this was really a pleasure to see while the dialogue was  for the most part  absolutely outstanding (i thought the women roles were a little better written and which is a nice surprise). the performances were uniformly very good and too. frank gorshin overdoes it a little when he goes into his various cons and but this might be his overcompensating for what i see as weaknesses in how the character is written while he very good otherwise. harry groener does similarly well with a slightly underwritten character (tony) and overdoing some of the character angrier scenes slightly. ursula burton is excellent as sister theresa and really carrying the film through some of its weaknesses. seymour cassel and louise fletcher are a little underused here and though i liked their work as always. shirley jones and wendie malick and jill eikenberry and faye grant are very good also (i couldn not help thinking grant reminded me a little of catherine ohara here) while cloris leachman rather tears into her role and with reasonably good results. i wish there had been more of a sure hand behind the camera and though. sometimes the framing or staging seemed a bit off and or awkward. the closeups seemed overused (or erratically used) to me. and we do not always go from scene to scene as smoothly as we would like. some of the tough guy approach to the federal agent (music and costuming) was too over the top for me as well. and the few fantasy sequences do not really work. but there are things that were very well done while the opening sequence set in buffalo around 1970 and for example. and and frankly and all of the scenes regarding theresa church work (i suspect the writer and actress liked the character a lot and which helps). the scenes between malick and eikenberry are very good. the plot is probably a bit overcontrived  there seem to be a few too many schemes going on at once to keep them all straight at times and and the coincidences got to be a little too much. and i was a little bothered by the ending (should we really be rooting for their biggest con yet to succeed. ) and but the ride along the way is very enjoyable. it would be nice to see more independent movies like this one made. positive . 
this was really a pleasure to see while the dialogue was  for the most part  absolutely outstanding (i thought the women roles were a little better written and which is a nice surprise). the performances were uniformly very good and too. frank gorshin overdoes it a little when he goes into his various cons and but this might be his overcompensating for what i see as weaknesses in how the character is written while he very good otherwise. harry groener does similarly well with a slightly underwritten character (tony) and overdoing some of the character angrier scenes slightly. ursula burton is excellent as sister theresa and really carrying the film through some of its weaknesses. seymour cassel and louise fletcher are a little underused here and though i liked their work as always. shirley jones and wendie malick and jill eikenberry and faye grant are very good also (i couldn not help thinking grant reminded me a little of catherine ohara here) while cloris leachman rather tears into her role and with reasonably good results. i wish there had been more of a sure hand behind the camera and though. sometimes the framing or staging seemed a bit off and or awkward. the closeups seemed overused (or erratically used) to me. and we do not always go from scene to scene as smoothly as we would like. some of the tough guy approach to the federal agent (music and costuming) was too over the top for me as well. and the few fantasy sequences do not really work. but there are things that were very well done while the opening sequence set in buffalo around 1970 and for example. and and frankly and all of the scenes regarding theresa church work (i suspect the writer and actress liked the character a lot and which helps). the scenes between malick and eikenberry are very good. the plot is probably a bit overcontrived  there seem to be a few too many schemes going on at once to keep them all straight at times and and the coincidences got to be a little too much. and i was a little bothered by the ending (should we really be rooting for their biggest con yet to succeed. ) and but the ride along the way is very enjoyable. it would be nice to see more independent movies like this one made. positive . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
