text:
# 1 Introduction

## 1 Introduction

The Lorentz group play a fundamental role in special relativity. It gives the lifetime dilatation of unstable particles in terms of their velocities and relativistic formulas of the energy-momentum four-vector in terms of the mass and the velocities.
The above considerations make especially interesting the study of the noncommutative special relativity in the frame of the quantum Minkowski space-time and its transformations under the quantum Lorentz group to derive measurable observables describing the evolution of particles in noncommutative space-time.
In the past few years, attention has been paid to formulate the particle evolution in quantum Minkowski space times through the construction of the $`q`$-analog of the relativistic plane waves  or the Hilbert space representation of the $`q`$-deformed Minkowski space-time .
Despite all the theoretical interests, the relevance of the quantum Minkowski space-time and its transformations under the quantum Lorentz group to derive measurable observable effects in particle physics has not been discused very much.
In Ref. the evolution of particles in noncommutative Minkowski space-time has been analysed. From the transformation of particle coordinates at rest, the quantum analog of the lifetime dilatation of unstable particles and the relativistic formulas of the energy-momentum four vector in terms of the mass and the velocity have been established. The mean results of this work concern the principle of the causality in the noncommutative special relativity and the quantization of the moving particle lifetime which is deduced from the discret spectrum of the velocity operators. In addition, it is shown that for a particle moving in the noncommutative Minkowski space-time, only the length of the velocity and its projection on the quantized direction can be measured exactly.
In this paper we investigated further the tranformations of the Hilbert space states describing particles moving in the noncommutative space-time to show how the addition rule of the velocities can be deduced from the coaction of the boost generators and how the quantum analog of Glebsch-Gordon coefficients of the transformed states can be calculated.
This paper is organized as follows: In section 2, we present the quantum analog of the Iwasawa decomposition of the $`SL(2,C)`$ group . From this decomposition and the correpondence between the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ and Lorentz groups , we extract the quantum boost generators and their commutation relations. In section 3 we give a representation of these quantum generators in the Hilbert space states. From the state transformation principle and the coaction on the boost generators we establish the addition rule of the velocities in the noncommutative special relativity and calculate the quantum analog of the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients of the transformed states.

## 2 The quantum boost generators

before we consider the Hopf algebra representing the quantum boost of particles in the noncommutative Minkowski space-time let us briefly recall the correspondence between the generators $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M(N,M=0,1,2,3)`$ of the quantum Lorentz group and those of the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group generated by $`M_\alpha ^\beta `$, $`(\alpha ,\beta =1,2)`$ and $`(M_\alpha ^\beta )^{}=M_{\dot{\alpha }}^{\dot{\beta }}`$ .
$`M_\alpha ^\beta =\left(\begin{array}{cc}\alpha & \beta \\ \gamma & \delta \end{array}\right)`$ corresponds to the representation of classical $`SL(2,C)`$ group acting on space of undotted spinors and $`M_{\dot{\alpha }}^{\dot{\beta }}`$ corresponds to the classical $`SL(2,C)`$ group acting on space of dotted spinors.
The unimodularity of $`M_\alpha ^\beta `$ is expressed by $`\epsilon _{\alpha \beta }M_\gamma ^\alpha M_\delta ^\beta =\epsilon _{\gamma \delta }I_𝒜`$, $`\epsilon ^{\gamma \delta }M_\gamma ^\alpha M_\delta ^\beta =\epsilon ^{\alpha \beta }I_𝒜`$, and $`\epsilon _{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\beta }}M_{\dot{\gamma }}^{\dot{\alpha }}M_{\dot{\delta }}^{\dot{\beta }}=\epsilon _{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\delta }}I_𝒜`$, $`\epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\delta }}M_{\dot{\gamma }}^{\dot{\alpha }}M_{\dot{\delta }}^{\dot{\beta }}=\epsilon ^{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\beta }}I_𝒜`$ where $`I_𝒜`$ is the unity of the $``$ algebra $`𝒜`$ generated by $`M_\alpha ^\beta `$ and the spinor metric $`\epsilon _{\alpha \beta }`$ and its inverse $`\epsilon ^{\alpha \beta }(\epsilon _{\alpha \delta }\epsilon ^{\delta \beta }=\delta _\alpha ^\beta =\epsilon ^{\beta \delta }\epsilon _{\delta \alpha })`$ satisfy $`(\epsilon _{\alpha \beta })^{}=\epsilon _{\dot{\beta }\dot{\alpha }}`$ and $`(\epsilon ^{\alpha \beta })^{}=\epsilon ^{\dot{\beta }\dot{\alpha }}`$. If we consider the case where the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group admits the quantum $`SU(2)`$ group as a subgroup, the spinor metric $`\epsilon _{\alpha \beta }`$ must satisfy additional condition $`\epsilon _{\alpha \beta }=\epsilon ^{\dot{\beta }\dot{\alpha }}`$ and $`\epsilon ^{\alpha \beta }=\epsilon _{\dot{\beta }\dot{\alpha }}`$ required by the compatibility of the unitarity, $`M_{(c)\dot{\alpha }}^{\dot{\beta }}=S(M_{(c)\beta }^\alpha )=\epsilon _{\beta \rho }M_{(c)\sigma }^\rho \epsilon ^{\sigma \alpha }`$, with the modularity conditions of the quantum $`SU(2)`$ group generators. In this case the commutation rules of the quantum $`SU(2)`$ subgroup are given by those of $`SL(2,C)`$ group where we impose the unitarity condition. The commutation rules are given by

