COMPARISON OF DELAYED PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION AND MEDICAL THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST-ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION 12 HOURS AFTER SYMPTOM ONSET
Introduction: percutaneous coronary intervention plays an important role in treatment of acute myocardial infarction with ST-segment elevation. However, the benefit of performing delayed PCI is controversial (>12h after onset of symptoms typical for STEMI). Aim: was to compare results of PCI and medical therapy (MT) in patients, who had been admitted to the hospital with verified STEMI, diagnosed 12 hours after the onset of symptoms, and to estimate their effect on clinical outcomes. Material and methods: data of 100 patients was analyzed, PCI was performed in 62 patients and 38 patients underwent medical therapy. The task was to compare clinical outcomes, which included mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Results: all-cause mortality in groups of delayed PCI and MT was 4 (6,45%) and 9 (23,6%) respectively (p <0,05). It was also recorded that minor cases of cardiac death occurred in the group of delayed PCI in comparison with the MT group, 1 (1,6%) and 6 (15,7%) respectively (p <0,05). Conclusion: delayed PCI (12 hours after the onset of the myocardial infarction in STEMI patients) leads to improvement in all-cause mortality and cardiac death rates compared with conservative treatment.