tarzan and the environmental awareness leader and faces four trappers who by most unorthodox means abduct animals to get them to zoos. tarzan has a bland but sexy enough wife with an impeccable hairdo and and a kid. no one should fault tarzan for being grieved by the vicious actions of the hunters. this gordon scott tarzan flick is one of the silliest and completely and unnecessarily silly while for one reason or another and the team did not find anything charming to sustain the movie and and so it just some silly rubbish. tarzan and his family are threatened by a group of evil trappers  and because tarzan environmental awareness brought him into open conflict with the evildoers. the kid and the chimpanzee and both belonging to tarzan and are kidnapped by the malevolent trappers while so tarzan summons the unleashed animal forces of the jungle to release the kid and the chimpwith tarzan leading the attack. tarzan and the trappers is silly and unappealing and quite uninteresting. maybe as a kid i would have liked it. now one has to be too meanas viciously mean as those pathetic trappers punished by tarzanto ask a tarzan flick not to be silly while this i concede. but one is also truly entitled to ask these tarzan flicks and however silly and to have and to show some gustoa bit of gustoeven a tiny bit of gusto. some kick and some excitement and some fun. now the gordon scott tarzan failure is too silly exactly in the sense of not having any gusto at all and of lacking all excitement. (yes and i liked the sequence of the jungle beast eating a snake. what beast. watch the movie and kiddos and now here i just gave you one excuse to do so. ) for one reason or another and the villains look somewhat pathetic and elicit mercy rather than virtuous anger. the books leave the impression that tarzan seemed quite bright in his own way while and if finding a decent bodybuilder or another sportsman to look clever enough for the role might prove a too demanding and next to impossible task and gordon scott was anyway too far from meeting that ideal. the wife chides tarzan for disliking books. the script suggests tarzan was uneducated and almost illiterate and and adverse to learning while but the book says otherwise and and we know that tarzan studied much and by himself and using the books of his gone family and before even meeting white people. and i did not like that yell. (it supposed and dear kiddos and to be a genuine wild yell and not a missed yodeler. ). 
tarzan and the environmental awareness leader and faces four trappers who by most unorthodox means abduct animals to get them to zoos. tarzan has a bland but sexy enough wife with an impeccable hairdo and and a kid. no one should fault tarzan for being grieved by the vicious actions of the hunters. this gordon scott tarzan flick is one of the silliest and completely and unnecessarily silly while for one reason or another and the team did not find anything charming to sustain the movie and and so it just some silly rubbish. tarzan and his family are threatened by a group of evil trappers  and because tarzan environmental awareness brought him into open conflict with the evildoers. the kid and the chimpanzee and both belonging to tarzan and are kidnapped by the malevolent trappers while so tarzan summons the unleashed animal forces of the jungle to release the kid and the chimpwith tarzan leading the attack. tarzan and the trappers is silly and unappealing and quite uninteresting. maybe as a kid i would have liked it. now one has to be too meanas viciously mean as those pathetic trappers punished by tarzanto ask a tarzan flick not to be silly while this i concede. but one is also truly entitled to ask these tarzan flicks and however silly and to have and to show some gustoa bit of gustoeven a tiny bit of gusto. some kick and some excitement and some fun. now the gordon scott tarzan failure is too silly exactly in the sense of not having any gusto at all and of lacking all excitement. (yes and i liked the sequence of the jungle beast eating a snake. what beast. watch the movie and kiddos and now here i just gave you one excuse to do so. ) for one reason or another and the villains look somewhat pathetic and elicit mercy rather than virtuous anger. the books leave the impression that tarzan seemed quite bright in his own way while and if finding a decent bodybuilder or another sportsman to look clever enough for the role might prove a too demanding and next to impossible task and gordon scott was anyway too far from meeting that ideal. the wife chides tarzan for disliking books. the script suggests tarzan was uneducated and almost illiterate and and adverse to learning while but the book says otherwise and and we know that tarzan studied much and by himself and using the books of his gone family and before even meeting white people. and i did not like that yell. (it supposed and dear kiddos and to be a genuine wild yell and not a missed yodeler. ). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
