i once heard this movie described as either you will love it or you will hate it. from reading some of the other reviews and the ratings and i would venture to say that this is true. i am placing myself in the hate it crowd. i have seen some truly bad movies and boring movies and and even low budget movies. this movie is bad on all three fronts. this island earth exeter (jeff morrow) and returns to his sci fi or b movie roots as dr. les (minus giant head prosthetic). the doctor and his assistant arnie (george ohanlon  aka the voice of george jetson) and along with les girlfriend assistant vera and are tracking a meteor. this is the crux of the cast and is almost a double date. les has vera and arnie has his susie (synchro unifying sinometric integrating equitensor  aka the computer). lets just say the relationship between george and his robotic maid and rosie and (and his relationship with susie) is more believable than the cold and clam like feelings vera has for les (and vice versa). the object of their all their interest is no ordinary meteor and however. it is really an alien art nouveau or art deco energy storage device and which moves around like a 3 legged dog. there is also the little alien energy being that controls dr. hubbel (aka and the chief scientist there). the alien is obviously and from the get go and malicious and evil. is this the kind of science we are handing out. no wonder the aliens from the explorers were afraid of us. from watching some of these movies and we shoot first. there no need for questions afterwards. the whole movie is synonymous with watching some really boring science experiments and like boiling an egg or adding food color to celery. its not the fact that this is a low budget sci fi movie or thats its a bit cheesy and outdated. it is really and really and really boring. the whole movie is about trying to figure out what is going on. that is it. most of the things we learn about what going on are through monologues and self dictation. now add crappy dialog and cardboard acting and cheap sets and you have the makings of an ed wood clone (by the way and ed has made some really boring movies as well  please avoid the orgy of the dead). the dialog . oh and the dialog. jems such as represent. from under 2 miles of ocean . why not . it came through a billion miles in space. ordo you think you will be able to respect a husband who probably pulled the scientific boner of all time . this movie is obviously trying to pull a forbidden planet and this island earth and magnetic monster or in the same light as the outer limits and twilight zone. namely and a low budget sci fi movie (or tv episode) that is compelling enough to get past the technical difficulties and strange situations. at the core and these movies are enjoyable on some level (the story and the underlying meaning or the sheer comical nature of the dialog or situations). this movie has none of that. it is just 90 minutes of boredom. i couldn not even enjoy this on a ed wood level. i definitely recommend skipping this one and seeing one of the movies i mentioned above instead. it is so bad and that if my name was dr. forrester and i would never think of showing this movie to anyone . except frank maybe. 
i once heard this movie described as either you will love it or you will hate it. from reading some of the other reviews and the ratings and i would venture to say that this is true. i am placing myself in the hate it crowd. i have seen some truly bad movies and boring movies and and even low budget movies. this movie is bad on all three fronts. this island earth exeter (jeff morrow) and returns to his sci fi or b movie roots as dr. les (minus giant head prosthetic). the doctor and his assistant arnie (george ohanlon  aka the voice of george jetson) and along with les girlfriend assistant vera and are tracking a meteor. this is the crux of the cast and is almost a double date. les has vera and arnie has his susie (synchro unifying sinometric integrating equitensor  aka the computer). lets just say the relationship between george and his robotic maid and rosie and (and his relationship with susie) is more believable than the cold and clam like feelings vera has for les (and vice versa). the object of their all their interest is no ordinary meteor and however. it is really an alien art nouveau or art deco energy storage device and which moves around like a 3 legged dog. there is also the little alien energy being that controls dr. hubbel (aka and the chief scientist there). the alien is obviously and from the get go and malicious and evil. is this the kind of science we are handing out. no wonder the aliens from the explorers were afraid of us. from watching some of these movies and we shoot first. there no need for questions afterwards. the whole movie is synonymous with watching some really boring science experiments and like boiling an egg or adding food color to celery. its not the fact that this is a low budget sci fi movie or thats its a bit cheesy and outdated. it is really and really and really boring. the whole movie is about trying to figure out what is going on. that is it. most of the things we learn about what going on are through monologues and self dictation. now add crappy dialog and cardboard acting and cheap sets and you have the makings of an ed wood clone (by the way and ed has made some really boring movies as well  please avoid the orgy of the dead). the dialog . oh and the dialog. jems such as represent. from under 2 miles of ocean . why not . it came through a billion miles in space. ordo you think you will be able to respect a husband who probably pulled the scientific boner of all time . this movie is obviously trying to pull a forbidden planet and this island earth and magnetic monster or in the same light as the outer limits and twilight zone. namely and a low budget sci fi movie (or tv episode) that is compelling enough to get past the technical difficulties and strange situations. at the core and these movies are enjoyable on some level (the story and the underlying meaning or the sheer comical nature of the dialog or situations). this movie has none of that. it is just 90 minutes of boredom. i couldn not even enjoy this on a ed wood level. i definitely recommend skipping this one and seeing one of the movies i mentioned above instead. it is so bad and that if my name was dr. forrester and i would never think of showing this movie to anyone . except frank maybe. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
