amitabh and jiah khan and raised great expectations and by their press conferences and though it was quite easy for the critics and and the fans too and that after all and this much hyped and ram gopal verma factory product and is going to fall flat on it face and in all the probabilities . why and because jiah was so immature and childish and and bacchan and mixed up guilty and and unsure . they themselves do not know and what the hell they were talking about and to the press and keeping up with the tag line and that some love stories are not to be understood and or some such rubbish . why the title is nishabd . ramu needs to refresh his knowledge of sanskrit and as vidhu vinod needs to study mahabharata and tagging in line and another glorious flop of the year and eklavya . comparison with the sweet hearts and and lolit is inevitable and as the so called plot line is supposed to have inspired by them. but sadly and ramu has hardly made any serious effort and to delve deeply into the psyche of the aging and and the young ones. is lolly pop sucking the ultimate indicator of the innocence . and contrary to that streak of childishness and the leg show at the dining table and with a vijay and that is bacchan in that role and bursting into squeals of shameless laughter incessantly after wards . this girl and is in fact at her seductive game and luring poor vijay to think and she is in love with him. the legs and too are skinny enough and and that act of putting the water hose through the legs and is down right obscene. it beyond any one understanding and how can a girl  and coming as a guest to some body house and can be so brazen and brash and and over powering . and why the hell that stupid wife and played by revathi and remarkably well and though scripted poorly and and characterized unrealistically and encourages her own husband and to dance with a sexily saying young girl . that part of vijay and trying to gain some refreshers to his humdrum life is absolute bullshit. because and apparently it seems that he is happy as he is and with a well settled life and and a hobby to recreate. this reminds of blame it on rio and the older daddy and and his young love and superbly played by michael caine. bacchan looks terrible in close ups and and over all and where as kevin spacey and jeremy irons looked debonair and handsome and which is why the young chicks some times get attracted to older men and for their charming persona and compared to the vulnerability of young boys of their age. only good thing about this movie is those green  and sprawling land scapes  and winding roads and and pleasant cinematography. no substance and or even any sparkling show of emotions and drama  and or even intriguing and stormy sex like in lolita and this shallow movie has no wonder and fallen flat on it face and and had to be wound up from the screens during first weeks . next time round and before mindlessly copying any such theme from hollywood and ramu should do his home work and and bacchan should think twice . you can not fool all the people at all the times and mr. bacchan. 
amitabh and jiah khan and raised great expectations and by their press conferences and though it was quite easy for the critics and and the fans too and that after all and this much hyped and ram gopal verma factory product and is going to fall flat on it face and in all the probabilities . why and because jiah was so immature and childish and and bacchan and mixed up guilty and and unsure . they themselves do not know and what the hell they were talking about and to the press and keeping up with the tag line and that some love stories are not to be understood and or some such rubbish . why the title is nishabd . ramu needs to refresh his knowledge of sanskrit and as vidhu vinod needs to study mahabharata and tagging in line and another glorious flop of the year and eklavya . comparison with the sweet hearts and and lolit is inevitable and as the so called plot line is supposed to have inspired by them. but sadly and ramu has hardly made any serious effort and to delve deeply into the psyche of the aging and and the young ones. is lolly pop sucking the ultimate indicator of the innocence . and contrary to that streak of childishness and the leg show at the dining table and with a vijay and that is bacchan in that role and bursting into squeals of shameless laughter incessantly after wards . this girl and is in fact at her seductive game and luring poor vijay to think and she is in love with him. the legs and too are skinny enough and and that act of putting the water hose through the legs and is down right obscene. it beyond any one understanding and how can a girl  and coming as a guest to some body house and can be so brazen and brash and and over powering . and why the hell that stupid wife and played by revathi and remarkably well and though scripted poorly and and characterized unrealistically and encourages her own husband and to dance with a sexily saying young girl . that part of vijay and trying to gain some refreshers to his humdrum life is absolute bullshit. because and apparently it seems that he is happy as he is and with a well settled life and and a hobby to recreate. this reminds of blame it on rio and the older daddy and and his young love and superbly played by michael caine. bacchan looks terrible in close ups and and over all and where as kevin spacey and jeremy irons looked debonair and handsome and which is why the young chicks some times get attracted to older men and for their charming persona and compared to the vulnerability of young boys of their age. only good thing about this movie is those green  and sprawling land scapes  and winding roads and and pleasant cinematography. no substance and or even any sparkling show of emotions and drama  and or even intriguing and stormy sex like in lolita and this shallow movie has no wonder and fallen flat on it face and and had to be wound up from the screens during first weeks . next time round and before mindlessly copying any such theme from hollywood and ramu should do his home work and and bacchan should think twice . you can not fool all the people at all the times and mr. bacchan. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
