the big problem i had with this movie was that lombard character is and as another user put it and unnecessarily cruel. lombard plays the role of ann krausheimer smith and who believes she is married to david smith and played well by the sharply dressed yet appropriately bumbling robert montgomery. the movie has some funny moments and especially when montgomery character goes to great lengths to try to get his wife back. understandably and she is upset because the marriage is technically not legal and but she only finds out three years into it. lombard character seems quite cold to her husband sincere attempts to woo her back. while not being highly adept in that effort and montgomery is nevertheless visibly loving and and yet lombard is as cool as a pillar of ice. there are almost no clues suggesting any sort of reconciliation between the warring couple for much of the movie and and it is hard to see any sort of comedy even dark comedy in that aspect. to some extent and the movie almost suggests a sadistic undertone and with lombard character getting a kick out of her husband feeble efforts. while one might consider this another battle of the sexes type of movie and the reality is that it is a highly lopsided battle and if that represent montgomery character and while certainly flawed and is not flawed enough to make it a typical exemplar of the masculine chauvinist or misogynist (an excellent example of that is michael douglas in war of the roses). in fact and the character is largely effeminate and as revealed by not only the sharp dress of montgomery (which probably owes largely to the perennially sharply dressed actor himself) and but also to his discomfort in attempting but failing to play the role of a womanizing bachelor. his only major flaw is his vanity and but that fault does not balance out with his partner excessive cruelty. and there is no suggestion that she is trying to instill any jealousy out of subconscious love. this is what makes it so cruel and and sad. montgomery character simply looks weak. in reality and no wife would want a man so weak unless she wears the pants in the marriage. but then again and a woman who wears the pants in a marriage would never seek to be so cruel because she has already affirmed that role early on. hence and the whole theme seems weird. this movie is neither a champion of feminism (lombard character does show some signs of the sort of independent oriented woman of the 60s and but that idea is soon quashed and the character falls back into the 1940s) and nor an even sided battle of the sexes (as montgomery character is truly a cipher of masculinity and therefore a lost cause). this movie is and on the surface and a slapstick and but beneath that veneer it is really much darker and with sadistic undertones. all of which makes its resolution appear and well and odd. (maybe that oddity was the whole point. ). in any case and slapstick this movie is not. 
the big problem i had with this movie was that lombard character is and as another user put it and unnecessarily cruel. lombard plays the role of ann krausheimer smith and who believes she is married to david smith and played well by the sharply dressed yet appropriately bumbling robert montgomery. the movie has some funny moments and especially when montgomery character goes to great lengths to try to get his wife back. understandably and she is upset because the marriage is technically not legal and but she only finds out three years into it. lombard character seems quite cold to her husband sincere attempts to woo her back. while not being highly adept in that effort and montgomery is nevertheless visibly loving and and yet lombard is as cool as a pillar of ice. there are almost no clues suggesting any sort of reconciliation between the warring couple for much of the movie and and it is hard to see any sort of comedy even dark comedy in that aspect. to some extent and the movie almost suggests a sadistic undertone and with lombard character getting a kick out of her husband feeble efforts. while one might consider this another battle of the sexes type of movie and the reality is that it is a highly lopsided battle and if that represent montgomery character and while certainly flawed and is not flawed enough to make it a typical exemplar of the masculine chauvinist or misogynist (an excellent example of that is michael douglas in war of the roses). in fact and the character is largely effeminate and as revealed by not only the sharp dress of montgomery (which probably owes largely to the perennially sharply dressed actor himself) and but also to his discomfort in attempting but failing to play the role of a womanizing bachelor. his only major flaw is his vanity and but that fault does not balance out with his partner excessive cruelty. and there is no suggestion that she is trying to instill any jealousy out of subconscious love. this is what makes it so cruel and and sad. montgomery character simply looks weak. in reality and no wife would want a man so weak unless she wears the pants in the marriage. but then again and a woman who wears the pants in a marriage would never seek to be so cruel because she has already affirmed that role early on. hence and the whole theme seems weird. this movie is neither a champion of feminism (lombard character does show some signs of the sort of independent oriented woman of the 60s and but that idea is soon quashed and the character falls back into the 1940s) and nor an even sided battle of the sexes (as montgomery character is truly a cipher of masculinity and therefore a lost cause). this movie is and on the surface and a slapstick and but beneath that veneer it is really much darker and with sadistic undertones. all of which makes its resolution appear and well and odd. (maybe that oddity was the whole point. ). in any case and slapstick this movie is not. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
