Error, Delusion and Deception as a Condition of Invalidity of a Transaction
The article is devoted to the problem of the correlation of delusion, error and deception concepts as conditions for the ineffectiveness of transactions. The author gives a review of theoretical approaches to distinguishing between delusion, error and deception. The analysis of the latest changes in civil legislation regarding the possibility of disputing transactions is made, under the influence of a significant delusion. Delusions that were recognized as significant in the old version of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation are now supplemented by such delusions as delusion in the person and delusion in the decisive circumstance that is mentioned by the party in the process of making a will or obvious to the other party. An unconditional novel was the recognition of the materiality of reservations, misprints, typos and other cases of incorrect transmission of information. In conclusion, it is noted that deception can be regarded as a conscious act leading to delusion or error, however, in order for the transaction to be invalidated, it is necessary that the delusion or error will be significant.