$`M_\alpha ^\rho M_\beta ^\sigma R_{\rho \sigma }^{\pm \gamma \delta }=R_{\alpha \beta }^{\pm \rho \sigma }M_\rho ^\delta M_\sigma ^\delta ,andM_{\dot{\alpha }}^{\dot{\rho }}M_{\dot{\beta }}^{\dot{\sigma }}R_{\dot{\rho }\dot{\sigma }}^{\pm \dot{\gamma }\dot{\delta }}=R_{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\beta }}^{\pm \dot{\rho }\dot{\sigma }}M_{\dot{\rho }}^{\dot{\delta }}M_{\dot{\sigma }}^{\dot{\delta }}.`$ (1)
where the $`R`$-matrices are given by $`R_{\alpha \gamma }^{\pm \delta \beta }=\delta _\alpha ^\delta \delta _\gamma ^\beta +q^{\pm 1}\epsilon ^{\delta \beta }\epsilon _{\alpha \gamma }(R_{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\gamma }}^{\pm \dot{\delta }\dot{\beta }}=\delta _{\dot{\alpha }}^{\dot{\delta }}\delta _{\dot{\gamma }}^{\dot{\beta }}+q^{\pm 1}\epsilon ^{\dot{\delta }\dot{\beta }}\epsilon _{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\gamma }})`$ and the spinor metric is of the form $`\epsilon _{\alpha \beta }=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& q^{\frac{1}{2}}\\ q^{\frac{1}{2}}& 0\end{array}\right)`$ where $`q0`$ is a real deformation parameter. The $`R^\pm `$-matrices satisfy $`R_{\alpha \gamma }^{\pm \delta \beta }R_{\delta \beta }^{\rho \sigma }=\delta _\alpha ^\rho \delta _\gamma ^\sigma (R_{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\gamma }}^{\pm \dot{\delta }\dot{\beta }}R_{\dot{\delta }\dot{\beta }}^{\dot{\rho }\dot{\sigma }}=\delta _{\dot{\alpha }}^{\dot{\rho }}\delta _{\dot{\gamma }}^{\dot{\sigma }})`$, the Hecke conditions $`(R^\pm +q^{\pm 2})(R^\pm 1)=0`$ and the Yang-Baxter equations. An explicit calculation gives from (1) the following commutation rules of the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group as:

$`\alpha \beta =q\beta \alpha ,\alpha \gamma =q\gamma \alpha ,\alpha \delta q\gamma \beta =1,`$
$`\gamma \delta =q\delta \gamma ,\gamma \beta =\beta \gamma ,\beta \delta =q\delta \beta ,\delta \alpha q^1\beta \gamma =1.`$ (2)
From the unitarity condition, the quantum $`SU(2)`$ subgroup reads $`M_{(c)\alpha }^\beta =\left(\begin{array}{cc}\alpha _c& q\gamma _c^{}\\ \gamma _c& \alpha _c^{},\end{array}\right)`$ and from (2) it follows that

$`\alpha _c\alpha _c^{}+q^2\gamma _c\gamma _c^{}=1,\alpha _c^{}\alpha _c+\gamma _c\gamma _c^{}=1,\gamma _c\gamma _c^{}=\gamma _c^{}\gamma _c,\alpha _c\gamma _c^{}=q\gamma _c^{}\alpha _c,\alpha _c\gamma _c=q\gamma _c\alpha _c.`$ (3)
It is shown in  that the generators $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M`$ of quantum Lorentz group may be written in terms of those of quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group as

$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\epsilon _{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\delta }}\overline{\sigma }_N^{\dot{\delta }\alpha }M_\alpha ^\sigma \sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^MM_{\dot{\beta }}^{\dot{\rho }}\epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\beta }}.`$ (4)
They are real, $`(\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M)^{}=\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M`$, and generate a Hopf algebra $``$ endowed with a coaction $`\mathrm{\Delta }`$, a counit $`\epsilon `$ and an antipode $`S`$ acting as $`\mathrm{\Delta }(\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M)=\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^K\mathrm{\Lambda }_K^M`$, $`\epsilon (\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M)=\delta _N^M`$ and $`S(\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M)=G_{\pm NK}\mathrm{\Lambda }_L^KG_\pm ^{LM}`$ respectively. $`G_\pm ^{NM}`$ is an invertible and hermitian quantum metric. It may be expressed in terms of the four matrices $`\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^N(N=0,1,2,3)`$, where $`\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^n(n=1,2,3)`$ are the usual Pauli matrices and $`\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^0`$ is the identity matrix, as:

$`G_\pm ^{IJ}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}Tr(\sigma ^I\overline{\sigma }_\pm ^J)={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\epsilon ^{\alpha \nu }\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^I\overline{\sigma }_\pm ^{J\dot{\beta }\gamma }\epsilon _{\gamma \nu }={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}Tr(\overline{\sigma }_\pm ^I\sigma ^J)={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\epsilon _{\dot{\nu }\dot{\gamma }}\overline{\sigma }_\pm ^{I\dot{\gamma }\alpha }\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^J\epsilon ^{\dot{\nu }\dot{\beta }}`$
where $`\overline{\sigma }_\pm ^{I\dot{\alpha }\beta }=\epsilon ^{\dot{\alpha }\dot{\lambda }}R_{\dot{\lambda }\nu }^{\sigma \dot{\rho }}\epsilon ^{\nu \beta }\sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^I`$. The undotted and dotted spinorial indices are raised and lowered as $`\sigma _{\dot{\beta }}^{I\alpha }=\sigma _{\rho \dot{\beta }}^I\epsilon ^{\rho \alpha }`$ and $`\sigma _\alpha ^{I\dot{\beta }}=\epsilon ^{\dot{\beta }\dot{\rho }}\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\rho }}^I`$ and the inverse of the metric may be written under the form $`G_{\pm IJ}=\frac{1}{Q}Tr(\overline{\sigma }_J\sigma _{\pm I})=\frac{1}{Q}\epsilon _{\dot{\nu }\dot{\gamma }}\overline{\sigma }_J^{\dot{\gamma }\alpha }\sigma _{\pm I\alpha \dot{\beta }}\epsilon ^{\dot{\nu }\dot{\beta }}`$ where $`\sigma _{\pm I\alpha \dot{\beta }}=G_{\pm IJ}\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^J`$. The form of the antipode of $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M`$ implies the orthogonality condition on the generators of quantum Lorentz group as:

$`G_{\pm NM}\mathrm{\Lambda }_L^N\mathrm{\Lambda }_K^M=G_{\pm LK}I_{}andG_\pm ^{LK}\mathrm{\Lambda }_L^N\mathrm{\Lambda }_K^M=G_\pm ^{NM}I_{}`$ (5)
where $`I_{}`$ is the unity of the Hopf algebra $``$.
In this framwork, it is also shown that there exist two copies of the quantum Minkowski space-times $`_\pm `$ equipped with metric $`G^{\pm IK}`$ and real coordinates $`X_{\pm I}`$ which transform under the left coaction $`\mathrm{\Delta }_L:_\pm _\pm `$ as:

$`\mathrm{\Delta }_L(X_{\pm I})=\mathrm{\Lambda }_I^KX_{\pm K}.`$ (6)
The coordinates $`X_{+I}`$ transform under the quantum lorentz whose generators $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M`$ are subject to commutation rules controlled by the $`_{PQ}^{+NM}`$, $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_L^P\mathrm{\Lambda }_K^Q_{PQ}^{+NM}=_{LK}^{+PQ}\mathrm{\Lambda }_P^N\mathrm{\Lambda }_Q^M`$, and the coordinates $`X_I`$ transform under the quantum lorentz whose generators $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M`$ are subject to commutation rules of the form $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_L^P\mathrm{\Lambda }_K^Q_{PQ}^{NM}=_{LK}^{PQ}\mathrm{\Lambda }_P^N\mathrm{\Lambda }_Q^M`$ where the $``$-matrices of the Lorentz group are constructed out of those of $`SL(2,C)`$ group as:

