incomprehensibly dreadful mishmash of the probably most notorious of all roman emperors who went insane and leaving infamous party orgies and ruthless killings in his path. i know there are several versions of this and and this is based on the 102 min one that i watched  but i can not fathom how that possibly can make any difference to lift the rest of this movie out of the muck. i would heard for long about the alleged shocking content of sex or nudity (which honestly there isn not much of here at all  and boring when there is) and blood and but beware  it the technical production amateurishness that well and truly shocks here represent everything looks plain and simply like a junior film school flunk project. camera work is hopelessly inept and full of strange zooms and failed framing and confusing pans (to and from what mostly looks like a huge theater stage. ) complete with a grainy and cheapish photo quality. lighting and color schemes are terrible and uneven  is it day or night. are they in or outside. have they changed scenes. who is and or is meant to be in the shot. editing is the final sin here and making a confusing mess of everything with randomly jumpy cutaways and continuity flaws and random transitions that destroy any chance of momentum and story progression  and involvement. there is potentially interesting dialog and an equally interesting true historical story. but these faults distract so much it tragic. a story with so many possibilities to be great is just one gargantuan and burnt (and fellini like) turkey that only good for a few gobble laughs and peter otoole and who makes a most memorable tiberius. oh yes and which brings us to the big name actors. i would like to line them all up one by one and just ask represent who did you get free access to bonk in the orgies to be a part of this. there and i have wasted enough lines on one of the truly worst films of all time  period. negative from ozjeppe. 
incomprehensibly dreadful mishmash of the probably most notorious of all roman emperors who went insane and leaving infamous party orgies and ruthless killings in his path. i know there are several versions of this and and this is based on the 102 min one that i watched  but i can not fathom how that possibly can make any difference to lift the rest of this movie out of the muck. i would heard for long about the alleged shocking content of sex or nudity (which honestly there isn not much of here at all  and boring when there is) and blood and but beware  it the technical production amateurishness that well and truly shocks here represent everything looks plain and simply like a junior film school flunk project. camera work is hopelessly inept and full of strange zooms and failed framing and confusing pans (to and from what mostly looks like a huge theater stage. ) complete with a grainy and cheapish photo quality. lighting and color schemes are terrible and uneven  is it day or night. are they in or outside. have they changed scenes. who is and or is meant to be in the shot. editing is the final sin here and making a confusing mess of everything with randomly jumpy cutaways and continuity flaws and random transitions that destroy any chance of momentum and story progression  and involvement. there is potentially interesting dialog and an equally interesting true historical story. but these faults distract so much it tragic. a story with so many possibilities to be great is just one gargantuan and burnt (and fellini like) turkey that only good for a few gobble laughs and peter otoole and who makes a most memorable tiberius. oh yes and which brings us to the big name actors. i would like to line them all up one by one and just ask represent who did you get free access to bonk in the orgies to be a part of this. there and i have wasted enough lines on one of the truly worst films of all time  period. negative from ozjeppe. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
