it seems to be a common thing in the 90 to play with cliches. some manage to do so with great talent. hervé hadmar doesn not. on the paper and the movie looked interesting though represent the weak plot could have been saved by great moments of comedy and dark humour and and a very décalé style. director hadmar and unfortunately and kills his direction with his camera angles and his absolute lack of rhythm. every joke is embarassing as no one reacts in the theater. the movie is incredibly slow and and the actors seem to be wondering what the hell theyre doing in this ridiculous mascarade. what could have been a stylish funny mindless comedy ends up being a cathedral of boredom. 
it seems to be a common thing in the 90 to play with cliches. some manage to do so with great talent. hervé hadmar doesn not. on the paper and the movie looked interesting though represent the weak plot could have been saved by great moments of comedy and dark humour and and a very décalé style. director hadmar and unfortunately and kills his direction with his camera angles and his absolute lack of rhythm. every joke is embarassing as no one reacts in the theater. the movie is incredibly slow and and the actors seem to be wondering what the hell theyre doing in this ridiculous mascarade. what could have been a stylish funny mindless comedy ends up being a cathedral of boredom. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
