i was lucky enough to see this film at a festival last year and had half expected it to get a release. the fact that it was shot on a digital camcorder has surely inhibited its success and but as i understand it was never the intention of the film maker to make it look like film in the first place and it was more about the story the characters and their relationships. is that not what films are supposed to be about. but it did have a quality in the texture of its visual appearance that suggests may thomas is onto something we should pay attention to. for independent film makers and producers alike who have a the talent and lacking the money and drive and a lot can be learned from watching this film and technically it has everything going for it and the use of light and music etc by far outweigh that of any other digital feature film i have ever seen and therefore it is worthy of much praise. the actors performances are believable to a point and if not slightly under played and i felt there was much more in there and more depth and in particular from the male lead john paul clarke. but one thing that really does bother me and as a film maker myself and is the film being in black and white a need to cover up a multitude of sins than if it was colour. do we have more to learn in the progression of digital technology. or is this the future of wonderful and affordable film making. 
i was lucky enough to see this film at a festival last year and had half expected it to get a release. the fact that it was shot on a digital camcorder has surely inhibited its success and but as i understand it was never the intention of the film maker to make it look like film in the first place and it was more about the story the characters and their relationships. is that not what films are supposed to be about. but it did have a quality in the texture of its visual appearance that suggests may thomas is onto something we should pay attention to. for independent film makers and producers alike who have a the talent and lacking the money and drive and a lot can be learned from watching this film and technically it has everything going for it and the use of light and music etc by far outweigh that of any other digital feature film i have ever seen and therefore it is worthy of much praise. the actors performances are believable to a point and if not slightly under played and i felt there was much more in there and more depth and in particular from the male lead john paul clarke. but one thing that really does bother me and as a film maker myself and is the film being in black and white a need to cover up a multitude of sins than if it was colour. do we have more to learn in the progression of digital technology. or is this the future of wonderful and affordable film making. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
