THE IMPACT OF THE DECISIONS OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ON COMPLAINTS OF CITIZENS ON THE LAW ENFORCEMENT PRACTICE
The article contains an analysis of the various aspects of the impact of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation decisions on complaints of citizens on the law enforcement practice. According to the author, this impact should be differentiated depending on whether it is a question of law acts on the applicants' cases (individuals and entities), due to which the calls in the order of concrete norm control verifies the constitutionality of a norm, or in cases of persons that directly to the Constitutional Court did not address. If the federal body of constitutional justice recognizes inconsistent with the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the law applied in a particular case, in connection with the decision by which the applicant appealed to the Constitutional Court, the relevant court decisions which have even entered into force, subject to unconditional review. For this purpose, it can be used as appeal procedures, supervisory appeal, and especially provided by procedural legislation the procedure for judicial review of acts of the new circumstances. As for judicial cases of those who did not apply to the Constitutional Court, but it is applied in their cases norm of law was later declared unconstitutional, the revision of judicial acts shall be as they did not come into force and entered but not executed or executed partially. Such a review, however, cannot be done without a proper will of the stakeholders and taking into account the requirements of sectoral legislation. The presence of substantive and procedural prerequisites, as well as possible obstacles to the review of judicial decisions, to be determined at the request of a citizen or an authorized officer of the court whose jurisdiction attributed this revision, subject to the general rules of procedure.