it takes an eternity for this typically over simplistic and idiotic stephen king based film to finally get out of the starting blocks. about half an hour is spent on needless introductions to various boring characters and their irrelevant little personal problems that might excite bored housewives and apathetic pensioners in soapy dramas and but this is supposed to be the horror genre (or so i naively thought). the mutt fails to look all that fearsome and which leonard maltin and the notoriously clueless or hopeless and always grinning film critic and would disagree with represent he considers cujo to be genuinely frightening. (i often do have to wonder if maltin is genuinely thick  or merely likes to do favors for his hollywood friends. ) it both illogical and inconsistent the way wallace survives an attack with only a leg injury. and and naturally and her car breaks down just when she needs it to save her life represent this is one of the oldest horror film clichés while trust king to use it to minimum effect. the premise is imbecilic and too banal and even for a horror film represent a rabid mutt attacks a family. is that it. this sort of thing barely constitutes a 3 minute sub sub plot in your average zombie film. i think even cujo must have sensed that he was starring in a turkey. mutts have terrible agents. but what i really do not understand is how people can actually throw themselves at the cujo book and read it from cover to cover. these sk fans must be immortal represent that the only explanation and i. e. why they treat time as such a meaningless commodity. bodycount represent 3. 
it takes an eternity for this typically over simplistic and idiotic stephen king based film to finally get out of the starting blocks. about half an hour is spent on needless introductions to various boring characters and their irrelevant little personal problems that might excite bored housewives and apathetic pensioners in soapy dramas and but this is supposed to be the horror genre (or so i naively thought). the mutt fails to look all that fearsome and which leonard maltin and the notoriously clueless or hopeless and always grinning film critic and would disagree with represent he considers cujo to be genuinely frightening. (i often do have to wonder if maltin is genuinely thick  or merely likes to do favors for his hollywood friends. ) it both illogical and inconsistent the way wallace survives an attack with only a leg injury. and and naturally and her car breaks down just when she needs it to save her life represent this is one of the oldest horror film clichés while trust king to use it to minimum effect. the premise is imbecilic and too banal and even for a horror film represent a rabid mutt attacks a family. is that it. this sort of thing barely constitutes a 3 minute sub sub plot in your average zombie film. i think even cujo must have sensed that he was starring in a turkey. mutts have terrible agents. but what i really do not understand is how people can actually throw themselves at the cujo book and read it from cover to cover. these sk fans must be immortal represent that the only explanation and i. e. why they treat time as such a meaningless commodity. bodycount represent 3. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
