the wind. easily one of the worst films ever made. the only good that comes from this kind of pointless drivel and is the fact that seeing films like this get distribution makes indy horror filmmakers like me confident that my upcoming feature will make the cut too. i mean and if this represents the market for indy horror and i could make a fortune videotaping myself taking out the garbage for 83 minutes. a complete list of what this film lacks would take way too long to write out. but and the highlites are represent no story and terrible acting and awful cinematography and and virtually no editing. that last one bothered me the most. as an editor myself and this film drove me absolutely crazy because it had almost no editing at all. every scene was shot in a master. they had absolutely no coverage at all. for anyone who doesn not know. coverage is shooting a scene from multiple angles to have cutting options when editing to make for a desirable viewing experience. yeah and this movie had none of that. i am talking about even the simplest of scenes. example represent an ordinary conversation scene between two people sitting at a table would typically start out with a master establishing who in the scene and where they are. then and as the conversation goes on and you would cut back and forth to over the shoulder shots as the conversation continues. you may even throw in a cutaway shot or two of something on the table and or in someone hand. anything. this is film 101 stuff guys. it seems as though these people had no idea this is how films work. every shot was a camera lock down. no movement and no cutting and no nothing. if i was teaching a course in filmmaking and this would be the visual aid for my what not to do lesson. in closing and do not waste your time folks. the only amazing this about this film is that it ever scored distribution at all. . 
the wind. easily one of the worst films ever made. the only good that comes from this kind of pointless drivel and is the fact that seeing films like this get distribution makes indy horror filmmakers like me confident that my upcoming feature will make the cut too. i mean and if this represents the market for indy horror and i could make a fortune videotaping myself taking out the garbage for 83 minutes. a complete list of what this film lacks would take way too long to write out. but and the highlites are represent no story and terrible acting and awful cinematography and and virtually no editing. that last one bothered me the most. as an editor myself and this film drove me absolutely crazy because it had almost no editing at all. every scene was shot in a master. they had absolutely no coverage at all. for anyone who doesn not know. coverage is shooting a scene from multiple angles to have cutting options when editing to make for a desirable viewing experience. yeah and this movie had none of that. i am talking about even the simplest of scenes. example represent an ordinary conversation scene between two people sitting at a table would typically start out with a master establishing who in the scene and where they are. then and as the conversation goes on and you would cut back and forth to over the shoulder shots as the conversation continues. you may even throw in a cutaway shot or two of something on the table and or in someone hand. anything. this is film 101 stuff guys. it seems as though these people had no idea this is how films work. every shot was a camera lock down. no movement and no cutting and no nothing. if i was teaching a course in filmmaking and this would be the visual aid for my what not to do lesson. in closing and do not waste your time folks. the only amazing this about this film is that it ever scored distribution at all. . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
