TWO DIAMETRICALLY OPPOSITE VIEWS ON THE FUNCTIONS OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION - THE CONSTITUTION OF THE RF CONSTITUTION AND ITS ADMINISTRATION
State of matter: Actively used in relation to any political parties and socio-political organizations, the notion of «leader», very similar to the concept of «leader», with the approval of foreign countries, with regard to the President of the Russian Federation, V.V. Putin acquired the only correct meaning - «leader of all Russians». However, as at all times, such a «leader-leader» is forced to carry out only a hierarchically constructed power that provides dominance over society. This allowed the leader of the Liberal Democratic Party V. Zhirinovsky to substantiate the President of the Russian Federation V. V. Putin «Ruler of Russia». At the heart of the activities of the «Governor of Russia» V. Putin lies his competence, determined by those functions, which due to the importance of the office of the President of the Russian Federation are fixed by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and the President of the Russian Federation is called the guarantor. <ie, «to those who ensure the implementation, the performance of something»> their «performance, observance and application». The abundance of functions and, as a consequence, the extraordinary employment of the President of the Russian Federation predetermined the appearance of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, to whose officials he delegated a significant part of his labor-intensive functions, in particular «control over the implementation of federal laws (insofar as concerns the powers of the President of the Russian Federation, including on ensuring the rights and freedoms of a person and a citizen)» and «accounting and analysis of citizens’ appeals,... submission of relevant reports to the President of the Russian Federation». This imposes on the employees of the «Office of the President of the Russian Federation to work with appeals from citizens and organizations», which is a structural subdivision of the Administration, the duty, guided by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, federal laws, in particular «to ensure objective, comprehensive and timely consideration of the appeal, if necessary - with the participation of the citizen who sent the appeal»,... and «Take measures aimed at restoring or protecting the violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of a citizen». However, the Office’s employees are instead limited to «timely consideration of requests and requests» and «participation in the implementation of measures aimed at restoring or protecting the violated rights, freedoms and legitimate interests of applicants», which in practice translates into referrals to individuals whose actions are appealed, the «appropriate pre-clade» to «Ruler of Russia» is not brought... Results: The current situation is confirmed by the numerous staff members of the Department who have been identified and quoted as saying that, on the one hand, they maintain that «the President of the Russian Federation is the head of the state and the guarantor of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the rights and freedoms of man and citizen», and, on the other hand, believe that, being, in the opinion of V. Zhirinovsky, «the Ruler of Russia», the President of the Russian Federation has no right «to interfere in the activities of public authorities», which, for example, violate the Constitution of the Russian Federation, in particular,. 1 tbsp. 19 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, which reads: «All are equal before the law …» and other existing normative documents. This actually means that the «head of state» and «guarantor of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, human and citizen rights and freedoms» in the «democratic federal state» can not be fully implemented by the state power. The resulted examples of violation of the Ministry of Education and Science of the procedural deadlines for examining a doctoral dissertation, which can not exceed 6 months, but in fact they unexpectedly amounted to 8 months; use instead of the criteria established by cl. 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 «Regulations on the award of academic degrees», approved by the Government of the Russian Federation from 24.09. 2013 № 842, other «formal signs» invented by the experts of the VAK; the unsubstantiated assertion that both I. Kant and G. Hegel did not deal with the problems of «government and power», as well as the substitution of consideration of the essence of the appeal by the stages of passing the thesis in the HAC, leave no doubt that the functions delegated by the President of the Russian Federation any control on his part, which leads to «permissiveness of officials» and undermines the authority of the authorities. One of the reasons for this situation is that the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, on the one hand, is positioned by the «state body», which is obliged to bring the appeals to the President of the Russian Federation, and, on the other hand, is also a «legal entity» which takes-profit. Moreover, without questioning the loyalty of the staff of the Administration and endlessly trusting them, Russian President Vladimir Putin, apparently, on these grounds «does not give his own»... The scope of the results: One of the reasons for this situation is that of the Administration of the President of the Russian Federation, on the one hand, is inserted by the «state body», which is obliged to bring the appeals to the President of the Russian Federation, and, on the other hand, is also a «legal entity» which takes-profit. And, without questioning the loyalty of the staff of the administration and endlessly trusting them, Russian President Vladimir Putin, apparently, on these of the «does not give his own»... Conclusions: To maintain the authority of the authorities in Russia, it is necessary to ensure not only the «execution and observance» of the Constitution of the Russian Federation and the current regulatory documents by Russian citizens, but also oblige officials of the Presidential Administration to interpret and «apply» the existing legislation at least correctly.