Resentment in modern conditions
The article deals with the problems of development of subjectivity. In the twenty-first century, Nietzsche has become one of the most published and discussed authors again. The question of the integrity of Nietzsche's work remains open. It should be noted that there is no logic in his philosophy, but he continues to polemize with his contemporaries. At present, we have to look again at the “death” of art, God and man, at his “planetary thinking”, “the transition from a national political order to a global one”, the search for a new person and values. The increasing interest in Nietzsche's philosophy at the present stage is obvious in connection with the problems that Europe is experiencing: Brexit, uncontrolled migration processes, the complexity of integration and survival, the often “herd” existence of migrants, some massification in science, art. Today, the popularity of Nietzsche's political ideas, interpretations of democracy, liberalism, and socialism is obvious. The purpose of the article is not to analyze the thoughts of Nietzsche, much has been written about this, so the problems related to language and art will not be touched upon, it will be about the application of his ideas for understanding the subjectivity of man, in relation to the modern situation. This perspective of the research involves the consideration of Nietzsche's philosophy in order to identify the problems of subjectivity, while the attention will be focused on revealing the nature of subjectivity. The methodological basis of the article was the dialectical approach, which identified the features of the formation of subjectivity as continuity, the relationship between the individual and the social, and continuity in development. The methodological platform allows us to link the formation of subjectivity with human existence. This research installation shows that the development of subjectivity affects not only epistemological, axiological, but also anthropological parameters in general. The research prospects are noted. The article allows us to add insufficiently explored area in Nietzsche's teaching and the need for a social-value model of subjectivity formation. The novelty of the work is the understanding of the development of subjectivity in the context of Nietzsche's thoughts.