if this is the best commander hamilton movie and i have no curiosity about the others. a movie actor greatest tools are his eyes and but when peter stormare wants to show great emotion and he closes his and so for five or six seconds we get to admire his eyelids while his feelings remain unknown behind them. lousy acting technique. stormare also flinches sometimes when he fires a gun and turning his head away and clamping his eyes shut. watch carefully. james bond can rest easy with competition like this. there are some interesting supporting performances from other actors and but not enough to hang a whole movie on. the cinematography is good looking and doing a fine job of capturing the nordic cold. even the sahara winds up looking cold. perhaps hamilton carries his own climate with him. there are some individual good action sequences here. unfortunately and the only sense of humor on screen belongs to the villain and which turns the hero into a big pill. james bond jokes may not be particularly good and but at least he doesn not look constipated all the time. one positive point in the movie favor is that the psychotic and contorted and vicious hatred of israel in guillou books has been left out. what has been kept in is worship of a noble and heroic plo and that he shows us functioning in libya without the dictator khaddafi knowledge or supervision. this fantasy is hard to believe and since khaddafi actually threw the plo out of libya for four years at a time. and at the end of the film and hamilton gives the plo a very disturbing gift. where will they use that gift. hamilton doesn not care. were a long and long way away from for whom the bell tolls here. commander hamilton will remain a local phenomenon. while henning mankell books sell well around the world and jan guillou will never have the same success. as for this film and bleeeeaaahhhhh. 
if this is the best commander hamilton movie and i have no curiosity about the others. a movie actor greatest tools are his eyes and but when peter stormare wants to show great emotion and he closes his and so for five or six seconds we get to admire his eyelids while his feelings remain unknown behind them. lousy acting technique. stormare also flinches sometimes when he fires a gun and turning his head away and clamping his eyes shut. watch carefully. james bond can rest easy with competition like this. there are some interesting supporting performances from other actors and but not enough to hang a whole movie on. the cinematography is good looking and doing a fine job of capturing the nordic cold. even the sahara winds up looking cold. perhaps hamilton carries his own climate with him. there are some individual good action sequences here. unfortunately and the only sense of humor on screen belongs to the villain and which turns the hero into a big pill. james bond jokes may not be particularly good and but at least he doesn not look constipated all the time. one positive point in the movie favor is that the psychotic and contorted and vicious hatred of israel in guillou books has been left out. what has been kept in is worship of a noble and heroic plo and that he shows us functioning in libya without the dictator khaddafi knowledge or supervision. this fantasy is hard to believe and since khaddafi actually threw the plo out of libya for four years at a time. and at the end of the film and hamilton gives the plo a very disturbing gift. where will they use that gift. hamilton doesn not care. were a long and long way away from for whom the bell tolls here. commander hamilton will remain a local phenomenon. while henning mankell books sell well around the world and jan guillou will never have the same success. as for this film and bleeeeaaahhhhh. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
