so here a bit of background on how i came to see this movie. as you probably know and this is the original french film and that was then remade (quelle surprise) by hollywood as wicker park. well i avoided that movie like the plague when it was first released and simply because and a) i knew it had absolutely nothing to do with wicker park and and living in chicago and i do not see why they called it that  it was filmed in fricking canada for a start.  b) i have a very hard time bothering with pointless remakes and done purely because hollywood thinks were too bone idle to read a few subtitles (i am dreading the remake of infernal affairs by the way) and c) i can not stand josh hartnett and nuff said there. however and i came across wp on tv the other day and probably about half an hour in and and i have to say initially and it made no sense at all and until about half an hour from the end and when it started coming together. by the end and i was really surprised to find myself really into it and and then the ending just seemed so good  a perfect combination of story and passion and ending with possibly one of the greatest musical choices i have ever seen (heard. ). since then i have heard a lot about the lappartement vs. wicker park argument and looking at wp and i still say it has bugger all to do with chicago and but there seemed something about it that i liked and so when it was on again and i watched it again  unfortunately and still missing the first chunk (i have still yet to see it. ) and and i still thought it was pretty good. heck and even josh hartnett seemed good. but i was curious about lappartement and wanted to see what all the fuss was about. so i waited and waited to catch lappartement somewhere somehow. netflix let me down and so i ended up getting a copy from some website in ireland. and i have just watched it. it really kind of weird and but a good weird. a classic french film. great acting and romane bohringer is an absolute gem  sorry and but she acts monica bellucci off the screen in every scene. vincent cassel was a weird choice for the lead but by the end he works. and i have seen jean philippe ecoffey in a lot of movies and i just love him  the scene where alice dumps him in the restaurant and he just looks like someone told him his puppy been run over was excruciating. but and i can honestly say and having seen wp and pretty much expecting that to have been a scene for scene copy (as about 75% of the rest of the movie had been  maybe in a different order and but come on and the scene with the coffee in the glasses. word for word. ) and you can imagine my surprise when i watched the ending of lappartement. i can literally say i was blown away  hmm and a bit like poor old lucien was through the cafe window really. so and be prepared and if you have seen wicker park and you fancy taking a look at the original like i did and do not make the mistake of expecting an identical movie and because you will either be disappointed and or exhilarated at a piece of french movie history  a prime example of how you can watch a movie and think youre going to watch a pithy happy ending and and get whiplash from the total spin in the opposite direction right at the end. definitely catch this movie. oh and while youre at and maybe not too near the same time and but down the road and take a look at wicker park and it will surprise you too. 
so here a bit of background on how i came to see this movie. as you probably know and this is the original french film and that was then remade (quelle surprise) by hollywood as wicker park. well i avoided that movie like the plague when it was first released and simply because and a) i knew it had absolutely nothing to do with wicker park and and living in chicago and i do not see why they called it that  it was filmed in fricking canada for a start.  b) i have a very hard time bothering with pointless remakes and done purely because hollywood thinks were too bone idle to read a few subtitles (i am dreading the remake of infernal affairs by the way) and c) i can not stand josh hartnett and nuff said there. however and i came across wp on tv the other day and probably about half an hour in and and i have to say initially and it made no sense at all and until about half an hour from the end and when it started coming together. by the end and i was really surprised to find myself really into it and and then the ending just seemed so good  a perfect combination of story and passion and ending with possibly one of the greatest musical choices i have ever seen (heard. ). since then i have heard a lot about the lappartement vs. wicker park argument and looking at wp and i still say it has bugger all to do with chicago and but there seemed something about it that i liked and so when it was on again and i watched it again  unfortunately and still missing the first chunk (i have still yet to see it. ) and and i still thought it was pretty good. heck and even josh hartnett seemed good. but i was curious about lappartement and wanted to see what all the fuss was about. so i waited and waited to catch lappartement somewhere somehow. netflix let me down and so i ended up getting a copy from some website in ireland. and i have just watched it. it really kind of weird and but a good weird. a classic french film. great acting and romane bohringer is an absolute gem  sorry and but she acts monica bellucci off the screen in every scene. vincent cassel was a weird choice for the lead but by the end he works. and i have seen jean philippe ecoffey in a lot of movies and i just love him  the scene where alice dumps him in the restaurant and he just looks like someone told him his puppy been run over was excruciating. but and i can honestly say and having seen wp and pretty much expecting that to have been a scene for scene copy (as about 75% of the rest of the movie had been  maybe in a different order and but come on and the scene with the coffee in the glasses. word for word. ) and you can imagine my surprise when i watched the ending of lappartement. i can literally say i was blown away  hmm and a bit like poor old lucien was through the cafe window really. so and be prepared and if you have seen wicker park and you fancy taking a look at the original like i did and do not make the mistake of expecting an identical movie and because you will either be disappointed and or exhilarated at a piece of french movie history  a prime example of how you can watch a movie and think youre going to watch a pithy happy ending and and get whiplash from the total spin in the opposite direction right at the end. definitely catch this movie. oh and while youre at and maybe not too near the same time and but down the road and take a look at wicker park and it will surprise you too. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
