On the expediency of the prosecutor''s anti-crime expertexamination of draft normative legal acts (on the example of the constitutional right to housing)
Our approach in the field of improving law-making activities is aimed at neutralizing criminal factors in the drafts of federal and regional laws through the expansion of the ''general supervisory powers'' of the prosecutor. In order to increase the content quality of the federal and regional laws adopted, to prevent the adoption of bills containing criminal factors, it is appropriate to legalize the anti-crime expert examination of draft normative legal acts, giving the prosecutor the authority to implement such an examination in the framework of lawmaking activities. The supplement to the Law on the Prosecutor's Office with Article 9.3 will expand the list of ''prosecutorial'' public funds. The prosecutor's implementation of anti-crime expert analysis of draft normative acts can play a socially useful role when it comes to projects regulating the constitutional rights of socially unprotected categories of citizens. The expediency of the above is justified by the need to build a strategy of ''general supervisory'' warning to public prosecutors of socially dangerous acts in socially significant spheres. The author underlines the significance of the impact of jurisprudence on lawmaking. In this context, we do not deny the controversy of our point of view and are open to the statements of opponents, since, in our opinion, taking into account the opinions of experts when improving lawmaking activity will create the conditions for the formation of a legislative framework corresponding to a legal social state.