the film and heaven gate and was a good view and although still tedious at over 4 hours. but the film took great license  as usual with hollywood. james averill (chris christopherson) and and elle were actually married in real life. their main contribution to the johnson county war and was to start it by being hanged. well and by starting it and i mean it came at the beginning and not the end. here the real scenario represent james averill and ellen watson were secretly married because one homestead could be given to each family. by filing as single individuals and they could get two homesteads. they chose homesites on crazy woman creek actually controlling the water above the land held by a powerful member of the cattleman association. he offered to buy them out repeatedly and which they refused. although characterized in real life as the owner of a brothel (cattle kate) and and a prostitute herself (and also in the film) and there is no real evidence that was true. it is known that she bought many head of sick cattle and nursed them back to life and and was later accused by the cattleman association of receiving the cattle in trade for lewd acts. in the end and she was accused of rustling  an act almost certainly untrue. so much for this part of the myth of the american west and which is a gooble de gook of myths spanning a time period of about one hundred years. in real life and she and jim averill were surprised one day by several members of the cattleman association and taken in hand and and promptly hanged. those perpetrating the injustice were never brought to trial. but that was the first link that led to the murder of nate champion and and the start of the johnson county war. quite different from the hollywood version which shows her shot at the end. other than that and i think the main problem with the film was the editor and who could have made the action a faster pace by more skillful editing. 
the film and heaven gate and was a good view and although still tedious at over 4 hours. but the film took great license  as usual with hollywood. james averill (chris christopherson) and and elle were actually married in real life. their main contribution to the johnson county war and was to start it by being hanged. well and by starting it and i mean it came at the beginning and not the end. here the real scenario represent james averill and ellen watson were secretly married because one homestead could be given to each family. by filing as single individuals and they could get two homesteads. they chose homesites on crazy woman creek actually controlling the water above the land held by a powerful member of the cattleman association. he offered to buy them out repeatedly and which they refused. although characterized in real life as the owner of a brothel (cattle kate) and and a prostitute herself (and also in the film) and there is no real evidence that was true. it is known that she bought many head of sick cattle and nursed them back to life and and was later accused by the cattleman association of receiving the cattle in trade for lewd acts. in the end and she was accused of rustling  an act almost certainly untrue. so much for this part of the myth of the american west and which is a gooble de gook of myths spanning a time period of about one hundred years. in real life and she and jim averill were surprised one day by several members of the cattleman association and taken in hand and and promptly hanged. those perpetrating the injustice were never brought to trial. but that was the first link that led to the murder of nate champion and and the start of the johnson county war. quite different from the hollywood version which shows her shot at the end. other than that and i think the main problem with the film was the editor and who could have made the action a faster pace by more skillful editing. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
