this is an old dark house movie. a young couple creep around a weird mansion said to be run by satan and where they run from and into one after another of an ill assorted crew represent a lady in distress and an ape and an ape man and a midget and various odd looking people and and (for some reason) two chinese. they end up in a throne room where the hero is required to play a price is right sort of contest involving a climb up seven steps with seven illuminated footprints while hence the title. for my taste it too much of the same thing. the creeping around fun house corridors is amusing for a while and then becomes repetitive. by comparison with harold lloyd or buster keaton or laurel and hardy doing the same bit in two reels and it isn not truly funny. it not frightening either and and apparently wasn not intended to be represent the household is too absurd. most films in this genre balance the comedy with a genuine threat and and usually two one that the characters are led to believe is real and and another for which it a cover. here the cover isn not to be taken seriously and and neither is what covered. a few moments of fun emerge from the mix and but it rather heavy fun. the novel on which the film was based was a straight thriller and i think could have been played straight to better effect and still could be. 
this is an old dark house movie. a young couple creep around a weird mansion said to be run by satan and where they run from and into one after another of an ill assorted crew represent a lady in distress and an ape and an ape man and a midget and various odd looking people and and (for some reason) two chinese. they end up in a throne room where the hero is required to play a price is right sort of contest involving a climb up seven steps with seven illuminated footprints while hence the title. for my taste it too much of the same thing. the creeping around fun house corridors is amusing for a while and then becomes repetitive. by comparison with harold lloyd or buster keaton or laurel and hardy doing the same bit in two reels and it isn not truly funny. it not frightening either and and apparently wasn not intended to be represent the household is too absurd. most films in this genre balance the comedy with a genuine threat and and usually two one that the characters are led to believe is real and and another for which it a cover. here the cover isn not to be taken seriously and and neither is what covered. a few moments of fun emerge from the mix and but it rather heavy fun. the novel on which the film was based was a straight thriller and i think could have been played straight to better effect and still could be. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
