the goodcarrey is good actor and he proved it in man on the moon and in eternal sunshine of the spotless mind. but hey and what can an actor do without good story and proper directing. he can do number 23. the bad joel schumacher is poor and overrated director and he proved it in almost every movie he made. what he did with batman is just disaster and but probably batman movies supposed to look good. well and they do not. instead of gothic and macabre we got disneyland. sure falling down was great but can you ruin the film with robert duvall and michael douglas and with excellent script. no you can not. and so good actor and poor director finally met and made number 23. the ugly (23)i know that it stupid to begin with but. fingerling subplot (almost half of this movie) looks exactly like intro to another chapter of max payne2. voiceovers and quality of detective story itself and quality of the characters and even colors and mood and music and editing and and sound mix too. perhaps it works for the game and but surely it doesn not in the cinema. mise en scene is so bad that it becomes funny. it not even annoying. carrey reads walking down the stairs in park. why. is it natural. no and but it looks good. why suicide blond covered walls in her apartment with white paper. if she just wanted to kill herself. there is no logic in that and but still it looks good. guess what it and it doesn not look good at all. it looks unnatural instead. all female characters are flat. why is that so. who cares and let go on with the story. who is this fingerling. private eye on the suicide. hardly believable. scenes when walter sparrow is arguing with his wife about weather book is really about him could be the best part of this movie. instead we get moulder or scully routine. disappointment. interiors has no sign of people living in them and except the significant objects (shoes and photos etc. ) hard luck. dialogs ain not that bad. but what about v. o. well that another story. there no such thing as destiny. there are only different choices. captain obvious to the rescue. number was coming after fingerling. and now it was coming after me. cliché. and so on. it obvious that average housewife would break into public building in the middle of the night. successfully and undisturbed. the subplot of the dog dragging main character to the graveyard. this is so old trick and so comfortable for writer and and that it should have been banned. i mean it. flashbacks and editing similar to what happened in last episode of x files isn not the best way to present the most interesting part of the movie. is it. i wish i could say that this story deserves a better fate and but it doesn not. it makes no sense. told in chronological order is weak and unbelievable. all the time we have undeveloped characters trapped is chain of situations which are nothing but badly written fiction. this could be fun and but  since whole movie is dead serious  it isn not. to many coincidences is just bad for every story. and the mystery. it predictable and easy to guess. losing touch with reality is great theme for good movie and but i never saw any of that in hollywood productions. if youre interested in the subject just watch repulsion by polanski or something by david cronenberg and spider or a history of violence both of that movies deals with similar problems that number 23 wanted to show. wanted and but failed. 
the goodcarrey is good actor and he proved it in man on the moon and in eternal sunshine of the spotless mind. but hey and what can an actor do without good story and proper directing. he can do number 23. the bad joel schumacher is poor and overrated director and he proved it in almost every movie he made. what he did with batman is just disaster and but probably batman movies supposed to look good. well and they do not. instead of gothic and macabre we got disneyland. sure falling down was great but can you ruin the film with robert duvall and michael douglas and with excellent script. no you can not. and so good actor and poor director finally met and made number 23. the ugly (23)i know that it stupid to begin with but. fingerling subplot (almost half of this movie) looks exactly like intro to another chapter of max payne2. voiceovers and quality of detective story itself and quality of the characters and even colors and mood and music and editing and and sound mix too. perhaps it works for the game and but surely it doesn not in the cinema. mise en scene is so bad that it becomes funny. it not even annoying. carrey reads walking down the stairs in park. why. is it natural. no and but it looks good. why suicide blond covered walls in her apartment with white paper. if she just wanted to kill herself. there is no logic in that and but still it looks good. guess what it and it doesn not look good at all. it looks unnatural instead. all female characters are flat. why is that so. who cares and let go on with the story. who is this fingerling. private eye on the suicide. hardly believable. scenes when walter sparrow is arguing with his wife about weather book is really about him could be the best part of this movie. instead we get moulder or scully routine. disappointment. interiors has no sign of people living in them and except the significant objects (shoes and photos etc. ) hard luck. dialogs ain not that bad. but what about v. o. well that another story. there no such thing as destiny. there are only different choices. captain obvious to the rescue. number was coming after fingerling. and now it was coming after me. cliché. and so on. it obvious that average housewife would break into public building in the middle of the night. successfully and undisturbed. the subplot of the dog dragging main character to the graveyard. this is so old trick and so comfortable for writer and and that it should have been banned. i mean it. flashbacks and editing similar to what happened in last episode of x files isn not the best way to present the most interesting part of the movie. is it. i wish i could say that this story deserves a better fate and but it doesn not. it makes no sense. told in chronological order is weak and unbelievable. all the time we have undeveloped characters trapped is chain of situations which are nothing but badly written fiction. this could be fun and but  since whole movie is dead serious  it isn not. to many coincidences is just bad for every story. and the mystery. it predictable and easy to guess. losing touch with reality is great theme for good movie and but i never saw any of that in hollywood productions. if youre interested in the subject just watch repulsion by polanski or something by david cronenberg and spider or a history of violence both of that movies deals with similar problems that number 23 wanted to show. wanted and but failed. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
