first let me say i am not someone who usually cringe at the fact of having to think while seeing movies and i love tarkowsky movies for example and berghman is also a favorite. but this. the positive points can be summed up easily represent the photography is splendid and and the music is perfect. does it make a good movie. i used to think so and but this one is a perfect example of one that (for me) doesn not make it. maybe it because i am too dumb. possible and but i do not think so. tarkwosky for example also used very long shots and but what he never did was filming 5 minutes of the exact same image of two people walking (and i mean just their heads and because in this movie there are a lot of those shots and but sometimes it is effective) and the general result is plainly boring and even with the intelligent undertones (which are done in a way that and while intelligent and is above all very pedantic)you also always feel that the director is making some of the long shots not for the aesthetic and or symbolic effect and but just to spare on budget. i am very disappointed in this film and because i really liked the first 30 minutes or so and but it just went on and on and without even keeping the same level as in the first scenes. while reading the very praising comments on this page and i also get the feeling some people just try to see much more in the movie than there is to it. when a movie is slow and arty and it doesn not necessarily mean it is very profound. yes it is an allegory on musical theory placed in the context of a small town and which is quite interesting on itself and but it does not make a profound movie. except for people who absolutely want to make some sort of intellectual masturbation out of it and but then it not what you find in the movie and but what you find in yourself. an exercise that and in my opinion can be made much more effectively while watching stalker or solyaris than werckmeister harmonies and that owes much to tarkowsky and but cab never equal it level. 
first let me say i am not someone who usually cringe at the fact of having to think while seeing movies and i love tarkowsky movies for example and berghman is also a favorite. but this. the positive points can be summed up easily represent the photography is splendid and and the music is perfect. does it make a good movie. i used to think so and but this one is a perfect example of one that (for me) doesn not make it. maybe it because i am too dumb. possible and but i do not think so. tarkwosky for example also used very long shots and but what he never did was filming 5 minutes of the exact same image of two people walking (and i mean just their heads and because in this movie there are a lot of those shots and but sometimes it is effective) and the general result is plainly boring and even with the intelligent undertones (which are done in a way that and while intelligent and is above all very pedantic)you also always feel that the director is making some of the long shots not for the aesthetic and or symbolic effect and but just to spare on budget. i am very disappointed in this film and because i really liked the first 30 minutes or so and but it just went on and on and without even keeping the same level as in the first scenes. while reading the very praising comments on this page and i also get the feeling some people just try to see much more in the movie than there is to it. when a movie is slow and arty and it doesn not necessarily mean it is very profound. yes it is an allegory on musical theory placed in the context of a small town and which is quite interesting on itself and but it does not make a profound movie. except for people who absolutely want to make some sort of intellectual masturbation out of it and but then it not what you find in the movie and but what you find in yourself. an exercise that and in my opinion can be made much more effectively while watching stalker or solyaris than werckmeister harmonies and that owes much to tarkowsky and but cab never equal it level. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
