CONFLICTING FACTORS IN THE ACTIVITIES OF A SPECIALIST IN A CIVIL PROCEDURE
Subject/topic The presented article examines the essential role of a specialist in the application of his special knowledge in civil proceedings. Work was carried out to study the legal status of this subject of civil procedural legal relations in the implementation of his functions related to the implementation of assistance to justice, and also revealed conflicting contradictions in the role of a specialist in legal proceedings: the lack of a conclusion and explanation of a specialist among the evidence, the lack of procedural consolidation of entry and participation in the case specialist, the specialist's procedural responsibility on an equal basis with other participants in civil procedural legal relations.Goals/objectives The main message will be the study of this issue, taking into account the opinions of other researchers, specific legal provisions not only of civil procedural legislation, but also of the norms of criminal law. Also, taking into account the probable and possible illegal behavior of a specialist in civil proceedings, give an appropriate legal assessment of the possibility of resolving the issue of bringing him to appropriate responsibility. Thus, the article is devoted to the legal analysis of the most acute problems associated with the issue of participation of a specialist in civil proceedings.Methodology Methods of analysis, description, comparison, methods of formal logic and mental modeling were used.Conclusions Based on the results of studying a number of topical issues related to the procedural status of a specialist in civil proceedings, such as the procedural form of involving a specialist in a civil case, introducing procedural certainty into the activities of a specialist in assisting in the administration of justice (regardless of whether it is a written opinion or oral consultations), the responsibility of a specialist in civil proceedings, recommendations are given on bringing mutually contradictory procedural norms to legal identity, including the introduction of appropriate amendments to the current procedural legislation, taking into account the norms of the criminal law of Russia.