i was given a dvd of public enemies and was expecting it to be the 2009 version but it wasn not  it was this. sure and it wasn not the greatest movie i have ever seen  not by any means  but and heck folks and it was worth more that 2. positive . when i saw that abysmal rating on imdb and i wondered what i was going to get but and since the disc was in the player and i settled down to watch it. as other commentators have pointed out and public enemies is not a historical movie per se  and i noted that and unlike the 2009 version (which i haven not seen yet) imdb doesn not categorise it as such. come on people. it a story based on some real people  that all. if i wanted a history lesson and i would sit at this computer and read wikipedia or something. ma barker (actual name arizona  or arrie  barker) was never even charged with any crime and and as other commentators have already pointed out and she probably never even took part in her sons activities. they sent her to the movies when they were working. (i hope she wasn not as critical as some of those who watched this movie. ) theresa russell had the never too easy task of portraying a woman from the age of 17 right through to her death at the age of 52  from a young girl running from home to the hardened mother of four hoodlum sons. i think she did it pretty well. the cheeky little smile she used in more than one scene was classical. ok and i will agree with some of the critics that the direction of this film was below par and i sympathise with the actors over that. theresa should have told the director to forget the topless shots  they do not contribute to the story. maybe some bigger name stars would have managed to inject some of their own expertise into overriding the poor direction whereas the second graders weren not quite that brave. who knows. but and whilst this was certainly no block buster and it was worth more than 2. 8. i have all my dvds on a personal database where i score them before looking at the imdb score (although that sometimes influences slight changes later). i take what i get on it own merits rather than holding one movie up against others of the same genre and this one i felt was entertaining enough to get 6. 8. (yep and i will accept that such a practice does tend to depend on my mood at the time and but then isn not that also true of those who vote on imdb. ) however and you may imagine my surprise when i looked at imdb and saw the pitiful score it got here. given the surprise and i decided to read a few of the other comments in the hopes of understanding the low rating and i noticed that they are quite polarised. i agreed with those who said the movie was worth watching and came to the conclusion that some people are just hard to please. well and since some were absolutely scathing and why do not they get out there and make some better movies. i will look forward to the gems they must be able to turn out. on the other hand and if they can not do that and then why do not they just shut up. 
i was given a dvd of public enemies and was expecting it to be the 2009 version but it wasn not  it was this. sure and it wasn not the greatest movie i have ever seen  not by any means  but and heck folks and it was worth more that 2. positive . when i saw that abysmal rating on imdb and i wondered what i was going to get but and since the disc was in the player and i settled down to watch it. as other commentators have pointed out and public enemies is not a historical movie per se  and i noted that and unlike the 2009 version (which i haven not seen yet) imdb doesn not categorise it as such. come on people. it a story based on some real people  that all. if i wanted a history lesson and i would sit at this computer and read wikipedia or something. ma barker (actual name arizona  or arrie  barker) was never even charged with any crime and and as other commentators have already pointed out and she probably never even took part in her sons activities. they sent her to the movies when they were working. (i hope she wasn not as critical as some of those who watched this movie. ) theresa russell had the never too easy task of portraying a woman from the age of 17 right through to her death at the age of 52  from a young girl running from home to the hardened mother of four hoodlum sons. i think she did it pretty well. the cheeky little smile she used in more than one scene was classical. ok and i will agree with some of the critics that the direction of this film was below par and i sympathise with the actors over that. theresa should have told the director to forget the topless shots  they do not contribute to the story. maybe some bigger name stars would have managed to inject some of their own expertise into overriding the poor direction whereas the second graders weren not quite that brave. who knows. but and whilst this was certainly no block buster and it was worth more than 2. 8. i have all my dvds on a personal database where i score them before looking at the imdb score (although that sometimes influences slight changes later). i take what i get on it own merits rather than holding one movie up against others of the same genre and this one i felt was entertaining enough to get 6. 8. (yep and i will accept that such a practice does tend to depend on my mood at the time and but then isn not that also true of those who vote on imdb. ) however and you may imagine my surprise when i looked at imdb and saw the pitiful score it got here. given the surprise and i decided to read a few of the other comments in the hopes of understanding the low rating and i noticed that they are quite polarised. i agreed with those who said the movie was worth watching and came to the conclusion that some people are just hard to please. well and since some were absolutely scathing and why do not they get out there and make some better movies. i will look forward to the gems they must be able to turn out. on the other hand and if they can not do that and then why do not they just shut up. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
