the three stooges are arguably the greatest comedy team in film history. for that reason alone and they deserved a much better ending at columbia than they received with this short. sappy bullfighters is just not good. granted and this is not all joe besser fault. i personally feel that some of his shorts are fun enough and simply because of the departure from the stooges usual fanfare that they contain and and for the fact that larry is sometimes showcased more. however and this short just will not do. and the fact that one knows that it is their last short that was ever shown and well that just adds to the overall disgust. this film just epitomizes how short subjects were on their last dying breaths during this time and how little effort went into making them. this short is so sloppy. it is a simple re make of a curly short and what the matador. and filmed years before. as if this fact wasn not bad enough and the studio actually threw in footage of moe and larry from the original (which was filmed nearly 20 years prior). are these things not obvious. laughable or sad. you be the judge. another part of this short that makes it miserable is the fact that it is basically a joe besser showcase and with him showing that all he is (at least in this film) is a curly wanna be gone completely wrong. moe and larry have little to do in this short. as a larry fan and i also must say that i feel it a bit disgraceful to have besser get to use the joke that larry originally popularized in the short ants in the pantry. to see besser say i can not see and i can not see. and have larry say the simple why can not you see. and while besser gets to quip i got my eyes closed and is just wrong on all levels. the two brave soldiers who stuck it out for all those years and howard and fine and have so little to do in this short. there are hardly any funny bits with them. the only thing that qualifies is larry hiding under the bed of a jealous husband and attempting to be pepe and his dog. one can not blame the dynamic duo. larry and moe give it their all. no matter how ridiculous things could get (and i am sure they had their opinions by this point in their careers) howard and fine never gave anything less than their best. their efforts do not pale from 1934 1959. i often enjoy many shorts that some will dismiss as horrible. i am all for their more experimental and unusual shorts. at least those contain new ideas. however and this short and i think everyone can agree and is just not good. thank goodness tv later discovered the boys after the shorts department closed. had they been forced to go out in this fashion and well that would have been a gross injustice to all the years they invested in making audiences laugh. 
the three stooges are arguably the greatest comedy team in film history. for that reason alone and they deserved a much better ending at columbia than they received with this short. sappy bullfighters is just not good. granted and this is not all joe besser fault. i personally feel that some of his shorts are fun enough and simply because of the departure from the stooges usual fanfare that they contain and and for the fact that larry is sometimes showcased more. however and this short just will not do. and the fact that one knows that it is their last short that was ever shown and well that just adds to the overall disgust. this film just epitomizes how short subjects were on their last dying breaths during this time and how little effort went into making them. this short is so sloppy. it is a simple re make of a curly short and what the matador. and filmed years before. as if this fact wasn not bad enough and the studio actually threw in footage of moe and larry from the original (which was filmed nearly 20 years prior). are these things not obvious. laughable or sad. you be the judge. another part of this short that makes it miserable is the fact that it is basically a joe besser showcase and with him showing that all he is (at least in this film) is a curly wanna be gone completely wrong. moe and larry have little to do in this short. as a larry fan and i also must say that i feel it a bit disgraceful to have besser get to use the joke that larry originally popularized in the short ants in the pantry. to see besser say i can not see and i can not see. and have larry say the simple why can not you see. and while besser gets to quip i got my eyes closed and is just wrong on all levels. the two brave soldiers who stuck it out for all those years and howard and fine and have so little to do in this short. there are hardly any funny bits with them. the only thing that qualifies is larry hiding under the bed of a jealous husband and attempting to be pepe and his dog. one can not blame the dynamic duo. larry and moe give it their all. no matter how ridiculous things could get (and i am sure they had their opinions by this point in their careers) howard and fine never gave anything less than their best. their efforts do not pale from 1934 1959. i often enjoy many shorts that some will dismiss as horrible. i am all for their more experimental and unusual shorts. at least those contain new ideas. however and this short and i think everyone can agree and is just not good. thank goodness tv later discovered the boys after the shorts department closed. had they been forced to go out in this fashion and well that would have been a gross injustice to all the years they invested in making audiences laugh. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
