basically the first two critters movie were already silly ones but in a good and entertaining way. this movie is way more of a b movie and that is silly but for all of the wrong reasons. this is the first sequel that doesn not really follows the plot of the first two movies. basically all of the characters are new and there are no bounty hunters this time (well and as good as none and since the bounty hunter in this movie shows up far too late) and the budget for this one obviously went down again. to save even more costs and the movie got shot back to back with part 4 and which i imaging will be just as bad and since it directly follows this movie and got made by the same people involved as with this one. it just a typical b genre movie and that doesn not really have any originality in it or brings entertainment. it makes critters 3 a real redundant sequel and you can easily do without. granted that things could had been way worse for this movie but it just ain not exactly a good one either. the movie just falls flat as a science fiction or horror or comedy. also kind of strange to notice how the critters has suddenly changed in this one. they are about double their usual size this time and without giving an explanation for that and they are even more gremlins like in this movie than was the case in the previous one. the movie is only made interesting because this was the feature film debut of leonardo dicaprio. he was about 17 in this movie and of course looking baby faced like he still does now. i like watching this well known actors in their early roles. it fun to see how they act and if their style has improved and changed over the years. of course dicaprio got only better but he already was kind of delivering his lines in the same way as he does these days. really a too silly and lame movie. negative . 
basically the first two critters movie were already silly ones but in a good and entertaining way. this movie is way more of a b movie and that is silly but for all of the wrong reasons. this is the first sequel that doesn not really follows the plot of the first two movies. basically all of the characters are new and there are no bounty hunters this time (well and as good as none and since the bounty hunter in this movie shows up far too late) and the budget for this one obviously went down again. to save even more costs and the movie got shot back to back with part 4 and which i imaging will be just as bad and since it directly follows this movie and got made by the same people involved as with this one. it just a typical b genre movie and that doesn not really have any originality in it or brings entertainment. it makes critters 3 a real redundant sequel and you can easily do without. granted that things could had been way worse for this movie but it just ain not exactly a good one either. the movie just falls flat as a science fiction or horror or comedy. also kind of strange to notice how the critters has suddenly changed in this one. they are about double their usual size this time and without giving an explanation for that and they are even more gremlins like in this movie than was the case in the previous one. the movie is only made interesting because this was the feature film debut of leonardo dicaprio. he was about 17 in this movie and of course looking baby faced like he still does now. i like watching this well known actors in their early roles. it fun to see how they act and if their style has improved and changed over the years. of course dicaprio got only better but he already was kind of delivering his lines in the same way as he does these days. really a too silly and lame movie. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
