Unsupervised Discovery of Implicit Gender Bias
Table 4: Evaluation over the microaggressions data set. Despite not being trained for this task, our models achieve better-than-random performance.
['[EMPTY]', '[BOLD] Prec.', '[BOLD] Rec.', '[BOLD] F1', '[BOLD] Acc.']
For comparison, we also show results from two random baselines. In “Random” we guess gender-tagged or not with equal probability. In “Class Random”, we guess gender-tagged or not according to the true test distributions (56.11% and 43.89%). All models outperform the class random baseline, and all models with demotion also outperform the true random baseline.