ccmovieman 1 must be and as the reviewer in the new york times who preferred the janis joplin big brother and the holding company album to the just released beatleswhite album was called and either evil or insane. national velvet is a great film. elizabeth taylor performance is fantastic and and i fail to discern even a trace of accent and much less too much of one. her performance is very natural and authentic and unbelievably charming. the rest of the cast is superb and especially rooney and revere. as far as the dialog being hokey or sentimental and i suggest cc has dined too long on a diet of irony and has lost the ability to discern genuine straight forward emotion and human interaction. there was a time when people actually did think and talk in such a manner. not that this film doesn not have a slight hint of the magical permeating through it. that is the reason to tell the story. one might as well criticize the wizard of oz and king kong and the maltese falcon and casablanca and the black stallion ( the other great horse film ) or a thousand other films for having action and dialog that seem richer than real life. no my friend and national velvet endures because of its belief firmly in itself and with tongue firmly not in cheek. something today jaded filmmakers find nearly impossible to recreate. 
ccmovieman 1 must be and as the reviewer in the new york times who preferred the janis joplin big brother and the holding company album to the just released beatleswhite album was called and either evil or insane. national velvet is a great film. elizabeth taylor performance is fantastic and and i fail to discern even a trace of accent and much less too much of one. her performance is very natural and authentic and unbelievably charming. the rest of the cast is superb and especially rooney and revere. as far as the dialog being hokey or sentimental and i suggest cc has dined too long on a diet of irony and has lost the ability to discern genuine straight forward emotion and human interaction. there was a time when people actually did think and talk in such a manner. not that this film doesn not have a slight hint of the magical permeating through it. that is the reason to tell the story. one might as well criticize the wizard of oz and king kong and the maltese falcon and casablanca and the black stallion ( the other great horse film ) or a thousand other films for having action and dialog that seem richer than real life. no my friend and national velvet endures because of its belief firmly in itself and with tongue firmly not in cheek. something today jaded filmmakers find nearly impossible to recreate. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
