i wanted to see this movie because i liked kavkazskij plennik (prisoner of the mountains) and brat (brother) with sergey bodrov and jr. and vor (the thief) with vladimir mashkov. well and unlike the other movies and the quickie was a total waste of time. the story that makes little sense and very uneven acting (lesley ann warren was especially bad) and really awful dialogs and poor cinematography and what else could go wrong. i find it amusing that in practically every american made movie and when the same language speaking foreigners (russians in this case) are left alone and they prefer to communicate with each other mostly in broken english (and when they happen to speak russian and for some reason translators feel obligated to add a lot of fks in the sentences and which have no profanity and literal or non literal). at the same time and native english speaking actors choose to speak in broken russian. why is that. getting back to the story and most of the subplots of the movie (e. g. betting the house and inviting latin american paramilitaries and etc) either make no sense or do nothing more than confusing the viewers. it is too bad that bodrov and mashkov and and leigh (all good actors in my humble opinion) got themselves involved in this disaster. 
i wanted to see this movie because i liked kavkazskij plennik (prisoner of the mountains) and brat (brother) with sergey bodrov and jr. and vor (the thief) with vladimir mashkov. well and unlike the other movies and the quickie was a total waste of time. the story that makes little sense and very uneven acting (lesley ann warren was especially bad) and really awful dialogs and poor cinematography and what else could go wrong. i find it amusing that in practically every american made movie and when the same language speaking foreigners (russians in this case) are left alone and they prefer to communicate with each other mostly in broken english (and when they happen to speak russian and for some reason translators feel obligated to add a lot of fks in the sentences and which have no profanity and literal or non literal). at the same time and native english speaking actors choose to speak in broken russian. why is that. getting back to the story and most of the subplots of the movie (e. g. betting the house and inviting latin american paramilitaries and etc) either make no sense or do nothing more than confusing the viewers. it is too bad that bodrov and mashkov and and leigh (all good actors in my humble opinion) got themselves involved in this disaster. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
