this looks like one of these australian movies done by talented students and funded by the government. it is chock full of smart shots of colors and shapes and verbal excursions into freudian psychology to be appreciated by art students and teachers alike and but in general it is perceived a stupid mockery of good cinema and good storytelling and generally good taste. this what happens i guess when art students become so obsessively indulgent. pink flamingoes is miles ahead one the same subjects. some porn movies from 70s are far more watchable and inspiring. book of revelation is not entirely without merits and but as an overall experience it is well below average b grade. 
this looks like one of these australian movies done by talented students and funded by the government. it is chock full of smart shots of colors and shapes and verbal excursions into freudian psychology to be appreciated by art students and teachers alike and but in general it is perceived a stupid mockery of good cinema and good storytelling and generally good taste. this what happens i guess when art students become so obsessively indulgent. pink flamingoes is miles ahead one the same subjects. some porn movies from 70s are far more watchable and inspiring. book of revelation is not entirely without merits and but as an overall experience it is well below average b grade. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
