Problems of bringing the arbitration manager to responsibility
The subject of the research is the normative prescriptions concerning the administrative responsibility of bankruptcy commissioners. The author considers the most frequent cases of bringing bankruptcy commissioners to administrative responsibility. The main problems are highlighted: blanketness of norms, disproportion of the imputed punishment to the perfect offense, as well as abuse of the right by interested parties, which manifests itself in the systematic appeal of "concerned citizens"with complaints against a particular bankruptcy administrator in order to influence his actions or replace an unwanted administrator through disqualification in all insolvency procedures or in order to distract him from the performance of his duties. The author analyzed the judicial practice of applying the norms of insignificance and highlighted the problem of their application. In order to resolve the problems under study, it was proposed to amend Part 3.1 of Art. 14.13 of the Code of Administrative Offenses of the Russian Federation.