for those curious and this episode is based in theme upon pirandello play and six characters in search of an author and jean paul sartre play and no exit (as indicated most obviously by its title) and but and of course and with a sterling twist. five very different individuals find themselves in a round room with no idea who they are other than the indication of their attire. a bell intermittently rings (perhaps also a hemmingway allusion. ) and increasing the agony of their incarceration. the newcomer to the group and a major and is determined to escape and while the others are resigned to their fate. unlike pirandello and these characters do not even have a story. they have nothing other than the experience of the room in their consciousness and and no one to author their nonexistent story and so their position is even more hopeless than the characters in pirandello piece. unlike both pirandello and sartre and there is no relationship involved between the characters and therefore no real conflict between them and though the theme of personal responsibility versus apathy is prominent in this story. though this diverges significantly from the storyline of the authors alluded to in the title and themes of sartre and pirandello (and many other authors of the twentieth century) come through with absolute clarity. this is very obviously a piece which addresses post modernist perspective in the context of the cold war era. there is also an emphasis upon issues of personal insignificance. this is easily one of the best episodes i have seen and and still exceptionally relevant to current experience (as are sartre and pirandello). exactly what makes a good piece of writing into a classic. 
for those curious and this episode is based in theme upon pirandello play and six characters in search of an author and jean paul sartre play and no exit (as indicated most obviously by its title) and but and of course and with a sterling twist. five very different individuals find themselves in a round room with no idea who they are other than the indication of their attire. a bell intermittently rings (perhaps also a hemmingway allusion. ) and increasing the agony of their incarceration. the newcomer to the group and a major and is determined to escape and while the others are resigned to their fate. unlike pirandello and these characters do not even have a story. they have nothing other than the experience of the room in their consciousness and and no one to author their nonexistent story and so their position is even more hopeless than the characters in pirandello piece. unlike both pirandello and sartre and there is no relationship involved between the characters and therefore no real conflict between them and though the theme of personal responsibility versus apathy is prominent in this story. though this diverges significantly from the storyline of the authors alluded to in the title and themes of sartre and pirandello (and many other authors of the twentieth century) come through with absolute clarity. this is very obviously a piece which addresses post modernist perspective in the context of the cold war era. there is also an emphasis upon issues of personal insignificance. this is easily one of the best episodes i have seen and and still exceptionally relevant to current experience (as are sartre and pirandello). exactly what makes a good piece of writing into a classic. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
