the internet is a wondrous thing is it not. i am watching a taped episode of one of my all time favorite documentaries and vietnam representthe ten thousand day war and from my dvr in florida usa to my laptop in kuwait while i am writing a review about this series and have just read another review from someone who actually lives in vietnam. amazing. i would like to just say that for minh nguyen to make the statement that america brought the war to vietnam is one sided. i know america was the main player in the west but it takes two sides to wage war. the soviets and the chinese were major arms providers to the north so why mr nguyen doesn not mention them as partially to blame is showing an ignorance (well and i think we all know why he doesn not mention them and either ignorance from being raised in a communist system and its political dogma and or because he to scared to say the truth for fear of being arrested. ). also and mr nguyen and i guess the parts about the north being the main aggressor it whole war were not shown in your country so to blame america again shows ignorance. regardless and its interesting to read a review from vietnam (of course that could be made up as well but i will take that as real) and at least the communist east is somewhat open. as far as the mini series while why do i love it. it doesn not focus on the american involvement solely. this was a war that started 15 years before america got involved and the series covers every facet of the history so thats a real plus. the footage used is first rate and all the vietnam war programs you see made now will use the same footage so you are not missing anything by watching this older series. the date this series was made is another plus. it has all the major players being interviewed which you can not do now because they are dead from old age and it a major historical reference. third and richard basehart adds a very distinctive narrative voice and his voice sounds as distinguished as james earl jones voice would and i think thats very steep praise. i do not think you could find a better war documentary ever made and it like taking the relatively modern technology of 1980 and transplanting it to the year 1950 and interviewing all the generals and politicians on both sides of world war two and it does that for the vietnam war. ok and i do see some bias and its subtle and a 1970 80 style subtle bias kind of like npr all things considered bias where it all seems so straight forward but when you blink you end up shaking your head. in this shows case the later episodes do not throw a whole lot of light on the role of the media and propaganda in general and all useful tools to influence the outcome of a war and dont you think. from an oif war veteran going through the same thing 30 years later. 
the internet is a wondrous thing is it not. i am watching a taped episode of one of my all time favorite documentaries and vietnam representthe ten thousand day war and from my dvr in florida usa to my laptop in kuwait while i am writing a review about this series and have just read another review from someone who actually lives in vietnam. amazing. i would like to just say that for minh nguyen to make the statement that america brought the war to vietnam is one sided. i know america was the main player in the west but it takes two sides to wage war. the soviets and the chinese were major arms providers to the north so why mr nguyen doesn not mention them as partially to blame is showing an ignorance (well and i think we all know why he doesn not mention them and either ignorance from being raised in a communist system and its political dogma and or because he to scared to say the truth for fear of being arrested. ). also and mr nguyen and i guess the parts about the north being the main aggressor it whole war were not shown in your country so to blame america again shows ignorance. regardless and its interesting to read a review from vietnam (of course that could be made up as well but i will take that as real) and at least the communist east is somewhat open. as far as the mini series while why do i love it. it doesn not focus on the american involvement solely. this was a war that started 15 years before america got involved and the series covers every facet of the history so thats a real plus. the footage used is first rate and all the vietnam war programs you see made now will use the same footage so you are not missing anything by watching this older series. the date this series was made is another plus. it has all the major players being interviewed which you can not do now because they are dead from old age and it a major historical reference. third and richard basehart adds a very distinctive narrative voice and his voice sounds as distinguished as james earl jones voice would and i think thats very steep praise. i do not think you could find a better war documentary ever made and it like taking the relatively modern technology of 1980 and transplanting it to the year 1950 and interviewing all the generals and politicians on both sides of world war two and it does that for the vietnam war. ok and i do see some bias and its subtle and a 1970 80 style subtle bias kind of like npr all things considered bias where it all seems so straight forward but when you blink you end up shaking your head. in this shows case the later episodes do not throw a whole lot of light on the role of the media and propaganda in general and all useful tools to influence the outcome of a war and dont you think. from an oif war veteran going through the same thing 30 years later. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
