The main means of differentiating responsibility for economic crimes
The article discusses the most common means of differentiating responsibility for economic crimes used in the norms of the General and Special Parts of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation. The relevance of this work is characterized by the uncertainty of the legislative decision on the public danger of economic crimes and its legislative consolidation. The general trend of modern criminal policy is aimed at the humanization of criminal legislation, which should lead to the mitigation of criminal liability. The implementation of this policy most clearly reflected in the practice of criminal law counteraction to economic crime. However, over the years, there is no effect of its prevention. The problems under consideration lie in the establishment of a range of means of differentiating criminal liability for economic crimes, their practical use and influence on the dynamics of changes in economic crime indicators. The main task of the state in the fight against economic crime is to ensure compensation for property damage that was caused as a result of a crime. Such a vector of criminal policy ensures the “softness” of the negative impact on the offender and Russian business as a whole, but at the same time does not exclude the commission of repeated crimes in the economic sphere.