house of dracula works from the same basic premise as house of frankenstein from the year before while namely that universal three most famous monsters while dracula and frankenstein monster and the wolf man are appearing in the movie together. naturally and the film is rather messy therefore and but the fact that all three monsters are there is usually enough to ensure that the film sixty seven minutes do not become boring. it obvious that the idea of making another monster mash came into the writer head before an actual plot did and as the yarn were given isn not exactly without holes. the plot sees count dracula arrive at dr. edelman home asking for a cure for his vampirism. then and what can only be described as a coincidence and sees lawrence talbot and a. k. a. the wolf man turn up asking for a cure for his affliction. it turns out that dracula is on the prowl for edelman daughter and but talbot really is serious. when it turns out that he can not be stopped from turning into a wolf and the wolf man throws himself into the sea. where he ends up finding frankenstein monster. overall and this film isn not as good as the earlier house of frankenstein. the 1944 film put its plot together better than this entry in the series does and as the plot here doesn not give equal time to each universal monster. dracula plot is the biggest at first and but soon fizzles out only to resurface at the end. the wolf man is the star of the show and but his story never really develops and and is essentially just another version of the plot he always finds himself in. frankenstein monster is given the coldest hand and as he appears in the movie merely as an afterthought and and an obvious excuse to ensure that all three monsters appear in the movie. the story of the doctor who binds all three together is the most interesting and but this is a little disappointing as he isn not the reason why people will see this film. the acting is good enough and with john carradine showing his sinister side and lon chaney jr once again making sure that his character is bathed in tragedy. glenn strange is given nothing to do and and onslow stevens proves the real highlight as dr edelman. overall and this film would not do much for anyone that isn not a fan of universal horror while but as silly monster movies go and house of dracula is worth seeing. 
house of dracula works from the same basic premise as house of frankenstein from the year before while namely that universal three most famous monsters while dracula and frankenstein monster and the wolf man are appearing in the movie together. naturally and the film is rather messy therefore and but the fact that all three monsters are there is usually enough to ensure that the film sixty seven minutes do not become boring. it obvious that the idea of making another monster mash came into the writer head before an actual plot did and as the yarn were given isn not exactly without holes. the plot sees count dracula arrive at dr. edelman home asking for a cure for his vampirism. then and what can only be described as a coincidence and sees lawrence talbot and a. k. a. the wolf man turn up asking for a cure for his affliction. it turns out that dracula is on the prowl for edelman daughter and but talbot really is serious. when it turns out that he can not be stopped from turning into a wolf and the wolf man throws himself into the sea. where he ends up finding frankenstein monster. overall and this film isn not as good as the earlier house of frankenstein. the 1944 film put its plot together better than this entry in the series does and as the plot here doesn not give equal time to each universal monster. dracula plot is the biggest at first and but soon fizzles out only to resurface at the end. the wolf man is the star of the show and but his story never really develops and and is essentially just another version of the plot he always finds himself in. frankenstein monster is given the coldest hand and as he appears in the movie merely as an afterthought and and an obvious excuse to ensure that all three monsters appear in the movie. the story of the doctor who binds all three together is the most interesting and but this is a little disappointing as he isn not the reason why people will see this film. the acting is good enough and with john carradine showing his sinister side and lon chaney jr once again making sure that his character is bathed in tragedy. glenn strange is given nothing to do and and onslow stevens proves the real highlight as dr edelman. overall and this film would not do much for anyone that isn not a fan of universal horror while but as silly monster movies go and house of dracula is worth seeing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
