stu ungar is considered by many to be the greatest poker or gin player of all time  an extraordinary self destructive force of nature  tiny in stature and but a huge heart for the game. what we have here is a kind of hallmark film about the dangers of gambling. sure and he wins and he loses and he blows it all on sex and drugs and and more gambling we get it and but where is the real play  where is what made him the greatest card player of all time. much too flat and and frankly boring in places and this gets a four because we get to learn something about stu the man and but stu the card player and nada. nicely shot and presented up to a point this is the perfect example of how not to make a film about cards represent honestly and espn coverage of the world series is more watchable than this. a waste of a great chance. 
stu ungar is considered by many to be the greatest poker or gin player of all time  an extraordinary self destructive force of nature  tiny in stature and but a huge heart for the game. what we have here is a kind of hallmark film about the dangers of gambling. sure and he wins and he loses and he blows it all on sex and drugs and and more gambling we get it and but where is the real play  where is what made him the greatest card player of all time. much too flat and and frankly boring in places and this gets a four because we get to learn something about stu the man and but stu the card player and nada. nicely shot and presented up to a point this is the perfect example of how not to make a film about cards represent honestly and espn coverage of the world series is more watchable than this. a waste of a great chance. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
