belonging to the subgenre of post apocalyptic future films and it is a stylistic and very very intimate installment. the most noticed element of the film is its silence while no one speaks. i do not think besson and despite what is evident in most of his later work and meant it as any kind of cool gimmick. i think what makes it so clever and so effective is the fact that with no other way of communicating and everyone has to read each other based on intuition and conveying of emotion and no matter how slight. though i wasn not glued to the screen and upon reflection i see that it a very touching and sensitive perspective on human nature. its vehicle is the stylized sci fi movie. part of its reflection on the nature of the human world is that each of its humans is not necessarily played as a perfect human being represent the hero and a lone drifter in the desolate new world and is taken in by an older recluse and who refuses to keep his part of an exchange of food between him and a husky and brutish character played by jean reno and and so reno tries everything he can and predominantly using brute force and to get what he wants. so and the antagonist is right and though not a good person and and the protagonist and his sympathetic foil are both wrong and though they are both good people. it shot in a clear and crisp black and white and edited and captured in a low key yet spry and small scale approach and and its actors are very real. how can they not be. they and like their characters are left with the bare necessities of communication. this is one of the few truly good films that luc besson has written. his earlier work is almost always better than the fluff he churns out now. 
belonging to the subgenre of post apocalyptic future films and it is a stylistic and very very intimate installment. the most noticed element of the film is its silence while no one speaks. i do not think besson and despite what is evident in most of his later work and meant it as any kind of cool gimmick. i think what makes it so clever and so effective is the fact that with no other way of communicating and everyone has to read each other based on intuition and conveying of emotion and no matter how slight. though i wasn not glued to the screen and upon reflection i see that it a very touching and sensitive perspective on human nature. its vehicle is the stylized sci fi movie. part of its reflection on the nature of the human world is that each of its humans is not necessarily played as a perfect human being represent the hero and a lone drifter in the desolate new world and is taken in by an older recluse and who refuses to keep his part of an exchange of food between him and a husky and brutish character played by jean reno and and so reno tries everything he can and predominantly using brute force and to get what he wants. so and the antagonist is right and though not a good person and and the protagonist and his sympathetic foil are both wrong and though they are both good people. it shot in a clear and crisp black and white and edited and captured in a low key yet spry and small scale approach and and its actors are very real. how can they not be. they and like their characters are left with the bare necessities of communication. this is one of the few truly good films that luc besson has written. his earlier work is almost always better than the fluff he churns out now. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
