i just finished watching dog watch. i thought parts of the movie were hokey with more than a few implausibilities. the acting wasn not too bad and the plot wasn not bad. but and as the saying goes and the devil was in the details. some examples represent1) the bleed through on charlie falon (sam elliott) bandage was shown to be coming from the back of his hand while it was his knuckles that were bleeding. 2) would a detective dispose of his murder victim from a very well lighted area. this seemed very silly to me. i am not unusually picky about a movie but and in my humble opinion and this one is definitely not recommended by me. 
i just finished watching dog watch. i thought parts of the movie were hokey with more than a few implausibilities. the acting wasn not too bad and the plot wasn not bad. but and as the saying goes and the devil was in the details. some examples represent1) the bleed through on charlie falon (sam elliott) bandage was shown to be coming from the back of his hand while it was his knuckles that were bleeding. 2) would a detective dispose of his murder victim from a very well lighted area. this seemed very silly to me. i am not unusually picky about a movie but and in my humble opinion and this one is definitely not recommended by me. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
