bloody awful. there just no other way to put it. in fact and it so bad that the only reason i am wasting words on this is to warn off other reasonable viewers who want to be intelligently entertained. you will lose i. q. points watching this. come to think of it and it not even suitable for mindless viewing because of the irritation factor. there no guilty pleasure in watching something this incompetent. reasons to avoid it represent1) horribly scientifically inaccurate and to the point where this isn not sci fi anymore and it just mindnumbingly sloppy and lazy fantasy. 2) it sports fx that are cheesy beyond belief. not even cheesy kitsch that a wink and a nod and like vintage doctor who and but just cheap and shoddy to the point of being insulting. the fx are so bad theyre not even laughable. they spent about a dollar fifty on this and not more. 3) the direction is so weak and mindless that the only way the actors could make it through to the end of shooting without becoming terminally depressed was to sleepwalk through their roles and although catherine mccormack made some effort anyway and probably on principle and despite the director. moreover and this isn not peter hyams only bad film represent his flubs vastly outnumber any barely salvageable ones and of which timecop was the last such and and that was 15 years before this writing. he had nothing halfway decent since (end of days was just as slapdash and arnold was the only draw and and he needed much firmer direction than hyams provided). hyams just keeps making it more and more pointless for anyone to consider giving him more work. and finally and 4) ray bradbury stories deserve far better treatment than this. refusing to watch this film sends that message and not that hollywood is particularly listening. watch at your own risk. if you do and it turns you off movies altogether and you have only yourself (and hyams) to blame because you have been more than adequately warned. 
bloody awful. there just no other way to put it. in fact and it so bad that the only reason i am wasting words on this is to warn off other reasonable viewers who want to be intelligently entertained. you will lose i. q. points watching this. come to think of it and it not even suitable for mindless viewing because of the irritation factor. there no guilty pleasure in watching something this incompetent. reasons to avoid it represent1) horribly scientifically inaccurate and to the point where this isn not sci fi anymore and it just mindnumbingly sloppy and lazy fantasy. 2) it sports fx that are cheesy beyond belief. not even cheesy kitsch that a wink and a nod and like vintage doctor who and but just cheap and shoddy to the point of being insulting. the fx are so bad theyre not even laughable. they spent about a dollar fifty on this and not more. 3) the direction is so weak and mindless that the only way the actors could make it through to the end of shooting without becoming terminally depressed was to sleepwalk through their roles and although catherine mccormack made some effort anyway and probably on principle and despite the director. moreover and this isn not peter hyams only bad film represent his flubs vastly outnumber any barely salvageable ones and of which timecop was the last such and and that was 15 years before this writing. he had nothing halfway decent since (end of days was just as slapdash and arnold was the only draw and and he needed much firmer direction than hyams provided). hyams just keeps making it more and more pointless for anyone to consider giving him more work. and finally and 4) ray bradbury stories deserve far better treatment than this. refusing to watch this film sends that message and not that hollywood is particularly listening. watch at your own risk. if you do and it turns you off movies altogether and you have only yourself (and hyams) to blame because you have been more than adequately warned. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
