Comparative retrospective analysis of the results of open femoral-popliteal bypass grafting and endovascular stenting with an interwoven biomimetic stent in patients with prolonged occlusions of the arteries in the femoropopliteal segment
Introduction. Autovenous graft is considered the gold standard for prolonged occlusive lesions of the arteries in the femoralpopliteal segment. However, the vein is not always anatomically suitable for bypass grafting; it may have been previously used in previous operations, for example, in coronary artery bypass grafting. Open surgery is always more traumatic than endovascular surgery. Conventional nitinol stents show unsatisfactory results in the femoral-popliteal position due to the high percentage of reocclusions associated with their breakage during physiological movements in the leg joints. The modified method of making interwoven nitinol stents allows improving their biomimetic properties and reducing the percentage of breakages and, accordingly, reocclusions.Material and Methods. There was a retrospective analysis of 437 patients with prolonged atherosclerotic occlusive lesion in the femoropopliteal segment (> 20 cm). There were two groups: a group of bypass surgery and a group of endovascular intervention. The pseudo-randomization method of propensity score matching was used to align the groups according to various criteria.Results. Primary and secondary patency rates for one- and two-year follow up were comparable between the two groups. A subgroup analysis of above-knee intervention showed that a two-year secondary patency rate was significantly higher in the endovascular intervention group than in the bypass group (90.9% vs. 77.5%, p = 0.048). The subgroup analysis of interventions below the knee joint showed that the patency rates at two years of primary and primary-assisted patency were significantly higher in the endovascular intervention group than in the bypass group with an artificial expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) graft (66.7% versus 42.4%, p = 0.046 and 76.7% versus 45.5%, p = 0.011, respectively). The autovenous graft showed better results for primary patency compared with the endovascular intervention group, but the difference was statistically insignificant (77.2% versus 66.7%, respectively, p = 0.3).Conclusion. The analysis of obtained results suggests that the primary endovascular strategy may be recommended for all prolonged occlusive lesions of the femoropopliteal segment above the knee joint gap. For lesions below the knee joint, the autovenous bypass grafting remains the operation of choice, but in the absence of a suitable autovenous graft, the primary endovascular strategy may also be recommended. Additional large multicenter randomized trials are required to refine these recommendations.