i must have been in a good mood to give this shameful and predictable and embarrassing movie even a 3. what wrong with it. let start with the gratuitous sex although i admit the rotational style of bonking was something i had not seen (nor experienced) before. and i guess they also saved a few bucks by showing the same sex scene three times. then there are the inconsistencies. the oakville tribune seems to be in a green part of whatever town it was supposed to be. (hamilton ontario. ) yet in the scenes on the roof and it appears to be in an industrial area with a steel mill belching smoke and flames. also and the inside of the building   the newsroom   the stairways   seem much bigger than the outside. spoilers here then and when our intrepid reporter finally gets fired and she comes back to the building several times and once after hours. hardly likely. the ending is also pitifully predictable. the classic bait and switch caper in which the good guy turns out to be the bad guy. but my major objection is the fact this is yet another movie financed with canadian and ontario tax credits which is ashamed to set itself in canada and yet again proving that the canadian film industry is craven and opportunistic. a country movies must do more than just provide jobs. they should reflect the culture. it bad enough that the american studios use toronto as a stand in for new york. but it is embarrassing and infuriating when canadian producers (in this case and canwest global) do it with help from the federal and provincial governments. in a word. bah. 
i must have been in a good mood to give this shameful and predictable and embarrassing movie even a 3. what wrong with it. let start with the gratuitous sex although i admit the rotational style of bonking was something i had not seen (nor experienced) before. and i guess they also saved a few bucks by showing the same sex scene three times. then there are the inconsistencies. the oakville tribune seems to be in a green part of whatever town it was supposed to be. (hamilton ontario. ) yet in the scenes on the roof and it appears to be in an industrial area with a steel mill belching smoke and flames. also and the inside of the building   the newsroom   the stairways   seem much bigger than the outside. spoilers here then and when our intrepid reporter finally gets fired and she comes back to the building several times and once after hours. hardly likely. the ending is also pitifully predictable. the classic bait and switch caper in which the good guy turns out to be the bad guy. but my major objection is the fact this is yet another movie financed with canadian and ontario tax credits which is ashamed to set itself in canada and yet again proving that the canadian film industry is craven and opportunistic. a country movies must do more than just provide jobs. they should reflect the culture. it bad enough that the american studios use toronto as a stand in for new york. but it is embarrassing and infuriating when canadian producers (in this case and canwest global) do it with help from the federal and provincial governments. in a word. bah. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
