just saw this at the madison horror film festival and was disappointed. a few shocking and funny moments (fisting the hollow carla and a urinating harpy in the dreamland) and two competing interesting premises (similar to new nightmare with belief bringing a mythical character to life and also lost highway with a man living out a fantasy in his head) but had long stretches of no movement and incoherent plot development. just because you use the framework of dreams or a mental fugue state doesn not make it lynchian. you need the compelling visuals and creepy performances. positive things represent dr. maitland had real comic timing and all the girls were very cute. carla father and chalmers and and ingrid pitt looked like they were having some fun. and tom savini at least looked like he had his lines memorized and we couldn not see if he was just reading cue cards. i get the hammer references and but it looks like the director realized the script was a snoozer and just added some shocks to try and get some laughs out of whatever footage he could put together. but they do not work because theyre too few and far between and create an inconsistent tone. condense this to 30 minutes of all the fun parts and you could have a surreal goofy short and but at feature length and skip it. it not so bad it good it just so bad it boring. 
just saw this at the madison horror film festival and was disappointed. a few shocking and funny moments (fisting the hollow carla and a urinating harpy in the dreamland) and two competing interesting premises (similar to new nightmare with belief bringing a mythical character to life and also lost highway with a man living out a fantasy in his head) but had long stretches of no movement and incoherent plot development. just because you use the framework of dreams or a mental fugue state doesn not make it lynchian. you need the compelling visuals and creepy performances. positive things represent dr. maitland had real comic timing and all the girls were very cute. carla father and chalmers and and ingrid pitt looked like they were having some fun. and tom savini at least looked like he had his lines memorized and we couldn not see if he was just reading cue cards. i get the hammer references and but it looks like the director realized the script was a snoozer and just added some shocks to try and get some laughs out of whatever footage he could put together. but they do not work because theyre too few and far between and create an inconsistent tone. condense this to 30 minutes of all the fun parts and you could have a surreal goofy short and but at feature length and skip it. it not so bad it good it just so bad it boring. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
