FUNCTIONAL - GRAMMATICAL TYPOLOGY OF ENGLISH IMPERATIVE MOOD AND KYRGYZ IMPERATIVE MOOD
The grammatical category of imperative mood in Kyrgyz and English languages is investigated in this article. Examples for imperative mood of compared languages are given in this article and on the base of these examples the similarities of moods in English and Kyrgyz languages are shown by the author. In the conceptual basis of grammatical category of imperiousness of any language implies impression of speaker’s will addressing to the talker. In academic grammar of Kyrgyz language is noted, that verb in imperative mood means action, which will be done under the order, request or will by the listener ( the 2d person) or by another person, who is not participant of conversation and received the order by his interlocutor (the 3d person). These forms usually make up the base of construction of imperative sentences. They refer to the future tense and by their own semantic cannot have other temporary forms and cannot refer to the 1<sup>st</sup> person. The opinion about grammatical category of imperative mood in English language is similar, English imperative mood as Kyrgyz imperative mood in logical- semantical relation focuses to the future tense. English orders express speaker’s stimulus to the action by communication participant, which has not been made, but it is necessary to make. Thus, in both compared languages- English and Kyrgyz- general functional- grammatical structure of imperative mood are constituted by general functional- semantic category of order, that is speaker’s will. Namely, this general semantic category permeates all of grammatical category of imperative mood.