the movie opens with a scene that simply could not be. a man wakes up and while his wife remains in bed and he begin his morning prayers in his bedroom while his wife sleeps peacefully. morning blessings are recited and but only the ones gitai finds controversial. the rest are conveniently omitted. then while in philactories and a tallis he kisses his wife good morning. this is not an accurate depiction of jewish prayer in any home and let alone a chassidic home. amos gittai is not interested in accurately portraying chassidic life. he is interested in adding to his ever growing list of melodramatic and empty films. the mikka (ritual bath) scenes are far from accurate and his jewish wedding was laughable as it does not even approach the atmosphere of a chassidic wedding. i have many problems with the chassidic way of life and but i have no use for amos gittai commentary on these issues. he would have you think that the chassidim are all dense comformists with severe bouts of depression. i may not agree with the chassidic lifestyle and but i acknowledge that chassidic life has many layers. amos gitai is blinded by his own secularist pseudo intellectual stubborness and is therefore and incapable of portraying an accurate depiciton of chassidic life. aside from his poor research and unbalanced portrayal of chassidic life and gitai fails in other aspects as well. the plot is full of holes and the dialogue loaded with silence and the soundtrack is too repetitive and the acting while at times powerfull was too often loaded with melodrama. the movie drags on and on and the ending is not worth sticking around for. watch if you must and but be warned. if you want to learn about chassidic life go to the communities and talk to chassidim. do not rely on gittai film. 
the movie opens with a scene that simply could not be. a man wakes up and while his wife remains in bed and he begin his morning prayers in his bedroom while his wife sleeps peacefully. morning blessings are recited and but only the ones gitai finds controversial. the rest are conveniently omitted. then while in philactories and a tallis he kisses his wife good morning. this is not an accurate depiction of jewish prayer in any home and let alone a chassidic home. amos gittai is not interested in accurately portraying chassidic life. he is interested in adding to his ever growing list of melodramatic and empty films. the mikka (ritual bath) scenes are far from accurate and his jewish wedding was laughable as it does not even approach the atmosphere of a chassidic wedding. i have many problems with the chassidic way of life and but i have no use for amos gittai commentary on these issues. he would have you think that the chassidim are all dense comformists with severe bouts of depression. i may not agree with the chassidic lifestyle and but i acknowledge that chassidic life has many layers. amos gitai is blinded by his own secularist pseudo intellectual stubborness and is therefore and incapable of portraying an accurate depiciton of chassidic life. aside from his poor research and unbalanced portrayal of chassidic life and gitai fails in other aspects as well. the plot is full of holes and the dialogue loaded with silence and the soundtrack is too repetitive and the acting while at times powerfull was too often loaded with melodrama. the movie drags on and on and the ending is not worth sticking around for. watch if you must and but be warned. if you want to learn about chassidic life go to the communities and talk to chassidim. do not rely on gittai film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
