i have witnessed some atrocities of cinema. in the past couple of years and it seems producers and directors are bent on making films that drive me closer and closer to insanity. hannibal was not an exception. i wasn not expecting much and when i went in to see the movie. the book was ridiculous and and the saying and the book is always better than the movie did not assure me at all that this movie would be anything but trash. but what i came to see was a movie that made all other bad movies seem better in comparison. usually and when i see a terrible movie and i find myself more amused than anything else. sadly though and i could not even laugh at the sad excuse for a film that hannibal is. the movie was filmed with promise and i guess. it had anthony hopkins and julianne moore and and gary oldman. and for directing and there was ridley scott. there have been movies with significantly less talent that have been tremendously better. there was so much i would have cut from this film that i doubt anything would have remained. it was pathetic. the storyline was so ludicrous that it seemed like a complete idiot had written it. what worse is that the book was even crazier and and there were some scenes that were too extreme to be included and which is sad in the case of a movie wherespoiler ahead ray liotta brain was being cooked in pieces. that scene more than any other made me want to cry and because it tarnished its predecessor to such a monumental level. silence of the lambs was one of my favorite films of all time. but hannibal was a two hour plus joke. this movie should only be watched and if people want to learn how not to write a good movie. 
i have witnessed some atrocities of cinema. in the past couple of years and it seems producers and directors are bent on making films that drive me closer and closer to insanity. hannibal was not an exception. i wasn not expecting much and when i went in to see the movie. the book was ridiculous and and the saying and the book is always better than the movie did not assure me at all that this movie would be anything but trash. but what i came to see was a movie that made all other bad movies seem better in comparison. usually and when i see a terrible movie and i find myself more amused than anything else. sadly though and i could not even laugh at the sad excuse for a film that hannibal is. the movie was filmed with promise and i guess. it had anthony hopkins and julianne moore and and gary oldman. and for directing and there was ridley scott. there have been movies with significantly less talent that have been tremendously better. there was so much i would have cut from this film that i doubt anything would have remained. it was pathetic. the storyline was so ludicrous that it seemed like a complete idiot had written it. what worse is that the book was even crazier and and there were some scenes that were too extreme to be included and which is sad in the case of a movie wherespoiler ahead ray liotta brain was being cooked in pieces. that scene more than any other made me want to cry and because it tarnished its predecessor to such a monumental level. silence of the lambs was one of my favorite films of all time. but hannibal was a two hour plus joke. this movie should only be watched and if people want to learn how not to write a good movie. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
