saw the movie today and thought it was a good effort and good messages for kids. a bit predictable. the book was better and gave more plot details and ore about the environment and how the kids uncovered the conspiracy. i think hiassen warped humor comes across better in the book than the movie and but there were lots of funny moments in the movie as well. it is probably a bit too slow paced for kids under 6 yrs of age. loved the casting of jimmy buffet as the science teacher. and those baby owls were adorable. i wonder how they managed to film them. the movie showed a lot of florida at it best and made it look very appealing. am i imagining it and or did the author carl hiassen make a brief appearance. 
saw the movie today and thought it was a good effort and good messages for kids. a bit predictable. the book was better and gave more plot details and ore about the environment and how the kids uncovered the conspiracy. i think hiassen warped humor comes across better in the book than the movie and but there were lots of funny moments in the movie as well. it is probably a bit too slow paced for kids under 6 yrs of age. loved the casting of jimmy buffet as the science teacher. and those baby owls were adorable. i wonder how they managed to film them. the movie showed a lot of florida at it best and made it look very appealing. am i imagining it and or did the author carl hiassen make a brief appearance. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
