 or may contain spoilers and but of course it does not matter positive. or battleship potemkin is one stunning spectacle of haunting images. the visual direction is (well and and has been) inspiring and the sheer scale of the film is impressive and and the technique is certainly pioneering. what is really amazing is and to my mind and the depth and effectiveness of a film and devoid of proper literary script and sound (save the soundtrack) and decent image quality and the faux profound (self )referentialism of today and exceptional acting and pretense and etc. what you get is a purely visual experience to be remembered. btw and the previous poster noted represent eisenstien felt after a lot of suffering to give the heroes what they wanted. the problem is that you think eisenstein is building up to a big final fight and then he tricks you. it a little cheap. i would have rather seen a huge final action scene. i must warn you and that the end is not cheap and and eisenstein wasn not being generous to the heroes. history and however and was. potemkin really did go through the squadron as it was shown in the film. finally and i would strongly recommend seeing battleship potemkin to anyone more or less seriously interested in cinema. see it with a fellow movie buff and it kept me talking for hours. however and if you tend to consider films and generally accepted as great or classic and to be slow or boring and this film might not be for you yet. not much cheap entertainment here. for me though and it is a full positive . 
 or may contain spoilers and but of course it does not matter positive. or battleship potemkin is one stunning spectacle of haunting images. the visual direction is (well and and has been) inspiring and the sheer scale of the film is impressive and and the technique is certainly pioneering. what is really amazing is and to my mind and the depth and effectiveness of a film and devoid of proper literary script and sound (save the soundtrack) and decent image quality and the faux profound (self )referentialism of today and exceptional acting and pretense and etc. what you get is a purely visual experience to be remembered. btw and the previous poster noted represent eisenstien felt after a lot of suffering to give the heroes what they wanted. the problem is that you think eisenstein is building up to a big final fight and then he tricks you. it a little cheap. i would have rather seen a huge final action scene. i must warn you and that the end is not cheap and and eisenstein wasn not being generous to the heroes. history and however and was. potemkin really did go through the squadron as it was shown in the film. finally and i would strongly recommend seeing battleship potemkin to anyone more or less seriously interested in cinema. see it with a fellow movie buff and it kept me talking for hours. however and if you tend to consider films and generally accepted as great or classic and to be slow or boring and this film might not be for you yet. not much cheap entertainment here. for me though and it is a full positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
