there are certain horror directors for whom i have built up so much respect and admiration over the years and that they can not possibly disappoint me know matter what garbage to decide to put on film. lucio fulci is surely one of them and but damned and he trying to disappoint me with his later efforts. you can easily afford yourself to skip most of the films fulci directed or produced during the late 80 and simply watch cat in the brain instead and because that one title gathers and repeats the best and absolute goriest footage of no less than seven other fulci flicks and including the sickest murders sequences featuring in when alice broke the mirror. as a whole and this movie definitely ranks among our director weakest and most pointless achievements. the script is incoherent as hell and the basic premise is totally implausible and somewhat stupid and there absolutely no suspense to enjoy. i love the title and but it actually quite meaningless. there is a character named alice in the story and but it only a supportive role and she certainly doesn not break any mirrors. i suppose she could break stuff simply using her voice and as she an opera singer and but she doesn not. the plot revolves on a middle aged and gambling addicted playboy who spends his days seducing wealthy widows and killing them for their money. lester parson butchers the ladies (as well as unwelcome witnesses) in gruesome ways and makes steaks out of their juiciest body parts and feeds the remainders to his cat. there also a silly psychological sub plot in which he thinks his own shadow is responsible for the murders instead of him. the difference between when alice broke the mirror and some of fulci greatest horror films (the beyond and city of the living dead and ) lies in the fact that he totally doesn not bother to create a horrific atmosphere. the characters and lester included and are colorless and boring and the murders are ordinarily depicted while like it the most common thing in the world to put a woman head in a microwave or repeatedly run back and forth over a human body with a car. the lighting is poor and the cinematography super ugly and the editing clumsy and amateurish and the acting performances are downright miserable. if i do not know any better and i would think lucio deliberately made a lousy film in order to protest against all the harsh critics that dislike his repertoire no matter how much spirit and effort he put into it. the obvious element to enjoy here is simply the outrageous gore and bloodshed and because even the attempt to blend in black comedy doesn not work properly. as long as lester swings around his chainsaw and cuts off women feet and when alice broke the mirror is an undemanding piece of horror entertainment and but other than that and there isn not a whole lot to recommend. 
there are certain horror directors for whom i have built up so much respect and admiration over the years and that they can not possibly disappoint me know matter what garbage to decide to put on film. lucio fulci is surely one of them and but damned and he trying to disappoint me with his later efforts. you can easily afford yourself to skip most of the films fulci directed or produced during the late 80 and simply watch cat in the brain instead and because that one title gathers and repeats the best and absolute goriest footage of no less than seven other fulci flicks and including the sickest murders sequences featuring in when alice broke the mirror. as a whole and this movie definitely ranks among our director weakest and most pointless achievements. the script is incoherent as hell and the basic premise is totally implausible and somewhat stupid and there absolutely no suspense to enjoy. i love the title and but it actually quite meaningless. there is a character named alice in the story and but it only a supportive role and she certainly doesn not break any mirrors. i suppose she could break stuff simply using her voice and as she an opera singer and but she doesn not. the plot revolves on a middle aged and gambling addicted playboy who spends his days seducing wealthy widows and killing them for their money. lester parson butchers the ladies (as well as unwelcome witnesses) in gruesome ways and makes steaks out of their juiciest body parts and feeds the remainders to his cat. there also a silly psychological sub plot in which he thinks his own shadow is responsible for the murders instead of him. the difference between when alice broke the mirror and some of fulci greatest horror films (the beyond and city of the living dead and ) lies in the fact that he totally doesn not bother to create a horrific atmosphere. the characters and lester included and are colorless and boring and the murders are ordinarily depicted while like it the most common thing in the world to put a woman head in a microwave or repeatedly run back and forth over a human body with a car. the lighting is poor and the cinematography super ugly and the editing clumsy and amateurish and the acting performances are downright miserable. if i do not know any better and i would think lucio deliberately made a lousy film in order to protest against all the harsh critics that dislike his repertoire no matter how much spirit and effort he put into it. the obvious element to enjoy here is simply the outrageous gore and bloodshed and because even the attempt to blend in black comedy doesn not work properly. as long as lester swings around his chainsaw and cuts off women feet and when alice broke the mirror is an undemanding piece of horror entertainment and but other than that and there isn not a whole lot to recommend. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
