Strongly Incremental Repair Detection
Table 3: Comparison of performance of systems with different stack capacities
['[EMPTY]', 'F [ITALIC] rm', 'F [ITALIC] s', 'DA', 'EO', 'PO', 'TD [ITALIC] rp', 'TD [ITALIC] rm']
Our experiments showed that different system settings perform better in different metrics, and no individual setting achieved the best result in all of them. ’s measure and STIR achieves 0.736 on the previously unevaluated Fs. The fastest average time to detection is 1 word for TDrp and 2.6 words for TDrm We make a preliminary investigation into the effect of increasing the stack capacity by comparing stacks with 1-best rmstart hypotheses per rpstart and 2-best stacks. Moving to the 2-stack condition results in gain in overall accuracy in Frm and Fs, but at the cost of EO and also time-to-detection scores TDrm and TDrp. The extent to which the stack can be increased without increasing jitter, latency and complexity will be investigated in future work.