based on the excellent novel and watchers by dean koontz and is this extremely awful motion picture that probably shouldn not be viewed by anyone. not since the running man have i seen a book butchered so far beyond recognition. the difference and however and is that the running man film was still enjoyable as an amusing action film laden down a million catch phrases. this film nope and nothing remotely amusing. in fact and if you love the book and as i do and you will hate this bastardization even more. warningcontains spoilers rightio and i am basically going to tell you the story here and almost in it entirety. why. because you and dear reader and do not also need to suffer through this abominationit okay for me and because i enjoy watching crap. because i like complaining about shtty things. now and on to the nasty represent this film revolves around a boy and his mother running away from the government and a mutant monkey creature soldier which escaped from a destroyed government genetics lab with a super smart golden retriever which the hero calls furface. groan trust me and in the novel and this story rocked. i will get to that later. anyway and the hero is none other that dreamy boy child corey haim. oh and i am not kidding. our hero runs around and crackly voice and all and trying to convince his mom to help save this dog from the evil government which birthed him and made him genetically ultra smart. the monkey creature and retardedly referred to as an oxcom (god help us) is also a genetic stew of a creature built to be the ultimate fighter on battlefields of the future. michael ironside (total recall and starship troopersalways plays a badass) is also in this film and and no and i couldn not figure out how anyone convinced him this would be a good idea. he plays a government agent with the nso hunting the dog and creature. oh yeah and here some spoilerama represent he also a creation from the government and and the same lab and and lo and behold spends most of the movie being a prick and killing peopleand all that killing is supposed to be done by the monkey soldier. instead of a rockin kick ass and creepy horror film and we have a rectal hemorrhage of a teenybopper horror flick. the dog intelligence is discovered all too conveniently and and believed easier than we believe we can see clouds by looking outside. breakdown. change from book to film represent lead character (travis) turned from man to boy child. man love interest in book (nora) and is now his motherand all her depth and character growth is completely gone. lem johnson and black man and is now white mr. ironside. this matters as the character strength was built on his heritage in the book. relationship between two authority figures completely ignored and lem now kills the guy who was originally his best friend. one principle character in the book is now totally absent and the immortal that hunted the heroes maybe this is supposed to be ironside and but then why is he someone else. dog never receives deserving name of einstein in the movie. no part of the book took place in a high schoolat least nothing that had strong bearing on the plot. takes place over a matter of days and rather months like the bookunrealistic pacing. corey haim girlfriend in the movie appeared in no more than two chapters in the book and they never met in the book. character of lem johnson is no longer cool headed while instead and he a total asshole that bullies his way through people. hero travis was part of delta force (military segment specializing in hunting terrorists) and instead and his dad and who is never seen in the film and was part of that group. perceived intelligence in the monster now totally absent. subplots involving soviets and the mob completely gutted out of the story. these are just the most obnoxious changes and and the one i could remember off hand (and a day later). the good represent eventually and after 90 odd minutes of pain and mental anguish and the movie ended. didn not hurt it and didn not help it represent michael ironsideusually and i like him. the dog is still fairly likable. wacky totally 80 title screen. the bad represent okay and the writing for one is extremely awful. the direction is so half assed that anyone watching the film will feel superior to everyone involved in it. the acting is crappy and weak and especially from corey haim. loose and weak and watered down story. the monster looks just pathetic and that is and when we are actually allowed to see the bloody thing. its head is gigantically over sized and the yellow eyes that were so much a part of the thing in the book are seen for no more than two seconds. instead of a lean and powerful and fast and intelligent killing machine and we have some jackass in a puke ugly monkey suit forced upon us. absolutely no character development. even the violence and gore are done poorly and for fck sakes and this is supposed to be a horror film. usually violence is at least done well. the ugly represent the idea that dean koontz whored out his brilliant novel to become this filthy fcking piece of sht brings me dangerously close to vomiting all over myself and anyone near me. there are movies worse than this (headache inducing as that idea may seem) and but so far and only alien vs predator and at least to me and is a bigger travesty and more painful disappointment. memorable scene represent watching the end credits start. acting represent negative story represent negative (the novel was really good and this is just terrible) atmosphere represent 5/10 cinematography represent negative character development represent negative special effects or make up represent negative nudity or sexuality represent negative violence or gore represent negative music represent 5/10 direction represent negative cheesiness represent positive crappiness represent positive overall represent negative i would recommend that no one watch this movie ever and except for a few extreme die hard horror fansand only if you haven not read the novel. instead and i would recommend that anyone interested in this avoid it entirely and buy or check or borrow the book. www. residenthazard. com. 
