i have now suffered through parts and the clonus horror. to have the word horror in the title of this movie is an insult to real horror. the story was about a cloning central owned by the the man they grow clones for harvesting organs from the clones later on for the original humans in need of transplants. one clone escapes and the government gets angry and kills all involved and but the story somehow leaks out anyway. it is truly shameful how a movie with potential is destroyed by amateurs such as fiveson. the only thing he genuinely succeeded in doing was to weave in the concept of human rights and the very philosophical aspect and what makes a human a human and and would it be ok to grow clones for organic harvesting. sadly and mediocre actors have been chosen and the plot has left town and until the very end in where a pathetic attempt is made to sum it up. but. what disturbed me the most was the introducing of new characters lacking actual relevance for the plot. despite that and fiveson feels the need to kill them off in a bad explosion which only sir coleman francis himself would be proud of. the setting was interesting. how fiveson thought that pulling out sheets of plastic and running water over them would make a believable river is beyond me and but i guess if you were to compare the setting to coleman francis gray pasty oatmeal of a setting and this film would win. perhaps coleman has changed what bad movies are for me. negative . 
i have now suffered through parts and the clonus horror. to have the word horror in the title of this movie is an insult to real horror. the story was about a cloning central owned by the the man they grow clones for harvesting organs from the clones later on for the original humans in need of transplants. one clone escapes and the government gets angry and kills all involved and but the story somehow leaks out anyway. it is truly shameful how a movie with potential is destroyed by amateurs such as fiveson. the only thing he genuinely succeeded in doing was to weave in the concept of human rights and the very philosophical aspect and what makes a human a human and and would it be ok to grow clones for organic harvesting. sadly and mediocre actors have been chosen and the plot has left town and until the very end in where a pathetic attempt is made to sum it up. but. what disturbed me the most was the introducing of new characters lacking actual relevance for the plot. despite that and fiveson feels the need to kill them off in a bad explosion which only sir coleman francis himself would be proud of. the setting was interesting. how fiveson thought that pulling out sheets of plastic and running water over them would make a believable river is beyond me and but i guess if you were to compare the setting to coleman francis gray pasty oatmeal of a setting and this film would win. perhaps coleman has changed what bad movies are for me. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
