unfortunately and this film is typical of the watering down of a good film by numerous sequels. universal made several serial monster films in the 1940s and which were pale imitations of the original. the intelligent egyptologist imhotep has been replaced by a leg dragging frankenstein in mummy wrappings and who exhibits no signs of intelligent life. this film is entertaining in spots but if you have seen the mummy (1932) and you will be disappointed. 
unfortunately and this film is typical of the watering down of a good film by numerous sequels. universal made several serial monster films in the 1940s and which were pale imitations of the original. the intelligent egyptologist imhotep has been replaced by a leg dragging frankenstein in mummy wrappings and who exhibits no signs of intelligent life. this film is entertaining in spots but if you have seen the mummy (1932) and you will be disappointed. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