$`_{LK}^{\pm NM}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q^2}}R_{\tau \sigma }^{\alpha \kappa }R_{\kappa \nu }^{\mu \beta }R_{\delta \alpha }^{\pm \rho ϵ}R_{ϵ\mu }^{\pm \lambda \gamma }\sigma _\gamma ^{M\dot{\beta }}\sigma _\rho ^{N\dot{\lambda }}\overline{\sigma }_{L\dot{\tau }}^\delta \overline{\sigma }_{K\dot{\nu }}^\sigma .`$
These $``$-matrices lead to the symmetrization of the Minkowski metric in the quantum sens as:

$`_{KL}^{\pm NM}G_\pm ^{KL}=G_\pm ^{NM},_{KL}^{\pm NM}G_{\pm NM}=G_{\pm KL}`$
and satisfy the Yang-Baxter equations and the cubic Hecke conditions

$`(^\pm +q^{\pm 2})(^\pm +q^2)(^\pm 1)=0.`$
In the following we shall consider the right invariant basis $`X_I=X_{+I}`$ as a quantum coordinate system of the Minkowski space-time $`=_+`$ equipped with the metric $`G^{IJ}=G_+^{IJ}`$. $`X_0`$ represents the time operator and $`X_i(i=1,2,3)`$ represent the space coordinate operators.
With this choice, the commutation rules between the undotted and dotted generators of the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group must necessarely be controlled by the $`R^{}`$-matrix, $`M_\alpha ^\gamma M_{\dot{\sigma }}^{\dot{\delta }}R_{\rho \gamma }^{\beta \delta }=R_{\delta \alpha }^{\gamma \sigma }M_{\dot{\delta }}^{\dot{\rho }}M_\gamma ^\beta `$ which gives explicitly

$`\alpha \alpha ^{}=\alpha ^{}\alpha (1q^2)\beta \beta ^{}`$ , $`\alpha \gamma ^{}=q^1\gamma ^{}\alpha (1q^2)\beta \delta ^{},`$
$`\gamma \gamma ^{}=\gamma ^{}\gamma +(1q^2)(\alpha \alpha ^{}\delta \delta ^{})`$ , $`\gamma \delta ^{}=q\delta ^{}\gamma +q(1q^2)\beta ^{}\alpha `$
$`\beta \beta ^{}=\beta ^{}\beta ,\beta \delta ^{}=q^1\delta ^{}\beta `$ , $`\delta \delta ^{}=\delta ^{}\delta +(1q^2)\beta ^{}\beta ,`$
$`\alpha \beta ^{}=q\beta ^{}\alpha ,\alpha \delta ^{}=\delta ^{}\alpha `$ , $`\gamma \beta ^{}=\beta ^{}\gamma `$ (7)
Note that if we have considered the coordinates $`X_I=X_I`$ wich correspond to the metric $`G^{NM}=G^{NM}`$ and the $``$-matrix $`R_{KL}^{NM}=R_{KL}^{NM}`$ the commutation rules between the undotted and dotted generators of the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group must necessarely be controlled by the $`R^+`$-matrix.
To make an explicit calculation of the different commutation rules of the generators of the quantum Lorentz group, we take the following apropriate choice of Pauli hermitian matrices

$`\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^0=\left(\begin{array}{cc}1& 0\\ 0& 1\end{array}\right),\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^1=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& 1\\ 1& 0\end{array}\right),\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^2=\left(\begin{array}{cc}0& i\\ i& 0\end{array}\right),\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^3=\left(\begin{array}{cc}q& 0\\ 0& q^1\end{array}\right).`$
The advantage of this choice arises from the fact that:
1)- The quantum metric $`G^{LK}`$ is of the form of two independent blocks, one for the time index and the others for space component indeces $`(k=1,2,3)`$. The nonvanishing elements of the metrics are; $`G^{00}=q^{\frac{3}{2}}`$, $`G^{11}=G^{22}=G^{33}=q^{\frac{1}{2}}`$, $`G^{12}=G^{21}=iq^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{qq^1}{Q}`$ and the non vanishing elements of its inverse are $`G_{00}=q^{\frac{3}{2}}`$, $`G_{11}=G_{22}=q^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{Q^2}{4}`$, $`G_{33}=q^{\frac{1}{2}}`$ and $`G_{12}=G_{21}=iq^{\frac{1}{2}}\frac{(qq^1)Q}{4}`$. In the classical limit $`q=1`$, this metric reduces to the classical Minkowski metric with signature $`(,+,+,+)`$.
2)- $`\overline{\sigma }_0^{\dot{\alpha }\beta }=\sigma _{\alpha \dot{\beta }}^0=\delta _\alpha ^\beta `$, $`\overline{\sigma }_{N\dot{\alpha }\alpha }=\overline{\sigma }_{N\dot{1}1}+\overline{\sigma }_{N\dot{2}2}=(q+q^1)\delta _N^0=Q\delta _N^0`$ and $`\sigma ^{N\alpha \dot{\alpha }}=Q\delta _0^N`$. These properties make explicit the restriction of the quantum Lorentz group to the quantum subgroup of the three dimensional space rotations by restricting the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group generators to those of the $`SU(2)`$ group. In fact when we restrict the generators of the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group to those of the $`SU(2)`$ by imposing unitarity condition in (4), we get

$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^0={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\overline{\sigma }_{N\dot{\gamma }}^\alpha M_\alpha ^\sigma \sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^0S(M_\rho ^\beta )\epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\beta }}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\overline{\sigma }_{N\dot{\gamma }}^\alpha \epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\alpha }}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\overline{\sigma }_{N\dot{\gamma }\gamma }=\delta _N^0`$ (9)
and

$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^M={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\epsilon _{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\delta }}\overline{\sigma }_0^{\dot{\delta }\alpha }M_\alpha ^\sigma \sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^MS(M_\rho ^\beta )\epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\beta }}`$ $`=`$ $`{\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\epsilon ^{\alpha \gamma }M_\alpha ^\sigma \sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^M\epsilon _{\rho \delta }M_\gamma ^\delta =`$
$`{\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\epsilon ^{\dot{\delta }\dot{\rho }}\sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^M\epsilon ^{\sigma \delta }`$ $`=`$ $`{\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\sigma ^{M\delta \dot{\delta }}=\delta _0^M`$ (10)
which lead us to the restriction of the Minkowski space-time transformations to the orthogonal transformations of the three dimensional space $`R_3`$ equipped with the coordinate system $`X_i`$, ($`i=1,2,3`$). These transformations leave invariant the time coordinate $`X_0`$. In fact, as a consequence of (8) and (9) we have

