Comparative legal analysis of the content of malicious (gross) violation of the procedure for serving sentences sentenced to imprisonment under the current legislation of the CIS countries
This article covers certain issues of legal regulation related to the content of malicious violations of the procedure for serving a sentence sentenced to imprisonment on the example of the legislation of some CIS countries. An analysis of the penal enforcement legislation of the CIS countries allows us to talk about relative unity, there are also fundamental differences in the legislative regulation of such violations of the regime as the manufacture, storage or transfer of prohibited items, evasion of the implementation of compulsory medical measures, etc. Comparative legal analysis of the content of malicious (gross) violation of the procedure for serving sentences sentenced to imprisonment under the current legislation of the CIS countries. Thus, the refusal of convicts to work or to stop work without good reason, as a malicious violation of the regime (Pt. 1 of Art. 116 of the Penal Code of the Russian Federation), in the Penal Codes of the Republic of Azerbaijan (Art. 108), the Republic of Belarus (Art. 117), the Kyrgyz Republic (Art. 88), the Republic of Tajikistan (Art. 122) is not contained at all. The same malicious violation is spelled out in more detail in the Penal Code of the Republic of Kazakhstan, which provides for: the refusal of paid work provided by the administration of the institution and the refusal of work to improve the institution and improve living conditions without good reasons.