contrary to most of the comments in this section and i have to say this film just barely escapes the definition rubbish. the only readers who seem to be aware of what a catalogue of clichés it is are those who and like me and live in the north east and know at first hand what the area is like. i am totally sick of films that are supposed to be realistic and yet portray the working class (of wherever) as stupid and criminal low lifes and but then excuse them because of their social background. and funny. i smiled briefly twice and laughed once and but that was at the incongruity of two boy actors with sunderland accents supposedly trying to hide their newcastle accents from sunderland football fans. there was only one likable character in the whole film and and that was the senile grandfather played quietly but very competently by roy hudd  the only non geordie in the cast. as for the writing  well and i just wonder what university sociology department the author studied at. he certainly had no ear for the local accent. and i too have never heard the expression purely belter  and not only am i a native and i am a linguist who written articles on the local dialect. don not waste your time and eyesight on this garbage. it isn not funny and it isn not realistic and it isn not entertaining and and it is fundamentally dishonest. 
contrary to most of the comments in this section and i have to say this film just barely escapes the definition rubbish. the only readers who seem to be aware of what a catalogue of clichés it is are those who and like me and live in the north east and know at first hand what the area is like. i am totally sick of films that are supposed to be realistic and yet portray the working class (of wherever) as stupid and criminal low lifes and but then excuse them because of their social background. and funny. i smiled briefly twice and laughed once and but that was at the incongruity of two boy actors with sunderland accents supposedly trying to hide their newcastle accents from sunderland football fans. there was only one likable character in the whole film and and that was the senile grandfather played quietly but very competently by roy hudd  the only non geordie in the cast. as for the writing  well and i just wonder what university sociology department the author studied at. he certainly had no ear for the local accent. and i too have never heard the expression purely belter  and not only am i a native and i am a linguist who written articles on the local dialect. don not waste your time and eyesight on this garbage. it isn not funny and it isn not realistic and it isn not entertaining and and it is fundamentally dishonest. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
