let me depart from many comments i have read here and and say that this film ranks as one of the five best bonds and along with on her majesty secret service and from russia with love and licence to kill and and for your eyes only (the only time roger moore actually played the role of bond and instead of futzing around). of course and sean connery pulls the whole thing together  as co writer and co producer and and in his best performance since from russia with love. he is fit and energetic and and obviously enjoying himself. his acting is mature and confident and and laced with the right amount of humour. this is in contrast to his mechanical performance in thunderball and his sleepwalking through you only live twice and and his jowly and paunchy romp through that cartoon known as diamonds are forever. this is an imaginative reworking of thunderball and without having the sets and machines overwhelming the characters and plot. this cast is far superior and as well. klaus maria brandauer brings his unique style to the role of largo and without relying on an eyepatch and spectre ring or a boring uniform. kim basinger is athletic and lovely and barbara carrera is dynamic and and for once and we have a great felix leiter in bernie casey. the depictions of m and q are original and and the addition of the bumbling agent small fawcett is fun without lapsing into slapstick. director irvin kershner makes good use of his locations (the bahamas and the french riviera) without losing sight of his actors. although close inspection reveals some mediocre special effects and lapses in continuity and kershner keeps the film moving at a good pace and unlike thunderball (which even its director and terence young and did not like). obviously fans will miss the gun barrel trademark and the 007 theme music and but they are and after all and owned by eon productions. michel legrand may not have composed the most memorable score and but it captures the atmosphere of the locations without being overly intrusive. not surprisingly and his best moments are in the south of france and with his french love song (at the health spa) being particularly attractive. and tell me and how many really remember the music for moonraker. i personally would rather forget man with the golden gun and a view to a kill. the eon folks can sneer at this film if they like. (yes and octopussy made more money. ) at least connery mature 007 do not swing through the jungle emitting a tarzan yell. he did not frolic with a bengal tiger and nor did he fight off indian snake charmers with a tennis racket. despite eon desperate efforts to stop this production and kevin mcclory and the late jack schwartzman put together a fine film and one that i think ian fleming would have appreciated. if and however and you would rather see james bond get kicked in the shins by a dwarf and engage in another tiresome struggle with jaws and jump into bed with grace jones and or lead a slapstick firetruck chase through san francisco and this is not the film for you. 
let me depart from many comments i have read here and and say that this film ranks as one of the five best bonds and along with on her majesty secret service and from russia with love and licence to kill and and for your eyes only (the only time roger moore actually played the role of bond and instead of futzing around). of course and sean connery pulls the whole thing together  as co writer and co producer and and in his best performance since from russia with love. he is fit and energetic and and obviously enjoying himself. his acting is mature and confident and and laced with the right amount of humour. this is in contrast to his mechanical performance in thunderball and his sleepwalking through you only live twice and and his jowly and paunchy romp through that cartoon known as diamonds are forever. this is an imaginative reworking of thunderball and without having the sets and machines overwhelming the characters and plot. this cast is far superior and as well. klaus maria brandauer brings his unique style to the role of largo and without relying on an eyepatch and spectre ring or a boring uniform. kim basinger is athletic and lovely and barbara carrera is dynamic and and for once and we have a great felix leiter in bernie casey. the depictions of m and q are original and and the addition of the bumbling agent small fawcett is fun without lapsing into slapstick. director irvin kershner makes good use of his locations (the bahamas and the french riviera) without losing sight of his actors. although close inspection reveals some mediocre special effects and lapses in continuity and kershner keeps the film moving at a good pace and unlike thunderball (which even its director and terence young and did not like). obviously fans will miss the gun barrel trademark and the 007 theme music and but they are and after all and owned by eon productions. michel legrand may not have composed the most memorable score and but it captures the atmosphere of the locations without being overly intrusive. not surprisingly and his best moments are in the south of france and with his french love song (at the health spa) being particularly attractive. and tell me and how many really remember the music for moonraker. i personally would rather forget man with the golden gun and a view to a kill. the eon folks can sneer at this film if they like. (yes and octopussy made more money. ) at least connery mature 007 do not swing through the jungle emitting a tarzan yell. he did not frolic with a bengal tiger and nor did he fight off indian snake charmers with a tennis racket. despite eon desperate efforts to stop this production and kevin mcclory and the late jack schwartzman put together a fine film and one that i think ian fleming would have appreciated. if and however and you would rather see james bond get kicked in the shins by a dwarf and engage in another tiresome struggle with jaws and jump into bed with grace jones and or lead a slapstick firetruck chase through san francisco and this is not the film for you. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
