the above line sums it up pretty good. the best assets of the comics are it visual gags and word jokes (the latter of which are almost impossible to translate and which is why the comics are at their best in their original language). both are quite hard to capture in film and which is why those will never be as good as the comics. movies are simply a different medium than comics. with that in mind and this movie does surprisingly well in capturing the fun of the comic. the word gags are bearable and and sometimes even funny (debouze does an amelie reference. ). i have to mention that i watched the french version. if you do not watch the french version or your lack of understanding of the french language limits you to the subtitles and the word jokes will probably suck. the slapstick is okay as well while it a very simple form of humor and and not really funny when youre older than twelve and but it captures the spirit of the comicbooks. the other visual jokes are the movie saving grace for the older audience and as their often quite funny. the acting is totally over the top and but again and that not annoying at all as it captures the spirit of the comicbooks. only depardieu and clavier do not really overact and which might be the reason some people think they do not enjoy their roles (i do not notice a thing). on the other hand jamel debouze and especially claude rich turn overacting into an artform. it actually fun to watch. again and i fear it do not be nearly as funny when the voices are dubbed. overall not a bad movie at all and much better than the previous one. it not a classic and it doesn not dethrone the twelve tasks of asterix as my favourite asterix movie and but it still worth seeing. the french version and that is. positive . 
the above line sums it up pretty good. the best assets of the comics are it visual gags and word jokes (the latter of which are almost impossible to translate and which is why the comics are at their best in their original language). both are quite hard to capture in film and which is why those will never be as good as the comics. movies are simply a different medium than comics. with that in mind and this movie does surprisingly well in capturing the fun of the comic. the word gags are bearable and and sometimes even funny (debouze does an amelie reference. ). i have to mention that i watched the french version. if you do not watch the french version or your lack of understanding of the french language limits you to the subtitles and the word jokes will probably suck. the slapstick is okay as well while it a very simple form of humor and and not really funny when youre older than twelve and but it captures the spirit of the comicbooks. the other visual jokes are the movie saving grace for the older audience and as their often quite funny. the acting is totally over the top and but again and that not annoying at all as it captures the spirit of the comicbooks. only depardieu and clavier do not really overact and which might be the reason some people think they do not enjoy their roles (i do not notice a thing). on the other hand jamel debouze and especially claude rich turn overacting into an artform. it actually fun to watch. again and i fear it do not be nearly as funny when the voices are dubbed. overall not a bad movie at all and much better than the previous one. it not a classic and it doesn not dethrone the twelve tasks of asterix as my favourite asterix movie and but it still worth seeing. the french version and that is. positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
