THE ARGUMENTATION TECHNIQUE OF THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM
This article analyzes the argumentation technique of the highest body in the United Kingdom's judiciary, its Supreme Court. The author examines the main types of arguments that can be used by judges when making decisions. It is emphasized that one of the characteristics of modern judicial discourse is the metaphoric language of the law, its informality, and its softening of once seemingly unshakeable theoretical constructs.