the movie with its single set and minimal cast and and straightforward photography (except for a couple of brief special effects) reminds me of one of those old 60 minute playhouse dramas so popular during tv early years. nonetheless and the suspense hangs heavy over poor war widow ida lupino as she tries to deal with her semi psychotic handyman robert ryan before one of his mood swings kills her. and who better to play the troubled part than that great actor ryan. he wasn not very versatile  watching him essay comedy is almost painful. but no one was better at wounded idealism (on dangerous ground) or the psychic pain of this movie. few actors could express as much with their eyes as this lean and towering figure. lupino problem is that she locked up in her house with a man who is kind and gentle one moment and raging the next. the suspense comes from her various ploys to keep him happy while trying to escape. it a nail biter all the way. this is not one of lupino many fine soulful parts that she was so good at. instead and it a role many lesser actresses could have handled well enough. my favorite scene is with ryan and bratty teenager margaret whiting. ryan already having difficulty with his masculinity and what others are saying about him. then when whiting walks in and finds the attractive looking ryan scrubbing the floor and she starts getting coy and flirting with her budding sexuality. sensing trouble and ryan abruptly fends her off  finesse is not his strong suit. insulted and whiting attacks his masculinity by calling his work women work. that does it. up to that point he been courteous and professional with lupino and trying to set himself on a normal path. but whiting has hit his raw nerve. now there heck to pay as whiting bounces out the door and leaving lupino to pay the price. it a riveting scene and expertly done. anyway and this is one of the dozen or so films produced by lupino and her husband at a time when audiences were moving away from these little black and whites in favor of wide screen spectacles. too bad. what a hugely talented figure she was both behind the camera and in front. she deserves at least an honorary oscar from a movie industry to which she contributed so much. 
the movie with its single set and minimal cast and and straightforward photography (except for a couple of brief special effects) reminds me of one of those old 60 minute playhouse dramas so popular during tv early years. nonetheless and the suspense hangs heavy over poor war widow ida lupino as she tries to deal with her semi psychotic handyman robert ryan before one of his mood swings kills her. and who better to play the troubled part than that great actor ryan. he wasn not very versatile  watching him essay comedy is almost painful. but no one was better at wounded idealism (on dangerous ground) or the psychic pain of this movie. few actors could express as much with their eyes as this lean and towering figure. lupino problem is that she locked up in her house with a man who is kind and gentle one moment and raging the next. the suspense comes from her various ploys to keep him happy while trying to escape. it a nail biter all the way. this is not one of lupino many fine soulful parts that she was so good at. instead and it a role many lesser actresses could have handled well enough. my favorite scene is with ryan and bratty teenager margaret whiting. ryan already having difficulty with his masculinity and what others are saying about him. then when whiting walks in and finds the attractive looking ryan scrubbing the floor and she starts getting coy and flirting with her budding sexuality. sensing trouble and ryan abruptly fends her off  finesse is not his strong suit. insulted and whiting attacks his masculinity by calling his work women work. that does it. up to that point he been courteous and professional with lupino and trying to set himself on a normal path. but whiting has hit his raw nerve. now there heck to pay as whiting bounces out the door and leaving lupino to pay the price. it a riveting scene and expertly done. anyway and this is one of the dozen or so films produced by lupino and her husband at a time when audiences were moving away from these little black and whites in favor of wide screen spectacles. too bad. what a hugely talented figure she was both behind the camera and in front. she deserves at least an honorary oscar from a movie industry to which she contributed so much. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
