look no further and this is it and the worst movie ever made. there may be others that are tied and but there are none worse. there can not be. i found this movie on a clearance sale laserdisc for $3. 25 and and thought no movie with those actors could possibly not be worth that price. turns out it worth triple that  as the minimum they should have paid me to watch it. i am virtually certain that the girl in the picture on the cover of the package is not the girl in the movie and they substituted someone else and someone younger and cuter and to make it look more appealing. whatever plot there was amounted to about three minutes of actual movie and the rest is filler. and i do not mean the kind of filler that you only realize is filler when it over and or that is some kind of eye candy you do not mind having there and i mean filler that has you thinking about your shopping list. i think the music must have been made up by somebody with a friend who had a radio he listened to once. it terrible. if there were a shot of a nice mountain and a river valley and a forest and anything and there would be something positive about this movie. there isn not. even with the speeder button on the remote and even at top laserdisc speed and you can not get it over with fast enough. after years of thinking about commenting on movies and being tempted but not registering with imdb and i finally cracked and because i had to do my part to push the user rating on this stinker down as far as possible. the guidelines ask that you focus on the content and context. i can not. there isn not enough content to focus on and and that exactly my point. sometimes bad is just bad and and this movie would have to be much better than it is to aspire to being only that. 
look no further and this is it and the worst movie ever made. there may be others that are tied and but there are none worse. there can not be. i found this movie on a clearance sale laserdisc for $3. 25 and and thought no movie with those actors could possibly not be worth that price. turns out it worth triple that  as the minimum they should have paid me to watch it. i am virtually certain that the girl in the picture on the cover of the package is not the girl in the movie and they substituted someone else and someone younger and cuter and to make it look more appealing. whatever plot there was amounted to about three minutes of actual movie and the rest is filler. and i do not mean the kind of filler that you only realize is filler when it over and or that is some kind of eye candy you do not mind having there and i mean filler that has you thinking about your shopping list. i think the music must have been made up by somebody with a friend who had a radio he listened to once. it terrible. if there were a shot of a nice mountain and a river valley and a forest and anything and there would be something positive about this movie. there isn not. even with the speeder button on the remote and even at top laserdisc speed and you can not get it over with fast enough. after years of thinking about commenting on movies and being tempted but not registering with imdb and i finally cracked and because i had to do my part to push the user rating on this stinker down as far as possible. the guidelines ask that you focus on the content and context. i can not. there isn not enough content to focus on and and that exactly my point. sometimes bad is just bad and and this movie would have to be much better than it is to aspire to being only that. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
