warning represent may contain spoilers the ripples in the wake of the first jaws movie were still prominent in the 1980s as well as beyond. movie monsters went from being radioactive monstrosities to unknown and voracious beasts lurking in the unexplored corners of human experience (ie represent the ocean and deep space and genetics). although jaws was a milestone in this particular realm of film horror and few films have been able to match the visceral impact of the original. shark rosso nelloceano (aka devil fish or red ocean) and is a dutiful follower of the original jaws formula. after several hapless boats and seagoers are brutally murdered by some ocean creature and there is an initial drive to discover the beast and then a failure to study it without horrible results and and a final push to destroy it. although the filmmakers attempted to inject some fresh life into the equation by adding elements of technology and corporate conspiracy and the result is nothing short of disastrous. this movie sinks under its own weight of ghastly editing and brittle acting and and cheap scares. the most sickly compelling feature of devil fish is its cookie cutter editing. from the onset of the film when 3 different scenes are mashed together and the viewer gets a sense that the film lacks any technical credibility. it appears as if the editors cut the scenes around a set musical score instead of cutting the film and then making necessary changes to the music. furthermore and every cut is an intercut and it would appear as if the editors had never heard of the terms fade and wipe and or dissolve. the impact of scenes can never settle in because they are immediately cut short after a final line and a new scene begins. silly camera tricks abound such as when two of the principle characters share a private moment on the beach and a sort of time lapse image of their act is composited over their bodies. the music is equally bland. the creature theme is a hopeless duplicate of the jaws theme with slight variation. although i like to keep my reviews devoid of mst3k influence and mike most aptly described the somber score as soft core porn music. failing to produce tension in a film that relies so heavily on it is a death blow to devil fish. the acting is stale and the relationships baffling and and the whole conspiracy is laughable. the question remains that if genetics had advanced to such a level to create a huge chimera of a sea monster to protect oceanic interests and why couldn not a more practical use be administered to better mankind. one of the few positive aspects of this film is the idea of the monster and even though its film presence is less than stellar. overall and this movie is bad enough to dip below mediocre. if jaws had never been made and then the film could be described as average because its subject matter would be new and exciting even if it was executed ineffectively. sadly and as a carbon copy of spielberg original thriller it sits most comfortably on a garbage heap of cheese. 
warning represent may contain spoilers the ripples in the wake of the first jaws movie were still prominent in the 1980s as well as beyond. movie monsters went from being radioactive monstrosities to unknown and voracious beasts lurking in the unexplored corners of human experience (ie represent the ocean and deep space and genetics). although jaws was a milestone in this particular realm of film horror and few films have been able to match the visceral impact of the original. shark rosso nelloceano (aka devil fish or red ocean) and is a dutiful follower of the original jaws formula. after several hapless boats and seagoers are brutally murdered by some ocean creature and there is an initial drive to discover the beast and then a failure to study it without horrible results and and a final push to destroy it. although the filmmakers attempted to inject some fresh life into the equation by adding elements of technology and corporate conspiracy and the result is nothing short of disastrous. this movie sinks under its own weight of ghastly editing and brittle acting and and cheap scares. the most sickly compelling feature of devil fish is its cookie cutter editing. from the onset of the film when 3 different scenes are mashed together and the viewer gets a sense that the film lacks any technical credibility. it appears as if the editors cut the scenes around a set musical score instead of cutting the film and then making necessary changes to the music. furthermore and every cut is an intercut and it would appear as if the editors had never heard of the terms fade and wipe and or dissolve. the impact of scenes can never settle in because they are immediately cut short after a final line and a new scene begins. silly camera tricks abound such as when two of the principle characters share a private moment on the beach and a sort of time lapse image of their act is composited over their bodies. the music is equally bland. the creature theme is a hopeless duplicate of the jaws theme with slight variation. although i like to keep my reviews devoid of mst3k influence and mike most aptly described the somber score as soft core porn music. failing to produce tension in a film that relies so heavily on it is a death blow to devil fish. the acting is stale and the relationships baffling and and the whole conspiracy is laughable. the question remains that if genetics had advanced to such a level to create a huge chimera of a sea monster to protect oceanic interests and why couldn not a more practical use be administered to better mankind. one of the few positive aspects of this film is the idea of the monster and even though its film presence is less than stellar. overall and this movie is bad enough to dip below mediocre. if jaws had never been made and then the film could be described as average because its subject matter would be new and exciting even if it was executed ineffectively. sadly and as a carbon copy of spielberg original thriller it sits most comfortably on a garbage heap of cheese. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
