this movie should have been called the eyes of alexander and and they should have done away with the bogart concept altogether. the film started out with a lighthearted approach to bogart legacy and some comical moments with his surgery oriented face and but after the first 15 30 minutes it morphs into a more serious thriller and where two palm size sapphires and purportedly laid as eyes into a marble headpiece of alexander the great and for him and and seen by him and right before his death. so the gems are of great value not only because of their quality and size and but also because of the tie to the greatest conquerer the world has ever known. being an expert on alexander qualifies me to say that this is wholly and completely a fiction and but it makes for a good movie anyway. so the film winds around some early silliness and stumbles along with all sorts of alexander allusions in both the foreground and background (which i really liked) and ending with a dated shark attack (you couldn not go to a movie in 79 80 without some shark showing up to menace the audience). there is a yacht named euridice (alexander father young wife) and a man named alexander and philip and cleitus. and (it been about 5 years since i have seen the film and so can not remember all the details) and olympias and some street names and and many others. it was fun to watch the film just to try to catch all the background details that the director (obviously an alexanderphile himself) put in. when all is said and done and the eyes are retrieved and the camera pans in on them on a bed as the credits roll by. kind of a neat ending. what would have been more fun would be if they went the indiana jones way and had an action adventure. there were many and many real artifacts that could have been used to make this more interesting and or instance and the hand annotated (by aristotle) version of the iliad that alexander kept with him all his life and even on his many journeys across asia (would be of incalculable value if found today). olivia hussey (my all time favorite b movie actress)is killed off way too early and and should have been the main actress throughout and not the girl from the momma and the poppa . though she was herself easy on the eyes. if you can find this flick and it might be worth checking out for the historical stuff and to see olivia hussey in an extremely funny deadpan humor bit early on and but beyond that and i would pass on it for something more entertaining. yours and nick. 
this movie should have been called the eyes of alexander and and they should have done away with the bogart concept altogether. the film started out with a lighthearted approach to bogart legacy and some comical moments with his surgery oriented face and but after the first 15 30 minutes it morphs into a more serious thriller and where two palm size sapphires and purportedly laid as eyes into a marble headpiece of alexander the great and for him and and seen by him and right before his death. so the gems are of great value not only because of their quality and size and but also because of the tie to the greatest conquerer the world has ever known. being an expert on alexander qualifies me to say that this is wholly and completely a fiction and but it makes for a good movie anyway. so the film winds around some early silliness and stumbles along with all sorts of alexander allusions in both the foreground and background (which i really liked) and ending with a dated shark attack (you couldn not go to a movie in 79 80 without some shark showing up to menace the audience). there is a yacht named euridice (alexander father young wife) and a man named alexander and philip and cleitus. and (it been about 5 years since i have seen the film and so can not remember all the details) and olympias and some street names and and many others. it was fun to watch the film just to try to catch all the background details that the director (obviously an alexanderphile himself) put in. when all is said and done and the eyes are retrieved and the camera pans in on them on a bed as the credits roll by. kind of a neat ending. what would have been more fun would be if they went the indiana jones way and had an action adventure. there were many and many real artifacts that could have been used to make this more interesting and or instance and the hand annotated (by aristotle) version of the iliad that alexander kept with him all his life and even on his many journeys across asia (would be of incalculable value if found today). olivia hussey (my all time favorite b movie actress)is killed off way too early and and should have been the main actress throughout and not the girl from the momma and the poppa . though she was herself easy on the eyes. if you can find this flick and it might be worth checking out for the historical stuff and to see olivia hussey in an extremely funny deadpan humor bit early on and but beyond that and i would pass on it for something more entertaining. yours and nick. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
