INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY IN JUSTICE IN ECONOMIC DISPUTES IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND THE REPUBLIC OF KAZAKHSTAN
The article is devoted to the issues of increasing access to the state courts, carrying out economic justice through the prism of expanding the possibilities of using information technology and moderate automation of the process of interaction of the parties with the court staff, in order to reduce the role of the human factor and bureaucratization in the judicial process. A wide range of issues Accessibility of justice; judicial system; optimization; court expenses; e-justice; court of arbitration related to the development of e-justice for several years does not go out of the field of view of researchers in our country and abroad. This is primarily due to the fact that the process of introduction of information technologies in various spheres of life is continuously accelerated and intensified. The subject of the article is legislative and other normative legal acts establishing and developing access to justice in economic disputes in the studied countries, legal positions of the Supreme Courts of Russia and Kazakhstan, expressed in the implementation and development of information technology in the administration of justice in economic disputes, historical sources. The aim of the work is to form practical proposals to improve the availability of justice in economic disputes in Russia through the modernization of information technologies. The methodological basis of the study was formal legal method, comparative legal method, historical and legal method. The ways of increasing the availability of courts to the population without making structural changes in the judicial system are proposed. In particular, the use of video conferencing system in the consideration of economic disputes not only between state courts, but also with the participation of multifunctional centers. The article also provides examples of the possible use of positive experience in the implementation of electronic document management in the domestic justice. It is significant that the implementation of the above proposals will simultaneously make it possible to make better use of the working time of both the persons who have applied for judicial protection and the most valuable element of the judicial system - judges and court staff, and, equally important, the implementation of these changes will not require the allocation of significant additional budget funds.