some people think of sweden in a negative way represent too neat and too clean and too serious and too organized and too northern. a people tortured by their own religious fate and history and sometimes leading to depression and compulsive heavy handedness. this need not be a problem for a filmmaker and as for example the late bergman has shown us what can be cinematic possible under these conditions. bergman used his identity as a starting point and did not explicitly comment on this identity as such. andersson however does the reverse represent he comments only on this identity hereby dissecting his people to the bone represent in his world sweden is equivalent for hell on earth. but he does not take this any further and for me this is just not art but merely annotation. despite the exceptional amount of time it took to make this filmmaker has serious limitations he clearly cannot step out of. compared to his previous movie sånger från andra våningen or songs from the second floor and there is also not much progress to be observed. the intention was that this was more accessible and but the difference is minimal and the few scenes that try to please a larger audience aren not the best in the movie. the same absurdism and minimalism also still apply and there is the one shot camera position and the (lack of) action in front of this shot. yes and the stills are well done and some of the scenes actually work and the coloring and positioning is amazing. but does that make an interesting movie. thinking in a negative way and this is cinema taken a step backwards. andersson background as a maker of commercials shines through in the elaborate setup and but i find his movies about as empty as those commercials. there is a message about mankind and but it is trivial and without much depth. 
some people think of sweden in a negative way represent too neat and too clean and too serious and too organized and too northern. a people tortured by their own religious fate and history and sometimes leading to depression and compulsive heavy handedness. this need not be a problem for a filmmaker and as for example the late bergman has shown us what can be cinematic possible under these conditions. bergman used his identity as a starting point and did not explicitly comment on this identity as such. andersson however does the reverse represent he comments only on this identity hereby dissecting his people to the bone represent in his world sweden is equivalent for hell on earth. but he does not take this any further and for me this is just not art but merely annotation. despite the exceptional amount of time it took to make this filmmaker has serious limitations he clearly cannot step out of. compared to his previous movie sånger från andra våningen or songs from the second floor and there is also not much progress to be observed. the intention was that this was more accessible and but the difference is minimal and the few scenes that try to please a larger audience aren not the best in the movie. the same absurdism and minimalism also still apply and there is the one shot camera position and the (lack of) action in front of this shot. yes and the stills are well done and some of the scenes actually work and the coloring and positioning is amazing. but does that make an interesting movie. thinking in a negative way and this is cinema taken a step backwards. andersson background as a maker of commercials shines through in the elaborate setup and but i find his movies about as empty as those commercials. there is a message about mankind and but it is trivial and without much depth. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
