in the scream franchise and i know what you did last summer and final destination. but these teen targeted and films seem to be part of a box office trend and whereas the 80 films like lifeforce belong a canon of british sci fi  even if this one was written by an american. in many ways this film holds up much better than latter day disaster and alien invasion flicks (independence day and armageddon and deep impact) in that the olutions do not reside in gun battles and weaponized payloads and testosterone. at the opposite end of the pole and it is unfortunate that steven soderbergh and james cameron do not examine tarkowski and lem more closely before they remade solaris. the goal of this film was fun and not ponderousness or stupidity. positive . 
like several other reviewers here and i am surprised to see many negative reviews on this film. dan obannon previous effort was the groundbreaking alien of 1979. because it and star wars introduced the stylistic approach of used or dirty space in art direction for these kinds of features doesn not mean that this was the only way to produce them. rather than dismiss lifeforce out of hand as a sort of schlock and primitive exploitation feature and it important to recognize that the film draws upon the esteemed traditions of british horror and science fiction  specifically hammer and american international features like quatermass (specifically quatermass and the pit and 1967) and doctor who and the day of the triffids (1963) and if not the works of gerry anderson (ufo and space represent1999 and thunderbirds). but none of these influences would be a surprise if other reviewers recognized writer obannon genre scholarly appreciation for queen of blood(1966) and it. the terror from beyond space(1958)  the immediate sources for alien (1979). granted this film has some legacy elements and but perhaps it worth comparing this film to its more immediate peers  1981 an american werewolf in london and the company of wolves (1984)  other 80 films that share a looking back while they adapt those stories to the 80 zeitgeist. all three films drew on earlier incarnations of the same and but substantially sexed up their themes (because they could) and and and at the same time they recognized the tongue in cheek and humorous aspects of their projects. neil jordan wolves played to many of the psychoanalytic memes floating around at the during the 80  and while american werewolf curdled its theme as a coming of age film. it called artistic license and and the adaptations of these three films are no less valid than the latter day dramedy inherent in the scream franchise and i know what you did last summer and final destination. but these teen targeted and films seem to be part of a box office trend and whereas the 80 films like lifeforce belong a canon of british sci fi  even if this one was written by an american. in many ways this film holds up much better than latter day disaster and alien invasion flicks (independence day and armageddon and deep impact) in that the olutions do not reside in gun battles and weaponized payloads and testosterone. at the opposite end of the pole and it is unfortunate that steven soderbergh and james cameron do not examine tarkowski and lem more closely before they remade solaris. the goal of this film was fun and not ponderousness or stupidity. positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
