Variance of phraseological units with zoonym components as nonlinearity manifestation in phraseological system of French
Summary. The article is devoted to solving the problem of variance of phraseological units from positions of the interdisciplinary system and synergetic approach actual for modern science allowing to interpret the phenomenon of language as a control mechanism of the language. The novelty of the undertaken analysis is defined by its purpose aimed to show that on the example of alternative FE with a zoonym component demonstrates how the variance of component structure of FE promotes updating and specification of phraseological value of nominative and communicative FE, expanding with that already available characteristics of denotation, at the same time showing semantic and functional fluctuations between alternative PhU. The studied phraseological material confirms the hypothesis that PhU options with zoonym components possess identical phraseological meaning (reflected in the ideogram), however change of component structure of PhU can lead to changes in denotative, significant or connotative aspects of meaning. Integrated semes are part of denotative meaning, differential structure are part of significant meaning, and accompanying semes are included in the structure of connotative meaning and are cornerstones of associative isomorphic communications. The article somewhat disproves an established opinion that options of PhU possess absolutely identical meaning (unlike synonyms). The carried-out analysis showed that in non communicative PhU the identity is shown only within denotative aspect and is realized in integrated semes. At the coincidence of volume of meaning there is a differentiation of area of signifikative meaning. Regarding the influence of variance of PhU on components of connotive meaning, a divergence concernes generally a style marker (belonging to different levels of language – colloquial, slang, etc.). However denotative meaning can change with PhU which are traditionally implied to the category of options. It is connected with alternation in gender features of a zoonym component. Comparison of communicative and non-communicative PhU patterns of variance leads to the conclusion that they coincide Divergences concern syntactic differentiation of communicative PhU and categorical alternations, mainly with the variance of verb forms, finding specific temporary implementation in PhU with sentence structure..