this movie has been advertised for over three months in greece as the biggest greek production ever. well and it could be and but. when you hear of a big production you expect to see something new and something different. what you get to watch here is a movie with no reason of existence. george corraface looks like he do not really enjoy making this movie. his acting is so simplistic and that looks almost amateur. the sound and especially when some of the turkish actors speak english (dubbed. ) and is full of hiss. the and thankfully few and special effects showing istanbul and athens in the late 50 and early 70 are more like digital paintings than computer graphics. finally and we see the same boy from 1959 (age 5) up to 1968 (age 14) and but in a miraculous way he becomes a teenager five years later. so much for the biggest greek production. at least one would think that there would be some kind of interesting script to qualify for such an expensive production. and all one gets is a love story between 7 year olds and who meet again 40 years later. oh and there is a political side and too. a couple of ironic remarks about the greek junta of 67 74 and so childish that seem almost forced. there are and of course a couple of good things in the movie represent most of the actors are great and mainly ieroklis michaelidis and the very good scenery and the magnificent music by evanthia remboutsika while but they are so few for such an expensive production. bottom line represent is it so bad a movie. to tell the truth i do not know. i just know that in no point does it justify its huge (for greek standards) budget. 
this movie has been advertised for over three months in greece as the biggest greek production ever. well and it could be and but. when you hear of a big production you expect to see something new and something different. what you get to watch here is a movie with no reason of existence. george corraface looks like he do not really enjoy making this movie. his acting is so simplistic and that looks almost amateur. the sound and especially when some of the turkish actors speak english (dubbed. ) and is full of hiss. the and thankfully few and special effects showing istanbul and athens in the late 50 and early 70 are more like digital paintings than computer graphics. finally and we see the same boy from 1959 (age 5) up to 1968 (age 14) and but in a miraculous way he becomes a teenager five years later. so much for the biggest greek production. at least one would think that there would be some kind of interesting script to qualify for such an expensive production. and all one gets is a love story between 7 year olds and who meet again 40 years later. oh and there is a political side and too. a couple of ironic remarks about the greek junta of 67 74 and so childish that seem almost forced. there are and of course a couple of good things in the movie represent most of the actors are great and mainly ieroklis michaelidis and the very good scenery and the magnificent music by evanthia remboutsika while but they are so few for such an expensive production. bottom line represent is it so bad a movie. to tell the truth i do not know. i just know that in no point does it justify its huge (for greek standards) budget. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
