plunkett and macleane are two highwaymen that rob from the rich in order to give to . well and the rich while comparatively and they are the rich. but we know theyre the good guys because the chap behind the forces of law and order and a mr. chance and is just so evil. he rapes women  or tries to. he beats up his underlings. he commits murder. he has bad breath. he doesn not shave properly. he has no fashion sense. he tortures puppy dogs. that last one is just an inference of mine represent we do not actually see him torture puppy dogs. but i am sure he does. little of chance villainy has much to do with his pursuit of plunkett and macleane. it just something he does in his spare time and a kind of a hobby he takes up to make absolutely certain that we do not like him. he needn not have tried so hard. no one in this film is likeable. let take stock. appealing characters. there aren not any represent i believe we have covered that. swashbuckling. not a swash. instead we have a kind of grimy heavy breathing. dash. sparkle. vigour. all gone the way of swashbuckling and i am afraid. realism. none of that and either. i think they were trying for realism and since everyone was so filthy and but the characters and action had all the plausibility of errol flynn  with no sense of exhilaration to back them up. beauty. nope. fine camera work. for a tv crew and perhaps. humour. you might giggle once or twice if youre in a benevolent mood. then again and you might not. dialogue. see `humour and above. music. don not even get me started on the music. the music in `ladyhawk was and by comparison and uncannily apt while and at least the misguided aesthetic of that score was a consistent one. ugh. i apologise to `ladyhawk for even thinking about it in this context. to sum up represent there much positive badness here and nothing good  unless you count liv tyler and which i am in two minds about doing. i feel as though i have just written a review of the pox. `not very good and the review says. it would be much more interesting if i could somehow defend the pox and to claim that critics of the pox have got it all wrong  but i do not know how i would go about doing that. 
plunkett and macleane are two highwaymen that rob from the rich in order to give to . well and the rich while comparatively and they are the rich. but we know theyre the good guys because the chap behind the forces of law and order and a mr. chance and is just so evil. he rapes women  or tries to. he beats up his underlings. he commits murder. he has bad breath. he doesn not shave properly. he has no fashion sense. he tortures puppy dogs. that last one is just an inference of mine represent we do not actually see him torture puppy dogs. but i am sure he does. little of chance villainy has much to do with his pursuit of plunkett and macleane. it just something he does in his spare time and a kind of a hobby he takes up to make absolutely certain that we do not like him. he needn not have tried so hard. no one in this film is likeable. let take stock. appealing characters. there aren not any represent i believe we have covered that. swashbuckling. not a swash. instead we have a kind of grimy heavy breathing. dash. sparkle. vigour. all gone the way of swashbuckling and i am afraid. realism. none of that and either. i think they were trying for realism and since everyone was so filthy and but the characters and action had all the plausibility of errol flynn  with no sense of exhilaration to back them up. beauty. nope. fine camera work. for a tv crew and perhaps. humour. you might giggle once or twice if youre in a benevolent mood. then again and you might not. dialogue. see `humour and above. music. don not even get me started on the music. the music in `ladyhawk was and by comparison and uncannily apt while and at least the misguided aesthetic of that score was a consistent one. ugh. i apologise to `ladyhawk for even thinking about it in this context. to sum up represent there much positive badness here and nothing good  unless you count liv tyler and which i am in two minds about doing. i feel as though i have just written a review of the pox. `not very good and the review says. it would be much more interesting if i could somehow defend the pox and to claim that critics of the pox have got it all wrong  but i do not know how i would go about doing that. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
