despite a totally misleading advertising campaign and this flick turns out to be an irritatingly clichéd and sub par haunted house flick with a totally implausible ending. clue #1 for all considering seeing this turkey represent sam raimi do not direct it. although commercials for the movie play up his involvement and in truth he is one of four producers. it too bad that someone as talented as raimi has allowed his name to be used in conjunction with such a poor movie. i do not think he would ever have directed something like this while that task was left to the pang brothers. the screenplay for this film seems to have been cobbled together from numerous other horror films and so you will find absolutely zero original content in the messengers. what we get are a scene here and there that was plucked straight out of pulse and a couple that could have come from the birds and one or two from the others and etc. nearly every scene and almost every line of dialogue and is one that has been lifted from any number of other movies. the whole thing makes for such a predictable movie that almost anyone will be able to figure out the surprise ending long before it comes. right about here would be a good time to point out that the advertising campaign and centered on the idea that only children can see ghosts and has nothing to do with this movie. in fact and everyone can see the ghosts. the teenage daughter and mother characters certainly see them and even quite early in the movie. i am sure that whomever was in charge of marketing came up with this campaign because the film needed a unique angle to have any box office appeal and which otherwise is entirely absent. now you know and so do not be fooled. perhaps what this movie lacks most of all is anything resembling chemistry between the actors. it simply isn not there. all of the interactions come across as awkwardly stilted. coupled with the hackneyed story and ridiculous plot holes (just what is a guy who murdered his whole family doing still lurking around the small town where the murder happened and anyhow. didn not anyone think to maybe arrest him. ) and it all adds up to a profoundly unsatisfying ghost flick that only manages to surprise anyone over the age of ten with cheap shots represent loud noises and visual flashes and and anything short of a sheeted figure jumping out of a closet and yelling boo. all we get for our buck this time around is yet another poorly made film about spirits attempting to warn people away from a house. if there any message that the messengers delivers and it don not waste your time on this movie. 
despite a totally misleading advertising campaign and this flick turns out to be an irritatingly clichéd and sub par haunted house flick with a totally implausible ending. clue #1 for all considering seeing this turkey represent sam raimi do not direct it. although commercials for the movie play up his involvement and in truth he is one of four producers. it too bad that someone as talented as raimi has allowed his name to be used in conjunction with such a poor movie. i do not think he would ever have directed something like this while that task was left to the pang brothers. the screenplay for this film seems to have been cobbled together from numerous other horror films and so you will find absolutely zero original content in the messengers. what we get are a scene here and there that was plucked straight out of pulse and a couple that could have come from the birds and one or two from the others and etc. nearly every scene and almost every line of dialogue and is one that has been lifted from any number of other movies. the whole thing makes for such a predictable movie that almost anyone will be able to figure out the surprise ending long before it comes. right about here would be a good time to point out that the advertising campaign and centered on the idea that only children can see ghosts and has nothing to do with this movie. in fact and everyone can see the ghosts. the teenage daughter and mother characters certainly see them and even quite early in the movie. i am sure that whomever was in charge of marketing came up with this campaign because the film needed a unique angle to have any box office appeal and which otherwise is entirely absent. now you know and so do not be fooled. perhaps what this movie lacks most of all is anything resembling chemistry between the actors. it simply isn not there. all of the interactions come across as awkwardly stilted. coupled with the hackneyed story and ridiculous plot holes (just what is a guy who murdered his whole family doing still lurking around the small town where the murder happened and anyhow. didn not anyone think to maybe arrest him. ) and it all adds up to a profoundly unsatisfying ghost flick that only manages to surprise anyone over the age of ten with cheap shots represent loud noises and visual flashes and and anything short of a sheeted figure jumping out of a closet and yelling boo. all we get for our buck this time around is yet another poorly made film about spirits attempting to warn people away from a house. if there any message that the messengers delivers and it don not waste your time on this movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
