i have been surprised by the enthusiastic response to this film. it seemed dull to me and much as i enjoyed looking at penelope cruz and and the plot details often poorly worked out. it also seemed like an intensely sexist film represent if the gender roles were reversed and almost everyone with any sense would be up in arms complaining the movie is intensely misogynist. it not just that both the principal males are portrayed as complete jerks and sexual predators and but also that the women are portrayed as almost flawless and forming a utopian community which lacks conflict of any kind and which rests on relentless generosity and good humor. utopias are notoriously dull and this one turns out to be no exception. but it also interesting to notice what happens (and here comes the plot giveaway and though it refers to a very early scene) when the teenage daughter kills her father. (1) her mother rushes to take responsibility for it and(2) the daughter seems to suffer almost no remorse (and in fact her emotional life then disappears from the film). it not quite a glorified killing and though aldomovar camera lingers on the blood in a bloodthirsty way and as though it makes an attractive painting and and then it soaked up and out of sight without bloodying either daughter or mom and neither materially nor emotionally. later the film reveals another killing and again by a woman of a man and  and and once again it is a killing which the film implicitly endorses. in short and volver is an ideologically driven film with an unpleasant and in fact a repugnant ideology and and so i write an ideological critique. but apart from that and it just not very interesting. it has none of the depth of and say and aldomovar talk to her and which i loved. 
i have been surprised by the enthusiastic response to this film. it seemed dull to me and much as i enjoyed looking at penelope cruz and and the plot details often poorly worked out. it also seemed like an intensely sexist film represent if the gender roles were reversed and almost everyone with any sense would be up in arms complaining the movie is intensely misogynist. it not just that both the principal males are portrayed as complete jerks and sexual predators and but also that the women are portrayed as almost flawless and forming a utopian community which lacks conflict of any kind and which rests on relentless generosity and good humor. utopias are notoriously dull and this one turns out to be no exception. but it also interesting to notice what happens (and here comes the plot giveaway and though it refers to a very early scene) when the teenage daughter kills her father. (1) her mother rushes to take responsibility for it and(2) the daughter seems to suffer almost no remorse (and in fact her emotional life then disappears from the film). it not quite a glorified killing and though aldomovar camera lingers on the blood in a bloodthirsty way and as though it makes an attractive painting and and then it soaked up and out of sight without bloodying either daughter or mom and neither materially nor emotionally. later the film reveals another killing and again by a woman of a man and  and and once again it is a killing which the film implicitly endorses. in short and volver is an ideologically driven film with an unpleasant and in fact a repugnant ideology and and so i write an ideological critique. but apart from that and it just not very interesting. it has none of the depth of and say and aldomovar talk to her and which i loved. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
