A Cluster Ranking Model for Full Anaphora Resolution
Table 5: The comparison between our models and the SoTA system on the pd test set.
['[EMPTY]', 'Models', 'MUC P', 'MUC R', 'MUC F1', 'B3 P', 'B3 R', 'B3 F1', 'CEAF [ITALIC] ϕ4 P', 'CEAF [ITALIC] ϕ4 R', 'CEAF [ITALIC] ϕ4 F1', 'Avg. F1']
Our system is 3% better when evaluated with singletons included and outperforms their system by 5.3% when evaluated without the singletons. In addition, our system achieved an F1 of 56.7% on non-referring expressions and this is 2.1% better than their result (54.6%). Overall, our system achieved the new SoTA on the pd data.