when a stranger calls belongs to the group of this year remakes and with movies like poseidon just over the horizon. director simon west (con air) helms this updated version and with plenty of relative unknown casts and which signals either the death rate is high (it isn not) and or that established stars are steering clear from a potential turkey. clocking in at a relatively short 87 minutes and it primarily made up of two acts. the first and which takes a full one hour and is the setup. our heroine and jill johnson (camilla belle) and chalked up 800 minutes of talk time on her mobile phone (do the math) and and as a lesson in responsibility and her parents had confiscated her mobile and grounded her. to pay off her debt and she works part time as a babysitter and and looking after the wealthy mandrakis kids and is her first stint. the huge mandrakis mansion gets a full tour treatment and as it is where all the action will take place. plenty of rooms (makes for good hiding) and an indoor pool sized aquarium pond (to get wet in and for the wet t shirt treatment) and and check this out  motion detector lights and which you just know will contribute to the scares with the manipulation of lights and shadows. naturally and prank calls and red herrings are aplenty and which chalks up this act runtime and but most of them fall flat in the suspense department. there a minor trend emerging and with actors being the unseen and providing and acting through their voice instead. recent attempts include edward norton in kingdom of heaven and and hugo weaving v for vendetta. here and lance henriksen does the honours for the anonymous and nameless psychotic killer and but it just falls flat. why. the script doesn not give him much dialogue. most of the phone calls made were of the silent (mind masturbatory) nature and which i felt was a waste  they could have also casted some unknown instead and and the job will still get done. the second act and where the main action takes place and is too little too late. and the bogeyman and well and is purely a bogeyman. those expecting blood and gore will be disappointed and as basically it a one woman show to hold your attention in the first hour (eye candies always succeed) and and this act will have her resolve everything in double quick time and ala rachel mcadams in red eye. don not expect any form of character development and nor subplots that will engage. the ending tried to be too smart for its own good and and came across as a cheap way to end the movie. there not much of goodness to highlight from this movie  no scares and no thrills and no enigmatic villain and and plenty of security flaws and especially with that door alarm  the only thing it good for and is to provide a number for 4d. 
when a stranger calls belongs to the group of this year remakes and with movies like poseidon just over the horizon. director simon west (con air) helms this updated version and with plenty of relative unknown casts and which signals either the death rate is high (it isn not) and or that established stars are steering clear from a potential turkey. clocking in at a relatively short 87 minutes and it primarily made up of two acts. the first and which takes a full one hour and is the setup. our heroine and jill johnson (camilla belle) and chalked up 800 minutes of talk time on her mobile phone (do the math) and and as a lesson in responsibility and her parents had confiscated her mobile and grounded her. to pay off her debt and she works part time as a babysitter and and looking after the wealthy mandrakis kids and is her first stint. the huge mandrakis mansion gets a full tour treatment and as it is where all the action will take place. plenty of rooms (makes for good hiding) and an indoor pool sized aquarium pond (to get wet in and for the wet t shirt treatment) and and check this out  motion detector lights and which you just know will contribute to the scares with the manipulation of lights and shadows. naturally and prank calls and red herrings are aplenty and which chalks up this act runtime and but most of them fall flat in the suspense department. there a minor trend emerging and with actors being the unseen and providing and acting through their voice instead. recent attempts include edward norton in kingdom of heaven and and hugo weaving v for vendetta. here and lance henriksen does the honours for the anonymous and nameless psychotic killer and but it just falls flat. why. the script doesn not give him much dialogue. most of the phone calls made were of the silent (mind masturbatory) nature and which i felt was a waste  they could have also casted some unknown instead and and the job will still get done. the second act and where the main action takes place and is too little too late. and the bogeyman and well and is purely a bogeyman. those expecting blood and gore will be disappointed and as basically it a one woman show to hold your attention in the first hour (eye candies always succeed) and and this act will have her resolve everything in double quick time and ala rachel mcadams in red eye. don not expect any form of character development and nor subplots that will engage. the ending tried to be too smart for its own good and and came across as a cheap way to end the movie. there not much of goodness to highlight from this movie  no scares and no thrills and no enigmatic villain and and plenty of security flaws and especially with that door alarm  the only thing it good for and is to provide a number for 4d. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