$`\mathrm{\Delta }_L(X_0)=\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_0^0X_0=IX_0`$
$`\mathrm{\Delta }_L(X_i)=\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^jX_j`$ (11)
where $`\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^j=\frac{1}{Q}\overline{\sigma }_{i\dot{\gamma }}^\alpha M_{(c)\alpha }^\sigma \sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^jM_{(c)\dot{\beta }}^{\dot{\rho }}\epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\beta }}=\frac{1}{Q}\overline{\sigma }_{i\dot{\gamma }}^\alpha M_{(c)\alpha }^\sigma \sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^jS(M_{(c)\rho }^\beta )\epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\beta }}`$ generate a Hopf subalgebra $`𝒮𝒪_q(3)`$ of $``$ whose the axiomatic structure is derived from those of $``$ as $`\mathrm{\Delta }(\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^j)=\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^k\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_k^j`$, $`\epsilon (\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^j)=\delta _i^j`$ and $`S(\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^j)=G_{iK}\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_L^KG^{Lj}=G_{ik}\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_l^kG^{lj}`$ where $`G^{ij}`$ is the restriction of the quantum Minkowskian metric $`G^{IJ}`$. It is the Euclidian metric of the quantum space $`R_3`$ satisfying $`G^{ik}G_{kj}=\delta _j^i=G_{jk}G^{ki}`$. The form of the antipode of $`\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^j`$ implies the orthogonality properties

$`G^{ij}\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^l\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_j^k=G^{lk}`$ $`and`$ $`G_{lk}\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^l\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^k=G_{ij}.`$
Therefore, $`\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^j=\frac{1}{Q}\overline{\sigma }_{i\dot{\gamma }}^\alpha M_{(c)\alpha }^\sigma \sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^jS(M_{(c)\rho }^\beta )\epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\beta }}`$ establishes a correspondence between $`SU_q(2)`$ and $`SO_q(3)`$ group. In the three dimensional space spanned by the basis $`Z`$, $`\overline{Z}`$ and $`X_3`$, the generators $`\overline{\mathrm{\Lambda }}_i^j=\frac{1}{Q}\overline{\sigma }_{i\dot{\gamma }}^\alpha M_{(c)\alpha }^\sigma \sigma _{\sigma \dot{\rho }}^jS(M_{(c)\rho }^\beta )\epsilon ^{\dot{\gamma }\dot{\beta }}`$ give the irreducible three-dimensional representation of $`SU_q(2)`$ considered in  as

$`(d_{1,i}^j)=\left(\begin{array}{cccc}2q\gamma _c\gamma _c& 2\alpha _c^{}\alpha _c^{}\hfill & Q\gamma _c\alpha _c^{}& \\ 2\alpha _c\alpha _c& 2q\gamma _c^{}\gamma _c^{}\hfill & Q\alpha _c\gamma _c^{}& \\ 2\alpha _c\gamma _c& 2\gamma _c^{}\alpha _c^{}\hfill & 1qQ\gamma _c\gamma _c^{}& \end{array}\right)M_3C(SU_q(2))`$ (15)
where the indices $`i,j`$ run over $`z=1+i2`$ and $`\overline{z}=1i2`$.
It is shown in  that the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group admits an unique Iwasawa decomposition of the form $`M_\alpha ^\beta =M_{(c)\alpha }^\rho M_{(d)\rho }^\beta `$ where $`M_{(c)}`$ is a quantum $`SU(2)`$-matrix and $`M_{(d)}`$ is a quantum-matrix the left-lower-corner element equal to zero. The matrix elements of $`M_{(c)}`$ doubly commute with matrix elements of $`M_{(d)}`$ (two operators $`a`$ and $`b`$ doubly commute if $`ab=ba`$ and $`ab^{}=b^{}a`$).
With our choice of the commutation rules (7) between the undotted and dotted generators of the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ group, in order to have nontrivial commutation relations, $`M_{(d)}`$ must have the right-upper-corner element equal to zero

$`M_{(d)\alpha }^\beta =\left(\begin{array}{cc}a& 0\\ n& a^1\end{array}\right).`$ (18)
From (12) and (7), it follows that

$`an=qna,aa^{}=a^{}a,an^{}=q^1n^{}a,`$ (19)
$`nn^{}=n^{}n+(1q^2)(aa^{}(aa^{})^1).`$ (20)
As $`M_{(d)}`$ is a subgroup of the quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ with coaction, counity and antipode acting in the following way: $`\mathrm{\Delta }(a)=aa`$, and $`\mathrm{\Delta }(n)=na+a^1n`$, $`\epsilon (a)=1`$, $`\epsilon (n)=0`$, $`S(a)=a^1`$, and $`S(n)=qn`$. The Iwasawa decomposition and the correspondence between quantum $`SL(2,C)`$ and Lorentz group (4) permits us to extract out of the latter the $`SO_q(3)`$ subgroup left by restriction to $`M_{(d)}`$ with the quantum boost.
More precisely by replacing the matrix elements of $`M`$ by those of $`M_{(d)}`$ into the relation (4), we get the following generators of the quantum boost as:

$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}(q^1aa^{}+q(aa^{})^1+q^1nn^{})`$ , $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}(qaa^{}+q^1(aa^{})^1qnn^{}),`$
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}(aa^{}(aa^{})^1nn^{})`$ , $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}(aa^{}(aa^{})^1+q^2nn^{})`$
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0=na^{},\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^3=qna^{}`$ , $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z={\displaystyle \frac{2q}{Q}}n(a^{})^1,\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^z={\displaystyle \frac{2}{Q}}n(a^{})^1`$
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}=2a^1a^{}`$ , $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^z=0.`$ (21)
The remaining generators are obtained by complex conjugation. Note that the commutation relations (13-14) permit us to take $`a`$ real, $`a^{}=a`$, then $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}=\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^z=2`$.
From the commutation relations (13-14), we see that $`[a^1a^{},n]=[a^1a^{},a]=0`$ which implies that $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}`$ is central, i.e. $`[\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}},\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M]=0`$. From $`[a,nn^{}]=[a^{},nn^{}]=0`$ we deduce that $`[\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3,\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3]=[\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3,\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0]=[\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3,\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0]=0`$. A straighforward computation shows that $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0`$ is central, $`[\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0,\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M]=0`$, and

