i went to the cinema slightly apprehensive and i came out seething with anger at the garbage (passing for a film)i had witnessed. the actors and particularly travolta and should be ashamed of themselves for their participation in this. clearly the only thing in their minds was the pay cheque and never mind the debasement of their talents and us . travolta needs to go back to doing some more look who talking movies as he has sunk back to the level of his pre tarantino work. it comes to something when the l w talking sequels are better than this one. travolta is no longer the king of cool but the king of corn. michael caine himself admitted to doing bad movies for the pay cheque and trvolta should follow suit if he has any self respect . 
i went to the cinema slightly apprehensive and i came out seething with anger at the garbage (passing for a film)i had witnessed. the actors and particularly travolta and should be ashamed of themselves for their participation in this. clearly the only thing in their minds was the pay cheque and never mind the debasement of their talents and us . travolta needs to go back to doing some more look who talking movies as he has sunk back to the level of his pre tarantino work. it comes to something when the l w talking sequels are better than this one. travolta is no longer the king of cool but the king of corn. michael caine himself admitted to doing bad movies for the pay cheque and trvolta should follow suit if he has any self respect . ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
