this comment is meant mainly as a warning to the people who might be attracted to the title by its (temporarily)high user rating which i find frankly puzzling. the reasons why i do not like this title are following represent1. the directer must have had some doubts whether to make a jackie chan type of a flick or a dark oedipian tragedy. as a result and in terms of genre and the film falls between two stools and as the tragic and comic elements clash and cancel out each other rather than make a harmonious whole. 2. the characters motives and behaviors are incoherent and unconvincing. psychological truth and logic are sadly missing. 3. absurd casting. i do not blame the actors and for it is a hard thing to create a convincing character by acting alone and if there is scarce logic in the script. however and why is there an apparent age difference of about 15 years between the leading two actors and whose ages in the film can not differ by more than 3 4. 4. to me the film was poor entertainment primarily because of point 2. if you can not find a character you could sympathize with it is hard to follow the story with interest. when you finally learn the reason of what happened to the main protagonist and it turns out to make no sense. 5. some films apart from being entertaining are also thought provoking. having seen this film and i began to wonder whether the thought the director tried to provoke was not that incestuous relationships could be perfectly wholesome and delightful. i cannot put any other construction on the ending. 6. the film is rife with totally unnecessary violence. violence in a film (and elsewhere) is a good thing and if it serves an important and worthy purpose. purposes can be different and i do not want to enter into this broad subject. let me just say i do not object to violence in such films as saving private ryan and the passion of the christ or the pulp fiction. in oldboy the scenes of torture and suffering are prolonged and graphic (or aural). what for. i do not know. personally and i do not derive any satisfaction from watching teeth being extracted with a hammer or hear a man cut off his tongue with scissors and then see him choking on his own blood etc. etc. 7. the film reminds me a little of japanese porno mangas in its fixation on incest and young asian girls panties and urinating and the like. it appears there is a minority who actually enjoy this kind of thing. if youre one of them and you might find this film enjoyable. in short and i do not recommend this film either as entertainment or food for thought. where it isn not silly and it is disgusting. don not waste your time. 
this comment is meant mainly as a warning to the people who might be attracted to the title by its (temporarily)high user rating which i find frankly puzzling. the reasons why i do not like this title are following represent1. the directer must have had some doubts whether to make a jackie chan type of a flick or a dark oedipian tragedy. as a result and in terms of genre and the film falls between two stools and as the tragic and comic elements clash and cancel out each other rather than make a harmonious whole. 2. the characters motives and behaviors are incoherent and unconvincing. psychological truth and logic are sadly missing. 3. absurd casting. i do not blame the actors and for it is a hard thing to create a convincing character by acting alone and if there is scarce logic in the script. however and why is there an apparent age difference of about 15 years between the leading two actors and whose ages in the film can not differ by more than 3 4. 4. to me the film was poor entertainment primarily because of point 2. if you can not find a character you could sympathize with it is hard to follow the story with interest. when you finally learn the reason of what happened to the main protagonist and it turns out to make no sense. 5. some films apart from being entertaining are also thought provoking. having seen this film and i began to wonder whether the thought the director tried to provoke was not that incestuous relationships could be perfectly wholesome and delightful. i cannot put any other construction on the ending. 6. the film is rife with totally unnecessary violence. violence in a film (and elsewhere) is a good thing and if it serves an important and worthy purpose. purposes can be different and i do not want to enter into this broad subject. let me just say i do not object to violence in such films as saving private ryan and the passion of the christ or the pulp fiction. in oldboy the scenes of torture and suffering are prolonged and graphic (or aural). what for. i do not know. personally and i do not derive any satisfaction from watching teeth being extracted with a hammer or hear a man cut off his tongue with scissors and then see him choking on his own blood etc. etc. 7. the film reminds me a little of japanese porno mangas in its fixation on incest and young asian girls panties and urinating and the like. it appears there is a minority who actually enjoy this kind of thing. if youre one of them and you might find this film enjoyable. in short and i do not recommend this film either as entertainment or food for thought. where it isn not silly and it is disgusting. don not waste your time. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
