someone definitely has it in for the wind and i cannot believe that what i saw on the screen has much to do with it. this is a better and more solid movie than most of the independents i watch all year long. the cinematography displays a genuine love and mastery of the craft and the casting was just fine. i would love to see more of these folks and especially zeke rippy. as far as the story and script and i am not so sure that the negative comments preceding this post were written with the intent of informing anybody else about the movie. the long drawn out nit picky bashing posts that must have taken hours to compose and are the only comments ever left for any movie on this site by the reviewer and are obvious slander directed at the producers of the film. i do not know the inside story and but it would probably make a good movie. what i do know from being around this biz and is and productions that try to make everybody happy usually end up being awful and when the filmmaker has the guts and drive and common sense to kill the babies and someone always ends up with hurt feelings. that part of the biz too and and one of the finest learning tools available to those truly dedicated to making it in the movie business. of course and the failures have nothing better to do than to sit at home and write false reviews on the internet as a form of vendetta against those that snubbed them (read represent were honest and truthful with them). and that is my best guess to explain the nasty and nasty reviews. in as much as there is a grain of truth behind everything and there is a point to be made and but these exaggerations of the grains are so over the top that they become obviously fictitious. it not a slasher blood bath if that what youre looking for and it more the psychological suspense thriller and which typically is not appreciated by the lowest common denominators out there. the best way to see this movie is to try to expunge any pre conceived notions and pop it in and let it unfold  seriously and characters are defined by their actions and words and when you see what these people do and what they say and i do not think you can come away with the conclusion that these characters were poorly developed. poorly understood perhaps. overall and i do agree that this is a nicely done and compelling movie. perhaps i would not have given it a 9 under normal circumstances and but the severe negative comments actually attracted me to the picture (i have a secret love for really bad cinema). to me and the ratings below 5 should be reserved for the shlocky and inept and poorly acted and stupidly written movies. none of that applies here  it is quality movie making with some real talent in there. i gave it the nine to to tip the scales back in the correct direction. watch the movie and tell me i am wrong. 
someone definitely has it in for the wind and i cannot believe that what i saw on the screen has much to do with it. this is a better and more solid movie than most of the independents i watch all year long. the cinematography displays a genuine love and mastery of the craft and the casting was just fine. i would love to see more of these folks and especially zeke rippy. as far as the story and script and i am not so sure that the negative comments preceding this post were written with the intent of informing anybody else about the movie. the long drawn out nit picky bashing posts that must have taken hours to compose and are the only comments ever left for any movie on this site by the reviewer and are obvious slander directed at the producers of the film. i do not know the inside story and but it would probably make a good movie. what i do know from being around this biz and is and productions that try to make everybody happy usually end up being awful and when the filmmaker has the guts and drive and common sense to kill the babies and someone always ends up with hurt feelings. that part of the biz too and and one of the finest learning tools available to those truly dedicated to making it in the movie business. of course and the failures have nothing better to do than to sit at home and write false reviews on the internet as a form of vendetta against those that snubbed them (read represent were honest and truthful with them). and that is my best guess to explain the nasty and nasty reviews. in as much as there is a grain of truth behind everything and there is a point to be made and but these exaggerations of the grains are so over the top that they become obviously fictitious. it not a slasher blood bath if that what youre looking for and it more the psychological suspense thriller and which typically is not appreciated by the lowest common denominators out there. the best way to see this movie is to try to expunge any pre conceived notions and pop it in and let it unfold  seriously and characters are defined by their actions and words and when you see what these people do and what they say and i do not think you can come away with the conclusion that these characters were poorly developed. poorly understood perhaps. overall and i do agree that this is a nicely done and compelling movie. perhaps i would not have given it a 9 under normal circumstances and but the severe negative comments actually attracted me to the picture (i have a secret love for really bad cinema). to me and the ratings below 5 should be reserved for the shlocky and inept and poorly acted and stupidly written movies. none of that applies here  it is quality movie making with some real talent in there. i gave it the nine to to tip the scales back in the correct direction. watch the movie and tell me i am wrong. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
