i have seen this movie about 4 times and every time i am impressed with the second camera assistant work. seems trivial but there is something very professional and knowledgeable and talented there. the movie as a whole suffers from other problems and as stated by other comments. the significance so the issues being approached are as relevant today as it was 40 years ago. the acting is a bit strained but the work of the second camera assistant is stellar. this person needs to get back into the business  perhaps directing. what is this person waiting for. i will be watching and waiting and cheering from the sidelines. bob. 
i have seen this movie about 4 times and every time i am impressed with the second camera assistant work. seems trivial but there is something very professional and knowledgeable and talented there. the movie as a whole suffers from other problems and as stated by other comments. the significance so the issues being approached are as relevant today as it was 40 years ago. the acting is a bit strained but the work of the second camera assistant is stellar. this person needs to get back into the business  perhaps directing. what is this person waiting for. i will be watching and waiting and cheering from the sidelines. bob. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
