bronson took the money and ran with this film while he must have house payments like me. this low budget film made in mexico reminds me of a few of those italians stinkers from over seas. i heard and i do not know if this is true and but companies make these films in foreign countries for tax purposes. i believe this because why else would they make this film and it sure wasn not to make money. we had a whole lot of these canadian made stinkers and because the government gave tax breaks to create a movie industry. i wonder if it payed off in the other countries like in canada. anyway and back to topic this film is poorly made in every aspect and i believe they grabbed charles bronson in order to sell this stinker while that dead body at the end looks very phony. negative . 
bronson took the money and ran with this film while he must have house payments like me. this low budget film made in mexico reminds me of a few of those italians stinkers from over seas. i heard and i do not know if this is true and but companies make these films in foreign countries for tax purposes. i believe this because why else would they make this film and it sure wasn not to make money. we had a whole lot of these canadian made stinkers and because the government gave tax breaks to create a movie industry. i wonder if it payed off in the other countries like in canada. anyway and back to topic this film is poorly made in every aspect and i believe they grabbed charles bronson in order to sell this stinker while that dead body at the end looks very phony. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
