Will Russia be a knowledge-based economy?
Once in the leading countries of the West was held industrialization, there was the idea that finally found the main path of development of humanity and therefore all other countries sooner or later will be forced to evolve in that direction. This view has changed a bit after the first in USA and then in Europe and Japan showed signs of a transition to some new way of life. This new way of life has been described by different researchers under different names (post-industrial society, network society, service society, information society, knowledge society, etc.). They believed that service a way of life, as well as the early industrial, opened up a world of new bright future. In this regard, has been actively implemented the idea that progressive industrial civilization replaces legacy of agrarian civilization, then civilization is a progressive service replaces the legacy industrial, etc. However, such a simplified description of the historical process not everyone accepted and was subjected to persuasive criticism. In particular, the critical attitude to the specified view is reflected in a recent book by F. Webster [1], in which detailed analyses have become a well-known book of D. bell [2], M. Castells [3]. Then it is shown that the descriptions of post-industrial society, produced by D. bell, M. Castells, N. A tofler, etc., do not consider center-periphery interdependence between the agricultural, industrial and service ways of life. To establish the above-mentioned interdependence view how the processes of industrialization and Informatization is not within the same country and in the world as a whole.