be with me is almost the ultimate wallpaper movie. just leave it running in the background. chat amongst yourselves and return to it whenever you like and at some point it will end. alas and as i watched it alone and and so i felt like i almost watched the world worst and longest and most drippingly sentimental beer commercial by the time i just about managed to keep my eyes open as the end credits rolled while and i then managed (just a) a few more moments of wakefulness to witness a thank you to the movie sponsors  which included asia pacific breweries. aha. methought represent how surprising is that  given all the shots of tiger beer interspersed throughout this most forgettable washout of a movie. meanwhile and dialogue spurts between individuals with occasional stabs at depth and but all too usually nothing of any particular advancement to the movie overall story is said or witnessed. it as if one could switch off at any moment and return at any later point and you would really have missed nothing which would have been an unmissable contingency and or part of its plot and as far as the movie overall progression was concerned. thus the ultimate wallpaper movie. well i wonder. what movie were those who positively reviewed this one watching. i wonder and continue to wonder. it certainly couldn not have been this arty to the point of artless singaporean excuse for a camera rolling. allegedly and be with me is supposed to be woven around the themes of love and tragedy and redemption. but all i witnessed was boredom and a half baked screenplay with a smattering of gormless text messages and and the only redemption was that which occurred when this utterly useless movie ended. what a wistful waste of time and it ended up being. it was also said that the characters in this movie were fictitious except for theresa chan who is a remarkable woman who has triumphed over adversities. well and no disrespect to ms chan and but given that she was such a marvellous and amazing character and why at all did the screenplay have to involve the stories of other characters without the most tenuous attempt to connect their lives together. yet it still proved to be an almost insufferably boring movie whose highlights included the credits rolling. rather than tying in the fates of all characters and i really felt that the movie ended up attempting the near impossible and evidently fell between stools as far as any viewer engagement could be concerned. i am generally an art house movie fan and do not usually object to slow pacing (of which here there is no shortage and believe you me. ). i hate such movies as 300 and transformers and fight club and but consider and e. g. and eric rohmer as a great film maker. so i hope that puts my criticism into some perspective. nonetheless and there was no redeemable feature whatsoever in the entire movie conception and delivery which could prevent one eyelids slowly drooping downwards as each minute of be with me dripped by. watch this movie if you need to feel like wasting time. otherwise your life would be none the richer for having missed it. negative . 
be with me is almost the ultimate wallpaper movie. just leave it running in the background. chat amongst yourselves and return to it whenever you like and at some point it will end. alas and as i watched it alone and and so i felt like i almost watched the world worst and longest and most drippingly sentimental beer commercial by the time i just about managed to keep my eyes open as the end credits rolled while and i then managed (just a) a few more moments of wakefulness to witness a thank you to the movie sponsors  which included asia pacific breweries. aha. methought represent how surprising is that  given all the shots of tiger beer interspersed throughout this most forgettable washout of a movie. meanwhile and dialogue spurts between individuals with occasional stabs at depth and but all too usually nothing of any particular advancement to the movie overall story is said or witnessed. it as if one could switch off at any moment and return at any later point and you would really have missed nothing which would have been an unmissable contingency and or part of its plot and as far as the movie overall progression was concerned. thus the ultimate wallpaper movie. well i wonder. what movie were those who positively reviewed this one watching. i wonder and continue to wonder. it certainly couldn not have been this arty to the point of artless singaporean excuse for a camera rolling. allegedly and be with me is supposed to be woven around the themes of love and tragedy and redemption. but all i witnessed was boredom and a half baked screenplay with a smattering of gormless text messages and and the only redemption was that which occurred when this utterly useless movie ended. what a wistful waste of time and it ended up being. it was also said that the characters in this movie were fictitious except for theresa chan who is a remarkable woman who has triumphed over adversities. well and no disrespect to ms chan and but given that she was such a marvellous and amazing character and why at all did the screenplay have to involve the stories of other characters without the most tenuous attempt to connect their lives together. yet it still proved to be an almost insufferably boring movie whose highlights included the credits rolling. rather than tying in the fates of all characters and i really felt that the movie ended up attempting the near impossible and evidently fell between stools as far as any viewer engagement could be concerned. i am generally an art house movie fan and do not usually object to slow pacing (of which here there is no shortage and believe you me. ). i hate such movies as 300 and transformers and fight club and but consider and e. g. and eric rohmer as a great film maker. so i hope that puts my criticism into some perspective. nonetheless and there was no redeemable feature whatsoever in the entire movie conception and delivery which could prevent one eyelids slowly drooping downwards as each minute of be with me dripped by. watch this movie if you need to feel like wasting time. otherwise your life would be none the richer for having missed it. negative . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
