GENERALIZATION OF JUDICIAL PRACTICE IN PROCESSINGOF COMPLAINTS UNDER ARTICLE 125 OF THE CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
The article, on the basis of the materials reviewed under appeal order, analyses the most frequent mistakes connected with incorrect determination of existence or absence of the subject of preceding, as a rule, resulting into unreasonable refusal to take cognizance of the complaint, or unreasonable return of the complaint to the applicant for elimination of drawbacks, or termination of the proceedings in the claim case.