CJRC: A Reliable Human-Annotated Benchmark DataSet for Chinese Judicial Reading Comprehension
Table 3: Experimental results
['[EMPTY]', 'Civil', 'Criminal', 'Overall']
From this table, it is obvious that BERT is 14.5∼19 percentage points higher than BiDAF, and Human performance is 14.8∼15.5 percentage points higher that BERT. This implies that models could be improved markedly in future research.