possible spoilersi have read up on dahmer a little and saw the new dahmer film (with the same name) at an earlier time. this movie here concentrates rather much on the victims and killings and too little on dahmer himself. the film called dahmer had the opposite problem and it was too little about his crimes and too much about himself. i did not find the acting to my satisfaction and it had a certain amateur feel too it and especially the probation officer. it also seemed as if the dahmer acting got worse every time he played against the probation officer actor. but i might be wrong about that. what annoyed me a bit was that some of the scenes were quite disturbing but that the filmmakers seemed to try and show the real deal about what he did anyway. that is ok  but what i then do not understand is why the guy who ran away from his flat while dahmer was out getting beer and was not depicted being naked and since that is also how it happened. it not a big deal and but it just eats away further on the movies quality that such details are left out. what wasn not shown either or not even really hinted was dahmers sexual obsession with the dead. again and i do not mind they do not show it and but at least they could have mentioned it or built it in to the movie somehow. conclusion represent i think the really good dahmer film is still to be made and a movie that incorporates not only dahmers crimes but also who he was and and why he did what he did. i think that 1. 5 or 2 hours are just not enough to grasp the complexity of it all. this movie was just a cutout (excuse the pun) of dahmers life and personality and does not give you any close to good insight into his life or personality. negative . 
possible spoilersi have read up on dahmer a little and saw the new dahmer film (with the same name) at an earlier time. this movie here concentrates rather much on the victims and killings and too little on dahmer himself. the film called dahmer had the opposite problem and it was too little about his crimes and too much about himself. i did not find the acting to my satisfaction and it had a certain amateur feel too it and especially the probation officer. it also seemed as if the dahmer acting got worse every time he played against the probation officer actor. but i might be wrong about that. what annoyed me a bit was that some of the scenes were quite disturbing but that the filmmakers seemed to try and show the real deal about what he did anyway. that is ok  but what i then do not understand is why the guy who ran away from his flat while dahmer was out getting beer and was not depicted being naked and since that is also how it happened. it not a big deal and but it just eats away further on the movies quality that such details are left out. what wasn not shown either or not even really hinted was dahmers sexual obsession with the dead. again and i do not mind they do not show it and but at least they could have mentioned it or built it in to the movie somehow. conclusion represent i think the really good dahmer film is still to be made and a movie that incorporates not only dahmers crimes but also who he was and and why he did what he did. i think that 1. 5 or 2 hours are just not enough to grasp the complexity of it all. this movie was just a cutout (excuse the pun) of dahmers life and personality and does not give you any close to good insight into his life or personality. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
