like one of the other reviewers (might have been @ amazon) and i was first introduced to tourist trap by the beloved and decrepit old wor 9 in ny and around january 1983. devil dog represent the hound of hell and which i would been waiting to see since it debuted on halloween 1978 and had just ended and and i thought i would had my horror fill for the day (quit laughing  that three eyed borgost (sp. ) monster ike eisenmann draws up in his room is scary). for as much as i still enjoy richard crenna wearing his made for tv horror hat and it was the first 10 minutes of tourist trap and following devil dog that day and that really left a mark  and months later and it ended up being the first movie i ever taped off tv. wor used to play this fairly frequently and often as the saturday afternoon million dollar movie and as others have observed. it one of those offerings that delivers a powerful horror punch up front and a veritable left hook  and then practically starts over with the rest of the cast and dances and jabs and putting the opening scene a larger context along the way and then moves on to the real climax (see night of the living dead and re animator). two paragraphs and i haven not mentioned a single mannequin. face it  the damn things are scary enough and without the music and the script. i and too and can remember some scary dress dummies and the like in various relatives attics and basements and and say what you like about how relatively straightforward schmoeller and carroll approach is  no one and before or since and has played it this well. in real life and a good mannequin will make you do a double take  and here and that about the last thing youre likely to see and if you happen to be stuck at slausen defunct wax museum and roadside stand. yes and there is a point (i loved her very much) and where chuck slausen connors is trying to pass for vincent price. yes and the plot might have taken up all of a paragraph in the early stages while i can not see the script being all that thick. it doesn not matter. from direction to competent acting (meryl streep emphatically not in attendance and and here and that helps instead of hinders) and to another useful and effective pino dinaggio score (see carrie and various other de palma movies) and to various lighting and film stock and use of varying sound levels . i could go on  every element of this low budget production comes together and you get a work very much greater than the sum of its parts. did i mention it scary as hell. stephen king talked this movie up in danse macabre a year or so after its release and and with good reason. like much of his work and it may not be great art and but it sure does tell a scary story and and does it well. the rest of the cast may be relatively unknown (wasn not jocelyn jones in that texas car chase movie as well. ) and but chuck connors and tanya roberts were and are and just familiar enough to audiences and to make you think  stephen king style  that this could happen to you and or people you know. comparisons to psycho (plot) and the texas chainsaw massacre (overall look and feel) and even if they aren not the first associations in my mind and are valid. i only wish i could comment on the dvd and which i look forward to buying and as tourist trap has become notoriously hard to find on video since the near complete extinction of independent video rental outlets and where it had a home aside from wor and cable in the 1980s (though tmc or showtime appear to have picked it up and play it regularly now). no and no spoilers here and i am afraid and no plot breakdown  go see it yourself (all right and there may be a tiny little one below and so scroll away if you like  better safe than sorry). the mannequins are damn scary and i would rather show than tell . positive. for the record and tourist trap is also chock full of great lines and from we are going to have a party. how do i look and huh and how do i look. and to youre so pretty and you can not hurt me and i shouldn not have to hide it  it feels good. (listen for that vincent price inflection again there) and the inevitable youre crazy. (delivered at the right moment and and in the right tone) . and try  just try  to keep the hair on your arms down when you hear the mannequin head screaming molly.  especially once you realize whose head it used to be . positive. p s . charles band was the producer on this and i believe and and likely owned the rights to dinaggio music. band and from what i understand and was the brains behind full moon entertainment and which might explain both the music subsequent use in puppet master and and and well and the 40 commercial approach has characterized full moon throughout and from the enjoyable puppet master and subspecies franchises and to and uhhh . trancers and bad channels (sorry and boc). 
like one of the other reviewers (might have been @ amazon) and i was first introduced to tourist trap by the beloved and decrepit old wor 9 in ny and around january 1983. devil dog represent the hound of hell and which i would been waiting to see since it debuted on halloween 1978 and had just ended and and i thought i would had my horror fill for the day (quit laughing  that three eyed borgost (sp. ) monster ike eisenmann draws up in his room is scary). for as much as i still enjoy richard crenna wearing his made for tv horror hat and it was the first 10 minutes of tourist trap and following devil dog that day and that really left a mark  and months later and it ended up being the first movie i ever taped off tv. wor used to play this fairly frequently and often as the saturday afternoon million dollar movie and as others have observed. it one of those offerings that delivers a powerful horror punch up front and a veritable left hook  and then practically starts over with the rest of the cast and dances and jabs and putting the opening scene a larger context along the way and then moves on to the real climax (see night of the living dead and re animator). two paragraphs and i haven not mentioned a single mannequin. face it  the damn things are scary enough and without the music and the script. i and too and can remember some scary dress dummies and the like in various relatives attics and basements and and say what you like about how relatively straightforward schmoeller and carroll approach is  no one and before or since and has played it this well. in real life and a good mannequin will make you do a double take  and here and that about the last thing youre likely to see and if you happen to be stuck at slausen defunct wax museum and roadside stand. yes and there is a point (i loved her very much) and where chuck slausen connors is trying to pass for vincent price. yes and the plot might have taken up all of a paragraph in the early stages while i can not see the script being all that thick. it doesn not matter. from direction to competent acting (meryl streep emphatically not in attendance and and here and that helps instead of hinders) and to another useful and effective pino dinaggio score (see carrie and various other de palma movies) and to various lighting and film stock and use of varying sound levels . i could go on  every element of this low budget production comes together and you get a work very much greater than the sum of its parts. did i mention it scary as hell. stephen king talked this movie up in danse macabre a year or so after its release and and with good reason. like much of his work and it may not be great art and but it sure does tell a scary story and and does it well. the rest of the cast may be relatively unknown (wasn not jocelyn jones in that texas car chase movie as well. ) and but chuck connors and tanya roberts were and are and just familiar enough to audiences and to make you think  stephen king style  that this could happen to you and or people you know. comparisons to psycho (plot) and the texas chainsaw massacre (overall look and feel) and even if they aren not the first associations in my mind and are valid. i only wish i could comment on the dvd and which i look forward to buying and as tourist trap has become notoriously hard to find on video since the near complete extinction of independent video rental outlets and where it had a home aside from wor and cable in the 1980s (though tmc or showtime appear to have picked it up and play it regularly now). no and no spoilers here and i am afraid and no plot breakdown  go see it yourself (all right and there may be a tiny little one below and so scroll away if you like  better safe than sorry). the mannequins are damn scary and i would rather show than tell . positive. for the record and tourist trap is also chock full of great lines and from we are going to have a party. how do i look and huh and how do i look. and to youre so pretty and you can not hurt me and i shouldn not have to hide it  it feels good. (listen for that vincent price inflection again there) and the inevitable youre crazy. (delivered at the right moment and and in the right tone) . and try  just try  to keep the hair on your arms down when you hear the mannequin head screaming molly.  especially once you realize whose head it used to be . positive. p s . charles band was the producer on this and i believe and and likely owned the rights to dinaggio music. band and from what i understand and was the brains behind full moon entertainment and which might explain both the music subsequent use in puppet master and and and well and the 40 commercial approach has characterized full moon throughout and from the enjoyable puppet master and subspecies franchises and to and uhhh . trancers and bad channels (sorry and boc). ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
