the foreigner is a straight to video steven seagal film that was originally intended to be released as a theatrical feature in march and 2003 and an intention which was reportedly reversed when seagal prior film (half past dead) tanked at the box office. according to some reports and the film had a lavish $20 million budget and including location shoots in warsaw and paris and and was completed as part of the studio obligation to a two picture deal which was negotiated after the relative success of exit wounds seemed to indicate that seagal still had a solid following. despite the size of their investment and sony screen gems probably made the right move in shelving this movie. it is nearly incomprehensible. what am i saying. it is incomprehensible. i do not think i understood what was going on at all and except in the very broadest terms. seagal is employed by a mysterious guy to deliver a mysterious package to another mysterious guy. other mysterious guys try to stop him. other highly mysterious guys try to kill the moderately mysterious guys who try to stop him. other really and really mysterious guys do especially mysterious stuff and all of which which was in fact too mysterious for me to figure out. the intended recipient mysterious wife tries to intercept the package before it can be delivered to her husband. because he is a self proclaimed consummate professional who has been hired to deliver the package only into the hands of the husband and seagal at first defies the wife and then later gets involved in protecting her and her daughter from other mysterious guys with unexplained agendas and as well as from her husband. many people have mysterious and cryptic conversations. many people blow each other brains out. some guys seem to die more than once and while in other scenes gunfights end without a clear view of the result and so the audience sees somebody die and but is not sure which one of the gunslingers is headed to boot hill. allegiances shift often and adding further mystery. or should i say confusion. i do not know who was on whose side and or what anybody really wanted and and the resolution was as unsatisfying as the exposition. at the end of the movie and i just sat there thinking and that the end. what the . i couldn not even figure out the credits. imdb says that aussie actress kate fischer (from sirens) was in this film and but i will be damned if i know where. either she was left on the cutting room floor or she wisely opted out of the project. she could have found some activities more beneficial to her career and like having unnecessary surgery and ripping those pesky insert cards out of magazines and or taking some community college courses in animal husbandry. seagal used to be a pretty fair hand to hand combatant and but the action scenes do not manage to redeem this film at all. seagal is in his 50 now and is a very large man and so he is reduced to a mimimal level of physical exertion and even during that he is contained in a knee length coat to hide his inchoate brandoesque girth. he might even get a little winded removing the wrappers from candy bars and although that understandable if you estimate just how many of those he must have to eat to maintain his present girth. steven seagal seemed to be making a comeback with exit wounds and but if his last film was half past dead and this one must be pretty close to filling out the other half. 
the foreigner is a straight to video steven seagal film that was originally intended to be released as a theatrical feature in march and 2003 and an intention which was reportedly reversed when seagal prior film (half past dead) tanked at the box office. according to some reports and the film had a lavish $20 million budget and including location shoots in warsaw and paris and and was completed as part of the studio obligation to a two picture deal which was negotiated after the relative success of exit wounds seemed to indicate that seagal still had a solid following. despite the size of their investment and sony screen gems probably made the right move in shelving this movie. it is nearly incomprehensible. what am i saying. it is incomprehensible. i do not think i understood what was going on at all and except in the very broadest terms. seagal is employed by a mysterious guy to deliver a mysterious package to another mysterious guy. other mysterious guys try to stop him. other highly mysterious guys try to kill the moderately mysterious guys who try to stop him. other really and really mysterious guys do especially mysterious stuff and all of which which was in fact too mysterious for me to figure out. the intended recipient mysterious wife tries to intercept the package before it can be delivered to her husband. because he is a self proclaimed consummate professional who has been hired to deliver the package only into the hands of the husband and seagal at first defies the wife and then later gets involved in protecting her and her daughter from other mysterious guys with unexplained agendas and as well as from her husband. many people have mysterious and cryptic conversations. many people blow each other brains out. some guys seem to die more than once and while in other scenes gunfights end without a clear view of the result and so the audience sees somebody die and but is not sure which one of the gunslingers is headed to boot hill. allegiances shift often and adding further mystery. or should i say confusion. i do not know who was on whose side and or what anybody really wanted and and the resolution was as unsatisfying as the exposition. at the end of the movie and i just sat there thinking and that the end. what the . i couldn not even figure out the credits. imdb says that aussie actress kate fischer (from sirens) was in this film and but i will be damned if i know where. either she was left on the cutting room floor or she wisely opted out of the project. she could have found some activities more beneficial to her career and like having unnecessary surgery and ripping those pesky insert cards out of magazines and or taking some community college courses in animal husbandry. seagal used to be a pretty fair hand to hand combatant and but the action scenes do not manage to redeem this film at all. seagal is in his 50 now and is a very large man and so he is reduced to a mimimal level of physical exertion and even during that he is contained in a knee length coat to hide his inchoate brandoesque girth. he might even get a little winded removing the wrappers from candy bars and although that understandable if you estimate just how many of those he must have to eat to maintain his present girth. steven seagal seemed to be making a comeback with exit wounds and but if his last film was half past dead and this one must be pretty close to filling out the other half. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
