how on earth can you have such fantastic actors in such a miserable creation. this is one of the most stylized pieces of rubbish i have seen in a long time. not only is it poorly written and it is a product of shoddy direction and editing. the cinematography is so horribly manipulative and unoriginal and the montage jumbled beyond belief. the actual ideas behind the plots (cloning and toxic waste and climate change) are all fine to begin with but where the production or direction team takes them is a big cesspool of filth and the likes of which are seen in one episode. and this is a scientific series. i am a physician and all i can say is that the science in this film is utter crap and almost embarrassing to watch. i really felt bad for the actors involved since they were all extraordinary. 
how on earth can you have such fantastic actors in such a miserable creation. this is one of the most stylized pieces of rubbish i have seen in a long time. not only is it poorly written and it is a product of shoddy direction and editing. the cinematography is so horribly manipulative and unoriginal and the montage jumbled beyond belief. the actual ideas behind the plots (cloning and toxic waste and climate change) are all fine to begin with but where the production or direction team takes them is a big cesspool of filth and the likes of which are seen in one episode. and this is a scientific series. i am a physician and all i can say is that the science in this film is utter crap and almost embarrassing to watch. i really felt bad for the actors involved since they were all extraordinary. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
