SUMMARY PROCEEDINGS IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS: ISSUES OF THEORY AND PRACTICE
The article examines the main issues introduction of summary proceedings as a separate species in the civil procedure of the Russian Federation, especially in this procedure, as well as to conduct a comparative - legal analysis of the writ and simplified production. The author in the study of the topic is largely believed that a new type of proceedings duplicates mandative procedure for consideration and resolution of cases that occurred earlier in the CCP RF. This, according to the author, gives grounds to believe how reasonable and correct administration of the institution in the civil process. The author, in particular, the problems and prospects of the further application of this institute in practice. The purpose of this - study the main aspects and peculiarities of the procedure of summary proceedings in the civil process of the Russian Federation, identifying contentious (controversial) issues of the theory and practice of their application by courts of the Russian Federation, to develop proposals for improving the rules governing simplified proceedings. The results of the - study reflected in the article, can be used in further theoretical and practical research in the field of both civil and arbitration proceedings. The methodological basis of the article is the dialectical materialist method of cognition, systemic and private - scientific methods: comparative legal, formal logical. The scope of the results received in the course of the study, the results are useful for improvement of expedited procedures for the consideration and resolution of civil cases, the prospects for the development of simplified production and ways of its improvement in the Russian civil process.