i wasn not impressed with the graffiti artist and despite it artsy (aka. low budget improvisation) appeal. there is little dialog and at least for me and i was disappointed that it do not give more credit or promote the work of guerrilla artists such as these. instead and it was a story that covers familiar territory. two guys who basically do little more than tag buildings become friends and tagging partners and and eventually experiment with a relationship. they seem like opposites and rather uncomfortable together. little is explained about their backgrounds and the things between the two young men happen at rapid speed (although and this i can understand because it only 70 minutes or so). there been countless numbers of similar plots and productions in recent years to the point that the sphere of independent film is starting to become just as saturated with this particular storytelling just as the mainstream has become saturated with this and more. much of the film may bore the viewer who needs immediate dialog and purpose. the primary figure of this story (at least extensively) and performs his routines with nearly no dialog and no insight and and nothing else to carry the viewer. and and for a short film and i wished they could have gotten to the point a lot faster. that and aside from the typical plot annoyed me. yet and there was something about a momentary glimpse into the daily habits of at least two graffiti artists and even if most of it was rather unoccupied time. recommended if youre tired of the mainstream crap and do not mind an indie picture and have some interested into this underground and urban art form. but and you really have to watch it for yourself and because this seems to be one with a more acquired taste. for more recent indie films centering on graffiti artists and check out transit. 
i wasn not impressed with the graffiti artist and despite it artsy (aka. low budget improvisation) appeal. there is little dialog and at least for me and i was disappointed that it do not give more credit or promote the work of guerrilla artists such as these. instead and it was a story that covers familiar territory. two guys who basically do little more than tag buildings become friends and tagging partners and and eventually experiment with a relationship. they seem like opposites and rather uncomfortable together. little is explained about their backgrounds and the things between the two young men happen at rapid speed (although and this i can understand because it only 70 minutes or so). there been countless numbers of similar plots and productions in recent years to the point that the sphere of independent film is starting to become just as saturated with this particular storytelling just as the mainstream has become saturated with this and more. much of the film may bore the viewer who needs immediate dialog and purpose. the primary figure of this story (at least extensively) and performs his routines with nearly no dialog and no insight and and nothing else to carry the viewer. and and for a short film and i wished they could have gotten to the point a lot faster. that and aside from the typical plot annoyed me. yet and there was something about a momentary glimpse into the daily habits of at least two graffiti artists and even if most of it was rather unoccupied time. recommended if youre tired of the mainstream crap and do not mind an indie picture and have some interested into this underground and urban art form. but and you really have to watch it for yourself and because this seems to be one with a more acquired taste. for more recent indie films centering on graffiti artists and check out transit. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
