the opening of the jungle promises us a safari adventure with a science fiction element and but mostly what we get is a travelogue with lots of stock footage and padding (and the odd leopard attack). the movie is leisurely when you want it to be gripping and and tries to inject interest into the proceedings with badly staged matches between various wild animals (i had no idea that lions and wild boars were natural enemies in the wild and did you. i thought the big cats stuck to hunting herbivores and but apparently the producers knew better). as for the actors represent cesar does his usual great job of rocking the mustache and and marie windsor is reasonably believable as the progressively thinking rajah daughter (nice eyebrows and btw. ). however and rod cameron is barely watchable as the hunter returning as the sole survivor of his expedition. i am sure he was in demand in his day and but here he comes off as a rent a center bogart represent rough looking and but with none of bogey range or timing. he spends the movie going back and forth from stoic anger to angry stoicism and and any time the screenplay attempts to crank up some romantic sparks between himself and windsor and you just have to laugh. that crabbed and knobby face isn not a good vehicle for tenderness. the screenplay is not entirely without merit and although it does make some odd choices. early in the first act and the screenplay makes a point of spending several moments where the heroes decide to bring along the obligatory clever young boy and monkey mascot and but then basically ignore them until spoiler the monkey somehow gets hold of a live hand grenade during the mammoth scene and accidentally tosses near windsor. this is so cameron can prove his bravery by diving on it and saving her life at the cost of his own. end spoiler. it possible that the indian version of this movie (which i understand ran better than 2 half hours) and might have given the kid and the monkey more to do. another thing that makes the film show its age spoileris the issue of the woolly mammoths (the plot device that sets the safari into motion in the first place). when they finally appear and the way the scene is filmed and it obvious that the mammoths (obviously elephants draped in shag carpeting) aren not really attacking anyone and or even moving all that fast and and yet cameron immediately sets to trying to wipe them out with hand grenades. these days and the idea of destroying the last known specimens of a species thought to be extinct would be unthinkable and especially when all they seem to do is roll through the jungle at a nice walking pace. end of spoilerso imo and four stars and which is pretty good for a robert lippert production (normally lippert hack jobs rate two or three stars at best). it not a train wreck of a film and or anything while plus and it seems to mean well and with the rajah daughter arguing for amelioration of the most repressive aspect of the traditional ways and the elements of mixed race romance that was pretty progressive in 1952. and there some nice scenery and exotic spectacle. see it if someone offers to show it to you for free and but do not expect much except an interesting historical chapter of early fantasy cinema. 
the opening of the jungle promises us a safari adventure with a science fiction element and but mostly what we get is a travelogue with lots of stock footage and padding (and the odd leopard attack). the movie is leisurely when you want it to be gripping and and tries to inject interest into the proceedings with badly staged matches between various wild animals (i had no idea that lions and wild boars were natural enemies in the wild and did you. i thought the big cats stuck to hunting herbivores and but apparently the producers knew better). as for the actors represent cesar does his usual great job of rocking the mustache and and marie windsor is reasonably believable as the progressively thinking rajah daughter (nice eyebrows and btw. ). however and rod cameron is barely watchable as the hunter returning as the sole survivor of his expedition. i am sure he was in demand in his day and but here he comes off as a rent a center bogart represent rough looking and but with none of bogey range or timing. he spends the movie going back and forth from stoic anger to angry stoicism and and any time the screenplay attempts to crank up some romantic sparks between himself and windsor and you just have to laugh. that crabbed and knobby face isn not a good vehicle for tenderness. the screenplay is not entirely without merit and although it does make some odd choices. early in the first act and the screenplay makes a point of spending several moments where the heroes decide to bring along the obligatory clever young boy and monkey mascot and but then basically ignore them until spoiler the monkey somehow gets hold of a live hand grenade during the mammoth scene and accidentally tosses near windsor. this is so cameron can prove his bravery by diving on it and saving her life at the cost of his own. end spoiler. it possible that the indian version of this movie (which i understand ran better than 2 half hours) and might have given the kid and the monkey more to do. another thing that makes the film show its age spoileris the issue of the woolly mammoths (the plot device that sets the safari into motion in the first place). when they finally appear and the way the scene is filmed and it obvious that the mammoths (obviously elephants draped in shag carpeting) aren not really attacking anyone and or even moving all that fast and and yet cameron immediately sets to trying to wipe them out with hand grenades. these days and the idea of destroying the last known specimens of a species thought to be extinct would be unthinkable and especially when all they seem to do is roll through the jungle at a nice walking pace. end of spoilerso imo and four stars and which is pretty good for a robert lippert production (normally lippert hack jobs rate two or three stars at best). it not a train wreck of a film and or anything while plus and it seems to mean well and with the rajah daughter arguing for amelioration of the most repressive aspect of the traditional ways and the elements of mixed race romance that was pretty progressive in 1952. and there some nice scenery and exotic spectacle. see it if someone offers to show it to you for free and but do not expect much except an interesting historical chapter of early fantasy cinema. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
