Spaces:
No application file
No application file
| = Ubuntu Code of Conduct v2.0 = | |
| == Community == | |
| Ubuntu is about showing humanity to one another: the word itself | |
| captures the spirit of being human. | |
| We want a productive, happy and agile community that can welcome new | |
| ideas in a complex field, improve every process every year, and foster | |
| collaboration between groups with very different needs, interests and | |
| skills. | |
| We gain strength from diversity, and actively seek participation from | |
| those who enhance it. This code of conduct exists to ensure that | |
| diverse groups collaborate to mutual advantage and enjoyment. We will | |
| challenge prejudice that could jeopardise the participation of any | |
| person in the project. | |
| The Code of Conduct governs how we behave in public or in private | |
| whenever the project will be judged by our actions. We expect it to be | |
| honored by everyone who represents the project officially or | |
| informally, claims affiliation with the project, or participates | |
| directly. | |
| We strive to: | |
| '''Be considerate.''' | |
| Our work will be used by other people, and we in turn will depend on | |
| the work of others. Any decision we take will affect users and | |
| colleagues, and we should consider them when making decisions. | |
| '''Be respectful.''' | |
| Disagreement is no excuse for poor manners. We work together to | |
| resolve conflict, assume good intentions and do our best to act in | |
| an empathic fashion. We don't allow frustration to turn into a | |
| personal attack. A community where people feel uncomfortable or | |
| threatened is not a productive one. | |
| '''Take responsibility for our words and our actions.''' | |
| We can all make mistakes; when we do, we take responsibility for | |
| them. If someone has been harmed or offended, we listen carefully | |
| and respectfully, and work to right the wrong. | |
| '''Be collaborative.''' | |
| What we produce is a complex whole made of many parts, it is the sum | |
| of many dreams. Collaboration between teams that each have their own | |
| goal and vision is essential; for the whole to be more than the sum | |
| of its parts, each part must make an effort to understand the whole. | |
| Collaboration reduces redundancy and improves the quality of our | |
| work. Internally and externally, we celebrate good collaboration. | |
| Wherever possible, we work closely with upstream projects and others | |
| in the free software community to coordinate our efforts. | |
| We prefer to work transparently and involve interested parties as | |
| early as possible. | |
| '''Value decisiveness, clarity and consensus.''' | |
| Disagreements, social and technical, are normal, but we do not allow | |
| them to persist and fester leaving others uncertain of the agreed | |
| direction. | |
| We expect participants in the project to resolve disagreements | |
| constructively. When they cannot, we escalate the matter to | |
| structures with designated leaders to arbitrate and provide clarity | |
| and direction. | |
| '''Ask for help when unsure.''' | |
| Nobody is expected to be perfect in this community. Asking questions | |
| early avoids many problems later, so questions are encouraged, | |
| though they may be directed to the appropriate forum. Those who are | |
| asked should be responsive and helpful. | |
| '''Step down considerately.''' | |
| When somebody leaves or disengages from the project, we ask that | |
| they do so in a way that minimises disruption to the project. They | |
| should tell people they are leaving and take the proper steps to | |
| ensure that others can pick up where they left off. | |
| == Leadership, Authority and Responsibility == | |
| We all lead by example, in debate and in action. We encourage new | |
| participants to feel empowered to lead, to take action, and to | |
| experiment when they feel innovation could improve the project. | |
| Leadership can be exercised by anyone simply by taking action, there | |
| is no need to wait for recognition when the opportunity to lead | |
| presents itself. | |
| '''Delegation from the top.''' | |
| Responsibility for the project starts with the "benevolent dictator", | |
| who delegates specific responsibilities and the corresponding | |
| authority to a series of teams, councils and individuals, starting | |
| with the Community Council ("CC"). That Council or its delegated | |
| representative will arbitrate in any dispute. | |
| We are a meritocracy; we delegate decision making, governance and | |
| leadership from senior bodies to the most able and engaged candidates. | |
| '''Support for delegation is measured''' | |
