what a cast. and what a waste of it. seriously and when a movie has gabriel byrne and jamie foxx and thandie newton and stuart townsend and hal holbrook and melanie griffith and sylvester stallone in it you would expect some quality. the movie is however one big mess with a unlikely story that can not seem to stop putting twist and turns in it. yeah and i think that they thought they were really being clever with all of it. the story is not only messy and unlikely and it also isn not exactly terribly original. it uses elements from earlier and much better poker game based movies. but to me it were really the many pointless twist and turns in the movie that did it. it made the story such an unlikely one to watch. on top of that the script remains filled with a lot of holes silly poker game errors and things that just do not make an awful lot of sense. why would any one above all things want to play against a card player that is known as the best cheater in the game. this is what the movie is about and builds up to but just do not ever made a lot of sense to me. despite that the movie has a great cast and it still feels as if most actors were miscast in their roles. i do not know what it is about stuart townsend. he is a good actor but in most roles he plays he always feels out of place. perhaps it are his looks and i do not known. this basically also was the reason why he got replaced in the lord of the rings represent the fellowship of the ring. also thandie newton isn not much good and actually quite annoying in her trong female role. and what was the point of having melanie griffith in this. oh and i guess i could go on about the movie its casting and could complaining even some more about the way too limited screen time the jamie foxx character gets but i guess you get my point by now. damian nieman just isn not much of an original writer or director and on top of that he also doesn not handle his own material very well. scenes often feel disjointed and it tries to put in way too many characters and everything about the movie is shallow and in a way predictable. on top of that the movie features some bad editing at times and which also doesn not help to make this movie look like one seamless whole. the movie was also one major box office bomb and no wonder that damian nieman hasn not made a movie ever since. a too big mess to make you enjoy this movie. negative . 
what a cast. and what a waste of it. seriously and when a movie has gabriel byrne and jamie foxx and thandie newton and stuart townsend and hal holbrook and melanie griffith and sylvester stallone in it you would expect some quality. the movie is however one big mess with a unlikely story that can not seem to stop putting twist and turns in it. yeah and i think that they thought they were really being clever with all of it. the story is not only messy and unlikely and it also isn not exactly terribly original. it uses elements from earlier and much better poker game based movies. but to me it were really the many pointless twist and turns in the movie that did it. it made the story such an unlikely one to watch. on top of that the script remains filled with a lot of holes silly poker game errors and things that just do not make an awful lot of sense. why would any one above all things want to play against a card player that is known as the best cheater in the game. this is what the movie is about and builds up to but just do not ever made a lot of sense to me. despite that the movie has a great cast and it still feels as if most actors were miscast in their roles. i do not know what it is about stuart townsend. he is a good actor but in most roles he plays he always feels out of place. perhaps it are his looks and i do not known. this basically also was the reason why he got replaced in the lord of the rings represent the fellowship of the ring. also thandie newton isn not much good and actually quite annoying in her trong female role. and what was the point of having melanie griffith in this. oh and i guess i could go on about the movie its casting and could complaining even some more about the way too limited screen time the jamie foxx character gets but i guess you get my point by now. damian nieman just isn not much of an original writer or director and on top of that he also doesn not handle his own material very well. scenes often feel disjointed and it tries to put in way too many characters and everything about the movie is shallow and in a way predictable. on top of that the movie features some bad editing at times and which also doesn not help to make this movie look like one seamless whole. the movie was also one major box office bomb and no wonder that damian nieman hasn not made a movie ever since. a too big mess to make you enjoy this movie. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