based on the excellent novel and watchers by dean koontz and is this extremely awful motion picture that probably shouldn not be viewed by anyone. not since the running man have i seen a book butchered so far beyond recognition. the difference and however and is that the running man film was still enjoyable as an amusing action film laden down a million catch phrases. this film nope and nothing remotely amusing. in fact and if you love the book and as i do and you will hate this bastardization even more. warningcontains spoilers rightio and i am basically going to tell you the story here and almost in it entirety. why. because you and dear reader and do not also need to suffer through this abominationit okay for me and because i enjoy watching crap. because i like complaining about shtty things. now and on to the nasty represent this film revolves around a boy and his mother running away from the government and a mutant monkey creature soldier which escaped from a destroyed government genetics lab with a super smart golden retriever which the hero calls furface. groan trust me and in the novel and this story rocked. i will get to that later. anyway and the hero is none other that dreamy boy child corey haim. oh and i am not kidding. our hero runs around and crackly voice and all and trying to convince his mom to help save this dog from the evil government which birthed him and made him genetically ultra smart. the monkey creature and retardedly referred to as an oxcom (god help us) is also a genetic stew of a creature built to be the ultimate fighter on battlefields of the future. michael ironside (total recall and starship troopersalways plays a badass) is also in this film and and no and i couldn not figure out how anyone convinced him this would be a good idea. he plays a government agent with the nso hunting the dog and creature. oh yeah and here some spoilerama represent he also a creation from the government and and the same lab and and lo and behold spends most of the movie being a prick and killing peopleand all that killing is supposed to be done by the monkey soldier. instead of a rockin kick ass and creepy horror film and we have a rectal hemorrhage of a teenybopper horror flick. the dog intelligence is discovered all too conveniently and and believed easier than we believe we can see clouds by looking outside. breakdown. change from book to film represent lead character (travis) turned from man to boy child. man love interest in book (nora) and is now his motherand all her depth and character growth is completely gone. lem johnson and black man and is now white mr. ironside. this matters as the character strength was built on his heritage in the book. relationship between two authority figures completely ignored and lem now kills the guy who was originally his best friend. one principle character in the book is now totally absent and the immortal that hunted the heroes maybe this is supposed to be ironside and but then why is he someone else. dog never receives deserving name of einstein in the movie. no part of the book took place in a high schoolat least nothing that had strong bearing on the plot. takes place over a matter of days and rather months like the bookunrealistic pacing. corey haim girlfriend in the movie appeared in no more than two chapters in the book and they never met in the book. character of lem johnson is no longer cool headed while instead and he a total asshole that bullies his way through people. hero travis was part of delta force (military segment specializing in hunting terrorists) and instead and his dad and who is never seen in the film and was part of that group. perceived intelligence in the monster now totally absent. subplots involving soviets and the mob completely gutted out of the story. these are just the most obnoxious changes and and the one i could remember off hand (and a day later). the good represent eventually and after 90 odd minutes of pain and mental anguish and the movie ended. didn not hurt it and didn not help it represent michael ironsideusually and i like him. the dog is still fairly likable. wacky totally 80 title screen. the bad represent okay and the writing for one is extremely awful. the direction is so half assed that anyone watching the film will feel superior to everyone involved in it. the acting is crappy and weak and especially from corey haim. loose and weak and watered down story. the monster looks just pathetic and that is and when we are actually allowed to see the bloody thing. its head is gigantically over sized and the yellow eyes that were so much a part of the thing in the book are seen for no more than two seconds. instead of a lean and powerful and fast and intelligent killing machine and we have some jackass in a puke ugly monkey suit forced upon us. absolutely no character development. even the violence and gore are done poorly and for fck sakes and this is supposed to be a horror film. usually violence is at least done well. the ugly represent the idea that dean koontz whored out his brilliant novel to become this filthy fcking piece of sht brings me dangerously close to vomiting all over myself and anyone near me. there are movies worse than this (headache inducing as that idea may seem) and but so far and only alien vs predator and at least to me and is a bigger travesty and more painful disappointment. memorable scene represent watching the end credits start. acting represent negative story represent negative (the novel was really good and this is just terrible) atmosphere represent 5/10 cinematography represent negative character development represent negative special effects or make up represent negative nudity or sexuality represent negative violence or gore represent negative music represent 5/10 direction represent negative cheesiness represent positive crappiness represent positive overall represent negative i would recommend that no one watch this movie ever and except for a few extreme die hard horror fansand only if you haven not read the novel. instead and i would recommend that anyone interested in this avoid it entirely and buy or check or borrow the book. www. residenthazard. com. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
