Content-Based Citation Recommendation
Table 10: Comparing NNRank with ClusCite. Ren et al. (2014) have presented results on several other topic-based, link-based and network-based citation recommendation methods as baselines. For succinctness, we show results for the best system, Cluscite, and two baselines BM25 and L2-LR.
['[BOLD] Method', '[BOLD] DBLP  [BOLD] P@10', '[BOLD] DBLP  [BOLD] P@20', '[BOLD] DBLP  [BOLD] R@20', '[BOLD] DBLP  [BOLD] F1@20', '[BOLD] DBLP  [BOLD] MRR', '[BOLD] PubMed  [BOLD] P@10', '[BOLD] PubMed  [BOLD] P@20', '[BOLD] PubMed  [BOLD] R@20', '[BOLD] PubMed  [BOLD] F1@20', '[BOLD] PubMed  [BOLD] MRR']
ClusCite Ren et al. clusters nodes in a heterogeneous graph of terms, authors and venues in order to find related documents which should be cited. ClusCite obtains the previous best results on these two datasets. L2-LR Yu et al. We show that NNRank (with and without metadata) consistently outperforms ClusCite and other baselines on all metrics on both datasets.