$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0q^2\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0`$ $`=`$ $`(qq^1)\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0,`$ (22)
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0`$ $`=`$ $`(qq^1)Q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0(\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0+q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0),`$ (23)
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^zq^2\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0`$ $`=`$ $`(qq^1)\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z,`$ (24)
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0q^2\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z`$ $`=`$ $`q^2(qq^1)\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^z,`$ (25)
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^zq^2\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3`$ $`=`$ $`(qq^1)\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z,`$ (26)
$`{\displaystyle \frac{Q}{4}}(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^{\overline{z}})`$ $`=`$ $`(qq^1)\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3q\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0),`$ (27)
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0q^2\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z`$ $`=`$ $`0`$ (28)
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0q^2\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3`$ $`=`$ $`q^1(qq^1)\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3+{\displaystyle \frac{Q}{4}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}),`$ (29)
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^zq^2\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3`$ $`=`$ $`q(qq^1)\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z(\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0{\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^z).`$ (30)
The remaining commutation relations are obtained by substituting into (16-24) the following relations

$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0=q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^3,\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z=q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^z,\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3+q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3=\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0`$ (31)
deduced from the form of the boost generators (15). From these relations and the commutation rules (16-24) we can also show that the orthogonality condition $`G^{NM}\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^L\mathrm{\Lambda }_M^K=G^{LK}`$ and $`G_{LK}\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^L\mathrm{\Lambda }_M^K=G_{NM}`$ are satisfied if

$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0={\displaystyle \frac{Q}{4}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z(q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0),\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0=q^2{\displaystyle \frac{Q}{4}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^{\overline{z}}(q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0),`$ (32)
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z={\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0(q\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3),\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^{\overline{z}}=q^2{\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0(q\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3).`$ (33)
In fact by substituting (15) and (25) into $`G^{NM}\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_M^0=0=q^{\frac{3}{2}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q^{\frac{1}{2}}(\frac{q\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0+q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0}{Q}+\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)`$, we get

$`{\displaystyle \frac{q^1}{Q}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0=q^2\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0=q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z(q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)`$
leading to the left relation of (26). The same procedure gives from $`G^{NM}\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_M^0=0`$ the right relation of (26) and from $`G_{NM}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^N\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^M=0`$ and $`G_{NM}\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^N\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^M=0`$ the relations (27).
By substituting (27) into (26) and by using $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^z=4`$ obtained from (15), we get $`(q\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3)(q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)=1`$ leading to

$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3=q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0+(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)^1,\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3=q\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0q(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)^1.`$ (34)
Then all generators of the boost can be given in terms of $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0`$, $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0`$, $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0`$ and $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0`$. As in , we set $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0=\gamma `$ and $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_i^0=\gamma V_i`$ where $`\gamma `$ is a real c-number given by

$`\gamma =(1|v|_q^2)^{\frac{1}{2}},`$ (35)
$`V_i`$ are the components of the velocity operator and $`|v|_q^2=\frac{G^{ij}}{G^{00}}V_iV_j`$ is its lenght which is also a c-number.

## 3 The addition rules of velocities in the noncommutative special relativity

In  the evolution of free particles in the coordinate system $`X_N`$, $`(N=0,1,2,3)`$ of the Minkowski space-time are described in terms of states $`|𝒫=|t,x_3,\tau ^2`$ belonging to the Hilbert space $`_{}`$. Here $`t`$, $`x_3`$ and $`\tau ^2`$ are the time, the coordinate $`x_3`$ and the proper-time respectively. They are eingenvalues of the set of commuting operators which are the time $`X_0`$, the component $`X_3`$ of the space coordinates and the lenght of the four-vector $`X_N`$, $`G^{NM}X_NX_M=\tau ^2=q^{\frac{3}{2}}X_0^2+\frac{q^{\frac{3}{2}}}{Q}Z\overline{Z}+\frac{q^{\frac{1}{2}}}{Q}\overline{Z}Z+q^{\frac{1}{2}}X_3^2`$, where $`Z=X_1+iX_2`$ and $`\overline{Z}=X_1iX_2`$. $`\tau ^2`$ is real, bi-invariant and central. Then $`|𝒫`$ is a common eingenstate of $`X_0`$, $`X_3`$ and $`\tau ^2`$

$`X_0|𝒫=t|𝒫,X_3|𝒫=x_3|𝒫,and\tau ^2|𝒫=\tau ^2|𝒫.`$ (36)
Since the coordinate system transforms under quantum Lorentz group with tensorial product as $`X_N^{}=\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^MX_M`$ we have assumed in  that the Hilbert state $`|𝒫`$ transforms into $`|𝒫^{}`$ as

$`|𝒫^{}=|sym_q|𝒫`$ (37)
where $`|𝒫^{}`$ describes the evolution of the particle in the coordinate system $`X_N^{}`$. Note that the coordinates $`X_N^{}`$ fulfil the same commutation relations as those of $`X_N`$, then $`|𝒫^{}=|t^{},x_3^{},\tau ^2`$ satisfy also

$`X_0^{}|𝒫^{}=t^{}|𝒫^{},X_3^{}|𝒫^{}=x_3^{}|𝒫^{},and\tau ^2|𝒫^{}=\tau ^2|𝒫^{}.`$ (38)
The state $`|sym_q`$ belongs to the Hilbert state $`_{}`$ where the quantum Lorentz generators act. It is a common eingenstate of a set of commuting operators of (15). Since all the generators of the Boost can be written in terms of $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^0=\gamma V_N`$, the set of commuting operators of the Boost are $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0=\gamma `$ and $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0=\gamma V_3`$ and therefore, $`|sym_q=|v_3,\gamma `$ is a common eingenstate of $`\gamma `$ or the lenght of the velocity $`\frac{G^{ij}}{G^{00}}V_iV_j`$ and $`V_3`$

$`\gamma |v_3,\gamma =\gamma |v_3,\gamma andV_3|v_3,\gamma =v_3|v_3,\gamma .`$ (39)
The coordinates $`X_N^{}`$ act on the transformed state $`|𝒫^{}`$ as

