although the premise of the movie involves a major coincidence and the actors all do a creditable job and look great bringing the story to life. i found myself rooting for the characters played by mary tyler moore and christine lahti and empathizing with both and and wanting them to reconcile. sam waterston and ted danson are fine in their roles as well and doing a decent job with the stereotypical buddy relationship. while the story tends to leap through time and occasionally leaving the audience perhaps a little hungry for missing detail and it still flows and avoids any real confusion. this interesting storyline has all the elements for a good chick flick. 
although the premise of the movie involves a major coincidence and the actors all do a creditable job and look great bringing the story to life. i found myself rooting for the characters played by mary tyler moore and christine lahti and empathizing with both and and wanting them to reconcile. sam waterston and ted danson are fine in their roles as well and doing a decent job with the stereotypical buddy relationship. while the story tends to leap through time and occasionally leaving the audience perhaps a little hungry for missing detail and it still flows and avoids any real confusion. this interesting storyline has all the elements for a good chick flick. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