| Nominations to the boards and councils are at the discretion of the | |
| Community Council, however the Community Council will seek the input | |
| of the community before confirming appointments. | |
| Leadership is not an award, right, or title; it is a privilege, a | |
| responsibility and a mandate. A leader will only retain their | |
| authority as long as they retain the support of those who delegated | |
| that authority to them. | |
| '''We value discussion, data and decisiveness.''' | |
| We gather opinions, data and commitments from concerned parties before | |
| taking a decision. We expect leaders to help teams come to a decision | |
| in a reasonable time, to seek guidance or be willing to take the | |
| decision themselves when consensus is lacking, and to take | |
| responsibility for implementation. | |
| The poorest decision of all is no decision: clarity of direction has | |
| value in itself. Sometimes all the data are not available, or | |
| consensus is elusive. A decision must still be made. There is no | |
| guarantee of a perfect decision every time - we prefer to err, learn, | |
| and err less in future than to postpone action indefinitely. | |
| We recognise that the project works better when we trust the teams | |
| closest to a problem to make the decision for the project. If we learn | |
| of a decision that we disagree with, we can engage the relevant team | |
| to find common ground, and failing that, we have a governance | |
| structure that can review the decision. Ultimately, if a decision has | |
| been taken by the people responsible for it, and is supported by the | |
| project governance, it will stand. None of us expects to agree with | |
| every decision, and we value highly the willingness to stand by the | |
| project and help it deliver even on the occasions when we ourselves | |
| may prefer a different route. | |
| '''Open meritocracy.''' | |
| We invite anybody, from any company, to participate in any aspect of | |
| the project. Our community is open, and any responsibility can be | |
| carried by any contributor who demonstrates the required capacity and | |
| competence. | |
| '''Teamwork''' | |
| A leader's foremost goal is the success of the team. | |
| "A virtuoso is judged by their actions; a leader is judged by the | |
| actions of their team." A leader knows when to act and when to step | |
| back. They know when to delegate work, and when to take it upon | |
| themselves. | |
| '''Credit''' | |
| A good leader does not seek the limelight, but celebrates team members | |
| for the work they do. Leaders may be more visible than members of the | |
| team, good ones use that visibility to highlight the great work of | |
| others. | |
| '''Courage and considerateness''' | |
| Leadership occasionally requires bold decisions that will not be | |
| widely understood, consensual or popular. We value the courage to take | |
| such decisions, because they enable the project as a whole to move | |
| forward faster than we could if we required complete consensus. | |
| Nevertheless, boldness demands considerateness; take bold decisions, | |
| but do so mindful of the challenges they present for others, and work | |
| to soften the impact of those decisions on them. Communicating changes | |
| and their reasoning clearly and early on is as important as the | |
| implementation of the change itself. | |
| '''Conflicts of Interest''' | |
| We expect leaders to be aware when they are conflicted due to | |
| employment or other projects they are involved in, and abstain or | |
| delegate decisions that may be seen to be self-interested. We expect | |
| that everyone who participates in the project does so with the goal of | |
| making life better for its users. | |
| When in doubt, ask for a second opinion. Perceived conflicts of | |
| interest are important to address; as a leader, act to ensure that | |
| decisions are credible even if they must occasionally be unpopular, | |
| difficult or favourable to the interests of one group over another. | |
| This Code is not exhaustive or complete. It is not a rulebook; it | |
| serves to distill our common understanding of a collaborative, shared | |
| environment and goals. We expect it to be followed in spirit as much | |
| as in the letter. | |
| '''The Ubuntu Code of Conduct is licensed under the | |
| [[http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/|Creative Commons | |
| Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 license]]. You may re-use it for your own | |
| project, and modify it as you wish, just please allow others to use | |
| your modifications and give credit to the Ubuntu Project!''' | |