it proof that movie makers and their financiers treating their audience with contempt isn not a new phenomena as it was done as early as the 1940s and house of dracula is a great example . you would think having a film with dracula  and the wolf man and frankenstein monster the producer would dictate to the screenwriter to have all three appear in a scene . they had a chance with house of frankenstein then when they had a second bite of the cherry they blew it again with house of dracula . to lose one chance is a misfortune  and to lose two smacks of cynical money making it obvious the producers are beyond caring . larry talbot turns up again even though he was shown to die in the previous film which sums up the cynicism of the franchise . it also shows what a poor screenplay it is and were mistreated to some awful plot turns like talbot condition being cured by a special type of plant which will soften his skull . i am thinking screenwriter edward t lowe might have had his skull softened if this is the type of stuff he comes up with director erie c kenton can not improve on the script and throws in a few spanners of his own . for example talbot is startled to see dr edelmann snatch a lift on a cart but nonchalantly watches edelmann climb a wall and jump in to the château courtyard . one can not help thinking talbot reaction shots were mistakenly switched round at the editing stage lon chaney jnr is famous for his roles in horror movies but do not have much of a career outside them . perhaps that down to the fact he not a good actor and here he commits the worst type of acting  being very wooden . it not entirely his fault though because all the characters spout rather awful dialogue and are all rather wooden due in part to kenton lackluster directing house of dracula feels a million miles away from james whale 1931 film and its sequel from 1935 and would have been a very sad note to end on . but ironically universal decided to make one more movie to wrap up their franchise with a horror comedy starring abbot and costello. 
it proof that movie makers and their financiers treating their audience with contempt isn not a new phenomena as it was done as early as the 1940s and house of dracula is a great example . you would think having a film with dracula  and the wolf man and frankenstein monster the producer would dictate to the screenwriter to have all three appear in a scene . they had a chance with house of frankenstein then when they had a second bite of the cherry they blew it again with house of dracula . to lose one chance is a misfortune  and to lose two smacks of cynical money making it obvious the producers are beyond caring . larry talbot turns up again even though he was shown to die in the previous film which sums up the cynicism of the franchise . it also shows what a poor screenplay it is and were mistreated to some awful plot turns like talbot condition being cured by a special type of plant which will soften his skull . i am thinking screenwriter edward t lowe might have had his skull softened if this is the type of stuff he comes up with director erie c kenton can not improve on the script and throws in a few spanners of his own . for example talbot is startled to see dr edelmann snatch a lift on a cart but nonchalantly watches edelmann climb a wall and jump in to the château courtyard . one can not help thinking talbot reaction shots were mistakenly switched round at the editing stage lon chaney jnr is famous for his roles in horror movies but do not have much of a career outside them . perhaps that down to the fact he not a good actor and here he commits the worst type of acting  being very wooden . it not entirely his fault though because all the characters spout rather awful dialogue and are all rather wooden due in part to kenton lackluster directing house of dracula feels a million miles away from james whale 1931 film and its sequel from 1935 and would have been a very sad note to end on . but ironically universal decided to make one more movie to wrap up their franchise with a horror comedy starring abbot and costello. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
