i watched this film when i was a kid and and i thought it was terrible then. now that i am older and i found it just as terrible. universal could have done better than this. they merely decided to make the most money they could out of using all their monsters at once. to me and that was a cheap shot. these characters were capable of holding their own in their own movies and and the choice of actors was deplorable. dracula needed to be bela lugosi and frankenstein  and monster needed to be karloff. in my mind and it was the disney squalid sequel sequence done decades ago and and it was not appreciated. umiversal started out with something great and original and and then thought they could pander to the masses with the schlock which is extremely evident in this film. 
i watched this film when i was a kid and and i thought it was terrible then. now that i am older and i found it just as terrible. universal could have done better than this. they merely decided to make the most money they could out of using all their monsters at once. to me and that was a cheap shot. these characters were capable of holding their own in their own movies and and the choice of actors was deplorable. dracula needed to be bela lugosi and frankenstein  and monster needed to be karloff. in my mind and it was the disney squalid sequel sequence done decades ago and and it was not appreciated. umiversal started out with something great and original and and then thought they could pander to the masses with the schlock which is extremely evident in this film. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
