On imperatives of economic science
The crisis of modern economic science is due to the fact that if there is a single object and the object is not a single scientific approach and research technique of science. The created for this reason that the uncertainty of the aggregate mental prerequisites makes it virtually impossible to systematize knowledge. In such circumstances, offered conflicting theories can not be objective by definition. Meanwhile, the objectivity of science, based on the reality and neutral, devoid of subjectivity, is generally recognized as a fundamental principle. The macroeconomic modeling, as the main instrument of knowledge of reality, there is a clear bias in favor of the development of different equilibrium models that do not have an application value. This is puzzling recognition for high achievement of science, even an approximate confirmation of local modeling results, without paying attention to the fallacy of the scientific approach, which prevents conflicts with reality. As a result, we have an economy with increasing exponentially, the number of risks and uncertainties, which exacerbate the already critical situation of both the theory and practice. In this paper we revealed disadvantages of different approaches, methods, which in the aggregate do not allow the use of this knowledge for applications. It offers original approaches and methods that will establish a direct link between theory and applied economics, establish a mechanism for the extrapolation of the results of theoretical research in the real economy.