no wonder so many young people have attention deficit disorder. it seems that stage (dance) productions these days are all about how many cameras and camera angles a director or editor can squeeze into a 1 hour show. is there a special emmy category for this feat. try counting them sometimes for something different to do with this and otherwise and completely unwatchable show. i tried to make out at least a few faces of some of the other dancers in the production. that was impossible. they do not appear to have any faces and just blurs  it was just michael flatley face and michael flatley bare chest(nice sheen. ) and michael flatley feet and and that patented flatley over the shoulder come hither look repeated infinity squared. since he was an executive producer of this cut and paste job i guess that was to be expected. one doesn not have to wonder too much as to who his target audience is. riverdance was a much better production and as it tried to present the show pretty much as one might see it from the audience and not the catwalk and side wings and or floor nail perspective. if i am not mistaken and i believe sir michael has retired. thank god for small blessings. 
no wonder so many young people have attention deficit disorder. it seems that stage (dance) productions these days are all about how many cameras and camera angles a director or editor can squeeze into a 1 hour show. is there a special emmy category for this feat. try counting them sometimes for something different to do with this and otherwise and completely unwatchable show. i tried to make out at least a few faces of some of the other dancers in the production. that was impossible. they do not appear to have any faces and just blurs  it was just michael flatley face and michael flatley bare chest(nice sheen. ) and michael flatley feet and and that patented flatley over the shoulder come hither look repeated infinity squared. since he was an executive producer of this cut and paste job i guess that was to be expected. one doesn not have to wonder too much as to who his target audience is. riverdance was a much better production and as it tried to present the show pretty much as one might see it from the audience and not the catwalk and side wings and or floor nail perspective. if i am not mistaken and i believe sir michael has retired. thank god for small blessings. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
