the philosophical and meditative tone of this movie renders it one of a kind. i would give it 10 stars for that alone. that being said and though and what hit me with particular force was what i take and possibly incorrectly and to be its art direction. many of the interior shots feature a rich concoction of color blends seemingly based on very understated munsell color model progressions and complementary juxtapositions. this makes the movie probably unrealistic to contemporary eyes and but and to me and very beautiful as an aesthetic work in itself. i think this movie is genuinely unique for this quality and and if for no other reason and earns it a full and careful and digital restoration. fox and are you listening. 
the philosophical and meditative tone of this movie renders it one of a kind. i would give it 10 stars for that alone. that being said and though and what hit me with particular force was what i take and possibly incorrectly and to be its art direction. many of the interior shots feature a rich concoction of color blends seemingly based on very understated munsell color model progressions and complementary juxtapositions. this makes the movie probably unrealistic to contemporary eyes and but and to me and very beautiful as an aesthetic work in itself. i think this movie is genuinely unique for this quality and and if for no other reason and earns it a full and careful and digital restoration. fox and are you listening. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
