some people like to tell you that deep space 9 is the best of all the star trek shows and because it stresses character development and continuity and and features a more complex background and ongoing plots. in some ways this makes it more satisfying and but in many ways the show fails entirely. the series starts out as a soap opera on a space station and with two entire seasons of generic science fiction stories balanced with banal subplots about the characters. the characters are a good bunch and and most of the actors are decent and but i think the writers tried too hard to make them normal. by normal they actually mean ordinary and tedious. at the end of season two we are introduced to the dominion and who hang around menacingly for a while before finally going to war with the good guys in season five. this is the main story arc of the show and but it only takes up a fraction of the entire series. we still get lame stand alone episodes and heroes still get stranded on weird planets for forty five minutes and and there an awful lot of low brow comedy featuring the greedy and goofy ferengi. a lot of episodes are merely dull and and some are unwatchable. the dominion and ds9 main villains and are bent on galactic domination for the convenient reason that and well and they just do not like anyone. the entire war is presented with a naive lack of moral complexity and imagination. impressively pyrotechnic space battles appear with great frequency from season three onwards and but these are carried out in ludicrously simplistic ways and such as two huge fleets of super advanced starships flying right at each other and blasting away. the writers of ds9 (including the talented ronald d. moore and later of battlestar galactica fame) spiced up their monotonous show by starting a war and but at heart it is still a pedantic soap. ds9 remains a very frustrating experience. the continuous story is too flat and obvious to be really gripping and and the characters never truly develop in interesting ways. babylon 5 and battlestar galactica both fulfilled the promise made by ds9 and and did everything much better. for star trek and stick with the original and the next generation. 
some people like to tell you that deep space 9 is the best of all the star trek shows and because it stresses character development and continuity and and features a more complex background and ongoing plots. in some ways this makes it more satisfying and but in many ways the show fails entirely. the series starts out as a soap opera on a space station and with two entire seasons of generic science fiction stories balanced with banal subplots about the characters. the characters are a good bunch and and most of the actors are decent and but i think the writers tried too hard to make them normal. by normal they actually mean ordinary and tedious. at the end of season two we are introduced to the dominion and who hang around menacingly for a while before finally going to war with the good guys in season five. this is the main story arc of the show and but it only takes up a fraction of the entire series. we still get lame stand alone episodes and heroes still get stranded on weird planets for forty five minutes and and there an awful lot of low brow comedy featuring the greedy and goofy ferengi. a lot of episodes are merely dull and and some are unwatchable. the dominion and ds9 main villains and are bent on galactic domination for the convenient reason that and well and they just do not like anyone. the entire war is presented with a naive lack of moral complexity and imagination. impressively pyrotechnic space battles appear with great frequency from season three onwards and but these are carried out in ludicrously simplistic ways and such as two huge fleets of super advanced starships flying right at each other and blasting away. the writers of ds9 (including the talented ronald d. moore and later of battlestar galactica fame) spiced up their monotonous show by starting a war and but at heart it is still a pedantic soap. ds9 remains a very frustrating experience. the continuous story is too flat and obvious to be really gripping and and the characters never truly develop in interesting ways. babylon 5 and battlestar galactica both fulfilled the promise made by ds9 and and did everything much better. for star trek and stick with the original and the next generation. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
