i have seen so many bad reviews on supervivientes de los andes that i felt compelled to stand for it (or at least i will try). first of all and of course that it looks dated and it was made in the seventies with very low budget and but that part of it charm. i like contemporary films but also dig the old ones for what they worth. i am not the one to feel the urge to only see or like movies with modern treatments and effects while besides and almost every movie buff likes old fashioned motion pictures (who doesn not like films from el santo or plan 9 from outer space and no matter it overall quality. ). in the aspect of pace and is just a tool for covering (again) it low cost and and i think the constant dialogs are in order of a better character and situations development. sure and alive has better fx and but i would not despise the old one just because of that and and i do not feel quite attracted to english speakers in an event involving people from uruguay and for me and that gives a plus to supervivientes de los andes. it like and even if canoa and from the seventies and based on a true event too and would have a better remake now due to the advance of technology and but i think i would stick to that one based on the emotions that offers regardless it production date. all of this is based in the impact that had on me because the first time i saw it was on tv and and nowadays i do not think it has lost some of it primal force. of course it been a long time and i have seen tons of better movies in every aspect of cinema and but that doesn not diminish it true value. it not a bad film and and i place it above alive without hesitation. just give it a break. 
i have seen so many bad reviews on supervivientes de los andes that i felt compelled to stand for it (or at least i will try). first of all and of course that it looks dated and it was made in the seventies with very low budget and but that part of it charm. i like contemporary films but also dig the old ones for what they worth. i am not the one to feel the urge to only see or like movies with modern treatments and effects while besides and almost every movie buff likes old fashioned motion pictures (who doesn not like films from el santo or plan 9 from outer space and no matter it overall quality. ). in the aspect of pace and is just a tool for covering (again) it low cost and and i think the constant dialogs are in order of a better character and situations development. sure and alive has better fx and but i would not despise the old one just because of that and and i do not feel quite attracted to english speakers in an event involving people from uruguay and for me and that gives a plus to supervivientes de los andes. it like and even if canoa and from the seventies and based on a true event too and would have a better remake now due to the advance of technology and but i think i would stick to that one based on the emotions that offers regardless it production date. all of this is based in the impact that had on me because the first time i saw it was on tv and and nowadays i do not think it has lost some of it primal force. of course it been a long time and i have seen tons of better movies in every aspect of cinema and but that doesn not diminish it true value. it not a bad film and and i place it above alive without hesitation. just give it a break. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
