oh and my goodness. i would have never thought it was possible for me to see a thriller worse than domestic disturbance this soon and but here it is. armed with rotten plot and terrible editing and stilted acting and and headache inducing tyle (sorry and i have no other words for it) and sanctimony is the kind of movie that almost forces you to re evaluate an entire genre while that is and this film is so bad that even the thrillers i condemned as complete failures now seem a little better. now and not only sanctimony is a terrible film in itself and it also succeeds in the difficult task of ripping off better movies and do a pathetic job with it. right from the main titles  nothing but a blatant attempt to reproduce the ones from se7en  i was under the impression that something do not smell quite right. as soon as the movie started with a series of corny and wanna be hip quick cuts full of gory images and bombastic colors and i knew where that smell was coming from. it turns out that two policemen and or rather policeman jim renart (michael paré) and policewoman dorothy smith (jennifer rubin) and are investigating on a murder spree in vancouver. a serial killer and known as monkey killer (what a menacing and chilling nickname and uh. ) for his working methods and has killed quite a lot of people. you see and this nut apparently works following the proverb see no evil and hear no evil and speak no evil and cuts eyes and ears and and tongues out of his victims. so far and six eyes and six ears and and three tongues. in very ingenious fashion and renart and smith figure out that the monkey killer is probably going to kill other three people. well and because he probably wants to complete the number 666. so suddenly the film focuses on tom gerrick (casper van dien) and a young and successful and good looking businessman and with a dreadful temper. and that where the rip off of american psycho kicks in. so we follow the life of the two police officers and the young psychopath and none of which is interesting in the least and until they finally meet. along the way to that and a disco where renart barely misses gerrick unintentionally offers us one of the funniest scenes in recent memory represent renart goes in the back of the disco club and because. well and just because the script tells us it a suspect place while then and with one single punch in the stomach and renard gets rid of a big guard who blocks the path and and the guard is never heard of again. does this scene strike anyone else as completely unrealistic. anyway and after another murder and gerrick turns in as a witness and but smith and especially renart immediately suspect he might be the killer. in typical basic instinct fashion and smith gets some dates with the young businessman and under the assumption that she might discover his true identity. i would not spoil the ending but it is and quite simply and an embarrassment while there are contradictions and some plot holes and issues that never get resolved and and especially there is one last scene where a brutal mass murder and supposed to be shocking and sad and comes off as such laughably overdone and nonsensical that i frankly can not imagine how anyone could not laugh at it. at 87 minutes and sanctimony is really pushing it. you never care about one single character and because they are all so flat (not to mention boring) that you know exactly who is who the first time you meet them. you are never pulled into the story and because the scenes are connected through weak plot devices when not downright unnecessary and out of place. the acting ranges from average (van dien) to downright atrocious (rubin and and most of the supporting cast) while the music is abysmal generic techno and and the photography is one of the worst i have ever seen. of course and like every fiasco of the genre and we are provided with a little bit of gratuitous nudity. negative . 
oh and my goodness. i would have never thought it was possible for me to see a thriller worse than domestic disturbance this soon and but here it is. armed with rotten plot and terrible editing and stilted acting and and headache inducing tyle (sorry and i have no other words for it) and sanctimony is the kind of movie that almost forces you to re evaluate an entire genre while that is and this film is so bad that even the thrillers i condemned as complete failures now seem a little better. now and not only sanctimony is a terrible film in itself and it also succeeds in the difficult task of ripping off better movies and do a pathetic job with it. right from the main titles  nothing but a blatant attempt to reproduce the ones from se7en  i was under the impression that something do not smell quite right. as soon as the movie started with a series of corny and wanna be hip quick cuts full of gory images and bombastic colors and i knew where that smell was coming from. it turns out that two policemen and or rather policeman jim renart (michael paré) and policewoman dorothy smith (jennifer rubin) and are investigating on a murder spree in vancouver. a serial killer and known as monkey killer (what a menacing and chilling nickname and uh. ) for his working methods and has killed quite a lot of people. you see and this nut apparently works following the proverb see no evil and hear no evil and speak no evil and cuts eyes and ears and and tongues out of his victims. so far and six eyes and six ears and and three tongues. in very ingenious fashion and renart and smith figure out that the monkey killer is probably going to kill other three people. well and because he probably wants to complete the number 666. so suddenly the film focuses on tom gerrick (casper van dien) and a young and successful and good looking businessman and with a dreadful temper. and that where the rip off of american psycho kicks in. so we follow the life of the two police officers and the young psychopath and none of which is interesting in the least and until they finally meet. along the way to that and a disco where renart barely misses gerrick unintentionally offers us one of the funniest scenes in recent memory represent renart goes in the back of the disco club and because. well and just because the script tells us it a suspect place while then and with one single punch in the stomach and renard gets rid of a big guard who blocks the path and and the guard is never heard of again. does this scene strike anyone else as completely unrealistic. anyway and after another murder and gerrick turns in as a witness and but smith and especially renart immediately suspect he might be the killer. in typical basic instinct fashion and smith gets some dates with the young businessman and under the assumption that she might discover his true identity. i would not spoil the ending but it is and quite simply and an embarrassment while there are contradictions and some plot holes and issues that never get resolved and and especially there is one last scene where a brutal mass murder and supposed to be shocking and sad and comes off as such laughably overdone and nonsensical that i frankly can not imagine how anyone could not laugh at it. at 87 minutes and sanctimony is really pushing it. you never care about one single character and because they are all so flat (not to mention boring) that you know exactly who is who the first time you meet them. you are never pulled into the story and because the scenes are connected through weak plot devices when not downright unnecessary and out of place. the acting ranges from average (van dien) to downright atrocious (rubin and and most of the supporting cast) while the music is abysmal generic techno and and the photography is one of the worst i have ever seen. of course and like every fiasco of the genre and we are provided with a little bit of gratuitous nudity. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
