my girlfriend wanted to see this (lol this is the case a lot). so i rented it. then i saw how acclaimed this was nominated for 10 oscars. great. this should be good ol drama. this movie had a lot of potential. the direction and the way everything was paced was very well. but once the movie ended and i couldn not help but ask myself if this story was really worth making a film for. virginia hill (annette bening) was extremely annoying and i just couldn not tolerate her character at all. warren beatty was excellent in the film acting wise and but again i just found it hard to have sympathy for his character. he just came off essentially as a idiotic and hotheaded loser of a gangster. who had no place in the life in the first place. how would he get in with the likes of meyer lansky and lucky luciano anyway. this film just left me with a bland but uneasy feeling. what was the big deal with this movie. i just do not feel a completeness with bugsy. beatty antics and although acted quite well and just seemed too random and illogical. i am guessing that how siegel really was. but it was just too much of that. there just do not seem to be much of a real story here. my basic assessment of it would be a hot headed and playboy and underachieving gangster falls in love with a loser of a woman and comes up with the idea of las vegas. but his failed attempt at the casino he builds and along with having no regard for his mob bosses money gets him killed. what else is there besides that. i just do not see the big deal with this and and it was a big disappointment. there must have not been many movies to come out in 1991 and how this was nominated for 10 oscars is beyond me (although the two it won is justifiable). 1. 5/4 stars. 
my girlfriend wanted to see this (lol this is the case a lot). so i rented it. then i saw how acclaimed this was nominated for 10 oscars. great. this should be good ol drama. this movie had a lot of potential. the direction and the way everything was paced was very well. but once the movie ended and i couldn not help but ask myself if this story was really worth making a film for. virginia hill (annette bening) was extremely annoying and i just couldn not tolerate her character at all. warren beatty was excellent in the film acting wise and but again i just found it hard to have sympathy for his character. he just came off essentially as a idiotic and hotheaded loser of a gangster. who had no place in the life in the first place. how would he get in with the likes of meyer lansky and lucky luciano anyway. this film just left me with a bland but uneasy feeling. what was the big deal with this movie. i just do not feel a completeness with bugsy. beatty antics and although acted quite well and just seemed too random and illogical. i am guessing that how siegel really was. but it was just too much of that. there just do not seem to be much of a real story here. my basic assessment of it would be a hot headed and playboy and underachieving gangster falls in love with a loser of a woman and comes up with the idea of las vegas. but his failed attempt at the casino he builds and along with having no regard for his mob bosses money gets him killed. what else is there besides that. i just do not see the big deal with this and and it was a big disappointment. there must have not been many movies to come out in 1991 and how this was nominated for 10 oscars is beyond me (although the two it won is justifiable). 1. 5/4 stars. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
