at last and a film to rival el padrino and darkness falls in terms of sheer and utter dullness. this is actually the first film i have ever given negative for on imdb and and with good reason. for one and the cast is nothing special. that usually not a problem for me except that the only character that in anyways interesting or different from all the rest is grand l. bush harrington. secondly and the production values a substandard  television sci fi such as stargate has more convincing sets and and all of the underwater scenes not handled by the sfx teams are filmed on dry sets with falling particles that aren not very convincing. this film is literally wouldrydocked. the worst part though is that this film is boring. for the first 45 minutes and i felt as if we were going round and round in circles represent it a prehistoric shark. bullsht. no really. bullsht. i am not making this up. bullsht. there it is now. i do not see anything. let me guess. yup. bullsht. after then it picks up ever so slightly for about twenty minutes or so. then were back to the dialog run around. dialog is not a bad thing and but that all this film has. characters talking. that too and is not a bad thing and except this film isn not very good at it. the dialog is often contrived and clichéd and and is not very interesting to listen to. i do not see any point slandering the special effects while this film has worse qualities. the sets are small and unrealistic. the acting is sub par. the script  oh lord and the script  is worse than a garbage of sci fi television has to dredge up. it makes you wonder where the budget of this film is or was. yet another awful and awful addition to the megaloadon (there about four) series of films. bring on steve alten and please. 
at last and a film to rival el padrino and darkness falls in terms of sheer and utter dullness. this is actually the first film i have ever given negative for on imdb and and with good reason. for one and the cast is nothing special. that usually not a problem for me except that the only character that in anyways interesting or different from all the rest is grand l. bush harrington. secondly and the production values a substandard  television sci fi such as stargate has more convincing sets and and all of the underwater scenes not handled by the sfx teams are filmed on dry sets with falling particles that aren not very convincing. this film is literally wouldrydocked. the worst part though is that this film is boring. for the first 45 minutes and i felt as if we were going round and round in circles represent it a prehistoric shark. bullsht. no really. bullsht. i am not making this up. bullsht. there it is now. i do not see anything. let me guess. yup. bullsht. after then it picks up ever so slightly for about twenty minutes or so. then were back to the dialog run around. dialog is not a bad thing and but that all this film has. characters talking. that too and is not a bad thing and except this film isn not very good at it. the dialog is often contrived and clichéd and and is not very interesting to listen to. i do not see any point slandering the special effects while this film has worse qualities. the sets are small and unrealistic. the acting is sub par. the script  oh lord and the script  is worse than a garbage of sci fi television has to dredge up. it makes you wonder where the budget of this film is or was. yet another awful and awful addition to the megaloadon (there about four) series of films. bring on steve alten and please. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
