at times i really wonder when i look at the comments here it seems as if most people have seen a completely different film than i have. i have just seen it. and liked it. not in the way and that it made me happy and but in the way of having seen a good film. the film needs some patience and yes. and yes and the main character is really annoying and but that i am sure is by intention. maybe it really makes a difference if you watch this film in a cinema or at home. most people watch films at home like they are listening to elevator music. this movie definitely doesn not fit as background noise. and no. good directing doesn not mean having five laughs or explosions a second. good directing means following your subject and keeping the story and actors together. and while that doesn not work out perfectly and at least i think it works quite good. i liked the photography and sets and even if they brink on the surreal at times. the opening scene is really special. i also liked the acting  guillaume depardieu is not playing pierre. he is acting the role of a pierre who is himself playing a role. pierre is not the romantic hero that he so hard tries to be and he is a presumptuous and self righteous idiot and a downright weakling who by and by harms all the people he claims to protect. that even his love for truth is simply a pose is beautifully demonstrated by his ongoing lying and not even once asking questions or explaining himself. people are wondering where this or that person came from and other stuff represent no character who is seen for more than two scenes is left unexplained and there is enough information scattered throughout the film on everyone. and even the strange building begins to make sense as soon as the target practicing is seen represent remember that isabelle fled from a war zone  and obviously this is a refuge for fighters in a civil war and most likely bosnia (which was still going on and when the film was produced). at least that what is hinted at by the story isabelle tells pierre when she first meets him and by the later scene where pierre shows isabelle the book with his father on the cover and which is surrounded by books on bosnia. 
at times i really wonder when i look at the comments here it seems as if most people have seen a completely different film than i have. i have just seen it. and liked it. not in the way and that it made me happy and but in the way of having seen a good film. the film needs some patience and yes. and yes and the main character is really annoying and but that i am sure is by intention. maybe it really makes a difference if you watch this film in a cinema or at home. most people watch films at home like they are listening to elevator music. this movie definitely doesn not fit as background noise. and no. good directing doesn not mean having five laughs or explosions a second. good directing means following your subject and keeping the story and actors together. and while that doesn not work out perfectly and at least i think it works quite good. i liked the photography and sets and even if they brink on the surreal at times. the opening scene is really special. i also liked the acting  guillaume depardieu is not playing pierre. he is acting the role of a pierre who is himself playing a role. pierre is not the romantic hero that he so hard tries to be and he is a presumptuous and self righteous idiot and a downright weakling who by and by harms all the people he claims to protect. that even his love for truth is simply a pose is beautifully demonstrated by his ongoing lying and not even once asking questions or explaining himself. people are wondering where this or that person came from and other stuff represent no character who is seen for more than two scenes is left unexplained and there is enough information scattered throughout the film on everyone. and even the strange building begins to make sense as soon as the target practicing is seen represent remember that isabelle fled from a war zone  and obviously this is a refuge for fighters in a civil war and most likely bosnia (which was still going on and when the film was produced). at least that what is hinted at by the story isabelle tells pierre when she first meets him and by the later scene where pierre shows isabelle the book with his father on the cover and which is surrounded by books on bosnia. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
