to be honest and i have never been to the congo or even africa and and after watching the made for television movie heart of darkness and i do not think i would want to. the movie completely shames the book to the highest level possible. though the book was not the best i have read and after watching the movie and i seemed to appreciate the book a hundred times more. nicolas roeg and the director of the movie and did a horrible job portraying joseph conrad novella into a movie. i give roeg some credit for trying to attempt the impossible by making the book into a movie and but this may not have been the job for him. the movie was unsuccessful to express any part of the novella other than the basics of the plot. the set and scenery also lacked the beauty conrad portrayed of africa in the book. in the book marlow had seen so many great wonders and but in the movie you did not get that same experience. no and i am not blaming everything on the director while the acting in the film was just terrible. all of the actors were dull and uninteresting. throughout the whole movie i felt as if the actors were not putting forth any emotions and as if they were reading from the script the entire time. tim roth and who plays marlow and did not portray marlow sense of adventure for his journey into the congo well. marlow journey to find kurtz was supposed to venturesome and but i do not experience that in the movie. i would not recommend watching this movie and especially if you have read the book already. it does not come close to doing justice for joseph conrad novella. conrad words capture the reader and take them on the journey with marlow and on his quest to find mr. kurtz and where as the film did not. a great novella and but a very poor film. heart of darkness and the movie and is based on the book written by joseph conrad also called heart of darkness. 
to be honest and i have never been to the congo or even africa and and after watching the made for television movie heart of darkness and i do not think i would want to. the movie completely shames the book to the highest level possible. though the book was not the best i have read and after watching the movie and i seemed to appreciate the book a hundred times more. nicolas roeg and the director of the movie and did a horrible job portraying joseph conrad novella into a movie. i give roeg some credit for trying to attempt the impossible by making the book into a movie and but this may not have been the job for him. the movie was unsuccessful to express any part of the novella other than the basics of the plot. the set and scenery also lacked the beauty conrad portrayed of africa in the book. in the book marlow had seen so many great wonders and but in the movie you did not get that same experience. no and i am not blaming everything on the director while the acting in the film was just terrible. all of the actors were dull and uninteresting. throughout the whole movie i felt as if the actors were not putting forth any emotions and as if they were reading from the script the entire time. tim roth and who plays marlow and did not portray marlow sense of adventure for his journey into the congo well. marlow journey to find kurtz was supposed to venturesome and but i do not experience that in the movie. i would not recommend watching this movie and especially if you have read the book already. it does not come close to doing justice for joseph conrad novella. conrad words capture the reader and take them on the journey with marlow and on his quest to find mr. kurtz and where as the film did not. a great novella and but a very poor film. heart of darkness and the movie and is based on the book written by joseph conrad also called heart of darkness. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
