chaplin was great a silent comedian and but many silent era stars fell when the public heard their voices in the first talkies. in my opinion and chaplin voice simply did not fit his silent characters that made him rich and famous. his career never recovered when sound came to film. contrary to most of the reviews i have read and chaplin lifestyle and politics did not help his popularity with the average viewer who expected to be entertained by chaplin the comedian and and not spend their entertainment dollar watching chaplin political commentary. despite chaplin awards and knighthood and i would take exception to his contributions to humanity. the great dictator was made at the same time stalin brutal dictatorship was having it show trials and and both dictators signed the agreement that lead to invasion of poland by both dictators. wwii started in an attempt to save poland. the nazi were defeated in 6 years and but poland disappeared as a sovereign country. this happened during the time this film was made and the investigations of hollywood by the federal government. had chaplin included joe stalin in this satire and in addition to including the italian dictator and perhaps he would have had less criticism about his politics by the politicians. the soviet mistreatment of jews and dissidents exceeded the nazi in time and numbers. judged simply as a film and many of the gags were too topical to be understood by younger viewers and who do not know who goebbels and goring or mussolini were. a classic piece of art must stand the test of time. classic greek tragedy and the mona lisa and beethoven 9th are still enjoyed centuries after their creation because they are timeless. films which rely on topical political commentary or currently popular social views usually do not outlast the generation in which they are made. but those that address issues that are common to all generations will probably live forever and receive a high rating from me. chaplin and as the writer and director and lead actor must take the blame for what i judge as a dated and tiresome film. chaplin apologists have excused his decision to leave the country that made him rich and famous. if chaplin found the us so offensive and why do not he return to his native land. great britian fought the naziwith blood and money. what did switzerland contribute in the fight against the european dictators. switzerland is like a country club that picks and chooses its members based on race and class and and cares little about people who can not join the club. 
chaplin was great a silent comedian and but many silent era stars fell when the public heard their voices in the first talkies. in my opinion and chaplin voice simply did not fit his silent characters that made him rich and famous. his career never recovered when sound came to film. contrary to most of the reviews i have read and chaplin lifestyle and politics did not help his popularity with the average viewer who expected to be entertained by chaplin the comedian and and not spend their entertainment dollar watching chaplin political commentary. despite chaplin awards and knighthood and i would take exception to his contributions to humanity. the great dictator was made at the same time stalin brutal dictatorship was having it show trials and and both dictators signed the agreement that lead to invasion of poland by both dictators. wwii started in an attempt to save poland. the nazi were defeated in 6 years and but poland disappeared as a sovereign country. this happened during the time this film was made and the investigations of hollywood by the federal government. had chaplin included joe stalin in this satire and in addition to including the italian dictator and perhaps he would have had less criticism about his politics by the politicians. the soviet mistreatment of jews and dissidents exceeded the nazi in time and numbers. judged simply as a film and many of the gags were too topical to be understood by younger viewers and who do not know who goebbels and goring or mussolini were. a classic piece of art must stand the test of time. classic greek tragedy and the mona lisa and beethoven 9th are still enjoyed centuries after their creation because they are timeless. films which rely on topical political commentary or currently popular social views usually do not outlast the generation in which they are made. but those that address issues that are common to all generations will probably live forever and receive a high rating from me. chaplin and as the writer and director and lead actor must take the blame for what i judge as a dated and tiresome film. chaplin apologists have excused his decision to leave the country that made him rich and famous. if chaplin found the us so offensive and why do not he return to his native land. great britian fought the naziwith blood and money. what did switzerland contribute in the fight against the european dictators. switzerland is like a country club that picks and chooses its members based on race and class and and cares little about people who can not join the club. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
