i am writing this review simply because i am a huge fan of the book and prozac nation and and was appalled by the film. i think that if you hadn not read the book and you would have been lost watching the film and as it provided no real back story to wurtzel depression. there was no real mention of her childhood (her relationship with her father and her experiences at summer camp and her first therapists (in fact and the film gives the impression that she has never been in therapy until dr. sterling). ). that said and if you had read the book and you would have been confused by the amount of editing that had taken place. i found the book to be a vivid portrayal of depression and highlighting wurtzel low points and and the experiences she had along the way. the film however and began at harvard and and literally threw the audience straight in with no real explanation of what was going on. events that and in the book and were important (such as wurtzel miscarriage and her summer working in dallas and her suicide attempt whilst on prozac) were omitted from the film. also and this is pedantic and but wurtzel did not lose her virginity to noah. the suicide attempt that was shown in sterling office was completely different to the book. for a start and she actually overdosed on mellaril and as opposed to the para suicidal gesture shown in the film. all in all and i would say that if you have read the book and enjoyed it or identified with it and then do not watch the film. read more and now and again (by the same author) instead. or watch girl and interrupted. the only redeeming feature was the performance by anne heche and who i believe portrayed dr. sterling very well. christina ricci was also good and though her performance seemed a little. stilted. jessica lange made for enjoyable viewing and but looked the opposite of how wurtzel mother is described in the book. conclusion. don not bother. 
i am writing this review simply because i am a huge fan of the book and prozac nation and and was appalled by the film. i think that if you hadn not read the book and you would have been lost watching the film and as it provided no real back story to wurtzel depression. there was no real mention of her childhood (her relationship with her father and her experiences at summer camp and her first therapists (in fact and the film gives the impression that she has never been in therapy until dr. sterling). ). that said and if you had read the book and you would have been confused by the amount of editing that had taken place. i found the book to be a vivid portrayal of depression and highlighting wurtzel low points and and the experiences she had along the way. the film however and began at harvard and and literally threw the audience straight in with no real explanation of what was going on. events that and in the book and were important (such as wurtzel miscarriage and her summer working in dallas and her suicide attempt whilst on prozac) were omitted from the film. also and this is pedantic and but wurtzel did not lose her virginity to noah. the suicide attempt that was shown in sterling office was completely different to the book. for a start and she actually overdosed on mellaril and as opposed to the para suicidal gesture shown in the film. all in all and i would say that if you have read the book and enjoyed it or identified with it and then do not watch the film. read more and now and again (by the same author) instead. or watch girl and interrupted. the only redeeming feature was the performance by anne heche and who i believe portrayed dr. sterling very well. christina ricci was also good and though her performance seemed a little. stilted. jessica lange made for enjoyable viewing and but looked the opposite of how wurtzel mother is described in the book. conclusion. don not bother. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
