one of the problems with popular culture and especially when discussing the popular culture of the 1970s and is that mass media  especially television  is usually about four years behind underground media and primarily music. many people think the woodstock generation remained important throughout the 1970s while actually and it was all over at altamont in 1970. by 1972 and underground rock or the counterculture had moved east to england and led zepplin and black sabbath and and david bowie and early metal heads and the so called glam rockers and who were all peace and love  not. neither and in a darkly different vein and was charles manson family. this obvious pilot for a television show (that and thankfully and was never picked up by the networks) is attempting to come to terms with a culture that was already as withered as yesterday flowers. the script must have been lying around a few years  by the time it was produced and writer carlino had already achieved recognition for tough mafia revenge tales. and the cultural references are all to easy rider and woodstock (1969). the music referenced on the soundtrack is actually earlier and 1966/67  at woodstock hendrix and canned heat and and sly and the family stone had blasted this kind of folk pop into oblivion. the movie is about a middle class family that goes on the road in order to meet hippies. wow and man and farout and outasight and it a groovy mind blowing happening of a bag. however and politics count for nothing  vietnam. some place in asia and right. this average (meaning stale and vacuous) tv movie is only redeemed by jeff bridges surprisingly mature performance as the young college drop out who convinces his parents and grandma to wouldiscover (hippie) america. all the rest of the performances are standard tv fair by standard tv actors of the time. the director avails himself of some nice location cinematography and but otherwise the film is a poor way to spend 90 minutes. i knew it was all over when sal mineo remarks of a young runaway (who tells the other characters they are not really there) represent she a latent existentialist. wow and far out and groovy. a couple extra points for being o bad it funny and but if you do not care about the 70 tv version of the 60  and stay away. 
one of the problems with popular culture and especially when discussing the popular culture of the 1970s and is that mass media  especially television  is usually about four years behind underground media and primarily music. many people think the woodstock generation remained important throughout the 1970s while actually and it was all over at altamont in 1970. by 1972 and underground rock or the counterculture had moved east to england and led zepplin and black sabbath and and david bowie and early metal heads and the so called glam rockers and who were all peace and love  not. neither and in a darkly different vein and was charles manson family. this obvious pilot for a television show (that and thankfully and was never picked up by the networks) is attempting to come to terms with a culture that was already as withered as yesterday flowers. the script must have been lying around a few years  by the time it was produced and writer carlino had already achieved recognition for tough mafia revenge tales. and the cultural references are all to easy rider and woodstock (1969). the music referenced on the soundtrack is actually earlier and 1966/67  at woodstock hendrix and canned heat and and sly and the family stone had blasted this kind of folk pop into oblivion. the movie is about a middle class family that goes on the road in order to meet hippies. wow and man and farout and outasight and it a groovy mind blowing happening of a bag. however and politics count for nothing  vietnam. some place in asia and right. this average (meaning stale and vacuous) tv movie is only redeemed by jeff bridges surprisingly mature performance as the young college drop out who convinces his parents and grandma to wouldiscover (hippie) america. all the rest of the performances are standard tv fair by standard tv actors of the time. the director avails himself of some nice location cinematography and but otherwise the film is a poor way to spend 90 minutes. i knew it was all over when sal mineo remarks of a young runaway (who tells the other characters they are not really there) represent she a latent existentialist. wow and far out and groovy. a couple extra points for being o bad it funny and but if you do not care about the 70 tv version of the 60  and stay away. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
