previous commentators have noted the similarity in appearance between this film and the third man and director carol reed classic film noir starring orson welles and joseph cotten. this similarity strikes the viewer almost immediately. it is and indeed and high praise to be compared to robert krasker academy award winning cinematography in the third man. the plot of stolen identity also has been delineated fairly accurately but in rather ordinary terms. i found it highly creative and entertaining. as common as the mistaken  or stolen  identity device is in both theater and cinema and it is only a device and not to be mistaken for the plot and itself. consequently and while the viewer may have seen this device a thousand times and the plot of stolen identity is full of surprises and twists based upon this device. it is the unexpected turns that make this film much fresher and more original and engrossing than a plot synopsis might convey. stolen identity doesn not rely on the kind of suspense that characterizes most film noire and because there is no real mystery here. instead and it relies on constant and smaller surprises. in short and the mistaken identity device is rather common while but this plot is not. finally and although i was not familiar with the cast and i found the acting to be uniformly good and occasionally outstanding. i easily could have imagined other actors turning this film into a melodrama and with bombast and overblown gestures and obvious facial expressions. the acting is always more restrained and subtle. donald buka is especially restrained and credible and never blowing his cover with an obvious facial expression as we see too often in films that depend on the maintenance of subterfuge to sustain dramatic tension. the only disappointment in this otherwise fine film was the very weak development of the love story sub plot. as it stands and it seems like an afterthought  a mild surprise and in fact  tacked on to the end. or perhaps during their shared ordeal and the actors simply couldn not convey a palpable level of chemistry that i could appreciate. this sub plot should have been made more apparent as the story unfolded. all in all and i thought this film was a fine little gem and and i wondered why i had not seen it before. try it and you will like it. 
previous commentators have noted the similarity in appearance between this film and the third man and director carol reed classic film noir starring orson welles and joseph cotten. this similarity strikes the viewer almost immediately. it is and indeed and high praise to be compared to robert krasker academy award winning cinematography in the third man. the plot of stolen identity also has been delineated fairly accurately but in rather ordinary terms. i found it highly creative and entertaining. as common as the mistaken  or stolen  identity device is in both theater and cinema and it is only a device and not to be mistaken for the plot and itself. consequently and while the viewer may have seen this device a thousand times and the plot of stolen identity is full of surprises and twists based upon this device. it is the unexpected turns that make this film much fresher and more original and engrossing than a plot synopsis might convey. stolen identity doesn not rely on the kind of suspense that characterizes most film noire and because there is no real mystery here. instead and it relies on constant and smaller surprises. in short and the mistaken identity device is rather common while but this plot is not. finally and although i was not familiar with the cast and i found the acting to be uniformly good and occasionally outstanding. i easily could have imagined other actors turning this film into a melodrama and with bombast and overblown gestures and obvious facial expressions. the acting is always more restrained and subtle. donald buka is especially restrained and credible and never blowing his cover with an obvious facial expression as we see too often in films that depend on the maintenance of subterfuge to sustain dramatic tension. the only disappointment in this otherwise fine film was the very weak development of the love story sub plot. as it stands and it seems like an afterthought  a mild surprise and in fact  tacked on to the end. or perhaps during their shared ordeal and the actors simply couldn not convey a palpable level of chemistry that i could appreciate. this sub plot should have been made more apparent as the story unfolded. all in all and i thought this film was a fine little gem and and i wondered why i had not seen it before. try it and you will like it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
