well and to each his own and but i thought gibson hamlet was the most god awful rendition i had ever witnessed. as subtly nuanced as a paper bag and and as inspired as a telemarketing call. the only reason i watched the movie through to the end was that i held out hope that either it would get better or become unintentionally funny. no luck. no disrespect for the supporting cast or for zefferelli staging and but nothing can make up for the bungling of the main character. i have seen hamlet well portrayed as an african prince and as an animated lion and as a rough and tumble warrior and as a romantic poet and etc. etc. etc. . but imho this portrayal was just a plentiful lack of wit together with most weak hams. 
well and to each his own and but i thought gibson hamlet was the most god awful rendition i had ever witnessed. as subtly nuanced as a paper bag and and as inspired as a telemarketing call. the only reason i watched the movie through to the end was that i held out hope that either it would get better or become unintentionally funny. no luck. no disrespect for the supporting cast or for zefferelli staging and but nothing can make up for the bungling of the main character. i have seen hamlet well portrayed as an african prince and as an animated lion and as a rough and tumble warrior and as a romantic poet and etc. etc. etc. . but imho this portrayal was just a plentiful lack of wit together with most weak hams. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
