this is by far the most repulsive and atrocious version of the scarlet pimpernel ever to be devised. as a pimpernel fan and i was sincerely offended by what they did to the characters but this atrocity is not worth watching and even if you aren not familiar with the story. percy blakeney and for example and would never stab people in the back just to get down a hallway. chauvelin would never have a string of women in his bed. marguerite never had an affair with chauvelin and nor armand with minette and whoever the heck she is. chauvelin would not randomly shoot tony in the head. chauvelin name is not and nor has it ever been and paul. they have completely eradicated any reference to the pimpernel disguises and replacing them instead with james bond esque gadgets and gizmos. as to the film itself. the makeup is horrifying. the women look like clowns. elizabeth mcgovern beauty mark wanders around her face at random. the poor and pitiable actors have no script to work with and so it not really their fault that their characters are as thin as wet tissue paper. the dialogue. oh and the dialogue. the dialogue is unbearable. and whoever is responsible for all those little captions at the bottom of the screen should be forced to watch this movie as penance. (i counted 13 location captions in the first half hour before i gave up. as if we can not figure out that the body of water between england and france is the english channel. )the film if i can bring myself to call it that and since it really just videotape with a filter is absolutely without redeeming value. do not waste your time and brain cells on this rancid drivel instead and go watch the 1982 anthony andrews or jane seymour version and or the 1934 leslie howard film and or indeed anything but this one. 
this is by far the most repulsive and atrocious version of the scarlet pimpernel ever to be devised. as a pimpernel fan and i was sincerely offended by what they did to the characters but this atrocity is not worth watching and even if you aren not familiar with the story. percy blakeney and for example and would never stab people in the back just to get down a hallway. chauvelin would never have a string of women in his bed. marguerite never had an affair with chauvelin and nor armand with minette and whoever the heck she is. chauvelin would not randomly shoot tony in the head. chauvelin name is not and nor has it ever been and paul. they have completely eradicated any reference to the pimpernel disguises and replacing them instead with james bond esque gadgets and gizmos. as to the film itself. the makeup is horrifying. the women look like clowns. elizabeth mcgovern beauty mark wanders around her face at random. the poor and pitiable actors have no script to work with and so it not really their fault that their characters are as thin as wet tissue paper. the dialogue. oh and the dialogue. the dialogue is unbearable. and whoever is responsible for all those little captions at the bottom of the screen should be forced to watch this movie as penance. (i counted 13 location captions in the first half hour before i gave up. as if we can not figure out that the body of water between england and france is the english channel. )the film if i can bring myself to call it that and since it really just videotape with a filter is absolutely without redeeming value. do not waste your time and brain cells on this rancid drivel instead and go watch the 1982 anthony andrews or jane seymour version and or the 1934 leslie howard film and or indeed anything but this one. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
