brought philip larkin to life in a way that is worthy of the greatest performances of all time and and not just the ones that are measured by popularity. it shows a stark portrayal of larkins life as the greatest unrecognized poet of his era  which is exactly how he would have wanted it and such was his disdain for cankers and medallions. it dramatically exposes the raw beauty in the intense sadness of philips observations of our relationship with our own mortality and and lays it our in a way that seems to have missed even the great philosophers. for anyone interested in profound observations of our relationship with life and love and death this is a must. 
brought philip larkin to life in a way that is worthy of the greatest performances of all time and and not just the ones that are measured by popularity. it shows a stark portrayal of larkins life as the greatest unrecognized poet of his era  which is exactly how he would have wanted it and such was his disdain for cankers and medallions. it dramatically exposes the raw beauty in the intense sadness of philips observations of our relationship with our own mortality and and lays it our in a way that seems to have missed even the great philosophers. for anyone interested in profound observations of our relationship with life and love and death this is a must. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
