decoteau has to be one of the worst directors working today in any genre and and it has nothing to do with his movies usually containing homoerotism and having guys run around in their matching boxer briefs. remember. anyone in tight black underwear is satanic and evil and want to suck out your blood or soul. such deep symbolism here). i just sat through the sisterhood to give him his fair shakes and i try to watch every horror movie i can and this one had barbara (from beyond and re animator) crampton in it (i had previously been sucked in to the world of decoteau thanks to linnea quigley and adrienne barbeau and several other actresses i like). lemme tell you what about the sisterhood. like the other reviewer pointed out and the supposed plot involves lesbian vampires on a college campus. but never has a parade of hot young babes (actresses if you want) running around dressed in bras and panties and bikinis been so boring. the movie has no plot and no gore and no nudity and the dialog is ridiculous and seems like they made it up as they go along. parts are put in slow motion and repeated many times to push the running time up. about ten minutes of this one consists of characters just walking around on campus (oh and the excitement. ) that looks more like a hotel resort than any college i have ever been to. and the acting is the absolute worst. the only thing these girls do well is lean forward and bend over to show off their bodies. the cast were so devoid of talent that i would be shocked to see any of them get a one day walk on role on passions in the future. ditto for the guys. yeah decoteau squeezed more hot guys in underwear in this one and too. guys who should be in some k mart brochure instead of trying to act. do these people actually have to audition or just show up in dave office and take their clothes off. i think the answer is obvious. i am willing to give any movie a chance if 1. ) it intelligently written and well directed and original and competently acted (or hell and even ambitious and stylish). or 2. ) it is chock full of gore and nudity and assorted trashiness and or or it unintentionally hilarious. david decoteau movies deliver none of that and they do it on better than usual production values for direct to video flicks. what a waste. so what is the appeal and especially with the advent of porn of the soft and hard core variety that easily accessible to anyone with a computer. i simply cannot answer that. decoteau is a gay horror director and could use his resources to put a unique spin on the genre. instead and he produces mind numbing drivel without an ounce of talent or intelligence shining through. ironically and when you think about it and his films are anything but pro gay. they actually make homosexuality seem seedy and secretive and sinister. the obviously gay characters in his films are always trying to corrupt and seduce and or or kill off the innocent and sexually confused leads. there no shading here to make things interesting. the protagonists are naive and seldom prove themselves to be strong and assertive or confident in who they are. i would understand this plotting if jerry falwell and fred phelps or dr. laura starting making direct to video horror films and but from a gay director and it just goes to show that he puts almost no thought into these beefcake cheese fests. 
decoteau has to be one of the worst directors working today in any genre and and it has nothing to do with his movies usually containing homoerotism and having guys run around in their matching boxer briefs. remember. anyone in tight black underwear is satanic and evil and want to suck out your blood or soul. such deep symbolism here). i just sat through the sisterhood to give him his fair shakes and i try to watch every horror movie i can and this one had barbara (from beyond and re animator) crampton in it (i had previously been sucked in to the world of decoteau thanks to linnea quigley and adrienne barbeau and several other actresses i like). lemme tell you what about the sisterhood. like the other reviewer pointed out and the supposed plot involves lesbian vampires on a college campus. but never has a parade of hot young babes (actresses if you want) running around dressed in bras and panties and bikinis been so boring. the movie has no plot and no gore and no nudity and the dialog is ridiculous and seems like they made it up as they go along. parts are put in slow motion and repeated many times to push the running time up. about ten minutes of this one consists of characters just walking around on campus (oh and the excitement. ) that looks more like a hotel resort than any college i have ever been to. and the acting is the absolute worst. the only thing these girls do well is lean forward and bend over to show off their bodies. the cast were so devoid of talent that i would be shocked to see any of them get a one day walk on role on passions in the future. ditto for the guys. yeah decoteau squeezed more hot guys in underwear in this one and too. guys who should be in some k mart brochure instead of trying to act. do these people actually have to audition or just show up in dave office and take their clothes off. i think the answer is obvious. i am willing to give any movie a chance if 1. ) it intelligently written and well directed and original and competently acted (or hell and even ambitious and stylish). or 2. ) it is chock full of gore and nudity and assorted trashiness and or or it unintentionally hilarious. david decoteau movies deliver none of that and they do it on better than usual production values for direct to video flicks. what a waste. so what is the appeal and especially with the advent of porn of the soft and hard core variety that easily accessible to anyone with a computer. i simply cannot answer that. decoteau is a gay horror director and could use his resources to put a unique spin on the genre. instead and he produces mind numbing drivel without an ounce of talent or intelligence shining through. ironically and when you think about it and his films are anything but pro gay. they actually make homosexuality seem seedy and secretive and sinister. the obviously gay characters in his films are always trying to corrupt and seduce and or or kill off the innocent and sexually confused leads. there no shading here to make things interesting. the protagonists are naive and seldom prove themselves to be strong and assertive or confident in who they are. i would understand this plotting if jerry falwell and fred phelps or dr. laura starting making direct to video horror films and but from a gay director and it just goes to show that he puts almost no thought into these beefcake cheese fests. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
