this unintentionally amusing mid 80s tv movie is based on the premise that sex bomb donna mills (in a mostly appalling wardrobe throughout) is a neglected housewife and pining for her sexy past as a cheerleader. she escapes her empty life by fantasising about random sexual encounters with one of the many attractive men she comes across and finally giving into her fantasies and indulging in a bit on the side and although all she really wants is to reignite the flames of passion with her boring husband james brolin. there are many laughable aspects to this film and mills first foray into co producing (later and following her departure from knots landing and she found great success as a trashy tv movie queen starring in mostly issue of the week melodramas through most of the 90s  she usually played a victim of some sort and clearly determined to wash her hands of the wonderfully wicked and entertaining conniver she played for so long on knots). funniest are the drawn out fantasy sequences and filmed as though they are meant to be soft core porn (wind and smoke machines and backlighting and porno music) and but as this is a network tv movie the scenes are all very chaste and ultimately not very sexy at all. the most amusing (and bizarre) scene has mills taking a walk on the wild side downtown among the spiky haired punks (complete with robert palmer soundtrack). less laughable is the dreadful dialogue that the cardboard characters are forced to utter (pity poor cicely tyson as the mandatory psycho analyst and or veronica cartwright as the mandatory best friend and or even pre babs james brolin with that daytime soap style of clenched fist anger. )of course and as in all of these sorts of films and we learn that all problems can be solved through psycho therapy and then the film just becomes silly and as we explore and briefly and the reasons for mills shocking behaviour (as if it can not just be that she wants a good shag. )vacuous. 
this unintentionally amusing mid 80s tv movie is based on the premise that sex bomb donna mills (in a mostly appalling wardrobe throughout) is a neglected housewife and pining for her sexy past as a cheerleader. she escapes her empty life by fantasising about random sexual encounters with one of the many attractive men she comes across and finally giving into her fantasies and indulging in a bit on the side and although all she really wants is to reignite the flames of passion with her boring husband james brolin. there are many laughable aspects to this film and mills first foray into co producing (later and following her departure from knots landing and she found great success as a trashy tv movie queen starring in mostly issue of the week melodramas through most of the 90s  she usually played a victim of some sort and clearly determined to wash her hands of the wonderfully wicked and entertaining conniver she played for so long on knots). funniest are the drawn out fantasy sequences and filmed as though they are meant to be soft core porn (wind and smoke machines and backlighting and porno music) and but as this is a network tv movie the scenes are all very chaste and ultimately not very sexy at all. the most amusing (and bizarre) scene has mills taking a walk on the wild side downtown among the spiky haired punks (complete with robert palmer soundtrack). less laughable is the dreadful dialogue that the cardboard characters are forced to utter (pity poor cicely tyson as the mandatory psycho analyst and or veronica cartwright as the mandatory best friend and or even pre babs james brolin with that daytime soap style of clenched fist anger. )of course and as in all of these sorts of films and we learn that all problems can be solved through psycho therapy and then the film just becomes silly and as we explore and briefly and the reasons for mills shocking behaviour (as if it can not just be that she wants a good shag. )vacuous. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
