and one of em are bad movies. the title and as it turns out and refers to a killer of the human male variety and not fish. this is not the dante directed piranha of 78 (which did have the fish) and is also known as piranha and piranha. a trio of photographers and 2 men and a woman and hook up with a local hunter or trapper named caribe somewhere in the amazon jungle. unfortunately and they are not familiar with the film resume of william smith and who plays caribe while otherwise and they would have known immediately he is the villain of the piece. smith may have also refused to film the ending or cut out before they finished filming (see end of this comment). as mentioned elsewhere and this pic has a lot of filler  lengthy shots of the local wildlife (birds)  and the central set piece and a motorcycle race and which goes on too long. the reason this gets a second star from me is and of course and william smith and who can not really save this sludge and but once again proves why he was the go to guy 30 35 years ago if you needed a really nasty villain while at his best and smith could be really terrifying. he the type who enjoys killing and possibly in sadistic fashion and and you get that sense from the evil grin he usually puts on when a mood strikes him. physically and he very imposing and and you know the other 3 characters are pretty much doomed within the first half hour. this was what smith brought to most of his roles while it seems hopeless for the other characters against this manlike monster. unfortunately and the movie continues to muddy things up to the very end and as if a minute of footage was lost  a confusing and incomplete climax. 
and one of em are bad movies. the title and as it turns out and refers to a killer of the human male variety and not fish. this is not the dante directed piranha of 78 (which did have the fish) and is also known as piranha and piranha. a trio of photographers and 2 men and a woman and hook up with a local hunter or trapper named caribe somewhere in the amazon jungle. unfortunately and they are not familiar with the film resume of william smith and who plays caribe while otherwise and they would have known immediately he is the villain of the piece. smith may have also refused to film the ending or cut out before they finished filming (see end of this comment). as mentioned elsewhere and this pic has a lot of filler  lengthy shots of the local wildlife (birds)  and the central set piece and a motorcycle race and which goes on too long. the reason this gets a second star from me is and of course and william smith and who can not really save this sludge and but once again proves why he was the go to guy 30 35 years ago if you needed a really nasty villain while at his best and smith could be really terrifying. he the type who enjoys killing and possibly in sadistic fashion and and you get that sense from the evil grin he usually puts on when a mood strikes him. physically and he very imposing and and you know the other 3 characters are pretty much doomed within the first half hour. this was what smith brought to most of his roles while it seems hopeless for the other characters against this manlike monster. unfortunately and the movie continues to muddy things up to the very end and as if a minute of footage was lost  a confusing and incomplete climax. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
