mexican werewolf in texas is set in the small border town of furlough where anna (erika fay) lives and her best friend is rosie (martine hughes) and she has a mexican boyfriend named miguel (gabriel gutierrez) who are determined to track a beast down that has been terrorising the town and killing livestock and several residents including some of their friends. local mexican legends speak of the chupacabra and an evil creature from myth and legend. erm and i am struggling now because not that much else actually happens. written and directed by scott maginnis i would not beat about the bush here and simply say that mexican werewolf in texas is awful and period. the script only ever mentions the word werewolf once and the rest of the time it referred to a chupacabra and in fact i suspect this wasn not really conceived as a werewolf flick at all. the werewolf creature looks mostly hairless and more like some vicious dog and there is no reference to anybody changing during the full moon and it actually attacks during the day on a couple of occasions and there is no transformation scene and at the end when it is killed it doesn not change back into anyone either. to be honest apart from the title there nothing here to indicate a werewolf film at all and even then the title is just a rip off of the highly popular an american werewolf in london (1981). this is the type of home made crap that i personally think is killing the horror genre and how long has it been since there was a true low budget horror classic like dawn of the dead (1978) and the evil dead (1981) and halloween (1978) or friday the 13th (1980) which were all made on shoe string budgets and maybe the blair witch project (1999) but that it in recent years and crap like mexican werewolf in texas has absolutely no chance of ever being considered a classic. the character are awful and things just happen around them and the dialogue is rubbish and the pacing is terrible and the story sucks and virtually sent me to sleep and as a whole this film is just crap and i am sorry but i do not know how else to describe it. director maginnis does nothing to make this watchable and there the annoying hand held camera type cinematography which could easily give someone a headache and quick blink and you will miss something editing which just annoys and irritates in equal measure. it not scary and there no nudity and there no tension or atmosphere and the special effects are awful. the monster really does look poor and it no wonder maginnis keeps it in the shadows or cuts his scenes so quickly you never get a good look at it. there virtually no colour to the picture either and it either almost pitch black or over saturated desert sand oranges which makes the thing an eye sore as well. the gore consists of some fake guts (blink and you will miss them. ) and a few bloody wounds and a severed arm and big deal. with a supposed budget of about $300 and 000 i admit the budget was low but i simply refuse to accept that for making such a rubbish film and there are plenty of low budget horror flicks that make their meagre budgets go far. the whole thing has the look of a home movie and it has no style and is throughly bland and dull to look at. the acting sucks too although you probably already knew that. mexican werewolf in texas will probably con a few people into renting or buying or watching it because they might mistakenly think it a sequel to john landis classic which it most certainly isn not and it isn not even a proper werewolf flick either. don not be fooled this is awful and i am fed up of having to waste time or money on home made amateur crap like this. 
mexican werewolf in texas is set in the small border town of furlough where anna (erika fay) lives and her best friend is rosie (martine hughes) and she has a mexican boyfriend named miguel (gabriel gutierrez) who are determined to track a beast down that has been terrorising the town and killing livestock and several residents including some of their friends. local mexican legends speak of the chupacabra and an evil creature from myth and legend. erm and i am struggling now because not that much else actually happens. written and directed by scott maginnis i would not beat about the bush here and simply say that mexican werewolf in texas is awful and period. the script only ever mentions the word werewolf once and the rest of the time it referred to a chupacabra and in fact i suspect this wasn not really conceived as a werewolf flick at all. the werewolf creature looks mostly hairless and more like some vicious dog and there is no reference to anybody changing during the full moon and it actually attacks during the day on a couple of occasions and there is no transformation scene and at the end when it is killed it doesn not change back into anyone either. to be honest apart from the title there nothing here to indicate a werewolf film at all and even then the title is just a rip off of the highly popular an american werewolf in london (1981). this is the type of home made crap that i personally think is killing the horror genre and how long has it been since there was a true low budget horror classic like dawn of the dead (1978) and the evil dead (1981) and halloween (1978) or friday the 13th (1980) which were all made on shoe string budgets and maybe the blair witch project (1999) but that it in recent years and crap like mexican werewolf in texas has absolutely no chance of ever being considered a classic. the character are awful and things just happen around them and the dialogue is rubbish and the pacing is terrible and the story sucks and virtually sent me to sleep and as a whole this film is just crap and i am sorry but i do not know how else to describe it. director maginnis does nothing to make this watchable and there the annoying hand held camera type cinematography which could easily give someone a headache and quick blink and you will miss something editing which just annoys and irritates in equal measure. it not scary and there no nudity and there no tension or atmosphere and the special effects are awful. the monster really does look poor and it no wonder maginnis keeps it in the shadows or cuts his scenes so quickly you never get a good look at it. there virtually no colour to the picture either and it either almost pitch black or over saturated desert sand oranges which makes the thing an eye sore as well. the gore consists of some fake guts (blink and you will miss them. ) and a few bloody wounds and a severed arm and big deal. with a supposed budget of about $300 and 000 i admit the budget was low but i simply refuse to accept that for making such a rubbish film and there are plenty of low budget horror flicks that make their meagre budgets go far. the whole thing has the look of a home movie and it has no style and is throughly bland and dull to look at. the acting sucks too although you probably already knew that. mexican werewolf in texas will probably con a few people into renting or buying or watching it because they might mistakenly think it a sequel to john landis classic which it most certainly isn not and it isn not even a proper werewolf flick either. don not be fooled this is awful and i am fed up of having to waste time or money on home made amateur crap like this. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
