PROBLEMS OF INTERPRETATION OF TERMS AT CRIME QUALIFICATION OF ARTICLE 272 OF CRIMINAL CODE OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION
The historical and legal analysis of criminal domestic criminal law in relation to art. 272 of the Criminal Code are provided. The effectiveness of criminal liability in the context of this provision at the present stage of development of domestic legislation is considered. It is stated that despite the attempt of the legislator to bring the norms of chapter 28 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation in accordance with modern trends in the development of information technology should be noted that in the formulation of the terms of the present interpretation of duality or not fully cover the existing types of crimes in the sphere of computer information. Thus the legislator in a footnote to art. 272 of the Criminal Code introduces the concept of computer information, which refers to information (messages, data) presented in the form of electrical signals, regardless of their means of storage, processing and transmission. Thus under the definition of crimes committed in relation to a fiber-optic communication channels or certain types of storage media (optical disks, flash memory) can be difficult because by definition this information cannot be considered a computer. There is a critical analysis, proposals made to optimize it in context to improve implementation of art. 272 of the Criminal Code. It is concluded that for the optimal disclosure of criminal responsibility, and later species, their optimal differentiation, effective unification of law enforcement is necessary legislator in art. 272 of the Criminal Code to define more clearly the scope of the data types of attacks.