i read the book after seeing the movie and do not care for it and finding it somewhat trashy while but trashy books often make good movies and and this one certainly could have. the story of a teen girl exploration of her attractive power over boys and which she finds as irresistibly stimulating as it is doubtfully controllable and and which has an even tighter grip on her than it would on a normal girl because it affects her through her werewolfry this story would have an obvious appeal to the young audience for which movies are made represent an appeal of one kind to girls and and of another kind to boys represent and i do not understand how the movie makers could be blind to that and turn the story into one with little appeal to anybody. to begin with and take the title (which is the best thing about the book) represent it drawn from a hesse quotation and also used as an epigraph and about a person running in fear and tasting both blood and chocolate in his mouth and one tasting as bad as the other. this is a wonderful metaphor for the heroine state represent torn between her human and wolf sides and savoring each but equally fearful of both. the movie dispenses with the epigraph and and instead introduces the character working in her aunt chocolate shop. i can understand how the book title might have suggested to the movie makers the erotically charged chocolates of like water for chocolate and and led them to want to link the same symbol to werewolves. but they do not while so why is it in the movie. in the book the characters are in high school or in and out and as with the five and a teen gang who favor black jeans and t shirts and and fall somewhere between being the heroine nemeses and her pet peeves. in the movie they have become decadent twenty something clubgoers. in the book the heroine is 16 and just of an age to be discovering how her sexuality operates on the boy she wants and as well as on herself while she the one who initiates the contact and then steps back and re initiates and and so on. in the movie she no longer a girl but a woman and and the guy is no longer a high school poet on the fringe of campus life but a fugitive from the law (and a comic book artist and to boot) and it he who comes on to her and in a manner as unattractive as that of her wormy cousin. she initially puts him off and but then gives in and as he confident she will represent hey and you know you want it. i would have thought a female director would have taken the chance the book offered to show a female protagonist in an uncompliant and proactive role while but no. in the book the heroine clan is driven from their home because of the five delinquent behavior while in the movie it because she went for a run(. ). she a great runner and prone to kicking off from building walls and and both she and her clanmates scale buildings in a trice while very like heroes of martial arts movies and very unlike wolves and or anything resembling them. in the book they do not turn into actual wolves and but things bigger than wolves while in the movie theyre just ordinary wolves. in the book they metamorphose in howling style and with crunching of spines while this is one of the things that make the heroine aware of the pain her body brings her and as well as the pleasure. in the movie the werewolves have become magical acrobats and taking great swan dives and transforming in mid air and shimmering yellow like tinker bell while it looks cool and means nothing. in the book the clan is a slightly white trashy family that has relocated from west virginia to maryland. in the movie they live in bucharest but all talk in different accents and none romanian. in the book nearly the whole pack want to lead normal lives and agree that to insure that and indeed and their survival one necessity is to keep their true nature secret from humans. and so the characters keep saying in the movie while yet the head of the clan is some kind of underground boss but apparently not a crime boss and since he despises criminals and has a standing deal with the police and who supply him with meat for the pack. this seems a big exception to the rule of keeping humans from knowing while but maybe the police are considered safe because of their known tolerance for eccentricity and cult murder. at the end of the book the heroine learns she can not be something she not when and in her effort to live a divided life and she gets stuck between the human and animal states and unable to be all one thing or the other. her boyfriend isn not sure or strong enough to accept her for what she is and the pack can not risk having him around and and the two are forced to separate. in the movie she rescues him like lassie and and they drive off to paris (why paris. ) and in an ending that smiley faced but not really happy and since the conflicts between their natures between _her_ natures remain unresolved. but the difference in the movie that hampers enjoyment the most is that whereas the book characters behave conventionally and within the realm of young adult novels and those in the movie for some reason have been made as annoying as possible. every other line is a threat or some other kind of oneupsmanship represent you will be sorry while you do not belong here while you would not get rid of me while i gave you your chance while etc. i prefer to steer clear of people who deal in that way. there have been many good vampire movies and never a good werewolf movie. had this one stuck to the book and it might have been the first. but no. 
