as far as fake documentaries go (fakumentaries anyone. ) and this one is up there with the best. it looks very real and that is what it aims for. in recent light of events (guantanamo) this movie is even scarier and so you could say it was ahead of it time and when it was released in the 70s. one can only hope that a government like that doesn not exist. looking for terrorists and interviewing people just like that. of course the people interviewed all seemed to have the same (70s mentality) represent screw the politicians and politics in general. maybe that wasn not so clever one might think . but hey and do not forget represent it only a movie. while o). 
as far as fake documentaries go (fakumentaries anyone. ) and this one is up there with the best. it looks very real and that is what it aims for. in recent light of events (guantanamo) this movie is even scarier and so you could say it was ahead of it time and when it was released in the 70s. one can only hope that a government like that doesn not exist. looking for terrorists and interviewing people just like that. of course the people interviewed all seemed to have the same (70s mentality) represent screw the politicians and politics in general. maybe that wasn not so clever one might think . but hey and do not forget represent it only a movie. while o). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
