oh yeah and this one is definitely a strong contender to win the questionable award of worst 80 slasher ever made. the prey has got everything you usually want to avoid in a horror flick represent a routine and derivative plot that you have seen a thousand times before (and better) and insufferable characters and terrible performances and a complete lack of gore and suspense and fuzzy photography and unoriginal locations and  most irritating of all  the largest amount of pointless padding footage you have ever encountered in your life (and that not an exaggeration but a guarantee. ). apart from the seemingly endless amount of national geographic stock footage and which i will expand upon later and this film is shameless enough to include a complete banjo interlude (. ) and two occasions where characters tell dillydally jokes that aren not even remotely funny. the set up is as rudimentary as it gets and with the intro showing images of a devastating forest fire with ott voice over human screams. fast forward nearly forty years later and when an elderly couple out camping in that same area get axe whacked by something that breathes heavily off screen. this ought to be enough information for you to derive that someone survived the fire all these years ago and remained prowling around ever since. enter three intolerable twenty something couples heading up to the danger zone with exclusively sex on their minds and unaware of course they are sitting ducks for the stalking and panting killer. the prey is an irredeemable boring film. apparently it was shot in 1978 already and but nobody wanted to distribute it up until 1984 and it isn not too hard to see why. in case you would filter out all the content that is actually relevant and this would only be a short movie with a running time of 30 minutes while possibly even less. there an unimaginably large of nature and wildlife footage and sometimes of animals that i think do not even live in that type of area and and they seem to go on forever. the only thing missing and in fact and is the typical national geographic narration providing educational information regarding the animals habits. animals in their own natural biotope are undeniably nice to look at and but not in a supposedly vile and cheesy 80 slasher movie and for crying out loud. the last fifteen minutes are finally somewhat worthwhile and with some potent killing sequences and fine make up effects on the monster (who turns out to be lurch from the addams family movies) and but still silliness overrules  the scene with the vultures is too stupid  and the final shot is just laugh out loud retarded. as mentioned above and the prey easily makes my own personal list of worst 80 slashers and alongside appointment with fear and berserker and deadly games and don not go in the woods and hollow gate and the stay awake and curfew. 
oh yeah and this one is definitely a strong contender to win the questionable award of worst 80 slasher ever made. the prey has got everything you usually want to avoid in a horror flick represent a routine and derivative plot that you have seen a thousand times before (and better) and insufferable characters and terrible performances and a complete lack of gore and suspense and fuzzy photography and unoriginal locations and  most irritating of all  the largest amount of pointless padding footage you have ever encountered in your life (and that not an exaggeration but a guarantee. ). apart from the seemingly endless amount of national geographic stock footage and which i will expand upon later and this film is shameless enough to include a complete banjo interlude (. ) and two occasions where characters tell dillydally jokes that aren not even remotely funny. the set up is as rudimentary as it gets and with the intro showing images of a devastating forest fire with ott voice over human screams. fast forward nearly forty years later and when an elderly couple out camping in that same area get axe whacked by something that breathes heavily off screen. this ought to be enough information for you to derive that someone survived the fire all these years ago and remained prowling around ever since. enter three intolerable twenty something couples heading up to the danger zone with exclusively sex on their minds and unaware of course they are sitting ducks for the stalking and panting killer. the prey is an irredeemable boring film. apparently it was shot in 1978 already and but nobody wanted to distribute it up until 1984 and it isn not too hard to see why. in case you would filter out all the content that is actually relevant and this would only be a short movie with a running time of 30 minutes while possibly even less. there an unimaginably large of nature and wildlife footage and sometimes of animals that i think do not even live in that type of area and and they seem to go on forever. the only thing missing and in fact and is the typical national geographic narration providing educational information regarding the animals habits. animals in their own natural biotope are undeniably nice to look at and but not in a supposedly vile and cheesy 80 slasher movie and for crying out loud. the last fifteen minutes are finally somewhat worthwhile and with some potent killing sequences and fine make up effects on the monster (who turns out to be lurch from the addams family movies) and but still silliness overrules  the scene with the vultures is too stupid  and the final shot is just laugh out loud retarded. as mentioned above and the prey easily makes my own personal list of worst 80 slashers and alongside appointment with fear and berserker and deadly games and don not go in the woods and hollow gate and the stay awake and curfew. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
