hooray for title misspellings. after reading reviews and contemplating and my girlfriend and i confirmed that this movie is an utter piece of trash. this movie lost her as one of those rare tarantino fans. i wish it were made on nitrate film and and all the copies piled neatly underneath a chain smoking tarantino fanboy. the literally needless violence and the plot holes and tarantino table itis sans drama and and absent character development made this a thoroughly painful and glorified montage. what acting was there. and how much of that was just because i was too busy reading the subtitles. i watch my share of fansubbed anime and and kudos for the attempt at authenticity and but it was overdone for an english language movie. with the glaring historical inadequacies and the constant reading killed what acting there was. why pay money for a narrator who will have absolutely no tie to any of the characters and plot and themes and setting and or anything involved in the movie. when the movie needs that sort of off hand explanation and it foreshadowing the utter filth that follows. historical research  while it was sprinkled with interesting factiods and used the proper costumes and props for the soldiers and this movie stretched the truth beyond belief even for historical fiction. kudos on mata hari reference and though using it as foreshadowing was a bit much. mata hari was executed by a firing squad and not choked in an isolated room. this ruined any sense that the reference may have had. other reviews mention more than half a dozen homages to other artists in the first 15 minutes. considering the audience and all these and other references were completely lost on many who would bother to see this movie and and all who would enjoy it. i am confused by his choices of when to start a scene and end it and and what needs to be included. in a movie promoted as an action film and why did it take nearly 20 minutes to set up any sort of testosterone. what i believe to be the message was trite. the idea of rats and how we act on a primal nature against them and and who is the rat. were at best clichéd and but at worst not realized. mention of american camps for the japanese and german americans would have added legitimacy to this question to the moral high ground. literally every character in the film that gets a speaking role was caught up in their own legend. is that the world in which tarantino lives. i am glad i do not pay to see this one. i regret that i bothered to view it at all and even with well meaning hosts. there was a rich base of ideas to develop and but none were realized. 
hooray for title misspellings. after reading reviews and contemplating and my girlfriend and i confirmed that this movie is an utter piece of trash. this movie lost her as one of those rare tarantino fans. i wish it were made on nitrate film and and all the copies piled neatly underneath a chain smoking tarantino fanboy. the literally needless violence and the plot holes and tarantino table itis sans drama and and absent character development made this a thoroughly painful and glorified montage. what acting was there. and how much of that was just because i was too busy reading the subtitles. i watch my share of fansubbed anime and and kudos for the attempt at authenticity and but it was overdone for an english language movie. with the glaring historical inadequacies and the constant reading killed what acting there was. why pay money for a narrator who will have absolutely no tie to any of the characters and plot and themes and setting and or anything involved in the movie. when the movie needs that sort of off hand explanation and it foreshadowing the utter filth that follows. historical research  while it was sprinkled with interesting factiods and used the proper costumes and props for the soldiers and this movie stretched the truth beyond belief even for historical fiction. kudos on mata hari reference and though using it as foreshadowing was a bit much. mata hari was executed by a firing squad and not choked in an isolated room. this ruined any sense that the reference may have had. other reviews mention more than half a dozen homages to other artists in the first 15 minutes. considering the audience and all these and other references were completely lost on many who would bother to see this movie and and all who would enjoy it. i am confused by his choices of when to start a scene and end it and and what needs to be included. in a movie promoted as an action film and why did it take nearly 20 minutes to set up any sort of testosterone. what i believe to be the message was trite. the idea of rats and how we act on a primal nature against them and and who is the rat. were at best clichéd and but at worst not realized. mention of american camps for the japanese and german americans would have added legitimacy to this question to the moral high ground. literally every character in the film that gets a speaking role was caught up in their own legend. is that the world in which tarantino lives. i am glad i do not pay to see this one. i regret that i bothered to view it at all and even with well meaning hosts. there was a rich base of ideas to develop and but none were realized. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