$`X_0^{}|𝒫^{}=(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0X_0)|𝒫^{}+(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^kX_k)|𝒫^{}=\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0|v_3\gamma X_0|𝒫+\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^k|v_3\gamma X_k|𝒫,`$ (40)
$`X_i^{}|𝒫^{}=(\mathrm{\Lambda }_i^0X_0)|𝒫^{}+(\mathrm{\Lambda }_i^kX_k)|𝒫^{}=\mathrm{\Lambda }_i^0|v_3\gamma X_0|𝒫+\mathrm{\Lambda }_i^k|v_3\gamma X_k|𝒫.`$ (41)
In the case where we boost a particle at rest described by the state $`|𝒫_0=|t,0,\tau ^2`$ satisfying $`X_0|𝒫_0=t|𝒫_0`$, $`X_i|𝒫_0=0|𝒫_0`$ and $`\tau ^2|𝒫_0=\tau ^2|𝒫_0`$ it is shown in  that this state is unique and transforms under the quantum Lorentz group as:

$`|𝒫=|t,x_3,\tau ^2=|v_3,\gamma |𝒫_0.`$ (42)
$`x_3`$ and $`v_3`$ are quantized and read

$`x_3^{(l,m)}=q^1({\displaystyle \frac{q^{2m}}{\gamma ^{(l)}}}1)t,v_3^{(l,m)}=q^1({\displaystyle \frac{q^{2m}}{\gamma ^{(l)}}}1)`$ (43)
where

$`\gamma ^{(l)}={\displaystyle \frac{(q^{(2l+1)}+q^{(2l+1)})}{Q}},`$ (44)
$`l=0,\frac{1}{2},1,\mathrm{}.\mathrm{}`$ and $`m`$ runs by integer steps over the range $`lml`$. In the following the states $`|v_3^{(l,m)},\gamma ^{(l)}`$ describing the boost will be notted $`|l,m`$. They form an orthonormal basis

$`l,m|l^{},m^{}=\delta _{l^{},l}\delta _{m^{},m}`$ (45)
satisfying

$`\gamma |l,m=\gamma ^{(l)}|l,mandV_3|l,m=v_3^{(l,m)}|l,m.`$ (46)
By setting $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3=\gamma V^3`$, we obtain from (28) $`V^3=q\frac{q}{\gamma ^2(1+qV_3)}`$ and $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3=q\gamma V_3+\frac{1}{\gamma (1+qV_3)}`$ from which we deduce

$`V^3|l,m=q({\displaystyle \frac{q^{2m}}{\gamma ^{(l)}}}1)|l,m=v^{3(l,m)}|l,mand\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3|l,m=(q^{2m}+q^{2m}\gamma ^{(l)})|l,m.`$ (47)
From the orthogonality condition $`G^{NM}\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_M^0=G^{00}=q^{\frac{3}{2}}=q^{\frac{3}{2}}\gamma ^2+q^{\frac{1}{2}}\gamma ^2(\frac{qV_zV_{\overline{z}}+q^1V_{\overline{z}}V_z}{Q}+V_3V_3)`$ and the commutation relation $`V_zV_{\overline{z}}V_{\overline{z}}V_z=(qq^1)QV_3(V_3+q^1)`$ obtained from (17), we get

$`V_{\overline{z}}V_z={\displaystyle \frac{1}{\gamma ^2}}(q^2(1+qV_3)(1q^3V_3)q^2),`$ (48)
$`V_zV_{\overline{z}}={\displaystyle \frac{1}{\gamma ^2}}(q^2(1+qV_3)(1q^1V_3)q^2).`$ (49)
On the other hand, the commutation relations

$`V_3V_zq^2V_zV_3=(qq^1)V_zandV_3V_{\overline{z}}q^2V_{\overline{z}}V_3=q^2(qq^1)V_{\overline{z}}`$ (50)
obtained from (16), show that

$`V_z|l,m=(\alpha _{(l,m)}^1)^{\frac{1}{2}}|l,m+1andV_{\overline{z}}|l,m=(\alpha _{(l,m)}^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}|l,m1`$ (51)
where

$`\alpha _{(l,m)}^1=l,m|V_{\overline{z}}V_z|l,m={\displaystyle \frac{1}{(\gamma ^{(l)})^2}}(q^{2m1}Q\gamma ^{(l)}q^{4m}q^2),`$ (52)
$`\alpha _{(l,m)}^2=l,m|V_zV_{\overline{z}}|l,m={\displaystyle \frac{1}{(\gamma ^{(l)})^2}}(q^{2m3}Q\gamma ^{(l)}q^{4m4}q^2).`$ (53)
From (27) we get

$`V^z={\displaystyle \frac{2}{Q\gamma }}V_z(q^1+V_3)^1andV^{\overline{z}}={\displaystyle \frac{2q^2}{Q\gamma }}V_{\overline{z}}(q^1+V_3)^1`$ (54)
implying

$`V^z|l,m={\displaystyle \frac{2}{Q}}q^{2m+1}V_z|l,m={\displaystyle \frac{2}{Q}}q^{2m+1}(\alpha _{(l,m)}^1)^{\frac{1}{2}}|l,m+1=(\beta _{(l,m)}^1)^{\frac{1}{2}}|l,m+1`$ (55)
where

$`\beta _{(l,m)}^1=l,m|V^{\overline{z}}V^z|l,m={\displaystyle \frac{4}{(Q\gamma ^{(l)})^2}}(q^{2m+1}Q\gamma ^{(l)}q^{4m}q^{+2}).`$ (56)
The same procedure applied to $`V^{\overline{z}}`$ gives

$`V^{\overline{z}}|l,m=(\beta _{(l,m)}^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}|l,m1`$ (57)
where

$`\beta _{(l,m)}^2=l,m|V^zV^{\overline{z}}|l,m={\displaystyle \frac{4}{(Q\gamma ^{(l)})^2}}(q^{2m+3}Q\gamma ^{(l)}q^{4m4}q^{+2}).`$ (58)
Now we want to consider successive boost transformations given in terms of left-coaction on the coordinates as:

$`X_N^{\prime \prime }=(\mathrm{\Delta }I)\mathrm{\Delta }_L(X_N)=(i\mathrm{\Delta }_L)\mathrm{\Delta }_L(X_N)=\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^K\mathrm{\Lambda }_K^MX_N.`$ (59)
As notted above $`X_N^{\prime \prime }`$ fulfil the same commutation relation as $`X_N`$ and $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^{{}_{}{}^{\prime \prime }M}=\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^K\mathrm{\Lambda }_K^M`$ fulfil the same commutation relations as $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M`$. Then a state describing the evolution of a particle in the coordinate system $`X_N^{\prime \prime }`$ read $`|𝒫^{\prime \prime }=|t^{\prime \prime },x_3^{\prime \prime },\tau ^2`$. It is a common eingenstate of $`X_0^{\prime \prime }`$, $`X_3^{\prime \prime }`$ and $`\tau ^2`$ with eingenvalues $`t^{\prime \prime }`$, $`x_3^{\prime \prime }`$ and $`\tau ^2`$ respectively. As assumed above, the transformed states may be written as

