What is the moral of the story?

Here is the story:
Four cows lived in a forest near a meadow. They were good friends and did everything together. They grazed together and stayed together, because of which no tigers or lions were able to kill them for food.

But one day, the friends fought and each cow went to graze in a different direction. A tiger and a lion saw this and decided that it was the perfect opportunity to kill the cows. They hid in the bushes and surprised the cows and killed them all, one by one.

Choices for the moral of the story:
1. Cows are better off alone.
2. Tigers and lions are friendly to cows.
3. It is always safe in the forest.
4. There is strength in unity.
The moral of the story is that there is strength in unity. This is evident from the outcome of the cows' fights when they were separated. Together, they were able to resist attacks from predators, but when they separated, they were easily hunted and killed. The story emphasizes the importance of unity and working together as a team. In this case, separating from their friends left them vulnerable to danger. Hence, the overall moral can be drawn as 'there is strength in unity' in the face of adversity. Other possible morals can be 'unity is strength' or 'teamwork is essential' or 'strength in numbers' or 'unity is power'. The other options are incorrect. Options 1, 2, and 3 are clearly misleading. Option 4 is correct. Option 1 suggests that cows are better off alone, which is contradictory to the outcome of the story. Option 2 implies that tigers and lions are friendly to cows, which is false in this context. Option 3 states that it's always safe in the forest, which is not true and would contradict the outcome of the story. These options can be categorized as either irrelevant or contradictory to the story. The correct option, 4, reflects the main theme and message of the story. Additionally, it can be further clarified by the sentence 'there is strength in unity', which is the opposite of the idea that the cows were 'better off alone'. Hence, the correct moral of the story can be summarized as 'there is strength in unity', or 'unity is strength'. These options are more specific and accurate.❒
¶
, 17
, 17
, 17
, 20
, 16
, 16
, 20
, 21
, 13
, 19
, 16
, 17
, 18
, 16
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 1
You are a meticulous evaluator assessing the quality of a response generated for a specific instruction. Your task is to assign a score between 1 and 10 (whole numbers only, no decimals) based on how well the response satisfies the requirements of the instruction. Consider the following criteria:

1. Completeness: Does the response fully address all aspects of the instruction?
2. Relevance: Is the response focused and aligned with the instruction's requirements?
3. Clarity: Is the response clear and easy to understand?

Provide a brief justification for your score, highlighting key strengths or weaknesses in the response. Output your evaluation in the following JSON format:
{"score": [integer score between 1 and 10], "justification": "[brief explanation of the score]"}

Instruction:
What is the moral of the story?

Here is the story:
Four cows lived in a forest near a meadow. They were good friends and did everything together. They grazed together and stayed together, because of which no tigers or lions were able to kill them for food.

But one day, the friends fought and each cow went to graze in a different direction. A tiger and a lion saw this and decided that it was the perfect opportunity to kill the cows. They hid in the bushes and surprised the cows and killed them all, one by one.

Choices for the moral of the story:
1. Cows are better off alone.
2. Tigers and lions are friendly to cows.
3. It is always safe in the forest.
4. There is strength in unity.

Response:
The moral of the story is that there is strength in unity. This is evident from the outcome of the cows' fights when they were separated. Together, they were able to resist attacks from predators, but when they separated, they were easily hunted and killed. The story emphasizes the importance of unity and working together as a team. In this case, separating from their friends left them vulnerable to danger. Hence, the overall moral can be drawn as 'there is strength in unity' in the face of adversity. Other possible morals can be 'unity is strength' or 'teamwork is essential' or 'strength in numbers' or 'unity is power'. The other options are incorrect. Options 1, 2, and 3 are clearly misleading. Option 4 is correct. Option 1 suggests that cows are better off alone, which is contradictory to the outcome of the story. Option 2 implies that tigers and lions are friendly to cows, which is false in this context. Option 3 states that it's always safe in the forest, which is not true and would contradict the outcome of the story. These options can be categorized as either irrelevant or contradictory to the story. The correct option, 4, reflects the main theme and message of the story. Additionally, it can be further clarified by the sentence 'there is strength in unity', which is the opposite of the idea that the cows were 'better off alone'. Hence, the correct moral of the story can be summarized as 'there is strength in unity', or 'unity is strength'. These options are more specific and accurate.❒
¶
, 17
, 17
, 17
, 20
, 16
, 16
, 20
, 21
, 13
, 19
, 16
, 17
, 18
, 16
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 16
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 17
, 19
, 18
, 17
, 20
, 18
, 19
, 17
, 18
, 17
, 1

Example Output:
{"score": 9, "justification": "The response is complete, relevant, and mostly clear, with minor areas for improvement in phrasing."}
