What do character-level models learn about morphology?The case of dependency parsing
Table 11: Morphological tagging results for Finnish.
['Feature', 'baseline', 'embedding char', 'embedding oracle', 'encoder char', 'encoder oracle']
The character embeddings achieves almost similar performance as the oracle embeddings. This results highlights the differences in morphological process between Finnish and the other fusional languages. We observe that performance of the encoder representations are slightly worse than the embeddings.