EVOLUTION OF SUBJECT-OBJECT STRUCTURE OF NATIONAL INTERESTS OF RUSSIA IN THE PROCESS OF FORMATION OF THE RUSSIAN STATEHOOD
The aim of the work is to analyze the historical, political, legal and socio-cultural correlativity of the real needs of society and government, synthesized in the concept of "national interest". The subject of the study is the legal background and connection of the formation of interests of national importance, forms and methods of their provision with different aspects of society, strengthening and evolution of statehood. The methodology of the work is determined in accordance with the ideological and methodological position of the author, which predetermined the need to use such methods as the reconstruction of ideas and theories, systemic and structural-functional, formal-legal, as well as the method of comparative law. In the course of work on the article the methods of theoretical modeling, hypotheses, interpretation of legal ideas and normative legal acts were used. The result of the assessment analysis of the main circumstances that led to the emergence and evolution of Russian statehood and the formation of interests of national importance on the basis of the study of historiography and historical literature, the author focuses on national diversity of the Russian state continued for many centuries in the unification and consolidation of ethnic communities that formed initially in the ancient era and continues to be a kind of part of the Imperial, then Soviet, and finally, Russian society, forming an already sovereign multi-ethnic state. The novelty lies in the author note the insights on the territorial-geographical peculiarity of the formation of the Russian state, as well as the specifics of the emergence and consolidation of public administration in the territory of a large state under its policy, which combines manifestations of ruthlessness and mutual concessions in the tasks of political construction of the country, first the Russian Empire, then Soviet Union. The author came to the conclusion that these aspects confirm the inherent sociological dynamics of the interests of the state of its inherent quality - dialectical cyclicality. That is, the interests of the state, as it were, activate and encourage the improvement of statehood and state institutions, but at the same time, statehood, having risen to some significant limit of its development, entails the need to update or form previously non-existent interests of the national level.