ray is interesting in parts and and technically it very well made and but ray is often sluggish and and forgets some important details about ray life. all the movie shows us is parts where he in his prime and and most successful and which is good and it just i wanted to see some bits about his older life too. jamie fox mimics ray charles to a t and at times it absolutely uncanny. i have to say and jamie is the reason i got through this movie. the 1st half is a lot better then the 2nd. it more interesting and it has more oomph and and it nowhere near as sluggish as the 2nd. i wasn not a big fan of ray charles to begin with to be honest and so i really do not have any expectations for the film and what so ever. ray biggest problem had to be the over length. this could have been cut very easily and with more relevant scenes and other then the ones they used. i found the early part of ray life when he was just starting to get successful and the most interesting. he was humble back then and and somewhat a gentleman. and while the film may have over exaggerated his actions and he got a bit too full of himself for me to care. performance. jamie fox gives a performance for the ages as ray. he looks like ray and talks like ray and acts like ray. he even sings like ray. this is much more then an impression and i truly believed he was and ray charles. he was the heart of the film and and without his presence and this film would have been a complete and utter bore. bottom line. ray is interesting at times and dreadfully dull at others. when all was said and done and i was disappointed by how routine it seemed at times. just because it a bibliographical film and doesen not mean it automatically oscar worthy. jamie fox deserved his oscar and but the movie is above average at best. worth a watch and but if i were you and i would keep my expectations at a rather comfortable level. positive . 
ray is interesting in parts and and technically it very well made and but ray is often sluggish and and forgets some important details about ray life. all the movie shows us is parts where he in his prime and and most successful and which is good and it just i wanted to see some bits about his older life too. jamie fox mimics ray charles to a t and at times it absolutely uncanny. i have to say and jamie is the reason i got through this movie. the 1st half is a lot better then the 2nd. it more interesting and it has more oomph and and it nowhere near as sluggish as the 2nd. i wasn not a big fan of ray charles to begin with to be honest and so i really do not have any expectations for the film and what so ever. ray biggest problem had to be the over length. this could have been cut very easily and with more relevant scenes and other then the ones they used. i found the early part of ray life when he was just starting to get successful and the most interesting. he was humble back then and and somewhat a gentleman. and while the film may have over exaggerated his actions and he got a bit too full of himself for me to care. performance. jamie fox gives a performance for the ages as ray. he looks like ray and talks like ray and acts like ray. he even sings like ray. this is much more then an impression and i truly believed he was and ray charles. he was the heart of the film and and without his presence and this film would have been a complete and utter bore. bottom line. ray is interesting at times and dreadfully dull at others. when all was said and done and i was disappointed by how routine it seemed at times. just because it a bibliographical film and doesen not mean it automatically oscar worthy. jamie fox deserved his oscar and but the movie is above average at best. worth a watch and but if i were you and i would keep my expectations at a rather comfortable level. positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
