sometimes when i hear an a list cast will be bunched up together for 2 hours in a movie i hope and and pray that it is good and not for the sake of my 10 bucks or 2 hours and but for the sake of these actors careers. in the case of be cool and everything went to waste. in the beginning of the film john travolta (aka chili palmer) and a music executive played by james woods are driving in a car talking about movie sequels and and how most aren not good. if you look passed the fact that this scene was shot the same way quentin tarrantino filmed his car scene in pulp fiction and and listen to the dialogue you can not help but ponder whether this is 1) a disclaimer to the audience that this movie is going to suck and or 2) an attempt to get the audience laughing at the sheer humor of 2 people talking about sequels in a sequel. oh the irony. (in case you were wondering and choice 1 is correct. ) the cool and slick chili palmer from the first and good film get shorty is revived to play a mobster gone music business pro. he steals a young hot singer (christina milian) from her ghetto pimped out jewish manager (vince vaughn) and and turns her into a singing sensation. of course a movie about an ex mobster can never be complete without new mobsters causing havoc. this time around the mobsters of choice are russian and played by american actors who cannot act russian if my entire family hit them upside the head with their russian bare hands. as a russian i wasn not so much offended by the way this film portrayed russians and but instead as a writer i was more offended by the horrible dialogue. this film tried too hard to get the audience to laugh. it turned potentially good lines into a redundancy. the russian and black and and gay jokes were the same ones only reworded a couple of hundred times. after calling the rock character a f (he plays a gay bodyguard to vince vaughn) and and cedric the entertainerer character a n (he played a black rapper with an entourage who threaten those who do not play his tracks with guns) i wanted to walk out of the movie theater and because it was painful to sit through. if this was get shorty none of this would have even needed to be in the film to build up drama and or a really bad laugh. what lacked in this film that do not in get shorty was chili hot spicey attitude. he a completely different person in this sequel. for one thing the old chili would have had more dialogue. john travolta doesn not have more than 20 speaking lines in be cool and because he is out staged by the repetitive lines and and the hundred and two cameo appearances by the most random celebrities. i would not ruin the shock by revealing all of the cameos for those who actually plan to see this movie (please dont. ) and but i will say that it will forever amaze me that these people agreed to be in a film of such inanity. what was even more stupid was the very lame dance sequence with travolta and uma thurman (she plays the widower of james woods who luckily gets killed in the first 10 minutes of the movie). tarrantino never made pulp fiction for an idiot like the director of be cool to mess around with. this dance number was boring and long and and just plain throbbing. the black eyed peas playing in the club with a total of 10 people do not make the scene any memorable. there were so many plot holes that i left the theater asking myself why. everything about this film was a big question mark. i just do not understand the point to anything. i couldn not even explain to you why the russians were after everyone and or why this film was ever made and because i am baffled. all i took out of this movie was that everyone in l. a. has a sidekick and and the only way this movie was probably funded was through all of the advertisements by diet coke and yahoo. and honda insight hybrid and t mobile and trimspa (even the spokeswoman herself is in the movie) and the bad screenwriters guild. plot holes and stupid dialogue and too many random cameos and horrible acting (even by the pros) and and a not so entertaining attempt to mimic pulp fiction makes this film the worst movie of 2005 and and it only the third month of the year. 
sometimes when i hear an a list cast will be bunched up together for 2 hours in a movie i hope and and pray that it is good and not for the sake of my 10 bucks or 2 hours and but for the sake of these actors careers. in the case of be cool and everything went to waste. in the beginning of the film john travolta (aka chili palmer) and a music executive played by james woods are driving in a car talking about movie sequels and and how most aren not good. if you look passed the fact that this scene was shot the same way quentin tarrantino filmed his car scene in pulp fiction and and listen to the dialogue you can not help but ponder whether this is 1) a disclaimer to the audience that this movie is going to suck and or 2) an attempt to get the audience laughing at the sheer humor of 2 people talking about sequels in a sequel. oh the irony. (in case you were wondering and choice 1 is correct. ) the cool and slick chili palmer from the first and good film get shorty is revived to play a mobster gone music business pro. he steals a young hot singer (christina milian) from her ghetto pimped out jewish manager (vince vaughn) and and turns her into a singing sensation. of course a movie about an ex mobster can never be complete without new mobsters causing havoc. this time around the mobsters of choice are russian and played by american actors who cannot act russian if my entire family hit them upside the head with their russian bare hands. as a russian i wasn not so much offended by the way this film portrayed russians and but instead as a writer i was more offended by the horrible dialogue. this film tried too hard to get the audience to laugh. it turned potentially good lines into a redundancy. the russian and black and and gay jokes were the same ones only reworded a couple of hundred times. after calling the rock character a f (he plays a gay bodyguard to vince vaughn) and and cedric the entertainerer character a n (he played a black rapper with an entourage who threaten those who do not play his tracks with guns) i wanted to walk out of the movie theater and because it was painful to sit through. if this was get shorty none of this would have even needed to be in the film to build up drama and or a really bad laugh. what lacked in this film that do not in get shorty was chili hot spicey attitude. he a completely different person in this sequel. for one thing the old chili would have had more dialogue. john travolta doesn not have more than 20 speaking lines in be cool and because he is out staged by the repetitive lines and and the hundred and two cameo appearances by the most random celebrities. i would not ruin the shock by revealing all of the cameos for those who actually plan to see this movie (please dont. ) and but i will say that it will forever amaze me that these people agreed to be in a film of such inanity. what was even more stupid was the very lame dance sequence with travolta and uma thurman (she plays the widower of james woods who luckily gets killed in the first 10 minutes of the movie). tarrantino never made pulp fiction for an idiot like the director of be cool to mess around with. this dance number was boring and long and and just plain throbbing. the black eyed peas playing in the club with a total of 10 people do not make the scene any memorable. there were so many plot holes that i left the theater asking myself why. everything about this film was a big question mark. i just do not understand the point to anything. i couldn not even explain to you why the russians were after everyone and or why this film was ever made and because i am baffled. all i took out of this movie was that everyone in l. a. has a sidekick and and the only way this movie was probably funded was through all of the advertisements by diet coke and yahoo. and honda insight hybrid and t mobile and trimspa (even the spokeswoman herself is in the movie) and the bad screenwriters guild. plot holes and stupid dialogue and too many random cameos and horrible acting (even by the pros) and and a not so entertaining attempt to mimic pulp fiction makes this film the worst movie of 2005 and and it only the third month of the year. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
