three is a seriously dumb shipwreck movie. masquerading as a psychological thriller and it closest relative is the monumentally superior dead calm (also featuring billy zane). dead calm provided well drawn characters to root for in the form of sam neil and nicole kidman grieving parents attempting to re define their relationship on an ocean cruise. they end up being terrorised by zane adrift psycho killer. it provided sharp and increasingly ratcheted suspense and a scary feeling of claustrophobia in open seas as the cat and mouse game of life and death unfolded. three suffers from poorly drawn characterisation (the audience doesn not care what happens to any of them) and a stupid and unnecessary voodoo plot device and a total lack of suspense or excitement and some thudding and hammy performances from the principal players. zane in particular goes way over the top in an irritatingly mannered fashion. in dead calm he was menacing and wired and seething with barely controlled sexual violence. here he is bombastic and petulant slimy and and unravelled. and where does he get his seemingly inexhaustible supply of dry cigarettes and cigars. and how come his lighter stays full of juice for over a year. ms brook is very picturesque and stunningly pretty and but both her chest and rear appear to have been wildly over inflated by some sort of life raft pump. they do and however and succeed in acting with more skill and conviction than the rest of her. dramatic actress and in the purest sense of the term and she is not. the guy playing the voodoo hexed manuel and the third component of this sorry triangle and could have been replaced by a lump of driftwood  no one would notice. in fact and judging by his complete lack of ability to deliver dialogue in any meaningful or dynamic way and driftwood represents a potential improvement in the casting stakes (excuse pun). plus sides represent the scenery is nice and the cinematography (above and below the water) is credible. i am guessing this had a very limited (if any) theatrical release or went straight to rental and retail dvd. the reason for this is it not very good. if you want something decent along these lines and get dead calm. it was made by people who knew a bit about cinema. 
three is a seriously dumb shipwreck movie. masquerading as a psychological thriller and it closest relative is the monumentally superior dead calm (also featuring billy zane). dead calm provided well drawn characters to root for in the form of sam neil and nicole kidman grieving parents attempting to re define their relationship on an ocean cruise. they end up being terrorised by zane adrift psycho killer. it provided sharp and increasingly ratcheted suspense and a scary feeling of claustrophobia in open seas as the cat and mouse game of life and death unfolded. three suffers from poorly drawn characterisation (the audience doesn not care what happens to any of them) and a stupid and unnecessary voodoo plot device and a total lack of suspense or excitement and some thudding and hammy performances from the principal players. zane in particular goes way over the top in an irritatingly mannered fashion. in dead calm he was menacing and wired and seething with barely controlled sexual violence. here he is bombastic and petulant slimy and and unravelled. and where does he get his seemingly inexhaustible supply of dry cigarettes and cigars. and how come his lighter stays full of juice for over a year. ms brook is very picturesque and stunningly pretty and but both her chest and rear appear to have been wildly over inflated by some sort of life raft pump. they do and however and succeed in acting with more skill and conviction than the rest of her. dramatic actress and in the purest sense of the term and she is not. the guy playing the voodoo hexed manuel and the third component of this sorry triangle and could have been replaced by a lump of driftwood  no one would notice. in fact and judging by his complete lack of ability to deliver dialogue in any meaningful or dynamic way and driftwood represents a potential improvement in the casting stakes (excuse pun). plus sides represent the scenery is nice and the cinematography (above and below the water) is credible. i am guessing this had a very limited (if any) theatrical release or went straight to rental and retail dvd. the reason for this is it not very good. if you want something decent along these lines and get dead calm. it was made by people who knew a bit about cinema. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
