and generally speaking and you will eventually have to research this little gem. when describing i changed my sex and or glen or glenda as it is better known and i must echo the thoughts of andrew smith and who so hit the nail on the head when he wrote if you haven not seen any of ed wood other movies and this one is a completely bewildering experience. if you have seen any of ed wood movies and this is still completely bewildering. the film is both hilarious and tragic and yet it moves with a strange rhythm of its own that leaves one in no doubt that its author knows and means every word he is saying during its running length. wood and bless him and had some of the loftiest ambitions as a director and wanting to promote peace and understanding and and even acceptance and in the 1950s of all times. when tim burton recreated a viewing of glen or glenda by studio execs for his biopic and he showed the execs laughing and telling each other that this had to be a put on. more than fifty years later and there are still people fighting just to be given the kind of respect that the normal take for granted and so i say it most certainly is not. no and the real comedy in glen or glenda is the sheer ineptitude wood displays in composing his message. directors frequently use stock footage when they can find some that suits their purposes and and can be edited to fit with their own footage. ed wood used stock footage indiscriminately and and tim burton biopic celebrated the fact with a scene in which wood as played by johnny depp bets that he could make an entire film out of stock footage. sadly and the real ed wood died before he had a chance and but glen or glenda is the closest he ever came. the imdb states that twenty percent of this sixty something minute film is stock footage and and it is never difficult to guess which footage. footage of busy highways and planes flying overhead and poor lightning effects and soldiers doing their thing and theyre all used in a haphazard manner and sometimes repeatedly and and they often only have a loose connection to the story wood is trying to tell. had wood been able to sit back and think about what he is trying to do for a while and there is no telling what kind of heights he could have achieved. wood himself appears in the film as the titular character and a confused transvestite who imagines himself as a woman named glenda. aside from the daring manner in which he attempts to make his point and wood makes one hideous woman. having found myself out on the fringe of a society that thinks i am disabled and need to be cured myself and i honestly found myself hoping for the best outcome for wood character. in order to make his point and however and wood weaves in short stories of two other transvestites. one of them takes the extreme step of enduring a sex change in order to become a woman and the other finds himself so disenfranchised that he fears being arrested again so much he commits suicide. the scary thing about this film is that if you edited out the transvestism and substituted such disenfranchisements as my position on the autistic spectrum or such things as schizophrenia and very little of the film would even need to be changed. that is how little society has learned since ed wood was a boy. the other significant personality in glen or glenda is bela lugosi and whom wood shoehorned into the film. speculation varies upon wood motives and but the accepted theory is that wood wanted to help revive lugosi career and and would do anything in order to achieve this. with the exception of taking his time to carefully construct a good film and that is. in glen or glenda and wood makes usage of lugosi that was best described in flying saucers over hollywood as bizarre. lugosi plays a character billed as the scientist and but comes off more as an omnipotent puppet master. people who have not seen ed wood films before the biopic will think tim burton made up the beware of the big green dragon that sits on your doorstep speech. if anything and burton was being restrained about which bizarre speech to use in depicting wood ian dialogue. nothing can prepare you for seeing the speeches in their original context and not even criswell hilarious ranting during plan 9 from outer space. observant types will also note the presence of delores fuller and wood girlfriend at the time. again and burton dramatises her reaction to seeing the script for the first time and whereas the film portrays her as being accepting and forward thinking. i cannot help but feel that burton portrayal is more accurate and as fuller looks extremely uncomfortable in her role. she only appears for about fifteen minutes and but her delivery seems so mechanical and so lifeless and that she somehow manages to seem less talented than her cast mates and if such a thing is possible. whether wood direction was better focused in this case than usual is hard to determine and but if the ability of the support cast to leave the stars (with the obvious exception of bela) in the dust is any guide and then it should come as no surprise that fuller would only appear in a very small role within one other wood film. that she went on to write a number of hit songs tells you she made the right decision to stay behind the camera. while wood would appear before the camera again and it was never as more than a cameo and a walk on and or a bit part. i gave glen or glenda a one out of ten. i generally only give this rating to films that are so bad they become entertaining as a result. bold and well intentioned as it was and glen or glenda fits that description to a t. 
