Philosophy of the Russian History at the Turnpoint of the Epochs in the 20 Century
The article is devoted to the study of the relationship between modernization and social memory. The relevance of the topic is determined both theoretically and practically. The theoretical aspect is the heterogeneity of the development of society and the future man, the heterogeneous tendencies of globalization / regionalization, rationalization / myth creation, liberalism / conservatism / technocracy. The practical aspect of the relevance is related to the need for forecasting and engineering of social systems. On the anniversary of the Russian revolutions, an important task is to define the internal institutional and structural conditions that determine the socio-political dynamics of Russia's development; to determine the decisive factors of actual social modernization; outline the main directions of socio-economic transformation. The aim of the work is to give a philosophical and acmeological description of the Russian history in the 20th century. The tasks of the work are: 1) to raise the problem of historical memory of the revolution, 2) to determine the place of the Russian Orthodox Church in the modern social sphere, 3) to study the place of elites in historical dynamics, 4) to consider the processes and results of social modernization in the 20th century, 4) to problematize the development of sociology in the USSR, and 5) indicate the actual guidelines for technological and value-based modernization. The subject of the study: the political and social processes in Russia related to the revolution of 1917 are considered. Research methods: general logical, general scientific and specific scientific. Results: The Soviet period is presented as an accelerated socio-technological modernization, a liminal technological leap. The newest history of Russia is seen as a crisis modernization of the social relations of labor and capital, cities and villages. The geopolitical resources and directions of the further modernization of Russia are justified. The place of the ROC in modern Russia is considered. The novelty of the article is determined by the following perspectives: 1) Bolshevism is interpreted beyond politics as an accelerated social restructtion, 2) the abolition of serfdom is put forward for 100 years, 3) the experience of resocializing the delinquents in connection with modernization is covered. Prospects for research: the study of socio-cultural innovation, aimed at saving the nation while preserving the traditional value-semantic core. Directions of further modernization of Russia: 1) infrastructure, 2) resource-energy-saving, 3) development of human capital in the form of the healthy life style, sciences and arts.