REFLECTION OF THE OBJECT CODE IN THE PHRASEOLOGY OF THE UDMURT LANGUAGE
The subject of this article is the phraseological vocabulary of the Udmurt language, namely, the units with the components denoting culture-specific concepts of the objective world. The topicality of the study is conditioned by the significance of phraseological units in the process of understanding the mindsets of representatives of various linguocultures and improvement of the process of intercultural communication. A classification of phraseological units was suggested according to their components that helped to determine such elements as objects of daily use, terms connected to horse breeding, names for various means of transportation, reservoirs, furniture, clothes, and footwear items, food, tools, buildings, etc. It was established that specific phraseological units manifest national character traits of Udmurtia and Russia due to selection of subject fields that are rethought and projected on the character of a person. Special emphasis was put on description of cultural and linguistic specifics of Udmurt and Russian phraseological units that reflect the objective world. Each language reflects a certain way of perception and the structure of the world, the mentality of nations, their identity and worldview. The national coloring of the phraseological units of the Udmurt and Russian languages is expressed in the specifics of the choice of subject areas for rethinking and further projection onto a person’s character. Household items, goods, tools, and various devices are real signs of the external world, having a special semiotic status and having a “primary” symbolic value. These data show that characteristic components of the Udmurt linguistic culture and phraseology are mainly such components of the nomination of Udmurt household realities: accordion, shaft, cart, basket, clew, gravy etc. It is stated that characteristic components of the Russian phraseology are the components nominating wooden products, settlements, scientific institutions, teaching aids, books, technical devices, etc. The examined phraseological material made it possible to assume that the phraseological units that characterize a person appear in the language as expressive synonyms of already existing designations and, therefore, serve not just as the name of the person, but express a certain attitude towards it.