uh and oh. i just said the this classic film has a plot that stinks. well and it true and . so get over it. this film was a vanity project for joseph p. kennedy in which his mistress starred and money flowed to make her an even bigger star. today and only a fragmentary copy exists one that was retored a few years back. however and even if the film had been in perfect shape and it still would have stunk for many reasons. and and without further ado and here are some of my reasons represent first and gloria swanson and aged 31 plays a girl in a convent school perhaps aged 16 or 18. come on she looks old enough to be the mother of many of the kids. second and the movie all hinges on the stupid concept of love at first sight. while some people believe it this and it is ridiculous to believe that a prince would throw away everything on a woman he do not even know. what a lot of hooey. third and the movie is histrionic and the plot is nuts. after leaving the school and kelly goes off to east africa and then becomes queen of the whores and later and after the evil queen back in europe dies (that convenient) and the prince is able to get out of prison and actually finds kelly and marries her and she then becomes queen of a real honest to goodness country. gimme a break this is ridiculous and even in the days of silent film this plot was a groaner. so and in summary and this is a poor film with great production values (mistresses need to look good) that is parading around as a classic. there are so many better silent films out there see them first and avoid this tripe. 
uh and oh. i just said the this classic film has a plot that stinks. well and it true and . so get over it. this film was a vanity project for joseph p. kennedy in which his mistress starred and money flowed to make her an even bigger star. today and only a fragmentary copy exists one that was retored a few years back. however and even if the film had been in perfect shape and it still would have stunk for many reasons. and and without further ado and here are some of my reasons represent first and gloria swanson and aged 31 plays a girl in a convent school perhaps aged 16 or 18. come on she looks old enough to be the mother of many of the kids. second and the movie all hinges on the stupid concept of love at first sight. while some people believe it this and it is ridiculous to believe that a prince would throw away everything on a woman he do not even know. what a lot of hooey. third and the movie is histrionic and the plot is nuts. after leaving the school and kelly goes off to east africa and then becomes queen of the whores and later and after the evil queen back in europe dies (that convenient) and the prince is able to get out of prison and actually finds kelly and marries her and she then becomes queen of a real honest to goodness country. gimme a break this is ridiculous and even in the days of silent film this plot was a groaner. so and in summary and this is a poor film with great production values (mistresses need to look good) that is parading around as a classic. there are so many better silent films out there see them first and avoid this tripe. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
