direct to video is a phrase that never sounds promising to the consumer unless its a direct to video sequel to something that went direct to video in the first place. despite this and studios have insisted on releasing numerous direct to video sequels over the years to cult hits. i do not think it even needs to be mentioned that these sequels rank among some of the worst titles of all time and including the hitcher ii and starship troopers 2 and and cruel intentions 3. it fitting that road house 2 was helmed by scott ziehl as he was also the man in charge of ruining the cruel intentions series. like his entry in the cruel intentions trilogy and ziehl takes elements that made the first road house a great guy flick and and rehashes them with no success whatsoever. this is no sequel and this is a remake all the way. various lines from the original are repeated and plot points cut and pasted and and scenes are replicated almost shot for shot from the first one. the one thing that could not be duplicated were the amazing fight scenes and which made road house what it was. here and we get clumsily directed fight sequences that are either too short or too long and seemingly planned out and shot within an hour. compare that with its predecessor fight scenes that look like they took months and months to prepare. ziehl is capable of directing action as he did well with the 2001 remake of earth vs. the spider and but none of the talent shown there comes through in this mess. it not completely his fault and as the screenplay is very and very poorly written and clunky. i do not care if something goes direct to video and a good script is still required. someone should keep that mind while continuously churning these low budget and direct to dvd movies out. skip it entirely. negative . 
direct to video is a phrase that never sounds promising to the consumer unless its a direct to video sequel to something that went direct to video in the first place. despite this and studios have insisted on releasing numerous direct to video sequels over the years to cult hits. i do not think it even needs to be mentioned that these sequels rank among some of the worst titles of all time and including the hitcher ii and starship troopers 2 and and cruel intentions 3. it fitting that road house 2 was helmed by scott ziehl as he was also the man in charge of ruining the cruel intentions series. like his entry in the cruel intentions trilogy and ziehl takes elements that made the first road house a great guy flick and and rehashes them with no success whatsoever. this is no sequel and this is a remake all the way. various lines from the original are repeated and plot points cut and pasted and and scenes are replicated almost shot for shot from the first one. the one thing that could not be duplicated were the amazing fight scenes and which made road house what it was. here and we get clumsily directed fight sequences that are either too short or too long and seemingly planned out and shot within an hour. compare that with its predecessor fight scenes that look like they took months and months to prepare. ziehl is capable of directing action as he did well with the 2001 remake of earth vs. the spider and but none of the talent shown there comes through in this mess. it not completely his fault and as the screenplay is very and very poorly written and clunky. i do not care if something goes direct to video and a good script is still required. someone should keep that mind while continuously churning these low budget and direct to dvd movies out. skip it entirely. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
