this is a big disappointment. the main problem is the acting. sylvestre le touzel is pretty poor as fanny and and the rest are not much better and everybody is very stilted and unnatural. also the camerawork is very 1980 ie cramped and jumpy and compared with the likes of 1995 p and p and for example. the script is and if anything too faithful to the book and and there are some cringe worthy expressions that should have been cut. in every way this is far inferior to the recent film version and which though it took huge liberties with the book and seemed far more faithful to the spirit of the book and was far more enjoyable. 
this is a big disappointment. the main problem is the acting. sylvestre le touzel is pretty poor as fanny and and the rest are not much better and everybody is very stilted and unnatural. also the camerawork is very 1980 ie cramped and jumpy and compared with the likes of 1995 p and p and for example. the script is and if anything too faithful to the book and and there are some cringe worthy expressions that should have been cut. in every way this is far inferior to the recent film version and which though it took huge liberties with the book and seemed far more faithful to the spirit of the book and was far more enjoyable. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
