yes and it sean connery playing bond again and looking more alive and into his part than any time since the first time they made this film and in 1965 when it was called thunderball. but the tongue is so firmly in cheek one wonders if connery isn not employing a few observed tricks from his friend and more humorous successor and roger moore. moore is my favorite bond and but connery makes a strong case for himself in this unusual outing. the only serious bond film not made under the aegis of the classic eon bond series and never say never again is an irreverent return to the well. soft on action and it nevertheless strong on character and clever dialogue. bond and it made clear right away and is a man in disfavor. no matter how many times he has saved the world and his new boss thinks little of his fat lifestyle. too many free radicals and that your problem. caused by eating too much red meat and white bread and too many martinis. then i shall cut out the white bread and sir and bond smartly replies. an early fight sequence in a spa represents the movie high point action wise and with bond and an attacker fighting their way through a kitchen and a bedroom and and a laboratory before bond finally douses his opponent and ironically with no small help from those free radicals. humor is liberally applied in the film and rather more cleverly than most of moore outings and though connery seems to be having more fun sending himself up as a result of moore less egotistic example. was it because he was making a good chunk of the gross. or was it working for less stingy producers. whatever it is and the screenplay serves his laid back style well and and the result is richer and more entertaining than connery prior two eon bond outings and you only live twice and diamonds are forever. the 1980s were not a good decade for bond and whether it was connery and moore and or timothy dalton. leg warmers and video games and and ugly sports cars are all in evidence and and the bianca jagger sunglasses klaus maria brandauer is seen wearing in his first scene do him no favors. forget first impressions. brandauer role as the chief villain and maximilian largo and is one of the best in any bond film and with brandauer enjoyably playing up his character menace and mania. at one point and he allows bond free roam of his situation room and with a martini to boot and and his dancing eyes and mad and engaging grin make for compelling company throughout. the best thing in this film and other than connery and are the bond girls and shot with more attention to personality than normal in bond films and a testament to cinematographer douglas slocombe and director irvin kirshner. barbara carrera was nominated for a golden globe for her role as the villainess fatima blush and every bit as crazy as largo and even nicer to look at. she doesn not last the whole movie while you almost need her gone in order to focus on the others. kim basinger breasts and buttocks should have had their own agents for the screen time they get in this film and but i am not complaining. basinger a rare beauty who in this early role as largo mistress mixes incredible hotitude with a childlike vulnerability that brings out the bond in me and and many others i suspect. (her lips and cheekbones are pretty sweet and too. )it not a well constructed film. it a knockoff of a better bond movie with a sloppy storyline and a terrible score and and a flat ending. but it does have connery and proving his was the definitive take on cinema definitive secret agent and even if he steals a page or two from my 007 and mr. moore. the end result is entertaining enough and so i am not complaining. 
yes and it sean connery playing bond again and looking more alive and into his part than any time since the first time they made this film and in 1965 when it was called thunderball. but the tongue is so firmly in cheek one wonders if connery isn not employing a few observed tricks from his friend and more humorous successor and roger moore. moore is my favorite bond and but connery makes a strong case for himself in this unusual outing. the only serious bond film not made under the aegis of the classic eon bond series and never say never again is an irreverent return to the well. soft on action and it nevertheless strong on character and clever dialogue. bond and it made clear right away and is a man in disfavor. no matter how many times he has saved the world and his new boss thinks little of his fat lifestyle. too many free radicals and that your problem. caused by eating too much red meat and white bread and too many martinis. then i shall cut out the white bread and sir and bond smartly replies. an early fight sequence in a spa represents the movie high point action wise and with bond and an attacker fighting their way through a kitchen and a bedroom and and a laboratory before bond finally douses his opponent and ironically with no small help from those free radicals. humor is liberally applied in the film and rather more cleverly than most of moore outings and though connery seems to be having more fun sending himself up as a result of moore less egotistic example. was it because he was making a good chunk of the gross. or was it working for less stingy producers. whatever it is and the screenplay serves his laid back style well and and the result is richer and more entertaining than connery prior two eon bond outings and you only live twice and diamonds are forever. the 1980s were not a good decade for bond and whether it was connery and moore and or timothy dalton. leg warmers and video games and and ugly sports cars are all in evidence and and the bianca jagger sunglasses klaus maria brandauer is seen wearing in his first scene do him no favors. forget first impressions. brandauer role as the chief villain and maximilian largo and is one of the best in any bond film and with brandauer enjoyably playing up his character menace and mania. at one point and he allows bond free roam of his situation room and with a martini to boot and and his dancing eyes and mad and engaging grin make for compelling company throughout. the best thing in this film and other than connery and are the bond girls and shot with more attention to personality than normal in bond films and a testament to cinematographer douglas slocombe and director irvin kirshner. barbara carrera was nominated for a golden globe for her role as the villainess fatima blush and every bit as crazy as largo and even nicer to look at. she doesn not last the whole movie while you almost need her gone in order to focus on the others. kim basinger breasts and buttocks should have had their own agents for the screen time they get in this film and but i am not complaining. basinger a rare beauty who in this early role as largo mistress mixes incredible hotitude with a childlike vulnerability that brings out the bond in me and and many others i suspect. (her lips and cheekbones are pretty sweet and too. )it not a well constructed film. it a knockoff of a better bond movie with a sloppy storyline and a terrible score and and a flat ending. but it does have connery and proving his was the definitive take on cinema definitive secret agent and even if he steals a page or two from my 007 and mr. moore. the end result is entertaining enough and so i am not complaining. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
