the hills have eyes is not a great film by any stretch of the imagination. for one the villains look almost normal and not what you would expect deranged lunatics to look like. for another the pacing is very slow at times and there are many scenes of the characters repeating themselves. by that and i mean there is a lot of filler in the movie and with a lot of running around aimlessly. the film do not have a clear direction. the plot of the movie is hardly original and even for its time. the texas chainsaw massacre came out a few year earlier and is a much more effective film and as far as horror goes. the film has little in the way of scares and and the pounding soundtrack just served to be both grating and distracting all at once. i suppose the music was used to cover up the fact that not much happens through much of the movie and though it failed in its intended purpose. i basically kept looking at the time every few seconds hoping something would happen or it would end . when something finally did happen any promise the film had was ruined by mere chaos and loud noise. i sat through it because i like to give a film the benefit of the doubt. yes and there is some loud screaming and and yes people die and but who cares. much too slow getting to any sort of pay off and if you can call it that. my buddy enjoyed it and so at least one of us got something out of it. the hills have eyes isn not the worst film we could have watched and but i doubt i will watch it again. this film was remade in 2006 and i will also have review of that version. anyway and this movie was painfully slow at times and while other times was chaotic and repetitive. unless you like watching paint dry and occasionally interspersed with someone running around your block and screaming their head off and stay away from this movie. a better bet would be the original texas chainsaw massacre(1973)1. 5 out of 10 which is being generous. 
the hills have eyes is not a great film by any stretch of the imagination. for one the villains look almost normal and not what you would expect deranged lunatics to look like. for another the pacing is very slow at times and there are many scenes of the characters repeating themselves. by that and i mean there is a lot of filler in the movie and with a lot of running around aimlessly. the film do not have a clear direction. the plot of the movie is hardly original and even for its time. the texas chainsaw massacre came out a few year earlier and is a much more effective film and as far as horror goes. the film has little in the way of scares and and the pounding soundtrack just served to be both grating and distracting all at once. i suppose the music was used to cover up the fact that not much happens through much of the movie and though it failed in its intended purpose. i basically kept looking at the time every few seconds hoping something would happen or it would end . when something finally did happen any promise the film had was ruined by mere chaos and loud noise. i sat through it because i like to give a film the benefit of the doubt. yes and there is some loud screaming and and yes people die and but who cares. much too slow getting to any sort of pay off and if you can call it that. my buddy enjoyed it and so at least one of us got something out of it. the hills have eyes isn not the worst film we could have watched and but i doubt i will watch it again. this film was remade in 2006 and i will also have review of that version. anyway and this movie was painfully slow at times and while other times was chaotic and repetitive. unless you like watching paint dry and occasionally interspersed with someone running around your block and screaming their head off and stay away from this movie. a better bet would be the original texas chainsaw massacre(1973)1. 5 out of 10 which is being generous. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
