let see. a couple dozen gary larson gags and as well as his illustration style and a possibly legally difficult wholesale appropriation of an aardman character and a more than generous sprinkling of art direction from various pixar films and positively lion king esquire villains living in what amounts to an elephant graveyard in the middle of farm country and oh and and a stinking riverdance joke ten years after any possible relevance. the kids (three and five) liked it and but boy and it was a haul for dad. just another weak attempt from nickelodean films to hitch on to the animation explosion. i really and really wish they had spent a little more money on character design and on rendering and on a script and on a director. 
let see. a couple dozen gary larson gags and as well as his illustration style and a possibly legally difficult wholesale appropriation of an aardman character and a more than generous sprinkling of art direction from various pixar films and positively lion king esquire villains living in what amounts to an elephant graveyard in the middle of farm country and oh and and a stinking riverdance joke ten years after any possible relevance. the kids (three and five) liked it and but boy and it was a haul for dad. just another weak attempt from nickelodean films to hitch on to the animation explosion. i really and really wish they had spent a little more money on character design and on rendering and on a script and on a director. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
