here why this movie fell very short of its potential(i do not read much and so i do not care what the novel was like). 1. i think brendan frasier copied his encino man from lambert tarzan. it was stiff and and while his tarzan call was a little more realistic and he had no humanity. 2. they screwed with the story. maybe that how the book goes and but for as long as i can remember the first utterances of tarzan were me tarzan and you jane. jane is the first human tarzan encounters. i did like the natives a bit more than the shoepolished midget pigmys in weismuller version and but those bows and arrows were a bit cheesy. 3. tarzan is primarily a love story. i am sorry and but the love interest enters over an hour into the picture. that qualifies her for a supporting role at best. supporting roles and leads do not fall for each other and not enough screen time and sorry. not only was andie mcdowell vioce over pathetic(most likely because her strong southern accent couldn not be masked) the chemistry scale between tarzan and jane was a whopping 0. i never believed they loved each other and which made the belgian dudes closing voice over and quite frankly and silly. when tarzan sees jane for the first time in the jungle and he feels an urge and if you will and a feeling he never felt before. jane brings out the humanity in him and and he brings out the untamed side of her. its this chemistry that compells the story of tarzan. not that lord greystoke dying wish is to keep his land whole and that johnny boy is going to do it for him. even a good face lift couldn not help this movie. it needs massive internal reconstruction. oh and and could we possibly shoot more in the jungle and or at least use camera angles that do not show off the sound stage like qualities of the place. final judgement and  negative . sorry tin man and and by the way and if you want to see real acting and drop lambert and check out leonardo dicaprio. 
here why this movie fell very short of its potential(i do not read much and so i do not care what the novel was like). 1. i think brendan frasier copied his encino man from lambert tarzan. it was stiff and and while his tarzan call was a little more realistic and he had no humanity. 2. they screwed with the story. maybe that how the book goes and but for as long as i can remember the first utterances of tarzan were me tarzan and you jane. jane is the first human tarzan encounters. i did like the natives a bit more than the shoepolished midget pigmys in weismuller version and but those bows and arrows were a bit cheesy. 3. tarzan is primarily a love story. i am sorry and but the love interest enters over an hour into the picture. that qualifies her for a supporting role at best. supporting roles and leads do not fall for each other and not enough screen time and sorry. not only was andie mcdowell vioce over pathetic(most likely because her strong southern accent couldn not be masked) the chemistry scale between tarzan and jane was a whopping 0. i never believed they loved each other and which made the belgian dudes closing voice over and quite frankly and silly. when tarzan sees jane for the first time in the jungle and he feels an urge and if you will and a feeling he never felt before. jane brings out the humanity in him and and he brings out the untamed side of her. its this chemistry that compells the story of tarzan. not that lord greystoke dying wish is to keep his land whole and that johnny boy is going to do it for him. even a good face lift couldn not help this movie. it needs massive internal reconstruction. oh and and could we possibly shoot more in the jungle and or at least use camera angles that do not show off the sound stage like qualities of the place. final judgement and  negative . sorry tin man and and by the way and if you want to see real acting and drop lambert and check out leonardo dicaprio. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
