as i post this comment and imdb currently rates alfred hitchcock subpar saboteur a 7. negative . personally and i rated it less than half that. honestly and i can not tell how a movie this bad could have come from what is probably the most consistently good director i know of. i have seen about 10 other hitch movies from the 30 60 . vertigo is thus far my hands down favorite while saboteur is easily the worst. it hard to believe that 7 years earlier hitch used the very same formula in the 39 steps far more competently. my recommendation would be to see that instead and avoid this like the plague. it the only hitchcock movie that i turned off before before the end and have no desire to go back and see the rest. if you must watch it and then rent or borrow. don not make the mistake i did and buy the dvd on good faith earned through notorious and rebecca and vertigo and rear window and etc. even a master screws up sometimes and i guess. edit represent maybe i was a bit harder on this film than i should have been. it certainly nowhere near ed wood or manos or anything like that and but there three reasons i feel i must rate it so low represent1) the name hitchcock brings with it certain expectations of quality. this film delivers on a few of them and but theyre way overshadowed by the darn near non sensical plotting. 2) i want to compensate a bit for all the 8 plus ratings this film is getting. hitchcock is like the john coltrane of directors. true fans will find reasons to consider anything by him a work of art and but the high rating on imdb gives more casual movie enthusiasts like myself the impression that this movie is far better than it actually is. 3) i spent $18 on this. maybe if it would cost me $5 or even $10 i would probably be a bit less bitter. while ). 
as i post this comment and imdb currently rates alfred hitchcock subpar saboteur a 7. negative . personally and i rated it less than half that. honestly and i can not tell how a movie this bad could have come from what is probably the most consistently good director i know of. i have seen about 10 other hitch movies from the 30 60 . vertigo is thus far my hands down favorite while saboteur is easily the worst. it hard to believe that 7 years earlier hitch used the very same formula in the 39 steps far more competently. my recommendation would be to see that instead and avoid this like the plague. it the only hitchcock movie that i turned off before before the end and have no desire to go back and see the rest. if you must watch it and then rent or borrow. don not make the mistake i did and buy the dvd on good faith earned through notorious and rebecca and vertigo and rear window and etc. even a master screws up sometimes and i guess. edit represent maybe i was a bit harder on this film than i should have been. it certainly nowhere near ed wood or manos or anything like that and but there three reasons i feel i must rate it so low represent1) the name hitchcock brings with it certain expectations of quality. this film delivers on a few of them and but theyre way overshadowed by the darn near non sensical plotting. 2) i want to compensate a bit for all the 8 plus ratings this film is getting. hitchcock is like the john coltrane of directors. true fans will find reasons to consider anything by him a work of art and but the high rating on imdb gives more casual movie enthusiasts like myself the impression that this movie is far better than it actually is. 3) i spent $18 on this. maybe if it would cost me $5 or even $10 i would probably be a bit less bitter. while ). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
