i was a junior in high school when flesh hit the big screens and but had the good fortune to see it at midnight movie houses in nyc just two years later. flesh is the first part of a so called trilogy of films and featuring joe dallesandro and as an object of desire. it bears the warhol name and but is more the work of paul morissey. essentially the story concerns itself with the exploits surrounding one day in the life of a street wise male hustler (played by joe dallesandro). joe is young and beautiful and and a bit naive. but he manages to bring home the bacon to his wife and for reasons which should not be explained to appreciate the film fully. of special note to film buffs is that this film (along with the remaining two of the trilogy) and had no script and per se. warhol superstars were given simply a premise. and the words and actions which the viewer sees are quite natural (even at times ridiculous or non sensical). but all in all it works. rolling stone noted in its review that the film was better than midnight cowboy and a film of the same year and more polished by hollywood (an academy award winner for best film)  and with big name talent (i equally admire the film). but flesh and being improvised and was somehow more gut wrenching and realistic and without the need for complex sub plots and any cause de celebre . or for that matter any cause at all. the film grossed more than $3 million dollars and was an absolute sensation and particularly in the german market (which and ironically and thought they were given a censored version of the film because of the post editing. see note below). curiously and the film is very much cut and paste with pops. clicks and flashes and and dialogue literally cut off mid sentence. it is almost as if warhol or morissey are stating a simple truth that it is a day in the life of a superstar and snippets for your voyeuristic tendencies. far better than earlier warhol works of 8 hours of sleeping and and the statue of liberty as a 20 plus hour movie. flesh and in my opinion and is the first of the warhol films that actually is digestible (given a wide pallette) and warhol or the factory first legitimate response to the hollywood phenomenon of stardom. as the first of a trilogy and it portrays a young and desirable male icon and naive and sought after and responding to invitations to please his family. subsequent films would show the same character with a differing set of values. (see trash and heat). 
i was a junior in high school when flesh hit the big screens and but had the good fortune to see it at midnight movie houses in nyc just two years later. flesh is the first part of a so called trilogy of films and featuring joe dallesandro and as an object of desire. it bears the warhol name and but is more the work of paul morissey. essentially the story concerns itself with the exploits surrounding one day in the life of a street wise male hustler (played by joe dallesandro). joe is young and beautiful and and a bit naive. but he manages to bring home the bacon to his wife and for reasons which should not be explained to appreciate the film fully. of special note to film buffs is that this film (along with the remaining two of the trilogy) and had no script and per se. warhol superstars were given simply a premise. and the words and actions which the viewer sees are quite natural (even at times ridiculous or non sensical). but all in all it works. rolling stone noted in its review that the film was better than midnight cowboy and a film of the same year and more polished by hollywood (an academy award winner for best film)  and with big name talent (i equally admire the film). but flesh and being improvised and was somehow more gut wrenching and realistic and without the need for complex sub plots and any cause de celebre . or for that matter any cause at all. the film grossed more than $3 million dollars and was an absolute sensation and particularly in the german market (which and ironically and thought they were given a censored version of the film because of the post editing. see note below). curiously and the film is very much cut and paste with pops. clicks and flashes and and dialogue literally cut off mid sentence. it is almost as if warhol or morissey are stating a simple truth that it is a day in the life of a superstar and snippets for your voyeuristic tendencies. far better than earlier warhol works of 8 hours of sleeping and and the statue of liberty as a 20 plus hour movie. flesh and in my opinion and is the first of the warhol films that actually is digestible (given a wide pallette) and warhol or the factory first legitimate response to the hollywood phenomenon of stardom. as the first of a trilogy and it portrays a young and desirable male icon and naive and sought after and responding to invitations to please his family. subsequent films would show the same character with a differing set of values. (see trash and heat). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
