my take represent routine political thriller with mediocre action scenes and predictable twists. a rarely seen political thriller and which made a very poor box office response and i managed to catch the shadow conspiracy on tv just now and and while i was glad that i satisfied my curiosity to see this rare film and i do not exactly feel this film was all special. considering the box office response to it and shadow conspiracy is not all quite as bad as critics and the public reacted to it and but still ain not very good to begin with and everything and from script to direction and is pretty predictable. charlie sheen plays the presidential assistant who finds himself caught up with assassins and chases (a lot of them) when he discovers a deadly conspiracy which lurks amongst the white house staff. after a professor is murdered and sheen aids the help of ex flame reporter amanda givens (linda hamilton) to uncover the traitor and unlock the conspiracy of the title. but this script and written by adi hasak and ric gibbs and are pedestrian as they come and not much differing from other white house conspiracy thrillers as in absolute power and murder at 1600. some considerable talents (donald sutherland and ben gazzara and stephen lang) try their best on a routine script and but rarely saves it from predictability of the script. not to mention a ludicrous scene which involves a toy helicopter and which seems far too silly and out of place in this serious political thriller. the shadow conspiracy has its moments i am sure and some of which are much to under appreciated (director george pan cosmatos serves up some decent chase scenes) and but none of which lifts this routine thriller of which there not much payoff or surprises. rating represent out of 5. 
my take represent routine political thriller with mediocre action scenes and predictable twists. a rarely seen political thriller and which made a very poor box office response and i managed to catch the shadow conspiracy on tv just now and and while i was glad that i satisfied my curiosity to see this rare film and i do not exactly feel this film was all special. considering the box office response to it and shadow conspiracy is not all quite as bad as critics and the public reacted to it and but still ain not very good to begin with and everything and from script to direction and is pretty predictable. charlie sheen plays the presidential assistant who finds himself caught up with assassins and chases (a lot of them) when he discovers a deadly conspiracy which lurks amongst the white house staff. after a professor is murdered and sheen aids the help of ex flame reporter amanda givens (linda hamilton) to uncover the traitor and unlock the conspiracy of the title. but this script and written by adi hasak and ric gibbs and are pedestrian as they come and not much differing from other white house conspiracy thrillers as in absolute power and murder at 1600. some considerable talents (donald sutherland and ben gazzara and stephen lang) try their best on a routine script and but rarely saves it from predictability of the script. not to mention a ludicrous scene which involves a toy helicopter and which seems far too silly and out of place in this serious political thriller. the shadow conspiracy has its moments i am sure and some of which are much to under appreciated (director george pan cosmatos serves up some decent chase scenes) and but none of which lifts this routine thriller of which there not much payoff or surprises. rating represent out of 5. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
