how could they take such a beautifully animated gem like don bluth all dogs go to heaven and bastardize it with a charmless and cheesy and uninspired sequel. the haunting music and delightful characters are gone and now replaced with tacky animation and an unimaginative plot. the pros represent charlie sheen is sometimes fun as charlie and but he lacks the charming tough guy attitude that brought him to life by burt reynolds. i did particularly enjoy the songs i will always be with you and it too heavenly here. the cons represent there seems to be no connection between this and the original. in the beginning charlie is chums with carface and but wait a minute. isn not this the same character who was responsible for charlie murder and kidnapped the sweet little orphan he loved. i guess that all changes in heaven but why isn not anne marie even mentioned. if itchy makes it to heaven and do not flo and killer make it too. what is with annabelle the whippet voice. in the original it sounded feminine and charming and in the sequel it sounds like a whiny and bitchy and parrot. the new characters aren not all that great (except sasha). and the animation is better compared to a generic saturday morning cartoon. the constant cartoony humor is flat and unfunny and the heart just doesn not work when compare to the original and which had such a moving unsubtle touch that makes me cry every time. all dogs go to heaven is one of my all time favorite films. how don bluth allowed this sequel to be made is beyond me. bottom line represent not all sequels go to heaven. 
how could they take such a beautifully animated gem like don bluth all dogs go to heaven and bastardize it with a charmless and cheesy and uninspired sequel. the haunting music and delightful characters are gone and now replaced with tacky animation and an unimaginative plot. the pros represent charlie sheen is sometimes fun as charlie and but he lacks the charming tough guy attitude that brought him to life by burt reynolds. i did particularly enjoy the songs i will always be with you and it too heavenly here. the cons represent there seems to be no connection between this and the original. in the beginning charlie is chums with carface and but wait a minute. isn not this the same character who was responsible for charlie murder and kidnapped the sweet little orphan he loved. i guess that all changes in heaven but why isn not anne marie even mentioned. if itchy makes it to heaven and do not flo and killer make it too. what is with annabelle the whippet voice. in the original it sounded feminine and charming and in the sequel it sounds like a whiny and bitchy and parrot. the new characters aren not all that great (except sasha). and the animation is better compared to a generic saturday morning cartoon. the constant cartoony humor is flat and unfunny and the heart just doesn not work when compare to the original and which had such a moving unsubtle touch that makes me cry every time. all dogs go to heaven is one of my all time favorite films. how don bluth allowed this sequel to be made is beyond me. bottom line represent not all sequels go to heaven. ---------------------------------Answer Question Below----------------------------------

Judge the movie review above, you need to make a function call:
    If you feel the movie review is positive
        print "This is a semantically positive review."
    Otherwise, if you feel the movie review is negative
        print "This is a semantically negative review."
