The Semantic Similarity Ensemble1footnote 11footnote 1This article extends work presented at the 6th International Workshop on Semantics and Conceptual Issues in Geographical Information Systems (SeCoGIS 2012) [7]
Table 6: Comparison between the preliminary evaluation in [7] and the evaluation in this article.
['Input and output', 'Preliminary', 'Current']
That evaluation included only eight of the ten \glswn-based similarity measures, on \glsplshortt of cardinality 2, 3, and 4, called similarity juries. The comparison of the two evaluations reveals that the same general trends are observable across the board. The total success of the current evaluation appears to be lower than in the preliminary evaluation, and this is because the current evaluation includes larger \glsplshortt, which tend to have lower total success than the small \glsplshortt of cardinality smaller than 5. On average, the partial success rates are very similar in both evaluations (≈70%). The success over mean is very high in both evaluations, consistently falling between from 93% to 100%.