spoilers spoilersi saw this movie last night at a screening. i started out already liking tim robbins and loving sci fi. the first third of the movie was very cool. the score was good and the cinematography was interesting and the film maker vision of the future was realistic yet starkly interesting nonetheless. i remember thinking to myself represent this is the most intelligently done sci fi movie i have seen in a while. then they just couldn not keep it together. although from the outset and there were a number of more rough around the edges issues with this film (namely the editing and and later some of the writing or plot development) and these issues were forgivable. they became unforgivable once the movie sort of lost all momentum around the half way mark and and then the film just got tedious when you realized that it wasn not going to go anywhere at all. robbins could not breathe life into his character and but did the best he could. his female counterpart (her name escapes me now) was good in her role. the main reason for the meandering of the movie seemed to be that the film makers could not decide whether or not to do a sci fi movie or a futuristic love story. they ended up with neither. good representsome of the cinematography represent grainy and it felt like 21 days later some times. very fitting for a futuristic movie like this. i dug some of the location shots. the music was cool. the film makers vision of the future was realistic but still cool and interesting. i liked the interactions with the other minor characters in the movie. some of the writing was interesting (early on). the girl who played maria gonzales (name. can not recall) and she was good. spoilers belowa few questions or comments representi felt that a lot of the futuristic things in this movie were convenient to fix a patchwork story. namely viruses. obviously the virus they gave her at the end of the film that made her physically afraid of him was just there so that they could stick in another sex scene and then she could uncontrollably report him for code 46. then they take him away and erase his memory and the movie ends. classic wouldream sequence cop out ending if you ask me. ties up all the loose ends very neatly if you just make it all a dream right. was robbin character naturally good as intuition or was it the virus. why do not they explore the myriad of issues surrounding the girl being a clone of his mom. that could have made some interesting story. at first i like the salutations from across the globe in everyone speech. but it became intrusive especially since their accents were not convincing. i get it and the future will undoubtedly be racially and culturally more androgynous and but it started feeling like an at and t global networking commercial by the end of it. if they were outside how could they have gotten busted for code 46. cover was never well defined. sometimes it seemed as trivial as a visa and and other times it was as vital as life or death. again and loose definitions allow them to use it for gluing disparate parts of the plot together. okay and i am starting to get to negative about it and so i will stop. there were some cool scenes and and interesting things about this movie and but that only gives it a negative . 
spoilers spoilersi saw this movie last night at a screening. i started out already liking tim robbins and loving sci fi. the first third of the movie was very cool. the score was good and the cinematography was interesting and the film maker vision of the future was realistic yet starkly interesting nonetheless. i remember thinking to myself represent this is the most intelligently done sci fi movie i have seen in a while. then they just couldn not keep it together. although from the outset and there were a number of more rough around the edges issues with this film (namely the editing and and later some of the writing or plot development) and these issues were forgivable. they became unforgivable once the movie sort of lost all momentum around the half way mark and and then the film just got tedious when you realized that it wasn not going to go anywhere at all. robbins could not breathe life into his character and but did the best he could. his female counterpart (her name escapes me now) was good in her role. the main reason for the meandering of the movie seemed to be that the film makers could not decide whether or not to do a sci fi movie or a futuristic love story. they ended up with neither. good representsome of the cinematography represent grainy and it felt like 21 days later some times. very fitting for a futuristic movie like this. i dug some of the location shots. the music was cool. the film makers vision of the future was realistic but still cool and interesting. i liked the interactions with the other minor characters in the movie. some of the writing was interesting (early on). the girl who played maria gonzales (name. can not recall) and she was good. spoilers belowa few questions or comments representi felt that a lot of the futuristic things in this movie were convenient to fix a patchwork story. namely viruses. obviously the virus they gave her at the end of the film that made her physically afraid of him was just there so that they could stick in another sex scene and then she could uncontrollably report him for code 46. then they take him away and erase his memory and the movie ends. classic wouldream sequence cop out ending if you ask me. ties up all the loose ends very neatly if you just make it all a dream right. was robbin character naturally good as intuition or was it the virus. why do not they explore the myriad of issues surrounding the girl being a clone of his mom. that could have made some interesting story. at first i like the salutations from across the globe in everyone speech. but it became intrusive especially since their accents were not convincing. i get it and the future will undoubtedly be racially and culturally more androgynous and but it started feeling like an at and t global networking commercial by the end of it. if they were outside how could they have gotten busted for code 46. cover was never well defined. sometimes it seemed as trivial as a visa and and other times it was as vital as life or death. again and loose definitions allow them to use it for gluing disparate parts of the plot together. okay and i am starting to get to negative about it and so i will stop. there were some cool scenes and and interesting things about this movie and but that only gives it a negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