i read the book after seeing the movie and do not care for it and finding it somewhat trashy while but trashy books often make good movies and and this one certainly could have. the story of a teen girl exploration of her attractive power over boys and which she finds as irresistibly stimulating as it is doubtfully controllable and and which has an even tighter grip on her than it would on a normal girl because it affects her through her werewolfry this story would have an obvious appeal to the young audience for which movies are made represent an appeal of one kind to girls and and of another kind to boys represent and i do not understand how the movie makers could be blind to that and turn the story into one with little appeal to anybody. to begin with and take the title (which is the best thing about the book) represent it drawn from a hesse quotation and also used as an epigraph and about a person running in fear and tasting both blood and chocolate in his mouth and one tasting as bad as the other. this is a wonderful metaphor for the heroine state represent torn between her human and wolf sides and savoring each but equally fearful of both. the movie dispenses with the epigraph and and instead introduces the character working in her aunt chocolate shop. i can understand how the book title might have suggested to the movie makers the erotically charged chocolates of like water for chocolate and and led them to want to link the same symbol to werewolves. but they do not while so why is it in the movie. in the book the characters are in high school or in and out and as with the five and a teen gang who favor black jeans and t shirts and and fall somewhere between being the heroine nemeses and her pet peeves. in the movie they have become decadent twenty something clubgoers. in the book the heroine is 16 and just of an age to be discovering how her sexuality operates on the boy she wants and as well as on herself while she the one who initiates the contact and then steps back and re initiates and and so on. in the movie she no longer a girl but a woman and and the guy is no longer a high school poet on the fringe of campus life but a fugitive from the law (and a comic book artist and to boot) and it he who comes on to her and in a manner as unattractive as that of her wormy cousin. she initially puts him off and but then gives in and as he confident she will represent hey and you know you want it. i would have thought a female director would have taken the chance the book offered to show a female protagonist in an uncompliant and proactive role while but no. in the book the heroine clan is driven from their home because of the five delinquent behavior while in the movie it because she went for a run(. ). she a great runner and prone to kicking off from building walls and and both she and her clanmates scale buildings in a trice while very like heroes of martial arts movies and very unlike wolves and or anything resembling them. in the book they do not turn into actual wolves and but things bigger than wolves while in the movie theyre just ordinary wolves. in the book they metamorphose in howling style and with crunching of spines while this is one of the things that make the heroine aware of the pain her body brings her and as well as the pleasure. in the movie the werewolves have become magical acrobats and taking great swan dives and transforming in mid air and shimmering yellow like tinker bell while it looks cool and means nothing. in the book the clan is a slightly white trashy family that has relocated from west virginia to maryland. in the movie they live in bucharest but all talk in different accents and none romanian. in the book nearly the whole pack want to lead normal lives and agree that to insure that and indeed and their survival one necessity is to keep their true nature secret from humans. and so the characters keep saying in the movie while yet the head of the clan is some kind of underground boss but apparently not a crime boss and since he despises criminals and has a standing deal with the police and who supply him with meat for the pack. this seems a big exception to the rule of keeping humans from knowing while but maybe the police are considered safe because of their known tolerance for eccentricity and cult murder. at the end of the book the heroine learns she can not be something she not when and in her effort to live a divided life and she gets stuck between the human and animal states and unable to be all one thing or the other. her boyfriend isn not sure or strong enough to accept her for what she is and the pack can not risk having him around and and the two are forced to separate. in the movie she rescues him like lassie and and they drive off to paris (why paris. ) and in an ending that smiley faced but not really happy and since the conflicts between their natures between _her_ natures remain unresolved. but the difference in the movie that hampers enjoyment the most is that whereas the book characters behave conventionally and within the realm of young adult novels and those in the movie for some reason have been made as annoying as possible. every other line is a threat or some other kind of oneupsmanship represent you will be sorry while you do not belong here while you would not get rid of me while i gave you your chance while etc. i prefer to steer clear of people who deal in that way. there have been many good vampire movies and never a good werewolf movie. had this one stuck to the book and it might have been the first. but no. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
