a young man and who never knew his birth parents and receives an old farm in an isolated section of west virginia upon the death of his natural father. he visits his property with a cross section of potential victims including the comic relief black guy and a trendy lesbian couple. (hmm and will there be skinny dipping. take a guess. ) unfortunately and the party comes to an end when the spirits of drifters killed by his evil great grandfather and used as scarecrows come back for revenge. this film starts out well. an artful montage of depression era photographs and phony newspapers set against a speech by fdr  this and i believe and is his first appearance in a killer scarecrow movie establishes the mood. i developed some hopes for the film and which were partially realized. the story was serviceable enough. the setting was sufficiently bucolic. the photography was mostly in focus. the acting and while no great shakes and was slightly above par for horror movies in this budget range. the film might have actually worked within the narrow demands of the genre if the scarecrows were scary. but they weren not they looked cheap. they weren not frightening at all. the better the monster and the better the movie. these scarecrows do not scare dorothy and let alone toto. 
a young man and who never knew his birth parents and receives an old farm in an isolated section of west virginia upon the death of his natural father. he visits his property with a cross section of potential victims including the comic relief black guy and a trendy lesbian couple. (hmm and will there be skinny dipping. take a guess. ) unfortunately and the party comes to an end when the spirits of drifters killed by his evil great grandfather and used as scarecrows come back for revenge. this film starts out well. an artful montage of depression era photographs and phony newspapers set against a speech by fdr  this and i believe and is his first appearance in a killer scarecrow movie establishes the mood. i developed some hopes for the film and which were partially realized. the story was serviceable enough. the setting was sufficiently bucolic. the photography was mostly in focus. the acting and while no great shakes and was slightly above par for horror movies in this budget range. the film might have actually worked within the narrow demands of the genre if the scarecrows were scary. but they weren not they looked cheap. they weren not frightening at all. the better the monster and the better the movie. these scarecrows do not scare dorothy and let alone toto. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
