i do not dislike cary grant but i have found his performances annoying in enough films to notice while this and arsenic and old lace and bringing up baby. i do not dislike him in north by northwest but i really find that movie unbearably silly. on top of that i find the endless raving about grant class tiresome. i do not have a clue what his class does for the viewers who herald it. it doesn not do a thing for me. in the behind the scenes feature included with this dvd patrcia hitchcock says that grant was her fathers favorite leading man while i think he was wrong. jimmy stewart was a better leading man in a string of better hitchcock movies. with it ruined ending this is really half a movie and doesn not bear discussion and and can not support the high ratings it getting. even if the movie had it ending intact there not much to it. fontaine is a completely unsympathetic sucker. she has to remain numb and inactive and and unwilling to contact anyone but johnny for the whole movie and in either ending and for his ploys to work. that not much to work with. cary grant begins every line with monkeyface. until i wanted to strangle him. he says it about sixty times. it positively grating. hitch technique here is shockingly shallow. an endless succession of rooms or sets have a phony skylight projected on the rear wall as a spiderweb effect. and a light bulb in a glass of milk may make fans excited and but it can not save a movie this poorly made. peter bogdanovich should retire if he does one more hitchcock or cary grant imitation on a dvd. i think that his whole career now. as soon as i saw him and i thought and oh crap and here comes an imitation that only he impressed with. instead there were two. oh joy. 
i do not dislike cary grant but i have found his performances annoying in enough films to notice while this and arsenic and old lace and bringing up baby. i do not dislike him in north by northwest but i really find that movie unbearably silly. on top of that i find the endless raving about grant class tiresome. i do not have a clue what his class does for the viewers who herald it. it doesn not do a thing for me. in the behind the scenes feature included with this dvd patrcia hitchcock says that grant was her fathers favorite leading man while i think he was wrong. jimmy stewart was a better leading man in a string of better hitchcock movies. with it ruined ending this is really half a movie and doesn not bear discussion and and can not support the high ratings it getting. even if the movie had it ending intact there not much to it. fontaine is a completely unsympathetic sucker. she has to remain numb and inactive and and unwilling to contact anyone but johnny for the whole movie and in either ending and for his ploys to work. that not much to work with. cary grant begins every line with monkeyface. until i wanted to strangle him. he says it about sixty times. it positively grating. hitch technique here is shockingly shallow. an endless succession of rooms or sets have a phony skylight projected on the rear wall as a spiderweb effect. and a light bulb in a glass of milk may make fans excited and but it can not save a movie this poorly made. peter bogdanovich should retire if he does one more hitchcock or cary grant imitation on a dvd. i think that his whole career now. as soon as i saw him and i thought and oh crap and here comes an imitation that only he impressed with. instead there were two. oh joy. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
