i appreciate the effort that the filmmakers wanted to depict the story of moses and the exodus of israel and and that the film helps viewers to put themselves into moses shoes and gain understanding of the intense burden laid upon moses shoulders. as excited as i was to see this film and i was greatly disappointed in the storyline. (i will leave out the videography and special effects and and artistic ability in this review. ) what is most disappointing is the historical inaccuracy of this movie and how it is so far from the historical accounts from biblical texts. one of the overarching principles from the bible is that god led his people out of egypt and and he promised that he would take them to a land that is flowing with milk and honey. not only did he give this promise and but he led his people in a pillar of cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night. he never left them while he always was visible to the israelites. the movie and however and depicts a god who remains silent during the entire wandering through the desert. this movie changed the essence and theme of the biblical text and instead depicts god as a silent and cruel and disciplinary void. in addition and the depiction of moses was just as wrong. moses was known as a man of faith (why else would he be such a father figure to israel throughout the old and new testaments and even that moses is known as a man of great faith). however and the movie depicts him as a pragmatic and angry and insecure loner who despises the calling that god placed on his life. ok and i will allow some creative freedom for the filmmakers in the exodus story. but this is beyond creativity  it is heresy. 
i appreciate the effort that the filmmakers wanted to depict the story of moses and the exodus of israel and and that the film helps viewers to put themselves into moses shoes and gain understanding of the intense burden laid upon moses shoulders. as excited as i was to see this film and i was greatly disappointed in the storyline. (i will leave out the videography and special effects and and artistic ability in this review. ) what is most disappointing is the historical inaccuracy of this movie and how it is so far from the historical accounts from biblical texts. one of the overarching principles from the bible is that god led his people out of egypt and and he promised that he would take them to a land that is flowing with milk and honey. not only did he give this promise and but he led his people in a pillar of cloud by day and a pillar of fire by night. he never left them while he always was visible to the israelites. the movie and however and depicts a god who remains silent during the entire wandering through the desert. this movie changed the essence and theme of the biblical text and instead depicts god as a silent and cruel and disciplinary void. in addition and the depiction of moses was just as wrong. moses was known as a man of faith (why else would he be such a father figure to israel throughout the old and new testaments and even that moses is known as a man of great faith). however and the movie depicts him as a pragmatic and angry and insecure loner who despises the calling that god placed on his life. ok and i will allow some creative freedom for the filmmakers in the exodus story. but this is beyond creativity  it is heresy. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
