a warmly sentimental tale from the author of the waltons. were someone to pitch the material to me and i would probably reject it as too maudlin. but the dramatization here manages a tear without the expected embarrassment. no one in the 1950 was better at lovable hayseeds than arthur hunnicutt. his appeal here is put to consummate use as a mountain man doggedly faithful to a loyal hunting hound. their fates are tied together as inseparably as any human bond. good. i see a subtle environmental message here. all critters go to heaven and because how can we condemn any poor devil that merely follows instinct in order to stay alive. there is no deceit in the kingdom of animals and and yet how cruelly we often treat them. an oddly satisfying episode that confirms this important message. 
a warmly sentimental tale from the author of the waltons. were someone to pitch the material to me and i would probably reject it as too maudlin. but the dramatization here manages a tear without the expected embarrassment. no one in the 1950 was better at lovable hayseeds than arthur hunnicutt. his appeal here is put to consummate use as a mountain man doggedly faithful to a loyal hunting hound. their fates are tied together as inseparably as any human bond. good. i see a subtle environmental message here. all critters go to heaven and because how can we condemn any poor devil that merely follows instinct in order to stay alive. there is no deceit in the kingdom of animals and and yet how cruelly we often treat them. an oddly satisfying episode that confirms this important message. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
