"THE STARTING POINT": HISTORY OF THE THEORY OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS AS A NEW SUB DISCIPLINE
Introduction. A new sub discipline of the The- ory of international relations - The History of the TIR, is already in place in the scientific community of international studies. One of the most important problems, stated by the scientists, is the heterogene- ity, fragmentation and the lack of finished structure of the Theory of international relations. This article is devoted to only one of the multitude of questions: what date may be regarded as a “starting point”, the beginning of the discipline from which we should analyze the achieved results? Materials and Methods. While preparing this article, the author used the method of the compara- tive study of the intellectual traditions in the history of the political and legal thought. The Results of the Study. Nowadays the The- ory of international relations is still at the stage of formation with its main features as fragmentation and absence of coherence towards the key moments of its development, including the date of its birth. Therefore, the appearance of the new discipline - History of the Theory of international relations - is quite natural as it helps to build necessary “bridges” and to clarify the details of the international studies development. Discussion and Conclusions. Today none of the existing theoretical or epistemological attitudes can be regarded sufficiently complete to pretend for a monopoly in the international studies. Moreover, no real intellectual progress allows this or that theoreti- cal worldview to have the absolute priority. In the context of the quite complicated and contradictory issues that exist in real international relations, no simple or unequivocal explanation is possible. There- fore, it is high time to turn away from the endless interdisciplinary debates and start evaluating the real problems, but it would presuppose, according to David A. Lake, the recognition of different judg- ments and articulation of the lexicon which is able to identify not only what the various research tradi- tions have in common but also what differentiates them.