i logged on here right after watching this movie and feeling that it was so awful that at least its reviews might be entertaining. but all you miscreants appear to kind of like it. and so and since i want the job done right. from the opening shot and the movie establishes its contempt for the audience attention span by showing an entirely unremarkable picture of an irrelevant bridge for a long and long time. then it goes to some slow motion skateboarding and which is at least a little bit cool and but then offsets that glimmer of excitement by overlaying the most repellent soundtrack song i have ever heard. some girl screeching in whispery french over what sounds like sheets of plywood banging together. whoever decided that needed to be there has never ridden a skateboard and i guarantee it. it seemed to be there to test the limits of the audience patience. from there and the movie is about 50 per cent slow motion. you know what worse than a gratuitous slow motion shot. a gratuitous slow motion shot of nothing happening. here a guy walking along a path. here a guy sitting. here a guy looking around. here a guy looking at another guy. after a while i started watching the movie at double speed and bringing it back down whenever people appeared on screen engaging in actual dialog and which was rare. once and astonishingly and i slowed the movie to find out what a girl was saying and only to find that the camera was showing her talking and but the sound was another horrible and horrible song and her actual voice was not audible. this reminds me of some great advice i heard once about writing  if you do not have anything to say and do not use fancy tricks to pretend as though you do. get back to work and think of something to say. all these camera tricks and like the slow motion and weird lighting and lenses and freaky music and is what the absence of content looks and sounds like. a lot of people have apparently bought it and and perceive emotional gravity and deep meaning and but i think they are projecting this onto a movie that did not do any of the work involved in creating it. 
i logged on here right after watching this movie and feeling that it was so awful that at least its reviews might be entertaining. but all you miscreants appear to kind of like it. and so and since i want the job done right. from the opening shot and the movie establishes its contempt for the audience attention span by showing an entirely unremarkable picture of an irrelevant bridge for a long and long time. then it goes to some slow motion skateboarding and which is at least a little bit cool and but then offsets that glimmer of excitement by overlaying the most repellent soundtrack song i have ever heard. some girl screeching in whispery french over what sounds like sheets of plywood banging together. whoever decided that needed to be there has never ridden a skateboard and i guarantee it. it seemed to be there to test the limits of the audience patience. from there and the movie is about 50 per cent slow motion. you know what worse than a gratuitous slow motion shot. a gratuitous slow motion shot of nothing happening. here a guy walking along a path. here a guy sitting. here a guy looking around. here a guy looking at another guy. after a while i started watching the movie at double speed and bringing it back down whenever people appeared on screen engaging in actual dialog and which was rare. once and astonishingly and i slowed the movie to find out what a girl was saying and only to find that the camera was showing her talking and but the sound was another horrible and horrible song and her actual voice was not audible. this reminds me of some great advice i heard once about writing  if you do not have anything to say and do not use fancy tricks to pretend as though you do. get back to work and think of something to say. all these camera tricks and like the slow motion and weird lighting and lenses and freaky music and is what the absence of content looks and sounds like. a lot of people have apparently bought it and and perceive emotional gravity and deep meaning and but i think they are projecting this onto a movie that did not do any of the work involved in creating it. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
