dresden had great expectations because of its spectacular theme and its high budget. i was really looking forward to it and i really wanted it to be good. but it is not. the only good thing are the special effects that are very well done and but and like in a really bad hollywood blockbuster and everything else is missing. it is poorly written and the screenplay tries to fulfill genre rules with standard suspense or love story elements but there is no depth or originality at all. it way below average. the next thing represent it is also poorly directed. it has this uninteresting tv directing style with lots of close ups and wanna be great action by fast editing where actually no action or suspense is. the actors are not bad but there is no performance that is touching in any way. i do not know. they obviously try to do a typical tv movie and not a film for the cinema and where its alway good to have some edges and a clear visual style. but why do they try to fulfill typical commercial hollywood rules. it really feels like the screenwriter did a weekend class with some american scriptwriting guru and then delivered this mess. is there no producer who is responsible for the project who has an interest in dramaturgy or visual style or plain in simple this magical cinematic moments that make some tv movies great . do they think that an tv audience is stupid and doesn not need to get a high quality movie experience. the downfall was a very good example for a good tv movie but there was probably some executive or producer who knew what he was doing. don not waste you time with this one and rent downfall instead. 
dresden had great expectations because of its spectacular theme and its high budget. i was really looking forward to it and i really wanted it to be good. but it is not. the only good thing are the special effects that are very well done and but and like in a really bad hollywood blockbuster and everything else is missing. it is poorly written and the screenplay tries to fulfill genre rules with standard suspense or love story elements but there is no depth or originality at all. it way below average. the next thing represent it is also poorly directed. it has this uninteresting tv directing style with lots of close ups and wanna be great action by fast editing where actually no action or suspense is. the actors are not bad but there is no performance that is touching in any way. i do not know. they obviously try to do a typical tv movie and not a film for the cinema and where its alway good to have some edges and a clear visual style. but why do they try to fulfill typical commercial hollywood rules. it really feels like the screenwriter did a weekend class with some american scriptwriting guru and then delivered this mess. is there no producer who is responsible for the project who has an interest in dramaturgy or visual style or plain in simple this magical cinematic moments that make some tv movies great . do they think that an tv audience is stupid and doesn not need to get a high quality movie experience. the downfall was a very good example for a good tv movie but there was probably some executive or producer who knew what he was doing. don not waste you time with this one and rent downfall instead. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
