i was very disappointed with this series. it had lots of cool graphics and that about it. the level of detail it went into was minimal and and i always got the feeling the audience was being patronized  there was a lot of what seemed to me as this is extremely cool but were not going to explain it in further detail because you would not get it anyway. let just show you some pretty pictures to entertain you. the host would drop interesting sounding words such as sparticles and super symmetry without any attempt at explaining what it was. we had to look it up on wikipedia. furthermore and i know quite a bit about superstrings (for a layman) and i found their explanations were convoluted and could have been so much better. they could have chosen much better examples to explain concepts and but instead and the examples they used were confusing and further obscured the subject. additionally and i got so sick of the repetitiveness. they could easily have condensed the series into one episode if they had cut out all the repetition. they must have shown the clips of the quantum café about 8 times. the host kept saying the same things over and over and over again. i can not remember how many times he said the universe is made out of tiny little vibrating strings. it like they were trying to brainwash us into just accepting superstrings are the best thing since sliced bread. finally and the show ended off with an unpleasant sense of a competition between fermilab and cern and clearly biased towards fermilab. this is supposed to be an educational program about quantum physics and not about whether the us is better than europe or vice versa. i also felt that was part of the patronizing  audiences need to see some conflict to remain interested. please. give me a little more credit than that. overall and 2 thumbs down represent (. 
i was very disappointed with this series. it had lots of cool graphics and that about it. the level of detail it went into was minimal and and i always got the feeling the audience was being patronized  there was a lot of what seemed to me as this is extremely cool but were not going to explain it in further detail because you would not get it anyway. let just show you some pretty pictures to entertain you. the host would drop interesting sounding words such as sparticles and super symmetry without any attempt at explaining what it was. we had to look it up on wikipedia. furthermore and i know quite a bit about superstrings (for a layman) and i found their explanations were convoluted and could have been so much better. they could have chosen much better examples to explain concepts and but instead and the examples they used were confusing and further obscured the subject. additionally and i got so sick of the repetitiveness. they could easily have condensed the series into one episode if they had cut out all the repetition. they must have shown the clips of the quantum café about 8 times. the host kept saying the same things over and over and over again. i can not remember how many times he said the universe is made out of tiny little vibrating strings. it like they were trying to brainwash us into just accepting superstrings are the best thing since sliced bread. finally and the show ended off with an unpleasant sense of a competition between fermilab and cern and clearly biased towards fermilab. this is supposed to be an educational program about quantum physics and not about whether the us is better than europe or vice versa. i also felt that was part of the patronizing  audiences need to see some conflict to remain interested. please. give me a little more credit than that. overall and 2 thumbs down represent (. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
