TOPOGRAPHY OF HAPPINESS: KURYANOVO COMMUNITY: CREATED AND TRANSFORMED
Kuryanovo is a settlement built on the river bank in the southeast of Moscow in the 1950s. It was built for the workers of the water treatment station serving the west of the city.The article describes some findings of the research conducted in preparation for the exhibition«Topography of happiness: Kuryanovo», held in the «Pechatniki» exhibition hall in Kuryanovo, Moscow in March-April 2015. Video works of contemporary artists, photographs and other artifacts dedicated to the Kuryanovo microdistrict, and based on sociological research of the same name were presented at the exhibition. The project was implemented with the financial support of the Department of Culture of Moscow and the organizational support of the «Moscow Administration of the Moscow City Agency for the Development of Territories through Culture (MosArt)».«Topography of happiness» is an artistic and research project telling about the happiness of people who live in the studied area. Through in-depth interviews with residents, their stories, experiences and individual connection with the place, we were able to find a selection of iconic places, describe how the daily life is unfolding within the given environment. The research team aimed to study the forms of interaction between people and space through the residents’ narratives, the influence of certain places and properties of the surrounding space on the emotional background - first of all, happiness - of the inhabitants.The way how local Kuryanovo community developed in the last fifty years became one of the most interesting topics in our research. We mean the changes occurred in the Kuryanovo community since Soviet times. Initially the territory was created as a set of opportunities in urban environment: general workplace for all, public spaces, trade union, etc. However, the top-bottom approach in this case turned out to be unviable - the trade union collapsed, the only public space for community gathering (the local House of Culture) was closed down; neighbors practically stopped communicating with each other. The question of how the community functions today, what it represents and how it starts to develop again, has become one of the most interesting moments in the research.