Methods to Refute False Theory
The academic course "Methods of Scientific Research" should contain illustrative examples of refutation ofdeliberately false theories. If a theory cannot be verified, that is, proven or refuted, it, according to modern concepts, cannotbe considered scientific, as, for example, the hypothesis of the existence of a higher mind that has fulfilled or is stillperforming the functions of a universal creator, that is. god. The area of interest of religion has clear boundaries with the areaof interest of science. According to Occam's principle, these two areas should never intersect. If in a scientific theory, at leastsomewhere, ideas about the functions or intention of the creator are exploited, such a theory ceases to be scientific. The useof this technique allows you to reasonably exclude the big bang hypothesis from the list of scientific hypotheses based onOccam's principle. In particular, modern astrophysics claims that the universe has finite dimensions, that it is constantlyexpanding, and, therefore, there was a time when it was all compressed into a point. This view of the universe follows fromthe theory of relativity. Today, the vast majority of modern physicists and astrophysicists consider the theory of relativity tobe correct, despite the many-pure facts that refute many of the theses of this theory, including its erroneous initial premises.Based on observations of the red shift of the spectrum of astronomical objects and on the platform of the delusion about theconstancy of the speed of light in all reference frames, astrophysicists made the erroneous conclusion that all astronomicalobjects are moving away from us. The red shift, which can be explained as a consequence of the dispersion of light ininterstellar gas, is nevertheless explained by most scientists as a consequence of the Doppler Effect. To explain such amagnitude of this displacement, which is revealed experimentally in the spectra of astronomical objects, one has to assumevery high rates of removal from us of these objects. Since the farther from us objects are, the greater the shift in the frequencyof light to the red region, it is assumed that the entire universe is expanding, and the further from us the stars are, the fasterthey move away from us. The article gives logical reasoning, which, on the basis of widely known and undoubtedinformation from astronomy, refutes the theory of the big bang.