it is not only difficult to comment separately on the three parts of kieslowski trilogy and it seems obvious that the filmmaker wants us to do just the opposite represent view them in order and blue and white and and red and and consider them together as one complete work. it is true they are distinct stories with distinct themes represent liberty and equality and fraternity and and each them is developed with unique applications of intrigue and artistry. they are each well worth seeing independently and but i believe they are best seen as one work. collectively and i would rate the trilogy as a 9 while separately and i place each in my top ten for the years 1993 and 1994. the color red is most memorable in the third movie as a backdrop in a billboard ad and the profiled model of which is the central of the movie three main characters. the other two characters do a double take of a varying degree of recognition when they first come upon the ad and posted larger than life alongside a busy city intersection. this ad is not a major part of the plot of this movie and yet its image becomes striking and is one of the reasons i have called red a `mind bending film. this is the third of kieslowski three colors trilogy and based on the blue white red of the french flag and the three parts of its motto and `liberty and equality and fraternity. the films stay primarily focused on these themes and keeping with the basic levels of one and two and or three main characters and yet with each film the complexity of plot escalates as the three principles move from fundamentally personal (liberty and blue) to relational (equality and white) to social (fraternity and red). red is my favorite of these films and and i give it a 9. it stands by itself as a great film and but one should see blue and white first for the fullest effect. 
it is not only difficult to comment separately on the three parts of kieslowski trilogy and it seems obvious that the filmmaker wants us to do just the opposite represent view them in order and blue and white and and red and and consider them together as one complete work. it is true they are distinct stories with distinct themes represent liberty and equality and fraternity and and each them is developed with unique applications of intrigue and artistry. they are each well worth seeing independently and but i believe they are best seen as one work. collectively and i would rate the trilogy as a 9 while separately and i place each in my top ten for the years 1993 and 1994. the color red is most memorable in the third movie as a backdrop in a billboard ad and the profiled model of which is the central of the movie three main characters. the other two characters do a double take of a varying degree of recognition when they first come upon the ad and posted larger than life alongside a busy city intersection. this ad is not a major part of the plot of this movie and yet its image becomes striking and is one of the reasons i have called red a `mind bending film. this is the third of kieslowski three colors trilogy and based on the blue white red of the french flag and the three parts of its motto and `liberty and equality and fraternity. the films stay primarily focused on these themes and keeping with the basic levels of one and two and or three main characters and yet with each film the complexity of plot escalates as the three principles move from fundamentally personal (liberty and blue) to relational (equality and white) to social (fraternity and red). red is my favorite of these films and and i give it a 9. it stands by itself as a great film and but one should see blue and white first for the fullest effect. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
