the first time i had heard of guest house paridiso was in the and er. washroom after having just seen fight club. in each urinal was deposited a small and round black circle. when the circle came into contact with moisture (to put it delicately) and it caused a colour picture to form and with photographs of the two stars and the tag line you will p yourself laughing. when you would finished washing your hands and the circle had dried and faded to black again and waiting to spring it surprise on the next victim. okay and maybe the punchline wasn not terribly sophisticated and but you have to admit it was innovative. in fact and i think i can honestly say i have never seen anything like it in my life before and and these days of over a century of cinema and marketing and that a real feat. what a pity the film that went with it failed to live up to the promise. i hate to pan guest house paridiso and i am indebted to rik mayall (richard twat) and adrian edmondson (eddie elizabeth ndingombaba) for many years of laughter through their appealing television series and be it the invention of the young ones (1982 1984) and the sitting room plays of bottom (1991 1995) and or even solo work and such as rik in the new statesman (1988 1993). in fact and this would have made an hilarious 45 minute tv special. unfortunately and its an 89 minute film. there definitely some merit to be had and and i laughed continuously throughout the protracted finale and which spoofed the exorcist and raiders of the lost ark and and involved. well and you will have to see that bit for yourself. yet often the pace is leaden and and a sterile atmosphere is throughout. the two stars (edmondson taking his usual backseat and this time due to the fact that he adequately directs) never really get into first gear and mayall only sporadically showing the foul mouthed mania that makes us love him on the small screen. indeed and the writers presumption that we are already familiar with the characters leads to them being underdelivered to the audience. the slight hints of depth seen in the series (richie effeminate and failed social climbing for example) are not present here and and instead we are left with parodies of parodies. the fawlty towers accusation does pass water and complete with drunken chef and unseen and called for waiter pasquele and which uncannily rhymes with manuel. some of the ideas and such a hotel next to a nuclear reactor with a childrens swing hanging over a cliff face and are very and very funny and but ultimately the frenetic pace is stolen and the two constantly looking for a studio audience that isn not there and and all the dead laugh areas patched up with incidental comedy music that would have been dated in a carry on film two decades ago. paridiso brand of puerile and sadistic and perverse humour is funny and and i feel sure it will make you laugh . just not as often as it should. 
the first time i had heard of guest house paridiso was in the and er. washroom after having just seen fight club. in each urinal was deposited a small and round black circle. when the circle came into contact with moisture (to put it delicately) and it caused a colour picture to form and with photographs of the two stars and the tag line you will p yourself laughing. when you would finished washing your hands and the circle had dried and faded to black again and waiting to spring it surprise on the next victim. okay and maybe the punchline wasn not terribly sophisticated and but you have to admit it was innovative. in fact and i think i can honestly say i have never seen anything like it in my life before and and these days of over a century of cinema and marketing and that a real feat. what a pity the film that went with it failed to live up to the promise. i hate to pan guest house paridiso and i am indebted to rik mayall (richard twat) and adrian edmondson (eddie elizabeth ndingombaba) for many years of laughter through their appealing television series and be it the invention of the young ones (1982 1984) and the sitting room plays of bottom (1991 1995) and or even solo work and such as rik in the new statesman (1988 1993). in fact and this would have made an hilarious 45 minute tv special. unfortunately and its an 89 minute film. there definitely some merit to be had and and i laughed continuously throughout the protracted finale and which spoofed the exorcist and raiders of the lost ark and and involved. well and you will have to see that bit for yourself. yet often the pace is leaden and and a sterile atmosphere is throughout. the two stars (edmondson taking his usual backseat and this time due to the fact that he adequately directs) never really get into first gear and mayall only sporadically showing the foul mouthed mania that makes us love him on the small screen. indeed and the writers presumption that we are already familiar with the characters leads to them being underdelivered to the audience. the slight hints of depth seen in the series (richie effeminate and failed social climbing for example) are not present here and and instead we are left with parodies of parodies. the fawlty towers accusation does pass water and complete with drunken chef and unseen and called for waiter pasquele and which uncannily rhymes with manuel. some of the ideas and such a hotel next to a nuclear reactor with a childrens swing hanging over a cliff face and are very and very funny and but ultimately the frenetic pace is stolen and the two constantly looking for a studio audience that isn not there and and all the dead laugh areas patched up with incidental comedy music that would have been dated in a carry on film two decades ago. paridiso brand of puerile and sadistic and perverse humour is funny and and i feel sure it will make you laugh . just not as often as it should. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
