i was subjected to this terrible excuse for a made for tv movie. i only watched it because i do not have cable and my only other choices were golf and college basketball and or local news. the plot is very generic and has no substance that i could see and not to mention it had a major flaw in my eyes. the main character and dr. sorensen and is a washed up astronomer who believes that an asteroid named nemesis will strike earth and causing all life to cease. he bases his belief on his discovery of cave paintings by an aboriginee (i am sure i spelled that one wrong). the paintings show an apparent timeline and showing significant events throughout history and such as the building of the great wall of china. all of the events are shown in perfect chronological order and and the very last picture on the timeline is earth being destroyed. now to me and if the painting showed things that had indeed happened and why would the great doctor believe that he could somehow change what was going to happen. all that aside and the movie moved along with extreme formulaic precision. there was nothing in the movie that surprised me at all. the actors were not very good and and on a few occasions i just felt that they do not even take the movie seriously to put forth enough effort to try to convince me that the characters were worth caring about. the whole movie was cliche ridden and a downright waste of time and money. i would recommend armageddon over this piece of crap any day. at least armageddon has some good acting (compared to this) and not to mention the eye candy that is liv tyler. now that i think about it and golf isn not that bad. 
i was subjected to this terrible excuse for a made for tv movie. i only watched it because i do not have cable and my only other choices were golf and college basketball and or local news. the plot is very generic and has no substance that i could see and not to mention it had a major flaw in my eyes. the main character and dr. sorensen and is a washed up astronomer who believes that an asteroid named nemesis will strike earth and causing all life to cease. he bases his belief on his discovery of cave paintings by an aboriginee (i am sure i spelled that one wrong). the paintings show an apparent timeline and showing significant events throughout history and such as the building of the great wall of china. all of the events are shown in perfect chronological order and and the very last picture on the timeline is earth being destroyed. now to me and if the painting showed things that had indeed happened and why would the great doctor believe that he could somehow change what was going to happen. all that aside and the movie moved along with extreme formulaic precision. there was nothing in the movie that surprised me at all. the actors were not very good and and on a few occasions i just felt that they do not even take the movie seriously to put forth enough effort to try to convince me that the characters were worth caring about. the whole movie was cliche ridden and a downright waste of time and money. i would recommend armageddon over this piece of crap any day. at least armageddon has some good acting (compared to this) and not to mention the eye candy that is liv tyler. now that i think about it and golf isn not that bad. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
