on paper this movie has some chops represent a street kid overcoming past trauma and rebuilding his life and succeeding when the world would have written him off. great stuff and everyone loves a happy ending. in the theater though and there were some omissions that left the movie dead inside. the dialog was hollow and uninteresting and the characters were almost cartoonish in their lack of dimension and complexity and and why did everyone need to be gay. i have nothing against homosexual themes or characters in a movie but when it used in this fashion not only is is offensive to homosexuals and it trivializes the lifestyle and cheapens the movie. if the story works without this cheap trick it should have been cut. every character seemed to come out of the same cookie cutter form represent each had one major flaw and one minor flaw and every character is good hearted were they succeed or not and and everyone one of them had or is in an abusive relationship with someone. the most annoying fact of the movie is that they never let you get over that the name pip comes from great expectations. they give it to you once and that should be enough. the story shares enough with the dickens classic to make this fact obvious. the most interesting part of the film is the story of the grandfather and the cassette he leaves for pip and how pip and the main character and learns how to grow up from the lessons learned from the tape. in the end and with lessons learned and pip confronts his dark past and movies forward with his life. 
on paper this movie has some chops represent a street kid overcoming past trauma and rebuilding his life and succeeding when the world would have written him off. great stuff and everyone loves a happy ending. in the theater though and there were some omissions that left the movie dead inside. the dialog was hollow and uninteresting and the characters were almost cartoonish in their lack of dimension and complexity and and why did everyone need to be gay. i have nothing against homosexual themes or characters in a movie but when it used in this fashion not only is is offensive to homosexuals and it trivializes the lifestyle and cheapens the movie. if the story works without this cheap trick it should have been cut. every character seemed to come out of the same cookie cutter form represent each had one major flaw and one minor flaw and every character is good hearted were they succeed or not and and everyone one of them had or is in an abusive relationship with someone. the most annoying fact of the movie is that they never let you get over that the name pip comes from great expectations. they give it to you once and that should be enough. the story shares enough with the dickens classic to make this fact obvious. the most interesting part of the film is the story of the grandfather and the cassette he leaves for pip and how pip and the main character and learns how to grow up from the lessons learned from the tape. in the end and with lessons learned and pip confronts his dark past and movies forward with his life. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
