i wish i could tell you that this film is as exciting as the theories it espouses. but i can not. another species could have come and mutated while i waited for some action. for such a controversial man and darwin lived the most conventional life. if you do not know about the mad theories and you could almost mistake him for a stamp collector. the film makers have cast darwin as a dullard which does him a disservice. even when he briefly loses his mind due to his tireless theorising and it wasn not interesting to watch. maybe great thinkers are dull people. i do not know what i was expecting represent a forehead banging eccentric with wild hair and eyes espousing his love of all things simian and the glint of madness straining from a furrowed brow. a long haired hermit who babbled to animals. a head cradling lunatic with eyes lit up like beacons of truth. all of the above would have been great. this is the movies for scorsese sake. but there was none of that. no lightning and no thunder and no wonder and no awe. just paul bettany and jennifer connelly fresh from the subtle as breath school of method acting. i imagine that someone with darwin ideas had a brain like a speeding train so why did this film just pootle along  chug chug chug  like a slow winter. the disappointment is immeasurable. 
i wish i could tell you that this film is as exciting as the theories it espouses. but i can not. another species could have come and mutated while i waited for some action. for such a controversial man and darwin lived the most conventional life. if you do not know about the mad theories and you could almost mistake him for a stamp collector. the film makers have cast darwin as a dullard which does him a disservice. even when he briefly loses his mind due to his tireless theorising and it wasn not interesting to watch. maybe great thinkers are dull people. i do not know what i was expecting represent a forehead banging eccentric with wild hair and eyes espousing his love of all things simian and the glint of madness straining from a furrowed brow. a long haired hermit who babbled to animals. a head cradling lunatic with eyes lit up like beacons of truth. all of the above would have been great. this is the movies for scorsese sake. but there was none of that. no lightning and no thunder and no wonder and no awe. just paul bettany and jennifer connelly fresh from the subtle as breath school of method acting. i imagine that someone with darwin ideas had a brain like a speeding train so why did this film just pootle along  chug chug chug  like a slow winter. the disappointment is immeasurable. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
