Abstract
Table .6: TempRelPro performances evaluated on the TimeBank-Dense test set and compared with CAEVO.
['[BOLD] System', '[BOLD] T-T  [BOLD] P/R/F1', '[BOLD] E-D  [BOLD] P/R/F1', '[BOLD] E-T  [BOLD] P/R/F1', '[BOLD] E-E  [BOLD] P/R/F1', '[BOLD] Overall  [BOLD] P', '[BOLD] Overall  [BOLD] R', '[BOLD] Overall  [BOLD] F1']
we report the performances of TempRelPro compared with CAEVO. We achieve a small improvement in the overall F1-score, i.e., 51.1% vs 50.7%. For each temporal entity pair type, since we label all possible links, precision and recall are the same. TempRelPro is significantly better than CAEVO in labelling T-T and E-T pairs.