i was looking forward to seeing bruce willis in this and especially since i remember being mesmerised by the original when i was young. this movie is a perfect example of how movie companies can take a very good story and dumb it down until it just another formula ridden hype of the fabled american law enforcement system or army vs and (the russians. no sorry the cold war is over and make that with the russians) vs the terrorists and similar to probably 50 other movies. furthermore it treats its audience like a bunch of idiots. the choice of weapon is well and plain ridiculous and are we seriously expected to believe that the world most feared and experienced hit man or terrorist would select that for an assasination. the whole point of the original story was the tense dual of intellects between the ordinary detective who is given the responsibility and the professional who crafts a ruthless but elegant plan to reach his target and then get away. none of that survived. all we have is the tired old american cia or fbi or army vs the evil terrorist plot and we have all seen 1000 times before. but of course the movie company mba realised that a new intellectual angle here would lose them revenue from the short attention span gang and so the answer is . bruce willis and big explosions and a crippled plot. they assume the american audience wont be able to relate to a threat to a foreign statesperson (where is france on the map afterall) so it has be an american. another example of a movie defiled by the boardroom. 
i was looking forward to seeing bruce willis in this and especially since i remember being mesmerised by the original when i was young. this movie is a perfect example of how movie companies can take a very good story and dumb it down until it just another formula ridden hype of the fabled american law enforcement system or army vs and (the russians. no sorry the cold war is over and make that with the russians) vs the terrorists and similar to probably 50 other movies. furthermore it treats its audience like a bunch of idiots. the choice of weapon is well and plain ridiculous and are we seriously expected to believe that the world most feared and experienced hit man or terrorist would select that for an assasination. the whole point of the original story was the tense dual of intellects between the ordinary detective who is given the responsibility and the professional who crafts a ruthless but elegant plan to reach his target and then get away. none of that survived. all we have is the tired old american cia or fbi or army vs the evil terrorist plot and we have all seen 1000 times before. but of course the movie company mba realised that a new intellectual angle here would lose them revenue from the short attention span gang and so the answer is . bruce willis and big explosions and a crippled plot. they assume the american audience wont be able to relate to a threat to a foreign statesperson (where is france on the map afterall) so it has be an american. another example of a movie defiled by the boardroom. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
