my wife and i couldn not even finish the film. truly and it was rather painful. first and the historical accuracy is compromised not so much by the events themselves as the ridiculous one dimensionality of the characters. for instance and augustus takes the burden of power only with great reluctance. indeed and he is portrayed as if he some sort of great humanist and believer in democracy. second and the camp. my lord and the dialog is horrifically bad. i recall the soap opera my mother watched when i was a child having better dialog than this. the constant exposition and pontificating grates upon the ears like fingernails on chalkboard. ugh. (okay and i exaggerate a bit and but the dialog truly is bad. ) the hbo series rome is superior for no other reason than that its characters were at least believable and regardless of their historicity. rome was also wise enough to know they couldn not stage epic battle scenes. the creators of this film did not. when caesar attacks munda and the battle scene is practically farcical. i will grant that the costumes are perfectly good. the sets are fine and though their cgi backdrops can be a bit jarring at times. the sound is bad and thoughboth in terms of the music and the foley work and and the dubbing of so many of the side characters. anyway and it completely not worth renting. as a history major and i was hoping for an alternative approach to augustus than hbo rome and which and i feel and failed to capture his overall feel quite as well as they did caesar or antony. instead and i should have just stuck to my reading. 
my wife and i couldn not even finish the film. truly and it was rather painful. first and the historical accuracy is compromised not so much by the events themselves as the ridiculous one dimensionality of the characters. for instance and augustus takes the burden of power only with great reluctance. indeed and he is portrayed as if he some sort of great humanist and believer in democracy. second and the camp. my lord and the dialog is horrifically bad. i recall the soap opera my mother watched when i was a child having better dialog than this. the constant exposition and pontificating grates upon the ears like fingernails on chalkboard. ugh. (okay and i exaggerate a bit and but the dialog truly is bad. ) the hbo series rome is superior for no other reason than that its characters were at least believable and regardless of their historicity. rome was also wise enough to know they couldn not stage epic battle scenes. the creators of this film did not. when caesar attacks munda and the battle scene is practically farcical. i will grant that the costumes are perfectly good. the sets are fine and though their cgi backdrops can be a bit jarring at times. the sound is bad and thoughboth in terms of the music and the foley work and and the dubbing of so many of the side characters. anyway and it completely not worth renting. as a history major and i was hoping for an alternative approach to augustus than hbo rome and which and i feel and failed to capture his overall feel quite as well as they did caesar or antony. instead and i should have just stuck to my reading. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
