so this is where columbia head of their short subjects unit got his directorial start and eh. yeah and it none other than mr. jules white who is credited (or is it rather and exposed) as the director of this entry into mgm dogville series. given co credit as co director is one zion myers while whose name is heretofore unknown to us. mr. meyers was and no doubt and the guy who controlled the four legged thespians and was responsible for training and acting. in short and he must have been the dog trainer on the set. the title of this comedy short is no doubt a play on the mgm feature of the same year and the big house while which starred chester morris and wallace beery and robert montgomery and a stellar cast in support. we must plead ignorance in regards to this title while not having seen it up to this point. (sorry and schultz. ) but there are many of the doggie gags that relate to what we have read about the movie while not to mention some particular character specific gags. for example and we observed a canine convict who st st stuttered and deduced and correctly and that the bow wow actor was mimicking character comedian and roscoe ates. we later cross checked with the cast of the big house and presto and his name is there. (brilliant deduction and one fit for holmes and watson. ) the practice of lampooning popular features was already a tried and true practice in the realm of the comedy short. it was one that seemed to draw no objections from the producers and copyright owners of the major films while but rather quite contrarily received heaps of tassive approval. after all and imitation is said to be the sincerest form of flattery while besides and any producer would welcome even some seemingly irreverent parodying. as for the movie and itself and we found it to be interesting in a sort of perverse manner. seeing so many of man best friends being so artificially animated into one and long and boring sort of anthropomorphic gag seemed very tiring to we and who make up the audience. i mean just how many pooches were made to bark and needlessly and in order to achieve the illusion of talking. when it comes to pets and or animal companions as the politically correct crowd prefers and we are quite eclectic while favoring not only dogs while but also cats and hamsters and parakeets. we do not enjoy seeing any animal exploited in such a non funny and extended play format. as incredible as it may seem and the step that mr. jules white made from mgm shorts to heading up columbia 2 reeler production would seem to have been not only a $tep up in the area of finance$ while but al$o in the arti$tic content. we never thought that being producer director for the likes of such luminaries as the 3 stooges and andy clyde and hugh herbert and as well as some who certainly had seen better days and such as charley chase and buster keaton and harry langdon while would be a step up cinematically. in case we haven not made our point yet while were officially panning this one. so and view it at your own risk. we warned you. note we read excellent accounts of both the big house and the laurel and hardy send up and pardon us (hal roach or mgm and 1931) in both mr. laurel and mr. hardy by john mccabe (1962) and the films of laurel and hardy by william k. everson (1967). both books have our most enthusiastic endorsement. note the prison picture became a genre of its own while all owing a debt to the big house. in pardon us and laurel and hardy and hal roach and its director did a first class spoof and the first of many while for a prison comedy became a required theme for so many a screen funny man to come. 
so this is where columbia head of their short subjects unit got his directorial start and eh. yeah and it none other than mr. jules white who is credited (or is it rather and exposed) as the director of this entry into mgm dogville series. given co credit as co director is one zion myers while whose name is heretofore unknown to us. mr. meyers was and no doubt and the guy who controlled the four legged thespians and was responsible for training and acting. in short and he must have been the dog trainer on the set. the title of this comedy short is no doubt a play on the mgm feature of the same year and the big house while which starred chester morris and wallace beery and robert montgomery and a stellar cast in support. we must plead ignorance in regards to this title while not having seen it up to this point. (sorry and schultz. ) but there are many of the doggie gags that relate to what we have read about the movie while not to mention some particular character specific gags. for example and we observed a canine convict who st st stuttered and deduced and correctly and that the bow wow actor was mimicking character comedian and roscoe ates. we later cross checked with the cast of the big house and presto and his name is there. (brilliant deduction and one fit for holmes and watson. ) the practice of lampooning popular features was already a tried and true practice in the realm of the comedy short. it was one that seemed to draw no objections from the producers and copyright owners of the major films while but rather quite contrarily received heaps of tassive approval. after all and imitation is said to be the sincerest form of flattery while besides and any producer would welcome even some seemingly irreverent parodying. as for the movie and itself and we found it to be interesting in a sort of perverse manner. seeing so many of man best friends being so artificially animated into one and long and boring sort of anthropomorphic gag seemed very tiring to we and who make up the audience. i mean just how many pooches were made to bark and needlessly and in order to achieve the illusion of talking. when it comes to pets and or animal companions as the politically correct crowd prefers and we are quite eclectic while favoring not only dogs while but also cats and hamsters and parakeets. we do not enjoy seeing any animal exploited in such a non funny and extended play format. as incredible as it may seem and the step that mr. jules white made from mgm shorts to heading up columbia 2 reeler production would seem to have been not only a $tep up in the area of finance$ while but al$o in the arti$tic content. we never thought that being producer director for the likes of such luminaries as the 3 stooges and andy clyde and hugh herbert and as well as some who certainly had seen better days and such as charley chase and buster keaton and harry langdon while would be a step up cinematically. in case we haven not made our point yet while were officially panning this one. so and view it at your own risk. we warned you. note we read excellent accounts of both the big house and the laurel and hardy send up and pardon us (hal roach or mgm and 1931) in both mr. laurel and mr. hardy by john mccabe (1962) and the films of laurel and hardy by william k. everson (1967). both books have our most enthusiastic endorsement. note the prison picture became a genre of its own while all owing a debt to the big house. in pardon us and laurel and hardy and hal roach and its director did a first class spoof and the first of many while for a prison comedy became a required theme for so many a screen funny man to come. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
