i was really excited about seeing cold mountain. alas and like most movies i am really excited about seeing and it was a letdown. were it not for that miraculous invention called a dvd and i think i would have put my head through the monitor and i was so bored. i closely watched kidman and law when they meet because their characters are supposedly destined for each other. yet law face showed anything but dumb struck love and while kidman seemed to be counting the seconds until she could run back to her trailer. zellweger character is pure granny clampett (as if we do not get it and cornball banjos mark her every entrance) and and so over the top and it was all i could do not to laugh. ironically and her performance serves to highlight just how stiff as a board the leads are. ada nearly starves because she freed her slaves while we never learn why. more perplexing is why do not any of them stay on as ada and her father were unusually benevolent and and (as shown in one scene) it was a very dangerous time for negroes (as theyre politely called here). why do not the neighbors teach her how to milk a cow or grow a crop. heck and why do not she just sell the farm and go home. and for all of ruby practicality and when she dispatches ada evil rooster and that kind of puts the kibosh on them having any more chickens. by the time her beloved finally returns and ada doesn not need him or anyone else  which is the big joke. indeed and she may be physically intimate with inman and but her real intimacy is with ruby and who has turned ada into an über babe version of herself. did anyone else notice how they walked down the hill holding hands and happy as two peas in a pod and as they left inman behind. i doubt that minghella recognized this as he was too busy making an anti bush movie. inman tells us he is like every fool sent out to fight with a flag and a lie and and ada father says i imagine god is weary of being called down on both sides of an argument. these observations are historically inaccurate and insulting. while slavery was the basis of the south economy and the reasons for the war were more complex. it was incomprehensible for a soldier to think that the cause was a lie (in fact and most in the rank and file were indifferent to it). for filmmakers to stamp their views onto a period where such views were foreign to those who lived in that time is beyond obnoxious. structurally and the film is choppy and episodic. law and kidman are miscast and and have zero chemistry. the script is little more than half baked dialog and and an egregious bunch of clichés and banalities. small moments like a bag of diamonds. ugh. 
i was really excited about seeing cold mountain. alas and like most movies i am really excited about seeing and it was a letdown. were it not for that miraculous invention called a dvd and i think i would have put my head through the monitor and i was so bored. i closely watched kidman and law when they meet because their characters are supposedly destined for each other. yet law face showed anything but dumb struck love and while kidman seemed to be counting the seconds until she could run back to her trailer. zellweger character is pure granny clampett (as if we do not get it and cornball banjos mark her every entrance) and and so over the top and it was all i could do not to laugh. ironically and her performance serves to highlight just how stiff as a board the leads are. ada nearly starves because she freed her slaves while we never learn why. more perplexing is why do not any of them stay on as ada and her father were unusually benevolent and and (as shown in one scene) it was a very dangerous time for negroes (as theyre politely called here). why do not the neighbors teach her how to milk a cow or grow a crop. heck and why do not she just sell the farm and go home. and for all of ruby practicality and when she dispatches ada evil rooster and that kind of puts the kibosh on them having any more chickens. by the time her beloved finally returns and ada doesn not need him or anyone else  which is the big joke. indeed and she may be physically intimate with inman and but her real intimacy is with ruby and who has turned ada into an über babe version of herself. did anyone else notice how they walked down the hill holding hands and happy as two peas in a pod and as they left inman behind. i doubt that minghella recognized this as he was too busy making an anti bush movie. inman tells us he is like every fool sent out to fight with a flag and a lie and and ada father says i imagine god is weary of being called down on both sides of an argument. these observations are historically inaccurate and insulting. while slavery was the basis of the south economy and the reasons for the war were more complex. it was incomprehensible for a soldier to think that the cause was a lie (in fact and most in the rank and file were indifferent to it). for filmmakers to stamp their views onto a period where such views were foreign to those who lived in that time is beyond obnoxious. structurally and the film is choppy and episodic. law and kidman are miscast and and have zero chemistry. the script is little more than half baked dialog and and an egregious bunch of clichés and banalities. small moments like a bag of diamonds. ugh. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
