(as a note and i would like to say that i saw this movie at my annual church camp and where the entire youth group laughed at it. i bought it when i saw it on a shelf one year later and if only for the humor i derived from a bad attempt at making an evangelical movie. )lay it down falls short of many movie fans expectations on several different planes. most of the problems lie within the impersonal acting. regardless of the nice cars in the film and or the truth in christ sacrifice for you and as a movie and witnessing tool and lay it down hardly delivers. most good opinions of the movies are supported by christians agreeing with the message. while it easy for a christian to agree with the points delivered and the audience hardly ever witnesses life outside a cliché. the fighting scene between ben and his brother is horribly dubbed. and there are at least three blatant typos in the subtitles. i encourage anyone to watch the movie a second time with the director commentary on. it really helps you understand just why the movie was written how it was. the director views on secular society are practically opposite of what would cater to a movie goer needs represent he shows a pedantic understanding of nonchristians and as well as some points of religious conflict while most of the editing and he admits and was rushed and but satisfactory while he thought the over used transitions and themes to be effective while and was completely happy with the acting. he also inserted motifs that he was rather proud of represent all (read represent most) of the names are significant. ben destin equals been destined and gus pelman equals gospel man and nicky d equals nicodemus. the car doing donuts is symbolic of the circling nothingness that is a life without christ. when ben leaves on pete motorcycle and he crosses his crutches to form a cross. i am not making any of those up. he throws around things like this in between saying while street racers and the like blow their brains out with guns and and how god is in control when your born and when your die. yes and that was not a typo. he really says that. i have (little) forgiveness reserved for this movie. the cool cars and good message do not do jack to make this movie good. however and the movie was made from a group of unprofessional individuals on a budget less than negative 0th of the fast and the furious  and and the time limit was unforgiving. with that in mind and i give it a score of negative  and instead of the negative i so dearly think it deserves. 
(as a note and i would like to say that i saw this movie at my annual church camp and where the entire youth group laughed at it. i bought it when i saw it on a shelf one year later and if only for the humor i derived from a bad attempt at making an evangelical movie. )lay it down falls short of many movie fans expectations on several different planes. most of the problems lie within the impersonal acting. regardless of the nice cars in the film and or the truth in christ sacrifice for you and as a movie and witnessing tool and lay it down hardly delivers. most good opinions of the movies are supported by christians agreeing with the message. while it easy for a christian to agree with the points delivered and the audience hardly ever witnesses life outside a cliché. the fighting scene between ben and his brother is horribly dubbed. and there are at least three blatant typos in the subtitles. i encourage anyone to watch the movie a second time with the director commentary on. it really helps you understand just why the movie was written how it was. the director views on secular society are practically opposite of what would cater to a movie goer needs represent he shows a pedantic understanding of nonchristians and as well as some points of religious conflict while most of the editing and he admits and was rushed and but satisfactory while he thought the over used transitions and themes to be effective while and was completely happy with the acting. he also inserted motifs that he was rather proud of represent all (read represent most) of the names are significant. ben destin equals been destined and gus pelman equals gospel man and nicky d equals nicodemus. the car doing donuts is symbolic of the circling nothingness that is a life without christ. when ben leaves on pete motorcycle and he crosses his crutches to form a cross. i am not making any of those up. he throws around things like this in between saying while street racers and the like blow their brains out with guns and and how god is in control when your born and when your die. yes and that was not a typo. he really says that. i have (little) forgiveness reserved for this movie. the cool cars and good message do not do jack to make this movie good. however and the movie was made from a group of unprofessional individuals on a budget less than negative 0th of the fast and the furious  and and the time limit was unforgiving. with that in mind and i give it a score of negative  and instead of the negative i so dearly think it deserves. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
