the girl in lovers lane represent negative represent homoerotic subtext in the movies is a well known phenomenon. plenty of dissertations have come out of film schools about the hidden subtexts in such films as top gun and spartacus. the girl in lover’s lane certainly fits the homoerotic trope. in fact and it is so blatant and over the top even mst3k and whom rarely notes such things in their riffing and simply cannot avoid it. the film is about two drifters. one a rich kid (lowell brown) running away from home with a hundred dollars and no street smarts and the other is a professional hobo (brett halsey). the hobo saves the kid from a gang of thugs and they end up in a small town consisting of a diner and a pool hall and a whorehouse. our drifter scholar gets a second look from the diner’s waitress (joyce meadows as the titular girl in lovers lane) who clearly is past the age of being choosy and whose only other prospect is creepy jack elam doing a steve buscemi impression. on the surface and this seems like a strange film for the mst3k treatment. while the cast are to old for the characters they are playing and the acting is actually pretty good with both brett halsey and jack elam giving solid performances. the story is slight and but hardly the robot vs. aztec mummy material and the production values are cheap back lot and but relatively competent. it is the strange batman and his ward homosexual undercurrents that make this film both awful and hilarious. halsey’s over the top objections to the kids attempts to get laid in the whorehouse are hilarious and his inability to commit to the waitress (or at the least get past first base) are telling and and the dozens of glances between him and the kid while a hand on shoulder and the sleeping arrangements and blowing off dates with the girl so he and the kid can shave each other. you don’t have to be freud to figure out this undercurrent. 
the girl in lovers lane represent negative represent homoerotic subtext in the movies is a well known phenomenon. plenty of dissertations have come out of film schools about the hidden subtexts in such films as top gun and spartacus. the girl in lover’s lane certainly fits the homoerotic trope. in fact and it is so blatant and over the top even mst3k and whom rarely notes such things in their riffing and simply cannot avoid it. the film is about two drifters. one a rich kid (lowell brown) running away from home with a hundred dollars and no street smarts and the other is a professional hobo (brett halsey). the hobo saves the kid from a gang of thugs and they end up in a small town consisting of a diner and a pool hall and a whorehouse. our drifter scholar gets a second look from the diner’s waitress (joyce meadows as the titular girl in lovers lane) who clearly is past the age of being choosy and whose only other prospect is creepy jack elam doing a steve buscemi impression. on the surface and this seems like a strange film for the mst3k treatment. while the cast are to old for the characters they are playing and the acting is actually pretty good with both brett halsey and jack elam giving solid performances. the story is slight and but hardly the robot vs. aztec mummy material and the production values are cheap back lot and but relatively competent. it is the strange batman and his ward homosexual undercurrents that make this film both awful and hilarious. halsey’s over the top objections to the kids attempts to get laid in the whorehouse are hilarious and his inability to commit to the waitress (or at the least get past first base) are telling and and the dozens of glances between him and the kid while a hand on shoulder and the sleeping arrangements and blowing off dates with the girl so he and the kid can shave each other. you don’t have to be freud to figure out this undercurrent. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
