NEOINDUSTRIALIZATION VERSUS POST-INDUSTRIALISM
In this article the question of essence and the maintenance of post-industrial society which owing to the latest world and national tendencies remains open is considered. The concepts «post-industrial economy» and «post-industrial society» open only sequence of stages of social and economic transformation, but not its intrinsic characteristic. And critics of post-industrialism – information society, economy of knowledge, innovative economy, service economy, transmarket economy, solidary economy – open variety of concepts with which followers operate separate, let and essential, but not the intrinsic parties and sectors of being transformed society. The thesis locates in article that in relation to Russia radical turn in economic is necessary for the policy, going to a section to post-industrialism doctrine. Negative experience of attempt of creation in Russia the national innovative system, undertaken in the first decade of a new eyelid showed a weak solvency «offer economy» in conditions when there is no demand for innovations from real sector. Degradation of the domestic industry together with unsuccessful experience of import of ready institutes and development models from the countries advancing Russia in social and economic development, leads economists to ideas about irrelevance of a paradigm of post-industrialism for Russia; neoindustrialization as historically only model of modernization at the present stage and neoindustrial way as the highest in conditions of the Russian reality.