i have to admit i am prejudiced about my vote on this film and but i have strong reasons as i know some of the true history that was given the hollywood treatment here. edna ferber novel upon which this is based is from an era where real names can not be used. in a way and this film is all smoke and mirrors. even though it was released in 1946 and it was filmed shortly after casablanca. ingrid bergman is at her most radiant in this movie as a brunette. she plays a beautiful woman who is trying to trade on her beauty to get a rich husband. today that is a gold digger and but in this social era and she is desirable and the kind of woman who makes all the men want her and  and all the old snooty society types talk of her and avoid her and while wishing they were her. ingrid is at her best and plays this role well. some sympathy for ingrids character is raised in the new orleans section of this film as she manages to get a decent belated tomb for her scandalized mother as part of the settlement by her relatives to get her to leave new orleans. the snooty family of relatives there are so scandalized by her that they will do almost anything she asks to get her to leave town. gary cooper is good in this film though he already appears to be aging a bit to play a dashing texan bachelor or gambler. he pulls it off well considering that handicap which he appeared older than he was due to his real life chain smoking. flora robison as ingrid maid got nominated for an oscar as supporting actress in this film. jerry austin as cupidor was over looked in many ways for his role but is the only comic relief in the film and does it well. when the film moves to saratoga and it depicts accurately how important saratoga was in that era. i like the sequence when bergman walks to the saratoge spring to get some of the sulfur water which everyone considered so healthy then. when she drinks some she forces herself not to make a face and comments how good it is and that she must have more. the real history is the railroad battle which really occurred on the rail line in tunnel and new york which is the actual saratoga trunk the film title is derived from. this battle actually happened in 1869 between agents for andrew carnagie and j. p. morgan. the line was the economic key to the country in 1869 connecting coal country and the east coast. the references to it are throughout the film are very real. there is even some dialog describing carnagie as a scot though the reference is vague and unfamiliar to anyone not knowing the history around the battle. the railroad line and the railroad tunnel in tunnel and new york (zip code 13848) still exist although the film was shot in california. the real tunnel is about 1 mile long. it is still part of a key freight line today and years after this occurred. i grew up there. gary cooper line in the film while he is riding the train into the tunnel is right and it is still mighty pretty country. 
i have to admit i am prejudiced about my vote on this film and but i have strong reasons as i know some of the true history that was given the hollywood treatment here. edna ferber novel upon which this is based is from an era where real names can not be used. in a way and this film is all smoke and mirrors. even though it was released in 1946 and it was filmed shortly after casablanca. ingrid bergman is at her most radiant in this movie as a brunette. she plays a beautiful woman who is trying to trade on her beauty to get a rich husband. today that is a gold digger and but in this social era and she is desirable and the kind of woman who makes all the men want her and  and all the old snooty society types talk of her and avoid her and while wishing they were her. ingrid is at her best and plays this role well. some sympathy for ingrids character is raised in the new orleans section of this film as she manages to get a decent belated tomb for her scandalized mother as part of the settlement by her relatives to get her to leave new orleans. the snooty family of relatives there are so scandalized by her that they will do almost anything she asks to get her to leave town. gary cooper is good in this film though he already appears to be aging a bit to play a dashing texan bachelor or gambler. he pulls it off well considering that handicap which he appeared older than he was due to his real life chain smoking. flora robison as ingrid maid got nominated for an oscar as supporting actress in this film. jerry austin as cupidor was over looked in many ways for his role but is the only comic relief in the film and does it well. when the film moves to saratoga and it depicts accurately how important saratoga was in that era. i like the sequence when bergman walks to the saratoge spring to get some of the sulfur water which everyone considered so healthy then. when she drinks some she forces herself not to make a face and comments how good it is and that she must have more. the real history is the railroad battle which really occurred on the rail line in tunnel and new york which is the actual saratoga trunk the film title is derived from. this battle actually happened in 1869 between agents for andrew carnagie and j. p. morgan. the line was the economic key to the country in 1869 connecting coal country and the east coast. the references to it are throughout the film are very real. there is even some dialog describing carnagie as a scot though the reference is vague and unfamiliar to anyone not knowing the history around the battle. the railroad line and the railroad tunnel in tunnel and new york (zip code 13848) still exist although the film was shot in california. the real tunnel is about 1 mile long. it is still part of a key freight line today and years after this occurred. i grew up there. gary cooper line in the film while he is riding the train into the tunnel is right and it is still mighty pretty country. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
