i believe there are two angles to the story and first and it the world satyric view and presented in an obvious kafkaesque manner and underlining the sordid spectacle behind some of life most common and but also pleasant and or comfortable moments and elements and which are usually enough to keep man functioning in society. like represent a good job and a good home and a good wife and a good car and and even a good mistress. apart from this so called common bliss and there are some and who cannot help asking themselves some more uncomfortable questions and like and where they come from and or weather they can have some other form of bliss and weather there could be a reason for them being or weather there could be something they missed out on and or and even more sinister and weather there could be something the system itself is withholding from them. second and the most interesting aspect of this film and i believe and is the fact that it attacks head on this natural compulsion to dissect the world around us and questioning it by our personal judgment and and usually condemning it because it doesn not serve us better and because it not tailor made to suit us as a person. the symbolism behind the train accident and i believe suggests that our own will can be overpowered by fate or some other universal greater power and even in the face of our so called power to decide when we want out. instead the man gets to be dismissed by this greater power(let call it the system and because the authors clearly avoid calling it god and perhaps further underlining that the system is man  made and therefore can be mastered by man and unlike fate and which is a concept closer to religion) on it own terms and not by killing him and but by showing him that there is a place for the man who asks or wants too much and suggesting maybe and that true fulfillment does not come from the outside world and but from within and and if the outside world decides to provide you with some comfort and you should learn to accept it and without questioning the fabric of every little aspect of it. unconfortable and but makes you reevaluate some existential questions which have become mainstream in the last century and like what can man do in a world increasingly drained of substance and a consumer driven world in which man can be interchanged without making a difference to the bigger picture and but only as long as he is of some use to the system. 
i believe there are two angles to the story and first and it the world satyric view and presented in an obvious kafkaesque manner and underlining the sordid spectacle behind some of life most common and but also pleasant and or comfortable moments and elements and which are usually enough to keep man functioning in society. like represent a good job and a good home and a good wife and a good car and and even a good mistress. apart from this so called common bliss and there are some and who cannot help asking themselves some more uncomfortable questions and like and where they come from and or weather they can have some other form of bliss and weather there could be a reason for them being or weather there could be something they missed out on and or and even more sinister and weather there could be something the system itself is withholding from them. second and the most interesting aspect of this film and i believe and is the fact that it attacks head on this natural compulsion to dissect the world around us and questioning it by our personal judgment and and usually condemning it because it doesn not serve us better and because it not tailor made to suit us as a person. the symbolism behind the train accident and i believe suggests that our own will can be overpowered by fate or some other universal greater power and even in the face of our so called power to decide when we want out. instead the man gets to be dismissed by this greater power(let call it the system and because the authors clearly avoid calling it god and perhaps further underlining that the system is man  made and therefore can be mastered by man and unlike fate and which is a concept closer to religion) on it own terms and not by killing him and but by showing him that there is a place for the man who asks or wants too much and suggesting maybe and that true fulfillment does not come from the outside world and but from within and and if the outside world decides to provide you with some comfort and you should learn to accept it and without questioning the fabric of every little aspect of it. unconfortable and but makes you reevaluate some existential questions which have become mainstream in the last century and like what can man do in a world increasingly drained of substance and a consumer driven world in which man can be interchanged without making a difference to the bigger picture and but only as long as he is of some use to the system. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
