lina mclaidlaw is a bright and solitary young women who falls unexpectedly in love with johnnie aysgarth and a highly eligible bachelor with a penchant for losing money. they get married and but almost at once lina is subjected to johnnie addiction to lying and gambling and getting into debt. despite his flaws and she is unable to resist his charming manner and until she starts to suspect he may be harbouring murderous thoughts toward her . this is a good movie and well made and with an attractive cast and a good script and possibly the single lousiest ending in movie history. okay and that maybe going too far and but not by much. lots of films change the ending of a book (great expectations and the shining and etc) but the last two scenes of this one not only manage to be horribly lame and but also render the entire preceding plot completely meaningless. the story is about a woman whose husband is driven by his greed and moral lacking  and what she knows about him  to kill her. it should end (as it does in francis iles or anthony berkeley book before the fact) with him attempting to murder her. the reason it doesn not is that the studio forced hitch to reshoot the ending and one of the first examples of the godawful process of preview audience testing. hitch was canny and did what he was told (this was only his third film in hollywood) knowing that if he played the game and sooner or later he would gain creative control of his films and evinced by his masterpieces of the fifties. but that still leaves us with a turkey of an ending. this is a great shame because it really is a very good movie with an intriguing theme  does anyone really know their husband or wife that well . the script is excellent and with many off guard moments (such as when lina father dies and johnnie assumes she crying about it) and a finely judged performance by grant (who never played a villain again) and fine photography throughout and culminating in the famous glass of milk shot. fontaine won an oscar for this performance and although personally i prefer her confusion and vulnerability in her earlier victimised wife role in rebecca. i would like to rate this movie higher and but i really can not forgive that ending while this is what happens when movies are made for money and not love and which i guess is curiously the theme of the film itself. look fast for hitchcock cameo as a man posting a letter. 
lina mclaidlaw is a bright and solitary young women who falls unexpectedly in love with johnnie aysgarth and a highly eligible bachelor with a penchant for losing money. they get married and but almost at once lina is subjected to johnnie addiction to lying and gambling and getting into debt. despite his flaws and she is unable to resist his charming manner and until she starts to suspect he may be harbouring murderous thoughts toward her . this is a good movie and well made and with an attractive cast and a good script and possibly the single lousiest ending in movie history. okay and that maybe going too far and but not by much. lots of films change the ending of a book (great expectations and the shining and etc) but the last two scenes of this one not only manage to be horribly lame and but also render the entire preceding plot completely meaningless. the story is about a woman whose husband is driven by his greed and moral lacking  and what she knows about him  to kill her. it should end (as it does in francis iles or anthony berkeley book before the fact) with him attempting to murder her. the reason it doesn not is that the studio forced hitch to reshoot the ending and one of the first examples of the godawful process of preview audience testing. hitch was canny and did what he was told (this was only his third film in hollywood) knowing that if he played the game and sooner or later he would gain creative control of his films and evinced by his masterpieces of the fifties. but that still leaves us with a turkey of an ending. this is a great shame because it really is a very good movie with an intriguing theme  does anyone really know their husband or wife that well . the script is excellent and with many off guard moments (such as when lina father dies and johnnie assumes she crying about it) and a finely judged performance by grant (who never played a villain again) and fine photography throughout and culminating in the famous glass of milk shot. fontaine won an oscar for this performance and although personally i prefer her confusion and vulnerability in her earlier victimised wife role in rebecca. i would like to rate this movie higher and but i really can not forgive that ending while this is what happens when movies are made for money and not love and which i guess is curiously the theme of the film itself. look fast for hitchcock cameo as a man posting a letter. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
