. said the continuity announcer as tactical assault was about to be broadcast . after seeing the first two minutes i started thinking rutger might want to get a new agent . after seeing the next ten minutes i started thinking rutger might want to retire thereby saving a potential audience from any more of his performances yup this is a truly terrible movie . i wasn not expecting much and why should i if the name rutget hauer appeared in the credits  and but within seconds of the opening title credits that featured nato warplanes with ussr markings bombing bosnia i realised i was going to be force fed inedible turkey three months after christmas . the attention to detail is non existent . nato planes carry ussr markings then were told hauer character spent six years in an iraqi prison which would make the setting 1997 . what nato were bombing the serbs in 1997 . i guess the producers do not think the audience would have noticed this ridiculous inaccuracy but i know i did . the producers also probably hoped the audience do not notice the lack of continuity such as dogfights with iraqi jets that suddenly turned from migs to f 4 phantoms then back again but i did . even stranger characters would take off in f 16s then when they arrive back at base there jet has changed into a soviet built mig oh and if youre expecting a dumb action movie youre only half right because it dumb but most of the plot centres around a basic instinct revenge plot . i will give the producers some credit ( maybe credit is too strong a word ) because after seeing plots featuring nannies from hell  and policemen from hell  and flat mates from hell we now have a fighter pilot from hell which means every single occupation of the 20th century has featured in a from hell type plot with perhaps tatical assualt being the worst movie of the lot. 
. said the continuity announcer as tactical assault was about to be broadcast . after seeing the first two minutes i started thinking rutger might want to get a new agent . after seeing the next ten minutes i started thinking rutger might want to retire thereby saving a potential audience from any more of his performances yup this is a truly terrible movie . i wasn not expecting much and why should i if the name rutget hauer appeared in the credits  and but within seconds of the opening title credits that featured nato warplanes with ussr markings bombing bosnia i realised i was going to be force fed inedible turkey three months after christmas . the attention to detail is non existent . nato planes carry ussr markings then were told hauer character spent six years in an iraqi prison which would make the setting 1997 . what nato were bombing the serbs in 1997 . i guess the producers do not think the audience would have noticed this ridiculous inaccuracy but i know i did . the producers also probably hoped the audience do not notice the lack of continuity such as dogfights with iraqi jets that suddenly turned from migs to f 4 phantoms then back again but i did . even stranger characters would take off in f 16s then when they arrive back at base there jet has changed into a soviet built mig oh and if youre expecting a dumb action movie youre only half right because it dumb but most of the plot centres around a basic instinct revenge plot . i will give the producers some credit ( maybe credit is too strong a word ) because after seeing plots featuring nannies from hell  and policemen from hell  and flat mates from hell we now have a fighter pilot from hell which means every single occupation of the 20th century has featured in a from hell type plot with perhaps tatical assualt being the worst movie of the lot. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
