THE TERM OF THE STATE OF CRIMINOLOGICAL SECURITY OF EDUCATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
One of the modern criminological doctrines is the theory of criminological security, and the author's appeal to the study of the concept of the state of criminological security of educational organizations is relevant. This article provides the author's definition of the term. It is noted that the state of criminological security is different depending on certain objective and subjective circumstances, in certain historical conditions. The state of security of the educational organization is directly dependent on the state of security of its individual elements. Revealing the proposed definition, the author points out that the basis of this definition is the concept of the level of security. If the level of criminological security is high, it means that educational organizations and all components are protected from criminological risks and dangers. Another key position of the concept is the characteristic and analysis of all elements of the educational organization, that is, the objects of criminological security of educational organizations. In this regard, the author proposes a summary table of indicators of the state of criminological security of educational institutions. By giving and analyzing the specific qualitative and quantitative indicators indicated in the proposed summary table, it is possible to assess the current state of criminological security of educational institutions. The author refers to the description of the criteria that make up a summary table of indicators of the state of criminological security of educational organizations. There are three types of indicators: indicators of general social nature, indicators of criminal nature and indicators of a crime nature. Specific examples are given for each category of indicators. Characteristics and analysis of each of the indicators will assess the current level of criminological protection of educational institutions. In addition, for scientific purposes, a number of surveys were carried out, respondents were 150 existing employees and law enforcement officers, as well as 150 experts, whose role was played by the heads of educational organizations.