the recent documentary the adventures of errol flynn is an in depth look at the ultimate hollywood hero. bogart and cagney and wayne and the like were basically blue collar types in their screen images but flynn was an aristocrat in his style and manner and the younger son out to carve out his own fiefdom for a sword and thunder and romance analogy that ironically he found himself trapped in. if he hadn not been under contract to warner bros. he would have of been perfect in the cary grant role in suspicion represent the good looking charmer whose 1000 watt smile blinds one to the fact that he a predator. and he could have starred with his best leading ladies sister joan fontaine. that was flynn trouble he was the ultimate screen hero until his own habits and bad timing caught up with him. grant and flynn in a way are similar but flynn was the more macho of the two while it is possible to see grant as captain blood but flynn in the philadelphia story mr. blanding builds his dream house and or monkey business and or operation petticoat would have turned those roles on their collective ears because he too damn sure on his feet and the sexual tension he would have brought naturally would have made the story lines wobbly. but this wobbly biography is just a plasticized view of flynn and his era. there are times when i half expected a laugh track or an audience to go ahhh at some point. it doesn not go deeply into flynn life just the screen magazine view. it also doesn not delve into his struggle to be considered more than a derring doer. like the cleaned up biographies of lon chaney( the father and not the wolfman and or lennyof mice and men) and buster keaton done in the 50 this is just a time killing piece of fluff. 
the recent documentary the adventures of errol flynn is an in depth look at the ultimate hollywood hero. bogart and cagney and wayne and the like were basically blue collar types in their screen images but flynn was an aristocrat in his style and manner and the younger son out to carve out his own fiefdom for a sword and thunder and romance analogy that ironically he found himself trapped in. if he hadn not been under contract to warner bros. he would have of been perfect in the cary grant role in suspicion represent the good looking charmer whose 1000 watt smile blinds one to the fact that he a predator. and he could have starred with his best leading ladies sister joan fontaine. that was flynn trouble he was the ultimate screen hero until his own habits and bad timing caught up with him. grant and flynn in a way are similar but flynn was the more macho of the two while it is possible to see grant as captain blood but flynn in the philadelphia story mr. blanding builds his dream house and or monkey business and or operation petticoat would have turned those roles on their collective ears because he too damn sure on his feet and the sexual tension he would have brought naturally would have made the story lines wobbly. but this wobbly biography is just a plasticized view of flynn and his era. there are times when i half expected a laugh track or an audience to go ahhh at some point. it doesn not go deeply into flynn life just the screen magazine view. it also doesn not delve into his struggle to be considered more than a derring doer. like the cleaned up biographies of lon chaney( the father and not the wolfman and or lennyof mice and men) and buster keaton done in the 50 this is just a time killing piece of fluff. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
