Auxiliary Interference Speaker Loss for Target-Speaker Speech Recognition
Table 3: WERs (%) for WSJ corpus with clean AM and target-speaker (TS) AMs.
['Model', 'Dev93', 'Eval92', 'wsj0-2mix']
We observed a significant improvement for Dev93 and moderate improvement for wsj0-2mix, while a marginal degradation of WER was observed for EVAL92. Note that the results by our AM were fairly good thanks to the state-of-the-art accuracy given by the LF-MMI.