and generally speaking and you will eventually have to research this little gem. when describing i changed my sex and or glen or glenda as it is better known and i must echo the thoughts of andrew smith and who so hit the nail on the head when he wrote if you haven not seen any of ed wood other movies and this one is a completely bewildering experience. if you have seen any of ed wood movies and this is still completely bewildering. the film is both hilarious and tragic and yet it moves with a strange rhythm of its own that leaves one in no doubt that its author knows and means every word he is saying during its running length. wood and bless him and had some of the loftiest ambitions as a director and wanting to promote peace and understanding and and even acceptance and in the 1950s of all times. when tim burton recreated a viewing of glen or glenda by studio execs for his biopic and he showed the execs laughing and telling each other that this had to be a put on. more than fifty years later and there are still people fighting just to be given the kind of respect that the normal take for granted and so i say it most certainly is not. no and the real comedy in glen or glenda is the sheer ineptitude wood displays in composing his message. directors frequently use stock footage when they can find some that suits their purposes and and can be edited to fit with their own footage. ed wood used stock footage indiscriminately and and tim burton biopic celebrated the fact with a scene in which wood as played by johnny depp bets that he could make an entire film out of stock footage. sadly and the real ed wood died before he had a chance and but glen or glenda is the closest he ever came. the imdb states that twenty percent of this sixty something minute film is stock footage and and it is never difficult to guess which footage. footage of busy highways and planes flying overhead and poor lightning effects and soldiers doing their thing and theyre all used in a haphazard manner and sometimes repeatedly and and they often only have a loose connection to the story wood is trying to tell. had wood been able to sit back and think about what he is trying to do for a while and there is no telling what kind of heights he could have achieved. wood himself appears in the film as the titular character and a confused transvestite who imagines himself as a woman named glenda. aside from the daring manner in which he attempts to make his point and wood makes one hideous woman. having found myself out on the fringe of a society that thinks i am disabled and need to be cured myself and i honestly found myself hoping for the best outcome for wood character. in order to make his point and however and wood weaves in short stories of two other transvestites. one of them takes the extreme step of enduring a sex change in order to become a woman and the other finds himself so disenfranchised that he fears being arrested again so much he commits suicide. the scary thing about this film is that if you edited out the transvestism and substituted such disenfranchisements as my position on the autistic spectrum or such things as schizophrenia and very little of the film would even need to be changed. that is how little society has learned since ed wood was a boy. the other significant personality in glen or glenda is bela lugosi and whom wood shoehorned into the film. speculation varies upon wood motives and but the accepted theory is that wood wanted to help revive lugosi career and and would do anything in order to achieve this. with the exception of taking his time to carefully construct a good film and that is. in glen or glenda and wood makes usage of lugosi that was best described in flying saucers over hollywood as bizarre. lugosi plays a character billed as the scientist and but comes off more as an omnipotent puppet master. people who have not seen ed wood films before the biopic will think tim burton made up the beware of the big green dragon that sits on your doorstep speech. if anything and burton was being restrained about which bizarre speech to use in depicting wood ian dialogue. nothing can prepare you for seeing the speeches in their original context and not even criswell hilarious ranting during plan 9 from outer space. observant types will also note the presence of delores fuller and wood girlfriend at the time. again and burton dramatises her reaction to seeing the script for the first time and whereas the film portrays her as being accepting and forward thinking. i cannot help but feel that burton portrayal is more accurate and as fuller looks extremely uncomfortable in her role. she only appears for about fifteen minutes and but her delivery seems so mechanical and so lifeless and that she somehow manages to seem less talented than her cast mates and if such a thing is possible. whether wood direction was better focused in this case than usual is hard to determine and but if the ability of the support cast to leave the stars (with the obvious exception of bela) in the dust is any guide and then it should come as no surprise that fuller would only appear in a very small role within one other wood film. that she went on to write a number of hit songs tells you she made the right decision to stay behind the camera. while wood would appear before the camera again and it was never as more than a cameo and a walk on and or a bit part. i gave glen or glenda a one out of ten. i generally only give this rating to films that are so bad they become entertaining as a result. bold and well intentioned as it was and glen or glenda fits that description to a t. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