$`|𝒫^{\prime \prime }=|sym_q^{\prime \prime }|𝒫=|sym_q^{}|sym_q|𝒫=|sym_q^{}|𝒫^{}`$ (60)
where $`|sym_q^{\prime \prime }=|v_3^{\prime \prime },\gamma ^{\prime \prime }`$ is a common eigenstate of $`\gamma ^{\prime \prime }=\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^{{}_{}{}^{\prime \prime }0}`$ and $`V_3^{\prime \prime }`$ deduced from $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^{{}_{}{}^{\prime \prime }0}=V_3^{\prime \prime }\gamma ^{\prime \prime }`$. Since $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^{{}_{}{}^{\prime \prime }M}`$ fulfil the same commutation relations as $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_N^M`$, $`|v_3^{\prime \prime },\gamma ^{\prime \prime }`$ has the same form as (37) and may be written as $`|l_3,m_3`$ satifying

$`\gamma ^{\prime \prime }|l_3,m_3=\gamma ^{(l_3)}|l_3,m_3andV_3^{\prime \prime }|l_3,m_3=v_3^{(l_3,m_3)}|l_3,m_3`$ (61)
where

$`\gamma ^{(l_3)}={\displaystyle \frac{q^{(2l_3+1)}+q^{(2l_3+1)}}{Q}},v_3^{(l_3,m_3)}=q^1({\displaystyle \frac{q^{2m_3}}{\gamma ^{(l_3)}}}1)`$ (62)
and $`l_3=0,\frac{1}{2},1,\mathrm{}.\mathrm{}`$ and $`m_3`$ runs by integer steps over the range $`l_3m_3l_3`$.
We are now ready to state the addition rule of the velocity out of the coaction on the generators of the boost. In fact let $`|sym_q^{}=|l_2,m_2`$ and $`|sym_q=|l_1,m_1`$. For $`l_2`$ and $`l_1`$ fixed, the basis $`|l_2,m_2|l_1,m_1=|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1`$ contains $`(2l_2+1)(2l_1+1)`$ linear independent states satisfying

$`l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_2,l_1,m_2^{},m_1^{}=\delta _{m_2,m_2^{}}\delta _{m_1,m_1^{}}`$ (63)
$`{\displaystyle \underset{m_2,m_1}{}}|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|=1.`$ (64)
The $`m_2`$ sum is performed over all values $`l_2m_2l_2`$ and analogously in the $`m_1`$ case over the interval $`l_1m_1l_1`$. Thus in the basis $`|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1`$ the state $`|l_3,m_3`$ reads

$`|l_3,m_3={\displaystyle \underset{m_2,m_1}{}}|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3`$ (65)
where the coefficients $`l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3`$ are the quantum-analog of the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients. Now we are ready to state that

$`m_3=m_2+m_1,l_3m_3l_3and|l_2l_1|l_3l_2+l_1.`$ (66)
From the coaction on the boost generators we get

$`\mathrm{\Delta }(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0)=\gamma ^{\prime \prime }=\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0+\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0)+\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0`$ (67)
$`\mathrm{\Delta }(\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)=V_3^{\prime \prime }\gamma ^{\prime \prime }=\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}(\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0+\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0)+\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^3\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0.`$ (68)
By replacing (25) into (62) we get

$`V_3^{\prime \prime }\gamma ^{\prime \prime }=\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0{\displaystyle \frac{q^1}{2}}(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0`$ $`+`$ $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0)+(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3)\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0=`$
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)`$ $`+`$ $`q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)`$
$`q^1(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0`$ $`+`$ $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0)+\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^3\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)=`$
$`\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)`$ $`+`$ $`q^1\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)q^1\gamma ^{\prime \prime }.`$
By applying the latter relation to the state (59), we get

$`V_3^{\prime \prime }\gamma ^{\prime \prime }|l_3,m_3`$ $`=`$ $`v_3^{(l_3,m_3)}\gamma ^{(l_3)}|l_3,m_3=q^1(q^{2m_3}\gamma ^{(l_3)})|l_3,m_3=`$ (69)
$`{\displaystyle \underset{m_2,m_1}{}}(v_3^{(l_2,m_2)}\gamma ^{(l_2)}(1`$ $`+`$ $`qv_3^{(l_1,m_1)})\gamma ^{(l_1)}|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3+`$
$`(q^1\gamma ^{(l_2)}(1+qv_3^{(l_1,m_1)})\gamma ^{(l_1)}`$ $``$ $`q^1\gamma ^{(l_3)})|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3=`$ (70)
$`{\displaystyle \underset{m_2,m_1}{}}q^1(q^{2(m_2+m_1)}`$ $``$ $`\gamma ^{(l_3)})|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3.`$ (71)
By identifying (63) with (65) and by applying $`l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|`$ from the left we get because of linear independence

$`(q^{2m_3}q^{2(m_2+m_1)})l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3=0`$ (72)
which implies $`m_3=m_2+m_1`$ and

$`l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3=0ifm_2+m_1m_3.`$ (73)
By applying (61) to (59) and then $`l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|`$ from the left, we get

$`\gamma ^{(l_3)}l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3`$ $`=`$ (74)
$`(\gamma ^{(l_1)}q^{2m_2}`$ $`+`$ $`\gamma ^{(l_2)}q^{2m_1}q^{2(m_2m_1)})l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3`$ (75)
$`+`$ $`{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}(\beta _{(l_2,m_21)}^1\alpha _{(l_1,m_1+1)}^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}l_2,l_1,m_21,m_1+1|l_3,m_3`$
$`+`$ $`{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}(\beta _{(l_2,m_2+1)}^2\alpha _{(l_1,m_11)}^1)^{\frac{1}{2}}l_2,l_1,m_2+1,m_11|l_3,m_3.`$
For $`m_2=l_2`$ and $`m_1=l_1`$ or $`m_2=l_2`$ and $`m_1=l_1`$ the second and third terms of the right hand side of this relation vanish implying $`l_3=l_2+l_1`$. we note in these cases that the upper value $`m_3^{max}=l_2+l_1`$ and the lower value $`m_3^{min}=(l_2+l_1)`$ appear once, thus the upper value of $`l_3`$ is $`l_3^{max}=l_2+l_1`$ and

