before i begin and a little correction represent imdb states that richard gere is 180 cm tall. wrong. i passed by him 10 years ago and and he can not be an ant a bigger than 165. i am 183 and and he looked like a child next to me. should have been called wheatlands while an appropriate title to complement malick previous (and much better) movie badlands. this movie shows that not all directors have as their prime objective to entertain. in fact and some of them have as their main objective to show wheat in all its splendour. the movie is depressing and relatively uninvolving and with the obligatory tragic ending. nothing more than an average and predictable love triangle drama and with the male two thirds of the triangle not surviving the movie. praised for its visual quality while while it does have that realistic 70s feel to it and there are limits to how spellbinding wheat fields can be. you can shoot them with 1500 mm cameras and for all i care and but they are still wheat fields. gere and who at first seems miscast as some kind of lower class factory worker turned wheatfield worker and is quite solid and while brooke adams appears distant and cool for most of the movie and making one wonder just how much she loved either of the two hunks. but for those looking for a movie that displays all the glorious colours of a field of wheat and look no further represent you have found your dream. if youre interested in reading my biographies of richard gere and other hollywood intellectual heavyweights and contact me by e mail. 
before i begin and a little correction represent imdb states that richard gere is 180 cm tall. wrong. i passed by him 10 years ago and and he can not be an ant a bigger than 165. i am 183 and and he looked like a child next to me. should have been called wheatlands while an appropriate title to complement malick previous (and much better) movie badlands. this movie shows that not all directors have as their prime objective to entertain. in fact and some of them have as their main objective to show wheat in all its splendour. the movie is depressing and relatively uninvolving and with the obligatory tragic ending. nothing more than an average and predictable love triangle drama and with the male two thirds of the triangle not surviving the movie. praised for its visual quality while while it does have that realistic 70s feel to it and there are limits to how spellbinding wheat fields can be. you can shoot them with 1500 mm cameras and for all i care and but they are still wheat fields. gere and who at first seems miscast as some kind of lower class factory worker turned wheatfield worker and is quite solid and while brooke adams appears distant and cool for most of the movie and making one wonder just how much she loved either of the two hunks. but for those looking for a movie that displays all the glorious colours of a field of wheat and look no further represent you have found your dream. if youre interested in reading my biographies of richard gere and other hollywood intellectual heavyweights and contact me by e mail. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
