first off and let it be known that i came into this movie not for the music while actually i find it repugnant. really and i was interested in the psychology of the punk subculture. on this point and the documentary did fairly well. one disagreeable aspect was the numerous scenes in which songs are played and the hyped up band and belligerent crowd are shown running amok. if you have seen the first such scene and you have seen them all. this superfluity is party made up for by printing lyrics for some of the songs. with these and the audience is able to somewhat connect mentally with the band. the lyrics are of far more interest than the jumble of sounds projecting from the speakers. i do not know why all the lyrics were not printed. scenes without lyrics slow (ironic eh. and given the many references to the speed of the music) the flow of the movie. also insightful were the interviews with fans and bands and though there is a letdown when the latter band interviews prove to be not nearly as enthralling or humorous as the first two. overall and a good movie that i am glad i saw. i will check out the follow ups if i ever get a chance. favorite quote represent he tried to hide the fact that he couldn not play by rubbing peanut butter over himself and breaking glass. broad punk generalization represent though their disgracefulness and lack of vocabulary and hygiene and and drug induced obliviousness is often hilarious and in the end it is understood that punks are just pathetic juveniles who rebel just for the sake of rebellion as seen through sophomoric lyrics and naive attempts to philosophize and politicize (disregarding black flag and who are slightly less misguided than their peers). 
first off and let it be known that i came into this movie not for the music while actually i find it repugnant. really and i was interested in the psychology of the punk subculture. on this point and the documentary did fairly well. one disagreeable aspect was the numerous scenes in which songs are played and the hyped up band and belligerent crowd are shown running amok. if you have seen the first such scene and you have seen them all. this superfluity is party made up for by printing lyrics for some of the songs. with these and the audience is able to somewhat connect mentally with the band. the lyrics are of far more interest than the jumble of sounds projecting from the speakers. i do not know why all the lyrics were not printed. scenes without lyrics slow (ironic eh. and given the many references to the speed of the music) the flow of the movie. also insightful were the interviews with fans and bands and though there is a letdown when the latter band interviews prove to be not nearly as enthralling or humorous as the first two. overall and a good movie that i am glad i saw. i will check out the follow ups if i ever get a chance. favorite quote represent he tried to hide the fact that he couldn not play by rubbing peanut butter over himself and breaking glass. broad punk generalization represent though their disgracefulness and lack of vocabulary and hygiene and and drug induced obliviousness is often hilarious and in the end it is understood that punks are just pathetic juveniles who rebel just for the sake of rebellion as seen through sophomoric lyrics and naive attempts to philosophize and politicize (disregarding black flag and who are slightly less misguided than their peers). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