$`|l_3^{max},l_3^{max}=|l_2,l_1,l_2,l_1,`$ (76)
$`|l_3^{max},l_3^{max}=|l_2,l_1,l_2,l_1.`$ (77)
Since they are $`(2l_2+1)(2l_1+1)`$ linear independent states $`|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1`$ and $`m_3^{max}=l_2+l_1`$ appears only once we may make a similar demonstration to the one of the addition of two angular momentum, called triangle rule in the text book of quantum machanics , to show that all values of $`l_3=l_2+l_1,l_2+l_11,\mathrm{}|l_2l_1|`$ appear precisely once and the number of states $`|l_3,m_3`$ is equal the number of basis $`|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1`$

$`{\displaystyle \underset{|l_2l_1|}{\overset{l_2+l_1}{}}}(2l_3+1)=(2l_2+1)(2l_1+1).`$ (78)
Therefore, the projection of the velocity on the quantization direction is given in terms of quantum number $`m_3=m_2+m_1`$ and $`l_3=l_2+l_1,l_2+l_11,\mathrm{}|l_2l_1|`$ with $`l_3m_3l_3`$.
Now we are ready to compute explicitly the $`q`$-deformed Clebsch-Gordon coefficients. We start from

$`\mathrm{\Delta }(\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0)=\gamma ^{\prime \prime }V_z^{\prime \prime }`$ $`=`$ $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}(\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^z\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0+\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0)+\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^3\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0=`$
$`=`$ $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+1\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0+\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^3\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0=`$
$`=`$ $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0(\mathrm{\Lambda }_0^0+q\mathrm{\Lambda }_3^0)+1\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^0`$
where we have used (25), $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^z=0`$ and $`\mathrm{\Lambda }_z^{\overline{z}}=2`$. By applying the latter relation to (59), we obtain

$`\gamma ^{(l_3)}(\alpha _{(l_3,m_3)}^1)^{\frac{1}{2}}|l_3,m_3={\displaystyle \underset{m_2,m_1}{}}\gamma ^{(l_2)}(\alpha _{(l_2,m_2)}^1)q^{2m_1}|l_2,l_1,m_2+1,m_1l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3+`$
$`\gamma ^{(l_1)}(\alpha _{(l_1,m_1)}^1)|l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1+1l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3`$
which give because of linear independence the condition

$`\gamma ^{(l_3)}(\alpha _{(l_3,m_3)}^1)^{\frac{1}{2}}l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_3+1`$ $`=`$
$`\gamma ^{(l_2)}(\alpha _{(l_2,m_21)}^1)^{\frac{1}{2}}q^{2m_1}l_2,l_1,m_21,m_1|l_3,m_3`$ $`+`$ $`\gamma ^{(l_1)}(\alpha _{(l_1,m_11)}^1)^{\frac{1}{2}}l_2,l_1,m_2,m_11|l_3,m_3.`$
The same procedure gives for $`\mathrm{\Delta }(\mathrm{\Lambda }_{\overline{z}}^0)=\gamma ^{\prime \prime }V_{\overline{z}}^{\prime \prime }`$ the condition

$`\gamma ^{(l_3)}(\alpha _{(l_3,m_3)}^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1|l_3,m_31`$ $`=`$
$`\gamma ^{(l_2)}(\alpha _{(l_2,m_2+1)}^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}q^{2m_1}l_2,l_1,m_2+1,m_1|l_3,m_3`$ $`+`$ $`\gamma ^{(l_1)}(\alpha _{(l_1,m_1+1)}^2)^{\frac{1}{2}}l_2,l_1,m_2,m_1+1|l_3,m_3`$
These conditions give recursion relations for the calculation of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients. For example in the case where $`l_2=\frac{1}{2}`$ and $`l_1=\frac{1}{2}`$ we obtain the folowing Clebsch-Gordon coefficients:

$`{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}|1,0=(qQ)^{\frac{1}{2}}and{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}|1,0=(q^1Q)^{\frac{1}{2}}`$ (79)
leading to

$`|1,1=|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},|1,1=|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},`$ (80)
$`|1,0=(qQ)^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}+(q^1Q)^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},`$ (81)
$`|0,0=(q^1Q)^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}+(qQ)^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}.`$ (82)
For the case $`l_2=\frac{1}{2}`$ and $`l_1=1`$ we obtain

$`|{\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}}=|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,|{\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}}=|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,`$ (83)
$`|{\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}=({\displaystyle \frac{q^1Q}{Q^21}})^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},0+q({\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q^21}})^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},0,`$ (84)
$`|{\displaystyle \frac{3}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}=({\displaystyle \frac{qQ}{Q^21}})^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},0+q^1({\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q^21}})^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1`$ (85)
$`|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}=q({\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q^21}})^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},0({\displaystyle \frac{q^1Q}{Q^21}})^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},0,`$ (86)
$`|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}}=q^1({\displaystyle \frac{1}{Q^21}})^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},0+({\displaystyle \frac{qQ}{Q^21}})^{\frac{1}{2}}|{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1,{\displaystyle \frac{1}{2}},1.`$ (87)
Conclusion:
In this paper we have showed how the addition rule of the velocity in the noncommutative special relativity is derived from the left coaction (53) on a quantum coordinate system of the noncommutative Minkowski space-time. The states describing the evolution of a particle in different coordinate systems tied by quantum boost cotransformations (54) are computed explicitely and the recursion formulas giving the $`q`$-deformed Glebsch-Gordon coefficients of the transformed states are investigated.
Acknowledgments: I am particularly grateful to the Abdus Salem International Center for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy.

References:
1)U. Meyer, Commun. Math. Phys. 174(1996)457. P. Podleś, Commun. Math. Phys. 181(1996)569.
2)M. Pillin, W. B. Schmidke and J. Wess, Nucl. Phys. B(1993)223. M. Pillin and Weilk, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 27(1994)5525. B. L. Cerchiai and J. Wess :”q-Deformed Minkowski Space based on q-Lorentz Algebra” LMU-TPW 98-02, MPI-PhT/89-09. O. Ogiesvestsky, W. B. Schmidke, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Commun. Math. Phys. 150(1992)495.
3)M. Lagraa, ”On the noncommutative special relativity”, Math.ph/9904014.
4)P. Podles and S. L. Woronowicz, Commun. Math. Phys. 130(1990)381.
5)M. Lagraa, J. Geom. Phys 34(2000)206.
6)S. L. Woronowicz, Publ. RIMS, Kyoto Univ. 23 (1987) 117, Commun. Math. Phys. 122(1989)125. P. Podleś, Lett. Math. Phys. 14(1987)193, Lett. Math. Phys. 18(1989)107, Commun. Math. Phys. 170(1995)1.
7)W. Greiner and Berndt Muller,”Quantum Mechanics, Symmetries” second revised edition, Spinger-Verlag (1994). A. Messiah, ”Mecanique Quantique”, tome 2, Dunod, Paris 1960.