i learned much from previous viewer reactions. is there one that does not mention propaganda. too glib. perception is concept dependent. i love fred astaire musicals and the great and great songs and  and fred peerless grace. but comrades and if you see idle and brainless and rich parasites dancing on the downtrodden and unemployed and that a valid criticism of capitalist propaganda. any movie is steeped in the values of its time and place and not to mention those who fund it  the pipers who call the tune. great art transcends all and as did nevsky and as did all quiet on the western front. i confess. i saw it last 40 odd years ago. but the images are burned in my brain. it the greatest battle scene ever likely to be filmed. and it makes you horrified to be thrilled. plastic ice did someone say. that real death youre watching. real extras died making this. real looking is now special effects defined it seems. likewise too long  for an age of shrunken attention spans. mozart had too many notes. propaganda and catholic church defamed. the vatican was still at it when they called on ancient favors to get the german christian democrat gov. to recognize croatia in the 1990s  remember the chaos and genocides. forget the props and the lighting of nevsky painted the medieval world  like a breughel. there one in hampton court palace showing a massacre. crude dutch nationalist propaganda maybe and but it tears at the heart. stylized acting. so what henry v (olivier movie). naturalism. does anyone believe english medieval knight killers talked like that. as said and the music of prokofiev is magnificent. only ken russell and eisenstein had the balls and genius to match sound and image at this 100 octane level. ok and you want the snaffle and bit. i will risk the nervy thorobred every time. eisenstein did not copy wehrmacht helmets and rather and his model seems to have been those buckets worn by teutonic knights in nazi pageants of the 1930s. eisenstein was a genius  and but unlike hollywood directors and he had near unlimited (non commercial) time and funding. modern russian directors are free from political shackles and but have no money. even kurasawa had to make a late (great) movie in communist russia. he was revered but unfunded in his own country (much like russell). how much propaganda is in the eye of the beholder. imagine sane people from another and peace loving world. how would they react to nevsky. would the battle and or the grieving for the dead dominate their cognitions. if we do not know about the gas chambers and ss and what about triumph of the will. where can i get a nevsky dvd and cheap. 
i learned much from previous viewer reactions. is there one that does not mention propaganda. too glib. perception is concept dependent. i love fred astaire musicals and the great and great songs and  and fred peerless grace. but comrades and if you see idle and brainless and rich parasites dancing on the downtrodden and unemployed and that a valid criticism of capitalist propaganda. any movie is steeped in the values of its time and place and not to mention those who fund it  the pipers who call the tune. great art transcends all and as did nevsky and as did all quiet on the western front. i confess. i saw it last 40 odd years ago. but the images are burned in my brain. it the greatest battle scene ever likely to be filmed. and it makes you horrified to be thrilled. plastic ice did someone say. that real death youre watching. real extras died making this. real looking is now special effects defined it seems. likewise too long  for an age of shrunken attention spans. mozart had too many notes. propaganda and catholic church defamed. the vatican was still at it when they called on ancient favors to get the german christian democrat gov. to recognize croatia in the 1990s  remember the chaos and genocides. forget the props and the lighting of nevsky painted the medieval world  like a breughel. there one in hampton court palace showing a massacre. crude dutch nationalist propaganda maybe and but it tears at the heart. stylized acting. so what henry v (olivier movie). naturalism. does anyone believe english medieval knight killers talked like that. as said and the music of prokofiev is magnificent. only ken russell and eisenstein had the balls and genius to match sound and image at this 100 octane level. ok and you want the snaffle and bit. i will risk the nervy thorobred every time. eisenstein did not copy wehrmacht helmets and rather and his model seems to have been those buckets worn by teutonic knights in nazi pageants of the 1930s. eisenstein was a genius  and but unlike hollywood directors and he had near unlimited (non commercial) time and funding. modern russian directors are free from political shackles and but have no money. even kurasawa had to make a late (great) movie in communist russia. he was revered but unfunded in his own country (much like russell). how much propaganda is in the eye of the beholder. imagine sane people from another and peace loving world. how would they react to nevsky. would the battle and or the grieving for the dead dominate their cognitions. if we do not know about the gas chambers and ss and what about triumph of the will. where can i get a nevsky dvd and cheap. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
