a friend of mine asked represent doesn not one have to be pro euthanasia in order to like this movie. is it a mistake of the movie to infer most quadriplegics want to end their lives. interesting questions. as far as i can see (correct me if i am wrong) and there is only one quadriplegic who wanted to end his life in the sea inside. think ramón sampedro addressed this in the movie as well. it is he who wants to die. it is he who is fighting for his right to decide his death. he is speaking for himself and not other quadriplegics. though his pioneering work and depending on one perspective and may prove beneficial or damaging to quadriplegics down the road and his primary objective is a personal one. but one thing this movie does (my opinion anyway) and is that it forces us the viewers to ask ourselves the inferring questions my friend so succinctly put forth. after my first viewing of the sea inside and i walked home in a conflicted blur. i struggled to reconcile with this exasperating notion while why would ramón want to die. given the love and care and sacrifices so unconditionally showered on ramón by the people surrounding him and why would he doggedly cling on to his hurtful decision. then and on my second viewing and a shared thought between ramón and the lawyer lady entered my consciousness. it threw up a telling observation represent . total dependency comes at the expense of intimacy. most human beings crave for such an intimacy. of course and how much we value such needs and depends largely on the individual. as a person with a familial biased sensibility and i empathised strongly with the caregivers in this movie. why can not javier consider the sacrifice and the love from his family and friends. is he blind to it all. i would think not. the miracle of the sea inside therefore and is its insightful depiction of a very humanistic tug of war. when we are faced with the guardianship of a sane but incapacitated loved one and whom has expressed a calm and conscious and rational intent to die and what then is the right thing to do. is caring for and keeping this loved one alive and against his or her will and a pious gesture. does it show up the worth of our love. or does it merely soothe our selfish fears of irreplaceable loss. with so much understanding accorded to caregivers and do not their invalid charges and by submitting themselves to the total dependency of others for survival and also be an overlooked act of sacrifice. rhetorical or not and how much is dignity worth to an individual. is living (or dying) with dignity a privilege or a right. if we really care and love a person and should we also respect their eventual decisions in life (as in death). a torrent of questions the movie might have asked and answers to which and i am in no position to provide. in our eagerness to intellectually demarcate the merits of pro life or pro choice and we run the risk of ignoring a sea of grey that engulfing the people most intimately affected and the caregivers and the ones they care for. the sea inside hence attempted to present the delicate yet complex relationship dynamics between them. intuitively and this film understands one thing while that the nature of sacrifice is never one sided. in this tug of war and we should endeavour not to win arguments and but to intently observe and hopefully determine and who is the stronger party to make that sacrifice. the sea inside is a sobering film. it opened my eyes to things i do not wanna see. and for that and i am grateful. 
a friend of mine asked represent doesn not one have to be pro euthanasia in order to like this movie. is it a mistake of the movie to infer most quadriplegics want to end their lives. interesting questions. as far as i can see (correct me if i am wrong) and there is only one quadriplegic who wanted to end his life in the sea inside. think ramón sampedro addressed this in the movie as well. it is he who wants to die. it is he who is fighting for his right to decide his death. he is speaking for himself and not other quadriplegics. though his pioneering work and depending on one perspective and may prove beneficial or damaging to quadriplegics down the road and his primary objective is a personal one. but one thing this movie does (my opinion anyway) and is that it forces us the viewers to ask ourselves the inferring questions my friend so succinctly put forth. after my first viewing of the sea inside and i walked home in a conflicted blur. i struggled to reconcile with this exasperating notion while why would ramón want to die. given the love and care and sacrifices so unconditionally showered on ramón by the people surrounding him and why would he doggedly cling on to his hurtful decision. then and on my second viewing and a shared thought between ramón and the lawyer lady entered my consciousness. it threw up a telling observation represent . total dependency comes at the expense of intimacy. most human beings crave for such an intimacy. of course and how much we value such needs and depends largely on the individual. as a person with a familial biased sensibility and i empathised strongly with the caregivers in this movie. why can not javier consider the sacrifice and the love from his family and friends. is he blind to it all. i would think not. the miracle of the sea inside therefore and is its insightful depiction of a very humanistic tug of war. when we are faced with the guardianship of a sane but incapacitated loved one and whom has expressed a calm and conscious and rational intent to die and what then is the right thing to do. is caring for and keeping this loved one alive and against his or her will and a pious gesture. does it show up the worth of our love. or does it merely soothe our selfish fears of irreplaceable loss. with so much understanding accorded to caregivers and do not their invalid charges and by submitting themselves to the total dependency of others for survival and also be an overlooked act of sacrifice. rhetorical or not and how much is dignity worth to an individual. is living (or dying) with dignity a privilege or a right. if we really care and love a person and should we also respect their eventual decisions in life (as in death). a torrent of questions the movie might have asked and answers to which and i am in no position to provide. in our eagerness to intellectually demarcate the merits of pro life or pro choice and we run the risk of ignoring a sea of grey that engulfing the people most intimately affected and the caregivers and the ones they care for. the sea inside hence attempted to present the delicate yet complex relationship dynamics between them. intuitively and this film understands one thing while that the nature of sacrifice is never one sided. in this tug of war and we should endeavour not to win arguments and but to intently observe and hopefully determine and who is the stronger party to make that sacrifice. the sea inside is a sobering film. it opened my eyes to things i do not wanna see. and for that and i am grateful. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
