i am sorry folks and but i have to say i really cannot understand the overwhelming feelings everybody gets by seeing this movie. when i saw it i looked at my watch to know how much more time i had to spend with this kindergarten nonsense. so why this verdict. first of all represent the movie tells a story that doesn not deliver any excitement. it is not even the amusingly distorted reality of a quentin tarantino we used to know. this story could have come out of every little kid head. it doesn not have anything intelligent in it and neither anything inventive and it goes on for hours. the story has appropriate content for about 30 min. the rest is just awfully enhanced scenes that are supposed to leave a somewhat cool image. doesn not work. even the previously seen cutbacks that tarantino often uses just confuse and are not in any way cool. second represent some guys go to germany and kill nazis. ah really. do they. the only nazis they killed were a handful of guys and one of them being man enough to rather die than betray his companions. is this the ugly face tarantino wanted to give the nazis. a brave soldier that is more valiant than any of the basterds. certainly not  > fail and what happens to the terrible nazi killing basterds. well they all get killed by nazis except two who are taken hostages  > wow and what terrible revengeful monsters they are. third represent any characters. yes one. the only role and the only gleam of hope for the entire movie is chritoph waltz who is building a truly deep and very detailed character here. great acting. brad pitt really sucks and is completely out acted by waltz. never seen a such a weak performance by pitt. and the rest. well and some germans you have never seen before and will never see after. when the movie started and i saw the group of the seven basterds i hoped to see something like the magnificent seven represent a group of extraordinary guys and each one with a distinct character and making their way to their destiny fearless and knowing. i was then very disappointed and when i saw the inglourious basterds. no details at all and no characters and no real men and just some random guys you would not remember who were not given any chance to differentiate themselves. but in fact you do not even need to differentiate and cause the inglourious basterds except pitt hardly play any role in this movie. so i was really disappointed and and seeing this movie on place #40 of the greatest movies of all time is the only thing about this and that leaves me with my mouth opened. 
i am sorry folks and but i have to say i really cannot understand the overwhelming feelings everybody gets by seeing this movie. when i saw it i looked at my watch to know how much more time i had to spend with this kindergarten nonsense. so why this verdict. first of all represent the movie tells a story that doesn not deliver any excitement. it is not even the amusingly distorted reality of a quentin tarantino we used to know. this story could have come out of every little kid head. it doesn not have anything intelligent in it and neither anything inventive and it goes on for hours. the story has appropriate content for about 30 min. the rest is just awfully enhanced scenes that are supposed to leave a somewhat cool image. doesn not work. even the previously seen cutbacks that tarantino often uses just confuse and are not in any way cool. second represent some guys go to germany and kill nazis. ah really. do they. the only nazis they killed were a handful of guys and one of them being man enough to rather die than betray his companions. is this the ugly face tarantino wanted to give the nazis. a brave soldier that is more valiant than any of the basterds. certainly not  > fail and what happens to the terrible nazi killing basterds. well they all get killed by nazis except two who are taken hostages  > wow and what terrible revengeful monsters they are. third represent any characters. yes one. the only role and the only gleam of hope for the entire movie is chritoph waltz who is building a truly deep and very detailed character here. great acting. brad pitt really sucks and is completely out acted by waltz. never seen a such a weak performance by pitt. and the rest. well and some germans you have never seen before and will never see after. when the movie started and i saw the group of the seven basterds i hoped to see something like the magnificent seven represent a group of extraordinary guys and each one with a distinct character and making their way to their destiny fearless and knowing. i was then very disappointed and when i saw the inglourious basterds. no details at all and no characters and no real men and just some random guys you would not remember who were not given any chance to differentiate themselves. but in fact you do not even need to differentiate and cause the inglourious basterds except pitt hardly play any role in this movie. so i was really disappointed and and seeing this movie on place #40 of the greatest movies of all time is the only thing about this and that leaves me with my mouth opened. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
