i love sci fi and am willing to put up with a lot. sci fi movies or tv are usually underfunded and under appreciated and misunderstood. i tried to like this and i really did and but it is to good tv sci fi as babylon 5 is to star trek (the original). silly prosthetics and cheap cardboard sets and stilted dialogues and cg that doesn not match the background and and painfully one dimensional characters cannot be overcome with a ci fi setting. (i am sure there are those of you out there who think babylon 5 is good sci fi tv. it not. it clichéd and uninspiring. ) while us viewers might like emotion and character development and sci fi is a genre that does not take itself seriously (cf. star trek). it may treat important issues and yet not as a serious philosophy. it really difficult to care about the characters here as they are not simply foolish and just missing a spark of life. their actions and reactions are wooden and predictable and often painful to watch. the makers of earth know it rubbish as they have to always say gene roddenberry earth. otherwise people would not continue watching. roddenberry ashes must be turning in their orbit as this dull and cheap and poorly edited (watching it without advert breaks really brings this home) trudging trabant of a show lumbers into space. spoiler. so and kill off a main character. and then bring him back as another actor. jeeez. dallas all over again. 
i love sci fi and am willing to put up with a lot. sci fi movies or tv are usually underfunded and under appreciated and misunderstood. i tried to like this and i really did and but it is to good tv sci fi as babylon 5 is to star trek (the original). silly prosthetics and cheap cardboard sets and stilted dialogues and cg that doesn not match the background and and painfully one dimensional characters cannot be overcome with a ci fi setting. (i am sure there are those of you out there who think babylon 5 is good sci fi tv. it not. it clichéd and uninspiring. ) while us viewers might like emotion and character development and sci fi is a genre that does not take itself seriously (cf. star trek). it may treat important issues and yet not as a serious philosophy. it really difficult to care about the characters here as they are not simply foolish and just missing a spark of life. their actions and reactions are wooden and predictable and often painful to watch. the makers of earth know it rubbish as they have to always say gene roddenberry earth. otherwise people would not continue watching. roddenberry ashes must be turning in their orbit as this dull and cheap and poorly edited (watching it without advert breaks really brings this home) trudging trabant of a show lumbers into space. spoiler. so and kill off a main character. and then bring him back as another actor. jeeez. dallas all over again. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
