Reasonableness and rationality in constitutional law
The author tries to draw a line between reasonableness and rationality, to define domains of these two in constitutional law. The attention focuses on reasonableness and rationality in constitutional court practice, basing on the idea that the legal norms are not the only premises in making constitutional decisions by courts, and these decisions involve value, economic and political context. The author concludes that definiteness of law, requiring reasonableness and rationality, demands that the court shows up all these premises, which are the basis of its decisions.