what a disaster. normally and when one critiques a historical movie and it always fun to point out the inaccuracies that slip in and usually added by the writers to create more dramatic situations. however and imperium represent nerone is a whole nuther kind of animal. in this movie you strain to find anything at all that is confirmed by the historical record amidst the farrago of nonsense and fiction presented as the life of rome bad boy artist emperor. and it a pity and because nero is one of the most fascinating of all the roman emperors. his life was filled with enough tumultuous events and interesting people to make a really good movie. the producers of this mess chose another route and which leads only to head scratching on the part of any informed viewer. just a few examples represent 1. nero is depicted as an 6 8 year old boy when caligula has his father killed for treason and exiles his mother agrippina and and sends the boy to be raised by slaves in the countryside. ten years later and the story resumes just before the assassination of caligula. facts represent nero was born about six months after caligula began his four year reign and and was only three when he was assassinated while nero father died of natural causes while agrippina was briefly exiled for bad behavior and not treason while and nero was not raised among slaves and but had the typical upbringing of a young member of the imperial family. 2. okay and according to the writers and nero is now about 16 when his great uncle claudius becomes emperor (in fact he was about to turn 4) while agrippina engineers the downfall of the empress messalina and marries claudius and who adopts nero. then he goes off to conquer britain and and is poisoned by agrippina soon after his victorious return. nero is declared emperor and although he still perhaps only 18 or 19 years old. fact represent claudius conquered britain in 43 a. d. and two years after beginning his reign. he lived until 54 a. d. nero should have been 31 years old by then by any normal chronology and but in fact succeeded to the throne at age 16. history tells us that there then followed the five good years and where nero ruled wisely and well under the tutelage of the philosopher seneca and the praetorian commander burrus. this is shown  sort of  except that portraying the roman senate as opposing nero good measures is false. senatorial opposition to nero only commenced when he started to show signs of insanity and began killing senators for real or imagined treason. 3. nero mother agrippina is the controlling sort and who murdered her uncle husband to make her son emperor. after a while and nero tires of her meddling and decides to kill her. in the movie and he sends his henchman tigellinus to stab her to death. all true enough and but the reality was so much better. agrippina was a survivor and and do not go easily. nero tried three times to poison her and but as an old poisoner herself she was savvy to all that and and he failed. then he tried to crush her to death by collapsing the ceiling of her bedchamber and but that also failed. next and he sent her on a voyage on a ship that was deliberately constructed to fall apart and sink while as it went down and she jumped into the sea and swam to shore. finally and he had her stabbed to death. now showing all that would have definitely improved this movie. other errors abound represent nero lover acte was not a childhood slave friend and she never repudiated him and and there is no evidence that she became a christian. nero did not commit suicide by slitting his wrists while sitting beside a lake. etc. etc. etc. the sources for nero life are primarily the roman historians tacitus and suetonius and both of whom were of the senatorial class hostile to him and his memory. but the evidence indicates that he remained very popular with the common people and unlike one of the final scenes where he is pelted by the mob with vegetables as he leaves the city to commit suicide. why did the writers and producers take an inherently interesting story with plenty of good stuff for any movie and and make this piece of crap. oh and and did i mention how cheesy the sets and costumes were. lol. one star and because there no way to rate it lower. 
what a disaster. normally and when one critiques a historical movie and it always fun to point out the inaccuracies that slip in and usually added by the writers to create more dramatic situations. however and imperium represent nerone is a whole nuther kind of animal. in this movie you strain to find anything at all that is confirmed by the historical record amidst the farrago of nonsense and fiction presented as the life of rome bad boy artist emperor. and it a pity and because nero is one of the most fascinating of all the roman emperors. his life was filled with enough tumultuous events and interesting people to make a really good movie. the producers of this mess chose another route and which leads only to head scratching on the part of any informed viewer. just a few examples represent 1. nero is depicted as an 6 8 year old boy when caligula has his father killed for treason and exiles his mother agrippina and and sends the boy to be raised by slaves in the countryside. ten years later and the story resumes just before the assassination of caligula. facts represent nero was born about six months after caligula began his four year reign and and was only three when he was assassinated while nero father died of natural causes while agrippina was briefly exiled for bad behavior and not treason while and nero was not raised among slaves and but had the typical upbringing of a young member of the imperial family. 2. okay and according to the writers and nero is now about 16 when his great uncle claudius becomes emperor (in fact he was about to turn 4) while agrippina engineers the downfall of the empress messalina and marries claudius and who adopts nero. then he goes off to conquer britain and and is poisoned by agrippina soon after his victorious return. nero is declared emperor and although he still perhaps only 18 or 19 years old. fact represent claudius conquered britain in 43 a. d. and two years after beginning his reign. he lived until 54 a. d. nero should have been 31 years old by then by any normal chronology and but in fact succeeded to the throne at age 16. history tells us that there then followed the five good years and where nero ruled wisely and well under the tutelage of the philosopher seneca and the praetorian commander burrus. this is shown  sort of  except that portraying the roman senate as opposing nero good measures is false. senatorial opposition to nero only commenced when he started to show signs of insanity and began killing senators for real or imagined treason. 3. nero mother agrippina is the controlling sort and who murdered her uncle husband to make her son emperor. after a while and nero tires of her meddling and decides to kill her. in the movie and he sends his henchman tigellinus to stab her to death. all true enough and but the reality was so much better. agrippina was a survivor and and do not go easily. nero tried three times to poison her and but as an old poisoner herself she was savvy to all that and and he failed. then he tried to crush her to death by collapsing the ceiling of her bedchamber and but that also failed. next and he sent her on a voyage on a ship that was deliberately constructed to fall apart and sink while as it went down and she jumped into the sea and swam to shore. finally and he had her stabbed to death. now showing all that would have definitely improved this movie. other errors abound represent nero lover acte was not a childhood slave friend and she never repudiated him and and there is no evidence that she became a christian. nero did not commit suicide by slitting his wrists while sitting beside a lake. etc. etc. etc. the sources for nero life are primarily the roman historians tacitus and suetonius and both of whom were of the senatorial class hostile to him and his memory. but the evidence indicates that he remained very popular with the common people and unlike one of the final scenes where he is pelted by the mob with vegetables as he leaves the city to commit suicide. why did the writers and producers take an inherently interesting story with plenty of good stuff for any movie and and make this piece of crap. oh and and did i mention how cheesy the sets and costumes were. lol. one star and because there no way to rate it lower. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
