PROBLEMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL REGULATION OF INTERACTION OF THE FEDERAL SERVICE OF FORENSES AND CREDIT ORGANIZATIONS
The necessity of writing this article is conditioned by the needs of scientific understanding of the existing problems of administrative and legal regulation of interaction between the Federal Bailiff Service of the Russian Federation and credit organizations. The theoretical basis of the research is the provisions and conclusions contained in the works of Russian and foreign administrative scientists examining the role of state regulation of credit institutions: Shitenkova EV, Sokolov IS, Ganin IS, Kirillova EA, Potapenko C.I. The article discusses the issues of interaction between the Federal Bailiffs Service and credit organizations. in practice, often when enforcing the enforcement of debtors' property, problems arise when the credit institution is a debtor. Among the main violations allowed by the Federal Service of Court Bailiffs against credit organizations, the following have become most common: 1. The seizure of property of credit institutions - debtors for executive proceedings for insignificant sums is carried out with violation of the principle of proportionality. 2. The divisions of the FSSP of Russia do not inform the credit organizations about the initiation of executive proceedings and the removal of previously imposed restrictions. 3. When recovering debts from credit institutions within the framework of executive proceedings by units of the FSSP of Russia, the priority of recovery is often violated. In the conclusions the author formulated recommendations for minimizing the number of violations by the Federal Service of Court Bailiffs in relation to credit institutions. The main expected consequence of the publication is the optimization of the basic approaches of the legislator to the practice of administrative and legal regulation of the interaction of the Federal Bailiff Service and credit organizations. The article is addressed primarily to the legislator, law enforcers, researchers, teachers, graduate students and students of law schools.