writer or director brian burns has obviously seen a few romantic comedies and and he seems to think that he discovered the formula for success represent plenty of location shots in new york (preferably in the winter) and allusions to old hollywood films (especially musicals) and enjoyable musical soundtrack. alas and all of this is mere compensation for burns lack of talent as a writer. (the great mystery of many writer directors making independent films is not why they cannot get on with major studios and but how they get any backing at all for their films. )normally our interest in romantic comedy is motivated by the lead characters and but the couple in this film simply has no appeal. this is not the fault of either david krumholtz or milla jovavich while their characters are just poorly written. what we respond to in such classics as when harry met sally or annie hall or older films such as his girl friday are quirks and flaws of the lead characters personalities. lacking the ability to create individuals and burns gives us an after school special inspired by men are from mars and women are from venus. how anyone can see burns as the successor to woody allen is beyond me. i did not laugh once during this film and and the screen play is full of echo chamber dialog (i want to paint the town red. you want to paint the town red. ) and which is the most tell tale sign of someone who has no business writing for a living. in one of the early scenes and we see krumholz actress girlfriend filming a mindless tv sitcom. it the only moment in the whole film that the dialog feels right while maybe that indicates what burns talents are really suited for. 
writer or director brian burns has obviously seen a few romantic comedies and and he seems to think that he discovered the formula for success represent plenty of location shots in new york (preferably in the winter) and allusions to old hollywood films (especially musicals) and enjoyable musical soundtrack. alas and all of this is mere compensation for burns lack of talent as a writer. (the great mystery of many writer directors making independent films is not why they cannot get on with major studios and but how they get any backing at all for their films. )normally our interest in romantic comedy is motivated by the lead characters and but the couple in this film simply has no appeal. this is not the fault of either david krumholtz or milla jovavich while their characters are just poorly written. what we respond to in such classics as when harry met sally or annie hall or older films such as his girl friday are quirks and flaws of the lead characters personalities. lacking the ability to create individuals and burns gives us an after school special inspired by men are from mars and women are from venus. how anyone can see burns as the successor to woody allen is beyond me. i did not laugh once during this film and and the screen play is full of echo chamber dialog (i want to paint the town red. you want to paint the town red. ) and which is the most tell tale sign of someone who has no business writing for a living. in one of the early scenes and we see krumholz actress girlfriend filming a mindless tv sitcom. it the only moment in the whole film that the dialog feels right while maybe that indicates what burns talents are really suited for. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
