COMPENSATION FOR HARM AS A COMPULSORY CONDITION FOR THE RELEASE ON PAROLE
the most popular type of release allowed by the current legislation is the release on parole. It extends only to convicts who serve sentence in prisons. The basis for application is achievement of convicts that extent of correction at which its contents in the conditions of penal institution becomes inexpedient. At the same time in the criminal legislation criteria on the basis of which the court could draw a conclusion on correction of the convicted person accurately arent designated. It sometimes leads to making decisions on release of those convicted completeness of correction of which was suspended. In May, 2014 Art. 79 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation was added with an indispensable condition for adoption of the positive decision on a conditional early release - compensation of damage which was caused as a result of commission of crime. This decision of the legislator meets only with approval as it will provide protection of property interests of the victim, will stimulate convicted to work. At the same time provision of norm short story on obligation of compensation of damage arent deprived of technical and legal mistakes. First, they dont determine the minimum amount of partial compensation for harm; secondly, they dont consider situations in which a convicted person for the objective reasons cant carry out compensation of this harm. It can negatively affect practical application of institute of a release on parole. To eliminate a legislative mistake made at the description of the basis of a release on parole and conditions which form it, we consider expedient to exclude from p.1 Art. 79 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation the instruction on indemnification (full or partial) caused by a crime in the amount determined by a court. It is connected with the following conditions forming the basis for making decision on a release on parole are already formulated in p. 41 Art. 79 of the Criminal code of the Russian Federation. For this reason the repeated instruction in p.1 of this article on obligation of the indemnification caused as a result of commission of crime offers the opportunity for ambiguous interpretation of provisions of this norm.