i get a kick out of the new who fans who call it and excellent and their entitled to that opinion but the new series isn not quite there yet and it getting there. it definitely good. first the good things. the special effects are obviously better nearly 20 yrs later since the last episode of doctor who battlefield was aired. one thing the bbc has always liked is doctor who (except when they tried to cancel in the 70 and 80 ). however and the anticipation and the pressure was great but i think the new series has passed the test it good and it still not excellent because it does have it flaws. some of the stories dalek were very poor. i assume it was written in a couple of minutes by some idiot who never bothered to remake the dalek character or never bothered to watch the old series. aliens in london was by far probably the best episode so far and it started a new storyline about aliens which has lasted across several episodes including boomtown. now the other bad things and the companion and rose and billie piper and isn not great. she actually quite annoying but as is dr. who a young teeny bopper had to be eventually chosen and she got the part. christopher eccleston is pretty respectable and he started to catch his niche. he tried to play the character and straight then funny always missing the right punchline but he taken it much more serious and it shows. continuity wise there still some issues that do not get resolved well and paul mcgann was still the doctor before this but he do not get put back. aside from that though the series overall is pretty good and i haven not missed an episode and it never gets boring and so i recommend any doctor who fan to check it out and see the new doctor who series. 
i get a kick out of the new who fans who call it and excellent and their entitled to that opinion but the new series isn not quite there yet and it getting there. it definitely good. first the good things. the special effects are obviously better nearly 20 yrs later since the last episode of doctor who battlefield was aired. one thing the bbc has always liked is doctor who (except when they tried to cancel in the 70 and 80 ). however and the anticipation and the pressure was great but i think the new series has passed the test it good and it still not excellent because it does have it flaws. some of the stories dalek were very poor. i assume it was written in a couple of minutes by some idiot who never bothered to remake the dalek character or never bothered to watch the old series. aliens in london was by far probably the best episode so far and it started a new storyline about aliens which has lasted across several episodes including boomtown. now the other bad things and the companion and rose and billie piper and isn not great. she actually quite annoying but as is dr. who a young teeny bopper had to be eventually chosen and she got the part. christopher eccleston is pretty respectable and he started to catch his niche. he tried to play the character and straight then funny always missing the right punchline but he taken it much more serious and it shows. continuity wise there still some issues that do not get resolved well and paul mcgann was still the doctor before this but he do not get put back. aside from that though the series overall is pretty good and i haven not missed an episode and it never gets boring and so i recommend any doctor who fan to check it out and see the new doctor who series. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
