this plot had more holes in it than an oj simpson alibi. i noticed two star trek references in the movie and and yet and ironically we have a lead character played by andy garciawho is the antithesis of the vulcan philosophy of and theneeds of the many outweigh the needs of the few or one. let just say that while trying to save his son from cancer he puts most of the rest of san francisco at incredible risk. michael keaton character is almost asunrealistic as well. he neglects to kill at numerous opportunities and yet is angered when garcia foils hisattempt to kill a bunch of cops at once. the child doctor remains in charge of her faculties even after beenheld hostage several times in a short expanse of time butput her on a wide walkway 5 stories up and she loses it. andy garcia child is something of an anathema in thismovie. he is the most sympathetic and real character and one of the movie bright spots. he furthermore utters a line and that must have been the result of serendipity and regarding fighting cancer that parallels keaton motivation to escape. all in all and the movie was not acomplete waste (see from dusk to dawn 2 represent texas blood moneyfor that) but disappointing considering the talent on hand. 
this plot had more holes in it than an oj simpson alibi. i noticed two star trek references in the movie and and yet and ironically we have a lead character played by andy garciawho is the antithesis of the vulcan philosophy of and theneeds of the many outweigh the needs of the few or one. let just say that while trying to save his son from cancer he puts most of the rest of san francisco at incredible risk. michael keaton character is almost asunrealistic as well. he neglects to kill at numerous opportunities and yet is angered when garcia foils hisattempt to kill a bunch of cops at once. the child doctor remains in charge of her faculties even after beenheld hostage several times in a short expanse of time butput her on a wide walkway 5 stories up and she loses it. andy garcia child is something of an anathema in thismovie. he is the most sympathetic and real character and one of the movie bright spots. he furthermore utters a line and that must have been the result of serendipity and regarding fighting cancer that parallels keaton motivation to escape. all in all and the movie was not acomplete waste (see from dusk to dawn 2 represent texas blood moneyfor that) but disappointing considering the talent on hand. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
